Re. IFRS

Land Securities Group Plc 23 June 2005 23 June 2005 LAND SECURITIES GROUP PLC ('Land Securities') Land Securities Group PLC ('Land Securities' / 'the Group') Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 2004/05 Income statement and balance sheet Introduction Land Securities has today released information showing the effect of adopting IFRS on its income statement and balance sheet for the year ended 31 March 2005 in preparation for the adoption of IFRS. Overview • The introduction of IFRS affects accounting only. There is no impact on the underlying business or cash flows. • The main IFRS adjustments impacting the Group's financial statements are: • to recognise revaluation surpluses and deficits in the income statement (IAS 40) • to provide in full for deferred tax on revaluations and to charge movements on this provision through the income statement (IAS 12) • to restate the financial effects of the November 2004 debt refinancing (IAS 39) • to show the Group's share of the profit after tax and net assets of all its joint ventures and joint arrangements (JANEs) as single lines in the income statement and balance sheet respectively (IAS 31) • to recognise the final dividend only after its approval at the Group's Annual General Meeting. • Financial effect 2004/05 UK GAAP £m (as reported) IFRS ------------ ------------ Gross property income 1,865.7 1,617.0 (Loss)/profit before tax (155.8) 1,331.4 (Loss)/profit after tax (35.8) 1,121.2 Net asset value 6,636.6 6,082.3 ------------ ------------ Notes 'UK GAAP' means generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom. References to 'IFRS' throughout this document refer to the application of International Financial Reporting Standards, including International Accounting Standards ('IAS') and interpretations of those standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ('IASB') and its Committees. For further information, please contact: Land Securities Andrew Macfarlane/David Holt/Emma Denne Tel: 020 7413 9000 Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Pro-forma 2004/05 Income Statement and Balance Sheet CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Transition to International Financial Reporting Standards 2.1 Main changes in accounting under IFRS 2.1.1 IAS 40 - Investment property 2.1.2 IAS 12 - Income taxes 2.1.3 IAS 39 - Financial instruments: recognition and measurement (a) Impact on debt refinancing (b) Interest rate hedges 2.1.4 IAS 31 - Interests in joint ventures 2.1.5 IAS 10 - Events after the balance sheet date 2.2 Other areas of changes 2.2.1 IAS 17 - Leases 2.2.2 SIC-15 Operating leases - incentives 2.2.3 IFRS 3 - Business combinations 2.2.4 IAS 19 - Employee benefits 2.2.5 IFRS 2 - Share-based payment 2.3 Presentation of the financial statements under IFRS 2.4 Other first time adoption considerations 3.0 Financial Statements 4.0 IFRS accounting policies 4.1 Basis of preparation 4.2 Basis of consolidation 4.3 Details of accounting policies (a) Goodwill (b) Derivative financial instruments ('derivatives') (c) Investment properties (d) Property, plant and equipment (e) Leases (f) Trading properties (g) Long-term construction contracts (h) Trade and other receivables (i) Cash and cash equivalents (j) Impairment (k) Share capital (l) Borrowings (m) Pensions (n) Provisions (o) Trade and other payables (p) Revenue (q) Expenses (r) Income tax 1.0 Introduction The purpose of this document is to • Set out the principal accounting policy differences between UK GAAP and IFRS as they affect Land Securities; • Indicate the effect of the adoption of IFRS on the income statement and balance sheet for the year ended on 31 March 2005; • State the Group's principal accounting policies under IFRS. Although the IASB adopted a 'stable platform' in 2004, IFRS has continued, and will continue, to evolve through the development and adoption of new Standards and Interpretations as well as through the practical experience gained from the application of IFRS by reporting entities and their auditors. As a result, the financial information contained in this release may be amended before it is presented as comparative figures in the IFRS accounts to be issued by the Group for the six months ending 30 September 2005 as well as for the year ending 31 March 2006. Furthermore, the financial information contained in this release does not constitute a complete set of financial statements (including comparative figures and all relevant and required notes) and therefore does not purport to show a true and fair view of the Group's financial position and results of operations in accordance with IFRS for the year to 31 March 2005. 2.0 Transition to International Financial Reporting Standards Under European legislation, companies listed on Exchanges within the European Union are required to adopt IFRS for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. As a result, IFRS applies to Land Securities from 1 April 2005 and the Group will present its consolidated interim and full year financial results for the year ending 31 March 2006 in accordance with IFRS, together with IFRS comparatives and reconciliations of certain key figures to UK GAAP. The transition date for the adoption of IFRS by Land Securities is 1 April 2004, which has been determined in accordance with IFRS 1, 'First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards'. For the past 18 months, Land Securities has been working towards the implementation of IFRS. This project has involved: • the analysis of each Standard to identify the differences between the Group's existing accounting policies under UK GAAP and those which it will adopt under IFRS • the collection of additional data required to restate the Group's results in accordance with IFRS with effect from the transition date • the on-going modification of the Group's reporting and consolidation systems to meet IFRS requirements. The results of the IFRS project have been reported on regularly to the Group's Audit Committee. The Group's current assessment of the impact of the transition to IFRS is based on all International Financial Reporting Standards, including International Accounting Standards and interpretations issued by the IASB and its Committees, published by 31 March 2005. These are subject to on-going review and amendment by the IASB and subsequent endorsement by the European Commission, and may therefore change. Further standards and interpretations may also be issued that will become applicable for the Group's financial year ending 31 March 2006. The IFRS in force at the time when the Group prepares its first IFRS financial statements may, therefore, require different accounting policies from those applied in preparing the financial information set out in this Announcement. In particular, the Group has assumed that the European Commission will endorse the recent amendment to IAS 19 (Employee Benefits - actuarial gains and losses, group plans and disclosures) which allows actuarial gains or losses to be taken directly to reserves as permitted under UK GAAP by FRS 17, 'Retirement benefits '. 2.1 Main changes in accounting under IFRS The differences between UK GAAP and IFRS that have the most significant effect on the Group's reported results and their presentation are summarised below. 2.1.1 IAS 40 - Investment property IAS 40 requires that revaluation gains and losses on investment properties should be recognised in the income statement rather than taken to reserves as is the case under UK GAAP. As a result, the revaluation reserve is no longer reported as a separate component of equity in the balance sheet and accumulated revaluation surpluses as at the transition date have been reallocated to retained earnings. This treatment does not, however, have any impact on the distributable profits of Land Securities Group PLC (the company) nor of its individual subsidiaries, as these will continue to be determined by the application of UK GAAP and the Companies Act 1985. 2.1.2 IAS 12 - Income taxes IAS 12 requires that full provision is made for the deferred tax liability associated with the revaluation of investment properties. UK GAAP explicitly prohibited the recognition of such a deferred tax liability. This means that the movement in deferred tax associated with the revaluation in the year will now be charged (or credited) to the income statement as a component of the tax charge. Under IAS 12, there is also a requirement that the provision established for deferred tax should have regard to the manner in which the revaluation surplus will be realised. There is as yet no consensus on how this requirement should be applied in practice in the real estate sector. Land Securities' approach, which is acceptable to its auditors in the absence of a consensus view, is outlined below. Due to the lack of consensus, as well as differences in individual circumstances, other companies in the sector may well take different approaches. The Group also understands that the IASB may, at some time in the future, re-visit these provisions of IAS 12. This area will remain under review and the Group may change its accounting treatment if a consensus emerges which it believes is consistent with the Standard. There appear to be three approaches available: • to provide on the basis of the latent tax on capital gains that would be payable had the whole investment portfolio been sold for its carrying value at 31 March 2005, or • to provide on the basis of the notional corporation tax that would be payable on the revaluation surplus on the assumption that it represents future net rents, or • to apply a mixture of the two methods. On a strict interpretation of the Standard, and applying it to the business circumstances of the Group, it is our opinion that it would only be permissible to apply the latent tax approach if it was expected that the whole portfolio would be turned over in the short to medium term. This is not the Group's strategy. Further, the mixed approach has been rejected as being impractical and too subjective as it would require forecasts to be made of the eventual date of sale of every asset in the Group's portfolio. We are of the opinion that value will more typically be realised from future rents, as opposed to sales. We have therefore concluded that, by default, and in the absence of definitive guidance, that the approach that more closely complies with the Standard, in the Group's case, is to provide on the basis of the notional corporation tax that would be payable on the revaluation surplus. That is, to provide deferred tax at 30% on the full amount of the surplus. The latent tax on capital gains, assuming the sale of individual assets with no mitigation, would have been £626.0m, whereas the notional corporation tax payable on the revaluation surplus amounts to £1,107.7m. As an exception to this general principle, where investment properties are classified as 'held for sale' under IFRS 5, 'Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations', deferred tax is provided on a capital gains basis. The carrying value of such assets at 31 March 2005 was £274.2m. 2.1.3 IAS 39 - Financial Instruments: recognition and measurement IAS 39 has two principal effects on the Group. The first of these, the impact on the manner in which the debt refinancing (which was effective as from November 2004) is reported, is the more significant. The Group has chosen not to take the exemption permitted under IFRS 1 from applying IAS 32 and 39 in the year ended 31 March 2005. (a) Impact on debt refinancing In November 2004, the Group replaced existing bonds and debentures with a nominal amount outstanding of £1.8bn and an average coupon rate of 8.5% with new structured debt with a nominal amount outstanding of £2.3bn and an average interest rate of 5.35%. Although the former debt has legally been fully discharged by the issue of new debt, the terms of the new debt are not deemed to be 'substantially different' for accounting purposes from those of the old debt and so, under IAS 39, the old debt cannot be de-recognised in the financial statements. As a result, under IFRS the Group is required to treat the transaction as a rollover of the old debt in its balance sheet (although it has been repaid) and amortise its book value up to the new, higher, maturity amount of the new debt over the life of each series of bonds. The amortisation will be effected by charging additional, notional, interest through the income statement. This means that the Group's IFRS balance sheet at 31 March 2005 (and subsequent period ends) will not reflect the actual financial liabilities of the Group and the interest charge reported in the income statement will significantly exceed the actual cash interest paid by the Group. The amortisation amount charged to the income statement will increase year on year as it will be calculated so as to give a constant effective interest rate on the carrying value of the bonds as the difference between the book and redemption amounts of the debt amortises. The restatement of the Group's accounts under IFRS will not change the tax treatment of the debt exchange. This continues to be driven by UK GAAP. Therefore, while the debt exchange has extinguished the Group's current tax liability for the year to 31 March 2005 and generated Corporation Tax losses to be carried forward, an equivalent exceptional loss is not being recognised in the IFRS financial statements. Differences are dealt with through deferred tax and a liability of £169.3m has been set up on the difference between the balance sheet value of the debt and its value for tax purposes. (b) Interest rate hedges The second difference in treatment under IAS 39 concerns the Group's interest rate hedges. The general interest rate hedge portfolio does not meet the criteria set out in the standard for hedge accounting. Although the Group is satisfied that, economically, all of the Group's interest rate hedges do indeed offset interest rate exposures, the practical difficulty in forecasting accurately the amount and timing of cash receipts and payments associated with investment portfolio transactions means that the IAS 39 tests on hedge effectiveness may not be met. In addition, in many cases, the length of the hedge could exceed the remaining term of the Group's committed bank facilities. Although it is very likely that committed bank facilities will always form a core part of the Group's funding strategy, the intention to renew maturing bank facilities in the future is not sufficient to permit application of the hedge accounting rules to all of the interest rate derivative portfolio. The Group has decided, therefore, in the interests of consistency, to mark all its general interest rate derivatives to market and report changes in the value of the portfolio as a component of net interest in the income statement. Under UK GAAP, the Group's interest rate hedges were treated as effective and the annual net payment or receipt under the hedges was taken in the profit and loss account as incurred. An exception to this general rule will be in respect of interest rate swaps linked to specific floating rate project finance or bank facilities. In particular, the swaps relating to the DWP project finance loan (£210m nominal at 31 March 2005) will meet the hedge recognition criteria from 1 April 2005. 2.1.4 IAS 31 - Interests in joint ventures Under UK GAAP, the Group was required to maintain a distinction between 'joint ventures' and 'joint arrangements that are not entities' ('JANEs') and follow different accounting treatments for these investments. UK GAAP required the Group to recognise its share of the profit and loss account of joint ventures, with disclosure of the amounts so accounted for on the face of the profit and loss account. The Group's aggregate share of the gross assets and gross liabilities of the joint ventures were shown separately on the balance sheet. In the case of JANEs, the Group was required to consolidate its proportion of the income, expenditure, assets and liabilities of each JANE, line by line, in its profit and loss account and balance sheet, without separate disclosure. Under IFRS, there is no equivalent distinction between joint ventures and JANEs and all such jointly controlled investments are treated in the same way. IAS 31 permits companies to make a one-time choice as to whether joint ventures will be accounted under the equity method or proportionally consolidated. Under the equity method, the Group's share of its joint ventures' profit after tax is shown as a single line in the income statement and its share of the net assets as a single line in the balance sheet. Many of the Group's partnerships are financed with stand-alone, secured, non-recourse debt and, as a result, the Group has no direct access to the assets or cash flows of the joint ventures. For this reason, the Group has elected to account for all joint ventures under the equity method, although additional disclosures will be made of the underlying income, expenditure, assets and liabilities for the joint ventures, together with supplemental notes. On adoption of IFRS, therefore, the disclosure of the Group's interests in joint ventures (including those previously treated as JANEs) in the income statement and balance sheet has been modified in line with the requirements of IAS 31. Under IAS 31, an investing entity must cease consolidating its share of a joint venture's results if the venture's net assets fall below zero, even if the joint venture remains solvent and profitable. This is the case with Telereal, which will now be carried at nil value in the Group balance sheet with distributions received, rather than the Group's share of profits earned, passed through the income statement. Consolidation would resume if Telereal were to have positive net assets at some point in the future. 2.1.5 IAS 10 - Events after the balance sheet date IAS 10 states that only liabilities actually existing at the balance sheet date are to be provided for. Final dividends payable do not meet this definition as they are subject to approval at the Annual General Meeting. As a result the 2005 proposed final dividend of £153.7m is excluded from the IFRS balance sheet and written back to retained earnings. 2.2 Other areas of change 2.2.1 IAS 17 - Leases Under UK GAAP, leases to occupational tenants were almost invariably treated as operating leases, because the risk and reward in the underlying freehold were usually assessed as remaining with the landlord. However, while IAS 17 is based on a similar principle, it lists a number of situations that individually or in combination would require a lease to be classified as a finance lease and, in particular, it requires an entity to consider land and buildings separately, even if the occupational lease is of the property as a whole and does not make such a distinction. This means that it is more likely that a lease term could be viewed as being for the major part of the economic life of an asset, resulting in finance lease classification of the building element. The Group has carefully reviewed each of its leases and has concluded that, at 31 March 2005, only 21 leases (out of some 3,500 leases) with current passing rent of £14.2m should be classified as finance leases under IAS 17. The determination of whether a lease is an operating or finance lease is made at the inception of the lease, and is not re-assessed over the life of the lease unless the lease terms are significantly varied. IAS 17 also indicates that, because land will typically have an indefinite economic life, a lease of land (as opposed to buildings) would typically be an operating lease. On adoption of IAS 17, therefore, the Group is required to make an allocation of the carrying value of properties between land and buildings and, where the deemed lease of the building falls to be treated as a finance lease, the Group has established a finance lease debtor in relation to the lease of the building, while continuing to carry the land as an investment property asset. The consequences of this are: • To establish the capital value of the finance leases as a long-term receivable (£151.1m at 31 March 2005) and derecognise the value of the buildings element (£138.9m). The initial passing rent will be allocated each year between notional interest on the finance lease receivable and an amount treated as a repayment of the deemed long-term loan to the tenant. (For 2005, rental income has been reduced by £10.8m and interest income increased by £8.6m); • To treat increases in rent as a result of rent reviews since the start of the leases as rent in the income statement as under UK GAAP; • To treat the land element as an investment property in the normal way and to revalue it through the income statement as required by IAS 40. Since the carrying value of the finance lease is not reassessed at each reporting date, the open market value of the building may differ significantly from the value of the finance lease receivable at that date. Where an investment property is itself held subject to a head or groundlease, that headlease must be treated as if it was a finance lease and accounted for accordingly. In addition, certain of the Group's operating properties are held under finance leases. In total, some 50 properties are affected, leading to the recognition of a finance lease liability of £116.1m at 31 March 2005 and an increase in the carrying value of the Group's properties by £106.2m, the difference being attributable to additional amortisation charged on the capitalised leases. 2.2.2 SIC-15 - Operating leases - incentives Under SIC-15, the cost of incentives given by landlords to tenants under operating leases must be spread over the term of the lease rather than, as under UK GAAP, to the first review to market rents. Further, there are no transitional provisions so that incentives granted before the UK standard came into effect have now been brought back into account. For the investment property business, the changes amount to a minor reclassification between rent and revaluation surpluses in the income statement and, in the balance sheet, between investment properties and receivables. There is a small net impact on the property outsourcing business, where properties are carried at depreciated cost, reflecting the spreading of lease incentives received. The minor changes in the income statement will also affect adjusted earnings per share. 2.2.3 IFRS 3 - Business combinations Under IFRS 3, goodwill on acquisition is not amortised, but is subject to review for impairment at each reporting date. The goodwill arising on the acquisition of Trillium has therefore been frozen at its 31 March 2004 value of £34.3m and the amortisation in the year of £2.4m written back. Under IFRS, the acquisition of net assets in the exchange of properties with Slough Estates plc has been treated as, in substance, an acquisition of assets rather than of a business. Adjustments have therefore been made to remove the negative goodwill and deferred tax created under UK GAAP. 2.2.4 IAS 19 - Employee benefits This standard requires the Group to adopt a method of accounting for defined benefit pension schemes that is very similar to that required under the UK standard, FRS 17. The Group has been making the required disclosures under FRS 17 for the last three years. The net effect for the year ended 31 March 2005 is to increase profit before tax by £2.7m. In addition, the prepayment recognised under UK GAAP in respect of additional contributions (£14.5m at 31 March 2005) is not recognised under IAS 19, while the net actuarial deficit of £10.9m is recognised in full. Service costs, the expected return on pension scheme assets and interest on pension scheme liabilities will be charged in arriving at profit before tax, while experience gains and losses will flow through the Statement of Recognised Income and Expense, broadly equivalent to UK GAAP's Statement of Recognised Gains and Losses. 2.2.5 IFRS 2 - Share-based payment The main effect of this standard is to require the Group to recognise the cost of granting share options and other share-based remuneration to employees and directors through the income statement. The Group has used the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the resulting value will be amortised through the income statement over the vesting period of the options. This results in an additional charge to the income statement in the year of £0.9m, which is net of provisions previously made by the Group in respect of the cost of certain of the share-based compensation arrangements. 2.3 Presentation of the financial statements under IFRS With effect from 1 April 2005, the Group will prepare its financial statements in accordance with IAS 1, 'Presentation of financial statements'. Where IAS 1 does not provide definitive guidance on presentation, for example in relation to aspects of the Income Statement, the Group proposes to adopt a format consistent, where possible, with UK GAAP requirements. The presentation of the balance sheet under IFRS differs from the requirements under UK GAAP in a number of respects. These include requirements to analyse all assets and liabilities, including provisions, between current and non-current items, and present deferred tax assets separately from deferred tax liabilities, rather than as a single net amount. The summary balance sheet, which does not contain all the line items required under IFRS, reflects these changed requirements to the extent necessary. 2.4 Other first time adoption considerations The Group has elected to adopt IFRS 5, 'Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations' with effect from 1 April 2004 and is also adopting IAS 39 from the same date. The Group will, however, take advantage of the optional exemption under IFRS 1 in relation to employee benefits in that the approach to accounting for actuarial gains and losses on the Group's pension schemes under IFRS will be consistent with UK GAAP (FRS 17). The corridor approach will not be applied and gains and losses will be recognised in full through the Statement of Recognised Income and Expenses. 3.0 Financial Statements Land Securities Group PLC - Reconciliation of Profit Previously IAS 40 IAS 39 IAS 31 IAS 17 SIC-15 IFRS 3 IAS 19 IFRS 2 reported Interests Operating Share- Restated under UK Investment Financial in joint leases - Business Employee based under For the year ended GAAP property instruments ventures Leases incentives combinations benefits payment Other IFRS 31 March 2005 £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Gross property income 1,865.7 (249.1) (10.8) 11.2 1,617.0 Interest income from finance leases - 8.6 8.6 _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Revenue 1,865.7 - - (249.1) (2.2) 11.2 - - - - 1,625.6 Costs (1,217.3) 92.5 2.6 (4.5) 2.4 3.0 (1.3) (1,122.6) _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Operating profit before net profit on investment 648.4 - - (156.6) 0.4 6.7 2.4 3.0 (1.3) - 503.0 properties _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Profit on disposal of investment properties 125.2 (10.5) 0.5 (3.2) 112.0 Net gain on valuation of investment - 800.3 - 29.9 (7.7) 12.7 835.2 properties _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Net profit on 125.2 800.3 - (10.5) 30.4 (10.9) 12.7 - - - 947.2 investment properties _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Net operating profit 773.6 800.3 - (167.1) 30.8 (4.2) 15.1 3.0 (1.3) - 1,450.2 Net financing costs (247.3) (11.2) 70.7 (6.9) (0.3) (0.1) (195.1) Net financing costs - (682.1) 616.7 (65.4) exceptional Share of the profits of associates and joint ventures - - 141.7 141.7 _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ (Loss) profit before (155.8) 800.3 605.5 45.3 23.9 (4.2) 15.1 2.7 (1.3) (0.1) 1,331.4 income tax Income tax credit/ 120.0 (162.3) (181.7) 26.5 (7.2) 1.3 (6.4) (0.8) 0.4 (210.2) (expense) _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ (Loss) profit for the (35.8) 638.0 423.8 71.8 16.7 (2.9) 8.7 1.9 (0.9) (0.1) 1,121.2 financial year ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Notes IFRS 3 - Cessation of goodwill amortisation IAS 31 - Equity accounting for all joint ventures IAS 17 - Finance lease accounting for certain tenant lease and all investment property headleases SIC-15 - Lease incentives amortised over term of lease IAS 40 - Investment property revaluations and tax thereon taken through income statement IAS 39 - Bonds reinstated at historical amounts and hedges marked to market IAS 19 - Pensions accounted on different basis IFRS 2 - Cost of share-based payments taken through income statement Land Securities Group PLC - Reconciliation of Equity IAS40 IAS 12 IAS 39 IAS 31 IAS 10 Events after the Interests balance Investment Income Financial in joint sheet At 31 March 2005 GAAP property taxes instruments Ventures date ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ASSETS Non-current assets Investment property 8,737.1 (402.0) Property, plant and equipment Operating properties 546.3 Other property, plant and 57.9 equipment ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 9,341.3 - - - (402.0) - ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ Goodwill 31.9 Negative goodwill (6.3) Net investment in finance leases - Pre-paid operating lease payments - Investments in joint ventures 437.5 429.3 Assets held for disposal - ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 9,804.4 - - - 27.3 - ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ Current assets Inventories 150.9 Trade and other receivables 529.6 (10.3) Short term investments 2.8 (2.8) Cash and cash equivalents 8.3 (3.3) ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 691.6 - - - (16.4) - ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ TOTAL ASSETS 10,496.0 - - - 10.9 - ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== LIABILITIES Current liabilities Short term borrowings and (77.3) (3.3) overdrafts Trade and other payables (744.8) 7.8 153.7 Provisions - ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ (822.1) - - (3.3) 7.8 153.7 Non-current liabilities Borrowings including finance (2,856.9) 564.3 leases Employee benefits - Trade and other payables (46.8) Deferred tax liabilities (115.9) (1,107.7) (168.4) Provisions (17.7) ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ (3,037.3) - (1,107.7) 395.9 - - ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ TOTAL LIABILITIES (3,859.4) - (1,107.7) 392.6 7.8 153.7 ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== NET ASSETS 6,636.6 - (1,107.7) 392.6 18.7 153.7 ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== Land Securities Group PLC - Reconciliation of Equity (continued)... IAS 17 SIC-15 IFRS 3 IAS 19 IFRS2 IFRS5 Operating Share Assets Restated leases- Business- Employee based held for under At 31 March 2005 Leases Incentives combinations Benefits payment Disposal IFRS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ ASSETS Non-current assets Investment property (69.0) (38.7) (274.2) 7,953.2 Property, plant and equipment Operating properties 36.3 (0.8) 581.8 Other property, plant and 57.9 equipment ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ (32.7) (38.7) - - (275.0) 8,592.9 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ Goodwill 2.4 34.3 Negative goodwill 6.3 - Net investment in finance leases 151.1 151.1 Pre-paid operating lease payments - Investments in joint ventures 866.8 Assets held for disposal 275.0 275.0 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ 118.4 (38.7) 8.7 - - - 9,920.1 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ Current assets Inventories 150.9 Trade and other receivables 39.6 (14.5) 544.4 Short term investments - Cash and cash equivalents 5.0 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ - 39.6 - (14.5) - - 700.3 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ TOTAL ASSETS 118.4 0.9 8.7 (14.5) - - 10,620.4 ====== ====== ======= ======= ====== ====== ====== LIABILITIES Current liabilities Short term borrowings and (80.6) overdrafts Trade and other payables (11.2) (0.9) (595.4) Provisions - ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ - (11.2) - - (0.9) - (676.0) ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ Non-current liabilities Borrowings including finance (116.1) (2,408.7) leases Employee benefits (10.9) (10.9) Trade and other payables 2.9 (43.9) Deferred tax liabilities (0.7) 3.1 7.7 1.0 (1,380.9) Provisions (17.7) ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ (116.8) 3.1 - (3.2) 3.9 - (3,862.1) ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______ _______ TOTAL LIABILITIES (116.8) (8.1) - (3.2) 3.0 - (4,538.1) ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== NET ASSETS 1.6 (7.2) 8.7 (17.7) 3.0 - 6,082.3 ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== 4.0 IFRS accounting policies The principal accounting policies that it is anticipated that Land Securities will adopt, under IFRS, for its accounts for the year to 31 March 2006 are set out below. These policies have been applied in preparing: • The opening IFRS balance sheet as at 1 April 2004, the date of transition to IFRS, and • The summary IFRS balance sheet as at 31 March 2005 and income statement for the year then ended attached to this announcement and which will be presented as comparative information in the Group's first IFRS Financial Statements. It has been assumed that the European Commission will endorse the recent amendment to IAS 19 (Employee Benefits - actuarial gains and losses, group plans and disclosures) which allows actuarial gains or losses to be taken directly to reserves as permitted under UK GAAP by FRS 17, 'Retirement benefits'. 4.1 Basis of preparation The summary income statement and balance sheet have been prepared, in so far as applicable in the summary format, as to measurement and presentation in accordance with International Accounting Standards (IAS) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and on the basis that all such standards will be endorsed by the European Union ('the EU'). These standards are also collectively referred to as IFRS. At this stage in its development, matters such as the interpretation and application of IFRS are continuing to evolve. In addition, standards currently in issue and endorsed by the EU are subject to interpretation by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee ('IFRIC') and further standards may be issued and endorsed by the EU before 31 March 2006. These uncertainties could result in the need to change the basis of accounting or presentation of certain financial information from that applied in the preparation of this document. As a general rule, the Group is required to establish its IFRS accounting policies for the year ended 31 March 2006 and apply these retrospectively to determine its opening IFRS balance sheet at the transition date of 1 April 2004 and the comparative information for the year ended 31 March 2005. However, advantage has been taken of certain exemptions afforded by IFRS 1, 'First-time adoption of IFRS' as follows: • Business combinations prior to 1 April 2004 and, in particular, the acquisition of Trillium have not been restated to comply with IFRS 3, 'Business Combinations'. • The Group has applied IFRS 2, 'Share-based payment', retrospectively only to awards made after 7 November 2002 that had not vested at 1 January 2005. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of the amount, event or actions, actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates. 4.2 Basis of consolidation The consolidated financial statements of the Group include the financial statements of Land Securities Group PLC ('the Company') and its subsidiaries made up to 31 March 2005. Subsidiaries are those entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date control ceases. Joint ventures are those entities over whose activities the Group has joint control, established by contractual agreement. Interests in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting as permitted by IAS 31 ' Interests in joint ventures' and following the procedures for this method set out in IAS 28 'Investments in associates'. The equity method requires the Group's share of the joint venture's profit or loss for the period to be presented separately in the income statement and the Group's share of the joint venture's net assets to be presented separately in the balance sheet. Joint ventures with net liabilities are carried at zero value in the balance sheet and any distributions received are included in the consolidated profit for the year. Intra-group balances and any unrealised gains and losses arising from intra-group transactions are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interest in the joint venture concerned. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same way, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment. 4.3 Details of Accounting Policies (a) Goodwill At the date of the Group's transition to IFRS, 1 April 2004, the goodwill in the Group balance sheet represented that arising on the acquisition of Trillium less amortisation to that date. In accordance with IFRS 1 'First-time adoption of IFRS', this amount has been adopted as the carrying amount of the goodwill for IFRS accounting purposes and the goodwill was reviewed for impairment at both 31 March 2004 and 31 March 2005. In accordance with IFRS 3 'Business combinations ', the goodwill is not amortised but is reviewed for impairment at each reporting date. The Group's policy on impairment is set out in (j) below. (b) Derivative financial instruments ('derivatives') The Group uses derivatives, particularly interest rate swaps, to help manage its interest rate risk. In accordance with its treasury policy, the Group does not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes. Derivatives are recognised initially at cost. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivatives are stated at fair value. The gain or loss on re-measurement to fair value is recognised immediately in profit or loss unless the derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, in which case recognition depends on the nature of the item being hedged. Where a derivative is designated as a hedge of the variability of a highly probable forecasted transaction, ie an interest payment, the element of the gain or loss on the derivative that is an effective hedge is recognised directly in equity. When the hedge of a forecasted transaction subsequently results in the recognition of a financial asset or a financial liability, the associated gains or losses that were recognised directly in equity are reclassified into profit or loss in the same period or periods during which the asset acquired or liability assumed affects profit or loss, ie when interest income or expense is recognised. The ineffective part of any gain or loss is recognised in the income statement immediately. (c) Investment properties Investment properties are those properties, either owned by the Group or where the Group is a lessee under a finance lease, that are held either to earn rental income or for capital appreciation or both. In addition, properties held under operating leases are accounted for as investment properties when the rest of the definition of an investment property is met. In such cases, the operating leases concerned are accounted for as if they were finance leases. Investment properties are measured initially at cost, including related transaction costs. After initial recognition at cost, investment properties are carried at their fair values based on a professional valuation made as of each reporting date. Properties are treated as acquired at the point when the Group assumes the significant risks and returns of ownership and as disposed when these are transferred to the buyer. Investment property is measured on initial recognition at cost, including related transaction costs. Additions to investment properties consist of costs of a capital nature and, in the case of investment properties under development, capitalised interest. Certain internal staff and associated costs directly attributable to the management of major schemes during the construction phase are also capitalised. The difference between the fair value of an investment property at the reporting date and its carrying amount prior to re-measurement is included in the income statement as a valuation gain or loss. When the Group begins to redevelop an existing investment property for continued future use as an investment property, the property remains an investment property and is accounted for as such. When the Group begins to redevelop an existing investment property with a view to sale, the property is transferred to trading properties and held as a current asset. The property is re-measured to fair value as at the date of the transfer with any gain or loss being taken to profit or loss. The re-measured amount becomes the deemed cost at which the property is then carried in trading properties. Property that is being constructed or developed for future use as an investment property, but which has not previously been classified as such, is classified as investment property under development within property, plant and equipment. This is recognised initially at cost but is subsequently re-measured to fair value at each reporting date. Any gain or loss on re-measurement is taken direct to equity unless the loss in the period exceeds the net cumulative gain previously recognised in equity. In the latter case, the amount by which the loss in the period exceeds the net cumulative gain previously recognised is taken to profit or loss. On completion, the property is transferred to investment property with any final difference on re-measurement accounted for in accordance with the foregoing policy. Gross borrowing costs associated with direct expenditure on properties under development or undergoing major refurbishment are capitalised. The interest capitalised is calculated using the Group's weighted average cost of borrowings after adjusting for borrowings associated with specific developments. Where borrowings are associated with specific developments, the amount capitalised is the gross interest incurred on those borrowings less any investment income arising on their temporary investment. Interest is capitalised as from the commencement of the development work until the date of practical completion. The capitalisation of finance costs is suspended if there are prolonged periods when development activity is interrupted. Interest is also capitalised on the purchase cost of a site or property acquired specifically for redevelopment in the short term but only where activities necessary to prepare the asset for redevelopment are in progress. (d) Property, plant and equipment Operating properties These are properties owned and managed by Land Securities Trillium, the Group's property outsourcing business, and which do not satisfy the definition of an investment property. Operating properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the properties concerned. The estimated useful lives are as follows: Freehold land - Not depreciated Freehold buildings - Up to 50 years Leasehold properties - Shorter of the unexpired lease term and 50 years Other property, plant and expenditure This category comprises computers, motor vehicles, furniture, fixtures and fittings, and improvements to Group offices. These assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of between two and five years. The residual values and useful lives of all property, plant and equipment are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at least at each financial year-end. (e) Leases A group company is the lessee i) Operating lease - leases in which substantially all risks and rewards of ownership are retained by another party, the lessor, are classified as operating leases. Payments, including prepayments, made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. ii) Finance lease - leases of assets where the Group has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the lease's commencement at the lower of the fair value of the property and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charges so as to achieve a constant rate on the finance balance outstanding. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in current and non-current borrowings. The finance charges are charged to the income statement over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The investment properties acquired under finance leases are carried at their fair value. A group company is the lessor i) Operating lease - properties leased out to tenants under operating leases are included in investment properties in the balance sheet. ii) Finance lease - when assets are leased out under a finance lease, the present value of the minimum lease payments is recognised as a receivable. The difference between the gross receivable and the present value of the receivable is recognised as unearned finance income. Lease income is recognised over the term of the lease using the net investment method before tax, which reflects a constant periodic rate of return. Where only the buildings element of a property lease is classified as a finance lease, the land element is shown within operating leases. (f) Trading properties Trading properties are those properties held as inventory and are shown at the lower of cost and net realisable value. (g) Long-term construction contracts Revenue on long-term contracts is recognised according to the stage reached in the contract by reference to the value of work completed using the percentage of completion method. An appropriate estimate of the profit attributable to work completed is recognised once the outcome of the contract can be estimated reliably. The gross amount due from customers for contract work is shown as a receivable. The gross amount due comprises costs incurred plus recognised profits less the sum of recognised losses and progress billings. Where the sum of recognised losses and progress billings exceeds costs incurred plus recognised profits, the amount is shown as a liability. (h) Trade and other receivables Trade and other receivables are recognised initially at fair value. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established where there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the receivables concerned. (i) Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents comprises cash balances, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Group's cash management are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the statement of cash flows. (j) Impairment The carrying amounts of the Group's non-financial assets, other than investment property (see (c) above), are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, the asset's recoverable amount is estimated (see below). An impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss whenever the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped together at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows. The recoverable amount of an asset is the greater of its net selling price and its value in use. The value in use is determined as the net present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset, discounted using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount after the reversal does not exceed the amount that would have been determined, net of applicable depreciation, if no impairment loss had been recognised. (k) Share capital Ordinary shares are classed as equity. External costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. (l) Borrowings Borrowings other than bank overdrafts are recognised initially at fair value less attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, borrowings are stated at amortised cost with any difference between the amount initially recognised and redemption value being recognised in the income statement over the period of the borrowings, using the effective interest method. Where existing borrowings are exchanged for new borrowings and the terms of the existing and new borrowings are not substantially different (as defined by IAS 39), the new borrowings are recognised initially at the carrying amount of the existing borrowings. The difference between the amount initially recognised and the redemption value of the new borrowings is recognised in the income statement over the period of the new borrowings, using the effective interest method. (m) Pensions The Group accounts for pensions under IAS 19 'Employee benefits'. In respect of defined benefit pension schemes, obligations are measured at discounted present value while scheme assets are measured at their fair value. The operating and financing costs of such plans are recognised separately in the income statement; service costs are spread systematically over the working lives of the employees concerned and financing costs are recognised in the periods in which they arise. Actuarial gains and losses arising from either experience differing from previous actuarial assumptions or changes to those assumptions are recognised immediately in the statement of recognised income and expense. Contributions to defined contribution schemes are expensed as incurred. (n) Provisions A provision is recognised in the balance sheet when the Group has a constructive or legal obligation as a result of a past event and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. A provision for onerous contracts is recognised when the expected benefits to be derived by the Group from a contract are lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting its obligations under the contract. Provision is made for dilapidations that will crystallise in the future where, on the basis of the present condition of the property, an obligation exists at the reporting date and can be reliably measured. The estimate is revised over the remaining period of the lease to reflect changes in the condition of the building or other changes in circumstances. The estimate of the obligation takes account of relevant external advice. (o) Trade and other payables Trade and other payables are stated at cost. (p) Revenue Revenue comprises rental income, service charges and other recoveries from tenants of the Group's investment and trading properties, property services income earned by its property outsourcing business, proceeds of sales of its trading properties and income arising on long-term contracts. Rental income includes the net income from managed operations such as car parks, food courts, serviced offices and flats. Service charges and other recoveries include income in relation to services charges and directly recoverable expenditure together with any chargeable management fees. Property services income represents unitary charges and the recovery of other direct property or contract expenditure reimbursable by customers. Where revenue is obtained from the rendering of services, it is recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the relevant transactions at the reporting date. Rental income from investment property leased out under operating lease is recognised in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives granted are recognised as an integral part of the net consideration for the use of the property and are therefore also recognised on the same, straight-line basis. When property is let out under a finance lease, the Group recognises a receivable at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease at inception of the lease. Rentals received are accounted for as repayments of principal and finance income as appropriate. Minimum lease payments receivable on finance leases are apportioned between finance income and reduction of the outstanding receivable. Finance income is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining net investment in the finance lease. Contingent rents, being those lease payments that are not fixed at the inception of a lease, for example increases arising on rent reviews, are recorded as income in the periods in which they are earned. Where revenue is obtained by the sale of assets, it is recognised when the significant risks and returns have been transferred to the buyer. In the case of sales of properties, this is generally on unconditional exchange except where payment or completion is expected to occur significantly after exchange. For conditional exchanges, sales are recognised as the conditions are satisfied. Sales of investment and other fixed asset properties, which are not included in revenue, are recognised on the same basis. (q) Expenses Property and contract expenditure, including bid costs incurred prior to the exchange of a contract, is expensed as incurred with the exception of expenditure on long-term contracts (see (g) above). Rental payments made under operating lease are recognised in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives received are recognised as an integral part of the net consideration for the use of the property and also recognised on a straight-line basis. Minimum lease payments payable on finance leases and operating leases accounted for as finance leases under IAS 40 are apportioned between finance expense and reduction of the outstanding liability. Finance expense is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining liability. Contingent rents (as defined in (p) above) are charged as expense in the periods in which they are incurred. (r) Income tax Income tax on the profit for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax is the tax payable on the taxable income for the year and any adjustment in respect of previous years. Deferred tax is provided in full using the balance sheet liability method on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. No provision is made for temporary differences (i) arising on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit and (ii) relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. In particular, deferred tax is provided on the full difference between the original cost of investment properties and their carrying amounts at the reporting date without taking into account deductions and allowances which would only apply if the properties concerned were to be sold, except where such properties are classified as held for sale. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
UK 100

Latest directors dealings