LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE ANNOUNCEMENT
Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC
Unaudited Half Year Results for the six months ended
30 September 2023
This Announcement is not the Company’s Half Year Report & Accounts. It is an abridged version of the Company’s full Half Year Report & Accounts for the six months ended 30 September 2023. The full Half Year Report & Accounts, together with a copy of this announcement, will also shortly be available on the Company’s website: www.worldwidewh.com where up to date information on the Company, including daily NAV, share prices and fact sheets, can also be found.
The Company's Half Year Report & Accounts for the six months ended 30 September 2023 has been submitted to the UK Listing Authority, and will shortly be available for inspection on the National Storage Mechanism (NSM): https://data.fca.org.uk/#/nsm/nationalstoragemechanism
For further information please contact: Mark Pope, Frostrow Capital LLP 020 3008 4913.
PERFORMANCE
Six months to | One year to | |
30 September | 31 March | |
2023 | 2023 | |
Net asset value per share (total return)* # | (0.6%) | (0.1%) |
Share price (total return)* # | 0.1% | (4.1%) |
Benchmark (total return)^ # | 0.8% | 2.5% |
30 September | 31 March | Six months | |
2023 | 2023 | change | |
Net asset value per share1 | 339.3p | 343.5p | (1.2%) |
Share price1 | 309.5p | 311.5p | (0.6%) |
Discount of share price to the net asset value per share* | 8.8% | 9.3% | |
Leverage* | 14.6% | 10.5% | |
Ongoing charges* | 0.8% | 0.8% | |
Ongoing charges (including performance fees crystallised during the period)* | 0.8% | 0.8% |
# Source – Morningstar.
^ Benchmark – MSCI World Health Care Index on a net total return, sterling adjusted basis (see Glossary).
* Alternative Performance Measure. Leverage calculated under the Commitment Method (see Glossary).
1 Comparative figures restated to reflect the ten for one share split during the period.
STATEMENT FROM THE CHAIR
DOUG MCCUTCHEON
PERFORMANCE
The first half of the Company’s financial year was a volatile period for markets, and the Company was not immune to this. External events continued to exert their influence, with geopolitics and macroeconomic conditions at the forefront of investors’ minds. The MSCI World and the FTSE All-Share Indices produced sterling based total returns of +4.5% and +1.4%, respectively. The Company’s Benchmark, the MSCI World Healthcare Index, measured on a net total return, sterling adjusted basis rose by 0.8%.
Against this backdrop, the Company’s net asset value per share total return was -0.6%, underperforming the Benchmark during the period. The Company’s share price total return was slightly better at +0.1%, which reflected a narrowing of the discount of the Company’s share price to its net asset value per share to 8.8% at the end of the half year (from 9.3% at the beginning). During the period, in absolute terms, net asset value performance was helped by the weakness of sterling, as sterling depreciated by 1.3% against the U.S. dollar, the currency in which the majority of the Company’s investments are denominated.
The Company’s investment performance has been disappointing in recent periods. The Board continues to monitor our performance closely and will further report on it in the full year results.
Looking at specific names in the portfolio, the largest contributions during the reporting period came from the large capitalisation pharmaceutical companies Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, both of which benefitted from their exposure to the rapidly growing GLP-1 agonist anti-obesity therapy market. The principal detractors from performance were the large capitalisation pharmaceutical company Bristol Myers Squibb and biotechnology company UniQure. Further information regarding the Company’s investments and performance can be found in the Review of Investments.
The Company had, on average, leverage of 14.7% during the period, which detracted 0.1% from performance. As at the half year-end, leverage stood at 14.6%, compared to 10.5% at the beginning of the period. Our Portfolio Manager continues to adopt both a pragmatic and a tactical approach to the use of leverage, which adds to performance in periods of rising portfolio share prices and has benefitted the Company over time.
The Company is able to invest up to 10% of the portfolio, at the time of acquisition, in unquoted securities. Our Portfolio Manager, through its extensive private equity research capabilities, continues to identify unquoted opportunities although, in the period under review, no new unquoted investments were made. Exposure to unquoted equities accounted for 6.5% of the total portfolio at the half year-end, and these holdings made a negative contribution of -0.3% to the Company’s performance during the period under review.
SHARE SPLIT
In the Company’s annual report published on 6 June 2023, the Board set out its plans to undertake a share split of each of the Company’s shares of 25p each into 10 shares of 2.5p each. The share split proposal was approved by shareholders at the Company’s Annual General Meeting held on 18 July 2023 and the new shares began trading on 27 July 2023. For every share held immediately prior to the transaction, shareholders received nine additional shares. Shareholders should note that the split did not affect the value of your investment in the Company, nor your shareholder rights.
PERFORMANCE FEE
No performance fee was accrued as at 30 September 2023 and no performance fee can become payable within the next year. The performance fee arrangements are described in detail in the Company’s Annual Report.
CAPITAL
Challenging stock market conditions and investor sentiment since the beginning of 2022 have continued to have a negative impact on share price discounts across the investment company sector, with the average level of discount currently standing at c.15.2%*.
* Source: Winterflood Investment Trusts
It is the Board’s policy to buy back our shares if the Company’s share price discount to the net asset value per share exceeds 6% on an ongoing basis. Shareholders should note, however, that it remains possible for the discount to be greater than 6%, particularly when sentiment towards the Company, the sector and to investment trusts generally remains poor. In such an environment, buybacks may prove unable to prevent the discount from widening. However, they enhance the net asset value per share for remaining shareholders and go some way to dampening discount volatility, which can adversely affect investors’ risk adjusted returns. Therefore, the Company’s share buy-back policy remains unchanged.
During the period under review, the Company regularly repurchased shares. A total of 42,028,574 shares were repurchased for treasury at a cost of £133.4m and at an average discount of 9.3%. The total number of shares shown to have been repurchased during the period has been adjusted to reflect the share split which took effect from 27 July 2023.
At the period end, there were 584,179,056 shares in issue (excluding the 17,486,144 shares held in treasury). Since the period end to 21 November 2023, a further 11,923,082 shares have been bought back for treasury, at a cost of £35.8m and at the time of writing, the share price discount stands at 10.7%.
In line with the Company’s stated policy, I confirm that 4,892,258 shares held in treasury following the date of the Company’s Annual General Meeting in July 2022, were cancelled. The cancellation took place prior to the share split. The Company currently holds 29,409,226 shares in treasury.
DIVIDENDS
The Board has declared an interim dividend of 0.7p per share, for the year to 31 March 2024, which will be payable on 11 January 2024 to shareholders on the register of members on 24 November 2023. The associated ex dividend date is 23 November 2023. Last year the Company paid an interim dividend of 7.0p per share. The level of this year’s interim dividend per share is the same level as last year taking account of the share split which became effective on 27 July 2023.
I remind shareholders that it remains the Company’s policy to pay out dividends at least to the extent required to maintain investment trust status. These dividend payments are paid out of the Company’s net revenue for the year and, in accordance with investment trust rules, a maximum of 15% of income can be retained by the Company in any financial year.
It is the Board’s continuing belief that it is in shareholders’ best interests to see the Company’s capital deployed in its investment portfolio rather than paid out as dividends to achieve a particular target yield.
COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD
Having joined the Company’s Board in 2016, Humphrey van der Klugt has expressed his intention to retire as a Director at the conclusion of next year’s Annual General Meeting, to be held on 10 July 2024. Humphrey became Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee in September 2016, handing over this role to Tim Livett in March of this year. Humphrey’s accounting and investment management experience, as well as his leadership, wisdom and probing questions, have been very valuable to the Board’s deliberations - he will be missed. The process of finding a new Director has begun and the Board will keep shareholders informed of the progress made.
OUTLOOK
Macroeconomic conditions continue to be difficult. Against a backdrop of high interest rates and volatile markets, equity investment remains challenging. This includes investing in the healthcare sector. However, the fundamentals of the healthcare sector remain strong.
As our Portfolio Manager sets out in their report, they are positive about the outlook for the healthcare sector. At some point, investment fundamentals will again reassert themselves over the macro environment. Our Portfolio Manager expects the currently elevated level of merger and acquisition activity to continue, supported by attractive valuations, healthy balance sheets and, within the larger pharmaceutical and biotechnology sub-sectors, a need to address future patent expirations. In addition, the pace of scientific and technological development within the healthcare sector more broadly will remain unchecked, with clinical and technological catalysts providing a regular flow of significant share price moving events.
As an indication of the continued strong demand for healthcare investment opportunities amongst professional investors, it is encouraging that in recent weeks our Portfolio Manager has been successful in raising three new funds totalling in excess of U.S$4.3bn to invest in venture capital, royalties and Asian healthcare companies.
Doug McCutcheon
Chair
22 November 2023
PORTFOLIO
AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2023
Market value | % of | |||
Investments | Sector | Country | £’000 | investments |
Novo Nordisk | Pharmaceuticals | Denmark | 133,917 | 6.3 |
AstraZeneca | Pharmaceuticals | Britain | 124,043 | 5.9 |
Boston Scientific | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | United States | 111,522 | 5.3 |
Humana | Health Care Providers & Services | United States | 103,638 | 4.9 |
Intuitive Surgical | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | United States | 93,422 | 4.4 |
Merck | Pharmaceuticals | United States | 72,989 | 3.4 |
Eli Lilly | Pharmaceuticals | United States | 71,276 | 3.4 |
BioMarin Pharmaceutical | Biotechnology | United States | 70,085 | 3.3 |
Daiichi Sankyo | Pharmaceuticals | Japan | 70,032 | 3.3 |
Sanofi | Pharmaceuticals | France | 69,665 | 3.3 |
Top 10 investments | 920,588 | 43.4 | ||
Roche | Pharmaceuticals | Switzerland | 66,336 | 3.1 |
Eisai | Pharmaceuticals | Japan | 60,173 | 2.8 |
Biogen | Biotechnology | United States | 59,855 | 2.8 |
Tenet Healthcare | Health Care Providers & Services | United States | 51,933 | 2.4 |
Stryker | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | United States | 49,959 | 2.4 |
Baxter International | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | United States | 48,558 | 2.3 |
Thermo Fisher Scientific | Life Sciences Tools & Services | United States | 46,882 | 2.2 |
Ionis Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | United States | 46,721 | 2.2 |
Caris Life Sciences* | Life Sciences Tools & Services | United States | 45,531 | 2.1 |
Evolent Health | Health Care Providers & Services | United States | 44,400 | 2.1 |
Top 20 investments | 1,440,937 | 68.0 | ||
Mirati Therapeutics | Biotechnology | United States | 43,372 | 2.0 |
United Therapeutics | Biotechnology | United States | 41,366 | 2.0 |
Cigna Group | Health Care Providers & Services | United States | 39,846 | 1.9 |
Sarepta Therapeutics | Biotechnology | United States | 31,865 | 1.5 |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | United States | 31,624 | 1.5 |
AbbVie | Pharmaceuticals | United States | 31,150 | 1.5 |
R1 RCM | Health Care Providers & Services | United States | 31,052 | 1.5 |
Neurocrine Biosciences | Biotechnology | United States | 30,173 | 1.4 |
UnitedHealth | Health Care Providers & Services | United States | 28,919 | 1.4 |
SI-BONE | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | United States | 26,138 | 1.2 |
Top 30 investments | 1,776,443 | 83.8 | ||
Apellis Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | United States | 24,767 | 1.2 |
Natera | Life Sciences Tools & Services | United States | 23,398 | 1.1 |
GSK | Pharmaceuticals | Britain | 22,869 | 1.1 |
Shanghai Kindly Medical Instruments | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | China | 21,364 | 1.0 |
ICON | Life Sciences Tools & Services | United States | 20,960 | 1.0 |
WuXi AppTec | Life Sciences Tools & Services | China | 20,434 | 1.0 |
Vaxcyte | Biotechnology | United States | 20,025 | 0.9 |
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | United States | 19,384 | 0.9 |
Crossover Health* | Health Care Providers & Services | United States | 17,407 | 0.8 |
New Horizon Health | Life Sciences Tools & Services | China | 15,300 | 0.7 |
Top 40 investments | 1,982,351 | 93.5 | ||
Beijing Yuanxin Technology* | Health Care Providers & Services | China | 15,207 | 0.7 |
EDDA Healthcare & Technology* | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | China | 14,838 | 0.7 |
Wuxi Biologics | Life Sciences Tools & Services | China | 14,072 | 0.7 |
VISEN Pharmaceuticals* | Biotechnology | China | 13,621 | 0.6 |
Jiangxi RiMAG* | Health Care Providers & Services | China | 11,692 | 0.6 |
Ruipeng Pet Group* | Health Care Providers & Services | China | 11,015 | 0.5 |
Iovance Biotherapeutics | Biotechnology | United States | 10,657 | 0.5 |
Xenon Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | Canada | 10,038 | 0.5 |
uniQure | Biotechnology | Netherlands | 7,410 | 0.3 |
Akero Therapeutics | Biotechnology | United States | 7,252 | 0.3 |
Top 50 investments | 2,098,155 | 99.0 | ||
MabPlex* | Health Care Providers & Services | China | 6,021 | 0.3 |
Innovent Biologics | Biotechnology | China | 5,962 | 0.3 |
Ikena Oncology | Biotechnology | United States | 5,769 | 0.3 |
Shanghai Bio-heart Biological Technology | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | China | 3,640 | 0.2 |
Dingdang Health Technology | Health Care Providers & Services | China | 2,658 | 0.1 |
API Holdings* | Health Care Providers & Services | India | 1,976 | 0.1 |
Passage Bio | Biotechnology | United States | 1,121 | 0.1 |
Peloton Therapeutics - Milestone* | Biotechnology | United States | 512 | 0.0 |
Total equities | 2,125,814 | 100.3 | ||
Equity Swaps | ||||
Healthcare M&A Target Swap | Basket Swaps | United States | 101,053 | 4.8 |
Catalyst Swap | Basket Swaps | United States | 12,736 | 0.6 |
Apollo Hospitals Enterprise | Health Care Providers & Services | India | 13,467 | 0.6 |
WuXi AppTec | Life Sciences Tools & Services | China | 18,543 | 0.9 |
Less: Gross exposure on financed swaps | (151,571) | (7.1) | ||
Total Equity Swaps | (5,772) | (0.3) | ||
Total investments including OTC Swaps | 2,120,042 | 100.0 |
* Unquoted holding.
SUMMARY
Market value | % of | |
Investments | £’000 | investments |
Listed Equities | 1,987,993 | 93.8 |
Unquoted Equities | 137,821 | 6.5 |
Equity Swaps | (5,772) | (0.3) |
Total of all investments | 2,120,042 | 100.0 |
PORTFOLIO MANAGER’S REVIEW
MARKETS
In the post-pandemic era, major macro factors have clearly been the largest influencers shaping global equity returns. Extreme inflationary pressures, the invasion of Ukraine, supply chain issues, and recessionary fears all helped push equity markets lower in 2022. So far in 2023, declining recessionary fears and a soft landing for the economy, despite continued upward pressure for interest rates, has the broad market rebounding. To note, the total returns in sterling terms for the MSCI World Index for the calendar year to the end of September was +11.6%, the S&P 500 was +12.0%, and the FTSE All-Share was +4.3% (source: Bloomberg).
However, 2023 has been difficult for healthcare stocks. In fact, relative performance versus the S&P has been the worst in over 20 years, with a -18% spread of share price underperformance for healthcare (in sterling terms) since the start of the calendar year. The primary issue – again – was macro in nature. Specifically, a recession did not materialise in 2023, the economy has been more robust than anticipated, and investors have chased growth, mostly in technology and communication stocks. Interest rates being “higher for longer” exacerbated this situation. This has neutralised the defensive aspects of healthcare stocks and marginalised absolute performance this year.
PERFORMANCE
For the period under review, the Company produced a net asset value total return of -0.6% whilst the share price total return was +0.1%. This performance lagged the Benchmark total return of +0.8% (MSCI World Healthcare Index). Multiple factors weighed on both absolute and relative performance.
First and foremost, absolute returns were impacted by a lagging healthcare sector, as discussed on the prior page. With a more robust-than-expected economy, healthcare share price returns were mostly flat to down in the period (save for large capitalisation stocks, up modestly on average). The macro impact on performance can better be identified by breaking down the six-month period into individual segments. The only segment where healthcare stocks enjoyed a respite from the macro overhangs was predominantly in April and May 2023. During this period, the fate of the economy was still being debated and markets were stable and moved higher as did healthcare stocks. Stock picking mattered, positive catalysts were rewarded, and the Company’s performance was strong at over a 7% return, more than 5% ahead of the Benchmark.
However, the macro environment reversed at the end of May and into June and July. Investor confidence in the economy inflected, technology stocks rallied, and the S&P 500 hit an all-time high at the end of July. During this period, healthcare stocks lagged materially, fundamentals of the sector were muted, and catalysts were punished. Biotechnology stocks were particularly out-of-favour, indiscriminately falling nearly 15% (in U.S.$ terms). This was reflected in the Company’s absolute and relative performance.
The final two-months of the period were a mix of both macro and fundamental influences. On the macro front, a downgrade of the U.S. credit rating and messaging that interest rates would be “higher for longer” paused the broad market rally. Fundamentally, interest in healthcare stocks re-ignited with the better-than-expected disclosure of the cardiovascular benefits of Novo Nordisk’s weight-loss drug, Wegovy (semaglutide), in August, although it was partially offset by a sell-off in medical technology stocks as a result.
In the six-month period, the largest contribution came from investments in large capitalisation pharmaceutical stocks, most notably Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. The phenomenon that the “obesity drugs” have become is real, given the outstanding weight loss efficacy and now the objective disclosure that these drugs can significantly lower the possibility of overweight patients experiencing heart attack, stroke, or death due to a cardiovascular event. This buoyed investor (and patient) enthusiasm and share prices reflected this accordingly. On a relative basis, attribution from large capitalisation pharmaceutical stocks was modestly negative due to allocation, as this sector remains a strategic underweight in the portfolio.
Another important source of contribution came from medical technology stocks in the period. A number of fundamental tailwinds attracted investor flows, including increased procedural volumes due to a clear inflection in demand and utilisation of healthcare services (post the pandemic), a positive pricing environment, and easy year-over-year comparisons. Relative contribution was even more impressive given positive stock picking in the period. Total contribution was partially clipped after the cardiovascular benefit of the aforementioned weight loss drugs was disclosed, as investors feared lowered future demand from the medical technology industry and much of the sector sold off.
The Company’s net underperformance was primarily due to allocation in biotechnology stocks, particularly small and mid-capitalisation biotechnology. This sub-sector was down by 3% (in sterling total return terms) in the reported period and down 13% in the calendar year (as measured by the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI)). The sub-sector continued to be out of favour with investors, especially in this prolonged high interest rate environment. In fact, the performance of the XBI made new records as it continued its drawdown, now the longest ever at over 31 months since the peak and the largest as well, now -76% relative to the S&P (as of 29 September 2023). The negative contribution from biotechnology was partially exacerbated by stock picking, with some notable idiosyncratic negative catalysts that occurred during the six-month period.
Another sub-sector of import that contributed to the negative performance was the investment in Japanese pharmaceutical stocks, predominantly due to stock picking. Also of note were unquoted (private) holdings which detracted 0.3%.
UNQUOTED HOLDINGS
During the half year, the Company strategically refrained from making new investments in unquoted (private) companies, as we continued to cautiously navigate the challenging public offering market for small and mid-capitalisation therapeutic firms. The capital market funding landscape has been improving and we are optimistic about the ability of some of our unquoted investments to achieve listings within the next year.
As of the half year end, unquoted company investments made up 6.5% of the Company’s portfolio, a slight decrease from 6.7% on 31 March 2023. The existing unquoted portfolio demonstrates a diverse and forward-looking approach. Geographically, exposure is evenly distributed among emerging markets and North American companies. On a sub-sector basis, the exposure is concentrated in services and life science tools, with small exposures to biotechnology and medical technology.
During the period under review, the Company’s unquoted investments returned a loss of £7.3 million, from an opening market value of £145.2 million across 11 positions, an implied return of -5.1% which detracted -0.3% from performance. Unfortunately, this negative return was exclusively driven by a single investment in India, API Holdings (better known as PharmEasy), that experienced a material write-down in its valuation. The company was compelled to accept a capital infusion at a distressed valuation after a planned IPO was delayed due to adverse market conditions, leading to a funding shortfall, including a potential breach of a debt covenant. Otherwise, eight out of 11 investments posted small positive returns in the period, including North American unquoted holdings returning a gain of £4.3 million. Given the emerging positive trends in the market and our strategic approach, we remain confident in the future performance of our unquoted investments.
Overall, we remain proud of performance since inception over 28-plus years. Since its inception as of 28 April 1995, the Company’s net asset value has posted a +4,189% return, a 42x multiple for an average of +14.1% per annum through to the end of the half year. This compares to a benchmark return of +2,206% and +11.7% per annum over the same investment horizon, and a FTSE All Share Index return of +588% and +7.5%.
MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS TO PERFORMANCE
The pursuit of innovation is a longtime hallmark of the Company. In 2023, the cardiometabolic therapeutic category reached a new level of innovation with semaglutide, a best-in-class “GLP-1” agonist approved for the treatment of diabetes (Ozempic) and obesity (Wegovy), a medication from the leader in this space, Novo Nordisk. Whilst Ozempic was first approved in 2017, and reformulated as Wegovy in 2021, landmark data was announced in August 2023, in the form of the “SELECT” trial. This was a global study in nearly 18,000 patients over five years that unequivocally showed a -20% drop in the risk of an obese patient suffering a “MACE” event (heart attack, stroke, or cardiovascular related death) by taking a once-weekly injection of Wegovy. This data surpassed all investor expectations and moved this drug from a lifestyle intervention into a chronic care medicine that can prolong a patient’s life. So far, the demand for Wegovy in the U.S. has been insatiable, and the company is literally selling everything they can make. Despite the supply constraints, sales of the semaglutide franchise are annualising at U.S.$10 billion per annum. These sales could reach U.S.$50 billion or more, as the company is developing the drug in a host of additional indications, including heart failure, fatty liver disease, sleep apnea, kidney disease, peripheral arterial disease, and even Alzheimer’s disease. With additional manufacturing coming online into 2024, we expect a potential doubling of Wegovy sales next year. In the nine months to 29 September 2023, the stock appreciated nearly 40% (in local currency terms) to become the largest company in Europe by market capitalisation (source: Bloomberg).
Another top contributor in 2023, also an undisputed leader in innovation, is Eli Lilly. The U.S.-based pharmaceutical company, like Novo Nordisk, has a long history in the diabetes and GLP-1 space. The company’s most recent offering is Mounjaro (tirzepatide), a dual GLP-1 and “GIP” agonist. Whilst approved for diabetes in 2022, the company presented additional data in obesity in 2023, showing weight loss eclipsing 20% and even approaching 25% in some cases. This dual-agonist therapy has pushed weight loss to new levels and the company benefitted materially from the SELECT trial, with investors (and the company) assuming that “more is better”: the cardiovascular benefits shown by Wegovy should extend to Mounjaro, if not moreso, given the superior weight loss profile. Sales of Mounjaro have already reached U.S.$1 billion per quarter, with the obesity indication still pending approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by year-end.
Another driver of share price in 2023 for Eli Lilly was their efforts in Alzheimer’s disease. Specifically, the company announced in May that their antibody for removing amyloid plaque from the brain (donenemab) significantly slowed cognitive and functional decline in a phase III study in early Alzheimer’s disease patients by 35%. This was an impressive result, becoming only the second molecule to demonstrate disease modifying effects. The drug is still pending approval by the FDA by year end. During the period under review, the stock appreciated over 50% (in U.S.$ terms) to become one of the ten largest companies in the world by market capitalisation (source: Bloomberg).
One of the true pioneers of robotic-assisted surgery is Intuitive Surgical, a medical equipment company based in California that developed the da Vinci Surgical System – a combination of software, hardware, and optics that allows doctors to perform robotically aided surgery from a remote console. In the quarter proceeding the current financial year, the company’s share price came under pressure due to concerns around a slowdown in the hospital capital equipment spending cycle and a delay to their next generation surgical robot. However, in the reported period, the company drove a material inflection in procedure volume growth rates given a combination of rebounding U.S. surgical volumes, further adoption of Intuitive technology in international markets such as China, and uptake of new robotic instruments that allow for new procedure indication expansion. Moreover, elevated procedure volumes led to increased robotic system purchases as hospitals become capacity constrained and needed to add new robots. Looking forward, the combination of heightened research & development levels over the past several years and historical system launch timelines suggest the company is on the verge of another new system launch, an event that would be a strong catalyst for their shares.
Mirati Therapeutics is a clinical stage precision oncology company located in San Diego, California. The company’s lead asset, adagrasib (MRTX849), is an investigational, highly selective and potent oral small molecule inhibitor of KRAS, a critical target to treat KRAS-mutated cancers commonly found in lung, colorectal and pancreatic cancers. The development programme over the past three plus years has been mixed. However, in August of 2023, the company concurrently announced several updates, including the return of their well-regarded former CEO, positive clinical updates from two ongoing development programs focused on lung cancer, and a U.S.$345 million financing. Shares responded positively as these updates renewed investors’ interest in the company. We would also note that shortly after the reported period, Bristol-Myers Squibb announced its intention to acquire Mirati Therapeutics for an equity value of U.S.$4.5 billion and a total consideration of up to U.S.$5.8 billion, representing a 52% premium to the 30-day volume-weighted average price (VWAP) as of the unaffected 4 October 2023 close.
Ionis Pharmaceuticals is a leader in RNA-targeted therapeutics, with a focus on neuro, orphan, and cardiometabolic diseases. Its antisense platform works by binding and destroying a messenger RNA (mRNA) in a highly specific manner, such that the amount of disease-causing protein is significantly decreased. The technology can also be used to treat disease by increasing protein production; this led to the development of one the most successful medicines on the market today, Spinraza (nusinersen), for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The company has made tremendous progress in the last 12 months on both wholly owned and partnered programmes, creating significant value for shareholders. Late last year, the company reported positive Phase II data from open label extension study of donidalorsen, a key pipeline asset, in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE). The 95%+ reduction in HAE-attacks in the monthly dosing arm was unprecedented, suggesting its potential to be a new standard of care in HAE. In April, Ionis Pharmaceuticals together with Biogen, announced the approval of Qalsody (tofersen), marking a major scientific advance in treatment of a specific form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Following a very successful Phase 3 study in transthyretin polyneuropathy, we expect eplontersen (developed with partner AstraZeneca) to be approved on 22 December 2023. In September, the company announced positive olezarsen topline data from Phase III study in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS); impressively, the drug eradicated acute pancreatitis events versus placebo, making this another important medical breakthrough.
MAJOR DETRACTORS FROM PERFORMANCE
In Japan, Daiichi-Sankyo has emerged as the global leader in next generation antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Unlike conventional chemotherapy treatments, which can damage healthy cells, ADCs are a construct of a targeted medicine linked to chemotherapy agents that only attack cancer cells. Daiichi-Sankyo has created new breakthroughs in this technology that has led to new levels of efficacy and survival in cancer patients across a host of tumour types. Their first commercial offering, Enhertu (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki) has already achieved blockbuster status, becoming the new standard of care in metastatic breast cancer (with HER2+ expression). Hence, investor enthusiasm increased for their second ADC offering, Dato-DXd (datopotamab deruxtecan), and its role in treating lung cancer. Rising expectations pushed the stock to an all-time high in June 2023. However, a press release in July 2023, confirmed that the first Phase III trial for Dato-DXd in lung cancer met its primary endpoint of progression free survival, whilst the final overall survival metric was not yet reached. Coupled with equivocal qualitative language about clinical significance of this finding, plus potentially worse than expected safety, pushed the stock price lower, falling over 25% (local currency) from its high over the subsequent month. We believe this reaction was overdone due to a misinterpretation of the company’s press release. We held the stock in anticipation of further data disclosures.
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, or NASH, is a severe form of fatty liver disease, a condition in which the liver builds up excessive fat deposits. Over time, inflammation, fibrosis, and cirrhosis can occur, leading to liver failure. With few options to treat this deadly condition and a huge prevalence globally, the commercial opportunity is large. Madrigal Pharmaceuticals is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company based in Pennsylvania, pursuing novel therapeutics for the treatment of NASH. Their primary pipeline asset, resmetirom, is a thyroid hormone β-receptor agonist which is believed to play a role in liver health. It has shown promising data in late stage, pivotal trials for this disease. However, the emergence of data for the GLP-1 class of drugs (for the treatment of diabetes and obesity from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk) have shown significant ability to reduce liver fat accumulation, decrease inflammation, and prevent the progression of fibrosis in patients with NASH. This finding dramatically hurt investor sentiment for all NASH players, including Madrigal. Pharmaceuticals Share price declines were exacerbated by a change in the CEO chair and a subsequent financing, which removed the takeout premium in the stock.
Massachusetts-based Apellis Pharmaceuticals is developing treatments for diseases driven by overactivation of the “complement system”, a complex ecosystem of plasma proteins in the blood that work together to fight infection. The company has two commercial products which are different formulations of pegcetacoplan, an inhibitor of the complement protein “C3”. The first, Empaveli, a systemic formulation for the treatment of a rare blood disease called paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, a disease that involves the destruction of red blood cells and can present as anaemia, blood clots, bone marrow failure, and can be lethal. The second is Syfovre, an “in the eye” formulation for the treatment of an age-related macular degeneration called geographic atrophy (GA) which leads to blindness. Approved by the FDA in February 2023, Syfovre was the first marketed therapy for the treatment of GA. Apellis Pharmaceuticals shares rose in mid-2023 as the commercial launch of Syfovre was very successful with rapid adoption. However, in July 2023, shares fell sharply on an unexpected report of severe safety events, called retinal vasculitis, that worsened vision in a handful of patients following treatment with Syfovre. Nevertheless, sales of Syfovre have continued to increase quarter-over-quarter despite the risk of retinal vasculitis. We held the stock as we believe the share price overly discounted the risk of this rare adverse event compared to its important benefit.
The Netherlands-based gene therapy player, UniQure, is a clinical-stage company that focuses on neurological disorders. Gene therapy, whilst still somewhat nascent, represents an incredible leap in innovation that has curative properties. Thecompany’s lead asset is a novel gene therapy, AMT-130, for Huntington’s disease, an inherited disorder that causes cells in parts of the brain to gradually degenerate and die, progressively impacting a person’s functional abilities and results in movement, cognitive, and psychiatric disorders. However, in June 2023 the company provided a mixed interim update from its Phase I/II trial for AMT-130, which raised investor concern over target engagement of the gene therapy. That said, we were encouraged by the totality of the data, including the early indication of function benefit across multiple measures.
The global pharmaceutical company, Bristol-Myers Squibb, is well known for its leadership in oncology, with major cancer franchises in both immuno-oncology and multiple myeloma. However, both franchises are aged and have reached or are nearing expiration of exclusivity. With a declining topline, the company’s price-to-earnings multiple has compressed to below 10x, creating the most heavily discounted stock in the large cap pharmaceutical space. However, this “value play” turned into a “value trap” in 2023. The company has had one of the most productive pipelines in the industry over the past three years, with new approvals in immunology, haematology, oncology, and cardiovascular disease. However, commercial execution of the many new product launches has underwhelmed, and a top line renaissance has so far failed to materialise. The share price has subsequently fallen further as has the multiple. We exited the stock during the period but will look to revisit the investment opportunity in 2024 where perhaps utilisation and reimbursement of their new drug portfolio may inflect.
DERIVATIVE STRATEGY
The Company has the ability to utilise equity swaps and options as part of its financial strategy. Throughout the financial year, the Company leveraged single stock equity swaps to access Chinese and Indian investments in emerging markets, which would otherwise be inaccessible through more traditional investment methods. During the period under review, single stock equity swaps contributed £7.1 million to performance, and we remain confident in the long-term prospects of emerging market securities, particularly those trading locally in mainland China.
Additionally, the Company strategically invested in two customised tactical basket swaps, targeting growth opportunities in undervalued small and mid-capitalisation therapeutic companies. These baskets were constructed to capitalise on two prevailing themes that we anticipate will deliver strong returns in the current financial year: 1) investment opportunities possessing considerable potential as attractive acquisition targets for larger corporations, and 2) those exhibiting a favourable risk/reward profile in light of upcoming clinical catalysts.
During the period under review, the basket swaps detracted £8.0 million from performance, primarily due to their direct exposure within the emerging biotechnology space, which remained under pressure.
LEVERAGE STRATEGY
Historically, the typical leverage level employed by the Company has been in the mid-to-high teens range. Considering the market volatility during the past three plus financial years, we have, more recently, used leverage in a more tactical fashion. For example, around the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 after the dramatic “V”-shape market recovery of April 2020, leverage was significantly reduced by over 10% month-over-month, to 3% and ultimately to 1% in May 2020. Another example includes lowered leverage ahead of and into the U.S. Presidential election, under the threat of a Democratic “sweep” of the U.S, Congress.
In 2023, we have flexed leverage modestly in response to the economic climate, including in consideration of a putative recession and interest rate fluctuations and speculation. Most recently, we increased leverage back into the low-to-mid-teens, a reflection of our overall bullishness on the portfolio, a hopeful turn in biotechnology stocks, and the relative outlook for healthcare ahead of a potential recession. One caveat that keeps us from extending leverage even further, is the continued volatile and uncertain macro backdrop, either economic in nature or even further geopolitical risk factors.
SECTOR DEVELOPMENTS
The plethora of innovation that underpins our positive investment stance in healthcare has certainly continued in 2023. Whilst not a perfect scorecard, the number of new drug approvals by the FDA in 2023 is once again at a record pace. With 51 new drug approvals through the end of September and at least another 14 novel applications with user fee deadlines by the end of the year (source: Washington Analysis), the potential to eclipse recent highs is almost a certainty in 2023.
Interestingly, the contribution of new vaccines, cell therapy, and gene therapy to the new product approvals (from the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research – CBER) has clearly inflected over the past three plus years, representing a paradigm shift in technological advancement of novel medications and platforms. Over the past three and a half years, there have been 31 approvals compared to eight in the previous four years – yet another key metric in the accelerating innovation engine in bio-pharmaceuticals. Moreover, after a down year in 2022, the past six plus years have been the most productive in industry history, with nearly 350 new product approvals during that span.
Despite a continued – if not accelerated – innovation stemming from the biotechnology industry, valuations have lagged in historical fashion. According to the annual IQVIA audit of therapeutic company pipelines, the number of clinical assets in development has increased more than 70% since 2016 across more than15 categories. We note that these numbers exclude COVID-related programs. This has pushed the cumulative number of product pipelines in the industry to all-time highs.
Of this incredible productivity, we note that effectively two-thirds of this innovation comes from emerging biotechnology companies, which represent a core holding in the portfolio and have been a strategic investment target of ours, historically. However, in this more recent macro-driven environment, the industry has not been rewarded and valuations are so depressed, that the net return of the XBI is below June 2015 levels by 12%, compared to returns of the healthcare sector of 80%; the S&P 500 which returned 142%; and the NASDAQ which returned 189% over this same period. We expect this valuation gap to close.
Specific examples of innovation are plentiful. In 2022, we focused on some specific development opportunities that we believed could deliver “The Next Big Thing” in healthcare, including oncology, obesity, and Alzheimer’s disease. In 2023, the industry delivered.
First in oncology, the leaders in antibody drug conjugate (ADC) technology, Daiichi-Sankyo (and partner AstraZeneca), have achieved blockbuster status with Enhertu (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki), the breast cancer drug for patients with metastatic disease who express any level of the protein called HER2+. Data for the company’s latest ADC offerings, Dato-DXd and HER3-DXd, were also presented in the period and we expect regulatory filings as soon as this year.
In immuno-oncology, Roche (unintentionally) disclosed data for their next generation agent, tiragolumab (an anti-TIGIT agent), showing a 20% benefit on top of the standard of care in progression free survival in lung cancer patients. We are eagerly awaiting more mature data sets in this setting in 2024. AstraZeneca also announced two critically important data sets for their best-in-class targeted therapy Tagrisso (Osimertinib), which is used to treat lung cancer patients with a specific EGFR mutation. These data sets included usage in early stages of the disease (showed a 51% reduction in death) and in combination with chemotherapy (38% reduction in progression free survival or death) compared to simply taking Tagrisso alone. These new indications for Tagrisso will put upward pressure on sales estimates and/or aid in fending off incoming competition.
Without question, obesity has become the “hot” space in therapeutics in 2023. The advancement of the GLP-1 drugs beyond diabetes and into weight loss has caught the attention of investors and the public alike. In 2023, we learned of best-in-class weight loss, at more than 20%, for Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro (tirzepatide) in obese patients. We expect Eli Lilly to launch tirzepatide for obesity early in 2024. Not to be outdone, Novo Nordisk confirmed unprecedented cardiovascular benefit of Wegovy (semaglutide) in obese patients in a five-year landmark trial called SELECT. Competition rushing to this space has been significant, but 2023 also demonstrated the stranglehold that both Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk have here.
The opportunity for GLP-1 drugs is immense, and it does not stop with just diabetes and weight loss. Rather, the impact of these “incretins” may have beneficial effects across multiple organs and disease states. The list of conditions and co-morbidities, for example, that Novo Nordisk is pursuing includes heart failure, kidney disease, sleep apnea, peripheral arterial disease, and even Alzheimer’s disease. Phase III data is already presented or in-house at the company for heart failure and kidney failure. We look forward to additional data sets from both Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly for years to come.
Finally, a word on Alzheimer’s disease. We have previously described this category as the “Holy Grail” of new drug development, owing to the huge unmet medical need, large global prevalence, and potential for lucrative price flexibility. Whilst now overshadowed by the obesity category, Alzheimer’s disease still represents a huge opportunity with mega-blockbuster prospects, where individual medicines could reach over U.S.$10 billion per product per annum. 2023 bore witness to the first ever full FDA approval for a novel, disease modifying drug, in this case, Leqembi (lecanemab) from Eisai of Japan and their U.S. partner, Biogen. The drug launched in March 2023 and we await key sales milestone in 2024 and beyond.
Eli Lilly was the second company to announce positive Phase III data for yet another disease modifying agent, donanemab, for Alzheimer’s disease. Acting on the same target, beta-amyloid, as Leqembi, donanemab may be more efficacious at slowing cognitive decline but perhaps with some increased side effect concerns (transient brain swelling). The company expects approval before the end of 2023. We expect a meaningful launch in 2024.
Another key investment theme we have been monitoring is the pace of mergers and acquisitions in the therapeutics space, fuelled by distressed biotechnology valuations, and a looming wave of drug patent expirations for the large cap pharmaceutical companies. This has created a very positive environment for deal making as high interest and a quiet initial public offering market has created some barriers to access for capital. 2023 is on pace for a record year, with 21 deals so far in the financial year, including four deals alone in the first three weeks of October. We certainly expect the number of transactions this year to eclipse the previous financial year (29) with total deal value potentially surpassing U.S.$100 billion.
A new emerging regulatory theme is a more activist Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), which has increasingly opposed mergers & acquisitions. Within healthcare, the FTC has opposed the Amgen/Horizon Therapeutics acquisition and is reviewing the Pfizer/Seagen transaction. In some cases, the FTC is relying on novel and unproven theories, for example that a merger could hamper innovation and slow the pace of drug development. Our focus (and a key return driver) is on smaller biotechnology companies that are acquired by larger pharmaceutical companies, transactions that remain largely uncontested by the FTC. That said, in September 2023 the FTC relented and has allowed the Horizon transaction to move forward to completion. The Seagen acquisition appears to have been less acrimonious and we expect that to also conclude favourably before the end of the year.
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 has further advanced in 2023, with the most recent development being the disclosure by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) its list of 10 drugs up for the first price negotiations under the IRA. The list contained a mix of expected drugs, such as Eliquis and Xarelto for cardiovascular disease, and unexpected drugs, like Jardiance, Farxiga, and Fiasp for diabetes. We conclude that it was mostly benign. The majority of drugs are facing imminent patent expirations and or generics anyhow, including Eliquis, Xarelto, Januvia, Entresto, Enbrel, Imbruvica, Farxiga, and Stelara. This blunts much of the impact that a lower Medicare price will bring to the financials of these companies. As we have postulated before, the net impact of the IRA is negative, but mostly manageable by the industry. That said, the mix of drugs listed for the first cycle of negotiation does raise some questions, including: How were they selected by CMS? How were total sales calculated? Were there any political motivations? Were new formulations protected? Some of these answers may become more transparent in 2024.
The industry is not accepting the immediate consequences of the IRA. We note that several companies have sued the Biden administration on the IRA including Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Boehringer Ingelheim. In addition, the lobby group Pharmaceutical Research Manufactures of America and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sued as well. We do note that Astellas withdrew their suit after their cancer drug, Xtandi, unexpectedly did not make the list.
There are a host of arguments that are being made by the industry that are questioning the constitutionality of IRA, whilst AstraZeneca has claimed the IRA contravenes the Orphan Drug Act. Tactically, the industry is taking a “shots on goal” approach. In other words, any judge from any district from any court in any of these cases could rule in favour of the industry on any argument. Even a SINGLE ruling against the government could halt the drug price negotiations portion of the IRA. Ultimately the Supreme Court will have the final say. We do not expect these legal proceedings to result in any near-term victory by the industry, and any potential preliminary injunction, whilst possible, would be an upside surprise. Nevertheless, this accumulation of legal proceedings allows the industry to maintain optionality to quash price negotiations anytime ahead of the 2026 enactment of the drug price negotiation clause of the IRA.
OUTLOOK
Whilst the investment backdrop for healthcare has been challenging, the state of the industry is strong. The long-term growth potential of healthcare remains, underpinned by global demographics, aging populations, and constant, persistent demand. Innovation, the true hallmark of the Company, continues to advance in unparalleled fashion. Innovation is not just in the domain of biotechnology, but across therapeutics, medical technology, patient services, analytics, and platform technologies. Together, they are improving patient care, advancing medical knowledge, and creating new medicines, with many that now can offer a cure. The productivity in the therapeutics space continues to be exceptional, with pipelines the fullest they have ever been, and the number of new drug approvals at all-time highs. The inflection in M&A in the space is just one testimony to this productivity, one that we believe will continue in 2024. We look forward to what next year brings, across the entirety of the healthcare spectrum, as the growth of this industry continues to create a multitude of exciting investment opportunities.
Sven H. Borho and Trevor M. Polischuk
OrbiMed Capital LLC
Portfolio Manager
22 November 2023
CONTRIBUTION BY INVESTMENT
PRINCIPAL STOCK CONTRIBUTORS TO AND DETRACTORS FROM ABSOLUTE NET ASSET VALUE PERFORMANCE
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2023
Contribution | ||||
Contribution | per share* | |||
Top Five Contributors | Sector | Country | £’000 | p |
Novo Nordisk | Pharmaceuticals | Denmark | 27,228 | 4.5 |
Eli Lilly | Pharmaceuticals | United States | 26,553 | 4.4 |
Intuitive Surgical | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | United States | 19,329 | 3.2 |
Mirati Therapeutics | Biotechnology | United States | 10,817 | 1.8 |
Ionis Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | United States | 10,348 | 1.7 |
Top Five Detractors | ||||
Bristol-Myers Squibb ** | Pharmaceuticals | United States | 12,246 | (2.0) |
UniQure | Biotechnology | Netherlands | 14,545 | (2.4) |
Apellis Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | United States | 14,617 | (2.4) |
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | United States | 14,797 | (2.4) |
Daiichi Sankyo | Pharmaceuticals | Japan | 17,996 | (3.0) |
* Based on 606,004,086 shares being the weighted average number in issue during the period.
** Not held at 30 September 2023.
INTERIM MANAGEMENT REPORT
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The Directors continue to review the Company’s key risk register, which identifies the risks and uncertainties that the Company is exposed to, and the controls in place and the actions being taken to mitigate them.
A review of the half year and the outlook for the Company can be found in the Chair of the Board’s Statement and the Portfolio Manager’s Review. The principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Company include the following:
Further information on these risks is given in the Annual Report for the year ended 31 March 2023. The Board has noted that global markets are continuing to experience unusually high levels of uncertainty and heightened geopolitical risks. Against a background of rising interest rates and slowing economic growth, risks associated with leverage and illiquid assets, especially in combination, have become more elevated. The Board has investment guidelines in place to mitigate these risks.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the first six months of the current financial year no material transactions with related parties have taken place which have affected the financial position or the performance of the Company during the period.
GOING CONCERN
The Directors believe, having considered the Company’s investment objectives, risk management policies, capital management policies and procedures, the nature of the portfolio and expenditure projections, that the Company has adequate resources, an appropriate financial structure and suitable management arrangements in place to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and, more specifically, that there are no material uncertainties relating to the Company that would prevent its ability to continue in such operational existence for at least 12 months from the date of the approval of this half yearly financial report. For these reasons, they consider there is reasonable evidence to continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts. In reviewing the position as at the date of this report, the Board has considered the guidance issued by the Financial Reporting Council.
As part of their assessment, the Directors have given careful consideration to the next continuation vote to be held in 2024. As previously reported, stress testing was carried out in May 2023, which modelled the effects of substantial falls in markets and significant reductions in market liquidity, on the Company’s net asset value, its cash flows and its expenses.
DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
The Board of Directors confirms that, to the best of its knowledge:
The Half Year Report has not been reviewed or audited by the Company’s auditors.
This Half Year Report contains certain forward-looking statements. These statements are made by the Directors in good faith based on the information available to them up to the date of this report and such statements should be treated with caution due to the inherent uncertainties, including both economic and business risk factors, underlying any such forward-looking information.
For and on behalf of the Board
Doug McCutcheon
Chair
22 November 2023
INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2023
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||
Six months ended | Six months ended | |||||
30 September 2023 | 30 September 2022 | |||||
Revenue | Capital | Revenue | Capital | |||
Return | Return | Total | Return | Return | Total | |
£’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | |
(Losses)/Gains on investments | – | (11,111) | (11,111) | – | 82,697 | 82,697 |
Foreign exchange losses | – | (6,791) | (6,791) | – | (15,052) | (15,052) |
Income from investments (note 2) | 12,481 | – | 12,481 | 9,295 | – | 9,295 |
AIFM, portfolio management, and performance fees (note 3) | (411) | (7,803) | (8,214) | (444) | (8,430) | (8,874) |
Other expenses | (686) | – | (686) | (579) | (22) | (601) |
Net return/(loss) before finance charges and taxation | 11,384 | (25,705) | (14,321) | 8,272 | 59,193 | 67,465 |
Finance charges | (246) | (4,673) | (4,919) | (61) | (1,157) | (1,218) |
Net return/(loss) before finance | 11,138 | (30,378) | (19,240) | 8,211 | 58,036 | 66,247 |
Taxation | (1,486) | – | (1,486) | (323) | – | (323) |
Net return/(loss) after taxation | 9,652 | (30,378) | (20,726) | 7,888 | 58,036 | 65,924 |
Return/(loss) per share (note 4)* | 1.6p | (5.0)p | (3.4)p | 1.2p | 8.9p | 10.1p |
The “Total” column of this statement is the Income Statement of the Company. The “Revenue” and “Capital” columns are supplementary to this and are prepared under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies.
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations.
The Company has no recognised gains and losses other than those shown above and therefore no separate Statement of Total Comprehensive Income has been presented.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
* The comparative return per share figures have been restated to reflect the ten for one share split. For weighted average purposes, the share split has been treated as happening on the first day of the accounting periods.
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2023
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |
Six months ended | Six months ended | |
30 September | 30 September | |
2023 | 2022 | |
£’000 | £’000 | |
Opening shareholders’ funds | 2,150,721 | 2,268,233 |
Shares purchased for treasury | (133,365) | (36,086) |
(Loss)/Return for the period | (20,726) | 65,924 |
Dividends paid – revenue | (14,709) | (12,721) |
Closing shareholders’ funds | 1,981,921 | 2,285,350 |
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2023
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |
30 September | 31 March | |
2023 | 2023 | |
£’000 | £’000 | |
Fixed assets | ||
Investments | 2,125,814 | 2,186,417 |
Derivatives – OTC swaps | 5,499 | 209 |
2,131,313 | 2,186,626 | |
Current assets | ||
Debtors | 16,734 | 4,376 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 43,642 | 58,925 |
60,376 | 63,301 | |
Current liabilities | ||
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year | (198,497) | (72,105) |
Derivative – OTC Swaps | (11,271) | (27,101) |
(209,768) | (99,206) | |
Net current liabilities | (149,392) | (35,905) |
Total net assets | 1,981,921 | 2,150,721 |
Capital and reserves | ||
Ordinary share capital – (note 5) | 15,042 | 16,265 |
Capital redemption reserve | 9,564 | 8,341 |
Share premium account | 841,599 | 841,599 |
Capital reserve | 1,097,282 | 1,261,025 |
Revenue reserve | 18,434 | 23,491 |
Total shareholders’ funds | 1,981,921 | 2,150,721 |
Net asset value per share – (note 6)* | 339.3p | 343.5p |
* The comparative Net asset value per share figures have been restated to reflect the ten for one share split. See notes 5 and 6 for further details.
CASH FLOW STATEMENT
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2023
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||
Six months ended | Six months ended | ||
30 September | 30 September | ||
2023 | 2022 | ||
Note | £’000 | £’000 | |
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities | 8 | 5,174 | 3,678 |
Purchases of investments and derivatives | (554,711) | (460,385) | |
Sales of investments and derivatives | 560,892 | 580,399 | |
Realised losses on foreign exchange | (2,218) | (14,343) | |
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities | 3,963 | 105,671 | |
Issue of shares | – | – | |
Shares repurchased | (133,365) | (36,086) | |
Equity dividends paid | (14,709) | (12,721) | |
Interest paid | (4,919) | (1,218) | |
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities | (152,993) | (50,025) | |
Decrease/(increase) in net debt | (143,856) | 59,324 |
Cash flows from operating activities includes interest received of £1,885,000 (2022: £592,000) and dividends received of £10,135,000 (2022: £9,235,000).
RECONCILIATION OF NET CASH FLOW MOVEMENT TO MOVEMENT IN NET DEBT
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |
Six months ended | Six months ended | |
30 September | 30 September | |
2023 | 2022 | |
£’000 | £’000 | |
(Increase)/decrease in net debt resulting from cashflows | (143,856) | 59,324 |
Losses on foreign currency cash and cash equivalents | (4,574) | (709) |
Movement in net debt in the period | (148,430) | 58,615 |
Net debt at 1 April | 2,997 | (87,003) |
Net debt at 30 September | (145,433) | (28,388) |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The condensed Financial Statements for the six months to 30 September 2023 comprise the Income Statement, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Statement of Financial Position, the Cash Flow Statement and the Reconciliation of Net Cash Flow Movement to Movement in Net Debt together with the related notes below. They have been prepared in accordance with FRS 104 ‘Interim Financial Reporting’, the AIC’s Statement of Recommended Practice published in February 2021 (‘SORP’) and using the same accounting policies as set out in the Company’s Annual Report and Financial Statements at 31 March 2023.
GOING CONCERN
After making enquiries, and having reviewed the Investments, Statement of Financial Position and projected income and expenditure for the next 12 months, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operation for the foreseeable future. The Directors have therefore adopted the going concern basis in preparing these condensed financial statements.
FAIR VALUE
Under FRS 102 and FRS 104 investments have been classified using the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets
Level 2 – Prices of a recent transaction for identical instruments
Level 3 – Valuation techniques that use:
(i) observable market data; or
(ii) non-observable data
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||
AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2023 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | |
Investments held at fair value through profit or loss | 1,987,993 | – | 137,821 | 2,125,814 | |
Derivatives: OTC swaps (assets) | – | 5,499 | – | 5,499 | |
Derivatives: OTC swaps (liabilities) | – | (11,271) | – | (11,271) | |
Financial instruments measured at fair value | 1,987,993 | (5,772) | 137,821 | 2,120,042 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||
AS AT 31 MARCH 2023 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | |
Investments held at fair value through profit or loss | 2,041,247 | – | 145,170 | 2,186,417 | |
Derivatives: OTC swaps (assets) | – | 209 | – | 209 | |
Derivatives: OTC swaps (liabilities) | – | (27,101) | – | (27,101) | |
Financial instruments measured at fair value | 2,041,247 | (26,892) | 145,170 | 2,159,525 |
2. INCOME
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |
Six months ended | Six months ended | |
30 September | 30 September | |
2023 | 2022 | |
£’000 | £’000 | |
Investment income | 10,596 | 8,713 |
Interest Income | 1,885 | 582 |
Total | 12,481 | 9,295 |
3. AIFM, PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE FEES
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||
Six months ended | Six months ended | |||||
30 September 2023 | 30 September 2022 | |||||
Revenue | Capital | Total | Revenue | Capital | Total | |
£’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | |
AIFM fee | 72 | 1,369 | 1,441 | 76 | 1,444 | 1,520 |
Portfolio management fee | 339 | 6,434 | 6,773 | 368 | 6,986 | 7,354 |
Performance fee charge for the period* | – | – | – | – | – | – |
411 | 7,803 | 8,214 | 444 | 8,430 | 8,874 |
As at 30 September 2023 no performance fees were accrued or payable (31 March 2023: nil accrued).
No performance fee could become payable by 30 September 2024.
See Glossary for further information on the performance fee.
4. RETURN/(LOSS) PER SHARE
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |
Six months ended | Six months ended | |
30 September | 30 September | |
2023 | 2022 | |
£’000 | £’000 | |
The return per share is based on the following figures: | ||
Revenue return | 9,652 | 7,888 |
Capital return/(loss) | (30,378) | 58,036 |
Total return | (20,726) | 65,924 |
Weighted average number of shares in issue for the period | 606,004,086 | 650,534,570 |
Revenue return per share | 1.6p | 1.2p |
Capital return/(loss) per share | (5.0)p | 8.9p |
Total return per share | (3.4)p | 10.1p |
The calculation of the total, revenue and capital returns per ordinary share is carried out in accordance with IAS 33, “Earnings per Share (as adopted in the EU)”.
The comparative return per ordinary share figures have been restated to reflect the ten for one share split on 27 July 2023. For weighted average purposes, the share split has been treated as happening on the first day of the accounting period.
5. SHARE CAPITAL
Total | |||
Treasury | shares | ||
Shares | shares | in issue | |
number | number | number | |
As at 1 April 2023 | 62,620,763 | 2,438,015 | 65,058,778 |
Purchase of shares into treasury – pre-share split | (2,507,439) | 2,507,439 | – |
Shares cancelled from Treasury | – | (4,892,258) | (4,892,258) |
Issue of shares following ten for one share split | 541,019,916 | 478,764 | 541,498,680 |
Purchase of shares into treasury – post-share split | (16,954,184) | 16,954,184 | – |
As at 30 September 2023 | 584,179,056 | 17,486,144 | 601,665,200 |
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | ||
30 September | 31 March | ||
2023 | 2023 | ||
£’000 | £’000 | ||
Issued and fully paid: | |||
Nominal value of ordinary shares of 2.5p | 14,604 | 16,265 |
During the period ended 30 September 2023 the Company bought back ordinary shares into treasury at a cost of £133,365,000 (Year ended 31 March 2023: £91,514,000).
At the AGM of the Company held in July 2023, shareholders approved a resolution for a ten for one share split such that each shareholder would receive ten shares with a nominal value of 2.5 pence each for every one share held. 541,498,680 additional shares (541,019,916 to shareholders and 478,764 in relation to shares held in treasury) were created on 27 July 2023 following this approval.
6. NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
The net asset value per share is based on the assets attributable to equity shareholders of £1,981,921,000 (31 March 2023: £2,150,721,000) and on the number of shares in issue at the period end of 584,179,056 (31 March 2023: 626,207,630*).
* restated to reflect the ten for one share split.
7. TRANSACTION COSTS
Purchase transaction costs for the six months ended 30 September 2023 were £499,000 (six months ended 30 September 2022: £705,000).
Sales transaction costs for the six months ended 30 September 2023 were £528,000 (six months ended 30 September 2022: £592,000).
8. RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING RETURN TO NET CASH INFLOW/(OUTFLOW) FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |
Six months ended | Six months ended | |
30 September | 30 September | |
2023 | 2022 | |
£’000 | £’000 | |
(Loss)/Gains before finance costs and taxation | (14,321) | 67,465 |
Add: capital loss/(Less: capital gain)/before finance charges and taxation | 25,705 | (59,193) |
Revenue return before finance charges and taxation | 11,384 | 8,272 |
Expenses charged to capital | (7,803) | (8,452) |
(Increase)/Decrease in other debtors | (474) | 525 |
Increase in other creditors and accruals | 2,678 | 3,422 |
Net taxation suffered on investment income | (611) | 19 |
Amortisation | – | (108) |
Net cash inflow from operating activities | 5,174 | 3,678 |
9. PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The principal risks facing the Company are listed in the Interim Management Report. An explanation of these risks and how they are managed is contained in the Strategic Report and note 16 of the Company’s Annual Report & Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2023.
10. COMPARATIVE INFORMATION
The condensed financial statements contained in this half year report do not constitute statutory accounts as defined in section 434 of the Companies Act 2006. The financial information for the half years ended 30 September 2023 and 30 September 2022 has not been audited or reviewed by the Company’s auditor.
The information for the year ended 31 March 2023 has been extracted from the latest published audited financial statements of the Company. Those financial statements have been filed with the Registrar of Companies. The report of the auditor on those financial statements was unqualified, did not include a reference to any matters to which the auditors drew attention by way of emphasis without qualifying the report, and did not contain statements under either section 498 (2) or 498 (3) of the Companies Act 2006.
Earnings for the first six months should not be taken as a guide to the results for the full year.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (“APMs”)
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUND MANAGERS DIRECTIVE (“AIFMD”)
Agreed by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union and transposed into UK legislation, the AIFMD classifies certain investment vehicles, including investment companies, as Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”) and requires them to appoint an Alternative Investment Fund Manager (“AIFM”) and depositary to manage and oversee the operations of the investment vehicle. The Board of the Company retains responsibility for strategy, operations and compliance and the Directors retain a fiduciary duty to shareholders.
BENCHMARK
The performance of the Company is measured against the MSCI World Health Care Index on a net total return, sterling adjusted basis.
The net total return is calculated by reinvesting dividends after the deduction of withholding taxes.
DISCOUNT OR PREMIUM (“APM”)
A description of the difference between the share price and the net asset value per share. The size of the discount or premium is calculated by subtracting the share price from the net asset value per share and is usually expressed as a percentage (%) of the net asset value per share. If the share price is higher than the net asset value per share the result is a premium. If the share price is lower than the net asset value per share, the shares are trading at a discount.
EMERGING BIOTECHNOLOGY
Biotechnology companies with a market capitalisation less than U.S.$10 billion.
EQUITY SWAPS
An equity swap is an agreement in which one party (counterparty) transfers the total return of an underlying equity position to the other party (swap holder) in exchange for a one-off payment at a set date. Total return includes dividend income and gains or losses from market movements. The exposure of the holder is the market value of the underlying equity position.
Your Company uses two types of equity swap:
The Company employs swaps for two purposes:
LEVERAGE (“APM”)
Leverage is defined in the AIFMD as any method by which the AIFM increases the exposure of an AIF. In addition to the gearing limit the Company also has to comply with the AIFMD leverage requirements. For these purposes the Board has set a maximum leverage limit of 140% for both methods. This limit is expressed as a percentage with 100% representing no leverage or gearing in the Company. There are two methods of calculating leverage as follows:
The Gross Method is calculated as total exposure divided by Shareholders’ Funds. Total exposure is calculated as net assets, less cash and cash equivalents, adding back cash borrowing plus derivatives converted into the equivalent position in their underlying assets.
The Commitment Method is calculated as total exposure divided by Shareholders’ Funds. In this instance total exposure is calculated as net assets, less cash and cash equivalents, adding back cash borrowing plus derivatives converted into the equivalent position in their underlying assets, adjusted for netting and hedging arrangements.
As at | As at | |||
30 September 2023 | 31 March 2023 | |||
Fair Value | Exposure* | Fair Value | Exposure* | |
£’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | |
Investments | 2,125,814 | 2,125,814 | 2,186,417 | 2,186,417 |
OTC equity swaps | (5,772) | 145,799 | (26,892) | 190,704 |
2,120,042 | 2,271,613 | 2,159,525 | 2,377,121 | |
Shareholders’ funds | 1,981,921 | 2,150,721 | ||
Leverage % | 14.6% | 10.5% |
* Calculated in accordance with AIFMD requirements using the Commitment Method
MSCI WORLD HEALTH CARE INDEX (THE COMPANY’S BENCHMARK)
The MSCI information (relating to the Benchmark) may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form and may not be used as a basis for or a component of any financial instruments or products or indices. None of the MSCI information is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Historical data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. The MSCI information is provided on an “as is” basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating any MSCI information (collectively, the “MSCI Parties”) expressly disclaims all warranties (including, without limitation, any warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall any MSCI Party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential (including, without limitation lost profits) or any other damages. (www.msci.com)
NET ASSET VALUE (NAV) TOTAL RETURN (“APM”)
The theoretical total return on shareholders’ funds per share, reflecting the change in NAV assuming that dividends paid to shareholders were reinvested at NAV at the time the shares were quoted ex-dividend. A way of measuring investment management performance of investment trusts which is not affected by movements in discounts/premiums.
Six months to | Year to | |
30 September | 31 March | |
2023 | 2023* | |
(p) | (p) | |
Opening NAV per share | 343.5 | 346.5 |
Decrease in NAV per share | (4.2) | (3.0) |
Closing NAV per share | 339.3 | 343.5 |
% Change in NAV per share | (1.2%) | (0.9%) |
Impact of reinvested dividends | 0.6% | 0.8% |
NAV per share Total Return | (0.6%) | (0.1%) |
* The comparative NAV per share figures have been restated to reflect the ten for one share split. See notes 4 to 6 for further details.
ONGOING CHARGES (“APM”)
Ongoing charges are calculated by taking the Company’s annualised ongoing charges, excluding finance costs, taxation, performance fees and exceptional items, and expressing them as a percentage of the average daily net asset value of the Company over the year.
Six months to | One year to | |
30 September | 31 March | |
2023 | 2023 | |
£’000 | £’000 | |
AIFM & Portfolio Management fees | 8,214 | 17,534 |
Other Expenses | 686 | 1,142 |
Total Ongoing Charges | 8,900 | 18,676 |
Performance fees paid/crystallised | – | – |
Total | 8,900 | 18,676 |
Average net assets | 2,111,076 | 2,247,296 |
Ongoing Charges (annualised) | 0.8% | 0.8% |
Ongoing Charges (annualised, including performance fees paid or crystallised during the period) | 0.8% | 0.8% |
PERFORMANCE FEE
Dependent on the level of long-term outperformance of the Company, a performance fee can become payable. The performance fee is calculated by reference to the amount by which the Company’s net asset value (‘NAV’) performance has outperformed the Benchmark.
The fee is calculated quarterly by comparing the cumulative performance of the Company’s NAV with the cumulative performance of the Benchmark since the launch of the Company in 1995. Provision is also made within the daily NAV per share calculation as required and in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards. The performance fee amounts to 15.0% of any outperformance over the Benchmark (see Company’s Annual Report & Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2023 for further information).
In order to ensure that only sustained outperformance is rewarded, at each quarterly calculation date any performance fee payable is based on the lower of:
The effect of this is that outperformance has to be maintained for a 12 month period before the related fee is paid.
In addition, a performance fee only becomes payable to the extent that the cumulative outperformance gives rise to a total fee greater than the total of all performance fees paid to date.
SHARE PRICE TOTAL RETURN (“APM”)
Return to the investor on mid-market prices assuming that all dividends paid were reinvested.
Six months to | One year to | |
30 September | 31 March | |
2023 | 2023* | |
Opening share price | 311.5 | 327.5 |
Decrease in share price | (2.0) | (16.0) |
Closing share price | 309.5 | 311.5 |
% Change in share price | (0.6%) | (4.8%) |
Impact of reinvested dividends | 0.7% | 0.7% |
Share price Total Return | 0.1% | (4.1%) |
* The comparative share price figures have been restated to reflect the ten for one share split. See notes 4 to 6 for further details.
For and on behalf of
Frostrow Capital LLP, Secretary
22 November 2023
- ENDS -