3rd Quarter Results
SEPTEMBER 29, 2006
RELEASE OF CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2006
-----------------------------
Carnival Corporation & plc announced its third quarter results of operations in its earnings release
issued on September 21, 2006. Carnival Corporation & plc is hereby announcing that it has filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") a joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q today containing
the Carnival Corporation & plc 2006 third quarter financial statements, which results remain unchanged
from those previously announced on September 21, 2006.
The information included in the attached Schedules A and B is extracted from the Form 10-Q and has
been prepared in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. Schedules A and B contain the unaudited
quarterly consolidated financial statements for Carnival Corporation & plc as of and for the three and
nine months ended August 31, 2006, together with management's discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations. These Carnival Corporation & plc consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America ("U.S. GAAP"). Within the Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc dual listed company structure
the Directors consider the most appropriate presentation of Carnival plc's results and financial position
is by reference to the U.S. GAAP financial statements of Carnival Corporation & plc.
MEDIA CONTACTS INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACT
US US/UK
Carnival Corporation & plc Carnival Corporation & plc
Tim Gallagher Beth Roberts
001 305 599 2600, ext. 16000 001 305 406 4832
UK
Brunswick
Richard Jaques/Ruban Yogarajah
020 7404 5959
The full joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (including the portion extracted for this announcement)
is available for viewing on the SEC website at www.sec.gov under Carnival Corporation or Carnival plc or
the Carnival Corporation & plc website at www.carnivalcorp.com or www.carnivalplc.com. A copy of the
joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will be available shortly at the UKLA Document Viewing Facility of
the Financial Services Authority at 25 The North Colonnade, London E14 5HS, United Kingdom.
Carnival Corporation & plc is the largest cruise vacation group in the world, with a portfolio of
cruise brands in North America, Europe and Australia, comprised of Carnival Cruise Lines, Holland America
Line, Princess Cruises, Seabourn Cruise Line, Windstar Cruises, AIDA Cruises, Costa Cruises, Cunard Line,
Ocean Village, P&O Cruises, Swan Hellenic and P&O Cruises Australia.
Together, these brands operate 81 ships totaling approximately 144,000 lower berths with 15 new
ships scheduled to enter service between March 2007 and spring 2010. Carnival Corporation & plc also
operates the leading tour companies in Alaska and the Canadian Yukon, Holland America Tours and Princess
Tours. Traded on both the New York and London Stock Exchanges, Carnival Corporation & plc is the only
group in the world to be included in both the S&P 500 and the FTSE 100 indices.
Additional information can be obtained via Carnival Corporation & plc's website at
www.carnivalcorp.com or www.carnivalplc.com or by writing to Carnival plc at Carnival House, 5 Gainsford
Street, London SE1 2NE, United Kingdom.
SCHEDULE A
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS UNDER U.S. GAAP
Some of the statements contained in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are
"forward-looking statements" that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions with respect to us,
including some statements concerning future results, outlook, plans, goals and other events which have
not yet occurred. These statements are intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability provided
by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
("Act"). You can find many, but not all, of these statements by looking for words like "will," "may,"
"believes," "expects," "anticipates," "forecast," "future," "intends," "plans," and "estimates" and for
similar expressions.
Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are many factors that
could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in this joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Forward-looking statements include those statements
which may impact the forecasting of our earnings per share, net revenue yields, booking levels, pricing,
occupancy, operating, financing and/or tax costs, fuel costs, costs per available lower berth day
("ALBD"), estimates of ship depreciable lives and residual values, outlook or business prospects. These
factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
- risks associated with the DLC structure, including the uncertainty of its tax status;
- general economic and business conditions, which may impact levels of disposable income of
consumers and thereby impact the net revenue yields for our cruise brands;
- conditions in the cruise and land-based vacation industries, including competition from
other cruise ship operators and providers of other vacation alternatives and increases
in capacity offered by cruise ship and land-based vacation alternatives;
- risks associated with operating internationally;
- the international political and economic climate, armed conflicts, terrorist attacks and
threats thereof, availability of air service, other world events and adverse publicity,
and their impact on the demand for cruises;
- accidents, unusual weather conditions or natural disasters, such as hurricanes and
earthquakes and other incidents (including machinery and equipment failures or improper
operation thereof), which could cause the alteration of itineraries or cancellation of a
cruise or series of cruises and the impact of the spread of contagious diseases,
affecting the health, safety, security and vacation satisfaction of passengers;
- changing consumer preferences, which may, among other things, adversely impact the demand
for cruises;
- our ability to implement our shipbuilding programs and brand strategies and to continue to
expand our business worldwide;
- our future operating cash flow may not be sufficient to fund future obligations and we may
not be able to obtain financing, if necessary, on terms that are favorable or consistent
with our expectations;
- our ability to attract and retain qualified shipboard crew and maintain good relations
with employee unions;
- the impact of changes in operating and financing costs, including changes in foreign
currency exchange rates and interest rates and fuel, food, payroll, insurance and security
costs;
- the impact of pending or threatened litigation;
- changes in and compliance with the environmental, health, safety, security, tax and other
regulatory regimes under which we operate, including the implementation of U.S.
regulations requiring U.S. citizens to obtain passports for travel to or from additional
foreign destinations;
- continued availability of attractive port destinations;
- our ability to successfully implement cost reduction plans; and
- continuing financial viability of our travel agent distribution system and air service
providers.
Forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results. Subject to
any continuing obligations under applicable law or any relevant listing rules, we expressly disclaim any
obligation to disseminate, after the date of this joint Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, any updates or
revisions to any such forward-looking statements to reflect any change in expectations or events,
conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based.
Key Performance Indicators and Critical Accounting Estimates
We use net cruise revenues per ALBD ("net revenue yields") and net cruise costs per ALBD as
significant non-GAAP financial measures of our cruise segment financial performance. We believe that net
revenue yields are commonly used in the cruise industry to measure a company's cruise segment revenue
performance. This measure is also used for revenue management purposes. In calculating net revenue
yields, we use "net cruise revenues" rather than "gross cruise revenues." We believe that net cruise
revenues is a more meaningful measure in determining revenue yield than gross cruise revenues because it
reflects the cruise revenues earned by us net of our most significant variable costs, which are travel
agent commissions, cost of air transportation and certain other variable direct costs associated with
onboard and other revenues. Substantially all of our remaining cruise costs are largely fixed once our
ship capacity levels have been determined, except for the impact of changing prices.
Net cruise costs per ALBD is the most significant measure we use to monitor our ability to control
our cruise segment costs rather than gross cruise costs per ALBD. In calculating net cruise costs, we
exclude the same variable costs that are included in the calculation of net cruise revenues. This is
done to avoid duplicating these variable costs in these two non-GAAP financial measures.
