Footnotes to Financial Statements
1 The tables: 'Maximum exposure to credit risk' (page 114), 'Gross loans and advances by industry sector' (page 115), 'Gross loans and advances to customers by industry sector and by geographical region' (page 116), 'Movement in impairment allowances on loans and advances to customers and banks' (page 149), the Composition of regulatory capital within 'Capital structure' (page 198), 'Impaired loans' (page 146), and the table 'Impaired loans and advances to customers' (page 147) also form an integral part of these financial statements.
2 Adjustment to bring changes between opening and closing balance sheet amounts to average rates. This is not done on a line-by-line basis, as details cannot be determined without unreasonable expense.
3 Share premium includes the deduction of nil in respect of issuance costs incurred during the period (30 June 2011: nil; 31 December 2011: US$2m).
4 Cumulative goodwill amounting to US$5,138m has been charged against reserves in respect of acquisitions of subsidiaries prior to 1 January 1998, including US$3,469m charged against the merger reserve arising on the acquisition of HSBC Bank plc. The balance of US$1,669m was charged against retained earnings.
5 Retained earnings include 83,578,031 (US$5,719m) of own shares held within HSBC's insurance business, retirement funds for the benefit of policyholders or beneficiaries within employee trusts for the settlement of shares expected to be delivered under employee share schemes or bonus plans, and the market-making activities in Global Markets (30 June 2011: 77,926,453 (US$968m); 31 December 2011: 98,498,019 (US$1,320m)).
6 Amounts transferred to the income statement in respect of cash flow hedges for the half-year to 30 June 2012 include US$12m loss (30 June 2011: US$345m gain; 31 December 2011: US$241m loss) taken to 'Net interest income' and US$232m loss (30 June 2011: US$149m loss; 31 December 2011: US$744m loss) taken to 'Net trading income'.
7 Statutory share premium relief under Section 131 of the Companies Act 1985 (the 'Act') was taken in respect of the acquisition of HSBC Bank in 1992, HSBC France in 2000 and HSBC Finance in 2003 and the shares issued were recorded at their nominal value only. In HSBC's consolidated financial statements the fair value differences of US$8,290m in respect of HSBC France and US$12,768m in respect of HSBC Finance were recognised in the merger reserve. The merger reserve created on the acquisition of HSBC Finance subsequently became attached to HSBC Overseas Holdings (UK) Limited ('HOHU'), following a number of intra-Group reorganisations. During 2009, pursuant to Section 131 of the Companies Act 1985, statutory share premium relief was taken in respect of the rights issue and US$15,796m was recognised in the merger reserve. The merger reserve includes the deduction of US$614m in respect of costs relating to the rights issue, of which US$149m was subsequently transferred to the income statement. Of this US$149m, US$121m was a loss arising from accounting for the agreement with the underwriters as a contingent forward contract. The merger reserve excludes the loss of US$344m on a forward foreign exchange contract associated with hedging the proceeds of the rights issue.
8 Including distributions paid on preference shares and capital securities classified as equity.
Note |
|
|
1 |
Basis of preparation ................................... |
219 |
2 |
Accounting policies .................................... |
222 |
3 |
Dividends ................................................... |
222 |
4 |
Earnings per share ...................................... |
223 |
5 |
Post-employment benefits ......................... |
223 |
6 |
Tax ............................................................ |
225 |
7 |
Trading assets ............................................ |
228 |
8 |
Fair values of financial instruments carried at fair value ............................................ |
229 |
9 |
Fair values of financial instruments not carried at fair value ................................. |
237 |
10 |
Reclassification of financial assets .............. |
238 |
11 |
Financial assets designated at fair value ...... |
239 |
12 |
Derivatives ................................................ |
240 |
13 |
Financial investments ................................ |
243 |
14 |
Assets held for sale ..................................... |
245 |
Note |
|
|
15 |
Trading liabilities ....................................... |
247 |
16 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value . |
247 |
17 |
Provisions .................................................. |
248 |
18 |
Maturity analysis of assets and liabilities .... |
249 |
19 |
Assets charged as security for liabilities and collateral accepted as security for assets . |
250 |
20 |
Notes on the statement of cash flows ......... |
251 |
21 |
Contingent liabilities, contractual |
253 |
22 |
Special purpose entities .............................. |
253 |
23 |
Segmental analysis ..................................... |
258 |
24 |
Goodwill impairment .................................. |
258 |
25 |
Legal proceedings and regulatory matters ... |
258 |
26 |
Events after the balance sheet date............. |
263 |
27 |
Interim Report 2012 and statutory accounts ............................................................... |
263 |
1 Basis of preparation
(a) Compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards
The interim consolidated financial statements of HSBC have been prepared in accordance with the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules of the Financial Services Authority and IAS 34 'Interim Financial Reporting' ('IAS 34') as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ('IASB') and as endorsed by the EU.
The consolidated financial statements of HSBC at 31 December 2011 were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ('IFRSs') as issued by the IASB and as endorsed by the EU. EU‑endorsed IFRSs may differ from IFRSs as issued by the IASB if, at any point in time, new or amended IFRSs have not been endorsed by the EU. At 31 December 2011, there were no unendorsed standards effective for the year ended 31 December 2011 affecting the consolidated financial statements at that date, and there was no difference between IFRSs endorsed by the EU and IFRSs issued by the IASB in terms of their application to HSBC. Accordingly, HSBC's financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2011 were prepared in accordance with IFRSs as issued by the IASB.
On 20 December 2010, the IASB issued 'Deferred tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets (amendments to IAS 12)' which is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2012 but has not yet been endorsed by the EU. The effect of the application of the amendment is not significant to HSBC.
At 30 June 2012, there were no other unendorsed standards effective for the period ended 30 June 2012 affecting these interim consolidated financial statements, and there was no significant difference between IFRSs endorsed by the EU and IFRSs issued by the IASB in terms of their application to HSBC.
IFRSs comprise accounting standards issued by the IASB and its predecessor body as well as interpretations issued by the IFRS Interpretations Committee ('IFRIC') and its predecessor body.
During the half-year ended 30 June 2012, HSBC also adopted amendments to standards which had an insignificant effect on these interim consolidated financial statements.
(b) Presentation of information
In accordance with HSBC's policy to provide meaningful disclosures that help investors and other stakeholders understand the Group's performance, financial position and changes thereto, the information provided in the Notes on the Financial Statements and the Interim Management Report goes beyond the minimum levels required by accounting standards, statutory and regulatory requirements and listing rules. In particular, HSBC has adopted the British Bankers' Association Code for Financial Reporting Disclosure ('the BBA Code'). The BBA Code aims to increase the quality and comparability of banks' disclosures and sets out five disclosure principles together with supporting guidance. In line with the principles of the BBA Code, HSBC assesses the applicability and relevance of good practice recommendations issued from time to time by relevant regulators and standard setters, enhancing disclosures where appropriate.
HSBC's consolidated financial statements are presented in US dollars. HSBC Holdings' functional currency is also the US dollar because the US dollar and currencies linked to it are the most significant currencies relevant to the underlying transactions, events and conditions of its subsidiaries, as well as representing a significant proportion of its funds generated from financing activities. HSBC uses the US dollar as its presentation currency in its consolidated financial statements because the US dollar and currencies linked to it form the major currency bloc in which HSBC transacts and funds its business.
(c) Use of estimates and assumptions
The preparation of financial information requires the use of estimates and assumptions about future conditions. The use of available information and the application of judgement are inherent in the formation of estimates; actual results in the future may differ from those reported. Management believes that HSBC's critical accounting policies where judgement is necessarily applied are those which relate to impairment of loans and advances, goodwill impairment, the valuation of financial instruments, the impairment of available-for-sale financial assets, deferred tax assets and provisions for liabilities. These critical accounting policies are described on pages 38 to 42 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
(d) Consolidation
The interim consolidated financial statements of HSBC comprise the financial statements of HSBC Holdings and its subsidiaries. The method adopted by HSBC to consolidate its subsidiaries is described on pages 292 to 293 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
(e) Future accounting developments
At 30 June 2012, a number of standards and amendments to standards had been issued by the IASB, which are not effective for these consolidated financial statements. Most of these new requirements have not yet been endorsed for use in the EU. In addition to the projects to complete financial instrument accounting, the IASB is continuing to work on projects on insurance, revenue recognition and lease accounting which, together with the standards described below, will represent significant changes to accounting requirements from 2013.
Amendments issued by the IASB and endorsed by the EU
In June 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 19 'Employee Benefits' ('IAS 19 revised'). The revised standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 with early adoption permitted. IAS 19 revised is required to be applied retrospectively.
The most significant amendment for HSBC is the replacement of interest cost and expected return on plan assets by a finance cost component comprising the net interest on the net defined benefit liability or asset. This finance cost component is determined by applying the same discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation to the net defined benefit liability or asset. The difference between the actual return on plan assets and the return included in the finance cost component in the income statement will be presented in other comprehensive income. The effect of this change is to increase the pension expense by the difference between the current expected return on plan assets and the return calculated by applying the relevant discount rate.
Based on our estimate of the impact of this particular amendment on the 2011 consolidated financial statements, the change would decrease pre-tax profit, with no effect on the pension liability. The effect on total operating expenses and pre-tax profit is not expected to be material. The effect at the date of adoption will depend on market interest rates, rates of return and the actual mix of scheme assets at that time.
Standards and amendments issued by the IASB but not endorsed by the EU
Standards applicable in 2013
In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 10 'Consolidated Financial Statements' ('IFRS 10'), IFRS 11 'Joint Arrangements' ('IFRS 11') and IFRS 12 'Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities' ('IFRS 12'). The standards are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 with early adoption permitted. IFRSs 10 and 11 are required to be applied retrospectively.
Under IFRS 10, there will be one approach for determining consolidation for all entities, based on the concept of power, variability of returns and their linkage. This will replace the current approach which emphasises legal control or exposure to risks and rewards, depending on the nature of the entity. IFRS 11 places more focus on the investors' rights and obligations than on the structure of the arrangement, and introduces the concept of a joint operation. IFRS 12 includes the disclosure requirements for subsidiaries, joint arrangements and associates and introduces new requirements for unconsolidated structured entities for which comparative information need not be provided for periods prior to initial application.
Based on our assessment to date, while the consolidation status of some entities may change because HSBC has control but not the majority of risks and rewards, or vice versa, we do not expect the overall impact of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11 on the financial statements to be material.
In May 2011, the IASB also issued IFRS 13 'Fair Value Measurement' ('IFRS 13'). This standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 with early adoption permitted. IFRS 13 is required to be applied prospectively from the beginning of the first annual period in which it is applied. The disclosure requirements of IFRS 13 do not require comparative information to be provided for periods prior to initial application.
IFRS 13 establishes a single source of guidance for all fair value measurements required or permitted by IFRSs. The standard clarifies the definition of fair value as an exit price, which is defined as a price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset or to transfer the liability would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions, and enhances disclosures about fair value measurement.
HSBC is currently assessing IFRS 13 and it is not practicable to quantify the effect as at the date of the publication of these financial statements, which will depend on final interpretations of the standard, market conditions and HSBC's holdings of financial instruments at 1 January 2013. However, based on the analysis performed to date, the main effect of applying IFRS 13 is considered to be an adjustment to derivative liabilities for HSBC's own credit risk which is often referred to as 'debit valuation adjustment'. This adjustment would be made on a symmetrical basis to credit valuation adjustments applied in valuing derivative assets. The magnitude of this impact will depend on the credit valuation adjustment methodology at the point of initial application of IFRS 13. See Note 8 for further information on credit valuation adjustment methodologies.
In December 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 7 'Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities' which requires the disclosures about the effect or potential effects of offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities and related arrangements on an entity's financial position. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. The amendments are required to be applied retrospectively.
Standards applicable in 2014
In December 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 32 'Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities' which clarified the requirements for offsetting financial instruments and addressed inconsistencies in current practice when applying the offsetting criteria in IAS 32 'Financial Instruments: Presentation'. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014 with early adoption permitted and are required to be applied retrospectively.
HSBC is currently assessing the impact of these clarifications but it is not practicable to quantify the effect as at the date of the publication of these financial statements.
Standards applicable in 2015
In November 2009, the IASB issued IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' ('IFRS 9') which introduced new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets. In October 2010, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 9 incorporating requirements for financial liabilities. Together, these changes represent the first phase in the IASB's planned replacement of IAS 39 'Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement' ('IAS 39') with a less complex and improved standard for financial instruments.
Following the IASB's decision in December 2011 to defer the effective date, the standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015 with early adoption permitted. IFRS 9 is required to be applied retrospectively but prior periods need not be restated.
The second and third phases in the IASB's project to replace IAS 39 will address the impairment of financial assets measured at amortised cost and hedge accounting.
