Interim Results - 6 Months to 31 October 1999
Taverners Trust PLC
15 December 1999
THE TAVERNERS TRUST PLC
Announcement of Unaudited Interim Results
for the six months to 31 October 1999
During the six month period under review the Fully diluted Net
Asset Value of your Trust advanced by 10.7% from 112.8p to
124.9p while our benchmark FTSE Actuaries Restaurants Pubs and
Breweries index fell by 21.2%. Since the end of the period on
31 October, the Trust's Net Asset Value has declined by 3.8%
while the Restaurants, Pubs and Breweries index has increased
by 1.5%, this reversal being occasioned by a better showing in
recent weeks by the larger companies.
Your Company does not invest in the large companies that
dominate the benchmark index so that the outperformance during
the half-year largely reflected the misfortunes of the larger
companies such as Whitbread whose share price had fallen by
over 40% from the level it reached during its bid for the
Allied Domecq Pubs; additionally both Bass and Scottish and
Newcastle underperformed in part because of investors' concern
about industry pricing. As a result of this, the Trust's NAV
since its launch in April 1996 has now drawn ahead of the
benchmark FTSE Restaurants Pubs and Breweries index.
Taverners was launched on the proposition that better capital
growth can be achieved by investing in the smaller companies
in the industry rather than in the national brewers; this
belief is supported by the better performance of smaller
companies in the 1999 calendar year.
It is noteworthy that three of the portfolio's better
performers in recent months viz; Springwood, Po Na Na and
Chorion are late night operators. Certainly it does seem that
sentiment towards this section of the market has improved
while many would suggest that they will be substantial
beneficiaries of the millennium trading period. Until
recently the night club operations of First Leisure, Rank and
European Leisure were under managed and had too many out of
town sites; downbeat trading statements by these three tended
to damage the rating of the rest of the sub-sector; all three
have now sold their clubs thus creating a healthier position
in this part of the industry. The minimum wage and working
time directive appear to have had less of an impact on
staffing costs in the night club sector while clubbers, some
of whom have actually gained from the minimum wage
legislation, are more confident in retaining their jobs and
are spending accordingly. Additionally, fears that nightclubs
will lose clientele if pub hours are lengthened have receded.
With regard to the wider scene, it would seem that the Brewery
and Pub sector is presently out of favour at a time when its
business is improving. It is true that following last year's
poor summer, trade did not recover against the soft
comparatives of 1998 as well as had been hoped; however the
outcome of the market's neglect of the sector is that
companies like Burtonwood, Belhaven, Wolverhampton and Greene
King all of which are looking forward to earnings growth of
12%+ over the next two years stand on single figure
price/earnings ratios and in many cases at a discount to Net
Asset Value. It appears that the ratings of the majors have
declined to a point that they have come into line with the
smaller companies. Yet in reality there are plenty of these
companies in the industry which are nimble enough to beat the
earnings growth of the nationals. However, it is possible
that the trading statements put out by Bass and Scottish and
Newcastle last week will start to create a better sentiment
towards all companies in the sector.
The industry recently received the good news of a relatively benign
regime for pubs in the upcoming business rate revaluation
which had threatened to put some marginal properties out of
business. A White Paper on the future of licensing is due in
the New Year and a recent newspaper article has suggested than
it will propose hours and regulations slightly more liberal
that expected; this also will be good news for the industry.
There remains the possibility that the blood alcohol limit for
drinking and driving will be reduced; the government has been
delaying their response on this matter but a decision is
expected in the New Year. The House of Lords refused Shepherd
Neame leave to appeal the decision that ended their legal
campaign against the UK government's beer duty increase.
However, although bootlegging continues to grow, the traffic
in legal personal imports has reduced with the abolition of
Duty Free and much of this business appears to have switched
to wine. The pain inflicted on brewers from imports is
therefore at present becoming worse more slowly.
The present comparative lack of interest in the sector while
investors chase the glamorous e-commerce and telecom stocks
seems to us to provide a buying opportunity. Currently we are
seeing a number of well-managed businesses whose share prices
we expect to move significantly higher over the next few
months. In these circumstances and in view of the fact that
the past investment record of the Trust has been sound in
quite testing circumstances, there are grounds for expecting
an improvement in the Trust's NAV. The Board is hopeful that
this will lead to a reduction in the discount at which the
share price currently stands.
Lionel Ross
Chairman
15 December 1999
The unaudited results were:
Statement of total return (incorporating the revenue account*)
For the six months to 31 October 1999
Six months ended
31 October 1999
(unaudited)
Revenue Capital Total
£'000 £'000 £'000
Gains on investments - 2,390 2,390
Income 314 - 314
Investment management fee (82) (82) (164)
Other expenses (90) - (90)
---- ----- -----
Net return before finance
costs and taxation 142 2,308 2,450
Interest payable and
similar charges (52) (52) (104)
---- ----- -----
Return on ordinary
activities before tax 90 2,256 2,346
Tax on ordinary
activities (35) 3 (32)
---- ----- -----
Return attributable to
Ordinary shareholders
transferred to reserves 55 2,259 2,314
==== ===== =====
Return per Ordinary share
(pence):
- Basic 0.35 14.23 14.58
==== ===== =====
Six months ended
31 October 1998
(unaudited)
Revenue Capital Total
£'000 £'000 £'000
Loss on investments - (7,348) (7,348)
Income 322 - 322
Investment management fee (73) (73) (146)
Other expenses (93) - (93)
---- ----- -----
Net return/(loss) before
finance costs and
taxation 156 (7,421) (7,265)
Interest payable and
similar charges (60) (59) (119)
---- ----- -----
Return/(loss) on ordinary
activities before tax 96 (7,480) (7,384)
Tax on ordinary
activities (61) 2 (59)
---- ----- -----
Return/(loss)
attributable to Ordinary
shareholders transferred
to reserves 35 (7,478) (7,443)
==== ===== =====
Return per Ordinary share
(pence):
- Basic 0.22 (47.19) (46.97)
==== ===== =====
Balance Sheet of the Company as at 31 October 1999
31 31 30
October October April
1999 1998 1999
(unaudited)(unaudited) (audited)
£'000 £'000 £'000
Fixed assets
Investments 23,593 16,969 20,216
Current assets
Debtors 167 93 549
Cash at bank and in hand 249 186 664
------ ------ ------
416 279 1,213
Creditors: amounts falling
due within one year (328) (239) (3,150)
------ ------ ------
Net current
assets/(liabilities) 88 40 (1,937)
------ ------ ------
Total assets less current
liabilities 23,681 17,009 18,279
Creditors: Amounts falling
due after one year (3,000) (3,000) -
------ ------ ------
Net assets 20,681 14,009 18,279
====== ====== ======
Capital and reserves
Called-up share capital 3,984 3,962 3,962
Share premium account 10,536 10,442 10,442
Other reserves
Warrant reserve 981 1,009 1,009
Capital reserve - realised 1,856 461 883
Capital reserve - unrealised 3,161 (1,985) 1,875
Revenue reserve 163 120 108
------ ------ ------
Total shareholder's funds 20,681 14,009 18,279
====== ====== ======
Net asset value per Ordinary
share (pence):
Basic 129.78 115.34 88.40
====== ====== ======
Diluted 124.95 n/a 112.78
====== ====== ======
Notes:
1 The interim financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with applicable accounting standards and under
the historic cost convention as modified to include the
revaluation of fixed asset investments.
2 The interim financial statements for the period ended 31
October 1999 are unaudited and do not constitute statutory
accounts. The financial information for the year ended
30 April 1999 has been abridged from published accounts
that have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and
on which the report of the auditors was unqualified.
3 In accordance with stated policy, no interim dividend has
been declared (1998 - nil).
4 The basic revenue return per Ordinary share is based on
net revenue on ordinary activities after taxation of
£55,000 (1998 - £35,000) and on 15,877,174 Ordinary
shares, being the weighted average number of Ordinary
shares in issue for the period (1998 - 15,848,000).
5 The basic capital return per share is based on net capital
gains of £2,259,000 (1998 - £7,478,000 loss) and on
15,877,174 Ordinary shares, being the weighted average
number of Ordinary shares in issue for the period (1998 -
15,848,000).
6 The fully-diluted returns per Ordinary share have not been
shown for the periods to 31 October 1999 and 1998 in
accordance with FRS14 'Earnings per Share' as there is no
dilution in earnings resulting from the Warrants in issue
as the average share prices for the periods are less than
the exercise price of the Warrants.
7 The fully-diluted net asset values per Ordinary share have
been calculated by reference to the total number of shares
in issue at the period end and on the assumption that
those Warrants which are not exercised at the period end,
amounting to 3,081,600 Warrants (1998 - 3,169,600), were
fully exercised on the first day of the financial period
at 100p per share, giving a total of 19,017,600 Ordinary
shares.
8 Copies of the Interim Report will be posted to all
shareholders and warrant holders in due course. Copies may
be obtained from One Bow Churchyard, Cheapside, London
EC4M 9HH.
15 December 1999 Aberdeen Asset
Management PLC
- Secretaries
Review report by Ernst & Young to The Taverners Trust PLC
We have reviewed the interim financial information for the
period ended 31 October 1999 set out above which is the
responsibility of, and has been approved by, the Directors.
Our responsibility is to report on the results of our review.
Our review was carried out having regard to the Bulletin
Review of Interim Financial Information, issued by the
Auditing Practices Board. This review consisted principally
of applying analytical procedures to the underlying financial
data, assessing whether accounting policies have been
consistently applied and making enquiries of management
responsible for financial and accounting matters. The review
excluded audit procedures such as tests of controls and
verification of assets and liabilities and was therefore
substantially less in scope than an audit performed in
accordance with Auditing Standards. Accordingly we do not
express an audit opinion on the interim financial information.
On the basis of our review:
- in our opinion the interim financial information has been
prepared using accounting policies consistent with those
adopted by The Taverners Trust PLC in its financial
statements for the year ended 30 April 1999; and
- we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the interim financial information as presented.
Ernst & Young
London
15 December 1999