Interim Results 2020
www.natwestgroup.com
NatWest Group plc
Interim Results for the period ending 30 June 2020
Alison Rose, Chief Executive Officer, commented:
"Our performance in the first half of the year has been significantly impacted by the challenges and uncertainty our economy continues to face as a result of Covid-19. However, NatWest Group has a robust capital position, underpinned by a resilient, capital generative and well diversified business.
Throughout this crisis we have provided exceptional levels of support to our customers, colleagues and the communities we serve. I am proud that our colleagues have consistently shown they are putting our purpose at the heart of everything they do.
Through our strong balance sheet and prudent approach to risk, we are well placed not only to withstand Covid-19 related impacts but also to provide the right support to those who will need it most in the tough times to come.
O ur purposeful strategy will help our customers, colleagues and communities to recover, rebuild and, ultimately, to thrive. We are building a sustainable business that will generate lasting value for all our stakeholders, as we work together to create a greener, fairer and more inclusive economy."
Financial performance in a challenging environment
● |
H1 2020 operating loss before tax of £770 million and operating profit before impairment losses of £2,088 million. |
|
||||||||
● |
Net impairment losses of £2,858 million in H1 2020, or 159 basis points of gross customer loans, resulted in an expected credit loss (ECL) coverage ratio of 1.72% across the Personal and Wholesale portfolios. |
|
||||||||
● |
In comparison to H1 2019, across the retail and commercial businesses income decreased by 9.0% whilst NatWest Markets income excluding asset disposals/strategic risk reduction, own credit adjustments (OCA) and notable items increased by 44.4%. |
|
||||||||
● |
Bank net interest margin (NIM) of 1.67% was 22 basis points lower than Q1 2020 reflecting the contraction of the yield curve, 10 basis points, the impact of a change in the mix of lending, 5 basis points, and excess levels of central liquidity, 7 basis points. |
|
||||||||
● |
Other expenses, excluding operating lease depreciation (OLD), were £41 million lower than H1 2019. |
|
||||||||
Robust balance sheet with strong capital and liquidity levels
|
||||||||||
Outlook (1) |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
We remain committed to achieving a £250 million cost reduction in 2020 and expect strategic costs to be within our £0.8-1.0 billion guidance after recognising property related charges in Q2 2020. |
||||||||||
We believe the full year 2020 impairment charge is likely to be in the range of £3.5-4.5 billion. Impairment charges in the second half of 2020 will be driven by a combination of the developing economic outlook for the UK and Republic of Ireland, along with the effectiveness of government support schemes in delaying and reducing the level of economic distress experienced by our personal and commercial customers, and the absolute level of defaults across lending portfolios and associated ECL stage migration.
|
||||||||||
We expect RWAs to be in the range of £185-195 billion at the end of 2020. Changes in RWAs in the second half of 2020 will be driven by the delivery of targeted reductions in NatWest Markets, the level of procyclical inflation driven by the economic outlook, downgrades in the credit quality and assessments in the commercial book and ongoing demand for lending from our customers.
|
||||||||||
We continue to target a reduction in NatWest Markets RWAs to £32 billion by the end of 2020, with income disposal losses of around £0.2 billion, subject to market conditions. We are now intending to achieve the majority of the expected medium term reduction in NatWest Markets RWAs by the end of 2021, while managing the associated income disposal losses to around £0.6 billion over the two years. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
We continue to monitor events closely and assess potential scenarios and outcomes. The multiple economic scenarios underpinning our guidance are disclosed on pages 28-35. The impacts of Covid-19 on the economy and the mitigating benefits of government support schemes remain uncertain and could result in changes to our financial results in upcoming periods, including the possible impairment of goodwill.
|
N ote:
(1) The guidance, targets, expectations and trends discussed in this section represent management's current expectations and are subject to change, including as a result of the factors described in the "Risk Factors" section on pages 108 and 109 of this announcement, pages 29-31 of NatWest Group plc's (formerly The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc) Q1 IMS and pages 281 to 295 of NatWest Group plc's 2019 Annual Report & Accounts. These statements constitute forward-looking statements. Refer to Forward-looking statements in this announcement.
Our Purpose in action - we champion potential, helping people, families and businesses to thrive
Helping our colleagues and customers through the impacts of Covid-19
Provided lending support to our customers with a disciplined approach to risk and value creation:
· Approved £10.1 billion through the government lending initiatives(1,2).
· Facilitated approximately £7.4 billion of Covid-19 Corporate Financing Facilities (CCFF) issuances(2).
Supported the financial health of our customers:
· Helped approximately 240,000 customers with an initial three month mortgage repayment holiday and provided payment holidays, of up to twelve months, on approximately 71,000 business customer accounts(2).
· Delivered approximately £2.0 million of cash to vulnerable customers' homes(2).
Long-term investment plan is powering our operational effectiveness:
· Increased digital adoption with over 500,000 new mobile app downloads and over 485,000 new online banking customers(2).
· Launched digital credit scoring in our mobile app with a net promoter score of +52(3).
Partnered to proactively respond and support UK communities:
· Supported the National Emergencies Trust by raising £10 million through matched customer donations.
· Donated £1 million to eight existing debt management not-for-profit partners.
Prioritised the wellbeing of our colleagues;
· Enabled over 50,000 colleagues to work from home, including over three quarters of our contact centre colleagues.
· Ensured that all colleagues continue to be paid as normal until September if they need to take some time to look after their families, are unable to work from home or if they are ill.
H1 2020 progress against our three chosen areas of focus
Enterprise - addressing barriers to enterprise and business creation:
· Migrated our twelve accelerator hubs to digital channel delivery.
· Digitised our Dream Bigger programme which supports the next generation of female entrepreneurs.
· Launched a £5 million Enterprise Relief Fund in partnership with The Prince's Trust.
Learning - skill building, particularly around financial confidence:
· Reached approximately two million people through financial capability interactions including live MoneySense lessons on social media platforms(2).
· Helped approximately 305,000 additional customers to start saving(2).
· Over 1 million downloads of Island Saver, the world's first financial education console and PC game.
Climate - supporting the necessary transition to a low carbon economy:
· NatWest Group plc issued a green MREL bond, the first green bond issued in USD by a UK bank, with $600 million of proceeds allocated to renewable energy projects.
· NatWest Group has recently joined the UNEP FI PRB Collective Commitment on Climate Action and is the first major UK bank to join the Partnership for Carbon Accounting (PCAF), two important global initiatives that signal our level of commitment to measuring and reducing our climate impact in accordance with the 2015 Paris Agreement.
· Helped our customers through c.£4.0 billion of new sustainable financing and funding for H1 2020.
Notes:
(1) Inclusive of Commercial Banking and Private Banking: Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS) - £6.1 billion; Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) - £3.3 billion; Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CLBILS) - £0.7 billion.
(2) As at 30 June 2020.
(3) As at 3 April 2020.
|
Half year ended |
|
Quarter ended |
|||
|
30 June |
30 June |
|
30 June |
31 March |
30 June |
Performance key metrics and ratios |
2020 |
2019 |
|
2020 |
2020 |
2019 |
Profit before impairment losses |
£2,088m |
£3,017m |
|
£767m |
£1,321m |
£1,918m |
Operating (loss)/profit before tax |
(£770m) |
£2,694m |
|
(£1,289m) |
£519m |
£1,681m |
(Loss)/profit attributable to ordinary shareholders |
(£705m) |
£2,038m |
|
(£993m) |
£288m |
£1,331m |
Bank net interest margin (NatWest Group NIM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
excluding NWM) (1) |
1.78% |
2.04% |
|
1.67% |
1.89% |
2.02% |
Bank average interest earning assets (NatWest Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
excluding NWM) (1) |
£440bn |
£407bn |
|
£458bn |
£422bn |
£410bn |
Cost:income ratio (1) |
63.8% |
57.2% |
|
70.9% |
57.7% |
52.6% |
Loan impairment rate (1) |
159bps |
21bps |
|
229bps |
90bps |
30bps |
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- basic |
(5.8p) |
16.9p |
|
(8.2p) |
2.4p |
11.0p |
- basic fully diluted |
(5.8p) |
16.8p |
|
(8.2p) |
2.4p |
11.0p |
Return on tangible equity (1) |
(4.4%) |
12.1% |
|
(12.4%) |
3.6% |
15.8% |
Average tangible equity |
£32bn |
£34bn |
|
£32bn |
£32bn |
£34bn |
Average number of ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding during the period (millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- basic |
12,079 |
12,058 |
|
12,085 |
12,074 |
12,069 |
- basic fully diluted (2) |
12,101 |
12,096 |
|
12,107 |
12,100 |
12,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 June |
31 March |
31 December |
Balance sheet related key metrics and ratios |
|
|
|
2020 |
2020 |
2019 |
Total assets |
|
|
|
£806.9bn |
£817.6bn |
£723.0bn |
Funded assets (1) |
|
|
|
£623.5bn |
£608.9bn |
£573.0bn |
Loans to customers - amortised cost |
|
|
|
£352.3bn |
£351.3bn |
£326.9bn |
Impairment provisions |
|
|
|
£6.1bn |
£4.2bn |
£3.7bn |
Customer deposits |
|
|
|
£408.3bn |
£384.8bn |
£369.2bn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) |
|
|
|
166% |
152% |
152% |
Liquidity portfolio |
|
|
|
£243bn |
£201bn |
£199bn |
Net stable funding ratio (NSFR) (3) |
|
|
|
144% |
138% |
141% |
Loan:deposit ratio (1) |
|
|
|
86% |
91% |
89% |
Total wholesale funding |
|
|
|
£86bn |
£86bn |
£75bn |
Short-term wholesale funding |
|
|
|
£22bn |
£32bn |
£19bn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity tier (CET1) ratio (4) |
|
|
|
17.2% |
16.6% |
16.2% |
Total capital ratio |
|
|
|
22.5% |
21.4% |
21.2% |
Pro forma CET1 ratio, pre dividend accrual (5) |
|
|
|
17.2% |
16.6% |
17.0% |
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) |
|
|
|
£181.5bn |
£185.2bn |
£179.2bn |
CRR leverage ratio |
|
|
|
5.1% |
5.1% |
5.1% |
UK leverage ratio |
|
|
|
6.0% |
5.8% |
5.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible net asset value (TNAV) per ordinary share |
|
|
|
264p |
273p |
268p |
Tangible net asset value (TNAV) per ordinary share - fully diluted (1,2) |
|
|
263p |
272p |
267p |
|
Tangible equity |
|
|
|
£32,006m |
£32,990m |
£32,371m |
Number of ordinary shares in issue (millions) |
|
|
|
12,125 |
12,094 |
12,094 |
Number of ordinary shares in issue (millions) - fully diluted (2,6) |
|
|
12,147 |
12,116 |
12,138 |
Notes:
(1) Refer to the Appendix for details of basis of preparation and reconciliation of non-IFRS financial and performance measures where relevant.
(2) Includes the effect of dilutive share options and convertible securities. Dilutive shares on an average basis for H1 2020 were 22 million shares and for Q2 2020 were 22 million shares; (Q1 2020 - 26 million shares, H1 2019 - 38 million shares; Q2 2019 - 35 million shares), and as at 30 June 2020 were 22 million shares (31 March 2020 - 22 million shares; 31 December 2019 - 44 million shares).
(3) NSFR reported in line with CRR2 regulations finalised in June 2019.
(4) Based on CRR end point including the IFRS 9 transitional adjustment of £1.6 billion. Excluding this adjustment, the CET 1 ratio would be 16.3%.
(5) At June 2020 and March 2020 there was no charge in CET1 for foreseeable dividends or charges. The pro forma CET 1 ratio at 31 December 2019 excludes foreseeable charges of £968 million for ordinary dividends (3p per share final dividend and 5p per share special dividend) and £365 million pension contribution.
(6) Includes 16 million shares held by the Employee Benefit Trust (31 March 2020 -18 million shares; 31 December 2019 - 15 million shares).
Summary consolidated income statement for the period ended 30 June 2020
| Half year ended |
| Quarter ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June |
| 30 June | 31 March | 30 June |
| 2020 | 2019 |
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
Net interest income | 3,852 | 4,004 |
| 1,910 | 1,942 | 1,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Own credit adjustments | 53 | (46) |
| (102) | 155 | (3) |
Strategic disposals | - | 1,035 |
| - | - | 1,035 |
Other non-interest income | 1,933 | 2,124 |
| 868 | 1,065 | 1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income | 1,986 | 3,113 |
| 766 | 1,220 | 2,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income | 5,838 | 7,117 |
| 2,676 | 3,162 | 4,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation and conduct costs | 89 | (60) |
| 85 | 4 | (55) |
Strategic costs | (464) | (629) |
| (333) | (131) | (434) |
Other expenses | (3,375) | (3,411) |
| (1,661) | (1,714) | (1,673) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses | (3,750) | (4,100) |
| (1,909) | (1,841) | (2,162) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before impairment losses | 2,088 | 3,017 |
| 767 | 1,321 | 1,918 |
Impairment losses | (2,858) | (323) |
| (2,056) | (802) | (237) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss)/profit before tax | (770) | 2,694 |
| (1,289) | 519 | 1,681 |
Tax credit/(charge) | 208 | (194) |
| 396 | (188) | 22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/profit for the period | (562) | 2,500 |
| (893) | 331 | 1,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shareholders | (705) | 2,038 |
| (993) | 288 | 1,331 |
Preference shareholders | 16 | 20 |
| 8 | 8 | 10 |
Paid-in equity shareholders | 192 | 182 |
| 95 | 97 | 92 |
Non-controlling interests | (65) | 260 |
| (3) | (62) | 270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notable items within total income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alawwal bank merger gain in NatWest Markets | - | 444 |
| - | - | 444 |
FX recycling (loss)/gain in Central items & other | (103) | 290 |
| (39) | (64) | 290 |
Legacy liability release in Central items & other | - | 256 |
| - | - | 256 |
Liquidity Asset Bond sale gain | 110 | 11 |
| 17 | 93 | 1 |
IFRS volatility in Central items & other | (11) | 17 |
| 55 | (66) | 21 |
NatWest Markets asset disposals/strategic risk reduction (1) | (63) | (27) |
| (63) | - | (23) |
Note:
(1) | Asset disposals/strategic risk reduction in 2020 relates to the cost of exiting positions and the impact of risk reduction transactions entered into, in respect of the strategic announcement on 14 February 2020. Prior period comparatives refer to the previously disclosed NatWest Markets legacy business disposal losses.
|
Income statement overview
H1 2020 compared with H1 2019 | |
● | Income across the retail and commercial businesses decreased by 9.0% reflecting the contraction of the yield curve, mortgage margin dilution, lower business activity and lower consumer spending, resulting from government measures in response to Covid-19. Partially offsetting, we have seen strong gross new mortgage lending in UK Personal Banking with drawdowns against UK Government lending initiatives and increased utilisation of revolving credit facilities (RCFs) in Commercial Banking, whilst maintaining a disciplined approach to risk. |
● | NatWest Markets income excluding asset disposals/strategic risk reduction, OCA and notable items increased by 44.4% reflecting increased customer activity as the market reacted to the spread of the Covid-19 virus, partially offset by the impact of credit market write-downs. |
● | Litigation and conduct costs included a £250 million PPI release reflecting lower than predicted valid complaints volumes, partially offset by other charges. |
● | Strategic costs of £464 million in H1 2020 included an £83 million charge related to technology spend, £155 million related to property charges and a £120 million direct charge in NatWest Markets primarily related to restructuring activity. |
● | Other expenses, excluding OLD, decreased by £41 million, or 1.2%, and headcount reduced by c.3,900, or 5.9%. We have maintained a focus on driving underlying cost reductions and efficiencies across the business through the continued shift from physical to digital, process improvements and property savings. |
● | The net impairment loss of £2,858 million, 159 basis points of gross customer loans, reflected the deterioration of the economic outlook. As a result the ECL coverage ratio across the Personal and Wholesale portfolios increased from 1.02% to 1.72%. |
|
|
Q2 2020 compared with Q1 2020 | |
● | Income across the retail and commercial businesses decreased by £176 million reflecting the contraction of the yield curve, reduced business activity and lower consumer spending, resulting from government measures in response to Covid-19. Partially offsetting, we have seen strong balance growth in Commercial Banking, largely relating to drawdowns against UK Government lending initiatives. |
● | NatWest Markets income excluding asset disposals/strategic risk reduction and OCA increased by £50 million. Income from Financing increased as credit markets stabilised, supported by central bank actions, whilst Rates and Currencies decreased as the volatility seen towards the end of Q1 2020 eased. |
● | Strategic costs of £333 million in Q2 2020 included a £44 million charge related to technology spend, £148 million related to property charges and an £86 million direct charge in NatWest Markets primarily related to restructuring activity. |
● | Other expenses, excluding OLD, decreased by £54 million reflecting reduced investment spend and other cost saving initiatives. Headcount decreased by c.500. |
● | The net impairment loss of £2,056 million, 229 basis points of gross customer loans, reflected the deterioration of the economic outlook. As a result the ECL coverage ratio across the Personal and Wholesale portfolios increased from 1.18% to 1.72%. |
|
|
Q2 2020 compared with Q2 2019 | |
● | Income across the retail and commercial businesses decreased by 11.4% whilst NatWest Markets income excluding asset disposals/strategic risk reduction, OCA and notable items increased by 62.2%. |
● | Other expenses, excluding OLD, decreased by £15 million, or 0.9%. |
|
|
|
|
Business performance summary
UK Personal Banking
|
Half year ended |
|
Quarter ended |
|||
|
30 June |
30 June |
|
30 June |
31 March |
30 June |
|
2020 |
2019 |
|
2020 |
2020 |
2019 |
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
£m |
Total income |
2,185 |
2,447 |
|
1,035 |
1,150 |
1,202 |
Operating expenses |
(1,075) |
(1,229) |
|
(546) |
(529) |
(594) |
Impairment losses |
(657) |
(181) |
|
(360) |
(297) |
(69) |
Operating profit |
453 |
1,037 |
|
129 |
324 |
539 |
Return on equity |
10.7% |
25.6% |
|
5.7% |
15.5% |
26.5% |
Net interest margin |
2.23% |
2.57% |
|
2.18% |
2.28% |
2.51% |
Cost:income ratio |
49.2% |
50.2% |
|
52.8% |
46.0% |
49.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
||
|
|
|
|
30 June |
31 March |
31 December |
|
|
|
|
2020 |
2020 |
2019 |
|
|
|
|
£bn |
£bn |
£bn |
Net loans to customers (amortised cost) |
|
|
|
164.5 |
163.7 |
158.9 |
Customer deposits |
|
|
|
161.0 |
152.8 |
150.3 |
RWAs |
|
|
|
36.7 |
38.2 |
37.8 |
Loan impairment rate |
|
|
|
87bps |
72bps |
20bps |
Note: (1) |
Comparisons with prior periods are impacted by the transfer of the Private Client Advice business to Private Banking from 1 January 2020. The net impact on H1 2019 operating profit would have been to decrease total income by £22 million and operating expenses by £4 million. The net impact on the H1 2019 balance sheet would have been to decrease customer deposits by £0.3 billion. The net impact on Q2 2019 operating profit would have been to decrease total income by £11 million and operating expenses by £2 million. The net impact on the Q4 2019 balance sheet would have been to decrease customer deposits by £0.2 billion.
