25 June 2013
Rare Earth minerals plc
("Rare Earth Minerals", "REM" or "the Company")
Final Results, Posting of Annual Report & Notice of AGM
Rare Earth Minerals is pleased to announce its final results for the year ended 31 December 2012. The company further announces that the annual report and accounts for the year ended 31 December 2012 have been posted to shareholders of the Company and that copies are available for download from the Company's website at: www.rareearthmineralsplc.com
REM further announces that the Annual General Meeting ("AGM") of the Company will be held at Suite 3B Princes House, 38 Jermyn Street, London, SW1Y 6DN at 11:00 am on 16 July 2013. The Notice of AGM and form of proxy accompany the annual report sent to shareholders today.
For further information please contact:
Rare Earth Minerals Plc www.rareearthmineralsplc.com
David Lenigas, Chairman
+44 (0) 207 440 0640
NOMAD - WH Ireland Limited
James Joyce
Nick Field
+44 (0) 207 220 1666
PR - Pelham Bell Pottinger
Charlie Vivian/ Weston Macklem
+44 (0)20 7861 3232
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
Rare Earth Minerals Plc ("REM" or the "Company") has continued to pursue its investment strategy, as approved by the shareholders in November 2010, to acquire a diverse portfolio of direct and indirect interests in exploration and producing Rare Earth Minerals and/or Metals projects and assets. In light of the nature of the assets and projects which are the focus of the investment strategy, the Company has considered investment opportunities anywhere in the world.
INVESTMENTS
Lithium Joint Venture, Mexico
The Company announced in February 2013 that it had signed an agreement with listed Canadian company Bacanora Minerals Ltd ("Bacanora") to participate in drilling and project evaluation of the extensions of its new 60 million tonne La Ventana high grade Lithium discovery in northern Mexico. The farm-in licences cover the 34 square kilometre El Sauz and Fleur concessions adjacent to and along strike from Bacanora's La Ventana discovery. The La Ventana discovery is stated by Bacanora to contain 930,000 tonnes of Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (LCE) in the 60 Million Tonnes of ore.
This is an exciting opportunity for REM, as the Board see Lithium as a metal in global demand over the coming years with an anticipated increase for Lithium batteries. Bacanora are making plans to mobilise the drill rig shortly and work has already started on the ground to prepare ahead of the commencement of the drilling programme."
The geology is similar to that of the La Ventana deposit which has Lithium grades of up to 7,220 ppm and Cesium (a Rare Earth element) up to 500 ppm having already been assayed at surface on El Sauz."
The intention of the farm-in is to progress drilling with the view of establishing a Lithium resource over the coming 12 months. The El Sauz property consists of a continuous 120+ metre thick volcano-sedimentary section exposed in an area that covers 1,200 X 400 metres in several outcrops. This section is composed of altered tuffs, white and green clays and silica layers similar in style to Bacanora's La Ventana Lithium deposit. The section is gently dipping to the NE in the northern outcrops and to the SE in the southern portion and would have a low stripping ratio for potential mining operations, since the lithium-bearing clays are exposed on the surface.
Lithium is the lightest of the alkali metals and has unique electrochemical properties that make it the element of choice in batteries of high energy storage capacity as well as a host of other industrial and health applications.
Bacanora announced on 25 January 2013 the results of a positive Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") on its adjacent La Ventana Lithium Project in Sonora, Mexico. In addition, Bacanora announced a total estimated inferred resource for the La Ventana Project of 60 million tonnes averaging 3,000 ppm Li (1.6% Lithium Carbonate Equivalent ('LCE') or 930,000 tonnes LCE . The Net present value ("NPV") of that Project, at an 8% discount rate, was $US848 million, assuming an output of 35,000 tonnes of battery grade Lithium Carbonate over a 20 year open pit life with an average Lithium Carbonate price of $US6,000/tonne for the life of the mine.
The key terms of the Binding Memorandum of Understanding are:
- REM is to acquire an initial 10% interest in the El Sauz and Fleur Concessions from Bacanora by paying Bacanora $250,000 upfront and spending $500,000 on exploration and drilling over a 6 month period.
- After the first 6 month period, REM then has the right, at its election, to increase that interest to 30% by paying Bacanora another $500,000 and spending a further $1,000,000 on drilling and exploration over a further 6 month period
- REM will then have an exclusive right of first refusal to further negotiate terms to increase that interest in the Concession to a maximum of 49.9%, provided the terms comply with the Company's stated investment strategy.
Background on the full Bacanora release in relation to its adjacent La Ventana property made to the Canadian Exchange on 25 January 2013 can be found on its website www.bacanoraminerals.com
On 11 April 2013, the Company announced that it had received encouraging assay results from the El Sauz lithium concession in northern Mexico. The Company has received the results of surface rock samples collected during the first phase of the field work programme on the El Sauz and Fleur concessions ("the Concessions") that form part of the Sonora Lithium Project in north Mexico (the "Project").
The sampling to date has focused on the El Sauz concession, where 210 samples were collected from exposures of the sedimentary-volcanic sequence that hosts lithium-bearing clay units. Geological mapping indicates that lithium-bearing clay units occur within a sedimentary-volcanic sequence that, on El Sauz, is exposed over a strike length of 2 kilometres in a window through Tertiary capping basalt. The sequence appears to be exposed in an open fold with one limb dipping gently to the northeast and the other gently to the southwest.
Rock samples were collected as channel samples, 1.5 m in length, taken across strata from surface exposures. The samples were analysed by ALS Chemex Laboratories at their facility in North Vancouver, BC. Results of the analyses indicate that lithium values range from 10 to 7,220 ppm Li (3.84% LCE*) with 10 samples greater than 2,168 ppm (0.95 percentile). The samples also have values in potassium, which range from 0.04% to 3.07%, as well as other alkali metals. High lithium values are localized in three areas which may correspond to exposures of a clay unit that correlates with the upper clay unit on the adjoining La Ventana concession owned by Bacanora Minerals Ltd.(TSX-V: BCN).
The field work programme, will advance to the diamond drilling stage with initial holes being placed adjacent to the exposures of the Li-bearing clay units on El Sauz in order to test the down dip continuity of the units and their Li content. Mapping and surface sampling will continue on the Fleur concession. The first drill hole is expected to be collared in May 2013.
Should the outcropping lithium clays be found to correlate with those on Bacanora's adjoining La Ventana concession, then the sedimentary basin that hosts the lithium-rich clays is likely to extend, in a northwesterly direction, for at least 7 kilometres, based on available geological evidence, suggesting potential for a large scale, world class lithium deposit.
Diamond drilling, initially wide spaced, commenced in May 2013 and this should lead to a far better understanding of the basin and the scale of the resource on the project areas.
Current results indicate the following:
- Intersects of 84 metres of clays in diamond drill hole ES-03 at Fleur - El Sauz Lithium Project in northern Mexico. This is the thickest clay intercept to date from this current drilling programme.
- The three holes completed to date have extended the strike length of the clay-bearing sedimentary succession on the La Ventana Lithium deposit by 1.7 kilometres to the southeast, for a total drill indicated strike length on both the La Ventana and Fleur concessions of approximately 6.7 kilometres.
- Intersects of significant lithium values in both Upper Clay and Lower Clay Units in drill hole ES-01 at its Fleur - El Sauz Lithium Project in northern Mexico.
- Upper Clay Unit averages 2,113 ppm Li (1.13% Lithium Carbonate Equivalent ('LCE')*) over 4.58 metres from 124.66 metres; in addition, another interval of 8.23 metres averages 4,017 ppm Li (2.14% LCE) from 135.33 metres down the hole.
- Lower Clay Unit averages 4,422 ppm Li (2.36% LCE) over 23.83 metres from 156.0 metres down the hole
REM is extremely pleased with the results for ES-01. These results are very similar to results from drill holes in the adjoining La Ventana lithium deposit of Bacanora Minerals, providing further confirmation of the continuity and persistence of the lithium-bearing clay units onto the joint venture lands and highlighting the potential for a significant lithium resource to be developed on the joint venture lands."
Update:
Hole ES-01 intersected sediments collectively grouped into the Upper Clay Unit from 99.4 metres to 143.4 metres down the hole (Table 1, below). Lithium values in individual samples taken across lengths from 0.91 to 1.52 metres range from 143 to 6,200 ppm Li. Within this interval there are two clay-rich zones: one averaging 2,113 ppm Li (1.13 % LCE*) occurs from 124.66 to 129.24 metres down the hole for an length of 4.58 metres and the other clay-rich zone occurs from 135.33 to 143.56 metres and averaged 4,017 ppm Li (2.14 % LCE) over that 8.23 metre interval.
The Lower Clay Unit was intersected from 156.10 to 193.50 metres down the hole. Lithium values in individual samples taken across lengths from 1.52 to 2.44 metres range from 2,030 to over 10,000 ppm Li. The interval from 156.0 to 179.83 averaged 4,422 ppm Li (2.36 % LCE) over the 23.83 metre length. Clay units also exhibited elevated values in other alkali metals, including K, Na, Cs, and Rb, as well as alkali earth metals: Mg, Ca and Sr.
Analyses of the drill core were performed by ALS Chemex, in Vancouver, BC, an internationally recognized assay service provider. The Company followed industry standard procedures for the work carried out during the drill program, with a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program. Internal standard samples were inserted into each drill core sample sequence sent to the laboratory for analysis. No significant QA/QC issues were detected during review of the data.
Table 1. Drill Hole ES-01 - Significant Intercepts
From |
To |
Interval |
Lithology |
Li ppm |
LCE* % |
Li2O % |
K2O % |
0 |
99.4 |
99.4 |
Basalt |
|
|||
99.4 |
143.56 |
44.16 |
Upper Clay |
|
|||
Including: |
|||||||
124.66 |
129.24 |
4.58 |
|
2,113 |
1.13 |
0.45 |
1.45 |
135.33 |
143.56 |
8.23 |
|
4,017 |
2.14 |
0.86 |
1.61 |
143.4 |
156.1 |
12.7 |
Ignimbrite |
|
|||
156.1 |
193.5 |
37.4 |
Lower Clay |
|
|||
Including: |
|||||||
156.00 |
179.83 |
23.83 |
|
4,422 |
2.36 |
0.95 |
2.26 |
193.5 |
204.2 |
10.7 |
Basal volcanics |
|
*LCE = Lithium Carbonate (Li2CO3) Equivalent: determined by multiplying Li value in percent by 5.324 to get an equivalent Li2CO3 value in percent. Use of LCE assumes 100% recovery and no process losses in conversion of Li to Li2CO3.
Li2O = lithium oxide and is determined by multiplying Li value in percent by 2.153 to get an equivalent Li2O value in percent.
Drilling is continuing on schedule with the drill currently on the fourth hole of the 10 hole program. Results from drill holes will be reported as they become available.
About the Sonora Lithium Project:
The Concessions cover 3,411 hectares out of a total of 5,786 contiguous hectares that make up the Sonora Lithium Project owned by Bacanora.
Initial rock sampling and mapping of the Project by Bacanora located the lithium-bearing clay units. Drilling by Bacanora in 2010 and 2011 located two lithium-bearing clay units (upper and lower) that average 41 and 22 m in thickness, respectively, and that are separated by an ignimbrite unit varying from 1 to 45 m in thickness. The sedimentary-volcanic sequence dips at approximately 20o to the east and crops out along 3.5 km of strike length. The exposures are in erosional windows looking through overlying basalt that covers much of the area. The lithium-bearing clay minerals have been identified as hectorite and polylithionite.
The Concessions border the La Ventana concession that is 100% owned by Bacanora in which Rare Earth Minerals has no interest. National Instrument 43-101 compliant inferred resources have been estimated for two clay units (referred to as the "La Ventana Lithium Deposit") on the La Ventana concession. The inferred resources for the two clay units total 60 million tonnes averaging 3,000 ppm Li (equivalent to 1.6% lithium carbonate assuming 100% recovery and no process losses). Bacanora has used the inferred resources on the La Ventana Lithium Deposit for a Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") of the La Ventana concession (refer to Bacanora news release dated January 25, 2013). Highlights of the PEA for a potential lithium mining and production operation with an output of 35,000 tonnes battery grade lithium carbonate per annum over a 20 year open pit mine life suggest annual revenue of $US210 million for an Internal Rate of Return ("IRR") of 138%, with a 1.9 year pay back. Capital costs are estimated at $US114 million and average operating costs at $US1,958/tonne. Net Present Value of the Project, discounted at 8%, is $US848 million, assuming an average lithium carbonate price of $US6,000/tonne.
Yangibana Project, Australia
The Company announced in December 2011 that it had completed an agreement (the "Agreement") with Camelot Trust Corporation Limited ("Camelot") whereby the Company has acquired the entire issued share capital of Mojito Resources Limited which owns a 30% interest in the Yangibana rare earth project ("the Project") situated in the Gascoyne region of Western Australia.
The Project is centred on narrow, discontinuously outcropping ironstone dykes that have been shown to carry anomalous rare earths associated with monazite mineralisation. The rare earths comprise 15 elements with atomic numbers between 57 and 71, plus scandium and yttrium. The heavy rare earth oxides comprise the oxides of europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium and yttrium. The light rare earth oxides comprise the oxides of lanthium, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium and samarium.
Hastings Rare Metals Limited is the manager of the Project and holds a 60% interest. The Project has the potential to increase possible resources by additional drilling along strike in the oxide zone at selected sites and at depth in the as yet largely untested primary zone of the dykes. The ironstone dykes at Yangibana are the weathered surface expressions of ferrocarbonatite dykes which along with the associated fenitic alteration are considered to be sourced from an as yet undiscovered carbonatite intrusion which might have significant rare earth potential.
Other Projects
The Company continues to hold an investment in the Cup Lake Project in Canada and also continues to progress with obtaining various licenses on prospective areas in Greenland.
FINANCIAL RESULTS
The Group's loss for the period is £1.0 million (2011: £ 1.4 million).
OUTLOOK
Your Board is confident that the investments made by the Company since it changed its investment strategy are both encouraging and potentially very rewarding. We will look to realise this potential over the future years in addition to continuing to review further investment opportunities.
The directors would like to take this opportunity to thank our shareholders, staff and consultants for their continued support.
David Lenigas
Executive Chairman
REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS
The Directors present their annual report together with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Group for the Year Ended 31 December 2012.
The principal activity of the Group and the Company is that of the identification, development and mining of rare earth minerals. The Group is also exploring other mining related opportunities.
Rare Earth Minerals plc is domiciled in the United Kingdom, which is also its principal place of business.
The results of the Group are shown on page 20. The directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend.
A review of the performance of the Group and its future prospects is included in the Chairman's Statement on pages 1 to 5.
The objective of the group is to invest in mining opportunities.
Principal risks and uncertainties
The principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group involve the ability to raise funding in order to finance the acquisition and exploitation of mining opportunities and the exposure to fluctuating commodity prices.
In addition, the amount and quality of minerals available and the related costs of extraction and production represent a significant risk to the group.
Financial risk management objectives and policies
The Group's principal financial instruments are available for sale assets, trade receivables, trade payables and cash at bank. The main purpose of these financial instruments are to fund the Group's operations.
It is, and has been throughout the period under review, the Group's policy that no trading in financial instruments shall be undertaken. The main risks arising from the Group's financial instruments are liquidity risk and interest rate risk. The board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks and they are summarised below.
Liquidity risk
The Group's objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of equity and its cash resources. Further details of this are provided in the principal accounting policies, headed 'going concern' and note 12 to the financial statements.
Interest rate risk
The Group has no loans and therefore the only interest rate risk is that on its cash balances. The Group seeks the highest rate of interest receivable on its cash deposits whilst minimising risk.
The membership of the Board is set out below. All directors served throughout the period unless otherwise stated.
|
|
David Lenigas |
Richard Griffiths |
Adrian Fairbourn |
Charles Wood (appointed 16 April 2012 and resigned 7 September 2012) |
Interests in excess of 3% of the issued share capital of the Company which had been notified as at 20 May 2013 were as follows:
|
|
Ordinary shares of 1p each Number |
Percentage of capital % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simplystockbroking Nominees Limited |
303,299,402 |
10.91% |
||
Redmayne (Nominees) Limited |
294,846,428 |
10.60% |
||
L R Nominees Limited |
258,387,336 |
9.29% |
||
Barclayshare Nominees Limited |
187,184,936 |
6.73% |
||
TD Direct Investing Nominees (Europe) Limited |
166,597,001 |
5.99% |
||
Investor Nominees Limited |
126,381,177 |
4.55% |
||
Ferlim Nominees Limited |
121,971,667 |
4.39% |
||
HSDL Nominees Limited |
111,945,004 |
4.03% |
||
Fitel Nominees Limited |
108,333,333 |
3.90% |
||
Bruce Rowan Esq |
100,000,000 |
3.60% |
||
JIM Nominees Limited |
95,743,268 |
3.44% |
||
Hargreaves Lansdown (Nominees) Limited |
87,937,693 |
3.16% |
||
It is the Group's policy to agree appropriate terms and conditions for its transactions with suppliers by means ranging from standard terms and conditions to individually negotiated contracts and to pay suppliers according to agreed terms and conditions, provided that the supplier meets those terms and conditions. The Group does not have a standard or code dealing specifically with the payment of suppliers.
Trade payables at the year end all relate to sundry administrative overheads and disclosure of the number of days purchases represented by year end payables is therefore not meaningful.
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have elected to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRSs). Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and profit or loss of the group for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
- select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
- make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
- state whether applicable IFRSs have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;
- prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group will continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
In so far as each of the Directors are aware:
· there is no relevant audit information of which the Group's auditors are unaware; and
· the Directors have taken all steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Auditors
Chapman Davis LLP, offer themselves for re-appointment as auditor in accordance with Section 489 of the Companies Act 2006.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
David Lenigas
Director
Date: 24 June 2013
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors
The Group supports the concept of an effective board leading and controlling the Group. The Board is responsible for approving Group policy and strategy. It meets on a regular basis and has a schedule of matters specifically reserved to it for decision. Management supply the Board with appropriate and timely information and the Directors are free to seek any further information they consider necessary. All Directors have access to advice from the Company Secretary and independent professional advice at the Group's expense.
The Board consists of three Directors, who hold the key operational positions in the Company. The Chairman of the Board is David Lenigas and the Group's business is run by David Lenigas.
Relations with shareholders
The Company values the views of its shareholders and recognises their interest in the Group's strategy and performance. The Annual General Meeting will be used to communicate with private investors and they are encouraged to participate. The Directors will be available to answer questions. Separate resolutions will be proposed on each issue so that they can be given proper consideration and there will be a resolution to approve the annual report and financial statements.
Internal control
The Board is responsible for maintaining a strong system of internal control to safeguard shareholders' investments and the Group's assets. The system of internal financial control is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss.
The Board has considered the need for an internal audit function but has decided the size of the Group does not justify it at present. However, it will keep the decision under annual review.
Going concern
The Directors note the substantial losses that the Group has made for the Year Ended 31 December 2012. The Directors have prepared cash flow forecasts for the period ending 30 June 2014 which take account of the current cost and operational structure of the Group.
The cost structure of the Group comprises a high proportion of discretionary spend and therefore in the event that cash flows become constrained, costs can be quickly reduced to enable the Group to operate within its available funding.
These forecasts demonstrate that the Group has sufficient cash funds available to allow it to continue in business for a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of these financial statements. Accordingly, the financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
REPORT ON REMUNERATION
Directors' remuneration
The Board recognises that Directors' remuneration is of legitimate concern to the shareholders. The Group operates within a competitive environment, performance depends on the individual contributions of the Directors and employees and it believes in rewarding vision and innovation.
Policy on executive Directors' remuneration
The policy of the Board is to provide executive remuneration packages designed to attract, motivate and retain Directors of the calibre necessary to maintain the Group's position and to reward them for enhancing shareholder value and return. It aims to provide sufficient levels of remuneration to do this, but to avoid paying more than is necessary. The remuneration will also reflect the Directors' responsibilities and contain incentives to deliver the Group's objectives.
The remuneration of the Directors was as follows:
|
A Fairbourn |
|
R Griffiths |
|
S Weltman |
|
D Lenigas |
|
C Wood |
|
Total |
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
£ |
Short-term employment benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to 31 December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary and fees |
30,000 |
|
48,000 |
|
- |
|
48,000 |
|
16,000 |
|
142,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based payments |
11,000 |
|
17,849 |
|
- |
|
17,849 |
|
- |
|
46,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
41,000 |
|
65,849 |
|
- |
|
65,849 |
|
16,000 |
|
188,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 months to 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary and fees |
25,000 |
|
64,000 |
|
- |
|
64,000 |
|
- |
|
153,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based payments |
- |
|
129,443 |
|
16,667 |
|
129,443 |
|
- |
|
275,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
25,000 |
|
193,443 |
|
16,667 |
|
193,443 |
|
- |
|
428,553 |
A further £65,000 not included above was paid to Steve Weltman as consultancy fees following his resignation as a director during the period ended 31 December 2011.
At 31 December 2012 £2,800 of the £48,000 paid to R Griffiths was still outstanding (2011: £2,800).
At 31 December 2012 £12,000 of the £30,000 paid to A Fairbourn was still outstanding (2011: Nil).
Charles Wood was appointed as a director on 16 April 2012 and resigned on 7 September 2012.
A Fairbourn was appointed as a Director on 2 February 2011.
Pensions
The Company does not operate a pension scheme for its directors.
Benefits in kind
No benefits in kind were paid during the year to 31 December 2012 or the 15 months ended 31 December 2011
Bonuses
No amounts were payable for bonuses in respect of the Year ended 31 December 2012 or the 15 months ended 31 December 2011.
Notice periods
David Lenigas, Richard Griffiths and Adrian Fairbourn have a 12 months rolling notice period.
Share option incentives
At 31 December 2012 the following options were held by the Directors:
|
Date of grant |
Exercise price |
Number of options |
|
|
|
|
R Griffiths |
7 March 2005 |
3p |
1,275,000 |
R Griffiths |
6 March 2006 |
3p |
1,275,000 |
R Griffiths |
28 January 2010 (amended 14 December 2012) |
0.06p |
14,000,000 |
R Griffiths |
30 November 2010 (amended 14 December 2012) |
0.06p |
30,000,000 |
|
|
|
46,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
D Lenigas |
28 January 2010 (amended 14 December 2012) |
0.06p |
14,000,000 |
D Lenigas |
30 November 2010 (amended 14 December 2012) |
0.06p |
30,000,000 |
|
|
|
44,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
A Fairbourn |
13 December 2012 |
0.06p |
20,000,000 |
All options are exercisable between three and ten years from the date of grant.
The high and low share price for the year were 0.34p and 0.05p respectively (15 month period ended 31 December 2011: 1.53p and 0.16p). The share price at 31 December 2012 was 0.05p (31 December 2011: 0.19p).
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS TO THE MEMBERS OF RARE EARTH MINERALS PLC
We have audited the Group financial statements of Rare Earth Minerals plc for the Year ended 31 December 2012 which comprise the principal accounting policies, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity, the consolidated statement of financial position, the consolidated cash flow statement and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union.
This report is made solely to the Company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of the Directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Directors' Responsibilities Statement set out on page 8, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's (APB's) Ethical Standards for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
A description of the scope of an audit of financial statements is provided on the APB's website at www.frc.ork.uk/apb/scope/private.cfm.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the Group financial statements:
· give a true and fair view of the state of the Group's affairs as at 31 December 2012 and its loss for the periodthen ended;
· have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union; and
· have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Opinion on other matter prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion the information given in the Report of the Directors for the financial period for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the group financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
· certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or
· we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Other matter
We have reported separately on the parent Company financial statements of Rare Earth Minerals plc for the Year ended 31 December 2012.
Keith Fulton
Senior Statutory Auditor
for and on behalf of Chapman Davis LLP
Statutory Auditor, Chartered Accountants
LONDON
Date: 24 June 2013
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Group financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRSs). The Company's shares are listed on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange. Separate financial statements of Rare Earth Minerals plc (the Company) have been prepared on pages 36 to 47 under the historical cost convention and in accordance with applicable accounting standards under UK GAAP.
The principal accounting policies of the Group are set out below.
The Directors note the substantial losses that the Group has made for the Year ended 31 December 2012. The Directors have prepared cash flow forecasts for the period ending 30 June 2014 which take account of the current cost and operational structure of the Group.
The cost structure of the Group comprises a high proportion of discretionary spend and therefore in the event that cash flows become constrained, costs can be quickly reduced to enable the Group to operate within its available funding.
These forecasts demonstrate that the Group has sufficient cash funds available to allow it to continue in business for a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of these financial statements. Accordingly, the financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The Group financial statements consolidate those of the Company and all of its subsidiary undertakings drawn up to the balance sheet date. Subsidiaries are entities over which the Company has the power to control, directly or indirectly, the financial and operating policies so as to obtain benefits from their activities. The Company obtains and exercises control through voting rights. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date at which control is transferred to the Company. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Amounts reported in the financial statements of subsidiaries have been adjusted where necessary to ensure consistency with the accounting policies adopted by the Group.
Acquisitions of subsidiaries are dealt with by the acquisition method. The acquisition method involves the recognition at fair value of all identifiable assets and liabilities, including contingent liabilities of the subsidiary, at the acquisition date, regardless of whether or not they were recorded in the financial statements of the subsidiary prior to acquisition. On initial recognition, the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary are included in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values, which are also used as the bases for subsequent measurement in accordance with the Group accounting policies. Goodwill is stated after separating out identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Acquisition costs are written off as incurred.
TAXATION
Current income tax assets and/or liabilities comprise those obligations to, or claims from, fiscal authorities relating to the current or prior reporting period, that are unpaid at the balance sheet date. They are calculated according to the tax rates and tax laws applicable to the fiscal periods to which they relate, based on the taxable result for the period. All changes to current tax assets or liabilities are recognised as a component of tax expense in the income statement.
Deferred income taxes are calculated using the liability method on temporary differences. This involves the comparison of the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements with their respective tax bases. In addition, tax losses available to be carried forward as well as other income tax credits to the Group are assessed for recognition as deferred tax assets.
Deferred tax liabilities are always provided for in full. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that they will be able to be offset against future taxable income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated, without discounting, at tax rates that are expected to apply to their respective period of realisation, provided they are enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Most changes in deferred tax assets or liabilities are recognised as a component of tax expense in the income statement. Only changes in deferred tax assets or liabilities that relate to a change in value of assets or liabilities that is charged directly to equity are charged or credited directly to equity.
FINANCIAL ASSETS
The Group's financial assets include cash, other receivables and available for sale assets.
All financial assets are recognised when the Group becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. All financial assets are initially recognised at fair value, plus transaction costs.
Trade and other receivables are provided against when objective evidence is received that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due to it in accordance with the original terms of the receivables. The amount of the write-down is determined as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows.
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE FINANCIAL ASSETS
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are either designated to this category or do not qualify for inclusion in any of the other categories of financial assets. The Group's available-for-sale financial assets include listed securities. These available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value. Gains and losses are recognised in other comprehensive income and reported within the available-for-sale reserve within equity, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange differences, which are recognised in profit or loss. When the asset is disposed of or is determined to be impaired, the cumulative gain or loss recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassified from the equity reserve to profit or loss and presented as a reclassification adjustment within other comprehensive income. Interest calculated using the effective interest method and dividends are recognised in profit or loss within finance income.
Reversals of impairment losses are recognised in other comprehensive income.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS - LICENCES
Licences are recognised as an intangible asset at historical cost and are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. The licences have a finite life and no residual value and are amortised over the life of the licence.
EXPLORATION OF MINERAL RESOURCES
Acquired intangible assets, which consist of mining rights, are valued at cost less accumulated amortisation.
The Group applies the full cost method of accounting for exploration and evaluation costs, having regard to the requirements of IFRS 6 'Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources'. All costs associated with mining development and investment are capitalised on a project by project basis pending determination of the feasibility of the project. Such expenditure comprises appropriate technical and administrative expenses but not general overheads.
Such exploration and evaluation costs are capitalised provided that the Group's rights to tenure are current and one of the following conditions is met:
(i) such costs are expected to be recouped through successful development and exploitation of the area of interest or alternatively by its sale; or
(ii) the activities have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of whether or not economically recoverable resources exist; or
(iii) active and significant operations in relation to the area are continuing.
When an area of interest is abandoned or the directors decide that it is not commercial, any exploration and evaluation costs previously capitalised in respect of that area are written off to profit or loss.
Amortisation does not take place until production commences in these areas. Once production commences, amortisation is calculated on the unit of production method, over the remaining life of the mine. Impairment assessments are carried out regularly by the directors. Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may exceed its recoverable amount. Such indicators include the point at which a determination is made as to whether or not commercial reserves exist.
The asset's residual value and useful lives are reviewed and adjusted if appropriate, at each reporting date. An assets' carrying value is written down immediately to its recoverable value if the assets carrying amount is greater than its listed recoverable amount.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and in hand, bank deposits repayable on demand, and other short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, less advances from banks repayable within three months from the date of advance if the advance forms part of the Group's cash management.
GOODWILL
Goodwill representing the excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is capitalised and reviewed annually for impairment. Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Negative goodwill is recognised immediately after acquisition in profit or loss.
On disposal of a subsidiary, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the determination of the profit or loss on disposal.
IMPAIRMENT TESTING OF GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). As a result, some assets are tested individually for impairment and some are tested at cash-generating unit level. Goodwill is allocated to those cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from synergies of the related business combination and represent the lowest level within the Group at which management monitors the related cash flows.
Goodwill, other individual assets or cash-generating units that include goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are tested for impairment at least annually.
An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset's or cash-generating unit's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value, reflecting market conditions less costs to sell, and value in use. Impairment losses recognised for cash-generating units, to which goodwill has been allocated, are credited initially to the carrying amount of goodwill. Any remaining impairment loss is charged pro rata to the other assets in the cash generating unit. With the exception of goodwill, all assets are subsequently reassessed for indications that an impairment loss previously recognised may no longer exist.
EQUITY
Share capital is determined using the nominal value of shares that have been issued.
The share premium account represents premiums received on the initial issuing of the share capital. Any transaction costs associated with the issuing of shares are deducted from share premium, net of any related income tax benefits.
The share based payment reserve represents the cumulative amount which has been expensed in the income statement in connection with share based payments, less any amounts transferred to retained earnings on the exercise of share options.
Retained earnings include all current and prior period results as disclosed in the income statement.
FOREIGN CURRENCIES
The financial statements are presented in Sterling, which is also the functional currency of the parent Company.
In the individual financial statements of the consolidated entities, foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency of the individual entity using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at year-end exchange rates are recognised in profit or loss.
In the consolidated financial statements, the financial statements of subsidiaries, originally presented in a functional currency, have been translated into Sterling. Assets and liabilities have been translated into Sterling at the exchange rates ruling at the balance sheet date. Profit and losses have been translated at an average monthly rate for the period. Any differences arising from this procedure are taken to the foreign exchange reserve. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity have been treated as assets and liabilities to the foreign entity and translated into Sterling at the closing rates.
SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
The Group issues equity-settled share-based payments to certain employees (including directors). Equity-settled share-based payments are measured at fair value at the date of grant. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, together with a corresponding increase in equity, based upon the Group's estimate of the shares that will eventually vest.
Fair value is measured using the Black-Scholes model. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.
The expense is allocated over the vesting period, based on the best available estimate of the number of share options expected to vest. Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to become exercisable. Estimates are subsequently revised, if there is any indication that the number of share options expected to vest differs from previous estimates.
No adjustment is made to the expense or share issue cost recognised in prior periods if fewer share options are, ultimately exercised than originally estimated. Upon exercise of share options, the proceeds received net of any directly attributable transaction costs up to the nominal value of shares issued are allocated to share capital with any excess being recorded as share premium.
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
The Group's financial liabilities include trade and other payables. Financial liabilities are obligations to pay cash or other financial assets and are recognised when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value, net of direct issue costs, and are subsequently recorded at amortised cost using the effective interest method with interest related charges recognised as an expense in the income statement.
Dividend distributions to shareholders are included in 'other short term financial liabilities' when the dividends are approved by the shareholders'.
Impairment of goodwill
The basis of review of the carrying value of goodwill is as detailed in note 4. The carrying value of goodwill is £692k at the balance sheet date. Management do not consider that any reasonably foreseeable changes in the key assumptions would result in an impairment. Further details of management's assessment of the goodwill for impairment are included in note 4.
Business combinations
On initial recognition, the assets and liabilities of the acquired business and the consideration paid for them are included in the consolidated financial statements at their fair values. In measuring fair value, management uses estimates of future cash flows. Any subsequent change in these estimates would affect the amount of goodwill if the change qualifies as a measurement period adjustment. Any other change would be recognised in the income statement in the subsequent period. Details of acquired assets and liabilities are given in note 16.
Share-based payments
The Group measures the cost of the equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The charge for the period ended 31 December 2012 of £86,000 (2011: £411,000) is determined using a Black-Scholes Valuation model, using the assumptions detailed in note 8.
Treatment of exploration and evaluation costs
IFRS 6 "Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources" requires an entity to consistently apply a policy to account for expenditure on exploration and evaluation of a mineral resource. The directors have set out their policy in respect of the treatment of these costs on page 13. Amounts capitalised in the year to 31 December 2012 were £nil (2011 £70k).
Treatment of licenses
The Company purchased the entire share capital of Mojito Resources Limited during the period ended 31 December 2011. Mojito Resources Limited is the beneficial owner of a 30% interest in the Tenements in the Yangibana Rare Earth Project. These have been treated in the accounting records of Mojito Resources Limited and on consolidation as an intangible asset. The directors consider the fair value of the tenements to be equal to the book value in Mojito Resources Limited at the date of acquisition as the interest in the tenements were purchased during the financial period. In addition Mojito Resources Limited has entered into an Agreement with GTI Resources Limited and Gascoyne Metals Pty Limited in respect of the Yangibana Project. Mojito Resources is not however liable for any of the exploration costs in the initial sole funding period until a Feasibility Report is produced by the operators (GTI Resources Limited). At this stage therefore the directors have treated the licenses as an intangible asset. Following the completion of the Feasibility report the directors will review the accounting treatment going forward giving consideration to their respective responsibilities for the development of the project.
Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective and have not been adopted early by the Group
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, certain new standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards have been published by the IASB but are not yet effective, and have not been adopted early by the Group.
Management anticipates that all of the relevant pronouncements will be adopted in the Group's accounting policies for the first period beginning after the effective date of the pronouncement. Information on new standards, amendments and interpretations that are expected to be relevant to the Group's financial statements is provided below. Certain other new standards and interpretations have been issued but are not expected to be relevant to the Group's financial statements is provided below.
Consolidation Standards
A package of consolidation standards are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. Information on these new standards is presented below. The Group's management have yet to assess the impact of these new and revised standards on the Group's consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (IFRS 10)
IFRS 10 supercedes IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (IAS 27) and SIC 12 Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities. It revised the definition of control together with accompanying guidance to identify an interest in a subsidiary. However, the requirements and mechanics of consolidation and the accounting for any non-controlling interests and changes in control remain the same.
IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements (IFRS 11)
IFRS 11 supercedes IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures (IAS 31). It aligns more closely the accounting by the investors with their rights and obligations relating to the joint arrangement. In addition, IAS 31's option of using proportionate consolidation for joint ventures has been eliminated. IFRS 11 now requires the use of the equity accounting method, which is currently used for investments in associates.
IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (IFRS 12)
IFRS 12 integrates and makes consistent the disclosure requirements for various types of investments, including unconsolidated structured entities. It introduces new disclosure requirements about the risks to which an entity is exposed from its involvement with structured entities.
Consequential amendments to IAS 27 and IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (IAS 28)
IAS 27 now only deals with separate financial statements. IAS 28 brings investments in joint ventures into its scope. However, IAS 28's equity accounting methodology remains unchanged.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Management (IFRS 13)
IFRS 13 does not affect which items are required to be fair-valued, but clarifies the definition of fair value and provides related guidance and enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. It is applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The Group's management have yet to assess the impact of this new standard.
Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1 Amendments)
The IAS 1 Amendments require an entity to group items presented in other comprehensive income into those that, in accordance with other IFRSs:
(a) will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss; and
(b) will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss when specific conditions are met. It is applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012.
The Group's management expects this will change the current presentation of items in other comprehensive income; however, it will not affect the measurement or recognition of such items.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (IFRS 9)
The IASB aims to replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurements in its entirety. IFRS 9 is being issued in phases. To date, the chapters dealing with recognition, classification, measurement and derecognition of financial assets and liabilities have been issued. These chapters are effective for annual periods beginning 1 January 2013. Further chapters dealing with impairment methodology and hedge accounting are still being developed. The Group's management have yet to assess the impact of this new standard on the Group's consolidated financial statements. However, they do not expect to implement IFRS 9 until all of its chapters have been published and they can comprehensively assess the impact of all changes.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the year ended 31 December 2012
|
|
Year ended |
|
15 months ended |
|
Notes |
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses |
|
(789) |
|
(1,438) |
Total administrative expenses |
|
(789) |
|
(1,438) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
1 |
(789) |
|
(1,438) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) on sale of available for sale investments |
|
(184) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before taxation |
|
(973) |
|
(1,483) |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation |
2 |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss after taxation, and loss attributable to the equity holders of the Company |
|
(973) |
|
(1,438) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange |
|
(22) |
|
25 |
Transfer to income statement of available for sale reserve |
|
115 |
|
- |
Decrease in value of available for sale asset |
|
(25) |
|
(137) |
Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
(112) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss for the year, attributable to owners of the company |
|
(905) |
|
(1,550) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per ordinary share |
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share (pence) |
3 |
(0.07) |
|
(0.14) |
The accompanying principal accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
Share capital |
Share premium |
Share based payment reserves |
Available for sale reserve |
Exchange reserve |
Retained earnings |
Total equity |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1 October 2010 |
|
464 |
3,868 |
215 |
- |
- |
(4,626) |
(79) |
Share based payments |
|
- |
- |
411 |
- |
- |
- |
411 |
Issue of share capital |
|
97 |
3,158 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3,255 |
Share placing costs |
|
- |
(160) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(160) |
Transactions with owners |
|
97 |
2,998 |
411 |
- |
- |
- |
3,506 |
Foreign exchange |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
- |
25 |
Decrease in value of available for sale asset |
|
- |
- |
- |
(137) |
- |
- |
(137) |
Loss for the year |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(1,438) |
(1,438) |
Total comprehensive loss for the period |
|
- |
- |
- |
(137) |
25 |
1,438 |
1,550 |
Balance at 31 December 2011 |
|
561 |
6,866 |
626 |
(137) |
25 |
(6,064) |
1,877 |
Share based payments |
|
- |
- |
86 |
- |
- |
- |
86 |
Share issue |
|
67 |
335 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
402 |
Share placing costs |
|
- |
(3) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(3) |
Transactions with owners |
|
67 |
332 |
86 |
- |
- |
- |
485 |
Foreign exchange |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
(22) |
- |
(22) |
Transfer to income statement |
|
- |
- |
- |
115 |
- |
- |
115 |
Decrease in value of available for sale asset |
|
- |
- |
- |
(25) |
- |
- |
(25) |
Loss for the period |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
(973) |
(973) |
Total comprehensive loss for the period |
|
- |
- |
- |
90 |
(22) |
(973) |
(905) |
Balance at 31 December 2012 |
|
628 |
7,198 |
712 |
(47) |
3 |
(7,037) |
1,457 |
The accompanying principal accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
|
|
31 December 2012 |
|
31 December 2011 |
ASSETS |
Notes |
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
4 |
879 |
|
1,030 |
Available for sale assets |
5 |
35 |
|
379 |
|
|
914 |
|
1,409 |
Current |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
176 |
|
243 |
Trade and other receivables |
6 |
489 |
|
266 |
Total current assets |
|
665 |
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
1,579 |
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
7 |
122 |
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
122 |
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
Issued share capital |
9 |
628 |
|
561 |
Share premium |
|
7,198 |
|
6,866 |
Share based premium reserve |
|
712 |
|
626 |
Available for sale asset reserve |
|
(47) |
|
(137) |
Exchange reserve |
|
3 |
|
25 |
Retained earnings |
|
(7,037) |
|
(6,064) |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable |
|
|
|
|
to equity holders of the Company |
|
1,457 |
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity and liabilities |
|
1,579 |
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board on 24 June 2013.
.
David Lenigas
Director
Company number 05234262
The accompanying principal accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASHFLOWS
|
|
Year ended |
|
15 months ended |
|
|
31 December 2012 |
|
31 December 2011 |
|
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
Cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
Loss after taxation |
|
(789) |
|
(1,438) |
Amortisation of intangibles |
|
57 |
|
43 |
Equity settled share based payments |
|
86 |
|
411 |
(Increase) in trade and other receivables |
|
(151) |
|
(249) |
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables |
|
81 |
|
(361) |
Net cash (outflow) from operating activities from continuing operations |
|
(716) |
|
(1,594) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of licences |
|
- |
|
(73) |
Purchase of subsidiary |
|
- |
|
(380) |
Investment in AFS asset |
|
- |
|
(516) |
Sale of AFS asset |
|
250 |
|
- |
Investment in exploration |
|
- |
|
(70) |
Net cash outflow from investing activities |
|
250 |
|
(1,039) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issue of share capital |
|
402 |
|
2,730 |
Share issue costs |
|
(3) |
|
(160) |
Net cash inflow from financing activities |
|
399 |
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(67) |
|
(63) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
243 |
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
176 |
|
243 |
The accompanying principal accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 LOSS before taxation and segmental information
Loss before taxation
The loss before taxation is attributable to the principal activities of the Group.
The loss before taxation is stated after charging:
|
Year ended 31 December 2012 |
|
15 months ended 31 December 2011 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
Share based payment charge |
86 |
|
411 |
Amortisation charge |
57 |
|
43 |
Staff costs (see note 14) |
142 |
|
153 |
Fees payable to the Company's auditor for the audit of the financial statements |
13 |
|
22 |
Fees payable to the Company's auditor and its associates for other services: |
|
|
|
Other services relating to taxation compliance |
1 |
|
1 |
Segmental information
An operating segment is a distinguishable component of the Group that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Group's chief operating decision maker to make decisions about the allocation of resources and assessment of performance and about which discrete financial information is available.
The chief operating decision maker has defined that the Group's only reportable operating segment during the period is mining.
Subject to further acquisitions the Group expects to further review its segmental information during the forthcoming financial year.
The Group has not generated any revenues from external customers during the period.
In respect of the total assets, £588,000 (2011: £509,000) arise in the UK, and £172,000 (2011: £449,000) arise in Greenland and £819,000 (2011:£960,000) arise in Australia.
2 Taxation - continuing operations
There is no tax credit on the loss for the current or prior period.
The tax assessed for the period differs from the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK as follows:
The Group has tax losses in the UK, subject to Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs approval, of approximately £695,000 (31 December 2011: £nil) available for offset against future operating profits. The Group has not recognised any deferred tax asset in respect of these losses, which would amount to £250,000 (31 December 2011: £nil) due to there being insufficient certainty regarding its recovery.
Following the operational decision to exit the music business and focus on investing in mining operations, all brought forward tax losses relating to the music business are no longer available for offset against future operating profits.
3 LOSS PER SHARE
The calculation of the basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the consolidated loss attributable to the equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period.
|
Year ended |
|
15 months ended |
|
31 December 2012 |
|
31 December 2011 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
(Loss) attributable to owners of the Company |
(973) |
|
(1,438) |
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
Number |
|
Number |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for calculating basic loss per share |
1,480,231,072 |
|
1,046,704,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
Pence |
|
Pence |
Basic and diluted loss per share |
(0.07) |
|
(0.14) |
The impact of the share options are anti dilutive.
4 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Exploration costs |
|
Goodwill |
|
Licences |
|
Total |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2010 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Additions |
70 |
|
691 |
|
73 |
|
834 |
Acquisition |
- |
|
- |
|
214 |
|
- |
Foreign exchange gains |
- |
|
20 |
|
5 |
|
25 |
At 31 December 2011 |
70 |
|
711 |
|
292 |
|
1,073 |
Reclassification |
(33) |
|
- |
|
(39) |
|
(72) |
Exchange Difference |
- |
|
(19) |
|
(3) |
|
(22) |
At 31 December 2012 |
37 |
|
692 |
|
250 |
|
979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortisation and impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2010 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Amortisation charge in the year |
- |
|
- |
|
(43) |
|
(43) |
At 31 December 2011 |
- |
|
- |
|
(43) |
|
(43) |
Amortisation charge in the year |
- |
|
|
|
(57) |
|
(57) |
At 31 December 2012 |
- |
|
- |
|
(100) |
|
(100) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value at 31 December 2012 |
37 |
|
692 |
|
150 |
|
879 |
Net book value at 31 December 2011 |
70 |
|
711 |
|
249 |
|
1,030 |
Net book value at 1 October 2010 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
On 4 May 2011 the Group entered into an agreement to acquire interests in 5 claims in Saskatchewan, Canada, as part of the Cup Lake Syndicate. Consideration paid totalled £33,000.
During the periods the Group incurred expenses which were in relation to the application of several prospecting licenses in Greenland, these costs have been re-classified as prepaid exploration & licence costs amounting to £172,000. The Group is awaiting confirmation of transfer of these licences to 2 subsidiaries newly incorporated in Greenland and currently held in trust on the Group's behalf.
On 1 December 2011 the Group acquired 100% of the shares in Mojito Resource Limited, a Company registered in British Virgin Islands, which has a 30% interest in the Yangibana rare earth project in Western Australia. Further information is given in note 16.
Goodwill of £691k arose on this acquisition, being the difference in the purchase price of £905k and the provisional fair value (£214k) of the licences within Mojito Resources Limited, being the only asset in the company. The directors are continuing to review their provisional assessment of the fair value of the licences acquired although do not expect any material adjustment. The directors have therefore identified only one cash generating unit to which the goodwill is allocated.
As set out in the accounting policies on page 15 Goodwill is reviewed annually or in the event of an indication of impairment. The recoverable amount of goodwill has been determined by the fair value less costs to sell. The directors consider that there have been no changes in circumstances between acquisition on 1 December 2011 and 31 December 2012 that would give rise to an impairment charge.
At this stage the Feasibility Study has not been completed to fully assess the potential future cash flows of developing the area under licence. The directors, however, having given consideration to the past exploration of the Project which has identified nine individual occurrences of rare earth elements known to occur within the Project area consider that the goodwill is not impaired. Management's review of the recoverable amount is most sensitive to changes in the commodity prices of the underlying minerals and the existence of the rare earth elements within the Project Area. Since the acquisition date there has been no significant fluctuation in the commodity prices of the underlying minerals or any material changes to the Project Area. The directors consider that no impairment is required at 31 December 2012. Further information in relation to the projects is contained within the Chairman's statement on pages 1 to 5.
Deferred tax has not been recognised on the intangible assets acquired as it is not material to the financial statements.
5 Available for sale assets
|
Available for sale assets |
|
£'000 |
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation at 1st October 2010 |
- |
Additions at cost |
516 |
Change in fair value recognised in other comprehensive income |
(137) |
Valuation at 31 December 2011 |
379 |
Disposal proceeds |
(250) |
Transfer from equity reserve |
115 |
Realised (loss) on disposal |
(184) |
Change in fair value recognised in other comprehensive income |
(25) |
Valuation at 31 December 2012 |
35 |
On 8 December 2011 the Company completed the acquisition of 1.27 million shares in Greenland Minerals and Energy Limited, representing 0.31% of that Company's issued share capital. During the year the Company disposed of 970,000 shares, for net proceeds of £250,000.
6 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
|
31 December 2012 |
|
31 December 2011 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
Other receivables |
305 |
|
162 |
Prepaid exploartion costs |
172 |
|
- |
Prepayments and accrued income |
12 |
|
104 |
|
489 |
|
266 |
Included within other receivables is £300,525 (31 December 2011: £63,575) in respect of unpaid share capital of which £275,525, remains outstanding at the date of approving the financial statements.
There is no impairment of receivables and no amounts are past due at 31 December 2012 or 31 December 2011.
The fair value of these financial assets is not individually determined as the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value.
7 TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
|
31 December 2012 |
|
31 December 2011 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
Trade payables |
95 |
|
20 |
Accruals and deferred income |
27 |
|
21 |
|
122 |
|
41 |
The fair value of trade and other payables, due to their short duration, management considers the carrying amounts recognised in the balance sheet to be a reasonable approximation of their fair value.
8 share based payments
The Group operates share option schemes for certain employees (including directors). Options are exercisable at the option price agreed at the date of grant. The options are settled in equity once exercised. The expected life of the options is three years. If the options remain unexercised after a period of ten years from the date of grant, the options expire. Options are forfeited if the employee leaves the Group before the options vest. There are no other vesting requirements.
Details of the number of share options and the weighted average exercise price (WAEP) outstanding during the period are as follows:
|
31 December 2012 |
|
31 December 2011 |
||||
|
Number |
|
WAEP |
|
Number |
|
WAEP |
|
£ |
|
|
£ |
|||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
144,925,000 |
|
0.005 |
|
46,925,000 |
|
0.010 |
Granted |
68,000,000 |
|
0.0006 |
|
98,000,000 |
|
0.005 |
Amended |
126,000,000 |
|
0.0006 |
|
- |
|
- |
Amended |
(126,000,000) |
|
(0.005) |
|
- |
|
- |
Outstanding at the end of the year |
212,925,000 |
|
0.0021 |
|
144,925,000 |
|
0.005 |
Exercisable at year end |
76,925,000 |
|
|
|
8,925,000 |
|
|
The share options outstanding at the end of the period have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 7.60 years (31 December 2011: 8.37 years) and have the following exercise prices and fair values at the date of grant:
First exercise date (when vesting conditions are met) |
Grant date |
Exercise price |
Fair value |
31 December 2012 |
31 December 2011 |
|
|
£ |
£ |
Number |
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 March 2008 |
7 March 2005 |
0.03 |
0.019221 |
5,100,000 |
5,100,000 |
6 March 2009 |
6 March 2006 |
0.0325 |
0.020776 |
3,825,000 |
3,825,000 |
28 January 2013 |
28 January 2010 |
0.005 |
0.004 |
38,000,000 |
38,000,000 |
29 November 2013 |
29 November 2010 |
0.005 |
0.003537 |
98,000,000 |
98,000,000 |
13 December 2012 |
13 December 2012 |
0.0006 |
0.00055 |
68,000,000 |
- |
28 January 2013 |
14 December 2012 |
0.005 |
(0.000476) |
(38,000,000) |
- |
28 January 2013 |
14 December 2012 |
0.0006 |
0.000551 |
38,000,000 |
- |
29 November 2013 |
14 December 2012 |
0.005 |
(0.000471) |
(98,000,000) |
- |
29 November 2013 |
14 December 2012 |
0.0006 |
0.000549 |
98,000,000 |
- |
|
|
|
|
212,925,000 |
144,925,000 |
The share options can be exercised up to seven years after the date first exercisable.
At 31 December 2012 76,925,000 options were exercisable (31 December 2011: 8,925,000).
For those options granted where IFRS 2 "Share-Based Payment" is applicable, the fair values were calculated using the Black-Scholes model. The inputs into the model were as follows:
|
Risk free rate |
Share price volatility |
Expected life |
Share price at date of grant |
7 March 2005 |
4.75% |
100% |
3 years |
£0.03 |
6 March 2006 |
4.75% |
100% |
3 years |
£0.0325 |
28 January 2010 |
0.50% |
100% |
3 years |
£0.004 |
29 November 2010 |
0.50% |
160% |
3 years |
£0.0043 |
13 December 2012 |
0.50% |
122% |
1 month |
£0.0006 |
14 December 2012 amendments |
0.50% |
122% |
2 months |
£0.0006 |
14 December 2012 amendments |
0.50% |
122% |
11 months |
£0.0006 |
Expected volatility was determined by calculating the historical volatility of the Company's share price for 12 months prior to the date of grant. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.
The Group recognised total expenses of £86,000 (15 months ended 31 December 2011: £411,000) relating to equity-settled share-based payment transactions during the period.
9 share capital
|
31 December 2012 |
|
31 December 2011 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
Allotted, issued and fully paid |
|
|
|
173,619,050 deferred shares of 0.24p |
417 |
|
417 |
2,113,619,050 ordinary shares of 0.01p (31 December 2011: 1,443,619,050) |
211 |
|
144 |
|
628 |
|
561 |
|
Ordinary shares |
|
|
|
No. |
|
£'000 |
Allotted and issued |
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
1,443,619,050 |
|
561 |
Issue of shares for cash |
670,000,000 |
|
67 |
At 31 December 2012 |
2,113,619,050 |
|
628 |
On 11 December 2012 670,000,000 Ordinary Shares of 0.01p were issued at 0.06p per share for proceeds of £402,000 before share placing costs.
The deferred shares have no voting rights and are not eligible for dividends.
10 contingent liabilities
There were no contingent liabilities at 31 December 2012 or 31 December 2011.
11 capital commitments
There were no capital commitments at 31 December 2012 or 31 December 2011.
12 Financial instruments
The Group is exposed to a variety of financial risks which result from both its operating and investing activities. The Board is responsible for co-ordinating the Group's risk management and focuses on actively securing the Group's short to medium term cash flows. Long term financial investments are managed to generate lasting returns.
The Group has purchased shares in Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd which is listed on the ASX, these shares are held as an available-for-sale asset. The Group has no financial derivatives. The most significant risks to which the Group is exposed are described as follows:
a Credit risk
The Group's credit risk will be primarily attributable to its trade receivables. At 31 December 2012, the Group had minimal trade receivables and therefore minimal risk arises.
Generally, the Group's maximum exposure to credit risk is limited to the carrying amount of the financial assets recognised at the balance sheet date, as summarised below:
|
|
|
31 December 2012 |
|
|
|
31 December 2011 |
||||||||
|
AFS (carried at fair value |
|
Loans and receivables |
|
Non financial assets |
|
Statement of Financial position total |
|
AFS (carried at fair value |
|
Loans and receivables |
|
Non financial assets |
|
Statement of financial position total |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
Available-for-sale financial asset |
35 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
35 |
|
379 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
379 |
Other long term financial assets |
35 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
35 |
|
379 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
379 |
Other short term financial assets |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Other receivables |
- |
|
305 |
|
- |
|
305 |
|
- |
|
162 |
|
- |
|
162 |
Prepayments and accrued income |
- |
|
- |
|
184 |
|
184 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
104 |
|
104 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
- |
|
176 |
|
- |
|
176 |
|
- |
|
243 |
|
- |
|
243 |
Total |
35 |
|
481 |
|
184 |
|
700 |
|
379 |
|
405 |
|
104 |
|
888 |
Financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:
· Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
· Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and
· Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Management's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgement, and considers factors specific to the investment.
Investments
The Group's investment in shares in Greenland Minerals and Energy Limited included as an available-for-sale asset has been classified as Level 1, as market prices are available and the market is considered an active, liquid market.
The credit risk on liquid funds is limited because the Group only places deposits with leading financial institutions in the United Kingdom.
b Liquidity risk
The Group seeks to manage financial risk by ensuring sufficient liquidity is available to meet foreseeable needs and to invest cash assets safely and profitably. The Directors prepare rolling cash flow forecasts and seek to raise
additional equity funding whenever a shortfall in funding is forecast. Details of the going concern basis of preparing the financial statements are included in the principal accounting policies.
c Market risk
The amount and quality of minerals available and the related costs of extraction and production represent a significant risk to the group. The group is exposed to fluctuating commodity prices in respect of the underlying assets. The Group seeks to manage this risk by carrying out appropriate due diligence in respect of the projects in which it invests.
Interest rate risk
The Group has no loans and therefore little interest rate risk.
d Financial liabilities
The group's financial liabilities are classified as follows:
|
31 December 2012 |
|
31 December 2011 |
||||||||
|
Other financial liabilities at amortised cost |
|
Liabilities not within the scope of IAS 39 |
|
Total |
|
Other financial liabilities at amortised cost |
|
Liabilities not within the scope of IAS 39 |
|
Total |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables |
95 |
|
- |
|
95 |
|
20 |
|
- |
|
20 |
Accruals and deferred income |
- |
|
27 |
|
27 |
|
- |
|
21 |
|
21 |
Total |
95 |
|
27 |
|
122 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
41 |
Maturity of financial liabilities
All financial liabilities at 31 December 2012 and 31 December 2011 mature in less than one year.
Borrowing facilities for the period ended 31 December 2012
The Group has no undrawn committed borrowing facilities at 31 December 2012 (31 December 2011: £ Nil).
e Capital risk management
The Group's objectives when managing capital are:
- to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, so that it continues to provide returns and benefits for the shareholders;
- to support the Group's stability and growth; and
- to provide capital for the purpose of strengthening the Group's risk management capability.
The Group actively and regularly reviews and manages its capital structure, to ensure an optimal capital structure, and equity holder returns, taking into consideration the future capital requirements of the Group and capital efficiency, prevailing and projected profitability, projected operating cash flows, projected capital expenditures and projected strategic investment opportunities. Management regards total equity as capital and reserves, for capital management purposes.
When the net assets of the parent Company are below half of the called up share capital, the directors contact the shareholders accordingly.
13 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Included within creditors at 31 December 2012 is £2,800 (31 December 2011: £2,800) in respect of monies owed to Richard Griffiths, a director of Rare Earth Minerals plc.
Included within accruals at 31 December 2012 is £12,000 (31 December 2011: £Nil) in respect of monies owed to Adrian Fairbourn, a director of Rare Earth Minerals plc.
14 Employee remuneration
Employee benefits expense
The expense recognised for employee benefits, including Directors' emoluments, is analysed below:
|
Year ended |
|
15 months ended |
|
31 December 2012 |
|
31 December 2011 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
Wages and salaries |
142 |
|
153 |
Share based payments |
86 |
|
411 |
|
228 |
|
564 |
The average number of employees (including directors) employed by the Group during the period was:
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
No. |
|
No. |
Directors |
3 |
|
3 |
Included within the above are amounts in respect of Directors, who are considered to be the key management personnel, as follows:
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
Salaries |
142 |
|
153 |
Share based payments |
47 |
|
358 |
|
189 |
|
511 |
Details of Directors' emoluments are included in the Report on Remuneration on page 10-11.
14 subsidiaries
Company name |
Share type |
% owned |
Principal activity |
|
|
|
|
Mojito Resources Limited |
Ordinary |
100% |
Mining |
Mojito Resources Limited is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands
15 ACQUISITIONS
On 1 December 2011, the group acquired the entire issued share capital of Mojito Resources Limited, a company registered in the British Virgin Islands, from Camelot Trust Corporation Limited for consideration of £905k. The consideration was settled by £380k of cash and 250 million ordinary shares in Rare Earth Minerals plc, at a fair value of £0.0021 per share, being the market value of the shares at the date of acquisition. Following the transaction, Camelot Trust Corporation Limited owned 17.3% of the share capital of Rare Earth Minerals plc. Mojito Resources Limited owns a 30% interest in the Yangibama Rare Earth Project situated in the Gascoyne region of Western Australia.
At acquisition Mojito Resources Limited owned 30% of 6 exploration licences relating to the Yangibama Rare Earth Project, there were no other identifiable assets or liabilities of the Company acquired.
In addition there is deferred contingent consideration of AUS$500,000. At the date of acquisition the directors consider that this is unlikely to be paid and have therefore not provided for this in the financial statements.
16 EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
On 14 February 2013, the Company announced it had signed a Farm-in Agreement with listed Canadian company Bacanora Minerals Ltd to participate in drilling and evaluation of its high grade Lithium discover in northern Mexico. The Company will acquire a 10% interest for US$250,000 initially, and expected spend of US$500,000 over a 6 month period. The Company then has the right to increase its interest to 30% for US$500,000 after the initial period.
On 11 March 2013, the Company raised gross proceeds of £400,000 in a placing to investors of 666,666,667 new ordinary shares of 0.01p each in the Company at 0.06p per share ("Placing Shares") together with a 0.5 warrant for each Placing Share subscribed, each warrant entitling the holder to subscribe for one ordinary share in the Company at 0.06p per share before 30 June 2014.
On 17 June 2013, the Company entered into a £300,000 Placing Agreement and, separately, a £150,000 Equity Swap Agreement with YA Global Master SPV, Ltd. ("YAGM"). ·YAGM have agreed with the Company that they will not dispose of any shares for an initial 2 month period.