Tullow Oil plc ("Tullow" or the "Company")
25 March 2013
Annual Report and Accounts and Notice of Annual General Meeting
Following the release on 13 February 2013 of the Company's preliminary full year results announcement for the year ended 31 December 2012 (the "Preliminary Announcement"), the Company announces it has published its Annual Report and Accounts for 2012 (the "Annual Report and Accounts").
The Company's 2013 AGM will be held at Haberdashers' Hall, 18 West Smithfield, London EC1A 9HQ on Wednesday 8 May 2013 at 12 noon.
Copies of the Annual Report and Accounts and the Notice of the Annual General Meeting 2013 are available to view on the Company's website: www.tullowoil.com.
In accordance with Disclosure and Transparency Rule 6.3.5(2)(b) additional information is set out in the appendices to this announcement. This information is extracted in full unedited text from the Annual Report and Accounts.
The Preliminary Announcement included a set of condensed financial statements and a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and the group.
In accordance with Listing Rule 9.6.1, a copy of each of the Annual Report and Accounts, the Notice of the Annual General Meeting 2013, the form of proxy in relation to the Annual General Meeting 2013 and the "Year in Review" for the year ending 31 December 2012 has been submitted to the UK Listing Authority via the National Storage Mechanism and will be available for viewing shortly at www.hemscott.com. Those documents are also being submitted to the Irish Stock Exchange and the Ghana Stock Exchange.
In addition, all of the above documents will shortly be available for inspection at the Irish Stock Exchange (which is situated at: Irish Stock Exchange, 28 Anglesea Street, Dublin 2, Ireland) and will be available to shareholders located in Ghana by contacting the Company's registrar: Computershare Pan Africa Ghana Limited, 23 Eleventh Lane, Osu R.E., P.O. Box CT2215 Cantonments, Accra, Ghana (Telephone: +233 (0)302 770 507 or +233 (0)302 773 922).
Appendices
Appendix A: Directors' responsibility statement
The following directors' responsibility statement is extracted from the Annual Report and Accounts (page 112).
Directors' responsibility statement required by DTR4.1.12R
We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:
- The financial statements, prepared in accordance with relevant financial reporting framework, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole; and
- The management report, which is incorporated into the Directors' report, includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.
By order of the Board
Aidan Heavey Ian Springett
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
12 February 2013 12 February 2013
Appendix B: A description of the principal risks and uncertainties that the Company faces
The following description of the principal risks and uncertainties that the Company faces is extracted from the Annual Report and Accounts
(pages 47-51).
2013 Short-to-medium term risks and uncertainties
· Receive appropriate approvals from Ugandan authorities, followed by commencement of the PoD;
· Receive TEN PoD approval from the Ghanaian Government and commence development;
· Successful management and mitigation of above-ground risk given local elections and political uncertainty in key African countries of operations; and
· Successful delivery of exploration programme and asset monetisation options.
Long-term performance risks
We have identified a number of 'evergreen' risks to our longer-term performance and strategic delivery, which are in addition
to the shorter and medium-term principal risks that are specifically associated with the delivery of our business plan. We believe these risks could potentially adversely impact our employees, operations, performance and assets. Each year we critically review and evaluate the risks Tullow faces and refresh these to reflect the changes in our business and operational profile.
Our business risk systems, combined with the Board's ownership of strategic risks, ensures that risk management is embedded in the business, aligned with our business model and directly linked to the delivery of the Group's strategic priorities, as is clearly demonstrated in the table below. These risks are not set out in any order or priority. They represent the Board and Management's view of the most material and important risks to Tullow and as a result they do not comprise all the risks and uncertainties we face.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Strategy fails to meet shareholder objectives
Strategic objective
Deliver substantial returns to shareholders.
Executive responsibility
Aidan Heavey Chief Executive Officer
Performance indicator
Long-term TSR
Impact
Ineffective or poorly-executed strategy fails to create shareholder value and to meet shareholder expectations, leading to a loss of investor confidence and a decline in the share price. This in turn reduces the Group's ability to access finance and increases vulnerability to a hostile takeover.
Policies and systems
Exploration-led growth strategy, ongoing portfolio management, three-year business plan, active Investor Relations programme, bi-annual investor survey, annual review of strategic objectives and monthly operational and financial reporting.
Mitigation process
Clear and consistent strategy execution, high-impact exploration and appraisal programme, selective development projects, asset monetisation across the value chain, resource growth, portfolio renewal and high-grading, strong balance sheet and financial flexibility, effective communication with all stakeholders, based on open and transparent dialogue.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sustained exploration failure
Strategic priority 1
Execute selective high-impact exploration and appraisal programmes.
Executive responsibility
Angus McCoss Exploration Director
Performance indicators
Resources growth
Exploration success ratio
Portfolio renewal and high-grading
Impact
Failure to sustain exploration success is costly and limits replacement of reserves and resources, which impacts investor confidence in long-term delivery of the Group's exploration-led growth strategy.
Policies and systems
Clear exploration strategy based on core campaigns, GELT, competitive capital allocation process and annual high-impact E&A programme.
Mitigation process
Board approved E&A programme. Monthly reporting to the Board on finding costs per boe and high-grading of Group's portfolio, with a view to measuring success of exploration spend. Application of technical excellence and appropriate technologies in exploration methodologies.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Key operational or development failure
Strategic priority 2
Safely manage and deliver all major projects and production operations, increasing cash flow and commercial reserves.
Executive responsibility
Paul McDade Chief Operating Officer
Performance indicator
Operationally-based yearly targets, both base and stretch
Impact
Operational delivery fails to meet cost and schedule budgets or operational objectives, causing returns to be eroded.
Policies and systems
Development & Operations Leadership Team, project leadership team, asset specific PoD, EHS systems and policies, Delegation of Authority (DoA), Code of Business Conduct and asset delivery risk management.
Mitigation process
Technical, financial and Board approval required for all projects, and for all dedicated project teams. Risk evaluation and progress reporting initiated for all projects and reported on monthly.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Insufficient liquidity, inappropriate financial strategy
Strategic priority 3
Manage financial and business assets to enhance our portfolio, replenish upside potential and support funding needs.
Executive responsibility
Ian Springett Chief Financial Officer
Performance indicators
Operating cash flow
Debt profile and capacity
Gearing
Impact
Asset performance and excessive leverage leads to the Group being unable to meet its financial obligations. This scenario, in the extreme, impacts on the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, or causes a breach of bank covenants.
Policies and systems
Financial strategy, cash flow forecasting and management and capital allocation processes.
Mitigation process
Prudent approach to debt and equity, with a balance maintained through refinancing, cash flow from operations and portfolio management activity. Board review and approval of financial strategy. Short-term and long-term cash forecasts reported on a regular basis to Senior Management and the Board. Strong banking and equity relationships maintained.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cost and capital discipline
Strategic priority 3
Manage financial and business assets to enhance our portfolio, replenish upside potential and support funding needs.
Executive responsibility
Ian Springett Chief Financial Officer
Performance indicators
Cash operating costs per boe
Finding costs per boe
Capital expenditure and cost management targets
Impact
Ineffective cost control leads to reduced margins and profitability, reducing operating cash flow and the ability to fund the business.
Policies and systems
DoA and budgeting and reporting processes, and project approval process for all significant categories of expenditure.
Mitigation process
Comprehensive annual budgeting processes covering all expenditure are approved by the Board. Executive management approval is required for major categories of expenditure, and investment and divestment opportunities are ranked on a consistent basis, resulting in effective management of capital allocation.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Oil and gas price volatility
Strategic priority 3
Manage financial and business assets to enhance our portfolio, replenish upside potential and support funding needs.
Executive responsibility
Ian Springett Chief Financial Officer
Performance indicator
Realised commodity prices
Impact
Volatility in commodity prices impacts the Group's revenue streams, with an adverse effect on liquidity.
Policies and systems
Hedging strategy.
Mitigation process
Hedging strategy agreed by the Board, with monthly reporting of hedging activity.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Supply chain failure
Strategic priority 3
Manage financial and business assets to enhance our portfolio, replenish upside potential and support funding needs.
Strategic priority 5
Achieve strong governance across all Tullow activities and continue to build trust and reputation with all stakeholders.
Executive responsibility
Ian Springett Chief Financial Officer
Performance indicator
Timely delivery of projects
Impact
A delay in delivery of products or services results in project delivery delays, causing significant financial penalties and a loss of reputation with stakeholders.
Policies and systems
Group contracting and procurement procedures, post contract award procedures, market, contract and supplier due diligence and logistics standard operating procedures.
Mitigation process
Risk assessment and full due diligence of all suppliers carried out prior to award of the contract. Risk management embedded in the Group contracting and procurement procedures at all stages of the process. Comprehensive supplier monitoring undertaken to ensure that any issues are identified promptly and rectified to avoid significant issues.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
EHS failure or security incident
Strategic priority 4
Ensure safe people, procedures and operations and minimise environmental impacts.
Executive responsibility
Paul McDade Chief Operating Officer
Performance indicator
EHS scorecard with nine indicators
Impact
Major event from drilling or production operations impacts staff, contractors, communities or the environment, leading to loss of reputation, revenue and/or shareholder value.
Policies and systems
Board-level EHS Committee, Group-wide EHS policies, Tullow Oil Environmental Standards (toes), EMS, crisis management procedures, EHS Strategy Forum, Tullow Security standard, Occupational Health programme, application of the UN's Voluntary Principles of Security and Human Rights (VPSHR).
Mitigation process
Board-level commitment. EHS standards set and monitored across the Group through Business Unit performance reporting. EHS management system implemented. Clear policies and procedures supported by strong leadership accountability and commitment throughout the organisation. Tullow Safety Rules launched. Over 100 EHS professionals embedded in the business.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Information and cyber security
Strategic priority 5
Achieve strong governance across all Tullow activities and continue to build trust and reputation with all stakeholders.