In addition, because a significant portion of our operations utilize the euro or sterling to measure
their results and financial condition, the translation of those operations to our U.S. dollar reporting
currency results in increases in reported U.S. dollar revenues and expenses if the U.S. dollar weakens
against these foreign currencies, and decreases in reported U.S. dollar revenues and expenses if the U.S.
dollar strengthens against these foreign currencies. Accordingly, we also monitor our two non-GAAP
financial measures assuming the current period currency exchange rates have remained constant with the
prior year's comparable period rates, or on a "constant dollar basis," in order to remove the impact of
changes in exchange rates on our non-U.S. cruise operations. We believe that this is a useful measure
indicating the actual growth of our operations in a fluctuating exchange rate environment.
On a constant dollar basis, net cruise revenues and net cruise costs would be $7.03 billion and
$4.23 billion for the nine months ended August 31, 2006 and $2.90 billion and $1.41 billion for the three
months ended August 31, 2006, respectively. On a constant dollar basis, gross cruise revenues and gross
cruise costs would be $8.72 billion and $5.93 billion for the nine months ended August 31, 2006 and $3.56
billion and $2.07 billion for the three months ended August 31, 2006, respectively. In addition to our
two non-GAAP financial measures discussed above, our non-U.S. cruise operations' depreciation and net
interest expense were impacted by the changes in exchange rates for the nine and three months ended
August 31, 2006 compared to the prior periods' rates.
All the prior periods financial information presented herein have been adjusted to reflect the
retrospective application of the change in our method of accounting for dry-dock costs and for certain
reclassifications, as more fully discussed in Notes 1 and 2 in the accompanying financial statements.
For a discussion of our critical accounting estimates, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations," which is included in Carnival Corporation & plc's 2005
joint Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Forward Outlook
As of September 21, 2006 we said that we expected our diluted earnings per share for the fourth
quarter of 2006 would be approximately $0.46 to $0.48. Our guidance was based on the then current
forward fuel price curve of $323 per metric ton for the fourth quarter of 2006, which is in line with the
average price for the 2005 fourth quarter. In addition, this guidance was also based on currency
exchange rates of $1.27 to the euro and $1.87 to sterling.
Looking into early 2007, overall booking levels on a capacity adjusted basis, for the first quarter
of 2007 are modestly down compared to the same period last year. The sluggish demand for the Caribbean
is continuing into the first quarter of 2007 causing North American booking levels to be behind last
year, while business for our European brands for that period is running ahead of last year's pace. For
the first quarter of 2007 we are expecting overall net revenue yields will be flat to down slightly on a
constant-dollar basis due to the continued softness in demand for Caribbean cruises, partially offset by
stronger yields from the European brands.
Excluding any future ship orders, the year-over-year percentage increase in our ALBD capacity for
the 2006 fourth quarter and the full years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, resulting substantially all from
new ships entering service, is currently expected to be 5.5%, 8.5%, 7.9%, 7.2% and 6.2%, respectively.
Seasonality
Our revenues and significant variable costs from the sale of passenger tickets are seasonal.
Historically, demand for cruises has been greatest during our third quarter, which includes the Northern
Hemisphere summer months. This higher demand during the third quarter results in higher net revenue
yields and, accordingly, the largest share of our net income is earned during this period. The
seasonality of our results is increased due to ships being taken out of service for dry-docking, which we
typically schedule during non-peak demand periods. Substantially all of Holland America Tours' and
Princess Tours' revenues and net income are generated from May through September in conjunction with the
Alaska cruise season.
Selected Information and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Selected information was as follows:
Nine Months Ended August 31, Three Months Ended August 31,
--------------------------- ----------------------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
---- ---- ---- ----
Passengers carried (in thousands) 5,237(a) 5,260 2,012 1,953
----- ----- ----- -----
Occupancy percentage 107.0%(a) 106.6% 111.0% 110.9%
----- ----- ----- -----
Fuel cost per metric ton $ 341 $ 239 $ 350 $ 271
----- ----- ----- -----
(a) Passengers carried in 2006 are lower than 2005 because 2006 does not include any
passengers for the three ships chartered to the Military Sealift Command ("MSC") in the
2006 first quarter in connection with the Hurricane Katrina relief efforts. Occupancy
percentage includes the three ships chartered to the MSC at 100% occupancy.
Gross and net revenue yields were computed by dividing the gross or net revenues, without rounding,
by ALBDs as follows:
Nine Months Ended August 31, Three Months Ended August 31,
--------------------------- ----------------------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
---- ---- ---- ----
(in millions, except ALBDs and yields)
Cruise revenues
Passenger tickets $6,825 $6,446 $2,894 $2,700
Onboard and other 1,847 1,766 709 656
------ ------ ------ ------
Gross cruise revenues 8,672 8,212 3,603 3,356
Less cruise costs
Commissions, transportation
and other (1,351) (1,278) (538) (475)
Onboard and other (326) (311) (128) (118)
------ ------ ------ ------
Net cruise revenues $6,995 $6,623 $2,937 $2,763
------ ------ ------ ------
ALBDs 37,116,575 35,595,494 12,937,155 12,297,220
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Gross revenue yields $233.64 $230.72 $278.50 $272.90
------- ------- ------- -------
Net revenue yields $188.44 $186.07 $227.06 $224.72
------- ------- ------- -------
Gross and net cruise costs per ALBD were computed by dividing the gross or net cruise costs, without
rounding, by ALBDs as follows:
Nine Months Ended August 31, Three Months Ended August 31,
--------------------------- ----------------------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
---- ---- ---- ----
(in millions, except ALBDs and costs per ALBD)
Cruise operating expenses $4,852 $4,451 $1,769 $1,598
Cruise selling and administrative
expenses 1,023 943 324 289
------ ------ ------ ------
Gross cruise costs 5,875 5,394 2,093 1,887
Less cruise costs included in net
cruise revenues
Commissions, transportation
and other (1,351) (1,278) (538) (475)
Onboard and other (326) (311) (128) (118)
------ ------ ------ ------
Net cruise costs $4,198 $3,805 $1,427 $1,294
------ ------ ------ ------
ALBDs 37,116,575 35,595,494 12,937,155 12,297,220
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Gross cruise costs per ALBD $158.29 $151.54 $161.83 $153.49
------- ------- ------- -------
Net cruise costs per ALBD $113.09 $106.89 $110.38 $105.31
------- ------- ------- -------
Nine Months Ended August 31, 2006 ("2006") Compared to the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2005 ("2005")
Revenues
Net cruise revenues increased $372 million, or 5.6%, to $7.00 billion in 2006 from $6.62 billion in
2005. The 4.3% increase in ALBDs between 2005 and 2006 accounted for $283 million of the increase, and
the remaining $89 million was from increased net revenue yields, which increased 1.3% in 2006 compared to
2005 (gross revenue yields also increased by 1.3%). Net revenue yields increased in 2006 primarily from
higher cruise ticket prices and, to a lesser extent, a 0.4% increase in occupancy. In addition, net
revenue yields in 2005 were reduced in part by the cancellation of the higher yielding P&O Cruises Aurora
world cruise. Currency exchange rates also had a negative impact on our net revenue yields in 2006
because a portion of our business is transacted in foreign currencies. Net revenue yields as measured on
a constant dollar basis increased 1.7% in 2006 compared to 2005. Gross cruise revenues increased $460
million, or 5.6%, in 2006 to $8.67 billion from $8.21 billion in 2005 for largely the same reasons as net
cruise revenues.
