Final Results
FEBRUARY 14, 2005
RELEASE OF CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
PRELIMINARY ANNOUNCEMENT OF CARNIVAL PLC FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 2004
-----------------
Carnival Corporation & plc announced its fourth quarter and annual results of operations in its
earnings release issued on December 16, 2004. Carnival Corporation & plc is hereby announcing that it
has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") a joint Annual Report on Form 10-K
today containing the Carnival Corporation & plc 2004 annual financial statements, which results remain
unchanged from those previously announced on December 16, 2004. However, Carnival Corporation & plc
has updated its fiscal 2005 outlook, which update is included in Schedule A.
The information included in the attached Schedules A and B is extracted from the Form 10-K and
has been prepared in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. Schedules A and B contain the audited
annual consolidated financial statements for Carnival Corporation & plc as of and for the twelve
months ended November 30, 2004, together with management's discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations. These Carnival Corporation & plc consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"), and include the consolidated results of Carnival Corporation
and Carnival plc for the entire year ended November 30, 2004. However, the prior year's reported
comparative information only included the consolidated results of Carnival plc from April 17, 2003,
the date the dual listed company ("DLC") transaction between Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc was
completed, to November 30, 2003. The directors consider that within the DLC arrangement, the most
appropriate presentation of Carnival plc's results and financial position is by reference to the U.S.
GAAP financial statements of Carnival Corporation & plc.
In addition, in accordance with the requirements of the UK Listing Authority ("UKLA"), the
directors are today presenting in the attached Schedule C the preliminary announcement of final
results for Carnival plc standalone as of and for the year ended November 30, 2004. The Carnival plc
group standalone financial information excludes the results of Carnival Corporation and is prepared
under generally accepted accounting principles in the UK ("UK GAAP"). The financial information set
out within Schedule C does not constitute Carnival plc's statutory accounts for the periods ended
November 30, 2004 and 2003. Statutory accounts for 2003 have been delivered to the registrar of
companies, whereas those for 2004 will be delivered following Carnival plc's annual general meeting.
The auditors have reported on those accounts; their reports were unqualified and did not contain
statements under section 237(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 1985.
MEDIA CONTACTS INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACT
US US/UK
Carnival Corporation & plc Carnival Corporation & plc
Tim Gallagher Beth Roberts
001 305 599 2600, ext. 16000 001 305 406 4832
UK
Brunswick
Sophie Fitton/Sarah Tovey
020 7404 5959
The full joint Annual Report on Form 10-K (including the portion extracted for this announcement)
is available for viewing on the SEC web site at www.sec.gov under Carnival Corporation or Carnival plc
or the Carnival Corporation & plc web site at www.carnivalcorp.com or www.carnivalplc.com. A copy of
the joint Annual Report on Form 10-K will be available shortly at the UKLA Document Viewing Facility
of the Financial Services Authority at 25 The North Colonnade, London E14 5HS, United Kingdom.
Carnival Corporation & plc
Carnival Corporation & plc is the largest cruise vacation group in the world, with a portfolio of
12 cruise brands in North America, Europe and Australia, comprised of Carnival Cruise Lines, Holland
America Line, Princess Cruises, Seabourn Cruise Line, Windstar Cruises, AIDA Cruises, Costa Cruises,
Cunard Line, Ocean Village, P&O Cruises, Swan Hellenic, and P&O Cruises Australia.
Together, these brands operate 77 ships totaling more than 132,000 lower berths with 13 new ships
scheduled for delivery between March 2005 and April 2009. Carnival Corporation & plc also operates
the leading tour companies in Alaska and the Canadian Yukon, Holland America Tours and Princess Tours.
Traded on both the New York and London Stock Exchanges, Carnival Corporation & plc is the only group
in the world to be included in both the S&P 500 and the FTSE 100 indices.
Additional information can be obtained via Carnival Corporation & plc's web site at
www.carnivalcorp.com or www.carnivalplc.com or by writing to Carnival plc at Carnival House, 5
Gainsford Street, London SE1 2NE, United Kingdom.
SCHEDULE A
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS UNDER U.S. GAAP
Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results
Some of the statements contained in this 2004 Annual Report are "forward-looking statements" that
involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions with respect to us, including some statements concerning
future results, outlook, plans, goals and other events which have not yet occurred. These statements
are intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability provided by Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can find many, but not all,
of these statements by looking for words like "will," "may," "believes," "expects," "anticipates,"
"forecast," "future," "intends," "plans," and "estimates" and for similar expressions.
Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are many factors that
could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed
or implied in this 2004 Annual Report. Forward-looking statements include those statements which may
impact the forecasting of our earnings per share, net revenue yields, booking levels, pricing,
occupancy, operating, financing and/or tax costs, costs per available lower berth day ("ALBD"),
estimates of ship depreciable lives and residual values, outlook or business prospects. These factors
include, but are not limited to, the following:
- risks associated with the DLC structure, including the uncertainty of its tax status;
- general economic and business conditions, which may impact levels of disposable income
of consumers and net revenue yields for our cruise brands;
- conditions in the cruise and land-based vacation industries, including competition from
other cruise ship operators and providers of other vacation alternatives and increases
in capacity offered by cruise ship and land-based vacation alternatives;
- risks associated with operating internationally;
- the international political and economic climate, armed conflicts, terrorist attacks and
threats thereof, availability of air service, other world events and adverse
publicity, and their impact on the demand for cruises;
- accidents and other incidents affecting the health, safety, security and vacation
satisfaction of passengers, including machinery and equipment failures, which could cause
the cancellation of a cruise or a series of cruises;
- our ability to implement our shipbuilding programs and brand strategies and to continue
to expand our business worldwide;
- our ability to attract and retain qualified shipboard crew and maintain good relations
with employee unions;
- our ability to obtain financing on terms that are favorable or consistent with our
expectations;
- the impact of changes in operating and financing costs, including changes in foreign
currency and interest rates and fuel, food, payroll, insurance and security costs;
- changes in the tax, environmental, health, safety, security and other regulatory
regimes under which we operate;
- continued availability of attractive port destinations;
- our ability to successfully implement cost improvement plans and to integrate business
acquisitions;
- continuing financial viability of our travel agent distribution system and air service
providers; and
- unusual weather patterns or natural disasters.
Forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results. Subject
to any continuing obligations under applicable law or any relevant listing rules, we expressly
disclaim any obligation to disseminate, after the date of this 2004 Annual Report, any updates or
revisions to any such forward-looking statements to reflect any change in expectations or events,
conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based.
Executive Overview
The post-September 11, 2001 travel environment was a challenging period for the travel and
leisure industry. In 2002, demand for travel was weakened due to the September 11th attacks followed
by the conflict in Afghanistan. In 2003, the cruise industry was challenged by, among other things, a
weaker economy and unstable geopolitical environment, the emergence of Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome ("SARS") in Asia and the threat and eventual outbreak of war in Iraq. These events had a
negative effect on the public's willingness to travel, and consequently, negatively impacted our net
revenue yields (see "Key Performance Indicators" below).
In 2004, the effects of those factors on the cruise industry were reduced, and we experienced a
substantial improvement in our net revenue yields. We believe this improvement was primarily the
result of stronger consumer demand for travel, which resulted in higher passenger ticket prices and
onboard revenues and, to a lesser extent, a weaker U.S. dollar relative to the euro and sterling. The
increase in pricing was achieved despite a 17.2% increase in proforma passenger capacity relating to
the introduction of seven new ships in fiscal 2004. In addition, from 2002 through 2004, the cruise
industry was impacted by substantial increases in fuel prices. It is possible that fuel prices may
continue to increase in 2005 and future years.
Throughout this period we generated significant cash flows and remained in a strong financial
position, which is a high priority and we believe provides us with a competitive advantage in the
capital intensive cruise industry. However, our operations are subject to many risks, as briefly
noted above and under the caption "Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results,"
which could adversely impact our future results.
During 2004, we ordered eight new ships for our North American and European brands, which are
expected to be delivered between 2007 and 2009. These new ships are expected to continue to help us
maintain our leadership position within the cruise industry. The year-over-year percentage increases
in Carnival Corporation & plc's ALBD capacity, resulting from new ships entering service, is 8.7%,
6.1%, 7.5%, 6.6% and 2.4% for fiscal 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, based on ships
currently on order.
We believe that given a stable geopolitical environment and the continuing strong demand for
travel, our net revenue yields will increase in 2005.
Outlook For Fiscal 2005 ("2005")
As of December 16, 2004 we said that we were comfortable with earnings per share estimates of
$2.70 for 2005. We also said that we expected our first quarter 2005 earnings per share to be in the
range of $0.38 to $0.40. Our guidance was based on flat fuel pricing compared to 2004, which was in
line with the forward curve for bunker fuel at that time, and an exchange rate of $1.30 to the euro
and $1.86 to the sterling.
On January 20, 2005, we announced that the 1,870-passenger ship Aurora, operated by P&O Cruises,
experienced a technical problem with its propulsion system that forced the cancellation of its 103-
day, 2005 world cruise. We expected that the vessel would be repaired and would return to service
prior to the date it was to end its world cruise and anticipated scheduling revised short replacement
cruises. The cancellation of the world cruise, net of estimated earnings from anticipated replacement
cruises, was expected to reduce 2005 full year earnings per share by approximately $0.05, of which
approximately $0.03 per share was expected to impact the first quarter and the remainder in the second
quarter. We now expect the Aurora to be out of service for a longer duration and anticipate
scheduling fewer replacement cruises. Consequently, we expect the full year 2005 impact to be
approximately $0.06 per share, of which approximately $0.04 per share will effect the first quarter of
2005.
We also expect that there will be $0.01 per share gain from the settlement of litigation recorded
in the first quarter of 2005.
Since our December guidance, fuel prices have risen. Our current forecast uses fuel prices that
are 10% higher than the prior year, which was determined based upon the current forward curve for
bunker fuel, which equates to approximately $0.06 per share on an annual basis.
Since early January 2005, the cruise industry has entered the "wave season," a period of higher
booking levels than during the rest of the year. During the 2005 wave season, company wide booking
levels, on an absolute basis, have been running slightly higher than during the same period last year.
However, pricing during wave season has been significantly higher than during the same period last
year. As of the end of January 2005, we have 10% less inventory remaining to sell for 2005 than at the
same time last year, even with a 9% capacity increase in 2005. We believe our lower inventory
availability provides us with the opportunity to execute our pricing strategies to maximize revenue
yields in 2005.
Based upon the stronger booking trends experienced during the month of January, we remain
comfortable with our previous guidance of $2.70 per share for the full year 2005 and a range of $0.38
to $0.40 per share for the first quarter of 2005, including the aforementioned impact of the Aurora,
the litigation settlement and higher fuel prices. Our current guidance is based upon an exchange rate
of $1.31 to the euro and $1.87 to the sterling.
Net revenue yields for 2005 are now forecasted to increase 4 to 6 percent (3 to 5 percent on a
constant dollar basis), compared to last year. The increase in expected net revenue yields compared
with our previous guidance is largely due to higher prices achieved during the initial month of wave
season partially offset by the impact of the cancellation of the Aurora world cruise. Net cruise
costs per ALBD are now forecast to be up 1 to 3 percent (flat to up 2 percent on a constant dollar
basis) compared to last year. This increase from our prior guidance is primarily because of assumed
higher fuel prices and costs associated with the cancellation of Aurora's world cruise.
We continue to expect that first quarter 2005 net revenue yields will increase approximately 5 to
7 percent (4 to 6 percent on a constant dollar basis), compared to last year. Our first quarter
guidance for net revenue yields remains the same as our previous guidance given in December because
the approximate 1 percent reduction in net revenue yields due to the cancellation of Aurora's world
cruise offset the stronger pricing achieved during the initial month of wave season. We continue to
expect net cruise costs per ALBD to be flat to up 2 percent (down 1 to up 1 percent on a constant
dollar basis), compared to last year. First quarter net cruise costs per ALBD remained the same as our
prior guidance because the impact of the cancellation of the world cruise was offset by the delay in
timing of advertising costs.
Share-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Share-Based Payment Statement
123(R), which will require us to recognize compensation costs in our financial statements in an amount
equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted to employees and directors. This statement is
effective for us in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. We have not yet determined which of the
alternative transition methods we will use upon adoption of this statement. However, based on
preliminary estimates, if we were to elect to adopt this statement with retroactive effect to December
1, 2004, our additional 2005 share-based compensation expense would be approximately $60 million,
which has not been included in the Outlook for 2005.
Key Performance Indicators and Pro Forma Information
We use net cruise revenues per ALBD ("net revenue yields") and net cruise costs per ALBD as
significant non-GAAP financial measures of our cruise segment financial performance. We believe that
net revenue yields are commonly used in the cruise industry to measure a company's cruise segment
revenue performance. This measure is also used for revenue management purposes. In calculating net
revenue yields, we use "net cruise revenues" rather than "gross cruise revenues." We believe that net
cruise revenues is a more meaningful measure in determining revenue yield than gross cruise revenues
because it reflects the cruise revenues earned by us net of our most significant variable costs, which
are travel agent commissions, cost of air transportation and certain other variable direct costs
associated with onboard revenues. Substantially all of our remaining cruise costs are largely fixed
once our ship capacity levels have been determined.
Net cruise costs per ALBD is the most significant measure we use to monitor our ability to
control our cruise segment costs rather than gross cruise costs per ALBD. In calculating net cruise
costs, we exclude the same variable costs as described above, which are included in the calculation of
net cruise revenues. This is done to avoid duplicating these variable costs in these two non-GAAP
financial measures.
We have not provided estimates of future gross revenue yields or future gross cruise costs per
ALBD because the reconciliations of forecasted net cruise revenues to forecasted gross cruise revenues
or forecasted net cruise costs to forecasted cruise operating expenses would require us to forecast,
with reasonable accuracy, the amount of air and other transportation costs that our forecasted cruise
passengers would elect to purchase from us (the "air/sea mix"). Since the forecasting of future
air/sea mix involves several significant variables that are relatively difficult to forecast and the
revenues from the sale of air and other transportation approximate the costs of providing that
transportation, management focuses primarily on forecasts of net cruise revenues and costs rather than
gross cruise revenues and costs. This does not impact, in any material respect, our ability to
forecast our future results, as any variation in the air/sea mix has no material impact on our
forecasted net cruise revenues or forecasted net cruise costs. As such, management does not believe
that this reconciling information would be meaningful.
In addition, because a significant portion of our operations utilize the euro or sterling to
measure their results and financial condition, the translation of those operations to our U.S. dollar
reporting currency results in increases in reported U.S. dollar revenues and expenses if the U.S.
dollar weakens against these foreign currencies, and decreases in reported U.S. dollar revenues and
expenses if the U.S. dollar strengthens against these foreign currencies. Accordingly, we also
monitor our key indicators assuming the 2004 exchange rates have remained constant with the prior
year's comparable rates, or on a "constant dollar basis," in order to remove the impact of changes in
exchange rates on our non U.S. cruise operations. We believe that this is a useful measure indicating
the actual growth of our operations in a fluctuating exchange rate environment.
Our 2003 reported results only included the results of P&O Princess since April 17, 2003.
Consequently, for the years ended November 30, 2004 and 2003, we believe that the most meaningful
comparison of our annual operating income and revenue and cost metrics is to the comparable pro forma
results and metrics in 2003 and 2002, which reflect the operations of both Carnival Corporation and
P&O Princess as if the companies had been consolidated throughout 2003 and 2002. Accordingly, we have
disclosed pro forma information for the year ended November 30, 2003 and 2002, as well as the required
reported information, in the discussion of our results of operations.
The 2003 and 2002 pro forma information were computed by adding the results of P&O Princess'
annual operations, and acquisition adjustments of $16 million and $14 million of depreciation expense
and $3 million and $7 million of interest expense, and excluding $51 million and $103 million of
nonrecurring DLC transaction costs, respectively, to the 2003 and 2002 Carnival Corporation reported
results for the year ended November 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our critical accounting estimates are those which we believe require our most significant
judgments about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. A discussion of our critical
accounting estimates, the underlying judgments and uncertainties used to make them and the likelihood
that materially different estimates would be reported under different conditions or using different
assumptions, is set forth below.
Ship Accounting
Our most significant assets are our ships and ships under construction, which represent 83% of
our total assets. We make several critical accounting estimates dealing with our ship accounting.
First, we compute our ships' depreciation expense, which represents 11.6% of our cruise operating
expenses in fiscal 2004, which requires us to estimate the average useful life of each of our ships,
as well as their residual values. Secondly, we account for ship improvement costs by capitalizing
those costs, which we believe will add value to our ships and depreciate those improvements over their
estimated useful lives. Finally, we account for the replacement or refurbishment of our ship
components based upon their estimated net book value.
We determine the average useful life of our ships based primarily on our estimates of the
weighted-average useful lives and residual values of the ships' major component systems, such as
cabins, main diesels, main electric, superstructure and hull. In addition, we consider, among other
things, the impact of anticipated technological changes, long-term vacation market conditions and
competition and historical useful lives of similarly-built ships. We have estimated our new ships'
average useful lives at 30 years and their average residual values at 15% of our original ship cost.
Given the very large and complex nature of our ships, ship accounting estimates require
considerable judgment and are inherently uncertain. We do not have cost segregation studies performed
to specifically componetize our ship systems. However, we have estimated the useful lives of our
ships to be 30 years based upon our estimates of the relative costs of the major components of a
cruise ship. In addition, since we do not separately componetize our ships, we do not identify and
track depreciation of specific component systems. Therefore, we have to estimate the net book value
of components that are replaced or refurbished, based primarily upon their replacement or
refurbishment cost and the age of the ship.
