Invista Foundation Property Trust Limited
("IFPT"/ the "Company"/ "Group")
Interim Report for the period ended six months to 30 September 2009
The Invista Foundation Property Trust today announces its results for the six months to 30 September 2009.
Financial and Operational Highlights
Net Asset Value per share of 42.9 p (31 March 2009: 43.8 p), fall of 1.9% largely due to the negative movement of SWAP values
Property assets of £293.7m (31 March 2009: £304.6m),
Dividend declared and paid of 1.76p per share for six months to 30 September 2009
Disposals totalling £10.28m exchanged or completed since March 2009 at an average premium to the immediately prior valuation of 7 %
Cash at 1 November 2009 of £82.0m
Borrowings, net of all cash, represent 43.6% of property assets, compared with an LTV covenant of 60%
Strategic Review Update
The Board has considered the range of options open to the Company to improve income and dividend cover without a material increase in net gearing and has agreed to take the following actions:
To repay £40.0m of debt at par at the next available opportunity, 16 January 2010, which will increase net income by approximately £2.1m per annum
To invest up to £15.0m in new property to generate ungeared total returns of between 8% and 10% per annum, adding approximately £1.0m per annum to net income
To reduce expenses where possible, including the recently announced reduction to the Investment and Asset Management Fee.
Commenting, Andrew Sykes, Chairman of the Board, said:
"Over the last two years the Company has taken a number of steps to counter the impact of steeply falling capital values. During the period under review, the Investment Manager and the Board have continued to focus on reducing risk while seeking to position the Company for a recovery in due course.
"Decisive action has resulted in a robust financial position and presents the Company with a number of options. The combination of debt repayment, new acquisitions, asset management and a continued focus on lowering expenses will enhance dividend cover and contribute towards a NAV total return in line with the Company's long-term objective."
Duncan Owen, Chief Executive of the Company's Investment Manager, added:
"The market now appears to have passed an inflection point with the IPD quarterly index showing a positive capital value movement of 1.5% over the quarter to 30 September 2009. Whilst we remain cautious about the outlook for rental values and believe that the UK commercial market is likely to face further challenges in 2010, the sector now offers a high income return and is already priced with much of the risk taken into account.
"IFPT's portfolio continues to comprise good quality assets, well diversified by tenant, sector and geography, as evidenced by the recent successful sales. Looking forward, the Company is now well placed to benefit from a recovery in property markets."
For further information:
Duncan Owen
Invista Real Estate Investment Management 020 7153 9345
Stephanie Highett / Dido Laurimore/ Rachel Drysdale
Financial Dynamics 020 7831 3113
Invista Foundation Property Trust Limited
Interim Report as at
30 September 2009
Financial Summary |
2 |
Chairman's Statement |
3 |
Investment Manager's Report |
6 |
Responsibility Statement |
12 |
Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income |
13 |
Condensed Balance Sheet |
14 |
Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity |
15 |
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows |
16 |
Notes to the Interim Report |
17 |
Independent Auditors' Review Report |
21 |
Corporate Information |
22 |
Invista Foundation Property Trust Limited aims to provide Shareholders with an attractive level of income together with the potential for income and capital growth from investing in UK commercial property.
Invista Foundation Property Trust Limited and its subsidiaries (the 'Company'/the 'Group') hold a diversified portfolio of UK commercial properties, which is mainly invested in three commercial property sectors: office, retail and industrial. The Group may also invest in other sectors from time to time. The Group will not invest in other listed investment companies. In pursuing the investment objective, the Investment Manager concentrates on assets with good fundamental characteristics, a diverse spread of occupational tenants and with opportunities to enhance value through active management.
Financial Summary
Net asset value (NAV) per share decreased by 1.9%
Earnings per share of -0.4p
The Company has declared and paid dividends amounting to 1.76p per share
Total NAV return of 2%
|
30/09/2009 |
31/03/2009 |
% change |
|
|
|
|
NAV1 (£000) |
138,925 |
141,663 |
(1.9) |
NAV per ordinary share1 (pence) |
42.9 |
43.8 |
(1.9) |
Share price (pence) |
44.0 |
23.0 |
91.3 |
Share price premium/(discount) to NAV |
2.6% |
(47.5%) |
|
NAV total return2 |
2% |
(56.9%) |
|
FTSE All Share Index |
2,634.8 |
1,984.2 |
32.8 |
FTSE Real Estate Index |
2,029.4 |
1,310.0 |
54.9 |
Total Group assets less current liabilities (£000) |
387,127 |
382,696 |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings as % of total assets less current liabilities |
58.0% |
55.8% |
2.23 |
Loan-to-value ratio, net of all cash |
43.6% |
43.2% |
0.43 |
Sources: Invista Real Estate Investment Management and Datastream based on returns during the period from 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2009.
1 Net Asset Value is calculated using International Financial Reporting Standards.
2 NAV total return calculated by Invista Real Estate Investment Management Limited.
3 Percentage point change.
4 Loan to value ratio is total borrowings less total cash as a percentage of investment property
Chairman's Statement
Results
In the course of the six months to 30 September 2009 we have seen a gradual stabilisation in financial markets, with modest signs of improvement in the UK commercial property market following the 44.1% decline in capital values between June 2007 and July 2009, as measured by Investment Property Databank ('IPD').
Invista Foundation Property Trust (the 'Company'/'Group') has responded to these challenging conditions and now has a stable financial position. The unaudited net asset value ('NAV') of the Company fell by 0.9 pence per share ('pps') or 1.9%, from 43.8 pps to 42.9 pps over the six months to 30 September 2009, largely due to the negative movement of swap values. Shareholders received total dividends of 1.76 pps over this period, resulting in a NAV total return of 2.0% over the six months to September 2009.
Strategic Review
Over the last two years the Company has taken a number of steps to counter the impact of steeply falling capital values. During the period under review, the Investment Manager and the Board have continued to focus on reducing risk while seeking to position the Company for a recovery in due course.
The Company has continued to sell properties where asset business plans have been completed or where there are concerns about future performance. Disposals totalling £10.28 million have been exchanged or completed since March 2009 at an average premium to the immediately prior valuation of 7%. Following these disposals the Company has cash of £82 million as at 1 November 2009.
The Company's borrowings, net of all cash (excluding rent deposits), represent 43.6% of its property assets, compared with the loan to value ('LTV') ratio covenant in the Company's debt facility of 60%. On this basis, the value of the underlying portfolio could fall by a further 26.2% before breaching the 60% LTV ratio covenant.
Following recent disposals, the Company's portfolio now generates £22.27 million of rental income per annum, which will increase by £2 million per annum over the next twelve months as rent free periods on recently negotiated new lettings expire. The reduction in rental income following property disposals combined with the extremely low return earned on cash means that dividend cover has fallen to 35% over the period.
The Company has considered acquiring new properties which will increase net income and dividend cover and it continues to review opportunities. However, the extent to which existing cash resources can be deployed to acquire property is limited by the need to maintain the Company's gearing, net of cash, at an acceptable level. Any reduction in cash balances to fund new property investments increases net gearing directly.
In July, in response to the opportunity that appeared to be offered by weakness in the commercial mortgage backed securities markets, the Company sought to deploy up to £55 million of its cash resources through a tender offer to repurchase and cancel up to £75 million of the Company's existing securitised borrowings at a discount to face value. A majority of noteholders responded negatively to the proposal and it was therefore withdrawn in August 2009.
The Board has considered the range of options open to the Company to improve income and dividend cover without a material increase in net gearing, and has agreed to take the following actions:
To repay £40 million of debt at par on 15 January 2010, which is the next available opportunity. This can be done without noteholder consent and the only associated fees are the pro-rata swap break costs, which will amount to approximately £3.7 million, depending on swap rates at the time of repayment. This will increase the Company's net income by approximately £2.1 million per annum.
To invest up to £15 million in new property to generate ungeared total returns of between 8% and 10% per annum. Properties yielding between 7.5% and 8.5% are likely to be targeted and whilst there will be no specific sector or regional focus, the Investment Manager expects to maintain an above-average weighting within the South East and Central London. As the cash to be deployed in this way currently earns very little on deposit, this will add £1 million per annum or more to net income.
To reduce expenses further where possible, including the Investment and Asset Management Fee.
Investment and Asset Management Fees
The Board and the Investment Manager have agreed a new Investment and Asset Management fee arrangement linked to Net Asset Value ('NAV'). This results in an immediate annualised reduction of 22% or £793,000 per annum and aligns the Investment Manager's incentives more closely with the interests of shareholders.
The current base fee arrangement of 0.95% per annum of Gross Asset Value ('GAV') less current liabilities has been changed to a fee based on the Company's NAV, back-dated to 1 July 2009. The current NAV linked performance fee arrangement will not change as part of the new base fee arrangement. The new fee arrangement will be payable monthly in arrears and will be equal to one twelfth of:
2% of NAV up to £150 million, plus
1.75% of NAV between £150 million and £200 million, plus
1.5% of NAV over £200 million
This NAV based fee will be subject to a floor of £229,000 per month. In the event that this floor is breached, the fee will then revert to being calculated on the previous basis of 0.95% per annum of GAV, until NAV recovers to a point where the monthly NAV based fee would once again exceed £229,000.
The combined new base fee and any performance fee based on the current arrangement cannot exceed 5% of the Company's total NAV during any financial year ending 31 March.
The Portfolio
The Group's portfolio continues to be well diversified with a bias towards the South East of England, with 58 properties and more than 150 tenants. As at 30 September 2009 the portfolio has an initial yield of 7.6%, increasing to 8.1% on expiry of contracted rent free periods over the next 12 months. The independent valuer has estimated that the current rental value of the portfolio is £27.3 million reflecting a reversionary yield of 9.3%.
On completion of exchanged lease agreements the average unexpired lease term in the Company's portfolio, assuming all tenants break or vacate at the earliest opportunity, is 8.1 years which compares to the IPD Benchmark of 8.3 years. The new lettings exchanged or completed over the period result in a void rate of 11.5% as at 30 September 2009, and these are described in more detail in the Investment Manager's Report.
The Board reviews regular asset management reports to assess performance relative to individual business plans and independent valuation assumptions. The Investment Manager also reports regularly to the Board on the financial health of tenants, and actions in hand to mitigate potential defaults.
The Group's three non-recourse, joint venture investments continue to be held at nil.
Outlook
The combination of debt repayment, new acquisitions, asset management and a continued focus on lowering expenses will increase dividend cover to an acceptable level, whilst maintaining a loan to value ratio, net of cash, of 47.4%. The Investment Manager will continue to make selected investments in the existing portfolio to enhance income, and will dispose of assets where business plans have been completed to redeploy proceeds in higher earning opportunities
Andrew Sykes
Chairman
Invista Foundation Property Trust Limited
26 November 2009
Investment Manager's Report
Performance and strategy
The Chairman's Statement highlights further progress made in implementing the key initiatives to protect shareholder value in challenging and volatile market conditions. The market does now appear to have passed an inflection point, with the Investment Property Databank ('IPD') quarterly index showing a positive capital value movement of 1.5% over the quarter to 30 September 2009 compared with a decline of -4.0% over the quarter to 30 June 2009. Encouragingly on a like for like basis the Company's underlying property portfolio performed relatively well over the June to September period, with a capital value movement of 2.3%. Looking forward, the action taken to strengthen the Company's financial position combined with good progress in generating additional income means that the Company is better placed to benefit from a recovery in property markets. The focus now is on growing net income and the package of measures set out in the Chairman's Statement is designed to achieve this.
The market
Substantial injections of liquidity into the financial system have reduced short and long term interest rates and supported a recovery in UK equities and commercial property. Capital values in the UK commercial property market have recently been driven by high yields relative to short and long term interest rates and by a lack of prime quality investments to satisfy recent demand from UK institutions and foreign investors seeking to invest at what is perceived to be a low point in the cycle. The strong demand for prime assets, with some transactions completing significantly above valuation, must be contrasted with very weak demand for secondary assets. The potentially negative outlook for rental income growth, moreover, means that while the market as a whole may have a more positive tone in the short term, there is a clear risk of continued volatility in returns over the months ahead.
Rental values should now be the key focus for investors. While capital values increased by 1.5% between June 2009 and September 2009, over the same period rental values fell by 1.6%. The pace of rental value falls appears to be easing but the contraction in rental values remains largely driven by the economic downturn. However there has not been an over supply of new development (as compared with the 1990s) so the supply/demand balance may be supportive. To illustrate new retail and office space available today of approximately 89 million sq ft compares with approximately 150 million sq ft available in 1990.
Although the UK commercial property market is likely to face further challenges over 2010 the sector now offers a high income return and is already priced with much of the risk taken into account. This explains increasing investor demand and should ensure that the sector produces positive total returns in line with or in excess of the long run average of 8% per annum. This indicates that we are likely to return to a more 'normal' property market where relative outperformance will be derived from growing income returns through exposure to good quality assets and pro-active asset management.
Property portfolio
The Group's direct property portfolio was valued at £303.4 million as at 30 September 2009, which reduces to £297.9 million when taking account of disposals that have completed following the period end. Following these disposals the Group had 58 direct property assets, with an average value of £5.1 million. The portfolio continues to comprise good quality assets well diversified by tenant, sector and geography.
Sector weightings
Sector |
Weighting |
|
|
Retail |
24.8% |
Offices |
46.2% |
Industrial |
24.8% |
Other |
4.2% |
Total |
100% |
Regional weightings
Region |
Weighting |
|
|
Central London |
14.3% |
South East excl. Central London |
47.5% |
Rest of South |
13.0% |
Midlands and Wales |
15.9% |
North and Scotland |
9.3% |
Total |
100% |
Top ten properties by value
|
|
September 2009 Value (£m) |
% |
1 |
Minerva House, Montague Close, London SE1 |
£22,650,000 |
7.6% |
2 |
Portman Square House, 43/45 Portman Square, London W1 |
£19,980,000 |
6.7% |
3 |
Victory House, Trafalgar Place, Brighton |
£16,500,000 |
5.5% |
4 |
The Galaxy, Luton |
£12,500,000 |
4.2% |
5 |
106 Oxford Road, Uxbridge |
£12,450,000 |
4.2% |
6 |
Reynard Business Park, Brentford |
£11,650,000 |
3.9% |
7 |
Retail Park, Churchill Way West, Salisbury, Wiltshire |
£11,400,000 |
3.8% |
8 |
Olympic Office Centre, Fulton Road, Wembley |
£9,650,000 |
3.2% |
9 |
The Gate Centre, Syon Gate Way, Brentford |
£9,300,000 |
3.1% |
10 |
Churchill Way, Basingstoke |
£9,000,000 |
3.0% |
|
Total as at 30 September 2009 |
£135,080,000 |
45.2% |
Top ten tenants by rent per annum
Asset management activity across the portfolio has focused increasing exposure to good quality tenants. Detailed below are the Company's ten largest tenants by rent per annum alongside which is shown the earliest termination of either tenant break or lease expiry. Following the disposal of the car dealership in Cannock, the Company no longer has an exposure to the private dealership Motorhouse 2000 Limited, and they have been replaced in the top ten by Booker Limited following the successful lease restructuring of the Booker property in Acton, West London.
|
Tenant |
Rent |
% of Total Rent |
Earliest of Expiry and Lease Break |
1 |
Cushman & Wakefield Finance Limited |
£1,183,617 |
4.9% |
23/06/2013 |
2 |
Wickes Building Supplies Limited1 |
£1,092,250 |
4.6% |
28/10/2032 |
3 |
Synovate Limited2 |
£950,000 |
4.0% |
08/11/2022 |
4 |
Mott MacDonald Ltd3 |
£940,000 |
3.9% |
25/06/2019 |
5 |
The British Broadcasting Corporation4 |
£918,250 |
3.8% |
24/03/2010 |
6 |
The Buckinghamshire New University5 |
£900,000 |
3.8% |
25/03/2024 |
7 |
Recticel SA |
£713,538 |
3.0% |
28/09/2017 |
8 |
Winckworth Sherwood LLP6 |
£663,095 |
2.8% |
21/10/2021 |
9 |
Partners of Irwin Mitchell LLP |
£555,000 |
2.3% |
28/09/2016 |
10 |
Booker Limited7 |
£550,000 |
2.3% |
29/09/2026 |
|
Total |
£8,465,750 |
35.4% |
|
£400,000 expires 24 March 2020 and £692,250 expires 28 October 2032
Aegis Group plc are guarantor. Figures based on 50% ownership of Minerva House
Currently paying £235,000 per annum following recent lease restructuring. Increases to £940,000 per annum on 25 December 2009. Mott MacDonald Group Limited are guarantor
£216,500 expires 24 March 2010 and £744,250 expiries 4 October 2011
The Buckinghamshire New University began paying 50% of their rent equating to £450,000 per annum from March 2009 and will increase to £900,000 per annum in June 2012
On assignment from Reed Smith Ramboud Charot LLP. Figures based on 50% ownership of Minerva House
Currently paying £275,000 per annum following recent lease restructuring. Increases to £550,000 on 24 June 2011
As noted in the Chairman's Statement, good progress has been made increasing the contracted income from the portfolio and following the disposal of Cannock, the portfolio produces a rental income of £22.3 million per annum. A combination of lease restructurings with existing tenants and new lettings over the period means that there is a further £2 million per annum of contracted rent that is due to be paid over the next twelve months. Expiry of the reduced rental periods at Acton and Uxbridge should add a further £725,000 per annum by the end of 2012. Further encouraging progress is being made in relation to other potentially income enhancing initiatives across the portfolio.
The table below shows the percentage of current income expiry over defined periods, with and without tenant break options exercised at the earliest opportunity.
% of rent passing |
||
Years to expiry |
Earliest Termination |
No Breaks |
Up to 5 |
42.77% |
38.38% |
5 to 10 |
17.03% |
19.90% |
10 to 15 |
31.39% |
28.86% |
15 to 20 |
4.06% |
6.49% |
Over 20 |
4.75% |
6.38% |
This activity has also helped to maintain a void rate of 9.2% as a percentage of rental value, below the IPD Benchmark of 11.1% as at 30 September 2009. This increases to 10.2% if tenants in administration but paying rent are taken into account.
Property portfolio performance
Investment Property Databank ('IPD') has analysed the performance of the Group's underlying property portfolio relative to its peer group Benchmark for the period up to 30 June 2009, the latest available data. This analysis excludes the Group's joint venture investments that are held at nil value.
IPD Sector |
IFPT Total Return (%) |
IPD Total Return (%) |
Relative (%) |
||||||
Period |
One Year |
Three Years |
Since Inception* |
One Year |
Three Years |
Since Inception* |
One Year |
Three Years |
Since Inception* |
All Retail |
-21.3 |
-9.3 |
+1.3 |
-26.0 |
-11.9 |
-0.8 |
+6.3 |
+3.0 |
+2.1 |
All Offices |
-23.7 |
-7.9 |
+1.6 |
-26.5 |
-10.1 |
+0.4 |
+3.9 |
+2.4 |
+1.2 |
All Industrials |
-25.6 |
-8.7 |
+0.7 |
-22.5 |
-9.2 |
+0.6 |
-4.0 |
+0.6 |
+0.1 |
All Sectors |
-23.4 |
-8.4 |
+1.3 |
-25.3 |
-10.6 |
0.0 |
+2.5 |
+2.4 |
+1.3 |
IPD Sector |
IFPT Rental Value Growth (%) |
IPD Rental Value Growth (%) |
Relative (%) |
||||||
Period |
One Year |
Three Years |
Since Inception* |
One Year |
Three Years |
Since Inception* |
One Year |
Three Years |
Since Inception* |
All Retail |
-0.2 |
+1.9 |
+2.6 |
-5.2 |
-0.5 |
+0.7 |
+5.3 |
+2.5 |
+1.9 |
All Offices |
-9.9 |
+2.1 |
+2.2 |
-12.7 |
-0.8 |
+0.3 |
+3.2 |
+2.9 |
+1.9 |
All Industrials |
+0.2 |
+1.7 |
+1.6 |
-3.8 |
-0.6 |
+0.1 |
+4.2 |
+2.3 |
+1.5 |
All Sectors |
-4.6 |
+2.1 |
+2.3 |
-7.4 |
-0.6 |
+0.5 |
+3.1 |
+2.7 |
+1.8 |
Source: Investment Property Databank ('IPD')
* Fund inception July 2004
The IPD analysis shows that the Company's underlying direct property portfolio continues to perform well relative to its Benchmark. The portfolio continues to generate significantly more rental value growth as a contributor to capital value growth.
Transactions
The Company has exchanged and completed four disposals since 31 March 2009 at an average premium to the immediately preceding independent valuation of 7%, and at a discount to the original purchase price of 12%. The details together with the rationale each disposal are shown below:
Address |
Sale date |
Valuation at Sale (£m) |
Sale Price (£m) |
Comments |
Consort Way, Burgess Hill |
May 2009 |
£0.85 |
£0.85 |
Recently vacated. Sold to owner occupier. |
Parliament Street, York |
May 2009 |
£1.73 |
£1.90 |
Successful asset management secured 22% rental uplift. Sold at 5.5% yield. |
Manchester, Sherbert |
September 2009 |
£1.41 |
£1.93 |
Tenant in administration. Sold to special purchaser. |
Cannock, Watling Street (contract exchanged) |
October 2009 |
£5.60 |
£5.60 |
Concerns over tenant covenant and future performance. |
Total |
|
£9.59 |
£10.28 |
|
Further selective disposals will be considered where business plans have been completed or where there are any concerns over performance. The Company will also have regard to further loss of income and the ability to redeploy capital effectively having regard to market conditions.
Finally, following the disposal of National Magazine House, London W1, the outstanding rent review which may trigger a possible second part payment remains outstanding. The rent review is now likely to go to a third party for determination which could take up to a further six months to resolve. The maximum possible payment to the Company is another £2 million but due to the uncertainty around the third party process no accrual is included in the Company's NAV.
In conjunction with the debt repayment, to increase net income and dividend cover new acquisitions are actively being considered and pursued.
Asset management highlights
There have been a number of successful asset management initiatives during the period, including the example below:
Wembley, Olympic Office Centre
This property comprises a 74,000 sq ft multi-let office property located close to Wembley Stadium, an area that has benefited from significant new investment. The property was valued at £9.65 million as at 30 September 2009. Network Housing, who had a break option in August 2009, have consolidated in the building, doubling the space occupied and increasing their rent from £160,000 to £320,000 per annum on a new five year lease. This, combined with other lettings completed over the period has increased the net rent from £360,000 as at 31 March 2009 to approximately £815,000 per annum on expiry of contracted rent free. The final vacant floor is under offer which has the potential to generate a further £150,000 per annum.
In addition to considering new investment opportunities, the Company will continue to invest capital expenditure in its existing portfolio where there is the potential for income and capital growth. There are a number of projects ongoing where the Company could deploy up to £10 million over the next twelve months.
Finance
As at 30 September 2009 and post the sale of Cannock, the Company has a loan to value ('LTV') ratio in the securitised debt facility of 51% compared with a LTV ratio covenant of 60%. In addition to the assets in the securitised debt facility the Company has uncharged free cash of £26 million. The LTV ratio, net of all cash, is 43.6%. The other key banking covenant is the interest cover ratio ('ICR'), expressed as a percentage of total annual rent over total annual interest. As at 30 September 2009 the Company had an ICR of 180% compared with an ICR covenant of 150%.
As highlighted in the Chairman's Statement, in July the Company withdrew a one-off tender offer to repurchase and cancel a portion of its existing listed, securitised borrowings at a discount. Further to this, the Company's strategy is now to repay £40 million of debt at par at the next available opportunity in January 2010. This can be achieved using cash inside the securitised pool without consent and there are no prepayment fees. The only cost associated with the repayment is the requirement to break a pro-rata amount of the Group's two interest rate swaps which must be funded using cash from outside the securitised pool, details of which are set out below:
Swap Amount (£) |
Fixed Rate (%) |
Swap Expiry |
M2M 31/10/2009 (£) |
M2M 30/09/2009 (£) |
M2M 31/03/2009 (£) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,500,000 |
5.099 |
15/07/2014 |
(9,481,869) |
(10,103,896) |
(11,703,275) |
111,000,000 |
5.713 |
15/07/2016 |
(15,648,610) |
(16,385,994) |
(19,126,572) |
213,500,000 |
5.420 |
|
(25,130,479) |
(26,489,890) |
(30,829,847) |
Assuming the Company breaks the swap resulting in the lowest break cost then based on the latest available valuation the break costs would be £3.7 million. This in turn would reduce annual interest from £12 million to approximately £9.9 million, a reduction of £2.1 million per annum.
Incurring the swap break cost will result in a small increase in the Group's net loan to value ratio due to the cash used to break the swap, but the impact on the ICR will be significant, increasing from 180% to 218% as a result of the debt repayment.
The Group's securitised debt facility has a Liquidity Facility of £11.2 million provided by Lloyds Banking Group ('Lloyds') attached to it. This is a standard feature designed as an on-demand loan to cover short-term income shortfalls as against payments due under the loan. The Liquidity Facility Agreement requires the provider to have a minimum Standard & Poor's ('S&P') credit rating of A-1+, which Lloyds breached in March 2009 when they were downgraded by S&P to A-1. The breach requires the Liquidity Facility to be drawn down in full and placed in a blocked deposit account or alternatively a new provider put in place. Accordingly, on the 23 September 2009 the Liquidity Facility was drawn down.
This has a neutral impact on the Group's NAV with the increase in loan off-set by an increase in cash. However, as a result, interest costs will rise by a nominal amount with an estimated net increase of approximately £50,000 per annum. The securitisation loan covenants exclude any amount drawn under the Liquidity Facility. In the event that Lloyd's credit rating reverts back to A-1+, the Liquidity Facility will be repaid.
Joint ventures
The Group continues to have three joint ventures that are financed using non-recourse debt, meaning that the lender's security is limited to the assets held by the individual joint ventures. Any breach or default of an individual joint venture has no impact upon the Group's other assets or banking arrangements.
The Crendon loan has been successfully restructured and good progress has been made in negotiating a restructure to the Merchant loan. Despite attempts negotiations to restructure Plantation Place have been unsuccessful. In each case the interest on the loans is being fully serviced by rent.
The Group's three joint ventures continue to be held at nil.
Conclusion
The UK commercial property market has passed an inflection point and the direction of value movements has changed. The Company is well placed to take advantage of any recovery, but we are exercising caution as the recovery may be drawn out with further upward and downward movements across the UK market. The steps taken over the last six months in terms of growing income combined with the steps outlined above should enhance dividend cover and enable the Company to selectively re-invest and add to long term NAV growth.
Duncan Owen, Chief Executive, Invista Real Estate Investment Management
26 November 2009
Statement of the Directors' Responsibility in respect of the half-yearly financial report
We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:
• the condensed set of financial statements has been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as adopted by the EU; and
• the interim management report includes a fair review of the information required by:
(a) DTR 4.2.7R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being an indication of important events that have occurred during the first six months of the financial year and their impact on the condensed set of financial statements; and a description of the principal risks and uncertainties for the remaining six months of the year; and
(b) DTR 4.2.8R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being related party transactions that have taken place in the first six months of the current financial year and that have materially affected the financial position or performance of the entity during that period; and any changes in the related party transactions described in the last annual report that could do so.
By order of the Board
Director
26 November 2009
Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the period from 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2009
|
|
Six months to |
Six months to |
Year to |
|
|
30/09/2009 |
30/09/2008 |
31/03/2009 |
|
Notes |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
(unaudited) |
(audited) |
Rental income |
|
12,678 |
14,820 |
30,631 |
Other income |
|
657 |
2,341 |
3,096 |
Property operating expenses |
|
(893) |
(1,013) |
(1,824) |
Net rental and related income |
|
12,442 |
16,148 |
31,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) on disposal of investment property |
|
398 |
(5,693) |
(29,202) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net valuation loss on investment property |
|
(3,755) |
(61,131) |
(130,528) |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
Investment management fee |
|
(1,773) |
(2,704) |
(4,661) |
Valuers' and other professional fees |
|
(533) |
(1,063) |
(2,075) |
Administrators and accounting fee |
|
(185) |
(185) |
(370) |
Auditors' remuneration |
|
(65) |
(59) |
(193) |
Directors' fees |
|
(85) |
(85) |
(170) |
Other expenses |
|
(311) |
(226) |
(338) |
Total expenses |
|
(2,952) |
(4,322) |
(7,807) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating profit/(loss) before net finance costs |
|
6,133 |
(54,998) |
(135,634) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
47 |
1,325 |
1,785 |
Finance costs payable |
|
(7,229) |
(7,806) |
(15,369) |
Net finance costs |
|
(7,182) |
(6,481) |
(13,584) |
|
|
|
|
|
Share of loss in associates and joint ventures |
|
- |
(33,629) |
(34,720) |
Loss before tax |
|
(1,049) |
(95,108) |
(183,938) |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation |
|
(334) |
(98) |
(124) |
Loss for the period/year attributable to the equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
(1,383) |
(95,206) |
(184,062) |
||
Movement on swaps |
|
4,340 |
2,586 |
(23,886) |
Total comprehensive profit/(loss) for the period/year attributable to the equity holders of the parent |
|
2,957 |
(92,620) |
(207,948) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
3 |
(0.4p) |
(27.6p) |
(55.0p) |
All items in the above statement are derived from continuing operations.
The accompanying notes 1 to 9 form an integral part of the financial statements.
Condensed Balance Sheet
as at 30 September 2009
|
|
30/09/2009 |
30/09/2008 |
31/03/2009 |
|
Notes |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
(unaudited) |
(audited) |
Investment property |
5 |
293,693 |
439,555 |
304,579 |
Investment in associates and joint ventures |
6 |
- |
- |
- |
Non-current assets |
|
293,693 |
439,555 |
304,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
13,869 |
7,394 |
39,513 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
89,891 |
97,776 |
50,318 |
Current assets |
|
103,760 |
105,170 |
89,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
397,453 |
544,725 |
394,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued capital and reserves |
|
138,925 |
265,296 |
141,663 |
Equity |
|
138,925 |
265,296 |
141,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings |
7 |
221,712 |
259,888 |
210,203 |
Interest rate swap |
|
26,490 |
4,358 |
30,830 |
Non-current liabilities |
|
248,202 |
264,246 |
241,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
|
9,871 |
14,957 |
11,626 |
Taxation payable |
|
455 |
226 |
88 |
Current liabilities |
|
10,326 |
15,183 |
11,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
258,528 |
279,429 |
252,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity and liabilities |
|
397,453 |
544,725 |
394,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value per Ordinary Share |
8 |
42.9p |
80.3p |
43.8p |
The financial statements were approved at a meeting of the Board of Directors held on 26 November 2009 and signed on its behalf by:
Andrew Sykes, Chairman Harry Dick-Cleland, Director
The accompanying notes 1 to 9 form an integral part of the financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity
for the period from 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2009
(unaudited) for the period from 1 April 2008 to 30 September 2008 |
Notes |
Share premium |
Hedge reserve |
Revenue reserve |
Total |
|
|
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
Balance as at 31 March 2008 |
|
98,356 |
(6,944) |
286,947 |
378,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital cancelled in the period |
|
- |
- |
(8,842) |
(8,842) |
Gain on cash flow hedge |
|
- |
2,586 |
- |
2,586 |
Loss for the period |
|
- |
- |
(95,206) |
(95,206) |
Dividends paid |
4 |
- |
- |
(11,601) |
(11,601) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at 30 September 2008 |
|
98,356 |
(4,358) |
171,298 |
265,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(audited) for the year ended 31 March 2009 and (unaudited) for the period from 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
Share premium |
Hedge reserve |
Revenue reserve |
Total |
|
|
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
Balance as at 31 March 2008 |
|
98,356 |
(6,944) |
286,947 |
378,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital cancelled in the year |
|
- |
- |
(11,405) |
(11,405) |
Loss on cash flow hedge |
|
- |
(24,801) |
- |
(24,801) |
Swap break costs transfer |
|
- |
915 |
- |
915 |
Loss for the year |
|
- |
- |
(184,062) |
(184,062) |
Dividends paid |
4 |
- |
- |
(17,343) |
(17,343) |
Balance as at 31 March 2009 |
|
98,356 |
(30,830) |
74,137 |
141,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on cash flow hedge |
|
- |
4,340 |
- |
4,340 |
Loss for the period |
|
- |
- |
(1,383) |
(1,383) |
Dividends paid |
4 |
- |
- |
(5,695) |
(5,695) |
Balance as at 30 September 2009 |
|
98,356 |
(26,490) |
67,059 |
138,925 |
The accompanying notes 1 to 9 form an integral part of the financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
for the period from 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2009
|
|
Six months to |
Six months to |
Year to |
|
|
30/09/2009 |
30/09/2008 |
31/03/2009 |
|
Notes |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
(unaudited) |
(audited) |
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period/year |
|
(1,383) |
(95,206) |
(184,062) |
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
|
(Profit)/loss on disposal of investment property |
|
(398) |
5,693 |
29,202 |
Net valuation loss on investment property |
|
3,755 |
61,131 |
130,528 |
Share of loss in associates and joint ventures |
|
- |
33,629 |
34,720 |
Net finance cost |
|
7,182 |
6,481 |
13,584 |
Taxation |
|
334 |
98 |
124 |
Operating profit before changes in working capital and provisions |
|
|
|
|
9,490 |
11,826 |
24,096 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables |
|
(156) |
1,739 |
766 |
Decrease in trade and other payables |
|
(1,714) |
(463) |
(3,850) |
Cash generated from operations |
|
7,620 |
13,102 |
21,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs paid |
|
(6,372) |
(7,457) |
(15,216) |
Interest received |
47 |
1,069 |
1,785 |
|
Tax (paid)/received |
(9) |
4 |
(160) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
1,286 |
6,718 |
7,421 |
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment property |
|
35,593 |
58,780 |
71,487 |
Addition to investment property |
|
(2,811) |
(2,101) |
(3,574) |
Investment in associates |
|
- |
(4,402) |
(5,492) |
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
32,782 |
52,277 |
62,421 |
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of shares |
|
- |
(8,842) |
(11,405) |
Drawdown/(repayment) of existing loans |
|
11,200 |
- |
(50,000) |
Dividends paid |
4 |
(5,695) |
(11,601) |
(17,343) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
5,505 |
(20,443) |
(78,748) |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period/year |
|
|
|
|
39,573 |
38,552 |
(8,906) |
||
Opening cash and cash equivalents |
|
50,318 |
59,224 |
59,224 |
Closing cash and cash equivalents |
|
89,891 |
97,776 |
50,318 |
The accompanying notes 1 to 9 form an integral part of the financial statements.
Notes to the Interim Report
1. Significant accounting policies
Invista Foundation Property Trust Limited ("the Company") is a closed-ended investment company incorporated in Guernsey. The condensed financial statements of the Company for the period ended 30 September 2009 comprise the Company, its subsidiaries and its interests in associates and joint ventures (together referred to as the 'Group').
Statement of compliance
The condensed interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority and International Financial Reporting Standards ('IFRS') IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting. They do not include all of the information required for the full annual financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Group as at and for the year ended 31 March 2009. The financial statements have been prepared on the basis of the accounting policies set out in the Group's annual financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2009. The Group's annual financial statements refer to new Standards and Interpretations none of which had a material impact on the financial statements.
The Group applies revised IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (2007), which became effective as of 1 April 2009. As a result, the Group presents in the consolidated statement of changes of equity all owner changes in equity, whereas all non-owner changes in equity are presented in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. This presentation has been applied in these condensed interim financial statements as of and for the six month period ended 30 September 2009. Comparative information has been re-presented so that it also is in conformity with the revised standard. Since the change in accounting policy only impacts presentation aspects, there is no impact on earnings per share.
2. Material agreements
Invista Real Estate Investment Management Limited (Invista) has been appointed as Investment Manager to the Company.
The Investment Manager is entitled to a base fee and a performance fee together with reasonable expenses incurred by it in the performance of its duties. The base fee is equal to one quarter of 95 basis points of the gross assets less current liabilities of the Group per quarter.
In addition, and subject to the conditions below, the Investment Manager is entitled to an annual performance fee where the NAV total return per ordinary share during the relevant financial period exceeds an annual rate of 10 percentage (the 'performance hurdle'). Where the performance hurdle is met, a performance fee will be payable in an amount equal to 15 percentage of any aggregate total return over and above the performance hurdle. A performance fee will only be payable where: (i) in respect of the relevant financial period, the total return of the underlying assets meets or exceeds the Investment Property Database ('IPD') Monthly Index balanced funds benchmark on a like for like basis; and (ii) the annualised total return over the period from admission of the Company's Ordinary Shares to the end of the relevant financial period is equal to or greater than 10 percentage per annum.
The Investment Management Agreement may be terminated by either the Company or the Investment Manager on not less than 12 months notice in writing.
Post the period end it has been agreed that the basis for calculating the base fee will be changed, see note 9.
The Board appointed Invista Real Estate Investment Management Limited as the Accounting Agent to the Company from 1 April 2007. The Accounting Agent is entitled to a fee equal to 5 basis points of Net Asset Value subject to a minimum annual fee of £250,000.
The Board appointed Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Guernsey) Limited as the Administrator to the Company with effect from 25 July 2007. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee equal to £120,000.
3. Basic and Diluted Loss per Share
The basic and diluted loss per share for the Group is based on the net loss for the period of £1,383,000, (March 2009: £184,062,000) (September 2008: £95,206,000) and the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue during the period of 323,594,219 (March 2009: 334,743,462) (September 2008: 344,415,176).
4. Dividends paid
|
Number of |
|
01/04/2009 to |
In respect of |
Ordinary |
Rate |
30/09/2009 |
|
Shares |
(pence) |
£000 |
|
|
|
|
Quarter 31 March 2009 dividend paid 20 May 2009 |
323.59 million |
0.8800 |
2,847 |
Quarter 30 June 2009 dividend paid 7 August 2009 |
323.59 million |
0.8800 |
2,848 |
|
|
1.7600 |
5,695 |
|
Number of |
|
01/04/2008 to |
In respect of |
Ordinary |
Rate |
30/09/2008 |
|
Shares |
(pence) |
£000 |
|
|
|
|
Quarter 31 March 2008 dividend paid 22 May 2008 |
350.85 million |
1.6875 |
5,921 |
Quarter 30 June 2008 dividend paid 22 August 2008 |
336.58 million |
1.6875 |
5,680 |
|
|
3.3750 |
11,601 |
|
Number of |
|
01/04/2008 to |
In respect of |
Ordinary |
Rate |
31/03/2009 |
|
Shares |
(pence) |
£000 |
|
|
|
|
Quarter 31 March 2008 dividend paid 22 May 2008 |
350.85 million |
1.6875 |
5,921 |
Quarter 30 June 2008 dividend paid 22 August 2008 |
336.58 million |
1.6875 |
5,680 |
Quarter 30 September 2008 dividend paid 21 November 2008 |
329.00 million |
0.8800 |
2,895 |
Quarter 31 December 2008 dividend paid 20 February 2009 |
323.59 million |
0.8800 |
2,847 |
|
|
5.1350 |
17,343 |
A dividend for the quarter ended 30 September 2009 of 0.88p (£2,848,000) was declared on 28 October 2009 and paid on 20 November 2009.
5. Investment property
(unaudited) for the period 1 April 2008 to 30 September 2008
|
Leasehold |
Freehold |
Total |
|
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
Amounts recognised as investment property at 31 March 2008 |
74,834 |
488,223 |
563,057 |
Additions |
569 |
1,533 |
2,102 |
Disposals |
- |
(64,473) |
(64,473) |
Net valuation losses on investment property |
(11,054) |
(48,105) |
(59,159) |
Movement in lease incentives |
(1) |
(1,971) |
(1,972) |
Amounts recognised as investment property at 30 September 2008 |
64,348 |
375,207 |
439,555 |
(audited) for the year 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009
|
Leasehold |
Freehold |
Total |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
|
Amounts recognised as investment property at 31 March 2008 |
74,834 |
488,223 |
563,057 |
Reclassification |
19,431 |
(19,431) |
- |
Additions |
931 |
2,643 |
3,574 |
Disposals |
- |
(131,524) |
(131,524) |
Net valuation losses on investment property |
(33,326) |
(97,202) |
(130,528) |
Amounts recognised as investment property at 31 March 2009 |
61,870 |
242,709 |
304,579 |
(unaudited) for the period 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2009
|
Leasehold |
Freehold |
Total |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
|
Amounts recognised as investment property at 31 March 2009 |
61,870 |
242,709 |
304,579 |
Additions |
116 |
2,684 |
2,800 |
Disposals |
(1,908) |
(8,421) |
(10,329) |
Net valuation gains/(losses) on investment property |
362 |
(3,719) |
(3,357) |
Amounts recognised as investment property at 30 September 2009 |
60,440 |
233,253 |
293,693 |
Fair value of investment property as determined by the valuers excluding lease incentives totals £297,935,000 (March 2009: £308,055,000).
6. Investment in associates and joint ventures
(unaudited) for the period 1 April 2008 to 30 September 2008
|
£000 |
Opening balance as at 1 April 2008 |
29,227 |
Additions |
4,402 |
Share of losses in associates and joint ventures |
(33,629) |
Amounts recognised as associates and joint ventures at 30 September 2008 |
- |
(audited) for the year 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009
|
£000 |
Opening balance as at 1 April 2008 |
29,227 |
Additions |
5,493 |
Share of losses in associates and joint ventures |
(34,720) |
Amounts recognised as associates and joint ventures at 31 March 2009 |
- |
(unaudited) for the period 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2009
|
£000 |
Opening balance as at 1 April 2009 |
- |
Additions |
- |
Share of losses in associates and joint ventures |
- |
Amounts recognised as associates and joint ventures at 30 September 2009 |
- |
The associates and joint ventures are still carried at nil value following declines in the values of the properties. These declines have also led to breaches in loan to value covenants.
7. Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
In March 2005 the Group entered into a £152.5 million loan repayable in July 2014 with a securitisation vehicle, along with a facility of £150 million of reserve notes. The Group has as at 30 September 2009 £213.5 million drawn under these two facilities.
At the same time as entering into these two facilities, the Group entered into a liquidity facility with Lloyds TSB Bank plc (Lloyds) as the Liquidity Facility Provider for £11.2 million, the intention of the facility was to provide funding for liquidity shortfalls. One of the criteria of the liquidity facility was that the Liquidity Facility Provider should have a credit rating of at least AA- (long term) by Fitch or A-1 (short term) by S&P. Recently Lloyds has been downgraded to A-1 (short term) by S&P. A consequence of this downgrade is the Group being required to drawdown the £11.2 million and place it in a block bank account. The drawdown can be repaid when Lloyds rating returns to at least the level set out in the agreement or the terms of the liquidity facility agreement are altered. The level of the drawdown reduces pro rata once the loan is less than £204 million.
8. NAV per Ordinary Share
The NAV per Ordinary Share is based on the net assets of £138,925,000 (March 2009: £141,663,000) (September 2008: £265,296,000) and 323,594,219 (March 2009: 323,594,219) (September 2008: 330,431,478) Ordinary Shares in issue at the Balance Sheet date.
9. Post balance sheet events
The Board and the Investment Manager have agreed a new Investment and Asset Management fee arrangement linked to Net Asset Value ('NAV').
The current base fee arrangement of 0.95% per annum of Gross Asset Value ('GAV') less current liabilities has been changed to a fee based on the Company's NAV, back-dated to 1 July 2009. The new fee arrangement will be payable monthly in arrears and will be equal to one twelfth of:
2% of NAV up to £150 million, plus
1.75% of NAV between £150 million and £200 million, plus
1.5% of NAV over £200 million
This NAV based fee will be subject to a floor of £229,000 per month. In the event that this floor is breached, the fee will then revert to being calculated on the previous basis of 0.95% per annum of GAV, until NAV recovers to a point where the monthly NAV based fee would once again exceed £229,000.
The combined new base fee and any performance fee based on the current arrangement cannot exceed 5% of the Company's total NAV during any financial year ending 31 March.
Independent Review Report to Invista Foundation Property Trust Limited ('the Company')
Introduction
We have been engaged by the Company to review the condensed set of financial statements in the half-yearly financial report for the six months ended 30 September 2009 which comprises Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income, Condensed Balance Sheet, Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity, Condensed Statement of Cash Flows and the related explanatory notes. We have read the other information contained in the half-yearly financial report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the information in the condensed set of financial statements.
This report is made solely to the Company in accordance with the terms of our engagement to assist the Company in meeting the requirements of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules ("the DTR") of the United Kingdom's Financial Services Authority ("the UK FSA"). Our review has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company those matters we are required to state to it in this report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company for our review work, for this report, or for the conclusions we have reached.
Directors' responsibilities
The half-yearly financial report is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the directors. The directors are responsible for preparing the half-yearly financial report in accordance with the DTR of the UK FSA.
As disclosed in note 1, the annual financial statements of the group are prepared in accordance with IFRS. The condensed set of financial statements included in this half-yearly financial report has been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 "Interim Financial Reporting".
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to express to the Company a conclusion on the condensed set of financial statements in the half-yearly financial report based on our review.
Scope of review
We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410 "Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity" issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Conclusion
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the condensed set of financial statements in the half-yearly financial report for the six months ended 30 September 2009 is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with IAS 34 and the DTR of the UK FSA.
KPMG Channel Islands Limited
Guernsey
26 November 2009
Corporate information
Registered Address Trafalgar Court Les Banques St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 3QL Directors Andrew Sykes (Chairman) Keith Goulborn John Frederiksen Harry Dick-Cleland David Warr Peter Atkinson (All Non-Executive Directors) Investment Manager and Accounting Agent Invista Real Estate Investment Management Limited Exchequer Court |
Auditor KPMG Channel Islands Limited 20 New Street St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 4AN Property Valuers Knight Frank LLP 20 Hanover Square London W1S 1HZ Channel Islands Sponsor Ozannes Securities Limited 1 Le Marchant Street St. Peter Port Guernsey GY1 4HP |
33 St Mary Axe London EC3A 8AA The Manager's Investment Committee Duncan Owen (Chairman) Philip Gadsden Nick Montgomery Mark Long Secretary and Administrator Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Guernsey) Limited Trafalgar Court Les Banques St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 3QL |
UK Sponsor and Broker JPMorgan Cazenove Limited 20 Moorgate London EC2R 6DA Tax Advisers Deloitte & Touche LLP 180 Strand London WC2R 1BL Receiving Agent and UK Transfer/Paying Agent Computershare Investor Services PLC The Pavilions Bridgewater Road Bristol BS99 1XZ |
Solicitors to the Company as to English Law: Herbert Smith Exchange House Primrose Street London EC2A 2HS |
as to Guernsey Law: Ozannes 1 Le Marchant Street St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 4HP |
ISA/PEP status The Company's shares are eligible for Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) and PEP transfers and can continue to be held in existing PEPs |
|