ATHELNEY TRUST plc
Legal Entity Identifier:
213800ON67TJC7F4DL05
Athelney Trust plc, the investor in small companies and junior markets announces its final results for the 12 months ended 31 December 2017.
Chairman's Statement and Business Review
· The total return, which is the increase in NAV plus the dividend, is 16.8 per cent (31 December 2016: 5.7 per cent)
· Audited Net Asset Value ("NAV") was 284.8p per share (31 December 2016: 251.1p) an increase of 13.4 per cent.
· Revenue return per ordinary share was 9.6p (31 December 2016: 10p).
· Recommended final dividend of 8.9p per share (2016: 8.6p), an increase of 3.5 per cent.
Review of 2017
The Treasury predicted I would become the most unpopular man in Britain. This was the only correct forecast that the Treasury made in the several years that I was chancellor. Former Chancellor of the Exchequer Norman, now Lord, Lamont.
Get your facts right, then you can distort them as you please. Mark Twain.
If you put the…government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years there would be a shortage of sand. Professor Milton Friedman.
If 2016 was the year of shock and surprise, then 2017 was the year of disruption. A blizzard of tweets followed President Trump's inauguration (my nuclear button is bigger than yours - all grown-up stuff, of course), answered by bots from the likes of Russia, China and North Korea. Prime Minister (strong and stable leadership) May turned a cast-iron majority into something much more precarious depending on the goodwill of the DUP and the Scottish Conservatives. The general election campaign was a superb example of ineptitude. As far as Brexit was concerned, Britain gave way completely on the Irish border, the rights of EU workers and the divorce settlement so was allowed to prepare for trade talks this year. Let us see how easy they turn out to be! Syria spent its sixth year in civil war and Yemen was not far behind in terms of danger to life. The rise of the populist parties continued in Europe and brought with it an exceptionally unwelcome increase in anti-Semitism, particularly in Hungary and Poland. President Maduro of Venezuela continued with his quest to destroy what at one time had been the strongest economy in Latin America. Tanks rolling down the streets of Harare eventually persuaded autocratic President Mugabe to resign while, at the same time, the Generals were claiming no, there is no coup.
For the most part, though, global markets continued their serene progress and thus improved on my hope that we could hang on to our gains of the first half. Major markets did very well with New York, Tokyo, Shanghai and London improving by 26.1, 19.1, 8.6 and 7.4 per cent respectively. Turkey, Hong Kong and Austria did particularly well in smaller markets with rises of 48.5, 38.9 and 33.2 per cent respectively whereas Saudi Arabia, with a fall of 0.2 per cent, and Russia and Sweden underperformed with small rises of 2.7 and 4.6 per cent. Russia is often touted as a recovery situation but four sets of sanctions have always put me off, resulting from: the arrest and murder of Sergei Magnitsy, the invasion of eastern Ukraine and the Crimea, the shooting down by pro-Moscow fighters of Malaysian Airlines flight number 17 and interference in the U.S. general election. A better recovery proposition might be battered and bashed retailers and shopping malls. Westfield is being bought by Unibail-Rodamco, Hammerson has bid for Intu and Brookfield is trying to buy out GGP. Hedge funds are heavily short and therefore vulnerable. The same comment applies, in my opinion, to underrated brewery groups such as Greene King and Marston's.
For the record, the Athelney Trust total return for 2017 was 16.8 per cent whereas the FTSE Small Cap., Fledgling and AIM All-share indices rose by 14.9, 23 and 24.1 per cent respectively, which just goes to underline the point that 2017 was about growth strategies while those based on value and income did well enough without matching the strong performance of Fledgling and AIM.
Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary only proposed getting rid of the co-pilot. But now Airbus has gone one better: pilotless 'planes. Soon, everyone will be baffled by flight attendant Elaine Dickinson of the Airplane! film, who memorably said There's no reason to become alarmed and we hope that you enjoy the rest of your flight. By the way, is there anyone on board who can fly a 'plane?
Let me start this paragraph with a quote: The single greatest edge an investor can have is a long-term orientation. So said the shrewd Seth Klarman in his book (Margin of Safety, Risk Averse Investing Strategies for the Thoughtful Investor) written over 25 years ago and still a great read. Private investors think themselves at a great disadvantage compared with the professional fund manager, who has access to considerable resources as well as by-the-second information about companies and markets. But many fund managers are incapable of thinking beyond a year and some not even beyond a quarter. This hands a great advantage to the thoughtful investor who, ideally, should do as little as possible whereas the majority of fund managers are incentivised to do things to show their bosses and clients that they are doing their job and deserve to keep it. There is a saying that time in the market, rather than timing the market, leads to a satisfactory end result. The less you chop and change your investments, the fewer mistakes you are likely to make. By following the simple rule of doing as little as possible, the private investor will tend, over the long term, to avoid many pitfalls that damage those unable to sit still. Remember, while you may be doing nothing with your money, that does not mean that your money is not doing anything for you.
