1st Quarter Results
April 7, 2005
RELEASE OF CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC QUARTERLY REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2005
------------------------------------------
Carnival Corporation & plc announced its first quarter results of operations in its earnings release
issued on March 21, 2005. Carnival Corporation & plc is hereby announcing that it has filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") a joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q today containing
the Carnival Corporation & plc 2005 first quarter financial statements, which results remain unchanged
from those previously announced on March 21, 2005.
The information included in the attached Schedules A and B is extracted from the Form 10-Q and has
been prepared in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. Schedules A and B contain the unaudited
quarterly consolidated financial statements for Carnival Corporation & plc as of and for the three months
ended February 28, 2005, together with management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations. These Carnival Corporation & plc consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
("U.S. GAAP"). The Directors consider that within the DLC arrangement, the most appropriate presentation
of Carnival plc's results and financial position is by reference to the U.S. GAAP financial statements of
Carnival Corporation & plc.
MEDIA CONTACTS INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACT
US US/UK
Carnival Corporation & plc Carnival Corporation & plc
Tim Gallagher Beth Roberts
001 305 599 2600, ext. 16000 001 305 406 4832
UK
Brunswick
Sophie Fitton/Sarah Tovey
020 7404 5959
The full joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (including the portion extracted for this announcement)
is available for viewing on the SEC web site at www.sec.gov under Carnival Corporation or Carnival plc or
the Carnival Corporation & plc web site at www.carnivalcorp.com or www.carnivalplc.com. A copy of the
joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will be available shortly at the UKLA Document Viewing Facility of
the Financial Services Authority at 25 The North Colonnade, London E14 5HS, United Kingdom.
Carnival Corporation & plc is the largest cruise vacation group in the world, with a portfolio of 12
cruise brands in North America, Europe and Australia, comprised of Carnival Cruise Lines, Holland America
Line, Princess Cruises, Seabourn Cruise Line, Windstar Cruises, AIDA Cruises, Costa Cruises, Cunard Line,
Ocean Village, P&O Cruises, Swan Hellenic, and P&O Cruises Australia.
Together, these brands operate 78 ships totaling more than 134,000 lower berths with 12 new ships
scheduled for delivery between July 2005 and April 2009. Carnival Corporation & plc also operates the
leading tour companies in Alaska and the Canadian Yukon, Holland America Tours and Princess Tours.
Traded on both the New York and London Stock Exchanges, Carnival Corporation & plc is the only group in
the world to be included in both the S&P 500 and the FTSE 100 indices.
Additional information can be obtained via Carnival Corporation & plc's web site at
www.carnivalcorp.com or www.carnivalplc.com or by writing to Carnival plc at Carnival House, 5 Gainsford
Street, London SE1 2NE, United Kingdom.
SCHEDULE A
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS UNDER U.S. GAAP
Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results
Some of the statements contained in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are
"forward-looking statements" that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions with respect to us,
including some statements concerning future results, outlook, plans, goals and other events which have
not yet occurred. These statements are intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability provided
by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You
can find many, but not all, of these statements by looking for words like "will," "may," "believes,"
"expects," "anticipates," "forecast," "future," "intends," "plans," and "estimates" and for similar
expressions.
Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are many factors that
could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in this joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Forward-looking statements include those statements
which may impact the forecasting of our earnings per share, net revenue yields, booking levels, pricing,
occupancy, operating, financing and/or tax costs, costs per available lower berth day ("ALBD"), estimates
of ship depreciable lives and residual values, outlook or business prospects. These factors include, but
are not limited to, the following:
- risks associated with the DLC structure, including the uncertainty of its tax
status;
- general economic and business conditions, which may impact levels of disposable
income of consumers and net revenue yields for our cruise brands;
- conditions in the cruise and land-based vacation industries, including competition
from other cruise ship operators and providers of other vacation alternatives and
increases in capacity offered by cruise ship and land-based vacation alternatives;
- risks associated with operating internationally;
- the international political and economic climate, armed conflicts, terrorist
attacks and threats thereof, availability of air service, other world events and
adverse publicity, and their impact on the demand for cruises;
- accidents and other incidents affecting the health, safety, security and vacation
satisfaction of passengers, including machinery and equipment failures, which
could cause the cancellation of a cruise or series of cruises;
- changing public and consumer tastes and preferences, which may, among other
things, adversely impact the demand for cruises;
- our ability to implement our shipbuilding programs and brand strategies and to
continue to expand our business worldwide;
- our ability to attract and retain qualified shipboard crew and maintain good
relations with employee unions;
- our ability to obtain financing on terms that are favorable or consistent with our
expectations;
- the impact of changes in operating and financing costs, including changes in
foreign currency and interest rates and fuel, food, payroll, insurance and
security costs;
- changes in the tax, environmental, health, safety, security and other regulatory
regimes under which we operate;
- continued availability of attractive port destinations;
- our ability to successfully implement cost improvement plans and to integrate
business acquisitions;
- continuing financial viability of our travel agent distribution system and air
service providers; and
- unusual weather patterns or natural disasters, such as hurricanes and earthquakes.
On April 5, 2005, the U.S. State Department announced details of the proposed "Western Hemisphere
Travel Initiative." If the proposed rules are enacted, U.S. citizens will be required to carry a
passport for travel to or from certain countries/areas that were previously exempt. The proposed
implementation is as follows:
- On December 31, 2005, a passport would be required for all air and sea travel to or from the
Caribbean, Bermuda, Central and South America.
- On December 31, 2006, a passport would be required for all air and sea travel to or from
Mexico and Canada.
- On December 31, 2007, a passport would be required for all air, sea and land border
crossings.
We believe that it is unlikely that these proposed rules will have a material adverse impact on our
results of operations. However, the ultimate effect cannot be determined at this time.
Forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results. Subject to
any continuing obligations under applicable law or any relevant listing rules, we expressly disclaim any
obligation to disseminate, after the date of this joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, any updates or
revisions to any such forward-looking statements to reflect any change in expectations or events,
conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based.
Key Performance Indicators and Critical Accounting Estimates
We use net cruise revenues per ALBD ("net revenue yields") and net cruise costs per ALBD as
significant non-GAAP financial measures of our cruise segment financial performance. We believe that net
revenue yields are commonly used in the cruise industry to measure a company's cruise segment revenue
performance. This measure is also used for revenue management purposes. In calculating net revenue
yields, we use "net cruise revenues" rather than "gross cruise revenues." We believe that net cruise
revenues is a more meaningful measure in determining revenue yield than gross cruise revenues because it
reflects the cruise revenues earned by us net of our most significant variable costs, which are travel
agent commissions, cost of air transportation and certain other variable direct costs associated with
onboard revenues. Substantially all of our remaining cruise costs are largely fixed once our ship
capacity levels have been determined.
Net cruise costs per ALBD is the most significant measure we use to monitor our ability to control
our cruise segment costs rather than gross cruise costs per ALBD. In calculating net cruise costs, we
exclude the same variable costs as described above, which are included in the calculation of net cruise
revenues. This is done to avoid duplicating these variable costs in these two non-GAAP financial
measures.
We have not provided estimates of future gross revenue yields or future gross cruise costs per ALBD
because the reconciliations of forecasted net cruise revenues to forecasted gross cruise revenues or
forecasted net cruise costs to forecasted cruise operating expenses would require us to forecast, with
reasonable accuracy, the amount of air and other transportation costs that our forecasted cruise
passengers would elect to purchase from us (the "air/sea mix"). Since the forecasting of future air/sea
mix involves several significant variables that are relatively difficult to forecast and the revenues
from the sale of air and other transportation approximate the costs of providing that transportation,
management focuses primarily on forecasts of net cruise revenues and costs rather than gross cruise
revenues and costs. This does not impact, in any material respect, our ability to forecast our future
results, as any variation in the air/sea mix has no material impact on our forecasted net cruise revenues
or forecasted net cruise costs. As such, management does not believe that this reconciling information
would be meaningful.
In addition, because a significant portion of our operations utilize the euro or sterling to measure
their results and financial condition, the translation of those operations to our U.S. dollar reporting
currency results in increases in reported U.S. dollar revenues and expenses if the U.S. dollar weakens
against these foreign currencies, and decreases in reported U.S. dollar revenues and expenses if the U.S.
dollar strengthens against these foreign currencies. Accordingly, we also monitor our key indicators
assuming the 2005 exchange rates have remained constant with the prior year's comparable rates, or on a
"constant dollar basis," in order to remove the impact of changes in exchange rates on our non U.S.
cruise operations. We believe that this is a useful measure indicating the actual growth of our
operations in a fluctuating exchange rate environment.
For a discussion of our critical accounting estimates, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations," which is included in Carnival Corporation & plc's 2004
joint Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Outlook for Remainder of Fiscal 2005
On March 21, 2005, we indicated that we expected diluted earnings per share for the second quarter
of 2005 would be in the range of $0.45 to $0.47 and approximately $2.70 for the full year 2005.
