Half-yearly report to 30 June 2010

ABERFORTH SMALLER COMPANIES TRUST plc HALF YEARLY REPORT For the Six Months ended 30 June 2010 Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (ASCoT) invests only in small UK quoted companies and is managed by Aberforth Partners LLP. The investment objective of ASCoT is to achieve a net asset value total return (with dividends reinvested) greater than on the RBS Hoare Govett Smaller Companies Index (Excluding Investment Companies) over the long term. All data throughout this Half Yearly Report is to, or as at, 30 June 2010 as applicable, unless otherwise stated. CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT For the six months to 30 June 2010, Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (ASCoT) achieved a net asset value total return of -0.5%, which compares with a total return of 1.2% from the RBS HGSC Index (Excluding Investment Companies), your Company's investment benchmark. Larger companies, as represented by the FTSE All- Share Index, registered a total return of -6.1%. ASCoT, therefore, outperformed the FTSE All-Share, but underperformed its benchmark. This is my first Statement to Shareholders since I became Chairman following the Annual General Meeting in March 2010. The period under review has been eventful. The macro environment has once again been dominated by the inflation versus deflation debate. Against a backdrop of increasing concerns over sovereign debt levels, and the appropriate timelines for austerity measures to be implemented, it is perhaps not so surprising to see deflationary forces build over the period. In the UK, as predicted by the pollsters, the election resulted in the first hung parliament since the early seventies. Notwithstanding the risks associated with austerity measures, initial policy actions have, in the short term, been well received by financial markets and the business community alike. This is helpful in maintaining confidence in the current fragile economic climate. During the period the UK stockmarket was influenced by three major events all worthy of comment. Two of these arose in the large cap world where both the impact of the Macondo well blow-out on BP and the misjudgement by Prudential over their proposed AIG Asia acquisition will, I am sure, come to be judged as momentous events. The consequent negative returns from these two companies, especially BP, were responsible for lowering the returns on the FTSE All-Share by over 3 percentage points, helping explain to some extent why large caps underperformed smaller companies over the period. The third factor, which has received a fraction of the media coverage of either BP or Prudential, is the nascent dividend recovery that is occurring within the UK stockmarket (ex-BP). Your Managers provide greater information and detail in their report but it is genuinely encouraging to be able to report to Shareholders on such a trend a mere fifteen months on from the depths of fourth quarter 2008, and after the unprecedented level of dividend cuts by many UK companies in 2009. A continuation of this recovery in dividends, if achieved, would likely be supportive of asset prices whilst providing Shareholders with a growing income stream. Gearing remains substantially unchanged over the period and, as at 30 June 2010, stood at 9.2%. On 4 March 2010, your Board was pleased to announce a first interim dividend of 6.0p per Ordinary Share in respect of the current financial year. The dividend was paid on 2 April 2010 to Shareholders on the register on 12 March 2010. Your Board believed that it was in Shareholders' interests to accelerate the timing of this year's first interim dividend, which would normally have been paid in August 2010. It is anticipated that future dividend payments will revert to the normal dividend schedule with the next anticipated payment date being February 2011. The revenue reserves at 30 June 2010 have been temporarily depressed as a result of this payment. At the Annual General Meeting on 3 March 2010, all resolutions proposed were passed, including that which renewed the authority to buy-in up to 14.99% of ASCoT's Ordinary Shares. During the six months to the end of June 2010, 120,000 shares (0.12% of the issued share capital) were purchased and cancelled under this authority for a total consideration of £647,000 at an average discount of 15.7%. Economic recoveries are by their very nature fragile, and history would point to more than a few bumps along the road to recovery. That fragility only increases when an economic downturn coincides with a banking crisis. Your Board fully appreciates the Managers' portfolio positioning in seeking both a margin of safety in valuation terms by being overweight in the "smaller" small companies in the RBS HGSC universe but also reinforcing it with balance sheet flexibility at the investee