The MSC charter in the first quarter of 2006 resulted in lower onboard revenues and higher cruise
ticket revenues because the charters did not generate onboard revenues as the entire charter price was
recorded in passenger ticket revenues. Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of $521
million in 2006 and $484 million in 2005.
Other non-cruise revenues increased $48 million, or 12.0%, to $449 million in 2006 from $401 million
in 2005 primarily due to the increase in the number of cruise/tours sold.
Costs and Expenses
Net cruise costs increased $393 million, or 10.3%, to $4.20 billion in 2006 from $3.81 billion in
2005. The 4.3% increase in ALBDs between 2005 and 2006 accounted for $163 million of the increase
whereas $230 million was from increased net cruise costs per ALBD, which increased 5.8% in 2006 compared
to 2005 (gross cruise costs per ALBD increased 4.5%). Net cruise costs per ALBD increased primarily due
to a $102 increase in fuel cost per metric ton, or 43%, to $341 per metric ton in 2006, which resulted in
an additional $211 million of expense, and a $41 million increase in share-based compensation expense,
which was substantially all a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) (see Note 3 in the accompanying
financial statements). This increase was partially offset by the non-recurrence in 2006 of a $23 million
Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund ("MNOPF") contribution and the impact of currency exchange rates.
Net cruise costs per ALBD as measured on a constant dollar basis increased 6.7% in 2006 compared to 2005.
On a constant dollar basis, net cruise costs per ALBD, excluding increased fuel prices, increased 1.4%
compared to 2005. Gross cruise costs increased $481 million, or 8.9%, in 2006 to $5.88 billion from
$5.39 billion in 2005 for largely the same reasons as net cruise costs.
Other non-cruise operating expense increased $44 million, or 14.3%, to $351 million in 2006 from
$307 million in 2005 primarily due to the increase in the number of cruise/tours sold.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $55 million, or 8.2%, to $727 million in 2006
from $672 million in 2005 largely due to the 4.3% increase in ALBDs through the addition of new ships,
and additional ship improvement expenditures.
Nonoperating (Expense) Income
Net interest expense, excluding capitalized interest, decreased $3 million to $242 million in 2006
from $245 million in 2005. This decrease was primarily due to lower average borrowings, partially offset
by the impact of higher average interest rates on borrowings. Capitalized interest increased $13 million
during 2006 compared to 2005 primarily due to higher average levels of investment in ship construction
projects and higher average interest rates on borrowings.
Other expense in 2006 included a $10 million expense for the write-down of a non-cruise investment,
partially offset by a $4 million gain on the subsequent sale of this investment, and a $6 million
provision for litigation reserves. Other expense in 2005 included a $22 million expense for the write-
down of a non-cruise investment, which was recorded in the 2005 third quarter, partially offset by $7
million in income from the settlement of litigation associated with the DLC transaction.
Three Months Ended August 31, 2006 ("2006") Compared to the Three Months Ended August 31, 2005
("2005")
Revenues
Net cruise revenues increased $174 million, or 6.3%, to $2.94 billion in 2006 from $2.76 billion in
2005. The 5.2% increase in ALBDs between 2005 and 2006 accounted for $144 million of the increase, and
the remaining $30 million was from increased net revenue yields, which increased 1.0% in 2006 compared to
2005 primarily due to the weaker U.S. dollar relative to the euro and sterling and slightly higher
onboard spending. This increase was partially offset by a $13 million reduction in the MSC charter
cruise revenues (see income taxes discussion below).
Our 2006 cruise ticket prices for Caribbean itineraries were less than 2005, which was offset by
price increases we achieved primarily from our Alaska and European cruises. We believe that this
reduction in Caribbean pricing was the result of weaker consumer demand caused primarily from the
lingering effects of the unusually strong 2005 hurricane season and higher fuel and other costs adverse
impacts on our customers' discretionary income. Net revenue yields as measured on a constant dollar
basis were flat in 2006 compared to 2005. Gross cruise revenues increased $247 million, or 7.4%, in 2006
to $3.60 billion from $3.36 billion in 2005 for largely the same reasons as net cruise revenues. Onboard
and other revenues included concession revenues of $224 million in 2006 and $201 million in 2005.
Other non-cruise revenues increased $51 million, or 15.5%, to $380 million in 2006 from $329 million
in 2005 primarily due to the increase in the number of cruise/tours sold.
Costs and Expenses
Net cruise costs increased $133 million, or 10.3%, to $1.43 billion in 2006 from $1.29 billion in
2005. The 5.2% increase in ALBDs between 2005 and 2006 accounted for $67 million of the increase, and
the balance of $66 million was from increased net cruise costs per ALBD, which increased 4.8% in 2006
compared to 2005 (gross cruise costs per ALBD increased 5.4%). Net cruise costs per ALBD increased
primarily due to a $79 increase in fuel cost per metric ton, or 29%, to $350 per metric ton in 2006,
which resulted in an additional $55 million of expense, a weaker U.S. dollar relative to the euro and
sterling in 2006, and a $13 million increase in share-based compensation expense, which was substantially
all a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). This increase was partially offset by the non-
recurrence in 2006 of the $23 million MNOPF contribution. Net cruise costs per ALBD as measured on a
constant dollar basis increased 3.8% in 2006 compared to 2005. On a constant dollar basis, net cruise
costs per ALBD excluding increased fuel prices were flat. Gross cruise costs increased $206 million, or
10.9%, in 2006 to $2.09 billion from $1.89 billion in 2005 for largely the same reasons as net cruise
costs.
Other non-cruise operating expense increased $44 million, or 18.3%, to $284 million in 2006 from
$240 million in 2005 primarily due to the increase in the number of cruise/tours sold.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $29 million, or 12.8%, to $255 million in 2006
from $226 million in 2005 largely due to the 5.2% increase in ALBDs through the addition of new ships,
and additional ship improvement expenditures.