On March 30, 2005, we announced that P&O Cruises Australia's Pacific Sky experienced a technical
problem that required dry-docking to complete the repair. The ship is expected to be out of service for
approximately two months and will impact second quarter 2005 diluted earnings per share by approximately
$0.02. We also announced that a recent court decision on how to allocate a fund deficit in the MNOPF is
expected to reduce full year 2005 diluted earnings per share by less than $0.01.
Other than the items discussed in the preceding paragraph, we have not changed our March 21 second
quarter and full year guidance, as we have not yet updated our internal operating forecast. However, in
our March 21 release, we noted that we based our guidance for the last three quarters of 2005 on assumed
average fuel prices of $246 per ton (derived from the forward fuel curve) and currency exchange rates of
$1.30 to the euro and $1.88 to the sterling. The current forward curve for fuel indicates average prices
of approximately $257 per ton for the last three quarters of 2005, which is 29 percent higher than
average prices for last year's comparable period. If actual fuel prices for the last three quarters of
2005 ultimately turn out to average $257 per ton, then our diluted earnings per share would be reduced by
$0.01 and $0.03 for the second quarter 2005 and full year 2005, respectively.
The year-over-year percentage increase in our ALBD capacity, resulting from new ships entering
service, is 5.3%, 5.7% and 8.5% in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2005, respectively, as
compared to the same quarters in 2004.
Share-Based Compensation
Based on preliminary estimates, if we were to elect to adopt FASB Share-Based Payment Statement
123(R) with retroactive effect to December 1, 2004, our additional full year 2005 share-based
compensation expense would be approximately $60 million, which has not been included in our above
earnings per share estimates.
Seasonality
Our revenue from the sale of passenger tickets is seasonal, with our third quarter being the
strongest. Historically, demand for cruises has been greatest during our third fiscal quarter, which
includes the Northern Hemisphere summer months. This higher demand during the third quarter results in
higher net revenue yields and, accordingly, the largest share of our net income is earned during this
period. Substantially all of Holland America Tours' and Princess Tours' revenues and net income are
generated from May through September in conjunction with the Alaska cruise season.
Three Months Ended February 28, 2005 ("2005") Compared to the Three Months Ended February 29, 2004
("2004")
Selected statistical information was as follows:
Three Months Ended February 28/29,
2005 2004
Passengers carried (in thousands) 1,619 1,347
----- -----
Occupancy percentage 103.8% 102.0%
----- -----
Gross and net revenue yields were computed by dividing the gross or net revenues, without rounding,
by ALBDs as follows:
Three Months Ended February 28/29,
2005 2004
(in millions, except ALBDs and yields)
Cruise revenues
Passenger tickets $1,841 $1,527
Onboard and other 546 446
------ ------
Gross cruise revenues 2,387 1,973
Less cruise costs
Commissions, transportation and other (431) (384)
Onboard and other (96) (81)
------ ------
Net cruise revenues $1,860 $1,508
------ ------
ALBDs 11,586,444 10,062,655
---------- ----------
Gross revenue yields $206.07 $196.02
------- -------
Net revenue yields $160.59 $149.84
------- -------
Gross and net cruise costs per ALBD were computed by dividing the gross or net cruise costs, without
rounding, by ALBDs as follows:
Three Months Ended February 28/29,
2005 2004
(in millions, except ALBDs and costs per ALBD)
Cruise operating expenses $1,412 $1,207
Cruise selling and
administrative expenses 322 302
------ ------
Gross cruise costs 1,734 1,509
Less cruise costs included in net
cruise revenues
Commissions, transportation and other (431) (384)
Onboard and other (96) (81)
------ ------
Net cruise costs $1,207 $1,044
------ ------
ALBDs 11,586,444 10,062,655
---------- ----------
Gross cruise costs per ALBD $149.62 $149.91
------- -------
Net cruise costs per ALBD $104.13 $103.73
------- -------
Revenues
Net cruise revenues increased $352 million, or 23.3%, to $1.86 billion in 2005 from $1.51 billion in
2004. The 15.1% increase in ALBD's between 2004 and 2005 accounted for $228 million of the increase, and
the remaining $124 million was from increased net revenue yields, which increased 7.2% in 2005 compared
to 2004 (gross revenue yields increased by 5.1%). Net revenue yields increased in 2005 primarily from
higher cruise ticket prices, a 1.8% increase in occupancy, higher onboard revenues and the weaker U.S.
dollar relative to the euro and sterling, partially offset by the impact of the cancellation of P&O
Cruises Aurora's 2005 world cruise. Net revenue yields as measured on a constant dollar basis, where we
recompute 2005 net revenue yields at the foreign currency exchange rates in effect for 2004, increased
5.9% in 2005. Gross cruise revenues increased $414 million, or 21.0%, in 2005 to $2.39 billion from $1.97
billion in 2004 primarily for the same reasons as net cruise revenues.
Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of $69 million in 2005 and $56 million in
2004, which increased in 2005 compared to 2004 primarily because of the 15.1% increase in capacity and
passengers increasing willingness to take advantage of the enhanced onboard spending opportunities on our
ships.
Costs and Expenses
Net cruise costs increased $163 million, or 15.6%, to $1.21 billion in 2005 from $1.04 billion in
2004. The 15.1% increase in ALBD's between 2004 and 2005 accounted for $158 million of the increase, and
the remaining $5 million was from increased net cruise costs per ALBD, which increased 0.4% in 2005
compared to 2004 (gross cruise costs per ALBD decreased 0.2%). Net cruise costs per ALBD increased
primarily due to a 10.0% increase in 2005 fuel prices and the weaker U.S. dollar relative to the euro and
the sterling in 2005. This increase was substantially offset by lower selling, general and
administrative costs per ALBD, partly due to a delay until later in the year of advertising expenditures,
higher promotional costs in 2004 related to the introduction of Cunard's Queen Mary 2, reduced costs from
the relocation of Cunard's shoreside operations and economies of scale associated with the 15.1% capacity
increase. Net cruise costs per ALBD as measured on a constant dollar basis compared to 2004 decreased
1.0% in 2005. Gross cruise costs increased $225 million, or 14.9%, in 2005 to $1.73 billion from $1.51
billion in 2004, which was a lower percentage increase than net cruise costs primarily because of the
lower proportion of passengers who purchased air transportation from us in 2005.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $33 million, or 17.6%, to $221 million in 2005
from $188 million in 2004 largely due to the 15.1% increase in ALBD's through the addition of new ships
and ship improvement expenditures, as well as the impact of a weaker U.S. dollar.
Nonoperating (Expense) Income
Net interest expense excluding capitalized interest, increased to $88 million in 2005 from $71
million in 2004, or $17 million. The increase was primarily due to a $13 million increase in interest
expense from higher average borrowing rates and a $4 million increase in interest expense due to higher
average borrowings associated with new ship deliveries.
Other income included $7 million from the settlement of litigation associated with the DLC
transaction in 2003.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our business provided $543 million of net cash from operations during the three months ended
February 28, 2005, which was flat compared to 2004. We continue to generate substantial cash from
operations and remain in a strong financial position.
During the first quarter of 2005, our net expenditures for capital projects were $556 million, of
which $449 million was spent for our ongoing new shipbuilding program, including the final delivery
payment for the Carnival Valor. The remaining capital expenditures consisted primarily of $71 million for
ship improvements and refurbishments, and $36 million for Alaska tour assets, cruise port facility
developments and information technology assets.
During 2005, we took delivery of one new ship compared to three ships in 2004. One of the 2004 ship
deliveries was paid for primarily from long-term debt proceeds. Accordingly, the net cash used in
investing activities in 2005 is less than in 2004, and the net cash used in financing activities has
increased in 2005 compared to 2004.
During the 2005 first quarter, we made $170 million of debt repayments, which included the final
payment on our capitalized lease obligations of $110 million. We also paid cash dividends of $120
million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005.
Future Commitments and Funding Sources
Our contractual cash obligations remained generally unchanged at February 28, 2005 compared to
November 30, 2004, except for changes to our debt as noted above, and changes to our ship construction
commitments as follows:
- We made the final contractual payments related to the Carnival Valor delivery in
December 2004.
- In January 2005, Costa entered into a new ship construction contract with
Fincantieri for a 3,000 passenger ship, which has an estimated all-in cost
of 475 million euros and is expected to enter service in June 2007.
During 2004, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1 billion of Carnival
Corporation and/or Carnival plc shares commencing in 2005 subject to certain repurchase restrictions on
Carnival plc shares. Through April 7, 2005 no repurchases had been made.
At February 28, 2005, we had liquidity of $2.88 billion, which consisted of $369 million of cash,
cash equivalents and short-term investments and $2.51 billion available for borrowing under our revolving
credit facilities. Our revolving credit facilities mature in March 2006 through June 2006. A key to our
access to liquidity is the maintenance of our strong credit ratings.
