Interims; Resource update

Hambledon Mining PLC 27 September 2006 HAMBLEDON MINING PLC Interim results and resource estimate update (All references to '£' are to the British pound and 'ounces' are to troy ounces) Hambledon Mining plc ('Hambledon' or the 'Group' or the 'Company'), the AIM-listed mining and exploration company developing precious metal deposits in Kazakhstan, announces its interim results for the six months ended 30 June 2006. Highlights •£10.4 million raised in March. •42 per cent expansion in planned process plant capacity to 850,000 tonnes per year. •General Resource Estimate approved by Kazakh authorities in April. •Mining operations commenced in June with own mining fleet. •JORC resource estimate increased to 2.6 million ounces (88 per cent higher than the beginning of the period). •Mine plan now shows an initial mining reserve estimate of 226,700 ounces of mainly open pittable ore. •Work on the underground mine plan is continuing and significant reserve increases are expected as detailed design progresses. •162 staff now employed. •Construction of process plant underway. Nicholas Bridgen, Chief Executive of Hambledon Mining plc, commented: 'In reviewing the half year, we are very pleased with what has been achieved, with good progress on all fronts. The JORC resource has almost doubled and as a result we are building a bigger process plant and have decided that it is more cost effective to operate our own mining fleet. The approval of the General Resource Estimate, which is the essential precursor of all other detailed approvals, was obtained and we are well on the way to recruiting our full complement of staff' 'Since the end of the half year, we have completed the open pit mine plan and a plan for the development of the westerly Orebody 11 from underground and can now announce initial mining reserves of 226,700 ounces.' Note to editors Hambledon Mining plc is an AIM-listed mining and exploration company which is mining an open pit and stockpiling ore in readiness for completion of an 850,000 tonnes per year treatment plant at its Sekisovskoye gold deposit in East Kazakhstan. After the start of processing, the Company will start to develop the much larger underground resources. Production from the open pit will average over 40,000 ounces per annum for five years, but total annual output will rise to around 100,000 ounces as the higher grade underground ore is added to the feed. The Group also holds the rights to and is exploring the adjacent Tserkovka licence territory which includes several areas of interest including the Tserkovka deposit itself. The Company has also been notified that it is to be awarded the nearby Glinka and Krugliachka areas. Any ore from these additional areas will be treated in an expanded plant at Sekisovskoye. Enquiries Hambledon Mining plc Telephone + 7 701 733 8915 Nicholas Bridgen, Chief Executive +44 7791 327180 Bankside Consultants Michael Spriggs / Michael Padley Telephone +44 207 367 8888 Chairman's Statement I am pleased to announce our financial results for the six months to 30 June 2006. Consistent progress has been achieved throughout the period. The increased size of the resource indicated that the pit would have a much longer life and that accordingly a much larger design capacity would be beneficial. To this end, the Group raised £10m (after expenses) in March 2006 to fund the construction of an 850,000 tonnes per year plant, 42 per cent larger than previously planned, and the purchase of our own mining fleet, which is now operating. In March 2006, the Group concluded a 4,000 metre drilling programme from the existing 440 level adit. The purpose of the programme was to drill into the open pit area to define further the geological model and resolve previous uncertainty. Significant new mineralisation was intercepted and additional data on existing ore zones was obtained. These have enabled us to produce a much more robust model. Comparison of the new data with old Soviet data has enabled us to statistically demonstrate that Soviet data consistently underestimated grade by around 19 per cent. Despite this, the current resource estimate has not been adjusted and, to the extent that it is based on Soviet data, a significant uplift in actual mined grades is likely in practice. Furthermore, approximately 15 per cent (over 6 per cent within the planned open pit) of the drilled gold intercepts have not been incorporated into the new model due to our limited understanding of the geological structure in those areas. This can be expected to produce more ore when actual mining commences, with a commensurate drop in the stripping ratio. In general, the new data indicated higher grades, but the effect was compensated by a more tightly defined modelling style that has resulted in lower overall tonnages. The overall gold content is therefore little changed in the indicated category, and the inferred category has been slightly reduced. Nevertheless, the Directors are pleased with the result, which means that a similar number of ounces can be produced by processing fewer tonnes. There is also a reasonable expectation that the results of actual mining will be significantly better than those predicted by the model. In April 2006, the Kazakhstan authorities approved our General Resource Estimate, a fundamental step in the approval process, which has enabled us to begin mining, acquire the necessary land use rights and seek the other detailed approvals required to put the mine and process plant into operation. In June 2006, we announced that a further consequence of the winter underground drilling programme had been increased confidence in the previously quoted Soviet prognosticated category of resource at Sekisovskoye, to the extent that our independent geologist had been able to reclassify it as JORC compliant inferred resource. This resulted in an increase of