Credit quality of financial instruments
The five classifications describing the credit quality of our lending, debt securities portfolios and derivatives are set out in the Appendix to Risk on page 183 and defined on page 191 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011. Additional credit quality information in respect of our consolidated holdings of ABSs is provided on page 154.
During 2011, we amended our presentation of impaired loans for portfolios with significant levels of forbearance to provide more relevant information on the effect of forbearance on the credit risk of loans and advances. This change in presentation does not affect the accounting policy for the recognition of loan impairment allowances. Further details are provided on page 146.
For the purpose of the following disclosure, retail loans which are past due up to 89 days and are not otherwise classified as impaired in accordance with our disclosure convention (see page 146), are not disclosed within the expected loss ('EL') grade to which they relate, but are separately classified as past due but not impaired.
Distribution of financial instruments by credit quality
|
Neither past due nor impaired |
|
Past due |
|
|
|
Impair- |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfac- |
|
Sub- |
|
but not |
|
|
|
ment |
|
|
|
Strong |
|
Good |
|
tory |
|
standard |
|
impaired |
|
Impaired |
allowances18 |
Total |
||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances at central |
146,337 |
|
1,364 |
|
210 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
147,911 |
Items in the course of collection from other banks .......................................... |
10,628 |
|
173 |
|
274 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
11,075 |
Hong Kong Government |
21,283 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
21,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets19 .................... |
242,618 |
|
68,646 |
|
49,377 |
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361,352 |
- treasury and other eligible bills .............................. |
26,256 |
|
2,726 |
|
1,116 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,098 |
- debt securities ................. |
97,559 |
|
14,196 |
|
19,458 |
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,563 |
- loans and advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to banks ....................... |
60,832 |
|
26,423 |
|
7,474 |
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,830 |
to customers ................ |
57,971 |
|
25,301 |
|
21,329 |
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at |
8,356 |
|
5,438 |
|
608 |
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,535 |
- treasury and other eligible bills .............................. |
77 |
|
- |
|
14 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
- debt securities ................. |
8,228 |
|
5,359 |
|
520 |
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,238 |
- loans and advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to banks ....................... |
51 |
|
- |
|
74 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
to customers ................ |
- |
|
79 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives19 ........................ |
271,850 |
|
53,347 |
|
27,875 |
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ................... |
611,942 |
|
259,989 |
|
217,188 |
|
26,981 |
|
17,517 |
|
40,832 |
|
(17,273) |
|
1,157,176 |
- to banks ......................... |
142,693 |
|
28,284 |
|
10,531 |
|
639 |
|
12 |
|
88 |
|
(56) |
|
182,191 |
- to customers20 ................ |
469,249 |
|
231,705 |
|
206,657 |
|
26,342 |
|
17,505 |
|
40,744 |
|
(17,217) |
|
974,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial investments ........... |
330,781 |
|
27,343 |
|
23,265 |
|
3,456 |
|
- |
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
387,050 |
- treasury and other similar bills .............................. |
62,669 |
|
4,691 |
|
4,093 |
|
99 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
71,552 |
- debt securities ................. |
268,112 |
|
22,652 |
|
19,172 |
|
3,357 |
|
- |
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
315,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale ............... |
4,677 |
|
1,365 |
|
3,125 |
|
665 |
|
449 |
|
366 |
|
(106) |
|
10,541 |
- disposal groups ............... |
4,632 |
|
1,365 |
|
3,125 |
|
665 |
|
447 |
|
255 |
|
(106) |
|
10,383 |
- non-current assets held for sale ............................. |
45 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
111 |
|
- |
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets .......................... |
11,908 |
|
7,672 |
|
12,403 |
|
1,604 |
|
290 |
|
520 |
|
|
|
34,397 |
- endorsements and acceptances .................. |
2,172 |
|
4,807 |
|
4,849 |
|
945 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
12,782 |
- accrued income and other |
9,736 |
|
2,865 |
|
7,554 |
|
659 |
|
285 |
|
516 |
|
|
|
21,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,660,380 |
|
425,337 |
|
334,325 |
|
36,412 |
|
18,256 |
|
43,923 |
|
(17,379) |
|
2,501,254 |
Distribution of financial instruments by credit quality (continued)
|
Neither past due nor impaired |
|
Past due |
|
|
|
Impair- |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfac- |
|
Sub- |
|
but not |
|
|
|
ment |
|
|
|
Strong |
|
Good |
|
tory |
|
standard |
|
impaired |
|
Impaired7 |
allowances18 |
Total |
||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances at central |
66,860 |
|
999 |
|
229 |
|
130 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
68,218 |
Items in the course of collection from other banks .......................................... |
14,107 |
|
658 |
|
291 |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
15,058 |
Hong Kong Government |
19,745 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
19,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets19 .................... |
318,456 |
|
51,432 |
|
62,735 |
|
5,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438,232 |
- treasury and other eligible bills .............................. |
21,488 |
|
1,197 |
|
1,214 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,899 |
- debt securities ................. |
173,233 |
|
10,726 |
|
22,215 |
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,805 |
- loans and advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to banks ....................... |
73,490 |
|
20,773 |
|
4,347 |
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,134 |
to customers ................ |
50,245 |
|
18,736 |
|
34,959 |
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at |
7,856 |
|
5,356 |
|
6,700 |
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,977 |
- treasury and other eligible bills .............................. |
207 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207 |
- debt securities ................. |
6,660 |
|
5,085 |
|
6,686 |
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,496 |
- loans and advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to banks ....................... |
70 |
|
271 |
|
14 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
to customers ................ |
919 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives19 ........................ |
211,625 |
|
34,718 |
|
11,096 |
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ................... |
695,086 |
|
302,837 |
|
186,904 |
|
31,426 |
|
22,166 |
|
44,406 |
|
(18,894) |
|
1,263,931 |
- to banks ......................... |
182,273 |
|
35,168 |
|
7,666 |
|
785 |
|
116 |
|
197 |
|
(162) |
|
226,043 |
- to customers20 ................ |
512,813 |
|
267,669 |
|
179,238 |
|
30,641 |
|
22,050 |
|
44,209 |
|
(18,732) |
|
1,037,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial investments ........... |
351,940 |
|
24,373 |
|
25,631 |
|
4,103 |
|
- |
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
408,650 |
- treasury and other similar bills .............................. |
54,771 |
|
3,370 |
|
3,479 |
|
44 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
61,664 |
- debt securities ................. |
297,169 |
|
21,003 |
|
22,152 |
|
4,059 |
|
- |
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
346,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets .......................... |
11,982 |
|
7,285 |
|
15,106 |
|
1,525 |
|
637 |
|
254 |
|
|
|
36,789 |
- endorsements and acceptances .................. |
1,801 |
|
4,228 |
|
4,776 |
|
499 |
|
16 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
11,338 |
- accrued income and other |
10,181 |
|
3,057 |
|
10,330 |
|
1,026 |
|
621 |
|
236 |
|
|
|