Based primarily on our historical results, current financial condition and future forecasts, we
believe that our existing liquidity and cash flow from future operations will be sufficient to fund most
of our expected capital projects, debt service requirements, dividend payments, working capital and other
firm commitments. However, our forecasted cash flow from future operations, as well as our credit
ratings, may be adversely affected by various factors, including, but not limited to, those factors noted
under "Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results." To the extent that we are
required, or choose, to fund future cash requirements, including our future shipbuilding commitments,
from sources other than as discussed above, we believe that we will be able to secure such financing from
banks or through the offering of debt and/or equity securities in the public or private markets. No
assurance can be given that our future operating cash flow will be sufficient to fund future obligations
or that we will be able to obtain additional financing, if necessary.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements, including guarantee contracts, retained or
contingent interests, certain derivative instruments and variable interest entities, that either have, or
are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial statements.
SCHEDULE B
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC - U.S. GAAP CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(in millions, except per share data)
Three Months
Ended February 28/29,
2005 2004
Revenues
Cruise
Passenger tickets $1,841 $1,527
Onboard and other 546 446
Other 9 8
------ ------
2,396 1,981
------ ------
Costs and Expenses
Operating
Cruise
Commissions, transportation and other 431 384
Onboard and other 96 81
Payroll and related 274 237
Food 154 127
Other ship operating 457 378
Other 11 10
------ ------
Total 1,423 1,217
Selling and administrative 334 316
Depreciation and amortization 221 188
------ ------
1,978 1,721
------ ------
Operating Income 418 260
------ ------
Nonoperating (Expense) Income
Interest income 3 4
Interest expense, net of
capitalized interest (86) (65)
Other income, net 7
------ ------
(76) (61)
------ ------
Income Before Income Taxes 342 199
Income Tax Benefit, Net 3 4
------ ------
Net Income $ 345 $ 203
------ ------
Earnings Per Share
Basic $ 0.43 $ 0.25
------ ------
Diluted $ 0.42 $ 0.25
------ ------
Dividends Per Share $ 0.15 $0.125
------ ------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(in millions, except par/stated values)
February 28, November 30,
ASSETS 2005 2004
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 321 $ 643
Accounts receivable, net 332 409
Inventories 245 240
Prepaid expenses and other 458 436
------- -------
Total current assets 1,356 1,728
------- -------
Property and Equipment, Net 21,228 20,823
Goodwill 3,319 3,321
Trademarks 1,308 1,306
Other Assets 388 458
------- -------
$27,599 $27,636
------- -------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Short-term borrowings $ 368 $ 381
Current portion of long-term debt 919 681
Convertible debt subject to current put option 600 600
Accounts payable 611 631
Accrued liabilities and other 806 868
Customer deposits 1,939 1,873
------- -------
Total current liabilities 5,243 5,034
------- -------
Long-Term Debt 5,879 6,291
Other Long-Term Liabilities and Deferred Income 460 551
Contingencies (Note 4)
Shareholders' Equity
Common stock of Carnival Corporation; $.01 par
value; 1,960 shares authorized; 635 shares at 2005
and 634 shares at 2004 issued and outstanding 6 6
Ordinary shares of Carnival plc; $1.66 stated value;
226 shares authorized; 212 shares at 2005 and
2004 issued 353 353
Additional paid-in capital 7,340 7,311
Retained earnings 8,847 8,623
Unearned stock compensation (20) (16)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 549 541
Treasury stock; 42 shares of Carnival plc at cost (1,058) (1,058)
------- -------
Total shareholders' equity 16,017 15,760
------- -------
$27,599 $27,636
------- -------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in millions)
Three Months Ended February 28/29,
2005 2004
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $ 345 $ 203
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization 221 188
Accretion of original issue discount 5 5
Other 7 3
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Increase in
Receivables (2) (53)
Inventories (4) (26)
Prepaid expenses and other (9) (8)
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable (29) 23
Accrued and other liabilities (57) 20
Customer deposits 66 187
------ ------
Net cash provided by operating activities 543 542
------ ------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment (556) (1,363)
Sales of short-term investments 27 541
Purchases of short-term investments (58) (227)
Proceeds from retirement of property and equipment 77
Other, net 1 (2)
------ ------
Net cash used in investing activities (586) (974)
------ ------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 457
Principal repayments of long-term debt (170) (204)
(Payments) proceeds from short-term borrowings, net (13) 7
Dividends paid (120) (100)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 23 87
Other (2) (5)
------ ------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing
activities (282) 242
------ ------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents 3 (4)
------ ------
Net decrease in cash and
cash equivalents (322) (194)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 643 610
------ ------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 321 $ 416
------ ------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 - Basis of Presentation
Carnival Corporation is incorporated in Panama, and Carnival plc is incorporated in England and
Wales. Together with their consolidated subsidiaries they are referred to collectively in these
consolidated financial statements and elsewhere in this joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as "Carnival
Corporation & plc," "our," "us," and "we."
Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc (formerly known as P&O Princess Cruises plc or "P&O Princess")
completed a dual listed company ("DLC") transaction (the "DLC transaction") in 2003. The DLC transaction
combined the businesses of Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc through a number of contracts and
through amendments to Carnival Corporation's articles of incorporation and by-laws and to Carnival plc's
memorandum of association and articles of association. The two companies have retained their separate
legal identities, however, they operate as if they were a single economic enterprise.
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at February 28, 2005 and the consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows for the three months ended February 28/29, 2005 and 2004 are unaudited and, in
the opinion of our management, contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation. Our interim consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in the
Carnival Corporation & plc 2004 joint Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our operations are seasonal and
results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.
Reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period
presentation, including reflecting the gross purchases and sales of variable rate securities as investing
activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows rather than as a component of cash and cash
equivalents in fiscal 2004. We also changed the amount of our previously reported cash and cash
equivalents in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at February 29, 2004 by $147 million to $416
million from $563 million.
NOTE 2 - Stock-Based Compensation
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-
Based Compensation," as amended, we elected to use the intrinsic value method of accounting for our
employee and director stock-based compensation awards instead of the fair value method. Accordingly, we
have not recognized compensation expense for our noncompensatory employee and director stock option
awards. Our adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share, had we elected to adopt the fair value
approach of SFAS No. 123, which charges earnings for the estimated fair value of stock options, would
have been as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):
Three Months
Ended February 28/29,
2005 2004
Net income, as reported $ 345 $ 203
Stock-based compensation
expense included in
net income, as reported 4 2
Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under
the fair value-based method
for all awards (18) (29)
------ ------
Adjusted net income for basic
earnings per share 331 176
Interest on dilutive convertible notes 12 4
------ ------
Adjusted net income for diluted
earnings per share $ 343 $ 180
------ ------
Earnings per share
Basic
As reported $ 0.43 $ 0.25
------ ------
Adjusted $ 0.41 $ 0.22
------ ------
Diluted
As reported $ 0.42 $ 0.25
------ ------
Adjusted $ 0.40 $ 0.22
------ ------
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123 (revised
2004), "Share-Based Payment Statement 123(R)," which will require us to recognize compensation costs in
our financial statements in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted to
employees and directors. This statement is effective for us in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. We
have not yet determined which of the alternative transition methods we will use upon adoption of this new
statement. However, based on preliminary estimates, if we were to elect to adopt this statement with
retroactive effect to December 1, 2004, our additional full year 2005 share-based compensation expense
would be approximately $60 million.
NOTE 3 - Debt
In January 2005, we paid the final installment of $110 million on our capitalized lease obligations.
In February 2005, Carnival plc extended its 600 million euro ($795 million U.S. dollars at the
February 28, 2005 exchange rate) unsecured multi-currency revolving credit facility for 364 days, and
reduced this facility's commitment fee on the undrawn portion from nine basis points ("BPS") to 7.5 BPS.
Accordingly, this facility now expires in March 2006.
In March 2005, Carnival plc entered into a five-year unsecured multi-currency term loan facility,
bearing interest at euribor/libor plus 32.5 BPS. Under this facility, we borrowed 368 million euro ($487
million U.S. dollars at the February 28, 2005 exchange rate) to repay a 368 million euro note, which bore
interest at euribor plus 60 BPS, prior to its October 2008 maturity date. We also borrowed 165 million
sterling under this facility ($317 million U.S. dollars at the February 28, 2005 exchange rate), which we
used to finance a portion of P&O Cruises' Arcadia purchase price.
NOTE 4 - Contingencies
Litigation
On March 7, 2005, a lawsuit was filed against Carnival Corporation in the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of Florida on behalf of some current and former crew members alleging that Carnival
Cruise Lines failed to pay the plaintiffs for overtime. The suit seeks payment of (i) the overtime wages
alleged to be owed, (ii) penalty wages under U.S. law and (iii) interest. We are not yet able to
estimate the impact of this claim, and the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this
time. However, we believe that we have meritorious defenses and we intend to vigorously defend against
this action.
In 2002, two actions (collectively, the "Facsimile Complaints") were filed against Carnival
Corporation on behalf of purported classes of persons who received unsolicited advertisements via
facsimile, alleging that Carnival Corporation and other defendants distributed unsolicited advertisements
via facsimile in contravention of the U.S. Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The plaintiffs seek to
enjoin the sending of unsolicited facsimile advertisements and statutory damages. The advertisements
referred to in the Facsimile Complaints that reference a Carnival Cruise Lines product were not sent by
Carnival Corporation, but rather were distributed by a professional faxing company at the behest of third
party travel agencies. We do not advertise directly to the traveling public through the use of facsimile
transmission. The ultimate outcomes of the Facsimile Complaints cannot be determined at this time.
However, we believe that we have meritorious defenses and we intend to vigorously defend against these
actions.
In February 2001, Holland America Line-USA, Inc. ("HAL-USA"), our wholly-owned subsidiary, received
a grand jury subpoena requesting that it produce documents and records relating to the air emissions from
Holland America Line ships in Alaska. HAL-USA responded to the subpoena. The ultimate outcome of this
matter cannot be determined at this time.
In March 2004, Holland America Line notified the U.S. and Netherlands governmental authorities that
one of its chief engineers had admitted to improperly processing bilge water on the Noordam. A
subsequent internal investigation has determined that the improper operation may have begun in January
2004 and may have continued sporadically through March 4, 2004. Holland America Line and three shipboard
engineers have received grand jury subpoenas from the Office of the U.S. Attorney in Tampa, Florida. If
the government investigations result in charges being filed, a judgment could include, among other forms
of relief, fines and debarment from federal contracting, which would prohibit Holland America Line
operations in Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve ("Glacier Bay") during the period of debarment. The
ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. If Holland America Line were to lose
its Glacier Bay permits as a result of the Noordam investigations, we would not expect the impact on our
financial statements to be material to us since we believe there are additional attractive alternative
destinations in Alaska and elsewhere that can be substituted for Glacier Bay.
Costa has instituted arbitration proceedings in Italy to confirm the validity of its decision not to
deliver its ship, the Costa Classica, to the shipyard of Cammell Laird Holdings PLC ("Cammell Laird")
under a 79 million euro denominated contract for the conversion and lengthening of the ship in November
2000. Costa has also given notice of termination of the contract. In October 2004, the arbitration
tribunal decided to increase the scope of work of the technical expert by introducing new demands for
reply in the expert's report. In March 2005, the expert submitted his report to the tribunal. It is
expected that the arbitration tribunal's decision will be made in late 2005 at the earliest. In the
event that an award is given in favor of Cammell Laird, the amount of damages, which Costa would have to
pay, if any, is not currently determinable. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at
this time.
In April 2003, Festival Crociere S.p.A. ("Festival") commenced an action against the European
Commission (the "Commission") in the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Luxembourg
seeking to annul the Commission's antitrust approval of the DLC transaction (the "Festival Action"). We
have been granted leave to intervene in the Festival Action and filed a Statement in Intervention with
the court. Festival was declared bankrupt in May 2004 and Festival did not submit observations on our
Statement in Intervention. A date for an oral hearing will be set in due course, unless Festival
withdraws its action. A successful third party challenge of an unconditional Commission clearance
decision would be unprecedented, and based on a review of the law and the factual circumstances of the
DLC transaction, as well as the Commission's approval decision in relation to the DLC transaction, we
believe that the Festival Action will not have a material adverse effect on the companies or the DLC
transaction. However, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In the normal course of our business, various other claims and lawsuits have been filed or are
pending against us. Most of these claims and lawsuits are covered by insurance and, accordingly, the
maximum amount of our liability is typically limited to our self-insurance retention levels. However,
the ultimate outcome of these claims and lawsuits cannot be determined at this time.
Contingent Obligations
At February 28, 2005, Carnival Corporation had contingent obligations totaling $1.08 billion to
participants in lease out and lease back type transactions for three of its ships. At the inception of
the leases, the entire amount of the contingent obligations was paid by Carnival Corporation to major
financial institutions to enable them to directly pay these obligations. Accordingly, these obligations
were considered extinguished, and neither the funds nor the contingent obligations have been included on
our balance sheets. Carnival Corporation would only be required to make any payments under these
contingent obligations in the remote event of nonperformance by these financial institutions, all of
which have long-term credit ratings of AAA or AA. In addition, Carnival Corporation obtained a direct
guarantee from another AAA rated financial institution for $295 million of the above noted contingent
obligations, thereby further reducing the already remote exposure to this portion of the contingent
obligations. If the major financial institutions' credit ratings fall below AA-, Carnival Corporation
would be required to move a majority of the funds from these financial institutions to other highly-rated
financial institutions. If Carnival Corporation's credit rating falls below BBB, it would be required to
provide a standby letter of credit for $84 million, or alternatively provide mortgages in the aggregate
amount of $84 million on two of its ships.