our JORC resource to 2.6 million ounces. A further 740,000 ounces of Soviet category resource remains outside the JORC basis, pending the receipt of sufficient further information to enable an updated analysis to be carried out. In June 2006, mining operations began; a significant milestone in our development. Initially, the mine fleet was being used for site preparation for the process plant, ore dumps and tailings facilities. Mining is now concentrated on pre-stripping waste from the open pit so that it can be used for construction of roads, the tailings dam walls and developing access to the main orebodies. A night shift has recently commenced work in order to stockpile ore in readiness for the start of the process facilities. We are pleased to announce a mining reserve based on mine plans for both open pit and underground. The planned open pit contains 4.2 million tonnes of ore at an average grade of 1.6 grams per tonne. The stripping ratio will be 4.7:1. As said above, the out-turn is expected to improve significantly in practice as a result of the underestimation of grade by Soviet drilling and the large quantity of drill intercepts that have not been included in the model. The scale of the open pit has been reduced because of the relative benefits of mining some of the near-surface ore from underground. In particular, we have decided that a major ore body lying to the west of the main deposit is better mined from underground, and that it is better to restrain open pit mining to the 340 level (approximately 100 metres depth) so that access to the existing underground development and shaft can be maintained. In the absence of such considerations, computerised open pit optimisation studies have shown that a much larger open pit would have been economically minable. As a part of the process of applying for approval of the General Resource Estimate by the Kazakh authorities, work was carried out on the development of an underground mine plan. This work concentrated on access development strategies and general infrastructure development. A high level of design detail was carried out on Orebody 11 that would otherwise have been mined in a separate open pit to the west of the main pit. This area was chosen for detailed design as it can be accessed during the life of the open pit. This design work has allowed the indicated resource in this area to be classified as a probable reserve. While the level of design in other areas is not yet sufficient to classify the resources as reserves it is anticipated that this will be achieved as further detailed work is carried out. The initial underground mining reserve in Orebody 11 is 82,000 tonnes, at a grade of 5.1 grams per tonne, containing about 13,400 ounces of gold. Progress on the construction of the process plant has continued apace. The crushing plant has been delivered and is now expected to be in operation around November 2006. Site preparation and the foundations for the process equipment are now largely complete. The latest estimate of the completion date of the process plant is within the first half of 2007. George Eccles 27 September 2006 Resource and reserve estimates Resource estimate This mineral resource estimate of the 100% owned Sekisovskoye deposit has been prepared under the JORC Code and is an update to the resource as reported in June 2006. Resources include reserves. +------------+----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+-------+ | Location | Resource | Tonnes |Au g/t |Contained|Ag g/t|Contained|Au g/t | | | | | | | | |Cut-off| | | Category |(millions)| | Metal | | Metal | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Au oz * | | Ag oz * | | +------------+----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+-------+ | Open pit |Indicated | 9.55| 1.8| 552,671| 3.0| 921,119| 0.5 | | area +----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+ | | |Inferred | 6.06| 1.8| 350,700| 2.0| 389,667| | | |(b) | | | | | | | +------------+----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+-------+ |Underground |Indicated | 2.21| 5.1| 362,371| 6.2| 440,529| 2.0 | | +----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+ | | |Inferred | 7.16| 5.2|1,197,036| 7.1|1,634,415| | | |(b) | | | | | | | +------------+----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+-------+ | Marginal |Indicated | 3.40| 0.7| 76,519| 1.4| 153,037| 0.5 | | | | | | | | | | |underground +----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+ | | (a) |Inferred | 0.96| 0.6| 18,519| 1.2| 37,038| | | | | | | | | | | +------------+----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+-------+ | Totals |Indicated | 15.16| 2.0| 991,561| 3.1|1,514,685| | | +----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+-------+ | |Inferred | 14.18| 3.4|1,566,255| 4.5|2,061,120| | +------------+----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+-------+ | |Indicated | | | | | | | | |& Inferred| | | | | | | | Total | | 29.34 | 2.7|2,557,816| 3.8|3,575,805| | +------------+----------+----------+-------+---------+------+---------+-------+ *Troy oz = 31.10348 grams (a) underground low grade material associated with high grade gold zones. (b) includes resources that have been defined beyond the current limits of the grade model. Note: 'Inferred' resources cannot be used for ore reserves until they have been upgraded. The re-modeling of the open pit area, above the 250m level, has resulted in a slight increase in contained gold for the higher 'indicated' category, but the lower 'inferred' resource shows an 11 per cent drop in contained gold for the Sekisovskoye deposit as a whole, with higher grades but lower tonnage. The total net reduction in estimated contained gold is 6.7 per cent. Results from the recently completed underground drilling programme have provided a better understanding of the gold distribution, and this has resulted in a resource model that we believe will better reflect the actual geometry and continuity of mineralisation. The previous model was based upon a more 'open' delineation of the mineralisation, whereby larger tonnages and lower grade material were modeled, resulting in higher tonnages of 'inferred' resource. This new model is much tighter with less low grade mineralisation, resulting in lower tonnages but higher grades. A total of 244 separate gold zones were delineated, indicating the complexity of this deposit. In practice, open pit mining is likely to encounter additional sources of gold. Drill-hole samples above the 0.5 grams per tonne cut-off level, but not in the model, imply that over 6 per cent of additional contained gold should be found within the planned pit. In addition, resources in our new licence areas of Tserkovka, Feodulikha and Areas 4 & 5 contain former Soviet-based resources categorized as C2 and P1 which are estimated to contain 740,000 ounces of gold. It is expected that some of these resources can be re-classified under the JORC Code after assessment of exploration drilling results. Reserve estimate This ore reserve estimate of the Sekisovskoye deposit has been prepared under the JORC Code. Location Reserve Tonnes Au g/t Contained Ag g/t Contained Au g/t Category (million) Metal Metal Cut-off Au oz Ag oz Open pit area Probable 4.19 1.6 213,352 2.6 346,665 0.5 Underground Probable 0.83 5.1 13,384 7.4 19,615 2.0 Total 226,736 366,280 *Troy oz = 31.10348 grams The Sekisovskoye open pit ore reserve model is based on the ordinary kriging of the mineral resource model using a 0.5 grams per tonne cut-off, taking into consideration the expected dilution and losses. Whittle optimisations resulted in a pit shell containing 7.25 million tonnes of ore representing a conversion of 76 per cent of the indicated resource to probable reserve in this area. However, development of this pit shell would have resulted in the loss of the existing underground infrastructure and made the process of bringing the underground operation into production much more difficult and on a much longer timeframe. It has therefore been decided to leave the existing 320 level intact and access this level from a decline developed from outside the pit limit. This will allow the western ore bodies to be mined from underground concurrently with the open pit and other ore zones below the pit bottom at the 340 level, which might otherwise have been included in the open pit mine plan, to be mined from underground. The resultant reserve estimate is calculated by applying mining costs, mining dilution (4 per cent) and recoveries (97.5 per cent) to that portion of the Indicated Resource falling entirely within the optimised open pit design. The area of this open pit reserve is contained within the mineral resource as reported above. The Sekisovskoye underground ore reserve has been determined from the mine design work carried out as a part of the approval of the General Resource Estimate by the Kazakh authorities using a 2.0 gram per tonne cut-off. The General Resource Estimate covered both the open pit resource and underground resource. Mine designs were therefore required for both the open pit and the underground areas. The underground design was carried out in detail on the resources from Elevation 340 up and in less detail in the lower areas. The design on some of the orebodies, notably Orebody 11, included stope design down to detailed stope blast ring design. This level of design and financial analysis has allowed for the ore tonnages in these orebodies to be classified as a probable reserve. It is anticipated that as further detailed design and financial evaluation is carried out on the indicated resources in these areas then these too will be convertible to reserves. The underground reserve estimate is calculated by applying mining costs, mining dilution (8 per cent) and recoveries (96 per cent) to that portion of the Indicated Resource falling entirely within the stope design. The area of this underground reserve is contained within the underground mineral resource as reported above. Glossary of technical terms used +---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+ |Grade |The tenor or concentration by weight of a metal in a | | |mineral deposit or ore | +---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+ |Indicated |A category of Mineral Resource of higher confidence than| |Resource |an Inferred Resource, the estimation of which is | | |prescribed by the JORC Code. This is the minimum level | | |of resource classification required for Ore Reserve | | |estimation under the JORC Code. | +---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+ |Inferred |A category of Mineral Resource the estimation of which | |Resource |is prescribed by the JORC Code. Inferred Resources | | |cannot be used as a basis for Ore Reserve estimation. | +---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+ |JORC Code |Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration | | |Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (Joint Ore | | |Reserves Committee). See www.jorc.org/main.php | +---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+ |Kriging |A class of methods of estimating mathematically the | | |distribution of a metal in three dimensions within the | | |earth, together with the confidence of the estimate | +---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+ |Mineral |An estimated tonnage and grade of mineralisation in the | |Resource |ground determined as prescribed by the JORC Code | +---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+ |Ore Reserve |That part of a Mineral Resource which can be | | |demonstrated to be worked profitably when all modifying | | |factors are taken into account. | +---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+ |Tonne |A metric tonne of 1000 kilograms | +---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+ Qualified Person These resource and reserve estimates have been prepared by Roger Rhodes BSc, MSc, MIMMM, independent geological consultant with Computer Resource Services. He has over 35 years of relevant experience and is a qualified person for the purpose of reporting resources under the JORC Code and the AIM rules. Consolidated profit and loss account For the six months ended 30 June 2006 Six months to Six months to Year ended 30 June 2006 30 June 2005 31 December 2005 (unaudited) (unaudited) (audited) restated restated Note £000s £000s £000s Administrative expenses 2 (395) (358) (846) Operating loss (395) (358) (846) Net interest and similar items 3 354 55 249 Loss on ordinary 6 (41) (303) (597) activities before and after taxation retained for the financial period Loss per ordinary share: - Basic 5 (0.01)p (0.13)p (0.24)p - Diluted 5 (0.01)p (0.13)p (0.24)p Consolidated balance sheet As at 30 June 2006 30 June 2006 30 June 2005 31 December 2005 (unaudited) (unaudited) (audited) restated restated Note £000s £000s £000s Fixed assets Intangible assets 61 - 52 Tangible assets 5,571 988 3,060 5,632 988 3,112 Current assets Stock 30 - - Debtors 2,059 107 213 Cash at bank and in hand 9,753 5,418 4,021 11,842 5,525 4,234 Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year (643) (450) (444) 11,199 5,075 3,790 Provisions for liabilities and charges (1,118) - (1,127) Net assets 15,713 6,063 5,775 Capital and reserves Called up equity share capital 366 262 262 Share premium account 16,690 6,813 6,820 Merger reserve (148) (148) (148) Other reserves 6 (1,195) (864) (1,159) Equity shareholders' funds 15,713 6,063 5,775 Consolidated cash flow statement For the six months ended 30 June 2006 Six months to Six months to Year ended 30 June 2006 30 June 2005 31 Dec 2005 (unaudited) (unaudited) (audited) restated restated £000s £000s £000s Net cash outflow from continuing (2,038) (400) (889) operating activities Returns on investments and servicing of finance Interest received 153 61 150 Interest paid (12) (12) (21) Miscellaneous non-operating income - - 17 141 49 146 Capital expenditure and financial investment Payments to acquire intangible fixed assets (5) - (988) Payments to acquire tangible fixed assets (2,340) (300) (277) (2,345) (300) (1,265) Net cash outflow before financing (4,242) (651) (2,008) Financing Issue of ordinary share capital (net of share issue expenses) 9,974 4,806 4,813 Share issue expenses relating to previous period - - (47) 9,974 4,806 4,766 Increase in net cash in the period 5,732 4,155 2,758 Consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses For the six months ended 30 June 2006 +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ | | Six months to| Six months to| Year ended| | | | | | | | 30 June 2006| 30 June 2005| 31 Dec 2005| | | | | | | | (unaudited)| (unaudited)| (audited)| | | | | | | | | restated| restated| +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ | | £000s| £000s| £000s| +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ |Loss for the financial period | (41)| (303)| (597)| +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ |Share based payment | 13| -| 10| +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ |Currency translation differences| (8)| 11| -| |on foreign currency net | | | | |investments | | | | +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ |Total recognised losses relating| (36)| (292)| (587)| |to the financial period | | | | +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ Reconciliation of movements in equity shareholders' funds For the six months ended 30 June 2006 +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ | | Six months to| Six months to| Year ended| | | | | | | | 30 June 2006| 30 June 2005| 31 Dec 2005| | | | | | | | (unaudited)| (unaudited)| (audited)| | | | | | | | | restated| restated| +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ | | £000s| £000s| £000s| +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ |Total recognised losses | (36)| (292)| (587)| +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ |New capital subscribed (net of | 9,974| 4,806| 4,813| |costs) | | | | +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ |Net increase in equity | 9,938| 4,514| 4,226| |shareholders' funds | | | | +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ |Equity shareholders' funds - | 5,775| 1,549| 1,549| |opening balance | | | | +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ |Equity shareholders' funds - | 15,713| 6,063| 5,775| |closing balance | | | | +--------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ Notes to the interim consolidated financial statements 1 Presentation of financial information and accounting policies These interim consolidated financial statements are for the six months ended 30 June 2006 and are unaudited. The information for the year ended 31 December 2005 does not constitute statutory accounts as defined in Section 240 of the Companies Act 1985. The financial information for the year ended 31 December 2005 has been extracted from the statutory accounts of Hambledon Mining plc ('the Group') for that year. A copy of the statutory accounts for that year has been delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The auditors' report on those accounts was unqualified and did not contain any statement under Section 237 of the Companies Act 1985. The interim financial information has been prepared in accordance with all relevant financial reporting standards. The accounting bases and policies are applied on a basis consistent with those set out in notes 1 and 2 in the Annual Report and Accounts for the Group for the year ended 31 December 2005. From 1 January 2006 the Group has adopted Financial Reporting Standard 20, 'Share-based Payment' as set out in note 2. 2 Change in accounting policy and comparatives for share based payment. The Group has adopted Financial Reporting Standard 20 ('FRS 20'), 'Share-based Payment' which is effective for accounting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2006. Prior to the adoption of FRS 20, the Group did not recognise any charge or credit in its profit and loss account in respect of any grant of equity instrument. The Group had not granted any equity instruments prior to 7 November 2002, and therefore FRS 20 has been applied to all grants of equity instruments that had not vested as of 1 January 2006. The Group issues equity-settled share based payments in the form of share options to certain employees. Equity-settled share-based payments are measured at fair value at the date of grant. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed on a straight line basis over the vesting period, based on the Group's estimate of shares that will eventually vest. Fair value is estimated by an independent third party using a proprietary binomial probability valuation model. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, on the basis of management's best estimate for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioral considerations. The new accounting policy for share based payment has been adopted retrospectively and the comparative profit and loss accounts for the six months ended 30 June 2005 and year ended 31 December 2005 have been restated. This change in accounting policy has resulted in an increase in administrative expenses and accordingly the loss on ordinary activities for the six months ended 30 June, 2005 and 2006 of £nil and £13,000 respectively and for the year ended 31 December 2005 of £10,000 Any profit and loss charge in a period in respect of share-based payments is credited to the Group's other reserves. The change in accounting policy has therefore had no effect on the consolidated balance sheets of the Group at 30 June, and 31 December, 2005. A revised statement of the movements in other reserves is shown in note 6 3 Net interest and similar items +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ | | Six months| Six months to| Year ended| | | to| | | +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ | |30 June 2006| 30 June 2005| 31 December| | | | | 2005| +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ | | (unaudited)| (unaudited)| (audited)| | | | restated| restated| +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ | | £000s| £000s| £000s| +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ | | | | | +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ |Interest payable to related| (12)| (12)| (25)| |party | | | | +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ |Foreign exchange gain | 213| 6| 107| +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ |Miscellaneous income: | -| -| 17| |non-operating | | | | +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ |Bank interest receivable | 153| 61| 150| +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ | | 354| 55| 249| +---------------------------+------------+----------------+---------------+ 4 Dividend The directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend. 5 Basic and diluted loss per share The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is based on the retained loss for the financial period (for the comparative periods - as restated). The weighted average number of ordinary shares for calculating the basic loss per share and diluted loss per share after adjusting for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares are as follows: +----------------+------------------+------------------+------------------+ | | Six months to| Six months to| Year ended| +----------------+------------------+------------------+------------------+ | | 30 June 2006| 30 June 2005| 31 December 2005| +----------------+------------------+------------------+------------------+ | | (unaudited)| (unaudited)|(audited) restated| | | | restated| | +----------------+------------------+------------------+------------------+ | | | | | +----------------+------------------+------------------+------------------+ |Basic | 314,265,328| 231,187,980| 246,854,369| +----------------+------------------+------------------+------------------+ | | | | | +----------------+------------------+------------------+------------------+ |Diluted | 317,430,012| 232,885,051| 249,308,944| +----------------+------------------+------------------+------------------+ 6 Other reserves +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ | | Six months to| Six months to| Year ended| +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ | | 30 June 2006| 30 June 2005| 31 December| | | | | 2005| +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ | | (unaudited)| (unaudited)| (audited)| | | | restated| restated| +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ | | £000s| £000s| £000s| +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ | | | | | +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ |Start of period | (1,159)| (572)| (572)| +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ |Shared based payment | 13| -| 10| +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ |Currency translation | | | | |differences on foreign | | | | |currency net investments| | | | | | | | | | | (8)| 11| -| +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ |Retained loss for the | (41)| (303)| (597)| |period | | | | +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ |End of period | (1,195)| (864)| (1,159)| +------------------------+---------------+----------------+---------------+ 7 Approval of interim financial statements The interim report for the six months to 30 June 2006 was approved by the Directors on 27 September 2006. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange

Companies

AltynGold (ALTN)
UK 100