The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC - Results of EU stress test exercise
23 July 2010
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc ("RBS") welcomes the publication of the results of the EU-wide stress testing exercise and confirms it remains well capitalised with a strong Tier One capital ratio under both the benchmark and adverse scenarios. It is important to note that the tests are theoretical in nature and none of the data published represent a forecast or prediction by RBS of what would actually happen in any of the modelled scenarios. Furthermore, the results are FSA calculations impacting revenues, impairments and balance sheet items and assume an unchanged balance sheet from end 2009.
RBS has continued to make good progress in its restructuring plans including the de-risking of its balance sheet, and reaffirms its commitment to strong capital ratios. It regularly runs its own stress tests to ensure capital adequacy. RBS will report its interim results for 2010 on Friday, 6 August.
Bruce Van Saun, Group Finance Director for RBS said: "We support the need for banks to maintain strong capital ratios and we believe that stress tests like these, whilst theoretical, can provide insights into absolute and relative strength. We are pleased that the results demonstrate the strong capital position of RBS as we endeavour to execute our recovery plans over the coming years."
The results for RBS are summarised in the table below with further detail in Appendix One.
|
2009 |
Benchmark 2011 |
Adverse 2011 |
|
All figures GBPm |
Before additional Sovereign Risk Scenario |
After Additional Sovereign Risk Scenario |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Total tier 1 capital |
62,898 |
63,460 |
54,644 |
|
Total regulatory capital |
71,320 |
71,789 |
62,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Risk Weighted Assets |
438,200 |
450,029 |
468,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-impairment income (including operating expenses)(1),(2) |
7,667 |
|
24,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments on financial assets(2) |
|
|
(27,355) |
|
Trading losses(2) |
|
|
(3,543) |
|
Additional impairment losses (sovereign scenario banking book)(2) |
|
|
|
(1,064) |
Additional valuation losses (sovereign scenario trading book)(2) |
|
|
|
(1,809) |
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 ratio(3) |
14.4% |
14.1% |
11.7% |
11.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The 2009 pre-impairment income number includes credit and other market losses of £6,152m reported in Income From Trading Activities. However, the 2011 benchmark and adverse stress scenarios exclude trading losses from pre-impairment income.
(2) The numbers for pre-impairment income, impairments and trading losses shown in the adverse scenarios are cumulative for 2010 and 2011 combined and are FSA scenarios not RBS forecasts.
(3) Note that under the assumptions used for both the benchmark and adverse scenarios shown above, RBS has not needed to draw on its £8bn contingent capital facility (equivalent to c. 1.8% of Tier 1 capital ratio in addition to the ratios shown above as at the end of 2009) nor receive any net payments under the Asset Protection Scheme through the end of 2011, representing additional capital strength.
Appendix Two shows our gross and net consolidated exposures to central and local governments in the thirty European Economic Area countries as at 31 March 2010. RBS continued to reduce exposures to countries with credit ratings of A+ or below during the second quarter of 2010.
Further details of the stress tests and the assumptions behind them along with further explanatory notes can be found on the websites of the Committee of European Banking Supervisors ("CEBS") at www.c-ebs.org/ and the UK Financial Services Authority ("FSA") at www.fsa.gov.uk. As both the FSA and CEBS emphasise in their communications, these simulations are not profit forecasts and should in no way be construed as such.
For Further Information Contact:
Richard O'Connor
Investor Relations
+44 (0) 20 7672 1758
Group Media Centre
Tel: +44 (0) 131 523 4205
This announcement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including those related to RBS's regulatory capital position, risk-weighted assets, impairment losses and credit exposures under certain specified scenarios. In addition, forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements typically containing words such as "intends", "expects", "anticipates", "targets", "plans", "estimates" and words of similar import. These statements concern or may affect future matters, such as RBS's future economic results, business plans and strategies, and are based upon the Group's current expectations. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that might cause actual results and performance to differ materially from any expected future results or performance expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to differences in current expectations include, but are not limited to, legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments, competitive conditions, technological developments, exchange rate fluctuations and general economic conditions. These and other factors, risks and uncertainties that may impact any forward-looking statement or the Group's actual results are discussed in RBS's UK Annual Report and materials filed with, or furnished to, the US Securities and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to, RBS's Reports on Form 6-K and most recent Annual Report on Form 20-F. The forward-looking statements contained in this announcement speak only as of the date of this announcement and RBS does not assume or undertake any obligation or responsibility to update any of the forward-looking statements contained in this announcement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent legally required.
Appendix One - Results of CEBS stress tests for RBS
Actual results |
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
GBPm |
|
|
Total Tier 1 capital |
62,898 |
Total regulatory capital |
71,320 |
Total risk weighted assets |
438,200 |
|
|
Pre-impairment income (including operating expenses) |
7,667 |
Impairment losses on financial assets in the banking book |
(13,899) |
|
|
1 yr Loss rate on Corporate exposures (%)(1) |
2.2% |
1 yr Loss rate on Retail exposures (%)(1) |
1.6% |
|
|
Tier 1 ratio (%) |
14.4% |
|
|
|
|
Outcomes of stress test scenarios |
|
|
|
The stress test was carried out under a number of key common simplifying assumptions (e.g. constant balance sheet, uniform treatment of securitisation exposures). Therefore, the information relative to the benchmark scenarios is provided only for comparison purposes. Neither the benchmark scenario nor the adverse scenario should in any way be construed as a forecast. |
|
|
|
Benchmark scenario at 31 December 2011(2) |
GBPm |
|
|
Total Tier 1 capital after the benchmark scenario |
63,460 |
Total regulatory capital after the benchmark scenario |
71,789 |
Total risk weighted assets after the benchmark scenario |
450,029 |
|
|
Tier 1 ratio (%) after the benchmark scenario |
14.1% |
|
|
|
|
Adverse scenario at 31 December 2011(2) |
GBPm |
|
|
Total Tier 1 capital after the adverse scenario |
54,644 |
Total regulatory capital after the adverse scenario |
62,849 |
Total risk weighted assets after the adverse scenario |
468,525 |
|
|
2 yr cumulative pre-impairment income after the adverse scenario (including operating expenses)(2) |
24,219 |
2 yr cumulative impairment losses on financial assets in the banking book after the adverse scenario(2) |
(27,355) |
2 yr cumulative losses on the trading book after the adverse scenario(2) |
(3,543) |
|
|
2 yr Loss rate on Corporate exposures (%) after the adverse scenario(1),(2) |
3.0% |
2 yr Loss rate on Retail exposures (%) after the adverse scenario(1),(2) |
4.6% |
|
|
Tier 1 ratio (%) after the adverse scenario |
11.7% |
|
|
Additional sovereign shock on the adverse scenario at 31 December 2011 |
GBPm |
|
|
Additional impairment losses on the banking book after the sovereign shock(2) |
(1,064) |
Additional losses on sovereign exposures in the trading book after the sovereign shock(2) |
(1,809) |
|
|
2 yr Loss rate on Corporate exposures (%) after the adverse scenario and sovereign shock(1),(2),(3) |
3.2% |
2 yr Loss rate on Retail exposures (%) after the adverse scenario and sovereign shock(1),(2),(3) |
4.8% |
|
|
Tier 1 ratio (%) after the adverse scenario and sovereign shock |
11.2% |
|
|
Additional capital needed to reach a 6 % Tier 1 ratio under the adverse scenario + additional sovereign shock, at the end of 2011 |
- |
|
|
(1) Impairment losses as a % of corporate/retail exposures in Available for sale ('AFS') and loans and receivables portfolios.
(2) Cumulative for 2010 and 2011.
(3) On the basis of losses estimated under both the adverse scenario and the additional sovereign shock.
Appendix Two - Exposures to central and local governments
All figures in GBPm |
Gross exposures (net of impairments) |
Of which |
Of which |
|
Net exposures (net of impairments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austria |
229 |
222 |
7 |
|
229 |
Belgium |
1,977 |
1,169 |
808 |
|
1,977 |
Bulgaria |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Cyprus |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Czech Republic |
169 |
169 |
- |
|
169 |
Denmark |
619 |
608 |
11 |
|
619 |
Estonia |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Finland |
199 |
47 |
152 |
|
199 |
France |
16,956 |
9,031 |
7,925 |
|
16,956 |
Germany |
20,785 |
16,738 |
4,047 |
|
20,785 |
Greece |
2,010 |
1,284 |
726 |
|
2,010 |
Hungary |
70 |
70 |
- |
|
70 |
Iceland |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Ireland |
4,280 |
3,322 |
958 |
|
4,280 |
Italy |
3,919 |
924 |
2,995 |
|
3,919 |
Latvia |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Liechtenstein |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Lithuania |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Luxembourg |
32 |
32 |
- |
|
32 |
Malta |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Netherlands |
16,263 |
15,343 |
920 |
|
16,263 |
Norway |
212 |
233 |
(21) |
|
212 |
Poland |
149 |
149 |
- |
|
149 |
Portugal |
660 |
558 |
102 |
|
660 |
Romania |
422 |
422 |
- |
|
422 |
Slovakia |
17 |
17 |
- |
|
17 |
Slovenia |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Spain |
821 |
179 |
642 |
|
821 |
Sweden |
696 |
343 |
353 |
|
696 |
United Kingdom |
19,964 |
16,062 |
3,902 |
|
19,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The exposures provided are for the RBS Group plc on a consolidated pro forma basis at 31 March 2010.
(2) Exposures are reported on an immediate borrower basis (e.g. an exposure of 100 to Country A, collateralised with bonds issued by Country B, is reported on Country A and not on Country B).
(3) The exposures to central and local governments include loans and receivables and securities.
(4) "Gross Exposures" are reported on the basis of their accounting value, net of impairment but gross of any Collateral and Hedging. This means:
- Trading, Fair value Option and AFS assets (whether securities or loans) are reported at their fair value
- Loans and receivables are reported at their amortised cost (net of impairment provisions)
- Derivatives (including credit default swaps ('CDS')) are reported at their fair value (if positive)
(5) "Net Exposures" are the "Gross Exposures" net of Collateral (fair-value) and Hedging (collateral and hedging between central and local administrations of the same country has not been applied).
Please note that the trading book exposures above are shown net of short positions.