The world's central banks now own a fifth of their respective countries' national debt after years of quantitative easing. The central banks are owned by the states whose paper they are holding so the ultimate owners of all the government debt are the governments themselves. If you owe something to yourself, in what sense do you owe it? Answers on a postcard to Mark Carney, c/o Bank of England, EC2R 8AH.
With all the problems that face us as a country, it would be good to report that the underlying economy was doing well - unfortunately, that is not the case; in fact, the short-term economic performance is already disappointing. Consensus forecasts cluster around GDP growth of around 1.5 per cent for 2018, lower than just about anything in the developed world except for Japan and Italy. So what is going wrong? The aftermath of the financial crisis has been devastating, the recovery from which has been the weakest since the war. Real household incomes are just five per cent higher than in 2007. Between 2007 and 2016, real wages grew by 10.6 in Germany and 6.4 per cent on average in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development members. Those of us aged 22-39 experienced a 10 per cent fall in real earnings between 2007 and 2017 and were particularly hard hit by the jump in house prices from 3.6 times average annual earnings 20 years ago to 7.6 times today.
The UK economy remains the most regionally divided: inner London is the richest in Europe but there are some areas of high deprivation. Part-time employment is relatively high and zero-hours work has increased from 0.7 per cent in 2007 to 2.8 per cent today. Productivity is poor and very close to that of Italy. This dire record partly reflects the long (and growing) tail of poor performers. Last, but not least, UK investment on capital equipment, research and development is exceptionally weak. Some argue that perverse incentives reward management for an increase in share prices rather than any improvement in the long-term performance of companies. This is not a description of a healthy economy well able to withstand the severe shock of worse access to its most important market - it is absurd to claim otherwise. The Brexit shock, coupled with the UK's underlying weaknesses, is likely to make the rising disappointment for the many who voted to Leave all the more severe. The collective sigh of relief which greeted the agreement on a two-year period of transition was wholly misplaced - all we have succeeded in doing is moving the cliff-edge from 2019 to 2021.
Some 47 per cent of Sports Direct's independent shareholders voted to remove chairman Keith Hellawell at September's AGM, believing him unable to impose corporate governance discipline on chief executive and majority shareholder Mike Ashley. So it was good of Mr. Ashley to show how seriously he now takes such matters. He didn't turn up.
The average Briton must find nearly eight times his or her salary to buy the average British house. Not in the Persimmon boardroom. The £232m notional profit on share options split between three executive Directors would be enough to purchase 300 such homes. Startling arithmetic like this comes with a few caveats. The three men in question, the CEO, FD and MD, could sell only 40 per cent of their options at the end of 2017. Obviously, the remainder could produce less or more when ultimately sold and the profits are likely to be taxed at rates approaching 50 per cent. The irony is that the long-term investment plan aimed to recognise good performance over a decade rather than just three or five years. It was also spread amongst 140 senior managers, though the top three received a third of the total awards. What the remuneration committee did not anticipate was the soaring share price. When shareholders approved the plan in 2012 (with some dissent), the shares were priced at 657p but were 2738p five years later. Ministers, trying to sound tough on inequality, will be embarrassed. So they should be. The main factor driving the increase in house-building shares has been the government's own interventions in the housing market which have fuelled demand without increasing supply. Quite rightly, the Chairman of the board and the Chair of the remuneration committee have now gone.
More proof of the railways' insatiable demand for money. One rail operator has come up with its third cash-call in three years. Anyone would think that Hornby operated real trains………
The border between accounting scandal and fraud is marked by the bars of a jail. Steinhoff, a South African-based, Dutch-registered, Frankfurt-listed retail group (containing Poundland) is under investigation by prosecutors in Germany over suspected inflated revenue numbers [which] made their way into the accounts and in December the Company said that it was considering the validity and recoverability of €60 billion of assets. Further back, the year 2002 was a classic of its type. Multibillion-dollar frauds at WorldCom and Tyco landed executives in jail but only three years later. Global Crossing filed for bankruptcy protection after it said that profits were inflated. Xerox admitted to over-stating revenues. Six years passed from 2009 before the chairman of Indian software group Satyam was sentenced. Let's Gowex of Spain collapsed in 2014: its CEO said that the accounts were untrustworthy and that he was responsible. The case continues. London-listed Globo failed in 2015: the CEO and CFO resigned, telling the board about falsification of data and misrepresentation of the Company's financial situation. Investigations continue. Justice should be as swift and as painful as possible - surely the authorities can do better than this!
Maybe Stephen Haddrill's 25-page speech on Lessons from the Financial Crisis was meant to be satire. The head of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) opened up with the news that the business had cost us £11 trillion in financial support for UK banks without mentioning that the FRC had cleared all accountancy firms of inadequate audits. He did admit, though, that one of the big four firms only produced a 'satisfactory' FTSE-350 audit 65 per cent of the time. KPMG, as it happens.
In October, John McDonnell, the shadow chancellor, reaffirmed the commitments in the Labour manifesto to bring Royal Mail, rail, water and the energy sector into public ownership. This raises not a few questions, of which possibly the least interesting is how much it will all cost. After all, if I borrow £200,000 to buy a house worth £200,000 then I do not become £200,000 worse off at the point of purchase. Similarly, to the extent that the government pays what the assets are worth, then overall the public sector would be no better or no worse off. Nevertheless, the printed media seems determined to concentrate on this area. The second question, in my view more important, is how much to pay for these assets. Forcibly buying assets at below market value smacks of expropriation and it would be crucial to the stability of the British economy that any compensation payment is seen to be reasonable. What is certain is that, if investors believe that they are at risk of being expropriated in the future, they will not invest, to the detriment of the whole country: that would be a disaster. The third and most important question is what benefit, if any, we might gain from spending an enormous amount of time, effort and disruption on renationalising these industries. It is important to remember that sectors of the economy such as energy and water are already highly regulated in terms of prices that can be charged and the amount of capital investment which must be undertaken. Broadly speaking, the regulatory framework is trying to ensure that these companies act in the public interest while the profit motive pushes them to be as efficient as possible. Labour government ministers should not be allowed a free hand to run these utilities any more than should private shareholders. It is not at all clear that from the inglorious past that such ministers are likely to be either more competent or more trustworthy than our present system of regulatory bodies.
Ah, those far-off days when trains, gas, electricity and water were all in public hands and there were no fat-cat oligarchs gouging deep profits out of our services - or so the young plus Jez Corbyn appear to believe. Those with longer memories might remember terrible trains, trying to get a telephone (and then sharing the line with one's next-door neighbour), sewage in the river and at sea, with state-owned industries run for the benefit of their employees. Estimated losses from 1948 to 1970 - £105 billion in today's money. Of course, it will be different next time…..
The price of Bitcoin rose from about $1,000 at the beginning of the year to $14,129 at the end but, for the life of me, I cannot see that there is any point to the thing apart from representing a mad, wild speculation. In The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams wrote about similarly useless money. The exchange rate of eight Ningis to one Pu is simple enough but since the Ningi is a triangular rubber coin 6,800 miles along each side, no-one has ever collected enough to own one Pu. Ningis are not negotiable currency because Galactibanks refuses to deal in fiddling small change. Back to Bitcoin, where a chap on the staff of the Wall Street Journal set out to buy lunch in December, paid $76.16 for a $10 pizza and ended up lunching on an ice cream instead. Apart from the $9.47 in fees, the problem was that the seller had not up-dated the pizza price to reflect price changes in the Bitcoin. The buyer gave up after waiting 30 minutes for the order to be confirmed and settled for a $5 ice cream sandwich (?) instead, for which he paid $17.50 including $9.62 in fees. He finally got his pizza four hours later but, alas, by which time he had lost his appetite.
I am often asked, Gentle Reader, is Britcoin a real currency and can I lose money if I hold onto it? The answer is, of course, that the pound, or Britcoin as it is sometimes referred to in the media, is an unstable and unpredictable currency often used by speculators in shady deals or in money-laundering operations and is not advisable for use by ordinary consumers. In recent years, Britcoin has been talked up but then crashed spectacularly with huge losses to investors. At present, the Britcoin remains fragile and ordinary punters are advised to stick to better regulated and more reliable currencies such as the Venezuelan Maduro or Zimbabwean Bling-bling.
Sensible taxes transfer money to the government in a straightforward way but stupid taxes are the ones which encourage stupid behaviour in the population. Stamp duty, for example, discourages older couples from downsizing and so forces them to live on in a house which is too big for them. Inheritance tax falls mainly on the less well off since the rich can gift their assets before they die, whereas the moderately off have only their house to bequeath. Mind you, the wallpaper tax of 1712 was not much better: the rich simply bought plain, untaxed wallpaper, then had it stencilled by hand. The idea of the window tax of 1696 was that the more windows you had the richer you were likely to be. You can still see the result in buildings of the period: surplus windows were merely bricked up. Hat and wig taxes were introduced in the late 18th Century: result, endless bickering about exactly what was a hat and the terminal decline of the wig industry. A tax on gin was introduced on the craze that peaked in 1742: result, the rise of the bootleggers who often mixed the rough product with turpentine and sulphuric acid. Blindness was a common side effect of this particularly stupid tax.
How to claim compensation from Tesco for its accounting scandal: submit claim to KPMG via web portal with evidence of share deals; wait for assessment at 24.5p per share plus 4 per cent interest; download Notice of Acceptance and Release form, sign and upload to portal; wait 35 days for payment. How to claim a refund on a dodgy packet of sprouts: return to store; show receipt; receive cash. Should do better!
When was the last time that the UK exported more goods than it imported for a decent period - say five years or so? The short answer is never. Over the past 200 years, this great trading nation has had a surplus in manufactured goods for fewer years than you, Gentle Reader, has fingers. Even during the Empire in all its pomp and the industrial revolution, the UK invariably sucked in more goods than it pumped out. It's not that we don't make anything - in fact the UK remains one of the world's biggest manufacturers. But we have never been truly self-sufficient in such goods: indeed, the only thing preventing Britain's balance of payments looking truly horrendous is the services we have sold abroad - financial, legal, consultancy, administration, retail and so on. In all but two peacetime years over the past two centuries, the UK exported far more services than it imported. How to square this with the political debate about Brexit? Listening to strong and stable leader Theresa May banging on about securing tariff-free access to European markets, you might be forgiven for believing that all we need is a replacement for the customs union, a quick trade deal and, hey presto, British lorries and containers will still be able to cross the Channel. Unfortunately, this catastrophically misses the point. As it happens, those lorries already face the lowest tariffs in history: these days the problems come from non-tariff barriers such as product standards (does the product conform to our rules), rules on immigration (no consulting work in the EU without permission) and qualifications (a legal degree or medical qualifications may not work in the EU). Which brings us to the single market, which is everything to do with non-tariff barriers policed by the Tories hate figure, the European Court of Justice. It works very well in goods but not so in services: architects can work well throughout Europe but it is much harder for accountants to do so.
What we need is a series of deep, complex deals with Europe and the world that harmonise regulation. Such deals are fiendishly difficult to negotiate: for instance I would expect the UK government to protect the NHS from overseas competition and farmers from those with lower standards on the use of hormones in meat and GM food. Striking such complex deals would invariably involve a loss of sovereignty - will the government explain to Leave voters that, having taken back control, Britain will have to give it up again?
An historic moment. One of the world's largest companies has changed its name. Wal-Mart Stores has found a way of better reflecting our company's path to win the future of retail. Yes, from now on it's to be called, er, Walmart.
Capital Gains
During the year the Company realised capital profits before expenses arising on the sale of investments in the sum of £296,629 (31 December 2016: £294,251).
Holdings of Biffa, Countrywide, Crest Nicholson, Debenhams, Greene King, Hostelworld, Ibstock, Marstons, Murgitroyds, NWF, The PRS REIT and Safecharge were all purchased for the first time. Additional holdings of Air Partner, M&C Saatchi and Record were also acquired. Beasley, Hiscox, Lancashire Holdings and Novae were sold. In addition, eleven holdings were top-sliced to provide capital for the new purchases.
Corporate Activity
The holdings of Lavendon and Cape were taken over at a capital profit of 99.1 and 19.8 percent respectively.
The unaudited NAV at 31 January 2018 was 279.4p whereas the share price on the same day stood at 262p. Further updates can be found on www.athelneytrust.co.uk
Prospects
The Federal Reserve has raised rates three times since the end of 2016 and, in September 2017, announced a reduction in its $4.5 trillion balance sheet. Despite the Fed's gradual removal of monetary accommodation, monetary conditions have not tightened: I would argue that they have in fact become looser. Long-term interest rates have hardly changed, markets keep going up and the dollar has not appreciated markedly. The most plausible reason for this apparent paradox is that the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England are still pursuing policies of extreme monetary accommodation. So, in theory at least, global markets may have a decent-enough year. As I said at this time last year, much could go wrong (geopolitical risks, trade protectionism, higher oil prices for instance) but monetary policy is unlikely to be unhelpful and so I would hope for a modest 5-7 per cent rise in net asset value in 2018 plus a further 3 per cent from dividends, all being well.
Dr. E C Pohl
Chairman
14 February 2018
Income Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
For the Year Ended 31 December 2017 |
|
For the Year Ended 31 December 2016 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Note |
Revenue |
|
Capital |
Total |
|
Revenue |
Capital |
Total |
||||||||
|
£ |
|
£ |
£ |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
|||||||||
Gains on investments held at fair value |
8 |
- |
|
835,709 |
835,709 |
|
- |
236,357 |
236,357 |
||||||||
Income from investments |
2 |
238,832 |
|
- |
238,832 |
|
242,157 |
- |
242,157 |
||||||||
Investment Management expenses |
3 |
(6,128) |
|
(56,042) |
(62,170) |
|
(5,210) |
(46,933) |
(52,143) |
||||||||
Other expenses |
3 |
(26,527) |
|
(73,817) |
(100,344) |
|
(25,519) |
(63,393) |
(88,912) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net return on ordinary |
206,177 |
|
705,850 |
912,027 |
|
211,428 |
126,031 |
337,459 |
|||||||||
activities before taxation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Taxation |
5 |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net return on ordinary activities after taxation 6 |
206,177 |
|
705,850 |
912,027 |
|
211,428 |
126,031 |
337,459 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net return per ordinary share |
6 |
9.6p |
|
32.7p |
42.3p |
|
10p |
6p |
16p |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Dividend per ordinary share paid during the year 7 |
8.6p |
|
|
|
|
7.9p |
|
|
|||||||||
The total column of this statement is the profit and loss account for the Company.
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations.
No operations were acquired or discontinued during the above financial years.
A statement of movements of reserves is given overleaf.
A Statement of Comprehensive Income is not required as all gains and losses of the Company have been reflected in the above Statement.
Statement of Changes in Equity for the Year Ended
31 December 2017
|
Called-up |
|
Capital |
Capital |
|
Total |
|
Share |
Share |
reserve |
reserve |
Revenue |
Shareholders' |
|
Capital |
Premium |
realised |
unrealised |
reserve |
Funds |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
Balance brought forward at 1 January 2016 |
495,770 |
545,281 |
1,563,158 |
1,910,653 |
343,369 |
4,858,231 |
Net profits on realisation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of investments |
- |
- |
294,251 |
- |
- |
294,251 |
Decrease in unrealised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation |
- |
- |
- |
(57,894) |
- |
(57,894) |
Expenses allocated to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
- |
(28,127) |
(110,326) |
- |
- |
(138,453) |
Profit for the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
211,428 |
211,428 |
Dividend paid in year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(156,663) |
(156,663) |
Shares issued in the year |
43,700 |
363,933 |
- |
- |
- |
407,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Funds at 31 December 2016 |
539,470 |
881,087 |
1,747,083 |
1,852,759 |
398,134 |
5,418,533 |
Balance brought forward at 1 January 2017 |
539,470 |
881,087 |
1,747,083 |
1,852,759 |
398,134 |
5,418,533 |
Net profits on realisation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of investments |
- |
- |
296,629 |
- |
- |
296,629 |
Increase in unrealised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation |
- |
- |
- |
539,080 |
- |
539,080 |
Expenses allocated to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
- |
- |
(129,859) |
- |
- |
(129,859) |
Profit for the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
206,177 |
206,177 |
Dividend paid in year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(185,036) |
(185,036) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Funds at 31 December 2017 |
539,470 |
881,087 |
1,913,853 |
2,391,839 |
419,275 |
6,145,524 |
Statement of the Financial Position as at
31 December 2017
Company Number: 02933559
Note |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£ |
|
£ |
Fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments held at fair value through profit and loss |
8 |
|
5,966,679 |
|
5,117,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Debtors |
9 |
|
156,798 |
|
256,964 |
Cash at bank and in hand |
|
|
45,289 |
|
59,133 |
|
|
|
202,087 |
|
316,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year |
10 |
|
(23,242) |
|
(14,832) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current assets |
|
178,845 |
|
301,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets less current liabilities |
6,145,524 |
|
5,418,533 |
||
|
|
|
|
||
Provisions for liabilities and charges |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
6,145,524 |
|
5,418,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital and reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
Called up share capital |
11 |
|
539,470 |
|
539,470 |
Share premium account |
|
|
881,087 |
|
881,087 |
Other reserves (non distributable) |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital reserve - realised |
|
|
1,913,853 |
|
1,747,083 |
Capital reserve - unrealised |
|
|
2,391,839 |
|
1,852,759 |
Revenue reserve (distributable) |
|
|
419,275 |
|
398,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' funds - all equity |
|
|
6,145,524 |
|
5,418,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value per share |
13 |
|
284.8 p |
|
251.1p |
Statement of Cash flows for the Year Ended
31 December 2017
|
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue return |
|
|
206,177 |
|
211,428 |
|
Adjustment for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses charged to capital |
|
|
(129,859) |
|
(110,326) |
|
Increase/(decrease) in creditors |
|
|
8,410 |
|
(547) |
|
Decrease/(increase) in debtors |
|
|
100,166 |
|
(132,596) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from/(used) operations |
|
|
184,894 |
|
(32,041) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(674,520) |
|
(741,319) |
|
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
|
660,818 |
|
570,157 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(13,702) |
|
(171,162) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share issue |
|
|
- |
|
379,506 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
- |
|
379,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity dividends paid |
|
|
(185,036) |
|
(156,663) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash |
|
|
(13,844) |
|
19,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the beginning of the year |
|
|
59,133 |
|
39,493 |
|
Cash at the end of the year |
|
|
45,289 |
|
59,133 |
|
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 31 December 2017
1. Accounting Policies
1.1 Statement of Compliance and Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with applicable United Kingdom accounting standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 ("FRS 102"), the Companies Act 2006 and with the AIC Statement of Recommended Practice ("SORP") issued in November 2014 (amended January 2017), regarding the Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts. All the Company's activities are continuing.
1.2 Income
Income from investments including taxes deducted at source is recognised when the right to the return is established (normally the ex-dividend date). UK dividend income is reported net of tax credits in accordance with FRS 102 "Income Tax". Interest is dealt with on an accruals basis.
1.3 Investment Management Expenses
All three Directors are involved in investment management, 10% of their salaries or fees have been charged to revenue and the other 90% to capital. All other investment management expenses have been charged to capital. The Board propose continuing this basis for future years.
1.4 Other Expenses
Expenses (including VAT) and interest payable are dealt with on an accruals basis and charged through the Revenue and Capital Accounts in an allocation that the Board consider to be a fair distribution of the costs incurred.
1.5 Investments
Listed investments comprise those listed on the Official List of the London Stock Exchange. Unlisted investments are traded on AIM. Profits or losses on sales of investments are taken to realised capital reserve. Any unrealised appreciation or depreciation is taken to unrealised capital reserve.
Investments have been classified as "fair value through profit and loss" upon initial recognition.
Subsequent to initial recognition, investments are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognised in the Income Statement.
Securities of companies quoted on a recognised stock exchange are valued by reference to their quoted bid prices at the close of the year, similarly, AIM-traded investments are valued using the closing bid price on 31 December.
1.6 Taxation
The tax effect of different items of income and expenses is allocated between capital and revenue on the same basis as the particular item to which it relates, using the Company's effective rate of tax for the year.
1.7 Judgements
The Directors confirm that no judgements have been made in the process of applying the Company's accounting policies.
1. Accounting Policies (continued)
1.8 Deferred Taxation
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of all timing differences that have originated but not reversed by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable timing differences but deferred tax assets are only recognised if it is considered more likely than not that there will be suitable profits from which the future reversal of the underlying timing differences can be deducted. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated at the tax rates expected to be effective at the time the timing differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted.
1.9 Capital Reserves
Capital Reserve - Realised
Gains and losses on realisation of fixed asset investments are dealt with in this reserve.
Capital Reserve - Unrealised
Increases and decreases in the valuations of fixed asset investments are dealt with in this reserve. Unrealised capital reserves cannot be distributed by way of dividends or similar.
1.10 Dividends
In accordance with FRS 102 "Events after the end of the Reporting Period", dividends are included in the financial statements in the year in which they go ex-div.
1.11 Share Issue Expenses
The costs associated with issuing shares are written off against any premium arising on the issue of Share Capital.
1.12 Financial Instruments
Short term debtors and creditors are held at cost.
2. Income
Income from investments |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
UK dividend income |
154,547 |
|
175,503 |
Foreign dividend income |
43,876 |
|
46,439 |
UK Property REITs |
40,334 |
|
20,210 |
Bank interest |
75 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
Total income |
238,832 |
|
242,157 |
UK dividend income |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
UK Main Market listed investments |
101,879 |
|
115,086 |
UK AIM-traded shares |
52,668 |
|
60,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
154,547 |
|
175,503 |
3. Return on Ordinary Activities before Taxation
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
£ |
|
£ |
The following amounts (inclusive of VAT) are included |
|
|
|
within investment management and other expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors' remuneration: |
|
|
|
- Services as a director |
21,000 |
|
21,000 |
- Otherwise in connection with management |
57,474 |
|
49,401 |
Auditors' remuneration: |
|
|
|
- Audit Services - Statutory audit |
10,500 |
|
10,500 |
Miscellaneous expenses: |
|
|
|
- Other wages and salaries |
4,134 |
|
10,300 |
- Management services |
30,996 |
|
22,140 |
- PR and communications |
3,891 |
|
9,662 |
- Stock exchange subscription |
7,920 |
|
6,420 |
- Sundry investment management and other expenses |
26,599 |
|
11,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
162,514 |
|
141,055 |
On 1 April 2016 the Company entered into a contract with J Girdlestone to provide management services at an annual cost of £24,600 plus VAT. An increase of 10% was agreed in July 2017 making the annual fee £27,060 plus VAT.
4. Employees and Directors' Remuneration
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
£ |
|
£ |
Costs in respect of Directors: |
|
|
|
Non-executive directors' fees |
21,000 |
|
21,000 |
Wages and salaries |
57,474 |
|
49,401 |
Social security costs |
4,134 |
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
82,608 |
|
73,372 |
Costs in respect of administrator: |
|
|
|
Wages and salaries |
- |
|
6,687 |
Social security costs |
- |
|
642 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
7,329 |
Total: |
|
|
|
|
Non-executive directors' fees |
21,000 |
|
21,000 |
|
Wages and salaries |
57,474 |
|
49,401 |
|
Social security costs |
4,134 |
|
3,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,608 |
|
80,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of employees: |
|
|
|
|
Chairman |
- |
|
- |
|
Investment |
1 |
|
1 |
|
Administration |
- |
|
- |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
5. Taxation
(i) On the basis of these financial statements no provision has been made for corporation tax (2016: Nil).
(ii) Factors affecting the tax charge for the year.
The tax charge for the period is lower than (2016: lower than) the average small company rate of corporation tax in the UK of 19 per cent. The differences are explained below:
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
£ |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total return on ordinary activities before tax |
|
912,027 |
|
|
337,459 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total return on ordinary activities multiplied by the average small company rate of corporation tax 19.25% (2016: 20%) |
175,565 |
|
|
67,492 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Effects of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
UK dividend income not taxable |
|
|
(29,750) |
|
|
(34,430) |
|
||||||
Revaluation of shares not taxable |
|
|
(103,773) |
|
|
11,578 |
|
||||||
Capital gains not taxable |
|
|
(57,101) |
|
|
(58,850) |
|
||||||
Unrelieved management expenses |
|
|
15,059 |
|
|
14,210 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Current tax charge for the year |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
||||||
The Company has unrelieved excess revenue management expenses of £127,919 at 31 December 2017 (2016: £92,354) and £102,597 (2016: £102,597) of capital losses for Corporation Tax purposes and which are available to be carried forward to future years. It is unlikely that the Company will generate sufficient taxable profits in the future to utilise these expenses and therefore no deferred tax asset has been recognised.
For the year ended 31 December 2016, the Company received approval from HM Revenue and Customs under Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, therefore the Company was not liable to Corporation Tax on any realised investment gains for 2016. The Directors intend to continue to meet the conditions required to obtain approval and therefore no deferred tax has been provided on any capital gains or losses arising on the revaluation or disposal of investments.
6. Return per Ordinary Share
The calculation of earnings per share has been performed in accordance with FRS 102. |
||||||||||
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|||||||
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
|||
|
Revenue |
Capital |
Total |
|
Revenue |
Capital |
Total |
|||
Attributable return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
ordinary activities after taxation |
206,177 |
705,850 |
912,027 |
|
211,428 |
126,031 |
337,459 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted average number of shares |
2,157,881 |
|
2,104,868 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Return per ordinary share |
9.6p |
32.7p |
42.3p |
|
10p |
6p |
16p |
|||
7. Dividend
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
Final dividend in respect of 2016 of 8.6p (2016: a final dividend of 7.9p was paid in respect of 2015) per share |
|
185,036 |
|
156,663 |
Set out below is the total dividend payable in respect of the financial year, which is the basis on which the requirements of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are considered.
It is recommended that a final dividend of 8.9p (2016: 8.6p) per ordinary share be paid out of revenue profits amounting to a total of £192,051. For the year 2016, a final dividend of 8.6p was paid on 6 April 2017 amounting to a total of £185,036.
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue available for distribution |
|
206,177 |
|
211,428 |
Final dividend in respect of financial year ended 31 December 2017 |
|
(192,051) |
|
(185,036) |
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed Revenue Reserve |
|
14,126 |
|
26,392 |
8. Investments
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
£ |
Movements in year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation at beginning of year |
|
5,117,268 |
|
|
4,709,749 |
|
Purchases at cost |
|
|
674,520 |
|
|
741,319 |
Sales - proceeds |
|
|
(660,818) |
|
|
(570,157) |
- realised gains on sales |
|
296,629 |
|
|
294,251 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in unrealised appreciation |
539,080 |
|
|
(57,894) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation at end of year |
|
|
5,966,679 |
|
|
5,117,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book cost at end of year |
|
|
3,574,834 |
|
|
3,264,509 |
Unrealised appreciation at the end of the year |
2,391,845 |
|
|
1,852,759 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,966,679 |
|
|
5,117,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK Main Market listed investments |
|
|
4,618,263 |
|
|
4,109,077 |
UK AIM-traded shares |
|
|
1,348,416 |
|
|
1,008,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,966,679 |
|
|
5,117,268 |
8. Investments (continued)
Gains on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
£ |
|
Realised gains on sales |
|
|
296,629 |
|
|
294,251 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in unrealised appreciation |
539,080 |
|
|
(57,894) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
835,709 |
|
|
236,357 |
|
The purchase costs and sales proceeds above include transaction costs of £5,711 (2016: £3,695) and £2,401 (2016: £1,344) respectively.
9. Debtors
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
|
£ |
|
£ |
Investment transaction debtors |
|
148,483 |
|
249,295 |
Other debtors |
|
8,315 |
|
7,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,798 |
|
256,964 |
10. Creditors: amounts falling due within one year
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
|
£ |
|
£ |
Social security and other taxes |
|
2,959 |
|
2,623 |
Other creditors |
|
8,628 |
|
172 |
Accruals and deferred income |
|
11,655 |
|
12,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,242 |
|
14,832 |
11. Called Up Share Capital
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
|
£ |
|
£ |
Authorised |
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 Ordinary Shares of 25p |
2,500,000 |
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allotted, called up and fully paid |
|
|
|
|
2,157,881 Ordinary Shares of 25p |
539,470 |
|
539,470 |
|
(2016: 2,157,881 Ordinary Shares of 25p) |
|
|
|
12. Financial Instruments
The Company's financial instruments comprise equity investments, cash balances and debtors and creditors that arise directly from its operations, for example, in respect of sales and purchases awaiting settlement.
The major risks associated with the Company are market, credit and liquidity risk. The Company has established a framework for managing these risks. The Directors have guidelines for the management of investments and financial instruments.
Market Risk
Market price risk arises mainly from uncertainty about future prices of financial investments used in the Company's business. It represents the potential loss the Company might suffer through holding market positions by way of price movements other than movements in exchange rates and interest rates.
The Company's investment portfolio is exposed to market price fluctuations which are monitored by the Fund Manager who gives timely reports of relevant information to the Directors.
Adherence to the investment objectives and the internal controls on investments set by the Company mitigates the risk of excessive exposure to any one particular type of security or issuer.
The Company's exposure to other changes in market prices at 31 December on its investments is as follows:
A 20% decrease in the market value of investments at 31 December 2017 would have decreased net assets attributable to shareholders by 55.3 pence per share (2016: 47.4 pence per share). An increase of the same percentage would have an equal but opposite effect on net assets available to shareholders.
|
2017 |
2016 |
|
£ |
£ |
Fair value through profit or loss investments |
5,966,679 |
5,117,268 |
Market risk also arises from changes in interest rates and exchange risk. All of the Company's assets are in sterling and accordingly the Company has limited currency exposure. The majority of the Company's financial assets are non-interest bearing, as a result the Company's financial assets are not subject to significant risk due to fluctuations in the prevailing levels of market interest rates.
The carrying amounts of financial assets best represent the maximum credit risk exposure at the balance sheet date. Bankruptcy or insolvency of the custodian may cause the Company's rights with respect to securities held with the custodian to be delayed.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity Risk is the risk that the Company may have difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities. The Company is able to reposition its investment portfolio when required so as to accommodate liquidity needs. However it may be difficult to realise its investment portfolio in adverse market conditions.
Maturity Analysis of Financial Liabilities
The Company's financial liabilities consist of creditors as disclosed in note 10. All items are due within one year.
12. Financial Instruments (continued)
Capital management policies and procedures
The Company's capital management objectives are:
· to ensure the Company's ability to continue as a going concern;
· to provide an adequate return to shareholders;
· to support the Company's stability and growth;
· to provide capital for the purpose of further investments.
The Company actively and regularly reviews and manages its capital structure to ensure an optimal capital structure, taking into consideration the future capital requirements of the Company and capital efficiency, projected operating cash flows and projected strategic investment opportunities. The management regards capital as total equity and reserves, for capital management purposes.
Fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities
Fixed asset investments (see note 8) are valued at market bid price where available which equates to their fair values. The fair values of all other assets and liabilities are represented by their carrying values in the balance sheet.
Financial instruments by category
The financial instruments of the Company fall into the following categories
31 December 2017 |
At Amortised Cost £ |
Assets at fair value through profit or loss £ |
Total £ |
|
|
Assets as per the balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
- |
5,966,679 |
5,966,679 |
|
|
Debtors |
156,798 |
- |
156,798 |
|
|
Cash at bank |
45,289 |
- |
45,289 |
|
|
Total |
202,087 |
5,966,679 |
6,168,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities as per the balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Creditors |
23,242 |
- |
23,242 |
|
|
Total |
23,242 |
- |
23,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
31 December 2016 |
At Amortised Cost £ |
Assets at fair value through profit or loss £ |
Total £ |
||
Assets as per the balance sheet |
|
|
|
||
Investments |
- |
5,117,268 |
5,117,268 |
||
Debtors |
256,964 |
- |
256,964 |
||
Cash at bank |
59,133 |
- |
59,133 |
||
Total |
316,097 |
5,117,268 |
5,433,365 |
||
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities as per the balance sheet |
|
|
|
||
Creditors |
14,832 |
- |
14,832 |
||
Total |
14,832 |
- |
14,832 |
||
12. Financial Instruments (continued)
Fair value hierarchy
In accordance with FRS 102, the Company must disclose the fair value hierarchy of financial instruments.
The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three classifications:
Classification A - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Quoted in an active market in this context means quoted prices are readily and regularly available and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm's length basis.
Classification B - The price of a recent transaction for an identical asset, where quoted prices are unavailable.
The price of a recent transaction for an identical asset provides evidence of fair value as long as there has not been a significant change in economic circumstances or a significant lapse of time since the transaction took place. If it can be demonstrated that the last transaction price is not a good estimate of fair value (e.g. because it reflects the amount that an entity would receive or pay in a forced transaction, involuntary liquidation or distress sale), that price is adjusted.
Classification C - Inputs for the asset or liability that are based on observable market data and unobservable market data, to estimate what the transaction price would have been on the measurement data in an arm's length exchange motivated by normal business considerations.
The Company only holds classification A investments (2016: classification A investments only).
13. Net Asset Value per Share
The net asset value per share is based on net assets of £6,145,524 (2016: £5,418,533) divided by 2,157,881 (2016: 2,157,881) ordinary shares in issue at the year end.
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share |
|
284.8p |
|
251.1p |
14. Dividends paid to Directors
During the year the following dividends were paid to the Directors of the Company as a result of their total shareholding:
Mr Robin Boyle |
£38,619² |
Dr. Manny Pohl |
£25,573¹ |
Mr Simon Moore |
£2,752 |
Notes:
1. Dr Manny Pohl's relationship with Global Masters Fund Limited is described in Note 1 to the table of Directors' interests on page 31. During the year a dividend of £25,573 was paid to Global Masters Fund Limited.
2. This figure includes £33,678 paid to Trehellas House Limited. Mr Robin Boyle's interest in Trehellas House Limited is described in Note 2 to the table of Directors' interests on page 31.
For further information:
Robin Boyle, Managing Director
Athelney Trust plc
020 7628 7937