28th September 2012
Clontarf Energy plc
("Clontarf" or "the Company")
Interim Statement for the period ended 30 June 2012
Clontarf Energy, the oil and gas exploration company focused on Peru, Ghana and Bolivia, today announces its interim results for the six months ending 30 June 2012.
Operational Highlights:
· Peru
o Following the re-processing and reinterpretation of seismic data, multiple leads and prospects have been worked up on both blocks 188 and 183 in Peru.
o Farm-out discussions are underway. In addition, the Company is considering a re-entry of the Panguana X-1 oil discovery well in Block 188, and a gas-to-power project in Block 183.
· Ghana
o Clontarf has provided the authorities with evidence of its financial and technical ability to conduct the required work programme on Tano 2A Block.
o Continued exploration success in Ghana, elsewhere in Africa and in South America, have confirmed the value of the geology in the Tano Basin.
o New exploration data support Clontarf's view that the extensive oil shows and seeps on the Tano shoreline are sourced from the prolific Cenomanian-Turonian source sequences of the deeper Tano Basin, which also charged the giant Jubilee Field. The migration of this oil across the Tano shelf presents opportunities for traps within the shallow marine-onshore sections.
· Bolivia
o Clontarf awaits state approval for ownership transfer of the Monteagudo oil/gas field.
John Teeling, Chairman, said, "Peru is our immediate priority. We hope to fast-track a re-evaluation of the Panguana structure in Block 188, possibly together with investigation of the Pinria structure to the west. In Block 183, there appears to be an early opportunity to tap likely gas reserves, as part of an integrated gas-to-power development to service this fast-growing electricity-hungry region.
"Ghana offers significant upside to the Company. We are ready to begin the next phase of exploration and remain hopeful of ratification as we have a signed agreement with the state petroleum company.
"Clontarf is examining ways to finance its future operations with the least impact on shareholders."
Peru
Clontarf acquired one million hectares of exploration acreage in two blocks with the signing of licences in September 2011. Seismic has been re-processed and reinterpreted. Multiple leads and prospects have been worked up on both blocks 188 and 183. An extensive programme of environmental workshops and community meetings has been completed. Farm-out discussions are ongoing with interested parties in relation to each block.
Block 183, located in the Marañon basin, covers 396,826 hectares in Central Peru. Two oil fields and one gas field neighbour Block 183. We have analysed and worked with 1,700 km of quality 2D seismic data, which was re-processed, migrated, and re-interpreted, with well-control from the fifteen wells drilled in the basin. The main source rocks is Pucara from the Triassic Age.
We have worked up several leads and drillable prospects, including a gas play, Pacaya, close to the Deminex-drilled neighbouring Shanushi gas occurence just north of our Block 183, with 4-way closure on the same Yurimaguas Anticline trend. This same trend has an additional prospect which also demonstrates strong amplitude anomalies correlated with the gas-condensate found in the same top Pucara/Sarayaquillo level of the Shanusi well. We are in farm-out discussions to drill what we believe to be an extension of this structure, so as to provide gas to generate electricity for the power-hungry city of Tarapoto, circa 60km away, as well as distributing natural gas and LPG as well as marketing the condensate production.
The second Peruvian Block, 188, covers 595,809 hectares in the South Ucayali/Madre de Dios basin. Block 188 is near the world-class producing Camisea gas and condensate fields, as well as two recent discoveries by Repsol of over 4 tcf of gas in Block 57, and recent significant discoveries by Petrobras in block 58. There is 2,000 km of reasonable quality analogue 2D seismic data within this Block. Extensive Ucayali regional data is also available (13,400 km of 2D seismic and 50 wells).
The main petroleum system is Paleozoic, but four source rocks & three seals have been proven. There are three main producing reservoirs in the area. The main challenge in seeking large stratigraphic traps is demonstrating a regional seal.
Oil & gas have already been discovered on Block 188, in the 2,750 metre Panguana X-1 well, drilled by Phillips Petroleum in 1999. Phillips tested the positive log interval, finding oil and no water in the chambre of the Formation RFT (Repeat Formation Tester) test tool (open hole). The oil collected was of 37°API in the Green Sandstone Formation of Cretaceous and Paleozoic age. Physical samples showed that the oil had been generated in the Devonian Madre de Dios kitchen.
Panguana was not developed due to historic factors, especially remoteness and a then low oil price. At that time explorers needed very large discoveries to pay demanding fiscal terms and justify the capex necessary in what was a remote and challenging area. Now there is established infrastructure linked to the nearby Camisea gas/condensate fields and better terms.
In a world of rising resource nationalism, Peru is now a priority area for oil multinationals due to its attractive fiscal terms, a stable government and a relatively unexplored hydrocarbon system. The Company is in discussions with potential partners to explore these blocks.
Ghana
Ghana is a world hot spot for oil development. Clontarf holds a 60% interest in a licence agreement over a very prospective onshore/offshore block. The 1,532 km2 Tano 2A Block is held by a private Ghanaian company, owned 60% by Clontarf Energy, 30% by Petrel, and 10% by local Ghanaian interests. A Petroleum Agreement was signed between the parties and the Ghana National Petroleum Company (GNPC) in March 2010. Parliamentary ratification is still awaited.
Tano onshore oil seepages have been recorded for a century. An initial concern was that these seepages might relate to a different source rock to that of the nearby discoveries. Clontarf's technical team has long believed that both the oil seepages as well as most of the discovered oil originated in the same source rock, deep out to sea.
Industry exploration data released during 2012 support the Company's view that the extensive oil shows and seeps on the Tano shoreline are sourced from the prolific Cenomanian-Turonian sequences of the deeper Tano Basin, which also charged the huge producing Jubilee Field. The possible migration of this oil across the Tano shelf presents opportunities for traps within the shallow marine-onshore sections.
In recent months negotiations have continued between the parties and GNPC. To assist the ratification process substantial security has been offered to GNPC. This guarantees a significant portion of the agreed work programme. Clontarf and its partners have completed all of the analysis possible on available data and are ready to move.
Bolivia
Our third sphere of activity is in Bolivia, a country with significant mineral and hydrocarbon potential. Clontarf inherited a company which has been active in Bolivia for over 20 years. The acquisition brought interests in two producing fields. The Monteagudo oil/gas field (30% Clontarf, 30% Repsol, 20% Petrobras, 20% Andina which is owned by the state), has been producing for 40 years and is in decline. There is a well-defined deep target (4,000 metres) in the Block, in the Devonian Formations. Giant gas discoveries, of trillions of cubic feet, have been made in the Huamapampa and Santa Rosa Formations on adjacent blocks by Total, Petrobras and Repsol. During 2011, negotiations to purchase Repsol's 30% and Petrobras' 20% stakes were satisfactorily concluded. Any transfer of ownership requires approval by the Bolivian Government and Legislature. This process is slow, but we are hopeful it will be completed during 2013. Operatorship would be transferred to our new partner, Latinoamericana de Energia, which would result in significantly lower operating costs and hence, profitability, for the Monteagudo Field. This restructuring would also facilitate early drilling of the deep gas play.
Clontarf also holds a 10% interest in the producing El Dorado gas field near Santa Cruz in Bolivia. There is a legal dispute with our operating partner, YPFB Chaco which is owned by the state. Negotiations are ongoing and, based on legal advice received, we believe that we can resolve the outstanding legal and financial issues. Clontarf has been involved in the El Dorado field for over a decade. Early drilling suggested a field in excess of 0.4 trillion cubic feet of gas. Plans to exploit this gas in the early 2000s were frustrated by low gas prices. Recently, the majority owner YPFB Chaco, has drilled additional wells, constructed a modern gas-processing plant and is producing 10 MMCFD of gas and 230 Bbls/day of liquids (condensate and natural gasoline) from 3 producing wells. The successful re-entry well has not yet been brought into production because of a delay in issuing environmental permits, which are expected soon. Once this permit is received, production could rise to about 19 million cubic feet daily with up to 500 barrels of condensate.
There is a dispute between Clontarf and Chaco over cash calls made by Chaco which originates from the time the asset was owned by Pan American Energy.
Existing oil and gas exploration and production contracts may be influenced by evolving Bolivian legislation. To date, the Bolivian Government has not issued the necessary regulations governing implementation of the new constitution, however a new supreme decree has been issued recently increasing the oil price from US$ 27/barrel to US$ 60/barrel.
Tax changes are currently the subject of international arbitration initiated by oil companies active in Bolivia. Other than these tax changes, Clontarf does not believe that the role of operator is adversely affected and expects to continue operating in Bolivia.
USA
In April 2011 Clontarf Energy plc acquired the Hydrocarbon Exploration group including its US subsidiary Endeavour Oil & Gas Inc which held interests in the Gulf of Mexico.
At that time Endeavour had already been in dispute for four years with its partner on HI30L block in the Gulf of Mexico, Hunt Oil Company, over unauthorized expenditure as described below. The dispute with Hunt Oil Company dates back to 2007 when Endeavour was a fully owned subsidiary of Pan Andean Resources plc. Endeavour had appointed Hunt operator of the HI30L block.
As operator, Hunt incurred unauthorized expenditure which was disputed by Endeavour. Legal proceedings commenced in 2009 and in January 2011 a judgement of US$3.8 million was obtained by Hunt against Endeavour. It was expected that the judgment would be settled by ceding the US assets of Endeavour to Hunt Oil.
Hunt was not satisfied with the value of the US assets and is seeking to make Hydrocarbon liable for any deficit. In March 2012 Hunt filed proceedings against Hydrocarbon Exploration Limited, Petrolex SA, Pan Andean Resources plc and the former directors of Endeavour Oil & Gas (including three of the current directors of Clontarf). We believe there is no merit for the proceedings and are defending them fully.
The dispute with Hunt Oil Company was fully disclosed when Hydrocarbon Exploration acquired Endeavour from Pan Andean Resources plc in April 2010. It was also fully disclosed in 2011 when Clontarf acquired Hydrocarbon Exploration and listed on AIM.
Due to the on-going proceedings Clontarf placed no value on the US assets.
Outlook
Peru is our immediate priority. We hope to fast-track a re-evaluation of the Panguana structure in Block 188, possibly together with investigation of the Pinria structure to the west. In Block 183, there seems an early opportunity to tap likely gas reserves, as part of an integrated gas-to-power development to service this fast-growing electricity-hungry region.
Ghana offers significant upside to the Company. We are ready to begin the next phase of exploration and remain hopeful of ratification as we have a signed agreement with the state petroleum company.
There is very little that can be done in Bolivia until title is clarified and the current proposal before the parliament is ratified. Clontarf is examining ways to finance operations with the least impact on shareholders.
John Teeling
Chairman
28th September 2012
For further information please visit http://clontarfenergy.com or contact:
Clontarf Energy plc
John Teeling, Chairman +353 (0) 1 833 2833
David Horgan, Managing Director
James Finn, Finance Director
Nominated Adviser and Joint Broker
Shore Capital
Pascal Keane/Toby Gibbs, Corporate Finance +44 (0)20 7408 4090
Jerry Keen, Corporate Broking
Joint Broker
Optiva Securities Limited
Jeremy King +44(0)20 3137 1904
Jason Robertson +44(0)20 3137 1906
Public Relations
Blythe Weigh Communications +44 (0)20 7138 3204
Tim Blythe +44 (0) 7816 924626
Pembroke Communications
David O'Siochain +353 (0) 1 649 6486
Clontarf Energy plc |
|||||||||
Financial Information (Unaudited) |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Year Ended |
||
|
|
|
|
|
30 June 12 |
|
30 June 11 |
|
31 Dec 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
unaudited |
|
unaudited |
|
audited |
|
|
|
|
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listing and acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
( 446 ) |
|
( 446 ) |
Administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
( 246 ) |
|
( 245 ) |
|
( 423 ) |
OPERATING LOSS |
|
|
|
|
( 246 ) |
|
( 691 ) |
|
( 869 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance revenue |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
- |
|
1 |
Finance costs |
|
|
|
|
( 1 ) |
|
( 2 ) |
|
( 2 ) |
LOSS BEFORE TAXATION |
|
|
|
|
( 246 ) |
|
( 693 ) |
|
( 870 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE PERIOD |
|
( 246 ) |
|
( 693 ) |
|
( 870 ) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS PER SHARE - basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
(.12p) |
|
(0.52p) |
|
(0.52p) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|
30 June 12 |
|
30 June 11 |
|
31 Dec 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unaudited |
|
unaudited |
|
audited |
|
|
|
|
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
4,822 |
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
4,822 |
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
47 |
|
262 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
1,154 |
|
492 |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
1,201 |
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
5,933 |
|
6,023 |
|
6,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
|
|
( 628 ) |
|
( 295 ) |
|
( 451 ) |
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
( 628 ) |
|
( 295 ) |
|
( 451 ) |
NET ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
5,728 |
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
500 |
|
500 |
Share premium |
|
|
|
|
9,249 |
|
9,249 |
|
9,249 |
Reserves |
|
|
|
|
( 4,444 ) |
|
( 4,021 ) |
|
( 4,198 ) |
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
5,728 |
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
Share based |
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
Share |
|
Payment |
|
Retained |
|
Total |
|
Capital |
|
Premium |
|
Reserves |
|
Losses |
|
Equity |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
As at 1 January 2011 |
188 |
|
2,674 |
|
207 |
|
( 3,732 ) |
|
( 663 ) |
Shares issued |
113 |
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,727 |
Hydrocarbon shares acquired |
169 |
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,051 |
Warrants exercised |
13 |
|
192 |
|
( 74 ) |
|
74 |
|
205 |
Share Options exercised |
17 |
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
Warrants issued |
|
|
( 6 ) |
|
6 |
|
|
|
- |
Share issue costs |
|
|
( 133 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
( 133 ) |
Share Options granted |
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
191 |
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( 693 ) |
|
( 693 ) |
As at 30 June 2011 |
500 |
|
9,249 |
|
330 |
|
( 4,351 ) |
|
5,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
( 177 ) |
|
( 177 ) |
As at 31 December 2011 |
500 |
|
9,249 |
|
330 |
|
( 4,528 ) |
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
( 246 ) |
|
( 246 ) |
As at 30 June 2012 |
500 |
|
9,249 |
|
330 |
|
( 4,774 ) |
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
30 June 12 |
|
30 June 11 |
|
31 Dec 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
unaudited |
|
unaudited |
|
audited |
|
|
|
|
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period |
|
|
|
|
( 246 ) |
|
( 693 ) |
|
( 870 ) |
Finance costs recognised in loss |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
Finance revenue recognised in loss |
|
|
|
( 1 ) |
|
|
|
( 1 ) |
|
Exchange movements |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
Profit on disposal of licence |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
( 207 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
( 235 ) |
|
( 688 ) |
|
( 1,074 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movements in Working Capital |
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
( 903 ) |
|
( 962 ) |
CASH USED IN OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
( 1,591 ) |
|
( 2,036 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs |
|
|
|
|
( 1 ) |
|
( 2 ) |
|
( 2 ) |
Finance revenue |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
- |
|
1 |
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
180 |
|
( 1,593 ) |
|
( 2,037 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
( 540 ) |
|
( 181 ) |
|
( 607 ) |
Profit from disposal of licence |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
207 |
Cash transfers on acquisition |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
34 |
|
34 |
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
( 540 ) |
|
( 147 ) |
|
( 366 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants |
|
|
|
- |
|
205 |
|
205 |
|
Proceeds from share issue |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
2,727 |
|
2,727 |
Share issue costs |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
( 133 ) |
|
( 133 ) |
Proceeds from exercise of options |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
43 |
|
43 |
NET CASH FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
- |
|
2,842 |
|
2,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE)/INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
( 360 ) |
|
1,102 |
|
439 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
492 |
|
55 |
|
55 |
|||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash held |
|
|
|
( 11 ) |
|
( 3 ) |
|
( 2 ) |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENT AT THE END OF THE PERIOD |
|
121 |
|
1,154 |
|
492 |
Notes:
1. INFORMATION
The financial information for the six months ended June 30th, 2012 and the comparative amounts for the six months ended June 30th, 2011 are unaudited. The financial information above does not constitute full statutory accounts within the meaning of section 434 of the Companies Act 2006.
The Interim Financial Report has been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as adopted by the European Union. The accounting policies and methods of computation used in the preparation of the Interim Financial Report are consistent with those used in the Group 2011 Annual Report, which is available at www.clontarfenergy.com
The interim financial statements have not been audited or reviewed by the auditors of the Group pursuant to the Auditing Practices board guidance on Review of Interim Financial Information.
2. No dividend is proposed in respect of the period.
3. LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss after taxation for the year available to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue and ranking for dividend during the year. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the loss after taxation for the year by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue, adjusted for the effect of all dilutive potential ordinary shares that were outstanding during the year.
The following table sets out the computation for basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS):
|
Six months Ended |
|
Year Ended |
||
|
30 June 12 |
|
30 June 11 |
|
31 Dec 11 |
|
£ |
|
£ |
|
£ |
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
For basic and diluted EPS retained loss |
(246,261) |
|
(693,411) |
|
(870,082) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator Weighted average number of ordinary shares |
200,184,469 |
|
134,378,870 |
|
167,785,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
(0.12p) |
|
(0.52p) |
|
(0.52p) |
Diluted EPS |
(0.12p) |
|
(0.52p) |
|
(0.52p) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share are the same as the effect of the outstanding share options is anti-dilutive and is therefore excluded.
4. ACQUISITION OF SUBSIDIARY
On 6 April 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of Hydrocarbon Exploration plc, including its subsidiaries Bolivian Hydrocarbon Limited, Pan Andean Oil and Gas Limited, Hydrocarbon Prospecting plc, Petrolex SA and endeavour Oil & Gas Limited.
The cost of the acquisition was satisfied by the issue of 2,800 Clontarf Energy plc shares for every one Hydrocarbon Exploration share. A total of 67,513,600 consideration shares were issued by the Company to Hydrocarbon shareholders giving a value for the transaction of £4,050,816 (Based on the Company share price of 6p)
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Analysis of assets and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition: |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
Non-Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£'000 |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,471 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
Total Assets Acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300) |
||
Total Liabilities Assumed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,051 |
||
Fair value of replacement options issued |
|
|
|
190 |
|||||
Fair value of previously held shares |
|
|
|
178 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of Hydrocarbon Exploration was completed in April 2011 and the Group completed a provisional assignment of fair values to identifiable net assets acquired for the 2011 interim financial statements. As permitted under IFRS 3, Business Combinations, these provisional fair values were amended for the year ended 31 December 2011. The amendments related to the fair value of the assets acquired in respect of Endeavour Oil & Gas Limited.
Prior to acquisition the Company owned 6% of Hydrocarbon Exploration plc. On acquiring control, the Company, as required under IFR3 Business Combinations, re-measured its existing interest at fair value. The resulting gain was not material
5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Exploration and evaluation assets: |
|
30 June 12 |
|
30 June 11 |
|
31 Dec 11 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January |
|
|
|
6,976 |
|
2,105 |
|
2,105 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
181 |
|
607 |
Disposal |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
(207) |
Assets acquired (Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
4,471 |
||
Closing Balance |
|
|
|
7,516 |
|
6,757 |
|
6,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
1,935 |
|
1,935 |
|
Disposal |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
(207) |
||
Closing Balance |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
1,935 |
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
170 |
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At period end |
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
4,822 |
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 Jun 12 £'000 |
30 Jun 11 £'000 |
31 Dec 11 £'000 |
Peru |
|
4,598 |
4,107 |
4,193 |
Ghana |
|
463 |
415 |
441 |
Bolivia |
|
727 |
300 |
614 |
|
|
_________ |
_________ |
_________ |
|
|
5,788 |
4,822 |
5,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation assets relates to expenditure incurred in prospecting and exploration for oil and gas in Ghana, Peru and Bolivia.
The realisation of these intangible assets is dependent on the discovery and successful development of economic oil and gas reserves which is affected by the risks outlined below. Should this prove unsuccessful the value included in the balance sheet would be written off to the statement of comprehensive income.
The group's activities are subject to a number of significant potential risks including:
- price fluctuations
- foreign exchange risks
- uncertainties over development and operational risks
- operations and environmental risks
- political and legal risks, including arrangements with governments for licenses, profit sharing and taxation.
- foreign investment risks including increases in taxes, royalties and renegotiation of contracts
- liquidity risks
- funding risks
Having reviewed the deferred exploration and evaluation development expenditure at 30 June 2012, the directors are satisfied that the value of the intangible asset is not less than carrying net book value.
6. The Interim Report for the six months to June 30th, 2012 was approved by the Directors on 27th September 2012.
7. The Company had cash balances of £121,000 as at 30 June 2012. The Directors consider that Clontarf is able to continue to operate within its current levels of funding in the immediate term although cash resources are limited. The Board is currently actively considering the best manner in which to address the future financing of the Company including ongoing discussions with a number of potential partners in relation to the group's interest in licences in Peru.
8. Copies of the interim report will be sent to shareholders and will be available for inspection at the Companies Registered Office at 20-22 Bedford Row, London WC1R 4JS. The Interim Report will also shortly be available for viewing at Clontarf Energy plc's website at www.clontarfenergy.com