Nonoperating (Expense) Income
Net interest expense, excluding capitalized interest, increased $9 million to $85 million in 2006
from $76 million in 2005. This increase was primarily due to lower average invested cash balances and
higher average interest rates on borrowings. Capitalized interest increased $5 million during 2006
compared to 2005 primarily due to higher average levels of investment in ship construction projects and
higher average interest rates on borrowings.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense decreased by $14 million to $31 million in 2006 from $45 million in 2005 as a
result of a $13 million tax adjustment related to the MSC charter. This reduction in income taxes was
offset by a reduction in cruise revenues, and, accordingly, had no impact on our 2006 third quarter net
income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our business provided $2.83 billion of net cash from operations during the nine months ended August
31, 2006, an increase of $36 million, or 1.3%, compared to fiscal 2005. We continue to generate
substantial cash from operations and remain in a strong financial position, thus providing us with
substantial financial flexibility in meeting operating, investing and financing needs.
During the nine months ended August 31, 2006, our net expenditures for capital projects were $2.18
billion, of which $1.82 billion was spent for our ongoing new shipbuilding program, including $1.22
billion for the final delivery payments for Holland America Line's Noordam, Princess Cruises' Crown
Princess and the Costa Concordia. The remaining capital expenditures consisted primarily of $220 million
for ship improvements and refurbishments, and $143 million for Alaska tour assets, cruise port facility
developments and information technology assets.
During the nine months ended August 31, 2006, we borrowed $352 million to pay part of the Crown
Princess purchase price, and we repaid $1.03 billion of long-term debt, which included $888 million of
Costa's indebtedness. We also had net short-term borrowings of $791 million under our commercial paper
programs and short-term bank loans during the nine months ended August 31, 2006. Finally, during the
first nine months of fiscal 2006 we purchased $793 million of Carnival Corporation common stock and
Carnival plc ordinary shares in open market transactions and paid cash dividends of $605 million.
Future Commitments and Funding Sources
Our contractual cash obligations remained generally unchanged at August 31, 2006 compared to
November 30, 2005, including ship construction contracts entered into in December 2005, except for
changes in our debt and the Noordam, Crown Princess and Costa Concordia delivery payments as noted above
and the two new ship construction contracts that we entered into in June 2006 as follows:
- Costa Cruises entered into a contract with Fincantieri for a 2,260 passenger ship, which
has an estimated all-in cost of 420 million euros and is expected to enter service in
spring 2009.
- AIDA Cruises entered into a contract with Meyer Werft for a 2,050 passenger ship, which
has an estimated all-in cost of 330 million euros and is expected to enter service in
spring 2010.
As of November 30, 2005, we had contractual cash obligations to pay interest on our variable-rate
debt, including interest swapped from a fixed-rate to a variable rate, using the forward interest rate
curve for the terms of the loans, as follows (in millions): $86, $73, $37, $29, $21 and $37 in fiscal
2006 through 2010 and thereafter, respectively.
At August 31, 2006, we had liquidity of $3.24 billion, which consisted of $615 million of cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments, $1.28 billion available for borrowing under our revolving credit
facility and $1.34 billion under committed ship financing facilities. Our revolving credit facility
matures in 2011. A key to our access to liquidity is the maintenance of our strong credit ratings.
Based primarily on our historical results, current financial condition and future forecasts, we
believe that our existing liquidity and cash flow from future operations will be sufficient to fund most
of our expected capital projects, debt service requirements, dividend payments, working capital and other
firm commitments. In addition, based on our future forecasted operating results and cash flows for
fiscal 2006, we expect to be in compliance with our debt covenants during the remainder of fiscal 2006.
However, our forecasted cash flow from future operations, as well as our credit ratings, may be adversely
affected by various factors including, but not limited to, those factors noted under "Cautionary Note
Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results." To the extent that we are required, or choose, to
fund future cash requirements, including our future shipbuilding commitments, from sources other than as
discussed above, we believe that we will be able to secure such financing from banks or through the
offering of debt and/or equity securities in the public or private markets. However, we cannot be
certain that our future operating cash flow will be sufficient to fund future obligations or that we will
be able to obtain additional financing, if necessary.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements, including guarantee contracts, retained or
contingent interests, certain derivative instruments and variable interest entities, which either have,
or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial statements.
SCHEDULE B
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(in millions, except per share data)
Nine Months Three Months
Ended August 31, Ended August 31,
--------------- ---------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
---- ---- ---- ----
(Notes (Notes
1 & 2) 1 & 2)
Revenues
Cruise
Passenger tickets $6,825 $6,446 $2,894 $2,700
Onboard and other 1,847 1,766 709 656
Other 357 309 302 251
------ ------ ------ ------
9,029 8,521 3,905 3,607
------ ------ ------ ------
Costs and Expenses
Operating
Cruise
Commissions, transportation and other 1,351 1,278 538 475
Onboard and other 326 311 128 118
Payroll and related 854 844 294 297
Fuel 707 491 243 189
Food 479 464 168 160
Other ship operating 1,135 1,063 398 359
Other 259 215 206 162
------ ------ ------ ------
Total 5,111 4,666 1,975 1,760
Selling and administrative 1,054 978 335 300
Depreciation and amortization 727 672 255 226
------ ------ ------ ------
6,892 6,316 2,565 2,286
------ ------ ------ ------
Operating Income 2,137 2,205 1,340 1,321
------ ------ ------ ------
Nonoperating (Expense) Income
Interest income 17 19 5 10
Interest expense, net of
capitalized interest (232) (250) (81) (82)
Other expense, net (17) (15) (1) (23)
------ ------ ------ ------
(232) (246) (77) (95)
------ ------ ------ ------
Income Before Income Taxes 1,905 1,959 1,263 1,226
Income Tax Expense, Net (42) (42) (31) (45)
------ ------ ------ ------
Net Income $1,863 $1,917 $1,232 $1,181
------ ------ ------ ------
Earnings Per Share
Basic $ 2.32 $ 2.38 $ 1.55 $ 1.46
------ ------ ------ ------
Diluted $ 2.25 $ 2.29 $ 1.49 $ 1.40
------ ------ ------ ------
Dividends Per Share $ 0.75 $ 0.55 $ 0.25 $ 0.20
------ ------ ------ ------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(in millions, except par values)
August 31, November 30,
2006 2005
ASSETS ---- ----
(Notes
1 & 2)
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 594 $ 1,178
Trade and other receivables, net 396 430
Inventories 278 250
Prepaid expenses and other 283 263
------- -------
Total current assets 1,551 2,121
------- -------
Property and Equipment, Net 23,263 21,312
Goodwill 3,281 3,206
Trademarks 1,311 1,282
Other Assets 460 428
------- -------
$29,866 $28,349
------- -------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Short-term borrowings $ 567 $ 300
Current portion of long-term debt 215 1,042
Convertible debt subject to current put option 220 283
Accounts payable 498 477
Accrued liabilities and other 984 1,032
Customer deposits 2,326 2,051
------- -------
Total current liabilities 4,810 5,185
------- -------
Long-Term Debt 6,556 5,727
Other Long-Term Liabilities and Deferred Income 621 554
Contingencies (Note 5)
Shareholders' Equity
Common stock of Carnival Corporation; $.01 par
value; 1,960 shares authorized; 640 shares at 2006
and 639 shares at 2005 issued 6 6
Ordinary shares of Carnival plc; $1.66 par value;
226 shares authorized; 213 shares at 2006 and
