Final Results
MONTANARO UK SMALLER COMPANIES INVESTMENT TRUST PLC
PRELIMINARY ANNOUNCEMENT OF AUDITED ANNUAL RESULTS
The Directors announce the audited statement of results for the year ended 31
March 2002 as follows:-
SUMMARISED STATEMENT OF TOTAL RETURN
(incorporating the revenue account* of the Company)
1 April 2001 to 31 March 1 April 2000 to 31 March
2002 2001
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Capital losses on
investments - (10,702) (10,702) - (4,932) (4,932)
Dividends and interest 2,256 - 2,256 2,113 - 2,113
receivable
Other income 13 - 13 2 - 2
Investment management (510) (510) (1,020) (1,174) - (1,174)
fee
Other expenses (422) - (422) (232) - (232)
Net return before
financing costs
and taxation 1,337 (11,212) (9,875) 709 (4,932) (4,223)
Interest payable and
similar
charges (311) (311) (622) (684) - (684)
Return on ordinary
activities
before taxation 1,026 (11,523) (10,497) 25 (4,932) (4,907)
Taxation on ordinary - - - - - -
activities
Return on ordinary 1,026 (11,523) (10,497) 25 (4,932) (4,907)
activities after
taxation
Dividends proposed (690) - (690) (120) - (120)
Transfer to/(from)
reserves
after dividends proposed 336 (11,523) (11,187) (95) (4,932) (5,027)
Pence Pence Pence Pence Pence Pence
Return per ordinary 2.66 (29.84) (27.18) 0.06 (12.30) (12.24)
share
* The revenue column of this statement is the revenue account of the Company.
The accounts have been prepared using accounting standards and policies adopted
at the previous year
end.
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing
operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the year.
SUMMARISED BALANCE SHEET
As at As at
31 March 31 March
2002 2001
£'000 £'000
Investments 78,543 89,979
Net current (liabilities)/assets (4,774) 6,514
Total assets less current liabilities 73,769 96,493
Creditors - amounts falling due after
more than one year - (7,500)
Net assets 73,769 88,993
Net asset value per ordinary share 197.84p 221.92p
STATEMENT OF CASHFLOWS
As at 31 As at 31
March March
2002 2001
£000 £000
Operating activities
- Investment income received 2,044 1,859
- Deposit interest received 262 281
- Underwriting commission received 13 2
- Investment Management fee (1,327) (1,068)
- Company Secretarial fees paid (50) (49)
- Other expenses (606) (397)
Net cash inflow from operating
Activities 336 628
Servicing of finance
- Interest and similar charges paid (614) (748)
Net cash outflow from servicing of finance (614) (748)
Taxation
- Taxation recovered 105 -
Net inflow from taxation 105 -
Capital expenditure and financial investment
- Purchases of investments (21,365) (31,397)
- Sales of investments 22,740 38,571
Net cash inflow from capital expenditure
and financial investment 1,375 7,174
Equity dividends paid (120) (120)
Financing
- Repayment of credit facility - (7,500)
- Ordinary shares repurchased
and cancelled (4,037) -
- Warrants repurchased and cancelled - (7)
Net cash outflow from financing (4,037) (7,507)
Decrease in cash (2,955) (573)
The financial information set out above does not constitute the Company's
statutory accounts for the years ended 31 March 2002 or 2001. Statutory
accounts for 2001 have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies, whereas
those for 2002 will be delivered following the Company's Annual General
Meeting. The auditors have reported on those accounts; their reports were
unqualified and did not contain a statement under section 237 (2) or (3) of the
Companies Act 1985.
Chairman's Statement
Background
The Company was launched on 16 March 1995 as an asset allocation vehicle for
institutional shareholders to invest in quoted UK 'smaller' companies. In 1996,
the initial £25 million Company was increased in size through a £30 million 'C'
share issue. Net assets now stand at £74 million.
At the time of the launch, 'smaller' companies were defined as those with a
market capitalisation of £100 million or less. Currently, the Company invests
in companies falling within the SmallCap, although the investment policy
remains to research and invest in the 'smaller' end of the quoted UK small
companies market to maximise returns for both institutional and individual
shareholders. At 31 March 2002, over 70% of the portfolio was held in companies
with a market capitalisation of less than £150 million.
The structure of the fund is important. Due to the investment focus on illiquid
companies, and the preference of investors for a listed structure, the fund was
launched as an investment trust. It avoids the situation where the fund manager
is forced to realise the most liquid portfolio holdings at an inappropriate
time as a result of redemptions that typically arise in periods of weak
stock-market performance. Investment trusts have the benefit of providing a
market in which shareholders can sell their shares. Furthermore, specialist
investment trusts offer both institutional and individual investors the
benefits of diversification.
At the Annual General Meeting held in July 2001, shareholders voted
overwhelmingly in favour of the Company continuing as an investment trust.
Performance
In the year to 31 March 2002, the NAV of the Company declined by 11% to 197.84p
(2001: 221.92p), in comparison with a 12% fall by the SmallCap. Once again, the
Company performed better than the UK small company market, outperforming by 1%.
It was one of only nine UK small company investment trusts to outperform the
SmallCap.
Since launch, the NAV of the Company has increased by more than 100%, whilst
the SmallCap has only risen by 49%. There are a number of requirements for
successful investment in quoted UK small companies. Since this market is
'inefficient', it requires the skills and resources of specialist fund managers
with proven track records. Within such a broad and diverse market, there are
many attractive quoted UK small companies from which to choose. Consistently
successful smallcap managers are those who not only have the skills to identify
sound investments but also the ability to avoid the pitfalls.
The Company has outperformed for seven consecutive years, which is a unique
achievement. This consistent outperformance has been due to the investment
approach and sound stock selection of the Investment Manager, which is one of
the few independent fund managers in the UK to specialise in quoted UK
'smaller' companies. In the past year, it has recruited several analysts to
create one of the largest quoted UK small company teams in the City.
Dividend
The Company's primary focus is on capital appreciation, rather than income. As
a result of the change to the allocation of costs announced last year, the
minimum dividend payable has increased and thus the Board proposes a final
dividend of 1.85p (2001: 0.3p) per ordinary share. The final dividend will be
payable on
31 July 2002 to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 7 June
2002.
Discount
The Company focuses on quoted UK 'smaller' companies, which are less widely
researched and more illiquid than quoted UK small companies, thereby creating
an inefficient market that offers the potential for higher returns. The
closed-end structure enhances the Investment Manager's ability to achieve high
returns through strong NAV performance. However, the illiquidity of the
underlying investments tends to be reflected in the level of discount of the
Company.
The discount of the Company's share price to NAV on 31 March 2002 was 17.9%,
having narrowed from 19% a year earlier, and is in line with the sector average
of 17%. The discount of the Company over the past seven years has averaged
around 15.5% (Source: Bloomberg).
Share Buy Backs
The Board is responsible for the implementation of the share buy back
programme, which is undertaken at arm's length from the Investment Manager. In
the year to 31 March 2002, a total of 2,813,470 shares were repurchased for
cancellation.
The Board will continue to consider share buy backs as and when appropriate.
Approval to renew this authority will be included as a Resolution at the
forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
Share Save Scheme
As previously announced, the Board is introducing a Share Save Scheme to
attract investment in the Company by individual shareholders, who wish to
invest in quoted UK 'smaller' companies for the long-term. Details of the
Scheme will accompany the Annual Report.
Outlook for Equities
It has been a difficult two years for investors in UK equities, whether in
large or small companies. The FTSE-100 Index and the SmallCap have fallen by
19% and 23% respectively, the worst performance since 1973-1974. Investor
confidence is understandably fragile following losses in technology shares in
2000, the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in the US in September 2001 and,
more recently, the collapse of the split capital investment trust market.
Such developments have prompted debate about the wisdom of investing in
equities for the long-term, which had been taken for granted over the past
forty years. The recent Equity-Gilt Study by Barclays Capital shows that, over
the past decade, the average annual return from UK equities was 8.6%, compared
with 9.6% from corporate bonds. Outperformance by corporate bonds has led
people to question the cult of the equity. The much-publicised decision last
year by Boots Company plc to move its £2.3 billion pension fund out of equities
altogether and into corporate bonds has added weight to such debate.
Most UK pension funds on average hold around 70% of their investments in global
equities and the balance in fixed interest securities (mainly gilts) and
property. Currently, we are witnessing a secular asset allocation shift away
from equities into bonds. Suggestions that the asset allocation could shift
further away from equities, reducing the weighting closer to 50% in favour of
corporate bonds, would have significant implications. HSBC has estimated that
this shift would result in the sale of £107 billion of UK equities, which is
equivalent to 7% of the total UK stock-market.
Even if this shift could be achieved in practice, there are simply not enough
corporate bonds in issue to meet such demand. Furthermore, such a development
might well increase risks both in terms of the quality of new corporate bond
issuance and also the level of increased gearing assumed by the companies
themselves.
The decision on the equity/bond allocation must depend on the individual
pension scheme, its requirements and the risk profile deemed appropriate. Any
debate amongst actuaries about optimum asset allocation revolves broadly around
life expectancy and investment returns. One of the benefits of the recent poor
performance of equities has been a healthy lowering of investor return
expectations. From the heady days of the 1980s when real returns of over 12%
were achieved, investors have come to accept that nominal returns of 7-8% are
more realistic in the current low inflationary environment.
To achieve such returns, there has been an increasing move towards indexation.
This is unsurprising after two years of poor performance by equity fund
managers. The argument runs that, since most active fund managers are unable to
consistently outperform global equity markets, it makes sense to be passive. A
refinement is to adopt a core-satellite approach whereby the bulk of equities
are invested in 'efficient' markets such as the FTSE-100 Index via indexation
and incremental performance is achieved at the margin from active management
within 'inefficient' markets such as private equity and small companies.
The trend towards indexation/tracking is potentially unhelpful to quoted UK
small companies, since it tends to marginalise their importance. Currently, the
SmallCap is less than 4% of the FTSE AllShare Index, making it easy for large
institutions to ignore small companies particularly as the proportion of funds
invested (passively) in large companies becomes ever greater.
Inevitably, the arguments in favour of indexation are more forceful after a
period of poor investment returns. Ironically, this is precisely the time when
quoted UK small companies should be more attractive. The inefficiency of this
asset class offers the potential for far higher investment returns through
selective stock picking - precisely the opposite approach to index tracking.
Whereas increasing indexation is unhelpful to quoted UK small companies, the
adoption of a core-satellite approach to asset allocation by large fund
management groups might be positive. Specialist mandates for inefficient asset
classes such as quoted UK small companies offer both the potential for
attractive investment returns and support for often overlooked small companies,
which are an important element of dynamism to a growing economy.
The Company has now reached its seventh anniversary. Since launch, the NAV has
more than doubled in value. The Company has outperformed its benchmark every
year and cumulatively by over 50% after deduction of all costs. It has also
outperformed the FTSE AllShare Index by 34%.
The Company demonstrates that sound stock selection from a specialist fund
manager with a proven track record operating within an appropriate fund
structure can deliver attractive returns even when prevailing markets are
subdued. It remains the only UK small company investment trust to have
outperformed for seven consecutive years.
SIR BRANDON GOUGH
Chairman
27 May 2002