Half-year Report

AVI Global Trust PLC
01 June 2023
 

 

 

AVI GLOBAL TRUST PLC

('AGT' or the 'Company')

 

LEI: 213800QUODCLWWRVI968

 

 

Announcement of unaudited results for the half-year ended 31 March 2023

 

Half Year Financial Report for the year ended 31 March 2023

A copy of the Company's Annual Report for the half year ended 31 March 2023 will shortly be available to view and download from the Company's website, https://www.aviglobal.co.uk. Neither the contents of the Company's website nor the contents of any website accessible from hyperlinks on the Company's website (or any other website) is incorporated into, or forms part of, this announcement.

 

Dividend

The Directors have declared the payment of an interim dividend of 1.2p per Ordinary Share for the period ended 31 March 2023, which will be paid on 14 July 2023 to Ordinary shareholders on the register at the close of business on 16 June 2023 (ex-dividend 15 June 2023).

 

The following text is copied from the Half-Year Report and Accounts:

 

OBJECTIVE

 

The investment objective of the Company is to achieve capital growth through a focused portfolio of investments, particularly in companies whose shares stand at a discount to estimated underlying net asset value.

 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

 

- Net asset value ('NAV') total return per share increased +5.3% to 208.35p

- Share price total return +5.5%

- Benchmark index increased on a total return basis +10.3%

- Interim dividend maintained at 1.2p

 

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

 

Net asset value per share (total return) for six months to 31 March 20231*

5.3% 


 


Share price total return for the six months to 31 March 2023*

 

5.5% 

 

 

 


31 March 2023

31 March 2022

Discount* (difference between share price and net asset value)2

10.4%

9.1%





Six months to

Six months to 


31 March 2023

31 March 2022 

Earnings and Dividends



Investment income

£9.40m

£9.25m

Revenue earnings per share

1.28p

1.25p

Capital earnings per share

9.42p

(0.18p)

Total earnings per share

10.70p

1.07p

Ordinary dividends per share

1.20p

   1.20p




Expense Ratio (annualised)*

 

 

Management, marketing and other expenses

(as a percentage of average shareholders' funds)

0.84%

0.87%

 

 

High

Low 

Period Highs/Lows

 

 

Net asset value per share

225.53p

195.03p

Net asset value per share (debt at fair value)

227.99p

197.80p

Share price (mid market)

205.50p

174.60p

 

1 As per guidelines issued by the Association of Investment Companies ('AIC'), performance is calculated using net asset values per share inclusive of accrued income and debt marked to fair value.

2 As per guidelines issued by the AIC, the discount is calculated using the net asset value per share inclusive of accrued income and with the debt marked to fair value.

 

Buybacks

During the six months ended 31 March 2023 the Company purchased 11,946,757 Ordinary Shares for cancellation at a cost of £23,206,000 . During the half-year no Ordinary Shares were cancelled from treasury.

 

*Alternative Performance Measures

For all Alternative Performance Measures included in this Report, please see definitions in the Glossary in the Half-Year Report and Accounts.

 

 

CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT

 

My predecessor Susan Noble retired at the Annual General Meeting in December 2022 and this is my first statement as Chairman. The Company has thrived under Susan's leadership and the Board would like to record our thanks to her. We have enjoyed working with her and wish her well in her future endeavours.

 

Overview of the Half Year

Having lived through over a decade of very low inflation and interest rates, economies and markets are now having to adjust to higher levels of both. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the rescue of Credit Suisse in March 2023 illustrate the challenges for governments and central banks in seeking to control inflation while not causing lasting economic damage.

 

The NAV total return1 for the six months under review was +5.3%, underperforming our comparator benchmark which produced a return of +10.3%. As set out in the Investment Manager's Report, all of the underperformance occurred in a difficult period in March 2023. While it is disappointing to report returns behind the benchmark, AVI have produced strong returns over the long term and we are encouraged by the range of investment opportunities which the team are now seeing.

 

Revenue and Dividends

Revenue earnings for the six months under review were 1.28 pence per share. The Board has elected to pay an interim dividend of 1.2 pence per share, which is the same as last year. The Board recognises that a dividend which is steady and able to rise over time is attractive to many shareholders but, as my predecessors in the chair have regularly noted, the portfolio is managed primarily for capital growth.

 

Gearing

We have not made any changes to the structure of the Company's debt in the period under review. Deployment of available cash is the responsibility of AVI and driven by their stock selection and, as set out in the Investment Manager's Report, net gearing increased in the period, driven by the Investment Manager taking advantage of some attractive investment opportunities.

 

Share Price Rating and Marketing

The Board and Manager take an active interest in the share price rating. We have an extensive marketing programme which promotes the shares to a wide variety of investors, both professional and individuals. We aim to provide comprehensive and engaging reports on our activities and disseminate these through both traditional and electronic media channels.

 

We also recognise that at times there can be merit in using share buybacks with the intention of limiting the volatility in the discount. This is an approach which we encourage with many of our investee companies. During the six months under review, 11.9 million shares were bought back, representing 2.43% of the shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) as at the start of the period. Shares were bought back when the Board believed that the discount was unnaturally wide. As well as benefitting shareholders by limiting the discount at which they could sell shares if they so wish, buying back shares at a discount also produced an uplift in value to the benefit of continuing shareholders, by approximately 0.22%.

 

The Board

Following Susan Noble's retirement, June Jessop was appointed as a non-executive Director with effect from 1 January 2023. June was previously Senior Business Manager at Stewart Investors and a member of the EMEA Management Committee of First Sentier Investors (of which Stewart Investors is a sub-brand). June has spent her entire career in financial services, gaining broad experience in portfolio management, client relationship, business development and, latterly, general management roles. She has been an investment manager for institutions, charities and private clients, including managing assets of an investment trust and investing in closed-end funds on behalf of clients. My colleagues and I are delighted to welcome June to the Board. She brings a wealth of experience in both managing assets and in the management of investment businesses. Her skills complement those of the other Board members and we look forward to working with her.

 

Annual General Meeting

The resolutions at the AGM in December 2022 were each passed by a large majority and the Board would like to thank shareholders for their continuing support.

 

Outlook

The changes to the portfolio described in the Investment Manager's Report are indicative of the opportunities currently presented in various parts of the world. In particular, the level of gearing has increased and I would emphasise that this is driven solely by opportunities at the individual company level rather than any view on economies or markets.

 

The recent issues in the banking sector are a cause for concern, as more broadly are the continuing geopolitical and inflationary challenges that the world faces. Against this background your Board believes that there is a good base of value in the portfolio and we are optimistic. While markets will inevitably be volatile, over the long term we expect AVI to continue to deliver attractive returns to investors.

 

Graham Kitchen

Chairman

31 May 2023

 

1 An Alternative Performance Measure: see Glossary in the Half-Year Report and Accounts.

 

 

INVESTMENT MANAGER'S REPORT

 

PERFORMANCE REVIEW

"This is the most complex, disparate and cross-cutting set of challenges that I can remember in the 40 years that I have been paying attention to such things" - Lawrence Summers, Former US Treasury Secretary.

 

The above quote was from late 2022, prior to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank ('SVB'), when the lagged effects of monetary policy tightening, its (un)intended consequences, and the conflicting nature of price stability and financial stability were laid bare. Undoubtedly the world has become more complex since, with the yield curve now the most inverted since 1981, indicating a high probability of a US recession and a precarious economic outlook globally.

 

Our experience shows that the key to driving successful long-term returns is to focus on the bottom-up fundamentals - and this is exactly what we continue to do.

 

Over the last six months we have found an increasingly attractive and varied opportunity set. This is in stark contrast to late 2021, when we reduced our use of gearing to reflect relatively narrow discounts and seemingly stretched underlying valuations. Since then, stock prices have de-rated considerably and we have been waiting for the right opportunities.

 

In the interim period we have added new positions in Spectrum Brands, Haw Par, Brookfield Corporation and News Corp. We have also initiated a position in a basket of heavily overcapitalised Japanese regional banks that we believe should benefit from changes to Japanese monetary policy, as yield curve control becomes increasingly untenable. Positions in Oakley Capital Investments and Schibsted were increased materially as we seek to have a more concentrated top-end of the portfolio, reflective of our conviction.

 

To fund these, we reduced our positions in EXOR and Pershing Square Holdings, and exited Sony and a number of smaller positions. Since January 2023, we have begun deploying a substantial portion of our borrowings for the first time in more than a year. At the end of March 2023 net gearing stood at 6.9%.

 

Over the interim period AGT achieved a NAV total return of +5.3%. Christian Dior, FEMSA and Oakley Capital Investments were the most significant contributors to returns, whilst Aker, Brookfield Corporation and Godrej Industries were the largest detractors.

 

AGT's return compares to the MSCI AC World ex US (your Company's comparator benchmark) and the MSCI AC World, which returned +10.3% and +6.3%, respectively. As such your Company underperformed on a relative basis by -4.9% and -1.0%, respectively.

 

All of the underperformance came during the final month of March 2023 (indeed, as at the end of February 2023 AGT was +1.0% ahead of the comparator benchmark for the interim period).

 

A comparison of performance with indices over three and five years is set out in the table below:

 

All returns in GBP, net of fees

3 years

5 years

AGT NAV TR

+76.7%

+46.2%

MSCI AC World ex US

+40.1%

+28.2%

MSCI AC World

+54.0%

+58.6%

 

As is the way in financial markets, the collapse of SVB has had repercussions and ramifications well beyond what seemed initially to be an isolated event.

 

The volatile market environment has led to a general widening of discounts. Combined with disappointing short-term developments at Schibsted (discussed below) this has pushed the portfolio weighted average discount wider, acting as a headwind to performance. In March 2023 alone, the portfolio weighted average discount moved from 33.5% to 37.2%, although it remains slightly narrower than the 38.0% at the end of the last financial year.

 

 

Contributors and Detractors for the six months ending 31 March 2023


Contribution*

Contributors

 

Christian Dior

+1.83%

FEMSA

+1.61%

Oakley Capital Investments

+1.39%

EXOR

+1.18%

Apollo Global Management

+0.83%



Detractors


Aker ASA

-0.61%

Brookfield Corporation

-0.58%

Godrej Industries

-0.58%

Third Point Investors

-0.53%

News Corp

-0.48%

* Contribution is the percentage amount that a position has added to the Company's net asset value over the six-month period.

 

In addition, our investments in US alternative asset managers KKR, Apollo and Brookfield Corporation were caught up in the ensuing general sell off in financials following the events at SVB. We believe this is a case of throwing the baby out with the bath water and remain excited about prospective returns for these high-quality lowly-valued companies.

 

The portfolio has also suffered from the strength of Sterling, which has reduced returns by -5.2% over the interim period.

 

At last year's AGM we highlighted FEMSA and Schibsted as two positions with idiosyncratic event potential that could drive returns.

 

As we detail in the commentary below, in the case of FEMSA this event has already come to fruition, with the conclusion of its strategic review. This helped the shares to rise by +54% over the interim period, making it the second largest contributor.

 

In the case of Schibsted the path has been a little more bumpy, detracting from returns of late. In March 2023 comments from the controlling shareholder dampened expectations for a near-term distribution of shares in Adevinta, which has seen the discount balloon to 45%. However, we continue to engage with all key stakeholders and have been adding to the position in what we believe to be one of our highest return potential ideas.

 

In a challenging and uncertain environment for equities en-masse, we believe that event-based opportunities where companies are undergoing structural change, with clear catalysts for discount narrowing, are an increasingly relevant part of our repertoire, and highlight new positions in Spectrum Brands and News Corp as fitting that pattern. Meanwhile, in Japan, we continue to find deeply undervalued companies where we can add value as engaged owners.

 

Whilst relative underperformance is never pleasing, it is an inevitable consequence of running a differentiated and concentrated portfolio, which in-turn are pre-requisites for generating excess returns.

 

In this vein we remain confident and excited about the opportunity set ahead of us and the underlying prospects for NAV growth and catalysts for discount narrowing. With the portfolio weighted average discount at 37.2%, we are optimistic about prospective returns.

 

CONTRIBUTORS

Christian Dior

(Discount: 16.2%/Contribution: +1.83%)

Christian Dior ('CDI') was the largest contributor to your company's performance during the interim period, adding 183bps to returns.

 

The shares rose +38% - slightly behind the NAV (which rose +39%) - and, as such, the discount widened modestly from 15% to 16%.

 

The proximate cause for CDI's outperformance was China, with luxury goods companies being key beneficiaries of the rapid re-opening of the economy and abandonment of zero-COVID policies. Industry analysts at Bain estimate that China's re-opening will see the global luxury industry grow at +6-8% in 2023, versus prior estimates of +3-5%. CDI's sole asset is a 41% stake in LVMH. Alongside LVMH's full year results - published at the end of January 2023 - Mr. Arnault struck a similarly optimistic tone, declaring "we have every reason to be confident, indeed optimistic on China", with "quite spectacular" signs of things to come from Macau, where Chinese tourists can now travel.

 

In terms of LVMH's fourth quarter and full year results, the business remains in rude health with Q4 sales organic growth of +9%, well ahead of consensus. On the other hand, operating profit and margins were weaker than expected with much higher than anticipated marketing expenditure. Whilst interpreted as a negative by some, we believe this speaks to both LVMH's strength and why megabrands are likely to continue outperforming, with significant scale advantages in an industry with high fixed costs. In the short term, megabrands go through periods where they underearn as spending runs far above "inflation operational expenditure", but in the long run the brand equity is increased and growth extended. Smaller monobrands simply cannot compete with this, with our estimates indicating that Louis Vuitton's incremental expenditure in 2022 is of a similar magnitude to a smaller monobrand's entire budget. If it is artistic creativity and a certain "je ne sais quoi" that creates brand strength, it is investment in the brand that maintains it.

 

As such, we see LVMH as well placed to keep compounding earnings. The current 19x forward EV/EBIT multiple is in-line with the five-year average and does not appear excessive relative to the group's quality, pricing power and margin structure. As such we are optimistic for the prospects for NAV growth. On top of this, there is further upside if and when the family decide to simplify the group structure - the Arnault family have bought ~€500m of LVMH stock in the market so far in 2023.

 

FEMSA

(Discount: 31.9%/Contribution: +1.61%)

FEMSA was a material contributor over the period, with a share price return of 54%.

 

By way of reminder, we initiated a position in FEMSA in 2021, with an investment case predicated on the highly attractive nature of FEMSA Comercio - which operates Oxxo-branded convenience stores, and other small-format retail stores, across Mexico and Latin America - and the unduly low valuation the market was awarding the business. In 2022 management announced a "comprehensive strategic review" of the group structure with a focus on reducing the sum-of-the-parts discount.

 

In February 2023, FEMSA concluded its strategic review and took considerable steps to unlock the sum-of-the-parts discount at which the company trades. The conclusion of the review will see FEMSA simplify its group structure and re-focus on its core businesses. Most pertinently, the company announced that it intends to exit its stake in Heineken, which prior to announcement was worth €7.4bn or 28% of FEMSA's market cap (gross of tax). Shortly following the announcement, FEMSA sold €3.2bn of Heineken/Heineken Holding stock in an accelerated book build and issued a €500m bond exchangeable in Heineken Holding shares.

 

The company will also monetise other non-core assets, the most notable of which is US speciality distributor Envoy Solutions, and return excess capital to shareholders, with a new targeted leverage ratio of 2x Net Debt to EBITDA. Our estimates suggest that, inclusive of further Heineken sales, the company could well have excess capital of $9bn, or 29% of its market cap.

 

We view these developments highly favourably. The company has taken concrete steps to unlock value and shine light on the value of FEMSA Comercio - an expertly managed and scale-advantaged operator with strong unit economics, improving margins, and a long growth runway. The stub currently trades at 8.4x forward EBITDA vs. closest peer Walmex at 13.4x. Such a discount feels increasingly unjustified given the measures taken, with a cleaner equity story and capital structure conducive to both a narrowing of this discount and the prospect of increased shareholder returns.

 

Oakley Capital Investments

(Discount: 31.3%/Contribution: +1.39%)

Oakley Capital Investments ('OCI') was a significant contributor to your company's NAV over the period, adding +1.4% as the shares returned +21% and its discount closed from -42% to -31%. The share price was driven by Oakley reporting its stellar FY22 results, with its NAV growing +24% for the year despite a turbulent economic backdrop.

 

OCI's underlying portfolio of asset-light, tech-enabled businesses delivered strong earnings growth in 2022, with 65% of total portfolio value growth attributable to the financial performance of the portfolio. The average EBITDA growth across the portfolio was 22%, a remarkable achievement reflecting the quality of the businesses that Oakley has assembled. The remaining 35% is from multiple expansion attributable to uplifts from divestments.

 

The market environment has been one of scepticism towards private valuations and, ultimately, the only point when there is certainty about valuations of private assets is when they are sold. Oakley are paid fees on committed/invested capital rather than mark-to-market gains, leaving them no incentive to unduly mark up the portfolio. In fact, we believe that Oakley's portfolio carrying value is very much at the conservative end of the peer group. This was evidenced by OCI making five exits in 2022 at an average 5x gross money multiple and average premium to their carrying value of +70%. This only further highlights the conservatism of OCI's portfolio valuation approach.

 

Oakley were equally active on the investing side over the period, making £214m in new investments and £55m in follow-on investments. They also made a €30m commitment to Oakley Capital PROfounders Fund III.

 

Of particular note was the performance of IU Group, which alone accounted for 51% of the NAV growth in 2022 (+64p). By way of reminder IU Group, Germany's largest private university group, is the crown jewel in Oakley's portfolio, now accounting for 21% of OCI's NAV. Despite its outsized position it remains one of the top three highest growth companies in the portfolio, growing EBITDA +38% year-on-year ('YoY') and student numbers +16%.

 

Oakley had anticipated that IU's growth would almost certainly come from international expansion, but the European business has continued to perform resiliently, increasing student numbers by 16% YoY. The international business remains an exciting prospect and represents a future avenue through which IU can spur company growth if/when the European business begins to plateau. Only one quarter of the total student growth in 2022 came from the international cohort.

 

Following the period end, Oakley's Fund III sold out of its position in German education business IU Group with Oakley's Fund V taking a stake alongside new third-party investors (thus ensuring validation of the transaction price). Although the sale price was equivalent to the most recent carrying value, we note that the asset had been written up by +85% over 2022. Over the life of the investment, it generated a multiple on cost of ~11x.

 

On a look-through basis, IU Group accounted for 21% of OCI's NAV and has now effectively been resized at 6% given OCI's continuing exposure to the asset via Fund V.

 

At Oakley's Capital Markets Day held on the day the transaction was announced, management discussed how IU Group's next phase of growth would require further investment into AI and M&A and that, given these investments would weigh on near-term earnings growth, the opportunity to realise some of the significant gains made sense.

 

While we feel that IU Group's true value is higher than the current carrying/exit value, realising the largest portfolio investment at NAV not only returns a lot of cash to Oakley in a good environment to make new investments (c. £240m for OCI alone), but should help to underpin the NAV. The retention of a material stake in the business means OCI shareholders will continue to benefit from the company's long growth runway.

 

OCI continues to offer the opportunity to own a fast-growing, high-quality portfolio of recurring revenue businesses, backed by a manager with a distinct deal sourcing strategy, and all available at a discount of 31%. We remain excited by our holding in OCI.

 

EXOR

(Discount: 45.0%/Contribution: +1.18%)

Over the interim period EXOR shares returned +16%. This was driven by NAV growth (+20%), as the discount widened from 43% to 45%.

 

All three key listed holdings, Ferrari, Stellantis and CNH Industrial, contributed to NAV growth, with share price returns of +30%, +36%, and +21% respectively, during a period in which they all reported encouraging full year results.

 

Results from Stellantis (the autos company that resulted from the merger of Fiat Chrysler ('FCA')] and PSA) were particularly impressive. In the second half of 2022, sales and operating profit grew +19% and +17% YoY, both coming in 4% ahead of consensus expectations. The broad trends that typified post-pandemic results - low volumes, strong pricing, high margins - were still present, albeit less pronounced and versus a more demanding comparison period. The full year group operating margin of 13.0% is a real yardstick of success - driven not only by exceptional North American performance (16.4% margin), but also performance in Europe that was previously unfathomable (9.9% margin vs. the FCA European business which was loss-making in five of the last eight years to 2020, with 3.2% the highest margin achieved).

 

Longer-term readers of our letters may remember that FCA's extreme undervaluation and the scope for value creation through industry consolidation were key attractions that initially led us to invest in EXOR in 2016. The latter of these two points has of course occurred, with the formation of Stellantis. 2022 results serve to highlight just what a success the merger has been, with Stellantis achieving €7.1bn of net cash synergies - exceeding the €5bn target more than two years ahead of plan. However, the first point - valuation - remains unresolved, with Stellantis trading at a 21% free cash flow yield and roughly half the PE multiple of Ford and GM (adjusted for accounting differences). The recent announcement of a €1.5bn share buyback further highlights the attractive valuation and, combined with the proposed dividend, will see a total of €5.7bn (11% of market cap) returned to shareholders.

 

The past 18 months have been challenging but profitable ones for the auto industry, as volume scarcity has led to increased pricing power, lower levels of dealer incentives and higher margins. Inventory levels are starting to normalise and the path ahead now appears less rosy. With industry-leading breakeven points and a rock-solid balance sheet, combined with the upcoming launch of the RAM BEV, we believe this could be exactly the environment in which Stellantis' quality is recognised - to the benefit of EXOR's NAV.

 

EXOR's discount remains wide (45%) and the prospects for NAV growth appear compelling. However, during the period we partially reduced the position to free up capital for new ideas with more imminent catalysts to drive returns, such that EXOR is currently your Company's sixth largest holding at 5.9% of NAV.

 

Apollo Global Management

(Discount: 32.3%/Contribution: +0.83%)

Apollo Global, the US alternative asset manager ('AAM'), was a strong contributor over the period on the back of accelerating growth in its asset management and insurance businesses. While the +37% increase in share price over the period compares favourably to the +16% recorded by the S&P 500 index, the return had been substantially higher heading into March 2023 before the fall-out from the SVB banking collapse hit the shares hard.

 

A non-immaterial portion of this March decline can likely be explained by programmatic sector-wide trades of "Financials" stocks. That said, one can understand that AAMs with insurance operations where asset/liability matching is a key risk should be under more scrutiny than peers running a pure-play asset management business. That some AAMs with no insurance exposure were down more than those with, suggests the selling was somewhat indiscriminate.

 

But a closer look at APO's insurance business is merited.

 

Following its 1 January 2022 merger with Athene Insurance, APO has by far the greatest amount of insurance liabilities on its balance sheet of all the AAMs. While classified as an insurance company, Athene is more usefully analysed as a spread-lending business. Its most common transaction involves a retail customer purchasing a deferred annuity for a one-off lump sum paid up front. In return, Athene promises to make a bullet repayment in eight to ten years' time that represents a fixed yearly percentage return on the original investment with some additional potential for capped upside based on equity market performance. No tax is payable by the customer until the end of the period, meaning returns compound at a greater rate than they otherwise would.

 

Athene invests the funds received in a portfolio of securities (94% in fixed income, of which 96% is investment grade) and makes a return on the difference between the yield it generates on those assets and the return it pays out to the policyholder. Athene seeks to earn a return premium from complexity and illiquidity rather than from taking additional credit risk, and its return-on-equity has averaged 16% over the last four years (in line with its target of mid-to-high-teens).

 

As interest rates rose, SVB suffered massive deposit flight from its undiversified customer base. This exposed the company's reckless duration mismatch with its capital base facing erosion from the recognition of hitherto-unrealised losses on its long duration investments in treasuries and mortgage backed securities. Crucially, unlike SVB, Athene's liabilities are well protected from disintermediation (i.e., policyholders withdrawing to seek higher returns elsewhere as rates rise). Firstly, 30% of its liabilities (predominantly institutional products) are entirely non-surrenderable, while a further 52% are structured with penalties for early withdrawal.

 

That leaves just 18% of Athene's liabilities that could be withdrawn without any surrender charge. Given Athene's strict liability-matching investment approach, these liabilities are backed by the shortest duration assets (floating rate securities). Indeed, the withdrawal of this group of policies could be a net benefit to Athene given it would release capital which could be redeployed to support the sale of better-protected products with lower liquidity needs and lower capital requirements. Analysis of historic consumer behaviour also confirms the sticky nature of annuities with even the most troubled institutions experiencing only modest upticks in withdrawals in 2008/09 during the global financial crisis.

 

Given Athene's fortress-like balance sheet, substantial excess capital, and Apollo's opportunistic/contrarian investment style, we would expect the company to be a net beneficiary of volatility. We added to Apollo at the March 2023 lows at a share price equating to just 10x our estimate of 2023 earnings. Later in the month, APO management re-confirmed both their 2023 and their long-term (2026) targets, with the latter being to double fee-related and total earnings between 2021 and 2026.

 

DETRACTORS

Aker ASA

(Discount: 16.6%/Contribution: -0.61%)

Aker detracted from returns over the interim period. In local currency terms the shares were down by a modest -3%; however, in Sterling terms this equated to a -9% return. The relatively small local share price return masks the larger (-16%) decline in the NAV, from which we were largely protected as the discount narrowed from 24% to 17%.

 

The key driver of the NAV decline was Aker BP, shares in which declined -15%.

 

Having held Aker since 2008, we have written about the company extensively in previous interim and annual reports. In recent times much of this focus has been on Aker BP, which accounts for 57% of NAV, and the attractive long-term prospects for a well-managed low-cost-low-emission oil and gas company, with a long-production growth runway in a world starved of capex. This idea led us to more than double our position in Aker since the start of 2020.

 

However, growing fears of recessions in Europe and the US have led to significant concerns about the demand outlook for oil, which have been amplified more recently as investors digested the ongoing issues in the US banking system. Meanwhile, during 2022 Russian production remained stubbornly high in the face of sanctions, and we have witnessed record drawings of US Strategic Petroleum Reserves. This led to a material setback in oil prices and in the share prices of oil-related equities.

 

The OPEC+ group of oil producing nations have responded, with a surprise production cut in October 2022 and again in April 2023 - which has helped oil prices to recover in the weeks following the end of the interim period. Whilst this has resulted in ire from the White House, it highlights the extent to which power has shifted to OPEC+ and Saudi Arabia, who no longer fear losing market share to US Shale, the role of which as a meaningful swing producer is now seemingly but a feature of history. This so-called "OPEC-put" should act as a floor for prices and serves as a reminder of the inelastic nature of non-OPEC supply.

 

All told, we believe that the thesis of insufficient capital investment and production growth remains intact, with events of the last year only serving to highlight the foundational and fundamental importance of energy sources, and the significant and elongated role of hydrocarbons.

 

We expect such an environment to be conducive to a period of sustained higher prices and that Aker BP will benefit from this, as they embark on a significant production growth plan. In turn these cash flows can be returned to Aker through dividends (with Aker BP's dividend growing +10% YoY) and invested in higher growth/higher terminal value businesses, such as Aker Horizons, Aker Asset Management and Cognite. Aker's history is one of tremendous value creation and business building, and this is something that we expect going forward.

 

Brookfield Corporation

(Discount: 47.1%/Contribution: -0.58%)

AGT acquired a position in what was then called Brookfield Asset Management in December 2022 ahead of the spin-off of a 25% stake in its asset management business. What was Brookfield Asset Management has been renamed Brookfield Corporation ('BN'); the spun-off asset management business has taken on the name of its parent company ('BAM').

 

Our research highlighted that BAM (as it was) was trading at a dislocated valuation and that either (i) the asset management business was being valued on too cheap a multiple or (ii) the discount on the other assets was too wide.

 

In our view, the stand-alone asset management business was likely to attract a high valuation given that its income is derived entirely from highly-prized fee-related earnings (up until approximately 2027 when it should start generating carry from funds launched post spin-off); its high (90%) dividend pay-out policy; its light balance sheet; its estimated five-year fee-related earnings compound annual growth rate of +17%; and its advantaged AUM mix focused on real assets, power, and renewables with BAM the best-placed of all the alternative asset managers ('AAM's) to exploit the multi-trillion dollar climate transition opportunity over the next decade.

 

Valuations subsequent to the spin-off mean that the discount on Brookfield Corp is very wide, with the spun-off asset management business trading towards the multiples of high-quality balance-sheet light peers. To take advantage of the relative valuations, we sold our BAM shares and used the proceeds to buy more BN.

 

Brookfield Corp's NAV is comprised of the remaining 75% stake in now-listed Brookfield Asset Management (42% of NAV); a 100% stake in unlisted Brookfield Property Group (34% of NAV); stakes in listed Brookfield-managed closed-end funds (18% of NAV); and an insurance business amongst other investments.

 

On all permutations, Brookfield Corp is valued cheaply. The headline discount of 46% is wide, as is the 88% implied discount to its unlisted investments.

 

Expressed differently, the discount could be looked at as writing off the entirety of the $33bn in real estate and then assigning an 18% discount to all the other assets. If we take another iteration, we could say that Brookfield Corp should trade at an arbitrary 20% holding-company discount - doing so would then imply a write-down in the Brookfield Property Group of -81%.

 

On Brookfield Corp's first earnings call post spin-off, management made clear that further action would be taken were the undervaluation to persist. Aside from ramping up share buybacks, we would also expect further spin-offs of the remaining stake in the asset management business to help in unlocking value. We added to the position after the accounting period end.

 

Godrej Industries

(Discount: 65.0%/Contribution: -0.58%)

Godrej Industries detracted 58bps from returns during the interim period. The shares declined -8%, fractionally more than the NAV (-7%), and as such the discount remained largely unchanged at 65%. The fall in share price was amplified by a -11% depreciation of the Indian Rupee against the Pound.

 

In terms of NAV, strength at Godrej Consumer (51% of NAV) was offset by weakness at Godrej Properties (29%) and Godrej Agrovet (11%). Shares in Godrej Properties declined -14% over the period, in what was generally a weaker environment for Indian real estate developers. The BSE Realty Index declined -6% as the impact of higher mortgage rates and reduction in affordability started to be felt and moderated an ebullient market. In April 2023 the Reserve Bank of India paused rate hikes, which all else equal provides a surer footing for the market as we look ahead. Indeed, the company targets +20% mid-term growth, and benefits from a strong brand equity, making it a preferred partner for landowners, and has a high preference from buyers.

 

Godrej Consumer shares rose +6% during a period in which the company reported a promising set of results, showing strong top-line growth and margin expansion, improved underlying consumer demand and cost input inflation abated. Management have navigated a tricky period over the last 12 months, investing heavily in marketing through the cycle, and addressing underperformance in Indonesia. They also simplified operations in Africa, where the turnaround over the last two years has been impressive. Input prices have declined materially YoY which, combined with improving underlying demand, should drive earnings growth.

 

The shares remain incredibly cheap, trading on a 65% discount to NAV. The unlisted Godrej Chemicals (7% of NAV) and Godrej Housing Finance Limited (2%) are performing well and highlight the way in which Godrej Industries can incubate and build businesses to create value. Over time we believe the market should reward this with a narrower discount. However, we believe the company could be much more dynamic in crystalising this value. As such we sold a portion of our holding during the period, re-allocating capital to situations with clearer catalysts to unlock value.

 

Third Point Investors

(Discount: 21.2%/Contribution: -0.53%)

Third Point Investors ('TPOU') materially underperformed with its NAV falling by -4% versus +16% and +18% gains for the S&P 500 and MSCI AC World indices respectively. A widening discount (from 17% to 20%) compounded matters and resulted in a share price decline of -8%.

 

While the credit book was a solid contributor to returns, woeful underperformance on both the long and short equity strategies more than offset this with mark-downs in the VC portfolio adding to the pain.

 

AGT also owns a direct position in the Third Point Offshore Master Fund that underlies TPOU. This was acquired as a result of our participation in an exchange facility offered to TPOU shareholders in early 2022, that allowed qualifying shareholders to exchange a portion of their TPOU shareholding for shares in the Master Fund at a 2% discount to NAV. This saw 43% of our position exchanged for shares in the Master Fund, and we have since redeemed this holding at the maximum permissible rate and will have exited entirely by the end of June 23.

 

News Corp

(Discount: 52.8%/Contribution: -0.48%)

During the period we initiated a new position in News Corp - the Murdoch family-controlled holding company. The shares continued to fall throughout the period, detracting from returns.

 

Whilst the current structure was established in 2013, the relevant history dates back to 1952, when a 21-year-old Rupert Murdoch returned to Australia from Oxford to take over what was left of his father's newspaper business - which had been much diminished by death duties and taxes. From this he built one of the most dominant media empires of the 20th - and indeed 21st - century, amassing vast wealth and notoriety in the process.

 

Today we believe that News Corp is one of the most misvalued and misunderstood companies in our investment universe, trading at a 53% discount to our estimated NAV. The NAV is principally comprised of the following assets: a 64% listed stake in REA Group (36% of NAV), the Australian real estate classified marketplace, and unlisted assets Dow Jones, HarperCollins and Move accounting for 39%, 13%, and 8%, respectively.

 

In particular, Dow Jones is a crown jewel asset that has successfully evolved to become a thriving digital consumer business, whilst both organically and in-organically building a high-quality information services business that warrants a premium multiple reflective of its growing, high margin, sticky, recurring revenues. The value and quality of this business is misunderstood by the sell side and ignored by the market.

 

We estimate that Dow Jones alone is worth nearly 3x News Corp's stub value. The stub trades at just 2.9x EBITDA, with EBITDA expected to grow at an estimated +9% CAGR from 2023-25. This compares to the S&P Communications Services sector median multiple of 10.4x, the New York Times at 16.1x and Information Services peers at 22.3x.

 

Management are highly aware of, and dissatisfied with, the current valuation. Although not consummated, the recent proposed sale of Move (8% NAV) indicates a willingness to make structural changes to unlock value, with multiple potential levers. These include the sale of Move, a monetisation of Foxtel, increased disclosure at Dow Jones - or the holy grail distribution of REA Group, which accounts for 76% of News Corp's market cap. Whilst timing is uncertain, the attractive underlying nature of the NAV means that we can afford to be patient and makes time our friend. Returns from NAV growth and discount narrowing appear attractive.

 

Joe Bauernfreund

Asset Value Investors Limited

31 May 2023


 

 

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

At 31 March 2023

 

Company

Portfolio classification

% of 
investee 
company 

IRR  

(%, GBP)1

ROI   

(%, GBP)2

Cost  
£'000
3 

Equity Exposure4

£'000  

% of net assets

Oakley Capital Investments

Closed-ended Fund

10.5%

27.8%

112.2%

38,241

83,588

8.5%

Schibsted 'B'

Holding Company

4.0%

15.3%

20.0%

71,238

66,694

6.7%

Aker ASA

Holding Company

1.6%

17.1%

77.7%

56,389

62,134

6.3%

Pershing Square Holdings

Closed-ended Fund

0.6%

19.8%

44.2%

41,476

59,800

6.1%

KKR and Co

Holding Company

0.2%

38.2%

98.9%

30,305

58,674

5.9%

EXOR

Holding Company

0.4%

11.5%

39.1%

40,665

56,233

5.7%

Christian Dior

Holding Company

0.0%

41.8%

162.4%

24,583

55,595

5.6%

FEMSA

Holding Company

0.3%

24.1%

44.5%

39,314

55,532

5.6%

Apollo Global Management 'A'

Holding Company

0.1%

16.1%

14.3%

33,528

41,467

4.2%

Nihon Kohden

Asset-backed Special Situation

2.0%

29.7%

10.0%

35,246

38,581

3.9%

Top ten investments





410,985

578,298

58.5%

Spectrum Brands Holdings

Holding Company

1.7%

nm

4.9%

35,602

37,124

3.8%

Wacom

Asset-backed Special Situation

4.7%

-10.6%

-14.7%

37,086

31,238

3.2%

News Corp

Holding Company

0.6%

nm

-13.9%

35,674

30,676

3.1%

Symphony International Holdings

Closed-ended Fund

15.7%

7.4%

45.2%

26,636

30,616

3.1%

IAC

Holding Company

0.8%

-66.0%

-48.4%

58,911

29,318

3.0%

Princess Private Equity

Closed-ended fund

4.9%

nm

2.9%

27,185

27,961

2.8%

Third Point Investors

Closed-ended Fund

3.9%

7.6%

34.9%

22,265

26,087

2.6%

D'Ieteren Group

Holding Company

0.3%

37.7%

34.4%

17,455

24,939

2.5%

DTS

Asset-backed Special Situation

2.6%

11.7%

27.1%

20,754

24,448

2.5%

Godrej Industries

Holding Company

1.8%

-6.1%

-18.8%

30,288

24,076

2.4%

Top twenty investments

 

 

 

 

722,841

864,781

87.5%

Digital Garage

Asset-backed Special Situation

1.6%

31.4%

36.5%

19,431

19,584

2.0%

SK Square

Holding Company

0.5%

nm

3.8%

17,342

17,987

1.8%

Pantheon International

Closed-ended Fund

1.2%

-8.3%

-5.5%

16,124

15,112

1.5%

SK Kaken

Asset-backed Special Situation

1.8%

-6.0%

-22.6%

19,056

13,373

1.4%

Molten Ventures

Closed-ended Fund

3.0%

-47.9%

-30.5%

18,332

12,745

1.3%

Dai Nippon Printing

Asset-backed Special Situation

0.2%

nm

12.8%

10,840

12,276

1.3%

Konishi

Asset-backed Special Situation

2.4%

3.0%

10.5%

10,913

11,201

1.1%

Pasona Group

Asset-backed Special Situation

2.1%

9.2%

25.9%

9,139

10,190

1.0%

ICG Enterprise Trust

Closed-ended Fund

1.4%

-10.5%

-6.3%

10,364

9,575

1.0%

Haw Par Corporation

Holding Company

0.7%

nm

-4.6%

9,423

8,995

0.9%

Top thirty investments





863,805

995,819

100.8%

Hipgnosis Songs Fund

Closed-ended Fund

0.8%

-2.8%

-2.0%

11,911

8,280

0.8%

Bank of Kyoto

Asset-backed Special Situation

0.3%

nm

-5.5%

8,361

7,811

0.8%

Hachijuni Bank

Asset-backed Special Situation

0.4%

nm

-4.6%

8,094

7,696

0.8%

VNV Global

Holding Company

4.0%

60.5%

37.5%

12,209

7,618

0.8%

Shiga Bank

Asset-backed Special Situation

0.9%

nm

-10.6%

8,332

7,418

0.8%

Third Point Offshore Master Fund

Closed-ended Fund


-6.0%

-4.8%

7,795

7,046

0.7%

Toagosei

Asset-backed Special Situation

0.7%

-0.1%

-0.5%

7,307

6,474

0.6%

Iyogin Holdings

Asset-backed Special Situation

0.4%

nm

-1.4%

6,496

6,394

0.6%

Shin Etsu Polymer

Asset-backed Special Situation

0.8%

50.9%

22.8%

2,887

6,197

0.6%

T Hasegawa

Asset-backed Special Situation

0.6%

7.9%

5.8%

4,458

4,661

0.5%

Top forty investments

 

 

 

 

941,655

1,065,414

107.8%

Teikoku Sen-I

Asset-backed Special Situation

1.5%

0.4%

1.2%

6,177

4,234

0.4%

JPEL Private Equity

Closed-ended Fund

15.4%

20.5%

105.0%

1,554

4,092

0.4%

VEF

Holding Company

2.3%

-22.5%

-12.2%

4,525

3,563

0.4%

TSI Holdings

Asset-backed Special Situation

0.8%

nm

20.0%

2,206

2,656

0.3%

Seraphim Space Investment

Closed-ended Fund

2.9%

-55.3%

-20.1%

3,213

2,566

0.3%

ITFOR

Asset-backed Special Situation

1.1%

nm

-1.9%

1,680

1,647

0.2%

Better Capital (2009)

Closed-ended Fund

17.4%

22.2%

41.4%

1,962

978

0.1%

Ashmore Global Opportunities - GBP

Closed-ended Fund

8.5%

97.4%

120.5%

40

249

0.0%

Equity investments at fair value



 

 

963,012

1,085,399

109.9%

 



 

 

 

 

 

Total Return Swaps


 

 

 

 

 

Brookfield Corporation


 

 

 

48,698

4.9%

Total Return Swaps - long positions


 

 

 

48,698

4.9%

SK hynix Inc


 

 

 

(10,145)

(1.0%)

Standard & Poors 500 Index ETF


 

 

 

(61,692)

(6.3%)

Total Return Swaps - short positions


 

 

 

(71,837)

(7.3%)

Total net investment exposure


 

 

 

1,062,260

107.5%

Total Return Swap - notional value included in above


 

 

 

5,676

0.6%

Net current assets less current liabilities (excluding Total Return Swaps)


 

 

 

42,239

4.3%

Non-current liabilities


 

 

 

(122,135)

(12.4%)

Net assets


 

 

 

988,040

100.0%

 

 

1 Internal Rate of Return. Calculated from inception of AVI Global Trust's investment. Refer to Glossary in the Half-Year Report and Accounts.

2 Return on Investment. Calculated from inception of AVI Global Trust's investment. Refer to Glossary in the Half-Year Report and Accounts.

3 Cost. Refer to Glossary in the Half-Year Report and Accounts.

4 Notional current equity value of investments and swaps.

 

 

 

FURTHER INFORMATION

AVI Global Trust Plc's Half Year Report for the period ended 31 March 2023 will be available today on https://www.aviglobal.co.uk.

 

It will also be submitted shortly in full unedited text to the Financial Conduct Authority's National Storage Mechanism and will be available for inspection at data.fca.org.uk/#/nsm/nationalstoragemechanism in accordance with DTR 6.3.5(1A) of the Financial Conduct Authority's Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules.

 

ENDS

 

Neither the contents of the Company's website nor the contents of any website accessible from hyperlinks on this announcement (or any other website) is incorporated into, or forms part of, this announcement.

 

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy Policy.
 
END
 
 
UK 100

Latest directors dealings