212 shares at 2005 issued 354 353
Additional paid-in capital 7,438 7,381
Retained earnings 11,402 10,141
Unearned stock compensation (13)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 522 159
Treasury stock; 17 shares at 2006 and 2 shares at 2005
of Carnival Corporation and 42 shares at 2006 and
2005 of Carnival plc, at cost (1,843) (1,144)
------- -------
Total shareholders' equity 17,879 16,883
------- -------
$29,866 $28,349
------- -------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in millions)
Nine Months Ended August 31,
---------------------------
2006 2005
---- ----
(Notes
1 & 2)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $1,863 $1,917
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization 727 672
Share-based compensation 50 10
Non-cruise investment write-down 10 22
Accretion of original issue discount 7 16
Other 1 1
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Receivables 26 (117)
Inventories (21) (16)
Prepaid expenses and other (23) (84)
Accounts payable 11 37
Accrued and other liabilities (54) 80
Customer deposits 231 254
------ ------
Net cash provided by operating activities 2,828 2,792
------ ------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment (2,182) (1,632)
Purchases of short-term investments (12) (865)
Sales of short-term investments 648
Other, net 1 5
------ ------
Net cash used in investing activities (2,193) (1,844)
------ ------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal repayments of long-term debt (1,030) (1,068)
Proceeds from (repayments of) short-term
borrowings, net 791 (133)
Purchases of treasury stock (793) (30)
Dividends paid (605) (402)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 352 1,151
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 42 52
Other 4 (7)
------ ------
Net cash used in financing activities (1,239) (437)
------ ------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents 20 (15)
------ ------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (584) 496
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1,178 643
------ ------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 594 $1,139
------ ------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 - Basis of Presentation
Carnival Corporation is incorporated in Panama, and Carnival plc is incorporated in England and
Wales. Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc operate as a dual listed company ("DLC"), whereby the
businesses of Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc are combined through a number of contracts and
through provisions in Carnival Corporation's articles of incorporation and by-laws and Carnival plc's
memorandum of association and articles of association. The two companies have retained their separate
legal identities; however, they operate as if they were a single economic enterprise.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Carnival Corporation and
Carnival plc and their respective subsidiaries. Together with their consolidated subsidiaries they are
referred to collectively in these consolidated financial statements and elsewhere in this joint Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q as "Carnival Corporation & plc," "our," "us," and "we."
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at August 31, 2006, the consolidated statements of
operations for the nine and three months ended August 31, 2006 and 2005 and the consolidated statements
of cash flows for the nine months ended August 31, 2006 and 2005 are unaudited and, in the opinion of our
management, contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation. Our interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in the Carnival Corporation &
plc 2005 joint Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our operations are seasonal and results for interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.
Our sale to passengers of air and other transportation to and from our ships and the related cost of
purchasing this service is recorded as cruise passenger ticket revenues and cruise transportation costs,
respectively, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The proceeds that we collect
from the sale of third party shore excursions and on behalf of onboard concessionaires, net of the
amounts remitted to them, are recorded as concession revenues, on a net basis, in onboard and other
cruise revenues. Transportation and shore excursion revenues and costs are recognized on voyage
completion for voyages with durations of ten nights or less, and on a pro rata basis for voyages in
excess of ten nights.
We have reclassified certain statement of operations, cash flow and balance sheet prior period
amounts to conform them to the current period presentation primarily as a result of our adopting a new
chart of accounts in conjunction with our initial implementation of a new worldwide accounting system in
the 2006 second quarter. During this implementation we identified certain classification differences
among our operating subsidiaries and, accordingly, we have recorded the appropriate reclassifications in
the prior periods to improve comparability.
NOTE 2 - Dry-docking
During the second quarter of 2006 we elected to change our method of accounting for dry-dock costs
from the deferral method, under which we amortized our deferred dry-dock costs over the estimated period
of benefit between dry-docks, to the direct expense method, under which we expense all dry-dock costs as
incurred. We believe the direct method is preferable as it eliminates the significant amount of time and
subjectivity that is needed to determine which costs and activities related to dry-docking should be
deferred. In connection with adopting this change in accounting policy, we elected to early adopt
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections",
which requires that we report changes in accounting policy by retrospectively applying the new policies
to all prior periods presented, unless it is impractical to determine the prior period impacts.
Accordingly, we have adjusted our previously reported financial information for all periods presented for
this change in dry-dock policy. The effects of this change in accounting policy were as follows (in
millions, except for earnings per share):
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Nine Months Ended August 31,
2006 2005
------------------------------ ----------------------------
Deferral Direct Effect Deferral Direct Effect
Method(a) Method of Change Method(b) Method of Change
------ ------ --------- ------ ------ --------
Other ship operating expenses $ 1,092 $ 1,135 $ 43 $ 1,076 $ 1,063 $ (13)
Net income $ 1,906 $ 1,863 $ (43) $ 1,904 $ 1,917 $ 13
Earnings per share
Basic $ 2.37 $ 2.32 $(0.05) $ 2.36 $ 2.38 $ 0.02
------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------
Diluted $ 2.30 $ 2.25 $(0.05) $ 2.27 $ 2.29 $ 0.02
------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------
Three Months Ended August 31,
2006 2005
------------------------------ ----------------------------
Deferral Direct Effect Deferral Direct Effect
Method(a) Method of Change Method(b) Method of Change
------ ------ --------- ------ ------ --------
Other ship operating expenses $ 404 $ 398 $ (6) $ 389 $ 359 $ (30)
Net income $ 1,226 $ 1,232 $ 6 $ 1,151 $ 1,181 $ 30
Earnings per share
Basic $ 1.54 $ 1.55 $ 0.01 $ 1.43 $ 1.46 $ 0.03
------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------
Diluted $ 1.48 $ 1.49 $ 0.01 $ 1.36 $ 1.40 $ 0.04
------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------
Consolidated Balance Sheets
August 31, 2006 November 30, 2005
------------------------------ ----------------------------
Deferral Direct Effect Deferral Direct Effect
Method(a) Method of Change Method(b) Method of Change
------ ------ --------- ------ ------ --------
Prepaid expenses and other $ 283 $ 283 $ 352 $ 263 $ (89)
Other assets $ 595 $ 460 $ (135) $ 428 $ 428
Retained earnings $11,537 $11,402 $ (135) $10,233 $10,141 $ (92)
(a) The amounts disclosed under the deferral method for the nine and three month periods ended
August 31, 2006 and at August 31, 2006 are based on the estimated effect of not changing
our dry-dock accounting method to the direct expense method for these current periods.
Accordingly, these estimated current period amounts have not been previously reported, but
are being disclosed in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 154.
(b) In order to simplify comparisons, the amounts shown under the previously reported deferral
method have been adjusted to include the reclassifications that were made as a result of
our adopting a new chart of accounts (see Note 1).
In addition, retained earnings at November 30, 2004 decreased by $88 million to $8.54 billion from
$8.62 billion, as a result of this change in accounting method.
NOTE 3 - Share-Based Compensation
Effective December 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(revised 2004), "Share-Based
Payment" ("SFAS No. 123(R)") using the modified prospective application transition method. Under this
method, the share-based compensation cost recognized beginning December 1, 2005 includes compensation
cost for (i) all share-based payments granted prior to, but not vested as of, December 1, 2005, based on
the grant date fair value originally estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"), and (ii) all share-based payments granted
subsequent to November 30, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). Compensation cost under SFAS No. 123(R) is recognized ratably using the
straight-line attribution method over the expected vesting period or to the retirement eligibility date,
if less than the vesting period, when vesting is not contingent upon any future performance. In
addition, pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R), we are required to estimate the amount of expected forfeitures,
which we estimate based on historical forfeiture experience, when calculating compensation cost, instead
of accounting for forfeitures as incurred, which was our previous method. As of December 1, 2005, the
cumulative effect of adopting the estimated forfeiture method was not significant. The effect of adopting
SFAS 123(R) has been to reduce our net income by approximately $41 million and $13 million and our basic
and diluted earnings per share by $0.05 and $0.02 for the nine and three months ended August 31, 2006,
respectively. Prior periods are not restated under this transition method.
Prior to December 1, 2005, we accounted for share-based compensation in accordance with the
provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," as permitted by SFAS
No. 123. We elected to use the intrinsic value method of accounting for employee and director share-
based compensation expense for our noncompensatory employee and director stock option awards and did not
recognize compensation expense for the issuance of options with an exercise price equal to or greater
than the market price of the underlying common stock/ ordinary shares at the date of grant. Had we
elected to adopt the fair value approach as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, which charges earnings for the
estimated fair value of stock options, our pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share for 2005
would have been as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):
Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended
August 31, 2005 August 31, 2005
--------------- ---------------
Net income, as reported $1,917 $1,181
Share-based compensation expense included in
net income, as reported 8 3
Total share-based compensation expense determined
under the fair value-based method for all awards (57) (20)
------ ------
Pro forma net income for basic earnings per share 1,868 1,164
Interest on dilutive convertible notes 37 12
------ ------
Pro forma net income for diluted earnings per share $1,905 $1,176
------ ------
Earnings per share
Basic
As reported $2.38 $1.46
----- -----
Pro forma $2.32 $1.44
----- -----
Diluted
As reported $2.29 $1.40
----- -----
Pro forma $2.24 $1.38
----- -----
Stock Incentive Plans
We issue our share-based compensation awards under the Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc stock
plans, which have an aggregate of 40.6 million shares available for future grant at August 31, 2006.
These plans allow us to issue stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units
(collectively "incentive awards"). Incentive awards are primarily granted to management level employees
and members of our Board of Directors. The plans are administered by a committee of our independent
directors (the "Committee"), that determines who is eligible to participate, the number of shares for
which incentive awards are to be granted and the amounts that may be exercised within a specified term.
These plans allow us to fulfill our incentive award obligations using shares purchased in the open
market, or with unissued or treasury shares. The total share-based compensation expense was $50 million
and $16 million for the nine and three months ended August 31, 2006, respectively, of which $44 million
and $14 million has been included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as selling, general and
administrative expenses and $6 million and $2 million as cruise payroll expenses, respectively.
Stock Option Plans
The Committee generally sets stock option exercise prices at 100% or more of the fair market value
of the underlying common stock/ordinary shares on the date the option is granted. All stock options
granted during the nine and three months ended August 31, 2006 and 2005 were granted at an exercise price
per share equal to or greater than the fair market value of the Carnival Corporation common stock and
Carnival plc ordinary shares on the date of grant. Generally employee options either vest evenly over
five years or at the end of three years. Our employee options granted prior to October 2005 have a ten-
year term and those options granted thereafter have a seven-year term. Since fiscal 2001, Carnival
Corporation director options vest evenly over five years and have a ten-year term.
As permitted by SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 123(R), the fair values of options were estimated using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes weighted-average values and assumptions were
as follows:
Nine Months ended August 31, Three Months ended August 31,
--------------------------- ----------------------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
---- ---- ---- ----
Fair value of options at the
dates of grant $12.25 $14.14 $ 9.18 $13.15
------ ------ ------ ------
Risk free interest rate(a) 4.29% 3.89% 4.72% 4.17%
------ ------ ------ ------
Expected dividend yield 2.31% 1.58% 3.25% 2.47%
------ ------ ------ ------
Expected volatility(b) 26.8% 27.0% 29.5% 27.0%
------ ------ ------ ------
Expected option life (in years)(c) 4.75 4.69 4.75 5.75
------ ------ ------ ------
(a) The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining
term equal to the expected option life assumed at the date of grant.
(b) The expected volatility is based on a weighting of the historical volatility of our common
stock and the implied volatilities derived from our exchange traded options and
convertible notes.
(c) The average expected life was based on the contractual term of the option and expected
employee exercise behavior.
A combined summary of Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc stock option activity during the nine
months ended August 31, 2006 was as follows:
Weighted- Weighted-Average Aggregate
Average Remaining Intrinsic
Shares Exercise Price Contractual Term Value(a)
------ -------------- ---------------- -----
(in years) (in millions)
Outstanding at
November 30, 2005 20,058,252 $39.15
Granted 756,512 $56.34
Exercised (1,484,153) $28.94
Forfeited or expired (545,989) $41.41
----------
Outstanding at
August 31, 2006 18,784,622 $41.21 6.1 $79
---------- --- ---
Exercisable at
August 31, 2006 9,302,207 $37.37 $57
---------- ---
(a) The aggregate intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair value of underlying
stock exceeds the option exercise price as of August 31, 2006.
As of the dates of exercise, the total intrinsic value of options exercised were $33 million ($37
million in 2005) and $3 million ($11 million in 2005) for the nine and three months ended August 31,
2006, respectively. As of August 31, 2006, there was $82 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 1.8 years.
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock awards ("RSAs") generally have the same rights as Carnival Corporation common
stock, except for transfer restrictions and forfeiture provisions. In prior periods, unearned stock
compensation was recorded within shareholders' equity at the date of award based on the quoted market
price of the Carnival Corporation common stock on the date of grant. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R),
the $13 million of unearned stock compensation as of November 30, 2005 was required to be charged against
additional paid-in capital. RSAs have been granted to certain officers and non-executive board members
and either have three or five-year cliff vesting or vest evenly over five years after the grant date. In
addition, Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc grant restricted stock units ("RSUs"), which do not have
an exercise price, and either vest evenly over five years or at the end of three or five years after the
grant date. The share-based compensation expense associated with RSAs and RSUs is based on the quoted
market price of the Carnival Corporation or Carnival plc shares on the date of grant, and is amortized to
expense using the straight-line method from the grant date through the earlier of the vesting date or the
estimated retirement eligibility date.
During the nine months ended August 31, 2006 RSA and RSU activity was as follows:
Restricted Stock Awards Restricted Stock Units
----------------------- ----------------------
Weighted- Weighted-
Average Average
Grant Date Grant Date
Shares Fair Value Shares Fair Value
------ ---------- ------ ----------
Outstanding at
November 30, 2005 966,417 $36.28 159,117 $44.56
Granted 150,000 $49.64 274,022 $52.38
Vested (243,667) $31.20 (47,319) $30.07
Forfeited (6,736) $51.76
------- -------
Outstanding at
August 31, 2006 872,750 $39.99 379,084 $51.89
------- -------
As of August 31, 2006, there was $22 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSAs
and RSUs. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
NOTE 4 - Debt
At August 31, 2006, our short-term borrowings consisted of commercial paper obligations of $245
million and bank loans of 139 million euros ($177 million U.S. dollars at the August 31, 2006 exchange
rate) and $145 million with an aggregate weighted-average interest rate of 4.7%.
During the nine months ended August 31, 2006, $69 million of our zero-coupon convertible notes were
converted into 2.1 million shares of Carnival Corporation common stock, of which 1.9 million shares were
issued from treasury stock.
The Carnival Corporation common stock trigger price of $43.05, which is required to be met in order
to allow the conversion of the Carnival Corporation 2% convertible notes, was not met for the defined
duration of time in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and, accordingly, these notes are not convertible
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006.
In May 2006, we borrowed $352 million under an unsecured term loan facility, which proceeds were
used to pay a portion of the Crown Princess purchase price. This facility bears interest at 4.51% and is
repayable in semi-annual installments through May 2018.
It is our current intention to refinance 441 million euros ($566 million U.S. dollars at the August
31, 2006 exchange rate) of our outstanding euro commercial paper obligations. Since we have the current
ability to use our long-term revolving credit facility to refinance this amount on a long-term basis, it
has been classified as long-term debt in the accompanying August 31, 2006 balance sheet. Our decision to
refinance this debt was made subsequent to August 31, 2006 and, accordingly, the net cash proceeds
received under this euro commercial paper program through August 31, 2006 have been classified as
proceeds from short-term borrowings in the accompanying statements of cash flows.
NOTE 5 - Contingencies
Litigation
On September 21, 2006, a class action complaint was filed by J. B. Miller on behalf of a purported
class of past passengers against Holland America Line ("HAL") in the U.S. The complaint alleges that HAL
(i) failed to disclose that shore excursion vendors paid HAL to promote their services as required by an
Alaska statute, and (ii) collected and retained payment from passengers for Passenger Vessel Services Act
("PSVA") violations in certain instances when HAL did not actually incur the fines. The complaint seeks
(i) certification as a class action, (ii) statutory damages under Alaska's consumer protection statutes,
(iii) damages for each PSVA fine collected and additional damages for each PSVA fine collected where no
fine was imposed, (iv) injunctive relief and (v) attorneys' fees, costs and interest. The ultimate
outcome of this action cannot be determined at this time. However, we believe that we have meritorious
defenses to these claims and intend to vigorously defend this matter.
As of August 31, 2006, three separate actions had been filed against each of Carnival Corporation
and Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. ("Princess") in the U.S. on behalf of some current and former crew
members alleging that Carnival Cruise Lines and Princess Cruises failed to timely pay the plaintiffs for
overtime and other wages due (the "Wage Actions"). These six actions generally seek payment of (i)
damages for breach of contract or restitution for back wages, (ii) damages under the Seaman's Wage Act
and (iii) interest. In May 2006, we entered into a settlement agreement for two of the three cases
pending against Carnival Corporation, which is subject to final court approval. There can be no
assurance that such approval will be obtained. However, the court has granted preliminary approval of
the settlement. The third action against Carnival Corporation is currently stayed pending final approval
of the settlement agreement reached in May 2006. Once final approval is granted this third action
against Carnival Corporation will be dismissed by the plaintiff. The settlement agreement required us to
establish a settlement fund, the ultimate net amount of which was estimated and recorded as an expense in
the first quarter of 2006. In September 2006, we entered into a settlement agreement for one of the
three cases pending against Princess, which is subject to final court approval. There can be no
assurance that such approval will be obtained. The settlement agreement requires us to establish a
settlement fund, the ultimate net amount of which was estimated and recorded as an expense in the third
quarter of 2006. Summary judgment was granted in favor of Princess in one of its three actions and an
appeal by the plaintiff is expected. The ultimate outcome of the remaining Princess action cannot be
determined at this time. However, we believe that we have meritorious defenses and we intend to
vigorously defend this Princess action.
In January 2006, an action was filed against Carnival Corporation and its subsidiaries and
affiliates, and other non-affiliated cruise lines in New York on behalf of James Jacobs and a purported
class of owners of intellectual property rights to musical plays and other works performed in the U.S.
The plaintiffs claim infringement of copyrights to Broadway, off Broadway and other plays. The action
seeks payment of (i) damages, (ii) disgorgement of alleged profits and (iii) an injunction against future
infringement. In the event that an award is given in favor of the plaintiffs, the amount of damages, if
any, which Carnival Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates would have to pay is not currently
determinable. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In 2002 and 2004, two actions (collectively, the "Facsimile Complaints") were filed against Carnival
Corporation on behalf of purported classes of persons who received unsolicited advertisements via
facsimile, alleging that Carnival Corporation and other defendants distributed unsolicited advertisements
via facsimile in contravention of the U.S. Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The plaintiffs seek to
enjoin the sending of unsolicited facsimile advertisements and statutory damages. The 2002 case has been
settled pending execution of the settlement agreement. The ultimate outcome of the remaining Facsimile
Complaint cannot be determined at this time. However, we believe that we have meritorious defenses and we
will continue to vigorously defend this action.
Costa Cruises ("Costa") instituted arbitration proceedings in Italy in 2000 to confirm the validity
of its decision not to deliver its ship, the Costa Classica, to the shipyard of Cammell Laird Holdings
PLC ("Cammell Laird") under a 79 million euro denominated contract for the conversion and lengthening of
the ship in November 2000. Costa also gave notice of termination of the contract in January 2001. It is
expected that the arbitration tribunal's decision will be made by February 2007 at the latest. In the
event that an award is given in favor of Cammell Laird, the amount of damages, if any, which Costa would
have to pay, is not currently determinable. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at
this time.
In the normal course of our business, various other claims and lawsuits have been filed or are
pending against us. Most of these claims and lawsuits are covered by insurance and, accordingly, the
maximum amount of our liability, net of any insurance recoverables, is typically limited to our self-
insurance retention levels. However, the ultimate outcome of these claims and lawsuits which are not
covered by insurance cannot be determined at this time.
Contingent Obligations
At August 31, 2006, Carnival Corporation had contingent obligations totaling approximately $1.1
billion to participants in lease out and lease back type transactions for three of its ships. At the
inception of the leases, the entire amount of the contingent obligations was paid by Carnival Corporation
to major financial institutions to enable them to directly pay these obligations. Accordingly, these
obligations were considered extinguished, and neither the funds nor the contingent obligations have been
included on our balance sheets. Carnival Corporation would only be required to make any payments under
these contingent obligations in the remote event of nonperformance by these financial institutions, all
of which have long-term credit ratings of AA or higher. In addition, Carnival Corporation obtained a
direct guarantee from an AA rated financial institution for $281 million of the above noted contingent
obligations, thereby further reducing the already remote exposure to this portion of the contingent
obligations. In certain cases, if the credit ratings of the major financial institutions who are
directly paying the contingent obligations fall below
AA-, then Carnival Corporation will be required to move those funds being held by those institutions to
other financial institutions whose credit ratings are AA- or above. If Carnival Corporation's credit
rating, which is A-, falls below BBB, it would be required to provide a standby letter of credit for $79
million, or alternatively provide mortgages in the aggregate amount of $79 million on two of its ships.
In the unlikely event that Carnival Corporation were to terminate the three lease agreements early
or default on its obligations, it would, as of August 31, 2006, have to pay a total of $171 million in
stipulated damages. As of August 31, 2006, $180 million of standby letters of credit have been issued by
a major financial institution in order to provide further security for the payment of these contingent
stipulated damages. Between 2017 and 2022, we have the right to exercise options that would terminate
these three lease transactions at no cost to us.
Some of the debt agreements that we enter into include indemnification provisions that obligate us
to make payments to the counterparty if certain events occur. These contingencies generally relate to
changes in taxes, changes in laws that increase lender capital costs and other similar costs. The
indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms and were entered into in the normal course
of business. There are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and we are
not able to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments, if any, under these indemnification
clauses. We have not been required to make any material payments under such indemnification clauses in
the past and, under current circumstances, we do not believe a request for material future
indemnification payments is probable.
War Risk Insurance
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006 we obtained additional war risk insurance, subject to
coverage limits, deductibles and exclusions for claims such as those arising from chemical and biological
attacks, to cover damage or loss to all of our 36 previously uninsured ships, including terrorist risks.
Under the terms of our war risk insurance coverage, which is typical for war risk policies in the marine
industry, underwriters can give seven days notice to the insured that the policies will be cancelled.
NOTE 6 - Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income was as follows (in millions):
Nine Months Three Months
Ended August 31, Ended August 31,
--------------- ---------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
---- ---- ---- ----
Net income $1,863 $1,917 $1,232 $1,181
Items included in accumulated other comprehensive
income
Foreign currency translation adjustment 351 (273) 42 (96)
Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges 12 2 (2) 8
------ ------ ------ ------
Total comprehensive income $2,226 $1,646 $1,272 $1,093
------ ------ ------ ------
NOTE 7 - Segment Information
Our cruise segment includes all of our cruise brands, which have been aggregated as a single
reportable segment based on the similarity of their economic and other characteristics, including
products and services they provide. Our other segment primarily represents the hotel, tour and
transportation operations of Holland America Tours and Princess Tours.
Selected segment information for our cruise and other segments was as follows (in millions):
Nine Months Ended August 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
Selling Depreciation
Operating and admin- and Operating
Revenues expenses istrative amortization income
-------- -------- --------- ------------ ------
2006
Cruise $8,672 $4,852 $1,023 $702 $2,095
Other 449 351 31 25 42
Intersegment elimination (92) (92)
------ ------ ------ ---- ------
$9,029 $5,111 $1,054 $727 $2,137
------ ------ ------ ---- ------
2005
Cruise $8,212 $4,451 $ 943 $651 $2,167
Other 401 307 35 21 38
Intersegment elimination (92) (92)
------ ------ ------ ---- ------
$8,521 $4,666 $ 978 $672 $2,205
------ ------ ------ ---- ------
Three Months Ended August 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
Selling Depreciation
Operating and admin- and Operating
Revenues expenses istrative amortization income
-------- -------- --------- ------------ ------
2006
Cruise $3,603 $1,769 $ 324 $246 $1,264
Other 380 284 11 9 76
Intersegment elimination (78) (78)
------ ------ ------ ---- ------
$3,905 $1,975 $ 335 $255 $1,340
------ ------ ------ ---- ------
2005
Cruise $3,356 $1,598 $ 289 $219 $1,250
Other 329 240 11 7 71
Intersegment elimination (78) (78)
------ ------ ------ ---- ------
$3,607 $1,760 $ 300 $226 $1,321
------ ------ ------ ---- ------
NOTE 8 - Earnings Per Share
Our basic and diluted earnings per share were computed as follows (in millions, except per share
data):
Nine Months Three Months
Ended August 31, Ended August 31,
--------------- ---------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
---- ---- ---- ----
Net income $1,863 $1,917 $1,232 $1,181
Interest on dilutive convertible notes 27 37 9 12
------ ------ ------ ------
Net income for diluted earnings per share $1,890 $1,954 $1,241 $1,193
------ ------ ------ ------
Weighted-average common and ordinary
shares outstanding 804 805 797 806
Dilutive effect of convertible notes 33 43 32 43
Dilutive effect of stock plans 2 6 2 5
----- ----- ----- -----
Diluted weighted-average shares
outstanding 839 854 831 854
----- ----- ----- -----
Basic earnings per share $2.32 $2.38 $1.55 $1.46
----- ----- ----- -----
Diluted earnings per share $2.25 $2.29 $1.49 $1.40
----- ----- ----- -----
Options to purchase 5.7 million (2.2 million in 2005) and 11.3 million (2.2 million in 2005) shares
for the nine and three months ended August 31, 2006, respectively, were excluded from our diluted
earnings per share computation since the effect of including them was anti-dilutive.
NOTE 9 - Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In June, 2006 the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
"Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 clarifies, among other things, the
accounting for uncertain income tax positions by prescribing a minimum probability threshold that a tax
position must meet before a financial statement income tax benefit is recognized. The minimum threshold
is defined as a tax position, that based solely on its technical merits is more likely than not to be
sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority. The tax benefit to be recognized is
measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized
upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 must be applied to all existing tax positions upon adoption. The
cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 at adoption is required to be reported separately as an adjustment
to the opening balance of retained earnings in the year of adoption. FIN 48 is required to be implemented
at the beginning of a fiscal year and is effective for Carnival Corporation & plc for fiscal 2008,
although early adoption is permitted. We have not yet determined the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our
financial statements.