Final Results Preliminary Results
JUPITER EUROPEAN OPPORTUNITIES TRUST PLC
Preliminary Announcement
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
It is always a pleasure to report on a year of excellent performance. The
Company's net asset value per share rose by 22.3 per cent in the year under
review, compared with a 19.3 per cent total return on the FTSE World Europe ex
UK Total Return Index, our benchmark.
For shareholders the return has been even better, since the discount of the
share price to the net asset value per share (the "discount") narrowed from 9.6
per cent to 2.7 per cent (as at the Company's financial year end). Two years ago
the discount was 17.7 per cent.
The Company's total assets have now risen to above £117 million and, for the
first time in your Company's history, a performance fee is payable to the
Manager. Although the Company has beaten its benchmark index in every financial
year since launch, your Manager has had to wait until now for this reward.
Unluckily for them (and indeed for us all) the Company started life just as the
most sustained bear market for decades was getting under way.
Discount Management
In last year's Chairman's Statement I described a newly-available tool in the
management of the discount, namely the facility to buy in and hold shares for
treasury pending their subsequent reissue or cancellation.
At last year's Annual General Meeting we asked for shareholders' permission to
use this facility, subject to an undertaking that any shares acquired for
treasury would only be reissued if the discount was lower, and the price higher,
than at the time of purchase. Moreover, if shares bought for treasury were not
reissued within six months, they would automatically be cancelled.
I note that mathematicians might argue that the level of the discount is the
important element, and that buying at a discount of `x' and reissuing at a
discount of less than `x' creates value irrespective of what the share price has
done in the meantime. However, our policy remains that any treasury shares held
by the Company should be reissued at a higher price than their purchase price.
Although no shares were bought into treasury during the past financial year, we
came close to doing so and it has been a valuable power to have had available.
Accordingly, we are asking for your permission to renew this facility at the
forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
Plus ça change....
Europe has recently dominated the headlines, although certain European leaders
would have preferred that the reasons were other than the principal cause,
namely the rejection of the proposed European constitutional treaty by a
significant majority of the French and Dutch electorates. There has even been
talk of the break-up of the Eurozone, stimulated by the Italian welfare
minister's suggestion that his country might abandon the euro in favour of the
lira. Italy is arguably in recession, and such a move might rejuvenate the
economy just as Britain's sudden (and, by Britain at least, unplanned) ejection
from the Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992 turned out to have been a blessing in
disguise.
Already the spread between Italian and German 10 year euro-denominated bond
yields has widened to its greatest extent in over two years. The writer never
expected to find himself agreeing with our current Prime Minister, but the
choice for Europe is simply to reform, or wither.
The European Central Bank has held the discount rate at 2 per cent since June
2003. There is now a chance that the next move might be downwards. The euro has
already slipped, although in sterling terms it is back to where it was a year
ago. As regards your Company, the effect on the portfolio should be minimal of
itself; our holdings are in companies which should prosper whatever the euro
does. However a weaker euro should benefit the profits of European exporters,
and this perception has sent European shares higher since the French "Non" vote.
A glance at our balance sheet shows that a year ago we had a positive cash
balance; now we are geared into what, for the moment at least, looks like a
healthy market. It could be that an interesting year lies ahead (and not merely
in the Chinese sense). We look forward to reporting on it a year hence.
H M Priestley
Chairman
25th August 2005
MANAGER'S REVIEW
Your Company performed better than the benchmark index during the twelve months
under review. Borrowings were maintained at 14.7 million throughout the year.
With rising asset values, this added to returns. The trading subsidiary JEOT
Securities made a pre tax profit of £0.3 million. After a relatively poor second
half of 2004, when the absence of steel and other cyclical stocks in the
portfolio hurt performance, there was a marked improvement in the second six
months. This was driven by fundamentals as `our' companies, in general, reported
good profits progress. Our focus on companies which do not depend unduly on a
particular set of economic circumstances obviates, to some extent, the impact of
macro factors such as rising oil prices (up by about 50 per cent. in sterling)
and currency movements (over the period the US dollar fell by 1.1 per cent.
against the euro) and interest rates (rates were lower). We continue to try to
identify companies with particular, sustainable characteristics that allow them
to take advantage of structural changes and trends.
The FTSE World Europe ex UK Index (+15.8 per cent. capital return) again
outperformed the FT World Index (+11.1 per cent.). The relatively good
performance of European equity markets is instructive. It underlines our view
that domestic economic performance (where the European economy is clearly
disappointing) is not necessarily the most important determinant of equity
performance. Europe is struggling with high unemployment, poor public finances
and low consumer demand. Italy is in recession and Germany barely growing at
all. (Spain, on the other hand, grew at around 3 per cent. in 2004). Economists
expect 1.4 per cent. GDP growth in the Eurozone this year (after 1.8 per cent.
in 2004) but if the pattern of recent years is repeated the economists will
continue their record of serial over optimism. Yet equities have done well. This
apparent paradox is explained in part by the fact that there has been a trend to
greater internationalization and so particular economic regions are, in general,
having relatively less impact. World trade as a proportion of world GDP has
risen from about 19 per cent. at the start of the 1990s to about 28 per cent.
now. For companies that have `winning' products and services the opportunity to
grow businesses has never been better. The corollary of this is that those
companies with `inferior' products and services are likely to find competition
ever tougher.
In terms of sectors, commodity stocks, notably oils and steel, performed
relatively well on the back of strong global demand. Banks too outperformed
partly on speculation of merger activity. In fact, this culminated in a big
Italian/German banking merger. Ironically this deal was concluded at just the
time when the voters across Europe rejected the proposed European Constitution,
neatly underlining our view that progress at the corporate level is increasingly
divorced from political developments. Sectors which depend more on European
consumer demand - retail, food and drinks, automotive and telecommunications -
all under-performed reflecting low consumer confidence in Europe.
There are a few themes particular to Europe. The new East European members of
the European Union (EU) are having a beneficial effect. The possibility of
moving operations to Eastern Europe has had the effect of empowering German
management teams. And lower tax rates in Eastern Europe have helped put downward
pressure on corporate tax rates across the rest of Europe. The difficult
background in Europe has spurred European management teams to become both more
rigorous and more international. If `fortress Europe' describes the political
elite's mentality, the same can not be said of the corporate sector. As interest
rates have come down in Europe so Mergers & Acquisitions and private equity
activity have increased.
There were a number of changes in your Company's portfolio. New positions were
taken in a range of companies across different sectors and countries: DIS, the
German temporary work agency, BioMerieux, the French `in vitro' diagnostics
company, Johnson Matthey, a world leader in catalysis, Barry Callebaut, the
world's leading chocolate company, Lonza, the Swiss based pharmaceutical
contract manufacturer, Ypsomed, the Swiss company which manufactures medical
injection systems, Wienerberger, the world leader in bricks, Indra, the Spanish
defence and electronics company, and Vopak, a world leader in the business of
storing chemicals and oils. Most purchases reinforced existing holdings:
positions in Euler Hermes, Elsevier, Imerys, and Air Liquide were all increased
following good results. The principal sales were of Medion (we had concerns
about the quality of the business model), FMC (sold on valuation grounds) and
Autoliv (tougher trading background). Our holding in RAC was sold following a
takeover bid.
Investment outlook
There is a realistic prospect of significant political progress in Germany
(though this does not appear to be the case in France or Italy). Such a
development would be welcome. Yet it is not the most important factor shaping
our prospects. The main factor is our ability to identify companies with a
`winning' franchise, that benefit from structural trends and that can develop
new markets. As world trade (globalization) continues to expand, the political
and economic backdrop in Europe is ever less important. Just as politicians are
frustrated at their inability to control companies through tax, labour laws and
other traditional instruments of government, so companies are `liberated' by
their ability to sidestep particular governments and, with the benefits of
technology, ability to develop new markets. Our objective is to identify those
companies whose success depends as far as possible on their own efforts;
companies which have strong proprietary characteristics. Such companies can
flourish in the current environment. It is this belief that underpins our
confidence for the future.
Alex Darwall
Manager
Jupiter Asset Management Limited
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF TOTAL RETURN
(Incorporating the Revenue Account)
for the year ended 31st May 2005
2005 2004
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Realised (losses) / gains on - (488) (488) - 1,575 1,575
investments
Increase in unrealised appreciation of - 21,396 21,396 - 17,371 17,371
fixed asset investments
______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
Total capital gains on investments - 20,908 20,908 - 18,946 18,946
Foreign exchange (losses) / gains on - (168) (168) - 901 901
loan
Other exchange losses - (4) (4) - (62) (62)
Income 2,218 - 2,218 2,584 - 2,584
Investment management fee (962) - (962) (811) - (811)
Investment performance fee - (1,524) (1,524) - - -
Other expenses (376) - (376) (389) - (389)
______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
Net return before finance costs 880 19,212 20,092 1,384 19,785 21,169
and taxation
Interest payable (312) - (312) (363) - (363)
______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
Return on ordinary activities 568 19,212 19,780 1,021 19,785 20,806
before tax
Tax on ordinary activities (124) - (124) (297) - (297)
______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
Return on ordinary activities after 444 19,212 19,656 724 19,785 20,509
tax
______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
Return per Ordinary share 0.55p 23.82p 24.37p 0.89p 24.53p 25.42p
The revenue column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Group.
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing
operations.
No operations were acquired or discontinued during the year.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
as at 31st May 2005
2005 2004
£'000 £'000
Fixed assets
Investments 118,568 93,335
________ ________
Current assets
Investments 1,525 1,070
Debtors 401 1,148
Cash at bank 41 2,821
________ ________
1,967 5,039
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year (2,796) (459)
________ ________
Net current (liabilities)/assets (829) 4,580
________ ________
Total assets less current liabilities 117,739 97,915
Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year (9,959) (9,791)
________ ________
Net assets 107,780 88,124
Capital and reserves
Called up share capital 807 807
Share premium 38,843 38,843
Special reserve 37,597 37,597
Redemption reserve 22 22
Capital reserve - realised (8,044) (6,028)
Capital reserve - unrealised 37,519 16,291
Revenue reserve 1,036 592
________ ________
Total equity shareholders' funds 107,780 88,124
Net asset value per ordinary share 133.61p 109.25p
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
for the year ended 31st May 2005
2005 2004
£'000 £'000
Operating activities
Net cash inflow from operating activities 720 4,487
_______ _______
Servicing of finance
Interest paid (312) (390)
_______ _______
Net cash outflow from servicing of finance (312) (390)
_______ _______
Taxation
Net tax paid (127) (411)
_______ _______
Capital expenditure and financial investment
Purchase of fixed asset investments (41,874) (31,519)
Sale of fixed asset investments 38,256 38,391
_______ _______
Net cash (outflow) / inflow from capital expenditure and (3,618) 6,872
financial investment
_______ _______
Net cash (outflow) / inflow before financing (3,337) 10,558
_______ _______
Financing
Long term loan received - 4,925
Long term loan repaid - (11,210)
_______ _______
Net cash outflow from financing - (6,285)
_______ _______
(Decrease) / increase in cash (3,337) 4,273
NOTES
1. Income
2005 2004
Group Group
£'000 £'000
Income from investments
Dividends from United Kingdom companies 346 414
Scrip dividends - 10
Dividends from overseas companies 1,561 1,251
1,907 1,675
Other income
Deposit interest 63 52
Profit on dealings by subsidiary 248 857
311 909
Total income 2,218 2,584
Total income comprises
Dividends 1,907 1,675
Interest 63 52
Other income 248 857
2,218 2,584
Income from investments
Listed in the UK 346 414
Listed overseas 1,561 1,261
1,907 1,675
2. Reconciliation of consolidated operating profit to net cash outflow from
operating activities
2005 2004
Group Group
£'000 £'000
Net revenue before finance costs and taxation 880 1,384
Increase in prepayments and accrued income (39) -
(Increase)/decrease in current asset investments (455) 3,075
Increase in other creditors and accruals 1,858 28
Investment performance fee charged to capital (1,524) -
______ ______
720 4,487
3. Creditors : amounts falling due after more than one year
2005 2004
Group & Company Group & Company
£'000 £'000
Bank loan 9,959 9,791
The Company's bank loan is with Commerzbank AG, London with a loan facility
available up to a maximum of 45 per cent. of the Group's total assets but
not exceeding £30 million. The amount outstanding at 31st May 2005 was
£9.959 million (14.7 million) (2004: £9.791 million (14.7 million)). The
interest rate is variable and is linked to Euribor plus a margin of 0.8 per
cent. p.a. The latest all-in rate being applied to the loan is 2.926 per
cent. p.a. (2004: 2.918 per cent.).
The Annual General Meeting of the Company has been convened for Tuesday 20th
September 2005.
The preliminary announcement is prepared on the same basis as set out in the
Statutory Accounts for the year ended 31st May 2004 and was approved by the
Board of Directors on 25th August 2005. The above financial information does
not constitute statutory accounts as defined in section 240 of the Companies Act
1985. The Auditors have reported on the Statutory accounts for the year ended
31st May 2005; their report was unqualified, and did not contain statements
under s237(2) or (3) Companies Act 1985. Statutory accounts for the year ended
31st May 2005 including an unqualified audit report will be delivered to the
Registrar of Companies in due course.
The Annual Report and Accounts are expected to be posted to all registered
shareholders shortly and copies may be obtained from the registered office of
the Company at 1 Grosvenor Place, London SW1X 7JJ.