company level. In the short term such positioning may be somewhat out of fashion, but this should change either over time as the stockmarket re-rates future income streams or more immediately as M&A activity continues to recover. Your Board remains confident that the Managers' experience and consistency of approach will benefit ASCoT over the long term. Prof. Paul Marsh Chairman 20 July 2010 MANAGERS' REPORT Investment background Small UK quoted companies extended the gains achieved in 2009. The RBS Hoare Govett Smaller Companies Index(XIC) ( RBS HGSC (XIC) or the benchmark) recorded a total return of 1.2%, which exceeded the -6.1% return of large companies as measured by the FTSE All-Share. In an echo of the pre-crisis bull market, the sweet-spot within the UK was the FTSE 250. The mid caps, which account for over three quarters of the market capitalisation of the RBS HGSC (XIC), were up by 2.1%. In contrast, `smaller small' companies, as measured by the FTSE SmallCap, experienced a total return of -3.6%. While these generally positive returns reflected the ongoing recovery from recession, the overall figures mask a period of considerable volatility. May and June witnessed substantial declines for equities worldwide as a combination of top-down concerns conspired to bring the risk of deflation back to the fore and to undermine risk appetites and confidence in the recovery. The RBS HGSC (XIC) shared in the pain, falling by 12% from its late April peak to the end of June. Of these concerns, that which made most headlines was the Greek sovereign debt crisis, which threatened to spread around the fringes of the euro zone and drove the euro down by 13% against the dollar. The financial markets were initially unconvinced by the official response. However, the European Central Bank and IMF unveiled a €750bn package in early May, which may go on to encompass measures such as quantitative easing. This seems to have restored some confidence, but risks of contagion and the implications for lenders to these countries continued to buffet the markets as the first half drew to a close. Doubts about the euro coincided with the impact of more restrictive policies within China. Here authorities appear concerned that the success of last year's stimulus in sustaining GDP growth of above 8% risks over-heating, particularly in the property sector. The view of China as an autonomous source of growth played an important part in the rebound in equities around the globe in 2009. Any challenge to this was always going to test the equity markets' mettle, as will be the case when the Western economies see fit to withdraw their own monetary stimuli. Late in June, China wrong-footed the markets again with an indication that its currency peg to the dollar would be relaxed. On balance this was taken positively, since, at the margin, a stronger renminbi would soften China's mercantilism and rebalance growth towards the Chinese consumer. On top of these global issues, the UK market has had to contend with the general election and an austerity budget. With ten year yields dropping from 4.0% to 3.4%, the gilt market was reassured by the outcome of the election, with the coalition government emphasising fiscal rectitude in the budget. These actions are not, however, without risk and have alarmed those of a Keynesian persuasion, who see risks of a double dip recession, or worse, as fiscal policy is tightened against the background of still uncertain domestic and international demand. For the Chancellor's strategy to succeed, the onus is on the private sector and companies in particular to take up the strain. There is reason for optimism among small UK quoted companies. Results through the first half of the year were on the whole strong, benefiting from a modest pick-up in sales and, more particularly, from the deep cost cutting exercises undertaken last year. Balance sheets in general are in good shape, helped in some cases by the substantial equity issuance that took place in 2009. With the corporate sector looking relatively robust in many major developed economies, these characteristics are not unique to constituents of the RBS HGSC (XIC). However, as detailed below, many small UK quoted companies are reflecting their more rapid than expected return to good levels of profitability in an encouraging dividend performance. Performance Analysis The first quarter of the year saw ASCoT secure a net asset value total return of 5.7%. With the stockmarket driven by a continuation of the recovery that took hold in 2009, the RBS HGSC (XIC)'s return was greater at 8.5%. This was driven by a 10.3% total return from the FTSE 250. Moving into the second quarter, the influence of the macro economic concerns previously described grew. In this environment, ASCoT's relative performance improved: its total return was -5.9% against -6.7% for the benchmark. However, over the first half as a whole ASCoT's NAV total return was -0.5%, which represents under-performance against the RBS HGSC (XIC) of 169 basis points (or 1.7%). The following table and paragraphs explain this performance. Performance Attribution Analysis For the six months ended 30 June 2010 Basis Points Stock selection } (96) Sector selection } Based on mid-prices (26) ----- Attributable to the portfolio of investments (122) (after transaction costs of 29 basis points) Movement in the spread between mid and bid prics 2 Cash/gearing (6) Purchase of Ordinary Shares 2 Management fee (41) Other expenses (4) ----- Total attribution based on bid-prices (169) ----- Note: 100 basis points = 1%. Total attribution is the difference between the total return of the net asset value and the Benchmark Index (i.e. net asset value = -0.50%; Benchmark Index = 1.19%; difference is -1.69% being -169 basis points). · At the portfolio level, attribution was negative. The `fallen stars', which so affected returns in 2009 and which were described in last year's reports, were not a significant factor. Many left the benchmark on its rebalancing at the start of this year and several of those that remained actually suffered badly in the difficult market in the second quarter. · In explaining sector selection, no individual sector or top down theme stands out. The portfolio is biased away from domestically oriented sectors and towards capital goods. This proved helpful, but, as concerns about growth in China and the US intensified over the first half, the benefit diminished. With China the marginal source of demand for industrial metals, these concerns also justified the lack of exposure to the commodities sectors through most of the period. However, such was the de-rating of mining and metals companies in May and June that new positions in two commodities businesses were taken. · Negative stock selection accounted for the majority of the under- performance. Four stocks each detracted at least 50 basis points from relative performance. All four represented at least 1.3% of the portfolio at the start of the year and, as with virtually all holdings, thus had a significant active weight. Three of the four issued disappointing trading updates through the first half. In a portfolio of 88 companies, this is not an uncommonly high incidence of profit warnings and, indeed, it was balanced by positive contributions from other holdings on the back of strong results. · The portfolio's size positioning was unhelpful and influenced both stock and sector selection. The RBS HGSC (XIC) has a substantial overlap with the FTSE 250, to the extent that mid caps accounted for 76% of the benchmark's market capitalisation at the end of June. In contrast, the portfolio's weighting in mid caps is 47%. Therefore, the large spread in performance between the FTSE 250, which was up by 2.1%, and the FTSE SmallCap, which was down by 3.6%, had an impact on relative returns. This over-weight position in the smaller constituents of the benchmark has been built up over time. It reflects the lower valuations available to your Managers down the scale of market capitalisations. The forward PE ratio of the FTSE SmallCap was 22% below that of the FTSE 250 at the end of June. Meanwhile, the FTSE SmallCap's yield was 34% higher than that of the mid caps. Some difference to reflect the illiquidity of smaller companies is probably justified but these levels seem excessive, especially and crucially when there is little discernible gap in the fundamental prospects of the companies in each part of the benchmark. · In the environment of very low or negative stockmarket returns, ASCoT's gearing proved unhelpful over the first half, modestly reducing relative returns to the tune of six basis points. · An indication of the fundamental prospects of the portfolio companies is the dividend decisions made by boards through the first half. The picture that emerges from an analysis of the 88 holdings at the end of June is encouraging and is summarised in the following table: Band Nil IPOs Down Flat +0-10% +10-20% + >20% No. of holdings 20 3 5 15 18 11 16 The `Nil' category includes those companies that did not pay a dividend in the first half. Just over half of those can be termed structural nil payers, typically technology businesses at a relatively early stage of development. The others may be considered cyclical nil payers that will come back to the dividend register once their profits recover. This latter phenomenon is relevant to the wider small company universe and can have a meaningful impact on aggregate reported dividend growth. Of the three holdings in IPOs, two are expected to go on to pay dividends. Five companies cut their dividends, which is not an abnormal incidence even in steadier economic conditions. The positive aspect of