26 May 2009
Empyrean Energy PLC
('Empyrean' or the 'Company'; Ticker: EME)
Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements
For the year ended 31 March 2009
Chairman's Statement
I am pleased to be able to report that Empyrean Energy Plc ('Empyrean' or 'the Company') has survived what has been the toughest 12 months since its incorporation. A number of very important decisions were made during some of the most difficult trading conditions the world has seen for a century. These decisions were made decisively to ensure the survival of the Company.
The Company completed three capital raisings during the period, with two in particularly challenging circumstances. The challenges were compounded by a freefalling oil price as a result of reduced demand due to the financial crisis. Despite the challenging circumstances Empyrean was able to raise funds at a time when other junior companies were not.
Empyrean also made several decisions to reduce expenses. These were made across all facets of the Company and included Directors' remuneration.
A tough decision was made to revert back to Empyrean's original 6% working interest in the Sugarloaf Project in Texas during the drilling of the Weston well on Block B. The decision was made to reduce Empyrean's cost exposure to the Sugarloaf Project as a whole. This defensive move has proved in hindsight to have been the correct decision with subsequent cost overruns occurring on the Weston well.
On a more positive note, the Company had its first Block A well turned to full time production during January 2009, followed by two further Block A wells during February 2009. The early production from these wells is encouraging and we expect production revenue to grow as the remaining drilled wells are turned to sales or re-worked.
In August last year the Board appointed Mr John Laycock as Finance Director, to provide the Board with additional corporate finance and financial risk management expertise, primarily gained within the oil and gas industry.
Empyrean's experienced management team continues to make decisions with the primary aim of unlocking as much value from our existing projects as possible whilst continuing to assess new opportunities. Empyrean cannot embark upon every project that we assess as having the criteria and technical merit that we are looking for, however the Company is laying the foundations for growth and as we grow we hope that the number of opportunities that we can aggressively pursue grows with us. Empyrean remains committed to its transformation into a substantial player in the oil and gas sector by adapting to new circumstances, keeping costs to a minimum, capitalising on our industry contacts and fully exploiting our experience and expertise.
We remind shareholders that we are primarily an oil and gas explorer and now a producer. It is fair to say that Empyrean has been an aggressive explorer and we are very proud of the technical success rate we have achieved. In the short 4 years since we listed on AIM, Empyrean has participated in the drilling of 18 exploratory wells. This is a huge number, by industry standards, for a junior with limited cash resources. Of those wells, all have encountered hydrocarbons, with 11 wells having either produced or are currently in production. The Company expects a further 2 wells will be put on production in the near future. This equates to a 61% success rate and we expect this to grow to 72% with the 2 further hook-ups to production. The industry wildcat well average success rate is only 8.3%. Not all of these wells were absolute wildcat wells and our success on absolute wildcats of 22% far exceeds the industry average.
We have already made the tough decisions that were appropriate for the tough times. Some of the worst aspects of the downturn have already started to improve and we are confident that the decisions we have made now hold us in good stead for future growth and success.
We thank shareholders for their loyalty and patience as we make every effort to convert our technical success into a commercial success.
Patrick Cross
Chairman
Operational Review
Empyrean continues to maintain its key assets in the USA and Germany. Of the three projects located in the USA, two of the projects which are located in Texas are producing oil and gas to market with increase in produced volumes anticipated in the second half of 2009.
During the last 12 months Empyrean has been involved in a vigorous, full-scale appraisal and development drilling programme focussed on the Sugarloaf Hosston Project involving the Austin Chalk play, onshore Texas. The wells involved are located in Blocks A and B which lie approximately 20 km south of the main producing historical Texas Austin Chalk trend.
Since drilling Sugarloaf-1 in Block B, five wells have been drilled in Block A and three wells in Block B. All wells have had significant hydrocarbon shows recorded while drilling and at present six wells are tied in and producing to market (three in Block A and three in Block B).
Most of the operational activity during the last 12 months has been focussed on the Sugarloaf Hosston Project, with the 9 wells involved being the focus of the following update.
Sugarloaf Hosston Project (Empyrean Interest: 6 - 18%)
The original farm-in Agreement with Texas Crude Energy Inc. ('TCEI') gave Empyrean the right to a 6% working interest across the whole of Block B.
The Sugarloaf-1 well was subsequently drilled. Significant gas shows and fluorescence were encountered in what was then considered to be a secondary objective higher in the well, and electric log analysis confirmed the presence of a 92ft gross column of gas in the fractured limestone of the Austin Chalk. As a result, Empyrean entered a second agreement with TCEI for an additional interest in the next 16 wells to follow Sugarloaf-1 on Block B or the adjacent Block A.
To date, a total of eight further wells have been drilled as part of second agreement that followed Sugarloaf-1, five in Block A and three in Block B. All wells have encountered hydrocarbon shows while drilling.
Since May 2008, four wells have been spudded, these being TCEI JV Block A-4, TCEI JV Block A-5, Kowalik-1H and Weston -1H. The operations in progress are as follows.
BLOCK A
TCEI JV Block A-1 (Empyrean Interest: 7.5%)
The TCEI JV Block A-1 well was shut in for pressure build-up measurement during the period 28 May 2008 to 21 November 2008, interspersed with several brief periods of production. The first production to sales was announced on 13 November 2008 when an initial seven day average rate of 2.6 million cubic feet of gas equivalent per day ('mmcfgepd') was produced from the lateral interval 13,521ft - 14,404ft.
A second stage of perforations was then carried out over the interval 11,805ft - 13,305ft accompanied by acid fraccing of the Austin Chalk.
The well is now flowing from a combined interval of 2,600ft and the latest production figures released to the Texas Railroad Commission showed 5,687 barrels of oil and 18.205 million cubic feet ('mmcf') of gas produced for the month of March 2009.
TCEI JV A-2 (Empyrean Interest: 7.5%)
The TCEI JV Block A-2 well was up until 21 December 2008 used for microseismic monitoring purposes during the fraccing and testing operations of the A-1 well which is located 1.5km to the south.
Operations pertinent to TCEI JV A-2 resumed on 21 December 2008 and perforations were made over six separate intervals between 11,865ft and 11,980ft in the formation underlying the classic Austin Chalk. An acid fracc was then carried out through the perforated intervals, followed by a shut in period of three months for the purpose of measuring reservoir pressure build up.
The well was re-opened on 2 April 2009 to allow 'well intervention operations' including swabbing and flow back.
This is a vertical well which exhibited encouraging hydrocarbon shows during drilling.
TCEI JV Block A-3 (Empyrean Interest 7.5%)
The well was spudded on 24 October 2007 and had significant shows and flares recorded for the entire 2,800ft open hole interval. It had been trying to flow while drilling, despite the fairly high mud weights, to such a degree that it was decided to test the flow potential even before reaching the proposed total measured depth of 17,800ft.
On 14 April 2008 Empyrean was able to announce the initial test results of a significant gas-condensate discovery. Initial flows through a 12/64' choke were measured at 1.9 million cubic feet of gas per day ('mmcfgpd') with 460 barrels of condensate per day. Based on present day prices for gas and condensate this would be equivalent to 6.6 mmcfgepd. This open hole test was conducted without stimulation.
The well was then 'shut in' as part of the normal reservoir and production engineering procedure. During the 'shut in 'period the operator has been finalising the design (based on TCEI JV Block A-1) and construction of production facilities and pipeline connection.
Operations resumed on 4 February 2009 and the well was again opened to flow following a water and surfactant flush of the open hole interval 12,276ft - 15,100ft. On 24 February 2009 Empyrean announced that the A-3 well had commenced flowing to sales, with average flow rates for the 7 days up to and including 21 February 2009 being 4.101 mmcfgpd and 408 barrels of condensate per day.
The latest production figures released to the Texas Railroad Commission showed 3,862 barrels of oil and 42.95 mmcf of gas produced for the month of March 2009.
TCEI JV Block A-4 (Empyrean Interest 7.5%)
TCEI JV Block A-4 is the fifth well in the original 16 well programme and the fourth drilled well located in Block A and is designed to test the same 'Upper' zone of the Austin Chalk as the producing Block A wells TCEI JV A-1 and TCEI JV A-3.
The well was spudded on 4 July 2008 and reached total depth of 12,756ft in the vertical pilot hole on 26 July 2008. At least 300ft of gas shows were encountered during this phase of drilling and backround readings of 50 units rose to a maximum of 1325 units in some instances.
The horizontal phase terminated at 15,084ft (measured depth) on 7 September 2008. More than 1500ft of gas-condensate pay had been intercepted in the Austin Chalk reservoir and this was considered by the operator to be sufficient to provide a good commercial outcome.
Preparations for production testing commenced at the beginning of October 2008, and on 31 October 2008 it was announced that TCEI JV Block A-4 had flowed initial rates as high as 2.5 mmcfgpd and 260 barrels of condensate per day, equating to approximately 5.1 mmcfgepd.
The sales pipeline connection and production facilities were completed, and on 14 February 2009 the well commenced flowing to sales after having been stimulated by an acid fracc. At the time the well achieved average flow rates for the 7 days up to and including 21 February 2009 of 4.101 mmcfgpd and 408 barrels of condensate per day.
The latest production figures released to the Texas Railroad Commission showed 5,372 barrels of oil and 49.907 mmcf of gas produced for the month of March 2009.
TCEI JV Block A-5 (Empyrean Interest 7.5%)
This vertical well was spudded on 29 September 2008 and reached a total depth of 12,469ft on 27 October 2008. Hydrocarbon shows were encountered during drilling in the traditional Austin Chalk and the underlying fractured Eagleford Shale.
The completion operations consisted of 2 phases. In Phase 1 the Eagleford Shale was perforated over the interval 12,190ft - 12,300ft, fracced and allowed to flow briefly. Initial rates recorded were 1.293 mmcfgpd and 408 barrels of condensate per day before the well was shut in for 38 days. In Phase 2 the overlying Austin Chalk reservoir was perforated over the interval 12,100ft - 12,160ft and acid fracced on 12 February 2009. The well was briefly allowed to flow recording 1.430 mmcfgpd and 403 barrels of condensate through a 12/64' choke.
Production tubing has since been run and the well is now completed in both the Austin Chalk and the Eagleford Shale with open ended tubing (no packer) at 12,079ft.
The latest production figures released to the Texas Railroad Commission showed 700 barrels of oil and 2.631 mmcf of gas produced for the month of March 2009.
BLOCK B
Kennedy-1H (Empyrean Interest: 18%)
Kennedy-1H is located 8km to the east of the Sugarkane Field discovery and contains the same primary target, the Austin Chalk.
The well spudded on 17 September 2007 and after 'kicking off' from the vertical at 11,845ft, the total depth of 16,750ft (measured depth) was reached on 12 November 2007, being 820ft short of the original proposed measured depth of 17,570ft.
A fraccing operation was carried out on 14 May 2008. A total of 95,000 lbs of sand and 5,182 barrels of fluid were injected under pressure into 4 sets of perforations over an approximate 600ft horizontal interval. Initial flow results of gas condensate and fracc fluid recovery were announced on 25 May 2008.
A second fraccing operation was performed on 3 July 2008. An additional 3 sets of perforation intervals, each 3ft long, were interspersed between the original 600ft perforated interval prior to the introduction of 100,000lbs of high strength proppant. The fraccing operation was terminated prematurely due to the high pumping pressures encountered and only 50% of the proppant entered the formation.
After cleanup operations, testing of the well resumed on 15 July 2008. The initial, unstabilised rates of 425,000 cubic feet of gas per day ('cfgpd') and 106 barrels of condensate per day reduced, after intermittent slugging, to 200-300 cfgpd and 46-107 barrels of condensate per day.
Since at least 5,000 barrels of fluid had not been recovered after the fraccing operation, a coil tubing unit was mobilised on 18 July 2008 to displace the fluid. Some additional fluid was recovered but the flow rates remained the same. It has been estimated by the operator that the production originated from only 17ft of perforations in the bottom section of the 600ft horizontal section.
On 31 August 2008 it was announced that Kennedy-1H was being shut- in while production and tie-in facilities were completed for eventual connection with the nearby transmission line. Production recommenced on 2 October at a rate of 20,000 cfgpd and 60 barrels of condensate per day.
This is the first time production has originated from the 'middle' pay zone of the Austin Chalk (which is still referred to as the upper part of Eagleford Shale by some authors), and therefore augurs well for recoverable reserve considerations. A decision whether or not to perforate and fracture stimulate the remaining 3,000ft of horizontal section will be made following the analysis of production performance from other wells in the area.
Kowalik-1H (Empyrean Interest: 18%)
Kowalik-1H is the third well drilled in Block B and the sixth well of the original 16 well programme. It was spudded on 4 July 2008 and was designed to test the so-called 'Upper' pay zone of the Austin Chalk over a 6,000ft horizontal interval. It is located 5 km north of Kennedy-1H and is on trend with the producing wells A-1 and A-3 of Block A.
The vertical pilot hole reached a total depth of 11,970ft on 11 August 2008. The horizontal phase was successfully completed on 22 October 2008 when it was announced that the well had reached a final measured depth 16,483ft (equivalent to approximately 4,600ft of horizontal section). Although the original plan was to penetrate a 6,000ft horizontal section, it was considered technically prudent to stop at this depth. There had been significant gas shows throughout the section, often reading more than 2,000 units with attendant flares on surface.
Testing operations commenced on 3 November 2008. Initial flows measured 937,000 cfgpd and 321 barrels of condensate per day. Interpretations indicate that most of this production comes from approximately 1800ft of the horizontal well through an uncemented, 3 ½'slotted liner.
Weston-1H (Empyrean Interest: 6%)
Weston-1H is the fourth well to be drilled in Block B and is located approximately 1.5 km to the east of the Kennedy-1H well. It was designed to test approximately 6,000 ft horizontally the upper part of the Austin Chalk interval.
The well spudded on 2 November 2008. It kicked off as planned at 11,916ft and had 7' casing set at 12,250 ft measured depth on 28 December 2008. Gas readings increased dramatically on entering the Austin Chalk and maximum daily average readings of 3100 units were reported with flares of up to 60 ft in length.
Total depth of 15,797ft was reached on 13 February 2009, after which a 4 ½' liner was cemented to total depth. The original plan was to drill to 18,405ft measured depth and drilling was cut short to reduce risks as several challenges were encountered whilst drilling. This premature termination still meant that approximately 3000ft of horizontal hole lay within the target zone of the Upper Austin Chalk.
The Weston -1H well remains suspended for completion with those operations likely to be a priority part of any farm-out deal concluded.
Glantal Gas Project, Germany (Empyrean Interest 40%)
The project still maintains the multi-TCF potential always quoted, despite the results of the exploration well Glantal-1 drilled and tested in 2006. Before any further drilling can occur, it is essential that the risk of encountering volcanism and its effects be minimised. The Lautertal Prospect has become the next focus of attention. It lies to the northeast of Glantal and will require at least 120-130 km of seismic acquisition and possibly some gravity and aeromagnetic assessment before a drill location is decided upon.
In addition, negotiations have already been instigated to secure tenure of Lautertal which means extending the termination date of the permit.
Eagle Oil Pool Development Project, California, USA (Empyrean Interest 48.5%)
No operations were carried out during the period, however Empyrean is pleased to report that it has concluded negotiations to purchase a further 10% working interest in the project for nominal consideration from Sun Resources Ltd who did not wish to continue in the project.
Currently, Australian Stock Exchange listed operator Victoria Petroleum NL is attempting to sell its USA assets including their 20% interest in Eagle. Empyrean is monitoring these efforts closely and intends to work with the new owners to have a well drilled at Eagle as soon as possible.
Margarita Project, Gulf Coast, Texas, USA (Empyrean Interest 44%)
Empyrean farmed into this 2 phase project in November 2006. It involved the drilling of 6 shallow wells, 4 of which resulted in being producers. At present one well is producing gas and two wells are suspended indefinitely.
Phase 1 drilling had successes at Dos Dedos (gas) and Milagro (oil and gas). Dos Dedos watered out prematurely after 2 months but Milagro, which commenced as a gas producer in April 2007, became oil dominant, peaking at 135 barrels of oil per day in September 2007. Since the end of December 2008 the well has been suspended following a period of intermittent production.
It is considered uneconomic to continue such small monthly production given the present oil price. There is updip potential but the volumes involved do not warrant exploitation.
Phase 2 gave two gas producers, Dona Carlotta (Heard Heirs) and Agavero (O'Brien Prichett).
Agavero was suspended on 28 December 08 following a period of diminished production rates coupled with pipeline leakages which require substantial expenditure to rectify. The estimated expenditure, combined with diminished revenue, do not justify continuation of the gas production which commenced on 4 October 2007.
Dona Carlotta continues to produce gas at approximately 100 mmcfgpd with no discernible increase in water production which remains a steady 26 barrels of water per day. Production began on 28 July 07 and the field has an estimated life of 3.363 years based on pressure drawdown measurements.
FJ Brophy BSc (Hons)
Technical Director
Empyrean Energy Plc
26 May 2009
Income Statement for the year ended 31 March 2009
|
Notes |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
724 |
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
|
|
Operating costs (excludes oil and gas properties and exploration expenditure impairment) |
|
|
(35) |
(38) |
Amortisation - oil and gas properties |
9 |
|
(611) |
(216) |
Total cost of sales |
|
|
(646) |
(254) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
78 |
271 |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(754) |
(419) |
Share based payments (directors & employees) |
4 |
|
(332) |
(329) |
Share based payments (consultants) |
|
|
(72) |
- |
Exploration expenditure impairment |
8 |
|
(168) |
(830) |
Oil and gas properties impairment |
9 |
|
(300) |
- |
Operating loss |
2 |
|
(1,548) |
(1,307) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
3 |
|
54 |
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on ordinary activities before taxation |
|
|
(1,494) |
(1,153) |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation on loss on ordinary activities |
6 |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the financial year |
|
|
(1,494) |
(1,153) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share expressed in pence per share |
|
|
|
|
- Basic |
7 |
|
(2.53)p |
(2.30)p |
All financial results presented are from continued operations.
No dividends were proposed or paid during the period.
Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2009
|
Notes |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
8 |
|
7,630 |
9,240 |
Oil and gas properties |
9 |
|
6,436 |
374 |
Plant and equipment |
10 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
14,067 |
9,615 |
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
11 |
|
413 |
351 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
291 |
1,510 |
|
|
|
704 |
1,861 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
12 |
|
(43) |
(422) |
|
|
|
(43) |
(422) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net current assets |
|
|
661 |
1,439 |
Net assets |
|
|
14,728 |
11,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
14 |
|
132 |
101 |
Share premium |
|
|
17,621 |
12,816 |
Share based payments reserve |
|
|
975 |
770 |
Retained loss |
|
|
(4,000) |
(2,633) |
Total equity |
|
|
14,728 |
11,054 |
Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 31 March 2009
|
Notes |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from operating activities |
13 |
|
122 |
(117) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Return on Investments |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest received |
|
|
54 |
154 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash inflow from returns on investments |
|
|
54 |
154 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital expenditure |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Purchase of tangible fixed assets |
|
|
(1) |
- |
|||||
Purchase of intangible fixed assets |
|
|
(6,072) |
(3,748) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash outflow for capital expenditure |
|
|
(6,073) |
(3,748) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Financing |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Issue of ordinary share capital |
|
|
4,985 |
332 |
|||||
Expenses relating to share issues |
|
|
(307) |
- |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash inflow from financing |
|
|
4,678 |
332 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Decrease in net cash |
|
|
(1,219) |
(3,379) |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the start of the year |
|
|
1,510 |
4,889 |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year |
|
|
291 |
1,510 |
Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 31 March 2009
|
Share capital account
|
Share premium reserve
|
Share based payment reserve
|
Retained loss
|
Total equity
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at 31 March 2007
|
99
|
12,486
|
441
|
(1,480)
|
11,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital issued
|
2
|
330
|
-
|
-
|
332
|
Share based payments
|
-
|
-
|
329
|
-
|
329
|
Loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,153)
|
(1,153)
|
As at 31 March 2008
|
101
|
12,816
|
770
|
(2,633)
|
11,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital issued
|
31
|
5,039
|
-
|
-
|
5,070
|
Cost of shares issued
|
-
|
(306)
|
-
|
-
|
(306)
|
Share based payments
|
-
|
72
|
205
|
127
|
404
|
Loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,494)
|
(1,494)
|
As at 31 March 2009
|
132
|
17,621
|
975
|
(4,000)
|
14,728
|
Statement of Accounting Policies for the year ended 31 March 2009
The financial statements of Empyrean Energy Plc for the year ended 31 March 2009 were authorised for issue by the Board on 26 May 2009 and the balance sheets signed on the Board's behalf by Mr Patrick Cross and Mr Thomas Kelly.
The Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ('IFRS') as adopted by the European Union. The principal accounting policies are summarised below. They have all been applied consistently throughout the year.
The financial report is presented in Sterling and all values are shown in pounds (£).
Basis of accounting
These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, modified for certain items carried at fair value, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee ('IFRIC') and with those parts of the Companies Act, 1985 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS.
IASB and IFRIC have issued the following standards and interpretations, which have not been applied as they have an effective date after the date of these financial statements:
IFRS 3 Business Combinations - revised January 2008 (Effective 1 July 2009)
IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements - revised January 2008 (Effective 1 July 2009)
There is not expected to be any material impact on the adoption of the above standards.
Going concern
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
Revenue Recognition
Net revenues from crude oil and natural gas sales are recognised when the oil and gas has been lifted and payment received from a third-party purchaser. The Company uses the entitlement method to account for its revenue from sales of condensate and gas production, which is presented in the accounts as net of production expenditure incurred prior to the product receipt by a third-party purchaser.
Finance Revenue
Finance Revenue is recognised as interest accrues.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and short-term deposits in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and in hand and short-term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less.
For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables, which generally have 30 day terms, are recognised and carried at original invoice amount less any allowance for any uncollectible amounts.
Deferred tax
Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured as the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date.
No deferred tax asset has been recognised because there is insufficient evidence of the timing of suitable future profits against which they can be recovered.
Foreign currencies
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at contracted rates or, where no contract exists, at average monthly rates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies which are held at the year-end are translated into sterling at year-end exchange rates. Exchange differences on monetary items are taken to the Income Statement.
Trade and other payables
Trade payables and other payables are carried at amortised cost and represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the company prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the company becomes obliged to make future payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services.
Tangible fixed assets
Tangible fixed assets are included in the balance sheet at cost, less accumulated depreciation and any provision for impairment. Tangible fixed assets are depreciated on a straight line basis at rates sufficient to write off the cost, less estimated residual values, of individual assets over their estimated useful lives.
Office systems, equipment and furniture: 2.5 - 6 years
Intangible Fixed Assets
- exploration and development expenditure
Exploration, evaluation and development expenditure incurred is accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of interest. Restoration, rehabilitation and environmental costs necessitated by exploration and evaluation activities are expensed as incurred and treated as exploration and evaluation expenditure. These costs are only carried forward to the extent that they are expected to be recouped through the successful development of the area or where activities in the area have not yet reached a stage which permits reasonable assessment of the existence of economically recoverable reserves. Accumulated costs in relation to an abandoned area are written off in full against the profit in the year in which the decision to abandon the area is made.
A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward the exploration and development costs in relation to that area of interest.
- oil and gas properties
Investments in unevaluated properties and development projects are not reclassified from exploration and development expenditure to oil and gas properties, until commercial production associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs. The capitalised costs of intangible oil and gas assets are subject to amortisation when they are determined to have commercial production, at which point the capitalised costs plus the estimated future costs to develop the underlying commercial reserves are amortised using the unit-of-production method using total estimated reserves.
Judgements and estimates
The Group makes judgements and assumptions concerning the future that impact the application of policies and reported amounts. The resulting accounting estimates calculated using these judgements and assumptions will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results but are based on historical experience and expectations of future events. The judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty that have a significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements are discussed below.
- impairment of assets
Financial and non-financial assets are subject to impairment reviews based on whether current or future events and circumstances suggest that their recoverable amount may be less than their carrying value. Recoverable amount is based on a calculation of expected future cash flows which includes management assumptions and estimates of future performance.
- share-based payments
Certain Directors of the Company receive remuneration in the form of equity-settled share-based payment transactions, whereby services are rendered in exchange for rights over shares ('equity-settled transactions').
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model, further details of which are given in Note 5 to the Financial Statements.
The cost of equity-settled transactions with parties other than employees is measured at the fair value of the services received at the date of receipt, with a corresponding increase in equity.
Financial instruments
The Company's financial assets consist of current account or short-term deposits at variable interest rates, loans and other receivables.
Any interest earned is accrued and classified as interest.
Trade and other receivables are stated at cost.
The Company's financial liabilities consist of trade and other payables. All are non-derivative assets. The trade and other payables are stated at cost.
Notes to the Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2009
1. Turnover and Segmental Analysis
The primary segmental reporting format is determined to be the geographical segment according to the location of the asset. The Directors consider the Company to have a single business being the exploration for, development and production of oil and gas properties.
There are three geographical segments being Continental Europe and North America which are involved in the exploration for, development and production of oil and gas properties, and the United Kingdom which is where the registered office is located.
2009 |
UK (£'000) |
Continental Europe (£'000) |
North America (£'000) |
Total (£'000) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenue |
- |
- |
724 |
724 |
Cost of sales |
- |
- |
(646) |
(646) |
Gross Profit |
- |
- |
78 |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Received |
54 |
- |
- |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
(754) |
- |
- |
(754) |
Share based payments |
(404) |
- |
- |
(404) |
Exploration expenditure impairment |
- |
- |
(168) |
(168) |
Oil and gas properties impairment |
- |
- |
(300) |
(300) |
Operating Expenses |
(1,158) |
- |
(468) |
(1,626) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Ordinary Activities (before tax) |
(1,104) |
- |
(390) |
(1,494) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration expenditure |
- |
2,793 |
4,837 |
7,630 |
Oil and gas properties |
- |
- |
6,436 |
6,436 |
|
- |
2,793 |
11,273 |
14,066 |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas Revenue |
- |
- |
525 |
525 |
Cost of Sales |
- |
- |
(254) |
(254) |
Gross Profit |
- |
- |
271 |
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Received |
154 |
- |
- |
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
(419) |
- |
- |
(419) |
Share Based Payments |
(329) |
- |
- |
(329) |
Exploration Impairment Write off |
- |
- |
(830) |
(830) |
Operating Expenses |
(748) |
- |
(830) |
(1,578) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Ordinary Activities (before tax) |
(594) |
- |
(559) |
(1,153) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration expenditure |
|
2,770 |
6,470 |
9,240 |
Oil and gas properties |
|
- |
374 |
374 |
|
- |
2,770 |
6,844 |
9,614 |
2. Operating Loss
The operating loss is stated after charging:
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
Auditors' remuneration - audit services |
|
|
13 |
13 |
- other services |
|
|
6 |
- |
Depreciation (Note 10) |
|
|
1 |
3 |
Amortisation Exploration Expenditure (Note 9) |
|
|
611 |
216 |
Exploration Expenditure Impairment (Note 8) |
|
|
168 |
830 |
Oil and Gas Properties Impairment (Note 9) |
|
|
300 |
- |
Directors' emoluments (Note 5) |
|
|
255 |
90 |
Directors' share based payments (Note 5) |
|
|
297 |
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Interest Receivable
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bank interest received |
|
|
54 |
154 |
4. Staff Costs (including Directors)
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity settled share based payments (directors & employees) |
|
332 |
329 |
The Company had no employees during the year, other than Directors.
The Company's equity-settled share based payments comprise incentive options granted to the Company's Directors. The amount and details of share options subject to equity-settled share based payments are set out in Note 14.
Options were issued to Directors and Employees on 26 June 2008 and 31 March 2009. The fair value of the options issued has been fully expensed during the year, based on a Black-Scholes model.
Under this model options issued on 26 June 2008 assumed a risk free rate of 4.25% and expected volatility of 60%. The value per option was 23.21 pence. Options issued on 31 March 2009 assumed a risk free rate of 1.98% and expected volatility of 65%. The value per option was 1.3 pence. There are no performance measures attached to either option issue.
In addition 1,250,000 options exercisable at 40 pence and 250,000 options exercisable at 35 pence, expired on 31 December 2008, resulting in a write back of £126,807 to equity.
5. Directors' Emoluments
|
|
Executive Salary |
Options Issued |
||
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
Non-Executive Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick Cross |
|
35 |
30 |
26 |
27 |
John Laycock (Appointed 20/08/08) |
|
20 |
n/a |
3 |
n/a |
Malcolm James (Resigned 03/07/07) |
|
- |
6 |
- |
- |
Executive Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Brophy (1) |
|
100 |
71 |
129 |
137 |
Thomas Kelly (2) |
|
100 |
71 |
139 |
137 |
Total |
|
255 |
178 |
297 |
301 |
(1) Services provided by F J Brophy Pty Ltd
(2) Services provided by Apnea Holdings Pty Ltd
No pension benefits are provided for any Director.
Directors' Share Options
The terms of the share option interests of Directors in office during the year ended 31 March 2009 were as follows:
|
Grant Date |
Options held 31 March 08 |
Options granted during year |
Options expired during year |
Options held 31 March 09 |
Exercise Price |
Expiry |
Patrick Cross |
31/10/05 |
250,000 |
|
250,000 |
- |
35p |
31/12/08 |
|
31/10/05 |
250,000 |
|
250,000 |
- |
40p |
31/12/08 |
|
28/06/07 |
200,000 |
|
|
200,000 |
50p |
28/06/10 |
|
27/02/08 |
100,000 |
|
|
100,000 |
25p |
27/02/11 |
|
26/06/08 |
- |
100,000 |
|
100,000 |
25p |
27/02/11 |
|
31/03/09 |
- |
200,000 |
|
200,000 |
4p |
31/03/12 |
Thomas Kelly |
20/10/06 |
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
50p |
20/10/09 |
|
28/06/07 |
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
50p |
28/06/10 |
|
27/02/08 |
500,000 |
|
|
500,000 |
25p |
27/02/11 |
|
26/06/08 |
- |
500,000 |
|
500,000 |
25p |
27/02/11 |
|
31/03/09 |
- |
1,800,000 |
|
1,800,000 |
4p |
31/03/12 |
Frank Brophy |
31/10/05 |
1,000,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
- |
35p |
31/12/08 |
|
20/10/06 |
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
50p |
20/10/09 |
|
28/06/07 |
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
50p |
28/06/10 |
|
27/02/08 |
500,000 |
|
|
500,000 |
25p |
27/02/11 |
|
26/06/08 |
- |
500,000 |
|
500,000 |
25p |
27/02/11 |
|
31/03/09 |
- |
1,000,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
4p |
31/03/12 |
John Laycock |
31/03/09 |
- |
200,000 |
|
200,000 |
4p |
31/03/12 |
TOTAL |
|
6,800,000 |
4,300,000 |
1,500,000 |
9,600,000 |
|
|
6. Taxation
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
Current year taxation |
|
|
|
|
UK corporation tax at 28% (2008: 30%) on profits for the year |
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Factors affecting the tax charge for the year |
|
|
|
|
Loss on ordinary activities before tax |
|
|
(1,494) |
(1,153) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on ordinary activities at the UK standard rate of 28% (2008: 30%) |
|
|
(418) |
(346) |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of tax benefit of loss carried forward |
|
|
418 |
346 |
Current year taxation |
|
|
- |
- |
No deferred tax asset has been recognised because there is insufficient evidence of the timing of suitable future profits against which they can be recovered.
Tax losses of approximately £3,160,000 (2008: £2,070,000) are available to be claimed going forward, which are inclusive of the exploration expenditure and oil & gas properties impairment total write off of £1,298,000 (2008: £830,000).
7. Loss Per Share
The basic loss per share is derived by dividing the loss for the year attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of shares in issue.
|
|
2009 |
2008 |
Loss for the year |
|
£1,494,000 |
£1,153,000 |
Weighted average number of Ordinary shares of £0.002 in issue |
|
58,847,344 |
50,242,755 |
Loss per share - basic (pence) |
|
2.53 |
2.30 |
Weighted average number of Ordinary shares of £0.002 in issue inclusive of outstanding options |
|
65,650,213 |
56,084,626 |
As the inclusion of the potential ordinary shares would result in a decrease in the loss per share they are considered to be anti-dilutive and, as such, a diluted loss per share is not included.
8. Intangible Assets
Exploration expenditure |
||||
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
Balance brought forward |
|
|
9,240 |
6,443 |
Additions |
|
|
5,531 |
4,217 |
At 31 March |
|
|
14,771 |
10,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified - Oil and Gas Properties |
|
|
(6,973) |
(590) |
Exploration Expenditure Impairment (1) |
|
|
(168) |
(830) |
|
|
|
(7,141) |
(1,420) |
Net Book Value |
|
|
|
|
At 31 March |
|
|
7,630 |
9,240 |
(1) During the period ended 31 March 2009, exploration expenditure of £168,000 (2008: £830,000) was written off due to
impairment. The impairment primarily relates to the Dos Dedos well at the Margarita prospect, Texas which has
resulted in a £166,000 (2008:£305,000) exploration impairment due to the well watering out. In addition, £2,000 (2008:
£525,000) was written down for a residual payment on the Bondi Prospect, Texas which was plugged and abandoned
in February 2008.
Exploration expenditure by project area (£'000)
|
9. Oil and Gas Properties
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
Net Book Value |
|
|
|
|
Balance brought forward |
|
|
374 |
- |
Reclassification of exploration costs (Note 8) |
|
|
6,973 |
590 |
Oil and Gas Properties Impairment (1) |
|
|
(300) |
- |
Amortisation |
|
|
(611) |
(216) |
At 31 March |
|
|
6,436 |
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) During the period ended 31 March 2009, £300,000 (2008: nil) was written off due to impairment relating to the Milagro and Agavero wells at the Margarita prospect in Texas, after diminished production resulted in each well being suspended. The operator considers it uneconomic to continue with either of these wells.
10. Plant and Equipment
Office Equipment |
||||
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
Balance brought forward |
|
|
12 |
12 |
Additions |
|
|
1 |
- |
Disposal |
|
|
(11) |
- |
At 31 March |
|
|
2 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
Balance brought forward |
|
|
11 |
8 |
Charge for the year |
|
|
1 |
3 |
Disposals |
|
|
(11) |
- |
At 31 March |
|
|
1 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value |
|
|
|
|
At 31 March |
|
|
1 |
1 |
11. Trade and Other Receivables
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivable |
|
|
6 |
177 |
Prepayments |
|
|
402 |
167 |
VAT receivables |
|
|
5 |
7 |
Total Receivables |
|
|
413 |
351 |
12. Trade and Other Payables
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
28 |
398 |
Accruals |
|
|
15 |
24 |
Total Payables |
|
|
43 |
422 |
13. Reconciliation of Operating Loss to Operating Cash Flows
|
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(1,494) |
(1,307) |
Decrease in receivables |
|
|
(94) |
(186) |
Decrease in prepayments |
|
|
(8) |
(28) |
Increase / (decrease) in accrued liabilities |
|
|
(24) |
7 |
Share based payments - directors & employees |
|
|
332 |
329) |
Share based payments - consultants |
|
|
72 |
- |
Depreciation |
|
|
1 |
3) |
Oil and gas properties amortisation |
|
|
611 |
216) |
Exploration expenditure impairment |
|
|
168 |
830) |
Oil and gas properties impairment |
|
|
300 |
- |
Increase in accounts payable |
|
|
14 |
19) |
Net cash outflow from operating activities |
|
|
122 |
(117) |
14. Called Up Share Capital
The authorised share capital of the Company and the called up and fully paid amounts at 31 March 2009 were as follows:-
|
|
2009 |
2008 |
Authorised |
|
|
|
1,000,000,000 ordinary shares of 0.2p each |
|
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
Issued and fully paid |
|
|
|
66,157,792 (2008: 50,546,291) ordinary shares of 0.2p each |
|
132,316 |
101,093 |
On 13 June 2008, 8,969,976 fully paid ordinary shares of 0.2p each were placed for cash at a price of £0.50 per share.
On 27 November 2008, a further 3,333,335 fully paid ordinary shares of 0.2p each were placed for cash at a price of £0.15 per share.
On 17 December 2008, 476,190 fully paid ordinary shares of 0.2p each were issued on a non-cash basis under the terms of a service agreement. The service agreement is for the provision of institutional investor relations.
On 31 March 2009, 2,832,000 fully paid ordinary shares of 0.2p each were placed for cash to Directors and management at a price of £0.03 per share, under an arrangement whereby Directors and management agree to take 30% of their current remuneration in equity for 12 months in equal instalments, following the placing. These new shares are subject to an orderly market arrangement with Blue Oar Securities for a period of 12 months.
Share Options and Warrants
The following equity instruments have been issued by the Company and have not been exercised at 31 March 2009:
|
Number options |
Exercise Price |
Vesting Date |
Expiry Date |
Value per option (pence) |
Incentive options |
2,200,000 |
50 pence |
20/10/06 |
20/10/09 |
13.07 |
Incentive options |
2,450,000 |
50 pence |
28/06/07 |
28/06/10 |
11.16 |
Incentive options |
1,225,000 |
25 pence |
26/06/08 |
27/02/11 |
5.07 |
Incentive options |
1,225,000 |
25 pence |
27/02/08 |
27/02/11 |
23.21 |
Incentive options |
3,700,000 |
4 pence |
31/03/09 |
31/03/12 |
1.30 |
During the year 1,250,000 options exercisable at 40 pence and 250,000 options exercisable at 35 pence, expired on 31 December 2008.
15. Commitments
As at 31 March 2009, the Company had no material capital commitments.
16. Related Party Transactions
On 31 March 2009 the Directors and management agreed to take 30% of their current remuneration in equity for the following 12 months in equal instalments. The total amount of £84,960, of which £70,200 is attributed to Directors, will be deducted from Directors and managements remuneration. The equity was converted at 3p on 31 March 2009 for a total of 2,832,000 new ordinary shares. These new shares are subject to an orderly market arrangement with Blue Oar Securities for a period of 12 months.
Other than those disclosed above and in Note 5 there were no other related party transactions during the year.
17. Financial instruments
The Board of Directors determine, as required, the degree to which it is appropriate to use financial instruments to mitigate risk. Current the Company's principal financial instruments comprise cash. Together with the issue of equity share capital, the main purpose of these is to finance the Company's operations. The Company has other financial instruments such as short-term receivables and payables which arise directly from normal trading.
The Company has not entered into any derivative of other hedging instruments.
The main risk affecting the groups financial instruments are interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and liquidity risk, which are discussed below.
Throughout the period ending 31 March 2009 no trading in financial instruments was undertaken.
There is no material difference between the book value and fair value of the Company cash balances, short-term receivables and payables.
Interest rate risk
The Company finances its operations through the use of cash deposits at variable rates of interest for a variety of short-term periods, depending on cash requirements. These rates are reviewed regularly and the best rate obtained in the context of the Company's needs.
Short-term receivables and payables are not exposed to interest rate risk.
Currency risk
The Company has potential currency exposures in respect of items denominated in foreign currencies comprising transactional exposure in respect of operating costs and capital expenditure incurred in currencies other than the functional currency of operations.
At times the Company may hold cash deposits in foreign currency to meet needs of commitments required for international operations.
Liquidity risk
The Company's policy throughout the year has been to ensure that it has adequate liquidity by careful management of its working capital. Amount held at bank amounted to £ 291,000 (2008: £ 1,510,000).
Capital
In managing its capital, the Company's primary objective is to maintain a sufficient funding base to enable the Company to meet its working capital and strategic investment needs. In making decisions to adjust its capital structure to achieve these aims, through new share issues, the Company considers not only its short-term position but also its long-term operational and strategic objectives.
18. Post Balance Sheet Date Events
On 2 April 2009, the Company allotted 30,000,001ordinary shares pursuant to a three tranche placement which raised £900,000 as announced on 19 March 2009, 20 March 2009 and 25 March 2009. The proceeds from the placing will contribute towards further development and the Sugarloaf project in Texas, USA and for general working capital.
On 5 May 2009 the Company announced that it has entered into arrangements with operator Texas Crude Energy Inc, to seek a farmout of up to half of the Company's interest in Block B of the Sugarloaf Project. Empyrean will join some of the other joint venture partners to contribute equity to this joint farmout effort to attract a significant E&P company or investor. It is envisaged that the incoming party will earn equity by carrying the farmout parties including Empyrean through a drilling and well stimulation work program in a timely fashion. A successful farmout and subsequent aggressive work program will generate significant momentum for the project, as well as allow the leasehold acreage position to be managed proactively.
On 6 May 2009 the Company announced that the operator of Block A, Conoco Phillips, has reported production figures for the month of March 2009 to the TRRC. The production figures show production from the Block A-1 well, Block A-3 well, Block A-4 well and the Block A-5 well as provided below. It is believed that the fifth well, the Block A-2 well is presently awaiting production facilities. It is not known how many days production this represents for each well.
The following table shows the total production summary for each of the individual wells:
Well Name |
Oil Production (Barrels) |
Gas Production (Cubic Feet) |
A-1 |
5,687 |
18,205,000 |
A-3 |
3,862 |
42,950,000 |
A-4 |
5,372 |
49,907,000 |
A-5 |
700 |
2,631,000 |
TOTALS |
15,621 |
113,693,000 |
For further information
Empyrean Energy plc
Tom Kelly
Tel: +618 9321 6988
Blue Oar Securities Plc
Olly Cairns / Jerry Keen / Shane Gallwey
Tel: (+61) 8 6430 1631 / (+44) 207 448 4400