2004 Interim Results
Diageo PLC
19 February 2004
19 February 2004 (7.00 am)
Shareholder value creation through growth in premium drinks
Interim results for the six months ended 31 December 2003
2003 2002 Reported movement Organic movement
£ million £ million % %
Premium drinks 5,060 4,854 4 5
Burger King - 479
Turnover 5,060 5,333 (5)
Premium drinks 1,181 1,151 3 6
Burger King - 53
Operating profit before exceptional items 1,181 1,204 (2)
2003 2002
Operating profit £1,162m £1,100m
Profit/(loss) for the period £891m £(459)m
Basic eps 29.3p (14.6)p
Basic eps before exceptional items 30.3p 28.8p
Interim dividend per share 10.6p 9.9p
Free cash flow £620m £363m
Premium drinks organic growth
• Volume up 3%
• Net sales (after deducting excise duties) up 6%
• Marketing investment up 8%
• Operating profit* up 6%
• Operating margin* level
* figures are stated before exceptional items - see page 4
See page 37 for explanatory notes
Figures for the six months ended 31 December 2002 have been restated for FRS 17
- Retirement benefits, UITF 38 - Accounting for
ESOP trusts and the amendment to FRS 5 - Reporting the substance of transactions
Paul Walsh, Chief Executive of Diageo, commenting on the six months ended 31
December 2003 said:
'Diageo, focused as it is now on premium drinks, continues to deliver growth
with improvement in key measures of performance in this first half. Further mix
improvement combined with good volume growth has led to a 6% organic increase in
both net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit at a time
when investment in marketing has again increased ahead of net sales growth and
we have absorbed restructuring costs. Looking forward the trends that we have
seen in the first half are expected to continue despite the uneven recovery in
Europe, although the current exchange rate volatility will impact reported
results.
'These results also reflect our financial strength; return on invested capital
is up 3 percentage points to 17.6%, free cash flow is up £257 million in the
period, the interim dividend is up 7% and we have returned a further £256
million to shareholders.
'Diageo is committed to creating shareholder value even in uncertain times.
These results demonstrate our ability to do so.'
DIAGEO INTERIM RESULTS
For the six months ended 31 December 2003
Key highlights
• Diageo is now a focused premium drinks business and this is the first
year in which premium drinks is the sole driver of Diageo's operating
performance
• The results reflect the strength of the performance platform Diageo has
created in premium drinks, based on brand range, advantaged route to market and
global reach. Further, they demonstrate Diageo's ability to deliver value for
shareholders
• Diageo's leadership position has again improved with share gains in the
four major markets
• Diageo's operating margin is 23.3% and return on invested capital is
17.6%
• Volume growth of 3% was driven by strong growth of global priority
brands, up 5%, and improved performance on category brands, volume up 2%.
However, ready to drink slowed, with volume down 4%, as volume declined in Great
Britain and the roll-out to new markets was completed
• Net sales (after deducting excise duties) grew by 6%, driven by the
strong mix improvement in North America and key markets
• Exchange rate movements reduced operating profit before exceptional
items by £20 million
• Operating profit grew by 6%, in a period when marketing investment
increased a further 8% and Diageo incurred restructuring costs of £19 million
which were taken to operating profit in the period
% movements are organic movements. They are before exceptional items. See page
37 for explanatory notes
For further information
Diageo's interim results presentation to analysts and investors will be
broadcast at 09.30 (UK time) on Thursday 19 February 2004 on Diageo's internet
home page at the address: www.diageo.com. Prior to the live link, the
presentation slides will also be available to download from Diageo's home page.
You will be able to listen to a live broadcast of the presentation and to the
question and answer session.
The number to call is:
France +33 1 70 75 00 0
Germany +49 69 2222 52100
Netherlands +31 20 710 0075
Spain +34 91 414 15 45
UK +44 20 7019 0810
USA (toll free) 1 877 951 7311
Passcode: Diageo results
After the presentation the slides and accompanying text will be available to
download from Diageo's homepage.
You will able to view a recording of the presentation and question and answer
session on the Diageo website from 14.00 (UK time) on the day. This facility
will be available until 30 April 2004.
A press conference will take place beginning at 12.30 (UK time) on Thursday 19
February and will be broadcast live from a link on www.diageo.com.
Diageo management will host a teleconference for analysts and investors at 15.00
(UK time) on Thursday 19 February. Call this number to participate:
France +33 1 70 75 00 02
Germany +49 69 2222 52100
Netherlands +31 20 710 0075
Spain +34 91 414 15 45
UK +44 20 7019 0810
USA (toll free) 1 877 951 7311
Passcode: Diageo results
The teleconference will be available on instant replay from 17.00 (UK time) and
will be available until 31 March 2004. The number to call is:
UK/Europe +44 20 7970 8452
USA/Canada (toll free) 1 877 795 7573
Investor enquiries to: Catherine James +44 (0) 20 7927 5272
Investor.relations@diageo.com
Media enquiries to: Kathryn Partridge +44 (0) 20 7927 5225
Media@diageo.com
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
For the six months ended 31 December 2003
OPERATING REVIEW
Summary consolidated profit and loss account
Six months ended 31 December 2003 Six months ended 31 December 2002
Before
Before exceptional Exceptional
exceptional Exceptional items items Total
items items Total (restated) (restated) (restated)
£ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million
Turnover 5,060 - 5,060 5,333 - 5,333
Operating costs (3,879) (19) (3,898) (4,129) (104) (4,233)
Operating profit 1,181 (19) 1,162 1,204 (104) 1,100
Associates' profits 273 (11) 262 266 (15) 251
Disposal of fixed assets (8) (8) (3) (3)
Disposal of businesses - - (1,360) (1,360)
Finance charges (157) - (157) (196) - (196)
Profit before taxation 1,297 (38) 1,259 1,274 (1,482) (208)
Taxation (324) 6 (318) (324) 118 (206)
Profit after taxation 973 (32) 941 950 (1,364) (414)
Minority interests (50) - (50) (45) - (45)
Profit/(loss) for the period 923 (32) 891 905 (1,364) (459)
On a reported basis, turnover decreased by £273 million (5%) from £5,333 million
(of which Burger King contributed £479 million) in the six months ended 31
December 2002 to £5,060 million in the six months ended 31 December 2003. For
premium drinks, turnover increased by £206 million (4%). The weakening of the US
dollar was offset by the strengthening of the euro, and therefore turnover was
broadly unaffected by the impact of exchange rate movements. The effect of
disposals and the termination of certain distribution rights reduced turnover by
£72 million in premium drinks.
On a reported basis, operating costs decreased by £335 million (8%) from £4,233
million (of which Burger King costs were £426 million) in the six months ended
31 December 2002 to £3,898 million in the six months ended 31 December 2003.
Operating costs for the premium drinks business increased by £91 million against
the comparable period last year partly due to an increase in excise duties of
£39 million and an increase in marketing of £39 million.
Reported operating profit increased by £62 million from £1,100 million (of which
Burger King contributed £53 million) to £1,162 million. Exceptional items
charged to operating profit, in respect of the integration of the Seagram
businesses, were £19 million in the six months ended 31 December 2003 compared
with £104 million (of which £89 million was in respect of the integration of the
Seagram businesses) in the six months ended 31 December 2002. Exchange rate
movements reduced operating profit before exceptional items for the six months
ended 31 December 2003 by £20 million (US dollar reduction of £38 million, euro
- benefit of £28 million, other currencies - reduction of £10 million) and
disposals and the termination of certain distribution rights reduced operating
profit by £12 million.
On a reported basis, marketing investment for premium drinks increased 7% from
£573 million to £612 million. Marketing investment on global priority brands
grew 2% to £454 million, while marketing spend on ready to drink brands declined
by £29 million.
Finance charges decreased from £196 million to £157 million in the six months
ended 31 December 2003. The net interest charge decreased by £61 million (29%)
from £207 million in the comparable prior period to £146 million in the six
months ended 31 December 2003. Other finance charges, principally in respect of
post employment plans, amounted to a charge of £11 million in the six months
ended 31 December 2003 compared with income of £11 million in the six months
ended 31 December 2002.
Reported profit before exceptional items, taxation and minority interests
increased by £23 million (2%) from £1,274 million in the six months ended 31
December 2002 to £1,297 million in the six months ended 31 December 2003.
Exceptional items before taxation were a charge of £38 million in the six months
ended 31 December 2003 compared with a charge of £1,482 million (including
£1,383 million in respect of Burger King) in the six months ended 31 December
2002.
After exceptional items, the result before taxation and minority interests
increased by £1,467 million from a loss of £208 million to a profit of £1,259
million in the six months ended 31 December 2003. After taxation and minority
interests the result for the period increased by £1,350 million from a loss of
£459 million to a profit of £891 million.
REVIEW BY BRAND CATEGORY
See explanatory notes on page 37 for definitions.
Organic volume and net sales (after deducting excise duties) movement by brand
Equivalent units Volume movement Net sales*
(million) % movement
%
Smirnoff 12.9 2 (1)
Johnnie Walker 6.9 9 11
Guinness 5.9 3 5
Baileys 4.3 9 11
J&B 3.5 (1) (4)
Captain Morgan 3.1 11 26
Jose Cuervo 2.0 2 7
Tanqueray 1.0 4 8
Total global priority brands 39.6 5 6
Local priority brands 12.8 1 7
Category brands 14.5 2 7
Total premium drinks 66.9 3 6
* after deducting excise duties
• On a reported basis total volume increased 2% from 65.8 million
equivalent units to 66.9 million equivalent units
• On a reported basis net sales (after deducting excise duties) increased
5% from £3,628 million to £3,795 million
• Smirnoff volume, excluding ready to drink, was up 4% and net sales
(after deducting excise duties) was up 7%
• Captain Morgan volume, excluding ready to drink, was up 7% and net
sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 10%
• Volume growth of the global priority brands, excluding ready to drink,
was 5%, compared to 3% in the six months ended 31 December 2002. Net
sales (after deducting excise duties) growth of the global priority
brands, excluding ready to drink, was 7%, compared to 5% in the six
months ended 31 December 2002.
REVIEW BY MARKET
2003 2002 Operating
profit*
(restated)
Operating profit* Turnover £ million
Turnover £ million (restated)
£ million £ million
Major markets
North America 1,465 416 1,464 397
Great Britain 847 150 829 139
Ireland 542 75 522 83
Spain 270 69 233 60
3,124 710 3,048 679
Key markets 1,286 306 1,136 309
Venture markets 650 165 670 163
Total premium drinks 5,060 1,181 4,854 1,151
* before exceptional items
ANALYSIS BY INDIVIDUAL MARKET
The figures for 2002 have been restated (see note 1 on page 27).
North America
Key measures: Reported Organic
2003 2002 movement movement
£ million £ million % %
Volume 1 3
Turnover 1,465 1,464 - 9
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) 1,238 1,219 2 10
Marketing 202 209 (3) 7
Operating profit before exceptional items 416 397 5 14
Reported performance:
Turnover was up from £1,464 million to £1,465 million in the six months ended 31
December 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items increased £19 million
(5%), from £397 million in the six months ended 31 December 2002 to £416 million
in the six months ended 31 December 2003.
Organic performance:
The weighted average exchange rate used to translate US dollar sales moved from
£1 = $1.55 in the six months ended 31 December 2002 to £1 = $1.65 in the six
months ended 31 December 2003. This weakening of the US dollar was the
principal reason for a £78 million reduction in turnover arising because of
exchange rate movements. In addition, the termination of distribution rights
for Bass Ale in June 2003 and Cuervo 1800 in October 2002 reduced turnover in
the period compared with the six months ended 31 December 2002 by £26 million
and £9 million, respectively. Other disposals, including Gibson's Whiskey in
Canada, adversely affected turnover by £3 million. The turnover of brands owned
or distributed throughout both periods was £117 million higher in the six months
ended 31 December 2003 than the comparable six month period, as discussed within
organic brand performance below.
Adverse exchange rate movements and the termination of distribution rights and
disposals noted above reduced reported operating profit before exceptional items
by £25 million and £7 million, respectively, compared with the six months ended
31 December 2002. However, those brands owned or distributed throughout both
periods contributed £51 million more in the six months ended 31 December 2003
compared with the six months ended 31 December 2002, leading to an overall
improvement of £19 million in operating profit before exceptional items.
Organic brand performance: Volume Net sales*
movement movement
% %
Smirnoff (1) 4
Johnnie Walker 6 10
Jose Cuervo 4 10
Baileys 15 18
Captain Morgan 13 31
Tanqueray 2 8
Guinness 7 7
J&B (2) (4)
Total global priority brands 4 10
Local priority brands 1 6
Category brands - 24
Total 3 10
* after deducting excise duties
• Total volume, excluding Captain Morgan Gold was up 2% and net sales
(after deducting excise duties) was up 9%
• Smirnoff volume, excluding ready to drink was down 1% and net sales
(after deducting excise duties) was up 6%
• Captain Morgan volume, excluding Captain Morgan Gold was up 8% and net
sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 11%
From 1 July 2003, terms of sale were harmonised between the former UDV and
Seagram brands and freight is now billed in net sales (after deducting excise
duties) for all brands. The actual freight cost is captured in cost of goods
sold. This resulted in approximately a 2 percentage point improvement in net
sales (after deducting excise duties) versus the comparable period in the prior
year.
As in previous periods, strong growth in global priority brands was the key
driver of the performance in Diageo's North America business.
Smirnoff volume excluding ready to drink declined as a result of the price
increase on Smirnoff Red in a number of markets within North America. The price
increase and mix improvement driven by the stronger growth of Smirnoff Twist
meant that net sales (after deducting excise duties) grew 6%. Marketing
investment grew 29%, with increased investment behind the re-launch of Smirnoff
with new packaging and the 'Neat' advertising campaign aired on national cable
television.
Johnnie Walker gained share with Johnnie Walker Red Label volume up 5% and net
sales (after deducting excise duties) up 6% and Johnnie Walker Black Label
volume up 7% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) up 12%. Marketing
investment increased by 16%, mainly behind the launch costs of the new 'Keep
Walking' advertising campaign introduced in September 2003.
Despite the competitive pricing environment, Jose Cuervo broadly maintained
price and benefited from mix improvement as a result of the launch of Clasico
and the launch of Tradicional in the fast growing super premium tequila segment.
Marketing investment grew 16% behind on premise initiatives and advertising.
Jose Cuervo is the number one tequila in North America, but has lost some share
as a result of price competition.
Baileys' growth was driven by increased display and television advertising. The
successful launch in June 2003 of Baileys Minis delivered 5% of Baileys volume
and contributed to an increase in share.
Tanqueray continued its improved performance and the brand grew share of the
imported gin segment. Net sales (after deducting excise duties) benefited from
price increases introduced in September 2003.
The main driver of Guinness' growth was the performance of Guinness Draught in
Bottles, where distribution has increased by 9 percentage points to 55% of the
off premise.
Captain Morgan continues to gain share of the rum category, with net sales
(after deducting excise duties) benefiting from price increases taken on Captain
Morgan Parrot Bay. Excluding ready to drink, marketing investment grew by 28%
mainly due to the development of a new advertising campaign.
J&B continued to decline, with both volume and net sales (after deducting excise
duties) down.
Ready to drink volume, excluding the positive impact of the returns of Captain
Morgan Gold in the prior period, declined 1%, mainly due to decline in Smirnoff
ready to drink in Canada. Weakness in Canada has meant that Smirnoff ready to
drink volume in North America declined by 2%. Volume of Smirnoff ready to drink
in the United States however grew 1% due in part to the launch of Smirnoff
Twisted V. Net sales (after deducting excise duties) grew by 6% reflecting the
benefit of price increases. The ready to drink segment in the United States
continued to decline with volume down 15% as some competitor products were
withdrawn. Smirnoff ready to drink however grew share by 17 percentage points
and now has 40% of the segment.
Performance of the local priority brands was mixed. Growth of Crown Royal,
volume up 6%, Beaulieu Vineyard, volume up 16%, and Sterling Vineyards, volume
up 27%, offset a decline in other local priority brands in North America.
The strong mix improvement in category brand performance reflects the strong
performance of Ciroc vodka, since its launch in 2003, and strong premium wine
sales, offset by a volume decline in other category brands.
Other business performance drivers:
• Robust growth of the spirits category in the United States
• Diageo's share of spirits grew by 0.6 percentage points
• Incremental Seagram synergy of £17 million
The spirits category continues to show robust growth with an increase of 2%
versus the same period last year and Diageo continues to gain share of the total
market with a share increase of 0.6 percentage points.
In September 2003 new distribution arrangements had been consolidated in 34
states plus Washington DC, representing nearly 80% of Diageo's United States
volume. To avoid disruption during the key October to December period, no
additional consolidations occurred. It is expected that Diageo will consolidate
the remaining open states and potentially several franchise states by June 2004.
For the next six months, the focus in respect of NGG remains the same:
• Continue to drive growth through better execution of retail programmes
• Build on premise leadership while strengthening off premise selling
capabilities
• Create a shared vision for growth across Diageo and the distributors
Great Britain
Key measures: Reported Organic
2003 2002 movement movement
£ million £ million % %
Volume 5 5
Turnover 847 829 2 3
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) 474 473 - 1
Marketing 80 84 (5) (5)
Operating profit before exceptional items 150 139 8 6
Reported performance:
Turnover in Great Britain was up 2% on a reported basis from £829 million in the
six months ended 31 December 2002 to £847 million in the six months ended 31
December 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items was up £11 million from
£139 million in the six months ended 31 December 2002 to £150 million in the six
months ended 31 December 2003.
Organic performance:
Reported turnover growth of £18 million was generated by a £26 million
improvement in turnover in brands owned throughout both periods (see organic
brand performance below), offset by an £8 million reduction from the effect of
disposals, principally the termination of distribution rights to Brown Forman
agency brands in Great Britain from August 2002.
Operating profit before exceptional items was up £11 million in the six months
ended 31 December 2003 compared with the six months ended 31 December 2002.
There was a positive impact from disposals of £3 million because the adverse
effect of the loss of the Brown Forman agency brands was more than offset by the
disposal in June 2003 of Translucis UK Limited, an e-business venture which made
a loss in the comparable period. The continuing brands grew operating profit
before exceptional items by £8 million compared to the six months ended 31
December 2002.
Organic brand performance: Volume Net sales*
movement movement
% %
Smirnoff 9 (7)
Guinness (3) (1)
Baileys 7 12
Total global priority brands 5 (1)
Local priority brands (2) (10)
Category brands 24 23
Total 5 1
* after deducting excise duties
• Excluding ready to drink total volume was up 7% and net sales (after
deducting excise duties) up 7%
Growth in Great Britain was driven by the strong volume performance of spirit
and wine brands which offset volume decline in ready to drink and beer. Net
sales (after deducting excise duties) performance has been negatively impacted
by the decline in ready to drink.
Pricing pressure continues to impact the vodka category and therefore net sales
(after deducting excise duties) growth lagged the strong volume performance.
However, Smirnoff increased share of the growing vodka category, driven by the '
if Smirnoff made' advertising campaign, distribution gains and category
development initiatives, such as the 'every serve perfect programme'. In
addition, a number of new distribution contracts have been agreed in the on
trade.
Baileys continued to gain share of the liqueur category, but growth slowed
against that achieved in previous periods. Net sales (after deducting excise
duties) grew ahead of volume due to the mix improvements generated by Baileys
Glide.
The volume performance of Guinness reflected decline in the on trade, partially
offset by growth in the off trade. The decline in net sales (after deducting
excise duties) was mitigated by a price increase taken in February 2003. An
additional factor was that Guinness' promotions in the off trade did not compete
directly on price and instead leveraged occasions, such as the Rugby in November
2003, to increase share of at-home consumption. Media spend in the second half
of the financial year will be significantly increased to address the decline in
on trade performance.