|
UK Personal Banking continues to support customers whose income has been impacted by Covid-19. We had 240,000 mortgage customers request an initial three month mortgage repayment holiday, representing 20% of the book by volume. To support mortgage customers who continue to be impacted, we are offering a range of options from a full payment holiday to part payments for a further three months; of those who have rolled off their initial repayment holiday, and who have reviewed their options and taken action, approximately one third have requested a further extension. Additionally, we offered the option of three month payment deferrals on loans, with 72,000, or 7%, of loan customers taking up the offer.
|
H1 2020 compared with H1 2019 |
|
● |
Total income decreased by £262 million, or 10.7%, due to lower deposit hedge income, mortgage margin dilution and lower fee income on overdrafts, partially offset by strong balance growth. |
● |
Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses increased by £17 million, or 1.5%, due to one-off releases in Q2 2019 partially offset by a reduction in staff costs associated with a 9.3% reduction in headcount. |
● |
Litigation and conduct costs include a £250 million PPI release reflecting lower than predicted valid complaints volumes. |
● |
Impairment losses of £657 million increased by £476 million primarily reflecting stage two charges linked to a forecast rise in unemployment and decline in HPI under a deteriorating economic outlook. |
● |
Net loans to customers increased by £12.6 billion, or 8.3%, as a result of strong gross new mortgage lending and lower redemptions. Gross new mortgage lending was £16.5 billion with market flow share of approximately 14%, supporting a stock share of approximately 10.5%. Personal advances and cards reduced by £0.2 billion and £0.3 billion respectively, reflecting lower spend and higher repayments as a result of Covid-19. |
● |
Customer deposits increased by £13.5 billion, or 9.2%, with stronger than normal growth as government backed initiatives for Covid-19, combined with lockdown restrictions, resulted in lower customer spend and increased savings. |
● |
RWAs remained broadly stable as mortgage lending growth was largely offset by lower unsecured balances, with no pro-cyclicality evident to date. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q1 2020 |
|
● |
Total income decreased by £115 million due to lower overdraft fees, Covid-19 support measures, significantly reduced card spend, which resulted in lower fees and lower unsecured balances, and the non-repeat of the annual insurance profit share. Net interest margin decreased by 10 basis points reflecting lower personal advances and cards balances and continued structural pressure in the mortgage business, as blended front book margins of around 124 basis points remain lower than the back book margin of approximately 138 basis points, partially offset by lower customer deposit rates payable. In the latter part of June 2020 blended front book application margins were around 130 basis points as spreads in the market continued to widen. |
● |
Impairment losses of £360 million increased by £63 million, primarily reflecting stage two charges linked to a forecast rise in unemployment and decline in HPI under a deteriorating economic outlook. |
● |
Net loans to customers increased by £0.8 billion due to mortgage growth of £1.9 billion, with lower consumer demand and increased repayments impacting unsecured. Personal advances and cards reduced by £0.4 billion respectively, as customers spent less and made repayments. |
● |
Customer deposits increased by £8.2 billion as customer spend reduced and savings increased as a result of Covid-19. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q2 2019 |
|
● |
Total income decreased by £167 million, or 13.9%, primarily reflecting lower overdraft fees, lower deposit hedge income and mortgage margin dilution. |
Business performance summary
Ulster Bank RoI
| Half year ended |
| Quarter ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June |
| 30 June | 31 March | 30 June |
| 2020 | 2019 |
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
| €m | €m |
| €m | €m | €m |
Total income | 285 | 324 |
| 135 | 150 | 158 |
Operating expenses | (283) | (322) |
| (140) | (143) | (166) |
Impairment losses/releases | (278) | 24 |
| (246) | (32) | 11 |
Operating (loss)/profit | (276) | 26 |
| (251) | (25) | 3 |
Return on equity | (24.2%) | 2.1% |
| (44.5%) | (4.2%) | 0.6% |
Net interest margin | 1.52% | 1.63% |
| 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.62% |
Cost:income ratio | 98.4% | 99.3% |
| 101.7% | 95.3% | 105.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As at | ||
|
|
|
| 30 June | 31 March | 31 December |
|
|
|
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
|
|
|
| €bn | €bn | €bn |
Net loans to customers (amortised cost) |
|
|
| 20.5 | 21.2 | 21.4 |
Customer deposits |
|
|
| 22.0 | 21.9 | 21.7 |
RWAs |
|
|
| 14.1 | 14.4 | 15.3 |
Loan impairment rate |
|
|
| 460bps | 58bps | 9bps |
Ulster Bank RoI continues to support all customers, including those who have been impacted by Covid-19. We have launched our digital Home Buying Platform, supporting customers to complete a mortgage application online, temporarily reduced our overdraft charges and we continue to support our vulnerable and elderly customers through our Companion card, dedicated helpline, priority banking hours and proactive outbound care calls. We have also provided mortgage payment breaks for approximately 12,000 customers, with over 4,000 extensions approved as at 30 June 2020. In our commercial business, we have provided payment breaks for approximately 3,000 customers and we continue to work closely with the Irish Government in providing customers with assistance through existing support schemes and the Credit Guarantee Scheme launched in July 2020.
H1 2020 compared with H1 2019 | |
● | Total income decreased by €39 million, or 12.0%, reflecting lower business activity resulting from the impact of Covid-19 on our customers and our business, the non-repeat of €11 million income relating to the restructure of interest rate swaps on free funds, and interest rate and foreign exchange movements. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses decreased by €6 million, or 2.2%, reflecting a 9.7% headcount reduction, including the scale down of our services and other functional teams, and lower project costs, which in H1 2019 included costs related to the improvement of the Ulster Bank RoI risk management framework. |
● | Impairment losses of €278 million increased by €302 million due to the impact across all portfolios from the deterioration in the economic outlook caused by Covid-19. |
● | Net loans to customers decreased by €0.7 billion, or 3.3%, which included the net de-recognition of €0.2 billion of non-performing loans (NPL) from a sale agreed in Q4 2019, and an increase in loan provisions against the remaining loans. Gross new lending of €1.1 billion was 29.0% lower, with Q2 2020 impacted by lower demand primarily related to Covid-19 factors. |
● | Customer deposits increased by €0.7 billion, or 3.3%, supporting a reduction in the loan:deposit ratio to 93% from 100%. |
● | RWAs decreased by €1.7 billion, or 10.8%, largely due to model recalibrations and the de-recognition of NPLs in H1 2020. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q1 2020 | |
● | Total income decreased by €15 million mainly due to lower personal and commercial fees. Net interest margin decreased by 8 basis points reflecting the impact of negative rates on increased liquid assets. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses were €3 million lower due to reduced marketing and administration costs and foreign exchange movements. |
● | Impairment losses increased by €214 million due to the deterioration in the economic outlook. |
● | Net loans to customers decreased by €0.7 billion due to an increase in provisions together with loan repayments outweighing gross new lending, which was adversely impacted by lower demand largely as a result of Covid-19. Gross new lending was €0.4 billion, €0.3 billion lower than Q1 2020. |
● | RWAs decreased by €0.3 billion due to model recalibrations and the impact of the NPL sale. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q2 2019 | |
● | Total income decreased by €23 million reflecting the impact of Covid-19, particularly on fee income due to lower transaction levels and implementation of waivers on both personal and commercial products. |
Business performance summary
Commercial Banking
| Half year ended |
| Quarter ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June |
| 30 June | 31 March | 30 June |
| 2020 | 2019 |
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
| £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
Total income | 2,003 | 2,165 |
| 995 | 1,008 | 1,083 |
Operating expenses | (1,221) | (1,262) |
| (611) | (610) | (622) |
Impairment losses | (1,790) | (202) |
| (1,355) | (435) | (197) |
Operating (loss)/profit | (1,008) | 701 |
| (971) | (37) | 264 |
Return on equity | (17.9%) | 8.8% |
| (32.5%) | (2.5%) | 6.2% |
Net interest margin | 1.76% | 1.98% |
| 1.70% | 1.83% | 1.97% |
Cost:income ratio | 59.5% | 56.9% |
| 59.9% | 59.1% | 56.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As at | ||
|
|
|
| 30 June | 31 March | 31 December |
|
|
|
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
|
|
|
| £bn | £bn | £bn |
Net loans to customers (amortised cost) |
|
|
| 112.0 | 109.2 | 101.2 |
Customer deposits |
|
|
| 159.6 | 143.9 | 135.0 |
RWAs |
|
|
| 78.3 | 76.9 | 72.5 |
Loan impairment rate |
|
|
| 472bps | 157bps | 32bps |
Commercial Banking continues to support customers through a comprehensive package of initiatives including participation in the UK Government's financial support schemes. As at H1 2020, £6.1 billion BBLS loans, £3.2 billion of CBILS loans and £0.7 billion of CLBILS loans had been approved and payment holidays, for up to twelve months, provided on c.71,000 customer accounts, representing c.12% of the lending book by value.
H1 2020 compared with H1 2019 | |
● | Total income decreased by £162 million, or 7.5%, reflecting £108 million lower non interest income due to reduced business activity and £54 million lower net interest income as a result of the contraction of the yield curve, partially offset by balance sheet growth. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses increased by £41 million, or 3.7%, reflecting a number of one-off releases in Q2 2019, higher innovation spend and a £5 million increase in OLD, partially offset by a 1.9% reduction in headcount following operating model efficiencies in H2 2019 and lower non staff costs. |
● | Impairment losses of £1,790 million primarily from stage one and two charges reflecting the deterioration in the economic outlook, with total stage three charges of £236 million, including a small number of single name charges. |
● | Net loans to customers increased by £10.6 billion, or 10.5%, with a £10.8 billion increase in H1 2020 reflecting drawdowns against UK Government lending schemes and £4.1 billion increased RCF utilisation. |
● | Customer deposits increased by £26.2 billion, or 19.6%, principally due to a £24.6 billion increase in H1 2020 as customers sought to retain liquidity in light of Covid-19 uncertainty. |
● | RWAs increased by £0.5 billion, or 0.6%, due to increased lending volumes and risk parameter changes, partially offset by a £4.5 billion reduction related to model improvements and active capital management, with limited procyclicality evident to date |
Q2 2020 compared with Q1 2020 | |
● | Total income decreased by £13 million as lower deposit funding benefits and reduced business activity offset balance sheet growth. Net interest margin decreased by 13 basis points mainly reflecting lower deposit funding benefits and higher liquidity portfolio costs. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses remained broadly stable as higher back office operations costs and a £1 million increase in OLD were partially offset by lower non-staff costs. |
● | Impairment losses of £1,355 million primarily from stage one and two charges reflecting the deterioration in the economic outlook, with total stage three charges of £169 million, including a small number of single name charges. |
● | Net loans to customers increased by £2.8 billion reflecting drawdowns against UK Government lending schemes, including £5.8 billion related to BBLS, £2.3 billion related to CBILS and £0.2 billion related to CLBILS, partially offset by £2.3 billion net RCF repayments, lower specialised business lending and increased loan provisions. RCF utilisation decreased to c.32% of committed facilities following increased drawdowns in March and April 2020, but remained above pre-Covid-19 levels. |
● | Customer deposits increased by £15.7 billion as customers sought to retain liquidity in light of Covid-19 uncertainty, including the retention of UK Government lending scheme drawdowns. |
● | RWAs increased by £1.4 billion due to increased lending volumes, risk parameter changes and business transfers of £0.4 billion from NatWest Markets. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q2 2019 | |
● | Total income decreased by £88 million, or 8.1%, reflecting reduced business activity and the contraction of the yield curve, partially offset by balance sheet growth and an £8 million fair value and disposal gain in Q2 2020, compared with a £15 million loss in Q2 2019. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses increased by £47 million, or 9.0%, reflecting a number of one-off releases in Q2 2019, higher innovation spend and £3 million higher OLD, partially offset by a 1.9% reduction in headcount following operating model efficiencies in H2 2019 and lower non-staff costs. |
Business performance summary
Private Banking (commentary adjusted for transfers)
| Half year ended |
| Quarter ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June |
| 30 June | 31 March | 30 June |
| 2020 | 2019 |
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
| £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
Total income | 392 | 384 |
| 191 | 201 | 191 |
Operating expenses | (252) | (232) |
| (129) | (123) | (115) |
Impairment (losses)/releases | (56) | 3 |
| (27) | (29) | (1) |
Operating profit | 84 | 155 |
| 35 | 49 | 75 |
Return on equity | 8.2% | 16.6% |
| 6.6% | 9.8% | 15.9% |
Net interest margin | 2.20% | 2.48% |
| 2.14% | 2.25% | 2.44% |
Cost:income ratio | 64.3% | 60.4% |
| 67.5% | 61.2% | 60.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As at | ||
|
|
|
| 30 June | 31 March | 31 December |
|
|
|
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
|
|
|
| £bn | £bn | £bn |
Net loans to customers (amortised cost) |
|
|
| 16.0 | 15.8 | 15.5 |
Customer deposits |
|
|
| 29.8 | 29.0 | 28.4 |
RWAs |
|
|
| 10.4 | 10.3 | 10.1 |
Assets Under Management (AUMs) |
|
|
| 27.1 | 24.3 | 23.2 |
Assets Under Administration (AUAs) (1) |
|
|
| 2.7 | 2.4 | 7.2 |
Total Assets Under Management and Administration (AUMA) |
|
|
| 29.8 | 26.7 | 30.4 |
Loan impairment rate |
|
|
| 67bps | 73bps | (3)bps |
Notes:
(1) Private Banking manages assets under management portfolios on behalf of UK Personal Banking and RBSI and receives a management fee in respect of providing this service.
(2) Comparisons with prior periods are impacted by the transfer of the Private Client Advice business to Private Banking from 1 January 2020. The net impact on H1 2019 operating profit would have been to increase total income by £22 million and operating expenses by £4 million. The net impact on the H1 2019 balance sheet would have been to increase AUMs by £4.5 billion and customer deposits by £0.3 billion. The net impact on Q2 2019 operating profit would have been to increase total income by £11 million and operating expenses by £2 million. The net impact on the Q4 2019 balance sheet would have been to increase AUMs by £4.6 billion and customer deposits by £0.2 billion. Variances in the commentary below have been adjusted for the impact of this transfer.
Private Banking remains committed to supporting clients through a range of initiatives during this period of significant uncertainty, including the provision of mortgage and loan repayment breaks and via participation in the UK Government's CBILS financial support scheme, with £146 million approved as at H1 2020.
H1 2020 compared with H1 2019 | |
● | Total income decreased by £14 million, or 3.4%, primarily reflecting £11 million lower net interest income due to lower deposit income and asset margin compression, partially offset by balance sheet growth. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses increased by £24 million, or 11.1%, reflecting higher investment spend and a number of one-off items. |
● | Impairment losses of £56 million, mainly reflected stage one and two charges linked to the deterioration of the economic outlook. |
● | Net loans to customers increased by £1.3 billion, or 8.8%, reflecting mortgage lending and other loans growth. RWAs increased by £0.7 billion, or 7.2%, primarily reflecting increased lending volumes. |
● | Customer deposits increased by £1.5 billion, or 5.3%, principally due to a £1.2 billion increase in H1 2020 reflecting an increase in instant access savings and current accounts. |
● | Total AUMAs overseen by Private Banking increased by £0.9 billion, or 3.1%, reflecting net new business inflows of £1.2 billion partially offset by adverse market movements of £0.3 billion. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q1 2020 | |
● | Total income decreased by £10 million, primarily reflecting asset margin compression and a reduction in fee income, partially offset by balance sheet growth. Net interest margin decreased by 11 basis points mainly due to asset margin compression, lower deposit income and higher liquidity portfolio costs. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses increased by £5 million reflecting higher investment spend and a number of one-off items. |
● | Impairment losses of £27 million, mainly reflected stage one and two charges linked to the deterioration of the economic outlook, partially offset by a single name release. |
● | Customer deposits increased by £0.8 billion reflecting an increase in instant access savings and current accounts. |
● | Total AUMAs overseen by Private Banking increased by £3.1 billion, reflecting positive investment performance of £2.9 billion and net new business inflows of £0.2 billion. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q2 2019 | |
● | Total income decreased by £11 million, or 5.4%, primarily reflecting lower deposit income, asset margin compression and a reduction in fee income, partially offset by balance sheet growth. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses increased by £18 million, or 17.1%, primarily reflecting higher investment spend and a number of one-off items. |
Business performance summary
RBS International
| Half year ended |
| Quarter ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June |
| 30 June | 31 March | 30 June |
| 2020 | 2019 |
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
| £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
Total income | 259 | 310 |
| 115 | 144 | 159 |
Operating expenses | (126) | (119) |
| (65) | (61) | (60) |
Impairment (losses)/releases | (46) | 3 |
| (31) | (15) | 2 |
Operating profit | 87 | 194 |
| 19 | 68 | 101 |
Return on equity | 11.8% | 29.7% |
| 4.3% | 19.4% | 30.8% |
Net interest margin | 1.30% | 1.69% |
| 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.68% |
Cost:income ratio | 48.6% | 38.4% |
| 56.5% | 42.4% | 37.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As at | ||
|
|
|
| 30 June | 31 March | 31 December |
|
|
|
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
|
|
|
| £bn | £bn | £bn |
Net loans to customers (amortised cost) |
|
|
| 12.7 | 13.6 | 14.1 |
Customer deposits |
|
|
| 29.5 | 32.3 | 30.1 |
RWAs |
|
|
| 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.5 |
Loan impairment rate |
|
|
| 97bps | 44bps | 14bps |
During H1 2020, RBS International supported 1,282 personal customers with mortgage repayment breaks, reflecting a mortgage value of £275 million, and 418 business customers with working capital facilities, reflecting a value of £452 million, while continuing to suspend a range of fees and charges for its personal and business customers.
H1 2020 compared with H1 2019 | |
● | Total income decreased by £51 million, or 16.5%, primarily due to the impact of interest rate reductions on deposit income as well as £2 million lower payments income with the waiving of personal and commercial banking fees in Q2 2020 to support customers during Covid-19. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses increased by £12 million, or 11.0%, mainly due to £6 million higher investment spend to enhance the digital proposition, £2 million Covid-19 incident costs and £3 million higher technology costs. |
● | Impairment losses of £46 million included £25 million stage one and stage two charges reflecting the deterioration in the economic outlook and a £19 million charge related to a single client. |
● | Net loans to customers decreased by £0.9 billion, or 6.6%, as Institutional Banking customers repaid facilities to position themselves in the uncertain environment. |
● | Customer deposits increased by £1.4 billion, or 5.0%, as Institutional Banking customers sought to build liquidity in response to Covid-19 uncertainty. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q1 2020 | |
● | Total income decreased £29 million primarily due to £23 million lower deposit income resulting from the full quarter impact of the central bank rate reductions and £4 million lower lending income. Net interest margin decreased by 30 basis points due to lower deposit funding benefits as a result of interest rate changes by central banks. |
● | Impairment losses of £31 million included £17 million stage one and two charges reflecting the deterioration in the economic outlook and a £13 million charge related to a single client. |
● | Net loans to customers decreased by £0.9 billion as Institutional Banking customers responded to the uncertain economic outlook by repaying facilities. |
● | Customer deposits decreased £2.8 billion due to lower call balances in the Institutional Banking sector as significant Q1 2020 inflows were used to fund loan repayments. Deposits in Local Banking increased by £0.4 billion, most notably in Local Corporate and Everyday Banking. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q2 2019 | |
● | Total income decreased by £44 million, or 27.7%, due to lower deposit funding benefits, and lower fee income reflecting the economic response to Covid-19 with central bank rate reductions and fee waivers. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses increased by £7 million, or 13.0%, reflecting higher investment spend and Covid-19 incident costs. |
Business performance summary
NatWest Markets(1)
| Half year ended |
| Quarter ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June |
| 30 June | 31 March | 30 June |
| 2020 | 2019 |
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
| £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
Total income | 816 | 942 |
| 273 | 543 | 686 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Income excluding asset disposals/strategic risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reduction and own credit adjustments | 826 | 989 |
| 438 | 388 | 691 |
- Asset disposals/strategic risk reduction (2) | (63) | - |
| (63) | - | - |
- Own credit adjustments | 53 | (47) |
| (102) | 155 | (5) |
Operating expenses | (707) | (678) |
| (365) | (342) | (344) |
Impairment (losses)/releases | (40) | 36 |
| (45) | 5 | 20 |
Operating profit/(loss) | 69 | 300 |
| (137) | 206 | 362 |
Return on equity | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| (7.1%) | 8.7% | 4.4% |
Cost:income ratio | 86.6% | 72.0% |
| 133.7% | 63.0% | 50.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As at | ||
|
|
|
| 30 June | 31 March | 31 December |
|
|
|
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
|
|
|
| £bn | £bn | £bn |
Funded Assets |
|
|
| 122.9 | 129.6 | 116.2 |
RWAs |
|
|
| 35.1 | 38.9 | 37.9 |
Notes:
(1) The NatWest Markets operating segment is not the same as the NatWest Markets Plc legal entity (NWM Plc) or group (NWM or NWM Group). For 2019, NWM Group includes NatWest Markets N.V. (NWM N.V.) from 29 November 2019 only. For periods prior to Q4 2019, NWM N.V. was excluded from the NWM Group. In both 2019 and 2020 the NatWest Markets segment excludes the Central items & other segment.
(2) Asset disposals/strategic risk reduction in 2020 relates to the cost of exiting positions and the impact of risk reduction transactions entered into, in respect of the strategic announcement on 14 February 2020.
Progress on strategic change | |
● | NatWest Markets continues to progress its strategy to refocus towards NatWest Group's corporate and institutional customers and reduce RWAs. During H1 2020, further refinements have been made to simplify the customer product suite, including exiting the Custom Index Trading business and the reduction of the third party market making offering in flow asset backed securities (ABS), residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) and collateralised loan obligations (CLO). Additionally, NatWest Markets selected BNP Paribas as a strategic partner for the provision of execution and clearing of listed derivatives, following the decision to no longer offer these services for certain exchange traded derivatives, as announced in Q1 2020. |
● | NatWest Markets continues to identify efficiency improvements. During Q2 2020 changes were made to the regional operating models in the US and APAC and actions were taken to drive closer alignment with NatWest Group, such as leveraging NatWest Group Technology infrastructure. |
● | NatWest Markets has also actively identified and progressed RWA reduction, with a number of asset exits completed during Q2 2020. NatWest Markets continues to target an RWA reduction to £32 billion at the end of 2020. |
H1 2020 compared with H1 2019 | |
● | Total income decreased by £126 million, or 13.4%, reflecting a £444 million gain from the merger of Alawwal bank with Saudi British Bank (SABB) in H1 2019, partially offset by heightened customer activity and OCA movements. An OCA credit of £53 million compared with a £47 million charge in H1 2019 reflected the significant widening of credit spreads. |
● | Income excluding asset disposals/strategic risk reduction, OCA and notable items increased by £254 million, or 44.4%, reflecting increased customer activity as the market reacted to the spread of the Covid-19 virus, resulting in higher levels of primary issuance from governments and increased secondary market activity in both the Rates and Currencies businesses, partially offset by the impact of credit market write-downs. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses decreased by £31 million, or 5.2%, primarily reflecting lower back office operational costs and initial reductions following the strategic announcement in February 2020. |
● | RWAs decreased by £6.3 billion, or 15.2%, reflecting lower levels of counterparty and market risk which, despite recent turbulence, have trended downwards as the business seeks to reduce its RWAs. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q1 2020 | |
● | Income excluding asset disposals/strategic risk reduction and OCA increased by £50 million. Income from Financing increased as credit markets stabilised, supported by central bank actions, whilst Rates and Currencies decreased as the volatility seen towards the end of Q1 2020 eased. Asset disposal/strategic risk reduction losses of £63 million included a £40 million loss related to a single significant transaction. |
● | Excluding strategic, litigation and conduct costs, operating expenses decreased by £27 million reflecting initial reductions following the strategic announcement in February 2020. |
● | RWAs decreased by £3.8 billion as the business works towards its full year RWA target. Counterparty credit risk decreased by £1.5 billion reflecting the exit of specific positions and market risk decreased by £1.5 billion, as markets normalised. A reduction in credit risk of £0.8 billion included £0.4 billion of business transfers to Commercial Banking. |
Q2 2020 compared with Q2 2019 | |
● | Income excluding asset disposals/strategic risk reduction, OCA and notable items increased by £168 million, or 62.2%, reflecting heightened levels of customer activity in Q2 2020, as markets reacted to the Covid-19 pandemic. |
Business performance summary
Central items & other
| Half year ended |
| Quarter ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June |
| 30 June | 31 March | 30 June |
| 2020 | 2019 |
| 2020 | 2020 | 2019 |
| £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
Central items not allocated | (216) | 284 |
| (146) | (70) | 337 |
● | Central items not allocated represented a £216 million operating loss in H1 2020 principally due to property related strategic costs, litigation and conduct charges and other treasury income. This compares with a £284 million gain in H1 2019 which primarily reflected FX recycling gains of £290 million and a legacy liability release of £256 million, both relating to the Alawwal bank merger. |
Segment performance
|
|
Half year ended 30 June 2020 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central |
Total |
|||
|
|
UK Personal |
Ulster |
|
Commercial |
Private |
RBS |
|
NatWest |
items & |
NatWest |
|
|
Banking |
Bank RoI |
|
Banking |
Banking |
International |
|
Markets |
other (1) |
Group |
|
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
£m |
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
1,982 |
194 |
|
1,370 |
251 |
201 |
|
(34) |
(112) |
3,852 |
|
Other non-interest income |
203 |
55 |
|
633 |
141 |
58 |
|
797 |
46 |
1,933 |
|
Own credit adjustments |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
53 |
- |
53 |
|
Total income |
2,185 |
249 |
|
2,003 |
392 |
259 |
|
816 |
(66) |
5,838 |
|
Direct expenses |
- staff costs |
(280) |
(100) |
|
(360) |
(93) |
(65) |
|
(326) |
(572) |
(1,796) |
|
- other costs |
(104) |
(42) |
|
(149) |
(47) |
(27) |
|
(94) |
(1,116) |
(1,579) |
Indirect expenses |
(785) |
(92) |
|
(630) |
(101) |
(29) |
|
(149) |
1,786 |
- |
|
Strategic costs |
- direct |
(1) |
(4) |
|
(5) |
- |
(3) |
|
(120) |
(331) |
(464) |
|
- indirect |
(103) |
(8) |
|
(70) |
(10) |
(5) |
|
(16) |
212 |
- |
Litigation and conduct costs |
198 |
1 |
|
(7) |
(1) |
3 |
|
(2) |
(103) |
89 |
|
Operating expenses |
(1,075) |
(245) |
|
(1,221) |
(252) |
(126) |
|
(707) |
(124) |
(3,750) |
|
Operating profit/(loss) before impairment losses |
1,110 |
4 |
|
782 |
140 |
133 |
|
109 |
(190) |
2,088 |
|
Impairment losses |
(657) |
(243) |
|
(1,790) |
(56) |
(46) |
|
(40) |
(26) |
(2,858) |
|
Operating profit/(loss) |
453 |
(239) |
|
(1,008) |
84 |
87 |
|
69 |
(216) |
(770) |
|
Additional information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity (2) |
10.7% |
(24.2%) |
|
(17.9%) |
8.2% |
11.8% |
|
0.8% |
nm |
(4.4%) |
|
Cost:income ratio (2) |
49.2% |
98.4% |
|
59.5% |
64.3% |
48.6% |
|
86.6% |
nm |
63.8% |
|
Total assets (£bn) |
187.1 |
27.6 |
|
186.0 |
23.9 |
31.5 |
|
303.8 |
47.0 |
806.9 |
|
Funded assets (£bn) |
187.1 |
27.6 |
|
186.0 |
23.9 |
31.5 |
|
122.9 |
44.5 |
623.5 |
|
Net loans to customers - amortised cost (£bn) |
164.5 |
18.7 |
|
112.0 |
16.0 |
12.7 |
|
11.4 |
17.0 |
352.3 |
|
Loan impairment rate (2) |
79bps |
248bps |
|
311bps |
70bps |
72bps |
|
nm |
nm |
159bps |
|
Impairment provisions (£bn) |
(1.9) |
(0.9) |
|
(3.0) |
(0.1) |
- |
|
(0.2) |
- |
(6.1) |
|
Impairment provisions - Stage 3 (£bn) |
(0.9) |
(0.6) |
|
(1.2) |
- |
- |
|
(0.1) |
- |
(2.8) |
|
Customer deposits (£bn) |
161.0 |
20.0 |
|
159.6 |
29.8 |
29.5 |
|
5.5 |
2.9 |
408.3 |
|
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (£bn) |
36.7 |
12.8 |
|
78.3 |
10.4 |
6.8 |
|
35.1 |
1.4 |
181.5 |
|
RWA equivalent (RWAe) (£bn) |
36.7 |
12.8 |
|
78.4 |
10.4 |
6.9 |
|
37.2 |
1.5 |
183.9 |
|
Employee numbers (FTEs - thousands) |
17.5 |
2.8 |
|
10.2 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
|
5.0 |
23.4 |
62.7 |
|
Average interest earning assets (£bn) |
178.6 |
25.7 |
|
156.5 |
23.0 |
31.2 |
|
38.0 |
nm |
477.9 |
|
Net interest margin |
2.23% |
1.52% |
|
1.76% |
2.20% |
1.30% |
|
(0.18%) |
nm |
1.62% |
|
Third party customer asset rate (3) |
2.96% |
2.27% |
|
2.86% |
2.65% |
2.65% |
|
nm |
nm |
nm |
|
Third party customer funding rate (3) |
(0.28%) |
(0.12%) |
|
(0.37%) |
(0.25%) |
(0.06%) |
|
nm |
nm |
nm |
For the notes to this table, refer to page 18.
Segment performance
|
| Half year ended 30 June 2019 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Central | Total | |||
|
| UK Personal | Ulster |
| Commercial | Private | RBS |
| NatWest | items & | NatWest |
|
| Banking | Bank RoI |
| Banking | Banking | International |
| Markets | other (1) | Group |
|
| £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income | 2,084 | 200 |
| 1,424 | 261 | 242 |
| (122) | (85) | 4,004 | |
Other non-interest income | 363 | 82 |
| 741 | 123 | 68 |
| 667 | 80 | 2,124 | |
Own credit adjustments | - | 1 |
| - | - | - |
| (47) | - | (46) | |
Strategic disposals | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| 444 | 591 | 1,035 | |
Total income | 2,447 | 283 |
| 2,165 | 384 | 310 |
| 942 | 586 | 7,117 | |
Direct expenses | - staff costs | (300) | (104) |
| (356) | (82) | (59) |
| (349) | (591) | (1,841) |
| - other costs | (136) | (48) |
| (155) | (35) | (23) |
| (86) | (1,087) | (1,570) |
Indirect expenses | (716) | (90) |
| (587) | (96) | (27) |
| (165) | 1,681 | - | |
Strategic costs | - direct | 4 | (9) |
| (32) | - | (5) |
| (49) | (538) | (629) |
| - indirect | (75) | (10) |
| (86) | (17) | (5) |
| (30) | 223 | - |
Litigation and conduct costs | (6) | (20) |
| (46) | (2) | - |
| 1 | 13 | (60) | |
Operating expenses | (1,229) | (281) |
| (1,262) | (232) | (119) |
| (678) | (299) | (4,100) | |
Operating profit before impairment (losses)/releases | 1,218 | 2 |
| 903 | 152 | 191 |
| 264 | 287 | 3,017 | |
Impairment (losses)/releases | (181) | 21 |
| (202) | 3 | 3 |
| 36 | (3) | (323) | |
Operating profit | 1,037 | 23 |
| 701 | 155 | 194 |
| 300 | 284 | 2,694 | |
Additional information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Return on equity (2) | 25.6% | 2.1% |
| 8.8% | 16.6% | 29.7% |
| 1.0% | nm | 12.1% | |
Cost:income ratio (2) | 50.2% | 99.3% |
| 56.9% | 60.4% | 38.4% |
| 72.0% | nm | 57.2% | |
Total assets (£bn) | 173.9 | 26.4 |
| 165.6 | 21.9 | 30.4 |
| 278.9 | 32.8 | 729.9 | |
Funded assets (£bn) | 173.9 | 26.4 |
| 165.6 | 21.9 | 30.4 |
| 133.4 | 32.7 | 584.3 | |
Net loans to customers - amortised cost (£bn) | 151.9 | 19.0 |
| 101.4 | 14.7 | 13.6 |
| 9.3 | 0.7 | 310.6 | |
Loan impairment rate (2) | 24bps | (21)bps |
| 39bps | (4)bps | (4)bps |
| nm | nm | 21bps | |
Impairment provisions (£bn) | (1.3) | (0.9) |
| (1.3) | - | - |
| (0.2) | - | (3.7) | |
Impairment provisions - Stage 3 (£bn) | (0.8) | (0.8) |
| (1.0) | - | - |
| (0.2) | - | (2.8) | |
Customer deposits (£bn) | 147.5 | 19.0 |
| 133.4 | 28.0 | 28.1 |
| 2.8 | 2.8 | 361.6 | |
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (£bn) | 37.0 | 14.2 |
| 77.8 | 9.7 | 6.9 |
| 41.4 | 1.5 | 188.5 | |
RWA equivalent (RWAe) (£bn) | 38.1 | 14.5 |
| 79.3 | 9.7 | 7.0 |
| 46.1 | 1.8 | 196.5 | |
Employee numbers (FTEs - thousands) | 19.3 | 3.1 |
| 10.4 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| 5.0 | 25.1 | 66.6 | |
Average interest earning assets (£bn) | 163.8 | 24.7 |
| 145.3 | 21.2 | 28.8 |
| 33.3 | nm | 440.3 | |
Net interest margin | 2.57% | 1.63% |
| 1.98% | 2.48% | 1.69% |
| (0.73%) | nm | 1.83% | |
Third party customer asset rate (3) | 3.28% | 2.30% |
| 3.20% | 2.95% | 1.75% |
| nm | nm | nm | |
Third party customer funding rate (3) | (0.37%) | (0.17%) |
| (0.43%) | (0.44%) | (0.14%) |
| nm | nm | nm |
For the notes to this table, refer to page 18.
Segment performance
|
| Quarter ended 30 June 2020 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Central | Total | |||
|
| UK Personal | Ulster |
| Commercial | Private | RBS |
| NatWest | items & | NatWest |
|
| Banking | Bank RoI |
| Banking | Banking | International |
| Markets | other (1) | Group |
|
| £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income | 975 | 97 |
| 696 | 124 | 90 |
| 6 | (78) | 1,910 | |
Other non-interest income | 60 | 23 |
| 299 | 67 | 25 |
| 369 | 25 | 868 | |
Own credit adjustments | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| (102) | - | (102) | |
Total income | 1,035 | 120 |
| 995 | 191 | 115 |
| 273 | (53) | 2,676 | |
Direct expenses | - staff costs | (139) | (52) |
| (176) | (46) | (33) |
| (159) | (272) | (877) |
| - other costs | (45) | (18) |
| (71) | (23) | (13) |
| (37) | (577) | (784) |
Indirect expenses | (393) | (46) |
| (324) | (54) | (15) |
| (75) | 907 | - | |
Strategic costs | - direct | (1) | (3) |
| - | - | (2) |
| (86) | (241) | (333) |
| - indirect | (69) | (4) |
| (34) | (5) | (2) |
| (8) | 122 | - |
Litigation and conduct costs | 101 | 1 |
| (6) | (1) | - |
| - | (10) | 85 | |
Operating expenses | (546) | (122) |
| (611) | (129) | (65) |
| (365) | (71) | (1,909) | |
Operating profit/(loss) before impairment losses | 489 | (2) |
| 384 | 62 | 50 |
| (92) | (124) | 767 | |
Impairment losses | (360) | (216) |
| (1,355) | (27) | (31) |
| (45) | (22) | (2,056) | |
Operating profit/(loss) | 129 | (218) |
| (971) | 35 | 19 |
| (137) | (146) | (1,289) | |
Additional information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Return on equity (2) | 5.7% | (44.5%) |
| (32.5%) | 6.6% | 4.3% |
| (7.1%) | nm | (12.4%) | |
Cost:income ratio (2) | 52.8% | 101.7% |
| 59.9% | 67.5% | 56.5% |
| 133.7% | nm | 70.9% | |
Total assets (£bn) | 187.1 | 27.6 |
| 186.0 | 23.9 | 31.5 |
| 303.8 | 47.0 | 806.9 | |
Funded assets (£bn) | 187.1 | 27.6 |
| 186.0 | 23.9 | 31.5 |
| 122.9 | 44.5 | 623.5 | |
Net loans to customers - amortised cost (£bn) | 164.5 | 18.7 |
| 112.0 | 16.0 | 12.7 |
| 11.4 | 17.0 | 352.3 | |
Loan impairment rate (2) | 87bps | 441bps |
| 472bps | 67bps | 97bps |
| nm | nm | 229bps | |
Impairment provisions (£bn) | (1.9) | (0.9) |
| (3.0) | (0.1) | - |
| (0.2) | - | (6.1) | |
Impairment provisions - Stage 3 (£bn) | (0.9) | (0.6) |
| (1.2) | - | - |
| (0.1) | - | (2.8) | |
Customer deposits (£bn) | 161.0 | 20.0 |
| 159.6 | 29.8 | 29.5 |
| 5.5 | 2.9 | 408.3 | |
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (£bn) | 36.7 | 12.8 |
| 78.3 | 10.4 | 6.8 |
| 35.1 | 1.4 | 181.5 | |
RWA equivalent (RWAe) (£bn) | 36.7 | 12.8 |
| 78.4 | 10.4 | 6.9 |
| 37.2 | 1.5 | 183.9 | |
Employee numbers (FTEs - thousands) | 17.5 | 2.8 |
| 10.2 | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 5.0 | 23.4 | 62.7 | |
Average interest earning assets (£bn) | 179.8 | 26.4 |
| 164.6 | 23.3 | 31.5 |
| 39.9 | nm | 497.4 | |
Net interest margin | 2.18% | 1.48% |
| 1.70% | 2.14% | 1.15% |
| 0.06% | nm | 1.54% | |
Third party customer asset rate (3) | 2.86% | 2.27% |
| 2.70% | 2.52% | 2.58% |
| nm | nm | nm | |
Third party customer funding rate (3) | (0.20%) | (0.12%) |
| (0.33%) | (0.13%) | (0.01%) |
| nm | nm | nm |
For the notes to this table, refer to page 18.
Segment performance
|
| Quarter ended 31 March 2020 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Central | Total | |||
|
| UK Personal | Ulster |
| Commercial | Private | RBS |
| NatWest | items & | NatWest |
|
| Banking | Bank RoI |
| Banking | Banking | International |
| Markets | other (1) | Group |
|
| £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income | 1,007 | 97 |
| 674 | 127 | 111 |
| (40) | (34) | 1,942 | |
Other non-interest income | 143 | 32 |
| 334 | 74 | 33 |
| 428 | 21 | 1,065 | |
Own credit adjustments | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| 155 | - | 155 | |
Total income | 1,150 | 129 |
| 1,008 | 201 | 144 |
| 543 | (13) | 3,162 | |
Direct expenses | - staff costs | (141) | (48) |
| (184) | (47) | (32) |
| (167) | (300) | (919) |
| - other costs | (59) | (24) |
| (78) | (24) | (14) |
| (57) | (539) | (795) |
Indirect expenses | (392) | (46) |
| (306) | (47) | (14) |
| (74) | 879 | - | |
Strategic costs | - direct | - | (1) |
| (5) | - | (1) |
| (34) | (90) | (131) |
| - indirect | (34) | (4) |
| (36) | (5) | (3) |
| (8) | 90 | - |
Litigation and conduct costs | 97 | - |
| (1) | - | 3 |
| (2) | (93) | 4 | |
Operating expenses | (529) | (123) |
| (610) | (123) | (61) |
| (342) | (53) | (1,841) | |
Operating profit/(loss) before impairment (losses)/releases | 621 | 6 |
| 398 | 78 | 83 |
| 201 | (66) | 1,321 | |
Impairment (losses)/releases | (297) | (27) |
| (435) | (29) | (15) |
| 5 | (4) | (802) | |
Operating profit/(loss) | 324 | (21) |
| (37) | 49 | 68 |
| 206 | (70) | 519 | |
Additional information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Return on equity (2) | 15.5% | (4.2%) |
| (2.5%) | 9.8% | 19.4% |
| 8.7% | nm | 3.6% | |
Cost:income ratio (2) | 46.0% | 95.3% |
| 59.1% | 61.2% | 42.4% |
| 63.0% | nm | 57.7% | |
Total assets (£bn) | 186.3 | 26.3 |
| 178.3 | 23.4 | 33.2 |
| 335.7 | 34.4 | 817.6 | |
Funded assets (£bn) | 186.3 | 26.3 |
| 178.3 | 23.4 | 33.2 |
| 129.6 | 31.8 | 608.9 | |
Net loans to customers - amortised cost (£bn) | 163.7 | 18.7 |
| 109.2 | 15.8 | 13.6 |
| 12.2 | 18.1 | 351.3 | |
Loan impairment rate (2) | 72bps | 56bps |
| 157bps | 73bps | 44bps |
| nm | nm | 90bps | |
Impairment provisions (£bn) | (1.6) | (0.7) |
| (1.7) | (0.1) | - |
| (0.1) | - | (4.2) | |
Impairment provisions - Stage 3 (£bn) | (0.9) | (0.6) |
| (1.0) | - | - |
| (0.1) | - | (2.6) | |
Customer deposits (£bn) | 152.8 | 19.3 |
| 143.9 | 29.0 | 32.3 |
| 5.7 | 1.8 | 384.8 | |
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (£bn) | 38.2 | 12.7 |
| 76.9 | 10.3 | 6.8 |
| 38.9 | 1.4 | 185.2 | |
RWA equivalent (RWAe) (£bn) | 38.2 | 12.7 |
| 77.0 | 10.3 | 7.1 |
| 42.2 | 1.7 | 189.2 | |
Employee numbers (FTEs - thousands) | 17.8 | 2.9 |
| 10.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 5.1 | 23.6 | 63.2 | |
Average interest earning assets (£bn) | 177.4 | 24.9 |
| 148.4 | 22.7 | 30.9 |
| 36.1 | nm | 458.5 | |
Net interest margin | 2.28% | 1.56% |
| 1.83% | 2.25% | 1.45% |
| (0.45%) | nm | 1.70% | |
Third party customer asset rate (3) | 3.06% | 2.28% |
| 3.03% | 2.77% | 2.79% |
| nm | nm | nm | |
Third party customer funding rate (3) | (0.37%) | (0.13%) |
| (0.42%) | (0.38%) | (0.11%) |
| nm | nm | nm |
For the notes to this table, refer to page 18.
Segment performance
|
| Quarter ended 30 June 2019 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Central | Total | |||
|
| UK Personal | Ulster |
| Commercial | Private | RBS |
| NatWest | items & | NatWest |
|
| Banking | Bank RoI |
| Banking | Banking | International |
| Markets | other (1) | Group |
|
| £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m |
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income | 1,032 | 102 |
| 716 | 129 | 125 |
| (91) | (42) | 1,971 | |
Other non-interest income | 170 | 35 |
| 367 | 62 | 34 |
| 338 | 71 | 1,077 | |
Own credit adjustments | - | 1 |
| - | - | - |
| (5) | 1 | (3) | |
Strategic disposals | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| 444 | 591 | 1,035 | |
Total income | 1,202 | 138 |
| 1,083 | 191 | 159 |
| 686 | 621 | 4,080 | |
Direct expenses | - staff costs | (148) | (53) |
| (175) | (41) | (31) |
| (176) | (281) | (905) |
| - other costs | (77) | (22) |
| (80) | (17) | (10) |
| (38) | (524) | (768) |
Indirect expenses | (317) | (42) |
| (269) | (45) | (13) |
| (76) | 762 | - | |
Strategic costs | - direct | 4 | (4) |
| (12) | - | (3) |
| (31) | (388) | (434) |
| - indirect | (49) | (5) |
| (50) | (10) | (3) |
| (17) | 134 | - |
Litigation and conduct costs | (7) | (19) |
| (36) | (2) | - |
| (6) | 15 | (55) | |
Operating expenses | (594) | (145) |
| (622) | (115) | (60) |
| (344) | (282) | (2,162) | |
Operating profit/(loss) before impairment (losses)/releases | 608 | (7) |
| 461 | 76 | 99 |
| 342 | 339 | 1,918 | |
Impairment (losses)/releases | (69) | 10 |
| (197) | (1) | 2 |
| 20 | (2) | (237) | |
Operating profit | 539 | 3 |
| 264 | 75 | 101 |
| 362 | 337 | 1681 | |
Additional information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Return on equity (2) | 26.5% | 0.6% |
| 6.2% | 15.9% | 30.8% |
| 4.4% | nm | 15.8% | |
Cost:income ratio (2) | 49.4% | 105.1% |
| 56.1% | 60.2% | 37.7% |
| 50.1% | nm | 52.6% | |
Total assets (£bn) | 173.9 | 26.4 |
| 165.6 | 21.9 | 30.4 |
| 278.9 | 32.8 | 729.9 | |
Funded assets (£bn) | 173.9 | 26.4 |
| 165.6 | 21.9 | 30.4 |
| 133.4 | 32.7 | 584.3 | |
Net loans to customers - amortised cost (£bn) | 151.9 | 19.0 |
| 101.4 | 14.7 | 13.6 |
| 9.3 | 0.7 | 310.6 | |
Loan impairment rate (2) | 18bps | (20)bps |
| 77bps | 3bps | (6)bps |
| nm | nm | 30bps | |
Impairment provisions (£bn) | (1.3) | (0.9) |
| (1.3) | - | - |
| (0.2) | - | (3.7) | |
Impairment provisions - Stage 3 (£bn) | (0.8) | (0.8) |
| (1.0) | - | - |
| (0.2) | - | (2.8) | |
Customer deposits (£bn) | 147.5 | 19.0 |
| 133.4 | 28.0 | 28.1 |
| 2.8 | 2.8 | 361.6 | |
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (£bn) | 37.0 | 14.2 |
| 77.8 | 9.7 | 6.9 |
| 41.4 | 1.5 | 188.5 | |
RWA equivalent (RWAe) (£bn) | 38.1 | 14.5 |
| 79.3 | 9.7 | 7.0 |
| 46.1 | 1.8 | 196.5 | |
Employee numbers (FTEs - thousands) | 19.3 | 3.1 |
| 10.4 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| 5.0 | 25.1 | 66.6 | |
Average interest earning assets (£bn) | 164.8 | 25.3 |
| 146.1 | 21.2 | 29.8 |
| 34.4 | nm | 444.8 | |
Net interest margin | 2.51% | 1.62% |
| 1.97% | 2.44% | 1.68% |
| (1.05%) | nm | 1.78% | |
Third party customer asset rate (3) | 3.25% | 2.29% |
| 3.18% | 2.89% | 1.79% |
| nm | nm | nm | |
Third party customer funding rate (3) | (0.38%) | (0.15%) |
| (0.42%) | (0.45%) | (0.13%) |
| nm | nm | nm |
Notes:
(1) Central items & other includes unallocated transactions, including volatile items under IFRS, items related to the Alawwal bank merger (2019 only) and RMBS related items.
(2) Refer to the Appendix for details of basis of preparation and reconciliation of non-IFRS performance measures where relevant.
(3) Ulster Bank Ireland DAC(UBI DAC) and RBS International manage their funding and liquidity requirements locally. Their liquidity asset portfolios and non-customer related funding sources are included within their net interest margin, but excluded from their third party asset and liability rates.
Capital and risk management
|
Page |
Capital, liquidity and funding risk |
19 |
Credit risk |
|
Economic loss drivers |
28 |
Credit risk - Banking activities |
|
Segmental exposure |
37 |
Sector analysis |
42 |
Personal portfolio |
49 |
CRE |
52 |
Flow statements |
54 |
Asset quality |
66 |
Credit risk - Trading activities |
70 |
Market risk |
|
Non-traded |
73 |
Traded |
76 |
Other risks |
77 |
Certain disclosures in this section are within the scope of EY's review report and are marked accordingly by a bracket in the right hand margin.
Capital, liquidity and funding risk
Introduction
The economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic was significant. While liquidity, capital and funding were closely monitored throughout, NatWest Group benefited from its strong positions - particularly in relation to CET1 - going into the crisis. Prudent risk management continues to be important as the full economic effects of the global pandemic unfold.
Key developments
● |
The CET1 ratio increased by 100 basis points to 17.2% primarily due to the release of £1.3 billion following the cancellation of the proposed 2019 dividend payments and associated pension contribution in Q1 2020, as announced by the Board in response to Covid-19. The attributable loss in the period was £705 million however the IFRS 9 transitional arrangements on expected credit losses provided relief of £1,578 million. |
● |
RWAs increased by £2.3 billion in H1 2020. Credit Risk RWAs increased by £4.7 billion largely due to increased utilisation of existing facilities, new lending under the Government lending initiatives and revision of risk parameters in Commercial Banking. There were offsetting credit risk reductions in UK Personal Banking and NatWest Markets segments. Market Risk RWAs decreased by £1.5 billion, primarily reflecting movements in risks-not-in-VaR (RNIV) and Incremental Risk Charge (IRC) as well as a reduction in non-modelled market risk during the period. |
● |
The CRR leverage ratio remained as 5.1% due to an increase in Tier 1 capital being offset by increases in balance sheet exposures. |
● |
The total loss absorbing capital ratio of 36.8% is above the Bank of England (BOE) requirement of 21.9% at 1 January 2020, including CRDIV combined buffer requirements. |
● |
In the first half of 2020, NatWest Group plc issued $1.6 billion (£1.3 billion) new MREL eligible senior debt, $1.5 billion (£1.2 billion) of AT1 and £1.0 billion Tier 2 securities. NatWest Group plc made a redemption announcement on $2 billion (£1.3 billion) AT1 in June 2020 which have been excluded from capital and will be redeemed in August 2020. CET1 reduced by £345 million due to the FX impact on the redemption announcement. In subsidiaries, a £1.25 billion covered bond from National Westminster Bank Plc matured and NatWest Markets Plc issued two benchmark transactions, in the form of a €1.0 billion five - year fixed rate EMTN and a $1.0 billion three - year fixed rate US Rule 144A programme issuance. |
● |
NatWest Group participation in the BOE Term Funding Scheme (TFS) reduced by £5 billion and the Group drew down £5 billion under the BOE Term Funding Scheme with additional incentives for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (TFSME) during H1 2020. |
● |
UBI DAC borrowed €3.1 billion from the European Central Bank (ECB) Targeted longer-term refinancing operation (TLTRO 3) and repaid €2.0 billion of TLTRO 2. |
● |
H1 2020 published LCR ratio of 166% is 14% higher than FY 2019 driven by increased deposits in NatWest Holdings Limited and Treasury issuance including AT1, Tier 2 and MREL, partially offset by NatWest Holdings Limited lending growth driven by mortgages and government schemes lending. |
● |
The net stable funding ratio was at 144% compared to 141% for FY 2019. The increase is mainly due to deposits growth. |
Capital and risk management
Capital, liquidity and funding risk continued
In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, a number of relief measures to alleviate the financial stability impact have been announced and recommended by regulatory and supervisory bodies. One significant announcement was on 26 June when the European Parliament passed an amended regulation to the CRR in response to the Covid-19 pandemic ("the CRR Covid-19 amendment"); NatWest Group has applied a number of the CRR amendments for H1 2020 reporting. The impact on capital and leverage of the CRR amendment and other relief measures are set out below.
● | IFRS 9 Transition - NatWest Group has elected to take advantage of the transitional regulatory capital rules in respect of expected credit losses following the adoption of IFRS 9; it had previously had a negligible impact up to Q4 2019. The CRR Covid-19 amendment now requires a full CET1 addback for the movement in stage 1 and stage 2 ECL from 1 January 2020 for the next two years. The IFRS 9 transitional arrangement impact on NatWest Group CET1 regulatory capital at 30 June 2020 is £1.6 billion. |
●
| UK Leverage exposure - The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) announced the ability for firms to apply for a modification by consent to permit the netting of regular-way purchase and sales settlement balances. The PRA also offered a further modification that gave an exclusion from the UK Leverage Exposure for Bounce Back Loans (BBL) and other 100% guaranteed government Covid-19 lending schemes. The NatWest Group has received permission to apply these and it has reduced the UK leverage exposure by approximately £6.9 billion and £5.2 billion respectively. |
●
| CRR Leverage exposure - The CRR Covid-19 amendment accelerated a change in CRR2 to allow the netting of regular-way purchase and sales settlement balances. The NatWest Group has applied this and it has reduced the CRR leverage exposure by approximately £6.9 billion. |
●
| Infrastructure and SME RWA supporting factors - The CRR Covid-19 amendment allowed an acceleration of the planned changes to the SME supporting factor and the introduction of an Infrastructure supporting factor, with these now being applicable with immediate effect. NatWest Group intends to implement these beneficial changes which will reduce RWAs but has not yet concluded the required operational change project to implement. |
●
| Prudential Valuation Adjustment (PVA) - The European Commission amended the prudent valuation Regulatory Technical Standard such that, due to the exceptional levels of market volatility, the aggregation factor was increased from 50% to 66% until 31 December 2020. This has reduced NatWest Group's PVA deduction by approximately £100 million. |
●
| Market Risk Value-at-risk (VaR) model capital multiplier - The PRA and De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) have announced temporary approaches in relation to the exceptional levels of market volatility which has resulted in an increase in VaR model back testing exceptions in NatWest Markets Plc and NatWest Markets N.V.. Under the PRA temporary approach, capital multiplier increases due to new back testing exceptions which have resulted in an increase in capital requirements can be offset through a commensurate reduction in RNIV capital requirements. Under the DNB approach, back testing exceptions have been allowed to be excluded from the capital multiplier. The PRA approach resulted in approximately £2,300 million benefit and the DNB approach a benefit of approximately €100 million. |
● | Capital buffers - Many countries have recently announced reductions in their countercyclical capital buffer rates in response to Covid-19. Most notably for NatWest Group, the Financial Policy Committee reduced the UK rate from 1% to 0% effective from 11 March 2020. The CBI also announced a reduction of the Republic of Ireland rate from 1% to 0% effective from 1 April 2020. |
|
|
Capital and risk management
Capital, liquidity and funding risk continued
Maximum Distributable Amount (MDA) and Minimum Capital Requirements
NatWest Group is subject to minimum capital requirements relative to RWAs. The table below summarises the minimum capital requirements (the sum of Pillar 1 and Pillar 2A), and the additional capital buffers which are held in excess of the regulatory minimum requirements and are usable in stress.
Where the CET 1 ratio falls below the sum of the minimum capital and the combined buffer requirement, there is a subsequent automatic restriction on the amount available to service discretionary payments, known as the MDA. Note that different capital requirements apply to individual legal entities or sub-groups and that the table shown does not reflect any incremental PRA buffer requirements, which are not disclosable.
The current capital position provides significant headroom above both our minimum requirements and our MDA threshold requirements.
Type | CET1 | Total Tier 1 | Total capital | ||||
Pillar 1 requirements | 4.5% | 6.0% | 8.0% | ||||
Pillar 2A requirements | 1.9% | 2.6% | 3.4% | ||||
Minimum Capital Requirements | 6.4% | 8.6% | 11.4% | ||||
Capital conservation buffer | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | ||||
Countercyclical capital buffer (1) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||||
G-SIB buffer (2) | - |
| - | - | |||
MDA Threshold | 8.9% |
| na |
| na | ||
Subtotal (3) | 8.9% | 11.1% | 13.9% | ||||
Capital ratios at 30 June 2020 | 17.2% | 19.4% | 22.5% | ||||
Headroom (4) | 8.3% | 8.3% | 8.6% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
(1) | Many countries have recently announced reductions in their countercyclical capital buffer rates in response to Covid-19. Most notably for NatWest Group, the Financial Policy Committee reduced the UK rate from 1% to 0% effective from 11 March 2020. The CBI also announced a reduction of the Republic of Ireland rate from 1% to 0% effective from 1 April 2020. |
(2)
(3)
(4) | In November 2018 the Financial Stability Board announced that NatWest Group is no longer a G-SIB. From 1 January 2020, NatWest Group was released from this global buffer requirement. The prevailing combined buffer requirements for NatWest Group equate to the aggregate of the capital conservation buffer and countercyclical buffer. 8.9% CET1 represents the MDA threshold for NatWest Group. The headroom does not reflect excess distributable capital and may vary over time. |
Capital and risk management
Capital, liquidity and funding risk continued
Capital and leverage ratios
The table below sets out the key capital and leverage ratios.
| CRR basis (1) | |
| 30 June | 31 December |
Capital adequacy ratios | 2020 | 2019 |
CET1 (%) | 17.2 | 16.2 |
Tier 1 (%) | 19.4 | 18.5 |
Total (%) | 22.5 | 21.2 |
|
|
|
Capital | £m | £m |
Tangible equity | 32,006 | 32,371 |
|
|
|
Expected loss less impairment provisions | - | (167) |
Prudential valuation adjustment | (370) | (431) |
Deferred tax assets | (844) | (757) |
Own credit adjustments | (244) | (118) |
Pension fund assets | (588) | (474) |
Cash flow hedging reserve | (341) | (35) |
Foreseeable ordinary and special dividends | - | (968) |
Foreseeable charges | - | (365) |
Adjustments under IFRS 9 transitional arrangements | 1,578 | - |
Other deductions | - | (2) |
Total deductions | (809) | (3,317) |
|
|
|
CET1 capital | 31,197 | 29,054 |
AT1 capital | 3,990 | 4,051 |
Tier 1 capital | 35,187 | 33,105 |
Tier 2 capital | 5,596 | 4,900 |
|
|
|
Total regulatory capital | 40,783 | 38,005 |
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets |
|
|
Credit risk | 135,700 | 131,000 |
Counterparty credit risk | 12,400 | 12,600 |
Market risk | 11,500 | 13,000 |
Operational risk | 21,900 | 22,600 |
Total RWAs | 181,500 | 179,200 |
|
|
|
Leverage |
|
|
Cash and balances at central banks | 100,300 | 77,900 |
Trading assets | 72,400 | 76,700 |
Derivatives | 183,400 | 150,000 |
Financial assets | 428,100 | 399,100 |
Other assets | 22,700 | 19,300 |
Total assets | 806,900 | 723,000 |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
- netting and variation margin | (194,400) | (157,800) |
- potential future exposures | 44,000 | 43,000 |
Securities financing transactions gross up | 1,300 | 2,200 |
Other off balance sheet items | 43,500 | 42,500 |
Regulatory deductions and other adjustments | (14,600) | (9,000) |
CRR leverage exposure | 686,700 | 643,900 |
|
|
|
CRR leverage ratio % (2) | 5.1 | 5.1 |
|
|
|
UK leverage exposure | 585,100 | 570,300 |
UK leverage ratio % (3) | 6.0 | 5.8 |
|
|
|
Notes:
(1) Based on CRR end point including the IFRS 9 transitional adjustment of £1.6 billion. Excluding this adjustment, the CET 1 ratio would be 16.3%.
(2) Presented on CRR end point Tier 1 capital (including IFRS 9 transitional adjustment) and leverage exposure under the CRR Delegated Act. Excluding the IFRS 9 transitional adjustment, the leverage ratio would be 4.9%.
(3) Presented on CRR end point Tier 1 capital (including IFRS 9 transitional adjustment). The UK leverage ratio excludes central bank claims from the leverage exposure where deposits held are denominated in the same currency and of contractual maturity that is equal or longer than that of the central bank claims. Excluding the IFRS 9 transitional adjustment, the UK leverage ratio would be 5.8%.
Capital and risk management
Capital, liquidity and funding risk continued
Capital flow statement
The table below analyses the movement in CET1, AT1 and Tier 2 capital for the half year ended 30 June 2020.
| CET1 | AT1 | Tier 2 | Total |
| £m | £m | £m | £m |
At 1 January 2020 | 29,054 | 4,051 | 4,900 | 38,005 |
Attributable loss for the period | (705) | - | - | (705) |
Own credit | (126) | - | - | (126) |
Share capital and reserve movements in respect of employee share schemes | (46) | - | - | (46) |
Foreign exchange reserve | 466 | - | - | 466 |
FVOCI reserves | (218) | - | - | (218) |
Goodwill and intangibles deduction | 20 | - | - | 20 |
Deferred tax assets | (87) | - | - | (87) |
Prudential valuation adjustments | 61 | - | - | 61 |
Expected loss less impairment | 167 | - | - | 167 |
New issues of capital instruments | - | 1,216 | 1,000 | 2,216 |
Redemption of capital instruments | - | (1,277) | - | (1,277) |
Net dated subordinated debt/grandfathered instruments | - | - | (756) | (756) |
Foreign exchange movements | (355) | - | 452 | 97 |
Foreseeable ordinary and special dividends | 968 | - | - | 968 |
Foreseeable charges | 365 | - | - | 365 |
Adjustment under IFRS 9 transitional arrangements | 1,578 | - | - | 1,578 |
Other movements | 55 | - | - | 55 |
At 30 June 2020 | 31,197 | 3,990 | 5,596 | 40,783 |
Key points
· | NatWest Group has elected to take advantage of the transitional regulatory capital rules in respect of expected credit losses following the adoption of IFRS 9, it had previously had a negligible impact up to Q4 2019. The CRR Covid-19 amendment now requires a full CET1 addback for the movement in stage 1 and stage 2 ECL from 1 January 2020 for the next two years. The IFRS9 transitional arrangement impact on NatWest Group CET1 regulatory capital at 30 June 2020 is £1.6 billion. |
· | Foreign exchange movements include a £345 million charge, in relation to a $2 billion AT1 redemption announcement on 28 June 2020. |
The table below analyses the movement in RWAs during the half year, by key drivers.
|
| Counterparty |
| Operational |
|
| Credit risk | credit risk | Market risk | risk | Total |
| £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn |
At 1 January 2020 | 131.0 | 12.6 | 13.0 | 22.6 | 179.2 |
Foreign exchange movement | 2.1 | 0.4 | - | - | 2.5 |
Business movement | 2.8 | (0.6) | 1.0 | (0.7) | 2.5 |
Risk parameter changes (1) | (0.6) | - | - | - | (0.6) |
Methodology changes (2) | 0.3 | - | (0.1) | - | 0.2 |
Model updates | 0.1 | - | - | - | 0.1 |
Other movements (3) | - | - | (2.4) | - | (2.4) |
At 30 June 2020 | 135.7 | 12.4 | 11.5 | 21.9 | 181.5 |
The table below analyses segmental RWAs.
| UK Personal | Ulster | Commercial | Private |
| NatWest | Central |
|
| Banking | Bank RoI | Banking | Banking | RBSI | Markets | items & other | Total |
Total RWAs | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn |
At 1 January 2020 | 37.8 | 13.0 | 72.5 | 10.1 | 6.5 | 37.9 | 1.4 | 179.2 |
Foreign exchange movement | - | 0.7 | 0.8 | - | 0.1 | 0.9 | - | 2.5 |
Business movement | (0.3) | (0.5) | 4.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | (1.4) | (0.3) | 2.5 |
Risk parameter changes (1) | (0.8) | (0.6) | 0.6 | - | - | 0.2 | - | (0.6) |
Methodology changes (2) | - | - | (0.3) | - | - | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
Model updates | - | 0.2 | (0.1) | - | - | - | - | 0.1 |
Other movements (3) | - | - | 0.3 | - | - | (2.7) | - | (2.4) |
At 30 June 2020 | 36.7 | 12.8 | 78.3 | 10.4 | 6.8 | 35.1 | 1.4 | 181.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit risk | 29.1 | 11.7 | 69.5 | 9.1 | 5.8 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 135.7 |
Counterparty credit risk | 0.1 | - | 0.2 | 0.1 | - | 12.0 | - | 12.4 |
Market risk | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - | 11.2 | - | 11.5 |
Operational risk | 7.4 | 1.0 | 8.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 2.8 | - | 21.9 |
Total RWAs | 36.7 | 12.8 | 78.3 | 10.4 | 6.8 | 35.1 | 1.4 | 181.5 |
Notes:
(1) | Risk parameter changes relate to changes in credit quality metrics of customers and counterparties (such as probability of default and loss given default) as well as internal ratings based model changes relating to counterparty credit risk in line with European Banking Authority Pillar 3 Guidelines. |
(2) | The new securitisation framework has been fully implemented from 1 January 2020 and all positions have moved to the new framework. |
(3) | The decrease in Other movements reflects the temporary reduction permitted by the PRA to offset the impact of multiplier increases (included in Business movement). The offset covers all metrics affected by the multiplier increase, including CVAs. Other movements also reflect transfers between segments, primarily reflecting a transfer of Insurance related assets from NatWest Markets to Commercial Banking. |
Capital and risk management
Capital, liquidity and funding risk continued
Key point
· RWAs increased by £2.3 billion in H1 2020, mainly reflecting increases in credit risk of £4.7 billion. There were offsetting decreases in market risk by £1.5 billion, operational risk by £0.7 billion and counterparty credit risk by £0.2 billion. The increase in credit risk RWAs primarily reflected increases in Commercial Banking due to drawdowns on existing facilities, new lending under the Government lending initiatives and deterioration of risk parameters. There were offsetting credit risk reductions in Personal Banking mainly due to revision of risk parameters as well as in the NatWest Markets segment in line with business strategy. Market Risk RWAs decreased by £1.5 billion, primarily reflecting movements in RNIVs and IRC as well as a reduction in non-modelled market risk during the period.
Credit risk exposure at default (EAD) and risk-weighted assets (RWAs)
The table below analyses credit risk RWAs and EADs, by on and off balance sheet.
|
| UK Personal | Ulster | Commercial | Private | RBS | NatWest | Central items |
|
|
| Banking | Bank RoI | Banking | Banking | International | Markets | & other | Total |
30 June 2020 | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | |
EAD | On balance sheet | 235.6 | 28.3 | 152.6 | 21.4 | 31.1 | 40.7 | 0.7 | 510.4 |
Off balance sheet | 27.2 | 2.2 | 29.9 | 0.3 | 4.8 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 71.0 | |
Total | 262.8 | 30.5 | 182.5 | 21.7 | 35.9 | 46.9 | 1.1 | 581.4 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RWAs | On balance sheet | 26.4 | 10.6 | 56.3 | 8.9 | 4.5 | 7.0 | 1.3 | 115.0 |
Off balance sheet | 2.7 | 1.1 | 13.2 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 20.7 | |
Total | 29.1 | 11.7 | 69.5 | 9.1 | 5.8 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 135.7 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
EAD | On balance sheet | 221.8 | 26.0 | 131.4 | 20.3 | 31.7 | 35.4 | 0.7 | 467.3 |
Off balance sheet | 30.2 | 2.2 | 27.2 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 7.5 | 0.4 | 71.1 | |
Total | 252.0 | 28.2 | 158.6 | 20.6 | 35.0 | 42.9 | 1.1 | 538.4 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RWAs | On balance sheet | 27.1 | 10.8 | 50.8 | 8.7 | 4.7 | 6.4 | 1.3 | 109.8 |
Off balance sheet | 3.1 | 1.1 | 12.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 0.1 | 21.2 | |
Total | 30.2 | 11.9 | 63.3 | 8.9 | 5.7 | 9.6 | 1.4 | 131.0 |
Capital resources
|
|
Capital and risk management
Capital, liquidity and funding risk continued
Loss absorbing capital
The following table illustrates the components of estimated loss absorbing capital (LAC) in NatWest Group plc and operating subsidiaries and includes external issuances only. The table is prepared on a transitional basis, including the benefit of regulatory capital instruments issued from operating companies, to the extent they meet the current MREL criteria.
| 30 June 2020 |
| 31 December 2019 | ||||||
|
| Balance |
|
|
|
| Balance |
|
|
| Par | sheet | Regulatory | LAC |
| Par | sheet | Regulatory | LAC |
| value (1) | value | value(2) | value (3) |
| value (1) | value | value (2) | value (3) |
| £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn |
| £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn |
CET1 capital (4) | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 |
| 29.1 | 29.1 | 29.1 | 29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital: end-point CRR compliant AT1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which: NatWest Group (holdco) | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
of which: NatWest Group operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subsidiaries (opcos) | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Tier 1 capital: end-point CRR non compliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which: holdco | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
of which: opcos | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0.6 |
Tier 2 capital: end-point CRR compliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which: holdco | 9.3 | 9.7 | 5.5 | 6.2 |
| 6.2 | 6.4 | 4,8 | 4.7 |
of which: opcos | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| 9.8 | 10.2 | 5.6 | 6.6 |
| 6.7 | 6.9 | 4.9 | 5.1 |
Tier 2 capital: end-point CRR non compliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which: holdco | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
of which: opcos | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
Senior unsecured debt securities issued by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NatWest Group holdco | 21.0 | 22.5 | - | 22.5 |
| 18.6 | 19.2 | - | 19.2 |
NatWest Group opcos | 22.5 | 23.0 | - | - |
| 21.1 | 20.7 | - | - |
| 43.5 | 45.5 | - | 22.5 |
| 39.7 | 39.9 | - | 19.2 |
Total | 91.8 | 94.7 | 43.7 | 66.7 |
| 82.7 | 83.5 | 40.8 | 59.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RWAs |
|
|
| 181.5 |
|
|
|
| 179.2 |
UK leverage exposure |
|
|
| 585.1 |
|
|
|
| 570.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAC as a ratio of RWAs |
|
|
| 36.8% |
|
|
|
| 33.3% |
LAC as a ratio of UK leverage exposure |
|
|
| 11.4% |
|
|
|
| 10.5% |
Notes:
(1) | Par value reflects the nominal value of securities issued. |
(2) | Regulatory capital instruments issued from operating companies are included in the transitional LAC calculation, to the extent they meet the current MREL criteria. |
(3) | LAC value reflects NatWest Group's interpretation of the Bank of England's approach to setting a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), published in June 2018. MREL policy and requirements remain subject to further potential development, as such NatWest Group estimated position remains subject to potential change. Liabilities excluded from LAC include instruments with less than one year remaining to maturity, structured debt, operating company senior debt, and other instruments that do not meet the MREL criteria. The LAC calculation includes eligible Tier 1 and Tier 2 securities before the application of any regulatory caps or adjustments. |
(4) | Corresponding shareholders' equity was £43.1 billion (2019 - £43.5 billion). |
(5) | Regulatory amounts reported for AT1, Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments are before grandfathering restrictions imposed by CRR. |
(6) | NatWest Group is no longer recognised as a G-SII from 1 January 2020 and is therefore not subject to the CRR MREL requirement as of this date which references CRR2 leverage exposure. To aid comparison the leverage exposure, and resulting ratio, is disclosed according to the BoE leverage framework for all time periods. |
Capital and risk management
Capital, liquidity and funding risk continued
Loss absorbing capital
The following table illustrates the components of the stock of outstanding issuance in NatWest Group and its operating subsidiaries including external and Internal issuances.
|
|
|
NatWest |
|
|
|
|
NatWest |
NWM |
|
|
|
NatWest |
Holdings |
NWB |
RBS |
UBI |
NWM |
Markets |
Securities |
RBSI |
|
|
Group plc |
Limited |
Plc |
plc |
DAC |
Plc |
N.V. |
Inc. |
Limited |
|
|
£bn |
£bn |
£bn |
£bn |
£bn |
£bn |
£bn |
£bn |
£bn |
Tier 1 (Inclusive of AT1) |
Externally issued |
5.8 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Tier 1 (Inclusive of AT1) |
Internally issued |
- |
3.7 |
2.4 |
1.0 |
- |
1.1 |
0.2 |
- |
0.3 |
|
|
5.8 |
3.7 |
2.5 |
1.0 |
- |
1.1 |
0.2 |
- |
0.3 |
Tier 2 |
Externally issued |
9.8 |
- |
1.2 |
- |
0.1 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
- |
- |
Tier 2 |
Internally issued |
0.0 |
5.4 |
3.5 |
1.6 |
0.5 |
2.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
|
|
9.8 |
5.4 |
4.7 |
1.6 |
0.6 |
2.6 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
- |
Senior unsecured |
Externally issued |
22.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Senior unsecured |
Internally issued |
- |
9.8 |
4.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
5.6 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
22.5 |
9.8 |
4.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
5.6 |
- |
- |
- |
Total outstanding issuance |
38.1 |
18.9 |
11.6 |
3.0 |
1.1 |
9.3 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Notes:
(1) The balances are the IFRS balance sheet carrying amounts, which may differ from the amount which the instrument contributes to regulatory capital. Regulatory balances exclude, for example, issuance costs and fair value movements, while dated capital is required to be amortised on a straight-line basis over the final five years of maturity.
(2) Balance sheet amounts reported for AT1, Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments are before grandfathering restrictions imposed by CRR.
(3) Internal issuance for NWB Plc, RBS plc and UBI DAC represents AT1, Tier 2 or Senior unsecured issuance to NatWest Holdings Limited and for NWM N.V. and NWM SI to NWM Plc.
(4) Senior unsecured debt category does not include CP, CD and short term/medium notes issued from NatWest Group operating subsidiaries.
(5) Tier 1 (inclusive of AT1) category does not include CET 1 numbers.
Funding sources The table below shows the carrying values of the principal funding sources based on contractual maturity. Balance sheet captions include balances held at all classifications under IFRS 9.
Notes: (1) Includes £5.0 billion (31 December 2019 - £10.0 billion) relating to Term Funding Scheme participation, £5.0 billion (31 December 2019 - nil) relating to Term Funding Scheme with additional incentives for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises participation and £2.8 billion (31 December 2019 - £1.7 billion) relating to NatWest Group's participation in central bank financing operations under the European Central Bank's targeted Long-term financing operations. (2) Excludes short positions of £20.5 billion (31 December 2019 - £21.2 billion). (3) Comprises central & other bank repos of £2.1 billion (31 December 2019 - £6.6 billion), other financial institution repos of £19.4 billion (31 December 2019 - £19.0 billion) and other corporate repos of £2.3 billion (31 December 2019 - £2.3 billion). (4) Eligible liabilities (as defined in the Banking Act 2009 as amended from time to time) that meet the eligibility criteria set out in the regulations, rules, policies, guidelines, or statements of the Bank of England including the Statement of Policy published by the Bank of England in June 2018. The balance consists of £22.6 billion (31 December 2019 - £19.2 billion) under debt securities in issue (senior MREL) and £8.5 billion (31 December 2019 - £6.9 billion) under subordinated liabilities. |
|
Capital and risk management
Capital, liquidity and funding risk continued
Liquidity portfolio The table below shows the liquidity portfolio by product, with primary liquidity aligned to internal stressed outflow coverage and regulatory LCR categorisation. Secondary liquidity comprises assets eligible for discount at central banks, which do not form part of the liquid asset portfolio for LCR or internal stressed outflow purposes.
Notes:
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk
Economic loss drivers Introduction The portfolio segmentation and selection of economic loss drivers for IFRS 9 follow closely the approach used in stress testing. To enable robust modelling the forecasting models for each portfolio segment (defined by asset class and where relevant, industry sector and region) are based on a selected, small number of economic factors, (typically two to four) that best explain the temporal variations in portfolio loss rates. The process to select economic loss drivers involves empirical analysis and expert judgement.
The most material economic loss drivers for the Personal portfolio include the unemployment rate, house price indices as well as the Bank of England and the European Central Bank base rates. For the Wholesale portfolio, in addition to interest and unemployment rates, national gross domestic product (GDP), stock price indices and world GDP are primary loss drivers.
Economic scenarios The range of anticipated future economic conditions is described by a set of four internally developed scenarios and their respective probabilities. In a change from previous quarters, two scenarios are used instead of a single base case to describe the central outlook. This reflects increased uncertainty as a result of Covid-19 and the difficulty in identifying a consensus among economic forecasters. Those two central scenarios are complemented by an upside and a downside scenario.
As at 31 December 2019, NatWest Group used five discrete scenarios to characterise the distribution of risks in the economic outlook. In contrast, the four scenarios set out below were deemed appropriate in capturing the uncertainty in economic forecasts and the non-linearity in outcomes under different scenarios. These four scenarios were developed to provide sufficient coverage across potential rises in unemployment, asset price falls and degree of permanent damage to the economy, around which there are pronounced levels of uncertainty at this stage.
The tables and commentary below provide details of the key economic loss drivers under the four scenarios. The average over the five-year horizon (2020 to 2024) for the two central scenarios and upside and downside scenarios used for expected credit loss (ECL) modelling, are set out below. It is compared with the five-year average (2020 to 2024) of the 2019 scenarios.
The scenarios are specified on a quarterly frequency. The extreme points refer to worst four-quarter rate of change for GDP and house price inflation and worst quarterly figures for unemployment.
|
|
Note:
(1) Probability weights for the Republic of Ireland were symmetrical with 15% on the upside and downside. Weightings for Ulster Bank RoI reflect the relative severity of scenarios in a Republic of Ireland context.
Capital and risk management
Credit risk continued
Five-year average
Probability weightings of scenarios NatWest Group's approach to IFRS 9 multiple economic scenarios (MES) involves selecting a suitable set of discrete scenarios to characterise the distribution of risks in the economic outlook and assigning appropriate probability weights.
The scale of the economic impact of Covid-19 and the range of recovery paths necessitates a change of approach to assigning probability weights from that used in recent updates. Previously GDP paths for NatWest Group's scenarios were compared against a set of 1,000 model runs, following which a percentile in the distribution was established that most closely corresponded to the scenario. This approach does not produce meaningful outcomes in the current circumstances because GDP is highly volatile and highly uncertain. |
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk continued
Instead, NatWest Group has subjectively applied probability weights, reflecting expert views within NatWest Group. The probability weight assignment was judged to present good coverage to the central scenarios and the potential for a far more robust recovery on the upside and exceptionally challenging outcome on the downside. A 20% weighting was applied to the upside scenario, a 35% weighting on each central scenario and a 10% weighting on the downside scenario. NatWest Group judged a downside-biased weighting as placing too much weight on negative outcomes.
Use of the scenarios in Personal Banking Personal Banking follows a discrete scenario approach which means that ECL is calculated based on the probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) values that arise directly from the probability weighted averages across all four economic scenarios.
Use of the scenarios in Wholesale Lending The Wholesale Lending methodology is based on the concept of credit cycle indices (CCI). The CCI represents all relevant economic loss drivers for a region/industry segment aggregated into a single index value describing the loss rate conditions in the respective segment relative to its long run average. That means a CCI value of zero corresponds to loss rates at long-run average levels, a positive CCI value corresponds to loss rates below long-run average levels and a negative CCI value corresponds to loss rates above long-run average levels.
The four economic scenarios outlined above are translated into individual projections of CCIs for each region/industry segment which are then subsequently aggregated into a single central CCI projection by calculating a weighted average according to the given scenario probabilities. The CCI projection for each economic scenario, and by extension the weighted central CCI projection, are overlaid with an additional assumption that after one to two years into the forecast period credit cycle conditions gradually revert to long-run average conditions, i.e. CCI values mean revert to zero.
Finally, ECL is calculated using a Monte Carlo approach by averaging PD and LGD values arising from a large number of CCI paths simulated around the central CCI projection calculated as above.
The rationale for the Wholesale approach, is the long-standing observation that loss rates in Wholesale portfolios tend to follow regular cycles. This allows NatWest Group to enrich the range and depth of future economic conditions embedded in the final ECL beyond what would be obtained from the discrete macro-economic scenarios alone.
Business Banking, while part of the Wholesale segment, for reporting purposes, utilises the Personal Banking rather than the Wholesale Lending methodology.
Covid-19 - estimating ECL in uncertain times Almost all areas of the global economy, in terms of both individuals and businesses, have been adversely affected by the unprecedented economic and social disruption resulting from Covid-19. The impact of the virus has led to the creation of significant government and central bank mechanisms to support businesses and individuals. Uncertainty remained elevated during H1 2020 and the severity of the economic impact becomes increasingly observable in key economic data such as GDP and unemployment. This crisis has created an unprecedented challenge for IFRS 9 ECL modelling, given the severity of economic shock and associated uncertainty for the future economic path coupled with the scale of government and central bank intervention and Covid-19 relief mechanisms that have altered the relationships between economic drivers and default.
The NatWest Group approach to dealing with this challenge is to leverage stress test modelling insights to inform IFRS 9 model refinements to enable modelled ECL estimates. Management review of modelling approaches and outcomes continues to inform any necessary adjustments to the ECL estimates through the form of in-model adjustments or overlays/underlays, based on expert judgement including the use of available information. Management considerations included the potential severity and duration of the economic shock, including the mitigating effects of government support actions, as well the potential trajectory of the subsequent recovery. NatWest Group also considered differential impacts on portfolio and sector classes, including pronouncements from regulatory bodies regarding IFRS 9 application in the context of Covid-19, notably on significant increase in credit risk (SICR) identification.
The modelling interventions described above and the severity of the MES scenarios underpinning the ECL estimate have alleviated the need for a dedicated economic uncertainty overlay. Consequently, the existing overlay for economic uncertainty at Q1 2020 of £798 million was absorbed through the H1 2020 modelled ECL estimate.
Treatment of Covid-19 relief mechanisms Use of Covid-19 relief mechanisms (for example, payment holidays, CBILS and BBLS) will not automatically merit identification of SICR and trigger a Stage 2 classification in isolation. For Personal products, where detailed information surrounding the customer situation may not be readily available, movements in account PD - which includes the effect of customer account behaviour as well as forward-looking economics - continued to be the key determinant of a SICR. This assessment was supplemented by an analysis of high-risk identifiers. |
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk continued
For Wholesale customers, at H1 2020, lifetime PD deterioration remains the primary driver of SICR identification, amplified by the forward-looking economics. NatWest Group continues to provide support, where appropriate, to existing customers. Those who are deemed either to require a) a prolonged timescale to return within NatWest Group's risk appetite or b) not to be viable pre-crisis or c) not to be able to sustain their debt once the crisis is over will trigger a SICR and, if concessions are sought, be categorised as forborne, in line with regulatory guidance.
As some of the government support mechanisms conclude, NatWest Group anticipates further credit deterioration in the portfolios. There are a number of key factors that could drive further downside to impairments, through deteriorating economic and credit metrics and increased stage migration as credit risk increases for more customers. A key factor would be a more adverse deterioration in GDP and unemployment in the economies in which NatWest Group operates, but also, among others: · The timing and nature of governmental exit plans from lockdown, notably in UK and the Republic of Ireland, and any future repeated lockdown requirements. · The progress of the pandemic, with potential for changes in worker/consumer behaviour and sickness levels. · The efficacy of the various government support initiatives in terms of their ability to defray customer defaults is yet to be proven, notably over an extended period. · Any further damage to certain supply chains, most notably in the case of any re-tightening of lockdown rules but also delays caused by social distancing measures and possible export/import controls. · The level of revenues lost by corporate clients and pace of recovery of those revenues may affect NatWest Group's clients' ability to service their borrowing, especially in those sectors most exposed to the impacts of Covid-19. · Higher unemployment if companies fail to restart jobs after periods of staff furlough.
This could potentially lead to further ECL increases. However, the income statement impact of this will be mitigated to some extent by the forward-looking provisions taken at H1 2020.
Model performance To date, model performance monitoring has not identified any noticeable increases in default or loss rates in Wholesale Lending or Personal Banking. This is not unexpected given the recent impact of Covid-19 and the implementation of government interventions aiming to delay and/or mitigate its impact on the economy. As a result, it is too early to meaningfully assess model performance against the actual impact.
Nonetheless, Covid-19 has already had a significant impact on the forward-looking economic information used by the IFRS 9 models in calculating ECL. While the central scenario used previously implied largely a continuation of current conditions, the central scenarios assumed now forecast a dramatic deterioration in conditions on a magnitude typically observed for severe stresses but with the deterioration and subsequent recovery compressed into a much shorter time frame than typical economic cycles. This extreme and unusual nature of the scenarios considered has highlighted several limitations in the components of the Wholesale methodology that translate projected economic loss drivers into aggregate default and loss rate conditions at portfolio level. To account for these limitations, a number of refinements and changes have been applied to the respective model components to ensure that the ECL outcome is reasonable, not only in aggregate, but at industry sector level and with regard to the timing in which deteriorating economics translate into default and loss outcomes. More specifically, the following key adjustments have been applied to the modelled forward-looking economic conditions for the Wholesale portfolios: · Scenario profile - The previously unseen, extreme movements and quarterly variations in some economic loss drivers (most notably year-on-year change in UK GDP) are extrapolated by some Wholesale models into unrealistically high default rate outcomes. Where necessary, judgement was applied to adjust model outcomes to more appropriate levels based on peak default rates observed in previous crises and other existing stress scenario analysis, including the 2019 Bank of England annual cyclical scenario. · Government support - The temporal profile of projected default and loss conditions was further adjusted to account for the expected impact of government interventions where those are not already reflected in the scenario's economic loss drivers. These adjustments result in both a delay and a reduction in the peak level of default and loss rates that would have been expected under the projected economic loss drivers without government intervention. The specification of the parameters of the adjustments - while guided by the level and characteristics of loans extended under the various government guarantee schemes - involve a considerable level of expert judgement. · Industry sector detail - The current suite of models for the Wholesale portfolios provides limited differentiation by industry sector. This approach is based on the data from the global financial crisis which exhibited a very high correlation across industry sectors. In contrast, the impact from Covid-19 is highly differentiated by industry sector and accordingly adjustments have been applied to implement an appropriate differentiation in the severity of projected default rate conditions for different sectors. The categorisation of industry sectors and scale of adjustments have been informed by a combination of expert judgement and external market data. |
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk continued
For the UK Personal Banking portfolio, the forward-looking components of the IFRS 9 PD models were also modified leveraging existing stress testing models to ensure that PDs appropriately reflect the forecasts for unemployment and house prices in particular. Additionally, post model ECL adjustments were made to ensure that the ECL was adjusted for known model over and under-predictions pending the systematic calibration of the underlying models.
The in-model adjustments have been applied in order to weight the PD and LGD estimates within the core ECL calculation process and therefore consistently and systematically inform stage allocation and ECL quantification.
Government guarantees During March and April 2020, the UK government launched a series of temporary schemes designed to support businesses deal with the impact of Covid-19. The BBLS, CBILS and CLBILS lending products are originated by NatWest Group but are covered by government guarantees. These are to be set against the outstanding balance of a defaulted facility after the proceeds of the business assets have been applied. The government guarantee is 80% for CBILS and CLBILS and 100% for BBLS. NatWest Group recognises lower LGDs for these lending products as a result, with 0% applied to the government-guaranteed part of the exposure.
Notwithstanding the government guarantees, NatWest Group's measurements of PD are unaffected and NatWest Group continues to move exposures to Stage 2 and Stage 3 where a significant deterioration in credit risk or a default is identified.
|
|
Wholesale support schemes
The table below shows the uptake of BBLS, CBILS and CLBILS in Wholesale, by sector.
| BBL |
| CBIL |
| CLBIL | ||||||
|
| Drawdown | % of BBIL to |
|
| Drawdown | % of CBIL to |
|
| Drawdown | % of CLBIL to |
30 June 2020 | Volume | amount (£m) | Sector loans |
| Volume | amount (£m) | Sector loans |
| Volume | amount (£m) | Sector loans |
Wholesale lending by sector |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airlines and aerospace | 175 | 5 | 0.21% |
| 17 | 4 | 0.17% |
| - | - | - |
Automotive | 9,267 | 309 | 4.07% |
| 495 | 111 | 1.46% |
| 26 | 22 | 0.29% |
Education | 1,347 | 36 | 2.11% |
| 83 | 21 | 1.23% |
| 4 | 30 | 1.76% |
Health | 6,976 | 222 | 3.78% |
| 543 | 69 | 1.17% |
| 2 | 5 | 0.09% |
Land transport and logistics | 6,222 | 181 | 3.94% |
| 306 | 66 | 1.44% |
| 2 | 3 | 0.07% |
Leisure | 22,776 | 715 | 7.13% |
| 1,697 | 305 | 3.04% |
| 16 | 11 | 0.11% |
Oil and gas | 197 | 6 | 0.29% |
| 13 | 5 | 0.24% |
| - | - | - |
Retail | 23,824 | 808 | 10.19% |
| 1,395 | 328 | 4.14% |
| 13 | 48 | 0.61% |
Shipping | 113 | 4 | 0.34% |
| 15 | 3 | 0.25% |
| 2 | - | - |
Textiles | 844 | 25 | 13.37% |
| 94 | 18 | 9.63% |
| 2 | - | - |
Property | 12,284 | 402 | 0.99% |
| 327 | 64 | 0.16% |
| 4 | 10 | 0.02% |
Other (including Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking) | 116,382 | 3,082 | 3.40% |
| 8,742 | 1,406 | 1.55% |
| 72 | 52 | 0.06% |
Total | 200,408 | 5,795 | 3.32% |
| 13,727 | 2,400 | 1.38% |
| 143 | 181 | 0.10% |
Notes:
(1) The table contains some cases which as at 30 June 2020 were approved but not yet drawn upon.
(2) Approved limits as at 30 June 2020 were as follows: BBLS - £6.1 billion; CBILS - £3.3 billion; and CLBILS - £0.7 billion.
Capital and risk management
Credit risk continued
Mortgage payment holidays/breaks by stage
The tables below show payment holidays in UK Personal Banking and payment breaks in Ulster Bank RoI, by loan-to-value (LTV) band and by stage. They show live payment holidays as at 30 June 2020, including any agreed second payment holidays. They exclude cases which have been completed prior to this date.
UK Personal Banking | Mortgages |
| ECL |
| Proportion of mortgage portfolio | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| Not within |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IFRS 9 ECL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | scope | Total |
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total |
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total |
30 June 2020 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m | £m |
| % | % | % | % |
≤50% | 4,441 | 661 | 31 | 4 | 5,137 |
| - | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| 9.2 | 14.7 | 5.8 | 9.6 |
>50% and ≤70% | 6,722 | 1,226 | 30 | 1 | 7,979 |
| 1 | 8 | 4 | 13 |
| 13.7 | 19.4 | 6.2 | 14.3 |
>70% and ≤80% | 3,159 | 1,447 | 11 | - | 4,617 |
| 1 | 9 | 2 | 12 |
| 15.8 | 21.3 | 6.2 | 17.1 |
>80 and ≤90% | 1,727 | 1,356 | 6 | - | 3,089 |
| - | 13 | 1 | 14 |
| 16.8 | 23.8 | 7.8 | 19.3 |
>90% and ≤100% | 378 | 121 | 1 | - | 500 |
| - | 2 | - | 2 |
| 18.5 | 25.1 | 2.3 | 19.7 |
>100% and ≤110% | 1 | 4 | - | - | 5 |
| - | 1 | - | 1 |
| 3.4 | 9.8 | - | 7.3 |
>110% and ≤130% | 2 | 3 | - | - | 5 |
| - | - | - | - |
| 5.6 | 6.3 | - | 5.8 |
>130 and ≤150% | - | 2 | - | - | 2 |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | 9.0 | - | 5.5 |
>150% | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
Total | 16,430 | 4,820 | 79 | 5 | 21,334 |
| 2 | 37 | 12 | 51 |
| 12.7 | 20.1 | 6.0 | 13.8 |
Note:
(1) Total payment holidays in the period up until 30 June 2020 were £33.6 billion (22% of the UK Personal Banking mortgage portfolio).
Ulster Bank RoI | Mortgages |
| ECL |
| Proportion of mortgage portfolio | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| Not within |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IFRS 9 ECL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | scope | Total |
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total |
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total |
30 June 2020 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| £m | £m | £m | £m |
| % | % | % | % |
≤50% | 148 | 115 | 49 | - | 312 |
| - | 5 | 13 | 18 |
| 3.5 | 21.4 | 11.9 | 6.1 |
>50% and ≤70% | 139 | 119 | 44 | - | 302 |
| - | 5 | 11 | 16 |
| 4.1 | 21.9 | 14.8 | 7.2 |
>70% and ≤80% | 47 | 62 | 23 | - | 132 |
| - | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| 3.4 | 19.0 | 15.1 | 7.1 |
>80 and ≤90% | 40 | 53 | 21 | - | 114 |
| - | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| 3.8 | 15.7 | 14.1 | 7.4 |
>90% and ≤100% | 2 | 42 | 16 | - | 60 |
| - | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 0.8 | 17.3 | 12.4 | 9.3 |
>100% and ≤110% | 1 | 17 | 13 | - | 31 |
| - | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 0.9 | 12.5 | 13.2 | 9.5 |
>110% and ≤130% | - | 13 | 9 | - | 22 |
| - | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| - | 15.8 | 9.0 | 9.8 |
>130 and ≤150% | - | 1 | 3 | - | 4 |
| - | - | 2 | 2 |
| - | 21.2 | 10.8 | 11.3 |
>150% | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | 8.2 | 4.1 | 4.8 |
Total | 377 | 423 | 178 | - | 978 |
| - | 20 | 55 | 75 |
| 3.6 | 19.1 | 13.0 | 7.0 |
Note:
(1) Total payment breaks in the period up until 30 June 2020 were £1.8 billion (13% of the Ulster Bank RoI mortgage portfolio).
Measurement uncertainty and ECL sensitivity analysis The recognition and measurement of ECL is complex and involves the use of significant judgement and estimation, particularly in times of economic volatility and uncertainty. This includes the formulation and incorporation of multiple forward-looking economic conditions into ECL to meet the measurement objective of IFRS 9. The ECL provision is sensitive to the model inputs and economic assumptions underlying the estimate.
The focus of the simulations is on ECL provisioning requirements on performing exposures in Stage 1 and Stage 2. The simulations are run on a stand-alone basis and are independent of each other; the potential ECL impacts reflect the simulated impact as at the H1 2020 balance sheet date.
Stage 3 provisions are not subject to the same level of measurement uncertainty - default is an observed event as at the balance sheet date, unsecured portfolio LGDs do not vary between scenarios, plus repossession periods in the UK mean that short term volatility in HPI does not translate directly to additional loss. Stage 3 provisions therefore have not been considered in this analysis.
The impact arising from the downside, upside and the central 1 scenarios has been simulated. These scenarios are three of the four discrete scenarios used in the methodology for Personal MES. In the simulations, NatWest Group has assumed that the economic macro variables associated with these scenarios replace the existing base case economic assumptions, giving them a 100% probability weighting and thus serving as a single economic scenario.
These scenarios have been applied to all modelled portfolios in the analysis below, with the simulation impacting both PDs and LGDs. Modelled overlays present in the underlying ECL estimates are also sensitised. As expected, the scenarios create differing impacts on ECL by portfolio and the impacts are deemed reasonable. In this simulation, it is assumed that existing modelled relationships between key economic variables and loss drivers hold, but in practice other factors would also have an impact, for example, potential customer behaviour changes, policy changes by lenders that might impact on the wider availability of credit.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk continued
NatWest Group's core criterion to identify a SICR is founded on PD deterioration, as discussed above. Under the simulations, PDs increase and result in exposures moving from Stage 1 to Stage 2 contributing to the ECL impact.
Notes: (1) Variations in future undrawn exposure values across the scenarios are modelled, however the exposure position reported is as at 30 June 2020 and therefore does not include variation in future undrawn exposure values. (2) The table above reflects ECL for all modelled exposure in scope for IFRS 9; in addition to loans this includes bonds and cash. The analysis excludes non-modelled portfolios. (3) All simulations are run on a stand-alone basis and are independent of each other, with the potential ECL impact reflecting the simulated impact at the H1 2020 balance sheet date. (4) Refer to page 28 for details of economic scenarios. (5) 2019 comparatives are not included as the sensitivity scenario analysis relates to the H1 2020 balance sheet position. Refer to the NatWest Group plc (formerly The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc) 2019 Annual Report and Accounts for the sensitivity analysis carried out at that time.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk continued
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities
Introduction
This section details the credit risk profile of NatWest Group 's banking activities.
Financial instruments within the scope of the IFRS 9 ECL framework Refer to Note 8 for balance sheet analysis of financial assets that are classified as amortised cost (AC) or fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI), the starting point for IFRS 9 ECL framework assessment.
Financial assets
Those assets outside the framework were as follows:
Contingent liabilities and commitments In addition to contingent liabilities and commitments disclosed in Note 13 - reputationally-committed limits, are also included in the scope of the IFRS 9 ECL framework. These are offset by £0.1 billion (31 December 2019 - £2.6 billion) out of scope balances primarily related to facilities that, if drawn, would not be classified as AC or FVOCI, or undrawn limits relating to financial assets exclusions. Total contingent liabilities (including financial guarantees) and commitments within IFRS 9 ECL scope of £135.5 billion (31 December 2019 - £127.9 billion) comprised Stage 1 £89.0 billion (31 December 2019 - £121.7 billion); Stage 2 £45.7 billion (31 December 2019 - £5.6 billion); and Stage 3 £0.8 billion (31 December 2019 - £0.6 billion).
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Portfolio summary - segment analysis The table below shows gross loans and ECL, by segment and stage, within the scope of the IFRS 9 ECL framework.
For the notes to this table refer to the following page.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Portfolio summary - segment analysis
Notes:
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Segmental loans and impairment metrics The table below shows gross loans and ECL provisions, by days past due, by segment and stage, within the scope of the ECL framework.
For the notes to this table refer to the following page.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Segmental loans and impairment metrics The table below shows ECL and ECL provisions coverage, by days past due, by segment and stage, within the scope of the ECL framework.
Notes: (1) 30 DPD - 30 days past due, the mandatory 30 days past due backstop is prescribed by IFRS 9 for a SICR. (2) ECL provisions on contingent liabilities and commitments are included within the Financial assets section so as not to distort ECL coverage ratios. (3) Includes a £7 million charge and a £1 million write-off (31 December 2019 - £5 million release and £3 million write-off) related to the business banking portfolio in Ulster Bank RoI.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Segmental loans and impairment metrics Key points ● Personal Banking -Balance sheet growth since the 2019 year-end was driven by mortgages, primarily pre-Covid-19, in the first quarter of the year. Unsecured lending balances reduced in the second quarter as customer spend and demand for borrowing reduced whilst in lockdown and customers have made repayments. The deteriorated economic outlook, as detailed in the Covid-19 - estimating ECL in uncertain times section, including forecast increases in unemployment, resulted in increased account level IFRS 9 PDs. Consequently, compared to the 2019 year-end, a larger proportion of customer accounts exhibited a SICR with an associated migration of assets from Stage 1 to Stage 2. As a result, the ECL requirement increased. Additionally, forecast declines in house prices increased the ECL requirement on the mortgage portfolio. The various Covid-19 related customer support mechanisms (loan repayment holidays, government job retention scheme) are mitigating actual portfolio deterioration in the short term, with the days past due, and flows to Stage 3 metrics, yet to be materially impacted. Provisions coverage increased overall but coverage on Stage 2 alone has reduced driven by a proportionately higher share of mortgage exposures where coverage levels are lower, reflecting the secured nature of the borrowing. The annualised loss rate for H1 2020 was significantly higher than in 2019. ● Commercial Banking - Balance sheet growth since the 2019 year-end was mainly due to further drawdowns on existing facilities and new lending under the Covid-19 government lending schemes. The deteriorated economic outlook, as detailed in the Covid-19 - estimating ECL in uncertain times section, including significant falls in GDP and commercial real estate valuations, resulted in increased IFRS 9 PDs. Consequently, compared to the 2019 year-end, a larger proportion of the exposures exhibited a SICR with an associated migration of assets from Stage 1 to Stage 2. As a result, the ECL requirement increased. The increase in Stage 2 assets due to PD deterioration was also the primary driver for the increase in the Stage 2 exposures less than 30 days past due. The various Covid-19 related customer support mechanisms are providing some mitigation against flows in to defaults in the short-term. Increased coverage in Stage 1 and Stage 2 was driven by the increased ECL, mainly as a result of the deteriorated economic outlook, which was partially offset by a slight decrease in Stage 3 coverage. The annualised loss rate for H1 2020 was significantly higher than in 2019. ● Ulster Bank RoI - Balance sheet growth since the 2019 year-end was mainly due to further drawdowns on existing facilities and new lending across both the commercial and personal banking portfolios, offset by ongoing deleveraging of the Ulster Bank RoI mortgage non-performing portfolio through the execution of two tranches of a portfolio sale. The deteriorated economic outlook, as detailed in the Covid-19 - estimating ECL in uncertain times section, included forecast increases in unemployment, falls in property prices and GDP, which resulted in increased IFRS 9 PDs across all portfolios. Consequently, compared to the 2019 year-end, a larger proportion of the exposures exhibited a SICR with an associated migration of assets from Stage 1 to Stage 2. As a result, the ECL requirement increased. The various Covid-19 related customer support mechanisms (loan repayment breaks, government job retention scheme) provided by Ulster Bank RoI are mitigating actual portfolio deterioration in the short-term, with the days past due, and flows to Stage 3 metrics, yet to be materially impacted. The annualised loss rate for H1 2020 was significantly higher than in 2019.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Portfolio summary - sector analysis The table below shows financial assets and off-balance sheet exposures gross of ECL and related ECL provisions, impairment and past due by sector, asset quality and geographical region based on the country of operation of the customer.
*Not within the scope of EY's review report.
For the notes to this table refer to page 45. |
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Portfolio summary - sector analysis
For the notes to this table refer to page 45.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Portfolio summary - sector analysis
*Not within the scope of EY's review report.
For the notes to this table refer to the following page. |
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Portfolio summary - sector analysis
Notes:
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Sector analysis The table below shows ECL by stage, for key sectors in the Personal and Wholesale portfolios impacted by Covid-19.
Notes:
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Sector performance in Wholesale portfolios The nature of the Covid-19 crisis is such that the impact on customers varies significantly by industry sector. NatWest Group has adopted a nuanced response to capture the sector ECL impact by using sector specific CCIs in its Wholesale methodology. The CCIs observed at the reporting date are based on average default probability estimates for publicly-listed companies, in a set of comprehensive sector/region segments derived from the stock market valuation, asset volatility and capital structure of each company. Forward-looking CCIs are projected based on the economic loss drivers in the scenarios (refer to the Use of the scenarios in Wholesale section) and have been adjusted by sector group specific CCI changes observed throughout H1 2020 to make them more sector specific (refer to the industry detail in the Model performance section). Since both, current and projected CCI are driving PD and LGD, NatWest Group obtains modelled ECL outcomes which are significantly differentiated by sector. As a result, the impact on ECL is more pronounced for those sectors which have suffered a more significant disruption from Covid-19. |
|
Wholesale forbearance The table below shows Wholesale forbearance, Heightened Monitoring and Risk of Credit Loss by sector. Personal forbearance is disclosed on page 49.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Personal portfolio Disclosures in the Personal portfolio section include drawn exposure (gross of provisions).
Notes: (1) Includes accounts which have an interest only sub-account and a capital and interest sub-account to provide a more comprehensive view of interest only exposures. (2) For UK Personal Banking this excludes a non-material amount of provisions held on relatively small legacy portfolios. (3) Comprises unsecured lending except for Private Banking, which includes both secured and unsecured lending. It excludes loans that are commercial in nature. (4) UK Personal Banking excludes additional lending to existing customers.
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Personal portfolio Mortgage LTV distribution by stage The table below shows gross mortgage lending and related ECL by LTV band. Mortgage lending not within the scope of IFRS 9 ECL reflected portfolios carried at fair value.
For the notes to this table refer to the following page.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Personal portfolio
Notes:
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Personal portfolio UK Personal Banking mortgage LTV distribution by region
|
|
Commercial real estate (CRE)
The CRE portfolio comprises exposures to entities involved in the development of, or investment in, commercial and residential properties (including house builders but excluding housing associations, construction and the building materials sub sector). The sector is reviewed regularly by senior executive committees. Reviews include portfolio credit quality, capital consumption and control frameworks. All disclosures in the CRE section are based on current exposure (gross of provisions and risk transfer). Current exposure is defined as: loans; the amount drawn under a credit facility plus accrued interest; contingent obligations; the issued amount of the guarantee or letter of credit; derivatives - the mark-to-market value, netted where netting agreements exist and net of legally enforceable collateral.
|
30 June 2020 |
|
31 December 2019 |
||||||
|
UK |
RoI |
Other |
Total |
|
UK |
RoI |
Other |
Total |
By geography and sub sector (1) |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential (2) |
4,791 |
412 |
5 |
5,208 |
|
4,507 |
462 |
27 |
4,996 |
Office (3) |
3,737 |
210 |
58 |
4,005 |
|
2,916 |
183 |
83 |
3,182 |
Retail (4) |
5,419 |
64 |
78 |
5,561 |
|
5,277 |
63 |
62 |
5,402 |
Industrial (5) |
2,881 |
18 |
100 |
2,999 |
|
2,457 |
18 |
115 |
2,590 |
Mixed/other (6) |
3,199 |
202 |
170 |
3,571 |
|
3,672 |
187 |
56 |
3,915 |
|
20,027 |
906 |
411 |
21,344 |
|
18,829 |
913 |
343 |
20,085 |
Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential (2) |
3,052 |
233 |
8 |
3,293 |
|
2,464 |
165 |
5 |
2,634 |
Office (3) |
137 |
22 |
- |
159 |
|
78 |
17 |
- |
95 |
Retail (4) |
147 |
- |
1 |
148 |
|
134 |
2 |
1 |
137 |
Industrial (5) |
129 |
2 |
- |
131 |
|
85 |
2 |
- |
87 |
Mixed/other (6) |
24 |
2 |
- |
26 |
|
16 |
2 |
- |
18 |
|
3,489 |
259 |
9 |
3,757 |
|
2,777 |
188 |
6 |
2,971 |
Total |
23,516 |
1,165 |
420 |
25,101 |
|
21,606 |
1,101 |
349 |
23,056 |
Notes:
(1) |
Geographical splits are based on country of collateral risk. |
(2) |
Properties including houses, flats and student accommodation. |
(3) |
Properties including offices in central business districts, regional headquarters and business parks. |
(4) |
Properties including high street retail, shopping centres, restaurants, bars and gyms. |
(5) |
Properties including distribution centres, manufacturing and warehouses. |
(6) |
Properties that do not fall within the other categories above. Mixed generally relates to a mixture of retail/office with residential. |
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Commercial real estate CRE LTV distribution by stage The table below shows CRE current exposure and related ECL by LTV band.
Notes: (1) Comprises gross lending, interest rate hedging derivatives and other assets carried at fair value that are managed as part of the overall CRE portfolio. (2) The exposure in Stage 3 mainly related to legacy assets. (3) Includes exposures relating to non-modelled portfolios and other exposures carried at fair value, including derivatives. (4) ECL provisions coverage is ECL provisions divided by current exposure. (5) Relates mainly to business banking, rate risk management products and unsecured corporate lending. The low Stage 3 ECL provisions coverage was driven by a single large exposure, which was written down to the expected recoverable amount. (6) Relates to the development of commercial and residential properties. LTV is not a meaningful measure for this type of lending activity.
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Flow statements The flow statements that follow show the main ECL and related income statement movements. They also show the changes in ECL as well as the changes in related financial assets used in determining ECL. Due to differences in scope, exposures in this section may therefore differ from those reported in other tables, principally in relation to exposures in Stage 1 and Stage 2. These differences do not have a material ECL impact. Other points to note:
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Flow statements The following flow statements show the material portfolios underpinning the NatWest Group flow statement.
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Flow statements
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Flow statements
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Flow statements
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Flow statements
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Flow statements
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Flow statements
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Flow statements
Note:
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Stage 2 decomposition - arrears status and contributing factors
The tables below show Stage 2 decomposition for the Personal and Wholesale portfolios.
|
|
|
UK mortgages |
|
RoI mortgages |
|
Credit cards |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|||||
|
|
|
Loans |
ECL |
|
Loans |
ECL |
|
Loans |
ECL |
|
Loans |
ECL |
|
Loans |
ECL |
30 June 2020 |
|
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
Personal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently in arrears (>30 DPD) |
|
|
532 |
21 |
|
34 |
3 |
|
30 |
10 |
|
102 |
35 |
|
698 |
69 |
Currently up-to-date |
|
|
23,553 |
173 |
|
2,173 |
95 |
|
1,291 |
233 |
|
3,063 |
440 |
|
30,080 |
941 |
- PD deterioration |
|
|
19,089 |
166 |
|
1,332 |
69 |
|
859 |
187 |
|
2,553 |
383 |
|
23,833 |
805 |
- Up-to-date, PD persistence |
|
|
1,017 |
1 |
|
66 |
2 |
|
293 |
15 |
|
256 |
17 |
|
1,632 |
35 |
- Other driver (adverse credit, forbearance etc) |
3,447 |
6 |
|
775 |
24 |
|
139 |
31 |
|
254 |
40 |
|
4,615 |
101 |
||
Total Stage 2 |
|
|
24,085 |
194 |
|
2,207 |
98 |
|
1,321 |
243 |
|
3,165 |
475 |
|
30,778 |
1,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently in arrears (>30 DPD) |
|
|
528 |
14 |
|
21 |
3 |
|
16 |
6 |
|
92 |
19 |
|
657 |
42 |
Currently up-to-date |
|
|
9,860 |
73 |
|
1,056 |
28 |
|
1,243 |
126 |
|
2,218 |
234 |
|
14,377 |
461 |
- PD deterioration |
|
|
4,184 |
60 |
|
208 |
15 |
|
727 |
92 |
|
1,482 |
188 |
|
6,601 |
355 |
- Up-to-date, PD persistence |
|
|
1,812 |
5 |
|
252 |
4 |
|
422 |
20 |
|
540 |
29 |
|
3,026 |
58 |
- Other driver (adverse credit, forbearance etc) |
3,864 |
8 |
|
596 |
9 |
|
94 |
14 |
|
196 |
17 |
|
4,750 |
48 |
||
Total Stage 2 |
|
|
10,388 |
87 |
|
1,077 |
31 |
|
1,259 |
132 |
|
2,310 |
253 |
|
15,034 |
503 |
Key points
● |
The deteriorated economic outlook, as detailed in the Covid-19 - estimating ECL in uncertain times section, including forecast increases in unemployment, resulted in increased account level IFRS 9 PDs. Consequently, compared to the 2019 year-end, a larger proportion of accounts exhibited a SICR causing Stage 2 exposures to increase significantly. |
● |
As expected, ECL coverage was higher in accounts that were more than 30 days past due than those in Stage 2 for other reasons.
|
|
|
Property |
|
Corporate |
|
FI |
|
Other |
|
Total |
||||||
|
|
|
Loans |
ECL |
|
Loans |
ECL |
|
Loans |
ECL |
|
Loans |
ECL |
|
Loans |
ECL |
30 June 2020 |
|
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
|
£m |
£m |
Wholesale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently in arrears (>30 DPD) |
|
|
346 |
7 |
|
492 |
27 |
|
75 |
3 |
|
- |
- |
|
913 |
37 |
Currently up-to-date |
|
|
12,054 |
385 |
|
49,550 |
1,527 |
|
3,714 |
66 |
|
1 |
- |
|
65,319 |
1,978 |
- PD deterioration |
|
|
10,715 |
304 |
|
47,137 |
1,418 |
|
3,217 |
38 |
|
1 |
- |
|
61,070 |
1,760 |
- Up-to-date, PD persistence |
|
|
25 |
- |
|
81 |
1 |
|
1 |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
107 |
1 |
- Other driver (forbearance, RoCL etc) |
1,314 |
81 |
|
2,332 |
108 |
|
496 |
28 |
|
- |
- |
|
4,142 |
217 |
||
Total Stage 2 |
|
|
12,400 |
392 |
|
50,042 |
1,554 |
|
3,789 |
69 |
|
1 |
- |
|
66,232 |
2,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently in arrears (>30 DPD) |
|
|
57 |
2 |
|
219 |
6 |
|
7 |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
283 |
8 |
Currently up-to-date |
|
|
2,523 |
45 |
|
9,485 |
192 |
|
539 |
4 |
|
4 |
- |
|
12,551 |
241 |
- PD deterioration |
|
|
1,386 |
28 |
|
6,083 |
144 |
|
368 |
3 |
|
3 |
- |
|
7,840 |
175 |
- Up-to-date, PD persistence |
|
|
45 |
1 |
|
183 |
5 |
|
2 |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
230 |
6 |
- Other driver (forbearance, RoCL etc) |
1,092 |
16 |
|
3,219 |
43 |
|
169 |
1 |
|
1 |
- |
|
4,481 |
60 |
||
Total Stage 2 |
|
|
2,580 |
47 |
|
9,704 |
198 |
|
546 |
4 |
|
4 |
- |
|
12,834 |
249 |
Key points
● |
The deteriorated economic outlook, as detailed in the Covid-19 - estimating ECL in uncertain times section, including significant falls in GDP and commercial real estate valuations, resulted in increased IFRS 9 PDs. Consequently, compared to the 2019 year-end, a larger proportion of the exposures exhibited a SICR causing Stage 2 exposures to increase significantly. |
● |
PD deterioration is the main trigger for identifying a SICR and Stage 2 treatment, although there has also been an increase in arrears. |
● |
There was an increase in flows on to the Risk of Credit Loss framework, however, these have been recorded under PD deterioration if this Stage 2 trigger has also been met. |
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Stage 2 decomposition by a significant increase in credit risk trigger
|
|
| UK mortgages |
| RoI mortgages |
| Credit cards |
| Other |
| Total | |||||
30 June 2020 |
|
| £m | % |
| £m | % |
| £m | % |
| £m | % |
| £m | % |
Personal trigger (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PD movement |
|
| 19,557 | 81.2 |
| 1,362 | 61.7 |
| 889 | 67.2 |
| 2,635 | 83.3 |
| 24,443 | 79.5 |
PD persistence |
|
| 1,017 | 4.2 |
| 66 | 3.0 |
| 293 | 22.2 |
| 257 | 8.1 |
| 1,633 | 5.3 |
Adverse credit bureau recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with credit reference agency |
|
| 2,910 | 12.1 |
| - | - |
| 51 | 3.9 |
| 69 | 2.2 |
| 3,030 | 9.8 |
Forbearance support provided |
|
| 209 | 0.9 |
| 2 | 0.1 |
| - | - |
| 37 | 1.2 |
| 248 | 0.8 |
Customers in collections |
|
| 112 | 0.5 |
| 53 | 2.4 |
| 4 | 0.3 |
| 54 | 1.7 |
| 223 | 0.7 |
Other reasons (2) |
|
| 228 | 0.9 |
| 724 | 32.8 |
| 84 | 6.4 |
| 109 | 3.4 |
| 1,145 | 3.7 |
Days past due >30 |
|
| 52 | 0.2 |
| - | - |
| - | - |
| 4 | 0.1 |
| 56 | 0.2 |
|
|
| 24,085 | 100 |
| 2,207 | 100 |
| 1,321 | 100 |
| 3,165 | 100 |
| 30,778 | 100 |
31 December 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal trigger (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PD movement |
|
| 4,583 | 44.0 |
| 223 | 20.7 |
| 742 | 59.0 |
| 1,538 | 66.6 |
| 7,086 | 47.1 |
PD persistence |
|
| 1,815 | 17.5 |
| 252 | 23.4 |
| 422 | 33.5 |
| 542 | 23.5 |
| 3,031 | 20.2 |
Adverse credit bureau recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with credit reference agency |
|
| 3,236 | 31.2 |
| - | - |
| 59 | 4.7 |
| 102 | 4.4 |
| 3,397 | 22.6 |
Forbearance support provided |
|
| 163 | 1.6 |
| 3 | 0.3 |
| - | - |
| 10 | 0.4 |
| 176 | 1.2 |
Customers in collections |
|
| 137 | 1.3 |
| 74 | 6.9 |
| 3 | 0.2 |
| 36 | 1.6 |
| 250 | 1.7 |
Other reasons (2) |
|
| 339 | 3.3 |
| 525 | 48.7 |
| 33 | 2.6 |
| 56 | 2.4 |
| 953 | 6.3 |
Days past due >30 |
|
| 115 | 1.1 |
| - | - |
| - | - |
| 26 | 1.1 |
| 141 | 0.9 |
|
|
| 10,388 | 100 |
| 1,077 | 100 |
| 1,259 | 100 |
| 2,310 | 100 |
| 15,034 | 100 |
For the notes to the table refer to the next page.
Key points
● | The primary driver of credit deterioration was PD, which including persistence, accounted for the majority of movements into Stage 2. High risk back-stops, for example, forbearance and adverse credit bureau, provide additional valuable discrimination. |
● | However, with a larger proportion of exposures now triggering PD deterioration following the deteriorated economic outlook, the proportion of accounts triggering high risk backstops alone decreased. |
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Stage 2 decomposition by a significant increase in credit risk trigger
|
|
| Property |
| Corporate |
| FI |
| Other |
| Total | |||||
|
|
| Loans | ECL |
| Loans | ECL |
| Loans | ECL |
| Loans | ECL |
| Loans | ECL |
30 June 2020 |
|
| £m | % |
| £m | % |
| £m | % |
| £m | % |
| £m | % |
Wholesale trigger (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PD movement |
|
| 10,849 | 87.6 |
| 47,483 | 94.9 |
| 3,259 | 86.0 |
| 1 | 100 |
| 61,592 | 93.0 |
PD persistence |
|
| 25 | 0.2 |
| 82 | 0.2 |
| 1 | - |
| - | - |
| 108 | 0.2 |
Risk of credit loss |
|
| 449 | 3.6 |
| 1,007 | 2.0 |
| 211 | 5.6 |
| - | - |
| 1,667 | 2.5 |
Forbearance support provided |
|
| 17 | 0.1 |
| 16 | - |
| 19 | 0.5 |
| - | - |
| 52 | 0.1 |
Customers in collections |
|
| 16 | 0.1 |
| 63 | 0.1 |
| - | - |
| - | - |
| 79 | 0.1 |
Other reasons (3,4) |
|
| 959 | 7.7 |
| 1,296 | 2.6 |
| 266 | 7.0 |
| - | - |
| 2,521 | 3.8 |
Days past due >30 |
|
| 85 | 0.7 |
| 95 | 0.2 |
| 33 | 0.9 |
| - | - |
| 213 | 0.3 |
|
|
| 12,400 | 100 |
| 50,042 | 100 |
| 3,789 | 100 |
| 1 | 100 |
| 66,232 | 100 |
31 December 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale trigger (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PD movement |
|
| 1,416 | 54.8 |
| 6,129 | 63.1 |
| 368 | 67.4 |
| 3 | 75.0 |
| 7,916 | 61.7 |
PD persistence |
|
| 45 | 1.7 |
| 183 | 1.9 |
| 3 | 0.5 |
| - | - |
| 231 | 1.8 |
Risk of credit loss |
|
| 915 | 35.5 |
| 2,394 | 24.7 |
| 69 | 12.6 |
| - | - |
| 3,378 | 26.3 |
Forbearance support provided |
|
| 31 | 1.2 |
| 140 | 1.4 |
| 29 | 5.3 |
| - | - |
| 200 | 1.6 |
Customers in collections |
|
| 10 | 0.4 |
| 47 | 0.5 |
| - | - |
| - | - |
| 57 | 0.4 |
Other reasons (3,4) |
|
| 146 | 5.7 |
| 659 | 6.8 |
| 71 | 13.0 |
| 1 | 25.0 |
| 877 | 6.8 |
Days past due >30 |
|
| 17 | 0.7 |
| 152 | 1.6 |
| 6 | 1.1 |
| - | - |
| 175 | 1.4 |
|
|
| 2,580 | 100 |
| 9,704 | 100 |
| 546 | 100 |
| 4 | 100 |
| 12,834 | 100 |
Notes:
(1) | The table is prepared on a hierarchical basis from top to bottom, for example, accounts with PD deterioration may also trigger backstop(s) but are only reported under PD deterioration. |
(2) | £322 million of Ulster Bank Rol mortgage exposure which did not meet existing SICR criteria have been classified within Stage 2 following a strategic review and are included in other reasons. It includes customers that have accessed payday lending, interest only mortgages past end of term, a small number of mortgage customers on a highly flexible mortgage significantly behind their repayment plan and customers breaching risk appetite thresholds for new business acquisition. |
(3) | Includes customers where a PD assessment cannot be undertaken due to missing PDs. |
(4) | £703 million of Ulster Bank Rol Wholesale exposure which did not meet existing SICR criteria have been classified within Stage 2 following strategic and sectoral reviews and are included in other reasons. |
Key points
● | PD deterioration continued to be the primary trigger of migration of exposures from Stage 1 to Stage 2. As the economic outlook deteriorated, it now accounts for a higher proportion of the balances migrated to Stage 2. |
● | Moving exposures on to the Risk of Credit Loss framework remains an important backstop indicator of a SICR. |
● | The exposures classified under the Stage 2 Risk of Credit Loss framework trigger decreased over the period as more exposures were captured under the PD deterioration Stage 2 trigger. |
● | NatWest Group continues to appraise its IFRS 9 SICR rules in the context of effectiveness, volatility and industry consistency. The recent PD driven increase in Stage 2 exposures in the Wholesale portfolios highlighted the gradual diminished impact on ECL of the threshold for better quality portfolios under stress, suggesting possible conservatism in the SICR rules for these portfolios. As an illustration, an increase of the de minimus PD threshold to 0.75% in the SICR rules could decrease the Wholesale portfolios Stage 2 exposure by 24% with a two basis point reduction on good book ECL coverage.
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Stage 3 vintage analysis
The table below shows estimated vintage analysis of the material Stage 3 portfolios totalling 83% of the Stage 3 loans of £7.0 billion.
| 30 June 2020 |
| 31 December 2019 | ||||
| UK Personal | Ulster Bank |
|
| UK Personal | Ulster Bank |
|
| Banking | RoI |
|
| Banking | RoI |
|
| mortgages | mortgages | Wholesale |
| mortgages | mortgages | Wholesale |
Stage 3 loans (£bn) | 1.3 | 1.4 | 3.1 |
| 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.3 |
Vintage (time in default): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 year | 33% | 5% | 46% |
| 32% | 13% | 37% |
1-3 years | 26% | 18% | 15% |
| 23% | 12% | 14% |
3-5 years | 10% | 23% | 9% |
| 11% | 23% | 9% |
5-10 years | 23% | 41% | 30% |
| 26% | 44% | 40% |
>10 years | 8% | 12% | - |
| 8% | 8% | - |
| 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | 100% |
Key points
● | Mortgages -The proportion of the Stage 3 defaulted population who have been in default for over five years reflected NatWest Group's support for customers in financial difficulty. When customers continue to engage constructively with NatWest Group, making regular payments, NatWest Group continues to support them. NatWest Group's provisioning approach retains customers in Stage 3 for a life-time loss provisioning calculation, even when their arrears status reverts to below 90 days past due. |
● | Wholesale -The value of Stage 3 loans that have been impaired for > 5 years was mainly due to customers being in a protracted formal insolvency process or subject to litigation or a complaints process. |
Asset quality The table below shows asset quality bands of gross loans and ECL, by stage, for the Personal portfolio.
Note: (1) AQ10 includes £0.5 billion (31 December 2019 - £0.6 billion) of RoI mortgages which are not currently considered defaulted for capital calculation purposes for RoI but are included in Stage 3.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Asset quality
Note: (1) AQ10 includes £0.5 billion (31 December 2019 - £0.6 billion) of RoI mortgages which are not currently considered defaulted for capital calculation purposes for RoI but are included in Stage 3.
Key points
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Asset quality The table below shows asset quality bands of gross loans and ECL, by stage, for the Wholesale portfolio.
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Banking activities continued
Asset quality
|
|
Capital and risk management
Credit risk - Trading activities
This section details the credit risk profile of NatWest Group's trading activities.
Securities financing transactions and collateral The table below shows securities financing transactions in NatWest Markets and Treasury. Balance sheet captions include balances held at all classifications under IFRS 9.
|
|