25,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,697,657 |
|
427,658 |
|
308,692 |
|
46,093 |
|
22,803 |
|
47,263 |
|
(18,894) |
|
2,531,272 |
|
Neither past due nor impaired |
|
Past due |
|
|
|
Impair- |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfac- |
|
Sub- |
|
but not |
|
|
|
ment |
|
|
|
Strong |
|
Good |
|
tory |
|
standard |
|
impaired |
|
Impaired |
allowances18 |
Total |
||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances at central banks ............................... |
126,926 |
|
2,678 |
|
263 |
|
35 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
129,902 |
Items in the course of collection from other banks ......................................... |
7,707 |
|
150 |
|
350 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
8,208 |
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness |
20,922 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
20,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets19 ................... |
231,594 |
|
37,182 |
|
39,171 |
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,449 |
- treasury and other eligible bills ............................. |
33,199 |
|
538 |
|
564 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,309 |
- debt securities .............. |
103,163 |
|
8,497 |
|
18,188 |
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,487 |
- loans and advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to banks ...................... |
49,021 |
|
20,699 |
|
5,186 |
|
619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,525 |
to customers ............... |
46,211 |
|
7,448 |
|
15,233 |
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at |
7,176 |
|
4,728 |
|
830 |
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,926 |
- treasury and other eligible bills ............................. |
123 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
- debt securities ............... |
6,148 |
|
4,728 |
|
767 |
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,834 |
- loans and advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to banks ...................... |
55 |
|
- |
|
63 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
to customers ............... |
850 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives19 ....................... |
279,557 |
|
45,858 |
|
18,627 |
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ................. |
609,081 |
|
245,352 |
|
194,661 |
|
28,210 |
|
20,009 |
|
41,739 |
|
(17,636) |
|
1,121,416 |
- to banks ........................ |
144,815 |
|
28,813 |
|
6,722 |
|
568 |
|
39 |
|
155 |
|
(125) |
|
180,987 |
- to customers20 .............. |
464,266 |
|
216,539 |
|
187,939 |
|
27,642 |
|
19,970 |
|
41,584 |
|
(17,511) |
|
940,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial investments .......... |
340,173 |
|
24,757 |
|
22,139 |
|
3,532 |
|
- |
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
392,834 |
- treasury and other similar bills ............................. |
58,627 |
|
3,348 |
|
3,144 |
|
104 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
65,223 |
- debt securities ............... |
281,546 |
|
21,409 |
|
18,995 |
|
3,428 |
|
- |
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
327,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale .............. |
14,365 |
|
12,587 |
|
7,931 |
|
536 |
|
2,524 |
|
1,479 |
|
(1,614) |
|
37,808 |
- disposal groups .............. |
14,317 |
|
12,587 |
|
7,931 |
|
536 |
|
2,522 |
|
1,467 |
|
(1,614) |
|
37,746 |
- non-current assets held for sale ............................. |
48 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
12 |
|
- |
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ......................... |
11,956 |
|
6,526 |
|
12,379 |
|
1,193 |
|
421 |
|
517 |
|
|
|
32,992 |
- endorsements and acceptances ................ |
1,789 |
|
4,075 |
|
4,629 |
|
504 |
|
10 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
11,010 |
- accrued income and other ......................................... |
10,167 |
|
2,451 |
|
7,750 |
|
689 |
|
411 |
|
514 |
|
|
|
21,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,649,457 |
|
379,818 |
|
296,351 |
|
37,538 |
|
22,954 |
|
45,968 |
|
(19,250) |
|
2,412,836 |
For footnotes, see page 180.
We assess credit quality on all financial instruments which are subject to credit risk. The balance of these financial instruments at 30 June 2012 was US$2,501bn, of which US$1,661bn or 66% were classified as 'strong'. This percentage was broadly in line with 31 December 2011. The proportion of financial instruments classified as 'good' and 'satisfactory' remained broadly stable at 17% and 13%, respectively. The proportion of 'sub-standard' financial instruments remained low at 1% at 30 June 2012.
Loans and advances held at amortised cost on which credit quality has been assessed increased by 3% to US$1,157bn. At 30 June 2012, 75% of the Group's lending balances were classified as either 'strong' or 'good', broadly in line with the end of 2011.
Financial investments on which credit quality is assessed were US$387bn at 30 June 2012, compared with US$393bn at 31 December 2011. The majority of the Group's exposure was in the form of available-for-sale debt securities issued by government and government agencies classified as 'strong' and this proportion was broadly in line with the end of 2011.
Derivative assets on which credit quality has been assessed increased by 3% to US$356bn compared with 31 December 2011. This rise was mainly in Europe, driven by a significant rise in the fair value of interest rate contracts due to downward movements of yield curves in major currencies, reflecting the ongoing monetary response to the economic weakness and turmoil in the eurozone. The proportion of balances classified as 'strong' declined marginally from 81% at the end of 2011 to 76% at 30 June 2012 and the proportion of 'satisfactory' balances increased from 5% to 8%.
Trading assets on which credit quality has been assessed grew by 17% to US$361bn from 31 December 2011, as client activity increased from the subdued levels seen in the second half of 2011. This resulted in higher reverse repo and equity securities balances as well as a rise in settlement account balances, which vary significantly in proportion to the level of trading activity. The proportion of balances classified as 'strong' declined despite an overall increase in total balances classified as 'strong'. This reflected a rise in the reverse repo transactions with counterparties classified as 'good' and 'satisfactory', as well as the downgrade of certain eurozone countries which resulted in the movement of related debt securities balances from 'strong' to 'good'.
Cash and balances at central banks, on which credit quality has been assessed, increased by 14% to US$148bn, reflecting the deposit of surplus liquidity in Europe with the local central bank. Substantially all of the Group's cash and balances at central banks were classified as 'strong', with the most significant concentrations in Europe and North America.
Assets held for sale on which credit quality has been assessed declined, with reductions across all classifications, following the completion of the sale of our Card and Retail Services business in the US.
Past due but not impaired gross financial instruments
Past due but not impaired loans are those for which the customer is in the early stages of delinquency and has failed to make a payment, or a partial payment, in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. This is typically where a loan is past due up to 89 days and there are no other indicators of impairment.
Further examples of exposures past due but not impaired include individually assessed mortgages that are in arrears 90 days or more where there are no other indicators of impairment, but where the value of collateral is sufficient to repay both the principal debt and all potential interest for at least one year; and short‑term trade facilities past due more than 90 days for technical reasons such as delays in documentation, but where there is no concern over the creditworthiness of the counterparty. Where groups of loans are collectively assessed for impairment, collective impairment allowances are recognised for loans classified as past due but not impaired.
At 30 June 2012, US$17.5bn of loans and advances held at amortised cost were classified as past due but not impaired (31 December 2011: US$20.0bn; 30 June 2011: US$22.2bn). The largest concentration of these balances was in HSBC Finance. The decrease in 2012 was primarily due to lower lending balances resulting in a reduction in early stage delinquency in the CML portfolio.
Past due but not impaired gross loans and advances to customers and banks by geographical region
|
Europe |
|
Hong Kong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2012 ........................... |
2,259 |
|
1,084 |
|
2,548 |
|
980 |
|
7,874 |
|
2,772 |
|
17,517 |
At 30 June 20117 ............................ |
2,528 |
|
1,071 |
|
2,377 |
|
1,292 |
|
11,447 |
|
3,451 |
|
22,166 |
At 31 December 2011 ..................... |
1,990 |
|
1,107 |
|
2,319 |
|
1,165 |
|
10,216 |
|
3,212 |
|
20,009 |
For footnote, see page 180.
Past due but not impaired gross loans and advances to customers and banks by industry sector
|
At |
|
At 20117 |
|
At |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks ................................................................................................................ |
12 |
|
116 |
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers ......................................................................................................... |
17,505 |
|
22,050 |
|
19,970 |
Personal ........................................................................................................ |
12,153 |
|
16,689 |
|
13,951 |
Corporate and commercial ............................................................................. |
5,011 |
|
5,047 |
|
5,855 |
Financial ........................................................................................................ |
341 |
|
314 |
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,517 |
|
22,166 |
|
20,009 |
For footnote, see page 180.
Ageing analysis of days past due but not impaired gross financial instruments
|
Up to 29 days |
|
30-59 |
|
60-89 |
|
90-179 |
|
180 days and over |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost .. |
13,137 |
|
2,903 |
|
1,307 |
|
79 |
|
91 |
|
17,517 |
- to banks ................................................ |
12 |
|
− |
|
− |
|
− |
|
− |
|
12 |
- to customers ......................................... |
13,125 |
|
2,903 |
|
1,307 |
|
79 |
|
91 |
|
17,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale1 ..................................... |
270 |
|
116 |
|
50 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
449 |
- disposal groups ...................................... |
270 |
|
114 |
|
50 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
447 |
- non-current assets held for sale ............. |
− |
|
2 |
|
− |
|
− |
|
− |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ................................................. |
168 |
|
39 |
|
30 |
|
10 |
|
43 |
|
290 |
- endorsements and acceptances .............. |
3 |
|
1 |
|
− |
|
− |
|
1 |
|
5 |
- other .................................................... |
165 |
|
38 |
|
30 |
|
10 |
|
42 |
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,575 |
|
3,058 |
|
1,387 |
|
95 |
|
141 |
|
18,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost7 . |
16,125 |
|
3,808 |
|
1,911 |
|
185 |
|
137 |
|
22,166 |
- to banks ................................................ |
116 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
116 |
- to customers ......................................... |
16,009 |
|
3,808 |
|
1,911 |
|
185 |
|
137 |
|
22,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ................................................. |
317 |
|
166 |
|
72 |
|
30 |
|
52 |
|
637 |
- endorsements and acceptances .............. |
13 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
16 |
- other .................................................... |
304 |
|
165 |
|
72 |
|
30 |
|
50 |
|
621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,442 |
|
3,974 |
|
1,983 |
|
215 |
|
189 |
|
22,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances held at amortised cost .. |
14,239 |
|
3,680 |
|
1,727 |
|
223 |
|
140 |
|
20,009 |
- to banks ................................................ |
39 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
39 |
- to customers ......................................... |
14,200 |
|
3,680 |
|
1,727 |
|
223 |
|
140 |
|
19,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale1 ..................................... |
1,563 |
|
644 |
|
307 |
|
8 |
|
2 |
|
2,524 |
- disposal groups ...................................... |
1,563 |
|
644 |
|
307 |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
2,522 |
- non-current assets held for sale ............. |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets ................................................. |
225 |
|
80 |
|
37 |
|
22 |
|
57 |
|
421 |
- endorsements and acceptances .............. |
7 |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
10 |
- other .................................................... |
218 |
|
78 |
|
37 |
|
21 |
|
57 |
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,027 |
|
4,404 |
|
2,071 |
|
253 |
|
199 |
|
22,954 |
For footnotes, see page 180.
Renegotiated loans and forbearance
|
Current policies and procedures regarding renegotiated loans and forbearance are described in the Appendix to Risk on page 183. |
The contractual terms of a loan may be modified for a number of reasons including changing market conditions, customer retention and other factors not related to the current or potential credit deterioration of a customer. When the contractual payment terms of a loan have been modified because we have significant concerns about the borrower's ability to meet contractual payments when due, these loans are classified as 'renegotiated loans'. For the purposes of this disclosure the term 'forbearance' is synonymous with the renegotiation of loans for these purposes.
Renegotiated loans and advances to customers
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|||||||
|
Neither past |
|
Past due but not impaired |
|
Impaired |
|
Total |
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail ................................................................................. |
8,007 |
|
3,532 |
|
19,229 |
|
30,768 |
|
|
First lien residential mortgages........................................ |
5,841 |
|
2,842 |
|
16,096 |
|
24,779 |
|
|
Other personal ............................................................... |
2,166 |
|
690 |
|
3,133 |
|
5,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate........................................................ |
2,392 |
|
30 |
|
3,216 |
|
5,638 |
|
|
Corporate and commercial.................................................. |
4,387 |
|
401 |
|
3,993 |
|
8,781 |
|
|
Financial ............................................................................ |
261 |
|
- |
|
560 |
|
821 |
|
|
Governments ..................................................................... |
44 |
|
- |
|
117 |
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,091 |
|
3,963 |
|
27,115 |
|
46,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total renegotiated loans and advances to customers as a percentage |
4.7% |
||||||||
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Neither past |
|
Past due but not impaired |
|
Impaired |
|
Total |
|
Neither past |
|
Past due but not impaired |
|
Impaired |
|
Total |
|||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Retail ......................... |
8,504 |
|
4,074 |
|
20,454 |
|
33,032 |
|
8,133 |
|
4,401 |
|
19,125 |
|
31,659 |
|||
First lien residential |
5,595 |
|
3,123 |
|
16,872 |
|
25,590 |
|
5,916 |
|
3,560 |
|
15,932 |
|
25,408 |
|||
Other personal ........ |
2,909 |
|
951 |
|
3,582 |
|
7,442 |
|
2,217 |
|
841 |
|
3,193 |
|
6,251 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Commercial real estate |
2,697 |
|
10 |
|
2,659 |
|
5,366 |
|
2,793 |
|
9 |
|
3,248 |
|
6,050 |
|||
Corporate and commercial.............. |
4,092 |
|
342 |
|
3,141 |
|
7,575 |
|
3,432 |
|
461 |
|
3,376 |
|
7,269 |
|||
Financial .................... |
341 |
|
- |
|
552 |
|
893 |
|
249 |
|
- |
|
491 |
|
740 |
|||
Governments .............. |
116 |
|
- |
|
21 |
|
137 |
|
113 |
|
2 |
|
132 |
|
247 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
15,750 |
|
4,426 |
|
26,827 |
|
47,003 |
|
14,720 |
|
4,873 |
|
26,372 |
|
45,965 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total renegotiated loans and advances to customers as a percentage |
|
4.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8% |
||||||||
Renegotiated loans and advances to customers by geography
|
At |
|
At |
|
At |
|
30 June |
|
30 June |
|
31 December |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe ............................................................................................. |
12,423 |
|
11,250 |
|
11,464 |
Hong Kong ...................................................................................... |
419 |
|
478 |
|
447 |
Rest of Asia-Pacific .......................................................................... |
445 |
|
608 |
|
448 |
Middle East and North Africa ........................................................... |
2,649 |
|
2,095 |
|
2,655 |
North America ................................................................................. |
27,528 |
|
29,761 |
|
28,475 |
Latin America .................................................................................. |
2,705 |
|
2,811 |
|
2,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,169 |
|
47,003 |
|
45,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances on renegotiated loans ......................... |
7,350 |
|
8,899 |
|
7,670 |
Individually assessed ..................................................................... |
2,422 |
|
1,989 |
|
2,311 |
Collectively assessed ..................................................................... |
4,928 |
|
6,910 |
|
5,359 |
Renegotiated loans totalled US$46.2bn at 30 June 2012 (30 June 2011: US$47.0bn; 31 December 2011: US$46.0bn). The most significant portfolio of renegotiated loans remains in North America and, at 30 June 2012, amounted to US$27.5bn or 60% of total renegotiated loans
(30 June 2011: US$29.8bn or 63%; 31 December 2011: US$28.5bn or 62%), substantially all of which were retail loans held by HSBC Finance. Of the total renegotiated loans in North America, US$17.9bn were presented as impaired at 30 June 2012 (30 June 2011: US$19.2bn; 31 December 2011: US$17.8bn),
and the ratio of total impairment allowances to impaired loans at 30 June 2012 was 27% (30 June 2011: 34%; 31 December 2011: 28%).
Europe is the next largest portfolio of renegotiated loans which, at 30 June 2012, amounted to US$12.4bn (30 June 2011: US$11.3bn; 31 December 2011: US$11.5bn), constituting 27% of total renegotiated loans (30 June 2011: 24%; 31 December 2011: 25%). Of the total renegotiated loans in Europe, US$6.2bn were presented as impaired at 30 June 2012 (30 June 2011: US$5.4bn; 31 December 2011: US$6.0bn), and the ratio of total impairment allowances to impaired loans at 30 June 2012 was 27% (30 June 2011: 30%; 31 December 2011: 30%). Renegotiated balances in Europe were largely concentrated in the commercial real estate sector 38% (30 June 2011: 40%; 31 December 2011: 41%) and the corporate and commercial sector 38% (30 June 2011: 34%; 31 December 2011: 32%). The commercial real estate sector, particularly in the UK, continued to face weakening in property values and a reduction in institutions funding commercial real estate lending. The commercial real estate mid-market sector continued to experience higher levels of renegotiation activity than is evident with larger corporates, where borrowers are generally better capitalised and have access to wider funding market opportunities. In all cases, in assessing the acceptability of renegotiated loans, we consider the
ability to service interest as a minimum and reduce capital repayments if possible. Despite Europe and the UK, in particular, holding the single largest retail lending portfolio in the Group, renegotiations of retail loans in this region were limited due to the quality of the residential mortgage book.
The balance of renegotiated loans in the Middle East and North Africa and Latin America (primarily in Mexico and Brazil) remained predominately concentrated in the corporate and commercial sectors. Forbearance in Hong Kong and Rest of Asia-Pacific remained insignificant.
HSBC Finance loan modifications and re‑ageing
HSBC Finance maintains loan modification and re‑age ('loan renegotiation') programmes in order to manage customer relationships, improve collection opportunities and, if possible, avoid foreclosure. For further details on HSBC Finance's loan renegotiation programmes, see page 131 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
At 30 June 2012, renegotiated real estate secured accounts represented 85% (30 June 2011: 86%; 31 December 2011: 86%) of North America's total renegotiated loans, and US$15.6bn (30 June 2011: US$17.4bn; 31 December 2011: US$16.0bn) of renegotiated real estate secured loans in HSBC Finance were classified as impaired.
Gross loan portfolio of HSBC Finance real estate secured accounts
|
Re-aged21 |
|
Modified and re-aged |
|
Modified |
|
Total re- negotiated loans |
Total non- renegotiated loans |
|
Total gross loans |
|
Total impair- ment allowances |
|
Impair- ment allowances/ gross loans |
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 June 2012 ............ |
9,906 |
|
12,171 |
|
1,293 |
|
23,370 |
|
17,860 |
|
41,230 |
|
4,884 |
|
12 |
30 June 2011 .............. |
10,507 |
|
13,460 |
|
1,757 |
|
25,724 |
|
21,548 |
|
47,272 |
|
4,504 |
|
10 |
31 December 2011 ..... |
10,265 |
|
12,829 |
|
1,494 |
|
24,588 |
|
19,540 |
|
44,128 |
|
5,088 |
|
12 |
For footnote, see page 180.
Number of renegotiated real estate secured accounts remaining in HSBC Finance's portfolio
|
Number of renegotiated loans |
||||||
|
Re-aged |
|
Modified and re-aged |
|
Modified |
|
Total |
|
(000s) |
|
(000s) |
|
(000s) |
|
(000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 June 2012 ................................................................... |
118 |
|
109 |
|
13 |
|
240 |
30 June 2011 ..................................................................... |
122 |
|
113 |
|
17 |
|
252 |
31 December 2011 ............................................................. |
121 |
|
112 |
|
14 |
|
246 |
During the half-year to 30 June 2012, the aggregate number of renegotiated loans reduced, despite renegotiation activity continuing, due to the run-off of the portfolio. Within the constraints of our Group credit policy, HSBC Finance's policies allow for multiple renegotiations under certain circumstances, and a number of accounts received a second (or further) renegotiation during the year which are not duplicated in the statistics presented above. These statistics present a loan as an addition to the volume of renegotiated loans on its first renegotiation only. At 30 June 2012, renegotiated loans were 57% (30 June 2011: 55%; 31 December 2011: 56%) of HSBC Finance's real estate secured accounts.
Corporate and commercial forbearance
|
For the current policies and procedures regarding forbearance in the corporate and commercial sector, see page 188 in the Annual Report and Accounts 2011. |
In the corporate and commercial sector, the increase of US$1,512m in renegotiated loans for the half-year ended 30 June 2012 compared with the end of 2011 was a result of increased forbearance activity in Europe, Middle East and North Africa and Latin America. In Europe the increases primarily related to CMB customers in the UK. In Middle East and North Africa, the increase was due largely to two significant individual loan renegotiations for UAE based borrowers, the larger of the two being cash secured. In Latin America the increase was largely related to Brazil due to a small number of larger corporate restructurings and increased restructuring activity in Business Banking.
In the commercial real estate sector the balance of renegotiated loans decreased by US$412m, compared with the end of 2011, mainly in the Middle East and North Africa. This predominately related to a decrease in balances for a single CMB customer in Bahrain.
Impaired loans
During 2011 we adopted a revised disclosure convention for the presentation of impaired loans and advances for geographical regions with significant levels of forbearance. The previous impaired loans disclosure convention was that impaired loans and advances were those classified as customer risk rating ('CRR') 9, CRR 10, EL 9 or EL 10 and all retail loans 90 days or more past due, unless individually they had been assessed as not impaired. Our current impaired loan disclosure convention is described below.
Impaired loans and advances are those that meet any of the following criteria:
· loans and advances classified as CRR 9, CRR 10, EL 9 or EL 10 (a description of our internal credit rating grades is provided on page 184);
·
retail exposures 90 days or more past due, unless individually they have been assessed as not impaired; or
· renegotiated loans and advances that have been subject to a change in contractual cash flows as a result of a concession which the lender would not otherwise consider, and where it is probable that without the concession the borrower would be unable to meet its contractual payment obligations in full, unless the concession is insignificant and there are no other indicators of impairment. Renegotiated loans remain classified as impaired until there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate a significant reduction in the risk of non-payment of future cash flows, and there are no other indicators of impairment.
For loans that are assessed for impairment on a collective basis, the evidence to support reclassification as no longer impaired typically comprises a history of payment performance against the original or revised terms, depending on the nature and volume of forbearance and the credit risk characteristics surrounding the renegotiation. For loans that are assessed for impairment on an individual basis, all available evidence is assessed on a case by case basis.
In HSBC Finance, where a significant majority of HSBC's loan forbearance activity occurs, the demonstrated history of payment performance is with reference to the original terms of the contract, reflecting the higher credit risk characteristics of this portfolio. The payment performance periods are monitored to ensure they remain appropriate to the levels of recidivism observed within the portfolio.
Further disclosure about loans subject to forbearance is provided on page 143. Renegotiated loans and forbearance disclosures are subject to evolving industry practice and regulatory guidance.
Impaired loan comparative data at 30 June 2011 have been restated to reflect the revised impaired loans disclosure convention. The following table shows the effect of the restatement on 30 June 2011 total reported impaired loans and advances to customers.
The impaired loan comparative data at 31 December 2011 were previously published in accordance with the revised disclosure convention. For further details see page 133 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
Impaired loans and advances to customers
|
At |
|
30 June |
|
2011 |
|
US$m |
|
|
Previous disclosure convention .......................................................................................................................... |
25,982 |
|
|
Reclassified from neither past due nor impaired ................................................................................................. |
11,341 |
Europe .......................................................................................................................................................... |
675 |
Middle East and North Africa ........................................................................................................................ |
71 |
North America .............................................................................................................................................. |
9,602 |
Latin America ............................................................................................................................................... |
993 |
|
|
Reclassified from past due but not impaired ....................................................................................................... |
6,886 |
Europe .......................................................................................................................................................... |
- |
Middle East and North Africa ........................................................................................................................ |
28 |
North America .............................................................................................................................................. |
6,708 |
Latin America ............................................................................................................................................... |
150 |
|
|
|
|
Revised disclosure convention ........................................................................................................................... |
44,209 |
Impairment of loans and advances
|
Impaired loans and advances at 30 June 2012 |
|
Impaired loans and advances |
|
Impaired loans and advances |
||||||||||||
|
Individ- ually assessed |
|
Collect- ively assessed |
|
Total |
|
Individ- ually assessed |
|
Collect- ively assessed |
|
Total |
|
Individ- ually assessed |
|
Collect- ively assessed |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks ............................ |
88 |
|
- |
|
88 |
|
197 |
|
- |
|
197 |
|
155 |
|
- |
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers ...................... |
16,973 |
|
23,771 |
|
40,744 |
|
15,794 |
|
28,415 |
|
44,209 |
|
16,554 |
|
25,030 |
|
41,584 |
- personal .................. |
2,280 |
|
23,211 |
|
25,491 |
|
2,198 |
|
27,144 |
|
29,342 |
|
2,473 |
|
24,070 |
|
26,543 |
- corporate and commercial ................ |
13,692 |
|
560 |
|
14,252 |
|
12,396 |
|
1,268 |
|
13,664 |
|
12,898 |
|
960 |
|
13,858 |
- financial .................. |
1,001 |
|
- |
|
1,001 |
|
1,200 |
|
3 |
|
1,203 |
|
1,183 |
|
- |
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,061 |
|
23,771 |
|
40,832 |
|
15,991 |
|
28,415 |
|
44,406 |
|
16,709 |
|
25,030 |
|
41,739 |
For footnote, see page 180.
The tables below analyse by geographical region the impairment allowances recognised for impaired
loans and advances that are either individually assessed or collectively assessed, and collective impairment allowances on loans and advances classified as not impaired.
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and advances to customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impaired loans22 .................................... |
9,680 |
|
475 |
|
1,035 |
|
2,309 |
|
1,946 |
|
1,528 |
|
16,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed23 ................ |
440,958 |
|
165,265 |
|
129,300 |
|
27,360 |
|
158,843 |
|
53,503 |
|
975,229 |
- impaired loans22 ................... |
1,201 |
|
80 |
|
113 |
|
205 |
|
20,240 |
|
1,932 |
|
23,771 |
- non-impaired loans24 ........... |
439,757 |
|
165,185 |
|
129,187 |
|
27,155 |
|
138,603 |
|
51,571 |
|
951,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGLAC ...................................... |
450,638 |
|
165,740 |
|
130,335 |
|
29,669 |
|
160,789 |
|
55,031 |
|
992,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances ......... |
5,193 |
|
536 |
|
846 |
|
1,773 |
|
6,798 |
|
2,071 |
|
17,217 |
- individually assessed ................. |
3,709 |
|
250 |
|
564 |
|
1,324 |
|
439 |
|
368 |
|
6,654 |
- collectively assessed ................. |
1,484 |
|
286 |
|
282 |
|
449 |
|
6,359 |
|
1,703 |
|
10,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and advances ................... |
445,445 |
|
165,204 |
|
129,489 |
|
27,896 |
|
153,991 |
|
52,960 |
|
974,985 |
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Allowances as a percentage of loans and advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed (in each case) .......................................... |
38.3 |
|
52.6 |
|
54.5 |
|
57.3 |
|
22.6 |
|
24.1 |
|
39.2 |
- collectively assessed (in each case) .......................................... |
0.3 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
1.6 |
|
4.0 |
|
3.2 |
|
1.1 |
- total (in each case) .................. |
1.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
6.0 |
|
4.2 |
|
3.8 |
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and advances to customers7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impaired loans22 ................................... |
9,584 |
|
489 |
|
1,081 |
|
1,949 |
|
1,826 |
|
865 |
|
15,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed23 ................ |
482,079 |
|
159,454 |
|
121,176 |
|
25,314 |
|
185,718 |
|
67,085 |
|
1,040,826 |
- impaired loans22 .................. |
1,294 |
|
21 |
|
127 |
|
344 |
|
23,831 |
|
2,798 |
|
28,415 |
- non-impaired loans24 ........... |
480,785 |
|
159,433 |
|
121,049 |
|
24,970 |
|
161,887 |
|
64,287 |
|
1,012,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGLAC ...................................... |
491,663 |
|
159,943 |
|
122,257 |
|
27,263 |
|
187,544 |
|
67,950 |
|
1,056,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances ......... |
5,332 |
|
573 |
|
828 |
|
1,569 |
|
8,282 |
|
2,148 |
|
18,732 |
- individually assessed ................ |
3,607 |
|
297 |
|
518 |
|
1,098 |
|
384 |
|
339 |
|
6,243 |
- collectively assessed ................ |
1,725 |
|
276 |
|
310 |
|
471 |
|
7,898 |
|
1,809 |
|
12,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and advances .................. |
486,331 |
|
159,370 |
|
121,429 |
|
25,694 |
|
179,262 |
|
65,802 |
|
1,037,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Allowances as a percentage of loans and advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed (in each case) .......................................... |
37.6 |
|
60.7 |
|
47.9 |
|
56.3 |
|
21.0 |
|
39.2 |
|
39.5 |
- collectively assessed (in each case) .......................................... |
0.4 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
1.9 |
|
4.3 |
|
2.7 |
|
1.2 |
- total (in each case) .................. |
1.1 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.7 |
|
5.8 |
|
4.4 |
|
3.2 |
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and advances to customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impaired loans22 ................................... |
10,490 |
|
519 |
|
963 |
|
2,187 |
|
1,832 |
|
563 |
|
16,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed23 ................ |
429,088 |
|
157,727 |
|
123,687 |
|
25,402 |
|
148,096 |
|
57,386 |
|
941,386 |
- impaired loans22 .................. |
1,261 |
|
85 |
|
106 |
|
238 |
|
20,864 |
|
2,476 |
|
25,030 |
- non-impaired loans24 ........... |
427,827 |
|
157,642 |
|
123,581 |
|
25,164 |
|
127,232 |
|
54,910 |
|
916,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGLAC ...................................... |
439,578 |
|
158,246 |
|
124,650 |
|
27,589 |
|
149,928 |
|
57,949 |
|
957,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment allowances ........ |
5,242 |
|
581 |
|
782 |
|
1,714 |
|
7,181 |
|
2,011 |
|
17,511 |
- individually assessed ................ |
3,754 |
|
288 |
|
505 |
|
1,250 |
|
416 |
|
324 |
|
6,537 |
- collectively assessed ................ |
1,488 |
|
293 |
|
277 |
|
464 |
|
6,765 |
|
1,687 |
|
10,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and advances .................. |
434,336 |
|
157,665 |
|
123,868 |
|
25,875 |
|
142,747 |
|
55,938 |
|
940,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Allowances as a percentage of loans and advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- individually assessed (in each case) .......................................... |
35.8 |
|
55.5 |
|
52.4 |
|
57.2 |
|
22.7 |
|
57.4 |
|
39.5 |
- collectively assessed (in each case) .......................................... |
0.3 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
1.8 |
|
4.6 |
|
2.9 |
|
1.2 |
- total (in each case) .................. |
1.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.6 |
|
6.2 |
|
4.8 |
|
3.5 |
|
1.8 |
For footnotes, see page 180.
|
Banks |
|
Customers |
|
|
||
|
individually assessed7 |
|
Individually assessed |
|
Collectively assessed |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2012 ............................................................. |
125 |
|
6,537 |
|
10,974 |
|
17,636 |
Amounts written off .......................................................... |
(70) |
|
(963) |
|
(4,110) |
|
(5,143) |
Recoveries of loans and advances previously written off .... |
- |
|
84 |
|
484 |
|
568 |
Charge to income statement .............................................. |
1 |
|
1,102 |
|
3,422 |
|
4,525 |
Exchange and other movements ........................................ |
- |
|
(106) |
|
(207) |
|
(313) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2012 ................................................................ |
56 |
|
6,654 |
|
10,563 |
|
17,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on loans and advances to customers ................................ |
|
|
6,654 |
|
10,563 |
|
17,217 |
- personal .................................................................. |
|
|
700 |
|
8,686 |
|
9,386 |
- corporate and commercial ....................................... |
|
|
5,341 |
|
1,809 |
|
7,150 |
- financial .................................................................. |
|
|
613 |
|
68 |
|
681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a percentage of loans and advances26,27 ....................... |
0.04% |
|
0.71% |
|
1.12% |
|
1.60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2011 ............................................................. |
158 |
|
6,457 |
|
13,626 |
|
20,241 |
Amounts written off .......................................................... |
- |
|
(986) |
|
(5,975) |
|
(6,961) |
Recoveries of loans and advances previously written off .... |
- |
|
107 |
|
623 |
|
730 |
Charge to income statement .............................................. |
1 |
|
637 |
|
4,335 |
|
4,973 |
Exchange and other movements ........................................ |
3 |
|
28 |
|
(120) |
|
(89) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 ................................................................ |
162 |
|
6,243 |
|
12,489 |
|
18,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on loans and advances to customers ................................ |
|
|
6,243 |
|
12,489 |
|
18,732 |
- personal .................................................................. |
|
|
679 |
|
10,550 |
|
11,229 |
- corporate and commercial ....................................... |
|
|
4,966 |
|
1,853 |
|
6,819 |
- financial .................................................................. |
|
|
598 |
|
86 |
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a percentage of loans and advances26,27 ....................... |
0.10% |
|
0.64% |
|
1.27% |
|
1.66% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2011 ................................................................... |
162 |
|
6,243 |
|
12,489 |
|
18,894 |
Amounts written off .......................................................... |
(16) |
|
(647) |
|
(4,856) |
|
(5,519) |
Recoveries of loans and advances previously written off .... |
- |
|
84 |
|
612 |
|
696 |
Charge to income statement .............................................. |
(17) |
|
1,294 |
|
5,255 |
|
6,532 |
Exchange and other movements25 ...................................... |
(4) |
|
(437) |
|
(2,526) |
|
(2,967) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 ........................................................ |
125 |
|
6,537 |
|
10,974 |
|
17,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment allowances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on loans and advances to customers ................................ |
|
|
6,537 |
|
10,974 |
|
17,511 |
- personal .................................................................. |
|
|
694 |
|
9,066 |
|
9,760 |
- corporate and commercial ....................................... |
|
|
5,231 |
|
1,820 |
|
7,051 |
- financial .................................................................. |
|
|
612 |
|
88 |
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a percentage of loans and advances26,27 ....................... |
0.09% |
|
0.71% |
|
1.20% |
|
1.67% |
|
Europe US$m |
|
Hong Kong US$m |
|
Rest of Pacific US$m |
|
MENA US$m |
|
North America US$m |
|
Latin America US$m |
|
Total US$m |
Half-year to 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances .................................. |
988 |
|
15 |
|
129 |
|
176 |
|
193 |
|
191 |
|
1,692 |
Release of allowances no longer required ............................................ |
(312) |
|
(16) |
|
(39) |
|
(54) |
|
(59) |
|
(25) |
|
(505) |
Recoveries of amounts previously |
(22) |
|
(3) |
|
(8) |
|
(17) |
|
(26) |
|
(8) |
|
(84) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654 |
|
(4) |
|
82 |
|
105 |
|
108 |
|
158 |
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ............................................ |
371 |
|
54 |
|
179 |
|
54 |
|
2,103 |
|
1,145 |
|
3,906 |
Recoveries of amounts previously |
(171) |
|
(13) |
|
(67) |
|
(24) |
|
(55) |
|
(154) |
|
(484) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
41 |
|
112 |
|
30 |
|
2,048 |
|
991 |
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses ....... |
854 |
|
37 |
|
194 |
|
135 |
|
2,156 |
|
1,149 |
|
4,525 |
Banks ................................................ |
1 |
|
− |
|
− |
|
− |
|
− |
|
− |
|
1 |
Customers .......................................... |
853 |
|
37 |
|
194 |
|
135 |
|
2,156 |
|
1,149 |
|
4,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans ...................................... |
10,935 |
|
555 |
|
1,148 |
|
2,534 |
|
22,200 |
|
3,460 |
|
40,832 |
Impairment allowances ......................... |
5,232 |
|
536 |
|
846 |
|
1,790 |
|
6,798 |
|
2,071 |
|
17,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half-year to 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances .................................. |
744 |
|
20 |
|
78 |
|
96 |
|
182 |
|
89 |
|
1,209 |
Release of allowances no longer required ............................................ |
(269) |
|
(23) |
|
(61) |
|
(37) |
|
(41) |
|
(35) |
|
(466) |
Recoveries of amounts previously |
(21) |
|
(13) |
|
(11) |
|
(11) |
|
(15) |
|
(34) |
|
(105) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
454 |
|
(16) |
|
6 |
|
48 |
|
126 |
|
20 |
|
638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ............................................ |
684 |
|
52 |
|
188 |
|
81 |
|
3,004 |
|
951 |
|
4,960 |
Recoveries of amounts previously |
(288) |
|
(13) |
|
(90) |
|
(30) |
|
(55) |
|
(149) |
|
(625) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396 |
|
39 |
|
98 |
|
51 |
|
2,949 |
|
802 |
|
4,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses ....... |
850 |
|
23 |
|
104 |
|
99 |
|
3,075 |
|
822 |
|
4,973 |
Banks ................................................ |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
Customers .......................................... |
850 |
|
23 |
|
104 |
|
99 |
|
3,075 |
|
821 |
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans7 ..................................... |
10,985 |
|
514 |
|
1,210 |
|
2,313 |
|
25,719 |
|
3,665 |
|
44,406 |
Impairment allowances ......................... |
5,412 |
|
573 |
|
828 |
|
1,586 |
|
8,346 |
|
2,149 |
|
18,894 |
|
Europe US$m |
|
Hong Kong US$m |
|
Rest of Pacific US$m |
|
MENA US$m |
|
North America US$m |
|
Latin America US$m |
|
Total US$m |
Half-year to 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually assessed impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances .................................. |
926 |
|
59 |
|
129 |
|
232 |
|
216 |
|
133 |
|
1,695 |
Release of allowances no longer required ............................................ |
(109) |
|
(18) |
|
(53) |
|
(43) |
|
(70) |
|
(39) |
|
(332) |
Recoveries of amounts previously |
(9) |
|
(7) |
|
(15) |
|
(38) |
|
(29) |
|
12 |
|
(86) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
808 |
|
34 |
|
61 |
|
151 |
|
117 |
|
106 |
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively assessed impairment allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ............................................ |
497 |
|
74 |
|
178 |
|
66 |
|
3,890 |
|
1,160 |
|
5,865 |
Recoveries of amounts previously |
(253) |
|
(14) |
|
(69) |
|
(24) |
|
(32) |
|
(218) |
|
(610) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
60 |
|
109 |
|
42 |
|
3,858 |
|
942 |
|
5,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses ....... |
1,052 |
|
94 |
|
170 |
|
193 |
|
3,975 |
|
1,048 |
|
6,532 |
Banks ............................................... |
(11) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(5) |
|
(1) |
|
(17) |
Customers ........................................ |
1,063 |
|
94 |
|
170 |
|
193 |
|
3,980 |
|
1,049 |
|
6,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans ...................................... |
11,819 |
|
608 |
|
1,070 |
|
2,445 |
|
22,758 |
|
3,039 |
|
41,739 |
Impairment allowances ......................... |
5,292 |
|
581 |
|
782 |
|
1,731 |
|
7,239 |
|
2,011 |
|
17,636 |
For footnote, see page 180.
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage of average gross loans and advances to customers by geographical region
|
Europe |
|
Hong |
|
Rest of Pacific |
|
MENA |
|
North America |
|
Latin America |
|
Total |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
Half-year to 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ................................. |
0.55 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.42 |
|
1.26 |
|
2.89 |
|
4.59 |
|
1.12 |
Recoveries ................................. |
(0.10) |
|
(0.02) |
|
(0.12) |
|
(0.29) |
|
(0.10) |
|
(0.57) |
|
(0.13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................................... |
0.45 |
|
0.05 |
|
0.30 |
|
0.97 |
|
2.79 |
|
4.02 |
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount written off net of recoveries ............................. |
0.47 |
|
0.10 |
|
0.18 |
|
0.53 |
|
3.20 |
|
3.01 |
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half-year to 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ................................. |
0.57 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.36 |
|
1.04 |
|
3.27 |
|
3.20 |
|
1.20 |
Recoveries ................................. |
(0.15) |
|
(0.03) |
|
(0.18) |
|
(0.31) |
|
(0.07) |
|
(0.58) |
|
(0.15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................................... |
0.42 |
|
0.04 |
|
0.18 |
|
0.73 |
|
3.20 |
|
2.62 |
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount written off net of recoveries ............................. |
0.68 |
|
0.10 |
|
0.38 |
|
0.45 |
|
3.89 |
|
2.39 |
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half-year to 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New allowances net of allowance releases ................................. |
0.62 |
|
0.15 |
|
0.41 |
|
1.87 |
|
4.94 |
|
3.93 |
|
1.51 |
Recoveries ................................. |
(0.12) |
|
(0.03) |
|
(0.14) |
|
(0.46) |
|
(0.07) |
|
(0.65) |
|
(0.14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge for impairment losses .................................... |
0.50 |
|
0.12 |
|
0.27 |
|
1.41 |
|
4.87 |
|
3.28 |
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount written off net of recoveries ............................. |
0.38 |
|
0.11 |
|
0.24 |
|
0.18 |
|
3.61 |
|
2.42 |
|
1.00 |
Reconciliation of reported and constant currency changes in impaired loans by geographical region
|
31 Dec 11 |
|
Constant currency effect |
|
31 Dec 11 at 30 Jun 12 exchange rates |
|
Movement |
|
30 Jun 12 as reported |
|
Reported change |
|
Change |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe ....................................... |
11,819 |
|
59 |
|
11,878 |
|
(943) |
|
10,935 |
|
(7) |
|
(8) |
Hong Kong ................................. |
608 |
|
1 |
|
609 |
|
(54) |
|
555 |
|
(9) |
|
(9) |
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................... |
1,070 |
|
- |
|
1,070 |
|
78 |
|
1,148 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
Middle East and North Africa ..... |
2,445 |
|
(2) |
|
2,443 |
|
91 |
|
2,534 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
North America ........................... |
22,758 |
|
- |
|
22,758 |
|
(558) |
|
22,200 |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
Latin America ............................ |
3,039 |
|
(109) |
|
2,930 |
|
530 |
|
3,460 |
|
14 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total .......................................... |
41,739 |
|
(51) |
|
41,688 |
|
(856) |
|
40,832 |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
Impaired loans and net loan impairment allowances
On a reported basis, loan impairment charges to the income statement of US$4.5bn in the first half of 2012 declined by 9% compared with the first half of 2011 and by 31% compared with the second half of 2011. Impaired loans were US$40.8bn, 2% lower than at 31 December 2011.
The following commentary is on a constant currency basis.
New loan impairment allowances were US$5.6bn, a decline of 6% compared with the first half of 2011, reflecting lower lending balances in our US run-off portfolios. Releases and recoveries of US$1.1bn were 6% lower, mainly in Europe.
Impaired loans were 3% of total gross loans and advances at 30 June 2012, in line with 31 December 2011.
In Europe, new loan impairment allowances were US$1.4bn, 1% lower than in the first half of 2011, primarily in the UK as we continued to focus our lending on higher quality assets. New collectively assessed loan impairment allowances declined, mainly in the UK due to lower delinquency rates in both the secured and unsecured lending portfolios in RBWM and the shortening of the write-off period for balances greater than 180 days in Marks and Spencer Retail Financial Services Holdings Limited ('M&S Money') which resulted in an increase in allowances in 2011. New individually assessed loan impairment allowances increased, mainly in the UK, reflecting the challenging economic conditions. Impaired loans of US$10.9bn were 8% lower than at 31 December 2011 due to lower delinquency rates.
Releases and recoveries in Europe were US$507m, a decrease of 9% compared with the first half of 2011, mainly in the UK due to the shortening of the write-off period for balances greater than 180 days overdue in M&S Money which resulted in an increase in releases and recoveries last year.
In Hong Kong, new loan impairment allowances fell by 5% compared with the first half of 2011, reflecting lower loan impairment charges against specific exposures and a reduction in general provisions as a result of lower delinquency rates. Impaired loans declined by 9% from 31 December 2011, reflecting improved delinquency in the mortgage portfolio.
Releases and recoveries in Hong Kong were US$32m, 35% lower than in the first half of 2011 due to the non-recurrence of significant releases and recoveries from two GB&M customers.
New loan impairment allowances in Rest of Asia-Pacific increased by 20% to US$308m as a result of a specific impairment on a corporate exposure in Australia and a number of individual loan impairment charges in India and New Zealand. Impaired loans in the region increased by 7% from the end of 2011 to US$1.1bn at 30 June 2012, mainly in Malaysia.
Releases and recoveries in the region decreased by 26%, mainly due to lower releases for cards as we run-off the portfolio in India, and the non-recurrence of recoveries in Thailand following the sale of the RBWM business.
In the Middle East and North Africa, new loan impairment allowances increased by 30% to US$230m in the first half of 2012 due to an increase in individually assessed impairment charges in GB&M. New collectively assessed loan impairment allowances declined, primarily in RBWM due to lower delinquencies driven by stricter acquisition criteria which resulted in an improvement in credit quality. Impaired loans of US$2.5bn increased marginally at 30 June 2012 from US$2.4bn at 31 December 2011.
Releases and recoveries in the region increased by 23% to US$95m, compared with the first half of 2011.
In North America, new loan impairment allowances declined markedly, reducing by 28% to US$2.3bn. In our CML portfolio, the fall in new collectively assessed loan impairment allowances reflected a reduction in lending balances as the portfolio continued to run off, and an improvement in two-months-and-over contractual delinquency on balances less than 180 days past due. Loan impairment charges were adversely affected by delays in expected cash flows from mortgage loans due, in part, to the delays in foreclosure processing, though the effects were less pronounced than in the first half of 2011. Additionally, in the first half of 2012, we increased our loan impairment allowances having updated our assumptions regarding the timing of expected cash flows received from customers with loan modifications. Impaired loans decreased by 2% from the end of 2011 to US$22.2bn, driven by the continued run‑off of the CML portfolio.
Releases and recoveries in North America increased by US$29m, due to higher customer repayments within the corporate and commercial sector, as well as a significant recovery in the first half of 2012.
In Latin America, new loan impairment allowances increased by 46% to US$1.3bn, driven by higher new collectively assessed loan impairment allowances in Brazil, primarily reflecting strong balance sheet growth in previous periods as a result of increased marketing, a focus on acquiring customers and strong customer demand in buoyant economic conditions which subsequently weakened, notably in the personal and corporate portfolios. We implemented a number of actions to address the increase in delinquencies including improving our collections capabilities reducing third-party originations and lowering credit limits where appropriate. New individually assessed loan impairment charges also rose, mainly in Brazil following a rise in individually assessed loan impairment charges and significantly increased loan impairment charges in Business Banking. Impaired loans increased by 18% compared with 31 December 2011, driven by worsening delinquency in Brazil.
Releases and recoveries in Latin America decreased by 3% from the first half of 2011 to US$187m, primarily in Brazil due to weaker economic conditions.
Securitisation exposures and other structured products
This section contains information about our exposure to the following:
· asset-backed securities ('ABS's), including mortgage-backed securities ('MBS's) and related collateralised debt obligations ('CDO's);
· direct lending at fair value through profit or loss;
· monoline insurance companies ('monolines');
· credit derivative product companies;
· leveraged finance transactions; and
· representations and warranties related to mortgage sales and securitisation activities.
Within the above is included information on the GB&M legacy credit activities in respect of Solitaire Funding Limited ('Solitaire'), the securities investment conduits ('SIC's), the ABSs trading portfolios and derivative transactions with monolines. Further information in respect of Solitaire and the SICs is provided in Note 22 to the Financial Statements.
Business model
Balance Sheet Management holds ABSs primarily issued by government agency and sponsored enterprises as part of our investment portfolios.
Our investment portfolios include SICs and money market funds. We also originate leveraged finance loans for the purpose of syndicating or selling them down to generate trading profit or holding them to earn interest margin over their lives.
Exposure in the first half of 2012
The first half of 2012 saw continued uncertainty and concerns over sovereign credit risk and continued challenges for the US housing market. Despite this, there was modest price appreciation across a range of ABSs asset classes. Unrealised losses in our available-for-sale portfolios reduced in the first half of 2012 from US$5.1bn to US$3.9bn, mainly as a result of this price appreciation.
Within the following tables are assets held in the GB&M legacy credit portfolio with a carrying value of US$33.3bn (30 June 2011: US$44.5bn; 31 December 2011: US$35.4bn).
|
A summary of the nature of HSBC's exposures is provided in the Appendix to Risk on page 183. |