The ready to drink segment in Great Britain continues to decline, with both
volume and price under pressure. Reflecting this trend, Smirnoff ready to
drink volume fell 12% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) declined
20%. However, share increased by nearly 3 percentage points.
The decline in local priority brands reflects the decline of Archers, volume
down 12% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) down 27%, and Bell's,
volume down 3%. This was partially offset by volume growth of Gordon's, up 4%.
Archers performance continues to be disappointing with both its schnapps and
ready to drink products declining. Excluding Gordon's Edge, which was withdrawn
from the market, Gordon's volume grew 7%, reflecting the benefit of increased
focus and investment in advertising. Mix improvement in Bell's was driven by
stronger pricing over the Christmas period than in the same period last year.
Bell's share of the scotch category at 25% is 6 percentage points higher than
its nearest competitor.
The strong growth on category brands was largely driven by Pimm's, volume up
34%, and Blossom Hill, volume up 59%. Blossom Hill Wines continue to outperform
in the branded wine segment, as both red and white Blossom Hill blends are now
the top selling wines in Great Britain.
Other business performance drivers:
• Increased share of the spirits market
• On trade decline
• Retailer/pub consolidation
• Reduced marketing due to lower level of new product launches
Diageo increased its share of the spirits category by 0.6 percentage points and
Diageo brands outperformed the gin, vodka, liqueur and wine categories in the
off trade over the important Christmas trading period. However as the off trade
continues to grow its share of the beverage alcohol market and with the trend
towards retailer and on trade consolidation, pressure on margins has increased.
Marketing investment decreased by 5% due to lower spend on new product
introductions which declined by £11 million.
Ireland
Key measures: Reported Organic
2003 2002 movement movement
£ million £ million % %
Volume (6) (6)
Turnover 542 522 4 (4)
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) 360 350 3 (5)
Marketing 43 38 13 5
Operating profit before exceptional items 75 83 (10) (17)
Reported performance:
In Ireland, turnover increased on a reported basis, from £522 million in the six
months ended 31 December 2002 to £542 million in the six months ended 31
December 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items was down from £83
million to £75 million.
Organic performance:
Although reported turnover was up £20 million, the main driver of this was the
strength of the euro, which had a beneficial impact of £41 million. The
weighted average exchange rate used for translation strengthened from £1 = €1.57
for the six months ended 31 December 2002 to £1 = €1.43 for the six months ended
31 December 2003. Underlying weakness in brand performance reduced turnover by
£21 million.
A similar trend can be seen for operating profit before exceptional items, where
the strength of the euro had a £7 million positive impact, offset by declining
performance of continuing brands of £15 million.
Organic brand performance: Volume Net sales*
movement movement
% %
Guinness (7) (3)
Smirnoff (12) (21)
Baileys (17) (19)
Total global priority brands (9) (8)
Local priority brands (3) (1)
Category brands 3 (4)
Total (6) (5)
* after deducting excise duties
The beverage alcohol market in Ireland declined by 4% in the period, impacted by
uncertainty in the general economic climate. In addition, there continues to be
a marked switch from on to off trade channels. The on trade declined 8% and the
off trade grew 3%, which negatively impacted Diageo's share by 1 percentage
point.
The impact of the price increase introduced in March 2003 has partially offset
the impact of the volume decline on net sales (after deducting excise duties).
Guinness' share of the long alcoholic drinks segment, which had stabilised in
the year ended 30 June 2003, declined 1.5 percentage points in the latest
period. Net sales (after deducting excise duties) fell by 3% reflecting some
benefit from price increases of 3% introduced in March 2003.
The decline in spirits and ready to drink volume reflects the impact of the
excise duty increase of over 40% in spirits and nearly 100% in ready to drink in
December 2002. Diageo has gained 1.7 percentage points share of spirits but has
lost some share of the ready to drink market as focus has been on driving value
rather than volume.
Volume of local priority brands Budweiser, Carlsberg, Harp and Smithwicks
declined by 3% where Diageo has lost share to lower priced competitors in the
off trade. Category brands grew by 3% principally driven by growth in agency
brands. Wine volume declined by 8%, however net sales (after deducting excise
duties) of wine grew by 3% as Diageo focused on value maximisation.
Other business performance drivers:
• Implementation of a reorganisation to reduce costs and improve
effectiveness
• Investment behind the brands with marketing up in the period
In response to the further decline in the beverage alcohol market in Ireland,
Diageo has taken steps to address the current operating profit pressures by the
introduction of a new operating model which is more consumer focused and
delivers an improved cost base. The cost of implementing this restructuring
adversely impacted operating profit in the period by £11 million. Investment in
marketing grew by 5% in the period as Diageo continued to invest behind the
priority brands despite the overall decline in the market.
Spain
Key measures: Reported Organic
2003 2002 movement movement
£ million £ million % %
Volume 4 4
Turnover 270 233 16 6
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) 203 175 16 6
Marketing 44 39 13 -
Operating profit before exceptional items 69 60 15 6
Reported performance:
Spain reported turnover of £270 million in the six months ended 31 December
2003, up 16% against the £233 million reported in the prior period. Reported
operating profit before exceptional items was up £9 million (15%) from £60
million in the six months ended 31 December 2002 to £69 million in the current
period.
Organic performance:
Favourable exchange rate variances due to the strength of the euro positively
impacted reported turnover by £23 million. There was a £2 million adverse
impact from the loss of the distribution rights to Lagunilla wines in January
2003. Organic growth of brands owned throughout this and the comparable period
contributed £16 million.
Operating profit before exceptional items increased £9 million from the £60
million reported for the six months ended 31 December 2002. This improvement
was the result of the strong euro, £5 million, and growth of continuing brands,
£4 million.
Organic brand performance: Volume Net sales*
movement movement
% %
J&B 1 (3)
Baileys 2 5
Johnnie Walker 15 15
Smirnoff 4 (2)
Total global priority brands 4 1
Local priority brands 14 15
Category brands (5) 7
Total 4 6
* after deducting excise duties
The performance in Spain was driven by volume growth from global and local
priority brands.
While the scotch category in Spain has shown a further marginal decline, J&B
volume was up and J&B gained share. However, there has been price discounting
in the category and J&B has responded. Hence net sales (after deducting excise
duties) declined. The performance of J&B Twist has been disappointing and the
brand has now been withdrawn from the market.
Volume of other major global priority brands in Spain, Johnnie Walker Red Label,
Smirnoff and Baileys all grew. Johnnie Walker Red Label and Baileys grew share.
However, Smirnoff has lost some share of the on trade channel.
Local priority brand performance was driven by the strong performance of both
Cacique, where volume was up 15% and share gains continued, and Cardhu where
volume was up 5%.
Category brands declined by 5% as distribution arrangements for Bell's and
Dimple were restructured.
Other business performance drivers:
• Changing Spanish consumer drinking habits
• Growth of the dark rum segment
• Lower level of new product introductions led to level marketing spend
The drinking habits of the Spanish consumer are changing. There has been a
reduction in on premise consumption of spirits while the dark rum segment, of
which Diageo has a 43% share, is growing strongly.
Despite spending £5 million less than the prior period on J&B Twist, marketing
investment was level.
Key markets
Reported Organic
Key measures: 2003* 2002** movement movement
£ million £ million % %
Volume 6 4
Turnover 1,286 1,136 13 6
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) 1,012 884 14 8
Marketing 161 115 40 18
Operating profit before exceptional items 306 309 (1) 1
* including Germany, excluding Portugal ** including Portugal, excluding
Germany
Reported performance:
Reported turnover in the six months ended 31 December 2003 was £1,286 million,
up 13% on the prior period figure of £1,136 million. Operating profit before
exceptional items was down 1% at £306 million for the six months ended 31
December 2003.
Organic performance:
Turnover in key markets was up £150 million compared with the six months ended
31 December 2002. There were favourable exchange gains of £34 million,
principally on the euro and the Australian dollar, and a £68 million improvement
in the performance of brands owned throughout this and the comparable period.
In addition, Germany has been transferred into key markets from venture markets,
and Portugal has been transferred out of key markets into venture markets. This
change has had a beneficial impact of £62 million on key markets' turnover. The
sale of 50% of Don Julio in January 2003 (which has since been accounted for as
an associate) has negatively impacted turnover by £14 million.
There has been a £3 million decline in operating profit before exceptional
items. This was due to unfavourable exchange rate movements of £6 million,
(including exchange controls imposed against the Venezuelan bolivar) and the Don
Julio disposal of £7 million, offset by the beneficial impact of replacing
Portugal with Germany in the key markets' structure of £8 million, and organic
improvement of the brands, £2 million.
Organic brand performance: Volume Net sales*
movement movement
% %
Johnnie Walker 11 12
Guinness 14 18
J&B (10) (8)
Smirnoff 3 (1)
Baileys 8 9
Total global priority brands 6 8
Local priority brands 3 22
Category brands (1) (2)
Total 4 8
* after deducting excise duties
The strong performance of the global priority brands in key markets was driven
by Guinness in Africa, growth in Johnnie Walker Red Label in Latin America and
Australia, and growth in Johnnie Walker Black Label in Global Duty Free, Taiwan
and Thailand.
The performance of local priority brands benefited from bringing the
distribution of Dimple in-house in South Korea. There were no sales of Dimple
in the prior period as distribution arrangements for the brand were
restructured. Local priority brand volume excluding Dimple was level. Strong
performances of Malta Guinness in Africa, volume up 22%, and Bundaberg in
Australia, volume up 12%, offset declines of Windsor Premier in South Korea and
of premium lager brands in Kenya.
Category brand volume was down 1%, as the decline of VAT 69 was partially offset
by the performance of brands such as Cacique in Venezuela.
Ready to drink volume grew 4%, with strong performance in Australia and the
continuing benefit of the launch of Smirnoff ready to drink in May 2003 in
France offset weakness in Germany and Southern Africa.
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) grew 8% reflecting price increases
achieved on Guinness and Malta Guinness in Africa. Marketing investment
increased 18% driven by investment in Australia behind Bundaberg's sponsorship
of the Rugby World Cup, the reintroduction of Dimple in South Korea, Guinness in
Africa and ready to drink launches in Japan and France.
Other business performance drivers:
• Strong performance in Africa
• Improved performance in Latin America
• Strong volume growth in Australia
• Weakening scotch market in South Korea
• Weakening trading environment in Western Europe
Overall volume in Africa grew 5% with Guinness volume up 15%. The key drivers
of the strong performance were the growth of Guinness in Nigeria where it has
held share in the growing beer market, Malta Guinness, with volume up 22% across
the region, and Johnnie Walker, volume up 8% as the brand benefited from the
group's 'everyday heroes' advertising being tailored for the African market.
The volume of premium lager brands in Kenya declined 15% as the worsening
economic situation there has led to a decline in the alcohol market. Net sales
(after deducting excise duties) grew 13% due to price increases being achieved
in Ghana and Kenya, together with market mix benefits as a greater proportion of
Guinness was sold in Nigeria. Marketing investment grew by 16% with greater
investment in Ghana behind the launch of Guinness Extra Smooth, the Guinness
brand in Nigeria and Cameroon, and Johnnie Walker. Additional production
capacity was installed in December in Ghana and there are plans to create
additional capacity in Nigeria to take advantage of the strong beer market
there. Route-to-market initiatives already implemented to drive distribution of
Malta Guinness in Cameroon are now being rolled out in Nigeria.
Volume in Latin America grew 9% and overall profitability increased as the
region benefited from more stable foreign exchange rates. Against this improved
economic environment, Johnnie Walker Red Label volume was up 28% in Brazil,
Paraguay and Uruguay. The brand gained share and now has a 50% share of the
standard scotch segment in these markets. In Venezuela, volume grew by 28%
driven by Cacique, Johnnie Walker Black label and Buchanan's. Marketing
investment across Latin America grew by 34% as marketing investment in the
region is rebuilt.
Volume in South Korea grew by 1% benefiting from sales of Dimple. Lack of
promotional activity on Dimple in the prior period as distribution was
restructured had a negative impact on volume. Increased marketing investment,
new packaging and route to market initiatives are being implemented to address
the position. The whisky category in South Korea declined by 18%, impacted by
weak economic conditions. However, volume of Windsor Premier, the leading
scotch whisky, declined by only 8% and therefore share improved.
In Asia, volume in Taiwan grew 37% due to the Chinese New Year falling earlier
in the year and buying ahead of a price increase implemented in January 2004.
Volume in Thailand grew 8%, however the market there is very price competitive
and net sales (after deducting excise duties) declined by 6%. Volume in Japan
declined by 9% as growth in Smirnoff, excluding ready to drink volume, up 4%,
was offset by a decline in Johnnie Walker volume, down 8%. The scotch category
declined by 13% and therefore Johnnie Walker gained some share. Smirnoff ready
to drink volume was negatively impacted by the stock build ahead of the launch
in May 2003, however distribution continues to build.
Volume in Global Duty Free grew 5% with growth in Johnnie Walker, Smirnoff and
Baileys. The Diageo Global Duty Free business benefited from a number of
programmes, including improved retail stores formats and initiatives to drive
growth in the premium sector.
In Australia, Diageo grew share in a flat spirits segment by 3 percentage points
as volume grew 7%. Johnnie Walker Red Label grew share with volume up 12%.
Baileys volume grew 32%. Bundaberg Rum's sponsorship of the Rugby World Cup
created tremendous exposure for the brand and volume grew 12%. The ready to
drink segment grew 14% and Diageo increased share to 32%.
In the Western European key markets, the economic environment has made trading
challenging. Volume in France declined 6% as the continuing weakness of the
beverage alcohol market there offset the benefit of the launch of Smirnoff ready
to drink in May 2003. Volume in Germany fell 18%, mainly due to the steep
decline in sales of Smirnoff ready to drink where volume declined 48%. The
ready to drink segment in Germany has been negatively impacted by the growth of
aggressively discounted own label and secondary ready to drink brands. Volume in
Greece grew 3% and share was maintained. Volume excluding ready to drink grew
4% driven by Johnnie Walker, which grew share with volume up 7%. Diageo grew
share of ready to drink but volume declined 23% as the segment was impacted in
part by lower levels of tourism.
Venture markets
Key measures: Reported Organic
2003* 2002** movement movement
£ million £ million % %
Volume (3) 6
Turnover 650 670 (3) 9
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) 508 527 (4) 8
Marketing 82 88 (7) 12
Operating profit before exceptional items 165 163 1 8
* including Portugal, excluding Germany ** including Germany, excluding
Portugal
Reported performance:
Reported turnover was £650 million in the six months ended 31 December 2003,
down 3% from £670 million in the prior period. Operating profit before
exceptional items improved by 1%, £2 million, to £165 million in the six months
ended 31 December 2003.
Organic performance:
The main factor in the fall in venture markets' turnover in the six months ended
31 December 2003 was the transfer of Germany out of venture markets into key
markets, to be replaced with Portugal. This reduced turnover by £62 million.
The disposals of Gilbey's Green and White Whisky in India (December 2002) and
Fernet Branca wines in Switzerland (December 2002) reduced turnover by £10
million. However, strong organic performance of the brands, up £52 million,
meant that overall, venture markets' turnover was only down £20 million, after
the impact of the Germany/Portugal transfer.
The £2 million increase in operating profit before exceptional items was the
result of improved performances in the underlying brands of £12 million in the
six months ended 31 December 2003 compared with the prior period partly offset
by £8 million arising on the Germany/Portugal transfer, adverse exchange rate
movements of £1 million and disposals of £1 million.
Organic brand performance: Volume Net sales*
movement movement
% %
Johnnie Walker 8 10
Smirnoff 11 9
Guinness 2 8
Baileys 10 7
J&B 2 2
Total global priority brands 7 8
Local priority brands (24) 6
Category brands 5 6
Total 6 8
* after deducting excise duties
Venture market's volume growth reflected the continued strong performance of
global priority brands and improved performance of category brands.
Johnnie Walker volume grew 8%. Johnnie Walker Black Label and Super Deluxe
volume was up 4% and Johnnie Walker Red Label grew 10% driven by strong
performances in the Middle East, India, Russia and Latin American venture
markets.
Smirnoff growth was led by the strong performance in the Middle East and Latin
American venture markets. Poland, the largest Smirnoff venture market, grew
volume against a low prior period comparative when there were limited sales in
the first quarter ahead of a reduction in duty in September 2002.
Guinness volume increased by 2%. Malaysia continues to deliver strong growth
behind the launch of a new can format and increased sales focus. There was also
some benefit due to the earlier timing of the Chinese New Year. Performance in
Indonesia continues to be impacted by political and economic instability. Price
increases introduced in Malaysia and Jamaica delivered mix benefits.
Baileys volume grew by 10%, driven by investment behind visibility and rate of
sale campaigns in the venture markets of Chile, Peru and Puerto Rico.
Volume of Red Stripe in Jamaica, venture markets' local priority brand, was down
24%. Volume has been impacted by worsening economic conditions and the price
and duty increases that took place in the second half of the last financial
year, although the volume decline lessened through the period.
The improvement in category brand volume performance was driven by strong growth
of Tiger and Heineken beers in Malaysia, wines in Argentina, rums in Chile and
secondary scotches in the Latin American and Caribbean markets.
Overall ready to drink volume declined by 13% versus the comparative period in
the prior year. Smirnoff ready to drink volume growth of 10%, which was mainly
due to the benefit of new market launches in 2003, was offset by a decline in
Gilbey's Island Punch in the Philippines which was discontinued in January 2004.
Switzerland and Norway increased taxes on ready to drink products in early 2004.
Marketing investment was up 12% mainly behind Johnnie Walker, Guinness and ready
to drink launches in Italy, Nordics, Caribbean and Latin America.
Other business performance drivers:
• Strong growth in the Middle East, Asia and Latin America
• Mixed performance across Europe
Middle East markets performed strongly as a result of good performance across
the brands with volume up 19%, benefiting from the growth of global priority
brands particularly in the Lebanon.
In the venture markets across Asia, overall volume grew by 5%. In India, the
sale of the Gilbey's Green and White whisky in December 2002 has resulted in
increased focus on the global priority brands. Parts of the region such as
Malaysia, Singapore and China are seeing recovery post SARS, though the
potential for further outbreaks remains a concern and trading in the Philippines
and Indonesia remains challenging.
In European venture markets, the Nordics have performed strongly and have been
bolstered by tax cuts in Denmark in October. Elsewhere the weakening economic
environment has impacted performance.
In Latin America and Caribbean markets, volume grew by 25% with growth across
the brands, in particular Baileys and category brands. The political and
economic climate in the region is still volatile, however the United States
economic recovery should have a positive impact in the months to come.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Exchange rates
Exchange rate movements during the six month period adversely impacted profit
before exceptional items and taxation by £14 million of which £38 million was in
respect of the US dollar, largely offset by a £34 million benefit on the euro.
This includes translation exchange only in respect of the profits of associates.
The adverse impact on group operating profit was £20 million, offset by a
beneficial impact on finance charges of £6 million.
Based on current exchange rates, it is expected that the full year equivalent
adverse impact of exchange rate movements (translation exchange only on reported
share of profits of associates) on profit before exceptional items and taxation
will be approximately £95 million. Similarly, based on current exchange rates,
the full year impact of adverse exchange rate movements on profit before
exceptional items and taxation for the financial year ending 30 June 2005 is
estimated to be £75 million.
The group currently has net transaction hedges for US dollars in place which
settle in the year ending 30 June 2004 to sell £435 million of US dollars and
which settle in the year ending 30 June 2005 to sell £439 million of US dollars.
Where these hedges are against sterling they are at an average rate of £1 =
$1.53 for the year ending 30 June 2004 and £1 = $1.59 for the year ending 30
June 2005.
The group currently has net transaction hedges for euros in place which settle
in the year ending 30 June 2004 to buy £51 million of euros and which settle in
the year ending 30 June 2005 to buy £141 million of euros. Where these hedges
are against sterling they are at an average rate of £1 = €1.54 for the year
ending 30 June 2004 and £1 = €1.41 for the year ending 30 June 2005.
Post employment plans
The application of FRS 17 resulted in a charge to operating profit of £54
million (2002 - £51 million) and other finance charges of £8 million (2002 -
credit of £18 million). The figures for the six months ended 31 December 2002
have been restated onto a FRS 17 basis. At 31 January 2004 Diageo's deficit
before taxation for all post employment plans was estimated at approximately
£1.1 billion (30 June 2003 - £1.4 billion). This improvement in the level of the
deficit reflects the partial recovery in equity markets subsequent to 30 June
2003. However, changes in the valuation subsequent to 30 June 2003 are not
included in the balance sheet until 30 June 2004.
Associates
The group's share of profits of associates before exceptional items was £273
million for the period compared to £266 million for the same period last year.
The 21% equity interest in General Mills contributed £153 million (2002 - £157
million). The equity interest in General Mills, in the six months ended 31
December 2003, contributed £120 million to profit after interest but before tax
and exceptional items (2002 - £119 million). Diageo's 34% equity interest in
Moet Hennessy contributed £110 million to operating profit (2002 - £103
million).
Exceptional items
Exceptional items in the six month period amounted to a net charge before
taxation of £38 million comprising Seagram integration costs of £19 million, a
share of associates' exceptional charges of £11 million and a net loss on
disposals of fixed assets of £8 million, principally in respect of the dilution
of the investment in General Mills through the issue of share options.
In the six month period, £19 million was incurred in respect of the integration
of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses, acquired in December 2001 (year
ended 30 June 2003 - £177 million; year ended 30 June 2002 - £164 million).
Approximately £7 million of these costs were employee related, £3 million were
in respect of write-downs of assets, and the balance of £9 million included
legal and professional and systems costs. The majority of these costs were
incurred in North America.
Finance charges
The interest charge in the period was £146 million, compared with £207 million
for the comparable period last year. The decrease is principally in respect of
£11 million arising from the disposal of businesses and £32 million from the
effect of reducing interest rates, partly offset by the funding of the share
repurchases, £7 million, and dividends, £10 million.
Other finance charges have increased by £22 million, principally as a result of
charges of £8 million in respect of the group's post employment plans in the six
months ended 31 December 2003 compared to income of £18 million in the six
months ended 31 December 2002. The adverse movement principally reflects the
decline in the values of the assets held by the post employment plans between 30
June 2002 and 30 June 2003.
Taxation
The effective rate of taxation on profit before exceptional items for the period
was 25%, compared with 25.4% for the six months ended 31 December 2002, restated
from the originally reported 25% following compliance with the new accounting
pronouncements for post employment plans and share trusts. The charge for the
six months ended 31 December 2003 is based on an estimate of the effective tax
rate for the financial year as a whole.
Dividend
Diageo will pay an interim dividend of 10.6 pence per share on 6 April 2004, an
increase of 7% on last year's interim dividend. Payment to US ADR holders will
be made 13 April 2004. The record date for this dividend will be 5 March 2004.
A dividend reinvestment plan is available in respect of this dividend and the
plan notice date will be 15 March 2004.
Cash flow
Summary cash flow statement
2003 2002
(restated)
£ million £ million
Operating profit 1,162 1,100
Exceptional operating costs 19 104
Restructuring and integration cash outflow (52) (99)
Depreciation and other amortisation 110 138
Increase in working capital (321) (540)
Other items 53 51
Operating cash inflow 971 754
Interest and dividends paid to equity minority interests (162) (212)
Dividends from associates 90 30
Taxation (179) (15)
Net purchase of investments (5) (16)
Net capital expenditure (95) (178)
Free cash flow 620 363
Free cash inflow was £620 million, compared with £363 million in the six months
ended 31 December 2002 (restated following the adoption of UITF 38, whereby
shares purchased and sold by the share trusts no longer form part of 'capital
expenditure and financial investment'). Cash inflow from operating activities
was £971 million compared with £754 million in the comparable period.
Discontinued operations contributed £76 million to cash inflow from operating
activities in the six months ended 31 December 2002. Cash flow from operating
activities was after £52 million of restructuring and integration payments and a
£321 million increase in working capital, mainly due to seasonal factors.
Net interest payments were £140 million against £200 million in the comparable
period. Purchases of tangible fixed assets in the period amounted to £110
million, a decrease of £89 million. Tax payments were £179 million compared to
£15 million in the six months ended 31 December 2002.
In the six months ended 31 December 2003, Diageo repurchased for cancellation 36
million shares (2002 - 71 million shares) at a cost of £256 million (2002 - £552
million) and spent a net cost of £16 million (2002 - £62 million) on the
purchase of shares for the employee share trusts.
Balance sheet
At 31 December 2003, total shareholders' funds were £2,992 million compared with
£2,801 million at 30 June 2003. The increase was mainly due to the £571 million
retained income for the period, less £272 million for the repurchase of own
shares. Total shareholders' funds at 30 June 2003 were restated from £4,954
million to £2,801 million following the adoption of FRS 17 - Retirement benefits
and UITF 38 - Accounting for ESOP trusts on 1 July 2003. The net deficit for
post employment plans (net of deferred tax) is now disclosed as a separate line
on the balance sheet and all prior period balance sheets have been restated.
Net borrowings were £4,705 million, a decrease of £165 million from 30 June
2003. The principal components of this decrease were free cash inflow of £620
million and the benefits from favourable exchange rate movements of £295
million, less £272 million on the repurchase of shares and a £480 million equity
dividend payment.
DIAGEO CONSOLIDATED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2003 31 December 2002
Before
Before exceptional Exceptional
exceptional Exceptional items items Total
items items Total (restated) (restated) (restated)
£ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million
Turnover
Continuing operations 5,060 - 5,060 4,854 - 4,854
Discontinued operations - - - 479 - 479
Total turnover 5,060 - 5,060 5,333 - 5,333
Operating costs (3,879) (19) (3,898) (4,129) (104) (4,233)
Operating profit
Continuing operations 1,181 (19) 1,162 1,151 (104) 1,047
Discontinued operations - - - 53 - 53
Operating profit 1,181 (19) 1,162 1,204 (104) 1,100
Share of associates' profits 273 (11) 262 266 (15) 251
1,454 (30) 1,424 1,470 (119) 1,351
Disposal of fixed assets (8) (8) (3) (3)
Sale of businesses - - (1,360) (1,360)
Interest payable (net) (146) - (146) (207) - (207)
Other finance (charges)/
income (11) - (11) 11 - 11
Profit/(loss) before
taxation 1,297 (38) 1,259 1,274 (1,482) (208)
Taxation (324) 6 (318) (324) 118 (206)
Profit/(loss) after taxation 973 (32) 941 950 (1,364) (414)
Minority interests
Equity (34) - (34) (28) - (28)
Non-equity (16) - (16) (17) - (17)
Profit/(loss) for the period 923 (32) 891 905 (1,364) (459)
Interim dividend (320) - (320) (304) - (304)
Transferred to/(from)
reserves 603 (32) 571 601 (1,364) (763)
Pence per share
Basic earnings 30.3p (1.0)p 29.3p 28.8p (43.4)p (14.6)p
Diluted earnings 30.3p (1.0)p 29.3p 28.8p (43.4)p (14.6)p
Interim dividend 10.6p - 10.6p 9.9p - 9.9p
Average shares 3,043m 3,143m
DIAGEO CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
30 June 2003 31 December 2002
31 December 2003 (restated) (restated)
£ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million
Fixed assets
Intangible assets 4,066 4,288 4,496
Tangible assets 1,928 1,974 1,916
Investments in associates 2,882 2,915 2,810
Other investments 186 188 183
9,062 9,365 9,405
Current assets
Stocks 2,162 2,250 2,296
Debtors 2,796 2,382 3,000
Cash at bank and liquid resources 1,304 1,191 1,360
6,262 5,823 6,656
Creditors - due within one year
Borrowings (2,986) (3,563) (3,521)
Other creditors (3,297) (3,283) (3,461)
(6,283) (6,846) (6,982)
Net current liabilities (21) (1,023) (326)
Total assets less current liabilities 9,041 8,342 9,079
Creditors - due after one year
Borrowings (3,469) (2,981) (3,463)
Other creditors (45) (18) (62)
(3,514) (2,999) (3,525)
Provisions for liabilities and charges (632) (648) (556)
4,895 4,695 4,998
Post employment liabilities (net of
deferred tax)
(1,412) (1,369) (277)
Net assets 3,483 3,326 4,721
Capital and reserves
Called up share capital 886 897 910
Reserves 2,106 1,904 3,278
Shareholders' funds 2,992 2,801 4,188
Minority interests
Equity 175 182 183
Non-equity 316 343 350
491 525 533
3,483 3,326 4,721
DIAGEO CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
Six months ended
Six months ended 31 December 2002
31 December 2003 (restated)
£ million £ million £ million £ million
Net cash inflow from operating activities 971 754
Dividends received from associates 90 30
Returns on investments and servicing of finance
Interest paid (net) (140) (200)
Dividends paid to equity minority interests (22) (12)
(162) (212)
Taxation (179) (15)
Capital expenditure and financial investment
Purchase of tangible fixed assets (110) (199)
Net purchase of investments (5) (16)
Sale of tangible fixed assets 15 21
(100) (194)
Acquisitions and disposals
Purchase of subsidiaries (13) (109)
Sale of subsidiaries 5 745
Sale of options in relation to associates - 58
(8) 694
Equity dividends paid (480) (459)
Management of liquid resources (218) 237
Financing
Issue of share capital 1 1
Net purchase of own shares for share trusts (16) (62)
Own shares purchased for cancellation (256) (552)
Increase/(decrease) in loans 269 (93)
(2) (706)
(Decrease)/increase in cash in the period (88) 129
MOVEMENTS IN NET BORROWINGS
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2003 31 December 2002
£ million £ million
(Decrease)/increase in cash in the period (88) 129
Cash flow from change in loans (269) 93
Change in liquid resources 218 (237)
Change in net borrowings from cash flows (139) (15)
Exchange adjustments 295 241
Non-cash items 9 11
Decrease in net borrowings 165 237
Net borrowings at beginning of the period (4,870) (5,496)
Net borrowings at end of the period (4,705) (5,259)
DIAGEO CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
TOTAL RECOGNISED GAINS AND LOSSES
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2003 31 December 2002
(restated)
£ million £ million
Profit/(loss) for the period - group 711 (588)
- associates 180 129
891 (459)
Exchange adjustments - group 10 (45)
- associates (123) (96)
Tax (charge)/income in reserves (7) 2
Total recognised gains and losses for the period 771 (598)
Prior year adjustment - adoption of FRS 17 and UITF 38 (1,849)
Total recognised gains and losses since the last annual report (1,078)
NOTES
1. New accounting policies
The group has adopted the reporting requirements of FRS 17 - Retirement benefits
in its primary financial statements from 1 July 2003. In prior years, the group
complied with the transitional disclosure requirements of the standard. The
financial information included in this interim statement also complies with the
following requirements issued by the UK's Accounting Standards Board: Abstract
38 - Accounting for ESOP trusts and the amendment to FRS 5 - Reporting the
substance of transactions.
FRS 17 - Retirement benefits. This standard replaces the use of the actuarial
values for assets in a pension scheme in favour of a market-based approach. In
order to cope with the volatility inherent in this measurement basis, the
standard requires that the profit and loss account shows the relatively stable
ongoing service cost, finance charge and expected return on assets. Differences
between expected and actual returns, and changes in actuarial assumptions, are
reflected in the statement of total recognised gains and losses.
The adoption of FRS 17 has decreased the reported operating profit for the six
months ended 31 December 2002 by £42 million. This charge has been offset by a
decrease in exceptional charges of £18 million, an increase in other finance
income of £18 million and a decrease in the tax charge of £2 million, giving a
net increase in the loss for the period of £4 million. In addition, the adoption
of the standard has reduced net assets at 30 June 2003 by £1,869 million (31
December 2002 - £735 million).
UITF 38 - Accounting for ESOP trusts. This abstract changes the presentation of
an entity's own shares held in an employee share trust from requiring them to be
recognised as assets to requiring them to be deducted in arriving at
shareholders' funds. It also requires that the minimum expense to the profit
and loss account should be the difference between the fair value of the shares
at the date of award and the amount that an employee may be required to pay for
the shares (i.e. the 'intrinsic value' of the award).
The impact of the adoption of UITF 38 in the six months ended 31 December 2002
has been to increase operating profit by £6 million and increase the tax charge
by £2 million. The reclassification of shares acquired by the share trust
(treasury shares) from fixed assets and debtors to equity has reduced net assets
by £288 million at 30 June 2003 (31 December 2002 - £301 million). In addition,
the net cash outflow arising from the purchase of shares by the share trusts has
been reclassified from 'capital expenditure and financial investment' to '
financing'. This reclassification increases free cash flow for the six months
ended 31 December 2002 by £62 million.
FRS 5 - Reporting the substance of transactions. The amendment to the standard
added a new application note (G) on revenue recognition. This requires that
revenue should be stated at fair value of the right to consideration. Diageo
incurs certain promotional expenditure (for example, slotting fees, whereby fees
are paid to retailers for prominence of display, listing or agreement not to
delist Diageo's products) that is not wholly independent of the invoiced product
price. Such expenditure is now deducted from turnover. The change, which has no
impact on operating profit, reduced turnover and operating costs by £95 million
in the six months ended 31 December 2002.
All appropriate primary statements and notes supporting the financial
information have been restated.
2. Segmental analysis
2003 2002
Operating profit Turnover Operating profit
Turnover (restated) (restated)
£ million £ million £ million £ million
Class of business:
Premium drinks 5,060 1,181 4,854 1,151
Discontinued operations - - 479 53
5,060 1,181 5,333 1,204
Geographical analysis by destination:
Great Britain 847 150 872 140
Rest of Europe 1,432 275 1,422 282
North America 1,481 424 1,812 445
Asia Pacific 571 132 533 126
Latin America 293 94 314 111
Rest of World 436 106 380 100
5,060 1,181 5,333 1,204
Operating profit is after deducting goodwill amortisation of £1 million (2002 -
£3 million, of which £2 million was in respect of discontinued operations). It
is before exceptional operating items of £19 million (2002 - £104 million). The
geographical analysis is based on the location of the third party customers.
The discontinued operations comprise quick service restaurants (Burger King).
2003 2002
(restated)
£ million £ million
Net assets by class of business:
Premium drinks 8,035 8,511
Investments in associates 2,882 2,810
Post employment liabilities (net of deferred tax) (1,412) (277)
Net borrowings (4,705) (5,259)
Tax, dividends and other (1,317) (1,064)
3,483 4,721
Net assets by geographical area*:
Europe 3,916 4,049
North America 2,943 3,266
Asia Pacific 815 816
Latin America 118 173
Rest of World 243 207
8,035 8,511
* excluding investments in associates, post employment liabilities, net
borrowings, tax, dividends and other.
Weighted average exchange rates used in the translation of profit and loss
accounts were US dollar - £1 = $1.65 (2002 - £1 = $1.55) and euro - £1 = €1.43
(2002 - £1 = €1.57). Exchange rates used to translate assets and liabilities at
the balance sheet date were US dollar - £1 = $1.79 (2002 - £1 = $1. 61) and euro
- £1 = €1.42 (2002 - £1 = €1. 53). The group uses foreign exchange transaction
hedges to mitigate the effect of exchange rate movements.
3. Exceptional items
2003 2002
(restated)
£ million £ million £ million £ million
Operating costs
Seagram integration (19) (89)
Guinness UDV integration - (15)
(19) (104)
Associates (11) (15)
Disposal of fixed assets (8) (3)
Sale of businesses
Continuing operations
Premium drinks brands - 16
Discontinued operations
Burger King - (1,383)
The Pillsbury Company - 7
- (1,360)
(38) (1,482)
4. Taxation
The £318 million total taxation charge for the six months ended 31 December 2003
comprises a UK tax charge of £17 million, a foreign tax charge of £251 million
and tax on associates of £50 million.
5. Note of historical cost profit and losses
There is no material difference between the reported profit shown in the
consolidated profit and loss account and the profit for the relevant years
restated on an historical cost basis.
6. Movements in consolidated shareholders' funds
2002
2003 (restated)
£ million £ million
Profit/(loss) for the period 891 (459)
Dividends (320) (304)
571 (763)
Exchange adjustments (113) (141)
Tax (charge)/income on exchange in reserves (7) 2
Share trust arrangements (14) (63)
New share capital issued 1 1
Purchase of own shares for cancellation (256) (552)
Goodwill on disposals of businesses 9 675
Net movement in shareholders' funds 191 (841)
Shareholders' funds at beginning of the period 2,801 5,029
Shareholders' funds at end of the period 2,992 4,188
7. Net borrowings
31 December 2003 30 June 2003 31 December 2002
£ million £ million £ million
Debt due within one year and overdrafts (2,986) (3,563) (3,521)
Debt due after one year (3,469) (2,981) (3,463)
Net obligations under finance leases - (1) -
(6,455) (6,545) (6,984)
Less: Cash at bank and liquid resources 1,304 1,191 1,360
Interest rate and foreign currency swaps 446 484 365
Net borrowings (4,705) (4,870) (5,259)
8. Stocks
30 June 31 December
31 December 2003 2002
2003 (restated) (restated)
£ million £ million £ million
Raw materials and consumables 208 200 201
Work in progress 17 14 11
Maturing stocks 1,447 1,466 1,510
Finished goods and goods for resale 490 570 574
2,162 2,250 2,296
9. Net cash inflow from operating activities
2002
2003 (restated)
£ million £ million
Operating profit 1,162 1,100
Exceptional operating costs 19 104
Restructuring and integration payments (52) (99)
Depreciation and amortisation charge 110 138
Increase in working capital (321) (540)
Other items 53 51
Net cash inflow from operating activities 971 754
10. Contingent liabilities
(i) Guarantees. In connection with the disposal of the quick service restaurants
business, Diageo has guaranteed up to $850 million (£475 million) of external
borrowings of Burger King until December 2007. These loans had an original term
of five years although Diageo and Burger King agreed to structure their
arrangements to encourage refinancing by Burger King on a non-guaranteed basis
prior to the end of five years. In connection with the disposal of Pillsbury,
Diageo has guaranteed the debt of a third party to the amount of $200 million
(£112 million) until 13 November 2009.
Including these guarantees, but net of the amount provided, the group has given
performance guarantees and indemnities to third parties of £606 million. There
has been no material change since 30 June 2003 in the group's performance
guarantees and indemnities.
(ii) Colombian excise duties. In August 2000, Diageo learned that the
Governors of the Departments of the Republic of Colombia and the City of Bogota
(the 'Departments') were considering initiating legal proceedings against major
spirits companies in relation to unpaid excise duties and taxes on products that
are smuggled into Colombia by third parties. Such proceedings are expected to
be similar to actions that have been brought in recent years by foreign
governments, including the Departments, against a number of major tobacco
companies. Specifically, there have been four such actions filed against
various tobacco companies. Three of the four actions have been dismissed. The
fourth has yet to proceed to the stage where motions to dismiss are filed. It
remains the directors' intent that any proceedings of this kind that might be
brought against Diageo will be strenuously defended.
(iii) Hakki versus Zima Company, et al and related cases. Diageo plc and
Diageo North America have been named as defendants in three purported class
action lawsuits. The first Hakki versus Zima, et al, was commenced against a
number of alcohol beverage companies on 14 November 2003 in the Superior Court
of Washington, D.C. The complaint asserts claims under the District of Columbia
Consumer Protection Procedures Act (DCCPPA) and the common law of the District
of Columbia that the defendants specifically targeted the US advertising and
marketing of certain of their products to individuals below the 21 year old
legal drinking age. The complaint alleges that 'at least 15-20% of all
alcoholic beverages sold in the United States are consumed by underage
drinkers'. The complaint further alleges that profits earned by the defendants
from the alleged illegal sales to underage drinkers 'greatly exceed $1 billion
per year'.
The lawsuit seeks certification as a class action on behalf of (a) parents and
guardians whose funds were used by their children under 21 from 1982 to the
present without their knowledge to purchase alcohol beverages marketed by the
defendants, on whose behalf monetary recovery is sought and (b) the parents and
guardians of all children under 21, on whose behalf the complaint requests that
the Court enter an injunction prohibiting the defendants from marketing alcohol
beverages to underage persons.
The prayer for relief in the complaint seeks, among other matters, (a) that
defendants each disgorge to the purported class all amounts by which they have
been allegedly unjustly enriched, plus costs and interest; (2) rescission of the
alleged transactions whereby defendants allegedly obtained revenues from the
illegal sale of alcoholic beverages to underage consumers and ordered to pay
such monies to the purported class; and (3) to assess all defendants jointly and
severally for all alleged actual damages sustained by the purported plaintiff
class plus treble damages or $1,500 per violation, whichever is greater,
punitive damages, attorneys fees, costs of suit and interest.
Since the filing of the Hakki lawsuit, two similar cases against Diageo and the
other Hakki defendants have been filed. The first, Kreft versus Zima Company,
et al, was brought in state court in Denver, Colorado; the second, Wilson versus
Zima Company et al, was brought in state court in Charlotte, North Carolina.
The allegations are largely similar to Hakki, refer to the same advertisements,
and were brought by mostly the same lawyers. Diageo intends to strenuously
defend all these claims.
(iv) Other. The group has extensive international operations and is a
defendant in a number of legal proceedings incidental to these operations.
There are a number of legal claims or potential claims against the group, the
outcome of which cannot at present be foreseen. Save as disclosed above,
neither Diageo nor any member of Diageo is or has been engaged in, nor (so far
as Diageo is aware) is there pending or threatened by or against it, any legal
or arbitration proceedings which may have a significant effect on the financial
position of the Diageo group. Provision is made for all liabilities that are
probable and reliably measurable.
11. Basis of preparation
The interim financial information has been prepared on the basis of accounting
policies consistent with those applied in the accounts for the year ended 30
June 2003, except for the accounting policy changes set out in note 1 above. The
information is unaudited but has been reviewed by the auditors, KPMG Audit Plc,
and their report is reproduced after these notes. The information does not
comprise the statutory accounts of the group. The statutory accounts of Diageo
plc for the year ended 30 June 2003 have been filed with the registrar of
companies. KPMG Audit Plc have reported on these accounts; their report was
unqualified and did not contain any statement under section 237 of the Companies
Act 1985.
INDEPENDENT REVIEW REPORT TO DIAGEO plc
Introduction
We have been instructed by the company to review the financial information for
the six months ended 31 December 2003 set out on pages 23 to 32. We have read
the other information contained in the interim report and considered whether it
contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the
financial information.
This report is made solely to the company in accordance with the terms of our
engagement to assist the company in meeting the requirements of the Listing
Rules of the Financial Services Authority. Our review has been undertaken so
that we might state to the company those matters we are required to state to it
in this report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by
law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company
for our review work, for this report, or for the conclusions we have reached.
Directors' responsibilities
The interim report, including the financial information contained therein, is
the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the directors. The directors
are responsible for preparing the interim report in accordance with the Listing
Rules of the Financial Services Authority which require that the accounting
policies and presentation applied to the interim figures should be consistent
with those applied in preparing annual accounts except where they are to be
changed in the next annual accounts in which case any changes, and the reasons
for them, are to be disclosed.
Review work performed
We conducted our review in accordance with guidance contained in Bulletin 1999/
4: Review of Interim Financial Information issued by the Auditing Practices
Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review consists principally of making
enquiries of group management and applying analytical procedures to the
financial information and underlying financial data and, based thereon,
assessing whether the accounting policies and presentation have been
consistently applied unless otherwise disclosed. A review is substantially less
in scope than an audit performed in accordance with Auditing Standards and
therefore provides a lower level of assurance than an audit. Accordingly, we do
not express an audit opinion on the financial information.
Review conclusion
On the basis of our review we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the financial information as presented for the six months
ended 31 December 2003.
KPMG Audit Plc
Chartered Accountants
London, 18 February 2004
Organic movement calculations
The organic movement calculations for turnover, net sales (after deducting
excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items for the six months
ended 31 December 2003 were as follows:
2002
Reported Organic 2003 Organic
(restated*) Exchange Disposals movement Reported movement %
£ million £ million £ million £ million £ million
Turnover
Major markets
North America 1,464 (78) (38) 117 1,465 9
Great Britain 829 - (8) 26 847 3
Ireland 522 41 - (21) 542 (4)
Spain 233 23 (2) 16 270 6
3,048 (14) (48) 138 3,124 5
Key markets 1,136 34 48 68 1,286 6
Venture markets 670 - (72) 52 650 9
Total premium drinks 4,854 20 (72) 258 5,060 5
Net sales (after deducting
excise duties)
Major markets
North America 1,219 (62) (34) 115 1,238 10
Great Britain 473 - (5) 6 474 1
Ireland 350 28 - (18) 360 (5)
Spain 175 18 (2) 12 203 6
2,217 (16) (41) 115 2,275 5
Key markets 884 24 31 73 1,012 8
Venture markets 527 (1) (54) 36 508 8
Total premium drinks 3,628 7 (64) 224 3,795 6
Excise duties 1,226 1,265
Turnover 4,854 5,060
Operating profit before
exceptional items
Major markets
North America 397 (25) (7) 51 416 14
Great Britain 139 - 3 8 150 6
Ireland 83 7 - (15) 75 (17)
Spain 60 5 - 4 69 6
679 (13) (4) 48 710 7
Key markets 309 (6) 1 2 306 1
Venture markets 163 (1) (9) 12 165 8
Total premium drinks 1,151 (20) (12) 62 1,181 6
* see notes (1) and (2)
Notes
(1) The reported turnover and net sales (after deducting excise
duties) for the six months ended 31 December 2002 has been restated following
the adoption of FRS 5 - Reporting the substance of transactions on revenue
recognition - application note (G). The change reduced turnover and net sales
(after deducting excise duties) by £95 million in the six months ended 31
December 2002 in respect of the following markets - £12 million for North
America, £32 million for Great Britain, £nil for Ireland, £11 million for Spain,
£27 million for key markets and £13 million for venture markets.
(2) The reported operating profit before exceptional items for the
six months ended 31 December 2002 has been restated following the adoption of
FRS 17 - Retirement benefits, UITF 38 - Accounting for ESOP trusts. The
operating profit before exceptional items has been reduced by £36 million in
respect of the following markets - £16 million for North America, £5 million for
Great Britain, £5 million for Ireland, £1 million for Spain, £8 million for key
markets and £1 million for venture markets.
(3) The exchange adjustments for turnover, net sales (after
deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items are
principally in respect of the US dollar and the euro.
(4) Disposals include the transfer of Portugal to venture markets
from key markets, and Germany to key markets from venture markets, effective 1
July 2003. This adjustment represents the differential between the incremental
amounts contributed by Germany compared to the amounts contributed by Portugal
in the six months ended 31 December 2002 - £62 million for turnover, £45 million
for net sales (after deducting excise duties) and £8 million for operating
profit before exceptional items. In addition, disposals for turnover, net sales
(after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items,
respectively, were principally in respect of the termination of distribution
rights for Bass Ale in North America and Brown Forman agency brands in Great
Britain, the disposals of Gilbey's Green and White Whisky in India, and the
partial disposal of Don Julio in Mexico.
(5) There have been no acquisitions of subsidiaries in the last
eighteen months.
(6) In the calculation of operating profit before exceptional
items the overheads included in disposals were only those directly attributable
to the businesses disposed, and do not result from subjective judgements of
management.
(7) The organic movement percentage is the amount in the column headed '
organic movement' in the table above expressed as a percentage of the aggregate
of the first three columns. The basis of the calculation of the organic movement
is explained below.
Calculation of organic movement
Where a business, brand, brand distribution right or agency agreement was
disposed of, or terminated, in the current period, the group, in organic
movement calculations, adjusts the results for the comparable prior period to
exclude the amount the group earned in that period that it could not have earned
in the current period (i.e. the period between the date in the prior period,
equivalent to the date of the disposal in the current period, and the end of the
prior period). As a result, the organic movement numbers reflect only comparable
trading performance. Similarly, if a business was disposed of part way through
the equivalent prior period then its contribution would be completely excluded
from that prior period's performance in the organic movement calculation, since
the group recognised no contribution from that business in the current period.
A further adjustment in organic movement is made to exclude the effect of
exchange rate movements by recalculating the prior period's results as if they
had been generated at the current period's exchange rates.
Organic movement percentages are calculated as the organic movement amount in £
million, expressed as the percentage of the prior period results at current year
exchange rates and after adjusting for disposals. The basis of calculation means
that the results used to measure organic movement for a given period will be
adjusted when used to measure organic movement in the subsequent period.
EXPLANATORY NOTES
Definitions
Unless otherwise stated, percentage movements given throughout this announcement
for volume, turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties), marketing
investment and operating profit are organic movements (at level exchange rates
and after adjusting for acquisitions and disposals) for continuing operations.
They are before exceptional items. Comparisons are with the equivalent period
in the last financial year. For an explanation of organic movements and free
cash flow please refer to Diageo's annual report for the year ended 30 June 2003
and 'Reconciliation to GAAP measures' in this announcement.
Volume has been measured on an equivalent servings basis to nine litre cases of
spirits. Equivalent units are calculated as follows: beer in hectolitres is
divided by 0.9, wine in nine litre cases is divided by 5, ready to drink in nine
litre cases is divided by 10. An equivalent unit represents approximately 272
servings. A serving comprises 33ml of spirits; 165ml of wine; or 330ml of ready
to drink or beer.
Net sales are turnover less excise duty.
References to ready to drink include flavored malt beverages in the United
States. References to Smirnoff ready to drink include Smirnoff Ice, Smirnoff
Black Ice, Smirnoff Twisted V, Smirnoff Mule, Smirnoff Spin and Smirnoff Caesar.
References to Smirnoff Black Ice include Smirnoff Ice Triple Black in the United
States.
The share data contained in this announcement is taken from independent industry
sources in the markets in which Diageo operates.
This announcement contains forward-looking statements that involve risk and
uncertainty. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and
developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements, including factors beyond Diageo's control. Please
refer to page 40 - 'Cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements'
for more details.
This announcement includes names of Diageo's products which constitute
trademarks or trade names which Diageo owns or which others own and license to
Diageo for its use.
Reconciliation to GAAP measures
(i) Organic movement
Organic movement in volume, turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties)
and operating profit before exceptional items are measures not specifically used
in the consolidated financial statements themselves (non-GAAP measures). The
performance of the premium drinks segment is discussed using these measures.
Since overall performance is the result of a number of factors, breaking these
down into broad categories and discussing each of these categories assists
management and the reader in understanding the overall picture. Once factors
such as the effect of currency movements, excise duties and acquisitions and
disposals have been discussed, the above measures enable the reader to focus on
the performance of the premium drinks brand portfolio which is common to both
periods. Organic movement measures also most closely reflect the way in which
the business is managed, for the same reasons of achieving comparability between
periods. Diageo's strategic planning and budgeting process is based on organic
movement in volume, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating
profit before exceptional items, and these measures closely reflect the way in
which operating targets are defined and performance is monitored by the group's
management.
These measures are chosen for planning, budgeting and reporting purposes since,
as explained further below, they represent those measures which local managers
are most directly able to influence and they enable consideration of the
underlying business performance without the distortion caused by fluctuating
exchange rates, excise duties, acquisitions and disposals. In addition,
management bonus targets are set based on the performance of the business as
measured by organic operating profit growth before exceptional items.
The group's management believe these measures provide valuable additional
information for users of the financial statements in understanding the group's
performance since they provide information on those elements of performance
which local managers are most directly able to influence and focus on that
element of the core brand portfolio which is common to both periods. However,
whilst these measures are important in the management of the business, they
should not be viewed as replacements for, but rather as complementary to, the
comparable GAAP measures such as turnover and reported (rather than organic)
movements in individual profit and loss account captions. These GAAP measures
reflect all of the factors which impact the business and the discussion in
relation to premium drinks should be read in the context of the discussion of
the overall group performance.
In the discussion of the performance of the premium drinks segment, net sales
(after deducting excise duties) is presented in addition to turnover, since
turnover reflects significant components of excise duties which are set by
external regulators and over which Diageo has no control. Diageo incurs excise
duties throughout the world. In some countries, such as the United States and
Canada, excise duties are based on sales and are separately identified on the
face of the invoice to the external customer. In others, such as the United
Kingdom and Ireland, it is effectively a production tax, which is incurred when
the spirit is removed from bonded warehouses. In these countries it is part of
the cost of goods sold and is not separately identified on the sales invoice.
Changes in the level of excise duties can significantly effect the level of
reported turnover and cost of sales, without directly reflecting changes in
volume, mix or profitability that are the variables that impact the element of
turnover retained by the group.
Also in the discussion of the performance of the premium drinks segment, certain
information is presented using sterling amounts on a constant currency basis.
This strips out the effect of foreign exchange and enables an understanding of
the underlying performance of the market that is most closely influenced by the
actions of the group's management. The risk from foreign exchange is managed
centrally and is not a factor over which local managers have any control.
Adjusting for these items enables group management to monitor performance over
factors which local managers are not directly able to influence in relation to
the core ongoing brand portfolio. The underlying performance on a constant
currency basis and excluding the impact of acquisitions and disposals is
referred to as 'organic' performance, and further information on the calculation
of organic measures as used in the discussion of the premium drinks segment is
included on page 35.
(ii) Free cash flow
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure that comprises the net cash flow arising
from operating activities, dividends received from associates, returns on
investments and servicing of finance, taxation, and capital expenditure and
financial investment. Free cash flow as used by the company covers all the
items that are required by FRS 1 to be on the face of the cash flow statement
down to, and including, capital expenditure and financial investment. It is
therefore a natural sub-total but may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures used by other companies. The group's management believe the measure
assists users of the financial statements in understanding the group's cash
generating performance as it comprises items which arise from the running of the
ongoing business.
Where appropriate, separate discussion is given for the impacts of acquisitions
and disposals of businesses, equity dividends and purchase of own shares - each
of which arises from decisions which are independent from the running of the
ongoing underlying business. The management regards capital expenditure as
ultimately non-discretionary since ongoing investment in plant and machinery is
required to support the day-to-day operations, whereas acquisitions and
disposals of businesses are discretionary. However, free cash flow does not
necessarily reflect all amounts which the group either has a constructive or
legal obligation to incur. The free cash flow measure is also used by
management for their own planning, budgeting, reporting and incentive purposes
since it provides information on those elements of performance which local
managers are most directly able to influence.
(iii) Return on average total invested capital
Return on average total invested capital is a non-GAAP measure that is used by
management to assess the return obtained from the group's asset base. This
measure is not specifically used in the consolidated financial statements, but
is calculated to aid comparison of the performance of the business between
periods.
Profits used in assessing the return on total invested capital reflect the
operating performance of the business after the effective tax rate for the
period, stated before exceptional items and interest. Average total invested
capital is calculated using the average derived from the consolidated balance
sheets at 30 June and 31 December. Capital employed comprises the average net
assets for the period, excluding post employment liabilities (net of deferred
tax) and average net borrowings. This is aggregated with restructuring and
integration costs, which have been charged to exceptional items, and goodwill
written off in reserves (up to 1 July 1998). For the six months ended 31
December 2002, the capital employed has also been adjusted for the assets,
including goodwill, of Burger King, as profits were generated for five and a
half months of this period. Calculations for the return on average total
invested capital for the six months ended 31 December 2003 were as follows:
2003 2002
(restated)
£ million £ million
Operating profit before exceptional items 1,181 1,204
Associates after interest 241 227
Effective tax rate 25% / 25.4% (356) (363)
1,066 1,068
Average net assets 4,795 4,733
Average net borrowings 4,788 5,362
Average integration costs (net of tax) 896 768
Average goodwill 1,619 1,661
Burger King - 2,067
Average total invested capital 12,098 14,591
Return on average total invested capital 17.6% 14.6%
Cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements
This document contains statements with respect to the financial condition,
results of operations and business of Diageo and certain of the plans and
objectives of Diageo with respect to these items. These forward-looking
statements are made pursuant to the 'Safe Harbor' provisions of the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, all
statements that express forecasts, expectations and projections with respect to
future matters, including trends in results of operations, margins, growth
rates, overall market trends, the impact of interest or exchange rates, the
availability of financing to Diageo and parties or consortia who have purchased
Diageo's assets, actions of parties or consortia who have purchased Diageo's
assets, anticipated cost savings or synergy and the completion of Diageo's
strategic transactions, are forward-looking statements. By their nature,
forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to
events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. There are a
number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ
materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements,
including factors that are outside Diageo's control.
These factors include, but are not limited to:
• Increased competitive product and pricing pressures and unanticipated
actions by competitors that could impact Diageo's market share,
increase expenses and hinder growth potential;
• The effects of future business combinations, partnerships, acquisitions
or disposals, existing or future, and the ability to realise expected
synergy and/or costs savings;
• Diageo's ability to complete future acquisitions and disposals;
• Legal and regulatory developments, including changes in regulations
regarding consumption of, or advertising for, beverage alcohol, changes
in accounting standards, taxation requirements, such as the impact of
excise tax increases with respect to the premium drinks business, and
environmental laws;
• Developments in the Hakki versus Zima Company et al, Kreft versus Zima
Company et al, Wilson versus Zima Company et al litigation and any
similar proceedings;
• Changes in the food industry in the United States, including increased
competition and changes in levels of consumer preferences;
• Changes in consumer preferences and tastes, demographic trends or
perception about health related issues;
• Changes in the cost of raw materials and labour costs;
• Changes in economic conditions in countries in which Diageo operates,
including changes in levels of consumer spending;
• Levels of marketing and promotional expenditure by Diageo and its
competitors;
• Renewal of distribution rights on favourable terms when they expire;
• Termination of existing distribution rights on agency brands;
• Technological developments that may affect the distribution of products
or impede Diageo's ability to protect its intellectual property rights;
and
• Changes in financial and equity markets, including significant interest
rate and foreign currency rate fluctuations, which may affect Diageo's
access to or increase the cost of financing.
All oral and written forward-looking statements made on or after the date of
this announcement and attributable to Diageo are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the above factors and the 'risk factors' contained in the annual
report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2003 filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.
The information in this announcement does not constitute an offer to sell or an
invitation to buy shares in Diageo plc or any other invitation or inducement to
engage in investment activities.
Past performance cannot be relied upon as a guide to future performance.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange BTMI