the analysis is the number of companies in the three right hand columns: 45 companies chose to announce increased dividends, some by a significant amount. Going into recession, your Managers emphasised the notion of being `paid to wait' for a recovery: a sustainable dividend yield can provide some compensation in periods of difficult trading. In the event, last year turned out to be the worst in terms of dividends in the RBS HGSC (XIC)'s history. ASCoT's portfolio fared less badly, but there were nevertheless some disappointing dividend decisions. The turnaround encapsulated in the preceding analysis is therefore welcome and is indicative of the rapid cost reductions implemented by the management teams of investee companies last year. It has come earlier than your Managers had expected, even at the start of the year, and is clearly supportive of ASCoT's income account. · When making their decisions about dividends, the boards of those companies in which ASCoT invests would have taken comfort from the strength of their balance sheets. At the end of the half year, just under one third of the portfolio was invested in companies with net cash on their balance sheets. Your Managers' preference for well financed businesses was not helpful to relative returns last year, when the stockmarket's charge was led by companies with indebted balance sheets and greater potential for recovery. However, the positioning proved assistive in the pessimism of the second quarter. Beyond this defensive aspect, a strong balance sheet gives a business the flexibility to invest at a time when more highly geared competitors remain challenged by the banks' focus on the repair of their own balance sheets. It is not your Managers' desire to see substantial balances of net cash reside on balance sheets indefinitely: if it cannot be invested profitably, a return of surplus cash to shareholders would seem appropriate. · Of course, management teams often use strong balance sheets to pursue M&A. While the dearth of mega deals continues, corporate activity in 2010 has, consistent with previous cycles, shown signs of life within the small company world. Last year was depressed with only 14 RBS HGSC (XIC) companies acquired, against an average of 50 per annum in the preceding five years. However, through the first half, deals for five companies, three of which were portfolio holdings, were completed. On top of those, twelve benchmark constituents were at some stage of talks at the end of June. Again, echoing previous cycles, the predators have frequently been large American companies, which typically trade on higher valuations than their smaller UK peers and, at the current time, benefit from the strength of the dollar. Premiums to stockmarket valuations have often been large, especially in those businesses further down the scale of market capitalisations. By way of illustration, at the quarter end one company had agreed a bid with an American trade buyer 262% above its £60m market capitalisation prior to the announcement of an approach. Regrettably, this company was not held within the portfolio, but this episode perhaps demonstrates how a continued recovery in M&A might be one way in which ASCoT stands to benefit from its size positioning. Conclusion & Investment Outlook Confidence in continued recovery and appetite for risk waned in May and June. Entering the second half, investors are confronted by doubts about China's contribution to global growth, fears of a `double-dip' recession in the US and ongoing sovereign debt concerns within Europe. If all that is not enough, the domestic economy has to cope with the implications of an austerity budget that a significant number of economists consider inappropriate. Weighed against these negative factors are the likelihood of very low interest rates for a number of years that will aid balance sheet repair, the coalition government's clear plans to control a public sector that has probably `crowded out' private sector activity in recent years, and the underlying health of the UK corporate sector. That health is obvious in the world of small UK quoted companies, which are, on the whole, well financed and, as previously demonstrated, able to reflect their robustness in good levels of dividend growth. But perhaps the most important factor that encourages your Managers in the face of the various macro economic challenges is the abundance of attractive valuations on offer within the RBS HGSC (XIC). 30 June 2010 31 December 2009 30 June 2009 Characteristics ASCoT Benchmark ASCoT Benchmark ASCoT Benchmark Number of 88 437 87 448 92 480 Companies Weighted Average £370m £668m £368m £619m £327m £605m Market Capitalisation Price Earnings 9.8x 12.8x 8.1x 11.2x 7.0x 8.7x Ratio (Historic) Net Dividend 3.0% 2.7% 3.2% 2.7% 4.3% 3.6% Yield (Historic) Dividend Cover 3.4x 2.9x 3.9x 3.3x 3.3x 3.2x (Historic) As the preceding table shows, valuations have moved upwards over the past twelve months. This reflects both falling profits as the recession took its toll and rising share prices in anticipation of recovery. The average PE ratio of ASCoT's portfolio was 9.8x at the end of June. In relation to the average PE of the RBS HGSC (XIC), the portfolio stands at a 23% discount, which compares with a long term average discount of 8%. Against its own history, the portfolio also represents good value, with the average PE over ASCoT's twenty years of 13.0x. Given the falls in profits endured through the recession, a higher than average valuation might be expected to reflect the scope for profits to grow strongly as the economy recovers. This is indeed what happened during the recovery from the recession in the early 1990s. The present valuation therefore reflects the market's doubts about the sustainability of the present recovery: a lot of the bad news, if indeed the infamous `double-dip' comes to pass, may already be in the price. Some additional comfort may be taken from the well diversified income profile of the portfolio. Consistent with the dividend experience so far in 2010, the strong balance sheets within the portfolio and a still high dividend cover of 3.4x, the dividends generating the 3.0% historic yield might be expected to grow. Echoing the strategy of 2008, being `paid to wait' might provide some compensation as the various macro economic dramas are played out. In judging the appropriateness of ASCoT's tactical gearing, your Managers continue to emphasise the attractive absolute valuations on offer within the small company universe. Over time, they should provide the basis for improved performance, notwithstanding current macro economic challenges. As the valuation disparities narrow- whether between `smaller small' and midcap companies or between well financed and highly geared companies - gearing should enhance the returns that accrue to ASCoT's shareholders. Aberforth Partners LLP Managers 20 July 2010 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO Fifty Largest Investments as at 30 June 2010 Valuation % of No Company £'000 Total Business Activity 1 JD Sports Fashion 21,319 3.8 Retailing - sports goods & clothing 2 Huntsworth 17,653 3.1 Media - public relations 3 Domino Printing 16,933 3.0 Industrial printers & inks Sciences 4 Beazley 16,171 2.9 Lloyds insurer 5 RPC Group 15,032 2.7 Plastic packaging 6 Bodycote 13,461 2.4 Engineering - heat treatment 7 Spectris 13,098 2.3 Diversified electronics businesses 8 JKX Oil & Gas 12,537 2.2 Oil & gas exploration & production 9 RPS Group 12,038 2.1 Energy & environmental consulting 10 Tullett Prebon 11,920 2.1 Inter dealer broker Top Ten Investments 150,162 26.6 11 CSR 11,759 2.1 Location & connectivity chips for mobile devices 12 Greggs 11,578 2.1 Retailing - baked products & sandwiches 13 Phoenix IT Group 11,567 2.0 IT services & disaster recovery 14 Hampson Industries 11,453 2.0 Composite tools & components for aerospace 15 St. Modwen 10,917 1.9 Property development Properties 16 e2v technologies 10,858 1.9 Electronic components & subsystems 17 Collins Stewart 10,593 1.9 Stockbroker & private client fund manager 18 Holidaybreak 10,329 1.8 Education & holiday services 19 Millenium & Copt. 9,928 1.8 Hotels Hotels 20 Anite 9,728 1.7 Software - telecoms & travel Top Twenty Investments 258,872 45.8 21 Galliford Try 9,311 1.6 Housebuilding & construction services 22 Micro Focus 9,077 1.6 Software - development & testing International 23 Wilmington Group 9,074 1.6 Information & training for professional business market 24 Punch Taverns 8,906 1.6 Leased & managed pub operator 25 UMECO 8,593 1.5 Supply chain management & advanced composite materials 26 National Express 8,487 1.5 Train, bus & coach operator Group 27 Melrose Resources 8,450 1.5 Oil exploration & development 28 Regus 8,434 1.5 Serviced office accommodation 29 Evolution Group 8,283 1.5 Stockbroker & private client fund manager 30 Biocompatibles Intl. 8,250 1.4 Drug-delivery technology Top Thirty Investments 345,737 61.1 31 Pace 8,103 1.4 Design & sourcing of set top boxes 32 Dunelm Group 7,940 1.4 Homewares retailer 33 Keller Group 7,800 1.4 Ground engineering services 34 Low & Bonar 7,718 1.4 Manufacture of industrial textiles 35 Dialight 7,690 1.3 LED based lighting solutions 36 Kofax 7,443 1.3 Document capture software 37 RM 7,351 1.3 IT services for schools 38 Ferrexpo 7,325 1.3 Iron ore resource company 39 United Business 7,298 1.3 B2B media conglomerate Media 40 Microgen 7,092 1.3 Workflow & financial services software Top Forty Investments 421,497 74.5 41 Redrow 6,876 1.2 Housebuilding 42 Bellway 6,848 1.2 Housebuilding 43 Intec Telecom 6,794 1.2 Billing software & related services Systems 44 Brewin Dolphin 6,777 1.2 Stockbroker & private client fund manager Holdings 45 Elementis 6,604 1.2 Specialty chemicals producer 46 Castings 6,367 1.2 Engineering - automotive castings 47 Ashtead Group 6,330 1.1 Plant hire 48 ProStrakan Group 6,302 1.1 Speciality pharmaceutical business 49 Hansard Global 6,265 1.1 Life assurance savings products 50 Debenhams 6,166 1.1 Department stores Top Fifty Investments 486,826 86.1 Other Investments(38)130,487 23.1 ------- ----- Total Investments 617,313 109.2 Net Liabilities (51,766)(9.2) ------- ----- Total Net Assets 565,547 100.0 INTERIM MANAGEMENT REPORT Risks and Uncertainties A review of the half year and the outlook for the Company can be found in the Chairman's Statement and the Managers' Report. The Directors have established an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing the key risks faced by the Company. The Board believes that the Company has a relatively low risk profile in the context of the investment trust industry. This belief arises from the fact that the Company has a simple capital structure; invests only in small UK quoted companies; has never been exposed to derivatives and does not presently intend any such exposure; and outsources all the main operational activities to recognised, well established firms. As the Company's investments consist of small UK quoted companies, the principal risks facing the Company are market related and include market price, interest rate, credit and liquidity risk. Additional risks faced by the Company include investment objective, investment policy, share price discount, regulatory and operational/financial risk and gearing risk. An explanation of these risks and how they are managed can be found in the Directors' Report contained within the 2009 Annual Report. These principal risks and uncertainties have not changed from those disclosed in the 2009 Annual Report. DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT The Directors confirm that, to the best of their knowledge: (i) the condensed set of financial statements has been prepared in accordance with the Statement `Half-yearly financial reports' issued by the UK Accounting Standards Board; and (ii) the half-yearly report includes a fair review of information required by: (a) DTR 4.2.7R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being an indication of important events during the first six months of the year and their impact on the financial statements together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties for the remaining six months of the year; and (b) DTR 4.2.8R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being disclosure of related party transactions and changes therein. On behalf of the Board Prof. Paul Marsh Chairman 20 July 2010 The Income Statement, Reconciliation of Movements in Shareholders' Funds, Balance Sheet and the Cash Flow Statement are set out below:- INCOME STATEMENT (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2010 Revenue Capital Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Realised net gains on sales - 18,096 18,096 Movement in fair value - (26,536) (26,536) -------- --------- --------- Net losses on investments - (8,440) (8,440) Dividend income 11,590 - 11,590 Other income 42 - 42 Investment management fee (891) (1,486) (2,377) (Note 2) Transaction costs - (1,693) (1,693) Other expenses (223) - (223) -------- --------- --------- Return on ordinary 10,518 (11,619) (1,101) activities before finance costs and tax Finance costs (458) (763) (1,221) -------- --------- --------- Return on ordinary 10,060 (12,382) (2,322) activities before tax Tax on ordinary activities - - - -------- -------- -------- Return attributable to 10,060 (12,382) (2,322) equity shareholders ======== ======== ======== Returns per Ordinary Share 10.39p (12.79p) (2.40p) (Note 4) On 4 March 2010, the Board declared a first interim dividend for the year ending 31 December 2010 of 6.00p per Ordinary Share (2009 - 6.00p) which was paid on 2 April 2010. INCOME STATEMENT (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2009 Revenue Capital Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Realised net losses on sales - (45,943) (45,943) Movement in fair value - 123,024 123,024 --------- ---------- ---------- Net gains on investments - 77,081 77,081 Dividend income 10,750 846 11,596 Other income 97 - 97 Investment management fee (619) (1,031) (1,650) (Note 2) Transaction costs - (1,068) (1,068) Other expenses (218) - (218) -------- --------- --------- Return on ordinary 10,010 75,828 85,838 activities before finance costs and tax Finance costs (182) (303) (485) -------- --------- --------- Return on ordinary 9,828 75,525 85,353 activities before tax Tax on ordinary activities - - - -------- --------- --------- Return attributable to 9,828 75,525 85,353 equity shareholders ======== ======== ======== Returns per Ordinary Share 10.14p 77.94p 88.08p (Note 4) INCOME STATEMENT(unaudited) For the year ended 31 December 2009 Revenue Capital Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Realised net losses on sales - (40,331) (40,331) Movement in fair value - 209,726 209,726 -------- --------- --------- Net gains on investments - 169,395 169,395 Dividend income 19,110 1,183 20,293 Other income 169 - 169 Investment management fee (1,450) (2,417) (3,867) (Note 2) Transaction costs - (2,624) (2,624) Other expenses (437) - (437) -------- --------- --------- Return on ordinary 17,392 165,537 182,929 activities before finance costs and tax Finance costs (579) (965) (1,544) -------- --------- --------- Return on ordinary 16,813 164,572 181,385 activities before tax Tax on ordinary activities - - - -------- -------- --------- Return attributable to 16,813 164,572 181,385 equity shareholders ======== ======= ======== Returns per Ordinary Share 17.35p 169.84p 187.19p (Note 4) RECONCILIATION OF MOVEMENTS IN SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2010 Capital Share Redemption Special Capital Revenue capital reserve reserve reserve Reserve Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Balance as at 31 December 2009 969 19 186,025 362,796 37,113 586,922 Return on ordinary activities - - - (12,382) 10,060 (2,322) after taxation Equity dividends - - - - (18,404) (18,404) paid Purchase of (2) 2 (649) - - (649) Ordinary Shares ----- ----- ------ ------- ------ ------- Balance as at 30 967 21 185,376 350,414 28,769 565,547 June 2010 ===== ===== ====== ======= ====== ======= For the six months ended 30 June 2009 Capital Share Redemption Special Capital Revenue capital reserve reserve reserve Reserve Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Balance as at 31 December 2008 969 19 186,192 198,224 38,711 424,115 Return on ordinary activities - - - 75,525 9,828 85,353 after taxation Equity dividends - - - - (12,597) (12,597) paid Purchase of - - - - - - Ordinary Shares ----- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Balance as at 30 969 19 186,192 273,749 35,942 496,871 June 2009 ===== ====== ======= ======= ====== ======= For the year ended 31 December 2009 Capital Share Redemption Special Capital Revenue capital reserve reserve reserve Reserve Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Balance as at 31 December 2008 969 19 186,192 198,224 38,711 424,115 Return on ordinary activities - - - 164,572 16,813 181,385 after taxation Equity dividends - - - - (18,411) (18,411) paid Purchase of - - (167) - - (167) Ordinary Shares ----- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------- Balance as at 31 December 2009 969 19 186,025 362,796 37,113 586,922 ===== ====== ======= ======= ====== ======= BALANCE SHEET (unaudited) As at 30 June 2010 30 June 30 June 31 December 2010 2009 2009 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Fixed assets: Investments at fair value 617,313 542,060 632,386 through profit or loss ---------- ---------- --------- Current assets Amounts due from brokers 3,250 3,745 422 Other debtors 1,898 3,003 1,588 Cash at bank 236 - 362 ---------- ---------- --------- 5,384 6,748 2,372 ---------- ---------- --------- Creditors (amounts falling due within one year) Bank debt facility - (50,582) - Amounts due to brokers (5,398) (1,279) - Other creditors (104) (76) (148) ---------- ---------- --------- (5,502) (51,937) (148) ---------- ---------- --------- Net current (118) (45,189) 2,224 (liabilities)/assets ---------- ---------- --------- Total assets less current 617,195 496,871 634,610 liabilities Creditors (amounts falling due after more than one year) Bank debt facility (51,648) - (47,688) --------- --------- --------- Total net assets 565,547 496,871 586,922 ========= ========= ========= Capital and reserves: equity interests Called up share capital 967 969 969 (Ordinary Shares) Reserves: Capital redemption 21 19 19 reserve Special reserve 185,376 186,192 186,025 Capital reserve 350,414 273,749 362,796 Revenue reserve 28,769 35,942 37,113 --------- --------- -------- 565,547 496,871 586,922 ========= ========= ======== Net Asset Value per Share 584.56p 512.77p 605.90p Share Price 512.50p 467.00p 534.00p CASH FLOW STATEMENT (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2010 Six Six Six months Six months ended ended Year ended 30 June 30 June 31 December 2010 2009 2009 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Net cash inflow from 8,707 9,076 16,833 operating activities Taxation Taxation paid (5) - - Returns on investments and (1,035) (504) (2,062) servicing of finance Capital expenditure and financial investment Payments to acquire (127,329) (89,971) (238,152) investments Receipts from sales of 134,834 84,588 235,245 investments -------- -------- --------- Net cash inflow/(outflow) from capital expenditure and financial investment 7,505 (5,383) (2,907) -------- -------- ---------- 15,172 3,189 11,864 Equity dividends paid (18,404) (12,597) (18,411) -------- -------- ---------- (3,232) (9,408) (6,547) Financing Purchase of Ordinary Shares (649) - (167) Net drawdown of bank debt 3,755 9,408 7,076 facilities (before costs) ------- -------- --------- Change in cash during the period (126) - 362 period ======= ======== ========= Reconciliation of net return before finance costs and taxation to net cash inflow from operating activities Net return before finance (1,101) 85,838 182,929 costs and taxation Losses/(gains) on 8,440 (77,081) (169,395) investments Transaction costs 1,693 1,068 2,624 (Increase)/decrease in debtors (305) (725) 690 Decrease in creditors (20) (24) (15) ------- ------- -------- Net cash inflow from 8,707 9,076 16,833 operating activities ======= ======= ======= NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified to include the revaluation of investments and in accordance with applicable accounting standards and the AIC's Statement of Recommended Practice "Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts" issued in 2009. The total column of the Income Statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. All revenue and capital items in the Income Statement are derived from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the period. The same accounting policies used for the year ended 31 December 2009 have been applied. 2. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEE Revenue Capital Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Total for the six months ended 891 1,486 2,377 30 June 2010 ====== ====== ====== Total for the six months ended 619 1,031 1,650 30 June 2009 ====== ====== ====== Total for the year ended 1,450 2,417 3,867 31 December 2009 ====== ====== ====== 3. DIVIDENDS Six months ended Six months ended Year ended 30 June 2010 30 June 2009 31 December 2009 £000 £000 £000 Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders in the period: Second interim dividend of 13.0p for the year ended 31 December 2008 - 12,597 12,597 First interim dividend of 6.0p for the year ended 31 December 2009 - - 5,814 Second interim dividend of 13.0p for the year ended 31 December 2009 12,592 - - First interim dividend of 6.0p for the year ending 31 December 2010 5,812 - - ------- ------- -------- 18,404 12,597 18,411 ======= ======= ======== The first interim dividend for the year ending 31 December 2010 of 6.0p (2009 - 6.0p) was paid on 2 April 2010 to shareholders on the register on 12 March 2010. 4. RETURNS PER ORDINARY SHARE The returns per Ordinary Share are based on: Six months ended Six months ended Year ended 30 June 2010 30 June 2009 31 December 2009 £000 £000 £000 Returns attributable to Ordinary Shareholders (2,322) 85,353 181,385 Weighted average number of shares in issue during the period 96,831,972 96,900,000 96,897,197 5. NET ASSET VALUES The net assets and the net asset value per share attributable to the Ordinary Shares at each period end are calculated in accordance with their entitlements in the Articles of Association and were as follows: 30 June 2010 30 June 2009 31 December 2009 £000 £000 £000 Net assets attributable 565,547 496,871 586,922 Pence Pence Pence Net asset value attributable per Ordinary Share 584.56 512.77 605.90 As at 30 June 2010, the Company had 96,747,000 Ordinary Shares in issue (30 June 2009 - 96,900,000 and 31 December 2009 - 96,867,000). 6. FURTHER INFORMATION The foregoing do not constitute statutory accounts (as defined in section 434(3) of the Companies Act 2006) of the Company. The statutory accounts for the year ended 31 December 2009, which contained an unqualified Report of the Auditors, have been lodged with the Registrar of Companies and did not contain a statement required under section 498(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006. All information shown for the six months ended 30 June 2010 is unaudited. Certain statements in this announcement are forward looking statements. By their nature, forward looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or assumptions that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those statements. Forward looking statements regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as representation that such trends or activities will continue in the future. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed on forward looking statements. The Half Yearly Report is expected to be posted to shareholders during the week commencing 26 July 2010. Members of the public may obtain copies from Aberforth Partners LLP, 14 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7NS or from its website at www.aberforth.co.uk. CONTACT: David Ross/Alistair Whyte · Aberforth Partners LLP · 0131 220 0733 Aberforth Partners LLP, Secretaries - 20 July 2010 ANNOUNCEMENT ENDS
UK 100

Latest directors dealings