Interim Results
African Consolidated Resources plc / Ticker: AFCR / Index: AIM / Sector: Mining
15 December 2011
African Consolidated Resources plc ('ACR' or 'the Company')
Interim Results
African Consolidated Resources plc, the AIM listed resource and development
company focused in Zimbabwe, is pleased to announce its results for the six
months to 30 September 2011.
Financial Highlights
* Loss of $1.7m to 30 September 2011 as exploration programmes continue (2010:
$1.8m)
* Cash balance of $7.1m (2010: $8.8m)
* $7.3m cash received through private placement of 78m shares (2010: nil)
Project Highlights
* Zimbabwe: Successful ongoing development of Pickstone Gold Project to
achieve cash generative, first phase production in mid 2012, subject to
funding
* 10,700 metres of drilling conducted at Gazema Gold Project to upgrade
current JORC resource of one million troy ounces - results expected Q1 2012
* Continued commitment to Indigenisation strategy to play a significant role
in ACR's 2012 activities
* Zambia: Acquisition of further assets with broad exploration of the highly
prospective region now underway
* Acquisition of an aircraft with high-tech radiometrics and aeromagnetic
equipment to commence extensive aeromagnetic programmes at Zambian projects,
primarily the Kasempa iron-oxide-copper-gold-project H1 2012
Executive Chairman's Report
Whilst work on our various projects continues on a broad front, the focus of
activity in the short period since our final results has centred on the advance
of our Pickstone gold production project and our Gadzema Gold resource
development, both in Zimbabwe, and in addition the negotiation for, and
acquisition of, significant areas of exploration ground in north west Zambia,
highly prospective for copper as well as other minerals.
We are making considerable headway in analysing alternate technologies whilst
fine tuning the feasibility of the metallurgically complex sulphide dump at
Pickstone which will provide us with some near term cash flow. Â As a result of
further test work we are now optimistic that we will make a significant saving
on the projected $7.5million residual CAPEX previously reported. Â The project
has the potential to be highly profitable. Â Andrew Cranswick explains this
further in his report below.
From a risk-management angle, it has been our view that the remaining financing
should be linked to our Indigenisation strategy as explained in Andrew
Cranswick's report and significant strides have been made in this regard. Â We
anticipate substantial news flow in this vein over the coming quarter.
 Following a preliminary scoping study, test-work continues on open-pit hard-
rock mining at the same project and we are hopeful that profits from the
sulphide dump may allow self-funding for the expansion of this activity.
 Throughout this ramp-up and production, the Company remains committed to full
compliance with Zimbabwe's Indigenisation regulations. Â Indigenous beneficiaries
of our programme will be dominated by the local community, our loyal staff and
many of our long-standing indigenous partners who have helped steer the Company
through difficult years.
We find that in practice there is scope for flexibility in the Indigenisation
Regulations in such a way that in smaller projects at least, they can be
compatible with a fair return to the investor and risk-taker. Â However in their
present form it is widely recognised within many elements of government and in
the investment community that the regulations do present a disincentive to
inward investment, at least on large scale projects, and in my opinion do not by
any means lead to a path of true empowerment of the people. Â Effective
empowerment would best be served through the encouragement of business
enterprise and the generation of employment. Â We believe that a job providing a
monthly income is far more empowering and provides more sense of worth than an
arbitrary possible interest in a company over which there is no real control and
no certainty of realisation. Â I remain confident that the regulations will be
rationalised towards a more universally accepted commercial regime within the
medium term.
We continue to seek contact and exchange of ideas with individuals in the
different wings of the Zimbabwe Government of National Unity and with senior
civil servants and have indeed achieved several important relationships.
 Although there remain many political hurdles, and not all elements of
Government speak with the same voice, we believe that there are increasing signs
of green shoots in the economy and in people's thinking.
Although the Marange diamond dispute is still before the Courts, we have again
refrained from advancing our appeal against the Rescission Judgement. Â We remain
committed to doing all we can to resolve the outstanding issues by dialogue. Â It
is evident from material in the public domain that diamond production from our
Marange claim has been very large indeed, amounting it seems, to a material
percentage of world supply. Â We believe that an amicable and fair solution to
this issue will lead to a win-win result. Â Apart from the benefit to ACR, it is
likely to help international acceptability of Zimbabwean diamonds, to add to the
fiscus, and to aid Zimbabwe image as an investment destination.
Returning to gold development, we have continued drilling at the Gadzema Gold
project and the JORC resource now exceeds 1 million troz. Â As previously stated,
we believe the total project resource is likely to be far higher, and mining
widths indicated appear to be up to 450 metres along significant stretches of
strike. Â It is clear that the best way to exploit this will be a large-scale
open pit operation. Â This looks like it will develop into a major mine. Â The on-
going resource definition will run in parallel with research on the funding of
such a large-scale operation, given the internationally perceived political risk
to finance opportunities in Zimbabwe.
In line with our Zambian expansion, particularly in the Greater Kasempa iron-
oxide-copper-gold ('IOCG') district in north west Zambia, several asset
acquisitions have been concluded while several more are under discussion. Â A
broad exploration of the highly prospective region is now under way. Â In
addition, upon resolution of various licensing issues, there exists a possible
opportunity for a short term cash generation from the brown-field sites. Â We
expect to develop these opportunities in the coming year.
As previously reported, the Company has acquired an aircraft with high-tech
radiometrics and aeromagnetic equipment. Â Delivery of the aircraft was delayed
by a technical fault that was resolved at the expense of the vendor and the
intended extensive aeromagnetic programme at Kasempa will now shortly be
underway. Â In general the equipment provides the Company with rapid access to
vital geophysics research capacity at short notice and low cost for projects
throughout the region. Â I expect this to play an important role on our portfolio
development.
Solid strides have been made during the period to transparently progress our
Zimbabwean gold assets, most notably the Pickstone and Gadzema projects, through
the development cycle towards production status. Â With this in mind, we are
approaching the stage where we can begin generating cash flow from Pickstone, a
pivotal moment for any exploration and development company. Â Our commitment to
our Indigenisation strategy will also play a key part in the Company's
activities moving forward, and we hope to achieve this in a way which aligns the
interests of our overseas shareholders as well as providing support and
investment to all local stakeholders.
Over the coming months, we hope to build further value in our prospective
projects and target a limited number of further assets through which to broaden
our already extensive mineral footprint in Zimbabwe and Zambia. Â I look forward
to providing shareholders with regular news flow on our developments in this
vein.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank our loyal staff and partners on
the ground in Zimbabwe and Zambia, and also our shareholders for their continued
support for ACR as we continue to develop as an emerging multi-commodity
exploration and development company focussed on Southern Africa.
Roy Tucker
Executive Chairman
Chief Executive Officer's Report
It is with a sense of achievement that I reflect on the practical field progress
made by ACR in 2011, a year which proved extraordinary in so many different
ways. Â As expected, the market turmoil has seen gold prices well underwritten
and our strategy of prioritising our gold projects has proved correct. Â With
gold price forecasts remaining high, our focus will remain to a great extent on
these highly prospective gold properties in the near to medium term. Â Although
our Zambian work and the concurrent broadening of sovereign risk base is
progressing with great promise, it is in Zimbabwe where we have achieved the
most this year.
Cash
The new reality of markets is that equity investment in exploration juniors is
likely to remain increasingly thin for an extended period. Â While this presents
challenges for the development of future ore bodies in all mineral classes to
maintain long-term world supply, it is the inescapable reflection of nervousness
in financial markets; a situation that will not evaporate overnight regardless
of the best Merkozy efforts. Â What does that mean for ACR and how are we
positioned for cash spend? Â Being reasonably well-funded from an over-subscribed
raising in June 2011 afforded us the cash to complete the targets we set at that
time for exploration and Resource-drilling on the Gadzema Gold project (see
below). Â It also provided the financial capacity to make decisive strides on our
key North-West Zambian project.
However, with stock markets punishing share prices, it is unlikely that we will
be comfortable returning to investors for additional equity-based funds in the
near future. Â Therefore on the basis of our ambitions to aggressively advance
our high-priority projects, we have been planning alternative styles of funding.
 The most desirable will of course be self-funding from production in order to
minimise dilution and in this regard we have made progress (see below -
Pickstone tailings). Â Complementary to that goal is project-level funding of
CAPEX to achieve such production and we have initiated dialogue with potential
investors and partners in respect of gold and nickel prospects. Â Exploration
projects that are too immature to achieve production in the near term have been
analysed for the best means of finding exploration partner funding and we have
had success in this regard with our highly prospective Rare Earths/Phosphates
project in Zambia. Â Early stage discussions on other projects continue and I am
hopeful we will during 2012 be able to agree terms in respect of at least two
major project areas attracting project-level exploration funding.
Risk in Zimbabwe
In terms of risk from non-technical and non-financial sources, the politics in
Zimbabwe has remained somewhat in limbo as the Unity Government tries to
conclude a constitution-drafting process. Â That in turn will lead to a
referendum (on the constitution) followed thereafter by a general election.
 While much lip-service is paid to a supposed election date in 2012, well-
informed advisors indicate that in practice, it is unlikely to be feasible
before 2013. Â This implies that, in the absence of some kind of watershed event,
we will for a while remain adrift in this fog of uncertainty. Â Consequently,
many will conclude that political certainty (and therefore investment certainty)
will remain elusive for that period.
That foggy vale of uncertain future needs to be pierced somewhat by evaluating
the reality on the ground right now vis-Ã -vis actual risk to ACR and other
investors sitting in the breach. Â The fact is that Zimbabwe is populated by a
literate, hard-working and non-violent people. Â There is little violent crime
and the political violence that occupies much media space has to date had almost
no effect on our mining and exploration activities (Marange being arguably the
exception). Â Dollarization of the economy has seen it growing for several years,
inflation is licked, and operating in Zimbabwe is now predictable. Â The ability
to accurately budget and cost has been restored. Â Gold sales and mining has been
extensively deregulated. Â The royalty is a little high (7%) but the corporate
tax regime is reasonable (variously at 15% and 25% depending on style of mining
right), with attractive capital write-down incentives.
Indigenisation is a reality. Â Analysed properly, and discussed with the Ministry
concerned, the reality is not as ominous as the picture that was initially
painted. Â As you will see from the Chairman's report, we have agreed a structure
in principle that will indigenise our first producing asset yet still return a
very respectable investment to ACR. Â The prime beneficiaries are the local
community, our loyal staff and a number of businessmen who have travelled the
road with ACR as stakeholders since our inception. Â The empowerment in our
situation is real and deserved, making the solution an elegant one and highly
practical. Â As an extension of this structure, a significant proportion of the
indigenised profit is likely to be re-invested in later stage projects as fully
paid equity.
The Indigenisation model provides ACR with a template that can be modified to
suit the circumstances and implemented at a project level as each project
approaches production, ensuring full compliance with the law. Â ACR has rightly
stated that Indigenisation does not affect an exploration company until
production revenues at a project level have accumulated sufficiently to absorb
the expenditure that has been written off against them. Â At such a point, where
the project/subsidiary crosses the net equity threshold, Indigenisation becomes
lawfully required. Â And indeed this is what we have worked upon and will comply
with early next year in our first producing asset. Â Furthermore, although not
required to do so by regulation, we are now considering the possibility of an
earlier stage, broad-brush, partial indigenisation roll-out to lower entry
barriers while offsetting risk to ACR at earlier stages. Â It would be helpful if
Indigenisation rules regarding the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange and cascading net
equity would be improved and clarified. Â Work continues in these spheres.
In light of the above, the risk profile of Zimbabwe and indeed ACR's Zimbabwe
projects has surely to be reassessed. Â While the proof of actual cash earned
will remove many doubts, the time has arrived where our technical mining risk
has been quantified and minimised; the primary sovereign risk issues
appropriately addressed; and these risks have been judged acceptable to proceed.
 This offers ACR Zimbabwe the prospect of being self-funded in exploration,
resource-development and in some cases subsequent production projects.
Throughout a difficult 2011, our Chairman has made many extended visits to
Zimbabwe. Â He has met officials at all levels and developed relationships that
give us comfort and confidence on our security of tenure. Â Simultaneously he has
been making strides in agreeing with several government officials that an
amicable resolution of the Marange issue is surely in the interests of all.
In light of the above work and progress, I am confident that our risk in
Zimbabwe is significantly lower than before and I am hopeful that we are
entering a period of relations and profitability which will allow us to spend
less time looking over our shoulder and more time developing both our assets and
the national interest.
Zambia
As you will no doubt be aware, Zambia recently held peaceful and fair general
elections. Â For the fourth time power passed peacefully between the old and new
President, from one party to another. Â The new government has made an
impassioned pledge to remove corruption and set the country more firmly on a
path of economic growth. Â Also in 2011, Zambian copper output achieved record
all-time historical highs. Â Since coming into office the new Minister of Mines
has declared a moratorium on license issues as irregularities and inefficiencies
in the system are investigated and rectified. Â This has been welcomed by the
industry at large, not least ACR which has been affected by some of the systemic
abuse - a trend which is now being reversed. Â I have personally witnessed the
transformation of Zambia since the late 1990's into an economic growth success
story, a process which is still underway. Â It has been truly impressive and the
new Government brings a freshness and energy that will compliment and
reinvigorate this strategy. Â There remain many opportunities for mineral
discovery in Zambia and ACR have made exciting headway on a number of fronts in
this regard. Â Our stated, long-standing goal of broadening our sovereign risk
base has been well served by our efforts and I must congratulate our Zambian
office for their dedication.
Projects
I will not dwell on details of all of our projects, but rather on those where we
have expended the most money and man-hours in the past six months and those
likely to attract the most attention in the next 12 months. Â This by no means
implies the projects I omit to be at standstill and regular technical updates
available on our website will keep the information and status of these projects
available to the market. Â Various geological and metallurgical work continues on
many deposits prior to decisions on resource definition. Â It is also noteworthy
that we have relinquished large parcels of prospective ground in Zimbabwe and
Zambia where we felt that we will not have sufficient resources to do justice to
prospectivity. Â This is in keeping with the law and with our own tighter
strategic focus.
Pickstone Gold
I address this project first to elaborate on some statements above. Â The new
reality in markets to which I referred has imparted an urgency to the derivation
of cash from our assets and the Pickstone sulphide tailings dump is a project
that is thoroughly and exhaustively researched. Â In the past six months, new
metallurgical test work has been extremely helpful and has led us to a simpler,
lower-cost design. Â We have had two false starts on this project when would-be
financial partners withdrew in light of sovereign risk issues. Â What remains
difficult (or nigh-impossible) in Zimbabwe is local debt-finance of any scale
for mining. Â However, with the Indigenisation concluded and the feasibility
complete, we are confident of achieving funding for the Pickstone sulphide
tailings dump project and I hope to announce news in that regard within the next
quarter.
Subject to funding, the first phase production (i.e. the sulphide tailings) will
commence mid-2012. Â Cash generated will be significant and can pay, if it was so
decided, for subsequent investment in production phases at Pickstone and Giant,
while simultaneously affording a more aggressive drill out of other assets,
especially Gadzema. Â The conclusion of our project Indigenisation is imminent at
Pickstone and the continued strength in the gold price indicates a strong
profitability will be enjoyed throughout the various phases of mining envisaged.
 The on-going injection of cash will re-define us as a self-funded exploration
company where small-to-medium projects are funding the development of large,
world-class resources which will eventually progress to bulk mining.
Gadzema Gold
As targeted in our last report, we have passed the 1 million troy ounce ('troz')
resource milestone at Gadzema. Â For reference, our Gadzema gold project
comprises a consolidation of smaller claims over a north-south strike length of
some 8kms, commencing in the north with the brown-field Giant mine-site. Â This
old mine deposit, which produced over half a million ounces before a mine-
collapse closed it in the 1960s, is well mineralised in the banded iron
structures with a large pit already modelled. Â Virgin discoveries of a
mineralised diorite in the southern fringes increased the resource. Â A further
virgin discovery of an associated, large-scale, mineralised felsic, ryolitic
porphyry deposit at surface extended the estimated strike significantly.
 Approximately a quarter of the entire structure length has now been drilled to
120 metres depth, and in the process we have defined a JORC-compliant resource
exceeding a million ounces. Â The mineralised structure is consistent and will
lend itself to a bulk mining proposition with efficient economics, considering
for example, that prospective mining widths delineated by drilling could exceed
450 metres (wide) over significant stretches of the strike. Â More than 35,000
metres have now been drilled in Gadzema and while awaiting assays from the
latest campaign we are planning the next resource drill out. Â It is hoped that
the bulk of the future funding will come from the near-term production at
Pickstone.
The main tailings dump at the Giant mine has been assessed with an approximate
10,000 troz of resource being defined to JORC standard, averaging a grade of
0.8 to 0.9 g/t gold ('Au'). Â Metallurgical tests of this resource are now
underway in which I anticipate a high percentage recovery and it is envisaged
that the tailings treatment plant from Pickstone will be relocated here upon the
latter's completion. Â While not a significant resource on its own, this dump is
expected to yield additional, profitable production at a low investment level,
perpetuating ACR's self-funding exploration strategy.
Zambia - Copper/Gold/Silver
We have made several announcements addressing the development of our strategy in
the north-west of Zambia. Â Zambian licensing issues and moratorium thereupon
have delayed full establishment of tenure in some instances, but we are
confident that the reformed system will deliver a greater degree of certainty.
 Included in the most recent rights acquisitions is a brown-field site which
produced high grade copper ('Cu') and silver ('Ag') ore in the 1970s (Kalengwa
mine). Â It was reported that 1.9 million tonnes of ore with a cut off grade of
3g/t Cu delivered an average of 9.44% Cu plus 50 g/t Ag. Â There remains
significant known tonnage in the tailings dumps (at 1.6% and 1.2% Cu each -
totalling > 1 million tonnes) which could lead to early cash flow but the real
target is of course significant ore bodies.
The known ore body has not been mined out and is expected to yield economic
tonnage at depth and along strike. Â The desired targets in the greater area are
replications of this extremely high-grade ore body hosted by hydro-thermally
enriched Katangan sediments as well as Iron Oxide Copper Gold ('IOCG') targets
which have been positively identified in the area, with others to be researched
and identified. Â Gold and silver showings are consistent with the IOCG targets
with petrology and mineralogy ratios correlating well to Olympic Dam style IOCG
mineralisation. Â A structural interpretation of Kalengwa-style Katangan deposits
has begun and is leading to a fine-tuned method of targeting guided by
structural controls which we believe may yield several deposits. Â Considering
the Kalengwa deposit did not outcrop and was detected only by a weak soil
anomaly, we appear to be dealing with an entirely new detection science for this
model which we believe may well be endemic to the southern fringes of the
greater Copperbelt. Â Geophysics is expected to provide a key cornerstone for
structural control analyses. Â Permissions are underway to commence an aerial
survey using ACR's recently acquired technology and aeroplane. Â The commencement
of that survey is imminent, limited only by logistics and the weather which has
set in with the prolific rainy season the region experiences.
Historical data of the known deposit has now been entirely recaptured and most
of it has been digitised. Â A 3 dimensional model is being developed which will
lead to extrapolations of the known body and its extensions, thereby yielding
immediate drill targets. Â In addition, ACR is in negotiations with an
exploration firm who was active in the 1990s to acquire an extensive digital
data-set of work completed including drilling, geochemistry and geophysics.
We expect to bring continuous news flow on our work in this region during the
next year and aim at some significant discoveries, likely brown-field resource
definitions and possible limited production in that time period.
Zambia - Rare Earths and Phosphates
Nkombwa Hills in north-eastern Zambia is a large topographical feature of the
area on the edge of the northern Luangwa rift valley, standing some 1,000 feet
above the surrounding plains. Â Results from sampling have yielded Total Rare
Earth Oxides ('TREO') commonly above 10% and up to 22%. Â Historically drilled
cores have been re-assayed and equally impressive results shown. Â A pre-rainy
season drilling programme was delayed by a tenure irregularity that was
announced to the market. Â Extensive discussions with the Minister of Mines and
his Deputy have assured us that the matter is being rectified but the delay has
given way to the rainy season which hampers drilling mobilisation. Â In the
meantime, trenching continues and is expected to further define various aspects
of the carbonatite's mineralised facies. Â In addition, higher than expected
phosphate values have been detected and ACR had agreed in principle to extend
the agreement with Southern Crown Resources (our partners and technical experts)
to incorporate phosphates into the joint venture mineral suite subject to an
agreed increase in exploration spend. Â This project does not require ACR to
contribute funding for at least another 12 months, by which time our partners
are obligated to have defined a JORC-compliant mineral resource. Â Technical
updates will be available on ACR's website from time to time detailing progress
on this project. Â The funding and technical partnership with ASX-listed Southern
Crown Resources is an example of a successful project-level funding model.
Conclusion
Our focus has tightened in tandem with the markets. Â We have gold production in
our sights and a commitment to self-funding thereafter. Â Under-valuation is a
common theme around stock exchanges at the moment, and proper valuations will
return fastest to those who can best weather the cash drought. Â Our strategy has
been moulded to match and we must progress steadily to profitable cash stream.
 Our staff, management and Board have contributed diligently and constructively
at all levels and I thank them for their continued commitment while wishing all
a joyous holiday and festive season. Â Next year will unlikely be any easier than
2011 so we need to ensure the skills and resilience we have developed are
sensibly deployed to ensure not only our survival but to succeed beyond
expectation.
Andrew Cranswick
Chief Executive Officer
This report and the report of the Executive Chairman have been reviewed by Mike
Kellow BSc, a member of the Australian Institute of Geologists and Technical
Director of ACR. Â Mr Kellow meets the definition of a "qualified person" as
defined in the AIM Note for Mining, Oil and Gas Companies.
For further information visit www.acrplc.com or please contact:
Roy Tucker          African Consolidated Resources +44 (0) 1622 816918
   plc +44 (0) 7920 189012
Andrew Cranswick       African Consolidated Resources +44 (0) 7920 189010
   plc
Andrew Godber Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited +44 (0) 207 459 3600
Callum Stewart Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited +44 (0) 207 459 3600
Susie Geliher St Brides Media & Finance Ltd +44 (0) 20 7236 1177
Group statement of comprehensive income
for the six months ended 30 September 2011
  For the six For the year For the six
 months ended 30  ended months ended 30
 September 2011 31 March 2011 September 2010
 Group Group Group
 $'000  $'000
Note $'000
Revenue  - - -
Share options (expense) Â 300 (232) (101)
writeback
Other administrative  (2,069) (3,612) (1,761)
expenses
----------------------------------------------------
Administrative expenses  (1,769) (3,844) (1,862)
----------------------------------------------------
Operating loss  (1,769) (3,844) (1,862)
Finance income  13 35 23
----------------------------------------------------
Loss before and after  (1,756) (3,809) (1,839)
taxation attributable
to the equity holders
of the parent company
----------------------------------------------------
Other comprehensive
income
Gain on available for  2 6 8
sale financial assets
----------------------------------------------------
Total comprehensive  (1,754) (3,803) (1,831)
loss attributable to
the equity holders of
the parent company
----------------------------------------------------
Loss per share - basic 3 (0.46) cents (1.09) cents (0.51) cents
and diluted
----------------------------------------------------
Group statement of changes in equity
for the six months ended 30 September 2011
Share Share Share Foreign Available EBT Retained Total
capital premium option currency for sale reserve earnings/
account account reserve translation reserve (losses)
reserve
     $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000  $'000
 $'000  $'000
At 31 March 6,460 41,722 2,239 (1,855) (13) (2,468) (14,059) 32,026
2011
Total - - - - 2 - (1,756) (1,754)
comprehensive
loss for the
period
Credit in - - 85 - - - - 85
respect of
share option
charges
Share options - - (2,045) - - - 2,045 -
lapsed
Share options - - (165) - - - 165 -
exercised
Allotment of - - - - - (1,454) - (1,454)
shares to EBT
Shares
issued:
- for cash 1,264 6,320 - - - - - 7,584
consideration
- in respect 126 439 - - - - - 565
of share
options
- for 28 131 - - - - - 159
purchase of
assets
- in respect 19 160 - - - - - 179
of fees
- share issue - (307) - - - - - (307)
costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
At 30 7,897 48,465 114 (1,855) (11) (3,922) (13,605) 37,083
September
2011
------------------------------------------------------------------------
At 31 March 2010 6,279 40,293 2,267 (1,855) (19) (1,734) (10,299) 34,932
Total comprehensive - - - - 6 - (3,809) (3,803)
loss for the year
Credit in respect of - - 21 - - - - 21
share option charges
Share options lapsed - - (49) - - - 49 -
Shares issued:
 - for purchase of 84 616 - - - - - 700
assets
 - to the EBT 79 655 - - - (734) - -
 - in respect of fees 18 158 - - - - - 176
---------------------------------------------------------
At 31 March 2011 6,460 41,722 2,239 (1,855) (13) (2,468) (14,059) 32,026
---------------------------------------------------------
At 31 March 2010 6,279 40,293 2,267 (1,855) (19) (1,734) (10,299) 34,932
Total comprehensive - - - - 8 - (1,839) (1,831)
loss for the period
Credit in respect of - - - - - - - -
share option charges
Shares issued:
 - for cash 84 616 - - - - - 700
consideration
---------------------------------------------------------
At 30 September 2010 6,363 40,909 2,267 (1,855) (11) (1,734) (12,138) 33,801
---------------------------------------------------------
Group statements of financial position
As at 30 September 2011
  30 September 2011 31 March 30 September 2010
Note Group 2011 Group
$'000 Group $'000
$'000
Assets
Non-current assets
Intangible assets 4 27,742 24,800 22,094
Property, plant and equipment  3,222 2,975 2,933
Available for sale investments  34 32 34
---------------------------------------------
  30,998 27,807 25,061
---------------------------------------------
Current assets
Inventory  29 60 5
Receivables  853 403 754
Available for sale investments  15 15 15
Cash and cash equivalents  7,149 4,929 8,796
---------------------------------------------
Total current assets  8,046 5,407 9,570
---------------------------------------------
Total Assets  39,044 33,214 34,631
---------------------------------------------
Equity and Liabilities
Capital and reserves
attributable to equity holders
of the Company
Called-up share capital  7,897 6,460 6,363
Share premium account  48,465 41,722 40,909
Available for sale reserve  (11) (13) (11)
Share option reserve  114 2,239 2,267
Foreign currency translation  (1,855) (1,855) (1,855)
reserve
EBT reserve  (3,922) (2,468) (1,734)
Retained earnings  (13,605) (14,059) (12,138)
---------------------------------------------
Total equity  37,083 32,026 33,801
---------------------------------------------
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables  1,961 1,188 830
---------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities  1,961 1,188 830
---------------------------------------------
Total Equity and Liabilities  39,044 33,214 34,631
---------------------------------------------
Group statements of cash flow
for the six months ended 30 September 2011
 For the six For the year For the six
 months ended 30  ended months ended 30
September 2011 31 March 2011 September 2010
Group Group Group
$'000 Â $'000
$'000
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITES
Loss for the year (1,756) (3,809) (1,839)
Adjustments for:
 Depreciation 29 78 45
 Unrealised exchange 75 (39)  (44)
gain/(loss) on cash and
cash equivalents
 Finance income (13) (35)  (23)
 Profit on sale of property, - (33)  -
plant and equipment
 Services settled in shares 179 176 -
 Share option (write (300) 232  101
back)/expense
---------------------------------------------------
 (30)  379 79
---------------------------------------------------
Changes in working capital:
 (Increase)/Decrease in (450) 106  (245)
receivables
 Decrease/(Increase) in 31 (40)  15
inventories
 Decrease in payables (297) (193)  (441)
---------------------------------------------------
 (716) (127) (671)
---------------------------------------------------
Cash used in operations (2,502) Â (3,557) (2,431)
Investing activities:
 Payments to acquire (2,815) (5,507)  (2,938)
intangible assets
 Payments to acquire (243) (1,513)  (2,001)
property, plant and
equipment
 Proceeds on disposal of - 33 -
property, plant and
equipment
 Interest received 13 35 23
---------------------------------------------------
 (3,045)  (6,952) (4,916)
---------------------------------------------------
Financing Activities:
 Proceeds from the issue of 7,842 - 700
ordinary shares, net of
issue costs
Increase /(Decrease) in cash 2,295 (10,509) (6,647)
and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at 4,929 Â 15,399 15,399
beginning of year
 Exchange (loss)/gain on (75) 39  44
cash and cash equivalents
---------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at 7,149 Â 4,929 8,796
end of year
---------------------------------------------------
Interim report notes
1 Â Interim Report
The information relates to the period from 1 April 2011 to 30 September 2011.
The interim report was approved by the Directors on 14 December 2011.
The interim report, which is unaudited, does not include all information
required for full financial statements and should be read in conjunction with
the Group's consolidated annual financial statements for the period ended 31
March 2011.
2 Â Basis of preparation
a. The unaudited condensed interim financial statements for the six months
ended 30 September 2011 do not constitute statutory accounts and have been
drawn up using accounting policies and presentation expected to be adopted
in the Group's full financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2012,
which are not expected to be significantly different to those set out in
note 1 to the Group's audited financial statements for the year ended 31
March 2011
b. These interim financial statements consolidate the financial statements of
the Company and all its subsidiaries.
c. After review of the Group's operations, the directors have a reasonable
expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational
existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the directors continue to
adopt the going concern basis in preparing the unaudited condensed interim
financial statements.
3 Â Loss per share
For the six months For the year  ended For the six months
ended 31 March ended
30 September 2011 30 September
 2011 Group  2010
Group Group
Loss per Ordinary
Share has been
calculated using the
weighted average
number of Ordinary 377,327,065 349,675,876 346,813,958
Shares in issue
during the relevant
financial year.
The weighted average
number of Ordinary
Shares in issue for
the period is:
Losses for the Group (1,756) (3,809) (1,839)
for the year are:
($'000)
Loss per share basic (0.47cents) (1.09cents) (0.53cents)
and diluted
The effect of all
potentially dilutive
share options is
anti-dilutive.
4Â Â Â Â Intangible assets
Group Deferred Mining options Licence acquisition Total
exploration costs costs
   $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Cost at 31 March 19,849 10 4,941 24,800
2011
Additions during 2,892 50 - 2,942
the year
Disposals during - - - -
the year
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cost at 30 22,741 60 4,941 27,742
September 2011
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cost at 31 March 14,173 - 4,845 19,018
2010
Additions during 5,728 10 96 5,834
the year
Disposals during (52) - - (52)
the year
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cost at 31 March 19,849 10 4,941 24,800
2011
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cost at 31 March 14,173 - 4,845 19,018
2010
Additions during 2,983 - 93 3,076
the year
Disposals during - - - -
the year
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cost at 30 17,156 - 4,938 22,094
September 2010
--------------------------------------------------------------
5Â Â Â Â Financial information
The financial information for the year ended 31 March 2011 has been extracted
from the statutory accounts for that period. While the auditors' report for the
year ended 31 March 2011 was unqualified, it did include an emphasis of matters
concerning the political and economic stability in Zimbabwe, to which the
auditors drew attention by way of emphasis without qualifying their report. Full
details of these comments is contained in the report of the Auditors on Page 8
of the Final Results for the year to 31 March 2011, released elsewhere on this
website on 20 July 2011.
This announcement is distributed by Thomson Reuters on behalf of
Thomson Reuters clients. The owner of this announcement warrants that:
(i) the releases contained herein are protected by copyright and
other applicable laws; and
(ii) they are solely responsible for the content, accuracy and
originality of the information contained therein.
Source: African Consolidated Resources Plc via Thomson Reuters ONE
[HUG#1571490]