Interim Results
Diageo PLC
16 February 2006
Interim results for the six months ended 31 December 2005
STRONG OPERATING PERFORMANCE ON ALL MEASURES
Operational highlights
• North America: continued share gains, especially in spirits where value
share in the US is now 28%
• Europe: organic operating profit up driven by growth in spirits brands and
cost efficiencies
• International: very strong top and bottom line growth, particularly in
Latin America, driven by growth of priority brands and successful
innovation. Performance improvements delivered in Korea, Taiwan and Nigeria
Results at a glance
First half First half Reported Organic
F'06 F'05 movement movement
Volume in equivalent units Million 72.6 68.9 5% 5%
Net sales after deducting excise duties £ million 3,960 3,674 8% 5%
Operating profit before exceptional items £ million 1,261 1,185 6% 7%
Basic eps before exceptional items Pence 31.1 25.0(^) 24% 11%
Basic eps Pence 40.4 32.2(^) 25%
(^) First half F'05 basic eps before exceptional items restated from 24.1p to
25.0p for IAS 21 amendment adoption and other changes to finance charges.
Similarly, first half F'05 basic eps has been restated from 31.3p to 32.2p.
Financial highlights
• Spirits net sales after deducting excise duties up 7%, ready to drink down
3%, beer up 4%, wine up 5%
• 5% organic growth in marketing spend
• Further operating margin expansion of 0.2 percentage points on an organic
basis
• Return on invested capital increased 1.2 percentage points to 16.8%
• Free cash flow increased to £651 million
• Share buyback doubled to £700 million
• Interim dividend increased 5% to 11.95 pence
• Strong first half results underpin full year guidance of 7% organic growth
in operating profit before exceptional items
First half First half Reported
F'06 F'05 movement
Operating profit after operating exceptional items £ million 1,261 1,169 8%
Profit attributable to parent company's equity
shareholders* £ million 1,166 967 21%
Diageo will prepare its annual financial statements for F'06 in accordance with
IFRS adopted for use in the European Union. The first half of F'06 is presented
on this basis and the first half of F'05 has been restated for IFRS as issued by
the IASB, as described in note 1 to the interim financial statements on page 22.
Percentage movements are organic movements unless otherwise stated. These
movements and operating margins are before exceptional items. Commentary,
unless otherwise stated, refers to organic movements. Share, unless otherwise
stated, refers to volume share. See page 32 for additional information for
shareholders and an explanation of non-GAAP measures including the
reconciliation of basic eps as reported to basic eps as restated and the organic
eps movement calculation.
* First half F'05 restated for IAS 21 amendment adoption and other changes to
finance charges.
Paul Walsh, Chief Executive of Diageo, commenting on the interim results said:
'This is a strong first half performance. We have invested in our brands and
built our market positions. We have again achieved our financial objectives
delivering top and bottom line organic growth, organic operating margin
improvement and an increase in return on invested capital.
'We continue to capitalise on our opportunities in the US where our market
leadership and superior route to market have led to further volume share gains
of 0.4 percentage points in spirits. In Europe, where we face a more challenging
trading environment, we have created a more efficient organisation and this has
enabled us to deliver 7% organic operating profit growth in the period.
Sustained investment behind our brands in International markets has led to
strong top line growth, up 12%. Throughout the business, mix improvement
through stronger growth of brands such as Johnnie Walker together with the
creation of a lower cost base have led to overall organic margin expansion of
0.2 percentage points.
'Strong cash flow and the liquidation of our remaining interest in General Mills
and Burger King have enabled us to double our share buy back programme,
returning a further £700 million to shareholders in the period.
'Material changes to these first half trends are unlikely in the balance of the
year and we are therefore comfortable in reiterating our full year guidance of
7% organic operating profit growth'.
Key features of the half year
• North America
Volume grew 4%, net sales after deducting excise duties increased 7%,
marketing spend increased 5% and operating profit improved 5%.
In spirits, excluding ready to drink, strong performance by the priority
brands in the US and growth of the higher value reserve brands have been
the key drivers, delivering top line mix improvement with net sales after
deducting excise duties up 8%. Value share of spirits increased 0.2
percentage points to 28% and volume share was up 0.4 percentage points.
Ready to drink net sales after deducting excise duties declined 2%. In
beer, net sales excluding excise duties increased 18% as a result of strong
growth in Guinness, Red Stripe and Smithwicks. Wine sales were up 6% with
good volume growth and mix improvement driven by Sterling wines.
Higher input costs, primarily as a result of the higher oil price and
increased costs behind our innovation pipeline, together with the adverse
impact of the hurricane season, have constrained operating profit growth.
• Europe
Volume was flat, net sales after deducting excise duties were down 1%,
marketing spend was down 7% and operating profit increased 7%.
The changes implemented in our European business have resulted in a more
profitable organisation focused on future opportunities for profitable top
line growth. As a result, although the continued decline in the ready to
drink segment has negatively impacted top line growth, operating profit is
up and margins have expanded. Spirits volume, excluding ready to drink,
grew 2% driven by continued strong growth from Smirnoff vodka, up 9%, and
Johnnie Walker, up 2%.
• International
Volume was up 11%, net sales after deducting excise duties grew 12%,
marketing spend increased 24% and operating profit was up 12%.
This strong top line performance was driven primarily by the global
priority brands, where volume was up 9% in the period, with Johnnie Walker
up 12% and Smirnoff up 13%. In addition, category brand growth of 19% was
driven by successful innovations in Asia and in Africa. Performance
improvements have been delivered in Korea, Taiwan and Nigeria.
• Brand performance
Organic Reported Organic
volume* movement net sales** net sales**
% movement movement
% %
Smirnoff vodka 7 13 10
Smirnoff ready to drink (4) (3) (6)
Johnnie Walker 8 10 12
Guinness (2) 3 2
Baileys 2 2 1
J&B - - 1
Captain Morgan 10 19 14
Jose Cuervo 5 17 12
Tanqueray 3 8 5
Total global priority brands 4 7 5
Local priority brands 2 8 4
Category brands 8 11 8
Total 5 8 5
* On a reported basis, volume increased by 4% for global priority brands, 2% for
local priority brands, 12% for category brands and 5% in total. Differences
from the organic volume movements shown above are due to acquisitions and the
exclusion of royalty volumes.
** Net sales after deducting excise duties.
• Continued high investment in brands as marketing spend again grew in line
with sales. Marketing spend was focused behind the priority spirits brands
particularly in the fast growing International market.
• The acquisition of Bushmills Irish Whiskey for approximately £200 million
was completed on 25 August 2005 and the brand is now fully integrated
into the Diageo business.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
For the six months ended 31 December 2005
Percentage movements, unless otherwise stated, are organic movements. These
movements and operating margins are before exceptional items. Commentary,
unless otherwise stated, refers to organic movements. Share, unless otherwise
stated, refers to volume share. See page 32 for additional information for
shareholders and an explanation of non-GAAP measures.
OPERATING REVIEW
Analysis by region
North America
Summary:
• Volume was up 4%, net sales after deducting excise duties grew 7% and
operating profit increased 5%
• In spirits, further share gains have taken Diageo's overall value share
to 28%
• Top line mix improvement was driven by the global priority brands,
Crown Royal and Don Julio
• Operating profit growth was constrained by higher raw material costs
and increased spend on innovation
Key measures: First half First half Reported Organic movement
F'06 F'05 movement
£ million £ million % %
Volume 4 4
Sales 1,565 1,385 13 7
Net sales after deducting excise duties 1,329 1,168 14 7
Marketing 209 188 11 5
Operating profit before exceptional items 476 454 5 5
Reported performance:
Sales were £1,565 million in the period ended 31 December 2005 up by £180
million from £1,385 million in the comparable period. Operating profit before
exceptional items increased by £22 million to £476 million in the period ended
31 December 2005.
Organic performance:
The weighted average exchange rate used to translate US dollar sales and profits
moved from £1 = $1.85 in the six months ended 31 December 2004 to £1 = $1.76 in
the six months ended 31 December 2005. The strengthening of the US dollar
resulted in a £60 million increase in sales. Acquisitions added £23 million of
sales and there was a further organic increase in sales of £97 million.
Operating profit before exceptional items decreased by £2 million as a result of
foreign exchange impacts. Acquisitions increased operating profit before
exceptional items by £3 million and organic growth of £21 million was achieved.
Organic brand performance: Organic Reported net Organic
volume* sales** net sales**
movement movement movement
% % %
Smirnoff vodka 6 13 8
Smirnoff ready to drink (8) (5) (9)
Johnnie Walker 4 14 10
Jose Cuervo 5 18 12
Baileys 6 13 9
Captain Morgan 10 22 16
Tanqueray 3 8 5
Guinness 12 18 15
Total global priority brands 5 12 7
Local priority brands 1 10 6
Category brands 2 30 12
Total 4 14 7
* On a reported basis, volume increased by 5% for global priority brands, 1% for
local priority brands, 5% for category brands and 4% in total. Differences from
the organic volume movements shown above are due to acquisitions.
** Net sales after deducting excise duties
Smirnoff vodka performed strongly, led by the successful media campaign 'Clearly
Smirnoff' which leveraged the very positive New York Times taste test report.
Net sales after deducting excise duties grew 8% on volume increases of 6% due to
a price increase on Smirnoff Twist in the first quarter. The first half of the
year also saw the introduction of two new Smirnoff Twist flavours, Black Cherry
and Lime. Smirnoff vodka growth outpaced the category gaining 0.4 percentage
points in value share.
While Smirnoff ready to drink remains the market leader, the ready to drink
category continued to decline and Smirnoff ready to drink volume was down 8%.
Strong consumer demand for premium brands drove Johnnie Walker performance, with
volume up 4% and net sales after deducting excise duties up 10%. This reflected
price increases in some states and stronger growth in Johnnie Walker Black Label
and super deluxe variants. The Johnnie Walker brands grew value share by 1.4
percentage points.
Although the tequila market has experienced strong pricing pressures, Diageo's
strategy has been to hold price and enhance Jose Cuervo's premium positioning.
As a result, the brand lost both volume share and value share. Volume grew 5%
and net sales after deducting excise duties increased 12% driven by the launch
of Cuervo Golden Margaritas, a ready to drink variant.
Baileys volume grew 6% and net sales after deducting excise duties were up 9%.
Performance was driven by the test launch of Baileys flavours and good growth in
Canada, as the comparable period reflected the strike of the Quebec Liquor
Board. For the second consecutive year price increases have been achieved on
Baileys.
Captain Morgan continued its strong performance with volume up 10% on the
consistent growth in Original Spiced Rum and the introduction of Tattoo and
Parrot Bay Passion Fruit. Increased marketing spend behind all Captain Morgan
variants helped drive performance. Captain Morgan net sales after deducting
excise duties grew 16% and the brand increased its value share by 1.5 percentage
points as price increases were implemented in the first half.
The success of the 'Tony Sinclair - Ready to Tanqueray' advertising campaign has
returned Tanqueray to growth. Volume grew 3% and net sales after deducting
excise duties were up 5% as a result of price increases in selected markets and
growth of the super premium variant, Tanqueray 10. The Tanqueray brand
outperformed the gin category gaining value share by 1.2 percentage points.
Guinness volume was up 12% as a result of successful advertising and promotions
behind several formats. Net sales after deducting excise duties grew 15% as
targeted price increases were taken in those markets that did not have price
increases the previous year.
The local priority brands performed well despite the impact of the hurricane
season on some of the biggest markets. Crown Royal volume grew 5%, net sales
after deducting excise duties were up 9% and the brand gained value share by 0.4
percentage points. Crown Royal was able to increase prices in 70% of the states
as it built on its sponsorship of NASCAR among key consumer groups. Crown Royal
volume growth was partially offset by weakness in Seagram's VO and 7 Crown, with
volumes down 7% and 1% respectively, as a result of a portfolio strategy to
increase focus on premium brands and de-prioritise lower value brands.
Performance of the California winery local priority brands continued to improve.
Sterling volume was up 6% and net sales after deducting excise duties grew 11%
driven by a positive mix shift toward more premium Sterling products. Beaulieu
Vineyards also grew volume by 8% due to strong growth of its mid-priced Century
Cellars brand, resulting in 3% growth in net sales after deducting excise
duties. A fire at a third-party warehouse destroyed most of the Sterling
Vineyard's 2003 vintage and single-vineyard wines. This will impact performance
in the second half and in future years when the wines were expected to be
released.
Category brands grew volume by 2% and net sales after deducting excise duties
increased 12% due to strong growth of Red Stripe, volume up 27%, Smithwicks,
volume up 72% and Don Julio, up 69%.
The development of the newly acquired Chalone brands is progressing well and the
brand equity has been leveraged across a number of new variants. Bushmills,
which was acquired in August 2005, is now fully integrated. As anticipated, the
brand's performance in the first half of the year has been impacted by the stock
build which took place prior to acquisition.
Performance was strong in Canada as the comparable period reflected the strike
of the Quebec Liquor Board. Volume grew 6% and net sales after deducting excise
duties were up 14%. Growth was particularly strong in the global priority
brands, with volume up 8% and net sales after deducting excise duties up 18%,
driven by a strong performance of Smirnoff ready to drink.
Europe
Summary:
• Volume was flat, net sales after deducting excise duties declined 1%,
marketing declined 7%, which, together with a more cost efficient
organisation, led operating profit to increase 7%
• Spirits and wine drove performance with volume up 2% and 5% respectively,
offsetting a 24% decline in ready to drink and a 5% decline in beer
• Europe remains a difficult trading environment due to increased duties and
regulations, and a continued shift from the on-trade to the off-trade in
key markets
Key measures: First half First half Reported Organic movement
F'06 F'05 movement
£ million £ million % %
Volume 1 0
Sales 2,221 2,244 (1) 0
Net sales after deducting excise duties 1,408 1,450 (3) (1)
Marketing 225 241 (7) (7)
Operating profit before exceptional items 494 463 7 7
Reported performance:
Reported sales in Europe in the period ended 31 December 2005 were down £23
million from £2,244 in the comparable period, to £2,221 million. Operating
profit before exceptional items increased by 7% from £463 million to £494
million.
Organic performance:
Sales decreased by £14 million as a result of the impact of foreign exchange
rates. Acquisitions net of the impact of disposals added sales of £3 million
and there was an organic decline in sales of £4 million. The exchange impact
results primarily from a weakening of the euro compared to the comparable period
in 2004. Operating profit before exceptional items increased by £31 million as
a result of £30 million of organic growth and the profit generated by
acquisitions of £8 million and an adverse exchange rate movement effect of £3
million. In the calculation of organic growth transfers between business
segments reduced prior period sales and operating profit before exceptional
items by £8 million and £4 million respectively.
Organic brand performance: Organic Reported net Organic
sales** net sales**
volume* movement movement movement
% % %
Smirnoff vodka 9 11 10
Smirnoff ready to drink (22) (21) (23)
Johnnie Walker 2 5 6
Guinness (5) (3) (2)
Baileys (1) (3) (3)
J&B (3) (4) (3)
Total global priority brands 0 (2) (1)
Local priority brands 1 0 1
Category brands (1) (6) (2)
Total 0 (3) (1)
* On a reported basis, volume was flat for global priority brands, increased by
1% for local priority brands, 4% for category brands and 1% in total.
Differences from the organic volume movements shown above are due to
acquisitions.
** Net sales after deducting excise duties
Smirnoff vodka grew volume 9%, and net sales after deducting excise duties were
up 10% due to continued strong performance in Great Britain, Spain and Greece.
Further decline of the ready to drink segment in Europe impacted Smirnoff ready
to drink and, as a result, volume was down 22% and net sales after deducting
excise duties declined 23%.
Johnnie Walker volume grew 2% and product mix improved due to strong growth of
the higher margin Johnnie Walker Black Label and the super deluxe variants,
which represent about 15% of total volume. Volume of Johnnie Walker Black Label
and super deluxe variants was up 13% and 19% respectively, due to continued
growth in Russia, Greece, Spain and Germany. Johnnie Walker Red Label also
performed well in Russia and Germany, however its overall volume was flat as a
result of more difficult market conditions in Portugal and the Canaries.
Over 90% of Guinness volume in Europe is sold in Great Britain and Ireland.
Consequently the declining beer market in both countries heavily impacted
performance. Guinness volume was down 5% and net sales after deducting excise
duties declined 2%, as pricing offset some of the volume weakness. Guinness was
launched in Russia following the new distribution agreement with Heineken, which
began in July 2005.
Baileys volume was down 1% as growth in Russia, Italy and France was offset by
weakness in Iberia and Benelux. Net sales after deducting excise duties
declined 3% due to the decision to reduce focus on Baileys Glide in Great
Britain.
The contraction of the standard whisky segment in Portugal and the Canaries
offset strong growth in France and Benelux. As a result, J&B volume and
net sales after deducting excise duties declined 3%.
Local priority brand volume and net sales after deducting excise duties
increased 1%. Growth in spirits brands around the region offset continued
weakness of the lager brands in Ireland.
Category brand volume declined 1% and net sales after deducting excise duties
were down 2%. Blossom Hill continued to grow in Great Britain while in Spain,
Gordon's and standard scotches declined due to aggressive pricing by competitor
brands.
Great Britain
In a weak market, Diageo delivered volume growth of 2%. Volume growth of 5% in
spirits and 4% in wine offset a 22% decline in ready to drink and a 5% decline
in beer. Net sales after deducting excise duties declined 3% mainly as a result
of the negative impact of the further decline in the ready to drink segment.
In a growing category, Smirnoff vodka continued to outperform the market.
Volume grew 11% and net sales after deducting excise duties were up 13%. Share
increased 2.4 percentage points due to a strong marketing programme and
consistent promotional activities. Marketing spend increased 4% and improved
our share of voice. The ready to drink segment declined 15% and while Smirnoff
ready to drink remains the segment leader with a 28% share, volume was down 20%.
Baileys volume declined 1% and net sales after deducting excise duties were down
5% reflecting the reduced focus on Baileys Glide. Excluding ready to drink,
Baileys volumes were flat and net sales after deducting excise duties declined
2% as retailers' promotions focused on less profitable SKUs during Christmas.
Local priority brand performance was mixed. Bell's volume grew 10% and the
brand increased share by 3.5 percentage points to 19%. New variants and
consistent advertising enabled Gordon's to grow volume by 2%, to increase net
sales after deducting excise duties by 4% and increase share by 3.2 percentage
points. Archers volume was down 20% due to a 37% volume decline of the ready to
drink variants.
In a weak beer market, Guinness volume declined 5% but the brand held share. A
price increase in February 2005 partially offset volume weakness with net sales
after deducting excise duties down 3%.
Category brand volume was up 4% driven by wine performance. There was a shift
in the wine market in Great Britain away from French towards New World wines.
This dynamic influenced the growth of 12% in Blossom Hill volume and the 19%
decline in Piat D'Or volume.
Ireland
The results for Ireland reflect the continued shift from the on-trade to the
off-trade as well as growth in wines and spirits and in the value segment.
These market dynamics have a significant impact on performance in Ireland as the
majority of Diageo's business is focused on premium brands and the on-trade.
Volume and net sales after deducting excise duties declined by 4% and 1%
respectively. This was driven by a 6% decline in beer volume, which was only
partially offset by a 4% increase in spirits volume and 15% increase in wine
volume.
Guinness volume was down 9% but net sales after deducting excise duties declined
only 2% due to pricing. The brand lost share, as performance was affected by a
particularly hot summer.
In spirits, Smirnoff vodka continues to be the number one vodka brand in Ireland
and volume grew 5% while Baileys volume declined 4% due to increased competition
from lower value brands.
Local priority brand volume was down 5% driven by the continued decline of the
beer brands. Of the agency brands, Carlsberg's performance was stronger due to
the launch of successful new advertising, which enabled it to capitalise on the
hot summer and slow its volume decline to 1%.
Iberia
Overall, volume in Iberia declined 4% and net sales after deducting excise
duties declined 3% driven by the contraction of the scotch category in Portugal
and the Canaries. Spain, which accounts for over 80% of Iberia's volume, grew
volume by 1% and net sales after deducting excise duties were up 3% due to a
price increase on a number of brands in January 2005. The 10% increase in duty
implemented by Spanish regulatory authorities in September 2005 has been fully
passed on to customers.
J&B volume in Iberia declined 6% driven by a 33% and 41% decline in
volumes in Portugal and the Canaries. In Spain, J&B volume and net sales
after deducting excise duties were flat. The brand is the leading standard
whisky in the Spanish market and gained share by 0.5 percentage points in a
category that was down 3%.
In Spain, Johnnie Walker volume grew 12% and net sales after deducting excise
duties were up by 15%. Johnnie Walker Black Label volume grew 23% due to strong
performance in the high end on-trade. Johnnie Walker Red Label gained share by
0.4 percentage points, while Johnnie Walker Black Label grew share by 0.7
percentage points. Performance was weak in the rest of Iberia due to the rapid
decline of the scotch category.
Baileys volume declined 9%. In Spain, although the brand gained share by 0.6
percentage points due to good performance in the off-trade, volume declined 6%.
The local priority brands, Cacique and Cardhu in Spain, delivered a 7% increase
in volume and grew net sales after deducting excise duties by 10% due to
stronger pricing. Continued growth of the dark rum category and a successful
advertising campaign resulted in a 7% increase in Cacique volume. Although
share was flat, the brand remains the leader of the dark rum segment with 23%
share.
Category brand volume was down 15% driven by the continued decline of standard
scotch brands and a significant decrease in Gordon's in Spain due to adverse
pricing versus the competition.
Rest of Europe
The rest of Europe accounts for a third of Diageo's European business. Total
volume was up 3% and net sales after deducting excise duties increased 2%. A
27% decline in ready to drink volume had a negative impact on mix. Performance
excluding ready to drink was stronger, with volume up 4% and net sales after
deducting excise duties up 5%, driven by strong growth in Greece, Russia and
Germany.
Volume in Greece increased 6%. Johnnie Walker volume was up 3% driven by a 17%
increase in Johnnie Walker Black Label, which is benefiting from a new
advertising campaign. Haig volume was up 30% due to the continued growth of
standard scotch in the off-trade. Volume in France declined by 2% as a result
of a 36% decline in ready to drink volume. However, in a tough market, J
&B grew volume 9% and Baileys volume grew 8%. In Germany, volume was
flat, due to a 54% reduction in ready to drink volume. Excluding ready to
drink, performance in Germany, as in France, was stronger with volume growth of
2% and a 5% increase in net sales after deducting excise duties. Growth was
driven by Johnnie Walker volume, up 14%, led by faster growth of Johnnie Walker
Black Label and the super deluxe variants, as well as a 5% increase in Smirnoff
vodka volume.
Russia continued its strong growth trajectory with volume up 41%, and net sales
after deducting excise duties up 51%. Johnnie Walker and Baileys were the main
growth drivers with volume up 41% and 25% respectively. Johnnie Walker Black
Label, Johnnie Walker Red Label and Baileys all gained share and are the clear
leaders in their segments. Guinness was launched in Russia in July of 2005 as a
result of the new distribution agreement with Heineken.
International
Summary:
• Volume grew 11%, net sales after deducting excise duties were up 12%
and operating profit increased 12%
• International's strong performance was across the vast majority of
brands and markets
• Marketing spend was up 24% with a significant up weight in investment
in China, India and Brazil
First half First half Reported Organic movement
F'06 F'05 movement
Key measures: £ million £ million % %
Volume 12 11
Sales 1,533 1,289 19 15
Net sales after deducting excise duties 1,183 1,028 15 12
Marketing 184 143 29 24
Operating profit before exceptional items 371 346 7 12
Reported performance:
Reported sales in the period ended 31 December 2005 were £1,533 million, up £244
million from £1,289 million in the comparable prior period. Operating profit
before exceptional items was up 7% at £371 million for the period ended 31
December 2005.
Organic performance:
Sales increased by £36 million as a result of exchange rate impacts.
Acquisitions added sales of £10 million and there was an organic increase in
sales of £198 million. These factors combined to generate the reported increase
of £244 million in the period.
There was a £25 million increase in reported operating profit before exceptional
items. Organic growth added £40 million to operating profit before exceptional
items, and acquisitions added a further £1 million; however, these increases
were offset by unfavourable exchange rate movements of £14 million. In the
calculation of organic growth, transfers between business segments reduced prior
period operating profit before exceptional items by £2 million.
Organic brand performance: Organic Reported net Organic
volume* sales** net sales**
movement movement movement
% % %
Johnnie Walker 12 12 14
Smirnoff vodka 8 18 15
Smirnoff ready to drink 35 47 42
Guinness (2) 5 2
Baileys 5 4 3
Total global priority brands 9 13 12
Local priority brands 4 13 5
Category brands 19 20 17
Total 11 15 12
* On a reported basis, volume increased by 9% for global priority brands, 4% for
local priority brands, 22% for category brands and 12% in total. Differences
from the organic volume movements shown above are due to acquisitions and the
exclusion of royalty volumes.
** Net sales after deducting excise duties
Johnnie Walker volume grew 12% driven by growth in Asia and Latin America.
Product mix improved due to stronger growth of the super deluxe variants.
Smirnoff ready to drink grew volume 35% and net sales after deducting excise
duties increased by 42% due to growth in Brazil, Venezuela, and successful
innovations in Australia and South Africa. Smirnoff vodka performance was
particularly strong in Brazil, India and Asia Pacific with volume up 15%, 39%
and 15% respectively.
Guinness volume declined 2% as difficult trading conditions in Cameroon offset
good performances in East Africa, Ghana and Asia. Stronger sales in South Asia
and Japan improved mix and as a result, net sales after deducting excise duties
were up 2%.
Baileys volume grew 5% due to volume growth in Asia and the test launch of
Baileys flavours in Global Duty Free. Net sales after deducting excise duties
were only up 3% due to adverse product mix, as the comparable period's volume
benefited from the launch of Baileys Glide and Minis in Australia.
Local priority brand volume and net sales after deducting excise duties were up
4% and 5% respectively, due to strong growth of Windsor in Korea, Buchanan's in
Venezuela and Malta Guinness and Bell's in Africa.
Category brand volume and net sales after deducting excise duties were up 19%
and 17%, respectively. Key drivers of performance were the successful re-launch
of Harp in Nigeria and the launch of Benmore and Golden Knight in Thailand.
Asia Pacific
In Australia, volume was up 2% and net sales after deducting excise duties were
flat as global priority brand growth was offset by a planned reduction in stock
levels of ready to drink category brands. Smirnoff volume grew 20% driven by
strong growth of Smirnoff ready to drink which increased share by 4.0 percentage
points. Johnnie Walker grew volume 9% as a result of strong brand equity
building activity. Bundaberg held share even though volume declined 1%, while
volume of the ready to drink variant was flat.
In Korea, performance was driven by the renovation of the Windsor brand and the
launch of new premium line extensions. A recovering economy also helped
stabilise the trading environment for beverage alcohol. Volume was up 6% and
net sales after deducting excise duties increased 7%. The launch of a super
deluxe variant combined with a 22% increase in marketing spend, led Windsor
volume to increase 8%. Both Johnnie Walker and Windsor increased share by 0.6
percentage points.
In Taiwan, volume was up 12%. Johnnie Walker volume increased by 10% and net
sales after deducting excise duties were up 13%, driven by 36% growth in volume
of the super deluxe variants. The launch of Real Mackenzie, a new whisky brand,
in April 2005 increased volume growth but had a dilutive effect on mix.
In Japan, volume grew 3% due to 82% growth in Baileys volume, albeit off a small
base, following the national roll out of an up weighted marketing programme.
Guinness volume grew 29% as distribution gains continued.
In Thailand, volume was up 73% and net sales after deducting excise duties grew
26%. Benmore and Golden Knight, two new whiskey brands launched in the first
half of 2005, drove volume growth but had an adverse impact on mix. Johnnie
Walker volume was up 19%, as Johnnie Walker Red Label regained momentum and
increased share by 4.3 percentage points in the premium scotch segment due to
new promotional activities. Spey Royal grew volume 18% and increased share by
1.0 percentage point as a result of a new, lower-priced strategy aimed at
attracting standard scotch consumers. In total, Diageo gained 9.9 percentage
points of share in the imported whisky segment in the period.
In India, volume increased 26%, albeit off a small base, due to continued strong
growth in global priority brands. Smirnoff vodka delivered the most significant
growth with volume up 39% and share up 9.7 percentage points as a result of
increased distribution and a successful advertising campaign. Johnnie Walker
volume grew 33% driven by continued advertising and increased distribution.
China also experienced rapid growth in volume and net sales after deducting
excise duties, driven primarily by an increase in Johnnie Walker volume of 54%.
Advertising on Johnnie Walker was upweighted significantly during the period
benefiting Johnnie Walker Black Label volume, which was up 75%. A new route to
market model also supported growth in Guinness, Baileys and Smirnoff vodka.
Africa
Africa grew volume by 8% and net sales after deducting excise duties by 9%.
In Nigeria, volume and net sales after deducting excise duties were up 17% as
turnaround plans started to take hold and a focus on innovation led to improved
performance. Harp's successful re-launch in April 2005 is a key driver of
Nigeria's recovery. Harp volume more than doubled and share grew by 4.2
percentage points. Guinness volume declined 1%, however, as a result of the
launch of Guinness Extra Smooth in June 2005 net sales after deducting excise
duties increased by 6%. Malta Guinness returned to growth with volume up 13%.
In East Africa, volume grew 17% and net sales after deducting excise duties were
up 8% due to faster growth in low value beers and spirits. Premium beer
performance was mixed. Tusker volume was up 2% due to an improved promotional
programme, while Pilsner volume declined 1% due to increased competition from
lower value beers.
In South Africa, volume grew 2% while net sales after deducting excise duties
were up 11%. Strong growth in Johnnie Walker drove product mix improvement.
Smirnoff volume declined 2% as a 23% increase in ready to drink was offset by a
significant decline in Smirnoff vodka. Bell's, the leading scotch brand in
South Africa, grew volume by 12%.
In Ghana, volume grew 15% and net sales after deducting excise duties were up
24%. Guinness grew volume 5% and net sales after deducting excise duties
increased by 18%. Malta Guinness benefited from a favourable relative price
point compared to soft drinks and as a result volume grew 21%.
Latin America
There was strong growth across Latin America with volume for the region as a
whole up 14% and net sales after deducting excise duties up 22%.
In Venezuela, a significant improvement in the environment led to 23% volume
growth and a 36% increase in net sales after deducting excise duties. The
product mix improvement was driven by the successful launch of Smirnoff ready to
drink and strong growth in the super deluxe variants of Johnnie Walker and
Buchanan's. Category brands also performed well with volume up 18% and net
sales after deducting excise duties increasing by 29% driven by strong growth of
Chequers and Ye Monks.
Performance in Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay benefited from strong economic
conditions. Volume was up 27% and net sales after deducting excise duties grew
by 45% driven by the strong growth of ready to drink. Johnnie Walker volume
increased 33% and net sales after deducting excise duties were 44% higher due to
strong growth of the super deluxe variants as the Reserve Brand Group gained
traction. Johnnie Walker Red Label and Johnnie Walker Black Label gained share
by 7.1 percentage points and 4.2 percentage points respectively. Smirnoff grew
volume 19% and net sales after deducting excise duties increased 55% due to
strong performance in ready to drink. Smirnoff vodka gained 2.9 percentage
points of share and Smirnoff ready to drink increased share by 4.6 percentage
points.
Performance in Mexico was strong with overall volume up 28% and net sales after
deducting excise duties up 33% primarily driven by growth across the scotch
category. Buchanan's increased share by 1.9 percentage points, Johnnie Walker
Red Label increased share by 2.6 percentage points and J&B increased
share by 1.8 percentage points.
Global Duty Free
Volume grew 13% and net sales after deducting excise duties were up 14% due to
strong growth in Europe, Australia and parts of Asia. Smirnoff and the Johnnie
Walker super deluxe variants had particularly good performances due to intensive
marketing initiatives in airports. Baileys returned to growth due in part to
the test launch of Baileys flavours in Europe.
Corporate revenue and costs
Reported sales increased by £12 million to £40 million from £28 million for the
comparable prior period. Net corporate operating costs before exceptional items
increased by £2 million to £80 million from £78 million in the comparable prior
period. Transfers between business regions increased corporate sales by £8
million and decreased operating costs before exceptional items by £6 million.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Condensed consolidated income statement
Six months ended 31 December 2005 Six months ended 31 December 2004
Before
Before exceptional
exceptional Exceptional items Exceptional Total
items items Total (restated) items (restated)
£ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million
Sales 5,359 - 5,359 4,946 - 4,946
Excise duties (1,399) - (1,399) (1,272) - (1,272)
Net sales 3,960 - 3,960 3,674 - 3,674
Operating costs (2,699) - (2,699) (2,489) (16) (2,505)
Operating profit 1,261 - 1,261 1,185 (16) 1,169
Investment income 5 - 5 8 - 8
Disposal of investments/
businesses 151 151 218 218
Finance charges (93) - (93) (74) - (74)
Associates' profits 77 - 77 71 - 71
Profit before taxation 1,250 151 1,401 1,190 202 1,392
Taxation (313) 117 (196) (404) 14 (390)
Profit for the period 937 268 1,205 786 216 1,002
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders 898 268 1,166 751 216 967
Minority interests 39 - 39 35 - 35
937 268 1,205 786 216 1,002
Adoption of IFRS
The interim results for the period ended 31 December 2005 have been prepared in
accordance with International Accounting Standards and International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS). The results for the comparative period to 31
December 2004 have been restated and are also presented in accordance with IFRS.
For further information related to the conversion to IFRS please see the notes
to the interim results, specifically note 1 'Basis of preparation' and note 12 '
Explanation of transition to IFRS'.
Sales and net sales after deducting excise duties
On a reported basis, sales increased by £413 million (8%) from £4,946 million in
the period ended 31 December 2004 to £5,359 million in the period ended 31
December 2005. On a reported basis net sales after deducting excise duties
increased by £286 million (8%) from £3,674 million in the period ended 31
December 2004 to £3,960 million in the period ended 31 December 2005.
Acquisitions and disposals contributed a net increase to reported sales and net
sales after deducting excise duties of £36 million and £26 million respectively
in the period and foreign exchange rate movements also increased reported sales
by £82 million and reported net sales after deducting excise duties by £56
million, principally arising from strengthening of the US dollar.
Operating costs
On a reported basis operating costs before exceptional items increased by £210
million principally due to an increase in cost of goods sold of £146 million and
an increase in marketing costs of 8% from £572 million to £618 million. There
were no exceptional operating costs in the period (2004 - £16 million). On a
reported basis, operating costs increased by £194 million (8%) from £2,505
million in the period ended 31 December 2004 to £2,699 million in the period
ended 31 December 2005. Overall, the impact of exchange rate movements increased
total operating costs before exceptional items by £75 million.
Post employment plans
Post employment costs for the period ended 31 December 2005 of £44 million (2004
- £43 million) included amounts charged to operating profit of £54 million (2004
- £47 million) and finance income of £10 million (2004 - £4 million). At 31
December 2005, Diageo's deficit before taxation for all post employment plans
was £1,099 million (30 June 2005 - £1,294 million).
Operating profit
Operating profit before exceptional items for the period increased by £76
million to £1,261 million from £1,185 million in the comparable prior period.
There were no exceptional operating charges in the period ended 31 December
2005, compared to costs in respect of the period ended 31 December 2004 of £16
million.
Exchange rate movements reduced operating profit before exceptional items for
the six months ended 31 December 2005 by £19 million.
Non-operating exceptional items
Non-operating exceptional items before taxation were a gain of £151 million in
the six months ended 31 December 2005 compared with a gain of £218 million in
the six months ended 31 December 2004. The gain in the period to 31 December
2005 represents the gain on sale of all of the group's remaining 25 million
shares of common stock of General Mills. In the period to 31 December 2004
non-operating exceptional items included a gain of £219 million on the disposal
of 54 million shares of common stock of General Mills and a net charge of £1
million in respect of the disposal of businesses.
Finance charges
Finance charges increased by £19 million from £74 million in the period ended 31
December 2004 to £93 million in the six months ended 31 December 2005.
The net interest charge increased by £14 million from £78 million in the
comparable prior period to £92 million in the six months ended 31 December 2005.
This increase principally resulted from increasing US dollar interest rates,
the loss of interest income on the Burger King subordinated debt, the increase
in net borrowings in the period and the termination of certain financing
arrangements. IAS 39 - Financial instruments: recognition and measurement had no
net impact on the interest charge for the six months ended 31 December 2005.
Other finance charges of £1 million (2004 - income of £4 million) included
income of £10 million (2004 - income of £4 million) in respect of the group's
post employment plans. This beneficial movement principally reflects the
increase in the value of the assets held by the post employment plans between 1
July 2004 and 30 June 2005. Other finance charges also include a £5 million
charge (2004 - gain of £3 million) in respect of foreign exchange translation
differences on inter-company funding arrangements that do not meet the
accounting criteria for recognition in equity.
Associates
The group's share of profits of associates after interest and tax was £77
million for the period compared to £71 million in the comparable period last
year. Diageo's 34% equity interest in Moet Hennessy contributed £71 million to
share of profits of associates after interest and tax (2004 - £66 million).
Profit before taxation
After exceptional items, profit before taxation increased by £9 million from
£1,392 million to £1,401 million in the six months ended 31 December 2005.
Taxation
The tax charge is based upon the estimate of the average annual effective tax
rate expected for the full financial year with the exception of tax in respect
of transactions that are presented by the group as exceptional items or tax
presented by the group as an exceptional item in its own right which are
accounted for in the period in which the items arise.
The effective tax rate before exceptional items for the six months ended 31
December 2005 is 25% compared with 34% for the six months ended 31 December
2004. The higher effective tax rate in the period ended 31 December 2004
mainly resulted from the reduction in the carrying value of deferred tax assets
following a change in tax rate.
The effective tax rate for the six months ended 31 December 2005 after
exceptional items is 14% compared with 28% for the six months ended 31 December
2004. The effective tax rate in the current period has been reduced following
the agreement of certain brand carrying values with fiscal authorities which
resulted in recognising an increase in the group's deferred tax assets of £110
million. The profit on disposal arising on the sale of General Mills shares in
the period and the comparative period is not subject to tax.
Exchange rates
Based on current exchange rates, it is estimated that in the year ending 30 June
2006 there will be an adverse impact from exchange rate movements on profit
before exceptional items and taxation of £30 million (translation exchange only
on reported share of profits of associates). Based on current exchange rates it
is estimated that the impact from exchange rate movements on profit before
exceptional items and taxation for the year ending 30 June 2007 will not be
material.
Dividend
An interim dividend of 11.95 pence per share will be paid to holders of ordinary
shares and ADR's on the register on 10 March 2006. This represents an increase
of 5% on last year's interim dividend. The interim dividend will be paid to
shareholders on 6 April 2006. Payment to US ADR holders will be made on 12 April
2006. A dividend reinvestment plan is available in respect of the interim
dividend and the plan notice date is 16 March 2006.
In the AGM statement in October 2004 Diageo announced that while final decisions
on annual dividends will continue to be taken in the light of earnings
performance, inflation and other external factors, the Diageo Board would
expect, from February 2006, to hold the company's dividend increase to
shareholders to around 5% annually to gradually rebuild dividend cover.
Cash flow
Extract from the consolidated cash flow statement Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2005 31 December 2004
£ million £ million
Cash generated from operations 957 1,029
Interest paid (net) (61) (93)
Dividends paid to equity minority interests (20) (25)
Taxation (118) (153)
Net purchase of investments (1) (2)
Net capital expenditure (106) (114)
Free cash flow 651 642
Cash generated from operations decreased from £1,029 million to £957 million in
the period to 31 December 2005 principally as a result of a £141 million
investment in working capital driven mainly by growth in the underlying
business. The decrease in cash generated from operations was principally offset
by reduced interest payments (down £32 million to £61 million) and reduced tax
payments (down £35 million to £118 million) and as a result free cash flow
increased £9 million to £651 million from £642 million in the prior period.
In the six months ended 31 December 2005, Diageo issued new share capital
generating proceeds of £2 million (2004 - £3 million) and purchased 84.4 million
shares as part of the share buy-back programme (2004 - 48.2 million shares) at a
cost of £704 million (2004 - £353 million). Diageo's stance on capital structure
is unchanged: it continues to target a range of ratios which are currently
broadly consistent with an A band credit rating. Diageo expects to continue the
share repurchase programme at broadly the current level.
Balance sheet
At 31 December 2005, total equity was £4,789 million compared with £4,626
million at 30 June 2005. This increase was mainly due to the profit for the
period of £1,205 million offset by the dividend paid out of shareholders' equity
of £529 million and the shares repurchased of £704 million.
Net borrowings were £3,911 million at 31 December 2005, an increase of £208
million from 1 July 2005 net borrowings of £3,703 million. The principal
components of this increase were the free cash inflow of £651 million, proceeds
from disposal of shares of General Mills of £651 million offset by payments of
£704 million (including costs of £4 million) to repurchase shares to be held as
treasury shares, the payment of £207 million to acquire Bushmills Irish Whiskey
and a £529 million equity dividend paid.
Economic profit
Economic profit increased by £68 million from £400 million in the six months
ended 31 December 2004 to £468 million in the six months ended 31 December 2005.
See page 39 for calculation and definition of economic profit.
DIAGEO CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
Six months ended 31 December 2005 Six months ended 31 December 2004
Before
Before exceptional
exceptional Exceptional items Exceptional Total
items items Total (restated) items (restated)
£ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million
Sales 2 5,359 - 5,359 4,946 - 4,946
Excise duties (1,399) - (1,399) (1,272) - (1,272)
Net sales 3,960 - 3,960 3,674 - 3,674
Cost of sales 4 (1,511) - (1,511) (1,365) (14) (1,379)
Gross profit 2,449 - 2,449 2,309 (14) 2,295
Marketing (618) - (618) (572) - (572)
Other operating 4
expenses (570) - (570) (552) (2) (554)
Operating profit 2 1,261 - 1,261 1,185 (16) 1,169
Investment income 5 - 5 8 - 8
Sale of General Mills
shares 4 151 151 219 219
Sale of other businesses 4 - - (1) (1)
Net interest 3 (92) - (92) (78) - (78)
Other finance (charges)/
income 3 (1) - (1) 4 - 4
Share of associates'
profits after tax 77 - 77 71 - 71
Profit before taxation 1,250 151 1,401 1,190 202 1,392
Taxation 5 (313) 117 (196) (404) 14 (390)
Profit for the period 937 268 1,205 786 216 1,002
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders 898 268 1,166 751 216 967
Minority interests 39 - 39 35 -
35
7 937 268 1,205 786 216 1,002
Pence per share
Basic earnings 40.4p 32.2p
Diluted earnings 40.4p 32.2p
Average shares 2,886m 2,999m
DIAGEO CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
RECOGNISED INCOME AND EXPENSE
Six months ended
Six months ended 31 December 2004
31 December 2005 (restated)
£ million £ million £ million £ million
Net foreign exchange translation differences
- group (including minority interests) 33 (46)
- associates 18 54
Holding gains on available for sale securities
- unrealised gains arising during the year (including
exchange) 33 -
- realised gains reclassified to profit for the period (181) -
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
- group (18) -
- associates 1
Actuarial gains on post employment plans 236 -
Tax on items taken directly to equity (50) -
Net income recognised directly in equity 72 8
Profit for the period
- group 1,128 931
- associates 77 71 -
Profit for the period 1,205 - 1,002
Total recognised income and expense for the period 1,277 1,010
Impact of IAS 39 adoption on 1 July 2005 (net of tax)
- group 170
- associates (6)
Impact of adoption of IAS39 164 -
1,441 -
Attributable to
- equity shareholders of the parent company 1,229 982
- minority interests 48 28
Total recognised income and expense for the period 1,277 1,010
DIAGEO CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
31 December 2005 30 June 2005 31 December 2004
Notes £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million
Non-current assets
Intangible assets 4,723 4,392 4,050
Property, plant and equipment 1,987 1,936 1,794
Biological assets 5 14 6
Investments in associates 1,347 1,261 1,308
Other investments 66 719 1,048
Deferred tax assets 705 778 955
Post employment benefit assets 11 12 10
Other financial assets 96 - -
Trade and other receivables 40 68 116
8,980 9,180 9,287
Current assets
Inventories 8 2,488 2,347 2,245
Trade and other receivables 2,185 1,607 2,114
Cash and cash equivalents 1,039 787 1,082
5,712 4,741 5,441
Total assets 14,692 13,921 14,728
Current liabilities
Borrowings and bank overdrafts 10 (1,047) (869) (2,109)
Trade and other payables (1,984) (1,912) (2,107)
Corporate tax payable (806) (746) (795)
Provisions (101) (88) (173)
(3,938) (3,615) (5,184)
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings 10 (3,907) (3,677) (2,911)
Other payables (107) (95) (60)
Deferred tax liabilities (406) (298) (387)
Post employment benefit
Liabilities (1,110) (1,306) (1,056)
Other financial liabilities (149) - -
Provisions (286) (304) (133)
(5,965) (5,680) (4,547)
Total liabilities (9,903) (9,295) (9,731)
Net assets 4,789 4,626 4,997
Equity
Called up share capital 883 883 883
Share premium 1,339 1,337 1,334
Other reserves 3,187 3,180 3,074
Retained deficit (817) (941) (452)
Equity attributable to equity
shareholders of the company 4,592 4,459 4,839
Minority interests 197 167 158
Total equity 7 4,789 4,626 4,997
DIAGEO CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2005 31 December 2004
£ million £ million £ million £ million
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit for the period 1,205 1,002
Taxation 196 390
Share of associates' profit after taxation (77) (71)
Investment income (5) (8)
Net interest and finance charges 93 74
Net non-operating exceptional gains (151) (218)
Depreciation and amortisation 105 119
Movements in working capital (463) (322)
Dividend income 14 20
Other items 40 43
Cash generated from operations 957 1,029
Interest paid (98) (168)
Interest received 37 75
Dividends paid to equity minority interests (20) (25)
Taxation paid (118) (153)
Net cash from operating activities 758 758
Cash flows from investing activities
Net purchase of investments (1) (2)
Disposal of property, plant and equipment 2 10
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (108) (124)
Disposal of shares in General Mills 651 1,210
Disposal of subsidiaries, associates and businesses 122 13
Purchase of subsidiaries (207) (15)
Net cash from investing activities 459 1,092
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of share capital 2 3
Net purchase of own shares for share trusts (42) (54)
Own shares repurchased for cancellation - (61)
Own shares repurchased for holding as treasury shares (704) (292)
Increase/(decrease) in loans 296 (264)
Redemption of guaranteed preferred securities - (302)
Equity dividends paid (529) (512)
Net cash used in financing activities (977) (1,482)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 240 368
Exchange differences 12 (66)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period 729 668
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period 981 970
Cash and cash equivalents consist of:
Other cash and cash equivalents 1,039 1,082
Bank overdrafts (58) (112)
981 970
NOTES
1. Basis of preparation
For all periods up to and including the year ended 30 June 2005, Diageo prepared
its primary financial statements under UK generally accepted accounting
principles (UK GAAP). From 1 July 2005, the group is required to prepare its
consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Accounting
Standards, International Financial Reporting Standards and interpretations of
the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRSs) as
adopted for use in the European Union (EU). These interim results have been
prepared in accordance with IFRSs as expected to be applied in the group's
annual financial results for the year ended 30 June 2006. The group accounting
policies applied in these interim results are those available on Diageo's
website, www.diageo.com with exception of the adoption of the amendment to IAS
21 - The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates, the impact of which is
outlined below. Further details of the impact of the transition to IFRSs are
presented in note 12.
IFRSs are subject to ongoing review and endorsement by the EU or possible
amendment by interpretative guidance from the International Accounting Standards
Board (IASB) and are therefore still subject to change. Accordingly, the
information presented here and the format of presentation may be subject to
change as standards are endorsed by the EU, new guidance is issued or practice
develops.
IFRS 1 - First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards
permits certain optional exemptions from full retrospective application of IFRS
accounting policies and the following options have been adopted:
• Business combinations: Business combinations prior to the date of
transition have not been restated onto an IFRS basis.
• Cumulative translation differences: The cumulative translation difference
arising on consolidation has been deemed to be zero at the date of
transition.
• Share-based payments: Full retrospective application has been adopted.
• Financial instruments: The group has adopted the provisions of IAS 39
- Financial instruments: recognition and measurement and IAS 32 - Financial
instruments: presentation and disclosure from 1 July 2005. Financial
instruments in the year ended 30 June 2005 remain recorded in accordance
with previous UK GAAP accounting policies, and the adjustment to IAS 39 is
reflected in the balance sheet at 1 July 2005.
The group expects to be able to adopt the amendment to IAS 21 - The effects of
changes in foreign exchange rates approved by the IASB in November 2005 in its
annual financial statements for the year ending 30 June 2006 and therefore has
adopted this amendment in the interim financial statements. Whilst passed by the
IASB, this amendment has yet to be endorsed by the European Parliament. This
amendment clarifies the accounting treatment for net investments in foreign
subsidiaries and for the treatment of foreign exchange differences on monetary
items which form part of a reporting entity's net investment in a foreign
operation.
The effect of implementing this amendment is that a number of intra-group
financing arrangements are now regarded as part of the group's net investment in
foreign operations and the foreign exchange arising on translation of these
balances is recorded in equity. Prior to adoption of the amendment, IAS 21
required the foreign exchange arising on translation of these balances to be
taken to income. The effect on implementation of the amendment is to increase
the interest charge by £2 million (2004 - decrease of £1 million). Basic and
diluted earnings per share for the period ended 31 December 2005 have been
decreased by 0.1p (2004 - increased by 0.1p). There is no impact on net assets.
In the process of implementing the amendment to IAS 21, the group reconsidered
its interpretation of the wording of the original IAS 21 standard and has
identified that other foreign exchange losses of £26 million in the preliminary
IFRS information previously published for the period ended 31 December 2004 in
respect of intra-group financing arrangements forming part of the group's net
investment in foreign operations were originally charged to income and should
have been recognised directly in equity. The group has reclassified these
exchange losses resulting in an increase in other finance income of £26 million
in the six months ended 31 December 2004. Basic and diluted earnings per share
for the period ended 31 December 2004 have been increased by 0.8p. There is no
impact on net assets.
This interim financial information is unaudited but has been reviewed by the
auditors, KPMG Audit Plc, and their report is reproduced after these notes. The
information does not comprise the statutory accounts of the group. The
statutory accounts of Diageo plc for the year ended 30 June 2005, which were
prepared under UK GAAP, have been filed with the registrar of companies. KPMG
Audit Plc have reported on these accounts; their report was unqualified and did
not contain any statement under section 237 of the Companies Act 1985.
2. Business and geographical analyses
Business analysis is presented under the categories of Diageo North America,
Diageo Europe, Diageo International and Corporate, reflecting the group's
management and internal reporting structure.
Business analysis:
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2005 31 December 2004
Operating profit/ Operating
Sales (loss) Sales profit/(loss)*
£ million £ million £ million £ million
North America 1,565 476 1,385 454
Europe 2,221 494 2,244 463
International 1,533 371 1,289 346
5,319 1,341 4,918 1,263
Corporate 40 (80) 28 (78)
5,359 1,261 4,946 1,185
Geographical analysis of sales and operating profit by destination:
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2005 31 December 2004
Operating profit Operating
Sales Sales profit*
£ million £ million £ million £ million
Europe 2,292 426 2,296 394
North America 1,581 485 1,405 465
Asia Pacific 561 122 482 120
Latin America 402 106 310 97
Rest of World 523 122 453 109
5,359 1,261 4,946 1,185
* Operating profit for the period ended 31 December 2004 is before exceptional
operating charges of £16 million.
Sales and operating profit by geographical destination have been stated
according to the location of the third party customers.
Certain businesses within Diageo International for internal management purposes
have been reported within the appropriate market in the geographical analysis
above. Corporate sales and operating loss (principally central costs) are
incurred in Europe.
Net corporate operating costs and trading losses increased 3% to £80 million.
Corporate revenues and costs are in respect of central costs including finance,
human resources and legal as well as certain information system, service centre,
facilities and employee costs that are not directly allocated to the
geographical operating units. They also include the revenues and costs related
to rents receivable in respect of properties not used by Diageo in the
manufacture, sale or distribution of premium drinks and the results of
Gleneagles Hotel.
31 December 2005 31 December 2004
£ million £ million
Total assets:
North America 994 660
Europe 1,563 1,474
International 1,278 1,159
Moet Hennessy 1,304 1,263
Corporate and other 9,553 10,172
14,692 14,728
Weighted average exchange rates used in the translation of profit and loss
accounts were US dollar - £1 = $1.76 (2004 - £1 = $1.85) and euro - £1 = €1.47
(2004 - £1 = €1.46). Exchange rates used to translate assets and liabilities at
the balance sheet date were US dollar - £1 = $1.72 (2004 - £1 = $1.92) and euro
- £1 = €1.46 (2004 - £1 = €1.42). The group uses foreign exchange transaction
hedges to mitigate the effect of exchange rate movements.
The Christmas holiday season provides the peak period for sales. Approximately
30% of annual sales volume occurs in the last three months of each calendar
year.
3. Interest and other finance charges
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 31 December 2004
2005 (restated)
£ million £ million
Interest payable (107) (135)
Interest receivable 15 57
Net interest (92) (78)
Net finance income in respect of post employment plans 10 4
Unwinding of discounts on provisions and debtors (6) (3)
Other finance charges (1) -
3 1
Net exchange movements on certain financial instruments (4) 3
Other finance (charges)/income (1) 4
4. Exceptional items
Following the implementation of IFRS, the group has decided to continue with its
separate presentation of certain items as 'exceptional'. These are items which,
in management's judgement, need to be disclosed by virtue of their size or
incidence in order for the user to obtain a proper understanding of the
financial information.
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2005 31 December 2004
£ million £ million
Operating costs
Park Royal brewery accelerated
depreciation - (14)
Seagram integration costs - (6)
Disposal of fixed assets - 4
- (16)
Disposals
Shares in General Mills 151 219
Other - (1)
151 202
5. Income taxes
The £196 million total taxation charge for the six months ended 31 December 2005
comprises a UK tax charge of £50 million and a foreign tax charge of £146
million. Exceptional tax credits amounted to £117 million in the period (2004 -
£14 million) reflecting a £110 million increase in the group's deferred tax
assets following agreement of certain brand carrying values with fiscal
authorities.
6. Dividends
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2005 31 December 2004
£ million £ million
Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders in the period
Final dividend paid for the year ended 30 June 2005 of 18.2p (2004 -
17.0p) per share 529 512
An interim dividend of 11.95 pence per share for the six months ended 31
December 2005 (2004 - 11.35 pence per share) was approved by the Board on 15
February 2006 and as the approval was after the balance sheet date it has not
been included as a liability.
7. Movements in total equity
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2005 31 December 2004
(restated)
£ million £ million
Total equity at beginning of the period 4,626
Adoption of IAS 39 on 1 July 2005 164
Restated total equity at beginning of the period 4,790 5,229
Profit for the period 1,205 1,002
Dividends paid to equity shareholders (529) (512)
Dividends paid to minority interests (20) (25)
Exchange adjustments 51 8
Tax on exchange adjustments in reserves 7 -
New share capital issued 2 3
Share trust arrangements (27) (42)
Purchase of own shares for cancellation - (61)
Purchase of own shares held as treasury shares (704) (292)
Actuarial gains on post employment plans 179 -
Redemption of preferred securities (net) - (312)
Other recognised losses -(165) (1)
Net movement in total equity (1) (232)
Total equity at end of the period 4,789 4,997
Total equity at the end of the period includes gains of £169 million in respect
of cumulative translation differences (2004 - gains of £14 million) and £1,349
million in respect of own shares held as treasury shares (2004 - £292 million).
8. Inventories
31 December 31 December
2005 2004
£ million £ million
Raw materials and consumables 273 231
Work in progress 22 15
Maturing stocks 1,610 1,484
Finished goods and goods for resale 583 515
2,488 2,245
9. Reconciliation of movement in net borrowings
Six months ended Six months ended
31 December 2005 31 December 2004
£ million £ million
Net borrowings at beginning of the period (3,706) (4,156)
Adoption of IAS 39 on 1 July 2005 3 -
Restated net borrowings at beginning of the period (3,703) (4,156)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents after exchange 252 302
Cash flow from change in loans (296) 264
Change in net borrowings from cash flows (44) 566
Exchange adjustments on borrowings (162) 98
Other non-cash items (2) 8
(Increase)/decrease in net borrowings (208) 672
Net borrowings at end of the period (3,911) (3,484)
10. Net borrowings
31 December 31 December
2005 2004
£ million £ million
Debt due within one year and overdrafts (1,047) (2,109)
Debt due after one year (3,907) (2,911)
Interest rate swaps 9 -
Obligations under finance leases (10) (10)
(4,955) (5,030)
Less: Cash and cash equivalents 1,039 1,082
Other liquid resources 14 506
Foreign currency swaps (9) (42)
Net borrowings (3,911) (3,484)
In the period ended 31 December 2005 the group issued a US$ 750 million global
bond repayable in 2015 with a coupon of 5.30% and a US$ 250 million medium term
note repayable in 2008 with floating rate coupons. A US$ 500 million bond
matured and was repaid in the period.
11. Contingent liabilities and legal proceedings
(i) Guarantees In connection with the disposal of Pillsbury, Diageo has
guaranteed the debt of a third party to the amount of $200 million (£116
million) until November 2009. Including this guarantee, but net of the amount
provided in the consolidated financial statements, the group has given
performance guarantees and indemnities to the third parties of £176 million.
There has been no material change since 31 December 2005 in the group's
performance guarantees and indemnities.
(ii) Colombian litigation An action was filed on 8 October 2004 in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of New York by the Republic of
Colombia and a number of its local government entities against Diageo and other
spirits companies. The complaint alleges several causes of action. Included
among the causes of action is a claim that the defendants allegedly violated the
Federal RICO Act by facilitating money laundering in Colombia through their
supposed involvement in the contraband trade to the detriment of government
owned spirits production and distribution businesses. The complaint was amended
on 29 December 2004 to add eight additional local Colombian government entities
as plaintiffs. Diageo intends to defend itself vigorously against this lawsuit.
(iii) Alcohol advertising litigation At least nine nearly identical putative
class actions were filed in state and federal courts in the United States
against Diageo plc, Diageo North America Inc and other Diageo entities, along
with a large group of other beverage alcohol manufacturers, brewers and
importers. All have been brought by the same national counsel. In each
action, the plaintiffs seek to pursue their claims on behalf of parents and
guardians of people under the legal drinking age who illegally bought alcohol
beverages during the period from 1982 to the present.
Plaintiffs allege several causes of action, principally for negligence, unjust
enrichment and violation of state consumer fraud statutes. Some complaints
include additional claims based on conspiracy, nuisance and on other legal
theories.
The litigation is ongoing and Diageo intends to defend itself vigorously against
these claims.
(iv) Other The group has extensive international operations and is defendant in
a number of legal proceedings incidental to these operations. There are a number
of legal claims against the group, the outcome of which cannot at present be
foreseen.
Save as disclosed above, neither Diageo, nor any member of the Diageo group, is
or has been engaged in, nor (so far as Diageo is aware) is there pending or
threatened by or against it, any legal or arbitration proceedings which may have
a significant effect on the financial position of the Diageo group.
12. Explanation of transition to IFRS
These are the group's first consolidated interim results for part of the period
covered by the first annual consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with IFRS.
The group has adopted the amendment to IAS 21 and accordingly the results for
the comparative period have been restated (see note 1 for further information).
In preparing its IFRS balance sheet at the transition date (1 July 2004),
comparative information for the six months ended 31 December 2004 and financial
statements for the year ended 30 June 2005, the group has adjusted amounts
reported previously in financial statements prepared in accordance with UK GAAP.
Set out in the following tables is the UK GAAP to IFRS reconciliation of
profit for the period for the six months ended 31 December 2004 and year ended
30 June 2005 and a reconciliation of total equity at 1 July 2004, 31 December
2004 and 30 June 2005.
Reconciliation of profit for the period
Year ended Six months ended
30 June 2005 31 December 2004
(restated) (restated)
£ million £ million
Profit after taxation under UK GAAP 1,439 908
Reversal of goodwill recycled to income statement on disposal (IAS 38) 247 247
Amortisation of deferred tax assets (IAS 12) (267) (149)
Foreign exchange differences on inter-company funding loans (IAS 21) (8) 3
Share based payments (IFRS 2) (9) (4)
Other (3) (3)
Profit for the period under IFRS 1,399 1,002
Reconciliation of total equity
30 June 31 December 1 July 2004
2005 2004 £ million
£ million £ million
Total shareholders' funds and minority interests under UK GAAP 3,834 4,284 4,183
Valuation of net post employment benefit liability (IAS 19) (52) (58) (54)
Net deferred tax asset on brands and group re-organisations (IAS 12) 423 548 706
De-recognition of final dividend creditor (IAS 10) 530 336 513
Elimination of revaluation reserve (IAS 16) (111) (111) (113)
Other 2 (2) (6)
Total equity under IFRS 4,626 4,997 5,229
Net impact of implementation of IAS 39 164
Total equity under IFRS at 1 July 2005 4,790
In accordance with the exemption available in IFRS 1, the group has adopted IAS
39 - Financial instruments recognition and measurement and IAS 32 - Financial
instruments presentation and disclosure with effect from 1 July 2005, the
principal impact of these standards being to change the carrying value of
financial instruments in the group's financial statements. The impact of
adoption of these standards on the balance sheet at 1 July 2005 (date of
adoption) is set out in the following table:
30 June Impact of 1 July 31 December
2005 IAS 39 2005 2005
£ million £ million £ million £ million
Non-current assets
Investments in associates 1,261 (6) 1,255 1,347
Other investments 719 148 867 66
Deferred tax assets 778 10 788 705
Other financial assets 96 96 96
Other non-current assets 6,422 70 6,492 6,766
9,180 318 9,498 8,980
Current assets 4,741 - 4,741 5,712
Total assets 13,921 318 14,239 14,692
Current liabilities (3,615) 41 (3,574) (3,938)
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings (3,677) (67) (3,744) (3,907)
Other financial liabilities (128) (128) (149)
Other non-current liabilities (2,003) - (2,003) (1,909)
(5,680) (195) (5,875) (5,965)
Total liabilities (9,295) (154) (9,449) (9,903)
Net assets 4,626 164 4,790 4,789
Equity
Other reserves 5,400 123 5,523 5,409
Retained deficit (941) 41 (900) (817)
Equity attributable to equity shareholders
of the company
4,459 164 4,623 4,592
Minority interests 167 - 167 197
Total equity 4,626 164 4,790 4,789
The group accounting policies applied to the financial information for the six
months ended 31 December 2005, the comparative information for the six months
ended 31 December 2004, the financial statements for the year ended 30 June
2005, and the preparation of an opening balance sheet at 1 July 2004 (the
group's date of transition), are available on Diageo's website, www.diageo.com
with the exception of the adoption of the amendment to IAS 21, the impact of
which is outlined in note 1.
INDEPENDENT REVIEW REPORT TO DIAGEO PLC
Introduction
We have been engaged by the company to review the financial information set out
on pages 18 to 30 and we have read the other information contained in the
interim report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or
material inconsistencies with the financial information.
This report is made solely to the company in accordance with the terms of our
engagement to assist the company in meeting the requirements of the Listing
Rules of the Financial Services Authority. Our review has been undertaken so
that we might state to the company those matters we are required to state to it
in this report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law,
we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company for
our review work, for this report, or for the conclusions we have reached.
Directors' responsibilities
The interim report, including the financial information contained therein, is
the responsibility of and has been approved by the directors. The directors are
responsible for preparing the interim report in accordance with the Listing
Rules which require that the accounting policies and presentation applied to the
interim figures should be consistent with those applied in preparing the
preceding annual financial statements except where any changes, and the reasons
for them, are disclosed.
As disclosed in note 1 to the financial information, the next annual financial
statements of the group will be prepared in accordance with IFRSs adopted for
use in the European Union.
The accounting policies that have been adopted in preparing the financial
information are consistent with those that the directors currently intend to use
in the next annual financial statements. There is, however, a possibility that
the directors may determine that some changes to these policies are necessary
when preparing the full annual financial statements for the first time in
accordance with those IFRSs adopted for use by the European Union. This is
because, as disclosed in note 1, the directors have anticipated that the
amendment to IAS 21 - The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates, which
has yet to be formally adopted for use in the EU, will be so adopted in time to
be applicable to the next annual financial statements.
Review work performed
We conducted our review in accordance with guidance contained in Bulletin 1999/4
Review of interim financial information issued by the Auditing Practices Board
for use in the United Kingdom. A review consists principally of making enquiries
of group management and applying analytical procedures to the financial
information and underlying financial data and, based thereon, assessing whether
the accounting policies and presentation have been consistently applied unless
otherwise disclosed. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit
performed in accordance with Auditing Standards and therefore provides a lower
level of assurance than an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit
opinion on the financial information.
Review conclusion
On the basis of our review we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the financial information as presented for the six months
ended 31 December 2005.
KPMG Audit Plc
Chartered Accountants
London, England
15 February 2006
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR SHAREHOLDERS
EXPLANATORY NOTES
Definitions
Unless otherwise stated, percentage movements given throughout this announcement
for volume, sales, net sales after deducting excise duties, marketing and
operating profit are organic movements (at level exchange rates and after
adjusting for acquisitions and disposals) for continuing operations. They are
before exceptional items. Comparisons are with the equivalent period in the
last financial year. For an explanation of organic movements please refer to
Diageo's annual report for the year ended 30 June 2005 and 'Reconciliation to
GAAP measures' in this announcement.
Volume has been measured on an equivalent units basis to nine litre cases of
spirits. An equivalent unit represents one nine litre case of spirits, which is
approximately 272 servings. A serving comprises 33ml of spirits, 165ml of wine,
or 330ml of ready to drink or beer. Therefore, to convert volume of products,
other than spirits, to equivalent units, the following guide has been used: beer
in hectolitres divide by 0.9, wine in nine litre cases divide by five and ready
to drink in nine litre cases divide by 10.
Net sales are sales less excise duties.
Exceptional items are those that in management's judgement need to be disclosed
by virtue of their size or incidence in order for the user to obtain a proper
understanding of the financial information. Such items are included within the
income statement caption to which they relate.
References to ready to drink include flavoured malt beverages in the United
States. References to Smirnoff ready to drink include Smirnoff Ice, Smirnoff
Black Ice, Smirnoff Twisted V, Smirnoff Mule, Smirnoff Spin, Smirnoff Caesar
and Smirnoff Signatures. References to Smirnoff Black Ice include Smirnoff Ice
Triple Black in the United States.
Volume share is a brand's volume when compared to the volume of all brands in
its segment. Value share is a brand's retail sales when compared to the retail
sales of all brands in its segment. The share data contained in this
announcement is taken from independent industry sources in the markets in which
Diageo operates. Unless otherwise stated, share refers to volume share.
Share of voice is the media spend of a particular brand when compared to all
brands in its segment. The share of voice data in this announcement is taken
from independent industry sources in the markets in which Diageo operates.
This announcement contains forward-looking statements that involve risk and
uncertainty. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and
developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements, including factors beyond Diageo's control. Please
refer to page 40 -'Cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements'
for more details.
This announcement includes names of Diageo's products which constitute
trademarks or trade names which Diageo owns or which others own and license to
Diageo for its use.
Reconciliation to GAAP measures
(i) Organic movement
Organic movement in volume, sales, net sales after deducting excise duties,
operating profit before exceptional items and basic earnings per share are
measures not specifically used in the consolidated financial statements
themselves (non-GAAP measures). The performance of the group is discussed using
these measures.
In the discussion of the performance of the business, certain information is
presented using sterling amounts on a constant currency basis. This strips out
the effect of foreign exchange rate movements and enables an understanding of
the underlying performance of the market that is most closely influenced by the
actions of that market's management. The risk from foreign exchange is managed
centrally and is not a factor over which local managers have any control.
Acquisitions and disposals also impact the reported performance and therefore
the reported movement in any period in which they arise. Management adjusts for
the impact of such transactions in assessing the performance of the underlying
business.
The underlying performance on a constant currency basis and excluding the impact
of acquisitions and disposals is referred to as 'organic' performance. Organic
movement calculations enable the reader to focus on the performance of the
business which is common to both periods.
Organic movement in volume, sales, net sales after deducting excise duties, and
operating profit before exceptional items
Diageo's strategic planning and budgeting process is based on organic movement
in volume, sales, net sales after deducting excise duties and operating profit
before exceptional items, and these measures closely reflect the way in which
operating targets are defined and performance is monitored by the group's
management. Therefore organic movement measures most closely reflect the way in
which the business is managed.
These measures are chosen for planning, budgeting, reporting and incentive
purposes since they represent those measures which local managers are most
directly able to influence and they enable consideration of the underlying
business performance without the distortion caused by fluctuating exchange
rates, acquisitions and disposals.
The group's management believes these measures provide valuable additional
information for users of the financial statements in understanding the group's
performance since they provide information on those elements of performance
which local managers are most directly able to influence and focus on that
element of the core brand portfolio which is common to both periods. They
should be viewed as complementary to, and not a replacement for, the comparable
GAAP measures: sales, net sales after deducting excise duties and reported
movements in individual income statement captions. These GAAP measures reflect
all of the factors which impact on the business.
The organic movement calculations for volume, sales, net sales after deducting
excise duties and operating profit before exceptional items for the six months
ended 31 December 2005 were as follows:
1. Volume
Organic
2004 Acquisitions movement 2005 Organic
units units units units movement
million million million million %
North America 24.5 0.1 0.9 25.5 4
Europe 23.8 0.2 - 24.0 -
International 20.6 0.2 2.3 23.1 11
Total 68.9 0.5 3.2 72.6 5
2. Sales
Acquisitions Organic
2004(1) Transfers Exchange and disposals Organic 2005 movement
Reported (2) (3) (4) movement Reported (a)
£ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million %
North America 1,385 - 60 23 97 1,565 7
Europe 2,244 (8) (14) 3 (4) 2,221 -
International 1,289 - 36 10 198 1,533 15
Corporate 28 8 - - 4 40 11
Total 4,946 - 82 36 295 5,359 6
3. Net sales after deducting excise duties
Acquisitions Organic
2004(1) Transfers Exchange and disposals Organic 2005 movement
Reported (2) (3) (4) movement Reported (a)
£ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million %
North America 1,168 49 22 90 1,329 7
Europe 1,450 (8) (15) (4) (15) 1,408 (1)
International 1,028 22 8 125 1,183 12
Corporate 28 8 - - 4 40 11
Total 3,674 - 56 26 204 3,960 5
Excise duties 1,272 1,399
Sales 4,946 5,359
4. Operating profit before exceptional items (b)
Acquisitions Organic
2004(1) Transfers Exchange and disposals Organic 2005 movement
Reported (2) (3) (4) movement Reported (a)
£ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million %
North America 454 - (2) 3 21 476 5
Europe 463 (4) (3) 8 30 494 7
International 346 (2) (14) 1 40 371 12
Corporate (78) 6 - - (8) (80) (11)
Total 1,185 - (19) 12 83 1,261 7
Notes - Information relating to the current period
(1) Results for 2004 have been restated for the impacts of implementing IFRS.
(2) Transfers represents the reallocation of the Guinness Storehouse visitor
centre in Dublin from Europe into the corporate business segment and the
transfer of the costs relating to a global information technology project
from Corporate into Europe and International.
(3) The exchange adjustments for sales, net sales after deducting excise
duties and operating profit before exceptional items are principally in
respect of the US dollar.
(4) Acquisitions in the period ended 31 December 2005 are only in
respect of the acquisition of The Old Bushmills Distillery Company Limited.
Acquisitions impacting the calculation of organic growth in the period were in
respect of the acquisition of The Chalone Wine Group (North America), Ursus
Vodka Holdings B.V. (Europe) and Ghana Breweries Limited (International).
Disposals affecting the period are only the disposal of United Beverages Limited
(Europe) which contributed sales, net sales after deducting excise duties and
operating profit before exceptional items of £16 million, £16 million and £nil
respectively in the six months ended 31 December 2004.
Notes - Information relating to the organic movement calculations
a) The organic movement percentage is the amount in the column headed
'Organic movement' in the table above expressed as a percentage of the
aggregate of the columns headed 2004 Reported, Transfers, Exchange and the
values for disposals (see note 4 above) from the column headed Acquisitions and
disposals. The inclusion of the column headed Exchange in the organic movement
calculation reflects the adjustment to exclude the effect of exchange rate
movements by recalculating the prior period results as if they had been
generated at the current period's exchange rates. Organic movement percentages
are calculated as the organic movement amount in £ million, expressed as the
percentage of the prior period results at current year exchange rates and after
adjusting for disposals. The basis of calculation means that the results used to
measure organic movement for a given period will be adjusted when used to
measure organic movement in the subsequent period.
b) Where a business, brand, brand distribution right or agency agreement
was disposed of, or terminated, in the current period, the group, in organic
movement calculations, adjusts the results for the comparable prior period to
exclude the amount the group earned in that period that it could not have earned
in the current period (i.e. the period between the date in the prior period,
equivalent to the date of the disposal in the current period, and the end of the
prior period). As a result, the organic movement numbers reflect only comparable
performance. Similarly, if a business was disposed of part way through the
equivalent prior period then its contribution would be completely excluded from
that prior period's performance in the organic movement calculation, since the
group recognised no contribution from that business in the current period. In
the calculation of operating profit before exceptional items the overheads
included in disposals were only those directly attributable to the businesses
disposed, and do not result from subjective judgements of management. For
acquisitions, a similar adjustment is made in the organic movement calculations.
For acquisitions subsequent to the end of the equivalent prior period, the post
acquisition results in the current period are excluded from the organic movement
calculations. For acquisitions in the prior period, post acquisition results are
included in full in the prior period but are only included from the anniversary
of the acquisition date in the current period.
c) A further adjustment in organic movement is made to exclude the
effect of exchange rate movements by recalculating the prior period's results as
if they had been generated at the current period's exchange rates.
Organic movement in earnings per share
The group's management believes basic earnings per share on a reported and
organic movement basis, provides valuable additional information for users of
the financial statements in understanding the group's overall performance. The
group's management believe that the comparison of movements on both a reported
and organic basis provides information as to the individual components of the
movement in basic earnings per share being: the impact of exceptional items,
fluctuating exchange rates, acquisitions and disposals arising in the period and
changes in the effective rate of tax. These measures should be viewed as
complementary to, and not a replacement for, the comparable GAAP measures such
as basic and diluted earnings per share and reported movements thereon. These
GAAP measures reflect all of the factors which impact on the business.
The organic movement calculation in earnings per share for the six months ended
31 December 2005 was as follows:
p per share (5)
Reported basic eps for period ended 31 December 2004 32.2
Exceptional items (1) (7.2)
Basic eps before exceptional items for period ended 31 December 2004 25.0
Disposals (2) (a) 0.3
Exchange (3) (d) (1.1)
Tax equalisation to 25% (4) 3.9
Restated basic eps for period ended 31 December 2004 28.1
Reported basic eps for period ended 31 December 2005 40.4
Exceptional items (1) (9.3)
Acquisitions (2) (b) (0.1)
Exchange (3) (d) 0.1
Basic eps before exceptional items for the period ended 31 December 2005 31.1
Reported basic eps movement amount 8.2p
Basic eps before exceptional items movement amount 6.1p
Organic movement amount (c) 3.0p
Reported basic eps growth 25%
Basic eps before exceptional items growth 24%
Organic growth (c) 11%
Notes - Information relating to the current period
1) The exceptional items (after tax and attributable to equity
shareholders) reported by the group for the period ended 31 December 2005 were a
gain of £268 million (2004 - a gain of £216 million) equating to 9.3 pence per
share for the period ended 31 December 2005 and 7.2 pence per share for the
period ended 31 December 2004.
2) Acquisitions in the period ended 31 December 2005 are in respect of
the acquisition of The Old Bushmills Distillery Company Limited. Acquisitions
impacting the calculation of organic growth in the period were in respect of the
acquisition of The Chalone Wine Group (North America), Ursus Vodka Holdings B.V.
(Europe) and Ghana Breweries Limited (International). Disposals affecting the
period are the disposal of United Beverages Limited (Europe) and the impact of
the disposal of 25 million shares of the common stock of General Mills.
Acquisitions contributed 0.1 pence per share for the period ended 31 December
2005.
3) Exchange - The exchange adjustments for operating profit before
exceptional items, net finance charges and taxation before exceptional items are
principally in respect of the US dollar. Transaction exchange adjustments are
taxed at the effective tax rate for the period. Exchange had an adverse impact
of 0.1 pence per share for the period ended 31 December 2005.
4) Tax equalisation - the impact of equalising the effective rate of
tax on profit before exceptional items and tax from the reported rate to 25%.
The group's underlying effective rate of tax before exceptional items is
expected to be 25%.
This adjustment is expected to be applied in the financial year ending 30 June
2006 only. The group adopted IFRS in the period ended 31 December 2005 and the
group's results for the period ended 31 December 2004 have been restated from UK
GAAP to IFRS. Under IFRS the effective rate of tax on profit before exceptional
items for the period ended 31 December 2004 was 34%, the equivalent rate under
UK GAAP was 24%. The increase in the effective tax rate under IFRS arose
primarily as a result of the implementation of IAS 12 - Income taxes in respect
of the recognition of movements in deferred tax.
5) All amounts are derived from amounts in £ million divided by the
weighted average number of shares in issue for the period to 31 December 2005 of
2,886 million (2004 - 2,999 million).
Notes - Information relating to the organic movement calculations
a) Where a business, brand, brand distribution right or agency agreement
or investment was disposed of, or terminated, in the current period, the
group, in organic movement calculations, adjusts the profit for the period
attributable to equity shareholders for the comparable prior period to exclude
the following: i) the amount the group earned in that period that it could not
have earned in the current period (i.e. the period between the date in the prior
period, equivalent to the date of the disposal in the current period, and the
end of the prior period), ii) a capital return in respect of the reduction in
interest charge had the disposal proceeds been used entirely to reduce
borrowings, and iii) taxation at the rate applying in the jurisdiction in which
the asset or business disposed was domiciled. As a result, the organic movement
numbers reflect only comparable performance. Similarly, if a business or
investment asset was disposed of part-way through the equivalent prior period
then its impact on the profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders
(i.e. after adjustment for a capital return from use of the proceeds of the
disposal to reduce borrowings and tax at the rate applying in the jurisdiction
in which the asset or business disposed was taxed) would be completely excluded
from that prior period's performance in the organic movement calculation, since
the group recognised no contribution from that business in the current period.
b) Where a business, brand, brand distribution right or agency agreement or
investment is acquired subsequent to the end of the equivalent prior period, the
group, in organic movement calculations adjusts the profit for the current
period attributable to equity shareholders to exclude the following: i) the
amount the group earned in the current period that it could not have earned in
the prior period, ii) a capital charge in respect of the increase in interest
charge had the acquisition been funded entirely by an increase in borrowings,
and iii) taxation at the rate applying in the jurisdiction in which the business
acquired is domiciled. As a result, the organic movement numbers reflect only
comparable performance. Similarly, if a business or investment asset was
acquired part way through the equivalent prior period then its impact on the
profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders (i.e. after adjustment
for a capital charge for the funding of the acquisition and tax at the rate
applying in the jurisdiction in which the acquired business is taxed) would be
adjusted in that prior period's performance in the organic movement calculation,
since the group recognised a full period's contribution from that business in
the current period.
c) Organic movement percentages for basic earnings per share are calculated
as the organic movement amount in pence (p), expressed as the percentage of the
prior period results at current year exchange rates, and after adjusting for
exceptional items, tax equalisation and acquisitions and disposals. The basis of
calculation means that the results used to measure organic movement for a given
period will be adjusted when used to measure organic movement in the subsequent
period.
d) The exchange effects of IAS 21 in respect of short term intercompany
funding balances as recognised in other finance charges / income are removed
from both the current and prior period as part of the organic movement
calculation.
(ii) Free cash flow
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure that comprises net cash from operating
activities as well as the net purchase and disposal of investments and property,
plant and equipment that form part of net cash from investing activities. The
group's management believe the measure assists users of the financial statements
in understanding the group's cash generating performance as it comprises items
that arise from the running of the ongoing business.
The remaining components of net cash from investing activities that do not form
part of free cash flow, as defined by the group's management, relate to the
purchase and disposal of subsidiaries, associates and businesses. The group's
management regards the purchase and disposal of property, plant and equipment as
ultimately non-discretionary since ongoing investment in plant and machinery is
required to support the day-to-day operations, whereas purchases and disposals
of businesses are discretionary. However, free cash flow does not necessarily
reflect all amounts that the group either has a constructive or legal obligation
to incur. Where appropriate, separate discussion is given for the impacts of
acquisitions and disposals of businesses, equity dividends and purchase of own
shares - each of which arises from decisions that are independent from the
running of the ongoing underlying business.
The free cash flow measure is also used by management for their own planning,
budgeting, reporting and incentive purposes since it provides information on
those elements of performance which local managers are most directly able to
influence.
(iii) Return on average total invested capital
Return on average total invested capital is a non-GAAP measure that is used by
management to assess the return obtained from the group's asset base. This
measure is not specifically used in the consolidated financial statements, but
is calculated to aid comparison of the performance of the business.
The profit used in assessing the return on total invested capital reflects the
operating performance of the business after the effective tax rate for the
period stated before exceptional items and interest. Average total invested
capital is calculated using the average derived from the consolidated balance
sheets at the beginning and the end of the period. Capital employed comprises
net assets for the period, excluding post employment benefit liabilities (net of
deferred tax) and net borrowings. This average total invested capital is
aggregated with restructuring and integration costs net of tax, which have been
charged to exceptional items, and goodwill written off to reserves at 1 July
2004 being the date of transition to IFRS.
Calculations for the return on average total invested capital for the six months
ended 31 December 2005 and 31 December 2004 were as follows:
2005 2004
£ million £ million
Operating profit before exceptional items 1,261 1,185
Associates after interest and taxation 77 71
Dividends receivable from investments 5 8
Effective tax rate 25% (2004 - 25%)* (336) (316)
1,007 948
Average net assets 5,671 5,880
Average net borrowings 3,807 3,820
Average integration costs (net of tax) 931 916
Average goodwill 1,562 1,562
Average total invested capital 11,971 12,178
Return on average total invested capital 16.8% 15.6%
* The effective tax rate for 2004 has been adjusted to 25% to achieve a
comparable measure in the year of IFRS adoption (2004 effective tax rate under
IFRS was 34%)
(iv) Economic profit
Economic profit is a non-GAAP measure that is used by management to assess the
group's return from its asset base compared to a standard cost of capital
charge. The measure is not specifically used in the consolidated financial
statements, but is calculated to aid comparison of the performance of the
business.
The profit used in assessing the return from the group's asset base and the
asset base itself are the same as those used in the calculation for the return
on average total invested capital (see (iii) above). The standard capital charge
applied to the average total invested capital is currently 9%, being
management's assessment of a constant minimum level of return that the group
expects to generate from its asset base. Economic profit is calculated as the
difference between the standard capital charge on the average invested assets
and the actual return achieved by the group on those assets.
Calculations for economic profit for the six months ended 31 December 2005 and
31 December 2004 were as follows:
2005 2004
£ million £ million
Average total invested capital (see (iii) above) 11,971 12,178
Operating profit before exceptional items 1,261 1,185
Associates after interest and taxation 77 71
Dividends receivable from investments 5 8
Effective tax rate 25% (2004 - 25%)* (336) (316)
1,007 948
Capital charge at 9% of average total invested capital (50% half year) (539) (548)
Economic profit 468 400
* The effective tax rate for 2004 has been adjusted to 25% to achieve a
comparable measure in the year of IFRS adoption (2004 effective tax rate under
IFRS was 34%)
Cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements
This document contains statements with respect to the financial condition,
results of operations and business of Diageo and certain of the plans and
objectives of Diageo with respect to these items. These forward-looking
statements are made pursuant to the 'Safe Harbor' provisions of the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, all
statements that express forecasts, expectations and projections with respect to
future matters, including trends in results of operations, margins, growth
rates, overall market trends, the impact of interest or exchange rates, the
availability of financing to Diageo, anticipated cost savings or synergies and
the completion of Diageo's strategic transactions, are forward-looking
statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and
uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will
occur in the future. There are a number of factors that could cause actual
results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
these forward-looking statements, including factors that are outside Diageo's
control.
These factors include, but are not limited to:
• increased competitive product and pricing pressures and unanticipated
actions by competitors that could impact Diageo's market share, increase
expenses and hinder growth potential;
• the effects of future business combinations, partnerships, acquisitions
or disposals, existing or future, and the ability to realise expected synergies
and/or costs savings;
• Diageo's ability to complete existing or future acquisitions and
disposals;
• legal and regulatory developments, including changes in regulations
regarding consumption of, or advertising for, beverage alcohol, changes in
accounting standards, taxation requirements, such as the impact of excise tax
increases with respect to the business, environmental laws and the laws
governing pensions;
• developments in the alcohol advertising class actions and any similar
proceedings or other litigation directed at the drinks and spirits industry;
• developments in the Colombian litigation and any similar proceedings;
• changes in consumer preferences and tastes, demographic trends or
perception about health related issues;
• changes in the cost of raw materials and labour costs;
• changes in economic conditions in countries in which Diageo operates,
including changes in levels of consumer spending;
• levels of marketing, promotional and innovation expenditure by Diageo
and its competitors;
• renewal of distribution rights on favourable terms when they expire;
• termination of existing distribution rights on agency brands;
• technological developments that may affect the distribution of products
or impede Diageo's ability to protect its intellectual property rights; and
• changes in financial and equity markets, including significant interest
rate and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which may affect
Diageo's access to or increase the cost of financing or which may affect
Diageo's financial results.
All oral and written forward-looking statements made on or after the date of
this announcement and attributable to Diageo are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the above factors and the 'risk factors' contained in the annual
report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2005 filed with the US Securities
and Exchange Commission. Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of
Diageo speak only as of the date they are made. Diageo does not undertake to
update forward-looking statements to reflect any changes in Diageo's
expectations with regard thereto or any changes in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any such statement is based. The reader should, however,
consult any additional disclosures that Diageo may make in documents it files
with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
The information in this announcement does not constitute an offer to sell or an
invitation to buy shares in Diageo plc or any other invitation or inducement to
engage in investment activities.
This document includes disclosure about Diageo's debt rating. A security rating
is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to
revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organisation. Each
rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Past performance cannot be relied upon as a guide to future performance.
For further information
Diageo's interim results presentation to analysts and investors will be
broadcast at 09.30 (UK time) on Thursday 16 February 2006. The presentation
will be available on the Diageo website www.diageo.com and also at
www.cantos.com. Prior to the event the presentation slides will also be
available to download from Diageo's home page.
You will be able to listen to a live broadcast of the presentation and to the
question and answer session.
The number to call is:
France +33 1 70 75 00 02
Germany +49 69 2222 52100
Ireland +353 1 246 0034
Netherlands +31 20 710 0075
Spain +34 91 414 15 45
UK +44 20 7019 0810
USA (toll free) 1 877 951 7311
Passcode: Diageo results
After the presentation the slides and accompanying text will be available to
download from Diageo's homepage.
You will be able to view a recording of the presentation and question and answer
session on the Diageo website from 14.00 (UK time) on the day. This facility
will be available until 16 March 2006.
A press conference will take place beginning at 12.30 (UK time) on Thursday 16
February and will be broadcast live from a link on www.diageo.com.
Diageo management will host a conference call for analysts and investors at
15.00 (UK time) on Thursday 16 February 2005. Call this number to
participate:
France +33 1 70 75 00 02
Germany +49 69 2222 52100
Ireland +353 1 246 0034
Netherlands +31 20 710 0075
Spain +34 91 414 15 45
UK +44 20 7019 0810
USA (toll free) 1 877 951 7311
Passcode: Diageo results
The teleconference will be available on instant replay from 17.00 (UK time) and
will be available until 16 March 2005. The number to call is:
UK/Europe +44 20 7970 4974
USA/Canada +1 203 369 4770
Investor enquiries to: Catherine James +44 (0) 20 7927 5272
Sandra Moura +44 (0) 20 7927 4326
Investor.relations@diageo.com
Media enquiries to: Isabelle Thomas +44 (0) 20 7927 5967
Jennifer Crowl +44 (0) 20 7927 5749
Media@diageo.com
--------------------------
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange