Final Results Part 2 of 3
AstraZeneca PLC
01 February 2007
Consolidated Income Statement
2006 2005
For the year ended 31 December $m $m
Sales 26,475 23,950
Cost of sales (5,559) (5,356)
Distribution costs (226) (211)
Research and development (3,902) (3,379)
Selling, general and administrative costs (9,096) (8,695)
Other operating income and expense 524 193
Operating profit 8,216 6,502
Finance income 888 665
Finance expense (561) (500)
Profit before tax 8,543 6,667
Taxation (2,480) (1,943)
Profit for the period 6,063 4,724
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the Company 6,043 4,706
Minority interests 20 18
6,063 4,724
Basic earnings per $0.25 Ordinary Share $3.86 $2.91
Diluted earnings per $0.25 Ordinary Share $3.85 $2.91
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue (millions) 1,564 1,617
Diluted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue (millions) 1,570 1,618
Dividends declared in the period 2,649 2,068
Consolidated Income Statement
2006 2005
For the quarter ended 31 December $m $m
Sales 7,154 6,286
Cost of sales (1,578) (1,388)
Distribution costs (61) (56)
Research and development (1,124) (873)
Selling, general and administrative costs (2,511) (2,403)
Other operating income and expense 123 70
Operating profit 2,003 1,636
Finance income 267 181
Finance expense (167) (128)
Profit before tax 2,103 1,689
Taxation (658) (462)
Profit for the period 1,445 1,227
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the Company 1,432 1,224
Minority interests 13 3
1,445 1,227
Basic earnings per $0.25 Ordinary Share $0.93 $0.77
Diluted earnings per $0.25 Ordinary Share $0.93 $0.77
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue (millions) 1,540 1,590
Diluted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue (millions) 1,545 1,592
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As at 31 December
2006 2005
$m $m
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 7,453 6,985
Intangible assets, including goodwill 4,204 2,712
Other investments 119 256
Deferred tax assets 1,220 1,117
12,996 11,070
Current assets
Inventories 2,250 2,206
Trade and other receivables 5,561 4,778
Other investments 657 1,624
Income tax receivable 1,365 183
Cash and cash equivalents 7,103 4,979
16,936 13,770
Total assets 29,932 24,840
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Interest bearing loans and borrowings (136) (90)
Trade and other payables (6,334) (5,466)
Income tax payable (2,977) (1,283)
(9,447) (6,839)
Non-current liabilities
Interest bearing loans and borrowings (1,087) (1,111)
Deferred tax liabilities (1,559) (1,112)
Retirement benefit obligations (1,842) (1,706)
Provisions (327) (309)
Other payables (254) (72)
(5,069) (4,310)
Total liabilities (14,516) (11,149)
Net assets 15,416 13,691
EQUITY
Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of
the Company
Share capital 383 395
Share premium account 1,671 692
Other reserves 1,902 1,831
Retained earnings 11,348 10,679
15,304 13,597
Minority equity interests 112 94
Total equity 15,416 13,691
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
For the year ended 31 December 2006 2005
$m $m
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before taxation 8,543 6,667
Finance income and expense (327) (165)
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment 1,345 1,327
Decrease in working capital 108 332
Other non-cash movements 263 220
Cash generated from operations 9,932 8,381
Interest paid (70) (32)
Tax paid (2,169) (1,606)
Net cash inflow from operating activities 7,693 6,743
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition of businesses* (1,148) -
Movement in short term investments and fixed deposits* 1,120 (491)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (794) (810)
Disposal of property, plant and equipment 35 87
Purchase of intangible assets (545) (157)
Disposal of intangible assets* 661 -
Purchase of non-current asset investments (17) (12)
Disposal of non-current asset investments 68 -
Interest received 352 206
Payments made by subsidiaries to minority interest (4) (5)
Net cash outflow from investing activities (272) (1,182)
Net cash inflow before financing activities* 7,421 5,561
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of share capital 985 143
Repurchase of shares (4,147) (3,001)
Dividends paid (2,220) (1,717)
Movement in short term borrowings 16 3
Net cash outflow from financing activities (5,366) (4,572)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents in the period 2,055 989
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period 4,895 3,927
Exchange rate effects 39 (21)
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period 6,989 4,895
Cash and cash equivalents consists of:
Cash and cash equivalents 7,103 4,979
Overdrafts (114) (84)
6,989 4,895
Note: Free Cash Flow (*) of $6,788 million (2005: $6,052 million) is calculated
as; net cash inflow before financing activities, adjusted for: acquisition of
businesses, movements in short term investments and fixed deposits, and disposal
of intangible assets.
Consolidated Statement of Recognised Income and Expense
For the year ended 31 December
2006 2005
$m $m
Profit for the period 6,063 4,724
Foreign exchange and other adjustments on consolidation 922 (1,052)
Available for sale losses taken to equity (20) (10)
Actuarial loss for the period (108) (35)
Tax on items taken directly to reserves 137 (25)
931 (1,122)
Total recognised income and expense for the period 6,994 3,602
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the Company 6,970 3,595
Minority interests 24 7
6,994 3,602
Notes to the Preliminary Announcement
1 BASIS OF PREPARATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preliminary announcement for the full year ended 31 December 2006 has been
prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards and International
Financial Reporting Standards (collectively 'IFRS') as adopted by the European
Union (EU) at 31 December 2006. Details of the accounting policies applied are
those set out in AstraZeneca PLC's Annual Report and Form 20-F Information 2005.
The annual financial information presented in this preliminary announcement
for the year ended 31 December 2006 is based on, and is consistent with, that in
the Group's audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2006,
and those financial statements will be delivered to the Registrar of Companies
following the Company's Annual General Meeting. The auditors' report on those
financial statements is unqualified and does not contain any statement under
Section 237 of the Companies Act 1985.
The information contained in Note 3 updates the disclosures concerning legal
proceedings and contingent liabilities in the Company's Annual Report and Form
20-F Information 2005 and the Third Quarter and Nine Months Results 2006.
Information in this preliminary announcement does not constitute statutory
accounts of the Group within the meaning of Section 240 of the Companies Act
1985. Statutory accounts for the year ended 31 December 2005 have been filed
with the Registrar of Companies. The auditors' report on those accounts was
unqualified and did not contain any statement under Section 237 of the Companies
Act 1985.
2 NET CASH FUNDS
The table below provides an analysis of net cash funds and a reconciliation of
net cash flow to the movement in net cash funds.
At 31
December
At 1 Jan Cash Non-cash Exchange 2006
2006 flow Acquisitions movements movements
$m $m $m $m $m $m
Loans due after 1 year (1,111) - - 24 - (1,087)
Other investments - current 1,624 (1,120) 157 (15) 11 657
Cash and cash equivalents 4,979 2,084 - - 40 7,103
Overdrafts (84) (29) - - (1) (114)
Short term borrowings (6) (16) - - - (22)
6,513 919 157 (15) 50 7,624
Net funds 5,402 919 157 9 50 6,537
Non-cash movements in the period consist of fair value adjustments under IAS 39.
3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS and contingent liabilities
AstraZeneca is involved in various legal proceedings considered typical to its
business, including litigation relating to employment matters, product
liability, commercial disputes, infringement of intellectual property rights and
the validity of certain patents. The matters discussed below constitute the
more significant developments since publication of the disclosures concerning
legal proceedings in the Company's Annual Report and Form 20-F Information 2005
and the Third Quarter and Nine Months Results 2006.
Matters disclosed in respect of the fourth quarter of 2006 and January 2007.
Legal proceedings
DiprivanTM (propofol)
As previously disclosed, in relation to a patent infringement action brought by
AstraZeneca, the US District Court for the Southern District of New York issued
an injunction against Mayne Pharma (USA) Inc. (the holder of the new Abbreviated
New Drug Application) preventing the manufacture, use, sale and offering for
sale in the US of Mayne's propofol product. Mayne filed an appeal against this
and in November 2006 the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed
the decision of the District Court. In June 2006, the DiprivanTM NDA was sold to
Abraxis BioScience Inc. as part of an Asset Purchase Agreement.
LosecTM/PrilosecTM (omeprazole)
AstraZeneca continues to be involved in numerous proceedings in Canada involving
various generics and patents, including under the Patented Medicines (Notice of
Compliance) Regulations, relating to omeprazole capsules or omeprazole magnesium
tablets. As previously disclosed, Apotex Inc. launched a generic omeprazole
capsule product in Canada in January 2004. Following this launch, AstraZeneca
commenced judicial review proceedings seeking to quash Apotex's notice of
compliance (marketing approval) and AstraZeneca sued Apotex in July 2004
alleging infringement of its formulation patents by Apotex's omeprazole
capsules. In May 2005, the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal quashed Apotex's
notice of compliance (marketing approval), overruling the first instance
decision in September 2004, which went against AstraZeneca. In June 2005, the
Canadian Federal Court of Appeal granted Apotex's motion for a stay of the
Court's decision to quash the notice of compliance, pending an application by
Apotex for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court of
Canada granted Apotex leave to appeal and also continued the stay granted by the
Federal Court of Appeal, thereby allowing Apotex to continue selling its
omeprazole capsules pending a decision by the Supreme Court on Apotex's appeal.
The appeal was heard in May 2006 and allowed in November 2006, with the result
that Apotex can continue to sell omeprazole capsules pending the outcome of the
patent infringement action.
In January 2006, AstraZeneca Canada Inc. was served with a claim in the Federal
Court of Canada for payment of an undetermined sum based on damages allegedly
suffered by Apotex due to the delay from January 2002 to January 2004 in the
issuance to Apotex of a notice of compliance (marketing approval) in Canada for
its 20mg omeprazole capsule product. The claim was held in abeyance pending
Apotex's appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, and following the November 2006
allowance of that appeal, Apotex has indicated it will be advancing the damages
claim. AstraZeneca believes the claim is without merit and intends to defend it
and to pursue its already pending patent infringement actions against Apotex
vigorously.
Sandoz Canada Inc. served AstraZeneca Canada with a notice of allegation in
connection with certain patents related to omeprazole capsules, on the basis
that Sandoz was seeking a notice of compliance (marketing approval) in Canada
based on a comparison with AstraZeneca's LosecTM capsules.
In January 2007, AstraZeneca Canada Inc. discontinued long pending proceedings
against Reddy-Cheminor Inc. in respect of patents relating to omeprazole
capsules, following Reddy-Cheminor's withdrawal of its allegations.
NexiumTM (esomeprazole magnesium)
As disclosed in the Annual Report and 20-F Information 2005, AstraZeneca
entities have been sued in various state and federal courts in the US in
purported representative and class actions involving the marketing of NexiumTM
(esomeprazole magnesium). These actions generally allege that AstraZeneca's
promotion and advertising of NexiumTM to physicians and consumers is unfair,
unlawful and deceptive conduct, particularly as the promotion relates to
comparisons of NexiumTM with PrilosecTM. They also allege that AstraZeneca's
conduct relating to the pricing of NexiumTM was unfair, unlawful and deceptive.
The plaintiffs allege claims under various state consumer protection, unfair
practices and false advertising laws. The plaintiffs in these cases seek
remedies that include restitution, disgorgement of profits, damages, punitive
damages, injunctive relief, attorneys' fees and costs of suit.
In October 2006, the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Court in and for
Miami-Dade County, Florida dismissed the plaintiff's complaint with prejudice
and without leave to amend. The plaintiff has appealed the dismissal, and the
opening appeal brief is due in February 2007.
In December 2006 and January 2007, several lawsuits against AstraZeneca
entities, including putative class actions, were filed in US District Court for
the District of Columbia alleging claims of unlawful monopolisation relating to
PrilosecTM and NexiumTM. Individual actions were filed on 7 December 2006 by
Walgreen Co., Eckerd Corporation, Maxi Drug, Inc. d/b/a Brooks Pharmacy, The
Kroger Co., New Albertson's Inc., Safeway, Inc., Hy-Vee, Inc., and American
Sales Company, Inc. and on 8 December 2006 by Rite Aid Corporation, and Rite Aid
Headquarters Corp. Putative class actions brought on behalf of direct
purchasers were filed on 18 December 2006 by Meijer, Inc. and Meijer
Distribution, Inc., on 19 December 2006 by Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc.,
and on 8 January 2007 by Burlington Drug Co., Inc., Dik Drug Co., Inc., and King
Drug Co. of Florence, Inc. The plaintiffs seek treble damages, injunctive
relief, and attorney fees. AstraZeneca denies the allegations and intends to
defend each of the actions vigorously.
In December 2006, the European Patent Office (EPO) ruled that one of the
European substance patents for NexiumTM would be rejected, following an appeal
from the German generic manufacturer ratiopharm. The original patent expiry for
this patent was 2014.
While disappointed with the EPO decision, AstraZeneca has confidence in the
intellectual property portfolio protecting NexiumTM. This portfolio includes
process, method of use and additional substance patents with expiration dates
ranging from 2009 through to 2019. The process patent is under opposition with
the EPO and an Opposition Division oral hearing is scheduled for October 2007
(postponed from the original hearing date in March 2007). In addition to these
patents, NexiumTM has data exclusivity valid to 2010 in major European markets.
The revocation of the AstraZeneca European substance patent relating to NexiumTM
should not have any substantive impact on AstraZeneca's ability to uphold and
enforce its NexiumTM patents in the United States. AstraZeneca has several US
Patents covering NexiumTM, all of which can be differentiated from the European
patent found to be invalid.
SeroquelTM (quetiapine fumarate)
In August 2003, Susan Zehel-Miller filed a putative class action against
AstraZeneca PLC and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP on behalf of 'all persons in
the US who purchased and/or used SeroquelTM'. Among other things, the class
action alleged that AstraZeneca failed to provide adequate warnings in
connection with an alleged association between SeroquelTM and the onset of
diabetes. In 2004, the United States District Court for the Middle District of
Florida denied class certification and the case was ultimately dismissed. Two
additional putative class actions raising similar allegations have likewise been
dismissed. There are no other US class actions relating to SeroquelTM; however,
four putative class actions raising substantially similar allegations have been
filed in Canada.
Additionally, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, either alone or in conjunction
with one or more affiliates, has been sued in numerous individual personal
injury actions involving SeroquelTM. In the overwhelming majority of these
cases, the nature of the plaintiffs' alleged injuries is not clear. Although
some plaintiffs contend that they developed diabetes or other related injuries
as a result of taking SeroquelTM and/or other atypical antipsychotic
medications, in most instances, little or no factual information regarding the
alleged injury has been provided. As of 24 January 2007, AstraZeneca was
defending 604 served or answered lawsuits involving approximately 7,450
plaintiff groups. These include a number of recently filed cases that include
close to 1,000 plaintiff groups per case. The majority of the SeroquelTM cases
are pending in federal court with clusters of state court activity in Delaware,
New Jersey, New York and Missouri. AstraZeneca is also aware of over 600
additional cases that have been filed but not yet served and has not determined
how many additional cases, if any, may have been filed. Some of the cases also
include claims against other pharmaceutical manufacturers such as Eli Lilly,
Janssen Pharmaceutica and/or Bristol-Myers Squibb. AstraZeneca intends to
vigorously defend all of the SeroquelTM cases.
As previously disclosed, in September 2005, AstraZeneca received a notice from
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA that Teva had submitted an Abbreviated New Drug
Application (ANDA) for quetiapine fumarate 25mg tablets containing a paragraph
IV certification alleging invalidity, unenforceability, or non-infringement
respecting AstraZeneca's US patent listed in the FDA's Orange Book with
reference to SeroquelTM. In November 2005, AstraZeneca filed a lawsuit directed
to Teva's 25mg ANDA tablets in the US District Court for the District of New
Jersey for willful patent infringement. In February 2006, AstraZeneca received
another notice from Teva Pharmaceuticals USA that Teva had amended its
previously submitted ANDA for quetiapine fumarate 25mg tablets and added 100,
200 and 300mg tablets to its application to the US FDA. The amended ANDA
submission contained a similar paragraph IV certification alleging invalidity,
unenforceability, or non-infringement in respect of AstraZeneca's US patent
listed in the FDA's Orange Book with reference to SeroquelTM. In March 2006, in
response to Teva's amended ANDA and Teva's intent to market additional strengths
of a generic version of SeroquelTM in the US prior to the expiration of
AstraZeneca's patent, AstraZeneca filed an additional lawsuit against Teva in
the US District Court for the District of New Jersey for patent infringement.
The two lawsuits were consolidated in April 2006. However in March 2006, the
US District Court had granted Teva's motion to strike AstraZeneca's added
allegation of willfulness in its patent infringement claim in the first
complaint directed to Teva's 25mg tablets. Therefore, in the consolidated
action, in response to AstraZeneca's now-combined allegations of patent
infringement directed to Teva's 25, 100, 200 and 300mg ANDA tablets, Teva
alleges non-infringement and patent invalidity. On 16 January, 2007, Teva filed
a motion seeking leave to amend its pleadings in the consolidated action to add
allegations, defenses, and counter-claims directed to alleged inequitable
conduct in the procurement of AstraZeneca's patent. Discovery in the
consolidated case is proceeding.
AstraZeneca continues to have full confidence in and will vigorously defend and
enforce its intellectual property protecting SeroquelTM.
Toprol-XLTM (metoprolol succinate extended release capsules)
As previously disclosed, in the consolidated litigation brought against KV,
Andrx and Eon, the AstraZeneca patents relating to Toprol-XLTM were found to be
invalid and unenforceable by the US District Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri in January 2006. AstraZeneca appealed the District Court decision to
the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The appeal was fully briefed
in 2006 and was argued in December 2006. We await the decision of the Court of
Appeals.
In August 2006, Sandoz (formerly Eon) received final approval from the US Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) on the 25 mg dose of metoprolol succinate and
tentative approval on the 50, 100 and 200mg doses. In November 2006, Sandoz
launched its 25mg metoprolol succinate product, which was followed by Par
Pharmaceutical's launch of a 25mg generic metoprolol succinate under a
distribution agreement by AstraZeneca. There is no longer a stay in effect on
the approval of the ANDAs filed by KV and Andrx but neither has received FDA
approval.
ZestrilTM (lisinopril)
In 1996, two of AstraZeneca's predecessor companies, Zeneca Limited and Zeneca
Pharma Inc. (as licencees), Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Frosst Canada Inc.
commenced a patent infringement action in the Federal Court of Canada against
Apotex Inc., alleging infringement of Merck's lisinopril patent. Apotex sold a
generic version of AstraZeneca's ZestrilTM and Merck's PrinivilTM tablets.
Apotex admitted infringement but has raised positive defences to infringement,
including that it acquired certain quantities of lisinopril prior to issuance of
the patent and that certain quantities were licensed under a compulsory licence.
Apotex also alleged invalidity of the patent. Following a trial in early 2006,
in April 2006 the Federal Court of Canada ruled in favour of AstraZeneca and
Merck on the key issues and Apotex stopped selling lisinopril in May 2006. In
October 2006, the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada upheld the lower court's
decision and dismissed Apotex's appeal. In December 2006, Apotex sought leave to
appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada and the application remains pending.
Average wholesale price class action litigation
In the Average Wholesale Price class action litigation pending in Boston, a
trial against certain of the defendants, including AstraZeneca, began on 6
November 2006 and concluded on 26 January 2007. That trial involved two of the
three classes of plaintiffs certified by the Court, consisting mainly of
third-party insurers for certain self-administered drugs, including Zoladex
(goserelin acetate implant). The Court has yet to render its decision. A
separate jury trial, against AstraZeneca only, is scheduled for 30 April 2007,
to resolve the claims of the remaining class of plaintiffs, the individual
Medicare beneficiaries. The multiple Attorney General lawsuits filed in state
courts are proceeding independently of the Boston proceeding. The first trials
that potentially involve AstraZeneca are scheduled for November 2007 in the
Alabama and Mississippi Attorney General cases.
Anti-trust
In July 2006, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP was named as a defendant, along
with a number of other pharmaceutical manufacturers and wholesalers, in a
complaint filed by RxUSA Wholesale, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of New York. The complaint alleges that the defendants
violated federal and state anti-trust laws by, among other things, allegedly
refusing to deal with RxUSA and other 'secondary wholesalers' in the wholesale
pharmaceutical industry. The plaintiff alleges a conspiracy among the
manufacturers and seeks an injunction and treble damages. AstraZeneca vigorously
denies the allegations and in November 2006 filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint.
Drug importation anti-trust litigation
As previously disclosed, in May 2004, plaintiffs in a purported class action
filed complaints in the US District Court for Minnesota and for New Jersey,
alleging that AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and eight other pharmaceutical
manufacturer defendants conspired to prevent American consumers from purchasing
prescription drugs from Canada, 'depriving consumers of the ability to purchase'
drugs at competitive prices. The New Jersey case was voluntarily dismissed in
July 2004. In August 2005, the Minnesota District Court dismissed with prejudice
the plaintiffs' federal anti-trust claims and declined to exercise supplemental
jurisdiction in relation to the state statutory and common law claims, which
claims were dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiffs appealed the District
Court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
In November 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
affirmed the District Court's decision.
As previously disclosed, in August 2004, Californian retail pharmacy plaintiffs
filed an action in the Superior Court of California making similar allegations
to the Minnesota action and also alleging a conspiracy by approximately fifteen
pharmaceutical manufacturer defendants to set the price of drugs sold in
California at or above the Canadian sales price for those same drugs. In July
2005, the court overruled in part and sustained in part, without leave to amend,
the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' third amended complaint in
these proceedings. The Court overruled the defendants' motion in respect of
conspiracy claims but sustained the motion in respect of the California Unfair
Competition Law claims. In December 2006, the Court granted the defendants'
motion for summary judgment and the case was subsequently dismissed. In January
2007, plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal with the Court of Appeal of the State
of California.
NolvadexTM (tamoxifen)
As previously disclosed, AstraZeneca is a co-defendant with Barr Laboratories,
Inc. in numerous purported class actions filed in federal and state courts
throughout the US. All of the state court actions were removed to federal court
and have been consolidated, along with all of the cases originally filed in the
federal courts, in a federal multi-district litigation proceeding pending in the
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Some of the cases were
filed by plaintiffs representing a putative class of consumers who purchased
tamoxifen. The other cases were filed on behalf of a putative class of 'third
party payers' (including health maintenance organisations, insurers and other
managed care providers and health plans) that have reimbursed or otherwise paid
for prescriptions of tamoxifen. The plaintiffs allege that they paid '
supra-competitive and monopolistic prices' for tamoxifen as a result of the
settlement of patent litigation between Zeneca and Barr in 1993. The plaintiffs
seek injunctive relief, treble damages under the anti-trust laws, disgorgement
and restitution. In April 2002, AstraZeneca filed a motion to dismiss the cases
for failure to state a cause of action. In May 2003, the US District Court for
the Eastern District of New York granted AstraZeneca's motion to dismiss. The
plaintiffs appealed the decision. In November 2005, the US Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit affirmed the District Court's decision. The plaintiffs
thereafter moved for re-hearing by the original panel of judges in the case and
re-hearing by a panel of all of the judges on the US Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit. The plaintiffs' requests for re-hearing were denied in September
2006. In December 2006, plaintiffs filed a Petition for a writ of certiorari to
the US Supreme Court seeking to have the Court hear an appeal of the Second
Circuit's decision.
4 FULL YEAR TERRITORIAL SALES ANALYSIS
% Growth
Full Year Full Year
2006 2005 Constant
$m $m Actual Currency
US 12,449 10,771 16 16
Canada 1,031 976 6 (1)
North America 13,480 11,747 15 14
France 1,642 1,654 (1) -
UK 850 757 12 12
Germany 1,165 1,223 (5) (4)
Italy 1,265 1,152 10 11
Sweden 308 295 4 5
Europe others 3,673 3,382 9 10
Total Europe 8,903 8,463 5 6
Japan 1,503 1,527 (2) 5
China 328 272 21 19
Rest of World 2,261 1,941 16 16
Total 26,475 23,950 11 11
5 FOURTH QUARTER TERRITORIAL SALES ANALYSIS
% Growth
4th Quarter 4th Quarter
2006 2005 Constant
$m $m Actual Currency
US 3,390 2,907 17 17
Canada 263 257 2 (2)
North America 3,653 3,164 15 15
France 423 389 9 2
UK 237 196 21 12
Germany 301 306 (2) (8)
Italy 311 274 14 7
Sweden 80 63 27 16
Europe others 1,006 861 17 10
Total Europe 2,358 2,089 13 6
Japan 442 424 4 6
China 87 76 14 13
Rest of World 614 533 15 13
Total 7,154 6,286 14 11
6 FULL YEAR PRODUCT SALES ANALYSIS
World US
Full Year Full Year Actual Constant Full Actual
2006 2005 Growth Currency Year Growth
Growth 2006
$m $m % % $m %
Gastrointestinal:
Nexium 5,182 4,633 12 12 3,527 13
Losec/Prilosec 1,371 1,652 (17) (16) 233 (12)
Others 78 70 11 11 24 71
Total Gastrointestinal 6,631 6,355 4 4 3,784 11
Cardiovascular:
Seloken/Toprol-XL 1,795 1,735 3 3 1,382 7
Crestor 2,028 1,268 60 59 1,148 57
Atacand 1,110 974 14 14 260 12
Tenormin 320 352 (9) (7) 24 (4)
Zestril 307 332 (8) (7) 28 N/m
Plendil 275 360 (24) (24) 24 (71)
Others 283 311 (9) (9) 3 N/m
Total Cardiovascular 6,118 5,332 15 15 2,869 21
Respiratory:
Pulmicort 1,292 1,162 11 11 835 22
Symbicort 1,184 1,006 18 18 - -
Rhinocort 360 387 (7) (7) 252 (9)
Oxis 88 91 (3) (3) - -
Accolate 81 72 13 13 59 28
Others 146 155 (6) (6) - -
Total Respiratory 3,151 2,873 10 10 1,146 14
Oncology:
Arimidex 1,508 1,181 28 29 614 29
Casodex 1,206 1,123 7 9 295 23
Zoladex 1,008 1,004 - 1 107 (9)
Iressa 237 273 (13) (11) 16 (76)
Others 303 264 15 16 121 27
Total Oncology 4,262 3,845 11 12 1,153 16
Neuroscience:
Seroquel 3,416 2,761 24 24 2,486 24
Local anaesthetics 529 511 4 5 76 9
Zomig 398 352 13 13 168 39
Diprivan 304 369 (18) (17) 85 (42)
Others 57 66 (14) (12) 15 (17)
Total Neuroscience 4,704 4,059 16 16 2,830 20
Infection and Other:
Merrem 604 505 20 19 113 33
Other Products 271 334 (19) (18) 139 (27)
Total Infection and Other 875 839 4 4 252 (8)
Aptium Oncology 374 335 12 12 374 12
Astra Tech 360 312 15 16 41 41
Total 26,475 23,950 11 11 12,449 16
7 FOURTH QUARTER PRODUCT SALES ANALYSIS
World US
4th 4th Constant 4th
Quarter Quarter Actual Currency Quarter Actual
2006 2005 Growth Growth 2006 Growth
$m $m % % $m %
Gastrointestinal:
Nexium 1,430 1,247 15 13 992 17
Losec/Prilosec 347 411 (16) (18) 77 5
Others 24 19 26 21 10 67
Total Gastrointestinal 1,801 1,677 7 5 1,079 16
Cardiovascular:
Seloken/Toprol-XL 387 455 (15) (16) 276 (20)
Crestor 625 353 77 73 356 75
Atacand 301 247 22 17 68 28
Tenormin 82 90 (9) (10) 5 (38)
Zestril 78 84 (7) (11) 7 (30)
Plendil 65 73 (11) (15) 4 (33)
Others 71 76 (7) (13) 2 N/m
Total Cardiovascular 1,609 1,378 17 14 718 15
Respiratory:
Pulmicort 400 338 18 16 271 28
Symbicort 323 264 22 15 - -
Rhinocort 90 92 (2) (3) 63 -
Oxis 23 22 5 - - -
Accolate 22 17 29 29 17 55
Others 41 40 3 (5) - -
Total Respiratory 899 773 16 12 351 23
Oncology:
Arimidex 412 325 27 24 174 33
Casodex 327 283 16 13 82 37
Zoladex 272 252 8 5 27 17
Iressa 63 72 (13) (14) 4 (76)
Others 83 69 20 16 36 44
Total Oncology 1,157 1,001 16 13 323 26
Neuroscience:
Seroquel 912 755 21 19 663 20
Local anaesthetics 133 131 2 (1) 11 (50)
Zomig 103 94 10 7 41 5
Diprivan 79 88 (10) (11) 22 (37)
Others 13 16 (19) (19) 2 (60)
Total Neuroscience 1,240 1,084 14 12 739 13
Infection and Other:
Merrem 167 130 28 23 29 21
Other Products 81 72 13 12 42 17
Total Infection and Other 248 202 23 20 71 18
Aptium Oncology 98 88 11 11 98 11
Astra Tech 102 83 23 16 11 38
Total 7,154 6,286 14 11 3,390 17
Convenience Translation of Key Financial Information
2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005
For the quarter ended 31 December $m $m £m £m SEKm SEKm
Total Sales 7,154 6,286 3,645 3,203 49,237 43,263
Operating profit 2,003 1,636 1,021 834 13,785 11,260
Profit before tax 2,103 1,689 1,072 861 14,474 11,624
Net profit for the period 1,445 1,227 736 625 9,945 8,445
Earnings per Ordinary Share $0.93 $0.77 £0.47 £0.39 SEK6.40 SEK5.30
2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005
For the year ended 31 December $m $m £m £m SEKm SEKm
Total Sales 26,475 23,950 13,490 12,204 182,212 164,833
Operating profit 8,216 6,502 4,186 3,313 56,546 44,749
Profit before tax 8,543 6,667 4,353 3,397 58,796 45,885
Net profit for the year 6,063 4,724 3,089 2,407 41,728 32,512
Earnings per Ordinary Share $3.86 $2.91 £1.97 £1.48 SEK26.57 SEK20.03
Dividend per Ordinary Share $1.72 $1.30 £0.896 £0.737 SEK12.20 SEK10.01
Net cash inflow from operating 7,693 6,743 3,920 3,436 52,946 46,408
activities
Increase in cash & cash 2,055 989 1,047 504 14,143 6,807
equivalents
Capital and Reserves 15,304 13,597 7,798 6,928 105,328 93,580
Attributable to Equity Holders
All Sterling (£) and Swedish krona (SEK) equivalents are shown for convenience
and have been calculated using the current period end rates of
$1= £ 0.509541 and $1= SEK 6.882400 respectively. Dividend per Ordinary Share
is shown as the actual amount payable using the rates at the date of declaration
of the dividend.
Information for US Investors
RECONCILIATION TO UNITED STATES ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
The consolidated income statement and balance sheet set out on pages 12 and 14
are prepared in accordance with IASs and IFRSs (collectively 'IFRS') as adopted
by the European Union (EU), which differ in certain material respects from those
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP). The
differences as they apply to AstraZeneca PLC are explained in the Annual Report
and Form 20-F Information 2005 except that, during the year, AstraZeneca adopted
the provisions of SFAS No. 158 'Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106 and 132(R)'. The effect of adoption, which is prospective from 15
December 2006, is to recognise in full the actuarial gains and losses arising
from post-retirement benefit plans. The effects on income and shareholders'
equity of the GAAP differences are shown below.
Full Year Full Year
Income attributable to Shareholders 2006 2005
$m $m
Net income for the period under IFRS 6,043 4,706
Adjustments to conform to US GAAP
Purchase accounting adjustments:
- amortisation and depreciation (1,017) (1,019)
- in-process research and development (502) -
Capitalisation less disposals and amortisation of interest (21) (13)
Pension and other post-retirement benefits (128) (74)
Financial instruments 7 (35)
In-licensed development intangibles (193) (29)
Deferred taxation 283 283
- on purchase accounting adjustments (101) 65
- others
Other 21 -
Net income in accordance with US GAAP 4,392 3,884
Net income per Ordinary Share in accordance with US GAAP - basic $2.81 $2.40
Net income per Ordinary Share in accordance with US GAAP - diluted $2.80 $2.40
RECONCILIATION TO UNITED STATES ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (CONTINUED)
Shareholders' equity 31 December 31 December
2006 2005
$m $m
Shareholders' equity under IFRS 15,304 13,597
Adjustments to conform to US GAAP
Purchase accounting adjustments:
- goodwill 14,712 13,562
- property, plant and equipment and intangible assets 4,655 5,229
- in-process research and development (605) -
Capitalisation, less disposals and amortisation of interest 220 241
Pension and other post-retirement benefits (48) 1,483
Financial instruments - 18
In-licensed development intangibles (309) (112)
Deferred taxation
- on purchase accounting adjustments (1,322) (1,629)
- others (153) (492)
Other 13 (3)
Shareholders' equity in accordance with US GAAP 32,467 31,894
Shareholder Information
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MEETINGS
Announcement of first quarter 2007 results 26 April 2007
Annual General Meeting 26 April 2007
Announcement of second quarter and half year 2007 results 26 July 2007
Announcement of third quarter and nine months 2007 1 November 2007
results
DIVIDENDS
The record date for the first interim dividend paid on 18 September 2006 (in the
UK, Sweden and the US) was 11 August 2006. Ordinary shares traded ex-dividend on
the London and Stockholm Stock Exchanges from 9 August 2006. ADRs traded
ex-dividend on the New York Stock Exchange from the same date.
The record date for the second interim dividend for 2006 payable on 19 March
2007 (in the UK, Sweden and the US) will be 9 February 2007. Ordinary shares
will trade ex-dividend on the London and Stockholm Stock Exchanges from 7
February 2007. ADRs will trade ex-dividend on the New York Stock Exchange from
the same date.
Future dividends will normally be paid as follows:
First interim Announced in July and paid in September
Second interim Announced in January/February and paid in March
TRADEMARKS
The following brand names used in these interim financial statements are
trademarks of the AstraZeneca Group of companies:
Accolate Arimidex Astra Tech Atacand Casodex Crestor Diprivan Faslodex
Iressa Losec Losec MUPS Merrem Nexium Nolvadex Oxis Plendil Prilosec
Pulmicort Pulmicort Respules Rhinocort Rhinocort Aqua Seloken Seroquel
Seroquel SR Symbicort Symbicort SMART Tenormin Toprol-XL Zestril Zoladex
Zomig
ADDRESSES FOR CORRESPONDENCE
Registrar and Depositary Registered Office Swedish Securities
Transfer Office for ADRs Registration Centre
The AstraZeneca Registrar JPMorgan Chase Bank 15 Stanhope Gate VPC AB
Lloyds TSB Registrars JPMorgan Service Center London PO Box 7822
The Causeway PO Box 3408 W1K 1LN SE-103 97 Stockholm
Worthing South Hackensack UK Sweden
West Sussex NJ 07606-3408
BN99 6DA US
UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7304 5000 Tel: +46 (0)8 402 9000
Tel (freephone in UK): Tel (toll free in US):
0800 389 1580 888 697 8018
Tel (outside UK): Tel: +1 (201) 680 6630
+44 (0)121 415 7033
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In order to utilise the 'safe harbour' provisions of the US Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act 1995, we are providing the following cautionary statement:
This preliminary announcement contains certain forward-looking statements about
AstraZeneca. Although we believe our expectations are based on reasonable
assumptions, any forward-looking statements may be influenced by factors that
could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those
predicted. We identify the forward-looking statements by using the words '
anticipates', 'believes', 'expects', 'intends' and similar expressions in such
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, certain of which
are beyond control, include, among other things: the loss or expiration of
patents, marketing exclusivity or trade marks; exchange rate fluctuations; the
risk that R&D will not yield new products that achieve commercial success; the
impact of competition, price controls and price reductions; taxation risks; the
risk of substantial product liability claims; the impact of any failure by third
parties to supply materials or services; the risk of delay to new product
launches; the difficulties of obtaining and maintaining governmental approvals
for products; the risk of failure to observe ongoing regulatory oversight; the
risk that new products do not perform as we expect; and the risk of
environmental liabilities.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange