Exposures to selected eurozone countries10
(Unaudited)
|
At 31 December 2010 |
||||||||||||
|
Not held for trading |
|
Held for trading |
|
|
||||||||
|
Cash and lending to banks11 |
|
Financial |
|
Total balances |
|
Net debt securities and loans |
|
Derivatives12 |
Total balances |
|
Total |
|
|
US$bn |
|
US$bn |
|
US$bn |
|
US$bn |
|
US$bn |
|
US$bn |
|
US$bn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belgium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign and agencies ............... |
0.2 |
|
0.7 |
|
0.9 |
|
0.6 |
|
- |
|
0.6 |
|
1.5 |
Banks ......................................... |
5.8 |
|
0.3 |
|
6.1 |
|
1.5 |
|
1.2 |
|
2.7 |
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
7.0 |
|
2.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
3.3 |
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greece |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign and agencies ............... |
- |
|
0.3 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.8 |
|
- |
|
0.8 |
|
1.1 |
Banks ......................................... |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.6 |
|
- |
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
0.3 |
|
0.3 |
|
1.4 |
|
- |
|
1.4 |
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ireland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign and agencies ............... |
- |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.4 |
Banks ......................................... |
0.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.7 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.4 |
|
1.5 |
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
0.7 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.7 |
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign and agencies ............... |
- |
|
1.7 |
|
1.7 |
|
1.8 |
|
- |
|
1.8 |
|
3.5 |
Banks ......................................... |
1.9 |
|
0.4 |
|
2.3 |
|
0.2 |
|
- |
|
0.2 |
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
2.1 |
|
4.0 |
|
2.0 |
|
- |
|
2.0 |
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portugal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign and agencies ............... |
- |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.1 |
Banks ......................................... |
0.3 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.1 |
|
- |
|
0.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.1 |
|
- |
|
0.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign and agencies ............... |
0.1 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.0 |
|
0.7 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.8 |
Banks ......................................... |
0.8 |
|
0.2 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.4 |
|
- |
|
1.4 |
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
1.1 |
|
2.0 |
|
2.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
2.2 |
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign and agencies ............... |
0.3 |
|
3.9 |
|
4.2 |
|
4.0 |
|
0.2 |
|
4.2 |
|
8.4 |
Banks ......................................... |
9.0 |
|
1.5 |
|
10.5 |
|
4.9 |
|
1.6 |
|
6.5 |
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
5.4 |
|
14.7 |
|
8.9 |
|
1.8 |
|
10.7 |
|
25.4 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
under pressure, but for its specific political situation. Rating agencies downgraded the debt of a number of eurozone countries during 2010 and put some on review for possible downgrades. While the ECB continues to provide broad access to liquidity support for eurozone sovereign borrowers and banks, the availability of longer-term fiscal support from the EU for sovereigns is less certain and may lead to debt restructuring and increased private sector participation.
The eurozone as a whole retained substantial economic and financial strength despite the stresses from the financial crisis. However, concerns remained over the refinancing risks for sovereign borrowers and banks posed by the problems with market liquidity and the uncertainty surrounding support arrangements in the longer term. Eurozone policymakers have created two major facilities to counter short-term financing problems, the European Financial Stability Facility and the European Financial Stability Mechanism. This has been viewed as a positive development by the market and rating agencies, though implementation awaits disclosure of further details by the policymakers. We expect the ECB and eurozone countries will focus in 2011 on resolving intra-eurozone imbalances, rebuilding public finances, improving fiscal discipline, strengthening the banking system and managing cross-border risk.
We have closely managed our exposure to sovereign debt during 2010. At the end of the year, our exposure to the sovereign debt of Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain was US$8.4bn and the overall quality of the portfolio was strong with most in-country and cross-border limits extended to countries with high-grade internal credit risk ratings. We regularly update our assessment of higher risk countries and adjust our risk appetite to reflect such changes.
European banks
In May 2010, an FSB review indicated that European banks would have to make additional loan impairment charges of up to US$143bn in 2011. Following the publication of this report, bond spreads on both European and US banks widened. The size of the financial sector's exposure to sovereign debt and doubts about economic conditions in parts of the eurozone raised fresh concerns about banks' credit ratings. In addition, uncertainty over liquidity, solvency, funding, changing regulation, capital requirements and taxation, and speculation over the stability of the euro, continued to cloud the future for European banking.
The banking sector in the eurozone remains under stress, mainly as a consequence of governments having to finance large budget deficits, troubles in property markets and weak credit growth. The Ireland bailout was a direct consequence of the failure of the Irish banking sector, largely driven by the domestic property price crash. Worries about the size and quality of eurozone banks' exposure to weaker eurozone countries are entwined with concerns about their ability to fund themselves. European banks share nearly three quarters of the public and private sector debt in Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain. The regional and local banks in the eurozone are considered more vulnerable than well-diversified global banks.
During 2010, we were subject to the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (now the European Banking Authority) coordinated stress test of 91 EU financial institutions. Banks were required to meet a 6% minimum tier 1 target under stress. We passed the test satisfactorily, with a post-stress tier 1 ratio of 10.2% placing us in the top quartile of the institutions tested. Further stress testing is due to take place in 2011.
We expect that the pace of reforms outlined by various policymakers will gather speed in 2011, most notably the Basel III proposals. These regulations will require banks to hold more capital and a higher quality of capital and implement new liquidity rules, and are likely to result in a rise in the cost of funding and put pressure on credit pricing.
We continue to closely monitor and manage eurozone bank exposures, and are cautious in lending to this sector. We regularly update our assessment of higher-risk eurozone banks and adjust our risk appetite accordingly. We also, where possible, seek to play a positive role in maintaining credit and liquidity supply.
Middle East and North Africa
In 2009, Dubai World requested a standstill agreement with creditors in respect of the indebtedness of certain Dubai World group companies. The market disruption that ensued cut would-be borrowers off from the capital markets, although continued restructuring efforts throughout 2010 saw the return of significant positive sentiment from investors. As one of the long-term bankers to Dubai World and the various entities related to the Government of Dubai, the Group has worked closely during 2010 to address the prevailing issues. In October 2010, Dubai World obtained an agreement to restructure US$25bn of its debt subject to final documentation expected to be signed in the first half of 2011. The arrangement extends loan maturities for five to eight years at discounted rates, allowing Dubai World time to sell off its non-core assets while focusing on its core earnings. The Group's exposure to Dubai is primarily spread across operating companies within the emirate.
Political developments in the region are being monitored closely and action taken to mitigate their impact. It is too early to foresee how events may unfold; hitherto, our business in the region has for the most part operated without serious disruption. In the medium term, economic growth in the region may be adversely affected, with wider implications if the prices of oil, food and commodities rise significantly.
Commercial real estate
Our exposure in the commercial real estate sectors is concentrated in the UK, North America and Hong Kong. While there were some positive signs of recovery in markets in the UK and the US, in part supported by the low levels of interest rates, the slow speed of the recovery meant that financing and re‑financing activity in the sector remained subdued. In Hong Kong, the economy recovered robustly and the market was relatively buoyant in 2010, characterised by strong demand and continuing credit appetite.
On a constant currency basis, the aggregate of our commercial real estate and other property-related lending of US$107bn at 31 December 2010 was 7% higher than at 31 December 2009 and represented 11% of total loans and advances to customers. The increase in exposure was largely in Hong Kong, offset by a reduction in North America. In 2010, credit quality across this sector generally showed signs of stabilising but remained under stress in certain markets.
Across our portfolios, credit risk is mitigated by long-standing and conservative policies on asset origination which focus on relationships with long-term customers and limited initial leverage. We also set and monitor sector risk appetite limits at Group and regional levels to detect and prevent higher risk concentrations. While individual regions differ in their approach, typically origination loan to value ratios would be less than 65% across the Group.
Personal lending
(Unaudited)
We provide a broad range of secured and unsecured personal lending products to meet customer needs. Given the diverse nature of the markets in which we operate, the range is not standard across all countries but is tailored to meet the demands of individual markets while using appropriate distribution channels and, wherever possible, global IT platforms.
Personal lending includes advances to customers for asset purchases, such as residential property and motor vehicles, where the loans are typically secured by the assets being acquired. We also offer loans secured on existing assets, such as first and second liens on residential property; unsecured lending products such as overdrafts, credit cards and payroll loans; and debt consolidation loans which may be secured or unsecured.
In 2010, credit quality in our personal lending portfolios improved, reflecting a recovery of economic conditions in most markets. Delinquency levels and loan impairment charges declined, particularly in those countries which had previously been most affected by rising unemployment and house price depreciation.
The commentary that follows is on an underlying basis.
At 31 December 2010, total personal lending was US$425bn, a decline of 2% from 31 December 2009 as the reduction in our US run-off portfolios continued, partly offset by notable growth in Hong Kong and the UK. Within our PFS business, total loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions of US$11.3bn were 44% lower than in 2009, and were concentrated in North America (US$8.2bn) and, to a lesser extent, Europe (US$1.2bn) and Latin America (US$1.2bn).
In the UK, total personal lending was US$129bn, an increase of 4% compared with the end of 2009. The increase was due to growth in mortgage lending as a result of the enhancement of our product offerings, successful marketing and competitive pricing (UK mortgage lending is discussed in greater detail on page 108). This was partly offset by an 8% fall in other personal lending balances, reflecting a reduction in unsecured lending products as we tightened our underwriting criteria and some consumers reduced their indebtedness.
Total personal lending balances in the US at 31 December 2010 were US$109bn, a decrease of 19% compared with the end of 2009, reflecting the continued reduction in balances in our consumer finance run-off portfolios and lower balances in our Card and Retail Services business.
US residential mortgage lending balances fell by 12% to US$58bn, driven by the decisions taken in 2007 to close the Mortgage Services business and in March 2009 to close all Consumer Lending branches and run off the residual consumer finance balances. US mortgage lending is discussed in greater detail on page 108.
In PFS, total loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions were 44% down on 2009.
Other personal lending balances in the US were US$52bn at 31 December 2010, 25% lower than at the end of 2009. Credit card balances declined by 14% reflecting a reduction in active customer accounts and an increased focus by our customers on reducing outstanding credit card debt.
In March we sold US$1.0bn of vehicle finance loans. This was followed in August by the sale of the residual vehicle finance loans (US$4.3bn) to the same purchaser.
In Hong Kong, total personal lending grew by 20% to US$57bn as a result of strong growth in residential mortgage lending. In the Rest of Asia-Pacific region, personal lending also grew strongly across many countries, notably Australia, Singapore and Malaysia, through successful marketing. This growth was partly offset by a managed reduction in unsecured personal lending balances in India.
In Latin America, total personal lending was broadly flat at US$22bn as moderate growth in residential mortgage lending, particularly in Brazil, was more than offset by a decline in other personal lending. The latter reflected falls in credit card lending in Mexico and other higher-risk portfolios in Mexico and Brazil as we continued to reduce higher-risk portfolios in the region and tighten our underwriting criteria.
For an analysis of loan impairment allowances and impaired loans, see page 119.
Total personal lending
(Unaudited)
|
UK |
|
Rest of Europe |
|
US13 |
|
Rest of North America |
|
Other regions14 |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages .................................. |
103,037 |
|
8,581 |
|
57,630 |
|
21,212 |
|
78,221 |
|
268,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other personal lending ................................ |
25,636 |
|
24,463 |
|
51,686 |
|
8,589 |
|
46,265 |
|
156,639 |
- motor vehicle finance ........................... |
- |
|
35 |
|
72 |
|
55 |
|
5,886 |
|
6,048 |
- credit cards ........................................... |
11,612 |
|
1,916 |
|
33,744 |
|
1,334 |
|
13,778 |
|
62,384 |
- second lien mortgages ........................... |
846 |
|
2 |
|
9,322 |
|
578 |
|
422 |
|
11,170 |
- other .................................................... |
13,178 |
|
22,510 |
|
8,548 |
|
6,622 |
|
26,179 |
|
77,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total personal lending ................................. |
128,673 |
|
33,044 |
|
109,316 |
|
29,801 |
|
124,486 |
|
425,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages .............................. |
(275) |
|
(58) |
|
(3,592) |
|
(25) |
|
(297) |
|
(4,247) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other personal lending ............................. |
(1,348) |
|
(467) |
|
(4,436) |
|
(179) |
|
(1,616) |
|
(8,046) |
- motor vehicle finance ....................... |
- |
|
(5) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(244) |
|
(249) |
- credit cards ....................................... |
(506) |
|
(216) |
|
(2,256) |
|
(62) |
|
(483) |
|
(3,523) |
- second lien mortgages ....................... |
(58) |
|
- |
|
(889) |
|
(19) |
|
- |
|
(966) |
- other ................................................ |
(784) |
|
(246) |
|
(1,291) |
|
(98) |
|
(889) |
|
(3,308) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances on personal |
(1,623) |
|
(525) |
|
(8,028) |
|
(204) |
|
(1,913) |
|
(12,293) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- as a percentage of total personal lending |
1.3% |
|
1.6% |
|
7.3% |
|
0.7% |
|
1.5% |
|
2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages .................................. |
100,667 |
|
9,205 |
|
65,784 |
|
20,807 |
|
64,206 |
|
260,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other personal lending ................................ |
29,018 |
|
23,672 |
|
69,275 |
|
8,068 |
|
43,504 |
|
173,537 |
- motor vehicle finance ........................... |
- |
|
65 |
|
5,771 |
|
99 |
|
6,378 |
|
12,313 |
- credit cards ........................................... |
12,427 |
|
1,820 |
|
39,374 |
|
1,118 |
|
13,319 |
|
68,058 |
- second lien mortgages ........................... |
1,068 |
|
2 |
|
11,786 |
|
695 |
|
472 |
|
14,023 |
- other .................................................... |
15,523 |
|
21,785 |
|
12,344 |
|
6,156 |
|
23,335 |
|
79,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total personal lending ................................. |
129,685 |
|
32,877 |
|
135,059 |
|
28,875 |
|
107,710 |
|
434,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages .............................. |
(151) |
|
(41) |
|
(4,416) |
|
(7) |
|
(233) |
|
(4,848) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other personal lending ............................. |
(1,443) |
|
(552) |
|
(7,691) |
|
(206) |
|
(2,349) |
|
(12,241) |
- motor vehicle finance ....................... |
- |
|
(7) |
|
(211) |
|
(1) |
|
(351) |
|
(570) |
- credit cards ....................................... |
(524) |
|
(233) |
|
(3,895) |
|
(42) |
|
(854) |
|
(5,548) |
- second lien mortgages ....................... |
(79) |
|
- |
|
(1,608) |
|
(56) |
|
- |
|
(1,743) |
- other ................................................ |
(840) |
|
(312) |
|
(1,977) |
|
(107) |
|
(1,144) |
|
(4,380) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances on personal |
(1,594) |
|
(593) |
|
(12,107) |
|
(213) |
|
(2,582) |
|
(17,089) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- as a percentage of total personal lending |
1.2% |
|
1.8% |
|
9.0% |
|
0.7% |
|
2.4% |
|
3.9% |
For footnotes, see page 174.
Mortgage lending
We offer a wide range of mortgage products designed to meet customer needs, including capital repayment mortgages subject to fixed or variable interest rates and products designed to meet demand for housing loans with more flexible payment structures. We underwrite both first lien residential mortgages and loans secured on second lien mortgages.
Interest-only mortgages are those for which customers make regular payments of interest during the life of the loan and repay the principal from the sale of their home or alternative sources of funds. Typically, with introductory interest-only mortgages, the interest-only element is for a fixed term at the start of the loan, after which principal repayments commence.
Affordability mortgages include all products where the customers' monthly payments are set at a low initial rate, either variable or fixed, before resetting to a higher rate once the introductory period is over. Offset mortgages are products linked to a current or savings account, where interest earned is used to repay mortgage debt.
UK mortgage lending
On a constant currency basis, total mortgage lending in the UK, comprising residential and second lien lending, increased by 7% to US$104bn at 31 December 2010. Growth was achieved largely through the enhancement of our product offerings, successful marketing and competitive pricing. Nonetheless, mortgage lending was constrained by the decline in re-mortgage activity due to the low interest rate environment and consumer concerns over future employment and higher interest rates.
Our UK mortgage portfolio remained of high quality, consisting primarily of lending to owner-occupiers. We restricted lending to purchase residential property for the purpose of rental and almost all new business was originated through our own salesforce, with the self-certification of income not permitted. The majority of mortgage lending was to existing customers holding current or savings accounts with HSBC; this facilitated and strengthened the underwriting process.
Loan impairment charges and delinquency levels in our UK mortgage book declined despite unemployment remaining high, mainly due to improving economic conditions and low interest rates, which helped make mortgages more affordable for customers. Our continuing enhancements in credit underwriting, credit policies and collection processes contributed to the reduction in delinquencies.
The percentage of loans that were 30 days or more delinquent declined from 1.6% at 31 December 2009 to 1.4% in 2010 in the HSBC Bank mortgage portfolio and remained at less than 1.0% in the First Direct portfolio.
In 2010, the average loan-to-value ratio for new business in the UK was 54%, an increase of a single percentage point on the previous year.
Interest-only mortgage balances increased by 4% to US$45bn compared with 2009. The majority of these mortgages were offset mortgages at First Direct for which delinquency rates remained at very low levels.
US mortgage lending
US mortgage lending balances, comprising residential and second lien lending, were US$67bn at 31 December 2010, a decline of 14% compared with the end of 2009.
Mortgage lending in HSBC Finance fell by 17% to US$51bn with declines in both the Consumer Lending and Mortgage Services portfolios from their planned run-off. See table on page 110 for a breakdown of mortgage lending in HSBC Finance.
Mortgage lending in the UK rose by 7% to US$104bn, while in the US balances declined by 14% to US$67bn.
Mortgage lending balances in HSBC Bank USA remained broadly unchanged at US$16bn. We continue to sell the majority of new origination to the secondary markets as a means of managing our interest rate risk and improving structural liquidity. This reduction was partly offset by an increase in originations to Premier customers with whom we already held a banking relationship. At 31 December 2010, approximately 32% of the HSBC Bank USA mortgage portfolio were fixed rate loans and 77% were first lien.
During 2010, state and federal officials announced investigations into the procedures followed by mortgage servicing companies and banks, including HSBC Finance and its affiliates, in relation to foreclosures. This included a joint examination by the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Following the examination, our examiners issued supervisory letters noting deficiencies in our processing, preparation and signing of affidavits and other documents supporting foreclosures, and in the governance of and resources devoted to our foreclosure process. We have suspended foreclosures pending correction of the weaknesses. Management is reviewing all foreclosures which have not yet been completed, and will correct deficient documentation and refile documents where required.
As a result of the investigations, we expect that the scrutiny of documents will increase, and in some states additional verification of information may be required. If these trends continue after we reinstitute foreclosure, there could be additional delays in the process.
A discussion of credit trends in the US mortgage lending portfolio and the steps taken to mitigate risk is provided in 'US personal lending - credit quality' on page 110.
The following table shows the levels of mortgage lending products in the various portfolios in the US, the UK and the rest of the HSBC Group.
Mortgage lending products (Unaudited) |
|||||||||||
|
UK |
|
Rest of Europe |
|
US13 |
|
Rest of North America |
Other |
Other regions14 |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages ................................. |
103,037 |
|
8,581 |
|
57,630 |
|
21,212 |
|
78,221 |
|
268,681 |
Second lien mortgages ................................. |
846 |
|
2 |
|
9,322 |
|
578 |
|
422 |
|
11,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage lending ............................... |
103,883 |
|
8,583 |
|
66,952 |
|
21,790 |
|
78,643 |
|
279,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien as a percentage of total mortgage lending ..................................... |
0.8% |
|
0.0% |
|
13.9% |
|
2.7% |
|
0.5% |
|
4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages .............................. |
(275) |
|
(58) |
|
(3,592) |
|
(25) |
|
(297) |
|
(4,247) |
Second lien mortgages ............................. |
(58) |
|
- |
|
(889) |
|
(19) |
|
- |
|
(966) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances on mortgage lending ................................................ |
(333) |
|
(58) |
|
(4,481) |
|
(44) |
|
(297) |
|
(5,213) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-only (including endowment) mortgages ............................................... |
45,039 |
|
51 |
|
- |
|
908 |
|
1,282 |
|
47,280 |
Affordability mortgages, including ARMs .... |
1,089 |
|
326 |
|
18,494 |
|
274 |
|
7,855 |
|
28,038 |
Other .......................................................... |
102 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
183 |
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-only and affordability mortgages ............................................... |
46,230 |
|
377 |
|
18,494 |
|
1,182 |
|
9,320 |
|
75,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- as a percentage of total mortgage lending ................................................ |
44.5% |
|
4.4% |
|
27.6% |
|
5.4% |
|
11.9% |
|
27.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative equity mortgages15 ....................... |
2,436 |
|
- |
|
15,199 |
|
103 |
|
291 |
|
18,029 |
Other loan-to-value ratios greater than 90%16 ............................................................ |
5,802 |
|
263 |
|
10,460 |
|
1,698 |
|
1,348 |
|
19,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total negative equity and other mortgages . |
8,238 |
|
263 |
|
25,659 |
|
1,801 |
|
1,639 |
|
37,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- as a percentage of total mortgage lending ................................................ |
7.9% |
|
3.1% |
|
38.3% |
|
8.3% |
|
2.1% |
|
13.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages ................................. |
100,667 |
|
9,205 |
|
65,784 |
|
20,807 |
|
64,206 |
|
260,669 |
Second lien mortgages ................................. |
1,068 |
|
2 |
|
11,786 |
|
695 |
|
472 |
|
14,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage lending ............................... |
101,735 |
|
9,207 |
|
77,570 |
|
21,502 |
|
64,678 |
|
274,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien as a percentage of total mortgage lending ..................................... |
1.0% |
|
- |
|
15.2% |
|
3.2% |
|
0.7% |
|
5.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages .............................. |
(151) |
|
(41) |
|
(4,416) |
|
(7) |
|
(233) |
|
(4,848) |
Second lien mortgages ............................. |
(79) |
|
- |
|
(1,608) |
|
(56) |
|
- |
|
(1,743) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances on mortgage lending ................................................ |
(230) |
|
(41) |
|
(6,024) |
|
(63) |
|
(233) |
|
(6,591) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-only (including endowment) mortgages ............................................... |
45,471 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,154 |
|
1,127 |
|
47,752 |
Affordability mortgages, including ARMs .... |
2,681 |
|
1,084 |
|
21,024 |
|
232 |
|
5,921 |
|
30,942 |
Other .......................................................... |
144 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
147 |
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-only and affordability mortgages ............................................... |
48,296 |
|
1,084 |
|
21,024 |
|
1,386 |
|
7,195 |
|
78,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- as a percentage of total mortgage lending ................................................ |
47.5% |
|
11.8% |
|
27.1% |
|
6.4% |
|
11.1% |
|
28.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative equity mortgages15 ....................... |
6,412 |
|
- |
|
20,229 |
|
163 |
|
488 |
|
27,292 |
Other loan-to-value ratios greater than 90%16 ............................................................ |
10,522 |
|
- |
|
13,695 |
|
1,887 |
|
1,451 |
|
27,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total negative equity and other mortgages . |
16,934 |
|
- |
|
33,924 |
|
2,050 |
|
1,939 |
|
54,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- as a percentage of total mortgage lending ................................................ |
16.6% |
|
- |
|
43.7% |
|
9.5% |
|
3.0% |
|
20.0% |
For footnotes, see page 174.
HSBC Finance held approximately US$51bn of residential mortgage and second lien loans and advances to personal customers secured on real
estate at 31 December 2010, 12% of the Group's gross loans and advances to personal customers.
HSBC Finance US mortgage lending17 (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
At 31 December 2010 |
|
At 31 December 2009 |
|
||||||||||||
|
Mortgage |
|
Consumer Lending |
|
Other mortgage lending |
|
Total |
|
Mortgage |
|
Consumer Lending |
|
Other mortgage lending |
|
Total |
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate ................... |
11,447 |
|
31,759 |
|
87 |
|
43,293 |
|
13,596 |
|
37,639 |
|
98 |
|
51,333 |
|
Other .......................... |
6,122 |
|
1,517 |
|
2 |
|
7,641 |
|
8,168 |
|
1,867 |
|
6 |
|
10,041 |
|
Adjustable-rate ........ |
5,042 |
|
1,517 |
|
2 |
|
6,561 |
|
7,070 |
|
1,867 |
|
- |
|
8,937 |
|
Interest-only (affordability mortgages)18 ........ |
1,080 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,080 |
|
1,098 |
|
- |
|
6 |
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,569 |
|
33,276 |
|
89 |
|
50,934 |
|
21,764 |
|
39,506 |
|
104 |
|
61,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien ..................... |
15,300 |
|
29,950 |
|
66 |
|
45,316 |
|
18,710 |
|
34,913 |
|
77 |
|
53,700 |
|
Second lien .................. |
2,269 |
|
3,326 |
|
23 |
|
5,618 |
|
3,054 |
|
4,593 |
|
27 |
|
7,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,569 |
|
33,276 |
|
89 |
|
50,934 |
|
21,764 |
|
39,506 |
|
104 |
|
61,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated income19 ........... |
2,905 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,905 |
|
3,905 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,905 |
|
Negative equity mortgages15 ............. |
5,161 |
|
8,910 |
|
- |
|
14,071 |
|
6,770 |
|
12,031 |
|
- |
|
18,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances |
1,837 |
|
2,474 |
|
- |
|
4,311 |
|
2,419 |
|
3,167 |
|
1 |
|
5,587 |
|
- as a percentage of total mortgage lending ................ |
10.5% |
|
7.4% |
|
- |
|
8.5% |
|
11.1% |
|
8.0% |
|
1.0% |
|
9.1% |
|
For footnotes, see page 174.
(Unaudited)
Credit quality
During 2010, economic conditions in the US generally improved, although the pace of improvement continued to be slow.
In the first half of 2010, house prices stabilised in many markets and began to recover in others, as the first time homebuyer tax credit and continued low interest rates favourably affected the housing market. However, in the second half of the year, house prices declined in many markets as the homebuyer tax credit ended and foreclosure levels rose.
Unemployment rates, which have been a major factor in the deterioration of credit quality, were 9.4% in December 2010, a decrease of 60 basis points since December 2009. Unemployment rates in 18 states were at or above the US national average and unemployment rates in 5 states were at or above 11%, including California and Florida, where more than 5% of HSBC Finance's total loan balances are based.
Ongoing improvement in the US economy will be dependent on a sustained recovery in the housing market and unemployment rates, as well as the continuation of low interest rates. Renewed weakening in these factors and in consumer confidence may adversely affect consumer payment patterns and credit quality.
HSBC Finance: geographical concentration of US lending17, 20
(Unaudited)
|
Mortgage lending |
|
Other personal lending |
|
|
||||
|
total lending |
|
total mortgage lending |
|
total lending |
|
total other personal lending |
|
percentage of total lending |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California ................................................................. |
6 |
|
10 |
|
4 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
New York ................................................................... |
4 |
|
7 |
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
Florida ....................................................................... |
4 |
|
6 |
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
Pennsylvania ............................................................ |
3 |
|
6 |
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
Texas .......................................................................... |
2 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
5 |
Ohio ........................................................................... |
3 |
|
6 |
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
Mortgage lending
In 2010, we reduced our non-prime mortgage exposure as balances continued to run-off in our Consumer Lending and Mortgage Services portfolios in HSBC Finance. At 31 December 2010, residential mortgage lending balances were US$58bn, a decline of 12% compared with the end of 2009.
In both our Consumer Lending and Mortgage Services mortgage portfolios, two months or more delinquent balances declined as balances ran-off and economic conditions improved. In addition, written-off balances were replaced with lower levels of new delinquency volumes as the portfolios continue to season. First lien two months or more delinquent balances in our Consumer Lending portfolio declined from US$5.4bn at 31 December 2009 to US$4.9bn at 31 December 2010 and, in our Mortgage Services portfolio, from US$3.1bn at 31 December 2009 to US$2.8bn at 31 December 2010. In each case, lending balances liquidated at a faster pace than delinquency. As a result, two months or more delinquency rates on first lien loans in our Consumer Lending portfolio increased from 15.4% at 31 December 2009 to 16.2%, while in our Mortgage Services portfolio, two months or more delinquency rates increased from 16.5% to 18.0%.
At HSBC Bank USA, we continued to sell the majority of new mortgage loan originations to the secondary markets. These decreases were partly offset by increases to the portfolio from new lending to our Premier relationship customers. Two months or more delinquency rates decreased from 8.6% to 7.9% at 31 December 2010, while delinquent balances remained flat at US$1.0bn.
Second lien mortgage loans have a risk profile characterised by higher loan-to-value ratios because, in the majority of cases, the loans were taken out to complete the refinancing or purchase of properties. Loss experience on default of second lien loans has typically approached 100% of the amount owed, as any equity in the property is initially applied to the first lien loan. In the Mortgage Services second lien portfolio, outstanding balances declined by 26% to US$2.3bn and two months or more delinquency rates decreased to 10.8% at 31 December 2010. In the Consumer Lending second lien portfolio, outstanding balances declined by 28% to US$3.3bn, and two months or more delinquency rates decreased to 12.7% at 31 December 2010.
At HSBC Bank USA, second lien balances declined by 10% to US$3.7bn, and two months or more delinquency rates increased from 4.0% at 31 December 2009 to 4.8% at 31 December 2010 due to the effects of high unemployment levels.
Stated-income mortgages are underwritten on the basis of borrowers' representations of annual income and are not verified by supporting documents and, as a result, represent a higher than average level of risk. Stated income balances in HSBC Finance declined from US$3.9bn to US$2.9bn as the portfolio continued to run off. Two months or more delinquency rates increased to 24.0% at 31 December 2010. In HSBC Bank USA, stated-income balances were unchanged at US$2.1bn while delinquency rates decreased from 11.1% at 31 December 2009 to 10.6% at 31 December 2010.
At 31 December 2010, HSBC Finance had US$7.6bn of affordability mortgages, a decline of 24% compared with 31 December 2009, as the portfolio continued to run off. At HSBC Bank USA, affordability mortgage balances of US$10.9bn at 31 December 2010 compared with US$11.1bn at 31 December 2009.
Real estate markets in the majority of the US have been and will continue to be, affected by stagnation or declines in property values. As a result, loan-to-value ratios for our real estate secured loans have generally deteriorated since origination. Loans with a loan-to-value of 100% or more have historically had a greater likelihood of becoming delinquent. At 31 December 2010 loans in negative equity were US$14bn, compared with US$19bn at the end of 2009.
At HSBC Finance, the number of foreclosed properties at 31 December 2010 increased compared with the end of 2009. The rise reflected the improvement in the processing of foreclosures as backlogs and action taken by local governments and certain states had lengthened proceedings in previous years. The average loss on sale of foreclosed properties decreased compared with 2009 though the average loss increased in the second half of 2010, as house prices in many markets showed signs of deterioration due to a rise in the number of foreclosed properties and the expiration of the homebuyer tax credit. We continued to assist customers in restructuring their debts to avoid foreclosure, including by modifying their loans when it was decided that they could be serviced on revised terms. For more details on the investigation into US foreclosure practices, see page 83.
HSBC Finance foreclosed properties in the US (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|||||||
|
2010 |
|
31 Dec 2010 |
|
30 Sep 2010 |
|
30 Jun |
|
31 Mar |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of foreclosed properties at end of period ......... |
10,940 |
|
10,940 |
|
9,798 |
|
8,394 |
|
6,961 |
|
6,188 |
Number of properties added to foreclosed inventory |
20,489 |
|
5,763 |
|
5,413 |
|
5,096 |
|
4,217 |
|
14,845 |
Average loss on sale of foreclosed properties21 ............ |
9% |
|
15% |
|
10% |
|
4% |
|
4% |
|
12% |
Average total loss on foreclosed properties22 ............... |
51% |
|
54% |
|
52% |
|
49% |
|
49% |
|
51% |
Average time to sell foreclosed properties (days) ......... |
161 |
|
165 |
|
158 |
|
156 |
|
170 |
|
193 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
Credit cards
In our credit card and private label portfolios two months or more delinquency balances declined markedly, reflecting actions taken to improve credit quality, and our customer payment rates benefited from an increased focus by consumers on reducing outstanding credit card debt. Two months or more delinquent balances in our credit card portfolio declined from US$1.8bn to US$1.0bn, while in percentage terms they declined from 7.4% at 31 December 2009 to 4.7% at 31 December 2010. In the private label cards portfolio, two months or more delinquent balances declined from US$622m to US$404m while in percentage terms delinquency decreased from 4.1% at 31 December 2009 to 3.0% at 31 December 2010.
Motor vehicle finance
In 2010, we sold our vehicle finance loan portfolio and vehicle finance servicing operations. See page 106 for details.
Other personal lending
In the US unsecured lending portfolio, two months or more delinquency rates declined as balances continued to run off, economic conditions generally improved, and actions taken previously to tighten underwriting and reduce risk in this portfolio continued to have a favourable effect on credit quality.
Loan delinquency
Trends in two months and over contractual delinquency in the US
(Unaudited)
|
Quarter ended |
||||||||||||||||
|
31 Dec 2010 |
|
30 Sep 2010 |
|
30 Jun |
|
31 Mar 2010 |
|
As reported 31 Dec 2009 |
Ex. period change 31 Dec 2009 |
|
30 Sep 2009 |
|
30 Jun |
|
31 Mar 2009 |
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
In Personal Financial Services in the US |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages |
8,632 |
|
8,885 |
|
8,591 |
|
8,960 |
|
9,551 |
|
11,519 |
|
10,834 |
|
10,070 |
|
9,892 |
Second lien mortgage lending ................ |
847 |
|
907 |
|
930 |
|
1,011 |
|
1,194 |
|
1,628 |
|
1,631 |
|
1,676 |
|
1,772 |
Vehicle finance ....... |
- |
|
- |
|
152 |
|
194 |
|
267 |
|
267 |
|
295 |
|
310 |
|
269 |
Credit card .............. |
957 |
|
1,066 |
|
1,201 |
|
1,511 |
|
1,798 |
|
1,798 |
|
1,834 |
|
1,864 |
|
1,992 |
Private label ........... |
404 |
|
445 |
|
478 |
|
510 |
|
622 |
|
622 |
|
639 |
|
636 |
|
659 |
Personal non-credit |
811 |
|
953 |
|
987 |
|
1,194 |
|
1,548 |
|
2,619 |
|
2,680 |
|
2,709 |
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ...................... |
11,651 |
|
12,256 |
|
12,339 |
|
13,380 |
|
14,980 |
|
18,453 |
|
17,913 |
|
17,265 |
|
17,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages |
15.00 |
|
14.97 |
|
14.02 |
|
14.12 |
|
14.54 |
|
17.03 |
|
15.39 |
|
13.89 |
|
12.82 |
Second lien mortgage lending ................ |
9.10 |
|
9.23 |
|
8.98 |
|
9.17 |
|
10.14 |
|
13.35 |
|
12.71 |
|
12.35 |
|
12.59 |
Vehicle finance ....... |
- |
|
- |
|
3.59 |
|
3.96 |
|
4.63 |
|
4.63 |
|
4.61 |
|
3.97 |
|
2.79 |
Credit card .............. |
4.69 |
|
5.23 |
|
5.65 |
|
6.84 |
|
7.38 |
|
7.38 |
|
7.28 |
|
7.25 |
|
7.14 |
Private label ........... |
3.03 |
|
3.56 |
|
3.80 |
|
3.78 |
|
4.12 |
|
4.12 |
|
4.38 |
|
4.08 |
|
4.28 |
Personal non-credit |
9.49 |
|
10.15 |
|
9.60 |
|
10.75 |
|
12.55 |
|
19.77 |
|
18.73 |
|
18.02 |
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ...................... |
10.67 |
|
10.99 |
|
10.28 |
|
10.61 |
|
11.09 |
|
13.34 |
|
12.47 |
|
11.49 |
|
10.92 |
|
Quarter ended |
||||||||||||||||
|
31 Dec 2010 |
|
30 Sep 2010 |
|
30 Jun |
|
31 Mar 2010 |
|
As reported 31 Dec 2009 |
Ex. period change 31 Dec 2009 |
|
30 Sep 2009 |
|
30 Jun |
|
31 Mar 2009 |
|
In Mortgage Services |
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Services: .. |
3,002 |
|
3,117 |
|
3,067 |
|
3,236 |
|
3,477 |
|
4,456 |
|
4,250 |
|
4,257 |
|
4,535 |
- first lien ........... |
2,757 |
|
2,850 |
|
2,788 |
|
2,928 |
|
3,093 |
|
3,900 |
|
3,688 |
|
3,642 |
|
3,824 |
- second lien ....... |
245 |
|
267 |
|
279 |
|
308 |
|
384 |
|
556 |
|
562 |
|
615 |
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Lending: . |
5,284 |
|
5,495 |
|
5,278 |
|
5,493 |
|
6,022 |
|
7,445 |
|
7,131 |
|
6,514 |
|
6,203 |
- first lien ........... |
4,861 |
|
5,022 |
|
4,795 |
|
4,970 |
|
5,380 |
|
6,541 |
|
6,241 |
|
5,640 |
|
5,322 |
- second lien ....... |
423 |
|
473 |
|
483 |
|
523 |
|
642 |
|
904 |
|
890 |
|
874 |
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
|
%23 |
Mortgage Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- first lien ........... |
18.02 |
|
17.73 |
|
16.50 |
|
16.38 |
|
16.53 |
|
20.00 |
|
18.09 |
|
17.13 |
|
17.24 |
- second lien ....... |
10.80 |
|
10.93 |
|
10.63 |
|
10.87 |
|
12.57 |
|
17.25 |
|
16.36 |
|
16.35 |
|
17.44 |
- total ................. |
17.09 |
|
16.83 |
|
15.71 |
|
15.62 |
|
15.98 |
|
19.61 |
|
17.84 |
|
17.01 |
|
17.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Lending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- first lien ........... |
16.23 |
|
16.16 |
|
14.85 |
|
14.79 |
|
15.41 |
|
18.15 |
|
16.75 |
|
14.72 |
|
13.52 |
- second lien ....... |
12.72 |
|
13.16 |
|
12.44 |
|
12.25 |
|
13.98 |
|
18.64 |
|
17.49 |
|
16.17 |
|
15.43 |
- total ................. |
15.88 |
|
15.85 |
|
14.59 |
|
14.51 |
|
15.24 |
|
18.21 |
|
16.84 |
|
14.90 |
|
13.76 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
Forbearance strategies and renegotiated loans
A range of forbearance strategies are employed in order to improve the management of customer relationships, maximise collection opportunities and, if possible, avoid foreclosure or repossession. Our policies and practices are based on criteria which, in the judgement of local management, indicate that repayment is likely to continue.
Forbearance arrangements include extended payment terms, a reduction in interest or principal repayments, approved external debt management plans, the deferral of foreclosures, other modifications, and loan restructures. These management policies and practices typically provide the customer with terms and conditions that are more favourable than those provided initially. Such arrangements could include cases where an account is brought up-to-date without full repayment of all the arrears.
Our most common forbearance arrangements are loan restructures applied to real estate loans within consumer finance portfolios in the US. Our credit risk management policy sets out restrictions on the number and frequency of restructures, the minimum period an account must have been opened before any restructure can be considered, and the number of qualifying payments that must be received before an account may be considered restructured and up-to-date. The application of this policy varies according to the nature of the market, the product and the management of customer relationships through the occurrence of exceptional events.
Loans that are subject to restructuring may only be classified as restructured and up-to-date once a specified number and/or amount of qualifying payments have been received. These qualifying payments are set at a level appropriate to the nature of the loan and the customer's ability to make the repayment going forward. Typically the receipt of two or more qualifying payments is required within a certain period, generally 60 days (in the case of HSBC Finance, in certain circumstances, for example where debt has been restructured in bankruptcy proceedings, fewer or no payments may be required). Loans that have been restructured and would otherwise have been past due or impaired are classified as renegotiated.
Renegotiated loans are segregated from other parts of the loan portfolio for collective impairment assessment, to reflect the higher rates of losses often encountered in this segment of the portfolio. When empirical evidence indicates an increased propensity to default and higher losses on such accounts, the use of roll rate methodology ensures these factors are taken into account when calculating impairment allowances. The carrying amount of loans that have been classified as renegotiated retain this classification until maturity or derecognition. Interest is recorded on renegotiated loans on the basis of new contractual terms following renegotiation.
Renegotiated loans totalled US$35bn at 31 December 2010 (2009: US$39bn). The largest concentration was in the US and amounted to US$28bn (2009: US$33bn) or 82% (2009: 86%) of our total renegotiated loans, substantially all of which was held by HSBC Finance.
HSBC Finance loan modifications and re‑ageing
HSBC Finance continued to refine its customer account management policies and practices, including account modification and re-age programmes. Modification occurs when the terms of a loan are modified either temporarily or permanently. Modification may also lead to a re‑ageing of the account. In 2010, HSBC Finance modified 42,500 loans with an aggregate balance of US$6.0bn in Consumer Lending and Mortgage Services through the foreclosure avoidance and account modification programmes.
At 31 December 2010, the total balance outstanding on HSBC Finance real estate secured accounts which have been re-aged or modified was US$26.7bn, compared with US$30.2bn at the end of 2009. US$10.6bn relates to loans that had been re‑aged without modification to the terms (2009: US$11.1bn), and US$13.9bn relates to loans whose terms have been modified and have been re-aged (2009: US$15.7bn). These amounts are included in the renegotiated loans balance disclosed above. In addition, US$2.2bn of loans have been modified but not re-aged (2009: US$3.4bn) and as such do not meet the definition of a renegotiated loan as the impairment or past-due status of the loans did not change on modification. At 31 December 2010, 62% of modified or re-aged real estate loans remained up-to-date or past due less than 30 days (2009: 61%) and 26% were two or more months delinquent (2009: 26%).
(Audited)
We obtained assets by taking possession of collateral held as security, or calling upon other credit enhancements, as follows:
|
Carrying amount |
||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Nature of assets |
|
|
|
Residential property ................ |
2,052 |
|
1,587 |
Commercial and industrial |
61 |
|
93 |
Other ...................................... |
119 |
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
2,035 |
We make repossessed properties available for sale in an orderly fashion, with the proceeds used to reduce or repay the outstanding indebtedness. If excess funds arise after the debt has been repaid, they are made available either to repay other secured lenders with lower priority or are returned to the customer. We do not generally occupy repossessed properties for our business use.
Credit quality of financial instruments
(Audited)
The five credit quality classifications defined below each encompass a range of more granular internal credit rating grades assigned to wholesale and retail lending business, as well as the external ratings attributed by external agencies to debt securities. There is no direct correlation between the internal and external ratings at a granular level, except to the extent each falls within a single quality classification.
Risk rating scales
Credit quality classification
(Unaudited)
|
Debt securities and other bills |
|
Wholesale lending and derivatives |
|
Retail lending |
||||
Quality classification |
External credit rating |
|
Internal credit rating |
|
Probability of default % |
|
Internal credit rating25 |
|
Expected loss % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strong ...................... |
A- and above |
|
CRR1 to CRR2 |
|
0 - 0.169 |
|
EL1 to EL2 |
|
0 - 0.999 |
Good ........................ |
BBB+ to BBB- |
|
CRR3 |
|
0.170 - 0.740 |
|
EL3 |
|
1.000 - 4.999 |
Satisfactory ............. |
BB+ to B+ |
|
CRR4 to CRR5 |
|
0.741 - 4.914 |
|
EL4 to EL5 |
|
5.000- 19.999 |
Sub-standard ............. |
B and below |
|
CRR6 to CRR8 |
|
4.915 - 99.999 |
|
EL6 to EL8 |
|
20.000 - 99.999 |
Impaired .................. |
Impaired |
|
CRR9 to CRR10 |
|
100 |
|
EL9 to EL10 |
|
100+ or defaulted26 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
Quality classification definitions · 'Strong': exposures demonstrate a strong capacity to meet financial commitments, with negligible or low probability of default and/or low levels of expected loss. Retail accounts operate within product parameters and only exceptionally show any period of delinquency. · 'Good': exposures require closer monitoring and demonstrate a good capacity to meet financial commitments, with low default risk. Retail accounts typically show only short periods of delinquency, with any losses expected to be minimal following the adoption of recovery processes. · 'Satisfactory': exposures require closer monitoring and demonstrate an average to fair capacity to meet financial |
|
commitments, with moderate default risk. Retail accounts typically show only short periods of delinquency, with any losses expected to be minor following the adoption of recovery processes. · 'Sub-standard': exposures require varying degrees of special attention and default risk is of greater concern. Retail portfolio segments show longer delinquency periods of generally up to 90 days past due and/or expected losses are higher due to a reduced ability to mitigate these through security realisation or other recovery processes. · 'Impaired': exposures have been assessed, individually or collectively, as impaired. |
The Customer Risk Rating ('CRR') 10-grade scale above summarises a more granular underlying 23‑grade scale (2009: 22-grade scale) of obligor probability of default ('PD'). The 23-grade scale was introduced in September 2010 following the harmonisation of PDs for three asset classes (banks, sovereigns and corporates) into one scale which required an additional PD band. All distinct HSBC customers are rated using the 10 or 23-grade scale, depending on the degree of sophistication of the Basel II approach adopted for the exposure.
The Expected Loss ('EL') 10-grade scale for retail business summarises a more granular underlying EL scale for these customer segments; this combines obligor and facility/product risk factors in a composite measure.
For debt securities and certain other financial instruments, external ratings have been aligned to the five quality classifications. The ratings of Standard and Poor's are cited, with those of other agencies being treated equivalently. Debt securities with short-term issue ratings are reported against the long-term rating of the issuer of those securities. If major rating agencies have different ratings for the same debt securities, a prudent rating selection is made in line with regulatory requirements.
Additional credit quality information in respect of our consolidated holdings of ABSs is provided on pages 134 and 135.
For the purpose of the following disclosure, retail loans which are past due up to 89 days and are not otherwise classified as EL9 or EL10, are not disclosed within the EL grade to which they relate, but are separately classified as past due but not impaired.
Financial instruments by credit quality
2010 compared with 2009
Financial instruments on which credit quality has been assessed increased by 4% to US$2,297bn due to strong growth in lending, mainly in Asia. At December 2010, US$1,550bn or 67% was classified as 'strong' in line with the end of 2009, reflecting the continued actions by management to mitigate the Group's exposure to credit risk. The proportion of financial instruments classified as 'good' and 'satisfactory' were broadly unchanged at 16% and 12% respectively. The proportion of 'sub-standard' financial instruments was 2%.
Loans and advances on which credit quality has been assessed increased by 8% to US$1,167bn, driven by growth in commercial and personal lending in Asia as generally economic conditions improved, while loans and advances to banks also rose. The growth was in balances classified as 'strong' and 'good', while balances classified as 'sub-standard' and 'past due but not impaired' declined.
Derivative assets on which credit quality has been assessed grew by 4% to US$261bn from 31 December 2009, with growth in balances being classified as 'strong'. The increase was mainly in interest rate derivatives, reflecting a downward shift in yield curves.
At 31 December 2010, financial investments on which credit quality has been assessed increased by 9% compared with the end of 2009, to US$393bn. Substantially all this growth was in assets classified as 'strong', reflecting increased investment of excess liquidity into low-risk government issued or government guaranteed bonds.
Trading assets on which credit quality has been assessed decreased by 11%, with the decline being in assets rated as 'strong'. This reflected the de-consolidation of the Constant Net Asset Value funds.
The following tables set out our distribution of financial instruments by measures of credit quality:
Distribution of financial instruments by credit quality
(Audited)
|
Neither past due nor impaired |
|
Past due |
|
|
|
Impair- |
|
|
||||||
|
Strong |
|
Good |
Satisfactory |
|
Sub- standard |
|
but not impaired |
|
Impaired |
|
ment allowances27 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances at central banks ........ |
51,682 |
|
3,100 |
|
2,461 |
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,383 |
Items in the course of collection from other banks .......... |
5,631 |
|
101 |
|
340 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,072 |
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness ......... |
19,057 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets28 ........ |
256,576 |
|
41,620 |
|
43,278 |
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,966 |
- treasury and other eligible bills .......................... |
23,663 |
|
1,000 |
|
957 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,620 |
- debt securities .... |
141,837 |
|
8,254 |
|
17,222 |
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,268 |
- loans and advances to banks .......................... |
55,534 |
|
9,980 |
|
4,865 |
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,456 |
- loans and advances to customers .......... |
35,542 |
|
22,386 |
|
20,234 |
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at |
8,377 |
|
4,640 |
|
6,536 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,593 |
- treasury and other eligible bills .......................... |
158 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
- debt securities .... |
7,310 |
|
4,368 |
|
6,530 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,248 |
- loans and advances to banks .......................... |
38 |
|
272 |
|
5 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
- loans and advances to customers .......... |
871 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives28 ............ |
199,920 |
|
45,042 |
|
13,980 |
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ...................... |
653,248 |
|
251,265 |
|
186,704 |
|
37,057 |
|
30,320 |
|
28,284 |
|
(20,241) |
|
1,166,637 |
- loans and advances to banks .......................... |
166,943 |
|
33,051 |
|
6,982 |
|
1,152 |
|
108 |
|
193 |
|
(158) |
|
208,271 |
- loans and advances to customers29 ....... |
486,305 |
|
218,214 |
|
179,722 |
|
35,905 |
|
30,212 |
|
28,091 |
|
(20,083) |
|
958,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial investments ................................. |
345,265 |
|
23,253 |
|
17,168 |
|
4,479 |
|
16 |
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
392,772 |
- treasury and other similar bills .......................... |
52,423 |
|
2,702 |
|
1,882 |
|
115 |
|
- |
|
7 |
|
|
|
57,129 |
- debt securities .... |
292,842 |
|
20,551 |
|
15,286 |
|
4,364 |
|
16 |
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
335,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ............. |
9,752 |
|
6,067 |
|
12,212 |
|
1,510 |
|
513 |
|
317 |
|
|
|
30,371 |
- endorsements and acceptances ....... |
2,074 |
|
3,305 |
|
4,227 |
|
493 |
|
9 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
10,116 |
- accrued income and other ............. |
7,678 |
|
2,762 |
|
7,985 |
|
1,017 |
|
504 |
|
309 |
|
|
|
20,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments .............. |
1,549,508 |
|
375,088 |
|
282,679 |
|
47,533 |
|
30,849 |
|
31,192 |
|
(20,241) |
|
2,296,608 |
|
Neither past due nor impaired |
|
Past due but not impaired |
|
|
|
Impair- |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Sub- standard |
|
|
Impaired |
ment allowances27 |
|
Total |
||||
|
Strong |
|
Good |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances at central banks ......... |
55,355 |
|
3,414 |
|
1,589 |
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,655 |
Items in the course of collection from other banks ............ |
5,922 |
|
20 |
|
453 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,395 |
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness ........... |
17,463 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets28 ......... |
306,481 |
|
37,911 |
|
39,457 |
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,070 |
- treasury and other eligible bills ......... |
21,747 |
|
315 |
|
169 |
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,346 |
- debt securities ..... |
180,876 |
|
7,499 |
|
12,360 |
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,598 |
- loans and advances to banks .............. |
59,152 |
|
14,213 |
|
4,572 |
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,126 |
- loans and advances to customers ....... |
44,706 |
|
15,884 |
|
22,356 |
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at |
11,163 |
|
3,834 |
|
7,122 |
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,198 |
- treasury and other eligible bills ......... |
223 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
- debt securities ..... |
9,701 |
|
3,834 |
|
7,104 |
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,718 |
- loans and advances to banks .............. |
336 |
|
- |
|
18 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
- loans and advances to customers ....... |
903 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives28 ............. |
169,430 |
|
60,759 |
|
15,688 |
|
5,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ....................... |
570,357 |
|
231,394 |
|
185,167 |
|
43,820 |
|
40,078 |
|
30,845 |
|
(25,649) |
|
1,076,012 |
- loans and advances to banks .............. |
130,403 |
|
34,646 |
|
13,154 |
|
1,434 |
|
12 |
|
239 |
|
(107) |
|
179,781 |
- loans and advances to customers29 ..... |
439,954 |
|
196,748 |
|
172,013 |
|
42,386 |
|
40,066 |
|
30,606 |
|
(25,542) |
|
896,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial investments |
316,604 |
|
20,080 |
|
15,359 |
|
5,602 |
|
- |
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
360,034 |
- treasury and other similar bills .......... |
54,158 |
|
1,458 |
|
2,315 |
|
498 |
|
- |
|
5 |
|
|
|
58,434 |
- debt securities ..... |
262,446 |
|
18,622 |
|
13,044 |
|
5,104 |
|
- |
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
301,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ............... |
13,454 |
|
6,968 |
|
12,477 |
|
1,718 |
|
908 |
|
848 |
|
|
|
36,373 |
- endorsements and acceptances ......... |
1,349 |
|
3,200 |
|
4,161 |
|
512 |
|
12 |
|
77 |
|
|
|
9,311 |
- accrued income and other ............... |
12,105 |
|
3,768 |
|
8,316 |
|
1,206 |
|
896 |
|
771 |
|
|
|
27,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments ............... |
1,466,229 |
|
364,380 |
|
277,312 |
|
58,746 |
|
40,986 |
|
34,082 |
|
(25,649) |
|
2,216,086 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
Past due but not impaired gross financial instruments
(Audited)
Examples of exposures past due but not impaired include overdue loans fully secured by cash collateral; mortgages that are individually assessed for impairment, and that are in arrears more than 90 days, but where the value of collateral is sufficient to repay both the principal debt and all potential interest for at least one year; and short‑term trade facilities past due more than 90 days for technical reasons such as delays in documentation, but where there is no concern over the creditworthiness of the counterparty.
Past due but not impaired loans and advances to customers and banks by geographical region
(Audited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong Kong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
Middle East |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2010 ............................... |
2,518 |
|
1,158 |
|
2,092 |
|
1,351 |
|
20,227 |
|
2,974 |
|
30,320 |
At 31 December 2009 ................................. |
3,759 |
|
1,165 |
|
1,996 |
|
1,661 |
|
27,989 |
|
3,508 |
|
40,078 |
Past due but not impaired loans and advances to customers and banks by industry sector
(Audited)
|
At 31 December |
||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
Banks ...................................................................................................................................... |
108 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
Customers ............................................................................................................................... |
30,212 |
|
40,066 |
Personal .............................................................................................................................. |
24,824 |
|
34,306 |
Corporate and commercial .................................................................................................. |
5,292 |
|
5,522 |
Financial ............................................................................................................................. |
96 |
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,320 |
|
40,078 |
Ageing analysis of days past due but not impaired gross financial instruments
(Audited)
|
Up to 29 days |
|
30-59 |
|
60-89 |
|
90-179 |
|
180 days and over |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ................. |
19,481 |
|
6,915 |
|
3,281 |
|
482 |
|
161 |
|
30,320 |
- loans and advances to banks ................................. |
108 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
108 |
- loans and advances to customers .......................... |
19,373 |
|
6,915 |
|
3,281 |
|
482 |
|
161 |
|
30,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- debt securities ...................................................... |
16 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ................................................................ |
262 |
|
123 |
|
57 |
|
26 |
|
45 |
|
513 |
- endorsements and acceptances ............................. |
7 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
9 |
- other ................................................................... |
255 |
|
123 |
|
57 |
|
25 |
|
44 |
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,759 |
|
7,038 |
|
3,338 |
|
508 |
|
206 |
|
30,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ................. |
24,330 |
|
9,920 |
|
5,259 |
|
355 |
|
214 |
|
40,078 |
- loans and advances to banks ................................. |
12 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
12 |
- loans and advances to customers .......................... |
24,318 |
|
9,920 |
|
5,259 |
|
355 |
|
214 |
|
40,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ................................................................ |
609 |
|
130 |
|
63 |
|
24 |
|
82 |
|
908 |
- endorsements and acceptances ............................. |
9 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
12 |
- other ................................................................... |
600 |
|
129 |
|
63 |
|
23 |
|
81 |
|
896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,939 |
|
10,050 |
|
5,322 |
|
379 |
|
296 |
|
40,986 |
Impaired loans and advances
(Audited)
|
Impaired loans and advances at |
|
Impaired loans and advances at |
||||||||
|
Individually assessed |
|
Collectively assessed |
|
Total |
|
Individually assessed |
|
Collectively assessed |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks .................................................. |
193 |
|
- |
|
193 |
|
239 |
|
- |
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers ............................................ |
15,201 |
|
12,890 |
|
28,091 |
|
14,767 |
|
15,839 |
|
30,606 |
Personal ........................................... |
2,121 |
|
12,592 |
|
14,713 |
|
1,977 |
|
15,451 |
|
17,428 |
Corporate and commercial ............... |
11,964 |
|
298 |
|
12,262 |
|
11,839 |
|
387 |
|
12,226 |
Financial .......................................... |
1,116 |
|
- |
|
1,116 |
|
951 |
|
1 |
|
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,394 |
|
12,890 |
|
28,284 |
|
15,006 |
|
15,839 |
|
30,845 |
(Audited)
The tables below analyse by geographical region the impairment allowances recognised for impaired loans and advances that are either individually assessed or collectively assessed, and collective impairment allowances on loans and advances classified as not impaired.
(Audited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
Middle East |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impaired loans30 ............... |
8,831 |
|
637 |
|
1,185 |
|
2,137 |
|
1,632 |
|
779 |
|
15,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed31 ...................................... |
432,631 |
|
140,683 |
|
108,505 |
|
24,141 |
|
198,070 |
|
59,218 |
|
963,248 |
Impaired loans30 ........................................... |
1,726 |
|
23 |
|
139 |
|
296 |
|
9,095 |
|
1,611 |
|
12,890 |
Non-impaired loans32 .................................... |
430,905 |
|
140,660 |
|
108,366 |
|
23,845 |
|
188,975 |
|
57,607 |
|
950,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans and advances ......................... |
441,462 |
|
141,320 |
|
109,690 |
|
26,278 |
|
199,702 |
|
59,997 |
|
978,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed ...................................... |
3,563 |
|
345 |
|
629 |
|
1,163 |
|
390 |
|
367 |
|
6,457 |
Collectively assessed ..................................... |
2,100 |
|
284 |
|
330 |
|
489 |
|
8,780 |
|
1,643 |
|
13,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances ........................... |
5,663 |
|
629 |
|
959 |
|
1,652 |
|
9,170 |
|
2,010 |
|
20,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and advances ..................................... |
435,799 |
|
140,691 |
|
108,731 |
|
24,626 |
|
190,532 |
|
57,987 |
|
958,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Individually assessed allowances as a |
40.3 |
|
54.2 |
|
53.1 |
|
54.4 |
|
23.9 |
|
47.1 |
|
42.5 |
Collectively assessed allowances as a |
0.5 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
2.0 |
|
4.4 |
|
2.8 |
|
1.4 |
Total allowances as a percentage of total |
1.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.9 |
|
6.3 |
|
4.6 |
|
3.4 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impaired loans30 ................ |
8,800 |
|
823 |
|
1,006 |
|
1,310 |
|
1,990 |
|
838 |
|
14,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed31 ...................................... |
436,816 |
|
99,362 |
|
80,033 |
|
22,912 |
|
218,539 |
|
49,344 |
|
907,006 |
Impaired loans30 ........................................... |
1,922 |
|
18 |
|
194 |
|
336 |
|
11,256 |
|
2,113 |
|
15,839 |
Non-impaired loans32 .................................... |
434,894 |
|
99,344 |
|
79,839 |
|
22,576 |
|
207,283 |
|
47,231 |
|
891,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans and advances ......................... |
445,616 |
|
100,185 |
|
81,039 |
|
24,222 |
|
220,529 |
|
50,182 |
|
921,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed ...................................... |
3,742 |
|
490 |
|
508 |
|
688 |
|
650 |
|
416 |
|
6,494 |
Collectively assessed ..................................... |
2,393 |
|
314 |
|
488 |
|
690 |
|
13,026 |
|
2,137 |
|
19,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances ........................... |
6,135 |
|
804 |
|
996 |
|
1,378 |
|
13,676 |
|
2,553 |
|
25,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and advances ..................................... |
439,481 |
|
99,381 |
|
80,043 |
|
22,844 |
|
206,853 |
|
47,629 |
|
896,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Individually assessed allowances as a |
42.5 |
|
59.5 |
|
50.5 |
|
52.5 |
|
32.7 |
|
49.7 |
|
44.0 |
Collectively assessed allowances as a |
0.5 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
3.0 |
|
6.0 |
|
4.3 |
|
2.1 |
Total allowances as a percentage of total |
1.4 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.2 |
|
5.7 |
|
6.2 |
|
5.1 |
|
2.8 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
(Audited)
|
Banks |
|
Customers |
|
|
||
|
Individually assessed8 |
|
Individually assessed |
|
Collectively assessed |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January ........................................................... |
107 |
|
6,494 |
|
19,048 |
|
25,649 |
Amounts written off ............................................... |
(9) |
|
(2,441) |
|
(16,850) |
|
(19,300) |
Recoveries of loans and advances written off in |
2 |
|
143 |
|
875 |
|
1,020 |
Charge to income statement ................................... |
12 |
|
2,613 |
|
10,923 |
|
13,548 |
Exchange and other movements ............................. |
46 |
|
(352) |
|
(370) |
|
(676) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ...................................................... |
158 |
|
6,457 |
|
13,626 |
|
20,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal .............................................................. |
|
|
615 |
|
11,678 |
|
12,293 |
Corporate and commercial .................................. |
|
|
5,274 |
|
1,863 |
|
7,137 |
Financial ............................................................. |
|
|
568 |
|
85 |
|
653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances as a percentage of loans and advances33,34 ...................................................... |
0.11 |
|
0.70 |
|
1.49 |
|
1.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January ........................................................... |
63 |
|
3,284 |
|
20,625 |
|
23,972 |
Amounts written off ............................................... |
(35) |
|
(1,563) |
|
(23,242) |
|
(24,840) |
Recoveries of loans and advances written off in |
6 |
|
128 |
|
756 |
|
890 |
Charge to income statement ................................... |
70 |
|
4,388 |
|
20,484 |
|
24,942 |
Exchange and other movements ............................. |
3 |
|
257 |
|
425 |
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ...................................................... |
107 |
|
6,494 |
|
19,048 |
|
25,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal .............................................................. |
|
|
572 |
|
16,517 |
|
17,089 |
Corporate and commercial .................................. |
|
|
5,528 |
|
2,354 |
|
7,882 |
Financial ............................................................. |
|
|
394 |
|
177 |
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances as a percentage of loans and advances33,34 ...................................................... |
0.09 |
|
0.75 |
|
2.21 |
|
2.63 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
Movement in impairment allowances by industry sector
(Audited)
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances at 1 January ................................. |
25,649 |
|
23,972 |
|
19,212 |
|
13,585 |
|
11,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts written off ......................................................... |
(19,300) |
|
(24,840) |
|
(17,955) |
|
(12,844) |
|
(9,473) |
Personal2 ...................................................................... |
(16,458) |
|
(22,703) |
|
(16,625) |
|
(11,670) |
|
(8,281) |
- residential mortgages2 ............................................ |
(4,163) |
|
(4,704) |
|
(2,110) |
|
(930) |
|
(628) |
- other personal2 ...................................................... |
(12,295) |
|
(17,999) |
|
(14,515) |
|
(10,740) |
|
(7,653) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................................ |
(2,789) |
|
(1,984) |
|
(1,294) |
|
(1,163) |
|
(1,153) |
- commercial, industrial and international trade ........ |
(1,050) |
|
(1,093) |
|
(789) |
|
(897) |
|
(782) |
- commercial real estate and other property-related . |
(1,280) |
|
(327) |
|
(115) |
|
(98) |
|
(111) |
- other commercial ................................................... |
(459) |
|
(564) |
|
(390) |
|
(168) |
|
(260) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial35 .................................................................... |
(53) |
|
(153) |
|
(36) |
|
(11) |
|
(39) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous years ......... |
1,020 |
|
890 |
|
834 |
|
1,005 |
|
779 |
Personal ........................................................................ |
846 |
|
712 |
|
686 |
|
837 |
|
605 |
- residential mortgages .............................................. |
93 |
|
61 |
|
19 |
|
19 |
|
19 |
- other personal ........................................................ |
753 |
|
651 |
|
667 |
|
818 |
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................................ |
156 |
|
170 |
|
142 |
|
157 |
|
163 |
- commercial, industrial and international trade ........ |
92 |
|
123 |
|
76 |
|
74 |
|
88 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related . |
21 |
|
9 |
|
6 |
|
29 |
|
21 |
- other commercial ................................................... |
43 |
|
38 |
|
60 |
|
54 |
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial35 .................................................................... |
18 |
|
8 |
|
6 |
|
11 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge to income statement36 .......................................... |
13,548 |
|
24,942 |
|
24,131 |
|
17,177 |
|
10,547 |
Personal ........................................................................ |
11,187 |
|
19,781 |
|
20,950 |
|
15,968 |
|
9,929 |
- residential mortgages .............................................. |
3,461 |
|
4,185 |
|
5,000 |
|
1,840 |
|
1,096 |
- other personal ........................................................ |
7,726 |
|
15,596 |
|
15,950 |
|
14,128 |
|
8,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................................ |
2,198 |
|
4,711 |
|
2,879 |
|
1,176 |
|
664 |
- commercial, industrial and international trade ........ |
909 |
|
2,392 |
|
1,573 |
|
897 |
|
503 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related . |
660 |
|
1,492 |
|
755 |
|
152 |
|
75 |
- other commercial ................................................... |
629 |
|
827 |
|
551 |
|
127 |
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial35 .................................................................... |
163 |
|
450 |
|
302 |
|
36 |
|
(9) |
Governments ................................................................ |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(3) |
|
(37) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange and other movements ....................................... |
(676) |
|
685 |
|
(2,250) |
|
289 |
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December2 ............................................................ |
20,241 |
|
25,649 |
|
23,972 |
|
19,212 |
|
13,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances against banks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................................... |
158 |
|
107 |
|
63 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
Impairment allowances against customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................................... |
6,457 |
|
6,494 |
|
3,284 |
|
2,699 |
|
2,565 |
- collectively assessed2 .................................................. |
13,626 |
|
19,048 |
|
20,625 |
|
16,506 |
|
11,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December2 .............................................................. |
20,241 |
|
25,649 |
|
23,972 |
|
19,212 |
|
13,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Impairment allowances against customers as a percentage of loans and advances to customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................................... |
0.66 |
|
0.70 |
|
0.34 |
|
0.27 |
|
0.29 |
- collectively assessed ................................................... |
1.39 |
|
2.07 |
|
2.16 |
|
1.65 |
|
1.25 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................................... |
2.05 |
|
2.77 |
|
2.50 |
|
1.92 |
|
1.54 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
Movement in impairment allowances by industry sector and by geographical region
(Audited)
|
2010 |
||||||||||||
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
Middle East |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances at 1 January ................. |
6,227 |
|
804 |
|
996 |
|
1,393 |
|
13,676 |
|
2,553 |
|
25,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts written off ......................................... |
(3,001) |
|
(265) |
|
(678) |
|
(386) |
|
(12,601) |
|
(2,369) |
|
(19,300) |
Personal ........................................................ |
(1,447) |
|
(150) |
|
(561) |
|
(375) |
|
(12,070) |
|
(1,855) |
|
(16,458) |
- residential mortgages ................................ |
(49) |
|
(1) |
|
(10) |
|
- |
|
(4,027) |
|
(76) |
|
(4,163) |
- other personal .......................................... |
(1,398) |
|
(149) |
|
(551) |
|
(375) |
|
(8,043) |
|
(1,779) |
|
(12,295) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................. |
(1,539) |
|
(109) |
|
(110) |
|
(11) |
|
(507) |
|
(513) |
|
(2,789) |
- commercial, industrial and international |
(385) |
|
(90) |
|
(46) |
|
(10) |
|
(174) |
|
(345) |
|
(1,050) |
- commercial real estate and other property-related ...................................................... |
(1,022) |
|
(18) |
|
(18) |
|
- |
|
(194) |
|
(28) |
|
(1,280) |
- other commercial ..................................... |
(132) |
|
(1) |
|
(46) |
|
(1) |
|
(139) |
|
(140) |
|
(459) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial35 ..................................................... |
(15) |
|
(6) |
|
(7) |
|
- |
|
(24) |
|
(1) |
|
(53) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous |
287 |
|
39 |
|
188 |
|
57 |
|
182 |
|
267 |
|
1,020 |
Personal ........................................................ |
251 |
|
32 |
|
168 |
|
53 |
|
134 |
|
208 |
|
846 |
- residential mortgages ................................ |
29 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
- |
|
30 |
|
27 |
|
93 |
- other personal .......................................... |
222 |
|
28 |
|
165 |
|
53 |
|
104 |
|
181 |
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................. |
33 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
4 |
|
46 |
|
59 |
|
156 |
- commercial, industrial and international |
16 |
|
7 |
|
5 |
|
2 |
|
19 |
|
43 |
|
92 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related ...................................................... |
6 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
11 |
|
4 |
|
21 |
- other commercial ..................................... |
11 |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
16 |
|
12 |
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial35 ..................................................... |
3 |
|
- |
|
13 |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge to income statement36 .......................... |
2,532 |
|
137 |
|
428 |
|
623 |
|
8,304 |
|
1,524 |
|
13,548 |
Personal ........................................................ |
1,263 |
|
78 |
|
297 |
|
226 |
|
8,138 |
|
1,185 |
|
11,187 |
- residential mortgages ................................ |
153 |
|
(17) |
|
11 |
|
46 |
|
3,189 |
|
79 |
|
3,461 |
- other personal .......................................... |
1,110 |
|
95 |
|
286 |
|
180 |
|
4,949 |
|
1,106 |
|
7,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................. |
1,080 |
|
72 |
|
146 |
|
304 |
|
269 |
|
327 |
|
2,198 |
- commercial, industrial and international |
395 |
|
21 |
|
100 |
|
165 |
|
25 |
|
203 |
|
909 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related ...................................................... |
360 |
|
(7) |
|
12 |
|
117 |
|
178 |
|
- |
|
660 |
- other commercial ..................................... |
325 |
|
58 |
|
34 |
|
22 |
|
66 |
|
124 |
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial35 ..................................................... |
189 |
|
(13) |
|
(15) |
|
93 |
|
(103) |
|
12 |
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange and other movements ....................... |
(305) |
|
(86) |
|
25 |
|
(18) |
|
(327) |
|
35 |
|
(676) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................. |
5,740 |
|
629 |
|
959 |
|
1,669 |
|
9,234 |
|
2,010 |
|
20,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances against banks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................... |
77 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
17 |
|
64 |
|
- |
|
158 |
Impairment allowances against customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................... |
3,563 |
|
345 |
|
629 |
|
1,163 |
|
390 |
|
367 |
|
6,457 |
- collectively assessed37 ................................ |
2,100 |
|
284 |
|
330 |
|
489 |
|
8,780 |
|
1,643 |
|
13,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................... |
5,740 |
|
629 |
|
959 |
|
1,669 |
|
9,234 |
|
2,010 |
|
20,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Impairment allowances against customers as a percentage of loans and advances to customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................... |
0.81 |
|
0.24 |
|
0.57 |
|
4.43 |
|
0.20 |
|
0.61 |
|
0.66 |
- collectively assessed37 ................................ |
0.48 |
|
0.20 |
|
0.30 |
|
1.86 |
|
4.40 |
|
2.74 |
|
1.39 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................... |
1.29 |
|
0.44 |
|
0.87 |
|
6.29 |
|
4.60 |
|
3.35 |
|
2.05 |
|
2009 |
||||||||||||
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
Middle East |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances at 1 January .............. |
3,922 |
|
733 |
|
813 |
|
414 |
|
16,090 |
|
2,000 |
|
23,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts written off ..................................... |
(2,781) |
|
(357) |
|
(850) |
|
(384) |
|
(17,792) |
|
(2,676) |
|
(24,840) |
Personal ..................................................... |
(1,876) |
|
(240) |
|
(787) |
|
(376) |
|
(17,204) |
|
(2,220) |
|
(22,703) |
- residential mortgages ............................ |
(41) |
|
(1) |
|
(9) |
|
- |
|
(4,610) |
|
(43) |
|
(4,704) |
- other personal ...................................... |
(1,835) |
|
(239) |
|
(778) |
|
(376) |
|
(12,594) |
|
(2,177) |
|
(17,999) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ......................... |
(810) |
|
(117) |
|
(63) |
|
(8) |
|
(534) |
|
(452) |
|
(1,984) |
- commercial, industrial and international |
(438) |
|
(114) |
|
(50) |
|
(8) |
|
(228) |
|
(255) |
|
(1,093) |
- commercial real estate and other property-related .................................... |
(148) |
|
(1) |
|
(3) |
|
- |
|
(163) |
|
(12) |
|
(327) |
- other commercial ................................. |
(224) |
|
(2) |
|
(10) |
|
- |
|
(143) |
|
(185) |
|
(564) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial35 .................................................. |
(95) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(54) |
|
(4) |
|
(153) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous |
265 |
|
34 |
|
132 |
|
27 |
|
93 |
|
339 |
|
890 |
Personal ..................................................... |
200 |
|
32 |
|
123 |
|
25 |
|
60 |
|
272 |
|
712 |
- residential mortgages ............................ |
28 |
|
6 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
7 |
|
19 |
|
61 |
- other personal ...................................... |
172 |
|
26 |
|
122 |
|
25 |
|
53 |
|
253 |
|
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ......................... |
57 |
|
2 |
|
9 |
|
2 |
|
33 |
|
67 |
|
170 |
- commercial, industrial and international |
52 |
|
2 |
|
7 |
|
2 |
|
16 |
|
44 |
|
123 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related .................................... |
5 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
9 |
- other commercial ................................. |
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
15 |
|
22 |
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial35 .................................................. |
8 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge to income statement36 ....................... |
4,409 |
|
450 |
|
874 |
|
1,333 |
|
15,372 |
|
2,504 |
|
24,942 |
Personal ..................................................... |
1,995 |
|
206 |
|
654 |
|
593 |
|
14,390 |
|
1,943 |
|
19,781 |
- residential mortgages ............................ |
158 |
|
(16) |
|
14 |
|
20 |
|
3,955 |
|
54 |
|
4,185 |
- other personal ...................................... |
1,837 |
|
222 |
|
640 |
|
573 |
|
10,435 |
|
1,889 |
|
15,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ......................... |
2,163 |
|
244 |
|
220 |
|
706 |
|
818 |
|
560 |
|
4,711 |
- commercial, industrial and international |
963 |
|
164 |
|
154 |
|
413 |
|
309 |
|
389 |
|
2,392 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related .................................... |
958 |
|
70 |
|
29 |
|
106 |
|
288 |
|
41 |
|
1,492 |
- other commercial ................................. |
242 |
|
10 |
|
37 |
|
187 |
|
221 |
|
130 |
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial35 .................................................. |
251 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
34 |
|
164 |
|
1 |
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange and other movements ................... |
412 |
|
(56) |
|
27 |
|
3 |
|
(87) |
|
386 |
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................ |
6,227 |
|
804 |
|
996 |
|
1,393 |
|
13,676 |
|
2,553 |
|
25,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances against banks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................ |
92 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
15 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
107 |
Impairment allowances against customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................ |
3,742 |
|
490 |
|
508 |
|
688 |
|
650 |
|
416 |
|
6,494 |
- collectively assessed37 ............................. |
2,393 |
|
314 |
|
488 |
|
690 |
|
13,026 |
|
2,137 |
|
19,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................ |
6,227 |
|
804 |
|
996 |
|
1,393 |
|
13,676 |
|
2,553 |
|
25,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Impairment allowances against customers as a percentage of loans and advances to customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................ |
0.84 |
|
0.49 |
|
0.63 |
|
2.84 |
|
0.29 |
|
0.83 |
|
0.70 |
- collectively assessed37 ............................. |
0.54 |
|
0.31 |
|
0.60 |
|
2.85 |
|
5.91 |
|
4.26 |
|
2.07 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................ .................................................................. |
1.38 |
|
0.80 |
|
1.23 |
|
5.69 |
|
6.20 |
|
5.09 |
|
2.77 |
For footnotes, see page 174.
(Unaudited)
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
||||||||
|
Individually assessed US$m |
|
Collectively assessed US$m |
|
Total US$m |
|
Individually assessed US$m |
|
Collectively assessed US$m |
|
Total US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks .......................................................... |
12 |
|
- |
|
12 |
|
70 |
|
- |
|
70 |
Personal ...................................................... |
180 |
|
11,007 |
|
11,187 |
|
316 |
|
19,465 |
|
19,781 |
Residential mortgages .............................. |
137 |
|
3,324 |
|
3,461 |
|
171 |
|
4,014 |
|
4,185 |
Other personal ......................................... |
43 |
|
7,683 |
|
7,726 |
|
145 |
|
15,451 |
|
15,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial .......................... |
2,190 |
|
8 |
|
2,198 |
|
3,699 |
|
1,012 |
|
4,711 |
Commercial, industrial and international |
997 |
|
(88) |
|
909 |
|
1,681 |
|
711 |
|
2,392 |
Commercial real estate and other |
680 |
|
(20) |
|
660 |
|
1,330 |
|
162 |
|
1,492 |
Other commercial .................................... |
513 |
|
116 |
|
629 |
|
688 |
|
139 |
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ..................................................... |
243 |
|
(92) |
|
151 |
|
373 |
|
7 |
|
380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge to income statement ............... |
2,625 |
|
10,923 |
|
13,548 |
|
4,458 |
|
20,484 |
|
24,942 |
(Unaudited)
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impairment allowances ..................... |
2,625 |
|
4,458 |
|
2,064 |
|
796 |
|
458 |
New allowances ............................................................. |
3,617 |
|
5,173 |
|
2,742 |
|
1,533 |
|
1,297 |
Release of allowances no longer required ....................... |
(847) |
|
(581) |
|
(565) |
|
(608) |
|
(711) |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off ............... |
(145) |
|
(134) |
|
(113) |
|
(129) |
|
(128) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed impairment allowances ..................... |
10,923 |
|
20,484 |
|
22,067 |
|
16,381 |
|
10,089 |
New allowances net of allowance releases ...................... |
11,798 |
|
21,240 |
|
22,788 |
|
17,257 |
|
10,740 |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off ............... |
(875) |
|
(756) |
|
(721) |
|
(876) |
|
(651) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses ................................... |
13,548 |
|
24,942 |
|
24,131 |
|
17,177 |
|
10,547 |
Banks ........................................................................... |
12 |
|
70 |
|
54 |
|
- |
|
(3) |
Customers .................................................................... |
13,536 |
|
24,872 |
|
24,077 |
|
17,177 |
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage of closing |
1.14 |
|
2.26 |
|
2.17 |
|
1.39 |
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans2 ................................................................. |
28,284 |
|
30,845 |
|
25,422 |
|
19,594 |
|
15,086 |
Impairment allowances2 .................................................... |
20,241 |
|
25,649 |
|
23,972 |
|
19,212 |
|
13,585 |
For footnote, see page 174.
(Unaudited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
Middle East |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impairment allowances ..... |
1,445 |
|
45 |
|
198 |
|
502 |
|
348 |
|
87 |
|
2,625 |
New allowances ............................................. |
1,874 |
|
111 |
|
311 |
|
561 |
|
580 |
|
180 |
|
3,617 |
Release of allowances no longer required ....... |
(394) |
|
(54) |
|
(84) |
|
(55) |
|
(196) |
|
(64) |
|
(847) |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
(35) |
|
(12) |
|
(29) |
|
(4) |
|
(36) |
|
(29) |
|
(145) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed impairment allowances .... |
1,087 |
|
92 |
|
230 |
|
121 |
|
7,956 |
|
1,437 |
|
10,923 |
New allowances net of allowance releases ...... |
1,339 |
|
119 |
|
389 |
|
174 |
|
8,102 |
|
1,675 |
|
11,798 |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
(252) |
|
(27) |
|
(159) |
|
(53) |
|
(146) |
|
(238) |
|
(875) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................. |
2,532 |
|
137 |
|
428 |
|
623 |
|
8,304 |
|
1,524 |
|
13,548 |
Banks ........................................................... |
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
8 |
|
- |
|
12 |
Customers .................................................... |
2,530 |
|
137 |
|
428 |
|
621 |
|
8,296 |
|
1,524 |
|
13,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage |
0.49 |
|
0.08 |
|
0.29 |
|
1.75 |
|
3.79 |
|
1.74 |
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans .................................................. |
10,663 |
|
665 |
|
1,324 |
|
2,453 |
|
10,789 |
|
2,390 |
|
28,284 |
Impairment allowances ..................................... |
5,740 |
|
629 |
|
959 |
|
1,669 |
|
9,234 |
|
2,010 |
|
20,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impairment allowances ..... |
2,248 |
|
242 |
|
244 |
|
580 |
|
916 |
|
228 |
|
4,458 |
New allowances ............................................. |
2,573 |
|
315 |
|
341 |
|
598 |
|
1,052 |
|
294 |
|
5,173 |
Release of allowances no longer required ....... |
(255) |
|
(64) |
|
(82) |
|
(16) |
|
(112) |
|
(52) |
|
(581) |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
(70) |
|
(9) |
|
(15) |
|
(2) |
|
(24) |
|
(14) |
|
(134) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed impairment allowances .... |
2,161 |
|
208 |
|
630 |
|
753 |
|
14,456 |
|
2,276 |
|
20,484 |
New allowances net of allowance releases ...... |
2,356 |
|
233 |
|
747 |
|
778 |
|
14,525 |
|
2,601 |
|
21,240 |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
(195) |
|
(25) |
|
(117) |
|
(25) |
|
(69) |
|
(325) |
|
(756) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................. |
4,409 |
|
450 |
|
874 |
|
1,333 |
|
15,372 |
|
2,504 |
|
24,942 |
Banks ........................................................... |
55 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
15 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
70 |
Customers .................................................... |
4,354 |
|
450 |
|
874 |
|
1,318 |
|
15,372 |
|
2,504 |
|
24,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage |
0.86 |
|
0.33 |
|
0.75 |
|
4.08 |
|
6.52 |
|
3.64 |
|
2.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans .................................................. |
10,873 |
|
846 |
|
1,201 |
|
1,666 |
|
13,308 |
|
2,951 |
|
30,845 |
Impairment allowances ..................................... |
6,227 |
|
804 |
|
996 |
|
1,393 |
|
13,676 |
|
2,553 |
|
25,649 |
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage of average gross loans and advances to customers2
(Unaudited)
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases .......................... |
1.65 |
|
2.92 |
|
2.54 |
|
2.09 |
|
1.49 |
Recoveries ........................................................................ |
(0.12) |
|
(0.10) |
|
(0.09) |
|
(0.12) |
|
(0.10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses ................................... |
1.53 |
|
2.82 |
|
2.45 |
|
1.97 |
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount written off net of recoveries ............................... |
2.08 |
|
2.71 |
|
1.75 |
|
1.36 |
|
1.15 |
For footnote, see page 174.
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage of average gross loans and advances to customers by geographical region
(Unaudited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
Middle East |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ......... |
0.74 |
|
0.15 |
|
0.66 |
|
2.71 |
|
4.02 |
|
3.41 |
|
1.65 |
Recoveries ........................................................ |
(0.07) |
|
(0.03) |
|
(0.20) |
|
(0.23) |
|
(0.09) |
|
(0.51) |
|
(0.12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................. |
0.67 |
|
0.12 |
|
0.46 |
|
2.48 |
|
3.93 |
|
2.90 |
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount written off net of recoveries ............... |
0.71 |
|
0.19 |
|
0.53 |
|
1.32 |
|
5.89 |
|
4.01 |
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ......... |
1.19 |
|
0.49 |
|
1.31 |
|
5.25 |
|
6.24 |
|
6.11 |
|
2.92 |
Recoveries ........................................................ |
(0.07) |
|
(0.03) |
|
(0.17) |
|
(0.11) |
|
(0.04) |
|
(0.73) |
|
(0.10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................. |
1.12 |
|
0.46 |
|
1.14 |
|
5.14 |
|
6.20 |
|
5.38 |
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount written off net of recoveries ............... |
0.63 |
|
0.33 |
|
0.94 |
|
1.40 |
|
7.14 |
|
5.03 |
|
2.71 |
2010 compared with 2009
(Unaudited)
Loan impairment charges of US$13.5bn declined by 46% on both a reported and an underlying basis compared with 2009. Reported impaired loans were US$28.3bn at 31 December 2010, a decrease of 8% on both bases. The following commentary is on a constant currency basis.
New allowances for loan impairment charges were US$15.4bn, a decline of 42% compared with 2009, while releases and recoveries of US$1.9bn were 23% higher.
Impaired loans were 2.4% of total gross loans and advances at 31 December 2010, compared with 2.8% at 31 December 2009.
In Europe, new loan impairment allowances were US$3.2bn, 34% lower than in 2009, reflecting a more stable credit environment across many countries in the region. Individually assessed loan impairment allowances declined, mainly in the UK, reflecting an improvement in credit conditions. Significantly, impairment charges in 2009 against specific customers in the property sector did not recur. Collectively assessed loan impairment allowances also declined due to a fall in delinquency levels as our customers continued to benefit from the low interest rate environment and the general improvement in economic conditions. In our personal lending portfolios, new collectively assessed loan impairment allowances declined, reflecting lower levels of unsecured lending and tightened underwriting criteria. Impaired loans of US$10.7bn were 3% higher than at the end of 2009.
In Europe, releases and recoveries increased by 32% to US$681m.
In Hong Kong, new loan impairment allowances declined by 58% to US$230m and impaired loans fell by 21% from the end of 2009 to US$665m. New loan impairment allowances declined in both the personal and commercial lending portfolios, reflecting the economic recovery and improvement in credit conditions in the territory and fewer customer downgrades, partly offset by an increase in lending balances.
Releases and recoveries in Hong Kong were US$93m, 5% lower than in 2009.
New loan impairment allowances in Rest of Asia-Pacific declined by 40% to US$700m. The decline reflected lower new collective impairment allowances in India due to improved delinquency rates and lower balances as certain unsecured portfolios and higher risk elements of the credit card portfolio were managed down. In addition, new individually assessed impairment allowances also declined, mainly in India, due to the non-recurrence of large impairments, notably on certain technology-related exposures. These were partly offset by a significant loan impairment charge against a single customer. Impaired loans in the region increased by 3% to US$1.3bn at the end of 2010.
Releases and recoveries in the region rose by 19% due to releases in the construction and software industries in India and higher recoveries of amounts previously written off, notably in Australia.
In the Middle East, new loan impairment allowances were US$735m, 47% lower than in 2009. The decrease was largely due to a decline in new collectively assessed loan impairment allowances net of allowance releases against the personal and commercial lending portfolios as delinquency rates improved, with a decline in personal balances in line
with the managing down of our exposure to higher risk unsecured personal lending. The lower allowances also reflected an overall improvement in economic conditions across the region. There were also declines in new individually assessed loan impairment charges as new charges for 2010 were restricted to a small number of large corporate exposures. Impaired loans rose by 47% from 31 December 2009 to US$2.5bn due to credit deterioration in a small number of specific exposures, and debt restructuring in the UAE.
Releases and recoveries in the Middle East more than doubled from 2009 to US$112m due to the release of judgemental impairment allowances reflecting improved economic conditions during 2010.
In North America, new loan impairment allowances declined markedly, reducing by 44% to US$8.7bn. In our HSBC Finance portfolios, lower new loan impairment allowances in Card and Retail Services reflected a reduction in lending balances and an improvement in delinquency rates. In our Consumer Lending and Mortgage Services portfolios, new loan impairment allowances also fell as the portfolio continued to run-off. In addition, total loss severities on foreclosed loans improved compared with 2009 reflecting the increase in the number of properties for which we accepted a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or a short sale, both of which result in lower losses compared with loans which are subjected to a formal foreclosure process.
In our corporate and commercial portfolios in North America, new loan impairment allowances declined, reflecting lower balances due to customer deleveraging and improved credit quality which, along with the improved economy, resulted in credit upgrades on certain accounts and fewer customer downgrades.
In North America, impaired loans decreased by 19% from the end of 2009 to US$10.8bn, while releases and recoveries rose by 80% compared with 2009 to US$378m.
In Latin America, new loan impairment allowances declined by 42% to US$1.9bn, while impaired loans declined by 23% to US$2.4bn as economic conditions in the region improved. Lower new loan impairment allowances in the personal lending portfolios were due to lower credit card balances in Mexico as we repositioned the portfolio to target higher quality customers and, to a lesser extent, in Brazil, due to the managed reduction in consumer finance balances. In addition, in the commercial lending portfolios in Brazil lower new impairment allowances reflected an improvement in economic conditions.
Releases and recoveries in Latin America declined by 21% from 2009 to US$331m.
For an analysis of loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions by customer group, see page 48.
HSBC Holdings
(Audited)
Credit risk in HSBC Holdings primarily arises from transactions with Group subsidiaries and from guarantees issued in support of obligations assumed by certain Group operations in the normal conduct of their business.
These risks are reviewed and managed within regulatory and internal limits for exposures by our Global Risk function, which provides high-level centralised oversight and management of our credit risks worldwide.
HSBC Holdings - maximum exposure to credit risk
(Audited)
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
Cash at bank and in hand: |
|
|
|
- balances with HSBC undertakings ...................................................................................... |
459 |
|
224 |
Derivatives ............................................................................................................................. |
2,327 |
|
2,981 |
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings .............................................................................. |
21,238 |
|
23,212 |
Financial investments ............................................................................................................. |
2,025 |
|
2,455 |
Financial guarantees and similar contracts ............................................................................... |
46,988 |
|
35,073 |
Loan and other credit-related commitments ............................................................................ |
2,720 |
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
75,757 |
|
67,185 |