with central banks considered strong, the proportion of balances classified as strong increased from 90% to 98%.
Loans and advances held at amortised cost, on which credit quality has been assessed, decreased by 4% to US$1,121bn. The decline was mainly in North America, following the reclassification of certain lending balances to assets held for sale. Despite the reclassification of balances, the proportion of the Group's loans and advances held at amortised cost and categorised as strong and good were broadly in line with the end of 2010, at 54% and 22% respectively.
Trading assets, on which credit quality has been assessed, decreased by 10% to US$309bn in 2011. This reflected a reduction in our holdings of government and highly-rated corporate debt securities and equity positions, notably in Europe. Despite the decline in balances, the proportion of balances classified as strong remained stable at 75%.
The following tables set out our distribution of financial instruments by measures of credit quality:
Distribution of financial instruments by credit quality
(Audited)
|
Neither past due nor impaired |
|
Past due |
|
|
|
Impair- |
|
|
||||||
|
Strong |
|
Good |
Satisfactory |
|
Sub- standard |
|
but not impaired |
|
Impaired |
|
ment allowances19 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances at central banks ............................... |
126,926 |
|
2,678 |
|
263 |
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,902 |
Items in the course of |
7,707 |
|
150 |
|
350 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,208 |
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness |
20,922 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets20 ................... |
231,594 |
|
37,182 |
|
39,171 |
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,449 |
- treasury and other |
33,199 |
|
538 |
|
564 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,309 |
- debt securities ............... |
103,163 |
|
8,497 |
|
18,188 |
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,487 |
- loans and advances to banks ............................ |
49,021 |
|
20,699 |
|
5,186 |
|
619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,525 |
- loans and advances to customers ...................... |
46,211 |
|
7,448 |
|
15,233 |
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at |
7,176 |
|
4,728 |
|
830 |
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,926 |
- treasury and other eligible bills ............................... |
123 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
- debt securities ............... |
6,148 |
|
4,728 |
|
767 |
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,834 |
- loans and advances to banks ............................ |
55 |
|
- |
|
63 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
- loans and advances to customers ...................... |
850 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives20 ....................... |
279,557 |
|
45,858 |
|
18,627 |
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ................. |
609,081 |
|
245,352 |
|
194,661 |
|
28,210 |
|
20,009 |
|
41,739 |
|
(17,636) |
|
1,121,416 |
- loans and advances to banks ............................ |
144,815 |
|
28,813 |
|
6,722 |
|
568 |
|
39 |
|
155 |
|
(125) |
|
180,987 |
- loans and advances to customers21 ................... |
464,266 |
|
216,539 |
|
187,939 |
|
27,642 |
|
19,970 |
|
41,584 |
|
(17,511) |
|
940,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial investments .......... |
340,173 |
|
24,757 |
|
22,139 |
|
3,532 |
|
- |
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
392,834 |
- treasury and other similar bills ............................... |
58,627 |
|
3,348 |
|
3,144 |
|
104 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
65,223 |
- debt securities ............... |
281,546 |
|
21,409 |
|
18,995 |
|
3,428 |
|
- |
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
327,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale .............. |
14,365 |
|
12,587 |
|
7,931 |
|
536 |
|
2,524 |
|
1,479 |
|
(1,614) |
|
37,808 |
- disposal groups .............. |
14,317 |
|
12,587 |
|
7,931 |
|
536 |
|
2,522 |
|
1,467 |
|
(1,614) |
|
37,746 |
- non-current assets held |
48 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
12 |
|
- |
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ......................... |
11,956 |
|
6,526 |
|
12,379 |
|
1,193 |
|
421 |
|
517 |
|
|
|
32,992 |
- endorsements and acceptances ................... |
1,789 |
|
4,075 |
|
4,629 |
|
504 |
|
10 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
11,010 |
- accrued income and other |
10,167 |
|
2,451 |
|
7,750 |
|
689 |
|
411 |
|
514 |
|
|
|
21,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments .. |
1,649,457 |
|
379,818 |
|
296,351 |
|
37,538 |
|
22,954 |
|
45,968 |
|
(19,250) |
|
2,412,836 |
Distribution of financial instruments by credit quality (continued)
|
Neither past due nor impaired8 |
|
Past due |
|
|
|
Impair- |
|
|
||||||
|
Strong |
|
Good |
Satisfactory |
|
Sub- standard |
|
but not impaired8 |
|
Impaired8 |
|
ment allowances19 |
|
Total |
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances at central banks ............................. |
51,682 |
|
3,100 |
|
2,461 |
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,383 |
Items in the course of |
5,631 |
|
101 |
|
340 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,072 |
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness.................... |
19,057 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets20 ................. |
256,576 |
|
41,620 |
|
43,278 |
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,966 |
- treasury and other |
23,663 |
|
1,000 |
|
957 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,620 |
- debt securities ............. |
141,837 |
|
8,254 |
|
17,222 |
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,268 |
- loans and advances to banks .......................... |
55,534 |
|
9,980 |
|
4,865 |
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,456 |
- loans and advances to customers .................... |
35,542 |
|
22,386 |
|
20,234 |
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at |
8,377 |
|
4,640 |
|
6,536 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,593 |
- treasury and other eligible bills ................. |
158 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
- debt securities ............. |
7,310 |
|
4,368 |
|
6,530 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,248 |
- loans and advances to banks .......................... |
38 |
|
272 |
|
5 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
- loans and advances to customers .................... |
871 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives20 ..................... |
199,920 |
|
45,042 |
|
13,980 |
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ................ |
646,296 |
|
250,393 |
|
183,165 |
|
37,231 |
|
22,729 |
|
47,064 |
|
(20,241) |
|
1,166,637 |
- loans and advances to banks .......................... |
166,943 |
|
33,051 |
|
6,982 |
|
1,152 |
|
108 |
|
193 |
|
(158) |
|
208,271 |
- loans and advances to customers21 ................. |
479,353 |
|
217,342 |
|
176,183 |
|
36,079 |
|
22,621 |
|
46,871 |
|
(20,083) |
|
958,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial investments ........ |
345,265 |
|
23,253 |
|
17,168 |
|
4,479 |
|
16 |
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
392,772 |
- treasury and other |
52,423 |
|
2,702 |
|
1,882 |
|
115 |
|
- |
|
7 |
|
|
|
57,129 |
- debt securities ............. |
292,842 |
|
20,551 |
|
15,286 |
|
4,364 |
|
16 |
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
335,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ....................... |
9,752 |
|
6,067 |
|
12,212 |
|
1,510 |
|
513 |
|
317 |
|
|
|
30,371 |
- endorsements and acceptances ................. |
2,074 |
|
3,305 |
|
4,227 |
|
493 |
|
9 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
10,116 |
- accrued income and other.............................. |
7,678 |
|
2,762 |
|
7,985 |
|
1,017 |
|
504 |
|
309 |
|
|
|
20,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments |
1,542,556 |
|
374,216 |
|
279,140 |
|
47,707 |
|
23,258 |
|
49,972 |
|
(20,241) |
|
2,296,608 |
For footnotes, see page 185.
Past due but not impaired gross financial instruments
(Audited)
Past due but not impaired loans are those for which the customer is in the early stages of delinquency and has failed to make a payment, or a partial payment, in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. This is typically where a loan is less than 90 days past due and there are no other indicators of impairment.
Further examples of exposures past due but not impaired include individually assessed mortgages that are in arrears more than 90 days where there are no other indicators of impairment, but where the value of collateral is sufficient to repay both the principal debt and all potential interest for at least one year; and short‑term trade facilities past due more than 90 days for technical reasons such as delays in documentation, but where there is no concern over the creditworthiness of the counterparty. Where groups of loans are collectively assessed for impairment, collective impairment allowances are recognised for loans classified as past due but not impaired.
At 31 December 2011, US$20.0bn of loans and advances held at amortised cost were classified as past due but not impaired (2010: US$22.7bn). The largest concentration of these balances is in HSBC Finance. The decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to the reclassification of the Card and Retail Services business to held for sale and the continued run-off of the CML portfolio.
Past due but not impaired loans and advances to customers and banks by geographical region8
(Audited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong Kong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 ........................... |
1,990 |
|
1,107 |
|
2,319 |
|
1,165 |
|
10,216 |
|
3,212 |
|
20,009 |
At 31 December 2010 ............................. |
2,516 |
|
1,158 |
|
2,092 |
|
1,318 |
|
12,751 |
|
2,894 |
|
22,729 |
Past due but not impaired loans and advances to customers and banks by industry sector8
(Audited)
|
At 31 December |
||
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
Banks ...................................................................................................................................... |
39 |
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
Customers ............................................................................................................................... |
19,970 |
|
22,621 |
Personal .............................................................................................................................. |
13,951 |
|
17,258 |
Corporate and commercial .................................................................................................. |
5,855 |
|
5,267 |
Financial ............................................................................................................................. |
164 |
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,009 |
|
22,729 |
For footnote, see page 185.
Ageing analysis of days past due but not impaired gross financial instruments
(Audited)
|
Up to 29 days |
|
30-59 |
|
60-89 |
|
90-179 |
|
180 days and over |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost8 ................ |
14,239 |
|
3,680 |
|
1,727 |
|
223 |
|
140 |
|
20,009 |
- loans and advances to banks ................................. |
39 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
39 |
- loans and advances to customers .......................... |
14,200 |
|
3,680 |
|
1,727 |
|
223 |
|
140 |
|
19,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale ..................................................... |
1,563 |
|
644 |
|
307 |
|
8 |
|
2 |
|
2,524 |
- disposal groups ..................................................... |
1,563 |
|
644 |
|
307 |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
2,522 |
- non-current assets held for sale ............................ |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ................................................................ |
225 |
|
80 |
|
37 |
|
22 |
|
57 |
|
421 |
- endorsements and acceptances ............................. |
7 |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
10 |
- other ................................................................... |
218 |
|
78 |
|
37 |
|
21 |
|
57 |
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,027 |
|
4,404 |
|
2,071 |
|
253 |
|
199 |
|
22,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost8 ................ |
15,576 |
|
4,272 |
|
2,238 |
|
482 |
|
161 |
|
22,729 |
- loans and advances to banks ................................. |
108 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
108 |
- loans and advances to customers .......................... |
15,468 |
|
4,272 |
|
2,238 |
|
482 |
|
161 |
|
22,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ................................................................ |
278 |
|
123 |
|
57 |
|
26 |
|
45 |
|
529 |
- endorsements and acceptances ............................. |
7 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
9 |
- other ................................................................... |
271 |
|
123 |
|
57 |
|
25 |
|
44 |
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,854 |
|
4,395 |
|
2,295 |
|
508 |
|
206 |
|
23,258 |
For footnote, see page 185.
Renegotiated loans and forbearance
(Audited)
|
Current policies and procedures regarding renegotiated loans and forbearance are described in the Appendix to Risk on page 188. |
The contractual terms of a loan may be modified for a number of reasons including changing market conditions, customer retention and other factors not related to the current or potential credit deterioration of a customer. When the contractual payment terms of a loan have been modified because we have significant concerns about the borrower's ability to meet contractual payments when due, these loans are classified as 'renegotiated loans'. For the purposes of this disclosure the term 'forbearance' is synonymous with the renegotiation of loans for these purposes.
In the Annual Report and Accounts 2011, the Group has separately presented all renegotiated loans by credit quality classification and has adopted a more stringent impaired loan disclosure convention for portfolios with significant levels of forbearance as described on page 133.
The following tables show the Group's holdings of renegotiated loans and advances to customers by industry sector, geography and credit quality classification.
Renegotiated loans and advances to customers
(Audited)
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2010 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Neither past |
|
Past due but not impaired |
|
Impaired |
|
Total |
|
Neither past |
|
Past due but not impaired |
|
Impaired |
|
Total |
|||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Retail ................................... |
8,133 |
|
4,401 |
|
19,125 |
|
31,659 |
|
7,690 |
|
4,339 |
|
23,406 |
|
35,435 |
|||
Residential Mortgages........ |
5,916 |
|
3,560 |
|
15,932 |
|
25,408 |
|
5,244 |
|
3,381 |
|
18,137 |
|
26,762 |
|||
Other personal ................. |
2,217 |
|
841 |
|
3,193 |
|
6,251 |
|
2,446 |
|
958 |
|
5,269 |
|
8,673 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Commercial real estate.......... |
2,793 |
|
9 |
|
3,248 |
|
6,050 |
|
2,877 |
|
12 |
|
2,401 |
|
5,290 |
|||
Corporate and commercial.... |
3,432 |
|
461 |
|
3,376 |
|
7,269 |
|
4,125 |
|
186 |
|
2,501 |
|
6,812 |
|||
Financial .............................. |
249 |
|
- |
|
491 |
|
740 |
|
17 |
|
- |
|
565 |
|
582 |
|||
Governments ........................ |
113 |
|
2 |
|
132 |
|
247 |
|
51 |
|
- |
|
7 |
|
58 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
14,720 |
|
4,873 |
|
26,372 |
|
45,965 |
|
14,760 |
|
4,537 |
|
28,880 |
|
48,177 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total renegotiated loans and advances to customers as a percentage |
4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0% |
|||||||||
Renegotiated loans and advances to customers by geography
(Unaudited)
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe ................................................................................................................................................... |
11,464 |
|
10,692 |
Hong Kong ............................................................................................................................................ |
447 |
|
420 |
Rest of Asia-Pacific ................................................................................................................................ |
448 |
|
679 |
Middle East and North Africa ................................................................................................................. |
2,655 |
|
1,866 |
North America ....................................................................................................................................... |
28,475 |
|
31,990 |
Latin America ........................................................................................................................................ |
2,476 |
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
|
Total ...................................................................................................................................................... |
45,965 |
|
48,177 |
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances on renegotiated loans ............................................................................... |
7,670 |
|
7,482 |
Individually assessed ........................................................................................................................... |
2,311 |
|
1,657 |
Collectively assessed ........................................................................................................................... |
5,359 |
|
5,825 |
2011 compared with 2010
(Unaudited)
Renegotiated loans totalled US$46.0bn at 31 December 2011 (2010: US$48.1bn). The most significant volume of renegotiation activity took place in North America and, at 31 December 2011, amounted to US$28.5bn or 62% of total renegotiated loans (2010: US$32.0bn or 66%), substantially all of which were retail loans held by HSBC Finance. Of the total renegotiated loans in North America, US$17.8bn were presented as impaired at 31 December 2011 (2010: US$22.0bn), and the ratio of total impairment allowances to impaired loans at 31 December 2011 was 28% (2010: 25%).
Europe was the next largest region for renegotiation activity which, at 31 December 2011, amounted to US$11.5bn (2010: US$10.7bn), constituting 25% of total renegotiated loans (2010: 22%). Of the total renegotiated loans in Europe, US$6.0bn were presented as impaired at 31 December 2011 (2010: US$4.8bn), and the ratio of total impairment allowances to impaired loans at 31 December 2011 was 30% (2010: 28%). The renegotiated loans in Europe were largely concentrated in the commercial real estate sector 41% (2010: 39%) and the corporate and commercial sector 32% (2010: 31%). The commercial real estate sector, particularly in the UK, faced a weakening in property values and a reduction in institutions funding commercial real estate lending. The commercial real estate mid-market sector continued to experience higher levels of renegotiation activity than is evident with larger corporates, where borrowers are generally better capitalised and have access to wider funding market opportunities. In all cases, in assessing the acceptability of renegotiated loans, we consider the ability to service interest as a minimum and reduce capital repayments as available. Despite Europe, and the UK in particular, holding the single largest retail lending portfolio in the Group, renegotiations of retail loans in this region were limited due to the quality of the residential mortgage book.
Forbearance activity within the Middle East and Latin America (primarily in Mexico and Brazil) was predominately undertaken in the commercial real estate and corporate and commercial sectors. Forbearance activity within Hong Kong and Rest of Asia-Pacific was insignificant.
HSBC Finance loan modifications and re‑ageing
HSBC Finance maintains loan modification and re‑age ('loan renegotiation') programmes in order to manage customer relationships, improve collection opportunities and, if possible, avoid foreclosure.
Since 2006, HSBC Finance has implemented an extensive loan renegotiation programme, and a significant portion of its loan portfolio has been subject to renegotiation at some stage in the life of the customer relationship as a consequence of the economic conditions in the US and the nature of HSBC Finance's customer base.
From late 2009 and continuing into 2011, the volume of loans that qualify for a new modification has reduced significantly. We expect this to continue to decline as HSBC Finance believes a decreasing percentage of its customers with unmodified loans would benefit from loan modification in a way that would avoid non-payment of future cash flows. In addition, volumes of new loan modifications are expected to decrease due to improvements in economic conditions over the long-term, the cessation of new real estate secured and personal non-credit card receivables originations, the continued run-off of the portfolio and, beginning in the second quarter of 2010, more stringent qualifying payment requirements for loan modifications.
Overview by type of loan renegotiation programme in HSBC Finance · A temporary modification is a change to the contractual terms of a loan that results in the giving up of a right to contractual cash flows over a pre-defined period of time. With a temporary modification the loan is expected to revert back to the original contractual terms including the interest rate charged after the modification period. An example is reduced interest payments. A substantial number of HSBC Finance modifications involve interest rate reductions. These modifications lower the amount of interest income HSBC Finance is contractually entitled to receive in future periods. Historically, modifications have generally been for a period of six months although extended modification periods are now more common. Loans that have been temporarily modified within HSBC Finance remain classified as impaired until they have demonstrated a history of payment performance against the original terms for typically 18 months after the modification date. · A permanent modification is a change to the contractual terms of a loan that results in giving up a right to contractual cash flows over the life of the loan. An example is a permanent reduction in the interest rate charged. Permanent or very long-term modifications, which are due to an underlying hardship event, remain classified as impaired for their full life. · The term 're-age' is a renegotiation whereby the contractual delinquency status of a loan is reset to current after demonstrating payment performance. The overdue principal and/or interest is deferred and paid at a later date. Loan re-ages enable customers who have been unable to make a small number of payments to have their loan delinquency status reset to current, thus remediating overdue balances that affect their credit score. Loans that have been re-aged remain classified as impaired until they have demonstrated a history of payment performance against the original contractual terms for at least 12 months. A temporary or permanent modification may also lead to a re‑ageing of the loan although a loan may be re-aged without any modification to the original terms and conditions of the loan. |
Qualifying criteria
For an account to qualify for renegotiation it must meet certain criteria. However, HSBC Finance retains the right to decline a renegotiation. The extent to which HSBC Finance renegotiates accounts that are eligible under its existing policies will vary depending upon its view of prevailing economic conditions and other factors which may change from year to year. In addition, exceptions to policies and practices may be made in specific situations in response to legal or regulatory agreements or orders.
Renegotiated real estate secured and personal non-credit card receivables are not eligible for a subsequent renegotiation until 12 or 6 months, respectively, with a maximum of five renegotiation actions within a five-year period. Borrowers must be approved for a modification and generally make two minimum qualifying monthly payments within 60 days to activate a modification.
In certain circumstances where the debt has been restructured in bankruptcy proceedings, fewer or no payments may be required. Accounts whose borrowers are subject to a Chapter 13 plan filed with a bankruptcy court generally may be re-aged upon receipt of one qualifying payment, whereas accounts whose borrowers have filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection may be re-aged upon receipt of a signed reaffirmation agreement. In addition, for some products, accounts may be re-aged without receipt of a payment in certain special circumstances (e.g. in the event of a natural disaster or a hardship programme).
Review of loan classification methodology
In the third quarter of 2011, HSBC Finance undertook a review of its loan classification methodology to provide greater differentiation of loans based on their credit risk characteristics. This review was performed partly as a result of updated
US guidance on 'troubled debt restructurings' and because an increasing percentage of the portfolio has been subject to forbearance in recent years, with the closure of the portfolio to new business. The review involved extensive statistical analysis of actual default experience in the portfolio. Amongst other improvements, this review resulted in changes to further differentiate the credit characteristics of forbearance cases, including those which return to performing status following forbearance. The review included consideration of the application of the Group's accounting policy for the recognition of impairment allowances for the CML portfolio, and changes to improve assumptions about default and severity rates for the purposes of measuring impairment allowances. The consequent changes did not result in a material change to impairment allowances recorded by HSBC Finance under IFRSs. However, the Group's revised impaired loan disclosure convention was adopted.
At 31 December 2011, renegotiated real estate secured accounts represented 86% (2010: 85%) of North America's total renegotiated loans, and US$16bn (2010: US$18.2bn) of renegotiated real estate secured loans in HSBC Finance were classified as impaired. Further details of HSBC Finance's real estate secured accounts and renegotiation programmes are provided below.
Gross loan portfolio of HSBC Finance real estate secured accounts
(Unaudited)
|
Re-aged22 |
|
Modified and re-aged |
|
Modified |
|
Total re- negotiated loans |
Total non- renegotiated loans |
|
Total gross loans |
|
Total impair- ment allowances |
|
Impair- ment allowances/ gross loans |
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2011 .... |
10,265 |
|
12,829 |
|
1,494 |
|
24,588 |
|
19,540 |
|
44,128 |
|
5,088 |
|
12 |
31 December 2010 ..... |
10,693 |
|
14,053 |
|
2,286 |
|
27,032 |
|
23,902 |
|
50,934 |
|
4,311 |
|
8 |
For footnote, see page 185.
Number of renegotiated real estate secured accounts remaining in HSBC Finance's portfolio
(Unaudited)
|
Number of renegotiated loans |
||||||
|
Re-aged |
|
Modified and re-aged |
|
Modified |
|
Total |
|
(000s) |
|
(000s) |
|
(000s) |
|
(000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2011 ........................................................... |
121 |
|
112 |
|
14 |
|
246 |
31 December 2010 ............................................................. |
123 |
|
115 |
|
20 |
|
258 |
During 2011, the aggregate number of renegotiated loans reduced, despite renegotiation activity continuing, due to the run-off of the portfolio. Within the constraints of our Group credit policy, HSBC Finance's policies allow for multiple renegotiations under certain circumstances, and a number of accounts received a second (or further) renegotiation during the year which did not appear in the statistics presented above. These statistics present a loan as an addition to the volume of renegotiated loans on its first renegotiation only. At 31 December 2011, renegotiated loans were 56% (2010: 53%) of HSBC Finance's real estate secured accounts.
Corporate and Commercial forbearance
|
For the current policies and procedures regarding forbearance in the corporate and commercial sector, see the Appendix to Risk on page 188. |
The majority of the increase in renegotiated loans activity for the commercial real estate sector in 2011 arose in Europe, which increased by US$617m. This increase predominately related to the renegotiation of a large exposure together with high levels of forbearance in the UK towards the end of 2011 reflecting current economic conditions, including a weakening in property values and a reduction in institutions funding commercial real estate lending.
In the corporate and commercial sector the increase in renegotiated loans in 2011 was again a result of increased forbearance activity in Europe. The increase related to renegotiations of a small number of larger lending arrangements provided to European corporate entities and economic pressures in Europe more generally. This was partially offset by repayments and write-offs of renegotiated loans in Europe, Rest of Asia-Pacific and Latin America.
In the financial sector the increase in renegotiated loans in 2011 primarily related to financial difficulties in one financial sector entity. In the government sector renegotiation activity was wholly due to increases in Latin America caused by term extension restructurings of municipal and local authority facilities.
Impaired loans disclosure
During 2011 we adopted a revised disclosure convention for the presentation of impaired loans and advances which affects the disclosure of loans and advances in the geographical regions with significant levels of forbearance activity. The previous impaired loan disclosure convention was that impaired loans and advances were those classified as CRR9, CRR10, EL9 or EL10 and all retail loans 90 days or more past due, unless individually they had been assessed as not impaired. Renegotiated loans that did not meet the above criteria were classified as 'neither past due nor impaired' or 'past due but not impaired' as appropriate, however these loans were assessed for impairment in accordance with the Group's accounting policy on the recognition of impairment allowances, as described on page 193.
The revised disclosure convention continues to be based on internal credit rating grades and, for retail exposures, 90 days or more past due status. However, it introduces a more stringent approach to the assessment of whether renegotiated loans are presented as impaired. Management believes that this revised approach better reflects the nature of risks and inherent credit quality in our loan portfolio as it is more closely calibrated to the types of forbearance concession granted and applies stricter requirements for the performance of renegotiated loans before they may be presented as no longer impaired. It also reflects developments in industry best practice disclosure, as well as a refinement of loan segmentation in our North America consumer lending business. The revised disclosure convention affects the disclosure presentation of impaired loans but does not affect the accounting policy for the recognition of impairment allowances.
Under this revised disclosure convention, impaired loans and advances are those that meet any of the following criteria:
· loans and advances classified as CRR 9, CRR 10, EL 9 or EL 10 (a description of our internal credit rating grades is provided on page 191);
· retail exposures 90 days or more past due, unless individually they have been assessed as not impaired; or
· renegotiated loans and advances that have been subject to a change in contractual cash flows as a result of a concession which the lender would not otherwise consider, and where it is probable that without the concession the borrower would be unable to meet its contractual payment obligations in full, unless the concession is insignificant and there are no other indicators of impairment. Renegotiated loans remain classified as impaired until there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate a significant reduction in the risk of non-payment of future cash flows, and there are no other indicators of impairment.
For loans that are assessed for impairment on a collective basis, the evidence to support reclassification as no longer impaired typically comprises a history of payment performance against the original or revised terms, depending on the nature and volume of forbearance and the credit risk characteristics surrounding the renegotiation. For loans that are assessed for impairment on an individual basis, all available evidence is assessed on a case by case basis.
In HSBC Finance, where a significant majority of HSBC's loan forbearance activity occurs, the demonstrated history of payment performance is with reference to the original terms of the contract, reflecting the higher credit risk characteristics of this portfolio. The payment performance periods are monitored to ensure they remain appropriate to the levels of recidivism observed within the portfolio.
Further disclosure about loans subject to forbearance is provided on page 129. Renegotiated loans and forbearance disclosures are subject to evolving industry practice and regulatory guidance.
Impaired loan comparative data for 31 December 2010 have been restated to reflect the revised impaired loans disclosure convention. Restatement of comparative data prior to 31 December 2010 is not practicable as sufficient information is not available to determine what assumptions management would have made in applying the revised disclosure convention for those comparative periods. This includes information about assumptions that would have been made in establishing the revised, more stringent period of payment performance for renegotiated loans before they are regarded as unimpaired. The difficulty associated with determining these estimates relates principally to retail portfolios that are assessed for impairment on a collective basis; these estimates become more difficult when a longer period of time has passed since the credit condition occurred.
The following table shows the effect of the revised disclosure convention on total reported impaired loans and advances to customers for geographical regions with significant levels of forbearance.
Impaired loans and advances to customers
(Audited)
|
At 31 December |
||
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
At 31 December - previous disclosure convention .................................................................. |
27,211 |
|
28,091 |
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from neither past due nor impaired ....................................................................... |
7,895 |
|
11,200 |
Europe ................................................................................................................................ |
509 |
|
838 |
Middle East and North Africa ............................................................................................. |
61 |
|
63 |
North America ................................................................................................................... |
6,688 |
|
9,638 |
Latin America .................................................................................................................... |
637 |
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from past due but not impaired ............................................................................. |
6,478 |
|
7,580 |
Europe ................................................................................................................................ |
- |
|
- |
Middle East and North Africa ............................................................................................. |
30 |
|
33 |
North America ................................................................................................................... |
6,310 |
|
7,475 |
Latin America .................................................................................................................... |
138 |
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December - revised disclosure convention ..................................................................... |
41,584 |
|
46,871 |
Impairment of loans and advances
(Audited)
|
Impaired loans and advances at |
|
Impaired loans and advances at |
||||||||
|
Individually assessed |
|
Collectively assessed |
|
Total |
|
Individually assessed |
|
Collectively assessed |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks .................................................. |
155 |
|
- |
|
155 |
|
193 |
|
- |
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers ............................................ |
16,554 |
|
25,030 |
|
41,584 |
|
16,058 |
|
30,813 |
|
46,871 |
- personal ....................................... |
2,473 |
|
24,070 |
|
26,543 |
|
2,443 |
|
29,997 |
|
32,440 |
- corporate and commercial ............ |
12,898 |
|
960 |
|
13,858 |
|
12,499 |
|
816 |
|
13,315 |
- financial ....................................... |
1,183 |
|
- |
|
1,183 |
|
1,116 |
|
- |
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,709 |
|
25,030 |
|
41,739 |
|
16,251 |
|
30,813 |
|
47,064 |
For footnote, see page 185.
(Audited)
The tables below analyse by geographical region the impairment allowances recognised for impaired
loans and advances that are either individually assessed or collectively assessed, and collective impairment allowances on loans and advances classified as not impaired.
(Audited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and advances to customers8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impaired loans23 ........... |
10,490 |
|
519 |
|
963 |
|
2,187 |
|
1,832 |
|
563 |
|
16,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed24 .................................. |
429,088 |
|
157,727 |
|
123,687 |
|
25,402 |
|
148,096 |
|
57,386 |
|
941,386 |
Impaired loans23 ....................................... |
1,261 |
|
85 |
|
106 |
|
238 |
|
20,864 |
|
2,476 |
|
25,030 |
Non-impaired loans25 ............................... |
427,827 |
|
157,642 |
|
123,581 |
|
25,164 |
|
127,232 |
|
54,910 |
|
916,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGLAC ........................................................ |
439,578 |
|
158,246 |
|
124,650 |
|
27,589 |
|
149,928 |
|
57,949 |
|
957,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances ................................ |
5,242 |
|
581 |
|
782 |
|
1,714 |
|
7,181 |
|
2,011 |
|
17,511 |
Individually assessed ................................. |
3,754 |
|
288 |
|
505 |
|
1,250 |
|
416 |
|
324 |
|
6,537 |
Collectively assessed ................................. |
1,488 |
|
293 |
|
277 |
|
464 |
|
6,765 |
|
1,687 |
|
10,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and advances ................................ |
434,336 |
|
157,665 |
|
123,868 |
|
25,875 |
|
142,747 |
|
55,938 |
|
940,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Individually assessed allowances as a percentage |
35.8 |
|
55.5 |
|
52.4 |
|
57.2 |
|
22.7 |
|
57.4 |
|
39.5 |
Collectively assessed allowances as a percentage |
0.3 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
1.8 |
|
4.6 |
|
2.9 |
|
1.2 |
Total allowances as a percentage of TGLAC |
1.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.6 |
|
6.2 |
|
4.8 |
|
3.5 |
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and advances to customers8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impaired loans23 ........... |
9,400 |
|
637 |
|
1,185 |
|
2,167 |
|
1,886 |
|
783 |
|
16,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed24 .................................. |
432,062 |
|
140,683 |
|
108,505 |
|
24,111 |
|
197,816 |
|
59,214 |
|
962,391 |
Impaired loans23 ....................................... |
1,994 |
|
23 |
|
139 |
|
362 |
|
25,954 |
|
2,341 |
|
30,813 |
Non-impaired loans25 ............................... |
430,068 |
|
140,660 |
|
108,366 |
|
23,749 |
|
171,862 |
|
56,873 |
|
931,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGLAC ........................................................ |
441,462 |
|
141,320 |
|
109,690 |
|
26,278 |
|
199,702 |
|
59,997 |
|
978,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances ................................ |
5,663 |
|
629 |
|
959 |
|
1,652 |
|
9,170 |
|
2,010 |
|
20,083 |
Individually assessed ................................. |
3,563 |
|
345 |
|
629 |
|
1,163 |
|
390 |
|
367 |
|
6,457 |
Collectively assessed ................................. |
2,100 |
|
284 |
|
330 |
|
489 |
|
8,780 |
|
1,643 |
|
13,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and advances ................................ |
435,799 |
|
140,691 |
|
108,731 |
|
24,626 |
|
190,532 |
|
57,987 |
|
958,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Individually assessed allowances as a percentage |
37.9 |
|
54.2 |
|
53.1 |
|
53.7 |
|
20.7 |
|
46.9 |
|
40.2 |
Collectively assessed allowances as a percentage |
0.5 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
2.0 |
|
4.4 |
|
2.8 |
|
1.4 |
Total allowances as a percentage of TGLAC |
1.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.9 |
|
6.3 |
|
4.6 |
|
3.4 |
|
2.1 |
For footnotes, see page 185.
(Audited)
|
Banks |
|
Customers |
|
|
||
|
individually assessed |
|
Individually assessed |
|
Collectively assessed |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January ...................................................................... |
158 |
|
6,457 |
|
13,626 |
|
20,241 |
Amounts written off .......................................................... |
(16) |
|
(1,633) |
|
(10,831) |
|
(12,480) |
Recoveries of loans and advances previously written off .... |
- |
|
191 |
|
1,235 |
|
1,426 |
Charge to income statement .............................................. |
(16) |
|
1,931 |
|
9,590 |
|
11,505 |
Exchange and other movements26 ...................................... |
(1) |
|
(409) |
|
(2,646) |
|
(3,056) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ................................................................. |
125 |
|
6,537 |
|
10,974 |
|
17,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances on loans and advances to customers |
|
|
6,537 |
|
10,974 |
|
17,511 |
- personal ..................................................................... |
|
|
694 |
|
9,066 |
|
9,760 |
- corporate and commercial .......................................... |
|
|
5,231 |
|
1,820 |
|
7,051 |
- financial ..................................................................... |
|
|
612 |
|
88 |
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of loans and advances27,28 ...................... |
0.09 |
|
0.71 |
|
1.20 |
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January ...................................................................... |
107 |
|
6,494 |
|
19,048 |
|
25,649 |
Amounts written off .......................................................... |
(9) |
|
(2,441) |
|
(16,850) |
|
(19,300) |
Recoveries of loans and advances previously written off .... |
2 |
|
143 |
|
875 |
|
1,020 |
Charge to income statement .............................................. |
12 |
|
2,613 |
|
10,923 |
|
13,548 |
Exchange and other movements ........................................ |
46 |
|
(352) |
|
(370) |
|
(676) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ................................................................. |
158 |
|
6,457 |
|
13,626 |
|
20,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances on loans and advances to customers |
|
|
6,457 |
|
13,626 |
|
20,083 |
- personal ..................................................................... |
|
|
615 |
|
11,678 |
|
12,293 |
- corporate and commercial .......................................... |
|
|
5,274 |
|
1,863 |
|
7,137 |
- financial ..................................................................... |
|
|
568 |
|
85 |
|
653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of loans and advances27,28 ...................... |
0.11 |
|
0.70 |
|
1.49 |
|
1.91 |
For footnotes, see page 185.
Movement in impairment allowances by industry sector
(Audited)
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances at 1 January ................................. |
20,241 |
|
25,649 |
|
23,972 |
|
19,212 |
|
13,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts written off ......................................................... |
(12,480) |
|
(19,300) |
|
(24,840) |
|
(17,955) |
|
(12,844) |
Personal ........................................................................ |
(10,431) |
|
(16,458) |
|
(22,703) |
|
(16,625) |
|
(11,670) |
- residential mortgages .............................................. |
(2,662) |
|
(4,163) |
|
(4,704) |
|
(2,110) |
|
(930) |
- other personal ........................................................ |
(7,769) |
|
(12,295) |
|
(17,999) |
|
(14,515) |
|
(10,740) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................................ |
(2,009) |
|
(2,789) |
|
(1,984) |
|
(1,294) |
|
(1,163) |
- manufacturing and international trade and services5 |
(1,137) |
|
(1,050) |
|
(1,093) |
|
(789) |
|
(897) |
- commercial real estate and other property-related . |
(392) |
|
(1,280) |
|
(327) |
|
(115) |
|
(98) |
- other commercial ................................................... |
(480) |
|
(459) |
|
(564) |
|
(390) |
|
(168) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial29 .................................................................... |
(40) |
|
(53) |
|
(153) |
|
(36) |
|
(11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous years ......... |
1,426 |
|
1,020 |
|
890 |
|
834 |
|
1,005 |
Personal ........................................................................ |
1,175 |
|
846 |
|
712 |
|
686 |
|
837 |
- residential mortgages .............................................. |
86 |
|
93 |
|
61 |
|
19 |
|
19 |
- other personal ........................................................ |
1,089 |
|
753 |
|
651 |
|
667 |
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................................ |
242 |
|
156 |
|
170 |
|
142 |
|
157 |
- manufacturing and international trade and services5 |
135 |
|
92 |
|
123 |
|
76 |
|
74 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related . |
20 |
|
21 |
|
9 |
|
6 |
|
29 |
- other commercial ................................................... |
87 |
|
43 |
|
38 |
|
60 |
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial29 .................................................................... |
9 |
|
18 |
|
8 |
|
6 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge to income statement30 .......................................... |
11,505 |
|
13,548 |
|
24,942 |
|
24,131 |
|
17,177 |
Personal ........................................................................ |
9,318 |
|
11,187 |
|
19,781 |
|
20,950 |
|
15,968 |
- residential mortgages .............................................. |
4,103 |
|
3,461 |
|
4,185 |
|
5,000 |
|
1,840 |
- other personal ........................................................ |
5,215 |
|
7,726 |
|
15,596 |
|
15,950 |
|
14,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................................ |
2,114 |
|
2,198 |
|
4,711 |
|
2,879 |
|
1,176 |
- manufacturing and international trade and services5 |
901 |
|
909 |
|
2,392 |
|
1,573 |
|
897 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related . |
764 |
|
660 |
|
1,492 |
|
755 |
|
152 |
- other commercial ................................................... |
449 |
|
629 |
|
827 |
|
551 |
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial29 .................................................................... |
73 |
|
163 |
|
450 |
|
302 |
|
36 |
Governments ................................................................ |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange and other movements ....................................... |
(3,056) |
|
(676) |
|
685 |
|
(2,250) |
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................................... |
17,636 |
|
20,241 |
|
25,649 |
|
23,972 |
|
19,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances against banks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................................... |
125 |
|
158 |
|
107 |
|
63 |
|
7 |
Impairment allowances against customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................................... |
6,537 |
|
6,457 |
|
6,494 |
|
3,284 |
|
2,699 |
- collectively assessed ................................................... |
10,974 |
|
13,626 |
|
19,048 |
|
20,625 |
|
16,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................................... |
17,636 |
|
20,241 |
|
25,649 |
|
23,972 |
|
19,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Impairment allowances against customers as a percentage of loans and advances to customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................................... |
0.68 |
|
0.66 |
|
0.70 |
|
0.34 |
|
0.27 |
- collectively assessed ................................................... |
1.15 |
|
1.39 |
|
2.07 |
|
2.16 |
|
1.65 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................................... |
1.83 |
|
2.05 |
|
2.77 |
|
2.50 |
|
1.92 |
For footnotes, see page 185.
Movement in impairment allowances by industry sector and by geographical region
(Audited)
|
2011 |
||||||||||||
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances at 1 January ................. |
5,740 |
|
629 |
|
959 |
|
1,669 |
|
9,234 |
|
2,010 |
|
20,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts written off ......................................... |
(2,781) |
|
(210) |
|
(554) |
|
(187) |
|
(6,830) |
|
(1,918) |
|
(12,480) |
Personal ........................................................ |
(1,685) |
|
(116) |
|
(391) |
|
(172) |
|
(6,591) |
|
(1,476) |
|
(10,431) |
- residential mortgages ................................ |
(25) |
|
- |
|
(6) |
|
(2) |
|
(2,545) |
|
(84) |
|
(2,662) |
- other personal5 ......................................... |
(1,660) |
|
(116) |
|
(385) |
|
(170) |
|
(4,046) |
|
(1,392) |
|
(7,769) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................. |
(1,066) |
|
(94) |
|
(161) |
|
(15) |
|
(233) |
|
(440) |
|
(2,009) |
- manufacturing and international trade |
(554) |
|
(64) |
|
(120) |
|
(4) |
|
(100) |
|
(295) |
|
(1,137) |
- commercial real estate and other property-related ...................................................... |
(265) |
|
(6) |
|
(13) |
|
(10) |
|
(83) |
|
(15) |
|
(392) |
- other commercial7 .................................... |
(247) |
|
(24) |
|
(28) |
|
(1) |
|
(50) |
|
(130) |
|
(480) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial29 ..................................................... |
(30) |
|
- |
|
(2) |
|
- |
|
(6) |
|
(2) |
|
(40) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous |
572 |
|
47 |
|
185 |
|
102 |
|
132 |
|
388 |
|
1,426 |
Personal ........................................................ |
525 |
|
31 |
|
168 |
|
53 |
|
101 |
|
297 |
|
1,175 |
- residential mortgages ................................ |
21 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
- |
|
39 |
|
19 |
|
86 |
- other personal5 ......................................... |
504 |
|
27 |
|
165 |
|
53 |
|
62 |
|
278 |
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................. |
44 |
|
16 |
|
12 |
|
49 |
|
30 |
|
91 |
|
242 |
- manufacturing and international trade |
19 |
|
16 |
|
8 |
|
2 |
|
8 |
|
82 |
|
135 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related ...................................................... |
7 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
8 |
|
4 |
|
20 |
- other commercial7 .................................... |
18 |
|
- |
|
3 |
|
47 |
|
14 |
|
5 |
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial29 ..................................................... |
3 |
|
- |
|
5 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge to income statement30 .......................... |
1,902 |
|
117 |
|
274 |
|
292 |
|
7,050 |
|
1,870 |
|
11,505 |
Personal ........................................................ |
610 |
|
77 |
|
215 |
|
124 |
|
6,887 |
|
1,405 |
|
9,318 |
- residential mortgages ................................ |
98 |
|
(10) |
|
5 |
|
42 |
|
3,899 |
|
69 |
|
4,103 |
- other personal5 ......................................... |
512 |
|
87 |
|
210 |
|
82 |
|
2,988 |
|
1,336 |
|
5,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................. |
1,277 |
|
37 |
|
55 |
|
146 |
|
122 |
|
477 |
|
2,114 |
- manufacturing and international trade |
416 |
|
57 |
|
35 |
|
25 |
|
42 |
|
326 |
|
901 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related ...................................................... |
498 |
|
- |
|
9 |
|
150 |
|
48 |
|
59 |
|
764 |
- other commercial7 .................................... |
363 |
|
(20) |
|
11 |
|
(29) |
|
32 |
|
92 |
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial29 ..................................................... |
15 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
22 |
|
41 |
|
(12) |
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange and other movements ....................... |
(141) |
|
(2) |
|
(82) |
|
(145) |
|
(2,347) |
|
(339) |
|
(3,056) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................. |
5,292 |
|
581 |
|
782 |
|
1,731 |
|
7,239 |
|
2,011 |
|
17,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances against banks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................... |
50 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
17 |
|
58 |
|
- |
|
125 |
Impairment allowances against customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................... |
3,754 |
|
288 |
|
505 |
|
1,250 |
|
416 |
|
324 |
|
6,537 |
- collectively assessed31 ................................ |
1,488 |
|
293 |
|
277 |
|
464 |
|
6,765 |
|
1,687 |
|
10,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................... |
5,292 |
|
581 |
|
782 |
|
1,731 |
|
7,239 |
|
2,011 |
|
17,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Impairment allowances against customers as a percentage of loans and advances to customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................... |
0.85 |
|
0.18 |
|
0.41 |
|
4.53 |
|
0.28 |
|
0.56 |
|
0.68 |
- collectively assessed31 ................................ |
0.34 |
|
0.19 |
|
0.22 |
|
1.68 |
|
4.51 |
|
2.91 |
|
1.15 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................... |
1.19 |
|
0.37 |
|
0.63 |
|
6.21 |
|
4.79 |
|
3.47 |
|
1.83 |
|
2010 |
||||||||||||
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances at 1 January ................. |
6,227 |
|
804 |
|
996 |
|
1,393 |
|
13,676 |
|
2,553 |
|
25,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts written off ......................................... |
(3,001) |
|
(265) |
|
(678) |
|
(386) |
|
(12,601) |
|
(2,369) |
|
(19,300) |
Personal ........................................................ |
(1,447) |
|
(150) |
|
(561) |
|
(375) |
|
(12,070) |
|
(1,855) |
|
(16,458) |
- residential mortgages ................................ |
(49) |
|
(1) |
|
(10) |
|
- |
|
(4,027) |
|
(76) |
|
(4,163) |
- other personal5 ......................................... |
(1,398) |
|
(149) |
|
(551) |
|
(375) |
|
(8,043) |
|
(1,779) |
|
(12,295) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................. |
(1,539) |
|
(109) |
|
(110) |
|
(11) |
|
(507) |
|
(513) |
|
(2,789) |
- manufacturing and international trade |
(385) |
|
(90) |
|
(46) |
|
(10) |
|
(174) |
|
(345) |
|
(1,050) |
- commercial real estate and other property-related ...................................................... |
(1,022) |
|
(18) |
|
(18) |
|
- |
|
(194) |
|
(28) |
|
(1,280) |
- other commercial7 .................................... |
(132) |
|
(1) |
|
(46) |
|
(1) |
|
(139) |
|
(140) |
|
(459) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial29 ..................................................... |
(15) |
|
(6) |
|
(7) |
|
- |
|
(24) |
|
(1) |
|
(53) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous |
287 |
|
39 |
|
188 |
|
57 |
|
182 |
|
267 |
|
1,020 |
Personal ........................................................ |
251 |
|
32 |
|
168 |
|
53 |
|
134 |
|
208 |
|
846 |
- residential mortgages ................................ |
29 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
- |
|
30 |
|
27 |
|
93 |
- other personal5 ......................................... |
222 |
|
28 |
|
165 |
|
53 |
|
104 |
|
181 |
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................. |
33 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
4 |
|
46 |
|
59 |
|
156 |
- manufacturing and international trade |
16 |
|
7 |
|
5 |
|
2 |
|
19 |
|
43 |
|
92 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related ...................................................... |
6 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
11 |
|
4 |
|
21 |
- other commercial7 .................................... |
11 |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
16 |
|
12 |
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial29 ..................................................... |
3 |
|
- |
|
13 |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge to income statement30 .......................... |
2,532 |
|
137 |
|
428 |
|
623 |
|
8,304 |
|
1,524 |
|
13,548 |
Personal ........................................................ |
1,263 |
|
78 |
|
297 |
|
226 |
|
8,138 |
|
1,185 |
|
11,187 |
- residential mortgages ................................ |
153 |
|
(17) |
|
11 |
|
46 |
|
3,189 |
|
79 |
|
3,461 |
- other personal5 ......................................... |
1,110 |
|
95 |
|
286 |
|
180 |
|
4,949 |
|
1,106 |
|
7,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial ............................. |
1,080 |
|
72 |
|
146 |
|
304 |
|
269 |
|
327 |
|
2,198 |
- manufacturing and international trade |
395 |
|
21 |
|
100 |
|
165 |
|
25 |
|
203 |
|
909 |
- commercial real estate and other property-related ...................................................... |
360 |
|
(7) |
|
12 |
|
117 |
|
178 |
|
- |
|
660 |
- other commercial7 .................................... |
325 |
|
58 |
|
34 |
|
22 |
|
66 |
|
124 |
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial29 ..................................................... |
189 |
|
(13) |
|
(15) |
|
93 |
|
(103) |
|
12 |
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange and other movements ....................... |
(305) |
|
(86) |
|
25 |
|
(18) |
|
(327) |
|
35 |
|
(676) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................... |
5,740 |
|
629 |
|
959 |
|
1,669 |
|
9,234 |
|
2,010 |
|
20,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances against banks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................... |
77 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
17 |
|
64 |
|
- |
|
158 |
Impairment allowances against customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................... |
3,563 |
|
345 |
|
629 |
|
1,163 |
|
390 |
|
367 |
|
6,457 |
- collectively assessed31 ................................ |
2,100 |
|
284 |
|
330 |
|
489 |
|
8,780 |
|
1,643 |
|
13,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................... |
5,740 |
|
629 |
|
959 |
|
1,669 |
|
9,234 |
|
2,010 |
|
20,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Impairment allowances against customers as a percentage of loans and advances to customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed ................................... |
0.81 |
|
0.24 |
|
0.57 |
|
4.43 |
|
0.20 |
|
0.61 |
|
0.66 |
- collectively assessed31 ................................ |
0.48 |
|
0.20 |
|
0.30 |
|
1.86 |
|
4.40 |
|
2.74 |
|
1.39 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December ............................................... |
1.29 |
|
0.44 |
|
0.87 |
|
6.29 |
|
4.60 |
|
3.35 |
|
2.05 |
For footnotes, see page 185.
(Unaudited)
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
||||||||
|
Individually assessed US$m |
|
Collectively assessed US$m |
|
Total US$m |
|
Individually assessed US$m |
|
Collectively assessed US$m |
|
Total US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks .......................................................... |
(16) |
|
- |
|
(16) |
|
12 |
|
- |
|
12 |
Personal ...................................................... |
141 |
|
9,177 |
|
9,318 |
|
180 |
|
11,007 |
|
11,187 |
Residential mortgages .............................. |
104 |
|
3,999 |
|
4,103 |
|
137 |
|
3,324 |
|
3,461 |
Other personal5 ....................................... |
37 |
|
5,178 |
|
5,215 |
|
43 |
|
7,683 |
|
7,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and commercial .......................... |
1,703 |
|
411 |
|
2,114 |
|
2,190 |
|
8 |
|
2,198 |
Manufacturing and international trade |
572 |
|
329 |
|
901 |
|
997 |
|
(88) |
|
909 |
Commercial real estate and other |
768 |
|
(4) |
|
764 |
|
680 |
|
(20) |
|
660 |
Other commercial7 .................................. |
363 |
|
86 |
|
449 |
|
513 |
|
116 |
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ..................................................... |
87 |
|
2 |
|
89 |
|
243 |
|
(92) |
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge to income statement ............... |
1,915 |
|
9,590 |
|
11,505 |
|
2,625 |
|
10,923 |
|
13,548 |
(Unaudited)
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impairment allowances ..................... |
1,915 |
|
2,625 |
|
4,458 |
|
2,064 |
|
796 |
New allowances ............................................................. |
2,904 |
|
3,617 |
|
5,173 |
|
2,742 |
|
1,533 |
Release of allowances no longer required ....................... |
(798) |
|
(847) |
|
(581) |
|
(565) |
|
(608) |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off ............... |
(191) |
|
(145) |
|
(134) |
|
(113) |
|
(129) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed impairment allowances ..................... |
9,590 |
|
10,923 |
|
20,484 |
|
22,067 |
|
16,381 |
New allowances net of allowance releases ...................... |
10,825 |
|
11,798 |
|
21,240 |
|
22,788 |
|
17,257 |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off ............... |
(1,235) |
|
(875) |
|
(756) |
|
(721) |
|
(876) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses ................................... |
11,505 |
|
13,548 |
|
24,942 |
|
24,131 |
|
17,177 |
Banks ........................................................................... |
(16) |
|
12 |
|
70 |
|
54 |
|
- |
Customers .................................................................... |
11,521 |
|
13,536 |
|
24,872 |
|
24,077 |
|
17,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans8 ................................................................. |
41,739 |
|
47,064 |
|
30,845 |
|
25,422 |
|
19,594 |
Impairment allowances ..................................................... |
17,636 |
|
20,241 |
|
25,649 |
|
23,972 |
|
19,212 |
For footnote, see page 185.
(Unaudited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impairment allowances ..... |
1,262 |
|
18 |
|
67 |
|
199 |
|
243 |
|
126 |
|
1,915 |
New allowances ............................................. |
1,670 |
|
79 |
|
207 |
|
328 |
|
398 |
|
222 |
|
2,904 |
Release of allowances no longer required ....... |
(378) |
|
(41) |
|
(114) |
|
(80) |
|
(111) |
|
(74) |
|
(798) |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
(30) |
|
(20) |
|
(26) |
|
(49) |
|
(44) |
|
(22) |
|
(191) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed impairment allowances .... |
640 |
|
99 |
|
207 |
|
93 |
|
6,807 |
|
1,744 |
|
9,590 |
New allowances net of allowance releases ...... |
1,181 |
|
126 |
|
366 |
|
147 |
|
6,894 |
|
2,111 |
|
10,825 |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
(541) |
|
(27) |
|
(159) |
|
(54) |
|
(87) |
|
(367) |
|
(1,235) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................. |
1,902 |
|
117 |
|
274 |
|
292 |
|
7,050 |
|
1,870 |
|
11,505 |
Banks ........................................................... |
(11) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(5) |
|
- |
|
(16) |
Customers .................................................... |
1,913 |
|
117 |
|
274 |
|
292 |
|
7,055 |
|
1,870 |
|
11,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans8 ................................................ |
11,819 |
|
608 |
|
1,070 |
|
2,445 |
|
22,758 |
|
3,039 |
|
41,739 |
Impairment allowances ..................................... |
5,292 |
|
581 |
|
782 |
|
1,731 |
|
7,239 |
|
2,011 |
|
17,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impairment allowances ..... |
1,445 |
|
45 |
|
198 |
|
502 |
|
348 |
|
87 |
|
2,625 |
New allowances ............................................. |
1,874 |
|
111 |
|
311 |
|
561 |
|
580 |
|
180 |
|
3,617 |
Release of allowances no longer required ....... |
(394) |
|
(54) |
|
(84) |
|
(55) |
|
(196) |
|
(64) |
|
(847) |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
(35) |
|
(12) |
|
(29) |
|
(4) |
|
(36) |
|
(29) |
|
(145) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed impairment allowances .... |
1,087 |
|
92 |
|
230 |
|
121 |
|
7,956 |
|
1,437 |
|
10,923 |
New allowances net of allowance releases ...... |
1,339 |
|
119 |
|
389 |
|
174 |
|
8,102 |
|
1,675 |
|
11,798 |
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
(252) |
|
(27) |
|
(159) |
|
(53) |
|
(146) |
|
(238) |
|
(875) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................. |
2,532 |
|
137 |
|
428 |
|
623 |
|
8,304 |
|
1,524 |
|
13,548 |
Banks ........................................................... |
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
8 |
|
- |
|
12 |
Customers .................................................... |
2,530 |
|
137 |
|
428 |
|
621 |
|
8,296 |
|
1,524 |
|
13,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans8 ................................................ |
11,500 |
|
665 |
|
1,324 |
|
2,549 |
|
27,902 |
|
3,124 |
|
47,064 |
Impairment allowances ..................................... |
5,740 |
|
629 |
|
959 |
|
1,669 |
|
9,234 |
|
2,010 |
|
20,241 |
For footnote, see page 185.
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage of average gross loans and advances to customers
(Unaudited)
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases .......................... |
1.34 |
|
1.65 |
|
2.92 |
|
2.54 |
|
2.09 |
Recoveries ........................................................................ |
(0.15) |
|
(0.12) |
|
(0.10) |
|
(0.09) |
|
(0.12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses ................................... |
1.19 |
|
1.53 |
|
2.82 |
|
2.45 |
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount written off net of recoveries ............................... |
1.14 |
|
2.08 |
|
2.71 |
|
1.75 |
|
1.36 |
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage of average gross loans and advances to customers by geographical region
(Unaudited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ......... |
0.59 |
|
0.11 |
|
0.38 |
|
1.46 |
|
4.01 |
|
3.54 |
|
1.34 |
Recoveries ........................................................ |
(0.14) |
|
(0.03) |
|
(0.15) |
|
(0.38) |
|
(0.07) |
|
(0.61) |
|
(0.15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................. |
0.45 |
|
0.08 |
|
0.23 |
|
1.08 |
|
3.94 |
|
2.93 |
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount written off net of recoveries ............... |
0.52 |
|
0.11 |
|
0.31 |
|
0.32 |
|
3.74 |
|
2.39 |
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ......... |
0.74 |
|
0.15 |
|
0.66 |
|
2.71 |
|
4.02 |
|
3.41 |
|
1.65 |
Recoveries ........................................................ |
(0.07) |
|
(0.03) |
|
(0.20) |
|
(0.23) |
|
(0.09) |
|
(0.51) |
|
(0.12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................. |
0.67 |
|
0.12 |
|
0.46 |
|
2.48 |
|
3.93 |
|
2.90 |
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount written off net of recoveries ............... |
0.71 |
|
0.19 |
|
0.53 |
|
1.32 |
|
5.89 |
|
4.01 |
|
2.08 |
Loans and advances to customers are excluded from average balances when reclassified to held for sale. Including these loans and advances to customers the North America new allowances net of allowance releases would be 3.77%, recoveries 0.07%, and amounts written off net of recoveries 3.51%.
Reconciliation of reported and constant currency changes in impaired loans by geographical region8
(Unaudited)
|
31 Dec 10 as reported |
|
Constant currency effect |
|
31 Dec 10 at 31 Dec 11 exchange rates |
|
Movement |
|
31 Dec 11 as reported |
|
Reported change |
|
Movement |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe ........................................ |
11,500 |
|
(211) |
|
11,289 |
|
530 |
|
11,819 |
|
3% |
|
5% |
Hong Kong .................................. |
665 |
|
3 |
|
668 |
|
(60) |
|
608 |
|
(9%) |
|
(9%) |
Rest of Asia-Pacific ..................... |
1,324 |
|
(55) |
|
1,269 |
|
(199) |
|
1,070 |
|
(19%) |
|
(16%) |
Middle East and North Africa ...... |
2,549 |
|
(6) |
|
2,543 |
|
(98) |
|
2,445 |
|
(4%) |
|
(4%) |
North America ............................ |
27,902 |
|
(19) |
|
27,883 |
|
(5,125) |
|
22,758 |
|
(18%) |
|
(18%) |
Latin America ............................. |
3,124 |
|
(299) |
|
2,825 |
|
214 |
|
3,039 |
|
(3%) |
|
8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,064 |
|
(587) |
|
46,477 |
|
(4,738) |
|
41,739 |
|
(11%) |
|
(10%) |
For footnote, see page 185.
2011 compared with 2010
(Unaudited)
On a reported basis, loan impairment charges to the income statement of US$11.5bn in 2011 declined by 15% compared with 2010 and by 16% on a constant currency basis. During 2011, we revised our disclosure convention for impaired loans for regions with material levels of forbearance which resulted in an increase in the population of impaired loans. Impaired loan comparative data for 2010 has been restated to reflect the change in disclosure convention. On a reported basis our restated impaired loans were US$41.7bn, 11% lower than at 31 December 2010.
The following commentary is on a constant currency basis.
New loan impairment allowances were US$13.7bn, a decline of 12% compared with 2010, reflecting lower lending balances in our US consumer finance portfolios. Releases and recoveries of US$2.2bn were 17% higher, mainly in Europe and Latin America reflecting improvements in our collections operations.
Impaired loans were 4% of total gross loans and advances at the end of 2011, in line with 31 December 2010.
In Europe, new loan impairment allowances were US$2.9bn, 14% lower than 2010. Individually assessed new loan impairment allowances decreased, mainly in the UK, as the credit quality of our lending portfolio improved, partly offset by an increase in allowances in respect of a small number of CMB customers in Greece. New collectively assessed loan impairment allowances also declined, mainly in the UK personal lending book, as a result of improved delinquency rates, reflecting improved quality in both the secured and unsecured portfolios, and a range of successful actions taken to mitigate credit risk within RBWM including a focus on monitoring and identifying customers facing financial difficulty at an earlier stage. In addition, lower new loan impairment allowances reflected a reduction in unsecured lending balances. Impaired loans of US$11.8bn were 5% higher than at 31 December 2010.
Releases and recoveries in Europe were US$949m, an increase of 36% compared with the end of 2010 due to successful actions taken to mitigate credit risk as described above.
In Hong Kong, new loan impairment allowances fell by 10% compared with 2010 driven by a reduction in new loan impairment allowances against specific exposures. This was partly offset by a rise in new collectively assessed loan impairment allowances following a more significant release of allowances in 2010, as well as strong growth in lending balances. Impaired loans declined by 9% from 31 December 2010, reflecting loans whose performance improved following the renegotiation of terms and are therefore regarded as no longer impaired.
Releases and recoveries in Hong Kong were US$88m, 4% lower than at the end of 2010.
New loan impairment allowances in Rest of Asia-Pacific decreased by 22% to US$573m. The decline reflected lower new collectively assessed loan impairment allowances, mainly in India, where lending balances fell as certain higher risk unsecured portfolios were managed down. New individually assessed loan impairment allowances also decreased, mainly in Singapore, due to lower new loan impairment allowances raised against a single GB&M customer compared with 2010. Impaired loans in the region decreased by 16% from the end of 2010 to US$1.1bn at the end of 2011, mainly in India due to the repayment or write-off of previously impaired loans.
Releases and recoveries in the region increased by 5%, mainly due to the increased release of individually assessed allowances, principally in Australia and India.
In the Middle East and North Africa, new loan impairment allowances declined by 35% to US$475m in 2011. New individually assessed loan impairment allowances fell, as charges in 2011 were restricted to a small number of corporate exposures and significant charges recorded in 2010 following the restructuring of corporate exposures in the UAE did not recur. New collectively assessed loan impairment allowances also declined, primarily in the UAE, due to lower delinquencies reflecting a repositioning of the loan book to reduce our exposure to unsecured lending and focus on higher quality customers. Impaired loans declined by 4% from 31 December 2010 due to improved delinquency in line with stricter credit criteria, as referred to above.
Releases and recoveries in the region increased by 63% to US$183m in 2011 due to improved economic conditions.
In North America, new loan impairment allowances declined markedly, reducing by 16% to US$7.3bn. New collectively assessed loan impairment allowances declined, mainly in the CML portfolio, reflecting continued run-off and, in our Card and Retail Services business, lower balances, as well as improved delinquency rates as overall credit quality improved. This was partly offset by additional new loan impairment allowances related to the effects of the delays in foreclosure activity. Releases and recoveries in North America declined by 36% to US$242m. This reflected both the improvement in economic conditions in 2010, which enabled a high volume of customers who were in financial difficulty to make repayments, and the continued reductions in outstanding balances in 2011 as the CML portfolio continued to run off.
Impaired loans decreased by 18% from the end of 2010 to US$22.8bn, due to the continued run-off of the CML portfolio and the reclassification of balances relating to the pending sale of our Card and Retail Services business. This was partly offset by the effects of the delays in foreclosure processing which slowed the rate at which lending balances were transferred to foreclosed.
In Latin America, new loan impairment allowances increased by 21% to US$2.3bn. The increase in new loan impairment allowances was primarily in Brazil reflecting strong lending growth in RBWM and CMB, as well as a rise in delinquency rates, notably in the second half of 2011. This was partly offset by lower new collectively assessed loan impairment allowances in Mexico, driven by the managed decline of the riskier elements of the credit cards portfolio. Impaired loans were 8% higher than at the end of 2010 driven by increased delinquency observed during the year.
Releases and recoveries in Latin America increased by 36% from the end of 2010 to US$463m, largely reflecting an increase in the volume of accounts that are delinquent.
For an analysis of loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions by global business, see page 57.
Collateral
Collateral and other credit enhancements held
(Audited)
Loans and advances held at amortised cost
Although collateral can be an important mitigant of credit risk, it is the Group's practice to lend on the basis of the customer's ability to meet their obligations out of their cash flow resources rather than rely on the value of security offered. Depending on the customer's standing and the type of product, facilities may be provided unsecured. However, for other lending a charge over collateral is obtained and considered in determining the credit decision and pricing. In the event of default the bank may utilise the collateral as a source of repayment.
Depending on its form, collateral can have a significant financial effect in mitigating our exposure to credit risk.
The tables below provide a quantification of the value of fixed charges we hold over a borrower's specific asset (or assets) where we have a history of enforcing, and are able to enforce, the collateral in satisfying a debt in the event of the borrower failing to meet its contractual obligations, and where the collateral is cash or can be realised by sale in an established market. The collateral valuation in the tables below exclude any adjustments for obtaining and selling the collateral.
We may also manage our risk by employing other types of collateral and credit risk enhancements, such as second charges, other liens and unsupported guarantees, but the valuation of such mitigants is less certain and their financial effect has not been quantified. In particular, loans shown in the tables below as not collateralised may benefit from such credit mitigants.
Personal lending
Residential mortgage loans including loan commitments by level of collateral
(Audited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully collateralised ................. |
125,702 |
|
46,532 |
|
38,381 |
|
1,761 |
|
60,794 |
|
4,891 |
|
278,061 |
Loan to Value ('LTV') ratio: - less than 25% .................. |
9,898 |
|
5,364 |
|
2,383 |
|
58 |
|
3,576 |
|
282 |
|
21,561 |
- 25% to 50% .................... |
31,601 |
|
19,643 |
|
9,978 |
|
336 |
|
10,593 |
|
1,350 |
|
73,501 |
- 51% to 75% .................... |
52,656 |
|
17,748 |
|
18,006 |
|
895 |
|
25,138 |
|
2,221 |
|
116,664 |
- 76% to 90% .................... |
23,919 |
|
2,884 |
|
7,624 |
|
304 |
|
13,590 |
|
876 |
|
49,197 |
- 91% to 100% .................. |
7,628 |
|
893 |
|
390 |
|
168 |
|
7,897 |
|
162 |
|
17,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partially collateralised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- greater than 100% LTV ... |
3,275 |
|
484 |
|
295 |
|
174 |
|
12,503 |
|
102 |
|
16,833 |
- collateral value ................ |
2,821 |
|
466 |
|
37 |
|
135 |
|
10,566 |
|
24 |
|
14,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential mortgages .... |
128,977 |
|
47,016 |
|
38,676 |
|
1,935 |
|
73,297 |
|
4,993 |
|
294,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully collateralised ................. |
115,700 |
|
43,948 |
|
34,674 |
|
1,490 |
|
66,542 |
|
5,086 |
|
267,440 |
LTV ratio: - less than 25% ................. |
9,531 |
|
4,815 |
|
2,082 |
|
58 |
|
3,779 |
|
282 |
|
20,547 |
- 25% to 50% .................... |
27,740 |
|
15,984 |
|
8,733 |
|
235 |
|
10,973 |
|
1,272 |
|
64,937 |
- 51% to 75% .................... |
46,395 |
|
19,574 |
|
15,912 |
|
634 |
|
25,750 |
|
2,310 |
|
110,575 |
- 76% to 90% .................... |
23,044 |
|
2,569 |
|
7,661 |
|
409 |
|
16,091 |
|
1,003 |
|
50,777 |
- 91% to 100% .................. |
8,990 |
|
1,006 |
|
286 |
|
154 |
|
9,949 |
|
219 |
|
20,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partially collateralised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- greater than 100% LTV ... |
4,156 |
|
18 |
|
176 |
|
404 |
|
12,327 |
|
173 |
|
17,254 |
- collateral value ................ |
3,705 |
|
15 |
|
45 |
|
152 |
|
10,539 |
|
88 |
|
14,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential mortgages .... |
119,856 |
|
43,966 |
|
34,850 |
|
1,894 |
|
78,869 |
|
5,259 |
|
284,694 |
The above table shows residential mortgage lending including off-balance sheet loan commitments by level of collateral. Off-balance sheet commitments include loans that have been approved but which the customer has not yet drawn, and the undrawn portion of loans that have a flexible drawdown facility such as the 'offset' mortgage product. The collateral included in the table above consists of first charges on real estate.
The LTV ratio is calculated as the gross on-balance sheet carrying amount of the loan and any off-balance sheet loan commitment at the balance sheet date divided by the value of collateral. The methodologies for obtaining residential property collateral values vary throughout the Group, but are typically determined through a combination of professional appraisals, house price indices or statistical analysis. Valuations must be updated on a regular basis and, as a minimum, at intervals of every three years. Valuations are conducted more frequently when market conditions or portfolio performance are subject to significant change or when a loan is identified and assessed as impaired.
Other personal lending
Other personal lending consists primarily of overdrafts, credit cards and second lien mortgage portfolios. Second lien lending is supported by collateral but the claim on the collateral is subordinate to the first lien charge. The majority of our second lien portfolios were originated in North America where loss experience on defaulted second lien loans has typically approached 100%; consequently, we do not generally attach any significant financial value to this type of collateral. Credit cards and overdrafts are generally unsecured.
Corporate, commercial and financial (non-bank) lending
Collateral held is analysed separately below for commercial real estate and for other corporate, commercial and financial (non-bank) lending. This reflects the difference in collateral held on the portfolios. In each case, the analysis includes off-balance sheet loan commitments, primarily undrawn credit lines.
Commercial real estate loans and advances including loan commitments by level of collateral
(Audited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rated CRR/EL 1 to 7 ............. |
33,376 |
|
25,202 |
|
10,934 |
|
746 |
|
10,238 |
|
4,841 |
|
85,337 |
Not collateralised ............... |
5,730 |
|
12,552 |
|
2,973 |
|
631 |
|
97 |
|
2,136 |
|
24,119 |
Fully collateralised .............. |
24,547 |
|
11,734 |
|
6,929 |
|
65 |
|
8,506 |
|
1,706 |
|
53,487 |
Partially collateralised (A)... |
3,099 |
|
916 |
|
1,032 |
|
50 |
|
1,635 |
|
999 |
|
7,731 |
- collateral value on A .... |
1,775 |
|
591 |
|
280 |
|
39 |
|
311 |
|
559 |
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rated CRR/EL 8 to 10 ........... |
3,768 |
|
4 |
|
75 |
|
310 |
|
1,057 |
|
326 |
|
5,540 |
Not collateralised ............... |
434 |
|
2 |
|
10 |
|
55 |
|
135 |
|
127 |
|
763 |
Fully collateralised .............. |
1,413 |
|
2 |
|
23 |
|
74 |
|
521 |
|
196 |
|
2,229 |
Partially collateralised (B)... |
1,921 |
|
- |
|
42 |
|
181 |
|
401 |
|
3 |
|
2,548 |
- collateral value on B .... |
1,083 |
|
- |
|
26 |
|
89 |
|
246 |
|
1 |
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
37,144 |
|
25,206 |
|
11,009 |
|
1,056 |
|
11,295 |
|
5,167 |
|
90,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rated CRR/EL 1 to 7 ............. |
32,192 |
|
24,463 |
|
9,829 |
|
1,015 |
|
8,009 |
|
4,341 |
|
79,849 |
Not collateralised ............... |
6,153 |
|
10,693 |
|
2,600 |
|
722 |
|
388 |
|
2,004 |
|
22,560 |
Fully collateralised .............. |
22,904 |
|
12,227 |
|
6,972 |
|
65 |
|
6,837 |
|
1,574 |
|
50,579 |
Partially collateralised (C)... |
3,135 |
|
1,543 |
|
257 |
|
228 |
|
784 |
|
763 |
|
6,710 |
- collateral value on C .... |
1,800 |
|
955 |
|
124 |
|
149 |
|
288 |
|
310 |
|
3,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rated CRR/EL 8 to 10 ........... |
2,810 |
|
3 |
|
113 |
|
271 |
|
1,241 |
|
403 |
|
4,841 |
Not collateralised ............... |
249 |
|
1 |
|
8 |
|
40 |
|
60 |
|
99 |
|
457 |
Fully collateralised .............. |
1,164 |
|
2 |
|
41 |
|
14 |
|
533 |
|
255 |
|
2,009 |
Partially collateralised (D) .. |
1,397 |
|
- |
|
64 |
|
217 |
|
648 |
|
49 |
|
2,375 |
- collateral value on D ... |
867 |
|
- |
|
44 |
|
206 |
|
430 |
|
29 |
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
35,002 |
|
24,466 |
|
9,942 |
|
1,286 |
|
9,250 |
|
4,744 |
|
84,690 |
The collateral included in the table above consists of fixed first charges on real estate and charges over cash for the commercial real estate sector.
Facilities are disclosed as not collateralised for this sector if they are unsecured or benefit from credit risk mitigation from guarantees, which are not quantified for the purposes of this disclosure. Lending to major property companies in Hong Kong is, by market practice, typically secured by guarantees or is unsecured. In Europe, facilities of a working capital nature are generally not secured by a first fixed charge and are therefore disclosed as not collateralised.
The value of commercial real estate collateral is determined through a combination of professional and internal valuations and physical inspection. Due to the complexity of collateral valuations for commercial real estate, local valuation policies determine the frequency of review based on local market conditions. Revaluations are sought with greater frequency where, as part of the regular credit assessment of the obligor, material concerns arise in relation to the transaction which may reflect on the underlying performance of the collateral, or in circumstances where an obligor's credit quality has declined sufficiently to cause concern that the principal payment source may not fully meet the obligation (i.e. the obligor's credit quality classification indicates it is at the lower end e.g. sub‑standard, or approaching impaired).
Other corporate, commercial and financial (non-bank) loans and advances including loan commitments by level of collateral
(Audited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rated CRR/EL 8 to 10 ........... |
8,715 |
|
512 |
|
1,098 |
|
2,253 |
|
2,448 |
|
2,538 |
|
17,564 |
Not collateralised ............... |
5,583 |
|
349 |
|
795 |
|
1,695 |
|
801 |
|
1,546 |
|
10,769 |
Fully collateralised .............. |
1,765 |
|
63 |
|
147 |
|
60 |
|
441 |
|
602 |
|
3,078 |
Partially collateralised (A)... |
1,367 |
|
100 |
|
156 |
|
498 |
|
1,206 |
|
390 |
|
3,717 |
- collateral value on A .... |
558 |
|
55 |
|
76 |
|
103 |
|
541 |
|
214 |
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rated CRR/EL 8 to 10 ........... |
11,962 |
|
675 |
|
1,256 |
|
2,336 |
|
2,947 |
|
1,902 |
|
21,078 |
Not collateralised ............... |
8,363 |
|
489 |
|
933 |
|
1,779 |
|
1,059 |
|
843 |
|
13,466 |
Fully collateralised .............. |
1,903 |
|
51 |
|
142 |
|
60 |
|
670 |
|
854 |
|
3,680 |
Partially collateralised (B)... |
1,696 |
|
135 |
|
181 |
|
497 |
|
1,218 |
|
205 |
|
3,932 |
- collateral value on B .... |
627 |
|
81 |
|
80 |
|
103 |
|
422 |
|
114 |
|
1,427 |
The collateral used in the assessment of the above primarily includes first legal charges over real estate and charges over cash in the commercial and industrial sector, and charges over cash and marketable financial instruments in the financial sector. Government sector lending is generally unsecured.
It should be noted that the table above excludes other types of collateral which are commonly taken for corporate and commercial lending such as unsupported guarantees and floating charges over the assets of a customer's business. While such mitigants have value, often providing rights in insolvency, their assignable value is insufficiently certain and they are assigned no value for disclosure purposes.
As with commercial real estate, the value of real estate collateral included in the table above is generally determined through a combination of professional and internal valuations and physical inspection. The frequency of revaluation is undertaken on a similar basis to commercial real estate loans and advances; however, for financing activities in corporate and commercial lending that are not predominantly commercial real estate-oriented, collateral value is not as strongly correlated to principal repayment performance. Collateral values will generally be refreshed when an obligor's general credit performance deteriorates and it is necessary to assess the likely performance of secondary sources of repayment should reliance upon them prove necessary. For this reason, the table above reports values only for customers with CRR 8 to 10, reflecting that these loans and advances generally have valuations which are of comparatively recent vintage. For the purposes of the table above, cash is valued at its nominal value and marketable securities at their fair value.
The difference between the collateral value and the value of partially collateralised lending disclosed in the tables above cannot be directly compared to any impairment allowances recognised in respect of impaired loans, as the loans may be performing in accordance with their contractual terms. Where loans are not performing in accordance with their contractual terms, the recovery of cash flows may be affected by other cash resources of the customer, or other credit risk enhancements not quantified for the purposes of the tables above. The Group's policy for determining impairment allowances, including the effect of collateral on these impairment allowances, is provided on page 190.
Loans and advances to banks
The following table shows loans and advances to banks including off-balance sheet loan commitments by level of collateral.
Loans and advances to banks including loan commitments by level of collateral
(Audited)
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not collateralised ................... |
25,896 |
|
34,892 |
|
42,586 |
|
9,337 |
|
14,132 |
|
19,516 |
|
146,359 |
Fully collateralised ................. |
31,515 |
|
1,365 |
|
6,927 |
|
32 |
|
978 |
|
1,238 |
|
42,055 |
Partially collateralised (A)...... |
146 |
|
50 |
|
445 |
|
- |
|
784 |
|
114 |
|
1,539 |
- collateral value on A ........ |
104 |
|
50 |
|
207 |
|
- |
|
702 |
|
88 |
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ...................................... |
57,557 |
|
36,307 |
|
49,958 |
|
9,369 |
|
15,894 |
|
20,868 |
|
189,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not collateralised ................... |
31,225 |
|
34,336 |
|
32,631 |
|
10,416 |
|
16,829 |
|
22,436 |
|
147,873 |
Fully collateralised ................. |
50,316 |
|
154 |
|
9,558 |
|
188 |
|
3,101 |
|
4,937 |
|
68,254 |
Partially collateralised (B)....... |
91 |
|
- |
|
28 |
|
- |
|
959 |
|
3 |
|
1,081 |
- collateral value on B ........ |
64 |
|
- |
|
24 |
|
- |
|
956 |
|
- |
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ...................................... |
81,632 |
|
34,490 |
|
42,217 |
|
10,604 |
|
20,889 |
|
27,376 |
|
217,208 |
The collateral used in the assessment of the aboverelates primarily to cash and marketable securities. Loans and advances to banks are typically unsecured. Certain products such as reverse repos and stock borrowing are effectively collateralised and have been included in the above as fully collateralised. The fully collateralised loans and advances to banks for Europe in the table above consist primarily of reverse repurchase agreements and stock borrowing.
Derivatives
The ISDA Master Agreement is our preferred agreement for documenting derivatives activity. It provides the contractual framework within which dealing activity across a full range of OTC products is conducted, and contractually binds both parties to apply close-out netting across all outstanding transactions covered by an agreement if either party defaults or another pre-agreed termination event occurs. It is common, and our preferred practice, for the parties to execute a Credit Support Annex ('CSA') in conjunction with the ISDA Master Agreement. Under a CSA, collateral is passed between the parties to mitigate the counterparty risk inherent in outstanding positions. The majority of our CSAs are with financial institutional clients.
A description of the derivative offset amount in the 'Maximum exposure to credit risk' table is provided on page 107.
Other credit risk exposures
In addition to collateralised lending described above, other credit enhancements are employed and methods used to mitigate credit risk arising from financial assets. These are described in more detail below.
Government, bank and other financial institution issued securities may benefit from additional credit enhancement, notably through government guarantees that reference these assets. Details of government guarantees are included in Notes 15, 19 and 21 on the Financial Statements. Corporate issued debt securities are primarily unsecured. Debt securities issued by banks and financial institutions include ABSs and similar instruments, which are supported by underlying pools of financial assets. Credit risk associated with ABSs is reduced through the purchase of CDS protection. Disclosure of the Group's holdings of ABSs and associated CDS protection is provided on page 152.
Trading assets include loans and advances held with trading intent, the majority of which consist of
reverse repos and stock borrowing which, by their nature, are collateralised. Collateral accepted as security that the Group is permitted to sell or repledge under these arrangements is described in Note 37 on the Financial Statements. Trading assets also include money market term placements which are unsecured.
The Group's maximum exposure to credit risk includes financial guarantees and similar arrangements that it issues or enters into, and loan commitments that it is irrevocably committed to. Depending on the terms of the arrangement, the bank may have recourse to additional credit mitigation in the event that a guarantee is called upon or a loan commitment is drawn and subsequently defaults. Further information about these arrangements is provided in Note 41 on the Financial Statements.
(Audited)
The carrying amount of assets obtained by taking possession of collateral held as security, or calling upon other credit enhancements, is as follows:
Carrying amount at |
|||
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Nature of assets |
|
|
|
Residential property ................ |
420 |
|
1,155 |
Commercial and industrial |
64 |
|
104 |
Other ...................................... |
17 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
1,261 |
For footnote, see page 185.
The significant reduction in residential properties was due to the suspension of foreclosure activities at the end of 2010 and during the first half of 2011. See page 122.
We make repossessed properties available for sale in an orderly fashion, with the proceeds used to reduce or repay the outstanding indebtedness. If excess funds arise after the debt has been repaid, they are made available to repay other secured lenders with lower priority or returned to the customer. We do not generally occupy repossessed properties for our business use.
HSBC Holdings
(Audited)
Risk on an enterprise-wide basis in HSBC Holdings is overseen by the HSBC Holdings Asset and Liability Committee ('ALCO'). The major risks faced by HSBC Holdings are credit risk and market risk (in the form of interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk), of which the most significant is credit risk.
Credit risk in HSBC Holdings primarily arises from transactions with Group subsidiaries and from guarantees issued in support of obligations assumed by certain Group operations in the normal conduct of their business.
These risks are reviewed and managed within regulatory and internal limits for exposures by our Global Risk function, which provides high-level centralised oversight and management of our credit risks worldwide.
HSBC Holdings' maximum exposure to credit risk at 31 December 2011 is shown below. Its financial assets principally represent claims on Group subsidiaries in Europe and North America. No collateral or other credit enhancements were held by HSBC Holdings in respect of its transactions with subsidiaries.
All of the derivative transactions are with HSBC undertakings which are banking counterparties (2010: 100%).
HSBC Holdings - maximum exposure to credit risk
(Audited)
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
Cash at bank and in hand: |
|
|
|
- balances with HSBC undertakings ...................................................................................... |
316 |
|
459 |
Derivatives ............................................................................................................................. |
3,568 |
|
2,327 |
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings .............................................................................. |
28,048 |
|
21,238 |
Financial investments ............................................................................................................. |
1,078 |
|
2,025 |
Financial guarantees and similar contracts ............................................................................... |
49,402 |
|
46,988 |
Loan and other credit-related commitments ............................................................................ |
1,810 |
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
84,222 |
|
75,757 |