Executive responsibility
Angus McCoss Exploration Director
Performance indicator
Prevent cyber attacks
Increase in maturity level and reduction
in risk profile
Impact
Loss of sensitive proprietary information, financial fraud, reduction or halt in production
Policies and systems
Information security policy framework defines structure, risk methodology, levels of activity, Group policy and standards.
Mitigation process
The information security strategy integrates information, personnel and physical security. A collaborative cross-functional risk group provides governance and ensures both technical and non-technical solutions are both effective and proportionate. A Protect, Monitor, Analyse and Respond methodology recognises the ever changing threat landscape that drives investment in next generation technologies.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bribery and corruption
Strategic priority 5
Achieve strong governance across all Tullow activities and continue to build trust and reputation with all stakeholders.
Executive responsibility
Graham Martin General Counsel & Company Secretary
Performance indicator
Rollout of the Code of Conduct training
Percentage Code of Conduct certification
Impact
Corrupt actions or practices in the Group's activities leading to prosecutions or investigations, impacting on the Group's reputation and leading to loss of shareholder value.
Policies and systems
Code of Business Conduct and corporate responsibility policies and systems.
Mitigation process
Consistent ethical standards established and applied through the Code of Business Conduct, and through contract and procurement procedures. Conduct regular reviews of compliance requirements together with periodic Board reporting.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Governance and legal risk
Strategic priority 5
Achieve strong governance across all Tullow activities and continue to build trust and reputation with all stakeholders.
Executive responsibility
Graham Martin General Counsel & Company Secretary
Performance indicator
TSR performance
Impact
Changes to the legal or fiscal regimes or contracts; modifications or expropriation can erode shareholder value.
Policies and systems
Stakeholder engagement enhanced; experienced legal and commercial teams; and comprehensive knowledge of contractual regimes and fair practice.
Mitigation process
Continuing to engage with all stakeholders to come to fair outcomes.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Loss of key staff and succession planning
Strategic priority 6
Build a strong unified team with excellent commercial, technical and financial skills and entrepreneurial flair.
Executive responsibility
Graham Martin General Counsel & Company Secretary
Performance indicator
Staff turnover
Recruitment for key roles
Impact
The loss of key staff and a lack of internal succession planning for key roles within the Group causes short and medium-term business disruption. Inability to recruit for key roles hinders performance.
Policies and systems
HR strategy, localisation, our values, HR function and policies, performance management and training and development. Talent management and external benchmarking.
Mitigation process
Clearly defined people strategy based on culture and engagement, talent development and reward and recognition, together with the continuing success of the Group.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Political and social risk
Strategic priority 7
Nurture long-term relationships with local governments, communities and key stakeholders.
Executive responsibility
Aidan Heavey Chief Executive Officer
Performance indicator
TSR Performance
Impact
Changes in political regimes can lead to re-negotiation of licence and agreement terms or delays in grants of licences and approval of agreements. Erosion of social licence to operate leading to erosion of value of projects, possible local disruptions and delays in project schedule and increased project costs. Failure to understand political and social contexts can lead to insufficient planning, resourcing and costing of projects.
Policies and systems
Portfolio risk management tool including political and social risks, social performance standards and management system, issues management plans and host country resources including stakeholder and community engagement activity.
Mitigation process
Early identification and ongoing monitoring of political and social risks and opportunities. Management plans that address business risks and political and social impacts associated with existing or planned operations. Ensuring that Tullow has appropriate resourcing and competency to identify, analyse and advise on political and social risk management. Social investment projects targeted at managing social risks and at delivering opportunities to maximise our business benefits. Policy and management system for operating in sensitive areas.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Appendix C: Related party transactions
The following related party transactions are extracted from the Annual Report and Accounts (page 166).
The Directors of Tullow Oil plc are considered to be the only key management personnel as defined by IAS 24 - Related party disclosures.
|
2012 £m |
2011 £m |
Short-term employee benefits |
9.1 |
8.7 |
Post employment benefits |
1.1 |
1.1 |
Amounts awarded under long-term incentive schemes |
2.9 |
3.7 |
Share-based payments |
9.5 |
7.5 |
|
22.6 |
21.0 |
Short-term employee benefits
These amounts comprise fees paid to the Directors in respect of salary and benefits earned during the relevant financial year, plus bonuses awarded for the year.
Post employment benefits
These amounts comprise amounts paid into the pension schemes of the Directors.
Amounts awarded under long-term incentive schemes
These amounts relate to the shares granted under the annual bonus scheme that is deferred for three years under the Deferred Share Bonus Plan (DSBP).
Share-based payments
This is the cost to the Group of Directors' participation in share-based payment plans, as measured by the fair value of options and shares granted, accounted for in accordance with IFRS 2, Share-based Payments.
There are no other related party transactions. Further details regarding transactions with the Directors of Tullow Oil plc are disclosed in the Directors' remuneration report on pages 98 to 114.
END