20 November 2015
Final Results for the Year Ended 30 June 2015
Pantheon Resources plc ("Pantheon" or "the Company"), the AIM-quoted oil and gas exploration and development company, today announces its final results for the year ended 30 June 2015.
HIGHLIGHTS
· Pantheon has had a transformational 18 months including completing a major capital raising, material acreage acquisition and a significant drilling discovery
· Raised £18.5 million before expenses, significantly increasing its acreage position in East Texas.
· This acreage was acquired following an extensive geological study completed together with the expert assistance of the independent Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Austin, Texas
· Estimated P50 Prospective Resource (Recoverable) net to Pantheon's 50% working interest is 150.5 million barrels of oil equivalent ("Mmboe")
· Post-year end, in October 2015, the first well (VOBM#1) was announced as a discovery, flowing c.1,500 barrels of oil equivalent per day ("boepd"). Tested flow rates and other data indicate that the well has the potential to exceed P50 pre drill estimates
· The second well (VOS#1) is presently approaching target depth, having already encountered a new and potentially significant hydrocarbon bearing zone
· VOBM#1 and VOS#1 results to date give validation to the quality and scale of the geological study undertaken
· Project economics estimated to be profitable at oil prices below US$30/barrel
Jay Cheatham, CEO, said:
"This has been a transformational period for the Company in which we have progressed the business from the geological thesis to the drill pad. This has been achieved as a result of the incredible work done by the JV and its partners in what is the most comprehensive geological study I have been associated with. A material fundraise earlier in the year then enabled us to execute a successful and on-going drilling programme, which, following the period end, has already delivered a successful discovery and significant flow test result.
Such progress has the potential to add significant value for shareholders, and I remain optimistic that there is much to look forward to in the months and years ahead."
Annual Report and Accounts
The Annual Report and Accounts for the financial year ending 30 June 2015 will be posted to shareholders today, together with a Notice of Annual General Meeting. Copies will be available today on the Company's website at: www.pantheonresources.com
The Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at the offices of Shakespeare Martineau LLP at One America Square, Crosswall, London EC3N 2SG on Tuesday 15 December, 2015 at 10.00am.
- Ends -
Further information:
Pantheon Resources plc |
+44 20 7484 5359 |
Jay Cheatham, CEO |
|
Justin Hondris, Director, Finance and Corporate Development |
|
|
|
Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited (Nominated Adviser and broker) |
+44 20 7710 7600 |
Michael Shaw |
|
Ashton Clanfield |
|
Nicholas Rhodes |
|
|
|
FTI Consulting |
+44 20 3727 1000 |
Ed Westropp |
|
Shannon Brushe |
|
James Styles |
|
For further information on Pantheon Resources plc, see the website at: www.pantheonresources.com
Neither the contents of the Company's website nor the contents of any website accessible from hyperlinks on the Company's website (or any other website) is incorporated into, or forms part of, this announcement.
In accordance with the AIM Rules - Note for Mining and Oil & Gas Companies - June 2009, the information contained in this announcement has been reviewed and signed off by Jay Cheatham, a qualified Chemical & Petroleum Engineer, who has over 40 years' relevant experience within the sector.
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
Years of frontline oilfield experience have taught the management of Pantheon the need for caution in a business of uncertain prices and often deceptive geological data. It would be foolish for us to drop our guard on these matters in the first flush of our recent success with the drilling bit.
However, it would be remiss at this stage of operations not to recognise the huge strides that Jay Cheatham and his team have taken in the last twelve months towards transforming an ambitious but unproven exploration venture into a resilient low cost oil and gas production company capable of generating cash flow and capital growth for some years to come.
A year ago I noted that the acquisition of additional interests in our joint venture with Vision Resources was potentially transformative for Pantheon and it is a pleasure to be able to report that this has indeed proved to be the case. The flow rates achieved during testing of our first well in Polk County have confirmed the presence of commercial quantities of oil and gas in the Eagle Ford sandstone, our primary target on our acreage. More details of this well are given in the Chief Executive's Report.
At the time of writing we are close to reaching the target depth in our second well in neighbouring Tyler County, having already encountered hydrocarbons from a different formation while drilling down towards target depth. The most encouraging feature of the first well is not simply that it is a commercial discovery, but that the reservoir we have found appears, as we anticipated, to display closely analogous characteristics to the prolific Double A Wells field nearby.
To that extent we feel justified in saying that we have taken an important first step towards "cracking the code" of the complex geology which has for many years prevented widespread development of other Eagle Ford sandstone reservoirs in East Texas. Our second well will provide us with further evidence and an indication whether or not the same characteristics are also present in the second location we identified as one of up to 167 Eagle Ford Sandstone prospects following an intensive three-year study with the expert assistance of the Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas, Austin.
We are fortunate that even a failure in the Eagle Ford sandstone on the second well will not exhaust the possibilities for commercial development from either the Austin Chalk or the third formation that we have already encountered while drilling the second well. Planning is well underway with Vision Resources, the operator of the joint venture, about the next steps we need to take in order to follow up the initial drilling success and maximise the value of the economic potential of our acreage position.
Truly, therefore, these are exciting and positive times for the Company, and ones that bear out the optimism of a year ago. It is important, as I said at the outset, not to get too far ahead of ourselves. There can be no guarantee that every future well result will be as positive as the first one. Only further drilling can confirm the validity of our thesis across the whole of our acreage position.
As we learnt to our cost earlier this year when extreme weather delayed the start of our drilling programme by several months, Mother Nature does not always march to man-made orders. Shareholders may have seen the photograph of our drilling location back in the early summer, after several weeks of torrential rain, looking more like an inland sea than typical Texas woodland. It was those highly unusual adverse climatic conditions which forced us to switch the location of our first well from Tyler to Polk County.
The outlook for oil prices also remains distinctly uncertain. We are fortunate that, with very low operating costs and ready access to nearby pipelines, gas processing plants and other infrastructure, discoveries in the East Texas Eagle Ford are expected to be profitable at prices below $30 per barrel, which is a comforting outlook. We must not lose sight of the fact, however, that the oil market remains out of balance and is marked by continued excess supply. Natural gas prices are also at or close to historical lows, in North America.
What we do know is that Pantheon should retain a strong competitive advantage compared to most other E&P companies, thanks to our historically tight control of costs and the attractive low cost profile of our prospects. Not all aspects of the falling oil price have been negative. We have benefited significantly from the knock on effects
of lower oil prices on drilling costs, such that the final cost of our first well came in substantially below the estimate that we made at the time of the share placing a little over a year ago, and we expect drilling costs to remain lower so long as energy prices remain depressed.
In summary, the news from our first well in Polk County is excellent and the outlook promising, even for those who share our naturally cautious temperament. We move forward with increased confidence that our tightly focused strategy can deliver much greater returns as the geological and operational risks progressively diminish with each new piece of information gained from the drilling programme.
John Walmsley
19 November 2015
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S STATEMENT AND OPERATIONAL REVIEW
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
I am pleased to report that, since our interim report in March 2015, Pantheon has continued to make excellent progress, drilling two wells on our 50% owned acreage in Tyler and Polk Counties, onshore East Texas, the first of which is a commercial discovery and the second is still to complete, but has already encountered a hydrocarbon bearing zone with significant potential. The results have happily vindicated our decision to raise c.$30 million of funding from investors in October 2014 to extend our acreage position and fund the two-well drilling programme. This in turn, despite the sharp decline in oil prices over the past 12 months, has resulted in a step change in the market valuation of your company.
The year under review began with the fundraising, fortuitously completed despite a falling oil price. I am particularly proud that we were able to complete this significant fundraising underlining our belief in the quality of this project and in the transaction. Building on the three year regional geological study the joint venture ("JV") carried out with the independent Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas, Austin, it enabled us to make a significant investment in extending our lease acreage position and increasing our exposure to a number of new prospect areas we had identified as being prospective for the high quality reservoir sands in the Eagle Ford sandstone, our primary target.
Our current land position covers five project areas in Tyler and Polk Counties, East Texas, with an estimated Prospective P50 Resource (Recoverable) net to Pantheon's 50% working interest of 150.5 Mmboe. The enlarged acreage position gives us the opportunity, in partnership with Vision Resources, the operator of our JV, to identify and potentially drill a large number of similar high quality targets possessing the Eagle Ford reservoir sands within the acreage. The extent of any future drilling programme will of course depend on the outcome of each well we complete. While the geological study has identified up to 167 world class Eagle Ford sandstone prospects in an area of abundant infrastructure, low operating cost and low sovereign risk, only drilling can ultimately confirm whether or not the reserves we hope to find are in place.
The results of the first well were extremely positive and have increased our confidence in the potential of our acreage position. Our first well was drilled in Polk County in our West Double A prospect, post the period end. The Vision Blackstone Minerals #1 ("VOBM#1") well was a discovery in the Eagle Ford sandstone formation and reached a target depth of c.14,200 feet. The well encountered 62 feet of net pay and testing confirmed it as a commercial discovery. The VOBM#1 flowed at a stabilised flow rate of 6,145 mcfpd natural gas and 504 bblpd oil on a 12/64ths choke at a flowing tubing pressure of 7,350 psi. Gross production at these rates equates to more than 1,500 boepd.
Diagnostics on the VOBM#1 well and comparisons with wells in the Double A Wells field indicate that it has the potential to exceed the pre-drill P50 estimate of 1.4Mmboe of recoverable reserves. It will however, take a period of sustained production data before a final, definitive assessment can be made. Preparations are underway to lay a pipeline to a nearby gas processing plant and oil will be collected on site and trucked to nearby refineries. It is expected that first production will occur in or after Q1 2016, once the necessary permits have been obtained.
On the commencement of production the well will be choked back and brought online slowly and carefully in order to preserve reservoir integrity, minimise possible damage and manage the well economics. Optimising the value of production from a complex, high pressure reservoir requires a high degree of technical skill, something that is often overlooked. We are fortunate that our joint venture is able to draw on many years of relevant experience and expertise.
At the time of writing, our second well in the 2015 drilling programme, the Vision Operating Smith #1 well ("VOS#1"), which was spudded in September 2015, is approaching its primary (Eagle Ford) and secondary (Austin Chalk) targets. It has however already encountered an unexpected but potentially significant hydrocarbon bearing zone at around 12,600 feet. This formation has now been side-tracked and put behind pipe to allow the well to proceed toward its primary and secondary targets. Final results for this well will be announced when drilling and, if appropriate, testing operations are complete.
Making a commercial discovery with the first well in our programme is clearly an excellent outcome for shareholders. The second well, has two separate targets (the Eagle Ford and the Austin Chalk), and will add
further to our knowledge base. Whatever the outcome, we have learnt enough already to have the confidence to proceed to further drilling. The extent and timing of that programme are presently under discussion with the operator of the joint venture, and once the results of the VOS#1 well are known an appropriate development plan can be established.
Establishing the optimum plan will require substantial planning and effort from the JV, however these are challenges that come from exploration success and as such are to be welcomed. We have a lot of hard work ahead as we look to build on our initial success. The good news is that in the course of the year under review we have finally transformed your company from one of promise to one of value, and I remain optimistic that there is much to look forward to in the months and years ahead.
Jay Cheatham
19 November 2015
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
Financial Review
The Group made a total loss from operations for the financial year ended 30 June 2015 of £1,148,900 (2014: £738,471). The increase over the prior year is primarily due to the non cash accounting charges made in relation to the granting of share options as well as the costs associated with the restructuring of the joint venture and recapitalization of the Group.
Production
The Group's net total sales production for the financial year ended 30 June 2015 amounted to 3.99 mcfd (2014: 6.4 mcfd) natural gas and nil bopd (2014: nil bopd) oil. Average realisations for the year for natural gas and oil were $3.30 (2014: $3.76) per mcf of natural gas and nil (2014: $nil) per barrel of oil respectively.
Revenue
Revenues for the year ended 30 June 2015 were marginally lower than the previous year at £3,389 (2014: £5,381).
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the year ended 30 June 2015 were £230 (2014: £26,372). These costs primarily relate to workover costs associated with a depleted well.
Impairments
The total impairment charge for the year was £nil (2014: £nil).
Accounting policies
There have been no major changes to accounting policies during the year.
Capital structure
The Company issued 94,256,626 new fully paid ordinary shares at an issue price £0.20 per share during the year, raising cash proceeds of c.£18.5m before expenses.
As at 30 June 2015 there were 196,356,396 shares in issue (2014: 102,099,770).
The Company also issued options to acquire 10,000,000 ordinary shares during the year to employees and Directors. These options had an exercise price of £0.30 per share and vested 50% on issue and 50% upon the later of the first anniversary of issue or the spudding of the second well. These are the only share options in issue in the Company.
Going concern
The Directors are satisfied with the Group's ability to operate as a going concern for the next 12 months, as documented further in Note 1.3.
Taxation
The Group incurred a loss for the year and has not incurred a tax charge. The Directors have not considered it appropriate to recognise a deferred tax asset to reflect the potential benefit arising from these timing differences.
Risk assessment
The Group's oil and gas activities are subject to a variety of risks, both financial and operational, including but not limited to those outlined below. These and other risks have the potential to materially affect the financial performance of the Group.
Liquidity and Interest Rate Risk
Liquidity risk has increased for many companies in the natural resources sector for a number of reasons including but not limited to the slowdown in the Chinese economy, the downturn in commodity prices and the recent political and other influences, which have negatively impacted energy prices.
Oil & Gas Price Risk
Oil and Gas sales revenues were subject to the volatility of the underlying commodity prices throughout the year. Over the past year the energy sector has been impacted by a dramatic reduction in both oil and gas prices which has resulted in very difficult market conditions for the sector. The Group did not engage in any commodity price hedging activity during the year.
Currency Risk
Almost all capital expenditure and operational revenues for the year were denominated in US dollars. The Group keeps the majority of its cash resources denominated in US dollars throughout the year to minimise volatility and foreign currency risk. The Group did not engage in any foreign currency hedging activity during the year.
Financial Instruments
As this stage of the Group's activities it has not been considered appropriate or necessary to enter into any derivatives strategies or hedging strategies. Once the Group's production revenues increase substantially, such strategies will be reviewed on a more regular basis.
Justin Hondris
19 November 2015
STRATEGIC REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
Principal activity
The Company is registered in England and Wales, having been incorporated under the Companies Act with registered number 05385506 as a public company limited by shares.
The principal activity of the Group is the investment in oil and gas exploration and development. The Group operates in the U.K. through its parent undertaking and in the U.S.A. through subsidiary companies, details of which are set out in the Note 8 to these accounts.
Review of the Business and Key Performance Indicators
Please refer to the Finance Director's Report on page 8 for the review of the business and analysis of the Key Performance Indicators of the business.
Financial Position and Future Prospects
Please refer to the Chief Executive Officer's statement and operation review on page 6 for an overview of the Company position and prospects.
Key operational risks and uncertainties
The Group is in the business of exploration and production of oil and gas. Accordingly, the principal operational risks and uncertainties affecting the Group include, but are not limited to, the time and monetary costs associated with the unsuccessful drilling of prospects; mechanical or other technical problems encountered during the drilling of prospects; mechanical or other technical problems which may from time to time affect existing production; the potential for increased costs for drilling in a tight rig market; the uncertainty surrounding potential recoverability of reserves; deterioration in commodity prices or economic conditions; and the potential for unexpected deterioration or abandonment of existing production. Pursuant to the terms of the respective joint ventures, and typical for the industry, the Group is also potentially exposed to the timing, financial and operational position of those joint ventures, in particular with respect to the timing, and therefore payment for the proposed drilling of wells.
By order of the board
Justin Hondris
Director
19 November 2015
Company Number 05385506
The Directors present their report together with the audited accounts of Pantheon Resources plc ("Pantheon" or "the Company") and its subsidiary undertakings (together "the Group") for the year ended 30 June 2015.
Results and dividends
The Group results for the period are set out on page 19. The Directors do not propose to recommend any distribution by way of a dividend for the year ended 30 June 2015.
Information to shareholders - website
The Group maintains its own website (www.pantheonresources.com) to facilitate provision of information to external stakeholders and potential investors and to comply with Rule 26 of the AIM Rules for Companies.
Group structure and changes in share capital
Details of the Group structure and the Company's share capital during the period are set out in Notes 8 and 14 to these accounts.
Directors
The following Directors held office during the year:
John Walmsley (Non-Executive Chairman)
John Cheatham (Chief Executive Officer)
Justin Hondris (Director, Finance & Corporate Development)
Directors' interests
The beneficial and non-beneficial interests in the Company's shares of the Directors and their families were as follows:
Name |
|
30 June 2015 Number of Ordinary shares of £0.01 |
J Cheatham |
|
3,554,249 |
J Hondris* |
|
1,135,000 |
J Walmsley* |
|
1,859,938 |
*Some of these ordinary shares are beneficially owned by the respective spouses of Messrs J Walmsley and J Hondris.
Share options for Ordinary shares of £0.01, held by Directors on 30 June 2015 were as follows:
|
Number of options |
Exercise price |
£0.30 |
|
|
J Walmsley |
1,000,000 |
J Cheatham |
4,385,000 |
J Hondris |
3,865,000 |
Total |
9,250,000 |
Only 50% of these share options had vested as at 30 June 2015. The remaining 50% vested subsequent to the year end on 30 September 2015.
Report on Directors' remuneration and service contracts
The service contracts of all the Directors are subject to a six month termination period.
Pensions
The Group does not operate a pension scheme for Directors or employees.
Directors' remuneration
|
Fees/basic |
Share-based |
Benefits |
2015 |
2014 |
|
salary |
payments |
in kind |
Total |
Total |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
J Cheatham |
189,797 |
164,986 |
- |
354,783 |
184,378 |
J Hondris |
138,575 |
145,421 |
- |
283,996 |
126,458 |
J Walmsley |
62,500 |
37,625 |
- |
100,125 |
52,083 |
S Graham |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47,917 |
|
390,872 |
348,032 |
- |
738,904 |
410,836 |
Director incentive scheme
In 2012 the Company implemented a short term executive director incentive scheme developed in conjunction with executive remuneration specialists at Deloitte LLP. Any incentive bonus resulting from the scheme will be shared by executive Directors and will be calculated as 2.25% of the value of "net-booked reserves" for a period (deducting any net-booked reserves recognised in earlier periods for this purpose). For the purposes of the scheme, net-booked reserves will include 100% of proved reserves and 25% of probable reserves booked to the Group, as determined by an independent third party, where relevant, in accordance with the classification definitions as mandated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers.
The Remuneration Committee will determine the extent to which any annual bonus will be settled in cash or share options with a discounted exercise price. The cash component will be at least one third of the total and there is no obligation to pay any of the annual bonus by way of share options. In the event of a sale of the Company or other change of control, the calculation will be undertaken by reference to the equity value of the Company (less the value of net booked reserves recognised in earlier periods). The Remuneration Committee believes that this annual incentive, together with the granting of out of the money share options provide an appropriate and reasonable structure to reward the executive Directors for performance that is aligned to the interests of shareholders as any potential benefit from this scheme is linked to the booking of net-booked reserves and share price appreciation. No benefit has been paid from this incentive scheme since inception.
Subsequent events
On 28 October, 2015 the Company announced the successful completion of testing operations of the VOBM#1 well located onshore Polk County, East Texas where Pantheon has a 50% working interest. The well encountered 62 feet of net pay in the Eagle Ford sandstone formation and flow tested natural gas and oil at a rate exceeding 1,500 boepd. The operator believes that the well has the potential to exceed the pre-drill P50 Prospective Resource (Recoverable) estimate of 1.4Mmboe, however it will take a period of sustained production data before a more definitive assessment can be made. The board is of the opinion that this discovery has been transformational for the Company and has the potential to add significant NPV for all shareholders. Importantly, it appears to have validated the understanding of the geological model constructed following the completion of the extensive regional geological study.
On 6 November, 2015 the Company announced that an oil and gas bearing zone had been encountered during drilling operations on the JV's second well in its drilling programme, the VOS#1 well, located onshore Tyler County, East Texas, where Pantheon has a 50% working interest. The zone, which is known to be present in a well to the South where it has been a substantial producer, is independent from both the primary and secondary objectives, and flowed both oil and gas. The well has since been successfully side-tracked and is presently drilling towards the primary and secondary formations.
The Company has been notified, in accordance with Chapter 5 of the FCA Disclosure and Transparency Rules, of the under noted interests in its ordinary shares as at 17 November 2015
|
Number of Ordinary Shares |
% of Share Capital |
|
|
|
Ferlim Nominees Limited |
36,282,300 |
18.48 |
Roy Nominees Limited |
10,176,652 |
5.18 |
Lynchwood Nominees Limited |
7,486,000 |
3.81 |
N.Y. Nominees Limited |
7,217,837 |
3.68 |
Barclayshare Nominees Limited |
6,955,993 |
3.54 |
Rock (Nominees) Limited |
6,400,000 |
3.26 |
Political and charitable contributions
There were no political or charitable contributions made by the Company during the year ended 30 June 2015 (2014:
Remuneration and Nomination Committee
The Board of Directors has established the Remuneration and Nomination Committee of the Board. John Walmsley is the chairman of the committee and Justin Hondris is the other member. Other Directors may attend meetings by invitation.
The Remuneration and Nomination Committee meets as required, but aims to meet at least twice a year. Its role is to determine the remuneration arrangements and contracts of executive Directors and senior employees, and the appointment or re-appointment of Directors. It also has the responsibility for reviewing the performance of the executive Directors and for overseeing administration of the Company's share option schemes. No Director is however involved in deciding his own remuneration.
Audit Committee
An Audit Committee of the Board has been established. During the year, the Audit Committee consisted of John Walmsley as chairman and Jay Cheatham as the other member. This Committee provides a forum through which the Group's finance functions and auditors report to the non-executive Directors. Meetings may be attended, by invitation, by the Company Secretary, other Directors and the Company's auditors.
The Audit Committee meets at least twice a year. Its terms of reference include review of the Annual and Interim Accounts, consideration of the Company and Group's accounting policies, the review of internal control, risk management and compliance procedures, and consideration of all issues surrounding the annual audit. The Audit Committee will also meet with the auditors and review their reports relating to accounts and internal control systems.
To follow best practice the external auditors have held discussions with the Audit Committee on the subject of auditor independence and have confirmed their independence in writing.
Conflicts Committee
A Conflicts Committee of the Board has been established. This Committee consists of John Walmsley as chairman, Justin Hondris and Jay Cheatham.
The role of the Conflicts Committee is to assist the Board in monitoring actual and potential conflicts of interest under the definitions of the Companies Act 2006. Under the Companies Act 2006 Directors are responsible for their individual disclosures of actual or potential conflict. To follow best practice, the Conflicts Committee holds discussions with the Company's UK lawyers.
Anti-Corruption & Bribery Committee
An Anti Corruption & Bribery Committee has been established. This committee consists of Justin Hondris (as Chairman) and Jay Cheatham.
The purpose of the Anti-Corruption & Bribery Committee is to ensure the Company's compliance with the Bribery Act 2010.
Corporate Governance
The Directors acknowledge their responsibility for, and recognise the importance of implementing and maintaining, high standards of corporate governance. Given its current size and operational status the Company has not adopted a formal corporate governance code. However the Company does, where practical, comply with relevant aspects from the UK Corporate Governance Code as appropriate for a company of its size, nature and stage of development. Further information on Corporate Governance can be found at the company's website www.pantheonresources.com
Statement of Directors' responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the financial statements in accordance with applicable laws and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as adopted by the European Union. Company Law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial period which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. In preparing those financial statements, the Directors are required to:
a) select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
b) make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
c) prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group will continue in business; and
d) state whether applicable accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements.
The Directors confirm that the financial statements comply with the above requirements.
The Directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group and Company and to enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. The Directors are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and hence for taking steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company's website.
Statement of disclosure to the auditors
So far as the Directors are aware:
a) there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's auditors are unaware; and
b) all the Directors have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information.
Auditors
In accordance with Section 489 of the Companies Act 2006, a resolution proposing that UHY Hacker Young be reappointed as auditors of the Company and that the Directors be authorised to determine their remuneration will be put to the next Annual General Meeting.
By order of the board
Justin Hondris
Director
19 November 2015
Company Number 05385506
John Walmsley, Non Executive Chairman
John Walmsley has over 30 years' experience in the energy sector as either adviser or principal. This includes periods as Chief Executive of Hardy Oil & Gas (1994 - 1998) and Managing Director, Finance and Business Development, of Enterprise Oil plc (1984 - 1993). He is currently Executive Chairman of Consilience Energy Advisory Group Ltd (CEAG) and non-executive Chairman of TSX and AIM listed Orosur Mining Inc. He has international business and financial experience in Europe, Asia-Pacific and North America at the corporate, institutional and senior government level. He is a fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and was a Tax Partner at Arthur Anderson prior to joining Enterprise Oil. He acts as Chairman of Pantheon's Audit and Nomination Committees.
Jay Cheatham, Chief Executive Officer
Jay Cheatham has more than 40 years' experience in all aspects of the petroleum business. He has extensive international experience in both oil and natural gas, primarily for ARCO. At ARCO, Jay held a series of senior appointments. These include Senior Vice President and District Manager (ARCO eastern District) with direct responsibility for Gulf Coast US operations and exploration and President of ARCO International where he had responsibility for all exploration and production outside the U.S. Jay's most recent appointment was as President and CEO of Rolls-Royce Power Ventures, where he had the key responsibility for restructuring the Company.
Jay also has considerable financial skills in addition to his corporate and operational expertise. He has acted as Chief Financial Officer for ARCO's US oil and natural gas company (ARCO Oil & Gas). Moreover he has understanding of the capital markets through his past position as CEO to the Petrogen Fund, a private equity fund.
Justin Hondris, Director, Finance and Corporate Development
Justin Hondris brings international experience in Private Equity investment management, corporate finance and investment banking and has over nine years of experience in the oil and gas sector. He previously qualified as a Chartered Accountant (although is no longer an active member), and as an Associate of the Securities Institute of Australia. He moved to London in 1997 to join Cazenove & Co in its investment banking (Institutional Equities) division. Prior to that he was an equity advisor at Hartley Poynton, an Australian based investment bank with a strong presence in the junior resources sector. Most recently Justin was a London based partner of an Australian private equity fund manager.
We have audited the financial statements of Pantheon Resources plc for the year ended 30 June 2015 which comprise the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated and Parent Company Statements of Changes in Equity, the Consolidated and Parent Company Statements of Financial Position, the Consolidated and Parent Company Statements of Cash Flows and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union and, as regards the parent company financial statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006.
This report is made solely to the Company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors' Responsibilities, set out in page 15, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's (APB's) Ethical Standards for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
A description of the scope of an audit of financial statements is provided on the APB's website at www.frc.org.uk/apb/scope/private.cfm.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion:
· the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group's and of the parent company's affairs as at 30 June 2015 and of the Group's loss for the year then ended;
· the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union; and
· the parent company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union and as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006; and
· the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF PANTHEON RESOURCES PLC (continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion the information given in Directors' Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
· adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
· the parent company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
· certain disclosures of Directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or
· we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Colin Wright (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of UHY Hacker Young
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
UHY Hacker Young
Quadrant House
4 Thomas More Square
London E1W 1YW
19 November 2015
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
|
Notes |
2015 |
2014 |
|
|
|
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
3 |
3,389 |
5,381 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
(230) |
(26,372) |
|
Gross profit/(loss) |
|
3,159 |
(20,991) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administration expenses |
|
(778,779) |
(717,874) |
|
Share-based payments |
20 |
(376,688) |
- |
|
Operating loss |
4 |
(1,152,308) |
(738,865) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
6 |
3,408 |
394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before taxation |
|
(1,148,900) |
(738,471) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation |
7 |
- |
- |
|
Loss for the year |
|
(1,148,900) |
(738,471) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income for the year |
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences from translating foreign operations |
|
645,921 |
(544,530) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the year |
|
(502,979) |
(1,283,001) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share |
2 |
|
|
|
Loss per ordinary share - basic and diluted from continuing operations |
|
(0.67)p |
(0.72)p |
|
The results above reflect above related accounting activities.
The loss for the current and prior years and the total comprehensive loss for the current year and prior years are wholly attributable to the equity holders of the parent company, Pantheon Resources Plc.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
|
Share |
Share |
Retained |
Currency |
Equity |
Total |
|
capital |
premium |
losses |
reserve |
reserve |
Equity |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2014 |
1,020,998 |
21,915,804 |
(19,219,576) |
274,548 |
55,335 |
4,047,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year |
- |
- |
(1,148,900) |
- |
- |
(1,148,900) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
- |
- |
- |
645,921 |
- |
645,921 |
Total comprehensive income for the year |
- |
- |
(1,148,900) |
645,921 |
- |
(502,979) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Raising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of shares |
926,097 |
17,595,875 |
- |
- |
- |
18,521,972 |
Issue of shares in lieu of fees |
16,469 |
312,882 |
- |
- |
- |
329,351 |
Issue costs |
- |
(1,002,502) |
- |
- |
- |
(1,002,502) |
Share-based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of share options |
- |
- |
- |
- |
376,688 |
376,688 |
Transfer of previously expensed share-based payment on cancellation of options |
- |
- |
55,335 |
- |
(55,335) |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 30 June 2015 |
1,963,564 |
38,822,059 |
(20,313,141) |
920,469 |
376,688 |
21,769,639 |
|
Share |
Share |
Retained |
Currency |
Equity |
Total |
|
capital |
premium |
losses |
reserve |
reserve |
Equity |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2014 |
1,020,998 |
21,915,804 |
(8,332,984) |
|
55,335 |
14,659,153 |
Net loss for the year |
- |
- |
(896,804) |
- |
- |
(896,804) |
Total comprehensive income for the year |
- |
- |
(896,804) |
- |
- |
(896,804) |
Capital Raising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of shares |
926,097 |
17,595,875 |
- |
- |
- |
18,521,972 |
Issue of shares in lieu of fees |
16,469 |
312,882 |
- |
- |
- |
329,351 |
Issue costs |
|
(1,002,502) |
- |
- |
- |
(1,002,502) |
Share-based Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of share options |
- |
- |
- |
- |
376,688 |
376,688 |
Transfer of previously expensed share-based payment on cancellation of options |
- |
- |
55,335 |
- |
(55,335) |
- |
Balance at 30 June 2015 |
1,963,564 |
38,822,059 |
(9,174,453) |
- |
376,688 |
31,987,858 |
CONSOLIDATED AND COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
|
Share |
Share |
Retained |
Currency |
Equity |
Total |
|
capital |
premium |
losses |
reserve |
reserve |
equity |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2013 |
1,020,998 |
21,915,804 |
(18,481,105) |
819,078 |
55,335 |
5,330,110 |
Net loss for the year |
- |
- |
(738,471) |
- |
- |
(738,471) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
- |
- |
- |
(544,530) |
- |
(544,530) |
Total comprehensive income for the year |
- |
- |
(738,471) |
(544,530) |
- |
(1,283,001) |
Balance at 30 June 2014 |
1,020,998 |
21,915,804 |
(19,219,576) |
274,548 |
55,335 |
4,047,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
Share |
Retained |
Currency |
Equity |
Total |
|
capital |
premium |
losses |
reserve |
reserve |
Equity |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2013 |
1,020,998 |
21,915,804 |
(7,840,955) |
- |
55,335 |
15,151,182 |
Net loss for the year |
- |
- |
(492,029) |
- |
- |
(492,029) |
Total comprehensive income for the year |
- |
- |
(492,029) |
- |
- |
(492,029) |
Balance at 30 June 2014 |
1,020,998 |
21,915,804 |
(8,332,984) |
- |
55,335 |
14,659,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 JUNE 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
2015 |
2014 |
|
|
£ |
£ |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation assets |
12 |
16,406,313 |
3,389,552 |
Property, plant and equipment |
13 |
3,589 |
- |
|
|
16,409,902 |
3,389,552 |
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
9 |
182,263 |
192,087 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
10 |
5,265,985 |
635,261 |
|
|
5,448,248 |
827,348 |
Total assets |
|
21,858,150 |
4,216,900 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
11 |
88,511 |
169,791 |
Total liabilities |
|
88,511 |
169,791 |
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
21,769,639 |
4,047,109 |
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
Capital and reserves |
|
|
|
Share capital |
14 |
1,963,564 |
1,020,998 |
Share premium |
14 |
38,822,059 |
21,915,804 |
Retained losses |
|
(20,313,141) |
(19,219,576) |
Currency reserve |
|
920,469 |
274,548 |
Equity reserve |
20 |
376,688 |
55,335 |
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity |
|
21,769,639 |
4,047,109 |
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 19 November 2015 and signed on its behalf by:
Justin Hondris
Director
Company Number 05385506
COMPANY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 JUNE 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
2015 |
2014 |
|
|
£ |
£ |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
Property, plant and machinery |
13 |
3,589 |
- |
Loans to subsidiaries |
9 |
29,341,087 |
14,573,576 |
|
|
29,344,676 |
14,573,576 |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
9 |
53,459 |
49,115 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
10 |
2,647,807 |
138,232 |
|
|
2,701,266 |
187,347 |
Total assets |
|
32,045,942 |
14,760,923 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
11 |
58,084 |
101,770 |
Total liabilities |
|
58,084 |
101,770 |
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
31,987,858 |
14,659,153 |
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
Capital and reserves |
|
|
|
Share capital |
14 |
1,963,564 |
1,020,998 |
Share premium |
14 |
38,822,059 |
21,915,804 |
Retained losses |
|
(9,174,453) |
(8,332,984) |
Equity reserve |
20 |
376,688 |
55,335 |
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity |
|
31,987,858 |
14,659,153 |
|
|
|
|
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 19 November 2015 and signed on its behalf by:
Justin Hondris
Director
Company Number 05385506
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
|
Notes |
2015 |
2014 |
|
|
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow from operating activities |
15 |
(497,522) |
(765,835) |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
3,408 |
394 |
Purchase of plant and equipment |
|
(4,037) |
- |
Funds used for drilling and exploration |
12 |
(12,719,946) |
(5,774) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow from investing activities |
|
(12,720,575) |
(5,380) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
Proceeds from share issues |
14 |
18,521,972 |
- |
Issue costs paid in cash |
|
(673,151) |
- |
Net cash inflow from financing activities
|
|
17,848,821
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
4,630,724
|
(771,215)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
|
|
635,261
|
1,406,476
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year |
10 |
5,265,985 |
635,261 |
COMPANY STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
2015 |
2014 |
|
|
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow from operating activities |
15 |
(570,237) |
(443,410) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant and equipment |
|
(4,037) |
- |
Interest received |
|
2,539 |
46 |
Loans to subsidiary companies |
|
(14,767,511) |
500,000 |
Net cash outflow from investing activities |
|
(14,769,019) |
500,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
Proceeds from share issues |
14 |
18,521,972 |
- |
Issue costs paid in cash |
|
(673,151) |
- |
Receipts from group companies |
|
- |
- |
Net cash inflow from financing activities |
|
17,848,821 |
- |
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
2,509,575 |
56,636 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year |
|
138,232 |
81,596 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year |
10 |
2,647,807 |
138,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015
1. Accounting policies
A summary of the principal accounting policies, all of which have been applied consistently throughout the year, is set out below.
1.1. Basis of preparation
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis using the historical cost convention and in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRSs"), including IFRS 6, 'Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources', as adopted by the European Union ("EU") and in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006.
The Group's financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2015 were authorised for issue by the board of Directors on 19 November 2015 and were signed on the Board's behalf by Mr J Hondris.
The Group and Company financial statements are presented in UK pounds sterling.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company has not presented an income statement. A loss for the year ended 30 June 2015 of £896,804 (2014: loss of £492,029) has been included in the consolidated income statement.
1.2. Basis of consolidation
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill arising on acquisitions is capitalised and subject to impairment review, both annually and when there are indications that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated.
All the companies over which the Company has control apply, where appropriate, the same accounting policies as the Company.
1.3. Going concern
The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal business activity and the realisation of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business.
The Directors believe the Tyler & Polk County Joint Venture to be of material potential value to the Group, based upon a number of factors. Over recent years the JV conducted an extensive three year study of the Woodbine/Eagle Ford sandstone potential for the JV acreage. This study concluded that parts of the original acreage footprint appeared analogous to the nearby and prolific "Double A Wells" field, and moreover enabled the JV to identify what it believed to be the key ingredients for successful identification and exploitation of this sandstone formation. The successful capital raising by the company during the year allowed the company to increase its working interest in the original joint venture from 25% to 50% and to acquire a 50% interest in four other prospects in the area which were also believed to possess excellent potential for this play. The study has materially upgraded the JV's understanding of, and confidence in, the potential for Woodbine/Eagle Ford sandstone. The successful drilling of the VOBM#1 well on the JV's Polk County acreage announced in October 2015 has reinforced this view.
As part of the Company's fundraising process during the year, an independent geological consultant was contracted to assess the potential prospectivity of the acreage and estimated Gross Prospective Resources (Recoverable) of 301 Million Barrels of Oil Equivalent ("Mmboe") on the acreage position. This equates to 150.5 Mmboe attributable to Pantheon's 50% working interest.
The Directors have reviewed the Group's overall position and outlook and are of the opinion that the Group will be able to operate as a going concern for at least the next twelve months from the date of approval of these financial statements. Following the recent drilling success, the Directors believe the Company has a number of options to obtain additional development funding if required, which could involve debt, equity or forward selling production. Additionally, given the VOBM#1 well has been completed as a producer, once necessary permitting is in place the Group would expect it to generate material free cashflow, potentially as early as Q1 2016. The Directors therefore believe that the use of the going concern basis is appropriate. Accordingly, the Directors have prepared the financial statements on a going concern basis.
1.4. Revenue
Oil and Gas revenue represents amounts invoiced (exclusive of sales related taxes) for the Group's share of oil and gas sales in the year.
Interest revenue is recognised on a proportional basis taking into account the interest rates applicable to the financial assets.
1.5. Foreign currency translation
(i) Functional and presentational currency
The financial statements are presented in Pounds Sterling ("£"), which is the functional currency of the Company and is the Group's presentation currency.
Items included in the Company's subsidiary entities are measured using United States Dollars ("US$"), which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which they operate.
(ii) Transactions and balances
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into Sterling at the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. The resulting exchange gain or loss is dealt with in the income statement.
The assets, liabilities and the results of the foreign subsidiary undertakings are translated into Sterling at the rates of exchange ruling at the year end. Exchange differences resulting from the retranslation of net investments in subsidiary undertakings are treated as movements on reserves.
1.6. Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments, with a maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents, carried at the lower of cost or market value.
1.7. Deferred taxation
Deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and expected to apply when the related deferred tax is realised or the deferred liability is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that the future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized.
1.8. Exploration and evaluation costs
The Group follows the 'successful efforts' method of accounting for exploration and evaluation costs. All costs associated with oil, gas and mineral exploration and investments are capitalised on a project by project basis, pending determination of the feasibility of the project. Costs incurred include appropriate technical and administrative expenses but not general corporate overheads. If an exploration project is successful, the related expenditures will be transferred to Developed Oil and Gas Properties and amortised over the estimated life of the commercial reserves on a unit of production basis. Where a licence is relinquished or project abandoned, the related costs are written off. Where the Group maintains an interest in a project, but the value of the project is considered to be impaired, a provision against the relevant capitalised costs will be raised.
The recoverability of all exploration and evaluation costs is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Group to obtain necessary financing to complete the development of the reserves and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition thereof. When production commences the accumulated costs for the relevant area are transferred from intangible fixed assets to property, plant and equipment as 'Developed Oil & Gas Assets' or 'Production Facilities and Equipment', as appropriate. Amounts recorded for these assets represent historical costs and are not intended to reflect present or future values.
1.9. Impairment of exploration and development costs and depreciation of assets
Impairment reviews on development and producing assets are carried out regularly. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of expenditure attributable to a successful well may not be recoverable from future net revenues from oil and gas reserves attributable to that well, a comparison between the net book value of the cost attributable to that well and the discounted future cash flows from that well is undertaken. To the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the cost attributable to that well is written down to its recoverable amount and charged as an impairment.
Exploration and evaluation costs
In relation to the Tyler and Polk County project, the carrying value as at 30 June 2015 solely represents back costs paid in relation to the project and prepaid costs towards future drilling.
Based on estimates by a third party technical consultant, the Group estimates potential for up 167 wells at an average P50 gross recoverable prospective resource of 1.4 Mmboe per well from the Eagle Ford sandstone zone alone. Additionally, great potential lies in the separate and independent Austin Chalk structure which is known to exist on the JV's Tyler Country acreage. Based upon those estimates the Directors believe the carrying values at 30 June 2015 are supported.
Developed Oil and Gas Properties
Developed Oil and Gas Properties are amortised over the estimated life of the commercial reserves on a unit of production basis.
Other property, plant and equipment
Other property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less depreciation. Depreciation is provided at rates calculated to write off the costs less estimated residual value of each asset over its estimated useful life as follows:
- Production Facilities and Equipment are depreciated by equal instalments over their expected useful lives, being seven years.
- Office equipment is depreciated by equal annual instalments over their expected useful lives, being three years.
1.10. Financial instruments
IFRS7 requires information to be disclosed about the impact of financial instruments on the Group's risk profile, how the risks arising from financial instruments might affect the entity's performance, and how these risks are being managed.
The Group's policies include that no trading in derivative financial instruments shall be undertaken. These disclosures have been made in Note 19 to the accounts.
1.11. Share based payments
On occasion the Company has made share-based payments to certain Directors and advisers by way of issue of share options. The fair value of these payments is calculated by the Company using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expense is recognised on a straight line basis over the period from the date of award to the date of vesting, based on the Company's best estimate of the number of shares that will eventually vest.a
During the year £376,688 was charged to share based payments in relation to share options granted to Directors and employees
1.12. Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards requires the use of accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions, actual results ultimately may differ from those estimates. IFRSs also require management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group's accounting policies.
The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are as follows:
Impairment of tangible and intangible assets
Determining whether an asset is impaired requires an estimation of whether there are any indications that its carrying value is not recoverable.
At each reporting date, the Company reviews the carrying value of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have been impaired. If such an indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset, being the higher of the asset's fair value less costs to sell and value in use, is compared to the asset's carrying value. Any excess of the asset's carrying value over its recoverable amount is expensed to the income statement.
Developed Oil & Gas Properties
Developed Oil & Gas Properties are amortised over the life of the area according to the estimated rate of depletion of the economically recoverable reserves. If the amount of economically recoverable reserves varies, this will impact on the amount of the asset which should be carried on the balance sheet.
Share-based payments
The Group records charges for share-based payments.
For option based share-based payments, to determine the value of the options management estimate certain factors used in the option pricing model, including volatility, vesting date, exercise date of options and the number of options likely to vest. At each reporting date during the vesting period management estimate the number of shares that will vest after considering the vesting criteria. If these estimates vary from actual occurrence, this will impact on the value of the equity carried in the reserves.
1.13. New standards and interpretations not applied
As of the date of these financial statements the IASB and IFRIC have issued a number of new standards, amendments and interpretations. These new Standards, Amendments and Interpretations are effective for accounting periods beginning on or after the dates shown below. Of these, only the following are expected to be relevant to the Group:
Standard |
Impact on initial application |
Effective date |
IAS 1 |
Presentation of Financial Statements: Disclosure Initiative |
1 January 2016 |
IAS 16 |
Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation |
1 January 2016 |
IAS 16 |
Property, plant and equipment: Bearer Plants |
1 January 2016 |
IAS 27 |
Separate Financial Statements |
1 January 2016 |
IAS 28 |
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures |
1 January 2016 |
IAS 28 |
Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation Exception |
1 January 2016 |
IAS 38 |
Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Amortisation |
1 January 2016 |
IAS 41 |
Agriculture: Bearer Plants |
1 January 2016 |
IFRS 9 |
Financial Instruments |
1 January 2018 |
IFRS 10 |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
1 January 2016 |
IFRS 10 |
Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation Exception |
1 January 2016 |
IFRS 11 |
Joint Arrangements: Accounting for Acquisitions of Interest in Joint Operations |
1 January 2016 |
IFRS 12 |
Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation Exception |
1 January 2016 |
IFRS 14 |
Regulatory Deferral Accounts |
1 January 2016 |
IFRS 15 |
Revenue from Contracts with Customers |
1 January 2017 |
Annual improvements |
2012 - 2014 Cycle |
1 July 2016 |
The Group does not anticipate that the adoption of these standards will have a material effect on its financial statements in the period of initial adoption. |
2. Loss per share
The total loss per share for the group of 0.67p (2014: 0.72p) is calculated by dividing the loss for the year from continuing operations by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue of 171,311,303 (2014: 102,099,770).
The diluted loss per share has been kept the same as the basic loss per share as the conversion of share options decreases the basic loss per share, thus being anti-dilutive.
3. Segmental information
The Group's activities involve production of and exploration for oil and gas. There are two reportable operating segments: USA and Head Office. Non-current assets, income and operating liabilities are attributable to the USA, whilst most of the corporate administration is conducted through Head Office.
Each reportable segment adopts the same accounting policies.
In compliance with IFRS 8 'Operating Segments', the following tables reconcile the operational loss and the assets and liabilities of each reportable segment with the consolidated figures presented in these Financial Statements, together with comparative figures for the year ended 30 June 2015.
Year ended 30 June 2015
Geographical segment (Group) |
Head Office |
USA |
Consolidated |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
Revenue |
- |
3,389 |
3,389 |
Cost of sales |
- |
(230) |
(230) |
Interest receivable |
2,539 |
869 |
3,408 |
Administration expenses Share-based payments |
(522,655) (376,688) |
(256,124) - |
(778,779) (376,688) |
Loss by reportable segment |
(896,804) |
(252,096) |
(1,148,900) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment Exploration and evaluation assets |
3,589 - |
- 16,406,313 |
3,589 16,406,313 |
Trade and other receivables |
53,459 |
128,804 |
182,263 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
2,647,807 |
2,618,178 |
5,265,985 |
Intercompany balances |
29,341,087 |
(29,341,087) |
- |
Total assets by reportable segment |
32,045,941 |
(10,187,791) |
(21,858,150) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities by reportable segment |
(58,084) |
(30,427) |
(88,511) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets by reportable segment |
31,987,857 |
(10,218,218) |
21,769,639 |
3. Segmental information (continued)
Year ended 30 June 2014
Geographical segment (Group) |
Head Office |
USA |
Consolidated |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
Revenue |
- |
5,381 |
5,381 |
Cost of sales |
- |
(26,372) |
(26,372) |
Interest receivable |
46 |
348 |
394 |
Administration expenses |
(492,075) |
(225,799) |
(717,874) |
Loss by reportable segment |
(492,029) |
(246,442) |
(738,471) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation assets |
- |
3,389,552 |
3,389,552 |
Trade and other receivables |
49,115 |
142,972 |
192,087 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
138,232 |
497,029 |
635,261 |
Intercompany balances |
14,573,576 |
(14,573,576) |
- |
Total assets by reportable segment |
14,760,923 |
(10,544,023) |
4,216,900 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities by reportable segment |
(101,770) |
(68,021) |
(169,791) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets by reportable segment |
14,659,153 |
(10,612,044) |
4,047,109 |
4. Operating loss
|
|
2015 |
2014 |
|
|
£ |
£ |
Operating loss is stated after charging: |
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
448 |
- |
Auditor's remuneration |
|
|
|
- group and parent company audit services |
|
14,000 |
13,500 |
Auditor's remuneration for non-audit services |
|
|
|
- taxation services and compliance services |
|
4,495 |
6,542 |
5. Employment costs
The employee costs of the Group, including Directors' remuneration, are as follows:
|
|
2015 |
2014 |
|
|
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
Wages and salaries |
|
440,976 |
454,836 |
Social security costs |
|
38,809 |
39,095 |
|
|
479,785 |
493,931 |
There is one employee in addition to the Directors. Further details on Directors' emoluments are shown in the Directors' report.
6. Interest receivable |
|
|
|
2015 |
2014 |
|
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
Bank interest received |
3,408 |
394 |
|
|
|
7. Taxation |
|
|
|
2015 |
2014 |
|
£ |
£ |
Current tax |
|
|
UK corporation tax |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Factors affecting the tax charge for the period |
|
|
Loss on ordinary activities before taxation |
(1,148,900) |
(738,471) |
|
|
|
Loss on ordinary activities before taxation |
|
|
multiplied by the standard rate of UK corporation |
|
|
tax of 20.5% (2014: 22.5%) |
(238,398) |
(166,162) |
|
|
|
Effects of: |
|
|
Non deductible expenses |
78,917 |
6,783 |
Capital allowances |
(198) |
(152) |
Tax losses carried forward not recognised as deferred tax asset |
159,679 |
159,531 |
|
|
|
Total tax charge |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Factors that may affect future tax charges
The rate of corporation tax from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015 was 21%, and 20% from 1 April 2015 onwards.
At year end the Group had unused losses carried forward of approximately £22.2m (2014: £20.2m) which are available for set off against future suitable profits. Of these losses, approximately £17.7m (2014: £16.2m) were sustained in the USA. Unused US tax losses expire within 20 years of the year in which they are sustained.
The directors do not consider it appropriate to recognise a deferred tax asset in respect of such losses, due to the uncertainty of future profit streams. The contingent deferred tax asset (re-measured at 20% for 2014 and 2015) is estimated to be £4.44m (2014: £4.03m) in respect of losses carried forward.
8. Subsidiary entities
The Company currently has the following wholly owned subsidiaries all of which were incorporated on 3 February 2006:
Country of Percentage
Name Incorporation ownership Activity
Hadrian Oil & Gas LLC United States 100% Holding Company
Agrippa LLC United States 100% Holding Company
Pantheon Oil & Gas LP United States 100% Oil & gas exploration
Pantheon Oil & Gas LP is 99% owned by Agrippa LLC as its limited partner and 1% by Hadrian Oil & Gas LLC as its general partner.
9. Trade and other receivables
|
Group |
Group |
Company |
Company |
|
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts falling due within one year: |
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
52,460 |
54,212 |
- |
- |
Prepayments and accrued income |
30,578 |
32,172 |
34,378 |
32,172 |
Other receivables |
1,692 |
16,942 |
19,081 |
16,943 |
Receivable from Padre Island Authority |
97,533 |
88,761 |
- |
- |
|
182,263 |
192,087 |
53,459 |
49,115 |
|
The receivable from Padre Island Authority comprises a security deposit provided to the Padre Island Environmental Authority. The Directors expect this balance to be received before 30 June 2016.
9. Trade and other receivables (continued)
|
Group |
Group |
Company |
Company |
|
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts falling due after more than one year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount due from subsidiary undertakings |
- |
- |
29,341,087 |
14,573,576 |
An annual impairment review of the amount due from subsidiary undertakings (loans to subsidiaries) is performed by comparing the expected recoverable amount of the subsidiary's underlying tangible and intangible assets to the carrying value of the loan in the Company's statement of financial position.
The recoverable amount of the amount due from subsidiary undertakings is based upon value in use calculations. The use of this method requires the estimation of future cash flows from the underlying assets, discounted using a suitable pre tax discount rate. For the purposes of these calculations the Company's Tyler & Polk County Eagle Ford sandstone project was modelled on a P50 basis using a discount rate of 10%. The key assumptions upon which the cash flow projections were based include recoverable reserves, number of wells drilled, cost of drilling and the future prices of both oil and natural gas. Management also recognised that material value is believed to exist in the separate and independent Austin Chalk prospect. For the purpose of the calculations the following assumptions were used:
Potential Number of vertical wells drilled |
<160 |
Average reserves per well |
1.4 Mmboe |
Oil price ($/bbl) |
$50 |
Natural gas price ($/mcf) |
$2.60 |
Cost of drilling typical Tyler County well |
$5.0m |
These key assumptions have been determined by reference to a number of sources including information provided by the operator of the project, external market information, published futures pricing for oil and natural gas and management's expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Management has performed sensitivity analysis on each of the key assumptions including increasing the drilling cost to as high as $10mm, reducing commodity prices by 20% and reducing average reserves per well by a number of scenarios. None of these factors lead to an indication of impairment, hence the Company concluded that no impairment was required as of 30 June 2015.
10. Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
Group |
Group |
Company |
Company |
|
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at bank and in hand |
5,265,985 |
635,261 |
2,647,807 |
138,232 |
11. Trade and other payables |
|
|
|
|
|
Group |
Group |
Company |
Company |
|
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade creditors |
30,801 |
54,681 |
30,801 |
54,681 |
Accruals |
57,710 |
115,110 |
27,283 |
47,089 |
|
88,511 |
169,791 |
58,084 |
101,770 |
|
12. Exploration and evaluation assets
|
|
|
|
Group |
|
2015 £ |
2014 £ |
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
At 1 July |
|
3,389,552 |
3,804,692 |
Additions |
|
12,719,946 |
5,774 |
Effects of foreign exchange |
|
296,815 |
(420,914) |
At 30 June |
|
16,406,313 |
3,389,552 |
Amortisation and impairment |
|
|
|
As at 1 July |
|
- |
- |
Charge for period |
|
- |
- |
As at 30 June |
|
- |
- |
Net book value |
|
|
|
At 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2014 |
|
16,406,313 |
3,389,552 |
|
The Company had no intangible assets at either 30 June 2015 or 30 June 2014.
The Group additions for the year comprise the costs associated with the acquisition of a working interest in leases and seismic data over the new project areas, together with the costs associated with increasing the Group's working interest in the existing Tyler County JV project from 25% to 50%.
The Group has performed value in use calculations on its exploration and evaluation assets. These involved NPV calculations with a variety of sensitivity assumptions for both commodity prices and well recoverabilities using the geological estimates provided by an independent geological consultant.
The Directors are satisfied that the NPV of the Groups exploration and evaluation assets exceeds the carrying values and believes that no impairment is required at 30 June 2015.
13. Property, plant and equipment
Group & Company |
Developed Oil & Gas Properties £ |
Production Facilities and Equipment £ |
Office Equipment £ |
Total £ |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2014 |
- |
- |
7,337 |
7,337 |
Additions |
- |
- |
4,037 |
4,037 |
At 30 June 2015 |
- |
- |
11,374 |
11,374 |
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2014 |
- |
- |
7,337 |
7,337 |
Depreciation for the year |
- |
- |
448 |
448 |
At 30 June 2015 |
- |
- |
7,785 |
7,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value |
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2015 |
- |
- |
3,589 |
3,589 |
At 30 June 2014 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Group & Company |
Developed Oil & Gas Properties £ |
Production Facilities and Equipment £ |
Office Equipment £ |
Total £ |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2013 |
- |
- |
7,337 |
7,337 |
Additions |
- |
- |
- |
- |
At 30 June 2014 |
- |
- |
7,337 |
7,337 |
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2013 |
- |
- |
7,337 |
7,337 |
Depreciation for the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
At 30 June 2014 |
- |
- |
7,337 |
7,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value |
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2014 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
At 30 June 2013 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14. Share capital |
|
2015 |
2014 |
|
|
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
|
Allotted, issued and fully paid: |
|
|
|
196,356,396 ordinary shares of £0.01 each |
|
1,963,564 |
1,020,998 |
|
|
Number |
Issued and fully paid capital |
Share premium |
|
|
|
£ |
£ |
Issued share capital: |
|
|
|
|
As at 30 June 2015 |
|
196,356,396 |
1,963,564 |
38,822,059 |
In October 2014 the company completed a placing of 94,256,626 shares with a nominal value of £0.01, raising cash proceeds of c.£18.5m before expenses.
The ordinary shares rank pari passu in all respects including the right to receive dividends and other distributions declared, made or paid.
15. Net cash outflow from operating activities
|
Group |
Group |
|
2015 |
2014 |
|
£ |
£ |
|
|
|
Operating loss from continuing operations |
(1,152,308) |
(738,865) |
Depreciation |
448 |
- |
Decrease in trade and other receivables |
9,824 |
18,335 |
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables |
(81,280) |
78,311 |
Share-based payments |
376,688 |
- |
Effect of translation differences |
349,106 |
(123,616) |
Net cash outflow from operating activities |
(497,522) |
(765,835) |
|
Company |
Company |
|
2015 |
2014 |
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
(899,342) |
(492,075) |
Depreciation |
448 |
- |
Increase/decrease in trade and other receivables |
(4,344) |
358 |
Increase in trade and other payables |
(43,687) |
48,307 |
Share-based payments |
376,688 |
- |
Net cash outflow from operating activities |
(570,237) |
(443,410) |
16. Control
No one party is identified as controlling the Company.
17. Decommissioning expenditure
The Directors have considered the environmental issues and the need for any necessary provision for the cost of rectifying any environmental damage, as might be required under local legislation. In their view, no provision is necessary for any future costs of decommissioning or any environmental damage.
18. Exploration and evaluation commitments
The Group has no obligation to drill any further wells or make any further payments in respect of any new wells in any of its joint ventures. Should the Group elect to not participate in any wells beyond the first well in the Polk and Tyler County joint venture then it would forfeit an area of acreage surrounding the particular well that the Group had elected not to participate in.
As at 30 June 2015, the Group has no fixed financial commitments in respect of any other programmes other than maintaining its interest in its existing joint ventures. Before any new wells are commenced in relation to these joint ventures, the Group must first elect to participate in any proposed well thereby allowing the Group to decline participation if it deems appropriate.
19. Financial instruments
The Group's principal financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables and trade and other payables.
The main purpose of cash and cash equivalents financial instruments is to finance the Group's operations. The Group's other financial assets and liabilities such as receivables and trade payables, arise directly from its operations. It is, and has been throughout the entire period, the Group's policy that no trading in financial instruments shall be undertaken.
The main risk arising from the Group's financial instruments is market risk. Other minor risks are summarised below. The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks.
Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, and market factors such as foreign exchange rates and interest rates will affect the entity's income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments.
The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters while optimising the return.
The Company does not use derivative products to hedge foreign exchange risk and has exposure to foreign exchange rates prevailing at the dates when funds are transferred into different currencies.
19. Financial instruments (continued)
Cash flow interest rate risk
The Group's exposure to the risks of changes in market interest rates relates primarily to the Group's cash and cash equivalents with a floating interest rate. These financial assets with variable rates expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. All other financial assets and liabilities in the form of receivables and payables are non-interest bearing. The Group does not engage in any hedging or derivative transactions to manage interest rate risk.
In regard to its interest rate risk, the Group continuously analyses its exposure. Within this analysis consideration is given to potential renewals of existing positions, alternative investments and the mix of fixed and variable interest rates. The Group has no policy as to maximum or minimum level of fixed or floating instruments.
Interest rate risk is measured as the value of assets and liabilities at fixed rate compared to those at variable rate.
Weighted average Fixed Non - interest
interest rate interest rate bearing
2015 2015 2015
Financial assets: % £ £
Cash on Deposit 0.15% 5,265,985 -
Trade and other receivables - - 182,263
Net fair value
The net fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities approximates to their carrying amount as disclosed in the balance sheet and in the related notes.
Currency risk
The functional currency for the Group's operating activities is the Pound Sterling and for exploration activities the United States of America dollar. The Group has not hedged against currency depreciation but continues to keep the matter under review.
Financial risk management
The Directors recognise that this is an area in which they may need to develop specific policies should the Group become exposed to wider financial risks as the business develops.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the entity will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.
The objective of managing liquidity risk is to ensure as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when they fall due, under both normal and stressed conditions.
The entity has established a number of policies and processes for managing liquidity risk. These include:
- Continuously monitoring actual and budgeted cash flows and longer term forecasting cash flows;
- Monitoring the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities in order to match inflows and outflows; and
- Monitoring liquidity ratios (working capital).
19. Financial instruments (continued)
Credit risk management
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group. The Group's main counterparties are the operators of the respective projects. Funds are normally only remitted on a prepayment basis a short period before the expected commencement of drilling. The Group has adopted a policy of only dealing with what it believes to be creditworthy counterparties and would consider obtaining sufficient collateral where appropriate, as a means of mitigating the risk of financial loss from defaults. The Group's exposure and the credit ratings of its counterparties are continuously monitored and the aggregate value of transactions concluded is spread amongst approved counterparties. Trade receivables at 30 June 2015 consist primarily of deposits and bonds relating to the Company's previous Padre Island Joint Venture. Ongoing credit evaluation is performed on the financial condition of accounts receivable.
Capital management
The Group's objective when managing capital is to ensure that adequate funding and resources are obtained to enable it to develop its projects through to profitable production, while in the meantime safeguarding the
Group's ability to continue as a going concern. This is aimed at enabling it, once the projects come to fruition, to provide appropriate returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Capital will continue to be sourced from equity and from borrowings as appropriate.
20. Share-based payments
10,000,000 share options were issued in the year for a total charge of £376,688 (2014: nil).
Movements in share options in issue |
|
|
|
|
Exercise price |
Number of options issued as of 30 June 2014 |
Issued during year |
Expired during year |
Number of options issued as of 30 June 2015 |
£0.30 |
750,000 |
10,000,000 |
(750,000) |
10,000,000 |
£0.40 |
550,000 |
- |
(550,000) |
- |
£0.50 |
500,000 |
- |
(500,000) |
- |
£0.60 |
300,000 |
- |
(300,000) |
- |
Total |
2,100,000 |
10,000,000 |
(2,100,000) |
10,000,000 |
The weighted average exercise price of share options outstanding and exercisable at the end of the period was £0.30 (2014: £0.42). The weighted average remaining contractual life for the share options outstanding as at 30 June 2015 was 0.25 years (2014: 0.2 years). The cost of the share options issued were calculates using the Black & Scholes valuation model using the following assumptions: Risk free rate 0.5%, Volatility (source: Bloomberg) 0.3404, prevailing share price £0.20, Exercise price £0.30, Time to maturity 10 years. A 30% discount was then applied to reflect the lack of marketability of unlisted share options. Only 50% of the shares options in existence at the year end had vested and are thus exercisable. Vested share options were amortised in full and unvested share options were amortised on a straight-line basis.
21. Related party transactions
There were no related party transactions during the period other than the payment of remuneration to Directors.
22. Subsequent events
On 28 October, 2015 the Company announced the successful completion of testing operations of the VOBM#1 well located onshore Polk County, East Texas where Pantheon has a 50% working interest. The well encountered 62 feet of net pay in the Eagle Ford sandstone formation and flow tested natural gas and oil at a rate exceeding 1,500 boepd. The operator believes that the well has the potential to exceed the pre-drill P50 Prospective Resource (Recoverable) estimate of 1.4Mmboe, however it will take a period of sustained production data before a more definitive assessment can be made. The board is of the opinion that this discovery has been transformational for the Company and has the potential to add significant NPV for all shareholders. Importantly, it appears to have validated the understanding of the geological model constructed following the completion of the extensive regional geological study.
On 6 November, 2015 the Company announced that an oil and gas bearing zone had been encountered during drilling operations on the JV's second well in its drilling programme, the VOS#1 well, located onshore Tyler County, East Texas, where Pantheon has a 50% working interest. The zone, which is known to be present in a well to the South where it has been a substantial producer, is independent from both the primary and secondary objectives, and flowed both oil and gas. The well has since been successfully side-tracked and is presently drilling towards the primary and secondary formations.
GLOSSARY
bbl barrel of oil
bopd barrels of oil per day
boepd barrels of oil equivalent per day
mcf thousand cubic feet
mcfd thousand cubic feet per day
Mmboe million barrels of oil equivalent
NPV net present value