The IASB re-opened the requirements for classification and measurement in IFRS 9 in 2012 to address practice and other issues, with an exposure draft of revised proposals expected in the second half of 2012. Therefore, HSBC remains unable to provide a date by which it will apply IFRS 9 and it remains impracticable to quantify the effect of IFRS 9 as at the date of the publication of these financial statements.
(f) Changes in composition of the Group
Except as discussed in Note 14 there were no material changes in the composition of the Group.
2 Accounting policies
The accounting policies adopted by HSBC for these interim consolidated financial statements are consistent with those described on pages 294 to 312 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011. The methods of computation applied by HSBC for these interim consolidated financial statements are consistent with those applied for the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
3 Dividends
The Directors declared after the end of the period a second interim dividend in respect of the financial year ending 31 December 2012 of US$0.09 per ordinary share, a distribution of approximately US$1,643m which will be payable on 4 October 2012. No liability is recorded in the financial statements in respect of this dividend.
Dividends to shareholders of the parent company
|
Half-year to |
||||||||||||||||
|
30 June 2012 |
|
30 June 2011 |
|
31 December 2011 |
||||||||||||
|
Per |
|
Total |
|
Settled |
|
Per |
|
Total |
|
Settled |
|
Per |
|
Total |
|
Settled |
Dividends declared on ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In respect of previous year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- fourth interim dividend ..................... |
0.14 |
|
2,535 |
|
259 |
|
0.12 |
|
2,119 |
|
1,130 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
In respect of current year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- first interim dividend ........................ |
0.09 |
|
1,633 |
|
748 |
|
0.09 |
|
1,601 |
|
204 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- second interim dividend .................... |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.09 |
|
1,603 |
|
178 |
- third interim dividend ....................... |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.09 |
|
1,605 |
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
4,168 |
|
1,007 |
|
0.21 |
|
3,720 |
|
1,334 |
|
0.18 |
|
3,208 |
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly dividends on preference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March dividend .................................... |
15.50 |
|
22 |
|
|
|
15.50 |
|
22 |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
June dividend ....................................... |
15.50 |
|
23 |
|
|
|
15.50 |
|
23 |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
September dividend .............................. |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
15.50 |
|
22 |
|
|
December dividend ............................... |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
15.50 |
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.00 |
|
45 |
|
|
|
31.00 |
|
45 |
|
|
|
31.00 |
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly coupons on capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January coupon .................................... |
0.508 |
|
44 |
|
|
|
0.508 |
|
44 |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
March coupon ..................................... |
0.500 |
|
76 |
|
|
|
0.500 |
|
76 |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
April coupon ....................................... |
0.508 |
|
45 |
|
|
|
0.508 |
|
45 |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
June coupon ......................................... |
0.500 |
|
76 |
|
|
|
0.500 |
|
76 |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
July coupon ......................................... |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
0.508 |
|
45 |
|
|
September coupon ............................... |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
0.500 |
|
76 |
|
|
October coupon ................................... |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
0.508 |
|
45 |
|
|
December coupon ................................ |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
0.500 |
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.016 |
|
241 |
|
|
|
2.016 |
|
241 |
|
|
|
2.016 |
|
242 |
|
|
1 HSBC Holdings issued Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities of US$3,800m in June 2010 and US$2,200m in April 2008, which are classified as equity under IFRSs.
On 16 July 2012, HSBC paid a further coupon on the capital securities of US$0.508 per security, a distribution of US$45m. No liability is recorded in the financial statements in respect of this coupon payment.
4 Earnings per share
Basic earnings per ordinary share were calculated by dividing the profit attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, excluding own shares held. Diluted earnings per ordinary share were calculated by dividing the basic earnings, which require no adjustment for the effects of dilutive potential ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, excluding own shares held, plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be issued on conversion of dilutive potential ordinary shares.
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent company
|
Half-year to |
||||
|
30 June |
|
30 June |
|
31 December |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company ............................ |
8,438 |
|
9,215 |
|
7,582 |
Dividend payable on preference shares classified as equity ............................ |
(45) |
|
(45) |
|
(45) |
Coupon payable on capital securities classified as equity ............................... |
(241) |
|
(241) |
|
(242) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent company .............. |
8,152 |
|
8,929 |
|
7,295 |
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
Half-year to 30 June 2012 |
|
Half-year to 30 June 2011 |
|
Half-year to 31 December 2011 |
||||||||||||
|
Profit US$m |
|
Number of shares (millions) |
|
Amount per share US$ |
|
Profit US$m |
|
Number (millions) |
|
Amount per share US$ |
|
Profit US$m |
|
Number of shares (millions) |
|
Amount per share US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic1 ........................ |
8,152 |
|
17,983 |
|
0.45 |
|
8,929 |
|
17,631 |
|
0.51 |
|
7,295 |
|
17,768 |
|
0.41 |
Effect of dilutive potential ordinary shares ..................... |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted2 ..................... |
8,152 |
|
18,141 |
|
0.45 |
|
8,929 |
|
17,897 |
|
0.50 |
|
7,295 |
|
17,947 |
|
0.41 |
1 Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding.
2 Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding assuming dilution.
5 Post-employment benefits
Included within 'Employee compensation and benefits' are components of net periodic benefit cost related to HSBC's defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits, as follows:
|
Half-year to |
||||
|
30 June 2012 |
|
30 June 2011 |
2005 |
31 December |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Defined benefit pension plans |
|
|
|
|
|
Current service cost .................................................................................. |
276 |
|
279 |
|
271 |
Interest cost ............................................................................................. |
792 |
|
859 |
|
830 |
Expected return on plan assets .................................................................. |
(858) |
|
(911) |
|
(895) |
Past service cost ....................................................................................... |
3 |
|
(579) |
|
37 |
Gains on curtailments ............................................................................... |
- |
|
- |
|
(59) |
Gains on settlements ................................................................................. |
- |
|
- |
|
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
(352) |
|
180 |
Defined benefit healthcare plans ................................................................... |
20 |
|
31 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (income)/expense ............................................................................... |
233 |
|
(321) |
|
181 |
HSBC revalues its defined benefit post-employment plans each year at 31 December, in consultation with the plans' local actuaries. The assumptions underlying the calculations are used to determine the expected income statement charge for the year going forward. At 30 June each year, HSBC revalues all plan assets to current market prices. HSBC also reviews the assumptions used to calculate the defined benefit obligations (the liabilities of the plans) and updates the carrying amount of the obligations if there have been significant changes as a consequence of changes in assumptions.
Retirement benefit liabilities for the Group have increased from US$3.7bn at 31 December 2011 to US$4.0bn at 30 June 2012. Retirement benefit assets for the Group were US$2.5bn at 30 June 2012, unchanged from the amount at 31 December 2011. Retirement benefit assets are reported as part of other assets in the consolidated balance sheet and are primarily in respect of a surplus in the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme funded defined benefit plan ('the principal plan'). At 30 June 2012 the principal plan was in surplus by US$2.2bn as a result of the special contribution made in 2010 and the changes in fair value of the derivative swaps entered into with HSBC Bank plc noted below.
In the first half of 2012, there was a reduction in the average yields of high quality (AA rated or equivalent) debt instruments in the UK, together with a decrease in inflation expectations. The change in these and other actuarial assumptions resulted in a US$489m decrease in the defined benefit obligation for the principal plan. This decrease was recognised directly in equity as an actuarial gain.
This gain has been offset by actuarial losses in the US and Hong Kong schemes due to decreasing discount rates noted in the table below. The fall in the Hong Kong discount rate is mainly due to a fall in yields on longer-dated government bonds, which are referenced due to the lack of a deep corporate bond market in Hong Kong.
In the US, the fall in the discount rate used is a result of the fall in the yields of long-term, high grade corporate bonds.
The discount rates used to calculate the Group's obligations to the largest defined benefit pension plans were as follows:
Discount rates
|
At |
|
At |
2005 |
At |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK ............................................................................................................... |
4.70 |
|
5.60 |
|
4.80 |
Hong Kong ................................................................................................... |
0.96 |
|
2.28 |
|
1.47 |
US ................................................................................................................ |
4.05 |
|
5.35 |
|
4.60 |
The inflation rate used to calculate the principal plan obligation at 30 June 2012 was 3.0% (30 June 2011: 3.8%; 31 December 2011: 3.2%). Other than described above, there were no material changes to other assumptions.
The actual return on plan assets of the principal plan was approximately US$572m below the expected return. This difference was recognised directly in equity as an actuarial loss.
Actuarial gains and losses
|
Half-year to |
||||
|
30 June 2012 |
|
30 June 2011 |
2005 |
31 December |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Defined benefit pension plans |
|
|
|
|
|
Experience gains/(losses) on plan liabilities ............................................... |
37 |
|
(36) |
|
(425) |
Experience gains/(losses) on plan assets .................................................... |
(495) |
|
166 |
|
3,460 |
Losses from changes in actuarial assumptions ........................................... |
(136) |
|
(139) |
|
(1,723) |
Other movements1 ................................................................................... |
(3) |
|
(16) |
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(597) |
|
(25) |
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit healthcare plans ................................................................... |
(22) |
|
7 |
|
(68) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net actuarial gains/(losses) ................................................................... |
(619) |
|
(18) |
|
1,285 |
1 Other movements include changes in the effect of the limit on plan surpluses.
Actuarial gains and losses comprise experience adjustments on plan assets and liabilities as well as adjustments arising from changes in actuarial assumptions. The experience gains and losses on plan assets arise as a result of the difference between the expected returns on the plan assets and the actual movement in the value of the plan assets during the period. The changes in actuarial assumptions arise as a result of changes in the plan assumptions, primarily discount rates and inflation rates, as previously described.
Total cumulative net actuarial losses, including the cumulative effect of the limit on plan surpluses recognised in equity at 30 June 2012, were US$4,002m (30 June 2011: US$4,738m cumulative losses; 31 December 2011: US$3,453m cumulative losses). Of this the cumulative effect of the limit on plan surpluses was US$20m (30 June 2011: US$65m; 31 December 2011: US$18m).
On 17 June 2010, HSBC Bank plc agreed with the Trustee to accelerate the reduction of the deficit of the principal plan with a special contribution of £1,760m (US$2,638m) in June 2010 followed by a revised payment schedule in the following years, as shown below.
In December 2011, HSBC Bank plc made a £184m (US$286m) special contribution to the principal plan. The additional contribution did not result in an amendment to the future funding payments to the principal plan.
Additional future funding payments to the principal plan
|
US$m1 |
|
£m |
|
|
|
|
2016 ....................................................................................................................................... |
776 |
|
495 |
2017 ....................................................................................................................................... |
988 |
|
630 |
2018 ....................................................................................................................................... |
988 |
|
630 |
1 The payment schedule was agreed with the Trustee in pounds sterling and the equivalent US dollar amounts are shown at the exchange rate effective as at 30 June 2012.
The triennial valuation applicable to the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme as at 31 December 2011 is currently being performed and is due to be completed no later than 31 March 2013.
As disclosed in 'Related party transactions' on page 411 in the Annual Report and Accounts 2011, the principal plan entered into collateralised swap transactions with HSBC to manage the inflation and interest rate sensitivity of the Scheme's pension obligations. At 30 June 2012, the swaps had a positive fair value of US$4,896m to the Scheme (30 June 2011: US$2,457m positive to the Scheme; 31 December 2011: US$5,560m positive to the Scheme). All swaps were executed at prevailing market rates and within standard market bid-offer spreads.
6 Tax
|
Half-year to |
||||
|
30 June |
|
30 June |
|
31 December |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Current tax |
|
|
|
|
|
UK corporation tax charge ....................................................................... |
100 |
|
230 |
|
590 |
Overseas tax1 ............................................................................................ |
3,549 |
|
1,694 |
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
1,924 |
|
3,151 |
Deferred tax |
|
|
|
|
|
Origination and reversal of temporary differences .................................... |
(20) |
|
(212) |
|
(935) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense ................................................................................................. |
3,629 |
|
1,712 |
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate ......................................................................................... |
28.5% |
|
14.9% |
|
21.3% |
1 Overseas tax included Hong Kong profits tax of US$476m (first half of 2011: US$453m; second half of 2011: US$544m). Subsidiaries in Hong Kong provided for Hong Kong profits tax at the rate of 16.5% (2011: 16.5%) on the profits for the period assessable in Hong Kong. Other overseas subsidiaries and overseas branches provided for taxation at the appropriate rates in the countries in which they operate.
Tax reconciliation
The tax charged to the income statement differs to the tax charge that would apply if all profits had been taxed at the UK corporation tax rate as follows:
|
Half-year to |
||||||||||
|
30 June 2012 |
|
30 June 2011 |
|
31 December 2011 |
||||||
|
US$m |
|
% |
|
US$m |
|
% |
|
US$m |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before tax ..................................................... |
12,737 |
|
|
|
11,474 |
|
|
|
10,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation at 24.5% (2011: 26.5%) .......................... |
3,122 |
|
24.5 |
|
3,041 |
|
26.5 |
|
2,755 |
|
26.5 |
Effect of differently taxed overseas profits ............. |
265 |
|
2.1 |
|
(275) |
|
(2.4) |
|
(217) |
|
(2.1) |
Adjustments in respect of prior period liabilities ..... |
479 |
|
3.7 |
|
522 |
|
4.6 |
|
(27) |
|
(0.3) |
Deferred tax temporary differences not recognised/ (previously not recognised) ................................. |
2 |
|
- |
|
(1,008) |
|
(8.8) |
|
85 |
|
0.8 |
Effect of profit in associates and joint ventures ...... |
(459) |
|
(3.6) |
|
(412) |
|
(3.6) |
|
(453) |
|
(4.4) |
Non-taxable income and gains ............................... |
(280) |
|
(2.2) |
|
(184) |
|
(1.6) |
|
(359) |
|
(3.4) |
Permanent disallowables ......................................... |
405 |
|
3.2 |
|
95 |
|
0.8 |
|
372 |
|
3.6 |
Change in tax rates ................................................. |
(18) |
|
(0.1) |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
(5) |
|
- |
Local taxes and overseas withholding tax ................ |
205 |
|
1.6 |
|
117 |
|
1.0 |
|
150 |
|
1.4 |
Other items (including low income housing tax credits) ................................................................ |
(92) |
|
(0.7) |
|
(186) |
|
(1.6) |
|
(85) |
|
(0.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax charged to the income statement ............ |
3,629 |
|
28.5 |
|
1,712 |
|
14.9 |
|
2,216 |
|
21.3 |
The effective tax rate for the first half of 2012 was 28.5% compared with 14.9% for the first half of 2011. The higher effective tax rate in the first half of 2012 reflects the impact of higher taxed profits arising on the disposal of the US branch network and cards business combined with the non-deductible provision in respect of certain US regulatory matters. The lower effective tax rate in the first half of 2011 included the benefit of deferred tax of US$0.9bn eligible to be recognised in respect of foreign tax credits in the US.
The UK Government announced that the main rate of corporation tax for the year beginning 1 April 2012 will reduce from 26% to 24% to be followed by further 1% reductions per annum to 22% for the year beginning 1 April 2014. The reduction in the corporate tax rate to 24% was substantively enacted in the first half of 2012 and this results in a weighted average of 24.5% for 2012 (2011: 26.5%). The reduction to 23% was enacted through the 2012 Finance Act in July and the reduction to 22% is expected to be enacted through the 2013 Finance Act. It is not expected that the future rate reductions will have a significant effect on the net UK deferred tax liability at 30 June 2012 of US$327m.
For the period ended 30 June 2012, HSBC's share of associates' tax on profit was US$476m (30 June 2011: US$418m; 31 December 2011: US$472m), which is included within share of profit in associates and joint ventures in the income statement.
The Group's legal entities are subject to routine review and audit by tax authorities in the territories in which the Group operates. The Group provides for potential tax liabilities that may arise on the basis of the amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities. The amounts ultimately paid may differ materially from the amounts provided depending on the ultimate resolution of open issues. A substantial proportion of the material open issues relate to the UK of which the principal matter concerns the application of the UK Controlled Foreign Company ('CFC') rules. Following further discussion with Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, the CFC and certain other open UK issues have now been resolved.
Deferred taxation
United States
Of the total net deferred tax assets of US$6.1bn at 30 June 2012 (30 June 2011: US$6.8bn; 31 December 2011: US$6.2bn) the net deferred tax asset relating to HSBC's operations in the US is US$5.0bn (30 June 2011: US$5.1bn; 31 December 2011: US$5.2bn). The deferred tax assets included in this total reflect the carry forward of tax losses and tax credits (US$0.2bn; 30 June 2011: US$1.0bn; 31 December 2011: US$1.2bn), deductible temporary differences in respect of loan impairment allowances (US$2.5bn; 30 June 2011: US$2.8bn; 31 December 2011: US$2.7bn) and other temporary differences (US$2.3bn; 30 June 2011: US$1.3bn; 31 December 2011: US$1.3bn).
Deductions for loan impairments for US tax purposes generally occur when the impaired loan is charged off, often in the period subsequent to that in which the impairment is recognised for accounting purposes. As a result, the amount of the associated deferred tax asset should generally move in line with the impairment allowance balance.
The taxable gains on the disposal of the US branch network and cards business has resulted in a reduction in the amount of deferred tax assets related to carried forward tax losses and tax credits. This was offset in part by the reversal of deferred tax liabilities as a result of these disposals.
On the evidence available, including historical levels of profitability, management projections of future income and HSBC Holdings' commitment to continue to invest sufficient capital in North America to recover the deferred tax asset, it is expected there will be sufficient taxable income generated by the business to realise these assets. Management projections of profits from the US operations are prepared for a 10 year period and include assumptions about future house prices and US economic conditions, including unemployment levels.
Management projections of profits from the US operations currently indicate that the existing carry forward tax losses and tax credits will be fully recovered by 2015. The current level of the deferred tax asset in respect of loan impairment allowances is projected to reduce over the 10-year period in line with the reduction of the consumer lending portfolio.
As there has been a recent history of losses in HSBC's US operations, management's analysis of the recognition of these deferred tax assets significantly discounts any future expected profits from the US operations and relies to a greater extent on capital support from HSBC Holdings, including tax planning strategies implemented in relation to such support. The principal strategy involves generating future taxable profits through the retention of capital in the US in excess of normal regulatory requirements in order to reduce deductible funding expenses or otherwise deploy such capital to increase levels of taxable income.
Brazil
The net deferred tax asset relating to HSBC's operations in Brazil is US$0.7bn at 30 June 2012 (30 June 2011: US$0.8bn; 31 December 2011: US$0.7bn). The deferred tax assets included in this total arise primarily in relation to deductible temporary differences in respect of loan impairment allowances. Deductions for loan impairments for Brazilian tax purposes generally occur in periods subsequent to those in which they are recognised for accounting purposes and, as a result, the amount of the associated deferred tax assets will move in line with the impairment allowance balance.
Loan impairment deductions are recognised for tax purposes typically within 24 months of accounting recognition. On the evidence available, including historical levels of profitability, management projections of income and the state of the Brazilian economy, it is anticipated there will be sufficient taxable income generated by the business to realise these assets when deductible for tax purposes. There are no material carried forward tax losses or tax credits recognised within the Group's deferred tax assets in Brazil.
Mexico
The net deferred tax asset relating to HSBC's operations in Mexico is US$0.5bn at 30 June 2012 (30 June 2011: US$0.6bn; 31 December 2011: US$0.5bn). The deferred tax assets included in this total relate primarily to deductible temporary differences in respect of accounting provisions for impaired loans, including losses realised on sales of impaired loans. The annual deduction for loan impairments is capped under Mexican legislation at 2.5% of the average qualifying loan portfolio. The balance is carried forward to future years without expiry but with annual deduction subject to the 2.5% cap.
On the evidence available, including historic and projected levels of loan portfolio growth, loan impairment rates and profitability, it is anticipated that the business will realise these assets within the next 15 years. The projections assume that loan impairment rates will return to and remain at levels below the annual 2.5% cap over the medium term.
There are no material carried forward tax losses or tax credits recognised within the Group's deferred tax assets in Mexico.
7 Trading assets
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
-. not subject to repledge or resale by counterparties ................................ |
296,042 |
|
338,455 |
|
235,916 |
-. which may be repledged or resold by counterparties .............................. |
95,329 |
|
136,495 |
|
94,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,371 |
|
474,950 |
|
330,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury and other eligible bills .................................................................... |
30,098 |
|
23,899 |
|
34,309 |
Debt securities .............................................................................................. |
131,563 |
|
208,805 |
|
130,487 |
Equity securities ........................................................................................... |
30,019 |
|
36,718 |
|
21,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities valued at fair value ........................................................... |
191,680 |
|
269,422 |
|
185,798 |
Loans and advances to banks ........................................................................ |
94,830 |
|
100,134 |
|
75,525 |
Loans and advances to customers ................................................................. |
104,861 |
|
105,394 |
|
69,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,371 |
|
474,950 |
|
330,451 |
Trading securities valued at fair value1
|
At |
|
At |
|
At |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and US Government agencies2 .................................................. |
21,369 |
|
23,849 |
|
15,686 |
UK Government ........................................................................................... |
11,043 |
|
30,535 |
|
12,917 |
Hong Kong Government .............................................................................. |
6,684 |
|
7,228 |
|
8,844 |
Other government ........................................................................................ |
87,798 |
|
110,691 |
|
90,816 |
Asset-backed securities3 ................................................................................ |
2,805 |
|
3,742 |
|
2,913 |
Corporate debt and other securities ............................................................... |
31,962 |
|
56,659 |
|
33,620 |
Equity securities ........................................................................................... |
30,019 |
|
36,718 |
|
21,002 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
191,680 |
|
269,422 |
|
185,798 |
1 Included within these figures are debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions of US$22,285m (30 June 2011: US$40,033m; 31 December 2011: US$24,956m), of which US$3,981m (30 June 2011: US$8,311m; 31 December 2011: US$5,269m) are guaranteed by various governments.
2 Includes securities that are supported by an explicit guarantee issued by the US Government.
3 Excludes asset-backed securities included under US Treasury and US Government agencies.
Trading securities listed on a recognised exchange and unlisted
|
Treasury and other eligible bills |
|
Debt securities |
|
Equity securities |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Fair value at 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ....................................... |
1,055 |
|
75,928 |
|
29,295 |
|
106,278 |
Unlisted2 ............................................................................ |
29,043 |
|
55,635 |
|
724 |
|
85,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,098 |
|
131,563 |
|
30,019 |
|
191,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ....................................... |
205 |
|
149,912 |
|
35,944 |
|
186,061 |
Unlisted2 ............................................................................ |
23,694 |
|
58,893 |
|
774 |
|
83,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,899 |
|
208,805 |
|
36,718 |
|
269,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ......................................... |
789 |
|
78,760 |
|
19,994 |
|
99,543 |
Unlisted2 ............................................................................. |
33,520 |
|
51,727 |
|
1,008 |
|
86,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,309 |
|
130,487 |
|
21,002 |
|
185,798 |
1 Included within listed securities are US$2,648m (30 June 2011: US$3,080m; 31 December 2011: US$2,836m) of investments listed in Hong Kong.
2 Unlisted treasury and other eligible bills primarily comprise treasury bills not listed on a recognised exchange but for which there is a liquid market.
Loans and advances to banks held for trading
|
At |
|
At |
|
At |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse repos ............................................................................................... |
54,590 |
|
60,833 |
|
45,490 |
Settlement accounts ..................................................................................... |
14,067 |
|
19,465 |
|
7,555 |
Stock borrowing ........................................................................................... |
5,191 |
|
7,374 |
|
5,531 |
Other ........................................................................................................... |
20,982 |
|
12,462 |
|
16,949 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
94,830 |
|
100,134 |
|
75,525 |
Loans and advances to customers held for trading
|
At |
|
At |
|
At |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse repos ............................................................................................... |
49,743 |
|
50,540 |
|
34,358 |
Settlement accounts ..................................................................................... |
18,480 |
|
28,274 |
|
5,804 |
Stock borrowing ........................................................................................... |
11,318 |
|
12,452 |
|
3,928 |
Other ........................................................................................................... |
25,320 |
|
14,128 |
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
104,861 |
|
105,394 |
|
69,128 |
8 Fair values of financial instruments carried at fair value
The accounting policies which determine the classification of financial instruments and the use of assumptions and estimation in valuing them are described on pages 294 to 312 and page 40, respectively, of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction.
The following table sets out the financial instruments carried at fair value.
Financial instruments carried at fair value and bases of valuation
|
|
|
Valuation techniques |
|
|
||
|
Quoted market price Level 1 |
|
Using observable inputs Level 2 |
|
With significant unobservable inputs Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets ................................................................. |
212,386 |
|
174,428 |
|
4,557 |
|
391,371 |
Financial assets designated at fair value ........................... |
24,844 |
|
6,814 |
|
652 |
|
32,310 |
Derivatives ..................................................................... |
1,530 |
|
350,142 |
|
4,262 |
|
355,934 |
Financial investments: available for sale ......................... |
229,863 |
|
132,894 |
|
8,494 |
|
371,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities ............................................................ |
136,437 |
|
164,455 |
|
7,672 |
|
308,564 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ...................... |
30,257 |
|
57,336 |
|
- |
|
87,593 |
Derivatives ..................................................................... |
1,724 |
|
351,058 |
|
3,170 |
|
355,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets ................................................................. |
303,025 |
|
165,224 |
|
6,701 |
|
474,950 |
Financial assets designated at fair value ........................... |
24,805 |
|
14,118 |
|
642 |
|
39,565 |
Derivatives ..................................................................... |
1,337 |
|
255,511 |
|
3,824 |
|
260,672 |
Financial investments: available for sale ......................... |
225,469 |
|
162,711 |
|
8,592 |
|
396,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities ............................................................ |
165,552 |
|
207,126 |
|
13,146 |
|
385,824 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ...................... |
27,570 |
|
70,110 |
|
600 |
|
98,280 |
Derivatives ..................................................................... |
1,521 |
|
252,154 |
|
3,350 |
|
257,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments carried at fair value and bases of valuation (continued)
|
|
|
Valuation techniques |
|
|
||
|
Quoted market price Level 1 |
|
Using observable inputs Level 2 |
|
With significant unobservable inputs Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets ................................................................. |
180,043 |
|
145,628 |
|
4,780 |
|
330,451 |
Financial assets designated at fair value ........................... |
22,496 |
|
7,644 |
|
716 |
|
30,856 |
Derivatives ..................................................................... |
1,262 |
|
340,668 |
|
4,449 |
|
346,379 |
Financial investments: available for sale ......................... |
217,788 |
|
151,936 |
|
9,121 |
|
378,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities ............................................................ |
98,208 |
|
159,157 |
|
7,827 |
|
265,192 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ...................... |
27,461 |
|
57,696 |
|
567 |
|
85,724 |
Derivatives ..................................................................... |
1,991 |
|
340,260 |
|
3,129 |
|
345,380 |
The increase in Level 1 trading assets and liabilities reflects an increase in equity securities and settlement account balances, the latter varying considerably in proportion with the level of trading activity. The increase in Level 2 assets reflects higher reverse repo balances used to cover short positions and an increase in repo balances contributed to the growth in Level 2 liabilities.
There were no material transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 in the period. An analysis of the movements of Level 3 financial instruments is provided on page 234.
Control framework
Fair values are subject to a control framework designed to ensure that they are either determined or validated by a function independent of the risk-taker. To this end, ultimate responsibility for the determination of fair values lies with Finance, which reports functionally to the Group Finance Director. Finance establishes the accounting policies and procedures governing valuation, and is responsible for ensuring compliance with all relevant accounting standards.
Further details of the control framework are included on pages 346 to 347 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
Determination of fair value
Fair values are determined according to the following hierarchy:
· Level 1 - quoted market price: financial instruments with quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
· Level 2 - valuation technique using observable inputs:financial instruments with quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets and financial instruments valued using models where all significant inputs are observable.
· Level 3 - valuation technique with significant unobservable inputs: financial instruments valued using valuation techniques where one or more significant inputs are unobservable.
The best evidence of fair value is a quoted price in an actively traded market. In the event that the market for a financial instrument is not active, a valuation technique is used. Further details on fair values determined using valuation techniques are included on pages 347 to 348 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
For swaps with collateralised counterparties and in significant currencies, HSBC applies a discounting curve that reflects the overnight interest rate ('OIS discounting').
Fair value adjustments
Fair value adjustments are adopted when HSBC considers that there are additional factors that would be considered by a market participant that are not incorporated within the valuation model. The magnitude of fair value adjustments depends upon many entity-specific factors, and therefore fair value adjustments may not be comparable across the banking industry.
HSBC classifies fair value adjustments as either 'risk-related' or 'model-related'. The majority of these adjustments relate to Global Banking and Markets.
Movements in the level of fair value adjustments do not necessarily result in the recognition of profits or losses within the income statement. For example, as models are enhanced, fair value adjustments may no longer be required. Similarly, fair value adjustments will decrease when the related positions are unwound, but this may not result in profit or loss.
Global Banking and Markets fair value adjustments
|
At |
|
At |
|
At |
|
30 June |
|
30 June |
|
31 December |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Type of adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-related .................................................................................................. |
1,777 |
|
1,934 |
|
1,899 |
Bid-offer ................................................................................................... |
646 |
|
623 |
|
695 |
Uncertainty .............................................................................................. |
151 |
|
110 |
|
154 |
Credit valuation adjustment ...................................................................... |
980 |
|
1,192 |
|
1,050 |
Other ........................................................................................................ |
- |
|
9 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Model-related ............................................................................................... |
282 |
|
351 |
|
567 |
Model limitation ....................................................................................... |
286 |
|
344 |
|
567 |
Other ........................................................................................................ |
(4) |
|
7 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception profit (Day 1 P&L reserves) (Note 12) ........................................ |
184 |
|
279 |
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
2,564 |
|
2,666 |
Fair value adjustments declined by US$423m during the period. The most significant movement was a reduction of US$281m in respect of model limitation adjustments driven by a reduction in the adjustment for OIS due to the narrowing of the OIS-LIBOR basis.
Detailed descriptions of risk-related and model-related adjustments are provided on pages 348 to 350 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
Credit valuation adjustment methodology
HSBC calculates a separate credit valuation adjustment for each HSBC legal entity, and within each entity for each counterparty to which the entity has exposure. The calculation of the monoline credit valuation adjustment and sensitivity to different methodologies that could be applied is described on page 159. Of the total credit valuation adjustment at 30 June 2012 of US$980m (30 June 2011: US$1,192m; 31 December 2011: US$1,050m), US$646m (30 June 2011: US$735m; 31 December 2011: US$746m) relates to the credit valuation adjustment taken against non-monoline counterparties. The methodology for calculating the credit valuation adjustment for non‑monoline counterparties is described below.
HSBC calculates the credit valuation adjustment by applying the probability of default ('PD') of the counterparty to the expected positive exposure to the counterparty and multiplying the result by the loss expected in the event of default. The calculation is performed over the life of the potential exposure.
The PD is based on HSBC's internal credit rating for the counterparty, taking into account how credit ratings may deteriorate over the duration of the exposure based on historical rating transition matrices. For most products, to calculate the expected positive exposure to a counterparty HSBC uses a simulation methodology to incorporate the range of potential exposures across the portfolio of transactions with the counterparty over the life of an instrument. The simulation methodology includes credit mitigants such as counterparty netting agreements and collateral agreements with the counterparty. A standard loss given default ('LGD') assumption of 60% is generally adopted. In respect of own credit risk, HSBC considers that a zero spread is appropriate and consequently does not adjust derivative liabilities for HSBC's own credit risk; such an adjustment is often referred to as a 'debit valuation adjustment'.
For certain types of exotic derivatives where the products are not currently supported by the simulation, or for derivative exposures in smaller trading locations where the simulation tool is not yet available, HSBC adopts alternative methodologies. These may involve mapping to the results for similar products from the simulation tool or, where the mapping approach is not appropriate, using a simplified methodology which generally follows the same principles as the simulation methodology. The calculation is applied at a trade level, with more limited recognition of credit mitigants such as netting or collateral agreements than is used in the simulation methodology.
The methodologies do not, in general, account for 'wrong-way risk'. Wrong-way risk arises when the underlying value of the derivative prior to any credit valuation adjustment is positively correlated to the probability of default by the counterparty. When there is significant wrong-way risk, a trade-specific approach is applied to reflect the wrong-way risk within the valuation.
HSBC includes all third-party counterparties in the credit valuation adjustment calculation and does not net credit valuation adjustments across HSBC Group entities. During the period, HSBC made no material changes to the methodologies used to calculate the credit valuation adjustment for non-monoline counterparties.
Consideration of other methodologies for calculation of credit valuation adjustments
HSBC's credit valuation adjustment methodology, in the opinion of management, appropriately quantifies its exposure to counterparty risk on its OTC derivative portfolio and appropriately reflects the risk management strategy of the business.
HSBC recognises that a variety of credit valuation adjustment methodologies are adopted within the banking industry and it reviews on a regular basis the appropriateness of its credit valuation methodology in light of the Group's risk management strategy as well as industry practice.
Some of the key attributes that may differ between these methodologies are:
· the PD may be calculated from historical market data or implied from current market levels for certain transaction types such as credit default swaps, either with or without an adjusting factor;
· some entities adopt a non-zero 'debit valuation adjustment', which has the effect of reducing the overall adjustment;
· differing loss assumptions in setting the level of LGD, which may utilise market recovery rates or levels set by regulators for capital calculation purposes; and
· counterparty exclusions, whereby certain counterparty types (for example collateralised counterparties) are excluded from the calculation.
The effect of adopting two alternative methodologies on the level of HSBC's credit and debit valuation adjustments (excluding the monoline credit valuation adjustment) was estimated as follows:
· adapting the Group's existing methodology to utilise PDs implied from credit default swaps, with no adjustment factor applied, and also including an adjustment to take into account HSBC's own PD implied from credit default swaps, would result in an overall adverse adjustment of US$0.7bn (30 June 2011: US$0.4bn; 31 December 2011: US$1.4bn);
· the reduction in estimated impact reflects model refinement and reduction in exposure to certain counterparties; and
· adapting HSBC's existing debit valuation adjustment methodology to include its own PD on a basis symmetric with the current calculation of credit valuation adjustment would result in a favourable reduction of the credit risk charge of US$0.1bn (30 June 2011: US$0.1bn; 31 December 2011: US$0.1bn).
Fair value valuation bases
Financial instruments measured at fair value using a valuation technique with significant unobservable inputs - Level 3
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
||||||||||
|
Available |
|
Held for trading |
Designated through profit or loss |
|
Derivatives |
|
Held for trading |
Designated at fair value through profit or loss |
|
Derivatives |
||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity including strategic |
4,367 |
|
88 |
|
433 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Asset-backed securities ........ |
2,362 |
|
966 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Leveraged finance ............... |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Loans held for securitisation ............................................ |
- |
|
618 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Structured notes .................. |
- |
|
17 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7,208 |
|
- |
|
- |
Derivatives with monolines |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
799 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Other derivatives ................ |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,463 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,170 |
Other portfolios ................. |
1,765 |
|
2,868 |
|
219 |
|
- |
|
464 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,494 |
|
4,557 |
|
652 |
|
4,262 |
|
7,672 |
|
- |
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity including strategic investments ...... |
3,915 |
|
88 |
|
178 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Asset-backed securities ........ |
1,711 |
|
1,093 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Leveraged finance ............... |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
10 |
Loans held for securitisation ........................................ |
- |
|
806 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Structured notes .................. |
- |
|
74 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
12,453 |
|
- |
|
- |
Derivatives with monolines |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
930 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Other derivatives ................ |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,894 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,340 |
Other portfolios ................. |
2,966 |
|
4,640 |
|
464 |
|
- |
|
693 |
|
600 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,592 |
|
6,701 |
|
642 |
|
3,824 |
|
13,146 |
|
600 |
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity including strategic investments ...... |
4,565 |
|
88 |
|
432 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Asset-backed securities ........ |
2,584 |
|
710 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Loans held for securitisation ............................................ |
- |
|
682 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7 |
Structured notes .................. |
- |
|
92 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7,340 |
|
- |
|
- |
Derivatives with monolines |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
940 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Other derivatives ................ |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,509 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,122 |
Other portfolios ................. |
1,972 |
|
3,208 |
|
284 |
|
- |
|
487 |
|
567 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,121 |
|
4,780 |
|
716 |
|
4,449 |
|
7,827 |
|
567 |
|
3,129 |
The basis for determining the fair value of the financial instruments in the table above is explained on pages 351 to 352 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
Movement in Level 3 financial instruments
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
||||||||||
|
Available |
|
Held for trading |
Designated at fair value through profit or loss |
|
Derivatives |
|
Held for trading |
Designated at fair value through profit or loss |
|
Derivatives |
||
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2012 .................. |
9,121 |
|
4,780 |
|
716 |
|
4,449 |
|
7,827 |
|
567 |
|
3,129 |
Total gains/(losses) recognised |
(146) |
|
73 |
|
5 |
|
(225) |
|
158 |
|
2 |
|
(36) |
Total gains/(losses) recognised in |
177 |
|
23 |
|
1 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
- |
|
26 |
Purchases ................................ |
503 |
|
291 |
|
64 |
|
- |
|
(202) |
|
- |
|
- |
New issuances ......................... |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,658 |
|
- |
|
- |
Sales ....................................... |
(282) |
|
(663) |
|
(33) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Settlements ............................. |
(163) |
|
(95) |
|
(1) |
|
36 |
|
(1,011) |
|
- |
|
78 |
Transfers out .......................... |
(1,542) |
|
(47) |
|
(150) |
|
(73) |
|
(889) |
|
(569) |
|
(69) |
Transfers in ............................ |
826 |
|
195 |
|
50 |
|
43 |
|
98 |
|
- |
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2012 ................... |
8,494 |
|
4,557 |
|
652 |
|
4,262 |
|
7,672 |
|
- |
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains/(losses) recognised |
10 |
|
(137) |
|
4 |
|
(29) |
|
63 |
|
- |
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2011 .................. |
8,237 |
|
5,689 |
|
587 |
|
3,961 |
|
11,393 |
|
570 |
|
3,806 |
Total gains/(losses) recognised |
187 |
|
(112) |
|
12 |
|
(43) |
|
71 |
|
12 |
|
298 |
Total gains/(losses) recognised in |
182 |
|
68 |
|
(4) |
|
47 |
|
199 |
|
18 |
|
92 |
Purchases ................................ |
1,277 |
|
908 |
|
132 |
|
- |
|
(89) |
|
- |
|
- |
New issuances ......................... |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,401 |
|
- |
|
- |
Sales ....................................... |
(417) |
|
(323) |
|
(16) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Settlements ............................. |
(815) |
|
(104) |
|
(4) |
|
(145) |
|
(1,561) |
|
- |
|
(736) |
Transfers out .......................... |
(885) |
|
(273) |
|
(75) |
|
(139) |
|
(565) |
|
- |
|
(362) |
Transfers in ............................ |
826 |
|
848 |
|
10 |
|
143 |
|
297 |
|
- |
|
252 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
At 30 June 2011 ..................... |
8,592 |
|
6,701 |
|
642 |
|
3,824 |
|
13,146 |
|
600 |
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains/(losses) recognised |
54 |
|
(146) |
|
12 |
|
131 |
|
103 |
|
12 |
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2011 ........................ |
8,592 |
|
6,701 |
|
642 |
|
3,824 |
|
13,146 |
|
600 |
|
3,350 |
Total gains/(losses) recognised |
35 |
|
(218) |
|
(1) |
|
810 |
|
(35) |
|
(4) |
|
330 |
Total gains/(losses) recognised in |
(361) |
|
(80) |
|
(11) |
|
(63) |
|
(188) |
|
(29) |
|
(92) |
Purchases ................................ |
581 |
|
575 |
|
110 |
|
- |
|
(1,754) |
|
- |
|
- |
New issuances ......................... |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,168 |
|
- |
|
- |
Sales ....................................... |
(339) |
|
(2,255) |
|
(53) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Settlements ............................. |
(273) |
|
(95) |
|
(3) |
|
112 |
|
33 |
|
- |
|
(347) |
Transfers out .......................... |
(1,006) |
|
(296) |
|
(98) |
|
(271) |
|
(4,701) |
|
- |
|
(246) |
Transfers in ............................ |
1,892 |
|
448 |
|
130 |
|
37 |
|
158 |
|
- |
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 ............ |
9,121 |
|
4,780 |
|
716 |
|
4,449 |
|
7,827 |
|
567 |
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains/(losses) recognised |
95 |
|
(218) |
|
1 |
|
810 |
|
(60) |
|
(2) |
|
331 |
1 Included in 'Available-for-sale investments: Fair value gains/(losses)' and 'Exchange differences' in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
Transfers out of Level 3 in respect of available-for-sale securities reflects increased confidence in the pricing of certain ABS assets. In respect of trading liabilities, new issuances of trading liabilities reflects structured note issuances, and settlements of trading liabilities reflected structured note redemptions during the period. Transfers out of Level 3 principally reflect equity volatilities and correlations becoming observable as the residual maturity of the liabilities declines.
Effect of changes in significant unobservable assumptions to reasonably possible alternatives
As discussed above, the fair value of financial instruments are, in certain circumstances, measured using valuation techniques that incorporate assumptions that are not evidenced by prices from observable current market transactions in the same instrument and are not based on observable market data. The following table shows the sensitivity of these fair values to reasonably possible alternative assumptions:
Sensitivity of fair values to reasonably possible alternative assumptions
|
Reflected in profit or loss |
|
Reflected in other |
||||
|
Favourable changes |
|
Unfavourable |
|
Favourable changes |
|
Unfavourable changes |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, trading assets and trading liabilities1 ................ |
366 |
|
(335) |
|
- |
|
- |
Financial assets and liabilities designated at fair value ......... |
70 |
|
(70) |
|
- |
|
- |
Financial investments: available for sale ............................. |
- |
|
- |
|
782 |
|
(784) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436 |
|
(405) |
|
782 |
|
(784) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, trading assets and trading liabilities1 ................ |
414 |
|
(310) |
|
- |
|
- |
Financial assets and liabilities designated at fair value .......... |
72 |
|
(64) |
|
- |
|
- |
Financial investments: available for sale ............................. |
- |
|
- |
|
673 |
|
(711) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
(374) |
|
673 |
|
(711) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, trading assets and trading liabilities1 ................ |
369 |
|
(436) |
|
- |
|
- |
Financial assets and liabilities designated at fair value .......... |
72 |
|
(72) |
|
- |
|
- |
Financial investments: available for sale ............................. |
- |
|
- |
|
814 |
|
(818) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
(508) |
|
814 |
|
(818) |
1 Derivatives, trading assets and trading liabilities are presented as one category to reflect the manner in which these financial instruments are risk-managed.
The decrease in the effect of unfavourable changes in significant unobservable inputs in relation to derivatives, trading assets and trading liabilities during the period primarily reflects an increase in the credit valuation adjustment taken against monoline exposures.
Sensitivity of fair values to reasonably possible alternative assumptions by Level 3 instrument type
|
Reflected in profit or loss |
|
Reflected in other |
||||
|
Favourable changes |
|
Unfavourable |
|
Favourable changes |
|
Unfavourable changes |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity investments ................................................. |
69 |
|
(69) |
|
448 |
|
(448) |
Asset-backed securities ....................................................... |
57 |
|
(52) |
|
192 |
|
(180) |
Loans held for securitisation .............................................. |
9 |
|
(9) |
|
- |
|
- |
Structured notes ................................................................. |
5 |
|
(5) |
|
- |
|
- |
Derivatives with monolines ................................................ |
71 |
|
(52) |
|
- |
|
- |
Other derivatives ............................................................... |
171 |
|
(162) |
|
- |
|
- |
Other portfolios ................................................................. |
54 |
|
(56) |
|
142 |
|
(156) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436 |
|
(405) |
|
782 |
|
(784) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity investments ................................................. |
103 |
|
(57) |
|
368 |
|
(368) |
Asset-backed securities ....................................................... |
3 |
|
(3) |
|
130 |
|
(124) |
Loans held for securitisation .............................................. |
5 |
|
(5) |
|
- |
|
- |
Structured notes ................................................................. |
16 |
|
(16) |
|
- |
|
- |
Derivatives with monolines ................................................ |
117 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Other derivatives ............................................................... |
126 |
|
(169) |
|
- |
|
- |
Other portfolios ................................................................. |
116 |
|
(124) |
|
175 |
|
(219) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
(374) |
|
673 |
|
(711) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity investments ................................................. |
123 |
|
(83) |
|
451 |
|
(451) |
Asset-backed securities ....................................................... |
3 |
|
(3) |
|
183 |
|
(175) |
Loans held for securitisation .............................................. |
4 |
|
(4) |
|
- |
|
- |
Structured notes ................................................................. |
6 |
|
(6) |
|
- |
|
- |
Derivatives with monolines ................................................ |
76 |
|
(178) |
|
- |
|
- |
Other derivatives ............................................................... |
145 |
|
(154) |
|
- |
|
- |
Other portfolios ................................................................. |
84 |
|
(80) |
|
180 |
|
(192) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
(508) |
|
814 |
|
(818) |
Favourable and unfavourable changes are determined on the basis of changes in the value of the instrument as a result of varying the levels of the unobservable parameters using statistical techniques. When parameters are not amenable to statistical analysis, the quantification of uncertainty is judgemental.
When the fair value of a financial instrument is affected by more than one unobservable assumption, the above table reflects the most favourable or the most unfavourable change from varying the assumptions individually.
In respect of private equity investments, in many of the methodologies the principal assumption is the valuation multiple to be applied to the main financial indicators. This may be determined with reference to multiples for comparable listed companies and includes discounts for marketability.
For ABSs, the principal assumptions in the models are based on benchmark information about prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities and the historical performance of the underlying assets.
For leveraged finance, loans held for securitisation and derivatives with monolines, the principal assumption concerns the appropriate value to be attributed to the counterparty credit risk. This requires an estimation of exposure at default, PD and recovery in the event of default. For loan transactions, assessment of exposure at default is straightforward. For derivative transactions, a future exposure profile is generated on the basis of current market data. Probabilities of default and recovery levels are estimated using available evidence, which may include financial information, historical experience, credit default swap spreads and consensus recovery levels.
For structured notes and other derivatives, principal assumptions concern the value to be attributed to the future volatility of asset values and the future correlation between asset values. These principal assumptions include credit volatilities and correlations used in the valuation of structured credit derivatives (including leveraged credit derivatives). For such unobservable assumptions, estimates are based on available market data, which may include the use of a proxy method to derive a volatility or a correlation from comparable assets for which market data is more readily available, and/or an examination of historical levels.
9 Fair values of financial instruments not carried at fair value
The accounting policies which determine the classification of financial instruments and the use of assumptions and estimation in valuing them are described on pages 294 to 312 and page 40, respectively, of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
Fair values of financial instruments which are not carried at fair value on the balance sheet
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
||||||
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to banks ......................... |
182,191 |
|
182,266 |
|
226,043 |
|
226,150 |
|
180,987 |
|
181,302 |
Loans and advances to customers ................... |
974,985 |
|
950,935 |
|
1,037,888 |
|
1,011,319 |
|
940,429 |
|
914,485 |
Financial investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- debt securities .......................................... |
22,485 |
|
24,202 |
|
19,883 |
|
21,320 |
|
21,018 |
|
22,500 |
- treasury and other eligible bills ................ |
- |
|
- |
|
202 |
|
202 |
|
181 |
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits by banks .......................................... |
123,553 |
|
123,576 |
|
125,479 |
|
125,492 |
|
112,822 |
|
112,848 |
Customer accounts ......................................... |
1,278,489 |
|
1,278,801 |
|
1,318,987 |
|
1,318,873 |
|
1,253,925 |
|
1,254,313 |
Debt securities in issue ................................... |
125,543 |
|
125,664 |
|
149,803 |
|
149,947 |
|
131,013 |
|
130,914 |
Subordinated liabilities .................................... |
29,696 |
|
29,357 |
|
32,753 |
|
32,931 |
|
30,606 |
|
29,351 |
Fair values of financial instruments held for sale which are not carried at fair value on the balance sheet
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
||||||
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Assets classified as held for sale1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to banks and customers ................................................................... |
6,772 |
|
6,816 |
|
62 |
|
62 |
|
35,720 |
|
37,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of disposal groups held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits by banks ...................................... |
326 |
|
326 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
206 |
|
206 |
Customer accounts ..................................... |
9,668 |
|
9,433 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
20,138 |
|
19,130 |
1 Including financial instruments within disposal groups held for sale.
The following is a list of financial instruments whose carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value because, for example, they are short-term in nature or reprice to current market rates frequently:
Assets
Cash and balances at central banks
Items in the course of collection from other banks
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness
Endorsements and acceptances
Short-term receivables within 'Other assets'
Accrued income
Liabilities
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation
Items in the course of transmission to other banks
Investment contracts with discretionary participation features within 'Liabilities under insurance contracts'
Endorsements and acceptances
Short-term payables within 'Other liabilities'
Accruals
Analysis of loans and advances to customers by geographical segment
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
||||||
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Loans and advances to customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe ........................................................... |
445,445 |
|
436,921 |
|
486,331 |
|
478,660 |
|
434,336 |
|
426,039 |
Hong Kong .................................................... |
165,204 |
|
163,139 |
|
159,370 |
|
157,859 |
|
157,665 |
|
154,054 |
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....................................... |
129,489 |
|
129,175 |
|
121,429 |
|
121,069 |
|
123,868 |
|
123,662 |
Middle East and North Africa ........................ |
27,896 |
|
27,889 |
|
25,694 |
|
25,781 |
|
25,875 |
|
25,758 |
North America .............................................. |
153,991 |
|
141,094 |
|
179,262 |
|
162,704 |
|
142,747 |
|
128,608 |
Latin America ............................................... |
52,960 |
|
52,717 |
|
65,802 |
|
65,246 |
|
55,938 |
|
56,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
974,985 |
|
950,935 |
|
1,037,888 |
|
1,011,319 |
|
940,429 |
|
914,485 |
Valuation
The calculation of fair value incorporates HSBC's estimate of the amount at which financial assets could be exchanged, or financial liabilities settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction. It does not reflect the economic benefits and costs that HSBC expects to flow from the instruments' cash flows over their expected future lives. Other reporting entities may use different valuation methodologies and assumptions in determining fair values for which no observable market prices are available, so comparisons of fair values between entities may not be meaningful and users are advised to exercise caution when using this data.
The secondary market demand for US consumer lending assets has been heavily influenced by the challenging economic conditions during the past few years, including house price depreciation, elevated unemployment, and the lack of financing options available to support the purchase of assets. The estimated fair value of these loans was determined by developing an approximate range of values from various sources as appropriate for the respective pools of assets. These sources include, internal value estimates based on over-the-counter trading activity, forward looking discounted cash flow models using assumptions we believe are consistent with those which would be used by market participants in valuing such loans, trading input from market participants and general discussions held with potential investors. The fair values of loans and advances to customers in the US are substantially lower than their carrying amount, reflecting the market conditions at the balance sheet date. The fair values reported do not reflect HSBC's estimate of the underlying long-term value of the assets.
The basis for estimating the fair values of loans and advances to banks and customers, financial investments, deposits by banks, customer accounts, debt securities in issue and subordinated liabilities is explained on pages 358 to 359 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
10 Reclassification of financial assets
During the second half of 2008, HSBC reclassified US$15.3bn and US$2.6bn of financial assets from the held-for-trading category to the loans and receivables and available-for-sale classifications, respectively, as permitted by the relevant amendment to IAS 39. The accounting policy for reclassifications is set out on page 296 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011. No further reclassifications were undertaken by HSBC.
Reclassification of HSBC's financial assets
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
||||||
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$ |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified to loans and receivables ......... |
7,253 |
|
6,166 |
|
8,560 |
|
7,544 |
|
7,867 |
|
6,651 |
Reclassified to available for sale ................... |
25 |
|
25 |
|
64 |
|
62 |
|
33 |
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,278 |
|
6,191 |
|
8,624 |
|
7,606 |
|
7,900 |
|
6,684 |
The following table shows the fair value gains and losses, income and expense recognised in the income statement in respect of reclassified assets and the gains and losses that would have been recognised if no reclassification had taken place.
Effect of reclassifying and not reclassifying financial assets
|
Half-year to |
||||
|
30 June |
|
30 June |
|
31 December |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Reclassification to loans and receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded in the income statement1 ............................................................ |
69 |
|
225 |
|
93 |
Assuming no reclassification2 ..................................................................... |
202 |
|
548 |
|
(231) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income statement effect of reclassification ............................................ |
(133) |
|
(323) |
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification to available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded in the income statement1 ............................................................ |
1 |
|
8 |
|
(7) |
Assuming no reclassification2 ..................................................................... |
(3) |
|
(10) |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income statement effect of reclassification ............................................ |
4 |
|
18 |
|
(15) |
1 'Income and expense' recorded in the income statement represents the accrual of the effective interest rate and, for the first half of 2012, includes US$81m in respect of impairment (first half of 2011: impairment of US$15m; second half of 2011: impairment US$54m).
2 Effect on the income statement during the period had the reclassification not occurred.
11 Financial assets designated at fair value
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
- not subject to repledge or resale by counterparties ................................. |
32,298 |
|
39,526 |
|
30,738 |
- which may be repledged or resold by counterparties ............................... |
12 |
|
39 |
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,310 |
|
39,565 |
|
30,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury and other eligible bills .................................................................... |
91 |
|
207 |
|
123 |
Debt securities .............................................................................................. |
14,238 |
|
18,496 |
|
11,834 |
Equity securities ........................................................................................... |
17,775 |
|
19,588 |
|
17,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities designated at fair value .................................................................. |
32,104 |
|
38,291 |
|
29,887 |
Loans and advances to banks ........................................................................ |
127 |
|
355 |
|
119 |
Loans and advances to customers ................................................................. |
79 |
|
919 |
|
850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,310 |
|
39,565 |
|
30,856 |
Securities designated at fair value1
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and US Government agencies2 .................................................. |
32 |
|
87 |
|
35 |
UK Government ........................................................................................... |
654 |
|
739 |
|
812 |
Hong Kong Government .............................................................................. |
145 |
|
152 |
|
151 |
Other government ........................................................................................ |
5,148 |
|
4,762 |
|
3,964 |
Asset-backed securities3 ................................................................................ |
172 |
|
6,164 |
|
201 |
Corporate debt and other securities ............................................................... |
8,178 |
|
6,799 |
|
6,794 |
Equity securities ........................................................................................... |
17,775 |
|
19,588 |
|
17,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,104 |
|
38,291 |
|
29,887 |
1 Included within these figures are debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions of US$3,311m (30 June 2011: US$9,746m; 31 December 2011: US$3,497m), of which none (30 June 2011: US$46m; 31 December 2011: US$40m) are guaranteed by various governments.
2 Includes securities that are supported by an explicit guarantee issued by the US Government.
3 Excludes asset-backed securities included under US Treasury and US Government agencies.
Securities listed on a recognised exchange and unlisted
|
Treasury and other eligible bills |
|
Debt securities |
|
Equity securities |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Fair value at 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ....................................... |
17 |
|
4,440 |
|
11,606 |
|
16,063 |
Unlisted ............................................................................. |
74 |
|
9,798 |
|
6,169 |
|
16,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
14,238 |
|
17,775 |
|
32,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ....................................... |
6 |
|
3,605 |
|
13,521 |
|
17,132 |
Unlisted ............................................................................. |
201 |
|
14,891 |
|
6,067 |
|
21,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207 |
|
18,496 |
|
19,588 |
|
38,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ....................................... |
4 |
|
3,607 |
|
11,859 |
|
15,470 |
Unlisted ............................................................................. |
119 |
|
8,227 |
|
6,071 |
|
14,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
11,834 |
|
17,930 |
|
29,887 |
1 Included within listed securities are US$831m (30 June 2011: US$668m; 31 December 2011: US$631m) of investments listed in Hong Kong.
12 Derivatives
Fair values of derivatives by product contract type
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
||||||||
|
Trading |
|
Hedging |
|
Total |
|
Trading |
|
Hedging |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange ......................... |
68,314 |
|
915 |
|
69,229 |
|
71,393 |
|
391 |
|
71,784 |
Interest rate ................................. |
561,439 |
|
2,465 |
|
563,904 |
|
551,245 |
|
6,511 |
|
557,756 |
Equities ........................................ |
17,550 |
|
- |
|
17,550 |
|
20,629 |
|
- |
|
20,629 |
Credit ........................................... |
20,193 |
|
- |
|
20,193 |
|
20,847 |
|
- |
|
20,847 |
Commodity and other .................. |
1,732 |
|
- |
|
1,732 |
|
1,610 |
|
- |
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross total fair values ................... |
669,228 |
|
3,380 |
|
672,608 |
|
665,724 |
|
6,902 |
|
672,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting ......................................... |
|
|
|
|
(316,674) |
|
|
|
|
|
(316,674) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
355,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange ......................... |
71,280 |
|
1,550 |
|
72,830 |
|
71,621 |
|
175 |
|
71,796 |
Interest rate ................................. |
283,315 |
|
2,236 |
|
285,551 |
|
277,545 |
|
3,577 |
|
281,122 |
Equities ........................................ |
15,348 |
|
- |
|
15,348 |
|
17,416 |
|
- |
|
17,416 |
Credit ........................................... |
19,284 |
|
- |
|
19,284 |
|
18,613 |
|
- |
|
18,613 |
Commodity and other .................. |
1,084 |
|
- |
|
1,084 |
|
1,503 |
|
- |
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross total fair values ................... |
390,311 |
|
3,786 |
|
394,097 |
|
386,698 |
|
3,752 |
|
390,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting ......................................... |
|
|
|
|
(133,425) |
|
|
|
|
|
(133,425) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
257,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange ......................... |
74,958 |
|
1,026 |
|
75,984 |
|
75,077 |
|
371 |
|
75,448 |
Interest rate ................................. |
510,652 |
|
2,439 |
|
513,091 |
|
502,906 |
|
6,221 |
|
509,127 |
Equities ........................................ |
15,262 |
|
- |
|
15,262 |
|
19,363 |
|
- |
|
19,363 |
Credit ........................................... |
25,694 |
|
- |
|
25,694 |
|
25,800 |
|
- |
|
25,800 |
Commodity and other .................. |
2,198 |
|
- |
|
2,198 |
|
1,492 |
|
- |
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross total fair values ................... |
628,764 |
|
3,465 |
|
632,229 |
|
624,638 |
|
6,592 |
|
631,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting ......................................... |
|
|
|
|
(285,850) |
|
|
|
|
|
(285,850) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
345,380 |
Derivative assets increased during the first half of 2012, driven by an increase in the fair value of interest rate derivatives as yield curves in major currencies continued to decline. This resulted in the increase in gross fair values and the increase in the netting adjustment.
A description of HSBC's determination of the fair values of financial instruments, including derivatives, is provided on pages 347 to 348 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2011.
Trading derivatives
The notional contract amounts of derivatives held for trading purposes indicate the nominal value of transactions outstanding at the balance sheet date; they do not represent amounts at risk. The 2% rise in the notional amounts of HSBC's derivative contracts during the first half of 2012 was primarily driven by an increase in trading volumes in the period.
Notional contract amounts of derivatives held for trading purposes by product type
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange ......................................................................................... |
4,630,298 |
|
4,440,515 |
|
3,945,774 |
Interest rate ................................................................................................. |
19,427,340 |
|
21,305,123 |
|
19,788,710 |
Equities ........................................................................................................ |
471,380 |
|
400,877 |
|
265,577 |
Credit ........................................................................................................... |
985,945 |
|
1,091,052 |
|
1,049,147 |
Commodity and other .................................................................................. |
96,975 |
|
97,825 |
|
76,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,611,938 |
|
27,335,392 |
|
25,125,695 |
Credit derivatives
The notional contract amount of credit derivatives of US$986bn (30 June 2011: US$1,091bn; 31 December 2011: US$1,049bn) consisted of protection bought of US$481bn (30 June 2011: US$539bn; 31 December 2011: US$518bn) and protection sold of US$505bn (30 June 2011: US$552bn; 31 December 2011: US$531bn).
HSBC manages the credit risk arising on buying and selling credit derivative protection by including the related credit exposures within its overall credit limit structure for the relevant counterparty. The trading of credit derivatives is restricted to a small number of offices within the major centres which have the control infrastructure and market skills to manage effectively the credit risk inherent in the products. The credit derivative business operates within the market risk management framework described on page 168.
Derivatives valued using models with unobservable inputs
The difference between the fair value at initial recognition (the transaction price) and the value that would have been derived had valuation techniques used for subsequent measurement been applied at initial recognition, less subsequent releases, is as follows.
Unamortised balance of derivatives valued using models with significant unobservable inputs
|
Half-year to |
||||
|
30 June 2012 |
|
30 June 2011 |
|
31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortised balance at beginning of period .................................................. |
200 |
|
250 |
|
279 |
Deferral on new transactions ........................................................................ |
71 |
|
161 |
|
73 |
Recognised in the income statement during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
- amortisation ......................................................................................... |
(61) |
|
(74) |
|
(69) |
- subsequent to unobservable inputs becoming observable ......................... |
- |
|
(38) |
|
(33) |
- maturity or termination, or offsetting derivative .................................. |
(20) |
|
(25) |
|
(35) |
Exchange differences .................................................................................... |
1 |
|
9 |
|
(11) |
Risk hedged .................................................................................................. |
(7) |
|
(4) |
|
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortised balance at end of period1 .......................................................... |
184 |
|
279 |
|
200 |
1 This amount is yet to be recognised in the consolidated income statement.
Hedging instruments
The notional contract amounts of these instruments indicate the nominal value of transactions outstanding at the balance sheet date; they do not represent amounts at risk.
Notional contract amounts of derivatives held for hedging purposes by product type
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
||||||
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
Fair value hedges |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
Fair value hedges |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
Fair value hedges |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange ........................................ |
15,219 |
|
102 |
|
11,476 |
|
1,403 |
|
12,078 |
|
1,363 |
Interest rate ................................................ |
210,362 |
|
69,605 |
|
340,773 |
|
74,434 |
|
228,052 |
|
76,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,581 |
|
69,707 |
|
352,249 |
|
75,837 |
|
240,130 |
|
78,313 |
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
||||||
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange ........................................ |
- |
|
15 |
|
236 |
|
- |
|
77 |
|
1 |
Interest rate ................................................ |
332 |
|
4,525 |
|
427 |
|
2,351 |
|
369 |
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332 |
|
4,540 |
|
663 |
|
2,351 |
|
446 |
|
4,332 |
Gains/(losses) arising from fair value hedges
|
Half-year to |
||||
|
30 June 2012 |
|
30 June 2011 |
|
31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Gains/(losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
- on hedging instruments ......................................................................... |
(706) |
|
(794) |
|
(3,288) |
- on the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk ............................... |
674 |
|
722 |
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32) |
|
(72) |
|
(152) |
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
||||||
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange ........................................ |
764 |
|
376 |
|
1,314 |
|
175 |
|
949 |
|
370 |
Interest rate ................................................ |
2,133 |
|
1,986 |
|
1,809 |
|
1,226 |
|
2,070 |
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,897 |
|
2,362 |
|
3,123 |
|
1,401 |
|
3,019 |
|
2,260 |
The gains and losses on ineffective portions of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recognised immediately in 'Net trading income'. During the period to 30 June 2012, a gain of US$3m was recognised due to hedge ineffectiveness (first half of 2011: gain of US$2m; second half of 2011: gain of US$24m).
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations
The Group applies hedge accounting in respect of certain consolidated net investments. Hedging is undertaken using forward foreign exchange contracts or by financing with currency borrowings.
At 30 June 2012, the fair values of outstanding financial instruments designated as hedges of net investments in foreign operations were assets of US$151m (30 June 2011: nil; 31 December 2011: US$121m) and liabilities of US$7m (30 June 2011: US$30m; 31 December 2011: US$36m), and notional contract values of US$2,637m (30 June 2011: US$1,251m; 31 December 2011: US$3,920m).
Ineffectiveness recognised in 'Net trading income' during the period to 30 June 2012 was nil (both halves of 2011: nil).
13 Financial investments
|
At |
|
At |
|
At |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Financial investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
-. not subject to repledge or resale by counterparties ................................ |
369,879 |
|
385,126 |
|
364,906 |
-. which may be repledged or resold by counterparties .............................. |
23,857 |
|
31,731 |
|
35,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,736 |
|
416,857 |
|
400,044 |
Carrying amounts and fair values of financial investments
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
||||||
|
Carrying |
|
Fair value |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair value |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair value |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury and other eligible bills ................... |
71,552 |
|
71,552 |
|
61,664 |
|
61,664 |
|
65,223 |
|
65,223 |
-. available for sale .................................. |
71,552 |
|
71,552 |
|
61,462 |
|
61,462 |
|
65,042 |
|
65,042 |
-. held to maturity ................................... |
- |
|
- |
|
202 |
|
202 |
|
181 |
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities ............................................. |
315,498 |
|
317,215 |
|
346,986 |
|
348,423 |
|
327,611 |
|
329,093 |
-. available for sale .................................. |
293,013 |
|
293,013 |
|
327,103 |
|
327,103 |
|
306,593 |
|
306,593 |
-. held to maturity ................................... |
22,485 |
|
24,202 |
|
19,883 |
|
21,320 |
|
21,018 |
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-. available for sale .................................. |
6,686 |
|
6,686 |
|
8,207 |
|
8,207 |
|
7,210 |
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,736 |
|
395,453 |
|
416,857 |
|
418,294 |
|
400,044 |
|
401,526 |
Financial investments at amortised cost and fair value1
|
Amortised |
|
Fair value |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
US Treasury ........................................................................................................................ |
49,944 |
|
51,271 |
US Government agencies2 ................................................................................................... |
22,264 |
|
23,283 |
US Government sponsored entities2 .................................................................................... |
4,581 |
|
5,262 |
UK Government ................................................................................................................. |
19,860 |
|
20,335 |
Hong Kong Government ..................................................................................................... |
36,993 |
|
37,018 |
Other government .............................................................................................................. |
133,375 |
|
135,540 |
Asset-backed securities3 ...................................................................................................... |
32,628 |
|
27,387 |
Corporate debt and other securities ..................................................................................... |
86,456 |
|
88,671 |
Equities ............................................................................................................................... |
4,806 |
|
6,686 |
|
|
||
|
390,907 |
|
395,453 |
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
US Treasury ........................................................................................................................ |
37,584 |
|
37,697 |
US Government agencies2 ................................................................................................... |
21,910 |
|
22,500 |
US Government sponsored entities2 .................................................................................... |
4,669 |
|
4,958 |
UK Government ................................................................................................................. |
30,034 |
|
30,787 |
Hong Kong Government ..................................................................................................... |
31,700 |
|
31,734 |
Other government .............................................................................................................. |
125,452 |
|
126,088 |
Asset-backed securities3 ...................................................................................................... |
37,835 |
|
32,292 |
Corporate debt and other securities ..................................................................................... |
122,521 |
|
124,031 |
Equities ............................................................................................................................... |
5,849 |
|
8,207 |
|
|
||
|
417,554 |
|
418,294 |
Financial investments at amortised cost and fair value3 (continued)
|
Amortised |
|
Fair value |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
US Treasury ....................................................................................................................... |
43,848 |
|
45,283 |
US Government agencies2 ................................................................................................... |
25,079 |
|
26,093 |
US Government sponsored entities2 .................................................................................... |
4,425 |
|
5,056 |
UK Government ................................................................................................................. |
32,165 |
|
33,603 |
Hong Kong Government .................................................................................................... |
33,359 |
|
33,374 |
Other government .............................................................................................................. |
125,623 |
|
127,049 |
Asset-backed securities3 ...................................................................................................... |
35,096 |
|
28,625 |
Corporate debt and other securities ..................................................................................... |
94,110 |
|
95,233 |
Equities .............................................................................................................................. |
5,122 |
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
398,827 |
|
401,526 |
1 Included within these figures are debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions with a carrying amount of US$60,043m (30 June 2011: US$98,472m; 31 December 2011: US$68,334m), of which US$11,680m (30 June 2011: US$37,929m; 31 December 2011: US$17,079m) are guaranteed by various governments. The fair value of the debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions at 30 June 2012 was US$60,583m (30 June 2011: US$98,939m; 31 December 2011: US$68,765m).
2 Includes securities that are supported by an explicit guarantee issued by the US Government.
3 Excludes asset-backed securities included under US Government agencies and sponsored entities.
Financial investments listed on a recognised exchange and unlisted
|
Treasury and other eligible bills available for sale |
|
Treasury and other eligible bills held to maturity |
|
Debt securities available for sale |
|
Debt securities held to maturity |
|
Equity securities available for sale |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Carrying amount at 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ................. |
1,938 |
|
- |
|
113,083 |
|
4,975 |
|
509 |
|
120,505 |
Unlisted2 ..................................................... |
69,614 |
|
- |
|
179,930 |
|
17,510 |
|
6,177 |
|
273,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,552 |
|
- |
|
293,013 |
|
22,485 |
|
6,686 |
|
393,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ................. |
2,049 |
|
- |
|
152,844 |
|
4,237 |
|
690 |
|
159,820 |
Unlisted2 ..................................................... |
59,413 |
|
202 |
|
174,259 |
|
15,646 |
|
7,517 |
|
257,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,462 |
|
202 |
|
327,103 |
|
19,883 |
|
8,207 |
|
416,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ................. |
4,077 |
|
- |
|
121,303 |
|
4,370 |
|
535 |
|
130,285 |
Unlisted2 ..................................................... |
60,965 |
|
181 |
|
185,290 |
|
16,648 |
|
6,675 |
|
269,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,042 |
|
181 |
|
306,593 |
|
21,018 |
|
7,210 |
|
400,044 |
1 The fair value of listed held-to-maturity debt securities at 30 June 2012 was US$5,374m (30 June 2011: US$4,483m; 31 December 2011: US$4,641m). Included within listed investments were US$3,507m (30 June 2011: US$3,125m; 31 December 2011: US$3,544m) of investments listed in Hong Kong.
2 Unlisted treasury and other eligible bills available for sale primarily comprise treasury bills not listed on a recognised exchange but for which there is a liquid market.
Maturities of investments in debt securities at their carrying amounts
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Remaining contractual maturities of total debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
1 year or less ............................................................................................ |
60,079 |
|
110,240 |
|
87,080 |
5 years or less but over 1 year ................................................................... |
147,920 |
|
116,145 |
|
128,192 |
10 years or less but over 5 years ............................................................... |
50,603 |
|
56,531 |
|
52,251 |
over 10 years ............................................................................................ |
56,896 |
|
64,070 |
|
60,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,498 |
|
346,986 |
|
327,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining contractual maturities of debt securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
1 year or less ............................................................................................ |
58,985 |
|
108,930 |
|
85,821 |
5 years or less but over 1 year ................................................................... |
139,967 |
|
109,498 |
|
120,763 |
10 years or less but over 5 years ............................................................... |
42,609 |
|
49,501 |
|
44,946 |
over 10 years ............................................................................................ |
51,452 |
|
59,174 |
|
55,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,013 |
|
327,103 |
|
306,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining contractual maturities of debt securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
1 year or less ............................................................................................ |
1,094 |
|
1,310 |
|
1,259 |
5 years or less but over 1 year ................................................................... |
7,953 |
|
6,647 |
|
7,429 |
10 years or less but over 5 years ............................................................... |
7,994 |
|
7,030 |
|
7,305 |
over 10 years ............................................................................................ |
5,444 |
|
4,896 |
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,485 |
|
19,883 |
|
21,018 |
14 Assets held for sale
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal groups ............................................................................................ |
11,695 |
|
445 |
|
38,903 |
Non-current assets held for sale .................................................................... |
688 |
|
1,154 |
|
655 |
- property, plant and equipment .................................................................. |
519 |
|
1,055 |
|
589 |
- other ......................................................................................................... |
169 |
|
99 |
|
66 |
|
|
||||
Total assets held for sale .............................................................................. |
12,383 |
|
1,599 |
|
39,558 |
Disposal groups
The major classes of assets and associated liabilities of disposal groups held for sale were as follows:
|
30 June 2012 |
||||||||||
|
Central America businesses |
|
South America businesses |
|
US branches |
|
US life insurance businesses |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
Assets of disposal groups held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets .............................................. |
18 |
|
126 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
311 |
|
455 |
Loans and advances to banks ....................... |
611 |
|
273 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
235 |
|
1,119 |
Loans and advances to customers ................ |
2,534 |
|
2,027 |
|
528 |
|
- |
|
407 |
|
5,496 |
Financial investments .................................. |
441 |
|
297 |
|
- |
|
1,702 |
|
280 |
|
2,720 |
Prepayments and accrued income ................ |
31 |
|
29 |
|
2 |
|
16 |
|
13 |
|
91 |
Goodwill and intangible assets ...................... |
220 |
|
35 |
|
2 |
|
62 |
|
15 |
|
334 |
Other assets of disposal groups .................... |
507 |
|
458 |
|
19 |
|
204 |
|
292 |
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets ................................................. |
4,362 |
|
3,245 |
|
551 |
|
1,984 |
|
1,553 |
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of disposal groups held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits by banks ........................................ |
211 |
|
113 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
326 |
Customer accounts ...................................... |
2,832 |
|
2,007 |
|
3,633 |
|
- |
|
1,196 |
|
9,668 |
Debt securities in issue ................................. |
162 |
|
463 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3 |
|
628 |
Liabilities under insurance contracts............. |
51 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,021 |
|
446 |
|
1,518 |
Other liabilities of disposal groups ............... |
155 |
|
166 |
|
2 |
|
14 |
|
122 |
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities ............................................ |
3,411 |
|
2,749 |
|
3,635 |
|
1,035 |
|
1,769 |
|
12,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealised losses recognised in |
(34) |
|
(92) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(11) |
|
(137) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected date of completion ....................... |
Q4 2012 |
|
Q1 2013 |
|
Q3 2012 |
|
Q1 2013 |
|
|
|
|
Operating segment....................................... |
Latin |
|
Latin |
|
North |
|
North |
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2012, the following businesses represented the majority of disposal groups held for sale:
· Central America businesses, which include banking operations in Costa Rica, El Salvador and Honduras. These were also classified as held for sale at 31 December 2011.
· South America businesses, which include banking operations in Peru, Colombia and Paraguay.
· 57 of the 195 US branches that were held for sale at 31 December 2011. 138 branches were sold on 18 May 2012, recognising a gain of US$661m. Subsequent to 30 June 2012, 53 branches were sold in July 2012 with a gain of approximately US$200m and the remaining four branches are expected to be sold in August 2012 with no significant effect on the financial statements.
· US life insurance businesses.
The sale of the US Card and Retail Services business that was held for sale at 31 December 2011 was completed on 1 May 2012 with a gain on disposal of US$3.1bn.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment classified as held for sale principally results from the repossession of property that had been pledged as collateral by customers. These assets are expected to be disposed of within 12 months of acquisition. The majority arose within the geographical segment, North America.
15 Trading liabilities
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits by banks ......................................................................................... |
65,894 |
|
54,651 |
|
47,506 |
Customer accounts ....................................................................................... |
149,556 |
|
166,974 |
|
123,344 |
Other debt securities in issue ......................................................................... |
30,808 |
|
37,746 |
|
29,987 |
Other liabilities - net short positions in securities ......................................... |
62,306 |
|
126,453 |
|
64,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,564 |
|
385,824 |
|
265,192 |
Deposits by banks held for trading
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repos ........................................................................................................... |
23,088 |
|
17,718 |
|
16,687 |
Settlement accounts ..................................................................................... |
17,086 |
|
16,067 |
|
7,221 |
Stock lending ................................................................................................ |
4,029 |
|
5,652 |
|
2,821 |
Other ........................................................................................................... |
21,691 |
|
15,214 |
|
20,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,894 |
|
54,651 |
|
47,506 |
Customer accounts held for trading
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repos ........................................................................................................... |
89,540 |
|
102,065 |
|
70,151 |
Settlement accounts ..................................................................................... |
18,076 |
|
23,970 |
|
6,909 |
Stock lending ................................................................................................ |
1,984 |
|
2,827 |
|
1,774 |
Other ........................................................................................................... |
39,956 |
|
38,112 |
|
44,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,556 |
|
166,974 |
|
123,344 |
At 30 June 2012, the cumulative amount of change in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk was a gain of US$270m (30 June 2011: gain of US$202m; 31 December 2011: gain of US$599m).
16 Financial liabilities designated at fair value
|
At 30 June 2012 |
|
At 30 June 2011 |
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits by banks and customer accounts ..................................................... |
500 |
|
6,515 |
|
517 |
Liabilities to customers under investment contracts ...................................... |
11,736 |
|
12,191 |
|
11,399 |
Debt securities in issue .................................................................................. |
53,459 |
|
55,885 |
|
52,197 |
Subordinated liabilities .................................................................................. |
17,700 |
|
18,920 |
|
17,503 |
Preferred securities ....................................................................................... |
4,198 |
|
4,769 |
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,593 |
|
98,280 |
|
85,724 |
|
Restruc- turing costs |
|
Contingent liabilities and |
|
Legal proceedings and regulatory matters |
|
Customer remediation |
|
Other provisions |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2012 ........................ |
169 |
|
206 |
|
1,473 |
|
1,067 |
|
409 |
|
3,324 |
Additional provisions/increase |
276 |
|
62 |
|
972 |
|
1,439 |
|
94 |
|
2,843 |
Provisions utilised ........................ |
(155) |
|
(1) |
|
(105) |
|
(476) |
|
(97) |
|
(834) |
Amounts reversed ......................... |
(50) |
|
(34) |
|
(47) |
|
(1) |
|
(29) |
|
(161) |
Unwinding of discounts ................. |
- |
|
- |
|
20 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
21 |
Exchange differences and other movements ............................... |
36 |
|
154 |
|
(127) |
|
(71) |
|
74 |
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2012 ......................... |
276 |
|
387 |
|
2,186 |
|
1,958 |
|
452 |
|
5,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2011 ........................ |
21 |
|
405 |
|
969 |
|
442 |
|
301 |
|
2,138 |
Additional provisions/increase |
54 |
|
- |
|
303 |
|
659 |
|
43 |
|
1,059 |
Provisions utilised ........................ |
(37) |
|
(12) |
|
(36) |
|
(76) |
|
(46) |
|
(207) |
Amounts reversed ......................... |
(8) |
|
(27) |
|
(11) |
|
(81) |
|
(26) |
|
(153) |
Unwinding of discounts ................. |
- |
|
- |
|
28 |
|
- |
|
3 |
|
31 |
Exchange differences and other movements ............................... |
4 |
|
60 |
|
(26) |
|
91 |
|
30 |
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 June 2011 ........................... |
34 |
|
426 |
|
1,227 |
|
1,035 |
|
305 |
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2011 ............................. |
34 |
|
426 |
|
1,227 |
|
1,035 |
|
305 |
|
3,027 |
Additional provisions/increase |
167 |
|
14 |
|
593 |
|
419 |
|
141 |
|
1,334 |
Provisions utilised ........................ |
(21) |
|
7 |
|
(331) |
|
(310) |
|
(25) |
|
(680) |
Amounts reversed ......................... |
(6) |
|
(14) |
|
(17) |
|
(6) |
|
(60) |
|
(103) |
Unwinding of discounts ................. |
- |
|
1 |
|
28 |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
31 |
Exchange differences and other movements ............................... |
(5) |
|
(228) |
|
(27) |
|
(71) |
|
46 |
|
(285) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 .................. |
169 |
|
206 |
|
1,473 |
|
1,067 |
|
409 |
|
3,324 |
Further details of legal proceedings and regulatory matters are set out in Note 25. Legal proceedings include civil court, arbitration or tribunal proceedings brought against HSBC companies (whether by way of claim or counterclaim) or civil disputes that may, if not settled, result in court, arbitration or tribunal proceedings. Regulatory matters refer to investigations, reviews and other actions carried out by, or in response to the actions of, regulators or law enforcement agencies in connection with alleged wrongdoing by HSBC. Additional provisions recognised at 30 June 2012 include a provision of US$700m, which reflects HSBC's best estimate of the aggregate amount of fines and penalties that are likely to be imposed in connection with US anti-money laundering, Bank Secrecy Act and Office of Foreign Assets Control investigations. There is a high degree of uncertainty in making this estimate, and it is possible that the amounts when finally determined could be higher, possibly significantly higher.
Customer remediation refers to activities carried out by HSBC to compensate customers for losses or damages associated with a failure to comply with regulations or to treat customers fairly. Customer remediation is initiated by HSBC in response to customer complaints and/or industry developments in sales practices, and not necessarily initiated by regulatory action.
Payment Protection Insurance
An increase in provisions of US$1,005m was recognised during the half-year ended 30 June 2012 in respect of the estimated liability for redress in respect of the possible mis-selling of payment protection insurance ('PPI') policies in previous years. Cumulative provisions made since the Judicial Review ruling in the first half of 2011 amount to US$1,721m of which US$751m has been paid. Provisions amounted to US$1,060m at 30 June 2012 (30 June 2011: US$509m; 31 December 2011: US$506m).
The main assumptions are the number of customer complaints expected to be received, and for how long a period; the number of non-complainant customers who will have to be contacted if systemic issues are identified following root cause analysis; the response rate from customers who are contacted proactively; and the expected uphold rate for complaints and the amount of redress payable in upheld cases. The main assumptions are likely to evolve over time as root cause analysis is completed and more experience is available regarding actual complaint volumes received.
In addition to these factors and assumptions, the extent of the required redress will also depend on the facts and circumstances of each individual customer's case. For these reasons, there is currently a high degree of uncertainty as to the eventual costs of redress for this matter.
During the first half of 2012, we increased the estimate of the total number of policies to be ultimately redressed, as the level of complaints received was higher in volume and for a longer period than previously assumed. This change in assumptions contributed approximately US$0.8bn to the increased provision for the period.
Interest rate derivatives
A provision of US$237m was recognised relating to the estimated liability for redress in respect of the possible mis-selling of interest rate derivatives in the UK.
Following an FSA review of the sale of interest rate derivatives, HSBC agreed with the FSA to pay redress to customers where mis-selling of more complex derivatives has occurred. HSBC will contact customers who have been sold certain interest rate derivatives, explaining the scope of the contact exercise, and either advising that their product sale will be automatically reviewed, or seeking confirmation from the customer that they wish to have their derivative sale reviewed and requesting further details of the sale.
The extent to which HSBC is required to pay redress depends on the responses of contacted and other customers during the review period and the facts and circumstances of each individual case. For these reasons, there is currently a high degree of uncertainty as to the eventual costs of redress related to this programme.
The following is an analysis, by remaining contractual maturities at the reporting date, of asset and liability line items that combine amounts due within one year and after one year. Trading assets and liabilities are excluded because they are not held for collection or settlement over the period of contractual maturity.
|
Due within |
|
Due after |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at fair value ......................................................... |
4,503 |
|
27,807 |
|
32,310 |
Loans and advances to banks ........................................................................ |
168,861 |
|
13,330 |
|
182,191 |
Loans and advances to customers ................................................................. |
434,555 |
|
540,430 |
|
974,985 |
Financial investments ................................................................................... |
131,374 |
|
262,362 |
|
393,736 |
Assets held for sale ....................................................................................... |
4,007 |
|
5,916 |
|
9,923 |
Other financial assets ................................................................................... |
23,798 |
|
6,039 |
|
29,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767,098 |
|
855,884 |
|
1,622,982 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits by banks ......................................................................................... |
111,165 |
|
12,388 |
|
123,553 |
Customer accounts ....................................................................................... |
1,247,130 |
|
31,359 |
|
1,278,489 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value .................................................... |
8,968 |
|
78,625 |
|
87,593 |
Debt securities in issue .................................................................................. |
71,079 |
|
54,464 |
|
125,543 |
Liabilities of disposal groups held for sale ..................................................... |
10,225 |
|
611 |
|
10,836 |
Other financial liabilities .............................................................................. |
32,599 |
|
7,354 |
|
39,953 |
Subordinated liabilities .................................................................................. |
712 |
|
28,984 |
|
29,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,481,878 |
|
213,785 |
|
1,695,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity analysis of assets and liabilities (continued)
|
Due within |
|
Due after |
|
Total |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
At 30 June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at fair value ......................................................... |
3,064 |
|
36,501 |
|
39,565 |
Loans and advances to banks ........................................................................ |
216,034 |
|
10,009 |
|
226,043 |
Loans and advances to customers ................................................................. |
482,370 |
|
555,518 |
|
1,037,888 |
Financial investments ................................................................................... |
172,407 |
|
244,450 |
|
416,857 |
Other financial assets ................................................................................... |
24,822 |
|
5,692 |
|
30,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
898,697 |
|
852,170 |
|
1,750,867 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits by banks ......................................................................................... |
118,505 |
|
6,974 |
|
125,479 |
Customer accounts ....................................................................................... |
1,272,152 |
|
46,835 |
|
1,318,987 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value .................................................... |
9,670 |
|
88,610 |
|
98,280 |
Debt securities in issue .................................................................................. |
82,747 |
|
67,056 |
|
149,803 |
Other financial liabilities .............................................................................. |
27,494 |
|
4,606 |
|
32,100 |
Subordinated liabilities .................................................................................. |
575 |
|
32,178 |
|
32,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,511,143 |
|
246,259 |
|
1,757,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at fair value ......................................................... |
2,581 |
|
28,275 |
|
30,856 |
Loans and advances to banks ........................................................................ |
171,132 |
|
9,855 |
|
180,987 |
Loans and advances to customers ................................................................. |
409,935 |
|
530,494 |
|
940,429 |
Financial investments ................................................................................... |
152,095 |
|
247,949 |
|
400,044 |
Assets held for sale ....................................................................................... |
20,936 |
|
15,919 |
|
36,855 |
Other financial assets ................................................................................... |
22,878 |
|
5,557 |
|
28,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
779,557 |
|
838,049 |
|
1,617,606 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits by banks ......................................................................................... |
101,371 |
|
11,451 |
|
112,822 |
Customer accounts ....................................................................................... |
1,214,190 |
|
39,735 |
|
1,253,925 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value .................................................... |
9,260 |
|
76,464 |
|
85,724 |
Debt securities in issue .................................................................................. |
74,129 |
|
56,884 |
|
131,013 |
Liabilities of disposal groups held for sale ..................................................... |
20,063 |
|
1,033 |
|
21,096 |
Other financial liabilities .............................................................................. |
25,177 |
|
6,304 |
|
31,481 |
Subordinated liabilities .................................................................................. |
810 |
|
29,796 |
|
30,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,445,000 |
|
221,667 |
|
1,666,667 |
19 Assets charged as security for liabilities and collateral accepted as security for assets
Financial assets pledged to secure liabilities
|
Assets pledged at |
||||
|
30 June |
|
30 June |
|
31 December |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
US$m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury bills and other eligible securities ..................................................... |
4,454 |
|
7,078 |
|
5,185 |
Loans and advances to banks ........................................................................ |
24,652 |
|
26,634 |
|
19,247 |
Loans and advances to customers ................................................................. |
86,419 |
|
77,039 |
|
81,570 |
Debt securities .............................................................................................. |
195,290 |
|
261,808 |
|
210,255 |
Equity shares ................................................................................................ |
10,828 |
|
7,612 |
|
6,916 |
Other ........................................................................................................... |
1,025 |
|
1,312 |
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,668 |
|
381,483 |
|
324,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total assets encumbered ........................................................................ |
12.2% |
|
14.2% |
|
12.7% |
The financial assets above represent the Group's encumbered assets on an IFRSs basis. Of the financial assets pledged to secure liabilities, the most significant amounts are located in the following geographical regions: