Monthly update

Lindsell Train Investment Trust PLC 21 May 2007 The Lindsell Train Investment Trust PLC As at 30 Apr 2007 Fund Objective To maximise long-term total returns subject to the avoidance of loss of absolute value and with a minimum objective to maintain the real purchasing power of Sterling capital, as measured by the annual average yield on the 2.5% Consolidated Loan Stock. Net Asset Value GBP 161.33 Share Price GBP 167.00 Premium (Discount) 3.51% Market Capitalisation GBP 33.4mn Benchmark (21/2% Con Ann Avg Yield +4.7%) +0.4 Source: Bloomberg; NAV-Lindsell Train. Share Price quoted is closing mid price. See Benchmark definition. Performance History (based in 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 YTD 2007 GBP) Net Asset Value TR% -9.6 +3.1 +23.7 +16.5 +13.7 +7.4 Share Price TR% -19.8 -8.7 +20.6 +27.5 +20.1 +9.3 Source: LTL and Bloomberg. Performance years listed Jan - Dec. Launch date 22 Jan 2001. TR=Total Return (with dividends reinvested) Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The price of units and the income from them may go down as well as up. Investors may not get back what they invested. 2006 Performance Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Net Asset Value TR% +0.9 +1.9 +1.2 -1.8 -2.0 +1.8 +1.7 +2.1 +3.2 +0.5 +0.2 +2.8 Share Price TR% -3.0 +7.5 +1.5 +3.4 -1.5 -2.6 +3.2 +4.1 +5.7 +3.0 +3.6 -1.6 Source: LTL and S&P Micropal unless otherwise indicated. Performance years listed Jan - Dec. Launch date 22 Jan 2001. TR=Total Return (with dividends reinvested) 2007 Performance Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Net Asset Value TR% +2.6 +0.8* +1.9 +2.6 Share Price TR% -1.3 +4.0 +3.1 +4.5 Source: LTL and Bloomberg unless otherwise indicated. Performance years listed Jan - Dec. Launch date 22 Jan 2001. TR= Total Return (with dividends reinvested) *Source: Lindsell Train Ltd . Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The price of units and the income from them may go down as well as up. Investors may not get back what they invested. Industry Breakdown % of NAV Bonds 14.4 Preference Shares 11.2 Equity - Media 12.0 Equity - Banks & Investment Co. 6.5 Equity - Leisure & Ent. 14.8 Equity - Food & Beverage 31.6 Equity - Consumer Goods 1.8 Equity - Internet 1.5 Investment Fund 19.6 Cash & Equivalent (13.4) Total 100.0 Source: Lindsell Train Top 10 Holdings % of NAV Barr AG 11.7 HBOS 9.25% Non Cum Pref Stk 11.2 Lindsell Train Global Media (Dist) 10.2 Cadbury Schweppes 9.6 Nintendo 8.1 Diageo 7.6 Marston's 6.8 Lindsell Train Ltd 6.5 21/2% Consolidated Loan Stock 5.6 Lindsell Train Japan (Dist) 5.0 Source: Lindsell Train Fund Exposure Bonds Prefs Equity Funds Cash % of NAV UK % 9.8 11.2 53.0 4.4 (13.9) 64.5 USA % 4.6 - 2.6 - 4.8 12.0 Europe (ex UK) % - - 4.5 - (2.3) 2.2 Japan % - - 8.1 5.0 (2.0) 11.1 Global % - - - 10.2 - 10.2 Total 14.4 11.2 68.2 19.6 (13.4) 100.0 Source: Lindsell Train Fund Manager's Comments It is our practice to write these reports strictly retrospectively - in other words never to discuss the events of May in a note dedicated to April. On this occasion, however, we break with practice, because events in early May 2007 are so significant for the Trust's investment portfolio that they supersede what was, in truth, a somewhat nondescript April. Those events were Rupert Murdoch's public approach to acquire Dow Jones, followed a day or so after by Thomson's agreed offer for Reuters. The ramifications are several. First, Dow Jones and Reuters are not just direct holdings in your portfolio, but also important positions within the Lindsell Train Global Media Fund (and Reuters within Finsbury Growth & Income Trust), which is, in turn, one of the biggest investments in the Trust. Adding these weights together, the current 'look through' exposure for LTIT to Dow Jones and Reuters combined amounts to c8.5% - admittedly after the 48.0% and 26.0% gains in each stock since the news broke. Both could make further progress, we believe, because both trade at meaningful discounts to the existing offers for each company and, for Dow Jones in particular, there is a chance that the bidding process will escalate. Next, although the contemporaneity of the bids was accidental, we have no doubt that this bouleversement of the global media industry has meaning and represents a beginning, not an end-game. What has happened here is that industrialists operating at that nexus where Internet, Media and Software meet, have looked into the 21st century and concluded that there is growth and value to be earned by translating 'old economy' media franchises onto digital platforms. Crucially, those industrialists recognise that investors in public markets underestimate and undervalue this opportunity and they have moved to corral for themselves two wonderful properties - the Wall Street Journal and Reuters - before portfolio investors catch on. Dow Jones has been a miserable performer in capital terms in recent years, while investors persist in analysing it as a newspaper company, exhibiting all the by now well-known structural problems of other purveyors of news via 'dead trees'. Murdoch, however, sees beyond the inky broadsheet and covets the intangible, but so valuable, mastheads. 'Wall Street Journal', 'Barrons' and 'Dow Jones' can draw audiences to PCs, TVs and mobile phones. Analyst, Ken Doctor, of Burlinghame (an institution we are not familiar with) puts it well - 'Dow Jones isn't Google, but for Murdoch it offers a means to become the #1 worldwide in business news and business news has become one of the most lucrative magnets for advertisers.' Finally, therefore, these deals have implications for the valuation of other owners of, admittedly rare, outstanding professional publishing franchises and have opened the door for other such transactions. We still expect to see fixed-line telephone companies around the world moving to acquire similar assets, in an attempt to retain subscribers to their networks. LTIT holdings Pearson and Reed Elsevier have each been galvanised by events, as well as other stocks within the Media Fund, such as McGraw Hill and Wolters Kluwer. In entertainment, we cherish our investment in Nintendo, up 10.0% in April, which also offers access to the meeting point of 'content' and 'on-line'. Elsewhere, in April Nestle announced the acquisition of Gerber Foods (US baby foods). The EV/Revenue terms for the deal were 2.8x. If Cadbury were valued similarly, its shares would trade at £9.70, rather than today's £6.60. We think Cadbury's brands are, in fact, even more desirable. Fund Manager Launch Date Denomination Nick Train 22 Jan 2001 GBP Year End Dividend Benchmark 31st Mar Ex Date: June The annual average yield on the 21/2% Payment: August Consolidated Loan Stock. The Board Management Fees Registered Address Rhoddy Swire Standard Fee: 0.65% Lindsell Train Investment Trust Donald Adamson Performance Fee: 10% of annual increase Springfield Lodge, Colchester Road Dominic Caldecott in the share price above the gross Chelmsford Michael Lindsell annual yield of the 21/2% Consolidated ESSEX CM2 5PW Michael Mackenzie Loan Stock. ISIN Secretary Listing GB0031977944 Phoenix Administration Services Limited London Stock Exchange Bloomberg LTI LN Disclaimer Risk Warning This factsheet is intended for use by shareholders of the Lindsell Train Investment Trust ('LTIT') and/or persons who are authorised by the UK Financial Services Authority or those who are permitted to receive such information in the UK. Any opinion expressed whether in general or both on the performance of individual securities and in a wider economic context represents Lindsell Train's views at the time of preparation. They are subject to change without notice and should not be construed as investment advice or investment recommendation. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Lindsell Train Investment Trust plc is an investment trust company listed on the London Stock Exchange. Investment trusts have the ability to borrow to invest which is commonly referred to as gearing. Companies with higher gearing are subject to higher risks and therefore the investment value may change substantially. The net asset value ('NAV') per share and its performance of an investment trust may not be the same as its market share price per share and performance. Issued by Lindsell Train Limited Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority 17 May 2007 LTL 000-048-4 Lindsell Train Limited 2 Queen Anne's Gate Buildings, Dartmouth Street, London SW1H 9BP U.K. Tel. +44 20 7227 8200 Fax. +44 20 7227 8299 enquiry@lindselltrain.com www.lindselltrain.com Lindsell Train Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
UK 100