Interim Results
Aberforth Smaller Companies Tst PLC
18 July 2000
ABERFORTH SMALLER COMPANIES TRUST plc
INTERIM RESULTS
For the Six Months to 30 June 2000
FEATURES
Fully Diluted Net Asset Value Total Return +2.8%
Benchmark Index Total Return -0.7%
Interim Dividend Increase +5.3%
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc ('ASCoT') invests only in small UK
quoted companies and is managed by Aberforth Partners.
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS
'RESULTS REVIEW
For the six months to 30 June 2000, ASCoT achieved a total return of plus
2.8% which compares favourably with a total return of minus 0.7% from the
Hoare Govett Smaller Companies Index (excluding investment trusts). The
comparative performance of large companies, represented by the FTSE All-
Share Index, was a total return of minus 5.5% over the same period.
Your Board is pleased to announce an increase in this year's interim
dividend to 3.00p per Ordinary Share, up from 2.85p last year, representing
an increase of 5.3%. This interim dividend will be paid on 1 September
2000 to holders of Ordinary Shares on the register on 4 August 2000.
During the six month period, your Company has bought-in 50,000 Warrants for
cancellation at a price which enhanced ASCoT's fully diluted asset value
only marginally due to the small number of Warrants bought-in. There
remain 2.9 million Warrants outstanding and your Company is prepared to buy
these in at attractive prices. In addition, at the Annual General Meeting
held in February, Shareholders passed resolutions renewing ASCoT's
authority to buy-in up to 14.99% of its Ordinary Shares and to change the
Articles of Association so that ASCoT will not have to relinquish its
status as an investment company should it do so. To date, no Ordinary
Shares have been bought-in, however your Board will not hesitate to do so
should we believe it to be in Shareholders' best interests.
At 31 December 1999, ASCoT's gearing ratio was 4.9% which reflected a
gradual reduction from its peak in July 1999 of 21.0%. As I noted in my
Statement in January of this year, this reduction in gearing reflected your
Managers' cautious view of prospective absolute returns at that time.
ASCoT's gearing was subsequently eliminated during February and a net cash
position of 6.2% has now been accumulated reflecting your Managers'
continued caution. However, it is not intended to take this cash position
further as it is ASCoT's policy to operate close to a fully invested
position and to employ gearing on a tactical basis.
INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
The six month period includes within it two very different stockmarket
environments. In the first ten weeks of the calendar year financial
markets globally behaved as they had in the second half of 1999 with
incredible enthusiasm for the New Economy benefiting the Technology, Media,
and Telecommunications sectors leading to the now universally recognised
acronym of TMT. Over that period stockmarket interest became increasingly
speculative as ever more esoteric methods of company valuation appeared and
investment companies targeting Internet start-ups sold on multiples of
their asset value ascribing skills to their managers akin to those of
financial alchemists. In March 2000 investor sentiment finally shifted and
share prices declined sharply around the globe with tightening monetary
policy in the USA playing a significant part.
Since early March 2000, interest in the TMT sectors has waned and share
prices have declined sharply. Despite this fact they remain the sectors of
the stockmarket with the highest absolute returns over the twelve months to
June 2000. At the same time interest has returned to areas of the
stockmarket which had been at best ignored or at worst used as a source of
cash in the period from the end of August 1999 to the middle of March 2000
allowing the Old Economy to retrace some, but certainly not all, of the
ground lost since the middle of last year.
Your Managers are value investors seeking shares in companies where the
financial characteristics are expected to improve or are already attractive
but remain unrecognised by the stockmarket. In the environment of the
early part of the year this discipline struggled as the majority of
companies were shunned regardless of their valuation and, for the remaining
minority, investor optimism had ensured that long term potential was more
than fully recognised in prevailing share prices. Indeed, towards the end
of this period even some investment managers with a growth discipline found
the environment increasingly difficult as the shares of companies where
high rates of future growth were anticipated had been driven to valuations
inconsistent with their likely achievements. Hence, towards the latter end
of this period of stockmarket euphoria, it was the so-called momentum
investor who was the major beneficiary.
As one would anticipate, ASCoT underperformed its benchmark in the early
part of the year by a wide margin. This is clearly illustrated in the
table below which highlights the difference between ASCoT's total return
and that of the investment benchmark for the first two and the last four
months of the period to end June.
ASCoT HGSC Under/
Total Returns NAV (ex ITs) Out-Performance
1 January - 29 February 2000 -5.2% +3.5% -8.7% pts
1 March - 30 June 2000 +8.4% -4.0% +12.4% pts
However, as is equally apparent, ASCoT recovered ground as quickly as it
was lost and, as stated previously, outperformed the benchmark over the six
month period as a whole. This sharp improvement in relative performance
reflects the following factors.
First, ASCoT, although exposed to the TMT sectors where your Managers
believed that value existed, was underexposed relative to the benchmark
index and benefited from that position as share prices declined.
Secondly, the other facet of being underexposed to the TMT sectors was a
greater exposure to segments of the stockmarket previously ignored during
the period of New Economy euphoria. The level of apathy prevailing earlier
in the year created an environment where businesses with strong market
positions, good returns on assets and potential for unit growth, were
available at historically very attractive valuations. Recently, these
fundamentally attractive features have received greater attention from
investors with better share price performances being the result. Further
impetus to this return to more fundamental values came from an increase in
the level of corporate activity with offers being made for companies at
significant premia to prevailing share prices with cash often being the
form of consideration. ASCoT benefited directly from a number of
transactions and indirectly as investors have sought out the next target in
areas of the stockmarket where corporate activity has been high.
Accordingly, the factors which were assistive to performance in the closing
months of the first half of 2000 were the opposite of those which
prevailed earlier in the year and at the end of 1999. Over the last year
technology exposure has been the key driver to relative returns and the
underweighting in these areas reflects the fact that in the view of your
Managers, valuations have been excessive in relation to the likely level of
future profits. Major technological advances are likely but they will not
always be correlated with making money from the shares of companies exposed
to those changes. However, Shareholders, who are quite correctly
encouraged by technological change and its longer term implications for
productivity, should take comfort from two factors.
First, the principal barrier to greater exposure by ASCoT to the TMT
sectors is one of price. The combination of more equity supply and
companies failing to meet somewhat heady expectations should lead to future
opportunities to gain exposure at valuations where money can be made for
Shareholders.
Secondly, your Managers see the distinction between the Old and the New
Economy becoming increasingly irrelevant. The key driver for any business
is the ability to use new technology to attract new customers or deal with
existing customers at a lower cost. In this regard many companies
currently perceived as belonging to the dark ages are well positioned with
products, services and customers combined with the necessary level of
existing profits and cash flow to fund any change in their business models.
Companies of this type are well represented in ASCoT's portfolio and are
available at modest valuations with a good chance of exploiting
technological change. They may prove to be more remunerative investments
than recently formed highly valued businesses dependent on external funding
and therefore the whim of the financial markets.
INVESTMENT OUTLOOK
The last few months have seen an improvement in the stockmarket environment
for the value style practised by your Managers. However, this change has
been modest in the context of the relative performance trends of the last
twelve months and your Managers are optimistic regarding future relative
performance for the following reasons.
The popular stockmarket areas of the last twelve months remain expensive in
an historic context and are vulnerable to both profit disappointments and
additional supply of shares. Further, the areas of the US stockmarket
which set the valuation benchmark for the technology sectors remain
vulnerable to further monetary tightening as the Federal Reserve attempts
to slow the US economy to more sustainable levels.
The derating of significant elements of the UK stockmarket outwith the
popular areas described has created many opportunities for your Managers to
select higher quality businesses with good potential for profits expansion
at historically attractive valuations. The table below details some of the
salient characteristics of the portfolio.
Portfolio Characteristics as at 30 June 2000 1999
Number of Companies in the Portfolio 95 109
Weighted Average Market Capitalisation £289.7m £262.7m
Capitalisation
Price Earnings Ratio (Historic) 12.2x 13.2x
Net Dividend Yield (Historic) 3.5% 3.2%
Dividend Cover (Historic) 2.4x 2.4x
Against a background of secular low inflation the necessity for industries
to consolidate compounded by the desire for greater portfolio focus from
investment institutions will continue to drive corporate activity to the
benefit of ASCoT.
In my Statement in January of this year, I sought to assure Shareholders
that, when the stockmarket environment changed from the obsession at that
time with 'growth' companies to one more favourable to your Managers'
investment style, ASCoT's relative performance would benefit. It is very
reassuring to note this has proved to be the case recently. Provided the
stockmarket continues its return to an environment whereby companies'
valuations are capable of rational explanation, your Board believes ASCoT's
future relative performance should be good.
William Y Hughes
Chairman
18 July 2000
The Statement of Total Return, Summary Balance Sheet and Summary Cash Flow
Statement are set out below:-
STATEMENT OF TOTAL RETURN
(Incorporating the Revenue Account*)
For the Six Months ended 30 June 2000
(unaudited)
6 months to 6 months to
30 June 2000 30 June 1999 (restated)
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Realised - 18,423 18,423 - 4,406 4,406
gains/(losses) on sales
Unrealised - (14,946) (14,946) - 69,723 69,723
gains/(losses) ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Gains/(losses) on - 3,477 3,477 - 74,129 74,129
investments
Deemed cost of
Warrants purchased for
cancellation - (41) (41) - (793) (793)
Dividend income 4,980 - 4,980 5,195 - 5,195
Interest income 234 - 234 55 - 55
Other income 4 - 4 1 - 1
Investment (462) (771) (1,233) (362) (601) (963)
management fee
Other expenses (98) - (98) (129) - (129)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Net return before
finance
costs and taxation 4,658 2,665 7,323 4,760 72,735 77,495
Interest payable and
similar
charges (41) (69) (110) (421) (703) (1,124)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Return on ordinary
activities
before tax 4,617 2,596 7,213 4,339 72,032 76,371
Tax on ordinary - - - - - -
activities
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Return attributable
to equity shareholders 4,617 2,596 7,213 4,339 72,032 76,371
Dividends in respect
of equity shares (2,498) - (2,498) (2,359) - (2,359)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Transfer to reserves 2,119 2,596 4,715 1,980 72,032 74,012
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Returns per Ordinary
Share
- Basic 5.56p 3.13p 8.69p 5.24p 87.04p 92.28p
Returns per Ordinary
Share
- Diluted 5.44p 3.06p 8.50p 5.08p 84.38p 89.46p
Dividends per
Ordinary
Share 3.00p - 3.00p 2.85p - 2.85p
NOTES
The calculations of revenue return per Ordinary Share are based on net
revenue of £4,617,000 (30 June 1999 - £4,339,000) and on Ordinary
Shares of 83,008,843 (30 June 1999 - 82,755,687) in the case of basic
returns and 84,920,175 (30 June 1999 - 85,369,020) in the case of
diluted returns.
The calculations of capital return per Ordinary Share are based on net
capital gains of £2,596,000 (30 June 1999 - £72,032,000) and on
Ordinary Shares of 83,008,843 (30 June 1999 - 82,755,687) in the case
of basic returns and 84,920,175 (30 June 1999 - 85,369,020) in the
case of diluted returns.
* The revenue column of this statement is the profit and loss account
of the Company.
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from
continuing operations.
No operations were acquired or discontinued in the period.
SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET
As at 30 June 2000
(unaudited)
30 June 30 June 31 December
2000 1999 1999
£'000 £'000 £'000
Securities listed on the London 254,809 304,336 279,325
Stock Exchange
Cash at bank 14,725 - -
Debtors 6,214 6,784 5,278
Bank overdrafts - (46,911) (14,205)
Other creditors (4,195) (7,907) (4,028)
------- ------- -------
Net current assets/(liabilities) 16,744 (48,034) (12,955)
------- ------- -------
Total assets less current 271,553 256,302 266,370
liabilities
------- ------- -------
Capital and reserves: equity
interests
Called up share capital (Ordinary 833 828 828
Shares)
Reserves:
Share premium account 500 2 2
Special reserve 133,525 133,525 133,525
Capital reserve - realised 118,665 78,980 101,158
Capital reserve - unrealised 9,012 35,843 23,958
Revenue reserve 9,018 7,124 6,899
------- ------- -------
271,553 256,302 266,370
------- ------- -------
Net Asset Values:
Ordinary Share (basic) 326.1p 309.7p 321.9p
Ordinary Share (fully diluted) 318.6p 300.4p 313.0p
Ordinary Share (diluted - FRS 14) 319.3p 301.1p 313.5p
NOTES
As at 30 June 2000, the Company had 83,260,325 Ordinary Shares (30 June
1999 and 31 December 1999 - 82,757,359) and 2,878,897 Warrants (30 June
1999 - 3,821,863 and 31 December 1999 - 3,431,863) in issue.
On 31 March 2000, as a result of certain holders exercising the
subscription rights of their Warrants, 502,966 Ordinary Shares of 1p were
issued at 100p per share. Also, during the six months to 30 June 2000,
the Company bought in 50,000 Warrants for cancellation at a total cost of
£76,000.
SUMMARY CASH FLOW STATEMENT
For the Six Months ended 30 June 2000
(unaudited)
6 months to 6 months to
30 June 2000 30 June 1999
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Net cash inflow from
operating activities 3,286 3,083
Returns on
investment and
servicing of finance
Interest paid (182) (1,018)
------ ------
Net cash outflow
from returns on
investment and
servicing of finance (182) (1,018)
Taxation
UK taxation 23 15
recovered ------ ------
Net cash inflow from 23 15
taxation
Capital expenditure
and financial investment
Payments to acquire
investments (51,947) (93,492)
Receipts from sales
of investments 81,254 72,059
------ ------
Net cash
inflow/(outflow)
from capital
expenditure
and financial 29,307 (21,433)
investment ------ ------
32,434 (19,353)
Equity dividends (3,931) (3,765)
paid ------ ------
28,503 (23,118)
Financing
Issue of Ordinary 503 3
Shares
Warrants purchased
for cancellation (76) (1,545)
------ ------
Net cash
inflow/(outflow)
from financing 427 (1,542)
------ ------
Increase/(decrease) 28,930 (24,660)
in cash ------ ------
NOTES
In accordance with FRS 16, dividend income is now shown excluding any
related tax credit with a consequential reduction in the amount of the
tax charge to £NIL. This change in policy does not affect the return
attributable to equity shareholders for either of the six month periods
to 30 June 1999 and 2000. The 1999 figures in the Statement of Total
Return have been restated to reflect this change in policy.
The foregoing do not comprise statutory accounts (as defined in section
240(5) of the Companies Act 1985) of the Company. The statutory accounts
for the year to 31 December 1999, which contained an unqualified Report
of the Auditors, have been lodged with the Registrar of Companies and did
not contain a statement required under section 237(2) or (3) of the
Companies Act 1985.
The Interim Report is expected to be posted to shareholders on 21 July
2000. Members of the public may obtain copies from Aberforth Partners,
14 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7NS.
CONTACT: John Evans Aberforth Partners 0131 220 0733