Annual Report and Accounts

The Biotech Growth Trust PLC Announcement of Annual Financial Report for the year ended 31 March 2008 The Biotech Growth Trust PLC announces its Annual Financial Report for the year ended 31 March 2008. This document is compiled from extracts from the Company's Annual Financial Report but does not form the full Report. A full copy of the Company's Annual Financial Report can be found on the Company's website at www.biotechgt.com COMPANY SUMMARY Year ended Year % change 31 March ended 2008 31 March 2007 Shareholders' funds (£'000) 64,497 76,803 (16.0) Net asset value per share 103.4p 117.1p (11.7) Share price 96.8p 109.8p (11.8) Discount of share price to net asset value 6.4% 6.2% N/A per share NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (sterling 393.1 394.7 (0.4) adjusted) Total expense ratio* 1.5% 1.9% N/A * Based on the average amount of shareholders' funds during the year - excludes performance fee accrued/written back - see note 3 to the financial statements. Investment Objective and Policy The Biotech Growth Trust PLC seeks capital appreciation through investment in the worldwide biotechnology industry, principally by investing in emerging biotechnology companies. Performance is measured against the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (sterling adjusted). It is the Company's policy to invest no more than 15.0% of its gross assets in other listed investment companies (including listed investment trusts). The Company has never had a holding in an investment company of any sort, and the Directors do not currently envisage any circumstances in which it is likely to do so in the future. The majority of the emerging biotechnology companies that the Company will invest in are likely to be companies with a market capitalisation of less than US$3 billion that have undergone an IPO (Initial Public Offering) but as yet are unprofitable. They will typically be focused on drug research and development, with their valuations driven by profitable developments, clinical trial results and partnerships. Subject to shareholder approval at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting, the Company intends to invest or commit for investment a maximum of US$15 million, after the deduction of proceeds of disposal and other returns of capital, in private equity funds managed by OrbiMed Capital LLC the Company's Investment Manager or an affiliate thereof. Further information concerning this proposed investment can be found in the Report of the Directors and details of the Company's investment policy are also set out in the Report of the Directors. Capital Structure As at 31 March 2008, the Company had 62,385,963 shares in issue. During the year, 3,191,300 shares were bought back for cancellation. Subsequent to the year end, to 13 June 2008, a further 3,051,000 shares were bought back for cancellation. As at 13 June 2008, the Company has 59,334,963 shares in issue. The Following are included: - Chairman's Statement - The Board - OrbiMed Capital LLC - Review of Investments - Investment Portfolio - Report of the Directors - Corporate Governance - Income Statement - Statement of Changes in Equity - Balance Sheet - Cash Flow Statement - Notes to the Financial Statements For further information please contact Mark Pope at Frostrow Capital on 020 3008 4913 CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT Performance The year under review has been a challenging one for global stock markets and in particular for the biotechnology sector. It is deeply disappointing to report another fall in the Company's net asset value per share, which declined by 11.7% during the year under review. This compares to a fall of 0.4% in the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (measured in sterling terms), the Company's benchmark index. The Company's share price fell by 11.8% as the discount of share price to net asset value per share widened slightly to finish the year at 6.4% compared to 6.2% at the beginning of the year. Larger biotechnology companies delivered strong earnings growth during the year and performed significantly better than smaller capitalisation stocks. Overall, the sector was held back by increased caution at the US Food and Drug Administration (`FDA') over the approval of new drugs. The scarcity of new approvals led to share price falls in smaller capitalisation biotechnology companies and in particular in those companies yet to receive approval for their first product. It is hoped that recent senior appointments at the FDA will reverse this trend and there have been encouraging signs in recent weeks. The second half of the year under review was dominated by unusually difficult credit markets both in the US and the UK and stock markets became increasingly volatile and unpredictable. This environment was particularly tough for smaller biotechnology companies and even larger capitalisation pharmaceutical companies, which have historically shown defensive qualities in bad markets, performed poorly. Recent attempts by the Federal Reserve Bank, the Bank of England and other monetary authorities to increase the liquidity of global markets have been partially successful but confidence is by no means yet fully restored. The biotechnology sector has been in the doldrums for a prolonged period and is now trading at historically low levels. Since the end of 2000 the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index has declined by 45.9% (in sterling terms) and traditional valuation methods such as P/E ratios and P/E to growth ratios are at a low point across the sector. The Board does not believe that these levels are sustainable and expects valuations to recover in the medium term. Investment Portfolio The Board and the Investment Manager keep the allocation of the Company's assets within the biotechnology sector under regular review and now believe that attractive returns are potentially available through a modest investment in private equity funds. Against that background the Company intends, subject to obtaining shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting, to make a commitment of US$5 million (£2.6 million using the current £/US$ exchange rate) to Caduceus Asia Partners, LP, a limited partnership whose mandate is to invest in unquoted Asian biotechnology companies, an area of the market in which the Board and the Investment Manager see significant growth opportunities. Caduceus Asia Partners, LP is managed by OrbiMed Asia GP, LP, an affiliate of the Investment Manager who have a track record of delivering upper quartile returns from similar investment vehicles. Should further opportunities present themselves, the Board and the Investment Manager will consider making similar investments. It is currently envisaged that the total investment or the amount committed for investment to such private equity funds will be limited to US$15 million, after the deduction of proceeds of disposal and other returns of capital (£7.7 million using the current £/US$ exchange rate). Loss per Share and Dividend The loss per share amounted to 13.8p for the year, comprising a revenue deficit of 0.4p per share (2007: deficit of 0.5p) and a capital loss of 13.4p (2007: return of 1.7p). No dividend is recommended in respect of the year ended 31 March 2008 (2007: Nil). Discount Management Policy and Buy-Back Authority The Board continued to implement its policy of active discount management and to buy back shares in the event of the market price being at a discount greater than 6.0% to the net asset value per share. During the year, a total of 3,191,300 shares were bought back for cancellation, at an average discount to net asset value per share of 6.9%, costing £3,378,000 (including expenses). The execution and timing of any share buy-back will continue to be at the absolute discretion of the Board. Shareholder approval to renew the authority to buy-back shares will be sought at the Annual General Meeting. Electronic Communication and Voting At last year's Annual General Meeting, the necessary resolutions were passed to facilitate the use of communications with shareholders both in electronic form and via our website. Further details about this can be found in the Report of the Directors. The Company's Articles of Association (the "Articles") The Board believes that as a result of various legislative and regulatory developments the Articles should be amended to bring them into line with current best practice. A Special Resolution will be proposed at the Annual General Meeting which will, if approved, ratify the adoption of new Articles. The material differences between the current and the proposed Articles are summarised in a separate circular to shareholders accompanying this Report and Accounts. VAT As mentioned at the interim stage, the Company is taking steps to recover VAT paid to its previous manager, Close Investments Limited (formerly Close Finsbury Asset Management Limited). Given the volume of claims HMRC have to process it is likely to take a significant time before any amounts are refunded. The amounts involved are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's net asset value. The Company will take credit for VAT recovered when any such recovery can be assessed with reasonable certainty and will continue to follow guidance issued by The Association of Investment Companies in this matter. Savings Plans The investment plans managed by Close Investments on behalf of the Company have, subject to FSA rules, recently been transferred to Alliance Trust Savings Limited ("ATSL"). It is our hope that being included in the much larger, market-wide scheme run by ATSL will lead to increased private investor interest in the Company. Existing plan members should have received confirmation of the transfer, including their new account details. Outlook I reported in my statement this time last year that the Board continued to believe that the prospects for the biotechnology sector were bright. We were wrong over the year but we remain of the view that the careful investor will be rewarded in the medium term. The successful development of new drugs, together with a more positive stance by the FDA as regards drug approval, is still seen as the key driver of long term investment returns. Other factors which we believe will drive future returns are a recovery in stock market conditions generally, supported by an easing of the recent difficult credit markets, and continued merger and acquisition activity in the biotechnology sector. Although we are cautiously optimistic for our sector in the medium term, we foresee continued volatility and a dangerous economic environment on a shorter horizon. Our focus will therefore be on the selection of particular stocks with exceptional prospects for capital enhancement. We plan to remain fully invested, in line with our ongoing policy. Annual General Meeting The Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at the Barber-Surgeons' Hall, Monkwell Square, Wood Street, London EC2Y 5BL on Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 2.45 p.m., and I hope as many shareholders as possible will attend. This will be an opportunity to meet the Board and to receive a presentation from our Investment Manager. John Sclater CVO Chairman THE BOARD John Sclater CVO* (Chairman) John Sclater, aged 67, has served on the Board as Chairman since the launch of the Company in June 1997; he is also Chairman of the Nominations Committee. He is currently self employed and is Chairman or Director of a number of companies. He was formerly a Trustee of The Grosvenor Estate, Chairman of Hill Samuel Bank Limited, Chairman of Foreign & Colonial Investment Trust PLC, First Church Estates Commissioner and President of The Equitable Life Assurance Society. He remains Chairman of Graphite Enterprise Trust PLC and Argent Group (Europe) Ltd and a Director of James Cropper PLC. Sven Borho* Sven Borho, aged 41, joined the Board in March 2006. He is a founding General Partner of OrbiMed Capital LLC, the Company's Investment Manager. He is a portfolio manager for OrbiMed's public equity funds and heads the firm's trading activities. He started his career in 1991 when he joined Mehta and Isaly as a Senior Analyst covering European pharmaceutical firms and biotechnology companies worldwide. Sven studied business administration at Bayreuth University in Germany and received an M.Sc (Econ.) from The London School of Economics. Sven, and a number of his fellow partners at OrbiMed Capital LLC, have a minority financial interest amounting in total to 20.0% in Frostrow Capital LLP. Paul Gaunt* Paul Gaunt, aged 59, joined the Board in June 1997. He has over 30 years' experience in the investment industry. He was formerly Senior Investment Manager and an Assistant General Manager of The Equitable Life Assurance Society and a Director of Brit Insurance Holdings PLC and of Oasis Healthcare plc. Paul is a Director of Finsbury Worldwide Pharmaceutical Trust PLC. OrbiMed Capital LLC acts as Investment Manager for both the Company and Finsbury Worldwide Pharmaceutical Trust PLC. Paul is not employed by and does not have any other connections with the Company's Investment Manager and is not employed by any of the companies in which the Company holds an investment. Paul is also a Director of RCM Technology Trust PLC. Dr John Gordon* John Gordon, aged 63, joined the Board in June 1997 and has been designated as the Senior Independent Director and the Chairman of the Remuneration Committee. He is currently Chairman of, and employed by, Quercus Management Limited. He has previously acted as Director of several biotechnology companies, as well as working at Beecham Research Laboratories, Cambridge University and the Medical Research Council. Peter Keen* Peter Keen, aged 50, has served on the Board as a Director since the launch of the Company in June 1997 and is Chairman of the Audit and Management Engagement Committee. A chartered accountant, he has over 24 years' experience in the management and financing of biotechnology businesses and is Corporate Development and Finance Director of the privately held biopharmaceutical company Serentis Limited. He has served as a Director of a number of biotechnology businesses and is currently a Director of Ark Therapeutics Group plc and the Senior Independent Director of Abcam plc; he was previously UK Managing Director of and consultant to Merlin Biosciences Limited. Lord Waldegrave of North Hill* Lord Waldegrave of North Hill, aged 61, joined the Board in June 1998. He has been employed by UBS since June 2003 as a vice-chairman in the Investment Banking Department. Lord Waldegrave of North Hill was previously Chairman of the Global Financial Institutions Group at Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein. From 1979 to 1997 he was MP for Bristol West and held a number of Cabinet posts including Secretary of State for Health. Lord Waldegrave of North Hill is Chairman of the National Museum of Science and Technology. All members of the Board are non-executive. * Member of the Audit and Management Engagement, Nominations and Remuneration Committees ORBIMED CAPITAL LLC OrbiMed Capital LLC, based in New York, is an investment manager focused exclusively on the healthcare sector, with over US$4 billion in assets under management as at 31 March 2008 across a range of funds, including investment trusts, hedge funds and other investment vehicles. OrbiMed's investment management activities were founded in 1989 by Samuel D. Isaly. Investment Strategy The Biotech Growth Trust's objective is to seek capital appreciation through investment in the worldwide biotechnology industry principally by investing in emerging biotechnology companies. Consistent with this mandate, OrbiMed has invested the majority of the Company's assets in emerging biotechnology companies with the remainder invested in major biotechnology companies. The investment portfolio comprises 37 holdings as at 31 March 2008. OrbiMed makes investments worldwide - in North America, Europe, and the Far East. Geographic allocation is in-line with the geographic distribution of investment opportunities, with a majority of the Company's investments in companies based in North America. OrbiMed takes a bottom-up approach to stock selection based on intensive proprietary research. Stock selection is based on rigorous financial analysis, exhaustive scientific review, frequent meetings with company management, and consultations with physicians and other industry experts. The firm seeks to invest in emerging biotechnology companies with strong management teams, innovative products in development, and sufficient financial resources to develop those products. For major biotechnology companies, OrbiMed looks for strong management teams, healthy organic growth from current products, and deep pipelines to fuel future growth. The attainment of profitability frequently acts as a significant catalyst for biotech share price appreciation. As a result, OrbiMed believes superior returns can be achieved by investing in emerging biotechnology companies 2-3 years prior to sustainable profitability. Companies that turn profitable benefit from greater analyst research coverage, a wider institutional investor base, and reduced clinical development risk (since profitability typically coincides with a product approval and launch). OrbiMed generally seeks to exit its investments when the wider investor community starts to value the newly profitable biotechnology company in excess of its anticipated future growth. Risk management will be conducted via position size limits, geographic diversification, and an appropriate weighting between major and emerging biotechnology. OrbiMed maintains adequate portfolio liquidity by generally limiting the firm's ownership to 10.0% of an individual company's equity and by strictly limiting the Company's exposure to unquoted companies. The OrbiMed Team OrbiMed's investment professionals possess a combination of extensive scientific, medical, and financial expertise. The following six individuals represent the portfolio management team for the Company: Samuel D. Isaly is a founder and the Managing Partner of OrbiMed. Sam has been active in global healthcare investing and analysis since 1968 when he joined Chase Manhattan Bank in New York. During his career, Sam has been a pharmaceutical analyst with Merrill Lynch, Legg Mason and SocGen Swiss International.Sam created OrbiMed's asset management business in 1989 through OrbiMed's predecessor organisation, Mehta and Isaly. Sam has a BA in Economics from Princeton University and a M.Sc. (Econ.) from The London School of Economics. Sven H. Borho, CFA, is a founding General Partner of OrbiMed. Sven is a portfolio manager for OrbiMed's public equity funds and he heads the firm's trading efforts. He started his career in 1991 when he joined Mehta and Isaly as a Senior Analyst covering European pharmaceutical firms and biotechnology companies worldwide. Sven studied business administration at Bayreuth University in Germany and received a M.Sc. (Econ.) from The London School of Economics; he is a citizen of both Germany and Sweden. ORBIMED CAPITAL LLC (continued) Carl L. Gordon, Ph.D, CFA, is a founding General Partner of OrbiMed and co-Head of Private Equity. Carl is active in both private equity and small-capitalisation public equity investments. He was a senior biotechnology analyst at Mehta and Isaly from 1995 to 1997. He was a Fellow at The Rockefeller University from 1993 to 1995. Carl received a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His doctoral work involved studies of protein folding and assembly. He received a Bachelors degree from Harvard College. Richard D. Klemm, Ph.D, CFA, joined OrbiMed in 2000 as a public biotechnology company analyst. He completed a Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Molecular Biology in 2000. Richard has published scientific articles in the fields of DNA replication and transcription. He received a BA from the University of California, Berkeley in 1994 with majors in molecular and cell biology and economics. Geoffrey C. Hsu, CFA, joined OrbiMed in 2002 as a public biotechnology analyst. Prior to joining OrbiMed, he worked as a financial analyst in the healthcare investment banking group at Lehman Brothers. Geoffrey received his AB degree summa cum laude from Harvard University and holds an MBA from Harvard Business School. Prior to business school, he spent two years studying medicine at Harvard Medical School. Jeffrey R. Comisarow, M.D., joined OrbiMed in 2006 as a biotechnology analyst. Prior to joining OrbiMed, he worked at Goldman Sachs & Co. as an analyst covering the biotechnology sector. Prior to his tenure at Goldman Sachs, he was an associate in the healthcare investment banking group of SalomonSmithBarney (Citigroup). Dr. Comisarow has co-authored scientific articles in the fields of neuroscience and neurologic rehabilitation. He received his B.Sc. degree from the University of British Columbia and his joint MD/MBA from the University of California, Los Angeles. REVIEW OF INVESTMENTS We present our third Review of Investments for The Biotech Growth Trust PLC. Performance Review The Company's net asset value per share declined by 11.7% during the year. This was a disappointing performance for the Company since the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (measured on a sterling adjusted basis) (the "Benchmark Index") was only down 0.4% for the year. During the time that OrbiMed has managed the Company's investment portfolio, to 30 May 2008, the Company's net asset value per share has increased by 11.7% compared to a 10.9% increase in the Benchmark Index. Currency effects did not significantly impact the Company's performance during the year. There was a significant divergence in performance between large capitalisation and small capitalisation biotechnology companies over the course of the year. Within the Benchmark Index, we estimate the group of companies with market capitalisations above US$500 million performed approximately 30.0% better during the year than the group of companies whose market capitalisations were below US$500 million. The Company had approximately twice the exposure to companies with a market capitalisation below US$500 million compared to the Benchmark Index. As a result, the Company's higher exposure to emerging biotechnology investments hindered its performance when compared to the Benchmark Index. Additionally, close to 15.0% of the weighting in the Benchmark Index at the beginning of the year consisted of generic companies, diagnostics companies, and life science tools companies, which are not the focus of the Company's investment mandate. Those particular subsectors had significantly higher returns during the year than emerging biotechnology companies, which exacerbated the difference in performance between the Company and the Benchmark Index. The top contributors to performance in the investment portfolio were Gilead Sciences, BioMarin Pharmaceuticals, and Onyx Pharmaceuticals. Gilead Sciences, a profitable biotechnology company, saw continued strong sales growth of its HIV franchise and launched a new drug for pulmonary arterial hypertension towards the end of 2007. BioMarin Pharmaceuticals received US Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") approval for Kuvan, a new treatment for a rare genetic enzyme deficiency called phenylketonuria, which should propel the company to profitability in 2008. Onyx Pharmaceuticals' Nexavar was shown to be effective for liver cancer and subsequent sales exceeded expectations. Noted underperformers in the investment portfolio included Arqule, Kosan Biosciences, and Momenta Pharmaceuticals. Shares in Arqule have been weak primarily due to a near-term lack of newsflow around the lead program and the departure of the company's CEO, who accepted an offer to become CEO of a much larger and more established pharmaceutical company. Momenta Pharmaceuticals received a rejection from the FDA for its version of generic Lovenox, an anticoagulant. Kosan underperformed after results for its cancer drug showed less activity against myeloma than previously demonstrated. However, subsequent to the Company's year end Kosan agreed to be acquired by Bristol-Myers Squibb at a premium in excess of 230.0% to its prevailing share price. Several other factors dampened performance of the overall biotechnology sector in the year under review. 1. FDA Conservatism Characterised the Year, But There are Recent Signs of Improvement Even though most major biotechnology companies posted strong earnings growth throughout the year, the sector as a whole was overshadowed by increased FDA conservatism regarding the approval of new drugs. Emerging biotechnology companies who have yet to receive approval for a first product were especially hurt by this trend. The FDA's cautiousness in approving drugs has been driven by new clinical data uncovering safety issues with some marketed drugs as well as increased scrutiny of the agency by Congress. Specifically, there have been a number of high profile Congressional hearings to debate the FDA's management of safety for several drugs, including Avandia, Epogen, Aranesp, and Ketek. The increased Congressional scrutiny has led the FDA to raise its safety hurdle for approving new drugs. In some cases, such as Zimulti from Sanofi-Aventis, drugs have been delayed or rejected despite approval in Europe and other markets. The FDA is also grappling with insufficient staff to handle new drug applications in a timely manner, leading to delays in the regulatory process. Illustrative of the safety-conscious regulatory environment this year was the plight of Amgen, the largest biotechnology company in the world, which suffered a dramatic share price decline due to safety concerns over its flagship anemia drug Aranesp. Despite being on the market for years, the drug was found in clinical studies to cause excess mortality in certain patients with cancer, leading the FDA to curtail its use. The challenges facing this bellwether stock probably affected investor sentiment for the biotechnology sector as a whole. Amgen was the worst performer in the investment portfolio this year, but we believe the valuation has become overly depressed. We hope that the recent appointment of Janet Woodcock as permanent head of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the FDA in March 2008 will reaccelerate the drug approval process. A number of drug approvals in recent weeks suggest the FDA's overly cautious stance may be improving. 2. Election Year Politics May Have Cast Overhang Over Healthcare In November 2008, US citizens will be voting for the next President of the United States. Both Democratic candidates, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, have campaigned for universal healthcare coverage and lower prices for prescription drugs. The election year rhetoric may have caused generalist investors to avoid the biotechnology sector, fearing that drug pricing power might be threatened. In the event a Democrat is elected President, we believe any drug reimbursement proposals they recommend would affect large pharmaceutical companies ("Big Pharma") much more than biotechnology companies. A streamlined process to approve generic versions of Big Pharma drugs already exists, while a comparable pathway for biologics has not yet been worked out. In addition, because most biotech drugs are novel and address serious unmet medical needs, we believe there is less opportunity for the government to influence pricing for those drugs. As long as biotech companies are able to continue introducing innovative products for unmet needs, we think their pricing power should remain intact. REVIEW OF INVESTMENTS (continued) 3) Difficult US Equity Markets The beginning of 2008 saw a sharp pullback in the broader US equity markets due to problems with the subprime mortgage industry, falling housing prices, deleveraging of major financial institutions, and fears of a recession. Historically, healthcare has been a defensive sector in periods of a slowing economy. However, sudden share price declines for specific stocks in Big Pharma and healthcare services in 2008 have caused skittish investors to look for safety elsewhere. In general, shares of major biotechnology companies have held up relatively well in the current climate because they have stable earnings, while shares of earlier stage companies have done poorly as investors reduced their exposure to high beta names. Biotech Poised for Rebound Despite the difficult environment for biotechnology companies over the past year, there are a number of reasons to be sanguine about the industry. From a valuation perspective, shares in biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies are trading at historically depressed levels. Customary valuation metrics such as P/E ratios and P/E to growth ratios are at historic lows for the industry. We do not think these depressed valuations are sustainable and expect a rebound in share prices as valuations return to historical norms. Merger and acquisition ("M&A") activity in the biopharmaceutical space also continues as cash-rich pharmaceutical companies seek to bolster their product portfolios. Of the announced transactions during the year, the Company benefited directly from acquisitions of two target companies in the investment portfolio: MedImmune and Aspreva. After the year end, the Company benefited from Bristol-Myers Squibb's announced acquisition of Kosan Biosciences. We expect M&A activity to remain robust. Premium Announcement Target Acquiror Deal size paid date 5 June 2008 Tercica Ipsen US$660 million 104% 29 May 2008 Kosan Biosciences Bristol-Myers Squibb US$190 million 233% 22 April 2008 Sirtris GlaxoSmithKline US$720 million 84% 11 April 2008 Millennium Takeda US$8.8 billion 53% 26 February CollaGenex Galderma US$420 million 30% 2008 20 February Encysive Pfizer US$325 million 118% 2008 10 December Adams Respiratory Reckitt US$2.3 billion 37% 2007 Benckiser 10 December MGI Pharma Eisai US$3.9 billion 39% 2007 29 November Axcan Pharma TPG Capita US$1.3 billion 28% 2007 18 November Pharmion Celgene US$2.9 billion 46% 2007 16 November Coley Pfizer US$160 million 167% 2007 Pharmaceuticals 18 October 2007 Aspreva Galenica US$915 million 34% 29 May 2007 Bioenvision Genzyme US$345 million 50% 23 April 2007 MedImmune AstraZeneca US$5.6 billion 53% Since the end of 2000 the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index, the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index and the S&P 500 Index have declined 45.9% and 50.4% and 24.7% in sterling terms respectively. Although the market environment for the biotechnology sector has been challenging in recent years, we remain confident about the prospects of the industry. We expect share prices to recover as this value is recognised. Sven Borho OrbiMed Capital LLC Investment Manager INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO The investments as at 31 March 2008 were: 2008 2008 Fair Value % of Security Country £'000 Investments Gilead Sciences United States 7,255 11.2 Genentech United States 3,836 5.9 Genzyme United States 3,557 5.5 Amgen United States 3,471 5.4 Biogen Idec United States 3,223 5.0 Imclone Systems United States 3,044 4.7 Allos Therapeutics United States 2,842 4.4 Celgene United States 2,771 4.3 Curis * United States 2,731 4.2 Vertex Pharmaceuticals United States 2,705 4.2 Top 10 Investments 35,435 54.8 BioMarin Pharmaceutical United States 1,965 3.0 Medivir Sweden 1,962 3.0 OSI Pharmaceuticals United States 1,784 2.7 Gen-Probe United States 1,722 2.6 Alexion Pharmaceuticals United States 1,673 2.6 Onyx Pharmaceuticals United States 1,618 2.5 Indevus Pharmaceuticals United States 1,602 2.5 United Therapeutics United States 1,311 2.0 Intermune Inc United States 1,233 1.9 American Oriental Bioengineering United States 1,220 1.9 Top 20 Investments 51,525 79.5 Tepnel Life Sciences * United Kingdom 1,191 1.8 Omrix Biopharmaceuticals United States 1,170 1.8 Human Genome Science United States 1,154 1.8 Amag Pharmaceuticals United States 1,118 1.7 Cytokinetics United States 1,095 1.7 Pharmacopeia * United States 1,015 1.6 Rosetta Genomics Israel 917 1.4 Infinity Pharmaceuticals United States 828 1.3 Affymax United States 812 1.2 Arqule United States 770 1.2 Top 30 Investments 61,595 95.0 Kosan Biosciences United States 692 1.0 Caliper Life Sciences United States 631 1.0 Orexigen Therapeutics United States 590 0.9 Pharmasset United States 430 0.7 Merlin Fund (Unquoted) United Kingdom 325 0.5 Biowisdom (Unquoted) United Kingdom 300 0.5 CV Therapeutics United States 243 0.4 Total Investments 64,806 100.0 * Includes warrants All of the above investments are equities unless otherwise stated Portfolio Breakdown Fair Value % of Investments £'000 Investments Equities 64,229 99.1 Warrants 577 0.9 Total Investments 64,806 100.0 REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS INCORPORATING THE BUSINESS REVIEW The Directors present their report and the audited financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2008. Status of the Company During the year under review the Company has continued to conduct its affairs so as to qualify as an investment company, as defined under Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006, and an investment trust within the meaning of Section 842 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. HM Revenue & Customs approval of the Company's status as an investment trust has been received for all years up to and including the year ended 31 March 2007. This is however subject to review should there be any enquiry under Corporation Tax Self Assessment. The Directors are of the opinion that the Company has subsequently directed its affairs so as to enable it to continue to obtain HM Revenue & Customs approval as an investment trust. The close company provisions of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 do not apply to the Company. The Company's shares are eligible for inclusion in the stocks and shares component of an Individual Savings Account. Continuation of the Company In accordance with the Company's Articles of Association, shareholders will have an opportunity to vote on the continuation of the Company at the AGM in 2010 and every five years thereafter. Investment Objective and Benchmark The Company seeks capital appreciation through investment in the worldwide biotechnology industry, principally by investing in emerging biotechnology companies. Performance is measured against the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (sterling adjusted). Investment Policy In order to achieve its investment objective, the Company invests in a diversified portfolio of biotechnology (including emerging biotechnology companies) and related securities on a worldwide basis. Investment Limitations and Guidelines The Board seeks to manage the Company's risk by imposing various investment limits and restrictions: * The Company will not invest more than 15.0% of its assets in other UK listed investment companies * The Company will not invest more than 10.0% of the investment portfolio in any one individual stock at the time of acquisition * The largest 30 quoted stocks will normally represent at least 50.0% of the quoted investment portfolio * Subject to shareholder approval at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting, the Company intends to invest or commit for investment a maximum of US$15 million, after the deduction of proceeds of disposal and other returns of capital, in private equity funds managed by Orbimed Capital LLC the Company's Investment Manager or an affiliate thereof. * The Company's gearing policy is to borrow up to a maximum of £15 million which can be used, inter alia, to finance any short term borrowing requirements. The Company currently has a £5 million uncommitted revolving credit facility provided by Allied Irish Banks p.l.c. This facility can be drawn down at the discretion of the Investment Manager Compliance with the Board's investment limitations and guidelines is monitored continuously by Frostrow Capital LLP ("Frostrow" or the "Manager") and OrbiMed Capital LLC ("OrbiMed" or the "Investment Manager") and is reported to the Board on a monthly basis. Performance In the year to 31 March 2008, the Company's net asset value per share decreased by 11.7% compared to a fall of 0.4% in the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (sterling adjusted). The Company's share price fell by 11.8% in the same period. The Review of Investments includes a review of the principal developments during the year, together with information on investment activity within the Company's investment portfolio. REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS INCORPORATING THE BUSINESS REVIEW (continued) Top and bottom five contributors to net asset value performance for the year to 31 March 2008 Contribution Contribution for the year to per share 31 March 2008 (pence)* £'000 Top Five Contributors Gilead Sciences 1,840 2.9 BioMarin Pharmaceutical 1,649 2.6 Onyx Pharmaceuticals 1,155 1.8 Savient Pharmaceutical 1,120 1.7 MedImmune 999 1.5 10.5 Bottom Five Contributors Amgen (2,281) (3.5) Kosan Biosciences (1,495) (2.3) Momenta Pharmaceuticals (1,101) (1.7) Cytokinetics (1,092) (1.7) Arqule (1,064) (1.7) (10.9) * based on 64,473,752 shares being the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year ended 31 March 2008 Results and Dividends The results attributable to shareholders for the year and the transfer from reserves are shown in the Income Statement. No dividend is proposed in respect of the year ended 31 March 2008 (2007: nil). Key Performance Indicators ("KPI") The Board assesses its performance in meeting the Company's objective against the following Key Performance Indicators: * Net asset value return * Share price return * Stock contribution analysis * Share price premium/discount to net asset value per share * Total expense ratio * Benchmark and peer group performance * Repurchase of own shares As indicated, the management of the investment portfolio has been delegated to the Investment Manager and management, administration, company secretarial and marketing services have been delegated to the Manager. Each provider is responsible to the Board which is ultimately responsible to the shareholders for performing against inter alia the above KPI's within the terms of their respective agreements by utilising the capabilities of the experienced professionals within each firm. Principal Risks and Their Mitigation The Company's assets consist principally of listed equities; its main area of risk is therefore market-related. The specific key risks faced by the Company, together with the Board's mitigation approach, are as follows: i. Objective and Strategy - The Company and its investment objective become unattractive to investors. The Board reviews regularly the Company's investment objective and investment guidelines in the light of investor sentiment monitoring closely whether the Company should continue in its present form. The Board, through the Manager and the Investment Manager, hold regular discussions with major shareholders. A continuation vote is to be held at the Annual General Meeting in 2010 and every five years thereafter. REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS INCORPORATING THE BUSINESS REVIEW (continued) Each month the Board receives a report which monitors the investments held in the investment portfolio compared against the Benchmark Index and the investment guidelines. Additional reports and presentations are received from and made by the Company's stockbroker and the Company Secretary. ii. Level of discount/premium - The level of discount/premium can fluctuate considerably. The Board undertakes a regular review of the level of discount/premium and consideration is given to ways in which share price performance may be enhanced, including the effectiveness of marketing and share buy-backs, if considered appropriate. The Board has implemented an active discount management policy, buying back the Company's shares for cancellation or to be held as treasury shares if the market price is at a discount greater than 6.0% to the net asset value per share. The making and timing of any share buy-backs is at the absolute discretion of the Board. iii. Portfolio Performance - Investment performance may not be meeting shareholder requirements. The Board reviews regularly investment performance against the Benchmark and against the Company's peer group. The Board also receives regular reports that show an analysis of performance compared to other relevant indices. The Investment Manager provides an explanation of significant stock selection decisions and an overall rationale for the make-up of the investment portfolio. The Investment Manager discusses current and potential investment holdings with the Board on a regular basis. iv. Operational and Regulatory - A breach of Section 842 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 could lead to the Company being subject to capital gains tax on the sale of its investments, whilst serious breach of other regulatory rules may lead to suspension from the Stock Exchange or to a qualified Audit Report. Other control failures, either by the Manager, the Investment Manager or any other of the Company's service providers, may result in operational and/or reputational problems, erroneous disclosures or loss of assets through fraud, as well as breaches of regulations. All transactions and income and expenditure forecasts are reported to the Board. The Board considers regularly all major risks, the measures in place to control them and the possibility of any other risks that could arise. The Board also ensures that satisfactory assurances are received from service providers. The Compliance Officer of the Manager and Investment Manager produce regular reports for review at the Company's Audit and Management Engagement Committee and are available to attend meetings in person if required. v. Market Price Risks - Uncertainty about future prices of financial instruments held. The Board meets as a team on a regular quarterly basis during the year and on an ad hoc basis if necessary. At each meeting the Directors consider the asset allocation of the investment portfolio in order to minimise the risk associated with particular countries or instruments. The Investment Manager has responsibility for selecting investments in accordance with the Company's investment objective and seeks to ensure that investment in individual stocks falls within acceptable risk levels. vi. Liquidity Risk - Ability to meet funding requirements when they arise. The Investment Manager has constructed the investment portfolio so that funds can be raised at short notice if required. vii. Shareholder Profile - Activist shareholders whose interests are not consistent with the long-term objectives of the Company may be attracted onto the shareholder register. The Manager provides a shareholder analysis to every Board Meeting for Board consideration of action required in addition to regular reporting by the Company's stockbroker. The Board has implemented an active discount management policy, buying back the Company's shares for cancellation or to be held as treasury shares if the market price is at a discount greater than 6.0% to the net asset value per share. The making and timing of any share buy-backs is at the absolute discretion of the Board. viii. Currency Risk - Movements in exchange rates could adversely affect the performance of the investment portfolio. A significant proportion of the Company's assets is, and will continue to be, invested in securities denominated in foreign currencies, in particular US dollars. As the Company's shares are denominated and trade in sterling, the return to shareholders will be affected by changes in the value of sterling relative to those foreign currencies. The Board has made clear the Company's position with regard to currency fluctuations which is that it does not currently hedge against currency exposure. Further information on financial instruments and risk, as required by IFRS 7, can be found in note 13 to the financial statements. REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS INCORPORATING THE BUSINESS REVIEW (continued) Share Capital As part of the package of measures adopted in 2005 by the Board to improve the attraction of the Company's shares to new investors and also to provide the prospect of a sustained improvement in the rating of the Company's shares, an active discount management policy was implemented, to buy-back shares if the market price is at a discount greater than 6.0% to net asset value per share. The making and timing of any share buy-back remain at the absolute discretion of the Board. Authority to buy back 14.99% of the Company's issued share capital is sought at each Annual General Meeting and as at 25 July 2007 authority was obtained to buy back up to 9,815,042 shares. During the year a total of 3,191,300 shares were bought back for cancellation representing 4.9% of the issued share capital at the beginning of the year. The purchases were made at prices ranging between £0.89163 and £1.14 per share at a cost of £ 3,378,000 (including expenses), at an average discount of 6.9% to net asset value per share. Subsequent to the year end, to 13 June 2008, a further 3,051,000 shares were bought back for cancellation at an average discount of 7.0% to the net asset value per share, at a cost of £3,043,000 (including expenses). Prospects The successful development of new drugs, together with a more positive stance by the FDA as regards drug approval, is still seen as the key driver of long term investment returns. Other factors which OrbiMed believe will drive future returns are a recovery in stock market conditions generally, supported by an easing of the recent difficult credit markets, and continued merger and acquisition activity in the biotechnology sector. Although OrbiMed are cautiously optimistic for the biotechnology sector in the medium term, they foresee continued volatility and a dangerous economic environment on a shorter horizon. Their focus will therefore be on the selection of particular stocks with exceptional prospects for capital enhancement. They plan to remain fully invested, in line with their ongoing policy. Management Management, Administrative and Secretarial Services Agreement: Management, Administrative, Secretarial and other services are provided to the Company by the Manager. The Manager is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. For the period 1 April 2007 to 30 June 2007 the management fee payable was 1.0% per annum of the Company's net asset value and was shared 0.35% to Close Investments Limited, the previous manager, and 0.65% to the Investment Manager. In addition Close Investments Limited received a fixed amount equal to £50,000 per annum. With effect from 1 July 2007, the new Manager, Frostrow Capital LLP, receives a periodic fee equal to 0.30% per annum of the Company's market capitalisation, plus a fixed amount equal to £50,000 per annum. The notice period on the Management, Administration and Company Secretarial Agreement with the Manager is 12 months. The Manager, under the terms of the Agreement provides inter alia the following services: * marketing and shareholder services; * administrative services to such extent and from such dates as the Board may determine; * advice and guidance in respect of corporate governance requirements; * maintaining adequate accounting records in respect of Company dealing, investments, transactions, dividends and other income, the income account, balance sheet and cash books and statements; * preparation and despatch of the audited annual and unaudited interim report and financial statements; and * attending to general tax affairs where necessary. Investment Management Agreement: Investment Management Services are provided by the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager is authorised and regulated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The Investment Manager receives a periodic fee equal to 0.65% p.a. of the Company's net asset value. The Investment Management Agreement may be terminated by either party giving notice of not less than 12 months. The Investment Manager under the terms of the Agreement provides inter alia the following services: * seeking out and evaluating investment opportunities; * recommending the manner by which monies should be invested, disinvested, retained or realised; * advising on how rights conferred by the investments should be exercised; * analysing the performance of investments made; and * advising the Company in relation to trends, market movements and other matters which may affect the REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS INCORPORATING THE BUSINESS REVIEW (continued) investment policy of the Company. Performance Fee: Dependent on the level of performance achieved, the Manager and Investment Manager are also entitled to the payment of a performance fee. The performance fee is calculated by reference to the amount by which the Company's investment portfolio has out-performed the benchmark index. The fee is calculated quarterly by comparing the cumulative performance of the Company's investment portfolio with the cumulative performance of the benchmark index since 30 June 2005. The performance fee amounts to 16.5% of any out-performance of the net asset value over the benchmark index, the Investment Manager receiving 15.0% and the Manager receiving 1.5% of the outperformance. At each quarterly calculation date any performance fee payable is based on the lower of: i. the cumulative out-performance of the investment portfolio over the benchmark index as at the quarter end date; and ii. the cumulative out-performance of the investment portfolio over the benchmark as at the corresponding quarter end date in the previous year. As at each quarterly calculation date, and on a daily basis, provision is made within the Company's net asset value for all performance fees that could crystallise over the ensuing four performance fee calculation dates, assuming that any outperformance arising is maintained in full for a twelve month period from the calculation date. In the event that outperformance is not maintained then the provision is adjusted accordingly within the Company's net asset value. In accordance with this arrangement, the performance fee accrued of £ 1,351,000 as at 31 March 2007 was no longer required as at 31 March 2008 and was reversed accordingly, see note 3. Manager and Investment Manager Evaluation and Re-Appointment The review of the Manager and the Investment Manager's performance is a continuous process carried out by the Audit and Management Engagement Committee with a formal evaluation being undertaken each year. As part of this process the Committee monitors the services provided by the Manager and the Investment Manager and receives regular reports and views from the Investment Manager on investment strategy, asset allocation and stock selection. The Committee also receives comprehensive performance measurement reports to enable it to determine whether or not the performance objective set by the Board has been met. In addition the Committee reviewed the appropriateness of the appointment of the Manager and the Investment Manager in May 2008 with a recommendation being made to the full Board. The Board believes the continuing appointment of the Manager and the Investment Manager, under the terms described above, is in the interests of shareholders as a whole. In coming to this decision, it also took into consideration the following additional reasons: * the quality and depth of experience of the management, administrative, company secretarial and marketing team that the Manager allocates to the management of the Company; and * the quality and depth of experience allocated by the Investment Manager to the management of the investment portfolio and the level of past performance of the investment portfolio in absolute terms and also by reference to the benchmark index. Going Concern The Directors believe that it is appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts as the assets of the Company consist mainly of securities that are readily realisable and, accordingly the Company has adequate financial resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Creditors' Payment Policy Terms of payment are negotiated with suppliers when agreeing settlement details for transactions. While the Company does not follow a formal code, it is the Company's continuing policy to pay amounts due to creditors as and when they become due. There were no creditors in respect of goods or services supplied at the year-end. Environmental and Ethical Policy The Company's primary objective is to achieve long term capital growth through investing in emerging biotechnology companies. The Board, however, recognise that this should be done in an environmentally responsible way. The Directors believe, however, that the Company would be in breach of its fiduciary duties to shareholders if investment decisions were based solely on ethical or environmental considerations. REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS INCORPORATING THE BUSINESS REVIEW (continued) Directors Directors of the Company, all of whom served throughout the year unless stated otherwise are as follows: John Sclater CVO (Chairman) Sven Borho Paul Gaunt Dr John Gordon Peter Keen Anthony Townsend (retired 8 November 2007) Lord Waldegrave of North Hill Directors' Interests The beneficial interests of the Directors and their families in the Company were as set out below: Shares of 25 p each 31 March 31 March 2008 2007 John Sclater 9,410 9,410 Sven Borho 221,218 221,218 Paul Gaunt - - Dr John Gordon 50,000 50,000 Peter Keen 32,585 32,585 Lord Waldegrave of North Hil 51,066 51,066 As at 13 June 2008, there had been no changes in the above details. None of the Directors were granted or exercised rights over shares during the year. None of the Directors has any contract (including service contracts) with the Company. Each Director is appointed by simple letter of appointment that sets out the basic terms of appointment. Sven Borho is a partner in the Investment Manager which is party to the Investment Management Agreement with the Company. A number of the partners at OrbiMed have a minority financial interest amounting in total to 20.0% in Frostrow, the Company's Manager. Directors' & Officers' Liability Insurance Cover Directors' & officers' liability insurance cover was maintained by the Board during the year ended 31 March 2008. It is intended that this policy will continue for the year ended 31 March 2009 and subsequent years. Directors' Responsibilities Company law in the United Kingdom requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. The Directors are responsible for preparing the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. The Directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge the financial statements, within the Annual Report, have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and the loss for the year ended 31 March 2008, and that the Chairman's Statement, Review of Investments and the Report of the Directors include a fair review of the information required by 4.1.8R to 4.2.11R of the FSA's Disclosure and Transparency Rules. In preparing these financial statements, the Directors have: * selected suitable accounting policies and applied them consistently; * made judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; * followed applicable international accounting standards; and * prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis. The Directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 1985. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS INCORPORATING THE BUSINESS REVIEW (continued) The financial statements are published on the Company's website at www.biotechgt.com, which is a website maintained by the Manager. The maintenance and integrity of the website maintained by the Manager is, so far as it relates to the Company, the responsibility of the Manager. The work carried out by the auditors does not involve consideration of the maintenance and integrity of this website and accordingly, the auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the website. Visitors to the website need to be aware that legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in their jurisdiction. Auditors RSM Robson Rhodes LLP merged with Grant Thornton during the year and now conducts business as Grant Thornton UK LLP. As a matter of formality Robson Rhodes resigned as auditors and the Board appointed Grant Thornton UK LLP to fill the casual vacancy. Due to the merger of the businesses, and special notice having been received, a resolution to reappoint Grant Thornton UK LLP as auditors to the Company will be proposed at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting together with a resolution to authorise the Directors to determine the auditors' remuneration. Awareness of Relevant Audit Information So far as the Directors are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware. The Directors have taken all steps they ought to have to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information. Corporate Governance A formal statement on Corporate Governance is set out in the Corporate Governance Report. Beneficial Owners of Shares - Information Rights Beneficial owners of shares who have been nominated by the registered holder of those shares to receive information rights under section 146 of the Companies Act 2006 are required to direct all communications to the registered holder of their shares rather than to the Company's registrar, Capita Registrars, or to the Company directly. Articles of Association The Companies Act 2006 (the "2006 Act") received Royal Assent in November 2006. The 2006 Act represents a major reform of UK companies' legislation and is being brought into force on a staged basis. In order to reflect certain of the provisions of the 2006 Act which have or will come into force, it is proposed that a number of alterations be made to the Articles of Association. Details of the proposed changes are set out in a separate circular to shareholders. Shareholders should be mindful that the 2006 Act is being implemented over a period of time, with the final stage taking effect in October 2009. Electronic Communication and Voting Following approval gained from shareholders at last year's Annual General Meeting, shareholders will now have the option to receive their communications electronically. Electronic communications has a number of benefits to the Company and to shareholders by reducing costs and increasing the speed of communication. A letter accompanying this Annual Report contains further details. Annual General Meeting The formal Notice of Annual General Meeting is set out in a separate circular to shareholders dated 18 June 2008. Resolutions relating to the following items of special business will be proposed at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting: a. Authority to allot shares Resolution 11 gives the Directors authority to allot new shares, otherwise than by a pro rata issue to existing shareholders, up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,483,374 such amount being equivalent to 10.0% of the issued share capital at 13 June 2008 and representing 5,933,496 shares of 25p each. Such issues would only be made at prices greater than the prevailing net asset value per share ("NAV") thereby increasing the assets underlying each share and spread administrative expenses, other than those charged as a percentage of assets, over a greater number of shares. b. Disapplication of pre-emption rights Resolution 12 seeks shareholder approval for the disapplication of pre-emption rights in respect of a) the allotment of shares or the sale by the Company of shares held by it in treasury ("treasury shares"), pursuant to a rights issue or a sale equivalent to a rights issue, and b) the allotment (other than as part of a rights issue) of shares or the sale of treasury shares for cash up to an aggregate nominal value of £1,483,374. No such allotment will be made at less than the prevailing NAV per share (as determined in the absolute discretion of the Directors). Shares held in treasury may also be resold by the Company at a price greater than the net asset value per share prevailing at the time of sale. c. Authority to repurchase shares Resolution 13 seeks shareholder approval for the Company to have the power to repurchase its own shares. The Board believes that the ability of the Company to purchase its own shares in the market will potentially benefit all shareholders of the Company. The repurchase of shares at a discount to the underlying NAV would enhance the NAV of the remaining shares. At the Annual General Meeting the Company will seek shareholder approval to repurchase up to 8,894,311 shares, representing approximately 14.99% of the Company's issued share capital (the maximum permitted under the Listing Rules) at a price that is not less than 25p a share (the nominal value of each share) and not more than the higher of (a) 105.0% of the average of the middle market quotations for the five business days preceding the day of purchase; and (b) the higher of the price of the last independent trade in shares and the highest then current independent bid for shares on the London Stock Exchange. The decision as to whether to repurchase any shares will be at the absolute discretion of the Board. Shares repurchased under this authority may either be held by the Company in treasury for resale up a maximum of 10.0% of the issued share capital or cancelled. d. Adoption of new articles of association Resolution 14 seeks shareholder approval that new articles of association be adopted in substitution for, and to the exclusion of, the existing articles of association. e. Proposed investment or commitment for investment in private equity funds Resolution 15 seeks shareholder approval for a proposed investment or commitment for investment in private equity funds which are managed or advised by the Company's Investment Manager or its affiliates to a maximum of US$15 million, after the deduction of proceeds of disposal and other returns of capital, as referred to in the Chairman's Statement. Any investment in such funds will be excluded from the calculation of the Investment Manager's annual management and performance fee. As referred to in the Chairman's Statement, the Company intends to commit US$5 million to Caduceus Asia Partners, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (`the Fund') with a ten year life (capable of being extended for up to a total of four more years). The General Partner of the Fund is OrbiMed Asia GP, LP, an affiliate of the Company's Investment Manager, the Fund has an anticipated size of US$150 million. The Fund seeks to generate returns for its partners principally through long-term capital appreciation by investing in equity and equity-related investments in healthcare and life science companies that are based in or have significant business activities in Asia. The Fund expects to make approximately 12 to 15 investments. The Fund will pay to the General Partner an annual management fee equal to 2.5% of the aggregate (drawn or undrawn) capital commitments of the Limited Partners. Net portfolio gains from the Fund will be allocated as to 80.0% to the Limited Partners in proportion to their percentage interest in the Fund and 20.0% to the General Partner. The authorities being sought under resolutions 11, 12 and 13 will last until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting or, if less a period of 15 months. By order of the Board Frostrow Capital LLP Company Secretary 13 June 2008 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Compliance The Board has considered the principles and recommendations of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance ("AIC Code") by reference to the AIC Corporate Governance Guide for Investment Companies ("AIC Guide"). The AIC Code, as explained by the AIC Guide, addresses all the principles set out in Section 1 of the Combined Code, as well as setting out additional principles and recommendations on issues that are of specific relevance to The Biotech Growth Trust PLC. The Board considers that reporting against the principles and recommendations of the AIC Code, and by reference to the AIC Guide (which incorporates the Combined Code), will provide better information to shareholders. The Company has complied with the recommendations of the AIC Code and the relevant provisions of Section 1 of the Combined Code throughout the year ended 31 March 2008 and up to the date of this report, except with regard to the composition of its committees and as set out below. The Combined Code includes provisions relating to: * The role of the chief executive; * Executive directors' remuneration; and * The need for an internal audit function. For the reasons set out in the AIC Guide, and in the preamble to the AIC Code, the Board considers these provisions are not relevant to the position of The Biotech Growth Trust PLC, being an externally managed investment company. The Company has therefore not reported further in respect of these provisions. Board Independence, Composition and Tenure The Board, chaired by John Sclater, currently consists of six non-executive Directors. The Directors' biographical details demonstrate a breadth of investment, commercial and professional experience. Dr John Gordon has been designated as the Senior Independent Director. The Directors review their independence annually. Paul Gaunt is a Director of Finsbury Worldwide Pharmaceutical Trust PLC for which OrbiMed also acts as Investment Manager; he has also served on the Board for over nine years. He is therefore not considered to be an Independent Director. Sven Borho is a Founding General Partner of OrbiMed, the Company's Investment Manager, and is also not considered to be an Independent Director. Mr Sclater, Dr Gordon, Lord Waldegrave of North Hill and Mr Keen have all served on the Board for over nine years. The Board considers them to be independent in character and judgement and, in accordance with the AIC Code, does not believe that the criterion of length of service should preclude them from being considered independent; they have no other links to the Investment Manager and have a wide range of other interests. The Directors retire by rotation at every third Annual General Meeting and any Directors appointed to the Board since the previous Annual General Meeting also retire and stand for election. Any Director who has served on the Board for more than nine years is subject to annual re-election. In light of the above Mr Sclater, Dr Gordon, Lord Waldegrave of North Hill and Messrs Borho, Gaunt and Keen will be retiring from the Board at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting and will be offering themselves for re-election. The Board has considered the position of Mr Sclater, Dr Gordon, Lord Waldegrave of North Hill and Messrs Borho, Gaunt and Keen as part of the evaluation process, and believes that it would be in the Company's best interests to propose them for re-election at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting. None of the Directors has a service contract with the Company. New Directors are appointed with the expectation that they will serve for a period of three years. Any Director may resign in writing to the Board at any time. The terms of their appointment are detailed in a letter sent to them when they join the Board. These letters are available for inspection at the offices of the Company's Manager and will be available at the Annual General Meeting. When a new Director is appointed to the Board, he/she is provided with all relevant information regarding the Company and his/her duties and responsibilities as a Director. In addition, a new Director will also CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (continued) spend time with representatives of the Manager and Investment Manager in order to learn more about their processes and procedures. The Board also receives regular briefings from, amongst others, the Auditors and the Company Secretary regarding any proposed developments or changes in laws or regulations that could affect the Company and/or the Directors. The Board's Responsibilities The Board is responsible for efficient and effective leadership of the Company and has reviewed the schedule of matters reserved for its decision. The Board meets at least on a quarterly basis and at other times as necessary. The Board is responsible for all aspects of the Company's affairs, including the setting of parameters for and the monitoring of the investment strategy, the review of investment performance and investment policy. It also has responsibility for all corporate strategy issues, dividend policy, share buy-back policy, gearing, share price and discount/premium monitoring and corporate governance matters. To enable them to discharge their responsibilities, prior to each meeting the Directors are provided, in a timely manner, with a comprehensive set of papers giving detailed information on the Company's transactions, financial position and performance. Representatives of the Manager and Investment Manager attend each Board meeting, enabling the Directors to seek clarification on specific issues or to probe further on matters of concern; a full written report is also received from the Investment Manager at each quarterly meeting. In light of these reports, the Board gives direction to the Investment Manager with regard to the Company's investment objectives and guidelines. Within these established guidelines, the Investment Manager takes decisions as to the purchase and sale of individual investments. There is an agreed procedure for Directors, in the furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional advice if necessary at the Company's expense. The Directors have access to the advice and services of the company secretary, through its appointed representative, who is responsible to the board for ensuring that Board procedures are followed. Performance Evaluation The Board has carried out an evaluation process for the year ended 31 March 2008, independently managed by Dr Gordon, the Senior Independent Director. This took the form of a questionnaire followed by discussions to identify how the effectiveness of its activities, including its committees, policies and processes might be improved. The results of the evaluation process were presented to and discussed by the Board and, as a result, it was agreed that the current Directors contributed effectively and that all have the skills and experience which are relevant to the leadership and direction of the Company. Committees of the Board During the year the Board delegated certain responsibilities and functions to committees. Copies of the full terms of reference, which clearly define the responsibilities of each committee, can be obtained from the Company Secretary, will be available for inspection at the Annual General Meeting, and can be found at the Company's website at www.biotechgt.com. Up until 25 July 2007 the committees were comprised of the independent Directors although the non-independent Directors were invited to attend meetings when appropriate by the Chairman. Following a review by the Board, it was agreed, on 25 July 2007, that, due to its size, the membership of the Remuneration and Nominations Committees should comprise the whole Board both under the chairmanship of John Sclater (provided that a majority of the Directors present are independent). It was further agreed that the Audit Committee should be reconstituted as an Audit and Management Engagement Committee, under the chairmanship of Peter Keen and that the membership of the committee, should also comprise the whole Board (provided that a majority of the Directors present are independent). This decision was taken to fully utilise the broad experience of the Board whilst ensuring that a majority of independent Directors formed the quorum for its meetings. Details of the membership of the committees as at 31 March 2008 are shown with the Directors' biographies. The table overleaf details the number of Board and Committee meetings attended by each Director. During the year there were 5 Board meetings and a separate meeting devoted to strategy, two Audit and Management Engagement Committee meetings, 2 meetings of the Nominations Committee and 1 meeting of the Remuneration Committee. Type and number of Board Strategy Audit and Nominations meetings Management Committee Remuneration Engagement Committee held in 2007/8: (5) (1) (2) (2) (1) John Sclater 5 1 2 2 1 Sven Borho 5 1 0 1 1 Paul Gaunt 5 1 1 1 1 Dr John Gordon 5 1 2 2 1 Peter Keen 5 1 2 2 1 Anthony Townsend* 4 1 1 1 N/A Lord Waldegrave of North 5 1 2 2 1 Hil * Anthony Townsend retired from the Board on 8 November 2007. All of the Directors attended the Annual General Meeting held on 25 July 2007. Prior to 25 July 2007 Messrs Borho, Gaunt and Townsend were not members of the Company's committees as they were not considered to be independent by the Board. After this date, the composition of the committees was changed to include all Directors. Nominations Committee The Nominations Committee is responsible for the Board appraisal process and for making recommendations to the Board on the appointment of new Directors. Where appropriate, each Director is invited to submit nominations and external advisers may be used to identify potential candidates. Remuneration Committee The level of Directors' fees is reviewed on a regular basis relative to other comparable investment companies and in the light of Directors' responsibilities. Details of the fees paid to the Directors in the year under review are detailed in the Directors' Remuneration Report. Audit and Management Engagement Committee The Audit and Management Engagement Committee meets at least twice a year and is responsible for the review of the interim and annual financial statements, the nature and scope of the external audit and the findings there from and the terms of appointment of the auditors, including their remuneration and the provision of any non-audit services by them. In addition, the Committee is responsible for the review of the Company's financial controls and of the Management and Investment Management agreements and of the services provided by the Manager and the Investment Manager. The Audit and Management Engagement Committee meets representatives of the Manager and Investment Manager and their Compliance Officers who report as to the proper conduct of business in accordance with the regulatory environment in which the Company, Manager and Investment Manager operate. The Company's external auditors also attend meetings of this Committee at its request and report on their work procedures and their findings in relation to the Company's statutory audit. They also have the opportunity to meet with the Committee without representatives of the Manager or the Investment Manager being present. The Audit and Management Engagement Committee reviews the need for non-audit services and authorises such fees on a case by case basis, having consideration to the cost effectiveness of the services and the independence and objectivity of the auditors. Non audit fees of £2,500 were paid to Grant Thornton UK LLP for their review of the Company's interim accounts and review of the performance fee calculation as at 30 September 2007. The Board has concluded, on the recommendation of the Audit and Management Engagement Committee, that the auditors continue to be independent and that their reappointment be proposed at the Annual General Meeting. Internal Controls The Combined Code requires the Directors, at least annually, to review the effectiveness of the Company's system of internal control and to report to shareholders that they have done so. This encompasses a review of all controls, which the Board has identified as including business, financial, operational, compliance and risk management. This accords with the FRC's Internal Control Guidance for Directors. The Directors are responsible for the Company's system of internal control which is designed to safeguard the Company's assets, maintain proper accounting records and ensure that financial information used within the business, or published, is reliable. Such a system, however, is designed to manage rather then eliminate the risks of failure to achieve the Company's business objectives and can only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss. Unlike the boards of most other listed companies, the boards of investment trust companies obtain the majority of their evidence as to whether internal controls are operating effectively from third party suppliers to whom investment management, custody, administration, accounting and secretarial matters have been delegated. This means that an understanding of the internal controls for an investment trust company requires Directors to consider information from a number of independent sources, rather than from a consolidated single source covering a typical listed company's system of internal control. The Directors, through the procedures outlined below, have kept the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls under review throughout the period covered by these financial statements and up to the date of their approval. The Manager and the Investment Manager have established an internal control framework to provide reasonable assurance on the effectiveness of the internal controls operated on behalf of their clients. Their compliance monitoring programmes assess the effectiveness of and provide the Board with regular reports on all aspects of internal control (including financial, operational and compliance control, risk management and relationships with external service providers including the Company's custodian). Business risks have been analysed and recorded in a Risk Register, which is reviewed at each meeting of the Audit and Management Engagement Committee and at other times as necessary. Relations with Shareholders The Board reviews the shareholder register at each Board meeting. The Company has regular contact with its institutional shareholders particularly through the Manager. The Board supports the principle that the Annual General Meeting be used to communicate with private investors. The full Board attends the Annual General Meeting under the Chairmanship of the Chairman of the Board. Details of proxy votes received in respect of each resolution are made available to shareholders at the meeting and are also published on the Company's website at www.biotechgt.com. Representatives from the Investment Manager attend the Annual General Meeting and give a presentation on investment matters to those present. The Company has adopted a nominee share code which is set out below. The Board receives marketing and public relations reports from the Manager to whom the marketing function has been delegated. The Board reviews and considers the marketing plans of the Manager on a regular basis. The annual and interim financial reports, the interim management statements and a monthly fact sheet are available to all shareholders. The Board considers the format of the annual and interim financial reports so as to ensure they are useful to all shareholders and others taking an interest in the Company. In accordance with best practice, the annual report, including the Notice of the Annual General Meeting, is sent to shareholders at least 20 working days before the Meeting. Separate resolutions are proposed for substantive issues. Exercise of Voting Powers The Board has delegated authority to the Investment Manager to vote the shares held by the Company through its nominee, The Bank of New York (Nominees) Limited, which accords with current best practice whilst maintaining a primary focus on financial returns. The Investment Manager may refer to the Board on any matters of a contentious nature. Accountability and Audit The Board has delegated contractually to external agencies, including the Manager and the Investment Manager, the management of the investment portfolio, custodial services (which includes the safeguarding of the Company's assets), the day to day marketing, accounting administration, company secretarial requirements and registration services. Each of these contracts was entered into after full and proper consideration by the Board of the quality and cost of the services offered, including the control systems in operation in so far as they relate to the affairs of the Company. The Board receives and considers regular reports from the Manager and ad hoc reports and information are supplied to the Board as required. Nominee Share Code Where shares are held in a nominee company name, where the beneficial owner of the shares is unable to vote in person, the Company nevertheless undertakes: * to provide the nominee company with multiple copies of shareholder communications, so long as an indication of quantities has been provided in advance; * to allow investors holding shares through a nominee company to attend general meetings, provided the correct authority from the nominee company is available; and * that investors in the Alliance Trust Savings Scheme or ISA are automatically sent shareholder communications, including details of general meetings, together with a form of direction to facilitate voting and to seek authority to attend. Nominee companies are encouraged to provide the necessary authority to underlying shareholders to attend the Company's general meetings. INCOME STATEMENT for the year ended 31 March Notes Revenue 2008 Total Revenue 2007 Total £'000 Capital £'000 £'000 Capital £'000 Investment income £'000 £'000 Investment income 2 116 - 116 36 - 36 Other income 2 6 - 6 8 - 8 Total income 122 - 122 44 - 44 Gains and losses on investments (Losses)/gains on 8 - (9,156) (9,156) - 3,373 3,373 investments held at fair value through profit or loss Exchange losses on - (4) (4) - (277) (277) currency balances Expenses Investment management, 3 - 514 514 - (2,048) (2,048) management and performance fees Other expenses 4 (366) - (366) (355) - (355) (Loss)/profit before (244) (8,646) (8,890) (311) 1,048 737 finance costs and taxation Finance costs 5 (26) (12) (38) (20) (17) (37) (Loss)/profit before (270) (8,658) (8,928) (331) 1,031 700 taxation Taxation 6 - - - - - - (Loss)/profit for the year (270) (8,658) (8,928) (331) 1,031 700 (Loss)/earnings per share 7 (0.4)p (13.4)p (13.8)p (0.5)p 1.7p 1.2p The total column of this statement represents the Company's Income Statement, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The revenue return and capital return columns are supplementary to this and are prepared under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies. All items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY For the year ended 31 March 2008 Capital Share Share Special Capital Capital Retained Redemption capital premium reserve reserve reserve earnings Total £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 At 31 March 2007 16,394 - 49,443 737 12,232 (2,003) 76,803 Net loss for the year - - - - (8,658) (270) (8,928) Buy-back of shares (798) - (3,378) 798 - - (3,378) At 31 March 2008 15,596 - 46,065 1,535 3,574 (2,273) 64,497 For the year ended 31 March 2007 Share Share Special Capital Capital Retained redemption capital premium reserve reserve reserve earnings Total £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 At 31 March 2006 6,935 272 19,167 653 11,201 (1,672) 36,556 Net profit/(loss) for - - - - 1,031 (331) 700 the year Issue of shares 9,543 31,267 - - - - 40,810 Issue expenses - (938) - - - - (938) Share premium account - (30,601) 30,601 - - cancelled Issue expenses written - - 39 - - - 39 back Buy-back of shares (84) - (364) 84 - - (364) At 31 March 2007 16,394 - 49,443 737 12,232 (2,003) 76,803 BALANCE SHEET as at 31 March 2008 2007 Notes £'000 £'000 Non current assets Investments held at fair value through 8 64,806 78,088 profit or loss Current assets Other receivables 9 850 2,443 Cash and cash equivalents 811 - 1,661 2,443 Total assets 66,467 80,531 Current liabilities Other payables 10 1,970 2,635 Bank overdraft - 1,093 1,970 3,728 Net assets 64,497 76,803 Equity attributable to equity holders Ordinary share capita 11 15,596 16,394 Share premium - - Special reserve 46,065 49,443 Capital redemption reserve 1,535 737 Capital reserve - realised 10,202 12,305 Capital reserve - unrealised (6,628) (73) Retained earnings (2,273) (2,003) Total equity 64,497 76,803 Net asset value per share 12 103.4p 117.1p The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. CASH FLOW STATEMENT for the year ended 31 March 2008 2007 £'000 £'000 Operating activities (Loss)/profit before tax (8,928) 700 Add back interest paid 38 37 Less: loss/(gain) on investments held at fair 9,160 (3,096) value through profit or loss Purchases of investments held at fair value (79,383) (97,713) through profit or loss Sales of investments held at fair value through 85,477 58,760 profit or loss Increase in other receivables (21) - (Decrease)/increase in other payables (1,359) 1,406 Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating 4,984 (39,906) activities before interest and taxation Interest paid (38) (37) Tax on overseas income - - Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating 4,946 (39,943) activities Financing activities Issue of shares - 40,810 Buy-back of shares (3,038) (364) Issue expenses paid - (899) Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing (3,038) 39,547 Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1,908 (396) Cash and cash equivalents at start of year (1,093) (420) Effect of foreign exchange rate changes (4) (277) Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 811 (1,093) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Accounting Policies The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). These comprise standards and interpretations approved by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"), together with interpretations of the International Accounting Standards and Standing Interpretations Committee approved by the International Accounting Standards Committee ("IASC") that remain in effect, to the extent that IFRS have been adopted by the European Union. a. Accounting Convention The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for the measurement at fair value of investments. Where presentational guidance set out in the revised Statement of Recommended Practice ("the SORP") for Investment Trust Companies produced by the Association of Investment Companies ("AIC") dated December 2005 is consistent with the requirements of IFRS, the Directors have sought to prepare the financial statements on a basis compliant with the recommendations of the SORP. The Company has adopted IFRS 7: "Financial Instruments: Disclosures" for the first time in these financial statements. b. Investments Investments are recognised and de-recognised on the trade date. As the entity's business is investing in financial assets with a view to profiting from their total return in the form of interest, dividends or increases in fair value, quoted investments are designated as fair value through profit or loss and are initially recognised at fair value. The entity manages and evaluates the performance of these investments on a fair value basis in accordance with its investment strategy, and information about the investments is provided internally on this basis to the Board. Investments designated as at fair value through profit or loss, which are quoted investments, are measured at subsequent reporting dates at fair value, which is either the bid or the last trade price, depending on the convention of the exchange on which it is quoted. In respect of unquoted investments, or where the market for a financial instrument is not active, fair value is established by using valuation techniques, which may include using recent arm's length market transactions between knowledgeable, willing parties, if available, reference to the current fair value of another instrument that is substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models. Where there is a valuation technique commonly used by market participants to price the instrument and that technique has been demonstrated to provide reliable estimates of prices obtained in actual market transactions, that technique is utilised. On disposal, realised gains and losses are also recognised in the Income Statement. The total transaction costs for the year were £350,000 (31 March 2007: £ 378,000) broken down as follows: purchase transaction costs for the year to 31 March 2008 were £170,000, (31 March 2007: £248,000), sale transaction costs were £180,000 (31 March 2007: £130,000) These costs consist mainly of commission. (c) Presentation of Income Statement In order to better reflect the activities of an investment trust company, and in accordance with guidance issued by the AIC, supplementary information which analyses the Income Statement between items of a revenue and capital nature has been presented alongside the Income Statement. In accordance with the Company's status as a UK investment company under section 833 of the Companies Act 2006, the capital reserves may not be distributed by way of dividend, although may be utilised for the purposes of share buybacks. Additionally, the net revenue is the measure the Directors believe appropriate in assessing the Company's compliance with certain requirements set out in section 842 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. d. Income Dividends receivable on equity shares are recognised on the ex-dividend date. Where no ex-dividend date is quoted, dividends are recognised when the Company's right to receive payment is established. Dividends and interest on investments in unquoted shares and securities are recognised when they become receivable. e. Expenses and Finance costs All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses are charged through the Income Statement except as follows: i. expenses which are incidental to the acquisition or disposal of an investment are charged to the capital column of the income statement; ii. expenses are charged to the capital column of the income statement where a connection with the maintenance or enhancement of the value of the investments can be demonstrated, and accordingly; iii. investment management and management fees and related irrecoverable VAT are charged to the capital column of the income statement as the Directors expect that in the long term virtually all of the Company's returns will come from capital, and iv. Loan interest is charged to the income statement and allocated to capital as the Directors expect that in the long term virtually all of the Company's returns will come from capital. f. Taxation In line with the recommendations of the SORP, the allocation method used to calculate tax relief on expenses presented against capital returns in the supplementary information in the income statement is the "marginal basis". Under this basis, if taxable income is capable of being offset entirely by expenses presented in the revenue return column of the income statement, then no tax relief is transferred to the capital return column. Investment trusts which have approval under Section 842 Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 are not liable for taxation on capital gains. Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. g. Foreign Currencies The currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates (the functional currency) is pounds sterling ("sterling"), which is also the presentational currency of the Company. Transactions involving currencies other than sterling, are recorded at the exchange rate ruling on the transaction date. At each Balance Sheet date, monetary items and non-monetary assets and liabilities that are fair valued, which are denominated in foreign currencies, are retranslated at the closing rates of exchange. Exchange differences arising on settlements of monetary items and from retranslating at the Balance Sheet date: * investments and other financial instruments measured as fair value through profit or loss, and * other monetary items, are included in the Income Statement and allocated as capital if they are of a capital nature, or as revenue if they are of a revenue nature. (h) Reserves Capital reserves The following are charged to the capital column of the Income Statement and then transferred to the Capital Reserve: * gains or losses on the realisation of investments * exchange differences of a capital nature * expenses charged to this reserve in accordance with the above referred policies * increases and decreases in the valuation of investments held at year end Special reserve During the financial year ended 31 March 2004 a special reserve was created, following the cancellation of the Share Premium account, in order to provide an increased distributable reserve out of which to purchase its own shares. 2. Income 2008 2007 £'000 £'000 Income from listed investments Unfranked interest 116 36 116 36 Other operating income Interest receivable 6 8 Total income 122 44 3. Investment Management, Management and Performance Fees Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007 2007 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Investment management - 471 471 - 437 437 periodic fee Management fee - 218 218 - 235 235 Performance fee paid - 169 169 - - - Performance fee accrual - (1,351) (1,351) - 1,351 1,351 written back Irrecoverable VAT thereon - (21) (21) - 25 25 - (514) (514) - 2,048 2,048 As at 30 September 2007, a performance fee of £169,000 crystalised and became payable and the £1,351,000 accrual at 31 March 2007 was reversed in accordance with the performance fee arrangements described in the Report of the Directors. As at 30 September 2006, this amount was accrued by the Company based on the cumulative outperformance of the Company's net asset value over the benchmark index since the appointment of OrbiMed Capital LLC in 2005. As at 30 September 2007, based on the continued outperformance of the Company's net asset value over the benchmark for a twelve month period, such fee crystallised and became payable. 4. Other Expenses Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007 2007 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Directors' emoluments 112 - 112 99 - 99 Administration fee 50 - 50 50 - 50 Marketing 4 - 4 27 - 27 ISA, Savings Scheme and PEP 30 - 30 21 - 21 Plan expenses Auditors' remuneration for the 22 - 22 18 - 18 audit of the Company's financial statements Auditors' remuneration for 3 - 3 2 - 2 review of the interim accounts and performance fee calculation Advisory and Consultancy 25 - 25 26 - 26 Other including irrecoverable 120 - 120 112 - 112 VAT 366 - 366 355 - 355 5. Finance Costs Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007 2007 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Bank overdraft 26 - 26 20 - 20 Bank loan interest - 12 12 - 17 17 26 12 38 20 17 37 6. Taxation a. Factors affecting current tax charge for year Approved investment trusts are exempt from tax on capital gains made within the Company. The tax assessed for the year is higher than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 30.0% (2007: 30.0%). The differences are explained below: 2008 2007 £'000 £'000 Net (loss)/profit on ordinary (8,928) 700 activities before tax tax Corporation tax at 30.0% (2,678) 210 Effects of: Non taxable gains on 2,748 (929) investments held at fair value through profit or loss Excess expenses unused (79) 712 Disallowed expenses 9 7 Current tax charge - - b. Provision for deferred tax No provision for deferred taxation has been made in the current or prior year. The Company has not recognised a deferred tax asset of £3,484,000 (2007: £ 3,551,000) arising as a result of excess management expenses. These excess management expenses will only be utilised if the Company generates sufficient taxable income in the future. 7. (Loss)/Earnings per Share Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007 2007 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 (Loss)/earnings per share (0.4)p (13.4)p (13.8p) (0.5)p 1.7p 1.2p Total loss per share of 13.8p (2007: gain 1.2p) is based on total loss attributable to equity shareholders of £8,928,000 (2007: gain £700,000). The revenue loss per share 0.4p (2007: 0.5p) is based on the revenue loss attributable to equity shareholders of £270,000 (2007: £331,000). The capital loss per share of 13.4p (2007: gain 1.7p) is based on the capital loss attributable to equity shareholders of £8,658,000 (2007: gain £1,031,000). Total loss, revenue loss and capital loss are based on the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year of 64,473,752 (2007: 59,520,000). 8.Investments Held at Fair Value Through Profit and Loss Listed Non- Equity equity AIM Unquoted Total £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Cost at 1 April 2007 73,700 - 711 3,750 78,161 Opening unrealised 1,876 - 64 (2,013) (73) appreciation/ (depreciation) Valuation at 1 April 2007 75,576 - 775 1,737 78,088 Movement in the year Purchases at cost 73,406 5,920 - 411 79,737 Sales - proceeds (77,492) (6,019) - (352) (83,863) - realised (losses)/gains (2,700) 99 - - (2,601) Movement in unrealised (6,087) - 125 (593) (6,555) (depreciation)/ appreciation Valuation at 31 March 2008 62,703 - 900 1,203 64,806 Closing book cost at 31 66,914 - 711 3,809 71,434 March 2008 Closing unrealised (4,211) - 189 (2,606) (6,628) (depreciation)/ appreciation Valuation at 31 March 2008 62,703 - 900 1,203 64,806 2008 2007 £'000 £'000 (Losses)/gains on investments: Realised (losses)/gains based on historical (2,601) 8,071 cost Amounts recognised as unrealised in previous (464) (4,229) year Realised (losses)/gains based on carrying (3,065) 3,842 value at previous balance sheet date Net movement in unrealised depreciation (6091) (469) (Losses)/gains on investments (9,156) 3,373 The unquoted investments include the following investment. Jersey Limited Partnership Fair Value % of Cost of Of Total net Latest investment Investment Investment Assets audited Owned by As at the Company 31/3/08 £'000 accounts Dividends £'000 £'000 Merlin Fund 3,965 31/12/07 - 15.0% 3,052 325 L.P. 9. Other Receivables 2008 2007 £'000 £'000 Future settlements - sales 816 2,430 Other debtors 9 - Prepayments and accrued income 25 13 850 2,443 10. Other Payables 2008 2007 £'000 £'000 Future settlements - purchases 1,345 991 Other creditors and accruals 625 1,644 1,970 2,635 11. Share Capital 2008 2007 £'000 £'000 Allotted, called up, issued and fully paid: 62,385,963 shares of 25p (2007: 65,577,263) 15,596 16,394 Authorised: 100,000,000 shares of 25p each 25,000 25,000 At the date of this report the Company had 62,385,963 shares of 25p in issue. During the year 3,191,300 shares were repurchased for cancellation at a cost of £3,378,000 (including expenses). Subsequent to the year end, to 13 June 2008, a further 3,051,000 shares were bought back for cancellation at a cost of £ 3,043,000 (including expenses). 12. Net Asset Value per Share 2008 2007 £'000 £'000 Net asset value per share 103.4p 117.1p The net asset value per share is based on the net assets attributable to equity shareholders of 64,497,000 (2007: £76,803,000 and on 62,385,963 (2007: 65,577,263) shares in issue at 31 March 2008. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) 13. Risk Management Policies and Procedures As an investment trust, the Company invests in equities and other investments for the long term so as to secure its investment objective. In pursuing its investment objective, the Company is exposed to a variety of risks that could result in either a reduction in the Company's net assets or a reduction in the profits available. The Company's financial instruments comprise securities and other investments, cash balances and debtors and creditors that arise directly from its operations (for example, in respect of sales and purchases awaiting settlement). The main risks the Company faces from its financial instruments are (i) market price risk (comprising currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk (i.e. changes in market prices other than those arising from interest rate or currency risk)), (ii) liquidity risk and (iii) credit risk. The Board regularly reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks. 1. Market Price risk: The fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument held by the Company may fluctuate because of changes in market prices. This market risk comprises three elements - currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk. The Company's investment portfolio is exposed to market price fluctuations which are monitored by the Investment Manager in pursuance of the investment objective. No derivatives or hedging instruments are utilised to specifically manage market price risk. (a) Currency risk: A significant proportion of the Company's investment portfolio is denominated in currencies other than sterling (the Company's functional currency, and in which it reports its results). As a result, movements in exchange rates can significantly affect the sterling value of those items. Management of risk The Investment Manager and Manager monitor the Company's exposure to foreign currencies on a continuous basis and report to the Board on a regular basis. The Investment Manager does not hedge against foreign currency movements, but takes account of the risk when making investment decisions. Income denominated in foreign currencies is converted into sterling on receipt. The Company does not use financial instruments to mitigate the currency exposure in the period between the time that the income is included in the financial statements and its receipt. Foreign currency exposure At the balance sheet date the Company held £61,028,000 (2007: £70,524,000) of investments denominated in US dollars and £3,778,000 (2007: £7,564) in other currencies. Currency sensitivity The following table details the sensitivity of the Company's profit or loss after taxation for the year to a 5.0% increase and decrease in sterling against US dollars (2007: 10.0% increase and decrease). The above percentages have been determined based on market volatility in exchange rates over the previous twleve months. The analysis is based on the Company's foreign currency financial instruments held at each balance sheet date, after adjusting for an increase/decrease in management fees. If sterling had weakened against the currencies below this would have the following effect: 2008 2007 USD USD £'000 £'000 Impact on revenue return - - Impact on capital return 3,191 3,688 Total return after tax/effect on 3,191 3,688 shareholders funds If sterling had strengthened against the currencies below this would have the following effect: 2008 2007 USD USD £'000 £'000 Impact on revenue return - - Impact on capital return (2,887) (3,337) Total return after tax/effect on (2,887) (3,337) shareholders funds (b) Interest rate risk: Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. As the Company holds only modest amounts of cash on deposit and generally does not invest in fixed interest investments, it is deemed that this risk is immaterial. Management of the risk The possible effects on fair value and cash flows that could arise as a result of changes in interest rates are taken into account when making investment decisions. The Company, generally, does not hold significant cash balances, with short term borrowing being used when required. Interest rate exposure The Company has a £5m uncommitted revolving credit facility provided by Allied Irish Banks p.l.c. At the year end the facility was not utilised (2007:not utilised). At the year end the Company held £811,000 (2007: nil) cash at Bank of New York and did not utilise the bank overdraft facility held with Bank of New York (2007: overdraft £1,093,000). Average interest receivable and finance costs are at the following rates: * Interest receivable on cash balances held in off-shore money market fund is was 4.5%. * Interest payable on borrowings under the uncommitted revolving credit facility provided by Allied Irish Banks p.l.c was at an average rate of 7.1%. (c) Other price risk Other price risk may affect the value of the quoted investments. If market prices at the balance sheet date had been 10.0% higher or lower while all other variables remained constant, the return and net assets attributable to shareholders for the year ended 31 March 2008 would have increased/decreased by £6,438,000 (2007: 7,758,000), after adjusting for an increase or decrease in management fees. The calculations are based on the investment portfolio valuations as at the respective Balance Sheet dates. 2. Liquidity risk: This is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities. Management of the risk Liquidity risk is not significant as the majority of the Company's assets are investments in quoted equities and other quoted securities that are readily realisable. The Company has a £5m uncommitted revolving credit facility with Allied Irish Banks p.l.c. The Board gives guidance to the Investment Manager as to the maximum amount of the Company's resources that should be invested in any one company. Liquidity exposure Contractual maturities of the financial liabilities as at 31 March 2008, based on the earliest date on which payment can be required are as follows: 3 months Not more More or less than one year than one year Total 31 March 2008 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Current liabilities: Amounts due to brokers and accruals 1,970 - - 1,970 1,970 1,970 31 March 2007 3 months or Not more than More than one Total less one year year £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Current liabilities: Bank overdraft 1,093 - - 1,093 Amounts due to 2,635 - - 2,635 brokers and accruals 3,728 - - 3,728 3. Credit risk: The failure of the counterparty to a transaction to discharge its obligations under that transaction could result in the Company suffering a loss. Management of the risk The risk is not significant and is managed as follows: * by only dealing with brokers which have been approved by OrbiMed Capital LLC and banks with high credit ratings and * by setting limits to the maximum exposure to any one counterparty at any time. 2008 2008 2007 2007 Balance Maximum Balance Maximum sheet exposure sheet exposure £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Current assets: Other receivables (amounts due from 850 3,513 2,443 4618 brokers, dividends and interest receivable) Cash at bank and on deposit 811 4,814 -- 3,289 Fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities: Financial assets and financial liabilities are either carried in the Balance Sheet at their fair value or at a reasonable approximation of fair value. Capital management policies and procedures The Company's capital management objectives are: * to ensure that it will be able to continue as a going concern; and * to maximise the income and capital return to its equity shareholders through an appropriate balance of equity capital and debt. The policy is that debt as shown below should amount to no more than 20.0% of the investment portfolio. The Company currently has a £5m uncommitted revolving credit facility, provided by Allied Irish Banks p.l.c., which can be used to finance any short term borrowing requirements. The Company's capital at 31 March comprises: 2008 2007 £'000 £'000 Debt: Bank overdraft - 1,093 - 1,093 Equity: Equity share capital 15,596 16,394 Retained earnings and other reserves 48,901 60,409 Total capital 64,497 76,803 Debt as a percentage of total capital - 1.4% NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) The Board, with the assistance of the Investment Manager, monitors and reviews the broad structure of the Company's capital on an ongoing basis. This review includes: * the planned level of gearing, which takes into account the Investment Manager's view on the market; * the need to buy back equity shares, either for cancellation or to hold in treasury, which takes account of the difference between the net asset value per share and the share price (ie the level of share price discount or premium); * the need for new issues of equity shares, including issues from treasury; and * the extent to which revenue in excess of that which is required to be distributed should be retained. The Company's objectives, policies and processes for managing capital are unchanged from the preceding accounting period. The Company is subject to several externally imposed capital requirements: * borrowings under the uncommitted revolving credit facility are not to exceed 20.0% of the investment portfolio; * as a public company, the Company has a minimum share capital of £50,000; and * in order to be able to pay dividends out of profits available for distribution, the Company has to be able to meet one of the two capital restriction tests imposed on investment companies by company law. These requirements are unchanged since last year, and the Company has complied with them at all times. 14. Related Parties Sven Borho is a Director of the Company, as well as a Partner of the Company's Investment Manager, OrbiMed Capital LLC. During the year ended 31 March 2008, OrbiMed Capital LLC received £471,000 in respect of the periodic fee and £ 153,000 in respect of a performance fee, of which £106,000 in respect of the periodic fee was outstanding at the year end. 15. Substantial Interests The Company holds interests in 3.0% or more of any class of capital in the following companies: % of issued Fair value Company Shares held share capital £'000 Curis 3,606,611 5.7% 2,504 Tepnel Life Sciences* 10,000,000 4.3% 900 Rosetta Genomics 375,000 3.2% 917 * Excludes warrants. A total of 8,840,000 warrants were held as at 31 March 2008. These investments are not considered significant in the context of these financial statements. 16. Contingent Assets On 5 November 2007, the European Court of Justice ruled that management fees should be exempt from VAT. HMRC has announced its intention not to appeal against this case to the UK VAT Tribunal. The Board is currently in the process of quantifying the potential repayment that should be due. However, the amount the Company will receive, the period to which it will refer, and the time scale for receipt are all uncertain and hence the Company has made no provision in these financial statements for any such payment. Frostrow Capital LLP Company Secretary
UK 100

Latest directors dealings