It is idle to pretend that the HBOS rights issue is anything but an unpleasant surprise for Lindsell Train Limited. HBOS ordinary shares have been a core holding in LT's UK equity accounts for many years and it has been cause of much chagrin to first watch the share price halve then witness its Board required to raise new capital on such apparently dilutive terms. In hindsight, we have focussed too hard on the Halifax brand- a great UK franchise -and not hard enough on HBOS, which has become an increasingly diverse institution, with a keener appetite for US mortgage debt than we could have conceived.
However, so far as the Lindsell Train Investment Trust is concerned, the HBOS rights is pretty much unalloyed good news, certainly relative to where the portfolio was a month ago. This is because LTIT owns no HBOS ordinary, but it does hold a big position in HBOS preference shares. The capital raised represents a material enhancement of the security of those preference dividends, which we already regarded as safe, except in the most dire circumstances. The pref shares have responded accordingly, rallying c28% from the lows of the week after the Bear Stearns bale-out and are now just about unchanged in calendar 2008. With the HBOS ordinary dividend set to be cut in the current financial year, it has been educational to be reminded of the reason that preference shares exist. With a prior claim on distributable earnings, the reliability of the pref dividends in times of economic difficulty is reassuring. We think it possible that the HBOS preference shares will offer a dividend yield rather lower than that on the ordinary, in recognition of that prior claim, during a period when the UK economy may be contracting and collateral values falling. This means further gains for the pref shares, which may be further enhanced by falling interest rates, if that economic prognosis plays out. For our other accounts, the decision whether to support the HBOS cash call will hang on any announcement of change in its corporate strategy - so far unforthcoming.
Meanwhile, the unexpected merger between Mars and Wrigley is an important confirmation of the trend to consolidation in the consumer branded goods industry, as companies look to capture scale and efficiency gains and prepare themselves for the multi-year opportunity in Emerging Markets. The valuation attributed to Wrigley is high, but not inconsistent with other recent deals, involving Scottish & Newcastle or Absolut vodka. The truth is that if you want to create a global confectionary or gum brand, you don't have time, nor probably sufficient capital, to start from scratch - because the existing owners already have both brand recognition and distribution. This makes a franchise like Wrigley very valuable - still far more valuable than stock market investors are prepared to acknowledge. Cadbury is valued at about half of the Wrigley takeout, perhaps not coincidentally the same level that Nelson Peltz aspires to for his semi-unfriendly 4.5% stake in the company. Cadbury Schweppes is soon to be no more, as the business splits in two. We do not expect any immediate action, once the demerger is effected, but remain convinced that LTIT holds a unique and undervalued corporate asset - to which we have added. Wrigley was thought to be invulnerable to corporate activity, because the founding family retained material voting rights. The fact that a deal has been done demonstrates the logic of such combinations and the rationality, in the end, of dynastic owners of companies. LTIT holds stock in two similar businesses, Clarins and Heineken. We are content to own each as a participation in their wonderful economics and growth opportunity, but recognise that neither we, nor their family owners can never say never .
Nintendo's full year results were amazing, with significantly more software sold than we expected - software being the source of supercharged profitability for the company. Bears argue that the peak of the current hardware cycle is in sight and that this year or next is 'as good as it gets'. We cannot definitively refute these worries, though we think that its recent dull share price is more to do with the strong Yen, than with canny investors pre-empting the top (they evince no such caution with commodity shares, still booming despite their certain cyclicality). However, we still think investors err in measuring Nintendo against previous episodes. The gaming industry is still too young for anyone to be certain that past fluctuations will recur either inevitably, or in the same shape. We note that the DS and Wii systems are each on track to be the biggest selling devices in gaming history, with far wider appeal, to age and gender, than any earlier platform. This is a prime growth industry and Nintendo is at its forefront, with the strongest balance sheet and best business model. A dividend yield on its shares above the average for Japan confirms us in our opinion that there is no reason to sell yet.
|