Final Results
British American Tobacco PLC
01 March 2005
1 March 2005
PRELIMINARY ANNOUNCEMENT - YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2004
SUMMARY
2004 2003 Change
Operating profit before goodwill
amortisation and exceptionals £2,830m £2,781m +2%
Pre-tax profit £1,886m £1,567m +20%
Adjusted earnings per share 75.83p 69.21p +10%
Dividends per share 41.90p 38.80p +8%
• Operating profit, before goodwill amortisation and exceptional
items, was 2 per cent higher at £2,830 million. The results were
adversely affected by sterling average rates strengthening
against almost all currencies. At comparable rates of exchange,
operating profit, before goodwill and exceptional items, would
have risen by 7 per cent. This reflected the benefit from the
ETI acquisition and a good performance in all regions except
America-Pacific.
• Group volumes, including make-your-own cigarette "stix", grew by
8 per cent to 853 billion, mainly due to additional volumes from
acquisitions and the Reynolds American transaction. Volumes
include the whole of the Reynolds American volume, as is the case
with our other associated companies. Global drive brands were
2 per cent ahead of last year.
• Pre-tax profit was up 20 per cent at £1,886 million, reflecting
higher total operating profit and a gain on the disposal of
subsidiaries compared to a loss in 2003, while basic earnings per
share rose to 52.20p (2003 26.93p).
• Adjusted diluted earnings per share at 75.83p were up 10 per
cent, benefiting from higher operating profit, the reduced
effective tax rate, lower minority interests and the impact of
the share buy-back programme.
• The Board is recommending a final dividend of 29.2p up 8 per
cent, which will be paid on 4 May 2005. This will take the
growth in dividends for the year as a whole to 8 per cent.
• The Chairman, Jan du Plessis, commented "It has been a good year
for the Group, with all regions apart from America-Pacific
achieving organic growth at comparable rates of exchange. This
demonstrates the fundamental strength provided by British
American Tobacco's successful strategy and geographical
diversity. Our goal remains to grow earnings per share, on
average, by high single figures and to pay out at least half of
our earnings in dividends. Our success over the last three years
has enabled us to deliver an average total shareholder return of
20.8 per cent a year, compared to 2.4 per cent for the FTSE 100."
ENQUIRIES:
INVESTOR RELATIONS: PRESS OFFICE:
Ralph Edmondson/ 020 7845 1180 David Betteridge/ 020 7845 2888
Rachael Cummins 020 7845 1519 Teresa La Thangue/ Emily Brand
BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO p.l.c.
PRELIMINARY ANNOUNCEMENT - YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2004
INDEX
PAGE
Chairman's statement 2
Business review 5
Dividends 10
Group profit and loss account 11
Statement of total recognised gains and losses 12
Interest of British American Tobacco's shareholders 12
Segmental analyses 13
Quarterly analyses of profit 14
Group balance sheet 16
Group cash flow statement 17
Accounting policies and basis of preparation 19
Changes in the Group 20
Convertible redeemable preference shares 21
Exchange rate effects 21
Restructuring costs 22
Investment costs written off 22
Goodwill amortisation 22
Write down of loan to joint venture 23
Gain/(loss) on disposal of subsidiaries and investments 23
Interest and interest cover 23
Taxation 24
Earnings per share 24
Share buy-back programme 25
Group reserves 25
Cash flow 26
Contingent liabilities 26
Annual report and accounts 30
Appendix: Restatement of financial information
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT 2.
British American Tobacco's operating profit before goodwill
amortisation and exceptional items grew by 2 per cent to
£2,830 million at current rates of exchange. At comparable rates of
exchange, the improvement would have been 7 per cent. Adjusted
diluted earnings per share increased by 10 per cent to 75.83p,
reflecting the increase in operating profit, the reduced effective
tax rate, lower minority interests and the impact of the share buy-
back programme.
During the year, 59 million shares have been repurchased,
representing 2.8 per cent of the average number of shares in issue
during 2004, at a cost of around £490 million and at an average
price of £8.35 per share. This brings the total number of shares
bought back since the programme was launched in 2003 to 165 million,
accounting for 8 per cent of the total outstanding, at a cost of
almost £1.2 billion. We expect to restart the share buy-back
programme following the announcement of these results.
The Board has proposed a final dividend of 29.2p per share, bringing
the total for the year to 41.9p, an increase of 8 per cent. The
dividend will be paid on 4 May to shareholders on the Register at
11 March.
In future, when the Board is considering the interim dividend, its
policy will be that the interim should represent one third of the
previous year's total dividend, unless there are any special factors
to be taken into account.
Group cigarette volumes, including make-your-own stix, were ahead by
8 per cent to 853 billion, principally as a result of the inclusion
of a full year's sales from the enlarged business in Italy, as well
as five months' results from Reynolds American Inc., formed by the
successful combination of R. J. Reynolds and the US businesses of
Brown & Williamson.
The completion of this transaction was a landmark event for the
Group in 2004 and the integration of the businesses is progressing
well. Our 42 per cent shareholding is now transparently valued, at
around US$5 billion, and the Group has the benefit of an indemnity
for all existing and future US litigation.
The recent Appeals Court decision to reject the US Federal
Government's US$280 billion claim against the US tobacco industry is
obviously encouraging, even though the US Government is seeking a
further appeal. Given the appeals pending in the Engle and
Price/Miles cases, 2005 is set to be an important year for the US
tobacco industry's attempts to put these three lawsuits behind it.
Excluding merger benefits, there were strong volume performances in
Russia, Turkey, India and Pakistan offset by declines in Germany,
France, Canada and Japan. The global drive brands, Dunhill, Kent,
Lucky Strike and Pall Mall, grew by 2 per cent. Kent's volume
increased by 10 per cent to a new record high of 33 billion.
Chairman's comments cont... 3.
As this is my first Chairman's Statement, I would like to remind
shareholders that there is more to the Group's strategy for creating
shareholder value than achieving growth, vital though it undoubtedly
is. It is essential that we maintain our balanced approach to
achieving growth, improving productivity, managing our business in a
responsible manner and developing a winning organisation. We will
continue to drive all four elements of our strategy, in order to
build a sustainable business and achieve leadership of the industry.
In terms of productivity, we have continued to meet the commitment
made two years ago to reduce overheads and indirect costs by
£200 million by 2007. Building on the £64 million in 2003, we saved
a further £89 million in 2004, principally as a result of
restructuring throughout the Group. Given our excellent progress, we
are now raising our five year target on overheads and indirect costs
to £320 million per year by the end of 2007, around a further
£170 million per year over the next three years.
Additionally, we have reduced our supply chain costs over the last
two years by £120 million per year, as a result of factory
rationalisation and logistics savings. We expect to achieve further
substantial supply chain savings in the years ahead.
On the responsibility front, I am pleased to report that we have
made further progress in the eyes of those organisations prepared to
consider our record in an objective way. The United Nations
Environmental Programme ranked British American Tobacco fourth out
of the top 50 global reporters in its annual survey of best practice
in non-financial reporting. The Group was also favourably mentioned
in a UK Department of Trade & Industry report entitled 'Building
Better Boards' and covering best practice in Corporate Governance.
We have maintained our position as the only tobacco company, apart
from our Malaysian subsidiary, to be included in the Dow Jones
Sustainability Index. Our website, bat.com, was, once again, ranked
as the best in the FTSE 100 by the Financial Times' Webranking
Survey.
We will continue to support tobacco regulation that balances the
preferences of consumers with the interests of society, establishes
an open-minded approach to harm reduction as a public health policy
and does not undermine the competitive business environment.
In the debate over smoking in public places, for example, we will
promote the provision of segregated and properly ventilated smoking
areas. These solutions work perfectly well and are a more balanced
approach than the social exclusion of smokers favoured by anti-
tobacco campaigners.
Chairman's comments cont... 4.
In addition to Martin Broughton's retirement as Chairman on 30 June
2004, there have been some other changes to the Board. Dr. Harald
Einsmann retired at last year's Annual General Meeting and Admiral
Bill Owens had to step down unexpectedly on becoming Chief Executive
of Nortel Networks. On shareholders' behalf, I should like to thank
all of them, and most particularly Martin Broughton, for their
service and to welcome Piet Beyers, Robert Lerwill and Sir Nick
Scheele as new Non-Executive Directors of the Board. It is with
great sadness that we learned of the sudden death of K S Wong, a
Non-Executive Director since 1998, and I extend my deepest sympathy
to his family.
These will be the last set of full year results presented under UK
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, as the Group will in
future present its results under International Financial Reporting
Standards. Based on the current understanding of the requirements,
we have set out a restatement of the key figures for 2004 in the
Appendix. I hope this will help to provide an early insight into the
impact of the change.
It has been a good year for the Group, with all regions apart from
America-Pacific achieving organic growth at comparable rates of
exchange. This demonstrates the fundamental strength provided by
British American Tobacco's successful strategy and geographical
diversity. Our goal remains to grow earnings per share, on average,
by high single figures and to pay out at least half of our earnings
in dividends. Our success over the last three years has enabled us
to deliver an average total shareholder return of 20.8 per cent a
year, compared to 2.4 per cent for the FTSE 100.
JAN DU PLESSIS
BUSINESS REVIEW 5.
Group operating profit for 2004, excluding goodwill amortisation and
exceptional items, was 2 per cent higher at £2,830 million, despite
the adverse effect from average sterling rates strengthening against
almost all currencies over the year. The growth in profit at
comparable rates of exchange would have been 7 per cent, a good
performance in the face of difficult conditions in some key markets,
with excellent results achieved in a number of others and the first
time contribution from the ETI acquisition.
Group cigarette volumes, including the make-your-own cigarette
"stix", grew by 8 per cent to 853 billion. The additional volumes
were mainly gained from acquisitions and the Reynolds American
transaction and, excluding these, the growth would have been 0.4 per
cent. Volumes include the whole of the Reynolds American volume, as
is the case with our other associated companies in India and
Denmark. The US volumes, therefore, include seven months from Brown
& Williamson and five months from Reynolds American.
The four global drive brands increased volumes by 2 per cent
overall, including the make-your-own cigarette "stix" which grew
substantially in Germany. Kent grew by 10 per cent, responding well
to various product innovations, while Pall Mall was up 4 per cent.
However, Dunhill and Lucky Strike were affected by markets where
steep excise increases substantially reduced the overall industry
volumes, and declined by 1 per cent and 6 per cent respectively.
Profit from the America-Pacific region was £795 million, a decrease
of £200 million from the same period last year. This was the result
of lower profits in Canada and Japan, further accentuated by the
translation of US and Canadian results to sterling. Volumes in the
region were up 27 per cent to 131 billion, mainly as a result of
Reynolds American, with higher volumes from South Korea more than
offset by declines in Canada and Japan.
The profit contribution from Imperial Tobacco Canada was down
£122 million to £342 million due to lower volumes, a deteriorating
sales mix and a weakening of the currency against sterling, partly
offset by lower operating costs. Industry volumes declined despite
the continued strong growth in low-priced cigarettes. In 2004,
Imperial has competed more vigorously in this area, leading to a
segment share increase from 15 per cent in 2003 to 35 per cent in
the second half of the year. Imperial's share of the premium market
declined slightly, but the total segment volume shrunk by more than
25 per cent. Despite the strong share growth in the low-priced
sector and du Maurier and Player's remaining the market leaders,
overall market share was down.
Business review cont... 6.
The total contribution from the US domestic business was
£295 million (2003 £316 million), up 4 per cent in local currency
despite a one-off benefit included in 2003. Following the Reynolds
American transaction described on page 20, the results for 2004
include the contribution from Group subsidiaries for seven months
(£149 million) and the Group's share in the profit of Reynolds
American for five months (£146 million).
Brown & Williamson's cigarette business profit for the seven months
was lower than the comparative period as a result of adverse
exchange rate movements, lower volumes and the non-recurrence of a
gain on the settlement of certain disputed MSA payments included in
the prior year numbers. Excluding this one-off item, profit at
comparable rates of exchange for the seven months increased as lower
supply chain and marketing costs were only partly offset by lower
volumes and net pricing. The integration of the businesses in
Reynolds American is progressing well.
In Japan, profit was heavily impacted following increased
competition and marketing investment. There was also an excise
increase, which exacerbated the overall market decline, resulting in
lower volumes. The Group's market share was slightly lower as,
while Lucky Strike maintained share and Kool continued to grow,
Kent's share was lower. In South Korea, Dunhill volumes continued
to grow although profit was in line with last year as marketing
investment was increased. From the first quarter results for 2005,
South Korea will be reported as part of the Asia-Pacific region.
In Asia-Pacific, regional profit rose by £42 million to £515 million
as strong performances in Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, Vietnam,
Pakistan, India and the duty-free business were only partially
offset by reduced profit from Indonesia and Taiwan. Regional
volumes at 201 billion were 4 per cent higher than last year, with
strong increases in India, Vietnam, Pakistan and Bangladesh
partially offset by declines in Indonesia and Malaysia.
Australia continued its impressive profit growth principally through
higher margins and volumes. Market share increased as a result of
the strong performance of Winfield and Holiday. Profit in New
Zealand was higher as a result of improved margins and reduced
costs, while volumes were maintained despite lower industry volume,
resulting in a further increase in market share.
In a very competitive environment in Malaysia, profit in local
currency grew due to price increases and cost savings, although
volumes and market share were lower. The significant excise-led
price increase in the last quarter of the year resulted in some
down-trading and an increase in illicit trade.
Business review cont... 7.
Vietnam continued to deliver good profit and volume growth,
increasing overall market share. Profit and volumes in Indonesia
were still under pressure due to further excise increases, but Lucky
Strike continued its strong growth. In Taiwan, volumes rose
slightly, principally due to the growth of Dunhill, but results were
adversely affected by higher marketing investment.
Excellent profit growth in Pakistan was the result of higher
volumes, driven by continued good performances from Gold Flake and
John Player Gold Leaf, lower costs and an improved sales mix. In
Bangladesh, profit was slightly lower as increases in volume and
market share were more than offset by the adverse effect of consumer
down-trading. The Group's associated companies in India continued
their good performance, with strong volume growth and increased
profit in local currency.
In Latin America, a decrease in profit of £12 million to
£428 million, was mainly the result of many currencies in this
region weakening against sterling. This masked good performances in
local currency terms as the region benefited from an improvement in
margins.
Regional sales volume at 148 billion was down by 2 billion mainly as
a result of increased pressure from growing illicit trade,
especially after excise driven price increases in Brazil and
Argentina. This was partly offset by the additional volumes from
the new business acquisition in Peru, good performances in the
majority of the Central American markets and growth in Venezuela.
Profit in Brazil was slightly down due to lower volumes resulting
from an excise increase, higher marketing investment and lower leaf
export profit. Profit in sterling was adversely affected by the
depreciation of the real against sterling.
In Mexico, profit rose as higher prices were only partly offset by
lower volumes and increased marketing investment. Higher prices and
productivity initiatives in Argentina led to increased profit,
despite lower volumes and the weakness of the currency against
sterling.
Profit in Chile was down, although volumes were higher reflecting
the success in both reducing illicit trade and counteracting
competitor activities. In Venezuela, despite the impact of
exchange, profit grew as a result of higher margins and increased
volumes, the latter driven by recently improved disposable income
levels and a reduction in imported illegal product. Volumes were up
in Central America and the Caribbean, but the results were
negatively affected by weaker exchange rates.
Business review cont... 8.
In Europe, profit increased by £190 million to £726 million, mainly
driven by the inclusion of Ente Tabacchi Italiani S.p.A. (ETI) in
the results from the beginning of 2004. Excluding ETI, there was
good profit growth of 10 per cent at comparable rates of exchange.
There were excellent performances in Russia, Romania and the Smoking
Tobacco and Cigars business, together with benefits realised from
cost savings across the board following the closure of factories and
a number of reorganisations. These more than offset the impact of
markets where excise increases resulted in lower volumes.
Regional volumes grew by 7 per cent, reaching 268 billion, primarily
due to incremental volume from newly acquired businesses and growth
in Russia, partly offset by market related declines in Western
Europe.
In Italy, the integration has gone very well with profit from the
combined business ahead of expectations at £184 million and market
share of over 30 per cent. The sale of the Italian tobacco
distributor Etinera, as described on page 20, was completed in
December, and it is estimated that Etinera contributed £42 million
to the Italian profit in 2004.
In Germany, cigarette market share was maintained with share growth
from Lucky Strike, Pall Mall and Gauloise, while total tobacco
market share including cigarette "stix" grew. Group cigarette
volume and profit suffered due to a 16 per cent decline of the
cigarette market, following excise related price increases. As the
Group is well positioned to benefit from the growth in consumer
demand for other tobacco products, including cigarette "stix", our
total tobacco volumes fell by only 8 per cent.
Market share in France remained stable but both profit and volumes
declined significantly as excise increases led to a reduction of
21 per cent in the total market size.
In Switzerland, profit was higher due to increased margins. Market
share also rose, driven by continued growth in Parisienne, although
total volumes were slightly lower after an excise increase. In the
Netherlands, efficient cost management and price increases
contributed to improved profit, while higher margins led to a strong
profit growth in Belgium.
Business review cont... 9.
Russia reported impressive results with profit significantly up and
a continued excellent growth in volumes, leading to an increased
market share, mainly driven by premium priced Kent. In Romania, the
strong profit growth of last year continued as improved margins were
achieved through the growth of Kent, Pall Mall and Viceroy. Although
the total market declined in Poland, volume and share increases from
Pall Mall and Viceroy resulted in good profit growth. Both volumes
and profit were slightly down in Ukraine while in Hungary, a massive
excise increase led to an 18 per cent reduction in the total market
size, adversely affecting volumes and profit, although the Group's
substantial market share increased by almost 3 per cent.
The Smoking Tobacco and Cigars operations, which will be
incorporated into the Group's cigarette businesses during 2005,
showed outstanding profit growth, led by price increases and the
growth of volumes in all product groups, especially Pall Mall "stix"
in Germany.
Profit in the Africa and Middle East region grew by £29 million to
£366 million with strong performances from South Africa, Nigeria and
the Caucasus, partly offset by the cost of continued investment in
new markets and a large fall in profit from Zimbabwe. Volumes rose
by 7 per cent to 105 billion mainly as a result of the significant
growth in Turkey, as well as increases in the Caucasus and Nigeria,
partly offset by declines in South Africa and Zimbabwe.
In South Africa, higher margins and the growth of Peter Stuyvesant
and Dunhill led to good profit growth, as they were only partially
reduced by lower volumes overall and increased marketing investment.
Volumes were higher in the Middle East and North Africa, with good
performances by Viceroy and Craven 'A' in Iraq and Kent in Iran.
Increases in Yemen and Egypt were partly offset by volume decline in
the Levant. Overall profit was lower as increased costs to support
market entries in North Africa offset improvements elsewhere.
In Turkey, volumes rose with good growth by Viceroy and Pall Mall.
However, investment to build market share continued and the company
is still some way from break even. In the Caucasus, both volumes
and profit rose.
In West Africa, volumes and profits were higher mainly as a result
of increased market share through improved distribution and the
strong growth by Benson & Hedges and Rothmans in Nigeria.
Elsewhere in Africa, volume gains in several markets more than
offset the decline in Zimbabwe, but the corresponding profit
increases were not sufficient to recover the drop in profit in that
country.
Non-trading items
The above results were achieved before accounting for goodwill
amortisation and exceptional items described on page 22 and 23.
DIVIDENDS 10.
The Directors will be recommending to the shareholders at the Annual
General Meeting to be held on 28 April 2005 the payment on 4 May
2005 of a final dividend for the year of 29.2p per ordinary share
of 25p.
Valid transfers received by the Registrar of the Company up to
11 March 2005 will be in time to rank for payment of this dividend.
Ordinary shares go ex-dividend on 9 March 2005.
The following is a summary of the dividends declared for the years
ended 31 December 2004 and 2003.
2004 2003
pence per pence per
share £m share £m
(a) On ordinary shares:
Interim 2004 paid 15 September 2004 12.7 271
2003 paid 15 September 2003 11.8 247
Final 2004 payable 4 May 2005 29.2 617
2003 paid 27 April 2004 27.0 552
----- --- ----- ---
41.9 888 38.8 799
===== === ===== ===
(b) On convertible redeemable
preference shares:
Interim 2003 paid 15 September 2003 11.8 14
Final 2003 paid 27 April 2004 27.0 33
Amortisation of discount 8 18
----- --- ----- ---
8 38.8 65
===== === ===== ===
The amortisation of discount on preference shares reflects the
difference between the share price at the date of the Rothmans
transaction and the redemption price in June 2004, which was
amortised over the period to the redemption date.
GROUP PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 11.
For the year ended 31 December
2004 2003
£m £m
REVENUE
Subsidiary undertakings 31,811 24,151
Share of associates and joint ventures 2,444 1,471
------ ------
34,255 25,622
====== ======
PROFIT
Subsidiary undertakings 1,794 1,777
after charging: restructuring costs (206) (437)
investment costs written off (50)
goodwill amortisation (474) (405)
Share of associates and joint ventures 144 75
after charging: restructuring cost (125)
goodwill amortisation (37)
write down of loan to joint venture (87)
------ ------
Total operating profit 1,938 1,852
Gain/(loss) on disposal of subsidiaries 147 (72)
Gain on disposal of fixed asset investments 38
------ ------
Profit on ordinary activities before interest 2,123 1,780
Net interest - subsidiary undertakings (234) (209)
Share of associates' and joint ventures'
net interest (3) (4)
------ ------
Profit before taxation 1,886 1,567
Taxation (662) (779)
------ ------
Profit after taxation 1,224 788
Minority interests (126) (157)
------ ------
Profit for the year 1,098 631
Dividends and other appropriations (896) (864)
------ ------
Retained profit/(loss) 202 (233)
====== ======
Earnings per share: Basic 52.20p 26.93p
====== ======
Diluted - unadjusted 50.93p 26.69p
====== ======
Diluted - adjusted 75.83p 69.21p
====== ======
See notes on pages 19 to 30.
STATEMENT OF TOTAL RECOGNISED GAINS AND LOSSES 12.
For the year ended 31 December
2004 2003
£m £m
Profit for the year 1,098 631
Differences on exchange 11 206
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries 918
------ -----
Total recognised gains related to the year (below) 2,027 837
====== =====
INTEREST OF BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO'S SHAREHOLDERS
For the year ended 31 December
2004 2003
Restated
£m £m
Balance 1 January 4,483 5,185
Accounting policy change (122) (107)
------ ------
4,361 5,078
Total recognised gains related to the year (above) 2,027 837
Issue of shares - share options 4 5
Dividends and other appropriations:
Ordinary shares (888) (799)
Convertible redeemable preference shares (47)
Amortisation of discount on preference shares (8) (18)
Purchase of own shares (492) (698)
Consideration paid for purchase of own shares held in
Employee Share Ownership Trusts (72) (58)
Consideration received on the exercise of options over
own shares held in Employee Share Ownership Trusts 32 15
Credit in respect of employee share schemes 32 28
Goodwill reinstated on disposal of subsidiaries 216
Other movements 8 18
------ -----
Balance 31 December 5,220 4,361
====== =====
See notes on pages 19 to 30.
13.
SEGMENTAL ANALYSES
The analyses below for the year ended 31 December include the
Group's share of associates and joint ventures.
Volumes* Net revenue
2004 2003 2004 2003
bns bns £m £m
America-Pacific 131.1 103.2 3,083 3,562
Asia-Pacific 200.5 192.2 1,714 1,765
Latin America 147.6 149.5 1,276 1,309
Europe 268.1 249.8 4,990 3,502
Africa and Middle East 105.3 98.2 1,347 1,289
------ ------ ------ ------
852.6 792.9 12,410 11,427
====== ====== ====== ======
OPERATING PROFIT
America-Pacific 795 995
Asia-Pacific 515 473
Latin America 428 440
Europe 726 536
Africa and Middle East 366 337
------ ------
2,830 2,781
Restructuring costs (331) (437)
Investment costs written off (50)
Goodwill amortisation (511) (405)
Write down of loan to
joint venture (87)
------ ------
1,938 1,852
====== ======
Operating profit, before exceptional items
and goodwill amortisation, restated at comparable
rates of exchange
2,981 2,781
====== ======
*Volumes includes make-your-own cigarette "stix", as well as cigarettes.
Comparative numbers have been restated, where applicable.
Net revenue includes £1,646 million (2003 £857 million) in respect of
associates and joint ventures.
The net revenue analysis is based on the external sales in each region
less duty, excise and other taxes.
The impact of the ETI and Reynolds American transactions on the above
results are described on page 20.
QUARTERLY ANALYSES OF PROFIT 14.
The figures shown below have been produced using average rates of
exchange for the years ended 31 December 2004 and 2003 respectively, with
the previously reported quarterly figures for 2004 restated using average
rates for the full year.
3 months to
31.3.04 30.6.04 30.9.04 31.12.04
£m £m £m £m
America-Pacific 188 203 212 192
Asia-Pacific 122 129 144 120
Latin America 89 100 120 119
Europe 151 188 227 160
Africa and Middle East 88 89 93 96
---- ---- ---- ----
638 709 796 687
Restructuring costs (5) (36) (110) (180)
Investment costs written off (50)
Goodwill amortisation (119) (119) (132) (141)
---- ---- ---- ----
Total operating profit 514 554 554 316
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries 127 20
Gain on disposal of fixed asset
investments 38
---- ---- ---- ----
Profit on ordinary activities
before interest 514 554 681 374
Net interest - subsidiary undertakings (63) (66) (73) (32)
Share of associates' and joint
ventures' net interest (2) (1)
---- ---- ---- ----
Profit before taxation 451 488 606 341
==== ==== ==== ====
Quarterly analyses of profit continued 15.
3 months to
31.3.03 30.6.03 30.9.03 31.12.03
£m £m £m £m
America-Pacific 190 284 251 270
Asia-Pacific 119 109 130 115
Latin America 91 125 115 109
Europe 136 126 182 92
Africa and Middle East 84 74 95 84
---- ---- ---- ----
620 718 773 670
Restructuring costs (281) (22) (134)
Goodwill amortisation (100) (102) (101) (102)
---- ---- ---- ----
520 335 650 434
Write down of loan to
joint venture (87)
---- ---- ---- ----
Total operating profit 520 335 650 347
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries (62) (10)
---- ---- ---- ----
Profit on ordinary activities before interest 520 335 588 337
Net interest - subsidiary undertakings (51) (47) (55) (56)
Share of associates' and joint ventures' net
interest (1) (1) (1) (1)
---- ---- ---- ----
Profit before taxation 468 287 532 280
==== ==== ==== ====
GROUP BALANCE SHEET 16.
31 December
2004 2003
Restated
£m £m
Fixed assets
Intangible assets 7,135 8,012
Tangible assets 2,232 2,578
Investments in associates and joint ventures 1,801 327
Other investments 400 396
------ ------
11,568 11,313
------ ------
Current assets
Stocks 2,145 2,582
Debtors 1,985 2,571
Current investments 85 108
Short term deposits and cash 1,893 2,283
------ ------
6,108 7,544
------ ------
TOTAL ASSETS 17,676 18,857
====== ======
Capital and reserves
Share capital 535 550
Share premium account 37 33
Merger reserves 3,503 3,748
Capital redemption reserves 72 57
Other reserves 1,491 565
Profit and loss account (418) (592)
(after deducting cost of own shares held in Employee
Share Ownership Trusts of £182 million
(2003 £187 million))
------ ------
Shareholders' funds (including non-equity interests) 5,220 4,361
Minority shareholders' equity interest 196 225
------ ------
5,416 4,586
------ ------
Other liabilities
Provisions for liabilities and charges 1,354 1,541
Borrowings 7,097 7,610
Creditors 3,809 5,120
------ ------
12,260 14,271
------ ------
TOTAL FUNDS EMPLOYED 17,676 18,857
====== ======
See notes on pages 19 to 30.
GROUP CASH FLOW STATEMENT 17.
For the year ended 31 December
2004 2003
Restated
£m £m
Net operating cash flow from subsidiary
undertakings (note 1) 2,596 3,067
Dividends from associates 81 46
------ ------
Net cash inflow from operating activities 2,677 3,113
Returns on investments and servicing of finance (417) (424)
Taxation (703) (709)
Capital expenditure and financial investment (265) (422)
------ ------
Net cash generation 1,292 1,558
Disposals less acquisitions 91 (1,820)
Equity dividends paid (823) (773)
------ ------
Cash flow before use of liquid resources and financing 560 (1,035)
Management of liquid resources 375 (303)
Financing (note 2) (889) 1,464
------ ------
Increase in cash in the period 46 126
====== ======
Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement
in net debt (note 3)
Increase in cash in the period 46 126
Decrease/(increase) in debt 361 (2,200)
(Decrease)/increase in liquid resources (375) 303
------ ------
Change in net debt resulting from cash flow 32 (1,771)
Net debt acquired on purchase of subsidiaries (35)
Other changes 2
Differences on exchange 66 (34)
------ ------
Movement in net debt in the period 100 (1,840)
Net debt at 1 January (5,219) (3,379)
------ ------
Net debt at period end (5,119) (5,219)
====== ======
NOTES TO THE GROUP CASH FLOW STATEMENT 18.
2004 2003
Restated
1) Net operating cash flow from £m £m
subsidiary undertakings
Operating profit 1,794 1,777
Depreciation 372 477
Goodwill amortisation 474 405
Decrease in stocks 40 179
Decrease/(increase) in debtors 3 (52)
(Decrease)/increase in creditors (26) 97
(Decrease)/increase in provisions (86) 157
Other 25 27
------ ------
Net operating cash flow from subsidiary
undertakings 2,596 3,067
====== ======
2) Financing
Proceeds from issue of shares 4 5
Purchase of own shares (492) (698)
Employee share ownership trusts
- purchase of own shares (72) (58)
- proceeds on exercise of options 32 15
(Decrease)/increase in debt (361) 2,200
------ ------
(889) 1,464
====== ======
Differences
Cash Other on
1.1.04 flow changes exchange 31.12.04
3) Analysis of £m £m £m £m £m
net debt
Cash and bank
balances 517 478
Overdrafts (172) (121)
------ ------
345 46 (34) 357
Term borrowings (7,366) 336 127 (6,903)
Finance lease
obligations (72) 25 (26) (73)
Short term
deposits 1,766 (353) 28 (26) 1,415
Current
investments 108 (22) (1) 85
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(5,219) 32 2 66 (5,119)
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
NOTES 19.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PREPARATION
The financial statements comprise the audited results for the years ended
31 December 2004 and 31 December 2003.
The audited Group results have been prepared under the historical cost
convention and in accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and applicable
UK accounting standards.
Accounting Standard FRS17 on Retirement Benefits was issued in 2001 and
represented a radical change in accounting for pension costs and other
post-retirement benefits. During 2002, the Accounting Standards Board
decided to allow deferral of full implementation of FRS17 until 2005,
while the International Accounting Standards Board considers revisions to
its standard on employee benefits.
Consequently, as the Group still reports under SSAP24 and is continuing
to make use of the transitional arrangement permitted under FRS17, the
reported income and shareholders' equity are not affected by the
standard. However, additional disclosures are being made as required by
the standard. The impact of FRS17 would be to increase Group pre-tax
profit for 2004 by £41 million (2003 £34 million) and reduce reported
shareholders' funds at 31 December 2004 by £285 million (2003 £486
million). The main reason for the reduction in the impact on
shareholders' funds is the removal of the US operations as part of the
Reynolds American transaction, which is described on page 20.
From 1 January 2004, the Group has amended its accounting for
employee share schemes and Employee Share Ownership Trusts (ESOTs)
in accordance with UITF abstracts 17 (as revised) and 38. As a
result the cost of awards made under the share schemes is now
calculated with reference to the fair value of the shares at the
date of the award rather than the cost of the shares purchased by
the Group. In addition, the net carrying value of shares held by
the Group's ESOTs, previously shown as an asset in other investments
in the balance sheet, is now deducted from shareholders' funds.
The comparative figures for 2003 have been restated to reflect the
impact of these changes. Consequently, the interest of British
American Tobacco's shareholders at 1 January 2003 and 31 December
2003, as published last year, has been reduced by £107 million and
£122 million respectively to reflect the deduction of the net
carrying value of the shares from shareholders' funds. The impact
of the revision to UITF 17 on the charges in respect of the share
scheme awards is not material.
As explained in the Appendix, from the first quarter results for
2005 the Group will report in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards.
CHANGES IN THE GROUP 20.
On 4 April 2003, the Group announced that it had acquired controlling
interests in a number of companies in Peru, including Peru's leading
tobacco company Tabacalera Nacional S.A.A. With the aggregate
consideration to the vendors of all the various shareholdings acquired
of £146 million, the goodwill arising on these transactions is
£132 million.
It was announced on 4 August 2003 that the Group had successfully bid
for a 67.8 per cent holding in the Serbian tobacco company Duvanska
Industrija Vranje. The Group's shareholding was subsequently increased
to 78.8 per cent, which brought the total consideration to £43 million.
The acquisition resulted in goodwill of £40 million. In addition, the
Group has committed to invest £17 million in factory modernisation over
two years and further amounts over five years on social programmes.
On 23 December 2003, the Group completed the acquisition of Ente
Tabacchi Italiani S.p.A., Italy's state tobacco company, for
€2.32 billion. The goodwill arising on this transaction amounts to
£1.6 billion. In a separate transaction, on 29 December 2004 the Group
sold Etinera S.p.A., the distribution business of the Italian
subsidiary, for €590 million. This resulted in a profit of £20 million,
after allocating the relevant portion of the goodwill on the ETI
acquisition to Etinera.
It is estimated that the acquisition, contributed £1,451 million of net
turnover and £157 million of operating profit to the Group results for
the year. Excluding Etinera, ETI contributed £337 million and £115
million respectively.
The Group announced on 27 October 2003 and completed on 30 July 2004 the
agreement to combine Brown & Williamson's (B&W) US domestic businesses
with R.J. Reynolds (RJR) under Reynolds American Inc., a new holding
company 58 per cent owned by RJR shareholders and 42 per cent by the
Group, through B&W. The Group also sold Lane to Reynolds American for
US$400 million in cash.
This transaction has been accounted for in accordance with UITF abstract
31, which gives rise to goodwill relating to the Group's investment in
Reynolds American Inc. and a gain on the partial disposal of the US
domestic businesses. The goodwill on the transaction is provisionally
estimated at £1,693 million, with a gain on the partial disposal of
£1,045 million. Of this amount £127 million is included in the Group
profit and loss account as a realised gain, reflecting the cash element
of the transaction. In addition, £918 million is included in the
statement of total recognised gains and losses as an unrealised gain.
Changes in the Group cont... 21.
The Group has consolidated the results of B&W and Lane for the seven
months to the end of July 2004, while for the five months from August to
December 2004, Reynolds American Inc. is accounted for as an
associated undertaking. In the year to 31 December 2004, Reynolds
American contributed £789 million of net turnover and £146 million of
operating profit before exceptional items, while B&W and Lane
contributed £960 million of net turnover and £149 million of operating
profit. In the comparative year B&W and Lane contributed
£1,974 million in net turnover and £316 million in operating profit.
The Group ceased to be the controlling company of British American
Racing (Holdings) Ltd (BAR) on 7 December 2004 when BAR went into
administration, and consequently ceased to consolidate BAR from that
date. In January 2005, a joint venture between British American
Tobacco and Honda Motor Co. Ltd. acquired the BAR business. As there
is now shared control with Honda, BAR will in future be reported as an
associated company.
CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PREFERENCE SHARES
On 7 June 1999, the Company issued 241,734,651 convertible
redeemable preference shares (CRPS) of 25p each to R&R Holdings SA
as part consideration for the acquisition of the issued share
capital of Rothmans International BV. Subsequently, in accordance
with the terms of the CRPS, 50 per cent of the CRPS were redeemed
for cash on 7 June 2000 and the remaining 50 per cent were converted
into the same number of ordinary shares on 3 June 2004.
EXCHANGE RATE EFFECTS
The results of overseas subsidiaries and associates have been translated
to sterling at average rates of exchange. The operating profit before
goodwill and exceptional items was reduced by £151 million as sterling
average rates strengthened against almost all currencies.
The principal exchange rates used were as follows:
Average Closing
------------- ------------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
US dollar 1.830 1.635 1.920 1.790
Canadian dollar 2.384 2.288 2.300 2.313
Euro 1.475 1.445 1.413 1.419
South African rand 11.821 12.331 10.816 11.949
RESTRUCTURING COSTS 22.
During 2003, the Group commenced a detailed review of its manufacturing
operations and organisational structure, including the initiative to
reduce overheads and indirect costs.
As a result, in the second quarter of 2003, the Group announced proposals
to restructure the businesses in the UK and Canada. These proposals
included the closure of the Darlington factory in the UK, with
manufacturing consolidated in the larger Southampton plant, and a major
restructuring of the business in Canada. This included the closure of
the Montreal factory with production transferred to other Canadian
facilities, as well as the closure of the leaf threshing operations at
Aylmer, Ontario.
Manufacturing rationalisation continued in the second half of 2003,
notably with the agreed closure plan for the Merksem factory in Belgium.
In addition, there have been a number of changes to the organisational
structure at all levels of the Group and a review of the supply chain is
underway.
The above restructurings continued during 2004, with further
announcements during the year principally in respect of a reorganisation
of the Group's business in Germany, the closing and downsizing of some
factories and the integration of the Smoking Tobacco and Cigars
operations with the cigarette businesses in Europe and the UK.
The results of subsidiary undertakings for the year include a charge for
restructurings of £206 million (2003 £437 million).
Following the combination of Brown & Williamson with R.J. Reynolds as
described on page 20, the new company Reynolds American incurred
restructuring costs in integrating the two businesses. For the period to
31 December 2004 the Group's share of these amounted to £125 million,
mainly in relation to asset write downs and staff costs.
INVESTMENT COSTS WRITTEN OFF
Considering the uncertainty of the timetable and the significant hurdles
in establishing a major strategic investment in China, the Group has
decided to write off all costs previously capitalised in reaching this
stage of the project.
GOODWILL AMORTISATION
The amortisation charge of £474 million (2003 £405 million) for
subsidiaries is in respect of goodwill which principally arose from the
Rothmans transaction during 1999, the Imasco transaction during 2000 and
the ETI transaction during 2003. The increase in the charge mainly
reflects the impact of the acquisition of ETI at the end of 2003. The
£37 million charge for associates reflects five months in respect of
Reynolds American.
WRITE DOWN OF LOAN TO JOINT VENTURE 23.
The write down in 2003 relates to the reduction in value of the
convertible loan stock of British American Racing (Holdings) (BAR), as
part of taking a controlling interest in that company. On 12 December
2003, the Group converted US$136 million of its convertible loan stock in
BAR, raising its shareholding in BAR from 50 per cent to 89.7 per cent
and changing the status of BAR from a joint venture to a subsidiary. No
goodwill was created by this transaction. Subsequent changes in the BAR
investment are described on page 21.
GAIN/(LOSS) ON DISPOSAL OF SUBSIDIARIES AND INVESTMENTS
In 2004, a gain on disposal of £127 million arises from the
agreement to combine Brown & Williamson with R.J. Reynolds, as well
as a £20 million gain on the disposal of Etinera, as described on
page 20.
In October 2004, the Group sold two fixed asset investments, its 20
per cent stake in Lakson Tobacco Company in Pakistan and Bollore
Investissement S.A. in France. The total proceeds were £66 million,
resulting in a profit on disposal of £38 million.
In 2003, there was a loss on disposal of subsidiaries. On 29 September
2003, a subsidiary of the Group absolutely and irrevocably transferred to
a newly created trust (the Trust) all of its rights, title and interest
in and to 100 per cent of the issued and outstanding shares of The
Flintkote Company (Flintkote) together with US$3 million in cash and did
not receive any consideration in return. The Trust, administered by a
trustee, was created for the management, conservation and eventual
disposition of the assets transferred to the Trust and named a medical
facility active in the research and treatment of asbestos-related
diseases as ultimate beneficiary. The Group will have no continuing
involvement in the Trust. Since by virtue of this arrangement Flintkote
was no longer a Group subsidiary, the Group ceased to consolidate
Flintkote effective 29 September 2003. The transfer resulted in a loss
on disposal of £62 million before tax.
The loss on disposal of subsidiaries in 2003 also includes a provision
for losses on the announced sale of the Group's shareholding in a company
in Myanmar.
INTEREST AND INTEREST COVER
Net interest rose by £24 million to £237 million due to the impact of the
share buy-back programme and the interest cost of acquisitions, partly
offset by the benefit from the Group's cash flow and the release of
interest accruals following resolution of tax issues.
The Group's interest cover was distorted by goodwill amortisation and
exceptional items. On an adjusted basis, interest cover based on profit
before interest paid over interest paid was 8.1x (2003 8.8x) reflecting
the higher level of interest paid in 2004.
TAXATION 24.
Year to
31.12.04 31.12.03
£m £m
British American Tobacco p.l.c. and
subsidiary undertakings
- overseas 663 821
Adjustments in respect of prior periods (66) (49)
---- ----
Current taxation 597 772
Deferred taxation 57 (48)
---- ----
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
and subsidiary undertakings 654 724
Share of associates and joint ventures 57 55
---- ----
711 779
Share of associate's exceptional credit (49)
---- ----
662 779
==== ====
Tax rate 35.1% 49.7%
==== ====
The tax rate for 2003 was adversely affected by the loss on disposal of
subsidiaries and the impact of the restructuring costs, whilst the tax
rate for 2004 has benefited from the tax free profit on disposal of
subsidiaries and other investments, as well as exceptional credits
arising from tax recoveries in Reynolds American Inc. The tax rates for
each period are also adversely affected by goodwill amortisation.
Both years benefited from the resolution of various outstanding tax
issues. The underlying tax rate reflected in the adjusted earnings per
share shown below was 31.9 per cent (2003 33.5 per cent) and the decrease
reflects changes in the mix of profits and the resolution of tax audits.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are based on the profit for the year
attributable to ordinary shareholders and the weighted average number of
ordinary shares in issue during the year (excluding shares held by the
Group's two Employee Share Ownership Trusts).
For the calculation of diluted earnings per share the weighted average
number of shares reflects the potential dilution effect of employee share
schemes and, up to their redemption on 3 June 2004, the convertible
redeemable preference shares. The earnings are correspondingly adjusted
to the amount of earnings prior to charging dividends and the
amortisation of discount on the convertible redeemable preference shares.
For 2003 the convertible redeemable preference shares were not dilutive
for the unadjusted earnings per share calculation.
Earnings per share cont... 25.
The earnings have been distorted by exceptional items and goodwill
amortisation. To illustrate the impact of these distortions, the
adjusted diluted earnings per share are shown below:
Diluted earnings per share
Year to
31.12.04 31.12.03
(pence) (pence)
Unadjusted earnings per share 50.93 26.69
Convertible redeemable preference
shares 1.47
Effect of restructuring costs 9.88 15.71
Investment costs written off 2.31
Effect of goodwill amortisation 23.70 18.07
Effect of write down of loan to
joint venture 3.88
Effect of tax recoveries in associated
company (2.27)
Effect of disposal of subsidiaries (6.82) 3.39
Effect of disposal of fixed asset
investments (1.90)
------ ------
Adjusted earnings per share 75.83 69.21
====== ======
Similar types of adjustments would apply to basic earnings per share
which, on an adjusted basis, would be 77.91p (2003 70.70p) compared to
unadjusted amounts of 52.20p (2003 26.93p).
SHARE BUY-BACK PROGRAMME
The Group initiated an on-market share buy-back programme at the end of
February 2003. During the year to December 2004, 59 million shares were
bought at a cost of £493 million (2003 106 million shares at a cost of
£698 million).
GROUP RESERVES
The Group reserve movements are summarised on page 12.
Shareholders' funds were £859 million higher at £5,220 million. This
reflected the retained profit after payment of dividends and the
unrealised gain on the Reynolds American transaction, which more than
offset the impact of the share buy-back programme. Exchange movements
only had a small impact on shareholders' funds as the weakening of the
year end US dollar rate was offset by a stronger rand rate and a small
strengthening of the euro and Canadian dollar rates.
Shareholders' funds comprise £5,220 million (2003 £3,551 million)
of equity interests and £nil million (2003 £810 million) of
non-equity interests.
CASH FLOW 26.
The Group's cash flow is summarised on page 17.
The Group's net cash inflow from operating activities was £436 million
lower at £2,677 million, reflecting the timing of cash flows in respect
of restructuring costs, the impact of the Reynolds American transaction
on flows in respect of US settlement costs and the large reduction in
stock levels in 2003, together with the impact of the strengthening of
sterling against most currencies.
Capital expenditure and financial investment was £157 million lower at
£265 million due to both a lower level of capital expenditure and a
reduction in purchases of investments. However, there was little change
in returns on investments and servicing of finance or the outflow for
taxation. Consequently net cash generation was £266 million lower at
£1,292 million.
Cash flows in respect of acquisitions less disposals were relatively
small in 2004, with a net inflow of £91 million due to the disposal of
Etinera and the Reynolds American transaction. The comparative period
showed an outflow of £1,820 million principally due to the acquisition
of the companies in Italy, Serbia and Peru (see page 20).
With equity dividends paid of £823 million (2003 £773 million), the
Group's net cash inflow after dividends paid was £560 million compared
to a net outflow in 2003 of £1,035 million.
The cost of shares purchased for the buy-back programme was £492 million
(2003 £698 million) and the net outflow for employee share schemes was
£40 million (2003 £43 million).
These, after a £66 million benefit from the impact of exchange on net
debt, resulted in the Group's net debt falling by £100 million to
£5,119 million.
The decrease in net debt was reflected in cash, short term deposits and
current investments £413 million lower at £1,978 million and debt
reducing by £513 million to £7,097 million.
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
There are contingent liabilities in respect of litigation, overseas taxes
and guarantees in various countries.
Product liability litigation
Group companies, notably Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc. (formerly
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation) ("B&W"), as well as other leading
cigarette manufacturers, are defendants, principally in the US, in a
number of product liability cases. In a number of these cases, the
amounts of compensatory and punitive damages sought are significant.
Contingent liabilities cont... 27.
Indemnity
On 30 July 2004, B&W completed transactions combining its US tobacco
business assets, liabilities and operations with R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Company. A new company called R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company ("RJRT") was
created as a result of the combination transactions. These transactions
(the "Business Combination") were accomplished through a new publicly
traded holding company Reynolds American Inc. ("RAI"), which is the
indirect parent corporation of RJRT. The Group, through B&W, owns
approximately 42% of the outstanding common stock of RAI. As a result of
the Business Combination: (a) B&W discontinued the active conduct of any
tobacco business in the US; (b) B&W contributed to RJRT all of its assets
other than the capital stock of certain subsidiaries engaged in non-US
businesses and other limited categories of assets; (c) RJRT assumed all
liabilities of B&W (except liabilities to the extent relating to
businesses and assets not contributed by B&W to RJRT and other limited
categories of liabilities) and contributed subsidiaries or otherwise to
the extent related to B&W's tobacco business as conducted in the US on or
prior to 30 July 2004; and, d) RJRT agreed to indemnify B&W and each of
its affiliates (other than RAI and its subsidiaries) against, among other
matters, all losses, liabilities, damages, expenses, judgments,
attorneys' fees, etc, to the extent relating to or arising from such
assumed liabilities or the assets contributed by B&W to RJRT (the "RJRT
Indemnification"). The scope of the RJRT Indemnification includes all
expenses and contingent liabilities in connection with litigation to the
extent relating to or arising from B&W's US tobacco business as conducted
on or prior to 30 July 2004, including smoking and health tobacco
litigation, whether the litigation is commenced before or after 30 July
2004 (the "tobacco litigation").
Pursuant to the terms of the RJRT Indemnification, RJRT is liable for any
possible judgments, the posting of appeal bonds or security, and all
other expenses of and responsibility for managing the defence of the
tobacco litigation. RJRT has assumed control of the defence of the
tobacco litigation involving B&W and RJRT is also a party in most (but
not all) of the same cases. Accordingly, RJRT uses or plans to use the
same law firm or firms to represent both B&W and RJRT in any single or
similar case (except in certain limited circumstances) as RJRT's
interests are typically aligned with B&W's interests, and RJRT has
substantial experience in managing recognized outside legal counsel in
defending the tobacco litigation, and outside counsel have independent
professional responsibilities to represent the interests of B&W. In
addition, in accordance with the terms of the RJRT Indemnification,
affiliates of B&W have retained control of the defence in certain tobacco
litigation cases with respect to which such affiliates are entitled to
indemnification.
Contingent liabilities cont... 28.
US Litigation
1. Medical reimbursement cases
These civil actions seek to recover amounts spent by government entities
and other third party providers on healthcare and welfare costs claimed
to result from illnesses associated with smoking. Although B&W continues
to be defendant in health-care cost recovery cases involving plaintiffs,
such as hospitals, Native American tribes, and local and foreign
governments, the vast majority of such cases have been dismissed on legal
grounds.
2. Class actions
As at 31 December 2004, B&W was named as a defendant in some 14 (2003 36)
separate actions attempting to assert claims on behalf of classes of
persons allegedly injured by smoking. In the Engle case (Florida), one
jury awarded compensatory damages totalling US$12.7 million and assessed
US$17.6 billion in punitive damages against B&W. On 21 May 2003, the
intermediate appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment and
remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to decertify the
class. On 12 May 2004, the Florida Supreme Court agreed to review this
case. Oral argument was held on 3 November 2004 and a decision is
awaited. In a Louisiana medical monitoring case brought on behalf of
Louisiana smokers (Scott) the jury made findings against the defendants
on claims relating to fraud, conspiracy, marketing to minors and smoking
cessation. On 21 May 2004, the jury returned a verdict in the amount of
US$591 million. On 29 September 2004, the defendants posted a US$50
million bond of which RJRT posted US$25 million (i.e. the portions for
RJRT and B&W) towards the bond. A new class action complaint (Scheab,
formerly known as McLaughlin) was filed in The US District Court for the
Eastern District of New York on 11 May 2004 against B&W and other UK-
based Group companies. The judge has advised the parties that he will
issue his class certification ruling on 31 August 2005 and a trial date
of 14 November 2005 has been set.
3. Individual cases
Approximately 3,867 cases were pending against B&W at 31 December 2004
(2003 4,245), filed by or on behalf of individuals in which it is
contended that diseases or deaths have been caused by cigarette smoking
or by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Of these cases: (a)
approximately two thirds are ETS cases brought by flight attendants who
were members of a class action (Broin) that was settled on terms that
allow compensatory but not punitive damages claims by class members; (b)
approximately one quarter are cases brought in consolidated proceedings
in West Virginia; and (c) only about 10 per cent are cases filed by other
individuals. Of the cases that went to trial or were decided or remained
on appeal during 2004, several resulted in verdicts against B&W. In
April 2003, a Florida jury (Eastman) awarded US$650,000 damages against
B&W and on 29 October 2004 RJRT, pursuant to its obligation to
Contingent liabilities cont... 29.
indemnify B&W, sent the plaintiff's counsel the amount of the judgment,
attorneys fees and costs, plus accrued interest (approximately US$1.2
million). On 7 January 2005, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
upheld the first instance (Boerner) compensatory damages award of
US$4.025 million and reduced the punitive damages award to US$5 million.
In December 2003, a New York jury (Frankson) awarded US$350,000
compensatory damages against B&W and two industry organisations. In
January 2004, the same jury awarded US$20 million punitive damages. On
22 June 2004, the trial judge granted a new trial unless the parties
agree to an increase in compensatory damages to US$500,000 and a decrease
in punitive damages to US$5 million, of which US$4 million would be
assigned to B&W. On 25 January 2005, B&W noticed an appeal to the Supreme
Court of the State of New York. On 1 February 2005, a Missouri jury
(Smith) awarded US$500,000 in compensatory damages against B&W and then,
on 2 February 2005, awarded US$20 million in punitive damages, also
against B&W. Post trial motions will be filed within the appropriate
time.
4. Conduct-based claims
On 22 September 1999, the US Department of Justice brought an action in
the US District Court for the District of Columbia against various
industry members, including R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and B&W.
British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited (formerly called British-
American Tobacco Company Ltd) is also now a co-defendant in the action.
The trial of this claim seeking disgorgement of profits pursuant to the
federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, began
on 21 September 2004. The trial is expected to last at least six months.
On 4 February 2005, the Court of Appeals ruled that the government could
not claim disgorgement of profits. The Government is seeking to appeal.
5. Other claims
As at 31 December 2004, two (2003 seven) cases were pending on behalf of
asbestos companies, seeking reimbursement for costs and judgements paid
in litigation brought by third parties against them. As at 31 December
2004, B&W was named as defendant in 3 (2003 4) US cases brought by
foreign government entities seeking reimbursement of medical costs which
they incurred for treatment for persons in their own countries who are
alleged to have smoked imported cigarettes, including those manufactured
by B&W.
Contingent liabilities cont... 30.
Other foreign litigation
At year end, active claims against Group companies existed in 19 other
countries but the only countries with more than five active claims were
Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands and the Republic of
Ireland. In Canada, the constitutionality of the Tobacco Damages and
Health Care Costs Recovery Act is under appeal to the Supreme Court of
Canada. In Quebec, in February 2005,2 smoking and health class actions
were certified. These decisions will be appealed in due course.
Conclusion
While it is impossible to be certain of the outcome of any particular
case or of the amount of any possible adverse verdict, the Company
believes that the defences of the Group companies to all these various
claims are meritorious both on the law and the facts, and a vigorous
defence is being made everywhere. If an adverse judgement were entered
against any of the Group companies in any case, an appeal would be made.
Such appeals could require the appellants to post appeal bonds or
substitute security in amounts which could in some cases equal or exceed
the amount of the judgement. In any event, with regard to US litigation,
the Group has the benefit of the RJRT Indemnification. At least in the
aggregate and despite the quality of defences available to the Group, it
is not impossible that the results of operations or cash flows of the
Group in particular quarterly or annual periods could be materially
affected by this and by the final outcome of any particular litigation.
Having regard to these matters, the Directors (i) do not consider it
appropriate to make any provision in respect of any pending litigation
and (ii) do not believe that the ultimate outcome of all this litigation
will significantly impair the financial condition of the Group.
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS
The above figures have been extracted from the Group's full financial
statements which, for the year ended 31 December 2003 have been delivered
and for the year ended 31 December 2004, will be delivered to the
Registrar of Companies. Both carry an unqualified audit report. The
Annual General Meeting will be held on 28 April 2005 at the Mermaid
Conference & Events Centre, Puddle Dock, Blackfriars, London EC4V 3DB.
The report and accounts will be posted to shareholders in March 2005.
Alan F Porter
Secretary
1 March 2005
APPENDIX
RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD (IFRS)
The Group currently prepares its financial statements under UK
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (UK GAAP). From 1 January
2005 onwards, the Group is required to prepare its consolidated
financial statements in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the European
Union (EU) and implemented in the UK. The accounting policies to be
applied under IFRS are set out on pages 14 to 22. This change applies
to all financial reporting for accounting periods beginning on 1
January 2005 and, consequently, the Group's first IFRS results will be
for the three months to 31 March 2005. As the 2005 financial
statements include comparatives for 2004, the Group's date of
transition to IFRS under IFRS1 (First time adoption of IFRS) will be
1 January 2004 and the 2004 comparatives will be restated to IFRS.
To explain how the Group's reported performance and financial position
are affected by this change, set out on pages 9 to 13 is a comparison
of key figures under UK GAAP for 2004 with unaudited restated IFRS
results.
The key figures set out on pages 9 to 13 are based on the IFRS expected
to be applicable as at 31 December 2005 and the interpretation of those
standards. IFRSs are subject to possible amendment by and
interpretative guidance from the International Accounting Standards
Board, as well as the ongoing review and endorsement by the EU, and are
therefore still subject to change. These figures may therefore require
amendment, to change the basis of accounting and/or presentation of
certain financial information, before their inclusion in the IFRS
financial statements for the year to 31 December 2005 when the Group
prepares its first complete set of IFRS financial statements.
IFRS1 permits those companies adopting IFRS for the first time certain
exemptions from the full requirements of IFRS in the transition period.
The Group has taken the following key exemptions, as explained in the
accounting policies on pages 14 to 22.
(i) Business combinations prior to the date of transition are not
restated.
(ii) All cumulative actuarial gains and losses for employee benefits
have been recognised at the date of transition.
- 2 -
(iii) As described in note (o) on page 6 and accounting policy 15 on
page 19, IAS32 and IAS39 on financial instruments are being applied
prospectively from 1 January 2005 and consequently the restated figures
for 2004 do not reflect the impact of these standards.
(iv) Cumulative exchange differences recognised separately in equity
under IFRS are taken as nil at the date of transition.
IFRS does not contain the same specific presentation of "exceptional"
items as UK GAAP but does require additional line items where necessary
to an understanding of an entity's financial performance. Given the
material distortions to the profit from operations under IFRS, the
Group therefore intends to continue to identify separately items
similar to those previously treated as exceptional under UK GAAP.
Therefore, on the basis of the IFRS income statement figures on
page 10, for 2004 the income statement would include the following
lines between revenue/normal expenses and net finance costs
------
2,589
Restructuring costs (206)
Investment costs written off (50)
Disposal of subsidiaries and
fixed asset investments 1,427
------
Profit from operations 3,760
Similarly after the line for share of post tax results of associates
there would be memorandum lines to identify the impact of brand
impairment (£(49) million), restructuring costs (£(63) million) and
exceptional tax recoveries (£49 million).
Revenue included on page 10 is after deducting duty, excise and other
taxes and excludes the share of associated company turnover.
The disposals line on pages 10 and 13 comprises the gains on disposal
of subsidiaries and fixed asset investments.
The main adjustments in changing to IFRS are as follows and the tables
on pages 9 to 13 are cross referenced to the notes below where
relevant.
(a) Under UK GAAP the Group accounted for post retirement benefits
under SSAP24, whereby the costs of providing pensions and post-
retirement health care benefits were charged against operating profit
on a systematic basis with surpluses and deficits arising allocated
over the expected average remaining service lives of current employees.
The approach under IFRS is described in accounting policy 6 on page 16
and the impact on the income statement is similar to the FRS17
disclosure under UK GAAP except that the unwinding of the discounting
on liabilities and the expected return on assets are included in
operating profit rather than net finance costs.
- 3 -
The adjustments to the UK GAAP balance sheet to reflect the adoption of
IAS19 at the date of transition are as follows:
31 December 2004 1 January 2004
Other investments (363) (341)
Retirement benefit assets 16 14
Deferred tax assets 41 174
Trade and other receivables (154) (189)
Retirement benefit liabilities 186 (201)
Deferred tax liabilities 23 33
Trade and other payables 15 18
Minority interests (1) (1)
------ ------
Shareholders' funds (237) (493)
====== ======
The changes in the total adjustment and the components principally
reflect the removal of Brown & Williamson following the Reynolds
American transaction.
(b) As described in accounting policy 9 on page 18 under IFRS it is
necessary to provide deferred tax on the unremitted profit of associates
and part of the unremitted profit of subsidiaries. This is not required
under UK GAAP. As at 31 December 2004 this resulted in an additional
deferred tax liability of £49 million (1 January 2004 £40 million) and
for the year ended 31 December 2004 an additional charge of £7 million.
Under IFRS, it is also necessary to provide deferred tax on the
difference between the carrying values and tax base of assets in
operations which use inflation accounting, as well as all differences
between the carrying values and tax base for land and buildings. As at
31 December 2004 these resulted in an additional deferred tax liability
of £16 million (1 January 2004 £19 million).
(c) Under UK GAAP, the final dividend for the year is provided in the
results for that year whereas, as described in accounting policy 16 on
page 22, under IFRS it is provided in the year that it is declared.
(d) Under UK GAAP, certain of the Group's share-based compensation plans
did not result in a charge as they had no intrinsic value or were
financed by new shares. However other schemes financed by the purchase
of shares did have an intrinsic value and were charged to operating
profit over the vesting period based on the share price at the date of
grant. Under IFRS all share schemes result in a charge based on the fair
value of the grant as described in accounting policy 7 on page 17.
Cash settled share-based payments result in the recognition of an
additional liability at 31 December 2004 of £8 million (1 January
2004 £6 million).
- 4 -
(e) Under UK GAAP, operating profit, net finance costs, taxation and
minority interests included the Group's share of the associates results
(£144 million, £(3) million, £(8) million and £(2) million respectively
for 2004). Under IFRS, the income statement only includes the Group's
share of the post-tax and minority results of the associates as one line
before the Group's pre-tax profit.
Previously under UK GAAP, interest on finance leases was included in
operating profit whereas under IFRS it is included in net finance costs.
For the year ended 31 December 2004 this resulted in a reallocation of
£4 million.
Under UK GAAP, the gains and losses on the disposal of subsidiaries and
fixed asset investments were shown as an exceptional item below operating
profit (£185 million in 2004). Also the £918 million unrealised gain in
respect of the Reynolds American transaction was included in the
Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses. Under IFRS both these
gains are included in the profit from operations.
In addition, the gain on the disposals is different under IFRS as it is
not necessary to write back the goodwill previously written off to
reserves under UK GAAP, as described in accounting policy 3 on page 15,
which results in an additional £216 million gain on disposal under IFRS.
(f) Under UK GAAP, goodwill on the balance sheet is amortised over its
useful economic life. As described in accounting policy 3 on page 15
goodwill is not amortised under IFRS from 1 January 2004.
The gain on the disposal of Etinera is reduced by £20 million under IFRS
as the goodwill allocated to this operation would not have been
amortised.
Under IFRS, as negative goodwill arises it is recognised immediately in
the income statement and therefore £6 million of negative goodwill under
UK GAAP as at 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2004 is released to
shareholders' equity on transition to IFRS.
(g) Exchange differences on certain inter company balances which do not
meet the functional currency requirements under IAS21 are shown in the
income statement not reserve movements and amounted to a pre-tax net gain
of £1 million in net finance costs for the year ended 31 December 2004.
As these amounts are generated by exchange movements they will vary from
period to period. However, for most items, there are equal and
offsetting amounts in reserve movements on consolidation and equity is
unaffected.
In addition £1 million of exchange losses have been reclassified from
operating profit to net finance costs.
- 5 -
(h) (i) Under UK GAAP companies operating in a hyper inflationary
environment were permitted to adjust for inflation by accounting in a
hard currency, whereas under IFRS it is almost always required to use a
system based on indexation. For the year ended 31 December 2004, this
resulted in increases in revenue of £4 million and operating profit of
£7 million.
(ii) Under UK GAAP, where there are losses in subsidiaries with
minority interests, the relevant share of the losses is allocated to
minorities. This is generally not permitted under IFRS and so minority
interests are increased by £1 million at 31 December 2004 (1 January 2004
£7 million) and shareholders' equity is reduced by the same amount. The
effect in the year ended 31 December 2004 is to increase minority
interests and reduce retained profit by £6 million.
(i) Under UK GAAP, the book value of derivative financial instruments
(cross currency swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts) in respect
of borrowings and short term deposits was included in their carrying
value on the balance sheet. Under IFRS, the book value of these
derivatives is shown separately on the balance sheet and as at
31 December 2004 the adjustments are as follows:
Derivative financial instruments - assets 146
Cash and cash equivalents 7
Increase in borrowings (89)
Derivative financial instruments - liabilities (64)
(j) The application of IFRS to the results of associated companies
reduced the Group's share of their post-tax results by £42 million for
the year ended 31 December 2004, or a reduction of £5 million excluding
the two exceptional items noted below. The adjustments principally arise
in respect of post-retirement benefits, inventories, intangibles and
property, plant and equipment. With the separate recognition of
intangibles under IFRS, there is a £49 million impairment charge (net of
tax) following the implementation of a review of brand strategies
resulting from the combination of R. J. Reynolds and Brown & Williamson.
The adjustment in respect of post-retirement benefits, reflected in the
Brown & Williamson liabilities as at the date of transition and
consequently the net assets of Reynolds American Inc., results in a
£128 million increase in the gain on disposal of Brown & Williamson and a
£12 million (net of tax) reduction in the restructuring costs in Reynolds
American Inc.
The application of IFRS, including the non amortisation of goodwill,
decreases the Group's carrying value of associates as at 31 December 2004
by £84 million.
(k) Under UK GAAP, software assets were included as part of property,
plant and equipment whereas under IFRS, unless they are integral to
another fixed asset, they are included as part of intangible assets. As
at 31 December 2004 these amounted to £92 million.
- 6 -
(l) Cash and cash equivalents under IFRS comprise cash and short term
highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts
of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in
value.
The format of the cash flow statement will change and the IFRS cash
flow statement will explain the change in cash and cash equivalents,
rather than just cash as under UK GAAP. However, the net debt position
is unaffected and a reconciliation of this will continue to be provided
as additional information.
(m) Under both UK GAAP and IFRS, basic earnings per share are based on
the profit attributable to ordinary shareholders and the average number
of ordinary shares in issue during the period (excluding shares held by
the Group's two Employee Share Ownership Trusts). The difference
between the UK GAAP and IFRS figures is therefore largely the result of
the different treatment of the profit on disposal of subsidiaries as
described in (e) above and amortisation of goodwill as described in (f)
above.
For both UK GAAP and IFRS, the adjusted diluted earnings per share uses
a similar number of shares, with profit adjusted to exclude
restructuring costs, investment costs written off, profit on disposal
of subsidiaries and fixed asset investments, goodwill
amortisation/impairment of brands and the exceptional credits arising
from tax recoveries in Reynolds American Inc. in 2004.
(n) Under IFRS, the Group will continue to report regional business
segments as for UK GAAP. However, shared Group costs, which are
corporate costs that are not directly attributable to individual
segments under IFRS, will now be shown as a separate line in the
segmental analyses.
(o) As described in accounting policy 15 on page 19, IAS32 and IAS39 on
financial instruments will be applied prospectively from 1 January 2005.
Consequently the restated figures for 2004 do not reflect the impact of
these standards.
These are complex standards which are also continuing to change. When
coupled with the fact that the apparent accounting implications do not
always match the underlying economic rationale for the transaction, this
makes the application somewhat problematic. What is an appropriate and
effective hedging transaction in economic terms does not always meet the
current tests for hedge accounting under these standards.
- 7 -
However, on the current understanding of IAS32 and IAS39, it is expected
that the main implications of applying these standards in 2005 will be as
follows:
(i) The Group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge its
exposure to foreign exchange and interest rate risks arising from
operational, financing and investment activities. The Group does not
hold derivatives for trading purposes but under IFRS, if the tests for
hedge accounting are not met, the derivatives are treated as if held for
trading purposes. The implications are:
- Following earlier amendments to IAS39, it has not been possible to
obtain hedge accounting for derivatives on forecast inter company
transactions such as hedging the currency risk on sales or purchases.
Consequently the changes in the fair value of these derivatives would be
included in operating profit and create volatility. However, it has
recently been announced that this particular aspect of IAS39 will be
amended to allow hedge accounting for highly probable forecast inter
company transactions which should avoid the potential distortion in
reported profit. As this would be a cash flow hedge, the impact would
then go to reserves until maturity which would still therefore reflect
the volatility.
- For many other derivatives used by the Group it is possible to
obtain hedge accounting or the implications of not doing so are not
material. However there will be a few instances where hedge accounting
is not possible and the implications for volatility in net finance costs
could potentially be material.
(ii) Available for sale investments will be marked to market with
changes in value taken to reserves and recycled to income when the
investment is sold. This is not expected to have a material impact on
the Group.
(iii) Under UK GAAP the approach on foreign currency borrowings used as
net investment hedges was to pool these at a Group level and consider the
effectiveness of hedging at a consolidated Group level. IFRS requires
each borrowing to be considered separately for hedge effectiveness.
There is currently a question as to whether hedge effectiveness under
IAS39 can be established for all our foreign currency borrowings and, if
not, potentially volatile exchange gains or losses would be reported in
net finance costs when there are equal and offsetting losses or gains in
reserves on consolidation and no net impact on Group equity.
- 8 -
(iv) Certain existing assets will be derecognised at date of transition
but these will not be material.
(v) Interest accruals will be reclassified from other
receivables/payables to form part of the carrying value of the related
financial asset or liability.
(vi) The net debt position as reported in the accounts will change with
the implementation of IAS39.
With the publication of the first quarter result for 2005, which will
reflect the application of IAS32 and IAS39, the Group will provide a
restatement of the opening balances at 1 January 2005 to explain the
changes as a result of these two standards.
- 9 -
The effect of the change to IFRS on shareholders' funds as at 1 January
2004 is as follows:
£m
UK GAAP - shareholders' funds 4,361
Post retirement benefits - note (a) (493)
Deferred taxation - note (b) (59)
Dividends - note (c) 585
Share schemes - note (d) (6)
Other changes - note (f) and (h) (1)
-----
IFRS - shareholders' funds 4,387
=====
- 10 -
The effect of the change to IFRS on the income statement for the year ended 31
December 2004 is as follows:
Post Retirement Share
UK GAAP Reallocations Goodwill benefits Schemes Others IFRS
Notes (e) (f) (a) (d) (b)(g)(h)(j) (m)
£m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Revenue 10,764 4 10,768
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Profit from operations* 1,794 1,323 454 60 (5) 134 3,760
Net Finance costs (237) (1) (18) 2 (254)
Share of associates** 144 (13) 37 (42) 126
Disposals 185 (185) -
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Pre-tax profit 1,886 1,124 491 42 (5) 94 3,632
Taxation (662) 8 (12) (7) (673)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Post tax profit 1,224 1,132 491 30 (5) 87 2,959
Minorities (126) 2 (6) (130)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Retained profit 1,098 1,134 491 30 (5) 81 2,829
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
*After:
Restructuring costs (206) (206)
Investment costs written off (50) (50)
Goodwill (474) 474 -
Disposals 1,319 (20) 128 1,427
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(730) 1,319 454 128 1,171
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
**after: Restructuring costs (125) 50 12 (63)
Goodwill (37) 37 -
Brand impairment (49) (49)
Exceptional tax
credits 49 49
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(162) 99 37 (37) (63)
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Basic earnings per share
- note(n) 55.20p 135.11p
====== ======
Adjusted diluted earnings per
share - note (n)
75.83p 76.53p
====== ======
- 11 -
The effect of the change to IFRS on the balance sheet as at 31 December 2004 is
as follows:
Post Retirement
UK GAAP benefits Deferred Tax Dividends Goodwill Others IFRS
(a) (b) (c) (f) (d)(h)(i)(j) (m)
Notes £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Assets 17,676 (460) 473 86 17,775
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Shareholders'
funds 5,220 (237) (65) 617 473 (89) 5,919
Minorities 196 1 1 198
Liabilities 12,260 (224) 65 (617) 174 11,658
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
17,676 (460) 473 86 17,775
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
- 12-
The assets as at 31 December 2004 under IFRS comprise: £m
Intangible assets note k 7,700
Property, plant and equipment note k 2,162
Investments in associates and joint ventures 1,717
Retirement benefit assets 16
Deferred tax assets 246
Available for sale investments 14
Trade and other receivables 199
Derivative financial instruments 134
------
Total non current assets 12,188
======
Inventories 2,143
Income tax receivable 51
Trade and other receivable 1,277
Available for sale investments 86
Derivative financial instruments 179
Cash and cash equivalents note l 1,851
------
Total current assets 5,587
======
Total assets 17,775
======
The liabilities as at 31 December 2004 under IFRS comprise:
Borrowings 5,978
Retirement Benefit Liabilities 549
Deferred tax liabilities 232
Other provisions for liabilities and charges 143
Trade and other payables 157
Derivative financial instruments 41
------
Total non current liabilities 7,100
======
Borrowings 1,210
Income tax payable 352
Other provisions for liabilities and charges 298
Trade and other payables 2,628
Derivative financial instruments 70
------
Total current liabilities 4,558
======
Total liabilities 11,658
======
- 13 -
Quarterly results for 2004
As a result of the adjustments from UK GAAP to IFRS described on the
preceding pages, the restated quarterly results for 2004 would be as set
out below. Under UK GAAP, at the year end, previously reported quarterly
figures were restated to the average rates for the full year to provide
comparatives for subsequent quarterly reporting. Under IFRS, each quarter
is not restated for subsequent movements in foreign exchange during the
year and so the figures below remain translated to sterling at the average
rates for the relevant periods during 2004.
3 months to
31 March 30 June 30 Sept 31 Dec
2004 2004 2004 2004
£m £m £m £m
Revenue 2,635 2,904 2,662 2,567
====== ====== ====== ======
Profit from operations* 604 642 2,075 439
Net finance costs (54) (85) (65) (50)
Share of associates** 25 27 45 29
------ ------ ------ ------
Pre tax profit 575 584 2,055 418
Taxation (197) (188) (195) (93)
------ ------ ------ ------
Post tax profit 378 396 1,860 325
Minorities (34) (36) (38) (22)
------ ------ ------ ------
Retained profit 344 360 1,822 303
====== ====== ====== ======
Basic earnings per share 16.65p 17.33p 85.46p 14.29p
====== ====== ====== ======
Adjusted diluted earnings per share 15.91p 17.98p 21.34p 21.50p
====== ====== ====== ======
*After:
restructuring costs (5) (36) (9) (156)
british Am.investment costs
written off (50)
disposals 1,392 35
------ ------ ------ ------
(5) (36) 1,383 (171)
====== ====== ====== ======
**After:
restructuring costs (60) (3)
brand impairment (49)
exceptional tax credits 41 8
------ ------ ------ ------
(19) (44)
====== ====== ====== ======
- 14 -
ACCOUNTING POLICIES TO BE ADOPTED FROM 1 JANUARY 2005
1 Basis of Accounting
The Group accounts have been prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the
European Union and with those parts of the Companies Act 1985
applicable to companies reporting under IFRS.
The 2005 financial statements are the Group's first consolidated
financial statements prepared under IFRS, with a transition date of
1 January 2004. Consequently, the comparative figures for 2004 and
the Group's balance sheet as at 1 January 2004 have been restated to
comply with IFRS, with the exception of IAS32 and IAS39 on financial
instruments which have been applied prospectively from 1 January
2005. In addition, IFRS1 "First time adoption of International
Financial Reporting Standards" allows certain exemptions from
retrospective application of IFRS in the opening balance sheet for
2004 and where these have been used they are explained in the
accounting policies below.
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical
cost convention except as described in accounting policy 15 below on
financial instruments.
2 Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial information includes the accounts of
British American Tobacco p.l.c. and its subsidiary undertakings,
together with the Group's share of the results of its associates.
A subsidiary is an entity controlled by the Group, where control is
the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the
entity so as to obtain benefit from its activities.
Associates comprise investments in undertakings, which are not
subsidiary undertakings, where the Group's interest in the equity
capital is long term and over whose operating and financial policies
the Group exercises a significant influence. They are accounted for
using the equity method.
The results of subsidiary undertakings acquired during the period
are included from the date of acquisition of a controlling interest
at which date, for the purposes of consolidation, the purchase
consideration is allocated between the underlying net assets
acquired, including intangible assets other than goodwill, on the
basis of their fair value.
- 15 -
The results of subsidiary undertakings which have been sold during
the year are included up to the date of disposal. The profit or loss
on sale is calculated by reference to the net asset value at the
date of disposal, adjusted for purchased goodwill previously
included on the balance sheet.
Where accumulated losses applicable to a minority exceed the
minority's interest in the equity of a subsidiary, the excess is
allocated to the Group's interest in the subsidiary, except to the
extent that the minority has a binding obligation and is able to
make an additional investment to cover the losses.
Inter company balances and transactions, and any unrealised gains
arising from inter company transactions, are eliminated in preparing
the consolidated financial statements.
3 Goodwill
Goodwill arising on acquisitions is capitalised and subject to
annual impairment reviews. Goodwill represents the excess of the
cost of acquisition of a subsidiary or associate over the Group's
share of the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired.
Goodwill is stated at cost less accumulated impairment losses.
The Group's policy up to and including 1997 was to eliminate
goodwill against reserves. Goodwill acquired from 1998 to 31
December 2003 was capitalised and amortised over its useful economic
life. As permitted under IFRS1, in respect of acquisitions prior to
1 January 2004, the classification and accounting treatment of
business combinations has not been amended on transition to IFRS.
Goodwill previously written off direct to reserves under UK GAAP is
not recycled to the income statement on the disposal of the
subsidiary or associate to which it relates.
Goodwill in respect of subsidiaries is included in intangible
assets. In respect of associates, goodwill is included in the
carrying value of the investment in the associated company.
4 Foreign currencies
The income and cash flow statements of Group undertakings expressed
in currencies other than sterling are translated to sterling at
average rates of exchange in each year. Assets and liabilities of
these undertakings are translated at rates of exchange at the end of
each year. For high inflation countries, the translation from local
currencies to sterling makes allowance for the impact of inflation
on the local currency results.
- 16 -
The differences between retained profits of overseas subsidiary and
associated undertakings translated at average and closing rates of
exchange are taken to reserves, as are differences arising on the
retranslation to sterling (using closing rates of exchange) of
overseas net assets at the beginning of the year. Any differences
that have arisen since 1 January 2004 are presented as a separate
component of equity. As permitted under IFRS1, any differences prior
to that date are not included in this separate component of equity.
Foreign currency transactions are initially recorded at the exchange
rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Foreign exchange gains
and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and
from the translation at year end rates of exchange are recognised in
the income statement, except when deferred in equity as qualifying
cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges.
5 Revenue
Revenue comprises sales to external customers excluding duty, excise
and other taxes. Revenue is after deducting rebates, returns and
other similar discounts and is recognised when the significant risks
and rewards of ownership are transferred to a third party.
6 Retirement benefit costs
The net surplus or deficit for each defined benefit pension scheme
is calculated in accordance with IAS19, based on the present value
of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date less the
fair value of the plan assets.
As permitted under IFRS1 all actuarial gains and losses as at
1 January 2004, the date of transition to IFRS, were recognised. In
respect of actuarial gains and losses that arise subsequent to that
date, to the extent that cumulatively they exceed ten per cent of
the greater of the present value of the defined benefit obligation
and the fair value of the plan assets, that portion is recognised in
the income statement over the expected average remaining working
lives of the employees participating in the plan. Otherwise, the
accumulated actuarial gains and losses are not recognised.
Where the actuarial valuation of the scheme demonstrates that the
scheme is in surplus, the recognised asset is limited to that for
which the Group can benefit in future, for example by refunds or a
reduction in contributions.
Past service costs resulting from enhanced benefits are expensed
over the period to vesting and if they vest immediately then they
are recognised at that time in the income statement.
- 17 -
The Group also has certain post retirement health care schemes and
they are accounted for on a similar basis to the defined benefit
pension schemes.
For defined benefit schemes, the actuarial cost charged to profit
from operations consists of current service cost, interest cost,
expected return on plan assets, past service cost and the impact of
any settlements or curtailments, as well as actuarial gains or
losses to the extent they are recognised.
Some benefits are provided through defined contribution schemes and
payments to these are charged as an expense as they fall due.
7 Share-based payments
The Group has equity-settled and cash-settled share-based compensation
plans and, from 1 January 2005, the Group will apply the requirements of
IFRS2 Share-based payments. IFRS2 has been applied to all equity
settled grants that were unvested as of 1 January 2004. IFRS2 has also
been applied to all cash settled grants not settled as at 1 January
2004. The comparative figures for 2004 have been adjusted accordingly
in respect of both types of grant.
Equity-settled share-based payments are measured at fair value at the
date of grant. The fair value determined at the grant date of the
equity-settled share-based payments is expensed on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period, based on the Group's estimate of shares that
will eventually vest. For cash-settled share-based payments, a liability
equal to the portion of the services received is recognised at their
current fair value determined at each balance sheet date.
Fair value is measured by the use of Black-Scholes and Monte-Carlo
option pricing models. The expected life used in the models has been
adjusted, based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non-
transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.
8 Research and development
Research expenditure is charged to income in the year in which it is
incurred. Internal development expenditure is charged to income in
the year it is incurred, unless it meets the recognition criteria of
IAS38 Intangible Assets.
- 18 -
9 Taxation
Taxation is that chargeable on the profits for the period, together
with deferred taxation.
Deferred taxation is provided in full on temporary differences
between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amount used for taxation purposes.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on
investments in subsidiaries and associates, except where the timing
of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the
Group and it is probable that it will not reverse in the foreseeable
future. A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that
it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against
which the asset can be utilised. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are not discounted.
Deferred tax is determined using the tax rates that have been
enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are
expected to apply when the related deferred tax asset is realised or
deferred tax liability is settled.
Tax is recognised in the income statement except to the extent that
it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it
is recognised in equity.
10 Intangible assets other than goodwill
These consist mainly of computer software which is carried at cost
less accumulated amortisation and is amortised on a straight line
basis over a period ranging from three to five years.
11 Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and impairment. Depreciation is calculated on a
straight line basis to write off the assets over their useful
economic life. No depreciation is provided on freehold land.
Freehold and long leasehold buildings are depreciated at rates
between 2.5 per cent and 4 per cent per annum, and plant and
equipment at rates between 7 per cent and 25 per cent per annum. In
accordance with the benchmark treatment under IFRS, borrowing costs
associated with expenditure on property, plant and equipment are not
capitalised.
- 19 -
12 Leased assets
Assets held under finance leases are included as part of property,
plant and equipment. Finance lease assets are initially recognised
at an amount equal to the lower of their fair value and the present
value of the minimum lease payments at inception of the lease, then
depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Leasing payments
consist of capital and finance charge elements and the finance
element is charged to the income statement.
Rental payments under operating leases are charged to the income
statement as they fall due.
13 Impairment of assets
Assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually for
impairment, while assets that are subject to amortisation are
reviewed for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised to
the extent that the carrying value exceeds the higher of the asset's
fair value less costs to sell and its value in use.
14 Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable
value. Cost is based on the average cost incurred in acquiring
inventories and bringing them to their existing location and
condition, which will include raw materials, direct labour and
overheads where appropriate. Net realisable value is the estimated
selling price less costs to completion and sale. Tobacco
inventories which have an operating cycle that exceeds twelve months
are classified as current assets, consistent with recognised
industry practice.
15 Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised when the
Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the relevant
instrument and derecognised when it ceases to be a party to such
provisions.
Non-derivative financial assets are classified as either available-
for-sale investments, loans and receivables or cash and cash
equivalents. Apart from available-for-sale investments, they are
stated at amortised cost using the effective interest method,
subject to reduction for allowances for estimated irrecoverable
amounts. For interest-bearing assets, their carrying value includes
accrued interest receivable.
- 20 -
Available-for-sale investments are stated at fair value, with
changes in fair value being recognised directly in equity. When such
investments are derecognised (e.g. through disposal) or become
impaired, the accumulated gains and losses, previously recognised in
equity, are recognised in the income statement.
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand and deposits held on
call, together with other short term highly liquid investments. In
the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents are shown net of
bank overdrafts, which are included as current borrowings in the
liabilities on the balance sheet.
Non-derivative financial liabilities are stated at amortised cost
using the effective interest method. For borrowings, their carrying
value includes accrued interest payable, as well as unamortised
issue costs.
The Group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge its
exposure to foreign exchange and interest rate risks arising from
operational, financing and investment activities. In accordance
with its treasury policy, the Group does not hold or issue
derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. However,
derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting under IAS39 are
accounted for as trading instruments.
Derivative financial assets and liabilities are stated at fair
value, which includes accrued interest receivable and payable where
relevant. Changes in their fair values are recognised as follows:
For derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges, the changes
in their fair values are recognised directly in equity, to the
extent that they are effective, with the ineffective portion being
recognised in the income statement. Where the hedged item results
in a non-financial asset, the accumulated gains and losses,
previously recognised in equity, are included in the initial
carrying value of the asset. Where the underlying transaction does
not result in such an asset, the accumulated gains and losses are
recognised in the profit and loss account in the same period in
which the hedged item affects the income statement.
For derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges, the
carrying value of the hedged item is adjusted for the fair value
changes attributable to the risk being hedged, with the
corresponding entry being made in the income statement. The changes
in fair value of these derivatives are also recognised in the income
statement.
- 21 -
For derivatives that are designated as hedges of net investments in
foreign operations, the changes in their fair values are recognised
directly in equity, to the extent that they are effective, with the
ineffective portion being recognised in the income statement. Where
non-derivatives such as foreign currency borrowings are designated
as net investment hedges, the relevant exchange differences are
similarly recognised. The accumulated gains and losses are
recognised in the income statement when the foreign operation is
disposed of.
For derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not
designated as hedges, the changes in their fair values are
recognised in the income statement in the period in which they
arise.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when a hedging instrument is
derecognised (e.g. through expiry or disposal), or no longer
qualifies for hedge accounting. Where the hedged item is a forecast
transaction, the related gains and losses remain in equity until the
transaction takes place, when they are removed from equity in the
same manner as for cash flow hedges as described above.
When a hedged future transaction is no longer expected to occur, any
related gains and losses, previously recognised in equity, are
immediately recognised in the income statement.
Application of IAS32 and IAS39: As noted above, the Group has
adopted IFRS for the first time in 2005. It has applied the
financial instruments' standards IAS32 and IAS39 prospectively from
1 January 2005, as permitted by these two standards. The impact of
this application is set out in the notes and reflects the following
changes from UK GAAP:
- The measurement of available-for-sale investments at fair value;
- The measurement of all derivative financial instruments at fair
value and the designation of derivatives as qualifying hedges
wherever possible;
- Derecognition of deferred gains on derivatives that were reported
under UK GAAP as assets and liabilities; and
- Interest accruals reclassified from other receivables/payables to
form part of the carrying value of the related asset or liability.
For 2004, financial instruments are accounted for in accordance with
UK GAAP and thus are not comparable with the amounts reported for
2005. However, the relevant balance sheet amounts for 2004 have
been classified in accordance with those for 2005. Also, as an aid
to comparability in the relevant notes to the accounts, the
disclosures have also been restated as at 1 January 2005 to comply
with the requirements of IAS32 and 39.
- 22 -
16 Dividends
Final dividend distributions to the Company's shareholders are
recognised as a liability in the Group's financial statements in the
period in which the dividends are approved by the Company's
shareholders, while interim dividend distributions are recognised in
the period in which the dividends are declared.
17 Segmental analysis
A segment is a distinguishable component of the Group that is
engaged in providing products or services within a particular
economic environment and the Group's geographical segments form the
focus of the Group's internal reporting systems. The Group is a
single product business providing cigarettes and other tobacco
products. While the Group has clearly differentiated brands, global
segmentation between a wide portfolio of brands is not part of the
regular internally reported financial information. It is not
feasible to segment global results without a high degree of
estimation, especially given that geographically the same operations
are used to produce the different brands and brand results are
managed in the context of the geographic markets in which they are
sold.
The prices agreed between Group companies for intra group sales of
materials, manufactured goods, charges for royalties, commissions,
services and fees are based on normal commercial practices which
would apply between independent businesses. Royalty income, less
related expenditure, is included in the region in which the licensor
is based.
18 Contingent liabilities
Subsidiaries and associated companies are defendants in tobacco
related litigation. Provision for this litigation would be made at
such time as an unfavourable outcome became probable and the amount
could be reasonably estimated.
The Group records its external legal fees and other external defence
costs for tobacco related litigation as these costs are incurred.
19 Repurchase of share capital
When share capital is repurchased the amount of consideration paid,
including directly attributable costs, is recognised as a charge in
equity. Repurchased shares which are not cancelled, or shares
purchased for the Employee Share Ownership Trusts, are classified as
treasury shares and presented as a deduction from total equity.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange