Household Int. Inc 10Q Part 1
HSBC Holdings PLC
16 November 2004
The following is a Current Report on Form 10-Q containing selected financial
information for the quarter ended 30 September 2004 filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission by Household International, Inc., a
subsidiary of HSBC Holdings plc. Copies of the Form 10-Q are available on
Household International, Inc.'s website at www.Household.com and on the SEC
website at www.sec.gov.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
(X)QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
OR
(_)TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission file number 1-8198
HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 86-1052062
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
60070
2700 Sanders Road,
Prospect Heights, Illinois
(Address of principal (Zip Code)
executive offices) (847) 564-5000
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (X) No (_)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (_) No (X)
At October 31, 2004, there were 50 shares of the registrant's common stock
outstanding, all of which were indirectly owned by HSBC Holdings plc.
The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a)
and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced
disclosure format.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Household International, Inc.
Form 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I.. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements:
Statement of Income................................................................... 3
Balance Sheet......................................................................... 4
Statement of Changes in Shareholder's(s') Equity...................................... 5
Statement of Cash Flows............................................................... 6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:
Forward-Looking Statements............................................................ 18
Executive Overview.................................................................... 18
Basis of Reporting.................................................................... 21
Receivable Review..................................................................... 27
Results of Operations................................................................. 28
Segment Results - Managed Basis....................................................... 33
Credit Quality........................................................................ 39
Liquidity and Capital Resources....................................................... 43
Risk Management....................................................................... 48
Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures............................................ 49
Item 4. Controls and Procedures............................................................... 53
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 1. Legal Proceedings..................................................................... 53
Item 5. Other Information..................................................................... 55
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K...................................................... 55
Signature...................................................................................... 57
2
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
Household International, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Nine months March 29 January 1
Three months ended ended through through
September 30, September 30, September 30, March 28,
----------------------- 2004 2003 2003
2004 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(Successor) (Successor) (Successor) (Successor) (Predecessor)
(in millions)
Finance and other interest income.......... $2,779 $2,571 $7,945 $5,147 $2,469
Interest expense........................... 744 557 2,021 1,130 897
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Net interest income........................ 2,035 2,014 5,924 4,017 1,572
Provision for credit losses................ 1,123 1,001 3,048 2,074 976
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Net interest income after
provision for credit losses.............. 912 1,013 2,876 1,943 596
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Other revenues:
Securitization revenue.................. 267 387 881 680 434
Insurance revenue....................... 203 193 618 382 171
Investment income....................... 36 37 107 71 80
Fee income.............................. 302 266 808 503 280
Other income............................ 161 68 650 237 247
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total other revenues....................... 969 951 3,064 1,873 1,212
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Costs and expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits.......... 472 493 1,415 999 491
Sales incentives........................ 91 77 260 162 37
Occupancy and equipment expenses........ 77 95 237 199 98
Other marketing expenses................ 174 128 437 268 139
Other servicing and administrative
expenses.............................. 235 282 659 555 314
Support services from HSBC
affiliates............................ 183 - 556 - -
Amortization of intangibles............. 83 82 278 163 12
Policyholders' benefits................. 93 95 299 196 91
HSBC acquisition related costs incurred
by Household.......................... - - - - 198
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total costs and expenses................... 1,408 1,252 4,141 2,542 1,380
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Income before income tax expense........... 473 712 1,799 1,274 428
Income tax expense......................... 151 240 601 429 182
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Net income................................. $ 322 $ 472 $1,198 $ 845 $ 246
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
3
Household International, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
September 30, December 31,
2004 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Successor) (Successor)
(in millions, except share data)
Assets
Cash...................................................................... $ 274 $ 463
Securities................................................................ 6,916 11,073
Receivables, net.......................................................... 104,225 91,027
Intangible assets, net.................................................... 2,684 2,856
Goodwill.................................................................. 6,811 6,697
Properties and equipment, net............................................. 476 527
Real estate owned......................................................... 601 631
Derivative financial assets............................................... 3,033 3,118
Other assets.............................................................. 2,740 2,762
-------- --------
Total assets.............................................................. $127,760 $119,154
======== ========
Liabilities
Debt:
Deposits............................................................... $ 51 $ 232
Commercial paper, bank and other borrowings............................ 14,507 9,122
Due to affiliates, net................................................. 11,371 7,589
Senior and senior subordinated debt (with original
maturities over one year)............................................ 78,516 79,464
-------- --------
Total debt................................................................ 104,445 96,407
-------- --------
Insurance policy and claim reserves....................................... 1,299 1,258
Derivative related liabilities............................................ 353 600
Other liabilities......................................................... 3,651 3,228
-------- --------
Total liabilities......................................................... 109,748 101,493
-------- --------
Shareholder's equity
Preferred stock issued to HNAH (issued to HSBC at December 31, 2003)...... 1,100 1,100
Common shareholder's equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized, 50 shares issued. - -
Additional paid-in capital............................................. 14,635 14,645
Retained earnings...................................................... 1,659 1,365
Accumulated other comprehensive income................................. 618 551
-------- --------
Total common shareholder's equity......................................... 16,912 16,561
-------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity................................ $127,760 $119,154
======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
4
Household International, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S(S') EQUITY
Nine months March 29 January 1
ended through through
September 30, September 30, March 28,
2004 2003 2003
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Preferred stock
Balance at beginning of period................................................. $ 1,100 $ 1,100 $ 1,193
Reclassification of preferred stock issuance costs............................. - - 21
Redemption..................................................................... - - (114)
------- ------- -------
Balance at end of period (successor)........................................... $ 1,100 $ 1,100 $ 1,100
======= ======= =======
Common shareholder's(s') equity
Common stock
Balance at beginning of period.............................................. - - $ 552
Effect of push-down accounting of HSBC's purchase price on net assets....... - - (552)
------- ------- -------
Balance at end of period (successor)........................................ - - $ -
------- ------- -------
Additional paid-in capital
Balance at beginning of period.............................................. $14,645 $14,661 $ 1,911
Return of capital to HSBC................................................... (31) (18) -
Employee benefit plans and other............................................ 21 14 10
Reclassification of preferred stock issuance costs.......................... - - (21)
Effect of push-down accounting of HSBC's purchase price on net assets....... - - 12,761
------- ------- -------
Balance at end of period (successor)........................................ $14,635 $14,657 $14,661
------- ------- -------
Retained earnings
Balance at beginning of period.............................................. $ 1,365 $ - $ 9,885
Net income.................................................................. 1,198 845 246
Dividends:
Preferred stock.......................................................... (54) (36) (22)
Common stock............................................................. (850) - (412)
Effect of push-down accounting of HSBC's purchase price on net assets....... - - (9,697)
------- ------- -------
Balance at end of period (successor)........................................ $ 1,659 $ 809 $ -
------- ------- -------
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Balance at beginning of period.............................................. $ 551 $ - $ (695)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on:
Derivatives classified as cash flow hedges............................ 89 46 101
Securities available for sale and interest-only strip receivables..... (38) 114 (25)
Foreign currency translation adjustment.................................. 16 81 (24)
------- ------- -------
Other comprehensive income, net of tax...................................... 67 241 52
Effect of push-down accounting of HSBC's purchase price on net assets....... - - 643
------- ------- -------
Balance at end of period (successor)........................................ $ 618 $ 241 $ -
------- ------- -------
Common stock in treasury
Balance at beginning of period............................................... - - $(2,431)
Exercise of stock options.................................................... - - 12
Issuance of common stock for employee benefit plans.......................... - - 12
Purchase of treasury stock................................................... - - (164)
Effect of push-down accounting of HSBC's purchase price on net assets........ - - 2,571
------- ------- -------
Balance at end of period (successor)......................................... - - $ -
------- ------- -------
Total common shareholder's(s') equity.............................................. $16,912 $15,707 $14,661
======= ======= =======
Comprehensive income
Net income......................................................................... $ 1,198 $ 845 $ 246
Other comprehensive income......................................................... 67 241 52
------- ------- -------
Comprehensive income............................................................... $ 1,265 $ 1,086 $ 298
======= ======= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
5
Household International, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Nine months March 29 January 1
ended through through
September 30, September 30, March 28,
2004 2003 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Successor) (Successor) (Predecessor)
(in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income............................................................. $ 1,198 $ 845 $ 246
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Provision for credit losses........................................ 3,048 2,074 976
Insurance policy and claim reserves................................ (138) (123) 47
Depreciation and amortization...................................... 367 232 53
Net change in interest-only strip receivables...................... 414 277 36
Net change in other assets......................................... 49 781 (593)
Net change in other liabilities.................................... 267 (650) 616
Other, net......................................................... (575) (274) 83
-------- -------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities.................... 4,630 3,162 1,464
-------- -------- -------
Cash flows from investing activities
Securities:
Purchased.......................................................... (1,152) (2,771) (1,047)
Matured............................................................ 1,179 2,107 584
Sold............................................................... 790 470 768
Net change in short-term securities available for sale................. 3,323 960 (375)
Receivables:
Originations, net of collections................................... (42,127) (27,404) (8,261)
Purchases and related premiums..................................... (597) (2,070) (129)
Initial and fill-up securitizations................................ 24,250 18,320 7,300
Sales to affiliates................................................ 1,371 - -
Properties and equipment:
Purchases.......................................................... (55) (70) (21)
Sales.............................................................. 2 5 -
-------- -------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.................... (13,016) (10,453) (1,181)
-------- -------- -------
Cash flows from financing activities
Debt:
Net change in short-term debt and deposits......................... 5,343 3,024 (513)
Net change in time certificates.................................... (155) 97 150
Net change in due to affiliates, net............................... 3,760 5,818 -
Senior and senior subordinated debt issued......................... 12,603 9,558 4,361
Senior and senior subordinated debt retired........................ (12,581) (11,337) (4,030)
Issuance of company obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred
securities of subsidiary trusts to HSBC........................... - 275 -
Redemption of company obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred
securities of subsidiary trusts................................... - (275) -
Insurance:
Policyholders' benefits paid....................................... (124) (106) (36)
Cash received from policyholders................................... 194 84 33
Shareholder's(s') dividends............................................ (850) (293) (141)
Redemption of preferred stock.......................................... - - (114)
Purchase of treasury stock............................................. - - (164)
Issuance of common stock for employee benefit plans.................... - - 62
-------- -------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities.................... 8,190 6,845 (392)
-------- -------- -------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash................................ 7 41 (15)
-------- -------- -------
Net change in cash..................................................... (189) (405) (124)
Cash at beginning of period............................................ 463 674 798
-------- -------- -------
Cash at end of period.................................................. $ 274 $ 269 $ 674
======== ======== =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of
Household International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively,
"Household") have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements.
In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results
of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been made.
Household may also be referred to in this Form 10-Q as "we," "us" or
"our." These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "2003 Form 10-K").
Household International, Inc. is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
HSBC Holdings plc ("HSBC"). Household was acquired by HSBC on March 28,
2003 in a purchase business combination recorded under the "push-down"
method of accounting, which resulted in a new basis of accounting for the
"successor" period beginning March 29, 2003. Information relating to all
"predecessor" periods prior to the acquisition is presented using our
historical basis of accounting, which impacts comparability to our
successor period.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP
requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts
and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Interim
results should not be considered indicative of results in future periods.
Interim financial statement disclosures required by U.S. GAAP regarding
segments are included in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") section of this Form
10-Q.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform
to the current period presentation. Immaterial adjustments have been made
to decrease finance income and increase securitization revenue as reported
in prior periods. These adjustments reflect corrections after discovery of
a system programming error in the posting of finance income between owned
receivables and receivables serviced with limited recourse. Reported net
income for all prior periods was not affected.
2. Securities
Securities consisted of the following available-for-sale investments:
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
September 30, 2004 Cost Gains Losses Value
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate debt securities......................... $2,393 $26 $ (9) $2,410
Money market funds................................ 749 - - 749
Time deposits..................................... 132 - - 132
U.S. government and federal agency debt securities 2,355 - (2) 2,353
Non-government mortgage backed securities......... 84 - - 84
Other............................................. 1,155 1 (2) 1,154
------ --- ---- ------
Subtotal.......................................... 6,868 27 (13) 6,882
Accrued investment income......................... 34 - - 34
------ --- ---- ------
Total securities available for sale............... $6,902 $27 $(13) $6,916
====== === ==== ======
7
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
December 31, 2003 Cost Gains Losses Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate debt securities......................... $ 5,641 $11 $ - $ 5,652
Money market funds................................ 794 - - 794
Time deposits..................................... 952 - - 952
U.S. government and federal agency debt securities 2,430 - (2) 2,428
Marketable equity securities...................... 14 4 - 18
Non-government mortgage backed securities......... 389 - - 389
Other............................................. 794 2 - 796
------- --- --- -------
Subtotal.......................................... 11,014 17 (2) 11,029
Accrued investment income......................... 44 - - 44
------- --- --- -------
Total securities available for sale............... $11,058 $17 $(2) $11,073
======= === === =======
A summary of gross unrealized losses and related fair values as of September
30, 2004, classified as to the length of time the losses have existed follows:
Less Than One Year Greater Than One Year
----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Gross Aggregate Gross Aggregate
Number of Unrealized Fair Value of Number of Unrealized Fair Value of
September 30, 2004 Securities Losses Investments Securities Losses Investments
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate debt securities......... 121 $(3) $305 195 $(6) $566
U.S. government and federal agency
debt securities................. - - - 62 (2) 309
Other............................. 24 (1) 147 42 (1) 98
Gross unrealized losses on our securities available for sale have increased
during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 due to a general increase in
interest rates. Since substantially all of these securities are rated A- or
better, no permanent impairment is expected to be realized.
The amortized cost of our securities available for sale was adjusted to fair
market value at the time of the merger with HSBC. As a result, at December 31,
2003 gross unrealized losses had existed less than one year.
8
3. Receivables
Receivables consisted of the following:
September 30, December 31,
2004 2003
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Real estate secured................................... $ 58,726 $ 51,221
Auto finance.......................................... 6,823 4,138
MasterCard/(1)//Visa/(1)/............................. 11,666 11,182
Private label......................................... 14,000 12,604
Personal non-credit card.............................. 14,888 12,832
Commercial and other.................................. 334 401
-------- --------
Total owned receivables............................... 106,437 92,378
Purchase accounting fair value adjustments............ 272 419
Accrued finance charges............................... 1,489 1,432
Credit loss reserve for owned receivables............. (3,953) (3,793)
Unearned credit insurance premiums and claims reserves (620) (703)
Interest-only strip receivables....................... 473 954
Amounts due and deferred from receivable sales........ 127 340
-------- --------
Total owned receivables, net.......................... 104,225 91,027
Receivables serviced with limited recourse............ 20,175 26,201
-------- --------
Total managed receivables, net........................ $124,400 $117,228
======== ========
--------
/(1)/ MasterCard is a registered trademark of MasterCard International,
Incorporated and Visa is a registered trademark of VISA USA, Inc.
Purchase accounting fair value adjustments represent adjustments which have
been "pushed down" to record our receivables at fair value at the date of
acquisition by HSBC.
Interest-only strip receivables are reported net of our estimate of probable
losses under the recourse provisions for receivables serviced with limited
recourse. Our estimate of the recourse obligation totaled $1,246 million at
September 30, 2004 and $2,374 million at December 31, 2003. Interest-only strip
receivables also included fair value mark-to-market adjustments which increased
the balance by $190 million at September 30, 2004 and $257 million at December
31, 2003.
Receivables serviced with limited recourse consisted of the following:
September 30, December 31,
2004 2003
---------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Real estate secured..... $ 165 $ 194
Auto finance............ 3,060 4,675
MasterCard/Visa......... 8,843 9,967
Private label........... 3,921 5,261
Personal non-credit card 4,186 6,104
------- -------
Total................... $20,175 $26,201
======= =======
9
The combination of receivables owned and receivables serviced with limited
recourse, which comprises our managed portfolio, is shown below:
September 30, December 31,
2004 2003
---------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Real estate secured..... $ 58,891 $ 51,415
Auto finance............ 9,883 8,813
MasterCard/Visa......... 20,509 21,149
Private label........... 17,921 17,865
Personal non-credit card 19,074 18,936
Commercial and other.... 334 401
-------- --------
Total................... $126,612 $118,579
======== ========
4. Credit Loss Reserves
An analysis of credit loss reserves was as follows:
Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
----------------- ----------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Owned receivables:
Credit loss reserves at beginning of period................ $ 3,795 $3,659 $ 3,793 $ 3,333
Provision for credit losses................................ 1,123 1,001 3,048 3,050
Charge-offs................................................ (1,068) (976) (3,176) (2,908)
Recoveries................................................. 99 77 271 204
Other, net................................................. 4 18 17 100
------- ------ ------- -------
Credit loss reserves for owned receivables................. 3,953 3,779 3,953 3,779
------- ------ ------- -------
Receivables serviced with limited recourse:
Credit loss reserves at beginning of period................ 1,904 1,980 2,374 1,759
Provision for credit losses................................ (232) 420 169 1,444
Charge-offs................................................ (418) (459) (1,343) (1,314)
Recoveries................................................. 24 24 76 68
Other, net................................................. (32) (11) (30) (3)
------- ------ ------- -------
Credit loss reserves for receivables serviced with limited
recourse................................................. 1,246 1,954 1,246 1,954
------- ------ ------- -------
Credit loss reserves for managed receivables.................. $ 5,199 $5,733 $ 5,199 $ 5,733
======= ====== ======= =======
Reductions to the provision for credit losses and overall reserve levels on
receivables serviced with limited recourse in 2004 reflect the impact of
reduced securitization levels, including our decision to structure new
collateralized funding transactions as secured financings.
We maintain credit loss reserves to cover probable losses of principal,
interest and fees, including late, overlimit and annual fees. Credit loss
reserves are based on a range of estimates and are intended to be adequate but
not excessive. We estimate probable losses of owned consumer receivables using
a roll rate migration analysis that estimates the likelihood that a loan will
progress through the various stages of delinquency, or buckets, and ultimately
charge off. This analysis considers delinquency status, loss experience and
severity and takes into account whether loans are in bankruptcy, have been
restructured or rewritten, or are subject to forbearance, an
10
external debt management plan, hardship, modification, extension or deferment.
Our credit loss reserves also take into consideration the loss severity
expected based on the underlying collateral, if any, for the loan in the event
of default. Delinquency status may be affected by customer account management
policies and practices such as the restructure of accounts, forbearance
agreements, extended payment plans, modification arrangements, consumer credit
counseling accommodations, loan rewrites and deferments. When customer account
management policies, or changes thereto, shift loans from a "higher"
delinquency bucket to a "lower" delinquency bucket, this is reflected in our
roll rate statistics. To the extent that restructured accounts have a greater
propensity to roll to higher delinquency buckets, this is captured in the roll
rates. Since the loss reserve is computed based on the composite of all of
these calculations, this increase in roll rate is applied to receivables in all
respective delinquency buckets, which increases the overall reserve level. In
addition, loss reserves on consumer receivables are maintained to reflect our
judgment of portfolio risk factors that may not be fully reflected in the
statistical roll rate calculation. Risk factors considered in establishing
overall loss reserves on consumer receivables include recent growth, product
mix, bankruptcy trends, geographic concentrations, economic conditions,
portfolio seasoning, account management policies and practices and current
levels of charge-offs and delinquencies.
While our credit loss reserves are available to absorb losses in the entire
portfolio, we specifically consider the credit quality and other risk factors
for each of our products. We recognize the different inherent loss
characteristics in each of our products as well as customer account management
policies and practices and risk management/collection practices. Charge-off
policies are also considered when establishing loss reserve requirements to
ensure the appropriate reserves exist for products with longer charge-off
periods. We also consider key ratios such as reserves to nonperforming loans
and reserves as a percent of net charge-offs in developing our loss reserve
estimates. Loss reserve estimates are reviewed periodically and adjustments are
reported in earnings when they become known. As these estimates are influenced
by factors outside of our control, such as consumer payment patterns and
economic conditions, there is uncertainty inherent in these estimates, making
it reasonably possible that they could change.
5. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
Accumulated Carrying
September 30, 2004 Gross Amortization Value
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Purchased credit card relationships and related programs $1,615 $296 $1,319
Retail services merchant relationships.................. 270 82 188
Other loan related relationships........................ 326 62 264
Trade names............................................. 717 - 717
Technology, customer lists and other contracts.......... 281 85 196
------ ---- ------
Total................................................... $3,209 $525 $2,684
====== ==== ======
Accumulated Carrying
December 31, 2003 Gross Amortization Value
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Purchased credit card relationships and related programs $1,512 $149 $1,363
Retail services merchant relationships.................. 270 41 229
Other loan related relationships........................ 326 34 292
Trade names............................................. 717 - 717
Technology, customer lists and other contracts.......... 281 26 255
------ ---- ------
Total................................................... $3,106 $250 $2,856
====== ==== ======
11
Estimated amortization expense associated with our intangible assets for each
of the following years is as follows:
Year ending December 31, (in millions)
2004.......... $360
2005.......... 345
2006.......... 337
2007.......... 320
2008.......... 225
During the third quarter of 2004, we completed our annual impairment test of
intangible assets and determined that the fair value of each intangible asset
exceeded its carrying value. As a result, we have concluded that none of our
intangible assets are impaired.
6. Goodwill
Goodwill balances associated with our foreign businesses will change from
period to period due to movements in foreign exchange. During the quarter
ended March 31, 2004, we made final adjustments to the purchase price
allocation resulting from our merger with HSBC. Since the one-year
anniversary of our merger with HSBC was completed in the first quarter of
2004, no further merger-related adjustments to our goodwill balance will
occur, except for changes in estimates of the tax basis in our assets and
liabilities or other tax estimates recorded at the date of our merger with
HSBC, pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Number 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes." During the third quarter of 2004, we reduced
our goodwill balance by approximately $15 million as a result of such
changes in tax estimates.
During the third quarter of 2004, we completed our annual impairment test
of goodwill. For purposes of this test, we assigned the goodwill to our
reporting units. The fair value of each of the reporting units to which
goodwill was assigned exceeded its carrying value. As a result, we have
concluded that none of our goodwill is impaired.
7. Income Taxes
Our effective tax rates were as follows:
Three months ended September 30:
2004 (successor)............................. 31.9%
2003 (successor)............................. 33.7
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 (successor) 33.4
March 29 through September 30, 2003 (successor). 33.7
January 1 through March 28, 2003 (predecessor).. 42.5
The effective tax rate for the period January 1 through March 28, 2003 was
adversely impacted by the non-deductibility of certain HSBC acquisition related
costs. Excluding HSBC acquisition related costs of $198 million, which resulted
in a $27 million tax benefit, our effective tax rate was 33.3 percent for the
period January 1 through March 28, 2003.
The effective tax rate differs from the statutory federal income tax rate
primarily because of the effects of state and local income taxes and tax
credits.
12
8. Stock-Based Compensation
In 2002, we adopted the fair value method of accounting for our stock
option and employee stock purchase plans. We elected to recognize stock
compensation cost prospectively for all new awards granted under those
plans beginning January 1, 2002 as provided under SFAS No. 148, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure (an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 123)" ("SFAS No. 148"). Prior to 2002, we applied the
recognition and measurement provisions of APB No. 25, "Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees" in accounting for those plans. Because options granted
prior to November 2002 vested upon completion of the merger with HSBC on
March 28, 2003, all of our stock options are now accounted for using the
fair value method.
Our employees currently participate in one or more stock compensation plans
sponsored by HSBC. A description of these plans is included in Note 17 of
our 2003 Form 10-K. Compensation expense relating to stock awards is
charged to earnings over the vesting period. During the first quarter of
2004, we began to consider forfeitures for all stock awards granted
subsequent to March 28, 2003 as part of our estimate of compensation cost
rather than adjust compensation cost for forfeitures as they occur. The
cumulative impact of this change was not material.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income if the fair value
method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each
period:
Three months ended Nine months March 29 January 1
September 30, ended through through
---------------------- September 30, September 30, March 28,
2004 2003 2004 2003 2003
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Successor) (Successor) (Successor) (Successor) (Predecessor)
(in millions)
Net income, as reported................... $322 $472 $1,198 $845 $246
Add stock-based employee compensation
expense included in reported net income,
net of tax:
Stock option and employee stock
purchase plans....................... 3 2 12 3 7
Restricted stock rights................ 4 2 9 5 11
Deduct stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under the fair value
method, net of tax:
Stock option and employee stock
purchase plans....................... (3) (2) (12) (3) (53)
Restricted stock rights................ (4) (2) (9) (5) (45)
---- ---- ------ ---- ----
Pro forma net income...................... $322 $472 $1,198 $845 $166
==== ==== ====== ==== ====
9. Related Party Transactions
In the normal course of business, we conduct transactions with HSBC and its
subsidiaries. The following tables present related party balances and the
income and (expense) generated by related party transactions:
September 30, December 31,
2004 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Assets and (Liabilities):
Derivative financial assets, net......... $ 2,491 $ 1,789
Other assets............................. 2 1
Due to affiliates, net...................
HSBC and subsidiaries................. (11,972) (7,589)
HSBC Investments (North America) Inc.. 601 -
Other liabilities........................ (109) (26)
13
Three months Three months Nine months Nine months
ended ended ended ended
September 30, September 30, September 30, September 30,
2004 2003 2004 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Income/(Expense):
Interest expense on borrowings from HSBC and
subsidiaries.................................... $ (95) $(23) $(213) $(28)
HSBC Bank USA, National Association:
Real estate secured servicing revenues......... 4 - 9 -
Real estate secured sourcing, underwriting and
pricing revenues............................. 1 - 3 -
Gain on sale of receivables.................... 10 - 25 -
Other servicing, processing, origination and
support revenues............................. 3 - 8 -
Support services from HSBC affiliates............. (183) - (556) -
HSBC Technology and Services (USA) Inc.:
Rental revenue................................. 8 - 24 -
Administrative services revenue................ 5 - 13 -
Other income from HSBC affiliates................. 4 - 4 -
The notional value of derivative contracts outstanding with HSBC subsidiaries
totaled $59.2 billion at September 30, 2004 and $39.7 billion at December 31,
2003. Affiliate swap counterparties have provided collateral in the form of
securities which are not recorded on our balance sheet and totaled $1.5 billion
at September 30, 2004 and $.5 billion at December 31, 2003.
During the second quarter of 2004, we made advances to our immediate parent,
HSBC Investments (North America) Inc. ("HINO") totaling $266 million which were
repaid during the third quarter of 2004. During the third quarter, we granted a
$1 billion line of credit to HINO which matures in July 2005. The balance
outstanding under the line of credit at September 30, 2004 was $601 million and
is included in due to affiliates. Interest income associated with these
advances, which totaled $2 million for both periods, is included in other
income and is reflected in other income from HSBC affiliates in the above table.
During the third quarter of 2004, our Canadian business began to originate and
service auto loans for an HSBC affiliate in Canada. Fees received for these
services are included in other income and are reflected in other income from
HSBC affiliates in the above table.
Due to affiliates also includes amounts owed to subsidiaries of HSBC (other
than preferred stock). This funding was at interest rates (both the underlying
benchmark rate and credit spreads) comparable to third-party rates for debt
with similar maturities.
In the first quarter of 2004, we sold approximately $.9 billion of real estate
secured receivables from our mortgage services business to HSBC Bank USA,
National Association ("HSBC Bank USA") and recorded a pre-tax gain of $15
million on the sale. Under a separate servicing agreement, we have agreed to
service all real estate secured receivables sold to HSBC Bank USA including all
future business they purchase from our correspondents. As of September 30,
2004, we were servicing $4.9 billion of real estate secured receivables for
HSBC Bank USA. We also received fees from HSBC Bank USA pursuant to a service
level agreement under which we sourced, underwrote and priced $.7 billion of
real estate secured receivables purchased by HSBC Bank USA during the quarter
and $2.2 billion year-to-date. These revenues have been recorded as other
income.
Under various service level agreements, we also provide various services to
HSBC Bank USA. These services include credit card servicing and processing
activities through our credit card services business, loan origination and
servicing through our auto finance business and other operational and
administrative support. Fees received for these services are reported as other
income.
14
On July 1, 2004, Household Bank (SB), N.A. purchased the account relationships
associated with $970 million of MasterCard and Visa credit card receivables
from HSBC Bank USA for approximately $99 million which are included in
intangible assets. The receivables will continue to be owned by HSBC Bank USA.
Originations of new accounts and receivables are made by Household Bank (SB),
N.A. and new receivables are sold daily to HSBC Bank USA. Gains on the daily
sale of credit card receivables to HSBC Bank USA are recorded in other income.
As part of ongoing integration efforts, HSBC has instituted certain changes to
its North American organization structure. Among these initiatives was the
creation of a new technology services company, HSBC Technology and Services
(USA) Inc. ("HTSU"). Effective January 1, 2004, our technology services
employees, as well as technology services employees from other HSBC entities in
North America, were transferred to HTSU. In addition, technology related assets
and software purchased subsequent to January 1, 2004 are generally purchased
and owned by HTSU. Technology related assets owned by Household prior to
January 1, 2004 currently remain in place and were not transferred to HTSU. In
addition to information technology services, HTSU also provides certain item
processing and statement processing activities to us pursuant to a master
service level agreement. As a result of these changes, operating expenses
relating to services provided by HTSU, which have previously been reported as
salaries and fringe benefits, occupancy and equipment expenses or other
servicing and administrative expenses, are now reported as support services
from HSBC affiliates. Support services from HSBC affiliates includes services
provided by HTSU as well as banking services and other miscellaneous services
provided by HSBC Bank USA and other subsidiaries of HSBC. We also receive
revenue from HTSU for certain office space which we have rented to them, which
has been recorded as a reduction of occupancy and equipment expenses, and for
certain administrative costs, which has been recorded as other income.
In addition, we utilize a related HSBC entity to lead manage substantially all
ongoing debt issuances. Fees paid for such services totaled approximately $7.8
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and approximately $7.7
million for the period March 29 through September 30, 2003. These fees are
amortized over the life of the related debt as a component of interest expense.
In September 2004, HSBC North America Holdings Inc. ("HNAH") issued a new
series of preferred stock totaling $1.1 billion to HSBC in exchange for our
outstanding 6.5% cumulative preferred stock issued to HSBC on March 28, 2003.
In October 2004, we paid the accrued dividend of $108 million on our preferred
stock. Also in October 2004, our immediate parent, HINO, issued a new series of
preferred stock to HNAH in exchange for our 6.5% cumulative preferred stock.
10. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Components of net periodic benefit cost related to our defined benefit pension
plans and our postretirement benefits other than pensions were as follows:
Other Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
---------------------- -----------------------
Three months ended September 30 2004 2003 2004 2003
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Successor) (Successor) (Successor) (Successor)
(in millions)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period $ 14 $ 12 $1 $1
Interest cost................................... 13 12 3 3
Expected return on assets....................... (23) (16) - -
Amortization of prior service cost.............. - - - -
Recognized (gains) losses....................... (1) - - -
---- ---- -- --
Net periodic benefit cost....................... $ 3 $ 8 $4 $4
==== ==== == ==
15
Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
---------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Nine months March 29 January 1 Nine months March 29 January 1
ended through through ended through through
September 30, September 30, March 28, September 30, September 30, March 28,
2004 2003 2003 2004 2003 2003
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Successor) (Successor) (Predecessor) (Successor) (Successor) (Predecessor)
(in millions)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period........... $ 41 $ 24 $ 11 $ 3 $2 $1
Interest cost................. 40 24 5 10 7 1
Expected return on assets..... (67) (32) (16) - - 2
Amortization of prior service
cost........................ - - - - - -
Recognized (gains) losses..... (4) - 14 - - -
---- ---- ---- --- -- --
Net periodic benefit cost..... $ 10 $ 16 $ 14 $13 $9 $4
==== ==== ==== === == ==
On November 9, 2004, sponsorship of the United States defined benefit pension
plan was transferred to HNAH.
11. New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
("AICPA") released Statement of Position 03-3, "Accounting for Certain
Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer" ("SOP 03-3"). SOP 03-3
addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and
cash flows expected to be collected from an investor's initial investment
in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are
attributable to credit quality. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans acquired in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. Adoption is not expected to
have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132 (revised), "Employers'
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits" ("SFAS 132
(revised)"). SFAS 132 (revised) revises employers' disclosures about
pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. It does not change
the measurement or recognition of those plans. SFAS 132 (revised) revises
certain disclosure requirements contained in the original SFAS 132. It also
requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows,
and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plans. We adopted the annual disclosure requirements
for SFAS 132 (revised) in our 2003 Form 10-K and the interim period
disclosure requirements in our Form 10-Q beginning with the quarter ended
March 31, 2004.
In January 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 106-1, "Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003" ("FSP 106-1"). FSP 106-1 was
issued in response to a new Medicare bill that provides prescription drug
coverage to Medicare-eligible retirees and was signed into law in December
2003. FSP 106-1 allowed plan sponsors the option of accounting for the
effects of this new law in financial statements for periods that cover the
date of enactment or making a one-time election to defer the accounting for
the effects of the new law. We elected to defer the accounting for the
effects of the new law. In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
FAS 106-2, "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003" ("FSP
106-2"), which superceded FSP 106-1. FSP 106-2 is effective for the first
interim period beginning after June 15, 2004. For companies that elected
deferral under FSP 106-1, and for which enactment is deemed to be a
"significant event," FSP 106-2 provides two methods of transition -
retroactive application or prospective application from the date
of adoption. If the effects of the new law are deemed not to be a
"significant event", the effect can be incorporated into the next
measurement date following the effective date. Based on the information
currently available, adoption of FSP 106-2 is not expected to have a
material impact on our accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or our
net periodic benefit cost and, as such, we do not consider the effects of
the new law to be a significant event.
Accordingly, we will account for the effects of the new law beginning on
December 31, 2004, our next measurement date.
16
In March 2004, the FASB reached a consensus on EITF 03-1, "The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments"
("EITF 03-1"). EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining when an investment
is impaired and whether the impairment is other than temporary. EITF 03-1 also
incorporates into its consensus the required disclosures about unrealized
losses on investments announced by the EITF in late 2003 and adds new
disclosure requirements relating to cost-method investments. The new disclosure
requirements are effective for annual reporting periods ending after June 15,
2004 and the new impairment accounting guidance was to become effective for
reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. In September 2004, the FASB
delayed the effective date of EITF 03-1 for measurement and recognition of
impairment losses until implementation guidance is issued. We do not expect the
adoption of the impairment guidance contained in EITF 03-1 to have a material
impact on our financial position or results of operations.
17
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations ("MD&A") should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements, notes and tables included elsewhere in this report and in
the Household International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "2003 Form 10-K"). MD&A may contain certain statements
that may be forward-looking in nature within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our results may differ materially
from those noted in the forward-looking statements. Words such as "believe",
"expects", "estimates", "targeted", "anticipates", "goal" and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but should not
be considered as the only means through which these statements may be made.
Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about
management's beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements which
involve inherent risks and uncertainties and are based on current views and
assumptions. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. For a list
of important factors that may affect our actual results, see Cautionary
Statement on Forward Looking Statements in Part I, Item 1 of our 2003 Form 10-K.
Executive Overview
Household International, Inc. is principally a non-operating holding company
and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Holdings plc ("HSBC").
Household may also be referred to in MD&A as "we", "us", or "our". Household's
acquisition by HSBC on March 28, 2003 has resulted in a new basis of accounting
reflecting the fair market value of our assets and liabilities for the
"successor" period beginning March 29, 2003. Information for all "predecessor"
periods prior to the merger is presented using our historical basis of
accounting, which impacts comparability to our "successor" period beginning
March 29, 2003. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the
"predecessor" period contributed $246 million of net income and the "successor"
period contributed $845 million of net income. To assist in the comparability
of our financial results and to make it easier to discuss and understand our
results of operations, MD&A combines the "predecessor" period (January 1 to
March 28, 2003) with the "successor" period (March 29 to September 30, 2003) to
present "combined" results for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
In addition to owned basis reporting, we also monitor our operations and
evaluate trends on a managed basis (a non-GAAP financial measure), which
assumes that securitized receivables have not been sold and are still on our
balance sheet. See "Basis of Reporting" for further discussion of the reasons
we use this non-GAAP financial measure.
On September 30, 2004, we commenced the rebranding of the majority of our U.S.
and Canadian businesses, including Household International, to the HSBC brand.
The rebranding means that businesses previously operating under the Household
name will be called HSBC. Our consumer lending business will retain the HFC and
Beneficial brands, accompanied by the HSBC Group's endorsement signature,
"Member HSBC Group." The single brand will allow HSBC in North America to
better align its businesses, providing a stronger platform to service customers
and advance growth. The HSBC brand also positions us to expand the products and
services offered to our customers. As part of this initiative and subject to
regulatory approvals, we expect to merge with our subsidiary, Household Finance
Corporation, in December 2004. At the time of the merger, Household
International, Inc. will change its name to HSBC Finance Corporation.
In measuring our results, management's primary focus is on managed receivable
growth and operating net income (a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes
$167 million, after-tax, of HSBC acquisition related costs and other merger
related items incurred by Household in the first quarter of 2003.) See "Basis
of Reporting" for further discussion of operating net income. Net income was
$322 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, a decrease of 32 percent
compared to net income of $472 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease
was primarily due to higher operating expenses and higher provision for credit
losses due to
18
receivable growth, partially offset by higher net interest income. Net income
for the first nine months of 2004 was $1,198 million, a 5 percent decrease from
operating net income of $1,258 million for the first nine months of 2003. The
decrease was primarily due to higher operating expenses and lower other
revenues partially offset by higher net interest income. Operating expenses
increased due to receivable growth, increases in legal costs and, for the nine
month period, higher amortization of intangibles which were established in
connection with the HSBC merger. The increase in net interest income during
both periods was due to higher average receivable balances offset by lower
yields on our receivables, particularly in real estate secured and auto finance
receivables and, for the nine month period, lower funding costs.
Funding costs were higher during the three month period resulting from a rising
interest rate environment. Other revenues decreased during the nine month
period due to reduced initial securitization activity partially offset by
higher other income. Amortization of purchase accounting fair value adjustments
increased net income by $21 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004,
and $56 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $32
million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and $75 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2003.
The financial information set forth below summarizes selected financial
highlights of Household as of September 30, 2004 and 2003 and for the three and
nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
-------------------------------- -------------------------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Successor) (Successor) (Successor) (Combined)
(dollars are in millions)
Net income:/(1)/............................. $ 322 $ 472 $1,198 $1,091
Owned Basis Ratios:
Return on average owned assets
("ROA")/(1)/............................ 1.03% 1.68% 1.33% 1.35%
Return on average common shareholder's
equity ("ROE")/(1)/..................... 6.9 11.8 8.8 10.4
Net interest margin....................... 7.54 8.39 7.67 8.07
Consumer net charge-off ratio, annualized. 3.77 3.98 3.98 4.17
Efficiency ratio/(1)(2)/.................. 45.2 40.3 44.2 43.3
Managed Basis Ratios:/(3)/
Return on average managed assets
("ROMA")/(1)/........................... .88% 1.39% 1.11% 1.11%
Net interest margin....................... 8.08 9.12 8.34 8.89
Risk adjusted revenue..................... 6.64 7.19 6.87 7.21
Consumer net charge-off ratio, annualized. 4.38 4.68 4.61 4.77
Efficiency ratio/(1)(2)/.................. 49.1 35.2 43.4 37.0
September 30, September 30,
2004 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Successor) (Successor)
(dollars are in millions)
Receivables:
Owned basis.................................... $106,437 $ 93,028
Managed basis/(3)/............................. 126,612 117,137
Two-month-and-over contractual delinquency ratios:
Owned basis.................................... 4.43% 5.36%
Managed basis/(3)/............................. 4.59 5.36
--------
/(1)/ The following table includes non-GAAP financial information for the nine
months ended September 30, 2003. This information is provided for
comparison of our operating trends only and should be read in conjunction
with our owned basis GAAP financial information. See "Basis of Reporting"
for additional discussion on the use of non-GAAP financial measures and
"Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures" for quantitative
reconciliations to the equivalent GAAP basis financial measure.
19
Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
------------------ -----------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Net income.............................................................. $ 322 $ 472 $1,198 $1,091
HSBC acquisition related costs and other merger related items, after-tax - - - 167
----- ----- - ------ ------
Operating net income.................................................... $ 322 $ 472 $1,198 $1,258
===== ===== = ====== ======
ROA..................................................................... 1.03% 1.68% 1.33% 1.56%
ROE..................................................................... 6.9 11.8 8.8 12.1
Owned basis efficiency ratio/(2)/....................................... 45.2 40.3 44.2 41.0
ROMA.................................................................... .88 1.39 1.11 1.27
Managed basis efficiency ratio/(2)/..................................... 49.1 35.2 43.4 35.0
/(2)/ Ratio of total costs and expenses less policyholders' benefits to net
interest margin and other revenues less policyholders' benefits.
/(3)/ Managed basis reporting is a non-GAAP financial measure. See "Basis of
Reporting" for additional discussion on the use of this non-GAAP
financial measure and "Reconciliations to GAAP financial Measures" for
quantitative reconciliations to the equivalent GAAP basis financial
measure.
Because HSBC reports results on a U.K. GAAP basis, our management also
separately monitors earnings excluding goodwill amortization and net income
under U.K. GAAP (non-GAAP financial measures). The following table summarizes
U.K. GAAP results:
March
Three months ended Nine months ended 29 through
September 30, September 30, September 30,
------------------ 2004 2003
2004 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Earnings excluding goodwill amortization - U.K. GAAP
basis............................................. $621 $576 $2,138 $1,095
Net income - U.K. GAAP basis........................ 491 463 1,745 867
Owned receivables were $106.4 billion at September 30, 2004, $99.4 billion at
June 30, 2004, and $93.0 billion at September 30, 2003. We experienced growth
in all our receivable products with real estate secured receivables being the
primary contributor of the growth. Real estate secured receivable levels
reflect sales to HSBC Bank USA, National Association ("HSBC Bank USA") of $.9
billion on March 31, 2004 and $2.8 billion on December 31, 2003 and purchases
of correspondent receivables directly by HSBC Bank USA of $.7 billion in the
third quarter of 2004 and $2.2 billion year-to-date, a portion of which we
otherwise would have purchased. Lower securitization levels also contributed to
the increase in owned receivables over June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003
levels.
We previously reported that we intend to transfer our domestic private label
credit card portfolio to HSBC Bank USA in 2004. We plan to maintain the related
customer account relationships and sell additional volume to HSBC Bank USA on a
daily basis following the initial sale. HSBC Bank USA has filed a formal
application seeking regulatory approval to acquire our domestic private label
portfolio in 2004. We and HSBC Bank USA will consider potential transfers of
some of our MasterCard and Visa receivables to HSBC Bank USA in the future
based upon continuing evaluations of capital and liquidity at each entity.
The private label receivables we expect to sell to HSBC Bank USA by year-end
will have a principal balance of approximately $12 billion ($15 billion on a
managed basis). Upon receipt of regulatory approval for transfer of the private
label portfolio, we will adopt charge-off and account management policies in
accordance with the Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management
Policy issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
("FFIEC") for our entire domestic private label and MasterCard and Visa
portfolios. Following the transfer of the private label portfolio, we expect
our net interest income and fee income will be substantially reduced, but our
other income will substantially increase as we record gains from the initial
and continuing sales of private label receivables in the future. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the timing as to when or if regulatory
approval will be received and, therefore, when the related asset transfers will
be completed. However, if regulatory approval is received, we currently expect
that adoption of FFIEC charge-
20
off and account management policies for our domestic private label and
Mastercard/Visa credit card portfolios would result in a reduction to net
income of approximately $130 million. We also currently expect that we will
recognize an after tax gain on sale of approximately $370 million when the
domestic private label portfolio is sold to HSBC Bank USA. Updates to the
information on the financial impact of the proposed transfer will be reported
as the regulatory approval process progresses and the amounts become certain.
Our owned basis two-months-and-over-contractual delinquency ratio decreased
compared to both the prior quarter and the prior year quarter. The decrease is
consistent with the improvements in early delinquency roll rate trends we began
to experience in the fourth quarter of 2003 as a result of improvements in the
economy and better underwriting, including both improved modeling and improved
credit quality of originations. Dollars of delinquency decreased compared to
the prior year quarter but increased compared to the prior quarter as
securitization levels declined and our interest in the receivables of certain
securitization trusts increased.
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average consumer receivables for the
September 2004 quarter decreased over the June 2004 and prior year quarter as
the lower delinquency levels we have been experiencing are having an impact on
charge-offs. Also contributing to the decrease in net charge-offs compared to
the prior year quarter were improved collections and a decrease in the
percentage of the portfolio comprised of personal non-credit card receivables,
which have a higher net charge-off rate than other products in our portfolio.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we became less reliant on
third party debt and initial securitization funding as we used proceeds from
the sale of real estate secured receivables to HSBC Bank USA and debt issued to
affiliates to assist in the funding of our businesses. Because we are now a
subsidiary of HSBC, our credit spreads relative to Treasuries have tightened.
We recognized cash funding expense savings, primarily as a result of these
tightened credit spreads and lower costs due to shortening the maturity of our
liabilities primarily through increased issuance of commercial paper, in excess
of $235 million for the first nine months of 2004 and less than $70 million for
the prior-year period compared to the funding costs we would have incurred
using average spreads from the first half of 2002.
Securitization of consumer receivables has been a source of funding and
liquidity for us. Under U.K. GAAP as reported by HSBC, our securitizations are
treated as secured financings. In order to align our accounting treatment with
that of HSBC under U.K. GAAP, we began to structure all new collateralized
funding transactions as secured financings in the third quarter of 2004.
However, because existing public private label and MasterCard and Visa credit
card transactions were structured as sales to revolving trusts that require
replenishments of receivables to support previously issued securities,
receivables of each of these asset types will continue to be sold to these
trusts and the resulting replenishment gains recorded until the revolving
periods end, the last of which is expected to occur in 2007. In addition, we
will continue to replenish at reduced levels, certain non-public personal
non-credit card and MasterCard and Visa securities issued to conduits and
record the resulting replenishment gains for a period of time in order to
manage liquidity. Since our securitized receivables have varying lives, it will
take several years for these receivables to pay-off and the related
interest-only strip receivables to be reduced to zero. The termination of sale
treatment on new collateralized funding activity reduces our reported net
income under U.S. GAAP. There is no impact, however, on cash received from
operations or on U.K. GAAP reported results.
Basis of Reporting
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP").
Unless noted, the discussion of our financial condition and results of
operations included in MD&A is presented on an owned basis of reporting.
Household's acquisition by HSBC on March 28, 2003 has resulted in a new basis
of accounting reflecting the fair value of our assets and liabilities for the
"successor" period beginning March 29, 2003. Information for all "predecessor"
periods prior to the merger are presented using our historical basis of
accounting, which impacts
21
comparability with the "successor" period beginning March 29, 2003. To assist
in the comparability of our financial results and to make it easier to discuss
and understand our results of operations, MD&A combines the "predecessor"
period (January 1 through March 28, 2003) with the "successor" period (March 29
through September 30, 2003) to present "combined" results for the nine months
ended September 30, 2003.
In addition to the U.S. GAAP financial results reported in our consolidated
financial statements, MD&A includes reference to the following information
which is presented on a non-GAAP basis:
Operating Results, Percentages and Ratios Certain percentages and ratios have
been presented on an operating basis and have been calculated using "operating
net income", a non-GAAP financial measure. "Operating net income" is net income
excluding $167 million, after-tax, of HSBC acquisition related costs and other
merger related items incurred by Household in the first quarter of 2003. This
nonrecurring item is also excluded in calculating our operating basis
efficiency ratios. We believe that excluding this nonrecurring item helps
readers of our financial statements to better understand the results and trends
of our underlying business.
Managed Basis Reporting We monitor our operations and evaluate trends on a
managed basis (a non-GAAP financial measure), which assumes that securitized
receivables have not been sold and are still on our balance sheet. We manage
and evaluate our operations on a managed basis because the receivables that we
securitize are subjected to underwriting standards comparable to our owned
portfolio, are serviced by operating personnel without regard to ownership and
result in a similar credit loss exposure for us. In addition, we fund our
operations, review our operating results, and make decisions about allocating
resources such as employees and capital on a managed basis.
When reporting on a managed basis, net interest income, provision for credit
losses and fee income related to receivables securitized are reclassified from
securitization revenue in our owned statement of income into the appropriate
caption. Additionally, charge-off and delinquency associated with these
receivables are included in our managed basis credit quality statistics.
Debt analysts, rating agencies and others also evaluate our operations on a
managed basis for the reasons discussed above and have historically requested
managed basis information from us. We believe that managed basis information
enables investors and other interested parties to better understand the
performance and quality of our entire managed loan portfolio and is important
to understanding the quality of originations and the related credit risk
inherent in our owned and securitized portfolios. As the level of our
securitized receivables falls over time, managed basis and owned basis results
will eventually converge, and we will only report owned basis results.
Equity Ratios Tangible shareholder's equity to tangible managed assets
("TETMA"), tangible shareholder's equity plus owned loss reserves to tangible
managed assets ("TETMA + Owned Reserves") and tangible common equity to
tangible managed assets are non-GAAP financial measures that are used by
Household management or certain rating agencies to evaluate capital adequacy.
These ratios may differ from similarly named measures presented by other
companies. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is common and
preferred equity to owned assets.
We also monitor our equity ratios excluding the impact of purchase accounting
adjustments. We do so because we believe that the purchase accounting
adjustments represent non-cash transactions which do not affect our business
operations, cash flows or ability to meet our debt obligations.
Preferred securities issued by certain non-consolidated trusts are considered
equity in the TETMA and TETMA + Owned Reserves calculations because of their
long-term subordinated nature and the ability to defer dividends. Our
Adjustable Conversion-Rate Equity Security Units, which exclude purchase
accounting adjustments, are also considered equity in these calculations
because they include investor obligations to purchase HSBC ordinary shares in
2006.
22
U.K. GAAP Because HSBC reports results on a U.K. GAAP basis, our management
also separately monitors net income and earnings excluding goodwill
amortization under U.K. GAAP (non-GAAP financial measures). The following table
reconciles our net income on a U.S. GAAP basis to earnings excluding goodwill
amortization and net income on a U.K. GAAP basis:
Nine months March 29
Three months ended ended through
September 30, September 30, September 30,
----------------- 2004 2003
2004 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Net income - U.S. GAAP basis.............................. $ 322 $ 472 $1,198 $ 845
Adjustments, net-of-tax:
Deferred origination expenses...................... 5 (24) (67) (46)
Derivative financial instruments................... - 3 1 (44)
Securitizations.................................... 177 (168) 426 (348)
Intangibles........................................ 46 46 163 97
Purchase accounting adjustments.................... 76 181 387 560
Other.............................................. (5) 66 30 31
----- ----- ------ ------
Earnings excluding goodwill amortization - U.K. GAAP basis 621 576 2,138 1,095
Goodwill amortization..................................... (130) (113) (393) (228)
----- ----- ------ ------
Net income - U.K. GAAP basis.............................. $ 491 $ 463 $1,745 $ 867
===== ===== ====== ======
Differences between U.S. and U.K GAAP are as follows:
Deferred origination expenses
U.K. GAAP
. Fee and commission income is accounted for in the period when receivable,
except when it is charged to cover the costs of a continuing service to,
or risk borne for, the customer, or is interest in nature. In these cases,
it is recognized on an appropriate basis over the relevant period.
. Loan origination costs are generally expensed as incurred. As permitted by
U.K. GAAP, HSBC applies a restricted definition of the incremental,
directly attributable origination expenses that are deferred and
subsequently amortized over the life of the loans.
U.S. GAAP
. Certain loan fee income and direct loan origination costs are amortized to
the profit and loss account over the life of the loan as an adjustment to
interest income (SFAS 91, "Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs
Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of
Leases".)
Derivative financial instruments
U.K. GAAP
. Non-trading derivatives are those which are held for hedging purposes as
part of our risk management strategy against cash flows, assets,
liabilities, or positions measured on an accruals basis. Non-trading
transactions include qualifying hedges and positions that synthetically
alter the characteristics of specified financial instruments.
. Non-trading derivatives are accounted for on an equivalent basis to the
underlying assets, liabilities or net positions. Any profit or loss
arising is recognized on the same basis as that arising from the related
assets, liabilities or positions.
. To qualify as a hedge, a derivative must effectively reduce the price,
foreign exchange or interest rate risk of the asset, liability or
anticipated transaction to which it is linked and be designated as a hedge
at inception of the derivative contract. Accordingly, changes in the
market value of the derivative must be highly correlated with changes in
the market value of the underlying hedged item at inception of the
23
hedge and over the life of the hedge contract. If these criteria are met,
the derivative is accounted for on the same basis as the underlying hedged
item. Derivatives used for hedging purposes include swaps, forwards and
futures.
. Interest rate swaps are also used to alter synthetically the interest rate
characteristics of financial instruments. In order to qualify for
synthetic alteration, a derivative instrument must be linked to specific
individual, or pools of similar, assets or liabilities by the notional
principal and interest rate risk of the associated instruments, and must
achieve a result that is consistent with defined risk management
objectives. If these criteria are met, accrual based accounting is
applied, i.e. income or expense is recognized and accrued to the next
settlement date in accordance with the contractual terms of the agreement.
. Any gain or loss arising on the termination of a qualifying derivative is
deferred and amortized to earnings over the original life of the
terminated contract. Where the underlying asset, liability or position is
sold or terminated, the qualifying derivative is immediately
marked-to-market through the profit and loss account.
. Derivatives that do not qualify as hedges or synthetic alterations at
inception are marked-to-market through the profit and loss account, with
gains and losses included within "other income".
U.S. GAAP
. All derivatives must be recognized as either assets or liabilities in the
balance sheet and be measured at fair value (SFAS 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities").
. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative (that is,
gains and losses) depends on the intended use of the derivative and the
resulting designation as described below:
- For a derivative designated as hedging exposure to changes in the fair
value of a recognized asset or liability or a firm commitment, the
gain or loss is recognized in earnings in the period of change
together with the associated loss or gain on the hedged item
attributable to the risk being hedged. Any resulting net gain or loss
represents the ineffective portion of the hedge.
- For a derivative designated as hedging exposure to variable cash flows
of a recognized asset or liability, or of a forecast transaction, the
derivative's gain or loss associated with the effective portion of the
hedge is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive
income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the forecast
transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion is reported in
earnings immediately.
- For net investment hedges in which derivatives hedge the foreign
currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, the
change in fair value of the derivative associated with the effective
portion of the hedge is included as a component of other comprehensive
income, together with the associated loss or gain on the hedged item.
The ineffective portion is reported in earnings immediately.
- In order to apply hedge accounting it is necessary to comply with
documentation requirements and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the
hedge on an ongoing basis.
- For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or
loss is recognized in earnings in the period of change in fair value.
Securitizations
U.K. GAAP
. FRS 5, "Reporting the Substance of Transactions," requires that the
accounting for securitized receivables is governed by whether the
originator has access to the benefits of the securitized assets and
exposure to the risks inherent in those benefits and whether the
originator has a liability to repay the proceeds of the note issue:
- The securitized assets should be derecognized in their entirety and a
gain or loss on sale recorded where the originator retains no
significant benefits and no significant risks relating to those
securitized assets.
- The securitized assets and the related finance should be consolidated
under a linked presentation where the originator retains significant
benefits and significant risks relating to those securitized
24
assets but where the downside exposure is limited to a fixed monetary
amount and certain other conditions are met.
- The securitized assets and the related finance should be consolidated
on a gross basis where the originator retains significant benefits and
significant risks relating to those securitized assets and does not
meet the conditions required for linked presentation.
- The run-off of prior period transactions and a lower volume of
transactions have resulted in lower income under U.S. GAAP in the
quarter and year-to-date periods and, therefore, higher reported net
income under U.K. GAAP.
U.S. GAAP
. SFAS 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities," requires that receivables that are sold
to a special purpose entity and securitized can only be derecognized and a
gain or loss on sale recognized if the originator has surrendered control
over those securitized assets.
. Control has been surrendered over transferred assets if and only if all of
the following conditions are met:
- The transferred assets have been put presumptively beyond the reach of
the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other
receivership.
- Each holder of interests in the transferee (i.e., holder of issued
notes) has the right to pledge or exchange their beneficial interests,
and no condition constrains this right and provides more than a
trivial benefit to the transferor.
- The transferor does not maintain effective control over the assets
through either an agreement that obligates the transferor to
repurchase or to redeem them before their maturity or through the
ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets,
other than through a clean-up call.
- If these conditions are not met the securitized assets should continue
to be consolidated.
. Where we retain an interest in the securitized assets, such as a servicing
right or the right to residual cash flows from the special purpose entity,
we recognize this interest at fair value on sale of the assets.
. There are no provisions for linked presentation of securitized assets and
the related finance.
Intangibles
U.K. GAAP
. An intangible asset is recognized separately from goodwill where it is
identifiable and controlled. It is identifiable only if it can be disposed
of or settled separately without disposing of the whole business. Control
requires legal rights or custody over the item.
. An intangible asset purchased as part of a business combination is
capitalized at fair value based on its replacement cost, which is normally
its estimated market value.
U.S. GAAP
. An intangible asset is recognized separately from goodwill when it arises
from contractual or other legal rights or if it is separable, i.e. it is
capable of being separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold,
transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged in combination with a related
contract, asset or liability. The effect of this is that certain
intangible assets such as trademarks and customer relationships are
recognized under U.S. GAAP, although such assets will not be recognized
under U.K. GAAP.
. Intangible assets are initially recognized at fair value. An intangible
asset with a finite useful life is amortized over the period for which it
contributes to the future cash flows of the entity. An intangible asset
with an indefinite useful life is not amortized but is tested for
impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.
Purchase accounting adjustments - The reconciling "purchase accounting
adjustments" predominantly reflect:
. the measurement of equity consideration at the date the terms of
acquisition are agreed and announced under U.S. GAAP; under U.K. GAAP
equity consideration is measured at the date of acquisition;
. recognition of deferred tax on all fair value adjustment under U.S. GAAP,
and corresponding amortization post-acquisition;
25
. non-recognition of residual interests in securitization vehicles existing
at acquisition under U.K. GAAP. Instead, the assets and liabilities of the
securitization vehicles are recognized on the U.K. GAAP balance sheet, and
credit provisions are established against the loans and advances. This
GAAP adjustment existing at acquisition unwinds over the life of the
securitization vehicles; and
. certain costs which under U.K. GAAP, relate to either post-acquisition
management decisions or certain decisions made prior to the acquisition
are required to be expensed to the post-acquisition profit and loss
account and cannot be capitalized as goodwill, or included within the fair
value of the liabilities of the acquired entity.
Other - Includes adjustments related to suspension of interest accruals on
nonperforming loans, capitalized software costs and other items.
. Capitalized software costs
- U.K. GAAP - HSBC generally expenses costs of software developed for
internal use. If it can be shown that conditions for capitalization
are met under FRS 10, "Goodwill and intangible assets," or FRS 15,
"Tangible fixed assets", the software is capitalized and amortized
over its useful life. Website design and content development costs are
capitalized only to the extent that they lead to the creation of an
enduring asset delivering benefits at least as great as the amount
capitalized.
- U.S. GAAP - The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants'
("AICPA") Statement of Position 98-1, "Accounting for the costs of
computer software developed or obtained for internal use," requires
that all costs incurred in the preliminary project and post
implementation stages of internal software development be expensed.
Costs incurred in the application development stage must be
capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful life. Website
design costs are capitalized and website content development costs are
expensed as they are incurred.
Goodwill amortization
U.K. GAAP
. Goodwill arising on acquisitions of subsidiary undertakings, associates or
joint ventures prior to 1998 was charged against reserves in the year of
acquisition.
. For acquisitions made on or after January 1, 1998, goodwill is included in
the balance sheet and amortized over its estimated useful life on a
straight-line basis. U.K. GAAP allows goodwill previously eliminated
against reserves to be reinstated, but does not require it.
. Goodwill included in the balance sheet is tested for impairment when
necessary by comparing the recoverable amount of an entity with the
carrying value of its net assets, including attributable goodwill. The
recoverable amount of an entity is the higher of its value in use,
generally the present value of the expected future cash flows from the
entity, and its net realizable value.
. At the date of disposal of subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures, any
unamortized goodwill or goodwill charged directly against reserves is
included in our share of the undertakings' total net assets in the
calculation of the gain or loss on disposal.
. Where quoted securities are issued as part of the purchase consideration
in an acquisition, the fair value of those securities for the purpose of
determining the cost of acquisition is the market price at the date of
completion.
U.S. GAAP
. Goodwill acquired up to June 30, 2001 was capitalized and amortized over
its useful life but not more than 25 years. The amortization of previously
acquired goodwill ceased from December 31, 2001.
. SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" requires that goodwill
should not be amortized but should be tested for impairment annually at
the reporting unit level by applying a fair-value-based test.
. The goodwill of a reporting unit should be tested for impairment between
annual tests in response to events or changes in circumstance which could
result in an impairment.
. Where quoted securities are issued as part of the purchase consideration
in an acquisition, the fair value of those securities for the purpose of
determining the cost of acquisition is the average market price of the
securities for a reasonable period before and after the date that the
terms of the acquisition are agreed and announced.
26
Quantitative Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to GAAP Financial
Measures For a reconciliation of managed basis net interest income, fee income
and provision for credit losses to the comparable owned basis amounts, see
"Segment Results -- Managed Basis" in this MD&A. For a reconciliation of our
owned loan portfolio by product to our managed loan portfolio, see Note 3,
"Receivables," to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. For
additional quantitative reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures
presented herein to the equivalent GAAP basis financial measures, see
"Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures."
Receivable Review
The following table summarizes owned receivables at September 30, 2004 and
increases (decreases) over prior periods:
Increases (decreases) from
---------------------------------
September 30, June 30, 2004 September 30, 2003
2004 ------------- ------------------
$ % $ %
------------------------------- ------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Real estate secured.......... $ 58,726 $2,693 4.8% $ 5,957 11.3%
Auto finance................. 6,823 1,364 25.0 3,122 84.4
MasterCard/(1)//Visa/(1)/.... 11,666 850 7.9 1,774 17.9
Private label................ 14,000 1,241 9.7 1,593 12.8
Personal non-credit card/(2)/ 14,888 869 6.2 1,038 7.5
Commercial and other......... 334 (12) (3.5) (75) (18.3)
-------- ------ ---- - ------- -----
Total owned receivables...... $106,437 $7,005 7.0% $13,409 14.4%
======== ====== ==== = ======= =====
--------
/(1)/ MasterCard is a registered trademark of MasterCard International,
Incorporated and Visa is a registered trademark of VISA USA, Inc.
/(2)/ Personal non-credit card receivables are comprised of the following:
September 30, June 30, September 30,
2004 2004 2003
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Domestic personal non-credit card.. $ 7,141 $ 6,492 $ 6,459
Union Plus personal non-credit card 510 576 755
Personal homeowner loans........... 3,535 3,408 3,735
Foreign personal non-credit card... 3,702 3,543 2,901
------- ------- -------
Total personal non-credit card..... $14,888 $14,019 $13,850
======= ======= =======
Receivable increases (decreases) since September 30, 2003 Driven by growth in
our correspondent and branch businesses, real estate secured receivables
increased over the year-ago period. Real estate secured receivable levels
reflect sales to HSBC Bank USA of $.9 billion on March 31, 2004 and $2.8
billion on December 31, 2003, as well as HSBC Bank USA's purchase of
receivables directly from correspondents totaling $.7 billion in the third
quarter of 2004 and $2.2 billion year-to-date, a portion of which we otherwise
would have purchased. Growth in real estate secured receivables was
supplemented by purchases from a single correspondent relationship which
totaled $.6 billion in the third quarter of 2004 and $1.9 billion year-to-date.
Real estate secured receivable levels in our branch-based consumer lending
business continue to improve, as sales volumes remain higher than the year-ago
period and we continue to emphasize real estate secured loans in our branches,
including a near-prime mortgage product we introduced in 2003. The increases in
the real estate secured receivable levels have been partially offset by run-off
of the higher yielding real estate secured receivables, including second lien
loans largely due to refinance activity. Auto finance receivables increased
over the year-ago period due to newly originated loans acquired from our dealer
network, strategic alliances established during 2003, increased growth in the
consumer direct loan program and lower securitization levels. MasterCard and
Visa receivables reflect organic growth especially in our subprime portfolios
and lower securitization levels.
27
Growth in private label receivables reflects year to date portfolio
acquisitions of $.5 billion, organic growth through existing merchants and
lower securitization levels. Personal non-credit card receivables increased due
to lower securitization levels and higher levels of foreign personal non-credit
card receivables.
Receivable increases (decreases) since June 30, 2004 Both our correspondent and
branch businesses reported growth in their real estate secured portfolios as
discussed above. Growth in our private label portfolio reflects organic growth
and lower securitization levels. Growth in our auto finance and personal
non-credit card portfolios reflect lower levels of securitizations. Auto
finance receivables also increased due to new originations from our dealer
network and increased growth in the consumer direct loan program. Personal
non-credit card receivables also experienced increased originations. During the
third quarter, we began to increase availability of personal non-credit card
loans as a result of an improving economy.
Results of Operations
Unless noted otherwise, the following discusses amounts reported in our owned
basis statement of income.
Net interest income The following table summarizes net interest income:
Increase (Decrease)
Three months ended September 30 -------------------
2004 2003 Amount %
-----------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Finance and other interest income........................... $2,779 $2,571 $208 8.1%
Interest expense............................................ 744 557 187 33.6
------ ------ ---- ----
Net interest income......................................... $2,035 $2,014 $ 21 1.0%
====== ====== ==== ====
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning
assets, annualized........................................ 7.54% 8.39%
====== ======
Increase (Decrease)
Nine months ended September 30 ------------------
2004 2003 Amount %
- -----------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Finance and other interest income........................... $7,945 $7,616 $329 4.3%
Interest expense............................................ 2,021 2,027 (6) (.3)
------ ------ ---- ----
Net interest income......................................... $5,924 $5,589 $335 6.0%
====== ====== ==== ====
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning
assets, annualized........................................ 7.67% 8.07%
====== ======
The increase in dollars of net interest income during the quarter was due to
higher average receivables, partially offset by lower yields on our
receivables, particularly real estate secured and auto finance receivables,
higher funding costs as a result of a rising interest rate environment and a
reduced impact from purchase accounting fair value adjustments. The
year-to-date increase was due to higher average receivables and lower funding
costs, partially offset by lower yields and a reduced impact from purchase
accounting fair value adjustments. The lower yields reflect reduced pricing,
including higher levels of near prime receivables, as well as the run-off of
higher yielding real estate secured receivables, including second lien loans
largely due to refinance activity. We experienced a lower benefit from the
amortization of purchase accounting fair value adjustments in both periods due
to the continued decline in these balances. Our purchase accounting fair value
adjustments include both amortization of fair value adjustments to our external
debt obligations, including derivative financial instruments, and to our
receivables. Amortization of purchase accounting fair value adjustments
increased net interest income during the quarter by $136 million in 2004 and
$235 million in 2003. For the nine month period, amortization of purchase
accounting fair value adjustments increased net interest income by $470 million
in 2004 and $509 million in 2003.
28
Net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets declined
during both the quarter and year-to-date period. As discussed above, lower
yields on our receivables drove the decreases in both periods. For the
three-month period, higher funding costs due to a rising interest rate
environment also contributed to the decrease. For the nine-month period, lower
yields were partially offset by lower funding costs.
Our net interest income on a managed basis includes finance income earned on
our owned receivables as well as on our securitized receivables. This finance
income is offset by interest expense on the debt recorded on our balance sheet
as well as the contractual rate of return on the instruments issued to
investors when the receivables were securitized. Managed basis net interest
income was $2,617 million in the three months ended September 30, 2004, down 4
percent from $2,729 million in the three months ended September 30, 2003. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2004, managed basis net interest income was
$7,910 million, up 2 percent from $7,751 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2003. Net interest income as a percent of average managed
interest-earning assets, annualized, was 8.08 percent in the current quarter
and 8.34 percent year-to-date, compared to 9.12 and 8.89 percent in the
year-ago periods. As discussed above, the decreases were due to lower yields on
our receivables, particularly in real estate secured and auto finance
receivables and, in the three month period, higher funding costs resulting from
a rising interest rate environment. For the nine month period, the lower yields
and reduced benefit from amortization of purchase accounting fair value
adjustments were partially offset by lower funding costs. Net interest income
as a percent of receivables on a managed basis is greater than on an owned
basis because the managed basis portfolio includes relatively more unsecured
loans, which have higher yields.
Provision for credit losses The following table summarizes provision for credit
losses:
Increase (Decrease)
-------------------
2004 2003 Amount %
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Three months ended September 30 $1,123 $1,001 $122 12.2%
Nine months ended September 30. 3,048 3,050 (2) -
Our provision for credit losses increased during the quarter due to receivable
growth, including lower securitization levels, which was partially offset by
improved credit quality. Provision for credit losses was flat for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004 compared to the year ago period as increased
requirements due to receivable growth were offset by improving credit quality.
The provision as a percent of average owned receivables, annualized, was 4.36
percent in the current quarter and 4.16 percent year-to-date, compared to 4.42
and 4.69 percent in the year-ago periods. We recorded provision for owned
credit losses $154 million greater than net charge-offs in the third quarter of
2004 and $143 million year-to-date. During the third quarter of 2004, the
provision for owned credit losses was greater than net charge-offs due to
receivable growth, partially offset by continued improvement in asset quality.
Net charge-off dollars for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004
increased compared to the prior year period as higher delinquencies in the
prior year due to adverse economic conditions migrated to charge-off. In 2003,
we recorded provision for owned credit losses greater than net charge-offs of
$102 million during the third quarter and $346 million year-to-date. The
provision for credit losses may vary from quarter to quarter, depending on the
product mix and credit quality of loans in our portfolio. See Note 4, "Credit
Loss Reserves" to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for
further discussion of factors affecting the provision for credit losses.
29
Other revenues The following table summarizes other revenues:
Increase (Decrease)
-------------------
Three months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Securitization revenue..... $ 267 $ 387 $(120) (31.0)%
Insurance revenue.......... 203 193 10 5.2
Investment income.......... 36 37 (1) (2.7)
Fee income................. 302 266 36 13.5
Other income............... 161 68 93 100.0+
------ ------ ----- ------
Total other revenues....... $ 969 $ 951 $ 18 1.9%
====== ====== ===== ======
Increase (Decrease)
-------------------
Nine months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Securitization revenue..... $ 881 $1,114 $(233) (20.9)%
Insurance revenue.......... 618 553 65 11.8
Investment income.......... 107 151 (44) (29.1)
Fee income................. 808 783 25 3.2
Other income............... 650 484 166 34.3
------ ------ ----- ------
Total other revenues....... $3,064 $3,085 $ (21) (0.7)%
====== ====== ===== ======
Securitization revenue is the result of the securitization of our receivables
and includes the following:
Increase (Decrease)
-------------------
Three months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Net initial gains/(1)/............. $ - $ 25 $ (25) (100.0)%
Net replenishment gains/(1)/....... 112 138 (26) (18.8)
Servicing revenue and excess spread 155 224 (69) (30.8)
---- ------ ----- ------
Total.............................. $267 $ 387 $(120) (31.0)%
==== ====== ===== ======
Increase (Decrease)
-----------------
Nine months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Net initial gains/(1)/............. $ 25 $ 92 $ (67) (72.8)%
Net replenishment gains/(1)/....... 344 410 (66) (16.1)
Servicing revenue and excess spread 512 612 (100) (16.3)
---- ------ ----- ------
Total.............................. $881 $1,114 $(233) (20.9)%
==== ====== ===== ======
--------
/(1)/ Net of our estimate of probable credit losses under the recourse
provisions
The decreases in securitization revenue were due to decreases in the level and
product mix of receivables securitized during 2004, including the impact of
higher run-off due to shorter expected lives as a result of our decision to
structure all new collateralized funding transactions as secured financings
beginning in the third quarter of 2004. However, because existing public
private label and MasterCard and Visa credit card transactions were structured
as sales to revolving trusts that require replenishments of receivables to
support previously issued securities, receivables of each of these asset types
will continue to be sold to these trusts and the resulting replenishment gains
recorded until the revolving periods end, the last of which is expected to
occur in 2007. In addition, we will continue to replenish at reduced levels,
certain non-public personal non-credit card and
30
MasterCard and Visa securities issued to conduits and record the resulting
replenishment gains for a period of time in order to manage liquidity. Since
our securitized receivables have varying lives, it will take several years for
these receivables to pay-off and the related interest-only strip receivables to
be reduced to zero. The termination of sale treatment on new collateralized
funding activity and the reduction of sales under replenishment agreements
reduces our reported net income under U.S. GAAP. There is no impact, however,
on cash received from operations or on U.K. GAAP reported results.
Our interest-only strip receivables, net of the related loss reserve and
excluding the mark-to-market adjustment recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income, decreased $122 million in the current quarter and $414
million year-to-date, compared to decreases of $80 million in the third quarter
of 2003 and $314 million for the year-to-date period as securitized receivables
decreased.
Insurance revenue increased in both periods, due primarily to increased sales
in our U.K. business.
Investment income, which includes income on securities available for sale in
our insurance business as well as realized gains and losses from the sale of
securities, was flat compared to the prior year quarter as decreases in income
due to lower yields were substantially offset by higher gains from security
sales during the quarter. The decrease in investment income for the nine month
period was due to lower yields, lower gains from security sales and the
amortization of purchase accounting adjustments.
Fee income, which includes revenues from fee-based products such as credit
cards, increased in both periods due to higher credit card fees. For the nine
month period, higher credit card fees were partially offset by higher payments
to merchant partners as a result of portfolio acquisitions in our retail
services business. See "Segment Results - Managed Basis" herein for additional
information on fee income on a managed basis.
Other income, which includes revenue from our tax refund lending business,
increased in both periods due to higher revenues from our mortgage operations.
The increase in the three month period also reflects higher enhancement
services income and higher gains on miscellaneous asset sales. The increase in
the nine-month period also reflects higher revenues from our tax refund lending
business which was primarily due to lower funding costs as a result of the HSBC
merger.
Costs and Expenses As discussed earlier, effective January 1, 2004, our
technology services employees were transferred to HSBC Technology and Services
(USA) Inc. ("HTSU"). As a result, operating expenses relating to information
technology as well as certain item processing and statement processing
activities, which have previously been reported as salaries and fringe
benefits, occupancy and equipment expenses, or other servicing and
administrative expenses are now billed to us by HTSU and reported as support
services from HSBC affiliates. Support services from HSBC affiliates also
includes banking services and other miscellaneous services provided by HSBC
Bank USA and other subsidiaries of HSBC.
The following table summarizes total costs and expenses:
Increase
(Decrease)
-------------
Three months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Salaries and employee benefits............. $ 472 $ 493 $(21) 4.3%
Sales incentives........................... 91 77 14 18.2
Occupancy and equipment expenses........... 77 95 (18) (18.9)
Other marketing expenses................... 174 128 46 35.9
Other servicing and administrative expenses 235 282 (47) (16.7)
Support services from HSBC affiliates...... 183 - 183 100.0
Amortization of intangibles................ 83 82 1 1.2
Policyholders' benefits.................... 93 95 (2) (2.1)
------ ------ ---- -----
Total costs and expenses................... $1,408 $1,252 $156 12.5%
====== ====== ==== =====
31
Increase
(Decrease)
---------------
Nine months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Salaries and employee benefits...................... $1,415 $1,490 $ (75) (5.0)%
Sales incentives.................................... 260 199 61 30.7
Occupancy and equipment expenses.................... 237 297 (60) (20.2)
Other marketing expenses............................ 437 407 30 7.4
Other servicing and administrative expenses......... 659 869 (210) (24.2)
Support services from HSBC affiliates............... 556 - 556 100.0
Amortization of intangibles......................... 278 175 103 58.9
Policyholders' benefits............................. 299 287 12 4.2
HSBC acquisition related costs incurred by Household - 198 (198) (100.0)
------ ------ ----- ------
Total costs and expenses............................ $4,141 $3,922 $ 219 5.6%
====== ====== ===== ======
Salaries and employee benefits decreased primarily due to the transfer of our
technology personnel to HTSU. Excluding this change, salaries and fringe
benefits increased $40 million for the quarter and $99 million year-to-date as
a result of additional staffing, primarily in our consumer lending, mortgage
services and international businesses to support growth and in our compliance
functions. For the nine month period, these increases were partially offset by
decreases in employee benefit expenses as a result of non-recurring expenses
incurred in the first quarter of 2003 in conjunction with the merger.
Sales incentives increased in both periods reflecting higher volumes in our
branches. The year-to-date increase also reflects increases in our mortgage
services business.
Occupancy and equipment expenses decreased in both periods primarily due to the
formation of HTSU as discussed above.
Other marketing expenses increased in both periods primarily due to increased
credit card marketing, largely due to changes in marketing responsibilities
associated with the General Motors ("GM") co-branded credit card which will
result in higher marketing expense for the GM Card(R) in the future.
Other servicing and administrative expenses decreased primarily due to the
transfer of certain item processing and statement processing services to HTSU.
The decreases were partially offset by higher systems costs due to growth,
higher insurance commissions and higher legal costs from the settlement of
claims.
Support services from HSBC affiliates primarily include technology and other
services charged to us by HTSU.
Amortization of intangibles was essentially flat during the quarter. The
increase in the nine month period reflects higher amortization of intangibles
established in conjunction with the HSBC merger.
Policyholders' benefits essentially remained flat in the third quarter.
Increases in policyholder benefits for the nine month period resulted from
higher sales in our U.K. business and higher amortization of fair value
adjustments relating to our insurance business, partially offset by lower
expenses in our domestic business.
HSBC acquisition related costs incurred by Household in the first quarter of
2003 include payments to executives under existing employment contracts and
investment banking, legal and other costs relating to our acquisition by HSBC.
The following table summarizes our owned basis efficiency ratio:
2004 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------
Three months ended September 30.................. 45.2% 40.3%
Nine months ended September 30:
GAAP Basis.................................... 44.2 43.3
Excluding HSBC acquisition related costs/(1)/. 44.2 41.0
32
--------
/(1)/ Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See "Basis of Reporting" for
additional discussion on the use of this non-GAAP financial measure and
"Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures" for quantitative
reconciliations of our operating efficiency ratio to our owned basis GAAP
efficiency ratio.
The increase in the efficiency ratios for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2004 was largely attributable to an increase in operating
expenses as discussed above. The year-to-date period also reflects higher
intangible amortization. Also contributing to the increase was lower
securitization revenue and lower net interest income as a percentage of average
interest earning assets as compared with the prior year periods.
Segment Results - Managed Basis
We have three reportable segments: Consumer, Credit Card Services and
International. Our Consumer segment consists of our consumer lending, mortgage
services, retail services and auto finance businesses. Our Credit Card Services
segment consists of our domestic MasterCard and Visa credit card business. Our
International segment consists of our foreign operations in the United Kingdom,
Canada, Ireland and the remainder of Europe.
Effective January 1, 2004, our direct lending business, which has previously
been reported in our "All Other" caption, was consolidated into our consumer
lending business and as a result is now included in our Consumer segment. Prior
periods have not been restated as the impact was not material. There have been
no other changes in the basis of our segmentation or any changes in the
measurement of segment profit as compared with the presentation in our 2003
Form 10-K.
We monitor our operations and evaluate trends on a managed basis (a non-GAAP
financial measure), which assumes that securitized receivables have not been
sold and are still on our balance sheet. We manage and evaluate our operations
on a managed basis because the receivables that we securitize are subjected to
underwriting standards comparable to our owned portfolio, are serviced by
operating personnel without regard to ownership and result in a similar credit
loss exposure for us. In addition, we fund our operations, review our operating
results, and make decisions about allocating resources such as employees and
capital on a managed basis. When reporting on a managed basis, net interest
income, provision for credit losses and fee income related to receivables
securitized are reclassified from securitization revenue in our owned statement
of income into the appropriate caption.
Consumer Segment The following table summarizes results for our Consumer
segment:
Increase
(Decrease)
----------------
Three months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Net income.......................................................... $ 294 $ 287 $ 7 2.4%
Net interest income................................................. 1,956 1,875 81 4.3
Securitization revenue.............................................. (547) (42) (505) (100.0+)
Fee and other income................................................ 187 153 34 22.2
Intersegment revenues............................................... 26 27 (1) (3.7)
Provision for credit losses......................................... 506 920 (414) (45.0)
Total costs and expenses............................................ 619 606 13 2.1
Receivables......................................................... 95,946 87,739 8,207 9.4
Assets.............................................................. 98,099 90,108 7,991 8.9
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets,
annualized........................................................ 8.20% 8.65% - -
Return on average managed assets.................................... 1.22 1.30 - -
33
Increase
(Decrease)
-----------------
Nine months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Net income.......................................................... $ 855 $ 679 $ 176 25.9%
Net interest income................................................. 5,735 5,417 318 5.9
Securitization revenue.............................................. (1,089) 12 (1,101) (100.0+)
Fee and other income................................................ 516 467 49 10.5
Intersegment revenues............................................... 74 82 (8) (9.8)
Provision for credit losses......................................... 1,905 3,042 (1,137) (37.4)
Total costs and expenses............................................ 1,892 1,765 127 7.2
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets,
annualized........................................................ 8.33% 8.63% - -
Return on average managed assets.................................... 1.22 1.06 - -
Our Consumer segment reported higher net income in both periods. Increases in
net interest income as well as fee and other income and decreases in provision
for credit losses were partially offset by higher operating expenses and
substantially lower securitization revenue. Net interest income increased
primarily due to higher receivable levels. Net interest income as a percent of
average interest-earning assets, however, decreased primarily due to lower
yields on real estate secured and auto finance receivables as a result of
reduced pricing and higher levels of near-prime receivables, as well as the
run-off of higher yielding real estate secured receivables, including second
lien loans largely due to refinance activity. For the three month period,
increased cost of funds due to a rising interest rate environment also
contributed to the decrease. Our auto finance business reported lower net
interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets as we have
targeted lower yielding but higher credit quality customers. Securitization
revenue decreased in both periods as a result of a significant decline in
receivables securitized, including the impact of higher run-off due to shorter
expected lives, as a result of our decision to structure all new collateralized
funding transactions as secured financings beginning in the third quarter of
2004. Initial securitization levels were lower in the first nine months of 2004
as we used funding from HSBC, including proceeds from receivable sales, to
assist in the funding of our operations. Operating expenses increased as the
result of additional operating costs to support the increased receivable levels
including higher salaries and sales incentives.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we experienced improved credit
quality. Our managed basis provision for credit losses, which includes both
provision for owned basis receivables and over-the-life provision for
receivables serviced with limited recourse, decreased in both the quarter and
year-to-date periods as a result of improving credit quality and changes in
securitization levels. Partially offsetting the decrease in managed loss
provision was an increase in estimated losses on securitized receivables at
auto finance in both periods. We have experienced higher dollars of net
charge-offs in our owned portfolio during the first nine months of 2004 as a
result of higher delinquency levels in prior quarters and higher levels of
owned receivables. However, our overall owned provision for credit losses was
lower than net charge-offs because charge-offs are a lagging indicator of
credit quality. Over-the-life provisions for credit losses for securitized
receivables recorded in any given period reflect the level and product mix of
securitizations in that period. Subsequent charge-offs of such receivables
result in a decrease in the over-the-life reserves without any corresponding
increase to managed loss provision. The combination of these factors, including
changes in securitization levels, resulted in a decrease in managed loss
reserves as net charge-offs were greater than the provision for credit losses
by $414 million for the quarter and $895 million year-to-date. For 2003, we
increased managed loss reserves by recording loss provision greater than net
charge-offs of $23 million for the quarter and $394 million year-to-date.
Managed receivables increased 4 percent compared to $92.2 billion at June 30,
2004. Growth during the quarter was driven by higher real estate secured
receivables in both our correspondent and branch-based consumer lending
businesses which was partially offset by $.7 billion of correspondent
receivables purchased directly by HSBC Bank USA (a portion of which we
otherwise would have purchased). Growth in our correspondent business was
supplemented by purchases from a single correspondent relationship which
totaled $.6 billion in the
34
quarter. We also experienced solid growth in auto finance receivables though
our dealer network as well as in private label receivables. Personal non-credit
card receivables also experienced growth as we began to increase availability
of the product as a result of an improving economy.
Compared to September 30, 2003, managed receivables increased 9 percent.
Receivable growth was strongest in our real estate secured portfolio. Real
estate secured receivable levels reflect sales to HSBC Bank USA totaling $3.7
billion and $2.2 billion of correspondent receivables purchased directly by
HSBC Bank USA, a portion of which we otherwise would have purchased. Real
estate growth also benefited from purchases associated with a single
correspondent relationship which totaled $1.9 billion year-to-date. Our auto
finance portfolio also reported strong growth as a result of newly originated
loans acquired from our dealer network and strategic alliances established
during 2003. Increases in private label receivables were the result of
portfolio acquisitions as well as organic growth.
The decrease in return on average managed assets ("ROMA") for the quarter
reflects a higher rate of increase in average managed assets than in net income
as discussed above. For the year-to-date period, the increase in ROMA reflects
higher income as discussed above.
Credit Card Services Segment The following table summarizes results for our
Credit Card Services segment.
Increase (Decrease)
-------------------
Three months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Net income.......................................................... $ 134 $ 144 $ (10) (6.9)%
Net interest income................................................. 519 490 29 5.9
Securitization revenue.............................................. (77) 11 (88) (100.0+)
Fee and other income................................................ 460 392 68 17.3
Intersegment revenues............................................... 6 6 - -
Provision for credit losses......................................... 364 400 (36) (9.0)
Total costs and expenses............................................ 328 268 60 22.4
Receivables......................................................... 18,509 18,285 224 1.2
Assets.............................................................. 20,620 20,826 (206) (1.0)
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets,
annualized........................................................ 10.24% 10.00% - -
Return on average managed assets.................................... 2.60 2.85 - -
Increase (Decrease)
-------------------
Nine months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Net income.......................................................... $ 391 $ 366 $ 25 6.8%
Net interest income................................................. 1,561 1,441 120 8.3
Securitization revenue.............................................. (222) 4 (226) (100.0+)
Fee and other income................................................ 1,271 1,116 155 13.9
Intersegment revenues............................................... 20 22 (2) (9.1)
Provision for credit losses......................................... 1,105 1,175 (70) (6.0)
Total costs and expenses............................................ 890 806 84 10.4
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets,
annualized........................................................ 10.10% 9.87% - -
Return on average managed assets.................................... 2.50 2.42 - -
Our Credit Card Services segment reported lower net income during the quarter
but higher net income year-to-date. The decrease in net income during the
quarter was due to the impact of lower securitization levels and higher
operating expenses, particularly marketing expenses, partially offset by
increases in net interest income
35
and fee and other income and lower credit loss provision. The trends in net
interest income, fee and other income, securitization revenue, credit loss
provision and operating expenses were consistent in both the quarter and the
year-to-date periods. Net income and ROMA for the year-to-date period, however,
were higher than in the year ago period but lower for the quarter. This is
because the decreases in the level of receivables securitized, coupled with the
increased marketing expense were more significant in the quarter than in the
year-to-date period. Increases in net interest income as well as fee and other
income in both periods resulted from higher receivable levels and product mix,
with the increase in net interest income partially offset in the quarter by
higher cost of funds due to a rising interest rate environment. Provision for
credit losses also decreased in both periods as a result of improving credit
quality and changes in securitization levels. We increased managed loss
reserves for the quarter by recording loss provision greater than net
charge-offs of $15 million and we decreased managed loss reserves year-to-date
by recording loss provision less than net charge-offs of $6 million. For 2003,
we increased managed loss reserves by recording loss provision greater than net
charge-offs of $43 million for the quarter and $98 million year-to-date.
Securitization revenue declined in both periods as a result of a decline in
receivables securitized, including higher run-off due to shorter expected lives.
Managed receivables of $18.5 billion increased .8 percent compared to $18.4
billion at June 30, 2004. The increase during the quarter was due to growth in
our subprime and internally branded prime portfolios which was substantially
offset by the continued decline in certain old acquired portfolios. Although
our subprime receivables tend to have smaller balances, they generate higher
returns. Compared to September 30, 2003, managed receivables increased 1.2
percent. Receivables growth was largely attributable to organic growth in our
subprime portfolios which was partially offset by the continued decline in
these old acquired portfolios.
International Segment The following table summarizes results for our
International segment:
Increase (Decrease)
-------------------
Three months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Net income.......................................................... $ 18 $ 42 $ (24) (57.1)%
Net interest income................................................. 185 190 (5) (2.6)
Securitization revenue.............................................. (87) 2 (89) (100.0+)
Fee and other income................................................ 130 98 32 32.7
Intersegment revenues............................................... 4 3 1 33.3
Provision for credit losses......................................... 19 101 (82) (81.2)
Total costs and expenses............................................ 181 128 53 41.4
Receivables......................................................... 11,833 10,180 1,653 16.2
Assets.............................................................. 12,770 11,053 1,717 15.5
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets,
annualized........................................................ 6.29% 7.45% - -
Return on average managed assets.................................... .57 1.54 - -
Increase (Decrease)
-------------------
Nine months ended September 30 2004 2003 Amount %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Net income.......................................................... $ 80 $ 116 $ (36) (31.0)%
Net interest income................................................. 583 549 34 6.2
Securitization revenue.............................................. (92) 13 (105) (100.0+)
Fee and other income................................................ 369 276 93 33.7
Intersegment revenues............................................... 10 9 1 11.1
Provision for credit losses......................................... 207 271 (64) (23.6)
Total costs and expenses............................................ 527 394 133 33.8
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets,
annualized........................................................ 6.76% 7.37% - -
Return on average managed assets.................................... .86 1.46 - -
36
Our International segment reported lower net income in both periods. The
decrease in net income reflects higher operating expenses and lower
securitization revenue partially offset by increased fee and other income,
lower provision for credit losses and, for the nine month period, higher net
interest income. Applying constant currency rates, which uses the average rate
of exchange for the 2003 period to translate current period net income, net
income would have been lower by $2 million in the current quarter and $7
million year-to-date. Net interest income decreased during the quarter as
increases in net interest income due to higher receivable levels were more than
offset by higher cost of funds due to a rising interest rate environment. Net
interest income increased during the nine month period due to higher receivable
levels partially offset by higher cost of funds. Net interest income as a
percent of average interest-earning assets, annualized, decreased in both
periods due to lower pricing, run-off of higher yielding receivables, the mix
of personal non-credit card receivables and a higher cost of funds.
Securitization revenue declined as a result of lower levels of securitized
receivables. Fee and other income increased primarily due to higher insurance
revenues. Provision for credit losses decreased due to reduced securitization
levels, partially offset by a higher provision for credit losses on owned
receivables due to receivable growth. We decreased managed loss reserves by
recording loss provision less than net charge-offs of $74 million for the
quarter and $52 million year-to-date. For 2003, we increased managed loss
reserves by recording loss provision greater than net charge-offs of $26
million for the quarter and $56 million year-to-date. Total costs and expenses
increased primarily due to higher salary expenses to support receivable
activity and higher policyholder benefits, which resulted from increased
insurance sales volumes.
Managed receivables increased 4 percent compared to $11.4 billion at June 30,
2004 primarily due to growth in our private label and personal non-credit card
portfolios. Compared to September 30, 2003, managed receivables increased 16
percent due to strong growth in our real estate secured and personal non-credit
card portfolios since September 30, 2003 partially offset by a decline in our
MasterCard/Visa portfolio. Applying constant currency rates, managed
receivables at September 30, 2004 would have been $.1 billion lower using June
30, 2004 exchange rates and $.9 billion lower using September 30, 2003 exchange
rates.
The decrease in ROMA reflects lower net income as discussed above.
Reconciliation of Managed Basis Segment Results Income statement information
included in the table for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 combines
January 1 through March 28, 2003 (the "predecessor period") and March 29 to
September 30, 2003 (the "successor period") in order to present "combined"
financial results for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Fair value
adjustments related to purchase accounting and related amortization have been
allocated to Corporate, which is included in the "All Other" caption within our
segment disclosure. As a result, managed and owned basis consolidated totals
for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 include combined information from
both the "successor" and "predecessor" periods which impacts comparability to
the current period.
37
Reconciliations of our managed basis segment results to managed basis and owned
basis consolidated totals are as follows:
Managed
Credit Adjustments/ Basis
Card Inter- All Reconciling Consolidated
Securitization
Consumer Services national Other Items Totals Adjustments
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Three months ended September 30, 2004
Net interest income...................$ 1,956 $ 519 $ 185 $ (43) $ - $ 2,617 $ (582)/(5)/
Securitization revenue................ (547) (77) (87) (31) - (742) 1,009 /(5)/
Fee and other income.................. 187 460 130 155 (35)/(2)/ 897 (195)/(5)/
Intersegment revenues................. 26 6 4 (1) (35)/(2)/ - -
Provision for credit losses........... 506 364 19 1 1 /(3)/ 891 232 /(5)/
Total costs and expenses.............. 619 328 181 280 - 1,408 -
Net income............................ 294 134 18 (101) (23) 322 -
Receivables........................... 95,946 18,509 11,833 324 - 126,612 (20,175)/(6)/
Assets............................... 98,099 20,620 12,770 25,062 (8,616)/(4)/ 147,935 (20,175)/(6)/
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Three months ended September 30, 2003
Net interest income.................. $ 1,875 $ 490 $ 190 $ 174 $ - $ 2,729 $ (715)/(5)/
Securitization revenue............... (42) 11 2 (71) - (100) 487 /(5)/
Fee and other income................. 153 392 98 149 (36)/(2)/ 756 (192)/(5)/
Intersegment revenues................ 27 6 3 - (36)/(2)/ - -
Provision for credit losses.......... 920 400 101 (2) 2 /(3)/ 1,421 (420)/(5)/
Total costs and expenses............. 606 268 128 250 - 1,252 -
Net income........................... 287 144 42 23 (24) 472 -
Receivables.......................... 87,739 18,285 10,180 933 - 117,137 (24,109)/(6)/
Assets............................... 90,108 20,826 11,053 25,405 (8,764)/(4)/ 138,628 (24,109)/(6)/
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Nine months ended September 30, 2004
Net interest income.................. $ 5,735 $ 1,561 $ 583 $ 31 $ - $ 7,910 $ (1,986)/(5)/
Securitization revenue............... (1,089) (222) (92) (124) - (1,527) 2,408 /(5)/
Fee and other income................. 516 1,271 369 719 (101)/(2)/ 2,774 (591)/(5)/
Intersegment revenues................ 74 20 10 (3) (101)/(2)/ - -
Provision for credit losses.......... 1,905 1,105 207 (1) 1 /(3)/ 3,217 (169)/(5)/
Total costs and expenses............. 1,892 890 527 832 - 4,141 -
Net income........................... 855 391 80 (62) (66) 1,198 -
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Nine months ended September 30, 2003
Net interest income.................. $ 5,417 $ 1,441 $ 549 $ 344 $ - $ 7,751 $ (2,162)/(5)/
Securitization revenue............... 12 4 13 (147) - (118) 1,232
Fee and other income................. 467 1,116 276 738 (112) 2,485 (514)
Intersegment revenues................ 82 22 9 (1) (112)/(2)/ - -
Provision for credit losses.......... 3,042 1,175 271 - 6 /(3)/ 4,494 (1,444)/(5)/
Total costs and expenses............. 1,765 806 394 957 - 3,922 -
HSBC acquisition related costs incurred by
Household........................... - - - 198 - 198 -
Net income........................... 679 366 116 5 (75) 1,091 -
Operating net income/(1)/............ 679 366 116 172 (75) 1,258 -
Owned
Basis
Consolidated
Totals
-------------------------------------------------------
Three months ended September 30, 2004
Net interest income....................... $ 2,035
Securitization revenue.................... 267
Fee and other income...................... 702
Intersegment revenues..................... -
Provision for credit losses............... 1,123
Total costs and expenses.................. 1,408
Net income................................ 322
Receivables............................... 106,437
Assets.................................... 127,760
--------
Three months ended September 30, 2003
Net interest income....................... $ 2,014
Securitization revenue.................... 387
Fee and other income...................... 564
Intersegment revenues..................... -
Provision for credit losses............... 1,001
Total costs and expenses.................. 1,252
Net income................................ 472
Receivables............................... 93,028
Assets.................................... 114,519
--------
Nine months ended September 30, 2004
Net interest income....................... $ 5,924
Securitization revenue.................... 881
Fee and other income...................... 2,183
Intersegment revenues..................... -
Provision for credit losses............... 3,048
Total costs and expenses.................. 4,141
Net income................................ 1,198
--------
Nine months ended September 30, 2003
Net interest income....................... $ 5,589
Securitization revenue.................... 1,114
Fee and other income...................... 1,971
Intersegment revenues..................... -
Provision for credit losses............... 3,050
Total costs and expenses.................. 3,922
HSBC acquisition related costs incurred by
Household................................ 198
Net income................................ 1,091
Operating net income/(1)/................. 1,258
--------
/(1) /This non-GAAP financial measure is provided for comparison of our
operating trends only and should be read in conjunction with our owned
basis GAAP financial information. Operating net income excludes $167.3
million (after-tax) of HSBC acquisition related costs and other merger
related items incurred by Household in 2003. See "Basis of Reporting" for
additional discussion on the use of non-GAAP financial measures.
/(2)/ Eliminates intersegment revenues.
/(3)/ Eliminates bad debt recovery sales between operating segments.
/(4)/ Eliminates investments in subsidiaries and intercompany borrowings.
/(5)/ Reclassifies net interest margin, fee income and provision for credit
losses relating to securitized receivables to other revenues.
/(6)/ Represents receivables serviced with limited recourse.
38
Credit Quality
Subject to receipt of regulatory approvals, we intend to transfer our domestic
private label credit card portfolio to HSBC Bank USA in 2004. Contingent upon
receiving regulatory approval for this asset transfer, we will adopt charge-off
and account management guidelines in accordance with the Uniform Retail Credit
Classification and Account Management Policy issued by the FFIEC for our entire
domestic private label and MasterCard and Visa portfolios. See "Executive
Overview" for further discussion.
Credit Loss Reserves
We maintain credit loss reserves to cover probable losses of principal,
interest and fees, including late, overlimit and annual fees. Credit loss
reserves are based on a range of estimates and are intended to be adequate but
not excessive. While our credit loss reserves are available to absorb losses in
the entire portfolio, we specifically consider the credit quality and other
risk factors for each of our products. We recognize the different inherent loss
characteristics in each of our products as well as customer account management
policies and practices and risk management/collection practices. Charge-off
policies are also considered when establishing loss reserve requirements to
ensure the appropriate reserves exist for products with longer charge-off
periods. We also consider key ratios such as reserves to nonperforming loans
and reserves as a percent of net charge-offs in developing our loss reserve
estimates. Loss reserve estimates are reviewed periodically and adjustments are
reported in earnings when they become known. As these estimates are influenced
by factors outside of our control, such as consumer payment patterns and
economic conditions, there is uncertainty inherent in these estimates, making
it reasonably possible that they could change. See Note 3, "Receivables," in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements for receivables by product
type and Note 4, "Credit Loss Reserves," for our credit loss reserve
methodology and an analysis of changes in the credit loss reserves.
The following table summarizes owned basis credit losses:
September 30, June 30, September 30,
2004 2004 2003
---------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Owned credit loss reserves $3,953 $3,795 $3,779
Reserves as a percent of:
Receivables............ 3.71% 3.82% 4.06%
Net charge-offs/(1)/... 102.0 98.2 105.1
Nonperforming loans.... 104.1 103.0 92.6
--------
/(1)/ Quarter-to-date, annualized
During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, credit loss reserves increased as
the provision for owned credit losses was $154 million greater than net
charge-offs reflecting growth in our loan portfolio, partially offset by
improved asset quality. In the quarter ended September 30, 2003, provision for
owned credit losses was $102 million greater than net charge-offs. Reserve
levels at September 30, 2004 reflect the factors discussed above.
For securitized receivables, we also record a provision for estimated probable
losses that we expect to incur under the recourse provisions. The following
table summarizes managed credit loss reserves:
September 30, June 30, September 30,
2004 2004 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars are in millions)
Managed credit loss reserves $5,199 $5,699 $5,733
Reserves as a percent of:
Receivables.............. 4.11% 4.66% 4.89%
Net charge-offs/(1)/..... 95.4 104.2 107.4
Nonperforming loans...... 111.1 122.8 111.7
--------
/(1)/ Quarter-to-date, annualized
39
During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, managed credit loss reserves
decreased as a result of changes in securitization levels.
See "Basis of Reporting" for additional discussion on the use of non-GAAP
financial measures and "Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures" for
quantitative reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to the
comparable GAAP basis financial measure.
Delinquency - Owned Basis
The following table summarizes two-months-and-over contractual delinquency (as
a percent of consumer receivables):
September 30, June 30, September 30,
2004 2004 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------
Real estate secured..... 3.27% 3.39% 4.20%
Auto finance............ 1.81 2.12 2.14
MasterCard/Visa......... 5.84 5.83 5.99
Private label........... 4.72 5.00 5.59
Personal non-credit card 8.83 8.92 9.96
---- ---- ----
Total................... 4.43% 4.57% 5.36%
==== ==== ====
Total owned delinquency decreased 14 basis points compared to the prior
quarter. This decrease is consistent with improvements in early delinquency
roll rate trends we began to experience in the fourth quarter of 2003 as a
result of improvements in the economy and better underwriting, including both
improved modeling and improved credit quality of originations. The overall
decrease in our real estate secured portfolio reflects receivable growth and
improved collection efforts which were partially offset by the seasoning and
maturation of the portfolio. The decrease in auto finance delinquencies
reflects the impact of tightened underwriting, higher receivable levels and
lower securitization levels. Auto finance delinquency in June 2004 was also
adversely impacted by changes in collections operations. The decrease in
private label delinquency reflects receivable growth as well as improved
underwriting, collections and credit models. The decrease in personal
non-credit card delinquency reflects the positive impact of receivable growth
as well as improved collection efforts.
Compared to a year ago, total delinquency decreased 93 basis points as all
products reported lower delinquency levels. The improvements are generally the
result of improvements in the economy and better underwriting.
Net Charge-offs of Consumer Receivables - Owned Basis
The following table summarizes net charge-offs of consumer receivables (as a
percent, annualized, of average consumer receivables):
September 30, June 30, September 30,
2004 2004 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Real estate secured................................................ 1.19% 1.04% .91%
Auto finance....................................................... 3.66 3.05 4.62
MasterCard/Visa.................................................... 8.50 9.91 8.61
Private label...................................................... 4.79 5.06 5.35
Personal non-credit card........................................... 9.50 10.59 10.55
---- ----- -----
Total.............................................................. 3.77% 4.02% 3.98%
==== ===== =====
Real estate secured net charge-offs and REO expense as a percent of
average real estate secured receivables.......................... 1.31% 1.47% 1.35%
Net charge-offs decreased 25 basis points compared to the quarter ended June
30, 2004 as the lower delinquency levels we have been experiencing due to an
improving economy are having an impact on charge-offs. Our real
40
estate secured portfolio experienced an increase in net charge-offs during the
third quarter reflecting lower estimates of net realizable value as a result of
process changes to better estimate property values at the time of foreclosure
which has resulted in an increase in real estate net charge-offs compared to
the previous quarter. The increase in auto finance net charge-offs reflects the
impact of higher delinquency levels in the second quarter which have progressed
to charge-off. The decrease in MasterCard/Visa reflects the impact of higher
net charge-offs in the second quarter due to seasonality. In addition to
economic conditions, the decrease in net charge-offs in personal non-credit
card is a result of improved credit quality and portfolio stabilization.
Total net charge-offs for the current quarter decreased from September 2003 net
charge-offs levels due to an improving economy and a decrease in the percentage
of the portfolio comprised of personal non-credit card receivables, which have
a higher net charge-off rate than other products in our portfolio. In addition,
auto finance, MasterCard and Visa, private label and personal non-credit card
reported lower net charge-off levels generally as a result of receivable
growth, improved collections and better underwriting, including both improved
modeling and improved credit quality of originations. The decrease in auto
finance net charge-offs also reflects the decision to target lower yielding but
higher credit quality customers as well as improved used auto prices which
resulted in lower loss severities. The increase in our real estate secured
portfolio reflects lower estimates of net realizable value at the time of
foreclosure.
MORE TO FOLLOW
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange