Jupiter US Smaller Companies PLC
Half Yearly Financial Report for the six months to 31 December 2015
Financial Highlights
Performance
|
31.12.15 |
30.06.15 |
% Change |
Net Assets (£'000) |
165,638 |
174,033 |
(4.8) |
Russell 2000 Index (Sterling adjusted) |
770.67 |
797.32 |
(3.3) |
Ordinary Share Performance
|
31.12.15 |
30.06.15 |
% Change |
Mid-market price (pence) |
607.50 |
662.00 |
(8.2) |
Net Asset Value (pence) |
691.20 |
724.11 |
(4.5) |
Discount to Net Asset Value (%) |
(12.1) |
(8.6) |
|
Chairman's Statement
Performance
The NAV per share of your Company fell 4.8% in the six month period to 31 December 2015, compared to a drop of 3.3% in the Company's benchmark, the sterling-adjusted Russell 2000.
Although performance was disappointing in the period, once the Biotech sector peaked in August, the Company's performance compared to its benchmark was better. This improvement continued after the period end.
Market review
The Russell 2000 Index declined by 9.4% in dollar terms, but the dollar's rise against sterling meant that this was limited to a fall of 3.3% in sterling terms, that being the currency in which the Company's assets are valued.
The market suffered weakness especially in August as investors became more concerned about slowing economic growth in China and the impact of a rising dollar on emerging market economies with high levels of dollar-denominated debt. Share values steadied subsequently but a rebound was confined mainly to large caps, while small caps made little headway. This kind of behaviour is typical of periods of investor worry about economic growth.
A concerning development was the widening of US corporate bond spreads (these are the difference between the yields on US corporate bonds and US Treasuries). When they widen it indicates that investors have less confidence in future corporate profits growth or are worried about credit strains, such as those in the oil shale industry.
Nevertheless, during the period, the US economy continued to expand but growth in the manufacturing sector seemed to slow almost to a halt as a result of weakness in the energy industry, the impact of the dumping of Chinese steel and a strengthening of the dollar. As a result, shares of manufacturing companies suffered badly.
As equities weakened in the summer, the biotechnology sector collapsed: these stocks have enjoyed a long bull market lasting several years leading to extremely high stock market valuations for the shares. An attack by Hillary Clinton on the pricing practices of the pharmaceutical industry appeared to be a catalyst for the reversal (new biotech therapies are often extremely expensive).
The worst performing sector in the six month period was energy, falling 41% as oil prices collapsed once again, after a rally in the first half of 2015. The materials and processing, and consumer discretionary sectors were also weak. Utilities were the only sector to rise (up 2%); the consumer staples and financials sectors were also relatively resilient.
Portfolio Review
There was good performance in particular from IPC Healthcare (a provider of specialist hospital physicians), Monarch Financial (a regional bank) and Civitas Solutions (the leading provider of community care for the intellectually disabled). The first two were the subject of agreed bids whereas Civitas delivered good profits growth. As ever there were stocks that performed poorly and the worst contributors in the period were CAI International (a lessor of shipping containers), Sotheby's (the auction house) and Pernix Therapeutics (an acquirer and marketer of niche pharmaceuticals). The first was hit by concerns about global trade and a drop in the price of new containers; Sotheby's suffered weak auction commissions and investors were concerned about the guarantees offered to secure the sale of the ex-Chairman's collection; and Pernix fell after a disappointing relaunch of its migraine drug.
New purchases were concentrated on out-of-favour stocks in two areas with recovery potential, namely, agriculture and selected producer durable stocks. An example of a new purchase was Sanderson Farms, a leading niche producer of larger chickens. Sales on the other hand reflected bids, such as IPC Healthcare, or recoveries, for example, in the case of Penn National Gaming. Sales were also made where stocks had failed to deliver on expectations and the original reason for purchase was now less compelling: an example was Tanger Factory Outlet Center.
Share price and discount
The price of the shares fell 8.2% to 607.5p over the period. The discount to NAV was 12.1% at the end of the period compared to a discount of 8.6% at 30 June 2015. The average discount during 2015 was 10.3%. As at 23 February 2016, the discount was 15.4%.
The Company bought back 70,099 shares for cancellation in the period at an average discount of 13.6%. The Board will continue to apply its long standing policy of buying back shares at appropriate times with a view to limiting any discount in the longer term to around 10%.
Outlook
Since the end of the period, conditions in equity markets have deteriorated and US small cap stocks have not been immune to this. Investors fear that a recession in the US is now more of a possibility than it was six months ago. In particular, concerns centre around slowing economic growth in China combined with credit market problems that could develop as a result of overly indebted emerging economies or oil shale companies.
These risks should not be underestimated and it is difficult to forecast their outcome. However, some comfort can be drawn from the importance of consumer spending to the American economy and the beneficial impact of low gasoline prices. In addition, the valuation of US small cap shares has fallen below their long term average and are the cheapest they have been for several years. The US smaller company sector is still an attractive and interesting one for long term investors. It is generally under-researched and offers areas of undiscovered value.
Gordon Grender
Chairman
26 February 2016
Twenty largest equity holdings as at 31 December 2015
|
|
Stock |
% of total |
Value |
|
Company Description |
Exchange |
investments |
£'000s |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Roper Technologies |
|
|
|
|
Diversified high value-added manufacturer, |
|
|
|
|
and provider of software and systems. |
NYSE |
3.0 |
4,837 |
2 |
American Vanguard |
|
|
|
|
Producer of specialised agrichemicals. |
NYSE |
2.6 |
4,283 |
3 |
Atlantic Tele-Network |
|
|
|
|
Holding company for telecommunications |
|
|
|
|
businesses. |
NASDAQ |
2.6 |
4,201 |
4 |
HMS Holdings |
|
|
|
|
Provider of billing analytics services to the |
|
|
|
|
healthcare industry. |
NASDAQ |
2.6 |
4,167 |
5 |
Cardinal Financial |
|
|
|
|
Regional bank operating in the Washington DC |
|
|
|
|
suburbs. |
NASDAQ |
2.6 |
4,148 |
6 |
Bottomline Technologies |
|
|
|
|
Provider of payment automation software. |
NASDAQ |
2.5 |
4,032 |
7 |
Civitas Solutions |
|
|
|
|
Provider of care in the community to intellectually |
|
|
|
|
disabled adults. |
NYSE |
2.5 |
3,995 |
8 |
Sanderson Farms |
|
|
|
|
Niche producer of chickens. |
NASDAQ |
2.3 |
3,781 |
9 |
Telephone & Data Systems |
|
|
|
|
Provider of cellular and other communication |
NYSE |
2.3 |
3,701 |
|
services. |
|
|
|
10 |
Monarch Financial Holdings |
|
|
|
|
Regional bank operating in southern Virginia. |
NASDAQ |
2.3 |
3,635 |
11 |
Alleghany |
|
|
|
|
Specialist insurance underwriter. |
NYSE |
2.2 |
3,614 |
12 |
State Bank Financial |
|
|
|
|
Regional bank operating in and around Atlanta. |
NASDAQ |
2.2 |
3,582 |
13 |
Catchmark Timber Trust "A" |
|
|
|
|
Timberland REIT. |
NYSE |
2.2 |
3,582 |
14 |
Healthways |
|
|
|
|
Provider of population health services. |
NASDAQ |
2.2 |
3,581 |
15 |
LKQ |
|
|
|
|
Distributor of alternative car parts. |
NASDAQ |
2.1 |
3,447 |
16 |
The Chefs' Warehouse |
|
|
|
|
Distributor of gourmet foods. |
NASDAQ |
2.1 |
3,446 |
17 |
DeVry Education Group |
|
|
|
|
Provider of post-secondary education. |
NYSE |
2.1 |
3,373 |
18 |
Kindred Healthcare |
|
|
|
|
Diversified operator of healthcare facilities in large |
|
|
|
|
cities. |
NYSE |
2.0 |
3,295 |
19 |
REIS |
|
|
|
|
Provider of real estate data to investors and |
NASDAQ |
2.0 |
3,292 |
|
lenders. |
|
|
|
20 |
The Rubicon Project |
|
|
|
|
Operator of online advertising auctions. |
NYSE |
2.0 |
3,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
The value of the twenty largest holdings represents 46.4% (30 June 2015: 44.0%) of the Company's total investments.
Cross Holdings in other Investment Companies
As at 30 June 2015 and 31 December 2015, none of the Company's assets were invested in the securities of other listed closed-ended investment companies.
Directors' Statement of Principal Risks and Uncertainties
Related Party Transactions
During the first six months of the current financial year no transactions with related parties have taken place which have materially affected the financial position or performance of the Company. Details of related party transactions are contained in the Annual Report and Accounts for the year to 30 June 2015.
The principal risks and uncertainties associated with the Company's business are set out on page 14 of the 2015 Annual Report & Accounts.
In the view of the Board these principal risks and uncertainties are as applicable to the remaining six months of the financial year as they were to the six months under review.
Going Concern
The Half Yearly Financial Report has been prepared on a going concern basis. The Directors consider that this is the appropriate basis as they have a reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. In considering this, the Directors took into account the Company's investment objective, risk management policies and capital management policies, the diversified portfolio of readily realisable securities which can be used to meet short-term funding commitments and the ability of the Company to meet all of its liabilities and ongoing expenses. Thus the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements.
Directors' Statement of Responsibilities in Respect of the Financial Statements
Directors' Responsibility Statement
The Directors of Jupiter US Smaller Companies PLC, confirm to the best of their knowledge that:
(a) the condensed set of financial statements has been prepared in accordance with the Accounting Standards Board's statement 'Half Yearly Financial Reports' and gives a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit/(loss) of the Company for the period ended 31 December 2015;
(b) the Chairman's Statement and the Interim Management Report include a fair review of the information required by Disclosure and Transparency Rule 4.2.7R; and
(c) the Interim Management Report includes a fair review of the information required by Disclosure and Transparency Rule 4.2.8R on related party transactions.
The Half Yearly Financial Report has not been audited or reviewed by the Company's auditors.
By Order of the Board
Gordon Grender
Chairman
26 February 2016
Income Statement
For the six months to 31 December 2015 (unaudited) |
||||||
|
Six months to 31.12.15 |
Six months to 31.12.14 |
||||
|
Revenue |
Capital |
Total |
Revenue |
Capital |
Total |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/Gain on investments held at fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
value through profit or loss |
- |
(8,185) |
(8,185) |
- |
7,494 |
7,494 |
Net foreign currency gain
|
- |
283 |
283 |
- |
368 |
368 |
Income |
802 |
- |
802 |
900 |
- |
900 |
Gross (loss)/return |
802 |
(7,902) |
(7,100) |
900 |
7,862 |
8,762 |
Investment management fee |
(647) |
- |
(647) |
(666) |
- |
(666) |
Other expenses |
(158) |
(1) |
(159) |
(157) |
- |
(157) |
Net (loss)/return on ordinary activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
before finance costs and taxation |
(3) |
(7,903) |
(7,906) |
77 |
7,862 |
7,939 |
Tax on ordinary activities |
(67) |
- |
(67) |
(164) |
- |
(164) |
Net (loss)/return on ordinary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
activities after taxation |
(70) |
(7,903) |
(7,973) |
(87) |
7,862 |
7,775 |
Net (loss)/return per Ordinary share |
(0.29)p |
(32.88)p |
(33.17)p |
(0.36)p |
32.71p |
32.35p |
The total column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company prepared in accordance with UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice ('UK GAAP').
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations.
No operations were acquired or discontinued in the period.
The financial information does not constitute 'accounts' as defined in section 434 of the Companies Act 2006.
Balance Sheet As at 31 December 2015 |
31.12.15 |
30.06.15 |
|
(unaudited) |
(audited) |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Fixed asset investments |
|
|
Investments at fair value through profit or loss |
162,356 |
168,890 |
Current assets |
|
|
Debtors |
211 |
536 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
3,903 |
4,264 |
|
4,114 |
4,800 |
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year |
(832) |
(657) |
Net current assets |
3,282 |
4,143 |
Net assets |
165,638 |
174,033 |
|
|
|
Capital and reserves |
|
|
Called up share capital |
5,990 |
6,008 |
Share premium |
19,550 |
19,550 |
Non-distributable reserve |
419 |
841 |
Capital redemption reserve |
8,193 |
8,175 |
Retained earnings+ |
131,486 |
139,459 |
Total shareholders' funds |
165,638 |
174,033 |
Net Asset Value per Ordinary share |
691.20p |
724.11p |
+ Under the Company's Articles of Association any dividends are distributed only from the revenue element of retained earnings.
Statement of Changes in Equity
For the six months to 31 December 2015 (unaudited)
|
||||||
|
Called up |
|
Non- |
Capital |
|
|
|
share |
Share |
distributable |
Redemption |
Retained |
|
|
Capital |
Premium |
Reserve |
Reserve |
Earnings |
Total |
For the six months to 31 December 2015 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
Balance at 1 July 2015 |
6,008 |
19,550 |
841 |
8,175 |
139,459 |
174,033 |
Shares bought back and cancelled |
(18) |
- |
(422) |
18 |
- |
(422) |
Net return from ordinary activities |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(7,973) |
(7,973) |
Balance at 31 December 2015 |
5,990 |
19,550 |
419 |
8,193 |
131,486 |
165,638 |
|
||||||
|
Called up |
|
Non- |
Capital |
|
|
|
share |
Share |
distributable |
Redemption |
Retained |
|
|
Capital |
Premium |
Reserve |
Reserve |
Earnings |
Total |
For the six months to 31 December 2014 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
Balance at 1 July 2014 |
6,008 |
19,550 |
841 |
8,175 |
130,383 |
164,957 |
Net return from ordinary activities |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7,775 |
7,775 |
Balance at 31 December 2014 |
6,008 |
19,550 |
841 |
8,175 |
138,158 |
172,732 |
|
Called up |
|
Non- |
Capital |
|
|
|
share |
Share |
distributable |
Redemption |
Retained |
|
|
Capital |
Premium |
Reserve |
Reserve |
Earnings |
Total |
For the year ended to 30 June 2015 (audited) |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
Balance at 1 July 2014 |
6,008 |
19,550 |
841 |
8,175 |
130,383 |
164,957 |
Net return from ordinary activities |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9,076 |
9,076 |
Balance at 30 June 2015 |
6,008 |
19,550 |
841 |
8,175 |
139,459 |
174,033 |
Notes
1 Accounting policies
The significant accounting policies have not been changed and have been applied consistently during the period ended 31 December 2015 (except to align with changes to the AIC SORP and FRS 102).
FRS 104, 'Interim Financial Reporting', issued by the FRC in March 2015 has been applied in preparing the financial statements included in this half yearly report.
2 (Loss)/Gain on investments
|
Six months to 31.12.15 |
Six months to 31.12.14 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Net gains realised on sale of investments |
7,847 |
11,825 |
Movement in investment holdings gains |
(16,032) |
(4,331) |
(Loss)/Gain on investments |
(8,185) |
7,494 |
3 Return per share
|
Six months to 31.12.15 |
Six months to 31.12.14 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Net revenue loss |
(70) |
(87) |
Net capital (loss)/return |
(7,903) |
7,862 |
Net capital (loss)/return |
(7,973) |
7,775 |
Weighted average number of Ordinary shares in |
|
|
issue during the period |
24,033,427 |
24,034,135 |
Net revenue return per Ordinary share |
(0.29)p |
(0.36)p |
Net capital return per Ordinary share |
(32.88)p |
32.71p |
Net return per Ordinary share |
(33.17)p |
32.35p |
4 Net Asset Value per Ordinary share
The Net Asset Value per Ordinary share as at 31 December 2015, calculated in accordance with the Articles of Association, was as follows:
|
|
31.12.15 |
|
30.06.15 |
|
Net |
|
Net |
|
|
Asset Value |
|
Asset Value |
|
|
per share |
Net assets |
per share |
Net assets |
|
attributable |
attributable |
attributable |
attributable |
|
(p) |
£'000 |
(p) |
£'000 |
Ordinary shares |
691.20 |
165,638 |
724.11 |
174,033 |
Net Asset Value per Ordinary share on the balance sheet is based on net assets of £165,638,000 (30 June 2015: £174,033,000) and on 23,964,036 (30 June 2015: 24,034,135) Ordinary shares, being the number of Ordinary shares in issue at the end of the period.
5 Related Parties
Transactions with the Investment Adviser and related parties
There are no transactions with the Board other than remuneration paid to the Directors as disclosed in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 24 of the 2015 Annual Report & Accounts and as set out in note 5 to the accounts therein and the beneficial interests of the Directors in the ordinary shares of the Company as disclosed on page 25 thereof.
Jupiter Unit Trust Managers Limited ('JUTM') is contracted to provide investment management services to the Company (subject to termination by not less than one year's notice by either party) for a quarterly fee of 0.20% of the net assets of the Company, excluding the value of any Jupiter managed investments.
The management fee payable to JUTM for the period 1 July 2015 to 31 December 2015 was £647,000 with £331,000 outstanding as at 31 December 2015.
JUTM is also eligible for a performance related management fee, charged through the capital account, of 5% of any annual out-performance by the net asset value ("NAV") per share of "target performance", defined as a margin of 2% over the Russell 2000 Index (in both cases converted to sterling). If the NAV per Ordinary share performance (adjusted to exclude the relevant performance-related fee) exceeds the target, the performance-related fee is payable on the excess. If the NAV per Ordinary share underperforms the Russell 2000 Index by 2% or more, the under-performance will be carried forward and no further performance-related fee will be payable until the NAV per ordinary share has both recovered the accumulated under-performance and exceeded the target performance for the year. The maximum performance-related fee which may be payable in respect of any year is 0.7% of gross assets.
At 31 December 2015, no performance fee has been accrued (30.06.15: £nil).
6 Report and accounts
A copy of the Half Yearly Financial Report will shortly be available for download from the Company's website www.jupiteram.com/JUS.
By order of the Board
Jupiter Asset Management Limited, Secretary
The Zig Zag Building
70 Victoria Street
London SW1E 6SQ
26 February 2016