If materially different conditions existed, or if we materially changed our assumptions of ship
lives and residual values, our depreciation expense or loss on replacement or refurbishment of ship
assets and net book value of our ships would be materially different. In addition, if we change our
assumptions in making our determinations as to whether improvements to a ship add value, the amounts
we expense each year as repair and maintenance costs could increase, partially offset by a decrease in
depreciation expense, as less costs would have been initially capitalized to our ships. Our fiscal
2004 ship depreciation expense would have increased by approximately $21 million for every year we
reduced our estimated average 30 year ship useful life. In addition, if our ships were estimated to
have no residual value, our fiscal 2004 depreciation expense would have increased by approximately
$100 million.
We believe that the estimates we made for ship accounting purposes are reasonable and our methods
are consistently applied and, accordingly, result in depreciation expense that is based on a rational
and systematic method to equitably allocate the costs of our ships to the periods during which
services are obtained from their use. In addition, we believe that the estimates we made are
reasonable and our methods consistently applied (1) in determining the average useful life and average
residual values of our ships; (2) in determining which ship improvement costs add value to our ships;
and (3) in determining the net book value of ship component assets being replaced or refurbished.
Finally, we believe our critical ship accounting estimates are generally comparable with those of
other major cruise companies.
Asset Impairment
The impairment reviews of our ship and trademark assets and of our goodwill, which has been
allocated to our cruise line reporting units, require us to make significant estimates to determine
the fair values of these assets or reporting units.
The determination of fair value includes numerous uncertainties, unless a viable actively traded
market exists for the asset or for a comparable reporting unit, which is usually not the case for
cruise ships, cruise lines and trademarks. For example, in determining fair values of ships and
cruise lines utilizing discounted forecasted cash flows, significant judgments are made concerning,
among other things, future net revenue yields, net cruise costs per ALBD, interest and discount rates,
cruise itineraries, ship additions and retirements, technological changes, consumer demand,
governmental regulations and the effects of competition. In addition, third party appraisers are
sometimes used to determine fair values and some of their valuation methodologies are also subject to
similar types of uncertainties. Also, the determination of fair values of reporting units using a
price earnings multiple approach also requires significant judgments, such as determining reasonably
comparable multiples. Finally, determining trademark fair values also requires significant judgments
in determining both the estimated trademark cash flows, and the appropriate royalty rates to be
applied to those cash flows to determine their fair value. We believe that we have made reasonable
estimates and judgments in determining whether our ships, goodwill and trademarks have been impaired.
However, if there is a material change in the assumptions used in our determination of fair value or
if there is a material change in the conditions or circumstances influencing fair value, we could be
required to recognize a material impairment charge.
Contingencies
We periodically assess the potential liabilities related to any lawsuits or claims brought
against us, as well as for other known unasserted claims, including environmental, legal, passenger
and crew, and tax matters. While it is typically very difficult to determine the timing and ultimate
outcome of these matters, we use our best judgment to determine if it is probable that we will incur
an expense related to the settlement or final adjudication of such matters and whether a reasonable
estimation of such probable loss, if any, can be made. In assessing probable losses, we make estimates
of the amount of insurance recoveries, if any. We accrue a liability when we believe a loss is
probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies," as amended. Such accruals are typically based on
developments to date, management's estimates of the outcomes of these matters, our experience in
contesting, litigating and settling other similar matters, historical claims experience and
actuarially determined assumptions of liabilities, and any related insurance coverage. See Notes 8
and 13 in the accompanying financial statements for additional information concerning our
contingencies.
Given the inherent uncertainty related to the eventual outcome of these matters and potential
insurance recoveries, it is possible that all or some of these matters may be resolved for amounts
materially different from any provisions or disclosures that we may have made with respect to their
resolution. In addition, as new information becomes available, we may need to reassess the amount of
probable liability that needs to be accrued related to our contingencies. All such revisions in our
estimates could materially impact our results of operations and financial position.
Results of Operations
We earn our cruise revenues primarily from the following:
- sales of passenger cruise tickets and, in some cases, the sale of air and other
transportation to and from our ships. The cruise ticket price includes
accommodations, meals, some non-alcoholic beverages, entertainment and many onboard
activities, and
- the sale of goods and/or services primarily on board our ships, which include bar
and some beverage sales, casino gaming, shore excursions, gift shop and spa sales,
photo and art sales and pre-and post cruise land packages. These activities are
either performed directly by us or by independent concessionaires, from which we
receive a percentage of their revenues.
We incur cruise operating costs and expenses for the following:
- the costs of passenger cruise tickets which represent costs that vary directly
with passenger cruise ticket revenues, and include travel agent commissions, air
and other travel related costs and credit card fees,
- onboard and other cruise costs which represent costs that vary directly with
onboard and other revenues, and include the costs of liquor and some beverages,
costs of tangible goods sold by us from our gift, photo and art auction activities,
pre- and post cruise land packages and credit card fees. Concession revenues do not
have any significant amount of costs associated with them, as the costs and
services incurred for these activities are provided by our concessionaires,
- payroll and related costs which represent costs for all our shipboard personnel,
including deck and engine officers and crew and hotel and administrative
employees,
- food costs, which include both our passenger and crew food costs, and
- other ship operating costs which include fuel, repairs and maintenance, port
charges, insurance, entertainment and all other shipboard operating costs and
expenses.
For segment information related to our revenues, expenses, operating income and other financial
information see Note 12 in the accompanying financial statements.
Summary
Our reported and pro forma results of operations and selected statistical information were as
follows:
Years Ended November 30,
Pro Forma Reported Pro Forma Reported
2004 2003 2003 2002 2002
(dollars in millions, except statistical information)
Revenues
Cruise
Passenger tickets $7,357 $5,732 $5,039 $5,128 $3,346
Onboard and other 2,070 1,600 1,420 1,356 898
Other 300 264 259 284 139
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
9,727 7,596 6,718 6,768 4,383
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Costs and Expenses
Operating
Cruise
Commissions, transportation
and other 1,572 1,227 1,021 1,121 658
Onboard and other 359 279 229 240 116
Payroll and related 1,003 841 744 676 458
Food 550 447 393 381 256
Other ship operating 1,763 1,428 1,237 1,149 734
Other 210 198 190 211 108
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total 5,457 4,420 3,814 3,778 2,330
Selling and administrative 1,285 1,103 936 960 609
Depreciation and amortization 812 653 585 534 382
Impairment charge 20 20
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Operating Income 2,173 1,420 1,383 1,476 1,042
Nonoperating Expense, Net (272) (185) (160) (148) (83)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Income Before Income Taxes 1,901 1,235 1,223 1,328 959
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit,
Net (47) (25) (29) 46 57
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Net Income $1,854 $1,210 $1,194 $1,374 $1,016
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Selected Statistical Information
Passengers carried
(in thousands) 6,306 5,422 5,038 4,725 3,549
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Occupancy percentage 104.5% 102.6% 103.4% 103.5% 105.2%
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Gross and net revenue yields were computed by dividing the gross or net revenues, without
rounding, by ALBDs as follows:
Years Ended November 30,
Pro Forma Reported Pro Forma Reported
2004 2003 2003 2002 2002
(in millions, except ALBDs and yields)
Cruise revenues
Passenger tickets $7,357 $5,732 $5,039 $5,128 $3,346
Onboard and other 2,070 1,600 1,420 1,356 898
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Gross cruise revenues 9,427 7,332 6,459 6,484 4,244
Less cruise costs
Commissions, transportation
and other (1,572) (1,227) (1,021) (1,121) (658)
Onboard and other (359) (279) (229) (240) (116)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Net cruise revenues $7,496 $5,826 $5,209 $5,123 $3,470
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
ALBDs 44,009,061 37,554,709 33,309,785 31,962,000 21,435,828
---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------
Gross revenue yields $214.21 $195.23 $193.91 $202.85 $198.01
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net revenue yields $170.32 $155.11 $156.38 $160.25 $161.91
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Gross and net cruise costs per ALBD were computed by dividing the gross or net cruise costs,
without rounding, by ALBDs as follows:
Years Ended November 30,
Pro Forma Reported Pro Forma Reported
2004 2003 2003 2002 2002
(in millions, except ALBDs and costs per ALBD)
Cruise operating expenses $5,247 $4,222 $3,624 $3,567 $2,222
Cruise selling and
administrative expenses 1,231 1,054 896 912 577
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Gross cruise costs 6,478 5,276 4,520 4,479 2,799
Less cruise costs included in net
cruise revenues
Commissions, transportation
and other (1,572) (1,227) (1,021) (1,121) (658)
Onboard and other (359) (279) (229) (240) (116)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Net cruise costs $4,547 $3,770 $3,270 $3,118 $2,025
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
ALBDs 44,009,061 37,554,709 33,309,785 31,962,000 21,435,828
---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------
Gross cruise costs per ALBD $147.20 $140.50 $135.69 $140.15 $130.54
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net cruise costs per ALBD $103.31 $100.38 $ 98.16 $ 97.55 $ 94.43
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Fiscal 2004 ("2004") Compared to Pro Forma 2003 ("pro forma 2003") and Reported Results 2003
("reported 2003")
Revenues
Net cruise revenues increased $1.67 billion, or 29%, to $7.50 billion in 2004 from $5.83 billion
in pro forma 2003. The 17.2% increase in ALBD's between pro forma 2003 and 2004 accounted for $1.0
billion of the increase, and the remaining $670 million was from increased net revenue yields, which
increased 9.8% in 2004 compared to pro forma 2003 (gross revenue yields increased by 9.7%). Net
revenue yields increased in 2004 primarily from higher cruise ticket prices, a 1.9% increase in
occupancy, higher onboard revenues and the weaker U.S. dollar relative to the euro and sterling. Net
revenue yields as measured on a constant dollar basis, where we recompute 2004 net revenue yields at
the foreign currency exchange rates in effect for pro forma 2003, increased 6.6% in 2004. Gross cruise
revenues increased $2.10 billion, or 29%, in 2004 to $9.43 billion from $7.33 billion in pro forma
2003 primarily for the same reasons as net cruise revenues.
Net cruise revenues increased $2.29 billion, or 44%, to $7.50 billion in 2004 from $5.21 billion
in reported 2003. The 32.1% increase in ALBD's between reported 2003 and 2004, which included P&O
Princess for a full year in 2004, but only since April 17, 2003 during 2003, accounted for $1.67
billion of the increase, and the remaining $615 million was from increased net revenue yields, which
increased 8.9% in 2004 compared to 2003 (gross revenue yields increased by 10.5%). Net revenue yields
increased primarily for the same reasons as noted above. Gross cruise revenues increased $2.97
billion, or 46%, in 2004 to $9.43 billion from $6.46 billion for primarily the same reasons as net
cruise revenues.
Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of $261 million in 2004, $201 million in
pro forma 2003 and $192 million in reported 2003, which increased in 2004 compared to both pro forma
2003 and reported 2003 primarily because of the same reasons noted above for net cruise revenues.
Other non-cruise revenues increased $48 million, or 13.7%, to $398 million in 2004 from $350
million in proforma 2003 (an increase of $53 million, or 15.4% from $345 million in reported 2003)
primarily due to the increase in the number of cruise/tours sold, as well as price increases.
Costs and Expenses
Net cruise costs increased $777 million, or 21%, to $4.55 billion in 2004 from $3.77 billion in
pro forma 2003. The 17.2% increase in ALBD's between pro forma 2003 and 2004 accounted for $650
million of the increase, and the remaining $127 million was from increased net cruise costs per ALBD,
which increased 2.9% in 2004 compared to pro forma 2003 (gross cruise costs per ALBD increased 4.8%).
Net cruise costs per ALBD increased primarily due to a 7.8% increase in 2004 fuel prices and the
weaker U.S. dollar relative to the euro and the sterling in 2004. In addition, net cruise costs
increased as a result of the 2004 Atlantic hurricane season and Cunard's $10 million of relocation
costs, resulting from combining the Cunard back-office operations into Princess' operations. Net
cruise costs per ALBD as measured on a constant dollar basis compared to pro forma 2003 declined 0.5%
in 2004. The decrease in constant dollar net cruise costs was primarily the result of the economies of
scale associated with the pro forma 17.2% ALBD increase and synergy savings from the integration
efforts following the DLC transaction. Gross cruise costs increased $1.20 billion, or 23%, in 2004 to
$6.48 billion from $5.23 billion in pro forma 2003 primarily for the same reasons as net cruise costs.
Net cruise costs increased $1.28 billion, or 39%, to $4.55 billion in 2004 from $3.27 billion in
reported 2003. The increase in ALBD's between reported 2003 and 2004 accounted for $1.05 billion of
the increase, and the remaining $230 million was from increased net cruise costs per ALBD, which
increased 5.2% in 2004 compared to reported 2003 (gross cruise costs per ALBD increased 8.5%). Net
cruise costs per ALBD increased primarily for the same reasons as noted above. Gross cruise costs
increased $1.96 billion, or 43%, in 2004 to $6.48 billion from $4.52 billion in reported 2003
primarily for the same reasons as net cruise costs and a higher proportion of P&O Princess brands'
customers who purchased air from us.
Other non-cruise operating expense increased $24 million, or 8.5%, to $308 million in 2004 from
$284 million in pro forma 2003 (an increase of $32 million, or 11.6%, from $276 million in reported
2003) primarily due to the increased volume of cruise/tours sold in 2004.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $159 million, or 24.3%, to $812 million in
2004 from $653 million in pro forma 2003 largely due to the pro forma 17.2% expansion of the combined
fleet and ship improvement expenditures, as well as the impact of a weaker U.S. dollar. Depreciation
and amortization increased by $227 million, or 38.8%, to $812 million in 2004 from $585 million in
reported 2003. This increase was primarily due to the same factors as noted above and the result of
the consolidation of P&O Princess.
Nonoperating (Expense) Income
Net interest expense, excluding capitalized interest, increased to $292 million in 2004 from $217
million in reported 2003, or $75 million, which increase consisted primarily of a $102 million
increase in interest expense from our increased level of average borrowings and a weaker U.S. dollar,
partially offset by a $27 million decrease in interest expense due to lower average borrowing rates.
The higher average debt balances were primarily a result of our consolidation of the former P&O
Princess debt and new ship deliveries.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense increased $18 million from reported 2003 to $47 million in 2004 primarily
because of the increase in Costa's Italian taxable income and other taxes relating to our operations.
Pro Forma 2003 ("pro forma 2003") Compared to Pro Forma 2002 ("pro forma 2002") and Reported Results
2003 ("reported 2003") Compared to Reported Results 2002 ("reported 2002")
Revenues
Net cruise revenues increased $703 million, or 14%, to $5.83 billion in pro forma 2003 from $5.12
billion in pro forma 2002. The 17.5% increase in pro forma ALBD's accounted for $895 million of the
increase, which was partially offset by a $192 million reduction from lower net revenue yields, which
declined 3.2% in pro forma 2003 compared to pro forma 2002 (gross revenue yields decreased 3.8%). Net
revenue yields decreased largely because of lower cruise ticket prices, and to a lesser extent, lower
occupancy levels. Our revenue yields in 2003 were adversely affected by consumer concerns about travel
during the period leading up to the war with Iraq and its eventual outbreak, the uncertain world
economy and the increase in cruise industry capacity. This was partially offset by the weaker U.S.
dollar. Gross cruise revenues increased $848 million, or 13%, in pro forma 2003 to $7.33 billion from
$6.48 billion in pro forma 2002 primarily for the same reasons as net cruise revenues.
Net cruise revenues increased $1.74 billion, or 50%, to $5.21 billion in reported 2003 from $3.47
billion in reported 2002. The 55.4% increase in reported ALBD's, which only included P&O Princess
since April 17, 2003, accounted for $1.92 billion of the increase, which was partially offset by $185
million from lower net revenue yields, which declined 3.4% in reported 2003 compared to reported 2002
(gross revenue yields decreased 2.1%). Net revenue yields decreased primarily for the same reasons as
noted above. Gross cruise revenues increased $2.22 billion, or 52%, in reported 2003 to $6.46 billion
from $4.24 billion in reported 2002 primarily for the same reasons as net cruise revenues.
Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of $201 million in pro forma 2003, $156
million in pro forma 2002, $192 million in reported 2003 and $147 million in reported 2002.
Other non-cruise revenues increased $169 million, or 96%, to $345 million in reported 2003 from
$176 million in reported 2002 due to the consolidation of Princess Tours and P&O Travel Ltd.
Costs and Expenses
Net cruise costs increased $652 million, or 21%, to $3.77 billion in pro forma 2003 from $3.12
billion in pro forma 2002. The 17.5% increase in pro forma ALBD's accounted for $546 million of the
increase, and the remaining $106 million was from increased net cruise costs per ALBD, which increased
2.9% in pro forma 2003 compared to pro forma 2002 (gross cruise cost per ALBD increased 0.2%). Net
cruise costs per ALBD increased primarily due to a 20% increase in fuel prices and the weak U.S.
dollar relative to the euro and the sterling, partially offset by the economies of scale associated
with the 17.5% pro forma ALBD increase. Gross cruise costs increased $797 million, or 18%, in pro
forma 2003 to $5.28 billion from $4.45 billion in pro forma 2002 primarily for the same reasons as net
cruise costs.
Net cruise costs increased $1.25 billion, or 61%, to $3.27 billion in reported 2003 from $2.03
billion in reported 2002. The increase in reported ALBD's accounted for $1.12 billion of the increase
and the remaining $130 million was from increased net cruise costs per ALBD, which increased 3.9% in
reported 2003 compared to reported 2002 (gross cruise cost per ALBD increased 3.9%). Gross cruise
costs increased $1.72 billion, or 61%, in reported 2003 to $4.52 billion from $2.80 billion in
reported 2002 primarily for the same reasons as net cruise costs and a higher proportion of P&O
Princess brands' customers who purchased air from us.
Other non-cruise operating expense increased $131 million, or 90.3%, to $276 million in reported
2003 from $145 million in reported 2002 due to the consolidation of Princess Tours and P&O Travel.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $119 million, or 22.3%, to $653 million in pro
forma 2003 from $534 million in pro forma 2002 largely due to the expansion of the combined fleet and
ship improvement expenditures, as well as the impact of a weaker U.S. dollar. Depreciation and
amortization increased by $203 million, or 53.1%, to $585 million in reported 2003 from $382 million
in reported 2002. Approximately $126 million of this increase was from the consolidation of the
former P&O Princess acquired operations. The majority of the remaining increase was a result of the
expansion of the Carnival Corporation fleet and ship improvement expenditures.
Nonoperating (Expense) Income
Net interest expense, excluding capitalized interest, increased to $217 million in reported 2003
from $118 million in reported 2002, or $99 million, which increase consisted primarily of a $125
million increase in interest expense from our increased level of average borrowings and a weaker U.S.
dollar, partially offset by a $31 million decrease in interest expense due to lower average borrowing
rates. The higher average debt balances were primarily a result of our consolidation of the former
P&O Princess debt and new ship deliveries.
Income Taxes
The income tax expense of $29 million in reported 2003 was primarily due to the consolidation of
Carnival plc's U.S. based Princess Tours and Costa's Italian taxable income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our business provided $3.22 billion of net cash from operations during fiscal 2004, an increase
of $1.28 billion, or 66.4%, compared to fiscal 2003, due primarily to a full year in 2004 of the P&O
Princess operations and significantly higher cash flows from operations. We continue to generate
substantial cash from operations and remain in a strong financial position.
During fiscal 2004, our net expenditures for capital projects were $3.59 billion, of which $3.22
billion was spent for our ongoing new shipbuilding program, including the final delivery payments for
seven new ships. The remaining capital expenditures consisted primarily of $219 million for ship
improvements and refurbishments, and $151 million for Alaska tour assets, cruise port facility
developments and information technology assets.
During fiscal 2004, we borrowed $843 million, which were used primarily to finance a portion of
the Diamond Princess and Sapphire Princess purchase prices. During fiscal 2004, we made $932 million
of debt repayments, which included $330 million of debt repaid prior to its maturity date in order to
reduce our borrowing rates. Finally, we borrowed $272 million of net short-term bank borrowings
primarily to make a portion of the final ship delivery payment for the Costa Magica. We also paid
cash dividends of $400 million in fiscal 2004.
Future Commitments and Funding Sources
At November 30, 2004, our contractual cash obligations, and the effects such obligations are
expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods were as follows (in millions):
Payments Due by Fiscal Year
Contractual Cash
Obligations Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Thereafter
Long-term debt(a) $7,572 $1,281 $1,686 $1,058 $1,435 $ 141 $1,971
Short-term borrowings(a) 381 381
Fixed-rate interest
payments(a) 1,675 211 162 146 210 103 843
Shipbuilding(a) 6,227 1,540 1,400 1,330 1,600 357
Port facilities and
other(a) 806 135 92 73 72 66 368
Operating leases(a) 231 51 37 25 21 18 79
Purchase obligations(b) 465 438 14 9 4
Other long-term
liabilities reflected
on the balance
sheet(c) 284 29 18 18 20 19 180
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total contractual
cash obligations(d) $17,641 $4,066 $3,409 $2,659 $3,362 $ 704 $3,441
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(a) See Notes 6 and 7 in the accompanying financial statements for additional information
regarding these contractual cash obligations. Fixed-rate interest payments represent
cash outflows for fixed interest payments, including interest swapped from a variable-
rate to a fixed-rate, but does not include interest payments on variable-rate debt or
interest swapped from a fixed-rate to a variable-rate, because these amounts cannot be
reasonably estimated.
(b) Represents legally-binding commitments to purchase inventory and other goods and services
made in the normal course of business to meet operational requirements. Many of our
contracts contain clauses that allow us to terminate the contract with notice, and with
or without a termination penalty. Termination penalties are generally an amount less
than the original obligation. Historically, we have not had any significant defaults of
our contractual obligations or incurred significant penalties for termination of our
contractual obligations.
(c) Represents cash outflows for certain of our long-term liabilities that could be
reasonably estimated. The primary outflows are for estimates of our employee benefit
plan obligations, certain deferred income taxes and other long-term liabilities. Other
long-term liabilities, such as deferred income, derivative contracts payable, which
convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt, fair value of hedged commitments and
certain deferred income taxes, have been excluded from the table as they do not require
cash settlement in the future or the timing of the cash outflow cannot be reasonably
estimated.
(d) Foreign currency payments are based on the November 30, 2004 exchange rates.
During 2004, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1 billion of Carnival
Corporation or Carnival plc shares commencing in 2005, subject to certain repurchase restrictions on
Carnival plc shares.
At November 30, 2004, we had liquidity of $3.20 billion, which consisted of $660 million of cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments and $2.54 billion available for borrowing under our
revolving credit facilities. Our revolving credit facilities mature in May and June 2006, except for
Carnival plc's 600 million euro facility, which expires in March 2005, and is currently expected to be
renewed for an additional year. No assurance can be given that we will be successful in extending this
facility. A key to our access to liquidity is the maintenance of our strong credit ratings.
Based primarily on our historical results, current financial condition and future forecasts, we
believe that our existing liquidity and cash flow from future operations will be sufficient to fund
most of our expected capital projects, debt service requirements, dividend payments, working capital
and other firm commitments. In addition, based on our future forecasted operating results and cash
flows for fiscal 2005, we expect to be in compliance with our debt covenants during 2005. However,
our forecasted cash flow from future operations, as well as our credit ratings, may be adversely
affected by various factors, including, but not limited to, those factors noted under "Cautionary Note
Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results." To the extent that we are required, or choose, to
fund future cash requirements, including our future shipbuilding commitments, from sources other than
as discussed above, we believe that we will be able to secure such financing from banks or through the
offering of debt and/or equity securities in the public or private markets. No assurance can be given
that our future operating cash flow will be sufficient to fund future obligations or that we will be
able to obtain additional financing, if necessary.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements, including guarantee contracts, retained
or contingent interests, certain derivative instruments and variable interest entities, that either
have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial
statements.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risks
In 2003, we broadened our global presence through Carnival plc's foreign operations, in addition
to the foreign currency denominated operations of our Costa subsidiary. Specifically, our expanded
international business operations through P&O Cruises, Ocean Village and Swan Hellenic in the UK and
AIDA in Germany subject us to an increasing level of foreign currency exchange risk related to the
sterling and euro because these operations have either the sterling or the euro as their functional
currency. Accordingly, exchange rate fluctuations of the sterling and the euro against the dollar will
affect our reported financial results since the reporting currency for our consolidated financial
statements is the U.S. dollar and the functional currency for our international operations is
generally the local currency. Any weakening of the U.S. dollar against these local functional
currencies has the financial statement effect of increasing the U.S. dollar values reported for cruise
revenues and cruise expenses in our consolidated financial statements. Strengthening of the U.S.
dollar has the opposite effect.
We seek to minimize the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates through our
normal operating and financing activities, including netting certain exposures to take advantage of
any natural offsets and, when considered appropriate, through the use of derivative financial
instruments. The financial impacts of these hedging instruments are generally offset by corresponding
changes in the underlying exposures being hedged. Our policy is to not use any financial instruments
for trading or other speculative purposes.
One of our primary foreign currency exchange rate risks is related to our outstanding commitments
under ship construction contracts denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the
cruise brand that is expected to be operating the ship. These currency commitments are affected by
fluctuations in the value of the functional currency as compared to the currency in which the
shipbuilding contract is denominated. We generally use foreign currency swaps to manage foreign
currency exchange rate risk from ship construction contracts (see Notes 2, 7 and 11 in the
accompanying financial statements). Accordingly, increases and decreases in the fair value of these
foreign currency swaps offset changes in the fair value of the foreign currency denominated ship
construction commitments, thus resulting in the elimination of such risk.
Specifically, we have foreign currency swaps for three of our euro denominated shipbuilding
contracts. At November 30, 2004, the fair value of these foreign currency swaps was an unrealized
gain of $219 million which is recorded, along with an offsetting $219 million fair value liability
related to our shipbuilding firm commitments, on our accompanying 2004 balance sheet. Based upon a
10% strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar compared to the euro as of November 30, 2004,
assuming no changes in comparative interest rates, the estimated fair value of these foreign currency
swaps would decrease or increase by $105 million, which would be offset by a decrease or increase of
$105 million in the U.S. dollar value of the related foreign currency ship construction commitments
resulting in no net dollar impact to us.
However, at November 30, 2004, we also have three shipbuilding contracts denominated in euros,
one of which has been assigned to a sterling functional currency company and two, which are still
unassigned, for which we have not entered into any foreign currency swaps. At current exchange rates,
it is most likely that these two contracts will be assigned to one of our cruise brands whose
functional currency is the euro or sterling.
The cost of shipbuilding orders that we may place in the future for our cruise lines who generate
their cash flows in a currency that is different than the shipyard's operating currency, generally the
euro, is expected to be affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Given the decline in
the U.S. dollar relative to the euro, the U.S. dollar cost to order new cruise ships at current
exchange rates has increased significantly. If the U.S. dollar remains at current levels or declines
further, this may affect our ability to order future new cruise ships for U.S. dollar functional
currency brands.
Finally, we consider our investments in foreign subsidiaries to be denominated in relatively
stable currencies and of a long-term nature. We partially address these exposures by denominating a
portion of our debt or entering into foreign currency swaps in our subsidiaries' functional currencies
(generally euros or sterling). Specifically, we have debt of $2.2 billion in euros and $415 million
in sterling and have $887 million of foreign currency swaps, whereby we have converted $251 million of
U.S. dollar debt into sterling debt, $466 million of U.S. dollar debt into euro debt and $170 million
of euro debt into sterling debt, thus partially offsetting this foreign currency exchange rate risk.
At November 30, 2004, the fair value of these foreign currency swaps was an unrealized loss of $137
million, which is recorded in AOCI and offsets a portion of the gains recorded in AOCI upon
translating these foreign subsidiaries net assets into U.S. dollars. Based upon a 10% hypothetical
increase or decrease in the November 30, 2004 foreign currency exchange rate, we estimate that these
contracts fair values would increase or decrease by $89 million, which would be offset by a decrease
or increase of $89 million in the U.S. dollar value of our net investments.
Interest Rate Risks
We seek to minimize the impact of fluctuations in interest rates through our long-term investment
and debt portfolio strategies, which include entering into a substantial amount of fixed rate debt
instruments. We continuously evaluate our debt portfolio, and make periodic adjustments to the mix of
floating rate and fixed rate debt based on our view of interest rate movements through the use of
interest rate swaps. Accordingly in 2003 and 2001, we entered into fixed to variable interest rate
swaps, which lowered our fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 interest costs, and are also expected to lower our
fiscal 2005 interest costs. At November 30, 2004, 68% of the interest cost on our long-term debt was
effectively fixed and 32% was variable, including the effect of our interest rate swaps.
Specifically, we have interest rate swaps at November 30, 2004, which effectively changed $929
million of fixed rate debt to Libor-based floating rate debt. In addition, we have interest rate
swaps at November 30, 2004, which effectively changed $828 million of euribor floating rate debt to
fixed rate debt. The fair value of our long-term debt and interest rate swaps at November 30, 2004
was $8.46 billion. Based upon a hypothetical 10% decrease or increase in the November 30, 2004 market
interest rates, the fair value of our long-term debt and interest rate swaps would increase or
decrease by approximately $100 million and interest expense on our variable rate debt, including the
effect of our interest rate swaps, would increase or decrease by approximately $8 million.
In addition, based upon a hypothetical 10% decrease or increase in Carnival Corporation's
November 30, 2004 common stock price, the fair value of our convertible notes would increase or
decrease by approximately $230 million.
These hypothetical amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest
rates and common stock price on our existing long-term debt and interest rate swaps. This analysis
does not consider the effects of the changes in the level of overall economic activity that could
exist in such environments or any relationships which may exist between interest rate and stock price
movements. Furthermore, since substantially all of our fixed rate long-term debt cannot currently be
called or prepaid and $828 million of our variable rate long-term debt is subject to interest rate
swaps which effectively fix the interest rate, it is unlikely we would be able to take any significant
steps in the short-term to mitigate our exposure in the unlikely event of a significant decrease in
market interest rates.
Bunker Fuel Price Risks
We have typically not used financial instruments to hedge our exposure to the bunker fuel price
market risk. Based upon a 10% hypothetical increase or decrease in our fiscal 2004 average bunker fuel
price of $194 per ton, we estimate that our fiscal 2005 bunker fuel cost would increase or decrease by
approximately $55 million.
SCHEDULE B
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC - U.S. GAAP CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share data)
Years Ended November 30,
2004 2003 2002
Revenues
Cruise
Passenger tickets $7,357 $5,039 $3,346
Onboard and other 2,070 1,420 898
Other 300 259 139
------ ------ ------
9,727 6,718 4,383
------ ------ ------
Costs and Expenses
Operating
Cruise
Commissions, transportation and other 1,572 1,021 658
Onboard and other 359 229 116
Payroll and related 1,003 744 458
Food 550 393 256
Other ship operating 1,763 1,237 734
Other 210 190 108
------ ------ ------
Total 5,457 3,814 2,330
Selling and administrative 1,285 936 609
Depreciation and amortization 812 585 382
Impairment charge 20
------ ------ ------
7,554 5,335 3,341
------ ------ ------
Operating Income 2,173 1,383 1,042
------ ------ ------
Nonoperating (Expense) Income
Interest income 17 27 32
Interest expense, net of
capitalized interest (284) (195) (111)
Other (expense) income, net (5) 8 (4)
------ ------ ------
(272) (160) (83)
------ ------ ------
Income Before Income Taxes 1,901 1,223 959
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit, Net (47) (29) 57
------ ------ ------
Net Income $1,854 $1,194 $1,016
------ ------ ------
Earnings Per Share
Basic $2.31 $1.66 $1.73
----- ----- -----
Diluted $2.24 $1.63 $1.69
----- ----- -----
Dividends Per Share $0.525 $0.440 $0.420
------ ------ ------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except par/stated values)
November 30,
ASSETS 2004 2003
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 643 $ 610
Short-term investments 17 461
Accounts receivable, net 409 403
Inventories 240 171
Prepaid expenses and other 266 212
Fair value of derivative contracts 153 275
------- -------
Total current assets 1,728 2,132
------- -------
Property and Equipment, Net 20,823 17,522
Goodwill 3,321 3,031
Trademarks 1,306 1,324
Other Assets 458 482
------- -------
$27,636 $24,491
------- -------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Short-term borrowings $ 381 $ 94
Current portion of long-term debt 681 392
Convertible debt subject to current put option 600 -
Accounts payable 631 634
Accrued liabilities and other 721 568
Customer deposits 1,873 1,358
Fair value of hedged firm commitments 147 264
------- -------
Total current liabilities 5,034 3,310
------- -------
Long-Term Debt 6,291 6,918
Other Long-Term Liabilities and Deferred Income 551 470
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 7, 8 and 13)
Shareholders' Equity
Common stock of Carnival Corporation; $.01 par
value; 1,960 shares authorized; 634 shares at 2004
and 630 shares at 2003 issued and outstanding 6 6
Ordinary shares of Carnival plc; $1.66 stated value;
226 shares authorized; 212 shares at 2004 and
210 at 2003 issued 353 349
Additional paid-in capital 7,311 7,163
Retained earnings 8,623 7,191
Unearned stock compensation (16) (18)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 541 160
Treasury stock; 42 shares of Carnival plc at cost (1,058) (1,058)
------- -------
Total shareholders' equity 15,760 13,793
------- -------
$27,636 $24,491
------- -------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
Years Ended November 30,
2004 2003 2002
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $1,854 $1,194 $1,016
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization 812 585 382
Impairment charge 20
Accretion of original issue discount 21 20 19
Other 16 8 14
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
excluding business acquired
Decrease (increase) in
Receivables 11 (91) (5)
Inventories (73) (17) 2
Prepaid expenses and other (54) 82 (81)
(Decrease) increase in
Accounts payable (28) 43 (12)
Accrued and other liabilities 178 (16) (28)
Customer deposits 479 125 142
------ ------ ------
Net cash provided by operating activities 3,216 1,933 1,469
------ ------ ------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment (3,586) (2,516) (1,986)
Sales of short-term investments 1,216 3,745 4,598
Purchases of short-term investments (772) (3,803) (4,637)
Cash acquired from (expended for) the acquisition
of P&O Princess, net 140 (30)
Proceeds from retirement of property and equipment 77 51 4
Other, net (24) (50) (10)
------ ------ ------
Net cash used in investing activities (3,089) (2,433) (2,061)
------ ------ ------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 843 2,123 232
Principal repayments of long term debt (932) (1,137) (190)
Dividends paid (400) (292) (246)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings, net 272 94
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 142 53 7
Other (4) (15) (1)
------ ------ ------
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities (79) 826 (198)
------ ------ ------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents (15) (23) (5)
------ ------ ------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents 33 303 (795)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 610 307 1,102
------ ------ ------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 654 $1,070 $ 667
------ ------ ------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in millions)
Accum-
Unear- ulated
Addit- ned compre- Total
Compre- Ordin- ional stock hensive Trea- share-
hensive Common ary paid-in Retained compen- income/ sury holders'
income stock shares capital earnings sation (loss) stock equity
Balances at November 30, 2001 $ 6 $1,805 $5,556 $(12) $(37) $(727) $6,591
--- ------ ------ ---- ---- ----- ------
Comprehensive income
Net income $1,016 1,016 1,016
Foreign currency
translation adjustment 51 51 51
Minimum pension liability
adjustment (9) (9) (9)
Unrealized gains on
marketable securities, net 3 3 3
------
Total comprehensive income $1,061
------
Cash dividends declared (246) (246)
Issuance of stock under stock
plans 11 (4) 7
Retirement of treasury stock (727) 727
Amortization of unearned stock
compensation 5 5
--- ---- ------ ------ ---- ---- ----- ------
Balances at November 30, 2002 6 1,089 6,326 (11) 8 7,418
Comprehensive income
Net income $1,194 1,194 1,194
Foreign currency
translation adjustment 162 162 162
Unrealized losses on
marketable securities, net (1) (1) (1)
Changes related to cash flow
derivative hedges, net (9) (9) (9)
------
Total comprehensive income $1,346
------
Cash dividends declared (329) (329)
Acquisition of Carnival plc $346 6,010 (1,058) 5,298
Issuance of stock under stock
plans 3 64 (14) 53
Amortization of unearned stock
compensation 7 7
--- ---- ------ ------ ---- ---- ----- ------
Balances at November 30, 2003 6 349 7,163 7,191 (18) 160 (1,058) 13,793
Comprehensive income
Net income $1,854 1,854 1,854
Foreign currency
translation adjustment 398 398 398
Unrealized loss on
marketable securities (1) (1) (1)
Minimum pension liability
adjustments (3) (3) (3)
Changes related to cash flow
derivative hedges, net (13) (13) (13)
------
Total comprehensive income $2,235
------
Cash dividends declared (422) (422)
Issuance of stock under stock
plans 4 148 (7) 145
Amortization of unearned stock
compensation 9 9
--- ---- ------ ------ ---- ---- ----- ------
Balances at November 30, 2004 $ 6 $353 $7,311 $8,623 $ (16) $ 541 $(1,058) $15,760
--- ---- ------ ------ ---- ---- ----- ------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 General
Description of Business
Carnival Corporation is incorporated in Panama, and Carnival plc is incorporated in England and
Wales. Together with their consolidated subsidiaries they are referred to collectively in these
consolidated financial statements and elsewhere in this 2004 Annual Report as "Carnival Corporation &
plc," "our," "us," and "we." Our consolidated financial statements only include the results of
operations of the former P&O Princess Cruises plc since April 17, 2003.
On April 17, 2003, Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc (formerly known as P&O Princess Cruises
plc or "P&O Princess") completed a dual listed company ("DLC") transaction (the "DLC transaction"),
which implemented Carnival Corporation & plc's DLC structure. The DLC transaction combined the
businesses of Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc through a number of contracts and through
amendments to Carnival Corporation's articles of incorporation and by-laws and to Carnival plc's
memorandum of association and articles of association. The two companies have retained their separate
legal identities, however, they operate as if they were a single economic enterprise. Each company's
shares continue to be publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") for Carnival Corporation
and the London Stock Exchange for Carnival plc. In addition, Carnival plc American Depository Shares
("ADSs") are traded on the NYSE. See Note 3.
We are the largest cruise company and one of the largest vacation companies in the world. As of
February 7, 2005, a summary of the number of cruise ships we operate, by brand, their passenger
capacity and the primary areas in which they are marketed is as follows:
Cruise Number Passenger Primary
Brands of Cruise Ships Capacity (a) Market
Carnival Cruise
Lines 20 44,866 North America
Princess Cruises
("Princess") 14 28,332 North America
Costa Cruises ("Costa") 11 18,272 Europe
Holland America Line 12 16,930 North America
P&O Cruises 4 7,724 United Kingdom
AIDA Cruises ("AIDA") 4 5,378 Germany
Cunard Line ("Cunard") 2 4,410 North America and United Kingdom
P&O Cruises Australia 2 2,686 Australia and New Zealand
Ocean Village 1 1,578 United Kingdom
Swan Hellenic 1 678 United Kingdom
Seabourn Cruise Line
("Seabourn") 3 624 North America
Windstar Cruises 3 604 North America
-- -------
77 132,082
-- -------
(a) In accordance with cruise industry practice, passenger capacity is calculated based
on two passengers per cabin even though some cabins can accommodate three or more
passengers.
Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported and disclosed in our financial statements. Actual results could differ
from these estimates. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
NOTE 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
We consolidate entities over which we have control (see Note 3), as typically evidenced by a
direct ownership interest of greater than 50%. For affiliates where significant influence over
financial and operating policies exists, as typically evidenced by a direct ownership interest from
20% to 50%, the investment is accounted for using the equity method.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
Cash and cash equivalents include investments with original maturities of three months or less,
which are stated at cost. At November 30, 2004 and 2003, cash and cash equivalents included $495
million and $477 million of investments, respectively, primarily comprised of investment grade asset-
backed debt obligations, commercial paper and money market funds.
Substantially all our short-term investments are comprised of investment grade variable rate debt
obligations, which are asset-backed and categorized as available-for-sale. Accordingly, our
investments in these securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value due to their
variable interest rates, which typically reset every 28 days. Despite the long-term nature of their
stated contractual maturities, we have the ability to quickly liquidate these securities. As a
result of the resetting variable rates, we had no cumulative gross unrealized or realized holding
gains or losses from these investments. All income generated from these investments was recorded
as interest income.
Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of provisions, gift shop and art merchandise held for resale, fuel
and supplies carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted-average or
first-in, first-out methods.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization were computed using the
straight line method over our estimates of average useful lives and residual values, as a percentage
of original cost, as follows:
Residual
Values Years
Ships 15% 30
Ship improvements 0% or 15% 2 to remaining
life of ship
Buildings and improvements 0-10% 5-40
Transportation equipment and other 0-25% 2-20
Leasehold improvements, including port facilities Shorter of lease term
or related asset life
We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be fully recoverable. The assessment of
possible impairment is based on our ability to recover the carrying value of our asset based on our
estimate of its undiscounted future cash flows. If these estimated undiscounted future cash flows are
less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess, if any,
of the asset's carrying value over its estimated fair value (see Note 4).
Dry-dock costs primarily represent planned major maintenance activities that are incurred when a
ship is taken out of service for scheduled maintenance. These costs are included in prepaid expenses
and are amortized to other ship operating expenses using the straight-line method generally over one
year.
Ship improvement costs that we believe add value to our ships are capitalized to the ships, and
depreciated over the improvements' estimated useful lives, while costs of repairs and maintenance are
charged to expense as incurred. Upon replacement or refurbishment of previously capitalized ship
components, these assets' estimated cost and accumulated depreciation are written off.
We capitalize interest on ships and other capital projects during their construction period.
Goodwill
We review our goodwill for impairment annually, or, when events or circumstances dictate, more
frequently. All of our goodwill has been allocated to our cruise reporting units. In April 2003, we
recorded $2.25 billion of goodwill as a result of our acquisition of Carnival plc (see Note 3). There
were no other significant changes to our goodwill carrying amounts since November 30, 2002, other than
the changes resulting from using different foreign currency translation rates at each balance sheet
date, except as noted below.
During 2004, we increased the fair values of the P&O Princess publicly traded debt, and
correspondingly, goodwill, by $61 million to take into account the extension of Carnival Corporation's
guarantee to cover this debt as of the acquisition date. In addition, we reduced the fair value of
P&O Princess' trademarks and, correspondingly increased goodwill by $54 million to properly value our
acquired trademarks as of the acquisition date. The impact of these changes on our current and prior
period financial statements was immaterial.
Our goodwill impairment reviews consist of a two-step process of first determining the fair value
of the reporting unit and comparing it to the carrying value of the net assets allocated to the
reporting unit. Fair values of our reporting units were determined based on our estimates of
comparable market price or discounted future cash flows. If this fair value exceeds the carrying
value, which was the case for our reporting units, no further analysis or goodwill write-down is
required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value of the net assets,
the implied fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all the underlying assets and
liabilities, including both recognized and unrecognized tangible and intangible assets, based on their
fair value. If necessary, goodwill is then written-down to its implied fair value.
Trademarks
The cost of developing and maintaining our trademarks have been expensed as incurred. However,
pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations,"
commencing for acquisitions made after June 2001, we have allocated a portion of the purchase price to
the acquiree's identified trademarks. The trademarks that Carnival Corporation recorded as part of the
DLC transaction, which are estimated to have an indefinite useful life and, therefore, are not
amortizable, are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently when events or circumstances
indicate that the trademark may be impaired. Our trademarks would be considered impaired if their
carrying value exceeds their fair value. See Note 3.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We utilize derivative and nonderivative financial instruments, such as foreign currency swaps and
foreign currency obligations to limit our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rate swaps to manage our interest rate exposure and to achieve a desired proportion of
variable and fixed rate debt (see Notes 6 and 11).
All derivatives are recorded at fair value, and the changes in fair value must be immediately
included in earnings if the derivatives do not qualify as effective hedges. If a derivative is a fair
value hedge, then changes in the fair value of the derivative are offset against the changes in the
fair value of the underlying hedged firm commitment. If a derivative is a cash flow hedge, then
changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income ("AOCI") until the underlying hedged item is recognized in earnings. If a
derivative or a nonderivative financial instrument is designated as a hedge of a net investment in a
foreign operation, then changes in the fair value of the financial instrument are recognized as a
component of AOCI to offset the change in the translated value of the net investment being hedged,
until the investment is liquidated. We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments
and hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking our hedge
transactions.
We classify the fair value of our derivative contracts and the fair value of our offsetting
hedged firm commitments as either current or long-term assets and liabilities depending on whether the
maturity date of the derivative contract is within or beyond one year from our balance sheet dates.
The cash flows from derivatives treated as hedges are classified in our statements of cash flows in
the same category as the item being hedged.
During fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, all net changes in the fair value of both our fair value
hedges and the offsetting hedged firm commitments and our cash flow hedges were immaterial, as were
any ineffective portions of these hedges. No fair value hedges or cash flow hedges were derecognized
or discontinued in fiscal 2004, 2003 or 2002, and the amount of estimated cash flow hedges unrealized
net losses which are expected to be reclassified to earnings in the next twelve months is
approximately $24 million.
Finally, if any shipyard with which we have contracts to build our ships is unable to perform, we
would be required to perform under our foreign currency swaps related to these shipbuilding contracts.
Accordingly, based upon the circumstances, we may have to discontinue the accounting for those
currency swaps as hedges, if the shipyard cannot perform. However, we believe that the risk of
shipyard nonperformance is remote.
Revenue and Expense Recognition
Guest cruise deposits represent unearned revenues and are initially recorded as customer deposit
liabilities when received. Customer deposits are subsequently recognized as cruise revenues, together
with revenues from onboard and other activities and all associated direct costs of a voyage, generally
upon completion of voyages with durations of ten nights or less and on a pro rata basis for voyages in
excess of ten nights. Future travel discount vouchers issued to guests are typically recorded as a
reduction of revenues when such vouchers are utilized. Revenues and expenses from our tour and travel
services are recognized at the time the services are performed or expenses are incurred.
Insurance/Self-Insurance
We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance for a number of risks including claims
related to crew and passengers, hull and machinery, workers' compensation and general liability.
Liabilities associated with these risks, including estimates for crew and passenger claims, are
estimated based on, among other things, historical claims experience, severity factors and other
actuarial assumptions. Our expected loss accruals are based on estimates, and while we believe the
amounts accrued are adequate, the ultimate loss may differ from the amounts provided.
Advertising Costs
Substantially all our advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred except costs which
result in tangible assets, such as brochures, which are recorded as prepaid expenses and charged to
expense as consumed. Media production costs are also recorded as prepaid expenses and charged to
expense upon the first airing of the advertisement. Advertising expenses totaled $425 million, $334
million and $208 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At November 30, 2004 and 2003,
the amount of advertising costs included in prepaid expenses was not material.
Foreign Currency Translations and Transactions
For our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates using the local currency as their functional
currency, assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet
dates. Revenues and expenses of these foreign subsidiaries and affiliates are translated at weighted-
average exchange rates for the period. Equity is translated at historical rates and the resulting
cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments resulting from this process are included as a
component of AOCI. Therefore, the U.S. dollar value of these items in our financial statements
fluctuates from period to period, depending on the value of the dollar against these functional
currencies.
Exchange gains and losses arising from the remeasurement of transactions and monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity involved are
immediately included in our earnings, unless such liabilities have been designated to act as a hedge
of a net investment in a foreign operation.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of
shares of common stock and ordinary shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share
is computed by dividing adjusted net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock
and ordinary shares, common stock equivalents and other potentially dilutive securities outstanding
during each period.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we elected to early adopt Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF")
No. 04-08, "Accounting Issues Related to Certain Features of Contingently Convertible Debt and the
Effect on Diluted Earnings Per Share." This statement requires all shares that are issuable under our
outstanding convertible notes that have contingent share conversion features to be considered
outstanding for our diluted earnings per share computations, if dilutive, using the "if converted"
method of accounting from the date of issuance. In prior periods, these shares were only included in
our diluted earnings per share computations if Carnival Corporation's common stock price had reached
certain conversion trigger prices. As required by EITF No. 04-08, we have retroactively restated our
2003 and 2002 diluted earnings per share amounts. Our previously reported diluted earnings per share
for 2003 and 2002 were $1.66 and $1.73, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
Pursuant to SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," as amended, we elected to
use the intrinsic value method of accounting for our employee and director stock-based compensation
awards instead of the fair value method. Accordingly, we have not recognized compensation expense for
our noncompensatory employee and director stock option awards. Our adjusted net income and adjusted
earnings per share, had we elected to adopt the fair value approach of SFAS No. 123, which charges
earnings for the estimated fair value of stock options, would have been as follows (in millions,
except per share amounts):
Years ended November 30,
2004 2003 2002
Net income, as reported $1,854 $1,194 1,016
Stock-based compensation
expense included in
net income, as reported 11 7 5
Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under
the fair value-based
method for all awards (66)(a) (36) (30)
------ ------ ------
Adjusted net income for basic
earnings per share 1,799 1,165 991
Interest on dilutive convertible notes 49 43 35
------ ------ ------
Adjusted net income for diluted
earnings per share $1,848 $1,208 $1,026
------ ------ ------
Earnings per share
Basic
As reported $ 2.31 $ 1.66 $ 1.73
------ ------ ------
Adjusted $ 2.24 $ 1.62 $ 1.69
------ ------ ------
Diluted(b)
As reported $ 2.24 $ 1.63 $ 1.69
------ ------ ------
Adjusted $ 2.18 $ 1.60 $ 1.66
------ ------ ------
(a) During fiscal 2004, we completed a corporate reorganization. As a result of that
reorganization, 1.6 million unvested options held by employees vested immediately and
their termination dates were accelerated to 2004. This vesting occurred either in
accordance with the terms of the option plan or to avoid having these employees and
Carnival Corporation incur unduly burdensome taxes upon the exercise of such options at a
later date. As a result of this accelerated vesting, we included an additional $19
million of stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair value based method
in the adjusted 2004 net income.
(b) The 2003 and 2002 diluted earnings per share amounts have been restated as a result of
early adoption of EITF No. 04-08 and we have reduced previously reported diluted earnings
per share amounts by $0.03 and $0.04, respectively.
As recommended by SFAS No. 123, the fair value of options were estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes weighted-average assumptions were as follows:
Years ended November 30,
2004 2003 2002
Fair value of options at the
dates of grant $15.87 $13.33 $12.16
------ ------ ------
Risk free interest rates 3.4% 3.5% 4.3%
------ ------ ------
Dividend yields 1.36% 1.30% 1.23%
------ ------ ------
Expected volatility 35.0% 48.7% 48.0%
------ ------ ------
Expected option life (in years) 5.75 6 6
------ ------ ------
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options that have no vesting or trading restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option-pricing models require the input of subjective assumptions, including expected stock price
volatility. Because our options have characteristics different from those of traded options, the
existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our options.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
"Share-Based Payment Statement 123(R)," which will require us to recognize compensation costs in our
financial statements in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted to employees
and directors. This statement is effective for us in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. We have not
yet determined which of the alternative transition methods we will use upon adoption of this new
statement. However, based on preliminary estimates, if we were to elect to adopt this statement with
retroactive effect to December 1, 2004, our additional 2005 share-based compensation expense would be
approximately $60 million.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
As part of our ongoing control procedures, we monitor concentrations of credit risk associated
with financial and other institutions with which we conduct significant business. Credit risk,
including counterparty nonperformance under derivative instruments, contingent obligations and new
ship progress payment guarantees, is considered minimal, as we primarily conduct business with large,
well-established financial institutions who have long-term credit ratings of A or above and we seek to
diversify our counterparties. In addition, we have established guidelines regarding credit ratings
and investment maturities that we follow to maintain safety and liquidity. We do not anticipate
nonperformance by any of our significant counterparties.
We also monitor the creditworthiness of our customers to which we grant credit terms in the
normal course of our business. Concentrations of credit risk associated with these receivables are
considered minimal primarily due to their short maturities and large number of accounts within our
customer base. We have experienced only minimal credit losses on our trade receivables. We do not
normally require collateral or other security to support normal credit sales. However, we do normally
require collateral and/or guarantees to support notes receivable on significant asset sales and new
ship progress payments to shipyards.
Reclassifications
Reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year
presentation, including reclassifying $460 million of variable rate debt obligations from their
previously reported classification as cash equivalents to short-term investments at November 30, 2003.
We have also made corresponding adjustments to our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for fiscal
2003 and 2002, to reflect the gross purchases and sales of these variable rate securities as investing
activities rather than as a component of cash and cash equivalents. We reclassified our previously
reported cash and cash equivalents at November 30, 2002 and 2001 by $360 million and $319 million,
respectively. These changes in classification do not affect previously reported cash flows from
operations or financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
NOTE 3 - DLC Transaction
The contracts governing the DLC structure provide that Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc each
continue to have separate boards of directors, but the boards and senior executive management of both
companies are identical. The amendments to the constituent documents of each of the companies also
provide that, on most matters, the holders of the common equity of both companies effectively vote as
a single body. On specified matters where the interests of Carnival Corporation's shareholders may
differ from the interests of Carnival plc's shareholders (a "class rights action"), each shareholder
body will vote separately as a class, such as transactions primarily designed to amend or unwind the
DLC structure. Generally, no class rights action will be implemented unless approved by both
shareholder bodies.
Upon the closing of the DLC transaction, Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc also executed the
Equalization and Governance Agreement, which provides for the equalization of dividends and
liquidation distributions based on an equalization ratio and contains provisions relating to the
governance of the DLC structure. Because the current equalization ratio is 1 to 1, one Carnival plc
ordinary share is entitled to the same distributions, subject to the terms of the Equalization and
Governance Agreement, as one share of Carnival Corporation common stock. In a liquidation of either
company or both companies, if the hypothetical potential per share liquidation distributions to each
company's shareholders are not equivalent, taking into account the relative value of the two
companies' assets and the indebtedness of each company, to the extent that one company has greater net
assets so that any liquidation distribution to its shareholders would not be equivalent on a per share
basis, the company with the ability to make a higher net distribution is required to make a payment to
the other company to equalize the possible net distribution to shareholders, subject to certain
exceptions.
At the closing of the DLC transaction, Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc also executed deeds
of guarantee. Under the terms of Carnival Corporation's deed of guarantee, Carnival Corporation has
agreed to guarantee all indebtedness and certain other monetary obligations of Carnival plc that are
incurred under agreements entered into on or after the closing date of the DLC transaction. The terms
of Carnival plc's deed of guarantee are identical to those of Carnival Corporation's. In addition,
Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc have each extended their respective deeds of guarantee to the
other's pre-DLC indebtedness and other monetary obligations, thus effectively cross guaranteeing all
Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc indebtedness and other monetary obligations. Each deed of
guarantee provides that the creditors to whom the obligations are owed are intended third party
beneficiaries of such deed of guarantee.
The deeds of guarantee are governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the Isle of Man.
Subject to the terms of the guarantees, the holders of indebtedness and other obligations that are
subject to the guarantees will have recourse to both Carnival plc and Carnival Corporation though a
Carnival plc creditor must first make written demand on Carnival plc and a Carnival Corporation
creditor on Carnival Corporation. Once the written demand is made by letter or other form of notice,
the holders of indebtedness or other obligations may immediately commence an action against the
relevant guarantor. There is no requirement under the deeds of guarantee to obtain a judgment, take
other enforcement actions or wait any period of time prior to taking steps against the relevant
guarantor. All actions or proceedings arising out of or in connection with the deeds of guarantee
must be exclusively brought in courts in England.
Under the terms of the DLC transaction documents, Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc are
permitted to transfer assets between the companies, make loans or investments in each other and
otherwise enter into intercompany transactions. The companies have entered into some of these types of
transactions and expect to enter into additional transactions in the future to take advantage of the
flexibility provided by the DLC structure and to operate both companies as a single unified economic
enterprise in the most effective manner. In addition, under the terms of the Equalization and
Governance Agreement and the deeds of guarantee, the cash flow and assets of one company are required
to be used to pay the obligations of the other company, if necessary.
Given the DLC structure as described above, we believe that providing separate financial
statements for each of Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc would not present a true and fair view of
the economic realities of their operations. Accordingly, separate financial statements for both
Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc have not been presented.
Simultaneously with the completion of the DLC transaction, a partial share offer ("PSO") for 20%
of Carnival plc's shares was made and accepted, which enabled 20% of Carnival plc shares to be
exchanged for 41.7 million Carnival Corporation shares. The 41.7 million shares of Carnival plc held
by Carnival Corporation as a result of the PSO, which cost $1.05 billion, are being accounted for as
treasury stock in the accompanying balance sheets. The holders of Carnival Corporation shares,
including the new shareholders who exchanged their Carnival plc shares for Carnival Corporation shares
under the PSO, now own an economic interest equal to approximately 79%, and holders of Carnival plc
shares now own an economic interest equal to approximately 21%, of Carnival Corporation & plc.
The management of Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc ultimately agreed to enter into the DLC
transaction because, among other things, the creation of Carnival Corporation & plc would result in a
company with complementary well-known brands operating globally with enhanced growth opportunities,
benefits of sharing best practices and generating cost savings, increased financial flexibility and
access to capital markets and a DLC structure, which allows for continued participation in an
investment in the global cruise industry by Carnival plc's shareholders who wish to continue to hold
shares in a UK-listed company.
Carnival plc was the third largest cruise company in the world and operated many well-known
global brands with leading positions in the U.S., UK, Germany and Australia. The combination of
Carnival Corporation with Carnival plc under the DLC structure has been accounted for under U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") as an acquisition of Carnival plc by Carnival
Corporation pursuant to SFAS No. 141. The purchase price of $25.31 per share was based upon the
average of the quoted closing market price of Carnival Corporation's shares beginning two days before
and ending two days after January 8, 2003, the date the Carnival plc board agreed to enter into the
DLC transaction. The number of additional shares effectively issued in the combined entity for
purchase accounting purposes was 209.6 million. In addition, Carnival Corporation incurred $60
million of direct acquisition costs, which have been included in the purchase price. The aggregate
purchase price of $5.36 billion, computed as described above, was allocated to the assets and
liabilities of Carnival plc as follows (in millions):
Ships $4,669
Ships under construction 233
Other tangible assets 866
Goodwill 2,387
Trademarks(a) 1,237
Debt (2,939)
Other liabilities (1,095)
------
$5,358
------
(a) Trademarks are non-amortizable and represent the Princess, P&O Cruises, P&O Cruises
Australia and AIDA trademarks' estimated fair values.
The information presented below gives pro forma effect to the DLC transaction between Carnival
Corporation and Carnival plc. Management has prepared the pro forma information based upon the
companies' reported financial information and, accordingly, the pro forma information should be read
in conjunction with the companies' financial statements.
As noted above, the DLC transaction has been accounted for as an acquisition of Carnival plc by
Carnival Corporation, using the purchase method of accounting. Carnival plc's accounting policies have
been conformed to Carnival Corporation's policies. Carnival plc's reporting period has been changed
to Carnival Corporation's reporting period, and the pro forma information presented below covers the
same periods of time for both companies.
The following pro forma information has been prepared assuming the DLC transaction had occurred
on December 1, 2002 and 2001, respectively, rather than April 17, 2003, and has not been adjusted to
reflect any net transaction benefits. In addition, the pro forma information does not purport to
represent what the results of operations actually could have been if the DLC transaction had occurred
on December 1, 2002 and 2001 or what those results will be for any future periods (in millions, except
earnings per share).
Years ended November 30,
2003 2002
Pro forma revenues $7,596 $6,768
------ ------
Pro forma net income (a)-(d) $1,159 $1,271
------ ------
Pro forma earnings per share
Basic $1.46 $1.60
----- -----
Diluted(e) $1.43 $1.57
----- -----
Pro forma weighted-average
shares outstanding
Basic 797 795
----- -----
Diluted(e) 840 833
----- -----
(a) In accordance with SFAS No. 141, pro forma net income was reduced by $51 million in 2003
and $103 million in 2002 for Carnival plc's nonrecurring costs related to its terminated
Royal Caribbean International Ltd. transaction and the completion of the DLC transaction
with Carnival Corporation, which were expensed by Carnival plc prior to April 17, 2003.
(b) As a result of the reduction in depreciation expense due to the revaluation of Carnival
plc's ships carrying values, pro forma net income has been increased by $16 million in
2003 and $14 million in 2002.
(c) The 2003 pro forma net income included a $13 million nonrecurring expense related to a
DLC litigation matter and $19 million of income related to the receipt of nonrecurring
net insurance proceeds.
(d) The 2002 pro forma net income included a $51 million nonrecurring income tax benefit
related to an Italian incentive tax law, which allowed Costa to receive an income tax
benefit for contractual expenditures during 2002 incurred on the construction of a new
ship.
(e) The 2003 and 2002 diluted earnings per share and outstanding diluted shares have been
restated, and we have reduced previously reported diluted earnings per share amounts by
$0.02 each year as a result of the early adoption of EITF No. 04-08.
NOTE 4 Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following (in millions):
November 30,
2004 2003
Ships $22,572 $18,134
Ships under construction 429 886
------- -------
23,001 19,020
Land, buildings and improvements,
and port facilities 555 504
Transportation equipment and other 628 549
------- -------
Total property and equipment 24,184 20,073
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (3,361) (2,551)
------- -------
$20,823 $17,522
------- -------
Capitalized interest, primarily on our ships under construction, amounted to $26 million, $49
million and $39 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Amounts related to ships under
construction include progress payments for the construction of the ship, as well as design and
engineering fees, capitalized interest, construction oversight costs and various owner supplied items.
At November 30, 2004, nine ships with an aggregate net book value of $2.92 billion were pledged as
collateral pursuant to mortgages related to $1.68 billion of debt and a $476 million contingent
obligation (see Notes 6 and 7).
Maintenance and repair expenses and dry-dock amortization were $353 million, $256 million and
$178 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
In fiscal 2002 we reduced the carrying value of one of our ships by recording an impairment
charge of $20 million based on negotiations with unrelated third parties and other available evidence.
NOTE 5 - Variable Interest Entity
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46,
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," we have determined that we are carrying a loan,
initially made in April 2001, to a ship repair facility that is a variable interest entity ("VIE").
Although we use this facility for some of our ship repair work, we are not a "primary beneficiary"
and, accordingly, this entity is not consolidated in our financial statements. At November 30, 2004
and 2003, our loan to this VIE, which is also our maximum exposure to loss, was $41 million.
NOTE 6 - Debt
Short-Term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings consisted of U.S. dollar and euro variable rate, unsecured notes due to
banks, bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 2.4% and 1.3% at November 30, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in millions):
November 30,
2004(a) 2003(a)
Secured
Floating rate notes, collateralized by four ships,
bearing interest from libor plus 1.13% to libor
plus 1.29% (3.0% to 3.6% at November 30, 2004) and
libor plus 1.25% to libor plus 1.29% (2.24% and 2.33%
at November 30, 2003), due through 2015 (b) $ 904 $ 631
Euro floating rate note, collateralized by one ship,
bearing interest at euribor plus 0.5% (2.75%
at November 30, 2004 and 2003), due through 2008 101 115
Fixed rate notes, collateralized by two ships, bearing
interest at 5.4% and 5.5%, due through 2016 (b) 381
Euro fixed rate note, collateralized by one ship,
bearing interest at 4.74%, due through 2012 183 182
Capitalized lease obligations, collateralized by
two ships, implicit interest at 3.66%, due
through 2005 110 115
Other 3 3
----- -----
Total Secured 1,682 1,046
----- -----
Unsecured
Fixed rate notes, bearing interest at 3.75% to 7.2%
and 3.75% to 7.7% at November 30, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, due through 2028 2,039 2,123
Euro floating rate notes, bearing interest at
euribor plus 0.25% to euribor plus 1.29%
(2.4% to 3.5% and 2.4% to 3.9% at November 30,
2004 and 2003, respectively), due through 2008 1,265 1,129
Euro revolving credit facilities, bearing interest
at euribor plus 0.50% and eurolibor plus 0.98%
(2.6% and 3.2% at November 30, 2003)(c) 300
Sterling fixed rate notes, bearing interest at 5.63%,
due in 2012 415 355
Euro fixed rate notes, bearing interest at 5.57%,
due in 2006 399 353
Floating rate note, bearing interest at libor plus
1.33% (2.45% at November 30, 2003)(d) 244
Other 36 44
Convertible notes, bearing interest at 2%, due in
2021, with first put option in 2005 600 600
Zero-coupon convertible notes, net of discount,
with a face value of $1.05 billion, due in 2021,
with first put option in 2006 561 541
Convertible notes, bearing interest at 1.75%, net of
discount, with a face value of $889 million, due in
2033, with first put option in 2008 575 575
----- -----
Total Unsecured 5,890 6,264
----- -----
7,572 7,310
Less portion due within one year (1,281) (392)
----- -----
$6,291 $6,918
----- -----
(a) All borrowings are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. Euro and sterling
denominated notes have been translated to U.S. dollars at the period-end exchange
rates. At November 30, 2004 and 2003, 59%, 31% and 10% of our debt was U.S. dollar,
euro and sterling denominated, respectively, including the effect of foreign currency
swaps. In addition, at November 30, 2004, 68% of the interest cost on our long-term
debt was fixed (60% at November 30, 2003) and 32% was variable (40% at November 30, 2003),
including the effect of our interest rate swaps. The deeds of guarantee between Carnival
Corporation and Carnival plc, or alternatively standalone guarantees in lieu of
utilization of these deeds of guarantee, effectively provide for the cross guaranteeing
of all Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc indebtedness and other monetary obligations
(see Note 3).
(b) In February and May 2004, we borrowed an aggregate of $739 million to finance a portion
of the Diamond Princess and Sapphire Princess purchase prices, pursuant to committed
financing arrangements. These loans have both a fixed and variable interest rate
component, mature through May 2016, and had a weighted-average interest rate of 4.4% at
November 30, 2004.
(c) In March 2004, Carnival plc repaid, prior to its maturity date, the outstanding amounts
under one of its subsidiary's $710 million revolving credit facilities, which facilities
were then terminated prior to their September 2005 maturity dates.
(d) In March 2004, we extinguished $237 million of unsecured debt before its July 2008
maturity date.
Convertible Notes
Carnival Corporation's 2% convertible notes ("2% Notes"), its zero-coupon convertible notes
("Zero-Coupon Notes") and its 1.75% convertible notes ("1.75% Notes") are convertible into 15.3
million shares, 17.4 million shares and a maximum of 20.9 million shares (10.8 million shares during
fiscal 2004), respectively, of Carnival Corporation common stock.
The 2% Notes are convertible at a conversion price of $39.14 per share, subject to adjustment,
during any fiscal quarter for which the closing price of the Carnival Corporation common stock is
greater than $43.05 per share for a defined duration of time in the preceding fiscal quarter. The
conditions for conversion of the 2% Notes were satisfied throughout fiscal 2004 and, accordingly, the
2% Notes were convertible into Carnival Corporation common stock commencing with the second quarter of
fiscal 2004. A nominal amount of 2% Notes were converted in fiscal 2004.
At November 30, 2004, the 2% Notes were classified as a current liability, since we may be
required to redeem the notes at the option of the holders on April 15, 2005 at their face value plus
any unpaid accrued interest. If the noteholders do not exercise this option, then we will change the
classification of the 2% Notes to long-term debt, as the next optional redemption date does not occur
until April 15, 2008. We do not currently expect these noteholders to exercise their put options, as
the current market value of the 2% Notes is greater than the redemption price.
The Zero-Coupon Notes have a 3.75% yield to maturity and are convertible during any fiscal
quarter for which the closing price of the Carnival Corporation common stock is greater than a
specified trigger price for a defined duration of time in the preceding fiscal quarter. The trigger
price commenced at a low of $31.94 per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2002 and increases at an
annual rate of 3.75% thereafter, until maturity. Since the third quarter of 2003, the Zero-Coupon
Notes have been convertible into Carnival Corporation common stock for the quarter following that
quarter in which it was convertible as a result of Carnival Corporation's common stock achieving its
target conversion trigger price per share, which ranged from $33.77 for the 2003 third quarter to
$35.38 for the 2004 fourth quarter, for the requisite periods of time. No Zero Coupon Notes were
converted in fiscal 2003 or 2004.
The 1.75% Notes, which were issued in April 2003, are convertible at a conversion price of $53.11
per share, subject to adjustment, during any fiscal quarter for which the closing price of the
Carnival Corporation common stock is greater than a specified trigger price for a defined duration of
time in the preceding fiscal quarter. During the fiscal quarters ending from August 31, 2003 through
April 29, 2008, the trigger price will be $63.73 per share. Thereafter, this conversion trigger price
increases each quarter based on an annual rate of 1.75%, until maturity. In addition, holders may
also surrender the 1.75% Notes for conversion if they have been called for redemption or for other
specified occurrences, including the credit rating assigned to the 1.75% Notes being Baa3 or lower by
Moody's Investors Service and BBB- or lower by Standard & Poor's Rating Services, as well as certain
corporate transactions. The conditions for conversion of the 1.75% Notes have not been met since
their issuance. The 1.75% Notes interest is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears, commencing
October 29, 2003 through April 29, 2008. Effective April 30, 2008, the 1.75% Notes no longer require
a cash interest payment, but interest will accrete at a 1.75% yield to maturity.
Subsequent to April 29, 2008 and October 23, 2008, we may redeem all or a portion of the 1.75%
Notes and Zero-Coupon Notes, respectively, at their accreted values and subsequent to April 14, 2008,
we may redeem all or a portion of our 2% Notes at their face value plus any unpaid accrued interest,
subject to the noteholders' right to convert.
In addition, on April 29 of 2008, 2013, 2018, 2023 and 2028 the 1.75% noteholders, on April 15 of
2005, 2008 and 2011 the 2% noteholders and on October 24 of 2006, 2008, 2011 and 2016 the Zero-Coupon
noteholders may require us to repurchase all or a portion of the outstanding 1.75% Notes and Zero-
Coupon Notes at their accreted values and the 2% Notes at their face value plus any unpaid accrued
interest.
Upon conversion, redemption or repurchase of the 1.75% Notes, the 2% Notes and the Zero-Coupon
Notes, we may choose to deliver Carnival Corporation common stock, cash or a combination of cash and
common stock with a total value equal to the value of the consideration otherwise deliverable.
Revolving Credit Facilities
Costa has a 257.5 million euro ($342 million U.S. dollars at the November 30, 2004 exchange rate)
unsecured euro revolving credit facility, which expires in May 2006. At November 30, 2004, this
entire facility was available.
In March 2004, Carnival plc entered into a 600 million euro ($798 million U.S. dollar at the
November 30, 2004 exchange rate) unsecured 364-day multi-currency revolving credit facility, which
currently bears interest at eurolibor plus 30 basis points ("BPS"). This interest rate spread over
the base rate will vary based on changes to Carnival plc's senior unsecured credit rating. This
facility also has a nine BPS commitment fee on the undrawn portion and expires in March 2005, but
provides Carnival plc with the option to extend the repayment date of the then existing outstanding
borrowings to June 2006. At November 30, 2004, this entire facility was available. In 2004, Carnival
plc established U.S. dollar and multi-currency commercial paper programs, which are supported by this
600 million euro revolving credit facility and, accordingly, any amounts outstanding under these
commercial paper programs, none at November 30, 2004, will reduce the aggregate amount available under
the facility.
Carnival Corporation's $1.4 billion unsecured multi-currency revolving credit facility matures in
June 2006. This facility currently bears interest at USD Libor plus 20 BPS, which interest rate
spread over the base rate will vary based on changes to Carnival Corporation's senior unsecured debt
ratings, and provides for an undrawn facility fee of ten BPS. Carnival Corporation's U.S. dollar
commercial paper program is supported by this revolving credit facility and, accordingly, any amounts
outstanding under its commercial paper program, none at November 30, 2004 and 2003, effectively reduce
the aggregate amount available under this facility. At November 30, 2004, the entire facility was
available.
These $1.4 billion and 600 million euro facilities and other of our loan and derivative
agreements, contain covenants that require us, among other things, to maintain a minimum debt service
coverage, minimum shareholders' equity and limits our debt to capital and debt to equity ratios, and
the amounts of our secured assets and secured indebtedness. In addition, if our business suffers a
material adverse change or if other events of default under our loan agreements are triggered, then
pursuant to cross default acceleration clauses, substantially all of our outstanding debt and
derivative contract payables could become due and the underlying facilities could be terminated. At
November 30, 2004, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
At November 30, 2004, the scheduled annual maturities of our long-term debt was as follows (in
millions):
Fiscal
2005 $1,281 (a)
2006 1,686 (a)
2007 1,058
2008 1,435 (a)
2009 141
Thereafter 1,971
------
$7,572
------
(a) Includes $600 million of Carnival Corporation's 2% Notes in 2005, $561 million of its Zero-Coupon
Notes in 2006, and $575 million of its 1.75% Notes in 2008, based in each case on the date of the
noteholders' first put option.
Debt issuance costs are generally amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method,
which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the notes or the noteholders first
put option date, whichever is earlier. In addition, all loan issue discounts are amortized to
interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the term of the notes.
NOTE 7 - Commitments
Ship Commitments
A description of our ships under contract for construction at November 30, 2004 was as follows
(in millions, except passenger capacity):
Expected
Service Passenger Estimated Total Cost(b)
Brand and Ship Date(a) Capacity Euros Sterling USD
USD Commitments
Carnival Cruise Lines
Carnival Valor(c) 12/04 2,974 $ 520
Carnival Liberty 7/05 2,974 460
Carnival Freedom 3/07 2,974 500
------ -----
Total Carnival Cruise Lines 8,922 1,480
------ -----
Princess
Crown Princess 6/06 3,110 500
Newbuild 4/07 3,100 525
------ -----
Total Princess 6,210 1,025
------ -----
Holland America Line
Noordam(c) 2/06 1,848 405
----- -----
Total USD Commitments 16,980 2,910
------ -----
Euro Commitments
AIDA
Newbuild(d) 5/07 2,030 € 315
Newbuild(d) 5/09 2,030 315
------ ------
Total AIDA 4,060 630
------ ------
Costa
Costa Concordia(d) 7/06 3,004 450
------ ------
Cunard
Queen Victoria(c) 12/07 1,982 340 95
------ ------ ------
Unassigned Contracts
Newbuild(e) 4/08 3,100 490
Newbuild(e) 6/08 3,000 485
------ ------
Total Unassigned Contracts 6,100 975
------ ------
Total Euro Commitments 15,146 €2,395
------ ------
Total Euro Commitments converted to USD(f) 3,190
------
Sterling Commitment
P&O Cruises
Arcadia(c) 4/05 1,968 £238
------ ----
Total Sterling Commitment 1,968 £238
------ ----
Total Sterling Commitment converted to USD(f) 455
------
Grand Total 34,094
------
Grand Total in USD $6,650
------
(a) The expected service date is the month in which the ship is currently expected to begin
its first revenue generating cruise.
(b) Estimated total cost of the completed ship includes the contract price with the shipyard,
design and engineering fees, capitalized interest, construction oversight costs and
various owner supplied items. All of our ship construction contracts are with the
Fincantieri shipyards in Italy, except for AIDA's which are with the Meyer Werft shipyard
in Germany.
(c) These construction contracts are denominated in euros, except for $95 million of the
Queen Victoria costs, which are denominated in USD. The euro denominated amounts, except
for the Queen Victoria, have been fixed into U.S. dollars or sterling by utilizing
foreign currency swaps.
(d) These construction contracts are denominated in euros, which is the functional currency
of the cruise line which will operate the ship and, therefore, we have not entered into
foreign currency swaps to hedge these commitments.
(e) We have not yet determined which of our North American or European brands will be
assigned these contracts. The brand assignments are expected to be made by September 30,
2005.
(f) The estimated total costs of all contracts denominated in euros and sterling have been
translated into U.S. dollars using the November 30, 2004 exchange rate.
In connection with our cruise ships under contract for construction, we have paid $429 million
through November 30, 2004 and anticipate paying the remaining estimated total costs as follows: $1.54
billion, $1.40 billion, $1.33 billion, $1.60 billion and $357 million in fiscal 2005 through 2009,
respectively.
Subsequent to November 30, 2004, Costa entered into a ship construction contract with Fincantieri
for a 3,000 passenger ship, which has an estimated all-in cost of 475 million euros, and is expected
to enter service in June 2007.
Operating Leases
Rent expense under our operating leases, primarily for office and warehouse space, was $50
million, $48 million and $15 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At November 30,
2004, minimum annual rentals for our operating leases, with initial or remaining terms in excess of
one year, were as follows (in millions): $51, $37, $25, $21, $18 and $79 in fiscal 2005 through 2009
and thereafter, respectively.
Port Facilities and Other
At November 30, 2004, we had commitments through 2052, with initial or remaining terms in excess
of one year, to pay minimum amounts for our annual usage of port facilities and other contractual
commitments as follows (in millions): $135, $92, $73, $72, $66 and $368 in fiscal 2005 through 2009
and thereafter, respectively.
NOTE 8 - Contingencies
Litigation
In 2002, two actions (collectively, the "Facsimile Complaints") were filed against Carnival
Corporation on behalf of purported classes of persons who received unsolicited advertisements via
facsimile, alleging that Carnival Corporation and other defendants distributed unsolicited
advertisements via facsimile in contravention of the U.S. Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The
plaintiffs seek to enjoin the sending of unsolicited facsimile advertisements and statutory damages.
The advertisements referred to in the Facsimile Complaints that reference a Carnival Cruise Line
product were not sent by Carnival Corporation, but rather were distributed by a professional faxing
company at the behest of travel agencies. We do not advertise directly to the traveling public
through the use of facsimile transmission. The ultimate outcomes of the Facsimile Complaints cannot
be determined at this time. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to these claims and,
accordingly, we intend to vigorously defend against these actions.
In February 2001, Holland America Line-USA, Inc. ("HAL-USA"), our wholly-owned subsidiary,
received a grand jury subpoena requesting that it produce documents and records relating to the air
emissions from Holland America Line ships in Alaska. HAL-USA responded to the subpoena. The ultimate
outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In August 2002, Holland America Line's Ryndam discharged wastewater from the ship while in
Juneau, Alaska. In December 2004, a plea agreement between HAL Maritime Ltd. ("HAL Maritime"), a
wholly-owned subsidiary, and the U.S. government was entered in which HAL Maritime pled guilty to a
single misdemeanor. Pursuant to the plea agreement, HAL Maritime paid a $0.2 million criminal fine, a
$0.5 million community service payment, and agreed to expend $1.3 million toward the implementation of
a Focused Environmental Compliance Plan. The agreement also provides for a three-year probationary
term, with the ability to request early termination of probation after two years. HAL Maritime also
paid a civil fine of $65,000 to the State of Alaska as a result of the same event.
In March 2004, Holland America Line notified the United States and Netherlands governmental
authorities that one of its chief engineers had admitted to improperly processing bilge water on the
Noordam. A subsequent internal investigation has determined that the improper operation may have
begun in January 2004 and may have continued sporadically through March 4, 2004. Holland America Line
and three shipboard engineers have received grand jury subpoenas from the Office of the U.S. Attorney
in Tampa, Florida. If the government investigations result in charges being filed, a judgment could
include, among other forms of relief, fines and debarment from federal contracting, which would
prohibit operations in Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve ("Glacier Bay") during the period of
debarment. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In August 2004, Holland America Line was notified by the National Park Service ("NPS") that the
Volendam and Statendam may have violated opacity standards while operating in Glacier Bay. In November
2004, NPS notified Holland America Line in separate letters that a Violation of Record would be
entered in the permanent park files for each ship. Holland America Line intends to vigorously oppose
the decision in each case. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
However, if the Violations of Record are not reversed and either ship receives a second such violation
within three years, that ship may be barred from entry into Glacier Bay.
If Holland America Line were to lose its Glacier Bay permits as a result of the Ryndam plea or
the Noordam investigations, or if the Statendam or Volendam were prohibited from entering Glacier Bay,
we would not expect the impact on our financial statements to be material to us since we believe there
are additional attractive alternative destinations in Alaska and elsewhere that can be substituted for
Glacier Bay.
Costa has instituted arbitration proceedings in Italy to confirm the validity of its decision not
to deliver its ship, the Costa Classica, to the shipyard of Cammell Laird Holdings PLC ("Cammell
Laird") under a 79 million euro denominated contract for the conversion and lengthening of the ship in
November 2000. Costa has also given notice of termination of the contract. In October 2004 the
arbitration tribunal decided to increase the scope of work of the technical experts by introducing new
demands for reply in the experts' report. It is expected that the arbitration tribunal's decision
will be made in the second half of 2005 at the earliest. In the event that an award is given in favor
of Cammell Laird, the amount of damages, which Costa would have to pay, if any, is not currently
determinable. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In April 2003, Festival Crociere S.p.A. ("Festival") commenced an action against the European
Commission (the "Commission") in the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Luxembourg
seeking to annul the Commission's antitrust approval of the DLC transaction (the "Festival Action").
We have been granted leave to intervene in the Festival Action and filed a Statement in Intervention
with the court. Festival was declared bankrupt in May 2004 and Festival did not submit observations on
our Statement in Intervention. A date for an oral hearing will be set in due course, unless Festival
withdraws its action. A successful third party challenge of an unconditional Commission clearance
decision would be unprecedented, and based on a review of the law and the factual circumstances of the
DLC transaction, as well as the Commission's approval decision in relation to the DLC transaction, we
believe that the Festival Action will not have a material adverse effect on the companies or the DLC
transaction. However, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In the normal course of our business, various other claims and lawsuits have been filed or are
pending against us. Most of these claims and lawsuits are covered by insurance and, accordingly, the
maximum amount of our liability is typically limited to our self-insurance retention levels. However,
the ultimate outcome of these claims and lawsuits which are not covered by insurance cannot be
determined at this time.
Contingent Obligations
At November 30, 2004, Carnival Corporation had contingent obligations totaling $1.08 billion to
participants in lease out and lease back type transactions for three of its ships. At the inception of
the leases, the entire amount of the contingent obligations was paid by Carnival Corporation to major
financial institutions to enable them to directly pay these obligations. Accordingly, these
obligations were considered extinguished, and neither the funds paid to the financial institutions nor
the contingent obligations have been included on our balance sheets. Carnival Corporation would only
be required to make any payments under these contingent obligations in the remote event of
nonperformance by these financial institutions, all of which have long-term credit ratings of AAA or
AA. In addition, Carnival Corporation obtained a direct guarantee from another AAA rated financial
institution for $294 million of the above noted contingent obligations, thereby further reducing the
already remote exposure to this portion of the contingent obligations. If the major financial
institutions' credit ratings fall below AA-, Carnival Corporation would be required to move a majority
of the funds from these financial institutions to other highly-rated financial institutions. If
Carnival Corporation's credit rating falls below BBB, it would be required to provide a standby letter
of credit for $88 million, or alternatively provide mortgages in the aggregate amount of $88 million
on two of its ships.
In the unlikely event that Carnival Corporation were to terminate the three lease agreements
early or default on our obligations, it would, as of November 30, 2004, have to pay a total of $177
million in stipulated damages. As of November 30, 2004, $186 million of standby letters of credit
have been issued by a major financial institution in order to provide further security for the payment
of these contingent stipulated damages. In addition, in 2004 Carnival Corporation entered into a five
year $170 million unsecured revolving credit facility, guaranteed by Carnival plc, which is being used
to support these standby letters of credit through the issuance of a back-up letter of credit. In the
event we were to default under covenants in our loan agreements, any amounts outstanding under the
$170 million unsecured revolving credit facility would be due and payable, and we would be required to
post cash collateral to support the stipulated damages standby letters of credit in excess of $170
million. Between 2017 and 2022, we have the right to exercise options that would terminate these
transactions at no cost to us. As a result of these three transactions, we have $39 million and $42
million of deferred income recorded on our balance sheets as of November 30, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, which is being amortized to nonoperating income through 2022.
Some of the debt agreements that we enter into include indemnification provisions that obligate
us to make payments to the counterparty if certain events occur. These contingencies generally relate
to changes in taxes, changes in laws that increase lender capital costs and other similar costs. The
indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms and were entered into in the normal
course of business. There are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses
and we are not able to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments, if any, under these
indemnification clauses. We have not been required to make any material payments under such
indemnification clauses in the past and, under current circumstances, we do not believe a request for
material future indemnification is probable.
NOTE 9 - Income and Other Taxes
We believe that substantially all of our income in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, with the exception
of our U.S. source income principally from the transportation, hotel and tour businesses of Holland
America Tours and Princess Tours, is exempt from U.S. federal income taxes. If we were found not to
qualify for exemption pursuant to applicable income tax treaties or under the Internal Revenue Code or
if the income tax treaties or Internal Revenue Code were to be changed in a manner adverse to us, a
portion of our income would become subject to taxation by the U.S. at higher than normal corporate tax
rates.
In August 2003, final regulations under Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code were published
in the Federal Register. Section 883 is the primary provision upon which we rely to exempt certain of
our international ship operation earnings from U.S. income taxes. The final regulations list elements
of income that are not considered to be incidental to ship operations and, to the extent earned within
the U.S., are subject to U.S. income tax. Among the items identified in the final regulations are
income from the sale of air transportation, shore excursions and pre-and post cruise land packages.
These rules will first be effective for us in fiscal 2005.
AIDA, through October 2004, Cunard, Ocean Village, P&O Cruises, P&O Cruises Australia and Swan
Hellenic are all strategically and commercially managed in the UK and have elected to enter the UK
tonnage tax regime. Accordingly, these operations pay UK corporation tax on shipping profits
calculated by reference to the net tonnage of qualifying vessels. Income not considered to be
shipping profits is taxable under the normal UK income tax rules. We believe that substantially all of
the income attributable to these brands constitutes shipping profits and, accordingly, UK income tax
expense from these operations has been and is expected to be minimal.
Some of our subsidiaries, including AIDA, a subsidiary of Costa commencing in November 2004,
Costa, Holland America Tours, Princess Tours and other of our non-shipping activities, are subject to
foreign and/or U.S. federal and state income taxes. In fiscal 2004 and 2003, we recognized a net $47
million and $29 million income tax expense, primarily related to these operations. In 2002, we
recognized a net $57 million income tax benefit primarily due to an Italian investment incentive law,
which allowed Costa to receive a $51 million income tax benefit based on contractual expenditures
during 2002 on the construction of a new ship. At November 30, 2004, Costa had a remaining net
deferred tax asset of approximately $13 million relating primarily to the tax benefit of the net
operating loss carryforwards arising from this incentive law, which expire in 2007.
We do not expect to incur income taxes on future distributions of undistributed earnings of
foreign subsidiaries and, accordingly, no deferred income taxes have been provided for the
distribution of these earnings.
In addition to or in place of income taxes, virtually all jurisdictions where our ships call,
impose taxes based on passenger counts, ship tonnage or some other measure. These taxes, other than
those directly charged to and/or collected from passengers by us, are recorded as operating expenses
in the accompanying statements of operations.
NOTE 10 Shareholders' Equity
Carnival Corporation's articles of incorporation authorize its Board of Directors, at its
discretion, to issue up to 40 million shares of its preferred stock and Carnival plc has 100,000
authorized preference shares. At November 30, 2004 and 2003, no Carnival Corporation preferred stock
had been issued and only a nominal amount of Carnival plc preferred shares had been issued.
In October 2004, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of either Carnival Corporation
common stock and/or Carnival plc ordinary shares up to an aggregate of $1 billion commencing in 2005,
subject to certain repurchase restrictions on Carnival plc shares.
At November 30, 2004, there were 88.4 million shares of Carnival Corporation common stock
reserved for issuance pursuant to its convertible notes and its employee benefit and dividend
reinvestment plans. In addition, Carnival plc shareholders have authorized 3.2 million ordinary
shares for future issuance under its employee benefit plans.
At November 30, 2004 and 2003 accumulated other comprehensive income was as follows (in
millions):
2004 2003
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, net $588 $190
Unrealized gain on marketable securities 1
Minimum pension liability adjustments (17) (14)
Unrealized losses on cash flow derivative hedges, net (30) (17)
---- ----
$541 $160
---- ----
NOTE 11 - Financial Instruments
We estimated the fair value of our financial instruments through the use of public market prices,
quotes from financial institutions and other available information. Considerable judgment is required
in interpreting data to develop estimates of fair value and, accordingly, amounts are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts that we could realize in a current market exchange. Our financial
instruments are not held for trading or other speculative purposes.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
The carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments approximate
their fair values due to their short maturities or variable interest rates.
Other Assets
At November 30, 2004 and 2003, long-term other assets included marketable securities held in
rabbi trusts for certain of our nonqualified benefit plans and notes and other receivables. These
assets had carrying and fair values of $240 million and $227 million at November 30, 2004,
respectively, and carrying and fair values of $200 million at November 30, 2003. Fair values were
based on public market prices, estimated discounted future cash flows or estimated fair value of
collateral.
Debt
The fair values of our non-convertible debt and convertible notes were $6.32 billion and $2.53
billion, respectively, at November 30, 2004 and $5.83 billion and $1.92 billion at November 30, 2003.
These fair values were greater than the related carrying values by $100 million and $790 million,
respectively, at November 30, 2004 and by $140 million and $205 million at November 30, 2003. The net
difference between the fair value of our debt and its carrying value was due primarily to our issuance
of debt obligations at fixed interest rates that are above market interest rates in existence at the
measurement dates. The net difference between the fair value of our convertible notes is largely due
to the impact of changes in the Carnival Corporation common stock value on the value of our
convertible notes on those dates. The fair values of our unsecured fixed rate public notes,
convertible notes, sterling bonds and unsecured 5.57% euro notes were based on their public market
prices. The fair values of our other debt were estimated based on appropriate market interest rates
being applied to this debt.
Foreign Currency Swaps and Other Hedging Instruments
We have foreign currency swaps that are designated as foreign currency fair value hedges for
three of our euro denominated shipbuilding contracts (see Note 7). At November 30, 2004 and 2003, the
fair value of the foreign currency swaps related to our shipbuilding commitments was an unrealized
gain of $219 million and $363 million, respectively. These foreign currency swaps mature through
2006.
We have foreign currency swaps totaling $887 million that are effectively designated as hedges of
our net investments in foreign subsidiaries, which have euro and sterling denominated functional
currencies. These foreign currency swaps were entered into to effectively convert $251 million and
$466 million of U.S. dollar denominated debt into sterling debt and euro debt, respectively, and $170
million of euro denominated debt into sterling debt. At November 30, 2004, the fair value of these
foreign currency swaps was an unrealized loss of $137 million, which is included in the cumulative
translation adjustment component of AOCI. These currency swaps mature through 2012.
The fair values of these foreign currency swaps were estimated based on prices quoted by
financial institutions for these instruments.
Finally, we have designated $1.1 billion of our outstanding euro and sterling debt and other
obligations, which are nonderivatives and mature through 2012, as hedges of our net investments in
foreign operations and, accordingly, have included $194 million of foreign currency transaction losses
in the cumulative translation adjustment component of AOCI at November 30, 2004.
Interest Rate Swaps
We have interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges whereby we receive fixed
interest rate payments in exchange for making variable interest rate payments. At November 30, 2004
and 2003, these interest rate swap agreements effectively changed $929 million and $1.19 billion of
fixed rate debt to Libor-based floating rate debt.
In addition, we also have interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges whereby we
receive variable interest rate payments in exchange for making fixed interest rate payments. At
November 30, 2004 and 2003, these interest rate swap agreements effectively changed $828 million and
$760 million, respectively, of euribor floating rate debt to fixed rate debt.
These interest rate swap agreements mature through 2008. At November 30, 2004 and 2003, the fair
value of our interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges was an unrealized loss of $22 million
and $6 million, respectively. The fair values of our interest rate swap agreements were estimated
based on prices quoted by financial institutions for these instruments.
NOTE 12 Segment Information
Our cruise segment included all of our cruise brands, which have been aggregated as a single
reportable segment based on the similarity of their economic and other characteristics, including the
products and services they provide. Our other segment primarily represents the transportation, hotel
and tour operations of Holland America Tours and Princess Tours, and the business to business travel
agency operations of P&O Travel Ltd., the latter two since completion of the DLC transaction on April
17, 2003. The significant accounting policies of our segments are the same as those described in Note
2 -"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies." Information for our cruise and other segments as of
and for the years ended November 30, was as follows (in millions):
Selling
and Depreciation Operating Capital
Operating adminis- and income expend- Total
Revenues(a) expenses trative amortization (loss) itures assets
2004
Cruise $9,427 $5,247 $1,231 $791 $2,158 $3,512 $27,136
Other 398 308 54 21 15 74 500(b)
Intersegment
elimination (98) (98)
------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------ -------
$9,727 $5,457 $1,285 $812 $2,173 $3,586 $27,636
------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------ -------
2003
Cruise $6,459 $3,624 $ 896 $568 $1,371 $2,454 $24,090
Other 345 276(c) 40(c) 17 12 62 401(b)
Intersegment
elimination (86) (86)
------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------ -------
$6,718 $3,814 $ 936 $585 $1,383 $2,516 $24,491
------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------ -------
2002
Cruise $4,244 $2,222 $ 577 $371 $1,055(d) $1,949 $12,120
Other 176 145 32 11 (13) 37 215(b)
Intersegment
elimination (37) (37)
------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------ -------
$4,383 $2,330 $ 609 $382 $1,042 $1,986 $12,335
------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------ -------
(a) Other segment revenues primarily included revenues for the cruise portion of a tour, when a
cruise is sold along with a land tour package by Holland America Tours or Princess Tours,
and shore excursion and port hospitality services provided to cruise passengers by these
tour companies. These intersegment revenues, which are included in full in the cruise
segment, are eliminated from the other segment revenues in the line "Intersegment
elimination."
(b) Other segment assets primarily included hotels and lodges in Alaska and the Canadian
Yukon, luxury dayboats offering tours to a glacier in Alaska and on the Yukon River,
motorcoaches used for sightseeing and charters in the States of Washington and Alaska,
British Columbia, Canada and the Canadian Yukon and private, domed rail cars, which run on
the Alaska Railroad between Anchorage and Fairbanks.
(c) Operating and selling expenses in 2003 have been reclassified to conform to the 2004
presentation.
(d) Cruise operating income included an impairment charge of $20 million in 2002.
Foreign revenues for our cruise brands represent sales generated from outside the U.S. primarily
by foreign tour operators and foreign travel agencies. Substantially all of these foreign revenues
are from the UK, Germany, Italy, Canada, France, Australia, Spain, Switzerland and Brazil.
Substantially all of our long-lived assets are located outside of the U.S. and consist principally of
our ships and ships under construction.
Revenue information by geographic area for fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 was as follows (in
millions):
2004 2003 2002
U.S. $5,788 $4,513 $3,304
Continental Europe 1,570 971 545
UK 1,341 724 158
Canada 562 231 167
Others 466 279 209
------ ------ ------
$9,727 $6,718 $4,383
------ ------ ------
NOTE 13 Benefit Plans
Stock Option Plans
We have stock option plans primarily for supervisory and management level employees and members
of our Board of Directors. The Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc plans are administered by a
committee of four of our independent directors (the "Committee"), that determines who is eligible to
participate, the number of shares for which options are to be granted and the amounts that may be
exercised within a specified term. The Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc option exercise price is
generally set by the Committee at 100% of the fair market value of the common stock/ordinary shares on
the date the option is granted. Substantially all Carnival Corporation options granted during fiscal
2004, 2003 and 2002 and Carnival plc options granted in 2004 and 2003 were granted at an exercise
price per share equal to the fair market value of the Carnival Corporation common stock and Carnival
plc ordinary shares on the date of grant. Carnival Corporation employee options generally vest evenly
over five years and have a ten-year term. Carnival plc employee options generally vest at the end of
three years and have a ten-year term. Carnival Corporation director options granted subsequent to
fiscal 2000 vest evenly over five years and have a ten-year term. At November 30, 2004, Carnival
Corporation had 31.7 million shares and Carnival plc had 3.2 million shares, which were available for
future grants under the option plans.
A combined summary of the activity and status of the Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc stock
option plans was as follows:
Weighted-
Average Exercise Price Number of Options
Per Share Years Ended November 30,
2004 2003 2002 2004 2003 2002
Outstanding options-
beginning of year $28.79 $29.26 $28.95 19,297,979 11,828,958 12,774,293
Carnival plc
outstanding options
at April 17, 2003(a) $19.64 5,523,013
Options granted $47.52 $30.88 $26.54 5,306,802(c) 5,464,109 33,000
Options exercised(b) $25.23 $17.35 $14.35 (5,686,484)(c,d)(2,919,554) (404,615)
Options canceled $30.17 $28.64 $32.80 (714,355) (598,547) (573,720)
---------- ---------- ----------
Outstanding options-
end of year $35.61 $28.79 $29.26 18,203,942(e) 19,297,979(e) 11,828,958
---------- ---------- ----------
Options exercisable-
end of year $32.05 $27.68 $28.71 5,920,890(f) 7,848,335(f) 4,775,894
---------- ---------- ----------
(a) All Carnival plc unvested options outstanding on the date the DLC transaction was
completed vested fully on such date, except for 1.3 million options, which were
granted on April 15, 2003.
(b) Included 2.0 million and 1.8 million Carnival plc options in 2004 and 2003, of which
0.8 million and 1.0 million had a sterling denominated exercise price, respectively.
(c) During 2004, as a result of Costa being transferred to the Carnival plc side of the
DLC structure, options to purchase 973,000 shares of Carnival Corporation vested
immediately and their termination dates were accelerated to 2004. These vested
options, along with all of Costa employees' already exercisable options, were
exercised in 2004 to avoid unduly burdensome taxes. In 2004, Carnival plc granted
1.1 million options at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Carnival
plc ordinary shares on the grant date, to replace Costa options, whose termination
was accelerated to 2004. See Note 2.
(d) On December 1, 2003, as a result of the Princess cruise operations being transferred
to the Carnival Corporation side of the DLC structure, options to purchase 657,000
shares of Carnival plc vested immediately, and the termination dates on all
Princess employees' Carnival plc exercisable options were accelerated to 2004. All
such changes have been made pursuant to the original terms of the Carnival plc
plan. In January 2005, Carnival Corporation granted 1.4 million options at an
exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of Carnival Corporation
common stock on the grant date, to replace those Princess options which terminated
in 2004 prior to their original termination dates.
(e) Included 3.3 million and 3.6 million of Carnival plc options at a weighted-average
exercise price of $38.42 and $20.89 per share, based on the November 30, 2004 and 2003
U.S. dollar to sterling exchange rate, respectively.
(f) Included 0.9 million and 2.2 million of Carnival plc options at a weighted-average
exercise price of $22.15 and $18.06 per share, based on the November 30, 2004 and
2003 U.S. dollar to sterling exchange rate, respectively.
Combined information with respect to outstanding and exercisable Carnival Corporation and
Carnival plc stock options at November 30, 2004 was as follows:
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Weighted- Weighted- Weighted-
Average Average Average
Exercise Remaining Exercise Exercise
Price Range Shares Life (Years) Price Shares Price
$ 1.94-$ 2.25 30,980 (a) $ 2.07 30,980 $ 2.07
$10.59-$15.00 46,071 4.0 $13.11 46,071 $13.11
$16.28-$23.03 2,512,830 6.4 $21.48 1,358,328 $20.85
$24.36-$27.88 3,388,674 7.3 $26.98 1,246,686 $26.22
$28.21-$34.88 4,840,230 7.6 $31.95 1,117,990 $30.69
$36.72-$41.34 102,000 3.8 $38.08 102,000 $38.09
$43.56-$48.56 3,393,814 6.1 $44.58 2,018,835 $44.51
$48.69-$54.46 3,889,343 9.7 $49.46
---------- --- ------ --------- ------
Total 18,203,942 7.5 $35.61 5,920,890 $32.05
---------- --- ------ --------- ------
(a) These stock options do not have an expiration date.
Carnival Corporation Nonvested Stock
Carnival Corporation has issued nonvested stock to a few officers. These shares have the same
rights as Carnival Corporation common stock, except for transfer restrictions and forfeiture
provisions. During fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, 160,000 shares, 455,000 shares and 150,000 shares,
respectively, of Carnival Corporation common stock were issued, which were valued at $7 million, $14
million and $4 million, respectively. Unearned stock compensation was recorded within shareholders'
equity at the date of award based on the quoted market price of the Carnival Corporation common stock
on the date of grant and is amortized to expense using the straight-line method from the grant date
through the earlier of the vesting date or the officers' estimated retirement date. These shares
either have three or five-year cliff vesting or vest evenly over five years after the grant date. As
of November 30, 2004 and 2003 there were 1,065,000 shares and 1,055,000 shares, respectively, issued
under the plan, which remained to be vested.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
We have several defined benefit pension plans, which cover some of our shipboard and shoreside
employees. The U.S. and UK shoreside employee plans are closed to new membership and are funded at or
above the level required by U.S. or UK regulations. The remaining defined benefit plans are primarily
unfunded. In determining our plans' benefit obligations at November 30, 2004, we used assumed
weighted-average discount rates of 5.5% and 5.2% for our U.S. and foreign plans, respectively. The
net liabilities related to the obligations under these single employer defined benefit pension plans
are not material.
A minimum pension liability adjustment is required when the actuarial present value of
accumulated benefits exceeds plan assets and accrued pension liabilities. At November 30, 2004 and
2003, our single employer plans had aggregated additional minimum pension liability adjustments, less
allowable intangible assets, of $17 million and $14 million, respectively, which are included in AOCI.
In addition, P&O Cruises participated in a Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund ("MNRPF"), which is
a defined benefit multiemployer pension plan that was available to their shipboard non-officers. This
plan has a significant funding deficit and has been closed to further benefit accrual since prior to
the completion of the DLC transaction. P&O Cruises, along with other unrelated employers, are making
payments into this plan under a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding to reduce the deficit.
Accordingly, at November 30, 2004 and 2003, we had recorded a long-term pension liability of $22
million and $19 million, which represented our estimate of the present value of the entire liability
due by us under this plan.
P&O Cruises, Princess and Cunard also participate in an industry-wide British Merchant Navy
Officers Pension Fund ("MNOPF"), which also is a defined benefit multiemployer pension plan that is
available to certain of their shipboard British officers. The MNOPF is divided into two sections, the
"New Section" and the "Old Section," each of which covers a different group of participants, with the
Old Section closed to further benefit accrual and the New Section only closed to new membership.
Holland America Line also participates in a Dutch shipboard officers defined benefit multiemployer
pension plan. Our multiemployer yearly pension fund plan expenses are based on the amount of
contributions we are required to make annually into the plans.
As of March 31, 2003, the date of the most recent formal actuarial valuation prepared by the
MNOPF's actuary, the New Section of the MNOPF was estimated to have a fund deficit of approximately
200 million sterling, or $380 million, assuming a 7.8% discount rate. At November 30, 2004, our
external actuary informally updated the March 31, 2003 valuation and estimated that the New Section
deficit was approximately 760 million sterling, or $1.44 billion, assuming a 5.2% discount rate. The
amount of the fund deficit could vary considerably if different assumptions and/or estimates were used
in its calculation. Our share of any liability with respect to the fund's deficit is uncertain, and
the MNOPF's participating employers are seeking guidance from the court, which is expected to be given
during the second quarter of 2005.
Substantially all of any MNOPF fund deficit liability which we may have relates to P&O Cruises
and Princess liabilities, which existed prior to the DLC transaction. However, since the MNOPF is a
multiemployer plan and it is not probable that we will withdraw from the plan nor is our share of the
liability certain, we are required to record our MNOPF plan expenses, including any contributions to
fund the deficit, as they are contributed, instead of as a Carnival plc acquisition liability that
existed at the DLC transaction date. It is currently expected that deficit funding contributions, if
any, will be required to be paid over at least ten years. Finally, if it is determined that we are
responsible for a portion of the MNOPF deficit, we expect that we will have to record an expense in
the amount of our estimated future contributions in the period that such amount can be reasonably
estimated. We have recently received indicative calculations from the MNOPF setting out our share of
the fund's deficit based on different possible court outcomes. These indicative calculations, which
could vary depending on the court's final determination and also other factors, such as the ability of
other employers to settle their liabilities, show that our share of the deficit would be between $26
million and $113 million, based on the estimated deficit of $1.44 billion.
Total expense for all of our defined benefit pension plans, including our multiemployer plans,
was $18 million, $17 million and $11 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Defined Contribution Plans
We have several defined contribution plans available to most of our employees. We contribute to
these plans based on employee contributions, salary levels and length of service. Total expense
relating to these plans was $12 million in each of fiscal 2004 and 2003 and $8 million in fiscal 2002.
NOTE 14 Earnings Per Share
Our basic and diluted earnings per share were computed as follows (in millions, except per share
data):
Years Ended November 30,
2004 2003 2002
Net income $1,854 $1,194 $1,016
Interest on dilutive convertible notes 49 43 35
------ ------ ------
Net income for diluted earnings
per share $1,903 $1,237 $1,051
------ ------ ------
Weighted-average common and ordinary
shares outstanding 802 718 587
Dilutive effect of convertible notes 44 39 33
Dilutive effect of stock plans 5 2 1
------ ------ ------
Diluted weighted-average shares
outstanding 851 759 621
------ ------ ------
Basic earnings per share $2.31 $1.66 $1.73
----- ----- -----
Diluted earnings per share $2.24 $1.63 $1.69
----- ----- -----
The weighted-average shares outstanding for the year ended November 30, 2003 includes the pro
rata Carnival plc shares since April 17, 2003.
Options to purchase 6.0 million, 8.4 million and 6.0 million shares for fiscal 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively, were excluded from our diluted earnings per share computation since the effect of
including them was anti-dilutive.
NOTE 15 - Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Total cash paid for interest was $250 million, $156 million and $110 million in fiscal 2004, 2003
and 2002, respectively. In addition, cash paid for income taxes was $8 million in fiscal 2004 and $20
million in fiscal 2003. Finally, we received a $60 million note on the sale of Holland America Line's
Nieuw Amsterdam in fiscal 2002, which represented a noncash investing activity.
SCHEDULE C
CARNIVAL PLC - UK GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUMMARISED GROUP PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT
Twelve Months to Eleven months to
November 30, 2004 November 30, 2003
Restated
(note 1)
US$ millions, except per share data
Turnover (note 3) 3,901.3 4,040.3
Cost of sales before exceptional item (2,632.3) (2,918.0)
Exceptional impairment loss - (50.0)
------- -------
(2,632.3) (2,968.0)
Administrative expenses
before exceptional costs (609.0) (533.7)
Exceptional transaction costs (note 4) - (30.7)
------- -------
(609.0) (564.4)
------- -------
Operating costs (3,241.3) (3,532.4)
------- -------
Group operating profit (note 3) 660.0 507.9
Loss on sale of business - (2.7)
------- -------
Profit on ordinary activities before interest 660.0 505.2
Net interest payable and similar items (110.3) (130.2)
------- -------
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation 549.7 375.0
Taxation (27.6) (26.2)
------- -------
Profit on ordinary activities after taxation 522.1 348.8
Dividends (116.5) (94.2)
------- -------
Retained profit for the financial period 405.6 254.6
------- -------
Carnival plc standalone earnings per share
Basic earnings per share (in U.S. dollars)* 2.47 1.67
Diluted earnings per share (in U.S. dollars)* 2.46 1.66
Dividend per share (in U.S. dollars)* 0.55 0.46
Weighted average number of shares
in issues (in millions)
-Basic* 211.4 209.3
-Diluted* 212.6 210.7
* Stated after the share consolidation (which took place on completion of the dual listed company
("DLC") transaction with Carnival Corporation on April 17, 2003, in which every 3.3289 shares of
Carnival plc were consolidated into 1 share of Carnival plc).
See accompanying notes to the group financial information. This financial information only presents
the UK GAAP results of Carnival plc, and does not include the consolidated results of Carnival
Corporation.
Within the DLC structure the most appropriate presentation of Carnival plc's results and financial
position is considered to be by reference to the U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements of
Carnival Corporation & plc, which are included in the attached Schedule B (see note 1). For
information, we set out below the U.S. GAAP consolidated earnings per share included within the
Carnival Corporation & plc consolidated financial statements for the twelve month periods ended
November 30, 2004 and 2003:
DLC Basic earnings per share (in U.S. dollars) 2004: 2.31 2003: 1.66
DLC Diluted earnings per share (in U.S. dollars) 2004: 2.24 2003: 1.63
CARNIVAL PLC - UK GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUMMARISED GROUP BALANCE SHEET
As at As at
November 30, 2004 November 30, 2003
Restated
(note 1)
US$ millions
Goodwill 749.4 690.4
Ships 7,176.9 8,312.8
Ships under construction 126.3 711.9
Properties and other fixed assets 544.9 555.6
Investments 7.9 9.6
------- --------
Total fixed assets 8,605.4 10,280.3
------- --------
Current assets
Stocks 106.3 120.0
Debtors 452.2 537.8
Cash at bank and in hand 174.5 221.6
------- --------
733.0 879.4
Creditors: amounts falling
due within one year (2,531.1) (4,675.6)
------- --------
Net current liabilities (1,798.1) (3,796.2)
------- --------
Total assets less current liabilities 6,807.3 6,484.1
Creditors: amounts falling due
after more than one year and
provisions for liabilities
and charges (2,289.4) (4,269.0)
------- --------
Net assets 4,517.9 2,215.1
------- --------
Equity shareholders' funds 4,515.9 2,214.2
Equity minority interests 2.0 0.9
------- --------
4,517.9 2,215.1
------- --------
See accompanying notes to the group financial information. This financial information only presents
the UK GAAP results of Carnival plc, and does not include the consolidated results of Carnival
Corporation.
Within the DLC structure the most appropriate presentation of Carnival plc's results and financial
position is considered to be by reference to the U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements of
Carnival Corporation & plc, which are included in the attached Schedule B (see note 1).
CARNIVAL PLC - UK GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUMMARISED GROUP CASH FLOW STATEMENT
Twelve Months to Eleven months to
November 30, 2004 November 30, 2003
Restated
(note 1)
US$ millions
Net cash inflow from operating activities 1,076.8 894.8
Returns on investments and servicing of finance (122.6) (174.9)
Taxation (10.3) (26.6)
Capital expenditure and financial investment
Purchase of ships (1,663.5) (1,516.9)
Purchase of other fixed assets (111.6) (103.6)
Purchase of own shares - (7.3)
Disposal of ships 150.1 20.0
Disposal of other fixed assets 12.9 3.7
------- -------
Net cash outflow for capital expenditure
and financial investment (1,612.1) (1,604.1)
Acquisitions and disposals
Purchase of subsidiaries and long-term
investments (4.1) (65.7)
Disposal of subsidiaries and long-term
investments 1.8 -
Cash disposed on corporate restructuring (note 2) (29.3) -
Equity dividends paid (105.4) (62.5)
------- -------
Net cash outflow before financing (805.2) (1,039.0)
------- -------
Net cash inflow from financing 728.5 1,066.2
------- -------
(Decrease)/increase in net cash in the period (76.7) 27.2
------- -------
Reconciliation to net debt including
Carnival Corporation funding
Net debt at beginning of period (7,109.1) (6,436.4)
(Decrease)/increase in net cash (76.7) 27.2
Cash inflow from loans with Carnival Corporation (1,145.9) (314.3)
Movements in borrowings 456.1 (435.9)
Non-cash movements in borrowings
Carnival Corporation capital contribution - 314.9
Carnival Corporation loan note on corporate
restructuring (note 2) 3,864.6 -
Debt disposed on corporate restructuring (note 2) 748.8 -
Carnival Corporation loan note on ship transfers 358.6 -
Amortisation of bond issue costs (1.4) (1.9)
Exchange adjustments (278.4) (262.7)
------- -------
Net debt at end of period (3,183.4) (7,109.1)
------- -------
See accompanying notes to the group financial information. This financial information only presents
the UK GAAP results of Carnival plc, and does not include the consolidated results of Carnival
Corporation.
Within the DLC structure the most appropriate presentation of Carnival plc's results and financial
position is considered to be by reference to the U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements of
Carnival Corporation & plc, which are included in the attached Schedule B (see note 1).
CARNIVAL PLC - UK GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
RECONCILIATION OF MOVEMENTS IN GROUP SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS
Twelve Months to Eleven months to
November 30, 2004 November 30, 2003
Restated
(note 1)
US$ millions
Profit for the period 522.1 348.8
Exchange movements 384.8 196.7
------- -------
Total recognised gains for the period 906.9 545.5
Dividends (116.5) (94.2)
New shares issued 38.7 27.8
Shares to be issued - (57.5)
Net movement in own shares held - (0.7)
Net investment in merged businesses
by Carnival Corporation (note 1) 1,472.6 603.1
------- -------
2,301.7 1,024.0
Shareholders' funds at beginning of the
period (Group shareholders' funds at
January 1, 2003 were originally
$1,193.1m before deducting the prior
year adjustment of $2.9m) 2,214.2 1,190.2
------- -------
Shareholders' funds at end of the period 4,515.9 2,214.2
------- -------
See accompanying notes to the group financial information. This financial information only presents
the UK GAAP results of Carnival plc, and does not include the consolidated results of Carnival
Corporation.
Within the DLC structure the most appropriate presentation of Carnival plc's results and financial
position is considered to be by reference to the U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements of
Carnival Corporation & plc, which are included in the attached Schedule B (see note 1).
CARNIVAL PLC - NOTES TO UK GAAP GROUP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Note 1. Basis of preparation
On April 17, 2003, Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc (formerly known as P&O Princess Cruises
plc) completed a dual listed company ("DLC") transaction (the "DLC transaction"), which implemented
the Carnival Corporation & plc DLC structure. The DLC transaction combined the businesses of Carnival
Corporation and Carnival plc (collectively known as "Carnival Corporation & plc") through a number of
contracts and through amendments to Carnival Corporation's articles of incorporation and by-laws and
to Carnival plc's memorandum of association and articles of association. The two companies have
retained their separate legal identities, however, they operate as if they were a single economic
enterprise. Each company's shares continue to be publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange
("NYSE") for Carnival Corporation and the London Stock Exchange for Carnival plc. In addition,
Carnival plc American Depository Shares are traded on the NYSE. The contracts governing the DLC
structure provide that Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc each continue to have separate boards of
directors, but the boards and senior executive management of both companies are identical.
In order to provide the Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc shareholders with the most
meaningful picture of their economic interest in the DLC formed by Carnival Corporation and Carnival
plc, consolidated financial statements and management commentary of Carnival Corporation & plc have
been included in Schedules A and B to this announcement. The consolidated Carnival Corporation & plc
financial statements have been prepared under purchase accounting principles whereby the DLC
transaction has been accounted for as an acquisition of Carnival plc by Carnival Corporation.
Therefore, the consolidated Carnival Corporation & plc financial statements include Carnival plc from
April 17, 2003, being the effective date of its acquisition by Carnival Corporation. These
consolidated Carnival Corporation & plc financial statements have been prepared under U.S. GAAP on the
basis that all significant financial and operating decisions affecting the DLC companies are taken on
the basis of U.S. GAAP information and consequences.
The standalone Carnival plc UK GAAP financial information is required to satisfy reporting
requirements of the UKLA and does not include the results of Carnival Corporation. However, the
directors consider that within the DLC arrangement the most appropriate presentation of Carnival plc's
results and financial position is by reference to the U.S. GAAP financial statements of Carnival
Corporation & plc, which are included in the attached Schedule B.
As described in note 2, commencing from December 1, 2003 Carnival Corporation & plc undertook a
corporate restructuring. Given the nature of the DLC structure, the transactions have been accounted
for as a group reconstruction applying merger accounting principles. As a result, the financial
information of Carnival plc for the periods ended November 30, 2004 and November 30, 2003 has been
presented as if the Carnival plc group had always included the businesses represented by Cunard Line
Limited, excluding Seabourn Cruise Line ("Cunard"), Costa Finance S.A. ("Costa") and the land based
operations located in North America, the UK and Mexico, previously owned by Carnival Corporation.
Except for the accounting policy change relating to the first time adoption of Urgent Issues Task
Force Abstract 38 "Accounting for ESOP Trusts" ("UITF 38"), the accounts for the twelve months ended
November 30, 2004 have been prepared using the accounting policies disclosed in the Annual Report and
Accounts for the period ended November 30, 2003.
UITF 38 has been adopted for the first time in these financial statements. As required by the
UITF, own shares held by the Carnival plc Employee Benefit Trust have been reclassified from fixed
asset investments to treasury stock resulting in a reduction in shareholders' funds. The balance
sheet as at November 30, 2003 has been restated to reflect this change in accounting policy, resulting
in a reduction in shareholders' funds of $3.6m as at November 30, 2003. The impact on the profit and
loss account in the current and prior period is immaterial.
Note 2. Corporate restructuring
On December 1, 2003 Carnival Corporation & plc commenced a corporate restructuring involving the
transfer within the DLC group of subsidiary companies below Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc.
These transactions were undertaken primarily to facilitate business integration and the flow of funds
between affiliated companies.
The principal transactions of the restructuring, which were substantially completed by April
2004, were:
* the transfer by Carnival plc to Carnival Corporation of Princess Cruise Lines Limited and a
number of related ship owning entities, which operate and own substantially all of Princess Cruises,
together with Carnival plc's obligations under public and private U.S. dollar notes and related
derivatives; and
* the transfer by Carnival Corporation to Carnival plc of the cruise operations of both Cunard and
Costa, as well as Carnival Corporation's North American, UK and Mexican land based operations,
including its Alaska and Canadian Yukon tour businesses and its Mexican port operation (the "Merged
Businesses").
AIDA Cruises, Ocean Village, P&O Cruises, Swan Hellenic, and P&O Cruises Australia continue to be
owned and operated within Carnival plc.
Due to the nature of the DLC structure, this series of transactions has been accounted for as a
group reconstruction in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 6, using merger accounting
principles to reflect the combination of Carnival plc with the Merged Businesses. As a result, the
financial statements of Carnival plc for the periods ended November 30, 2004 and 2003 have been
presented as if the Carnival plc group had always included the Merged Businesses. Accordingly, the
assets and liabilities of the Merged Businesses have been included in these financial statements at
their book values. Under the DLC agreement, the transfer of assets and liabilities between Carnival
Corporation and Carnival plc is based on fair market values. Accordingly, the difference between the
book value and the fair value of the Merged Businesses (which equates to the value of the
consideration paid) is included in equity shareholders' funds.
The businesses which were transferred from Carnival plc to Carnival Corporation have been
accounted for as a disposal in these financial statements. The difference between the book value and
the fair value of these businesses (which equates to the value of the consideration received) of
approximately $1.47bn, has been shown as a movement in 2004 equity shareholders' funds.
The directors consider that within the DLC structure the use of merger accounting for the
restructuring is required to give a true and fair presentation of the transfer of businesses from
Carnival Corporation. This represents a departure from the provision of the Companies Act 1985 which
sets out the conditions for merger accounting based on the assumption that a merger is effected
through the issue of equity shares. The main consequence of adopting merger rather than acquisition
accounting is that the balance sheet of the Group includes the assets and liabilities of the Merged
Businesses at their book values prior to the merger, rather than at their fair values at the date of
the merger. Further, as a result of this accounting treatment, the disposal of businesses to Carnival
Corporation did not result in a gain or loss on disposal. In the particular circumstances of the
merger, the effect of applying acquisition accounting cannot reasonably be quantified.
Note 3. Discontinued operations
Pursuant to the corporate restructuring substantially all of the Princess Cruises operation was
treated as discontinued in 2003. The transfer of Princess Cruises was completed on December 1, 2003,
and thus there is no trading activity to report in the twelve months ended November 30, 2004.
Accordingly, the profits and losses in the twelve months ended November 30, 2004 arose from continuing
activities only. Turnover in respect of discontinued operations in the eleven month period ended
November 30, 2003 was $1,398.7m and operating profit was $265.1m.
Note 4. Exceptional transaction costs
Carnival plc's results for the eleven months ended November 30, 2003 include $30.7m related to
legal and professional expenses incurred in connection with the Royal Caribbean International Ltd.
terminated transaction and the Carnival Corporation DLC transaction.
Latest directors dealings
- 1 day ago The Renewables Infrastructure Group Limited
- 1 day ago The Renewables Infrastructure Group Limited
- 1 day ago Smurfit Westrock (DI)
- 1 day ago Menhaden Resource Efficiency
- 1 day ago BP