In the unlikely event that Carnival Corporation were to terminate the three lease agreements early
or default on its obligations, it would, as of February 28, 2005, have to pay a total of $171 million in
stipulated damages. As of February 28, 2005, $179 million of standby letters of credit have been issued
by a major financial institution in order to provide further security for the payment of these contingent
stipulated damages. Between 2017 and 2022, we have the right to exercise options that would terminate
these transactions at no cost to us.
Some of the debt agreements that we enter into include indemnification provisions that obligate us
to make payments to the counterparty if certain events occur. These contingencies generally relate to
changes in taxes, changes in laws that increase lender capital costs and other similar costs. The
indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms and were entered into in the normal course
of business. There are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and we are
not able to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments, if any, under these indemnification
clauses. We have not been required to make any material payments under such indemnification clauses in
the past and, under current circumstances, we do not believe a request for material future
indemnification payments is probable.
NOTE 5 - Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income was as follows (in millions):
Three Months
Ended February 28/29,
2005 2004
Net income $345 $203
Items included in accumulated
other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustment (3) 209
Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges 11 (13)
---- ----
Total comprehensive income $353 $399
---- ----
NOTE 6 - Segment Information
Our cruise segment included all of our cruise brands, which have been aggregated as a single
reportable segment based on the similarity of their economic and other characteristics, including
products and services they provide. Our other segment primarily represents the transportation, hotel and
tour operations of Holland America Tours and Princess Tours, and the business to business travel agency
operations of P&O Travel Ltd.
Selected segment information for our cruise and other segments was as follows (in millions):
Three Months Ended February 28/29,
Selling Depreciation Operating
Operating and admin- and income
2005 Revenues expenses istrative amortization (loss)
Cruise $2,387 $1,412 $322 $213 $440
Other 12 14 12 8 (22)
Intersegment elimination (3) (3)
------ ------ ---- ---- ----
$2,396 $1,423 $334 $221 $418
------ ------ ---- ---- ----
2004
Cruise $1,973 $1,207 $302 $183 $281
Other 10 12 14 5 (21)
Intersegment elimination (2) (2)
------ ------ ---- ---- ----
$1,981 $1,217 $316 $188 $260
------ ------ ---- ---- ----
Note 7 - Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund ("MNOPF")
P&O Cruises, Princess and Cunard participate in an industry-wide British MNOPF, which is a defined
benefit multiemployer pension plan that is available to certain of their shipboard British officers. The
MNOPF is divided into two sections, the "New Section" and the "Old Section," each of which covers a
different group of participants, with the Old Section closed to further benefit accrual and the New
Section only closed to new membership.
As of March 31, 2003, the date of the most recent formal actuarial valuation prepared by the MNOPF's
actuary, the New Section of the MNOPF was estimated to have a fund deficit of approximately 200 million
sterling, or $380 million, assuming a 7.7% discount rate. At November 30, 2004, our external actuary
informally updated the March 31, 2003 valuation and estimated that the New Section deficit was
approximately 760 million sterling, or $1.44 billion, assuming a 5.2% discount rate. The amount of the
fund deficit could vary considerably if different assumptions and/or estimates were used in its
calculation. Substantially all of any MNOPF fund deficit liability which we may have relates to P&O
Cruises and Princess obligations, which existed prior to the DLC transaction.
Our share of any liability with respect to the fund's deficit was uncertain and, accordingly, the
MNOPF's participating employers sought guidance from the court as to how to allocate the deficit to
participating employers, which ruling was issued on March 22, 2005. Notwithstanding the court's
decision, there are still a number of uncertainties remaining as to our portion of the fund's ultimate
deficit. Therefore, we will record as expense our portion of any deficit as amounts are invoiced by the
fund's trustee, which is currently expected to be over a period of at least 10 years. In accordance with
the court ruling and other factors, and assuming all of the other participating employers are able to pay
their share of the MNOPF deficit, we believe our share of the ultimate deficit could be in the range of
$25 million to $90 million.
NOTE 8 - Earnings Per Share
Our basic and diluted earnings per share were computed as follows (in millions, except per share
data):
Three Months
Ended February 28/29,
2005 2004
Net income $345 $203
Interest on dilutive convertible notes 12 4
---- ----
Net income for diluted earnings per share $357 $207
---- ----
Weighted-average common and ordinary shares outstanding 805 800
Dilutive effect of convertible notes 44 15
Dilutive effect of stock plans 6 5
----- -----
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding 855 820
----- -----
Basic earnings per share $0.43 $0.25
----- -----
Diluted earnings per share $0.42 $0.25
----- -----
Options to purchase 1.4 million and 5.0 million shares for the three months ended February 28/29,
2005 and 2004, respectively, were excluded from our diluted earnings per share computation since the
effect of including them was anti-dilutive.