JZ CAPITAL PARTNERS LIMITED (the "Company" or "JZCP")
(a closed-end investment company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of Guernsey with registered number 48761)
ANNUAL RESULTS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED 28 FEBRUARY 2014
6 May 2014
~ Well positioned to capitalise on attractive investment opportunities
focusing on long-term NAV growth ~
JZ Capital Partners, the London listed private equity fund which invests in high-quality US and European micro cap companies, announces its annual results for the twelve month period ended 28 February 2014.
Results Highlights
· NAV Total Return of 8.8% including:
o Distribution of US$0.30 per share (FY 28/2/13: US$0.29 per share), implying a dividend yield of 4% (as at 28/2/14)
o Pre-dividend NAV per share growth of 8.8% to US$10.55 (28/2/13: US$9.69)
o Post-dividend NAV growth of 5.8% to US$666 million (28/2/13: US$630 million)
· NAV growth in 19 of the last 20 quarters
Portfolio Highlights
· Significant investment activity with US$150.1 million invested across the US micro cap (US$29.7 million), European micro cap (US$45.1 million) and real estate portfolios (US$75.2 million).
· US$72.7 million of proceeds, primarily from the realisation of two investments including the sale of Horsbugh and Scott, and the refinancing of certain Industrial Services Solutions debt.
· New industry vertical - Logistics Solutions - added to core US micro cap portfolio
· US micro cap portfolio generated EBITDA growth of 31% over the period, on a combined basis
· At the end of the period, the portfolio consisted of 50 companies across 10 industries
Outlook
· Positive outlook - improving macro-economic indicators, specialist sector focus and balance sheet strength provide the Company with attractive investment opportunities across all three portfolios
David Zalaznick, JZCP's Founder and Investment Adviser, said: "The Company has had another year of sustained NAV growth driven by strong earnings performance from our core US and European micro cap portfolios and steady progress with our maturing real estate assets in Brooklyn.
Our differentiated micro cap strategy, distinct industry verticals and proprietary network continue to provide attractive investment and realisation opportunities for the Company. Early signs of an economic recovery in our core regions of the United States and Europe will further support our ability to generate long-term growth for our shareholders and we approach the next twelve months with confidence."
David Macfarlane, Chairman of JZCP, said: "It has been another year of significant progress for the Company, in the first full year following the implementation of several strategic initiatives. The Investment Adviser's disciplined approach to micro cap investing has delivered another period of steady NAV growth and the Company remains well positioned in an improving macro-economic environment.
The Board's confidence in the outlook is reflected in the declaration of a dividend of US$0.30 per share, in line with the policy of distributing 3% of NAV per annum."
Presentation details:
There will be an analyst and investor presentation to discuss JZCP's recent financial performance and portfolio developments at midday on 6 May 2014 at FTI Consulting, 200 Aldersgate, Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4HD. It can be accessed by dialing +44 (0)20 3427 1912 (UK) or +1 646 254 3360 (US) with the participant access code 3971962.
A playback facility will be available two hours after the conference call concludes. This facility may be accessed by dialing +44 (0)20 3427 0598 (UK) or +1 347 366 9565 (US) with the participant access code 3971962.
For further information:
Ed Berry / Kit Dunford +44 (0)20 3727 1046 / 1143
FTI Consulting
David Zalaznick +1 212 572 0800
Jordan/Zalaznick Advisers, Inc.
Andrew Maiden +44 (0) 1481 745368
JZ Capital Partners
About JZCP
JZCP is a London and Channel Islands listed private equity fund which invests in high quality US and European micro cap companies. Its objective is to achieve a superior overall return comprised of a current yield and significant capital appreciation. JZCP receives investment advice from Jordan/Zalaznick Advisers, Inc. ("JZAI") which is led by David Zalaznick and Jay Jordan. They have worked together for 30 years and are supported by teams of investment professionals in New York, Chicago, London and Madrid. JZAI's experts work with the existing management of micro cap companies to help build better businesses, create value and deliver strong returns for investors. JZCP also invests in mezzanine loans, first and second lien investments and other publicly traded securities.
For more information please visit www.jzcp.com.
The financial information set out below does not constitute the Company's statutory accounts for the year ended 28 February 2014. All figures are based on the audited financial statements for the year ended 28 February 2014.
The announcement is prepared on the same basis as will be set out in the audited financial statements for the year ended 28 February 2014.
The annual report and audited financial statements for the year ended 28 February 2014 will shortly be posted to shareholders and will also be available on the company website: www.jzcp.com.
Chairman's Statement
I am pleased to report the results of JZ Capital Partners ("JZCP" or the "Company") for the twelve month period ended 28 February 2014.
Performance
It has been another twelve months of positive NAV growth for the Company in its first full year since the implementation of several strategic initiatives designed to broaden the shareholder base, build on the Company's core micro cap investment strategy and lay the foundation for long-term growth.
The Company's differentiated micro cap strategy has continued to provide attractive investment and realisation opportunities in its core geographies, while increased economic optimism and signs of recovery in the US and Eurozone have provided a more stable macro-economic backdrop.
Central bank stimulus during the first half of the year paved the way for a strong equity rally as investors increased their appetite for risk. While the US economy grew at a slower annualised pace than the third quarter's 4.1% rate, the final six months of the year delivered the strongest second half since 2003, boosted by exports, consumer spending and business investment. The Eurozone and one of our core markets, Spain, emerged from a two-year recession, with export growth and companies becoming more confident, while ratings agencies raised their outlook for Spain on signs of economic improvement.
Uncertainty across global markets, particularly in developing countries leading up to and in the aftermath of the US Federal Reserve's tapering announcement, partially offset some of the strong equity gains. The end of the fiscal year was dominated by political turmoil in Ukraine and with the outcome still uncertain, the conflict continues to weigh heavily on the surer footing that the global economy had built during the year.
Against this economic backdrop, the Company delivered another year of steady NAV growth, driven by a positive performance across the underlying portfolio. The Company's NAV (including dividends paid) grew 8.8% to US$10.55, from US$9.69 (FY12). This marks the 19th quarter of positive NAV growth out of the last 20 quarterly periods, reflecting the quality of the Company's portfolio and unrivalled micro cap expertise of JZAI, the Investment Adviser.
Portfolio update
There has been significant investment activity during the year with the Company putting US$150.1 million to work across the three main portfolios - US micro cap, European micro cap and real estate, which represent 51% 28% and 17% of NAV respectively.
Operationally, the underlying portfolio continues to deliver, with US micro cap businesses generating increased EBIDTA of 21 per cent over the period, on a combined basis. This has been achieved through the strong operational focus of the experienced industry professional responsible for each of the US micro cap industry 'verticals'.
The Board has been particularly pleased with the micro cap investments which remain the Company's strategic focus and main driver of NAV growth. We have introduced a new vertical this year, Logistics Solutions, focusing on companies in the specialised transport and logistics industry. The first investment in this vertical was a 30.5% acquisition in Priority Express, offering same-day express delivery services to laboratories, hospitals and health systems and pharmaceutical organisations.
Our exposure to the European micro cap sector continues to complement and diversify the US micro cap portfolio and is a strategically important segment of the business. The Board is pleased with the significant progress within the European micro cap portfolio which now consists of seven investments in Spain, one UK-based company and one German company, representing an increase of US$77.4 million. The Company continues to explore attractive investment opportunities in Europe through its investment in the EuroMicrocap Fund, 2010 LP.
The Investment Adviser's disciplined and opportunistic approach to value investing continues to lead to a healthy investment pipeline in the real estate sector, where it replicates its proven micro cap strategy of buying businesses at reasonable values in conjunction with excellent management teams.
The Company invested 66.7 million to acquire interests in 13 retail and residential properties in rapidly growing areas in Brooklyn to bring the total number of properties in which the Company is interested within the real estate portfolio to 19.
The Company is making steady progress in establishing a new, previously announced asset management business in the US that will address the growing demand from endowments and pension funds for fiduciary management services. We look forward to updating the market on the progress of these investments later in the year.
Realisations
There have been two significant realisations generating most of the US$72.7 million received during 2013. The Company realised its investment in Horsburgh and Scott, a manufacturer of large diameter gears for US$38.6 million. It was purchased in 2007 and earned a multiple of capital invested of 1.8x and an IRR of 13%. The Company also refinanced US$26.4 million of JZCP-held investments in the Industrial Services Solutions ("ISS") vertical with a senior debt facility.
Distributions
In accordance with their policy of distributing 3 per cent of NAV per annum in two equal instalments, the Directors declared a second Dividend of 16 cents per share for the six months ended 28 February 2014, compared to 15 cents for the period ended 28 February 2013. Having already paid a first interim dividend of 14.5 cents, this implies an annualised yield as at 28 February 2014 of 4%.
NAV Discount
Against this positive background and performance, the discount to NAV at which JZCP's shares stand in the market is disappointing. The Directors' view remains that, while all available options are regularly assessed, the conventional discount control devices have no long-term effect for a listed private equity company and that the solution to the issue lies in a clear explanation of strategy and transparent reporting, coupled with continued outstanding performance. We strive to achieve high standards of reporting and we are confident that performance will be delivered, noting particularly, the interest through their own substantial investment in JZCP that our Investment Adviser, JZAI, have in delivering that.
Outlook
We approach the next twelve months with confidence and a continued commitment to providing superior returns for our shareholders, through both capital and income appreciation.
The Board is encouraged by a pipeline of high quality potential investments in the US, particularly through the verticals, and quality existing and prospective investments in Europe. Positive macroeconomic indicators and a strong balance sheet means the Company is well positioned to capitalise on attractive investment opportunities in its core markets. The Company will continue to focus on long-term NAV growth and preserving shareholder value.
Special business at AGM
Shareholders will note that at current value, JZCP's European investments constitute approximately 23.3% of its total portfolio. Under JZCP's existing investment policy, the proportion of the Company's gross assets which it is permitted to invest in businesses outside the United States is limited to 30%.
This situation arises as a result of the continuing availability of outstanding investment opportunities in Europe and the success of the investments that we have already made. In these circumstances the Directors seek shareholders authority to increase this proportion to 40% and an ordinary resolution to this effect will be proposed at the Annual General Meeting. Whilst there is immediate pressure on the ceiling, the maturity of parts of the European portfolio is such that realisations might be expected, although the Directors would in the light of opportunities currently available, expect a continued significant commitment to investment in Europe.
The Board is also seeking an authority from shareholders to allot ordinary shares for cash on a non pre-emptive basis equivalent to up to 10% of its issued share ordinary share capital. The Board is considering methods of raising additional capital and this would allow it greater flexibility to do so. The Board would not raise capital at a discount to NAV.
David Macfarlane
Chairman
2 May 2014
Report of the Directors
The Directors present their annual report together with the audited financial statements of JZ Capital Partners Limited (the "Company") for the year ended 28 February 2014.
Principal activities
JZ Capital Partners Limited is a closed-ended investment company with limited liability which was incorporated in Guernsey on 14 April 2008 under The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 1994. The Company is subject to The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008. The Company's Share Capital consists of Ordinary shares and Zero Dividend Preference ("ZDP") shares. The Ordinary and ZDP shares were admitted to the official list of the London Stock Exchange ("LSE") on 27 June 2008.
The Company's objective is to create a portfolio of investments in businesses primarily in the United States, providing a superior overall return comprised of a current yield and significant capital appreciation. The Company's present strategies include investments in micro cap buyouts, mezzanine loans (sometimes with equity participations) and high yield securities, senior secured debt and second lien loans, real estate and other debt and equity opportunities, including distressed debt and structured financings, derivatives and opportunistic purchases of publicly traded securities.
The Company's Ordinary shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange's Specialist Fund Market and the Company is also listed on the Channel Islands Securities Exchange ("CISE").
Business review
The total profit attributable to Ordinary shareholders for the year ended 28 February 2014 was US$55,454,000 (year ended 28 February 2013: profit of US$35,850,000). The revenue return for the year was US$29,178,000 (year ended 28 February 2013: US$27,113,000), after charging directors fees and administrative expenses of US$2,486,000 (year ended 28 February 2013: US$2,785,000) and Investment Adviser's base fee of US$11,220,000 (year ended 28 February 2013: US$10,707,000). The revenue return for the year includes a write back of an income incentive of US$4,411,000 charged against the revenue return for the year ended 29 February 2012. The net asset value ("NAV") of the Company at the year end was US$666,456,000 (28 February 2013: US$630,182,000) equal to US$10.25 (28 February 2013: US$9.69) per Ordinary share.
For the year ended 28 February 2014, the Company had US$7,296,000 of cash outflows resulting from operating activities (year ended 28 February 2013: inflows of US$2,196,000).
A review of the Company's activities and performance is detailed in the Chairman's Statement and the Investment Adviser's Report. The valuation of the listed and unlisted investments is detailed below.
Dividends
It is the Board's policy to distribute an amount equivalent to 3% of the Company's net assets in the form of dividends.
For the year ended 28 February 2014 an interim dividend of 14.5 cents per Ordinary share (total US$9,427,698) was declared by the Board on 16 October 2013 and paid on 13 October 2013.
A second interim dividend of 16 cents per Ordinary share (total US$10,402,978) was declared by the Board on 2 May 2014.
Directors
The Directors listed below are all non-executive and, with the exception of Christopher Waldron, who was appointed to the Board on 21 October 2013, have served on the Board throughout the year and were in office at the end of the year and subsequent to the date of this report.
David Macfarlane (Chairman)
Patrick Firth
James Jordan
Tanja Tibaldi
Christoper Waldron
All Directors are independent.
Annual General Meeting
The Company's Annual General Meeting is due to be held on 19 June 2014.
Share capital and purchase of own shares
Details of the ZDP shares and the Ordinary shares can be found in Notes 17 and 18. During the year the Company did not buy back any of its own shares.
The beneficial interests of the Directors in the Ordinary shares of the Company are shown below:
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Ordinary shares |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares |
|
|
|
purchased/ |
|
Ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
1 March 2013 |
|
|
|
(sold) |
|
28 February 2014 |
David Macfarlane |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
50,000 |
|
James Jordan |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
30,000 |
|
Tanja Tibaldi |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
2,000 |
|
Patrick Firth |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
4,000 |
|
Christopher Waldron |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
88,000 |
None of the Directors held any interest in the Zero Dividend Preference Shares during the year. There have been no changes in the Directors' interests between 28 February 2014 and the date of this report.
Discount management programme
The Directors review the share price in relation to Net Asset Value on a regular basis and determine whether to take any action to manage the discount. For additional information refer to Note 19 of the Financial Statements.
Substantial shareholders
As at 28 February 2014 and at the date of this report the Company has been notified in accordance with applicable listing rules of the following interests in the Ordinary share capital of the Company:
|
As at 28 February 2014 |
|
As at 30 April 2014 |
|||
|
Ordinary |
|
% of Ordinary |
|
Ordinary |
% of Ordinary |
|
shares |
|
shares |
|
shares |
shares |
Edgewater Growth Capital Partners |
13,494,037 |
|
20.75% |
|
13,494,037 |
20.75% |
John. W. Jordan |
7,719,240 |
|
11.87% |
|
7,719,240 |
11.87% |
David. W. Zalaznick |
7,717,377 |
|
11.87% |
|
7,717,377 |
11.87% |
Rothschild Wealth Management |
5,609,498 |
|
8.63% |
|
5,527,429 |
8.50% |
Third Avenue Management LLC |
5,076,656 |
|
7.81% |
|
5,076,656 |
7.81% |
Abrams Capital Management L.P. |
4,914,389 |
|
7.56% |
|
4,914,389 |
7.56% |
Leucadia Financial Corporation |
4,527,563 |
|
6.96% |
|
4,527,563 |
6.96% |
The percentage of Ordinary shares shown above represents the ownership of voting rights at the year end, before weighting for votes on Directors.
It is the responsibility of the shareholders to notify the Company of any change to their shareholdings when it reaches 3% of shares in issue and any change which moves up or down through any whole percentage figure above 3%.
Ongoing charges
Ongoing charges for the years ended 28 February 2014 and 28 February 2013 have been prepared in accordance with the Association of Investment Companies ("AIC") recommended methodology. The Ongoing charges for the year ended 28 February 2014 were 2.14 per cent. (28 February 2013: 2.22 per cent.) excluding incentive fees and 3.54 per cent. including incentive fees (28 February 2013: 3.69 per cent.).
Principal risks and uncertainties
As an investment fund, our principal risks are those that are associated with our investment portfolio. Given the nature of the portfolio, the principal risks are associated with the financial and operating performance of the underlying investments, along with market risk associated with the publicly-listed equities.
Statement of Directors' responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing Financial Statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union ("IFRS") and the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 for each financial period which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and its profit or loss for that period. International Accounting Standard 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements requires that financial statements present fairly for each financial period the Company's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the International Accounting Standards Board's "Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements". In virtually all circumstances a fair presentation will be achieved by compliance with all applicable International Financial Reporting Standards.
In preparing Financial Statements the Directors are required to:
* ensure that the Financial Statements comply with the Memorandum & Articles of Incorporation and IFRS;
* select suitable accounting policies and apply them consistently;
* present information including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable
Information
* make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
* prepare the Financial Statements on the going concern basis, unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will
continue in business; and
* provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements of IFRS is insufficient to enable users to
understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the Company's financial position and financial
performance.
The Directors confirm that they have complied with these requirements in preparing the Financial Statements.
Responsibility statement of the Directors in respect of the Financial Statements
Each of the Directors confirms to the best of each person's knowledge and belief that:
(a) The Annual Report and Accounts have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and give a true and fair view of the financial position and profit of the Company as at and for the year ended 28 February 2014.
(b) The Annual Report includes information detailed in the Chairman's Report, Investment Adviser's, Investment Manager's and Directors' Reports, Audit Committee Report and Notes to the Annual Financial Statements required by:
(i) DTR 4.1.8 and DTR 4.1.9 of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being a fair review of the development and performance of the Company business and the position of the Company together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the Company; and
(ii) DTR 4.1.11 of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being an indication of important events that have occurred since the end of the financial year and the likely future development of the Company.
Directors' statement
So far as each of the Directors is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's auditor is unaware, and each Director has taken all the steps they ought to have taken as a Director to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company's auditor is aware of that information. In the opinion of the Board, the Annual Report and Accounts taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary to assess the Company's performance, business model and strategy.
Approved by the Board of Directors and agreed on behalf of the Board on 2 May 2014.
David Macfarlane
Chairman
Patrick Firth
Director
Audit Committee Report
Dear Shareholder,
On the following pages, we present the Audit Committee's Report for 2014, setting out the responsibilities of the Audit Committee and its key activities in 2013/2014. The Audit Committee has reviewed the Company's financial reporting, the independence and effectiveness of the external auditor and the internal control and risk management systems of the Company's service providers. In order to assist the Audit Committee in discharging these responsibilities, regular reports are received and reviewed from the Investment Manager, Administrator and external auditor. Following its review of the independence and effectiveness of the Company's external auditors, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that Ernst & Young LLP be reappointed as auditor, which the Board has submitted for approval to the Company's Members.
A member of the Audit Committee will continue to be available at each Annual General Meeting to respond to any shareholder questions on the activities of the Audit Committee.
Responsibilities
The terms of reference of the Audit Committee include the requirement to:
• monitor the integrity of the published Financial Statements of the Company
• review and report to the Board on the significant issues and judgements made in the preparation of the Company's published Financial Statements, (having regard to matters communicated by the external auditors) and other financial information
• monitor and review the quality and effectiveness of the external auditors and their independence
• consider and make recommendations to the Board on the appointment, reappointment, replacement and remuneration of the Company's external auditor
• review the Company's procedures for prevention, detection and reporting of fraud, bribery and corruption
• monitor and review the internal control and risk management systems of the service providers
• consider and make representations to the Board regarding Directors' remuneration.
The Audit Committee's full terms of reference can be viewed on the Company's website www.JZCP.com.
Key activities of the Audit Committee
The following sections discuss the assessments made by the Audit Committee during the period:
Financial Reporting:
The Audit Committee's review of the Annual Financial Statements focused on the following significant areas:
Valuation of investments:
The fair value of the Company's unlisted securities at 28 February 2014 was US$654,209,000 accounting for substantially all of the net assets of the Company. The Committee has concentrated on ensuring the Investment Manager has applied appropriate valuation methodologies to these investments in producing the net asset value of the Company.
Members of the Audit Committee meet the Investment Adviser at least annually to discuss the valuation process. The Committee gains comfort in the valuations produced by reviewing the methodologies used. The valuations were challenged and approved by the Audit Committee in a recent visit to the Investment Adviser. The Audit Committee has thus satisfied itself that the valuation techniques are appropriate and accurate.
Ownership of investments:
The Audit Committee considered the ownership of the investments held by the Company as at 28 February 2014 to be substantiated from confirmations provided by the Investment Manager, Custodian and Administrator. Following a review of the presentations and reports from the Administrator and consulting where necessary with the external auditor, the Audit Committee is satisfied that the Company duly owns its investments which are correctly stated in the Annual Report and Accounts.
NAV based fees
The Board has identified that there is a risk that management and incentives fees which are calculated based on the NAV of the Company could potentially be misstated if there were to be an error in the calculation of the NAV. However, as each monthly NAV calculation is approved by the Investment Adviser and the year end NAV has been audited, the Board are satisfied that the fees have been correctly calculated as stated in the Annual Report and Accounts.
The external auditor reported to the Audit Committee that no material misstatements were found in the course of their work. Furthermore, the Investment Manager and Administrator confirmed to the Audit Committee that they were not aware of any material misstatements including matters relating to financial statement presentation. The Audit Committee confirms that it is satisfied that the external auditor has fulfilled its responsibilities with diligence and professional scepticism. The Audit Committee advised the Board that this annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable.
During the year the Audit Committee considered the early adoption of the 'Investment Entities' amendment to IFRS10. The amendment was endorsed by the European Union on 21 November 2013 and as such was formally early adopted by the Company for the preparation of these Financial Statements.
Risk Management:
The Audit Committee continued to consider the process for managing the risk of the Company and its service providers. Risk management procedures for the Company, as detailed in the Company's risk assessment matrix, were reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee. There were no issues noted during the year.
Fraud, Bribery and Corruption:
The Audit Committee continues to monitor the fraud, bribery and corruption policies of the Company. The Board receives a confirmation from all service providers that there have been no instances of fraud or bribery.
The external auditor
Independence, objectivity and fees:
The independence and objectivity of the external auditor is reviewed by the Audit Committee which also reviews the terms under which the external auditor is appointed to perform non-audit services. The Audit Committee has established pre-approval policies and procedures for the engagement of the auditor to provide non-audit and assurance services.
These are that the external auditors may not provide a service which:
• places them in a position to audit their own work
• creates a mutuality of interest
• results in the external auditor developing close relationships with service providers of the Company
• results in the external auditor functioning as a manager or employee of the Company
• puts the external auditor in the role of advocate of the Company
As a general rule, the Company does not utilise external auditors for internal audit purposes, secondments or valuation advice. Services which are in the nature of audit, such as tax compliance, tax structuring, private letter rulings, accounting advice, quarterly reviews and disclosure advice are normally permitted but will be pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
The following table summarises the remuneration paid to Ernst & Young LLP and to other Ernst & Young LLP member firms for audit services during the year ended 28 February 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01.03.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to 28.02.14 |
Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
- Annual audit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
£107,500 |
|
- Auditor's interim review |
|
|
|
|
|
£25,500 |
||
Other Ernst & Young LLP affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
- Passive Foreign Investment Company tax services |
|
|
|
$65,000 |
In line with the policies and procedures above, the Audit Committee does not consider that the provision of these non-audit services, which comprised determining whether the Company is a passive foreign investment company as defined by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, to be a threat to the objectivity and independence of the external auditor.
Performance and effectiveness:
During the period, when considering the effectiveness of the external auditor, the Audit Committee has taken into account the following factors:-
• the audit plan presented to them before each audit;
• the post audit report including variations from the original plan;
• changes in audit personnel;
• the external auditor's own internal procedures to identify threats to independence; and
• feedback received from both the Investment Adviser and Administrator.
The Audit Committee reviewed and challenged the audit plan and the post audit report of the external auditor and concluded that the audit plan sufficiently identified audit risks and that the post audit report indicated that the audit risks were sufficiently addressed and that there were no variations from the audit plan. The Audit Committee considered reports from the external auditor on their procedures to identify threats to independence and concluded that the procedures were sufficient to identify potential threats to independence.
There were no significant adverse findings from this evaluation.
The Audit Committee has examined the scope and results of the audit, its cost effectiveness and the independence and objectivity of the external auditor and considers Ernst & Young LLP, as external auditor, to be independent of the Company.
Reappointment of external auditor:
Consequent to this review process, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that a resolution be put to the 2014 Annual General Meeting for the reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as external auditor. The Board has accepted this recommendation.
Internal control and risk management systems
Additional work performed by the Audit Committee in the areas of internal control and risk management are disclosed below.
The Audit Committee has also reviewed the need for an internal audit function. The Audit Committee has decided that the systems and procedures employed by the Investment Adviser and the Administrator, including the Administrator's internal audit function, provide sufficient assurance that a sound system of internal control, which safeguards the Company's assets, is maintained. An internal audit function specific to the Company is therefore considered unnecessary.
In finalising the Annual Report and Accounts for recommendation to the Board for approval, the Audit Committee has satisfied itself that the Annual Report and Accounts taken as a whole are fair, balanced and understandable.
The Audit Committee Report was approved by the Board on 2 May 2014 and signed on behalf by:
Patrick Firth
Chairman, Audit Committee
Investment Adviser's Report
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
We are pleased to report that JZCP's pre-dividend NAV grew 8.8 per cent in the fiscal year ended 28 February 2014, from US$9.69 as of 1 March 2013 to US$10.55 as of 28 February 2014, continuing JZCP's trend in NAV growth seen in every year since our recapitalisation in 2009. The steady NAV growth was again underpinned by positive performance from the underlying assets across the various portfolios. Post-dividend NAV increased 5.8 per cent during the same period, taking into account US$0.30 in dividend distributions made over the past year. 2014 marks the second full year of our new dividend policy of distributing 3 percent of NAV in semi-annual payments; at our stock price as of 31 March 2014, the implied dividend yield was 4.0 per cent.
JZCP had an active investment period for the fiscal year ended 28 February 2014, putting US$150.1 million to work across our three primary portfolios - US micro cap, European micro cap and real estate. During the same period, we received US$72.7 million in proceeds from realisations, primarily through asset sales and the refinancing of JZCP-held debt.
JZCP's underlying portfolio companies performed well on an operating basis during the fiscal year ended 28 February 2014. On a combined basis, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation ("EBITDA") of all our US micro cap businesses increased 31% per cent over that period though a decent portion of the growth came from one co-investment.
As of 28 February 2014, our US micro cap portfolio was valued at 7.3x EBITDA, after applying an average 27 per cent marketability discount. The underlying leverage senior to JZCP's position in our U.S. micro cap portfolio grew from 1.0x to 1.8x EBITDA, as certain of our portfolio companies demonstrated an ability to support greater leverage. Consistent with our value oriented investment philosophy, we acquired our US micro cap portfolio at a combined 5.9x EBITDA. Additionally, despite a very pricey acquisition market, we paid just 5.5x EBITDA on average for US micro cap acquisitions made during the year ended 28 February 2014.
Our European micro cap portfolio, currently consisting of seven Spanish companies, one UK-based company and one German company, was valued at a combined 7.3x EBITDA multiple at 28 February 2014, after a 30 per cent marketability discount. European acquisition multiples are lower than their U.S. counterparts; for acquisitions made during the year ended 28 February 2014, we paid, in cash, 3.1x EBITDA. The European micro cap portfolio has very little debt senior to JZCP's position, under 2.0x EBITDA.
We had two significant realisations in the most recent fiscal year. The first involves one of our US micro cap investments, Horsburgh and Scott, a manufacturer of large diameter gears, which we acquired in November 2007. In March 2013, we sold Horsburgh and Scott, realising cumulative proceeds of US$38.6 million on our US$21.8 million investment, for a 1.8x multiple of capital invested and a 13 per cent IRR. Given that we had been writing this investment up over time, there was a negligible effect on NAV.
We also refinanced US$26.3 million of JZCP-held investments in our Industrial Services Solutions ("ISS") vertical with a senior debt facility, as these businesses demonstrated they could prudently support increased third-party leverage.
Investing in micro cap companies has historically been the main driver of NAV growth and will continue to be so. We continue to be active in our five established business sectors, or "verticals," (Industrial Services Solution ("ISS"), Sensors Solutions, Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management, Water Services, and Testing Services) and we are excited to have introduced a new vertical this year, Logistics Solutions.
Individual verticals are managed by an experienced industry professional, who is involved in both making acquisitions and helping each business grow organically and through synergies with other portfolio companies. For these activities, we invest with Edgewater Growth Capital Partners; together, we take a majority position in all of our verticals. We are also growing our micro cap portfolio by co-investing with other well-known US buyout firms whose operational focus in buying and managing small businesses overlaps with ours.
We are now approaching our third year of investing in the real estate sector; specifically, redevelopment of properties in gentrifying neighbourhoods in Brooklyn, NY. We are applying the same disciplined approach to these investments that we have always used; buying properties at reasonable values (non-auction) in partnerships with a management team that can add considerable value.
Our newly established asset management business in the US is also taking firm root, and will address the growing demand from endowments, foundations and corporate pension funds for fiduciary management services.
NAV Growth
For the fiscal year ended 28 February 2014, JZCP's NAV increased from US$9.69 per share to US$10.55, an 8.8 per cent increase (before the US$0.30 of dividends paid in the period). The chart below details the changes in NAV on a per share basis:
Net Asset Value per Ordinary Share as of 28 February 2013 |
|
|
|
|
$9.69 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ Change in Private Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ Change in Public Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ Income from Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ Escrows received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- ZDP Dividend Accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Fees and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.35) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+/- Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value per Ordinary Share (before dividends) |
|
|
|
|
|
$10.55 |
||
- Dividends Paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.30) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value per Ordinary Share as of 28 February 2014 |
|
|
|
|
$10.25 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The US$0.70 increase in the value of our private investments is primarily due to an increase in earnings of the underlying entities. The US micro cap portfolio contributed US$0.17 to this increase, primarily due to increased earnings at: Milestone Aviation Group, the helicopter leasing business (US$0.07); our water vertical (US$0.05); our sensors vertical (US$0.06); Nationwide Studios (US$0.04); and Justrite Manufacturing, an industrial safety co-investment (US$0.04). Offsetting these increases were decreases in (a) Healthcare Products Holdings, our power wheelchair company (US$0.10), as lower Medicare-sponsored prices hurt earnings and (b) MEDS Holdings, our healthcare revenue cycle management business (US$0.03), which was hurt by since-rectified management issues.
The European micro cap portfolio increased US$0.50, spurred by a US$0.63 increase in Factor Energia, our Spanish energy reseller, due to both increased earnings and a multiple increase. Grupo Ombuds, our personal and commercial security business, increased US$0.02 following the successful repositioning of its business. Offsetting these increases were write-downs at (a) gold reseller Oro Direct (US$0.13), hurt by falling gold prices and a government mandated investigation into the gold resale industry, and (b) Xacom (US$0.04), which was affected by delayed shipments of new products, although those shipments have begun again.
We have increased the value of one of the Fulton Mall real estate properties by US$.03, given positive movement in comparable properties values.
Safety Insurance, the only listed equity investment of material size, increased US$0.16.
Returns
The chart below summarises the cumulative total NAV returns and total shareholder returns for the most recent three-month period, fiscal year and four-year period following our refinancing and restructuring in June 2009.
|
|
As at |
|
Since |
|
Since |
|
Since |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
30/11/2013 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
28/02/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Price (in GBP) |
|
£4.45 |
|
£4.45 |
|
£5.00 |
|
£2.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid (in US Cents) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
$0.30 |
|
$1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders' return |
|
- |
|
0% |
|
-7% |
|
86% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per share (in USD) |
|
$10.25 |
|
$9.94 |
|
$9.69 |
|
$7.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV total returns |
|
- |
|
3% |
|
9% |
|
60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV to market price discount |
|
27% |
|
27% |
|
22% |
|
41% |
Despite our rarely selling an investment for less than its carrying value, the market continues to undervalue our assets; as of 28 February 2014, our stock traded at a 27 per cent discount to NAV, compared to 22 per cent a year ago.
Portfolio Summary
Our portfolio is well diversified across 50 businesses and 10 industries, and continues to become more diversified geographically as we grow our European portfolio. Given the tough investing market from 2008 to 2011, it is not surprising that 70 per cent of our portfolio is less than three years old.
Below is a summary of JZCP's assets at 28 February 2014 as compared to 28 February 2013. As you will note, both our European micro cap portfolio and our real estate portfolio increased by US$79.3 million, due to the acquisition activity described below.
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
as at 28/02/2014 |
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
US micro cap portfolio |
|
35 |
|
341,561 |
|
342,567 |
European investments |
|
9 |
|
186,781 |
|
107,463 |
Real estate portfolio |
|
10 |
|
112,296 |
|
30,860 |
Other portfolio |
|
6 |
|
13,571 |
|
22,374 |
Total private investments |
|
60 |
|
654,209 |
|
503,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed equity |
|
2 |
|
65,423 |
|
55,069 |
Listed corporate bonds |
|
1 |
|
16,415 |
|
26,450 |
Bank debt |
|
1 |
|
11,810 |
|
11,690 |
UK treasury gilts |
|
- |
|
43,292 |
|
31,809 |
Cash |
|
- |
|
11,372 |
|
102,740 |
Total Listed Investments (including cash) |
|
4 |
|
148,312 |
|
227,758 |
Note that we have continued our program of holding highly rated listed corporate bonds as a means of earning an enhanced return on our cash. Currently, Goldman Sachs is the sole obligor of these bonds, which mature in January 2017. During the fiscal year ended 28 February 2014, as in previous periods, we purchased UK Gilts with an eye toward the 2016 maturity date of our ZDPs.
US micro cap portfolio
As mentioned, we have written this portfolio up by US$0.17, led by increased earnings at a number of our portfolio companies.
New US investments - verticals
Our activity during the period focused on ensuring the efficient operation of our most recent investments, coupled with selected high-quality new investments.
We added to our five existing industry sectors by starting a new vertical, Logistics Solutions, to be managed by Bruce Parker. Bruce built his career managing various transportation and logistics companies, including serving as an officer of Ryder System, Inc. and United Airlines as well as CEO of AirNet Systems, Inc. Our first investment in this vertical was Priority Express, which provides same-day express delivery services to reference laboratories, hospitals and health systems, pharmacy organisations and various other companies located primarily in the greater Philadelphia and Lehigh Valley regions of Pennsylvania, northern New Jersey and southern New York. The company provides both scheduled courier services as well as on-demand delivery. We invested US$8.0 million in 10 per cent senior notes and US$4.4 million in preferred equity. Post-close, JZCP owns 30.5 per cent of the combined entity on a fully-diluted basis.
We purchased Amerimex, an addition to our Industrial Services Solutions vertical managed by Jim Rogers, a former GE senior manager. Amerimex specialises in new and remanufactured alternating current ("AC") traction motors, new blowers and remanufactured direct current ("DC") traction motors for application in oil & gas (traditional drilling and hydraulic fracturing), marine and dredging industries. The company also repairs industrial AC and DC motors for a broad range of applications. JZCP invested US$4.1 million in 10 per cent PIK preferred equity. In addition to the preferred equity provided by the sponsors, a US$10.0 million term loan was provided by a third-party financing institution. Post-close, JZCP owns 30.6 per cent of the combined entity on a fully-diluted basis.
Post period (March 2014), we purchased Premier Safety, an add-on acquisition to Argus-Hazco, our industrial hygiene equipment supplier and lessor of our Testing Holdings vertical. This small acquisition helps expand Argus' geographic footprint into Pittsburgh, PA and its surrounding areas. Premier has developed a reputation as a quality provider of both products and services. JZCP assisted in the purchase of this business by investing in US$1.7 million of senior notes, already owning 30.5 per cent of Premier Safety though our existing holding company.
Recently, we purchased MedFin, our second investment in the healthcare revenue cycle management vertical. MedFin is based in Sarasota, FL and has an office in Kolkata, India. The company specialises exclusively in billing, practice management and outsourcing services for anesthesiology physician and nurse groups and ambulatory surgery centers ("ASCs"). The company's anesthesiology and nurse group clients contract with healthcare facilities (hospitals and ASCs) to provide anesthesia services and outsource their billing and practice management operations to MedFin. ASC clients own and operate the surgery centers that contract with or employ the anesthesiologists/nurses. ASC clients choose to outsource their practice management or billing operations to MedFin. Investing US$3.8 million in debt and US$3.3 million in stock, both directly and through the Bolder Healthcare Solutions holding entity, JZCP owns approximately 28 per cent of MedFin.
European micro cap portfolio
JZCP is investing in the European micro cap sector through its 75 per cent ownership of the European Microcap Fund ("EMC"). Exposure to the European micro cap sector continues to complement and diversify JZCP's existing US micro cap portfolio. As you may recall, EMC has offices in London and Madrid and an outstanding team with over ten years of investment experience in European micro cap deals. As of 28 February 2014, EMC has made seven investments in Spain, one investment in the UK and one investment in Germany, which combined represent 28 per cent of total NAV.
As mentioned previously, Factor Energia, our Spanish energy reseller, led the increase in the European micro cap portfolio (US$0.50).
New European investments
In the fiscal year ending 28 February 2014, we made four investments into the European micro cap portfolio.
One World Packaging is a business we spun out of a larger, traditional packaging company in Spain. One World Packaging manufactures disposable trays for the food service industry in Spain and throughout Europe. This proprietary product is unique in that it outperforms plastic and is biodegradable. The company plans to sell the product to large food manufacturers and distributors in European countries which value environmentally friendly and sustainable products. EMC purchased 70 per cent of One World Packaging for €5.0 million in April 2013 and will support the company's development.
EMC co-invested £9.5 million to acquire 36 per cent of the Winn Group, a successful UK legal services firm specialising in personal injury cases and claims management. The Winn Group also provides replacement car hire, credit repair advice and medical treatment services. Founded in 2002, the Winn Group employs nearly 300 people in Newcastle and is well positioned to benefit from the rapid consolidation of the personal injury sector in the UK due to its efficient business model. EMC's investment will further enhance the Winn Group's strong growth trajectory.
EMC also invested €7.7 million to acquire 25.2 per cent of Fidor Bank, an innovative and fast growing online German bank. Founded in 2003, Fidor Bank is one of the only banks in Europe to allow customers to transfer money through social media. Additionally, Fidor Bank provides deposit and savings accounts, foreign exchange transactions, credit cards and crowd-funding, which enables small businesses to secure financing from individual lenders. The bank's deposit book in the year to 31 December 2013 increased from €156 million to €201 million, while its lending portfolio grew from €90 million to €150 million. As of December 31, 2013, Fidor Bank had 250,000 customers and is listed on the Open Market of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
EMC invested €10.5 million, alongside Avenue Capital Group, in a newly created vehicle, Toro Finance, which will provide short-term receivables financing to the suppliers of major Spanish companies. In addition, JZCP is participating with Avenue Capital Group in current pay securities on top of the capital structure. To date, JZCP has lent about €8.0 million and anticipates another €8.0 million to be funded this year. Toro Finance will draw on the track record of JZCP's European advisers who have worked with businesses on the continent for more than a decade. Toro Finance will also benefit from Avenue Capital Group's expertise investing in finance companies globally and strong presence in Europe, having invested more than €11.0 billion throughout the continent over the past 10 years. JZCP's total US$31 million commitment will, together with Toro Finance's management, purchase 50 per cent of Toro Finance's equity. The venture is off to a fast start and we look forward to continuing to report our progress.
Real estate portfolio
Our careful, value approach to investing has led to some exciting opportunities in the real estate sector. It is important to note that we are applying the same disciplined approach to these investments as we have always used in our micro cap portfolio; buying entities at reasonable prices in conjunction with excellent management teams. We are purchasing these properties through the JZCP Realty Fund.
Starting in April 2012, we began assembling a portfolio of properties, both retail and residential, in Brooklyn, a borough of New York City that has experienced rapid gentrification in certain neighbourhoods. The management team we are backing is RedSky Capital, a Brooklyn-based real estate and development and management company.
On its own, Brooklyn would be the fourth largest city in the United States, and demographic projections suggest that significant growth is anticipated in the next ten years. It has 2.5 million people, approximately the same size as Chicago in terms of population.
Brooklyn is in the early stages of a renaissance where areas that have been historically industrial, low-income and/or artist communities are beginning to see seismic population changes, fuelled by an influx of young and affluent ex-Manhattan residents in search of more space and a trendier community that embraces a relaxed, artistic and young lifestyle.
In the fiscal year ended 28 February 2014, JZCP, together with RedSky acquired 13 properties. Since we began investing with RedSky in April 2012, we have acquired, a total of 19 properties. The current capitalisation of the existing portfolio is approximately US$400 million, with US$176 million in total equity, of which US$100 million was funded by separate JZ REIT entities. The properties are located in the Williamsburg, Flatbush, Greenpoint and the Fulton Mall areas of Brooklyn.
The first acquired property is almost a square block on Bedford Avenue, in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn; JZCP's investment is US$16.5 million. This retail/residential building is in a premier location of an area that is in the biggest and most valuable retail redevelopment in Northern Brooklyn. Renovation is currently taking place.
The second acquired property involved a JZCP investment of US$3.5 million in the Flatbush area, across the street from the entrance to the newly opened US$1.2 billion Barclays Center, a 20,000 person arena in Brooklyn, home to the NBA franchise Brooklyn Nets. The Barclays Center has been the focus of a newly revitalised neighbourhood in the center of Brooklyn. Our team plans to renovate the building and build an additional floor and premium signage and lease it to a sports retailer.
The third investment, with a total investment by JZCP of US$14.5 million, is an assemblage of three contiguous properties on the Fulton Mall area, the third largest retail centre in New York City and second only to Times Square in terms of transit density. Our plans are to raze these buildings and rebuild, alongside City Point, a large mall anchored by Target.
We paid US$12.1 million for three properties on Flatbush Avenue, for both retail and residential use. Near the Barclays Center, these properties are well situated to take advantage of the influx of higher-end shoppers and residents in part driven by the Barclays Center's success.
JZCP invested US$8.2 million for two mixed use development properties on Driggs Avenue, which is adjacent to Bedford Avenue, where our first Williamsburg property is located. We plan on developing these properties and renting to a national retailer looking to create a footprint in this up-and-coming area of Brooklyn.
We invested US$32.8 million to acquire a 49 per cent interest in a development site on the Greenpoint waterfront in Brooklyn. The site allows for development of 652,000 square feet of residential and retail space, and includes a pier which acts as the Greenpoint terminal location for the East River Ferry. In conjunction with our partner, we plan on partnering with a large New York City development firm to build a residential tower on the site, containing both market rate and affordable housing, as well as 100,000 square feet of retail space.
Finally, we invested US$15.3 million to purchase several properties in Williamsburg, again nearby to the first property we purchased, with an eye to redevelop and re-tenant the retail and residential properties into a Class A mixed use area.
Other assets
We have made great strides toward launching a new portfolio company, Spruceview Capital Partners, an asset management business. As previously reported, we have recruited as our management partners, Richard Sabo (CEO) and David Russ (CIO). Most recently, Richard Sabo served as Chief Investment Officer of Global Pension and Retirement Plans at JPMorgan as well as a member of the firm's executive committee. David Russ brings with him an impressive track record as Chief Investment Officer of Dartmouth College's endowment, as well as having senior investment roles at Stanford University and the Regents of the University of California. Richard and David are complemented by a team of 10 senior investment, business development, legal and operations professionals. We will target smaller endowments, foundations, family offices and corporate pension funds that are not large enough to afford a world class team of investment professionals; this type of asset management business is known as an "outsourced CIO/Endowment model". We are excited to be working with Richard, David and their team, and will report more on this business as it develops.
Significant realisations
We had two significant realisations in the fiscal year ended 28 February 2014. The first involves one of our US micro cap investments, Horsburgh and Scott, a manufacturer of large diameter gears, which we acquired in November 2007. In March 2013, we sold Horsburgh and Scott, realising cumulative proceeds of US$38.6 million on our US$21.8 million investment, for a 1.8x multiple of capital invested and a 13 per cent IRR. Given that we had been writing this investment up over time, there was a negligible effect on NAV.
We also refinanced US$26.3 million of JZCP-held investments in our Industrial Services Solutions ("ISS") vertical with a senior debt facility, as these businesses demonstrated they could prudently support increased third party leverage.
Outlook
We are opportunistic, value oriented investors (i.e. we like to buy things that we hope have more intrinsic value and growth prospects than we have to pay in cash), an approach that has been tried and tested over the years. JZCP has experienced long term NAV growth using this model of value investing. In addition, JZCP's strong balance sheet positions us well to take advantage of investment opportunities on an immediate basis. We look forward to continuing to put your (and our) money to work in a diverse portfolio of reasonably priced assets.
As always, thank you for your confidence in our investment strategy. Please feel free to contact us with any ideas that might be beneficial to JZCP.
Yours faithfully,
Jordan/Zalaznick Advisers, Inc.
Investment Review - Verticals
The primary US micro cap investment strategy is to invest in well researched industry sectors, or "verticals". We purchase similar companies in the relevant vertical, integrating them as appropriate, and selling the resulting larger company as one entity. This strategy has served us well over the years. Each of these verticals are managed by a seasoned industry executive whose responsibilities include managing, integrating and growing their respective vertical. We set out below details of four of these verticals:
Industrial Services Solutions
Industrial Services Solutions ("ISS") is currently a combination of nine acquired businesses in the industrial maintenance, repair and service industry, focusing primarily on industrial rotating equipment. Most of the maintenance and repair work is performed at and/or from any of the 20 sites across the country.
The idea for this investment is to acquire and manage these non-discretionary activities that are typically non-cyclical. In addition, the increasing complexity of the equipment in industrial settings, along with the declining maintenance staff at these plants, should encourage growth in ISS' customers' needs. This large and very fragmented industry is well suited for a build-up in this sector.
Nine companies were purchased for a total purchase price of $123.7 million; JZCP's cost of these investments was $32.4 million, representing 41% of the preferred stock in these entities, and an average of 32% the common stock. These investments are currently valued at $34.9 million, as significant management upgrades have only partially achieved their anticipated benefits. Due to the management initiatives, proforma EBITDA has grown from $16 million in 2010 to $22.9 million in 2013.
ISS is managed by Jim Rogers, a seasoned industry executive, having held several senior management positions at GE for 26 years. His last position at GE was CEO of GE Industrial Controls. His leadership, ideas and oversight have been critical in creating value for ISS.
Testing Vertical
Testing Services Holdings is a business consisting of (1) laboratory testing services, and (2) sales and distribution of laboratory testing equipment. Recent EBITDA has grown for these businesses, from $15.4 million in 2012 to $20.0 million in 2013. JZCP currently has $44.6 million invested in these entities.
The laboratory businesses can be broken out into 2 major components: Environmental Testing, and Industrial Hygiene. The environmental segment includes testing soil and groundwater for contaminants, under the Accutest name. Accutest has made four laboratory acquisitions to date.
The Industrial Hygiene segment consists of four acquisitions under the Galson name. These businesses collect sample from industrial setting via on-person badges, which are then sent to a Galson lab for analysis.
The sales and distribution segment is managed under the Argus-Hazco platform, with two additional acquisitions made to expand Argus' geographic footprint. It is a renter and reseller of equipment and instruments necessary to ensure worker safety.
These businesses are led by Phil Rooney, a seasoned executive with experience in a variety of industries, with a focus on environmental businesses. Phil played a major role in achieving a commendable return on Mid-America Recycling, one of our more successful realisations. He formerly served as president of ServiceMaster and Waste Management
Water Services Vertical
Triwater Holdings is our vertical in the $500 billion water sector. To date, we have focused on two areas in this very fragmented market: water infrastructure and water treatment.
Water infrastructure businesses have been created to deal with the ageing and deteriorating infrastructure in the United States. Leaking underground pipes for potable water create significant waste, while leaking underground sewer pipes create a significant health hazard. The companies in this area we have so far (LMK Technologies and Perma-Liner) address this second issue by sealing underground sewer pipes without digging, attractive for a variety of practical and cost concerns. We hope to add to the two current investments in this sector with manhole liners, sewer cleaning, etc.
The current water treatment business consists of three companies (Nashville Chemical, Klenzoid and Eldon) which sell and distribute chemicals for (1) industrial plants' boilers, etc and (2) outside plant use (e.g. "fracking"). This extremely fragmented business is ready for consolidation.
Pro forma EBITDA for these businesses has grown from $8.6 million in 2010, to $11.8 million in 2013. We purchased these five businesses for a total of $51.3 million, with JZCP supplying $19.8 million of capital in the form of debt, which we plan on refinancing shortly) and equity. JZCP's equity position is $13.8 million. JZCP's position is currently valued at $42.2 million.
This vertical is managed by Mike Reardon, an executive with over 25 years of experience in the water business, most recently as President and COO of Culligan International, a leader in commercial Consumer water treatment programs and products.
Logistics Services Vertical
JZCP's newest vertical involves businesses in the same day/next day delivery services sector. This vertical consists of Priority Express, a provider of same-day express courier services to reference laboratories, hospitals and health systems, pharmacy organisations and various other companies located in New Jersey and Eastern Pennsylvania. The Company provides both scheduled courier services as well as on-demand courier services. We plan on making further acquisitions in contiguous regions, as well as establishing other "beachheads' around the country.
This vertical is managed by Bruce Parker, who has significant experience managing air and ground based logistics businesses. His experience includes senior management positions at Ryder Systems, United Airlines and American Airlines
JZCP has $13.3 million invested in this business, which had EBITDA of $4.2 million in 2013. We have a very active pipeline to add to this vertical.
Investment Review - Major Holdings
The investments listed represent the top ten investments in terms of valuation (excluding investments in vertical structures):
FACTOR ENERGIA S.A.
Headquarters: Barcelona, Spain
Sector: Energy Supplier
Factor Energia is an energy distribution business in Spain, which resells electricity to smaller and medium-sized companies, a recently deregulated part of the energy sector. It purchases electricity on the spot market, and sells to its customers for a fixed or variable price, depending on the relevant contract.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
11,648 |
|
92,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2013 Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
€422.0 million |
Year ended 31 December 2013 Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
€14.2 million |
SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Headquarters: Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Sector: Property and Casualty Insurance
Safety Insurance Group, Inc., which is listed on NASDAQ (NASDAQ: SAFT), provides personal property and casualty insurance focused exclusively on the Massachusetts market. The Company's principal product line is private passenger automobile insurance. In addition, Safety Insurance offers commercial automobile, homeowners, dwelling fire, umbrella and business owning policies.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
28.02.2014 |
|
28.02.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
6,816 |
|
64,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2013 Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$745.3 million |
Year ended 31 December 2013 Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$87.8 million |
GREENPOINT
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Sector: Real Estate
This investment represents a 49 per cent interest in a development site on the Greenpoint waterfront section in Brooklyn. The site allows for development of 652,000 square feet of residential and retail space, and includes a pier which acts as the Greenpoint terminal location for the East River Ferry.
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
28.02.2014 |
|
28.02.2014 |
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio investment of JZ Realty Fund |
|
|
32,750 |
|
32,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRUPO OMBUDS S.A.
Headquarters: Madrid, Spain
Sector: Private Security
Grupo Ombuds is a provider of security, surveillance and facility services to the public sector and blue chip clients in Spain.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
17,156 |
|
19,651 |
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
13,950 |
|
11,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,106 |
|
31,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2013 Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
€76.9 million |
Year ended 31 December 2013 Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
€4.3 million |
DENTAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Headquarters: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Sector: Healthcare Equipment and Services
Dental Holdings Corporation is the parent of Dental Services Group ("DSG"). DSG is an operator of laboratories which manufacture oral appliances for dentists and dental centres. It runs both full service labs and "sale and delivery" sites in the United States, Canada and Mexico, making it one of the largest companies of its kind.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
28.02.2014 |
|
28.02.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
12,017 |
12.5% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
8,404 |
|
14,233 |
8% Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
6,713 |
|
4,000 |
10% Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
4,950 |
|
- |
Common stock |
|
|
|
37 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,604 |
|
30,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2013 Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$78.4 million |
Year ended 31 December 2013 Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ 2.6 million |
AMPTEK, INC.
Headquarters: Bedford, Massachusetts, USA
Sector: Non-destructive testing
Amptek, Inc. ("Amptek") designs and manufactures instrumentation used in numerous non-destructive testing and elemental analysis applications. Amptek's instruments are typically used both in the field and within laboratory settings to quickly and easily identify the composition of materials using Amptek's industry-leading x-ray detectors. Amptek is the largest manufacturer of detectors in the world that utilise the x-ray flourescence method.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
28.02.2014 |
|
28.02.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7% Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
13,877 |
|
16,233 |
Common stock |
|
|
|
31 |
|
8,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,908 |
|
25,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2013 Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$29.2 million |
Year ended 31 December 2013 Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$13.1 million |
MILESTONE AVIATION GROUP, INC.
Headquarters: Dublin, Ireland
Sector: Financial Services
Milestone is a global aircraft leasing company focused on helicopters and private jets, providing aircraft owners and operators 100% financing on new, pre-owned and sale-leaseback transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
28.02.2014 |
|
28.02.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9% Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
15,137 |
|
18,763 |
Common stock |
|
|
|
- |
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,137 |
|
23,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2013 Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$162.8 million |
Year ended 31 December 2013 Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$137.0 million |
TORO FINANCE
Headquarters: Madrid, Spain
Sector: Financial Services
Toro Finance is a provider of short-term receivables financing to the suppliers of major Spanish companies.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
10,996 |
|
11,178 |
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
10,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,496 |
|
22,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEDPLAST/UPG HOLDINGS
Headquarters: Tempe, Arizona, USA
Sector: Medical/industrial plastic injection moulding
Medplast designs, engineers and produces precision custom moulded thermoplastic, rubber and elastomer components and moulds for the healthcare and pharmaceutical and consumer/industrial markets. UPG Holdings operates as a manufacturer of precision plastic products for electronics, automotive, industrial, medical, datacentre and consumer markets.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
28.02.2014 |
|
28.02.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.5% Subordinated Notes |
|
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
10,379 |
7% Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
8,406 |
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
879 |
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,983 |
|
20,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2013 Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$268.1 million |
Year ended 31 December 2013 Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$29.1 million |
SALTER LABS, INC.
Headquarters: Arvin, California, USA
Sector: Respiratory medical products
Salter Labs is a leading manufacturer of disposable oxygen delivery and respiratory therapy products in the multi-billion dollar home medical and acute care markets. Salter develops, manufactures and sells single-use, disposable products, primarily for respiratory therapies
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
28.02.2014 |
|
28.02.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15% Subordinated Notes |
|
|
|
|
5,880 |
|
6,646 |
10% Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
13,268 |
|
8,700 |
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,163 |
|
15,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trailing 12 month period ended 31 December 2013 Sales |
|
|
|
US$72.3 million |
|||
Trailing 12 month period ended 31 December 2013 Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
US$11.4 million |
Directors' Remuneration Report
The Directors' remuneration report has been prepared on behalf of the Directors in accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code ("the Code") as issued by the UK Listing Authority.
The Company's policy in regard to Directors' remuneration is to ensure that the Company maintains a competitive fee structure in order to recruit, retain and motivate non-executive Directors of excellent quality in the overall interests of shareholders.
Remuneration policy
The Directors do not consider it necessary for the Company to establish a separate Remuneration Committee. All of the matters recommended by the Code that would be delegated to such a committee are considered by the Board as a whole.
It is the responsibility of the Board as a whole to determine and approve the Directors' fees, following a recommendation from the Chairman who will have given the matter proper consideration, having regard to the level of fees payable to non-executive Directors in the industry generally, the role that individual Directors fulfil in respect of Board and Committee responsibilities and the time committed to the Company's affairs. The Chairman's remuneration is decided separately and is approved by the Board as a whole.
During the year Mr Firth's fees were increased to US$70,000 per annum to reflect the increasing time commitment as chairman of the audit committee.
The Company's Articles state that Directors' remuneration payable in any accounting year shall not exceed in the aggregate an annual sum of US$650,000. Each Director is also entitled to reimbursement of their reasonable expenses. There are no commission or profit sharing arrangements between the Company and the Directors. Similarly, none of the Directors is entitled to pension, retirement or similar benefits. No element of the Directors' remuneration is performance related.
The remuneration policy set out above is the one applied for the year ended 28 February 2014 and is not expected to change in the foreseeable future.
Directors' and Officers' liability insurance cover is maintained by the Company on behalf of the Directors.
Remuneration for qualifying services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees for services to the Company for the year to 28 February 2014 |
|
Fees for services to the Company for the year to 28 February 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
US$ |
David Macfarlane (Chairman) |
|
|
140,000 |
|
140,000 |
Patrick Firth * |
|
|
61,616 |
|
60,000 |
James Jordan |
|
|
60,000 |
|
60,000 |
Tanja Tibaldi |
|
|
60,000 |
|
60,000 |
David Allison ** |
|
|
5,300 |
|
60,000 |
Christopher Waldron *** |
|
|
21,371 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,287 |
|
380,000 |
The amounts payable to Directors as shown above were for services as non-executive Directors.
No Director has a service contract with the Company, nor are any such contracts proposed.
* Patrick Firth's Directors fee was increased to $70,000 effective 1 January 2014. The above figure has been pro-rated to reflect the increase.
** David Allison served as a Director until his death on 26 April 2013.
*** Christopher Waldron was appointed to the Board on 21 October 2013.
Directors' term of appointment
Each Director retires from office at the third annual general meeting after his appointment or (as the case may be) the general meeting at which he was last reappointed and is eligible for reappointment.
The Directors were appointed as non-executive Directors by letters issued in April 2008 which state that their appointment and any subsequent termination or retirement shall be subject to three-months' notice from either party in accordance with the Articles. Each Director's appointment letter provides that, upon the termination of his/her appointment, that he/she must resign in writing and all records remain the property of the Company. The Directors' appointments can be terminated in accordance with the Articles and without compensation. There is no notice period specified in the Articles for the removal of Directors. The Articles provide that the office of director shall be terminated by, among other things: (a) written resignation; (b) unauthorised absences from board meetings for six months or more; (c) unanimous written request of the other directors; and (d) an ordinary resolution of the Company.
Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors on 2 May 2014 by:
David Macfarlane
Chairman
Patrick Firth
Director
Corporate Governance
Introduction
The Board of JZ Capital Partners Limited has considered the principles and recommendations of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance published in October 2010 (the "AIC Guide"). The AIC Code, as explained by the AIC Guide, addresses all the principles set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code, as well as setting out additional principles and recommendations on issues that are of specific relevance to JZ Capital Partners Limited.
The Company is a member of the Association of Investment Companies (the "AIC") and by complying with the AIC Code of Corporate Governance ("AIC Code") is deemed to comply with both the UK and Guernsey Codes of Corporate Governance.
The Board considers that reporting against the principles and recommendations of the AIC Code, and by reference to the AIC Guide (which incorporates the UK Corporate Governance Code), will provide better information to shareholders. To ensure ongoing compliance with these principles the Board receives and reviews a report from the Corporate Secretary, at each quarterly meeting, identifying how the Company is in compliance and identifying any changes that might be necessary.
Throughout the accounting period the Company has complied with the recommendations of the AIC Code and thus the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code, except as set out below.
The UK Corporate Governance code includes provisions relating to:
- the role of the chief executive
- executive directors remuneration
- the need for an internal audit function
- whistle blowing policy
For the reasons set out in the AIC guide, and as explained in the UK Corporate Governance Code, the Board considers these provisions are not relevant to the position of JZ Capital Partners Limited, being an externally managed investment company. The Company has therefore not reported further in respect of these provisions. The Directors are non-executive and the Company does not have employees, hence no whistle blowing policy is required. However the Directors have satisfied themselves that the Company's service providers have appropriate whistle blowing policies and procedures and have received confirmation from the service providers that nothing has arisen under those policies and procedures which should be brought to the attention of the Board.
Guernsey Code of Corporate Governance
The Guernsey Financial Services Commission's (GFSC) "Finance Sector Code of Corporate Governance" (Guernsey Code) came into effect on 1 January 2012. The introduction to the Guernsey Code states that companies which report against the UK Corporate Governance Code or the AIC's Code of Corporate Governance are deemed to meet the Guernsey Code.
The Board
Corporate Governance of JZCP is monitored by the Board which at the end of the year comprised five Directors, all of whom are non-executive. Biographical details of the Board members at the date of signing these Financial Statements are shown later in these accounts and their interests in the shares of JZCP are shown in the Report of the Directors. The Directors' biographies highlight their wide range of business experience.
The Board considers that all of the Directors are independent of the Investment Adviser. The Board considers the Directors are free from any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with the exercise of their independent judgment. The Board reviews the independence of the Directors at least annually.
Proceedings of the Board
The Directors have overall responsibility for the Company's activities and the determination of its investment policy and strategy. The Company has entered into an investment advisory and management agreement with its Investment Adviser, JZAI, pursuant to which, subject to the overall supervision of the Directors, the Investment Adviser acts as the investment manager to the Company and manages the investment and reinvestment of the assets of the Company in pursuit of the investment objective of the Company and in accordance with the investment policies and investment guidelines from time to time of the Company and any investment limits and restrictions notified by the Directors (following consultation with the investment adviser). Within its strategic responsibilities the Board regularly considers corporate strategy as well as dividend policy, the policy on share buy backs and corporate governance issues.
The Directors meet at least quarterly to direct and supervise the Company's affairs. This includes reviewing the investment strategy, risk profile and performance of the Company and the performance of the Company's functionaries, and monitoring compliance with the Company's objectives. The Directors hold regular meetings to review the Investment Adviser's investment decisions and valuations and to decide if the levels of gearing within the investment portfolio are appropriate. The Directors deem it appropriate to review the valuations on a quarterly basis.
Continuing terms of Investment Adviser agreement
In the opinion of the Directors, the continuing appointment of the Investment Adviser on the terms agreed continues to be in the interests of Shareholders. In reaching its conclusion the Board considers the Investment Adviser's investment strategy and performance.
Supply of information
The Chairman ensures that all Directors are properly briefed on issues arising at Board meetings. The Company's advisers provide the Board with appropriate and timely information in order that the Board may reach proper decisions. Directors can, if necessary, obtain independent professional advice at the Company's expense.
Directors' training
The Board is provided with information concerning changes to the regulatory or statutory regimes as they may affect the Company, and are offered the opportunity to attend courses or seminars on such changes, or other relevant matters. An induction programme is available for any future Director appointments.
Chairman and senior independent Director
The Chairman is a non-executive Director, together with the rest of the Board. There is no executive Director position within the Company. Day-to-day management of the Company's affairs has been delegated to the Administrator. The Board has considered whether a senior independent Director should be appointed. However, as the Board comprises entirely non-executive Directors, the appointment of a senior independent Director for the time being, is not considered necessary. Any of the non-executive Directors are available to shareholders if they have concerns which cannot be resolved through discussion with the Chairman.
Board diversity
The Board has also given careful consideration to the recommendations of the Davies Report on women on boards and as recommended in that report has reviewed its composition and believes that it has available an appropriate range of skills and experience. In order to extend its diversity, the Board is committed to implementing the recommendations of the Davies Report, if possible within the timescales proposed in the Davies Report, and to that end will ensure that women candidates are considered when appointments to the Board are under consideration - as indeed has always been its practice.
Re-election of Directors
The principle set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code is that Directors should submit themselves for re- election at regular intervals and at least every three years, and in any event as soon as it is practical after their initial appointment to the Board. It is a further requirement that non-executive Directors are appointed for a specific period.
The Letters of Appointment of the non-executive Directors suggest that it is appropriate for Directors to retire and be nominated for re-election after three years of service, subject to the recommendation of the General Meeting. The Nominations Committee met on 2 May 2014 and it was decided Mr Firth and Ms Tibaldi would put themselves forward for re-election at the 2014 Annual General Meeting. David Macfarlane and James Jordan were re-elected to the Board at the 2013 Annual General Meeting. A resolution will be tabled to ratify the appointment of Christopher Waldron to the Board.
The Board's evaluation
The Board, Audit Committee, and Nomination Committee undertake an evaluation of their own performance and that of individual Directors on an annual basis. In order to review their effectiveness, the Board and its Committees carry out a process of formal self-appraisal. The Board and Committees consider how they function as a whole and also review the individual performance of its members. This process is conducted by the respective Chairman reviewing each member's performance, contribution and commitment to the Company. The Board as a whole reviews the performance of the Chairman. Each Board member is also required to submit details of training they have undertaken on an annual basis.
The results of the evaluation process concluded the Board was functioning effectively and the Board and its committees provided a suitable mix of skills and experience.
Board Committees
In accordance with the AIC Code, the Board has established an Audit Committee and a Nomination Committee, in each case with formally delegated duties and responsibilities within written terms of reference. The identity of each of the chairmen of the committees referred to below are reviewed on an annual basis. The Board has decided that the entire Board should fulfil the role of the Audit and Nomination committees. The terms of reference of the committees are kept under review and can be viewed on the Company's website www.jzcp.com.
Nomination Committee
In accordance with the Code, the Company has established a Nomination Committee. The main role of the committee is to propose candidates for election to the Board of Directors, including the Chairman. The Nomination Committee takes into consideration the Code's rules on independence of the Board in relation to the Company, its senior management and major shareholders. The nomination committee is chaired by David Macfarlane, and each of the other Directors is also a member. The members of the committee are independent of the Investment Adviser. The Nomination Committee has responsibility for considering the size, structure and composition of the Board, retirements and appointments of additional and replacement Directors and making appropriate recommendations to the Board. This responsibility was exercised in 2013, when Christopher Waldron was appointed to the Board following an extensive selection process.
Due to the nature of the Company being a listed investment company investing in private equity with an international shareholder base, the Company needs Directors with a broad range of financial experience. For this reason, Directors believe that it is more appropriate to use their own contacts as a source of suitable candidates as no one external consultancy or advertising source is likely to be in a position to identify suitable candidates.
The final decision with regard to appointments always rests with the Board and all such appointments are subject to confirmation by shareholders.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is chaired by Patrick Firth. All the other Directors are members. Members of the Committee are independent of the Company's external auditors and the Investment Adviser. The Audit Committee meets at least twice a year and meets the external auditors at least twice a year. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company's relationship with the external auditors, including making recommendations to the Board on the appointment of the external auditors and their remuneration. The Committee also considers the nature, scope and results of the auditors' work and reviews, and develops and implements policies on the supply of any non-audit services that are to be provided by the external auditors.
Management Engagement Committee
The Company currently does not have a separate Management Engagement committee. The recommended functions and responsibilities of such a committee are exercised by the full board each member of which is unassociated with the Investment Advisers.
Remuneration Committee
In view of its non-executive and independent nature, the Board considers that it is not appropriate for there to be a separate Remuneration Committee as prescribed by the AIC Code. The process for agreeing the non-executive Directors' fees is set out in the Directors' Remuneration Report.
Board and Committee meeting attendance
The number of formal meetings of the Board and its committees held during the year and the attendance of individual Directors at these meetings was as follows:
|
|
Number of meetings |
|||
|
|
Board |
Ad Hoc |
Other |
Audit |
|
|
Main |
Meetings |
Committee |
Committee |
Total number of meetings |
|
5 |
2 |
- |
2 |
David Macfarlane |
|
5 |
- |
- |
2 |
Patrick Firth |
|
5 |
2 |
- |
2 |
James Jordan |
|
5 |
- |
- |
1 |
Tanja Tibaldi |
|
5 |
- |
- |
2 |
Christopher Waldron* |
|
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
The main Board meetings are held to agree the Company's valuation of its investments, agree the Company's financial statements and discuss and agree other strategic issues. Other meetings are held when required to agree board decisions on ad-hoc issues.
* Appointed 21 October 2013
Internal Controls
Responsibility for the establishment and maintenance of an appropriate system of internal control rests with the Board and to achieve this a process has been established which seeks to:
- review the risks faced by the Company and the controls in place to address those risks
- identify and report changes in the risk environment
- identify and report changes in the operational controls
- identify and report on the effectiveness of controls and errors arising
- ensure no override of controls by its service providers, the Manager and Administrator.
A report is tabled and discussed at each Board meeting setting out the risks identified, their potential impact, the controls in place to mitigate them, the residual risk assessment and any exceptions identified during the period under review. The Board considers the current activities of the company and external factors and amends the risk reporting accordingly.
The Board also receives confirmation from the Administrator of its accreditation under the SOC1 report.
Further reports are received and reviewed from the Administrator in respect of compliance, London Stock Exchange continuing obligations and other matters.
Going Concern
The Directors consider the Company has adequate financial resources, in view of its holding in cash and cash equivalents and liquid investments and the income streams deriving from its investments and believe that the Company is well placed to manage its business risks successfully to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and that it is appropriate to prepare the Financial Statements on the going concern basis.
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ("FATCA") became effective on 1 January 2013. The legislation is aimed at determining the ownership of US assets in foreign accounts and improving US tax compliance with respect to those assets. The States of Guernsey has entered into an intergovernmental agreement ("IGA") with US Treasury in order to facilitate the requirements under FATCA. The Board is monitoring the implementation with the assistance of its professional advisers.
Inter-Governmental Agreements
The States of Guernsey have signed an intergovernmental agreement with the UK ("UK-Guernsey IGA") under which potentially mandatory disclosure requirements may be required in respect of Shareholders who have a UK connection. The Board is monitoring implementation of the UK-Guernsey IGA with the assistance of its professional advisers.
Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive
The Company does not expect to be required to comply with the AIFM Directive except to the extent that it may be required to satisfy certain provisions of the AIFM Directive in order to permit the marketing of the Company's shares in EEA Member States. In this circumstance the relevant regime remains the national private placement arrangements in the relevant EEA Member State into which the fund is marketed. Compliance with the Directive may result in increased reporting requirements, possible changes to the governance structure of the Company and additional disclosure in the financial statements. The Company will consult with its professional advisors to minimise this impact where possible.
Relations with shareholders
The Directors believe that the maintenance of good relations with both institutional and retail shareholders is important for the long term prospects of the Company. It therefore seeks active engagement with investors, bearing in mind the duties regarding equal treatment of shareholders and the dissemination of inside information. The Board receives feedback on shareholder views from its Corporate Broker and Investment Adviser, and is circulated with Broker reports on the Company.
The Directors believe that the Annual General Meeting, a meeting for all shareholders, is the key point in the year when the Board of Directors accounts to all shareholders for the performance of the Company. It therefore encourages all shareholders to attend, and all Directors are present unless unusual circumstances prevail.
The Directors believe that the Company policy of reporting to shareholders as soon as possible after the Company's year end and the holding of the Annual General Meeting at the earliest opportunity is valuable.
The Company also provides an Interim Report and Accounts in accordance with IAS 34 and Interim Management statements for the quarterly periods in line with the requirements of the EU Transparency Directive.
Independent Auditors' Report
We have audited the financial statements of JZ Capital Partners Limited (the "Company") for the year ended 28 February 2014 which comprise the Investment Portfolio, the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Statement of Cash Flows and the related notes 1 to 33. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.
This report is made solely to the Company's members, as a body, in accordance with Section 262 of the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors
As explained more fully in the Directors' Responsibilities Statement, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's Ethical Standards for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the Company's circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the annual report to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements and to identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, the knowledge acquired by us in the course of performing the audit. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the financial statements: |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
give a true and fair view of the state of the Company's affairs as at 28 February 2014 and of its profit for the year then ended; |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
• |
have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union; and |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
• |
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008. |
Our assessment of risks of material misstatement
We identified the following risks of material misstatement that we believed would have the greatest impact on our overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team:
• |
valuation of the Company's non-publicly traded investments; |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
existence and ownership of the Company's investments; and |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
calculation of management and incentive fees. |
Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality to the individual account or balance level through our determination of performance materiality, which is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality.
We determined materiality for the Company to be $13.3 million, which is 2% of total equity. This provided a basis for determining the nature, timing and extent of risk assessment procedures, identifying and assessing the risk of material misstatement and determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures.
On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the Company's overall control environment, our judgement was that overall performance materiality (i.e. our tolerance for misstatement in an individual account or balance) for the Company should be 75% of materiality, namely $9.9 million. Our objective in adopting this approach was to ensure that total uncorrected and undetected audit differences in all accounts did not exceed our materiality level.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to the Committee all audit differences in excess of $0.67 million, as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
An overview of the scope of our audit
Our response to the risks identified above was as follows;
• |
we considered the appropriateness of the valuation techniques applied to unlisted investments by testing the arithmetical accuracy of calculations in the valuation models, and obtained evidence to corroborate the inputs into the valuation models. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
we obtained independent confirmations directly from the underlying investee companies and agreed them to the books and records of the Company; |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
we obtained independent confirmation from the custodian of the Company's publicly traded investments and agreed this to the records of the Company; and |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
we reviewed the management and incentive fee calculations for clerical accuracy and consistency with agreements. We also reviewed the reasonableness of the inputs used in the incentive fee calculations and considered the risk of management overriding internal controls. |
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:
Under the ISAs (UK and Ireland), we are required to report to you if, in our opinion, information in the annual report is:
• |
materially inconsistent with the information in the audited financial statements; or |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
• |
apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, our knowledge of the Company acquired in the course of performing our audit; or |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
• |
is otherwise misleading. |
|||
In particular we are required to consider whether we have identified any inconsistencies between our knowledge acquired during the audit and the Directors' statement that they consider the annual report is fair, balanced and understandable and whether the annual report appropriately discloses those matters that we communicated to the audit committee which we consider should have been disclosed.
Under the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
• |
proper accounting records have not been kept; or |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records; or |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit |
Christopher James Matthews, FCA
for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP
Guernsey, Channel Islands
2 May 2014
Notes:
1. The maintenance and integrity of the JZ Capital Partners Limited web site is the responsibility of the directors; the work carried out by the auditors does not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, the auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the web site.
2. Legislation in Guernsey governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Investment Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including |
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
Accrued Interest |
Percentage of net assets |
|
|
|
|
Book |
|
28 February |
||
|
|
|
cost* |
|
2014 |
||
Company |
|
Industry |
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Micro Cap Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Micro Cap Verticals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Service Solutions |
|
Industrial Services |
|
|
|
|
|
INDUSTRIAL SERVICES SOLUTIONS ("ISS") |
|
|
33,174 |
|
34,916 |
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management |
|
Healthcare Services & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEDS HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
|
14,439 |
|
13,784 |
|
2.1 |
BHS PHYSICIAN |
|
|
7,035 |
|
7,035 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sensors Solutions |
|
Sensors & Instrumentation |
|
|
|
|
|
AMPTEK, INC. |
|
|
13,908 |
|
25,133 |
|
3.8 |
NIELSEN-KELLERMAN |
|
|
2,614 |
|
5,546 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing Services |
|
Testing Services & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCUTEST HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
|
33,516 |
|
32,039 |
|
4.8 |
ARGUS GROUP HOLDINGS |
|
|
8,381 |
|
10,114 |
|
1.5 |
GALSON LABORATORIES |
|
|
2,671 |
|
9,235 |
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logistics Solutions |
|
Industrial Investment Firms |
|
|
|
|
|
PRIORITY EXPRESS, LLC |
|
|
13,296 |
|
13,805 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Services |
|
Water Treatment & Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TWH INFRASTRUCTURE INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|
|
15,651 |
|
18,558 |
|
2.8 |
TWH WATER TREATMENT INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|
|
18,404 |
|
23,654 |
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US Micro Cap Verticals |
|
|
163,089 |
|
193,819 |
|
29.1 |
US Micro Cap Co-investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JUSTRITE MANUFACTURING COMPANY |
|
Specialised Equipment Manufacturers |
6,068 |
|
10,370 |
|
1.6 |
MEDPLAST/UPG HOLDINGS |
|
Industrial Engineering |
17,983 |
|
20,660 |
|
3.1 |
MILESTONE AVIATION GROUP, INC. |
|
Specialty Finance |
15,137 |
|
23,563 |
|
3.5 |
NEW VITALITY HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
Personal Care Products |
3,280 |
|
6,242 |
|
0.9 |
VITALYST |
|
Strategic Workforce Solutions |
9,020 |
|
7,301 |
|
1.1 |
SALTER LABS, INC. |
|
Healthcare Services & Equipment |
19,163 |
|
15,346 |
|
2.3 |
SUZO HAPP GROUP |
|
Specialised Equipment Manufacturers |
5,509 |
|
7,209 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,160 |
|
90,691 |
|
13.6 |
US Micro Cap Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOLDER INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE SOLUTIONS |
|
|
208 |
|
210 |
|
- |
ISS#1, LLC |
|
Industrial Engineering |
31 |
|
31 |
|
- |
CHINA DENTAL HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
Industrial Investment Firms |
1,375 |
|
1,840 |
|
0.3 |
DENTAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION |
|
Healthcare Services & Equipment |
27,604 |
|
30,205 |
|
4.5 |
HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS HOLDINGS, INC.*** |
|
Healthcare Services & Equipment |
17,638 |
|
14,541 |
|
2.2 |
MODC, LLC |
|
Specialty Retail |
208 |
|
210 |
|
- |
NATIONWIDE STUDIOS, INC. |
|
House, Leisure & Personal Goods |
16,132 |
|
9,211 |
|
1.4 |
NTT ACQUISITION CORP.*** |
|
Education & Training |
894 |
|
- |
|
- |
TIGER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.*** |
|
Strategic Workforce Solutions |
400 |
|
300 |
|
- |
US SANITATION, LLC |
|
Industrial Investment Firms |
425 |
|
502 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US Micro Cap Other |
|
|
64,915 |
|
57,050 |
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US Micro Cap Portfolio |
|
|
304,164 |
|
341,560 |
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Micro Cap Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUROMICROCAP FUND 2010, LP |
|
European Microcap |
93,463 |
|
150,115 |
|
22.5 |
DOCOUT, S.L. |
|
Document Processing |
2,777 |
|
3,212 |
|
0.5 |
GRUPO OMBUDS |
|
Private Security |
17,156 |
|
19,651 |
|
2.9 |
TORO FINANCE |
|
Financial General |
10,996 |
|
11,178 |
|
1.7 |
XACOM COMUNICACIONES SL |
|
Telecom |
2,055 |
|
2,625 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total European Micro Cap Portfolio |
|
|
126,447 |
|
186,781 |
|
28.0 |
Mezzanine Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GED HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
Construction & Materials |
6,100 |
|
305 |
|
- |
METPAR INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|
Construction & Materials |
7,754 |
|
751 |
|
0.1 |
PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC. |
|
Animal Supplies |
1,237 |
|
2,650 |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mezzanine Porfolio |
|
|
15,091 |
|
3,706 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Debt: Second Lien Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEKKO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC |
|
Electronic & Electrical Equipment |
11,368 |
|
11,810 |
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Debt |
|
|
11,368 |
|
11,810 |
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP, INC.*** |
|
Insurance |
6,816 |
|
64,521 |
|
9.7 |
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.*** |
|
Education & Training |
15 |
|
902 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Listed Equity Investments |
|
|
6,831 |
|
65,423 |
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK Gilts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK treasury 2% - maturity 22.01.2016 |
|
Financial General |
40,732 |
|
43,292 |
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total UK Gilts |
|
|
40,732 |
|
43,292 |
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs, 03.22.2016 |
|
Financial General |
16,590 |
|
16,415 |
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Corporate Bonds |
|
|
16,590 |
|
16,415 |
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JZCP REALTY** |
|
Real Estate |
107,595 |
|
112,792 |
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Investments |
|
|
107,595 |
|
112,792 |
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSM ENGENHARIA S.A. |
|
Logistics |
6,115 |
|
5,050 |
|
0.8 |
SPRUCEVIEW CAPITAL, LLC |
|
Financial General |
3,917 |
|
3,917 |
|
0.6 |
JZ INTERNATIONAL, LLC*** |
|
Financial General |
660 |
|
1,620 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other |
|
|
10,692 |
|
10,587 |
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total - Portfolio |
|
|
639,510 |
|
792,366 |
|
118.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zero Dividend Preference shares |
|
|
|
|
(107,201) |
|
(16.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and other net assets |
|
|
|
|
(18,709) |
|
(2.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets attributable to Ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
666,456 |
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Original book cost incurred by JZEP/JZCP adjusted for subsequent transactions. The book cost represents cash outflows and excludes PIK investments.
** JZCP owns 100% of the shares and voting rights of JZCP Realty Fund, Ltd.
*** Legacy Investments. Legacy investments are excluded from the calculation of capital and income incentive fees.
Mezzanine Portfolio includes common stock with a carrying value of US$2,713,000. These investments are classified as Investments at fair value through profit or loss.
Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the year ended 28 February 2014
|
|
Year ended 28 February 2014 |
|
Year ended 28 February 2013 |
|||||||||
|
|
Revenue |
|
Capital |
|
Total |
|
Revenue |
|
Capital |
|
Total |
|
|
|
return |
|
return |
|
|
|
return |
|
return |
|
|
|
|
Notes |
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on investments at fair value through profit or loss |
6 |
- |
|
55,408 |
|
55,408 |
|
- |
|
13,886 |
|
13,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Net impairment)/net write back of impairments on loans and receivables |
7 |
- |
|
(77) |
|
(77) |
|
- |
|
1,025 |
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realisations from investments held in escrow accounts |
|
- |
|
2,233 |
|
2,233 |
|
- |
|
7,528 |
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign currency exchange (losses)/gains |
|
- |
|
(9,980) |
|
(9,980) |
|
- |
|
3,915 |
|
3,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
8 |
39,184 |
|
- |
|
39,184 |
|
41,343 |
|
- |
|
41,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank and deposit interest |
|
130 |
|
- |
|
130 |
|
393 |
|
- |
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,314 |
|
47,584 |
|
86,898 |
|
41,736 |
|
26,354 |
|
68,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Adviser's base fee |
10 |
(11,220) |
|
- |
|
(11,220) |
|
(10,707) |
|
- |
|
(10,707) |
|
Investment Adviser's incentive fee |
10 |
4,411 |
|
(13,819) |
|
(9,408) |
|
- |
|
(9,030) |
|
(9,030) |
|
Directors' remuneration |
10 |
(348) |
|
- |
|
(348) |
|
(380) |
|
- |
|
(380) |
|
Administrative expenses |
10 |
(2,138) |
|
- |
|
(2,138) |
|
(2,405) |
|
- |
|
(2,405) |
|
Share class restructuring costs |
10 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(1,580) |
|
(1,580) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,295) |
|
(13,819) |
|
(23,114) |
|
(13,492) |
|
(10,610) |
|
(24,102) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
30,019 |
|
33,765 |
|
63,784 |
|
28,244 |
|
15,744 |
|
43,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs in respect of Zero Dividend Preference shares |
9 |
- |
|
(7,489) |
|
(7,489) |
|
- |
|
(7,007) |
|
(7,007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before taxation |
|
30,019 |
|
26,276 |
|
56,295 |
|
28,244 |
|
8,737 |
|
36,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withholding taxes |
11 |
(841) |
|
- |
|
(841) |
|
(1,131) |
|
- |
|
(1,131) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
29,178 |
|
26,276 |
|
55,454 |
|
27,113 |
|
8,737 |
|
35,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue during year |
18 |
|
|
|
65,018,607 |
|
|
|
|
65,018,607 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted profit per Ordinary share using the weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue during the year |
|
44.88c |
|
40.41c |
|
85.29c |
|
41.70c |
|
13.44c |
|
55.14c |
|
All items in the above statement are derived from continuing operations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The profit for the year is attributable to the Ordinary shareholders of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The format of the Income Statement follows the recommendations of the AIC Statement of Recommended Practice. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Total" column of this statement represents the Company's Statement of Comprehensive Income, prepared in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
||||||||||||
There was no comprehensive income other than the profit for the year. |
||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Financial Position
As at 28 February 2014
|
|
|
28 February |
|
28 February |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
Notes |
|
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value through profit or loss |
12 |
|
791,366 |
|
619,517 |
Investments classified as loans and receivables |
12 |
|
1,000 |
|
8,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
792,366 |
|
628,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and cash held on deposit |
13 |
|
11,372 |
|
102,740 |
Other receivables |
14 |
|
517 |
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,889 |
|
103,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
804,255 |
|
731,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Adviser's base fee |
|
|
848 |
|
715 |
Investment Adviser's incentive fee |
|
|
9,408 |
|
9,030 |
Directors' remuneration |
|
|
63 |
|
62 |
Other payables |
15 |
|
2,440 |
|
1,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,759 |
|
11,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable |
16 |
|
17,839 |
|
- |
Zero Dividend Preference shares |
17 |
|
107,201 |
|
89,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,040 |
|
89,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
137,799 |
|
101,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital account |
20 |
|
149,269 |
|
149,269 |
Distributable reserve |
20 |
|
353,528 |
|
353,528 |
Capital reserve |
20 |
|
76,788 |
|
50,512 |
Revenue reserve |
20 |
|
86,871 |
|
76,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
666,456 |
|
630,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
804,255 |
|
731,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Ordinary shares in issue at year end |
18 |
|
65,018,607 |
|
65,018,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per Ordinary share |
|
|
US$ 10.25 |
|
US$ 9.69 |
These audited financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 2 May 2014. They were signed on its behalf by:
David Macfarlane
Chairman
Patrick Firth
Director
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Equity
For the year ended 28 February 2014
|
|
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
Distributable |
Capital Reserve |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
Account |
Reserve |
Realised |
Unrealised |
Reserve |
Total |
|
|
Notes |
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at 1 March 2013 |
|
149,269 |
353,528 |
92,834 |
(42,322) |
76,873 |
630,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
- |
- |
(6,924) |
33,200 |
29,178 |
55,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
30 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(19,180) |
(19,180) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 28 February 2014 |
|
149,269 |
353,528 |
85,910 |
(9,122) |
86,871 |
666,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Capital |
Distributable |
Capital Reserve |
Revenue |
|
||||
|
|
|
Account |
Reserve |
Realised |
Unrealised |
Reserve |
Total |
|||
|
|
|
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Balance at 1 March 2012 |
|
|
149,269 |
353,528 |
68,107 |
(26,332) |
70,890 |
615,462 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Profit/(loss) for the year |
|
|
- |
- |
24,727 |
(15,990) |
27,113 |
35,850 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Dividends paid |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
(21,130) |
(21,130) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Balance at 28 February 2013 |
|
|
149,269 |
353,528 |
92,834 |
(42,322) |
76,873 |
630,182 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended 28 February 2014
|
|
|
1 March 2013 to |
|
1 March 2012 to |
|
|
|
28 February |
|
28 February |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
|
Notes |
US$'000 |
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from operating activities |
25 |
(7,296) |
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash outflow for purchase of investments |
|
(195,526) |
|
(253,923) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash outflow for capital calls by the EuroMicrocap Fund 2010, LP |
|
(31,035) |
|
(13,275) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash inflow from deposits with maturity greater than 3 months |
|
- |
|
7,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash inflow from repayment and disposal of investments |
|
143,830 |
|
186,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow before financing activities |
|
(90,027) |
|
(70,643) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to shareholders |
30 |
(19,180) |
|
(21,130) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in loan payable |
16 |
17,839 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow from financing activities |
|
(1,341) |
|
(21,130) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(91,368) |
|
(91,773) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net cash flow to movements in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 March |
|
102,740 |
|
194,513 |
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents as above |
|
(91,368) |
|
(91,773) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at year end |
|
11,372 |
|
102,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements.
Notes to the Financial Statements
1. General Information
JZ Capital Partners Limited (the "Company") is a Guernsey domiciled closed-ended investment company which was incorporated in Guernsey on 14 April 2008 under The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 1994. The Company is now subject to The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008. The Company's Share Capital consists of Ordinary shares and Zero Dividend Preference ("ZDP") shares. The Ordinary shares and ZDP shares were admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange's Specialist Fund Market ("SFM") and were admitted to listing on the Channel Islands Securities Exchange ("CISE") on 31 July 2012.
The Company is classed as an authorised fund under The Protection of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law 1987.
The Company's corporate objective is to create a portfolio of investments in businesses primarily in the United States, providing a superior overall return comprised of a current yield and significant capital appreciation. The Company's present strategies include investments in micro cap buyouts, mezzanine loans (sometimes with equity participations) and high yield securities, senior secured debt and second lien loans, real estate and other debt and equity opportunities, including distressed debt and structured financings, derivatives and opportunistic purchase of publicly traded securities.
The Company has no direct employees. For its services the Investment Adviser receives a management fee and is also entitled to performance related fees (note 9). The Company has no ownership interest in the Investment Adviser. During the year under review the Company was administered by Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Guernsey) Limited.
The financial statements are presented in US$'000 except where otherwise indicated.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the audited annual financial statements have been consistently applied during the year, unless otherwise stated.
Statement of Compliance
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union ("IFRS"), which comprise standards and interpretations approved by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") and International Accounting Standards ("IAS") and Standing Interpretations approved by the International Accounting Standards Committee ("IASC") that remain in effect, and have been adopted by the European Union, together with applicable legal and regulatory requirements of Guernsey Law, the SFM and the CISE.
Basis of Preparation
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost or amortised cost basis, modified by the revaluation of financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or loss upon initial recognition. The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial statements follow the Association of Investment Companies ("AIC") Statement of Recommended Practice ("SORP") issued on 21 January 2009.
Changes in accounting policy and disclosures
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year, except that the Company has adopted the following:
(i) Standards, amendments and interpretations effective during the year
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements. IFRS 10 establishes a single control model that applies to all entities including special purpose entities. The changes introduced by IFRS 10 require management to exercise significant judgement to determine which entities are controlled, and therefore, are required to be consolidated by a parent. Investment Entities (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27) was issued on 31 October 2012 and provides an exception to the consolidation requirements of IFRS 10. The amendment requires that investment entities measure subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss, rather than consolidate them. This standard becomes effective on 1 January 2014 but as the Company meets the definition of an investment entity, the Company has early adopted to allow it to apply the provisions at the same time they first apply the rest of IFRS 10. The Company's interim report at 31 August 2013 was prepared on a consolidated basis. At the date the interim report and financial statements were issued, the European Union had yet to endorse the 'Investment Entities' amendment to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27.
Retrospective amendment is required following the early adoption of the 'Investment Entities' amendment to IFRS10. Therefore the presentation of relevant comparative figures has been amended.
Associates have now been included in investments at fair value through profit or loss, as the carrying value assessed through the equity method is equivalent to the fair value classified as investments at fair value through profit or loss.
IFRS 12 Disclosure of Involvement with Other Entities. IFRS 12 includes all of the disclosures that were previously in IAS 27 related to consolidated financial statements, as well as all of the disclosures that were previously included in IAS 31 and IAS 28. These disclosures relate to an entity's interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structured entities. A number of new disclosures are also required as presented in note 12.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement. IFRS 13 establishes a single source of guidance under IFRS for all fair value measurements. IFRS 13 does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather provides guidance on how to measure fair value under IFRS when fair value is required or permitted. IFRS 13 also requires additional disclosures which are presented in note 4.
IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements. As a consequence of the new IFRS 10 and IFRS 12, what remains of IAS 27 is limited to accounting for subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities, and associates in separate financial statements. The Company does not present separate financial statements.
IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. As a consequence of the new IFRS 11 and IFRS 12. IAS 28 has been renamed IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, and describes the application of the equity method to investments in joint ventures in addition to associates. The Company has elected for an exemption from the IAS 28 equity method and values its investment in associate at fair value through profit or loss.
Retrospective restatement is required following the exemption from IAS 28. Therefore the presentation of relevant comparative figures has been restated.
(ii) Standards, amendments and interpretations that are not effective and are not expected to have material impact on the financial position or performance of the Company
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement. The adoption of the first phase of IFRS 9 (tentatively effective for periods beginning on after 1 January 2018) may have an effect on the classification and measurement of the Company's financial assets, but will potentially have no impact on classification and measurements of financial liabilities.
Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Amendments to IAS 32. These amendments clarify the meaning of "currently has a legally enforceable right to set-off". The amendments also clarify the application of the IAS 32 offsetting criteria to settlement systems (such as central clearing house systems) which apply gross settlement mechanisms that are not simultaneous. These amendments are not expected to impact the Company's financial position or performance and become effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014.
There are certain other current standards, amendments and interpretations that are not relevant to the Company's operations.
Assessment as investment entity
Entities that meet the definition of an investment entity within IFRS 10 are required to measure their subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss rather than consolidate them. The criteria which define an investment entity are, as follows:
• An entity that obtains funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing those investors with investment services
• An entity that commits to its investors that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for returns from capital appreciation, investment income or both
• An entity that measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis
The Company has a wide range of investors; through its Investment Adviser management services it enables investors to access private equity, real estate and similar investments.
The Company's objective to provide a "superior overall return comprised of a current yield and significant capital appreciation" is consistent with that of an investment entity. The Company has clearly defined exit strategies for each of its investment classes, these strategies are again consistent with an investment entity.
In determining the fair value of unlisted investments JZCP follows the principals of The International Private Equity and Venture Capital Association ("IPEVCA") Valuation Guidelines. The Valuation Guidelines have been prepared with the goal that Fair Value measurements derived when using these Valuation Guidelines are compliant with IFRS.
The Board of JZCP evaluates the performance of unlisted investments quarterly on a fair value basis. Listed investments are recorded at Fair Value in accordance with IFRS being the last traded market price where this price falls within the bid-ask spread. In circumstances where the last traded price is not within the bid-ask spread, the Board determines the point within the bid-ask spread that is most representative of fair value in accordance with IFRS 13.
The Board has also concluded that the Company meets the additional characteristics of an investment entity, in that it has more than one investment; the investments are predominantly in the form of equities and similar securities; it has more than one investor and its investors are not related parties.
Going concern
A fundamental principle of the preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS is the assumption that an entity will continue in existence as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations and the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities occurring in the ordinary course of business.
The Directors consider the Company has adequate financial resources, in view of its holding in cash and cash equivalents and liquid investments and the income streams deriving from its investments and believe that the Company is well placed to manage its business risks successfully to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and that it is appropriate to prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis.
Functional and presentational currency
Items included in the financial statements of the Company are measured in the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates (the "functional currency"). The functional currency of the Company as determined in accordance with IFRS is the US Dollar because this is the currency that best reflects the economic substance of the underlying events and circumstances of the Company. The financial statements are presented in US Dollars, as the Company has chosen the US Dollar as its presentation currency.
Foreign exchange
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the rate of exchange ruling at the end of the reporting period date. Transactions in foreign currencies during the course of the period are translated at the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at reporting period end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities and non-monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Foreign exchange gains and losses on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are recognised together with other changes in the fair value. Net foreign exchange gains or losses on monetary financial assets and liabilities other than those classified as at fair value through profit or loss are included in the line item 'Net foreign currency exchange gains'.
Financial assets and financial liabilities
(a) Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
(i) Classification
The Company classifies its investments in listed investments, investments in first and second lien debt securities, other equity opportunities and other investments within its Micro Cap and Real Estate portfolios as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. These financial assets are designated by the Board of Directors as at fair value through profit or loss at inception.
Financial assets and financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss at inception are those that are managed and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with the Company's investment strategy as documented in its prospectus and includes those investments over which the Company has significant influence except for the investment in the Associate (see (c) below). Information about these financial assets and financial liabilities are evaluated by the management of the Company on a fair value basis together with other relevant financial information.
(ii) Recognition / derecognition
Purchases and sales of investments are recognised on the trade date - the date on which the Company commits to purchase or sell the investment. Investments are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.
Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value. Transaction costs are expensed in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Subsequent to initial recognition, all financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the 'financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss' category are presented in the Statement of Comprehensive Income in the period in which they arise.
Dividend income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income within investment income when the Company's right to receive payment is established.
Realised surpluses and deficits on the partial sale of investments are arrived at by deducting the average cost of such investments from the sales proceeds.
(iii) Fair value estimation
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded securities) is based on quoted market prices at the Statement of Financial Position date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Company is the bid price.
Unquoted preferred shares, micro cap loans, unquoted equities and equity related securities investments are typically valued by reference to their enterprise value, which is generally calculated by applying an appropriate multiple to the last twelve months' earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation ("EBITDA"). In determining the multiple, the Directors consider inter alia, where practical, the multiples used in recent transactions in comparable unquoted companies, previous valuation multiples used and where appropriate, multiples of comparable publicly traded companies. In accordance with IPEVCA guidelines, a marketability discount is applied which reflects the discount that in the opinion of the Directors, market participants would apply in a transaction in the investment in question.
Traded loans including first and second lien term securities are valued by reference to the last indicative bid price from recognised market makers. These investments are classified in the Statement of Financial Position as Investments at fair value through profit or loss.
(b) Loans and receivables
(i) Classification
The Company classifies unquoted senior subordinated debt within Mezzanine investments as loans and receivables. Investments are generally accounted for at amortised cost using the effective interest method except where there is deemed to be impairment in value which indicates that a provision should be made.
(ii) Recognition / derecognition
Purchases and sales of investments are recognised on the trade date - the date on which the Company commits to purchase or sell the investment. Investments are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.
(iii) Measurement
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or a financial liability and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability. When calculating the effective interest rate, the Company estimates cash flows considering all contractual terms of the financial instrument but does not consider future credit losses. The calculation includes all fees paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums or discounts.
(iv) Impairment
The Company assesses at each reporting date whether the loans and receivables are impaired. Evidence of impairment may include indications that the counterparty is experiencing significant financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or principal payments, the probability that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation and where observable data indicates that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows, such as changes in arrears or economic conditions that correlate with defaults. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has occurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the net present value of expected cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate.
The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the amount of the loss is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as net impairments on loans and receivables.
Impaired debts together with the associated allowance are written off when there is no realistic prospect of future recovery and all collateral has been realised or has been transferred to the Company. If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the estimated impairment loss increases or decreases because of an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is increased or reduced by adjusting the allowance account. If a previous write-off is later recovered, the recovery is credited to net impairments/write back of impairments on loans and receivables.
(c) Investment in an associate
An associate is an entity in which the Company has significant influence. An entity is regarded as a subsidiary only if the Company has control over its strategic, operating and financial policies and intends to hold the investment on a long-term basis for the purpose of securing a contribution to the Company's activities.
In accordance with the exemption within IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, the Company does not account for its investment in EuroMicrocap Fund 2010, LP (the "Partnership") using the equity method. Instead, the Company has elected to measure its investment in its associate at fair value through profit or loss.
The Directors have determined that although the Company has over 50% economic partnership interest in the Partnership, it does not have the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the partnership. Such powers are vested with the General Partner. However the Company does have significant influence over the Partnership.
(d) Investment in a subsidiary
JZCP owns 100% of the shares and voting rights of JZCP Realty Fund, Ltd through which JZCP holds its interests in real estate. As the Company has elected to early adopt the "Investment Entities" amendment to IFRS 10 and the Board has concluded that it meets the criteria of an investment entity, its investment in JZCP Realty Fund, Ltd is carried at fair value through profit or loss.
(e) Cash on deposit
Cash on deposit comprise bank deposits with an original maturity of three months or more.
(f) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise bank balances and cash held by the Company including short-term bank deposits with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash also includes amounts held in interest-bearing overnight accounts.
(g) Other receivables and payables
Other receivables do not carry any interest and are short-term in nature and are accordingly stated at their nominal value as reduced by appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts. Other payables are not interest-bearing and are stated at their nominal value.
(h) Financial liabilities and equity
Financial liabilities and equity are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. Financial liabilities and equity are recorded at the amount of proceeds received, net of issue costs. Ordinary shares are regarded as equity.
(i) Zero dividend preference ("ZDP") shares
In accordance with International Accounting Standard 32 - 'Financial Instruments: Presentation', ZDP shares have been disclosed as a financial liability as the shares are redeemable at a fixed date and holders are entitled to a fixed return. ZDP shares are recorded at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
Income
Interest income for all interest bearing financial instruments is included on an accruals basis using the effective interest method. Dividend income is recognised when the Company's right to receive payment is established. When there is reasonable doubt that income due to be received will actually be received, such income is not accrued until it is clear that its receipt is probable. Where following an accrual of income, receipt becomes doubtful, the accrual is either fully or partly written off until the reasonable doubt is removed.
Expenses
Investment Adviser's basic fees are allocated to revenue. The Company also provides for a Capital Gains Incentive fee based on net unrealised investments gains.
Expenses which are deemed to be incurred wholly in connection with the maintenance or enhancement of the value of the investments are charged to realised capital reserve. All other expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis and are presented as revenue items.
Finance costs
Finance costs are interest expenses in respect of the ZDP shares and loans payable and are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income using the effective interest rate method.
Escrow accounts
Where investments are disposed of, the consideration given may include contractual terms requiring that a percentage of the consideration is held in an escrow account pending resolution of any indemnifiable claims that may arise and as such the value of these escrow amounts is not immediately known. The Company records gains realised on investments held in escrow in the Statement of Comprehensive Income following confirmation that any such indemnifiable claims have been resolved and none is expected in the future.
3. Segment information
The Investment Manager is responsible for allocating resources available to the Company in accordance with the overall business strategies as set out in the Investment Guidelines of the Company. The Company has been organised into the following segments:
• Portfolio of US micro cap investments |
• Portfolio of European micro cap investments |
• Portfolio of Mezzanine investments |
• Portfolio of Bank debt |
• Portfolio of Listed investments |
• Portfolio of Real Estate investments |
• Portfolio of Other investments
The investment objective of each segment is to achieve consistent medium-term returns from the investments in each segment while safeguarding capital by investing in a diversified portfolio.
Investment in corporate bonds, money market funds and treasury gilts are not considered part of any individual segment and have therefore been excluded from this segmental analysis. |
For the year ended 28 February 2014
|
|
|
|
Micro Cap |
Micro Cap |
Mezzanine |
Bank |
Listed |
Real |
Other |
Total |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
US |
European |
Portfolio |
Debt |
Investments |
Estate |
Investments |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Interest revenue |
|
|
31,210 |
2,124 |
215 |
1,307 |
- |
495 |
- |
35,351 |
|
||||||||
Dividend revenue |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,804 |
- |
- |
2,804 |
|
|||||||
Net gain/(loss) on investments at fair value through profit or loss |
|
|
3,659 |
32,744 |
176 |
- |
10,354 |
4,701 |
(675) |
50,959 |
|
||||||||
Impairments on loans and receivables |
|
|
- |
- |
(77) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(77) |
|
||||||||
Investment Adviser's base fee |
(4,765) |
(2,605) |
(52) |
(165) |
(1,753) |
(1,573) |
(149) |
(11,062) |
|
||||||||||
Investment Adviser's capital incentive fee1 |
|
(10,411) |
- |
2,284 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(8,127) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total segmental operating profit |
|
|
|
19,693 |
32,263 |
2,546 |
1,142 |
11,405 |
3,623 |
(824) |
69,848 |
||||||||
Year ended 28 February 2013
|
|
|
|
Micro Cap |
Micro Cap |
Mezzanine |
Bank |
Listed |
Real |
Other |
Total |
|
|
|
|
US |
European |
Portfolio |
Debt |
Investments |
Estate |
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
|
29,131 |
1,607 |
2,223 |
2,290 |
- |
- |
- |
35,251 |
Dividend revenue |
|
|
|
- |
- |
1,023 |
- |
3,771 |
- |
29 |
4,823 |
Other revenue |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
189 |
- |
- |
- |
189 |
Net gain/(loss) on investments at fair value through profit or loss |
|
|
(2,768) |
4,142 |
1,704 |
1,817 |
8,481 |
- |
(681) |
12,695 |
|
Impairments on loans and receivables |
|
|
- |
- |
1,025 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,025 |
|
Investment Adviser's base fee |
(5,014) |
(1,573) |
(163) |
(172) |
(813) |
(452) |
(162) |
(8,349) |
|||
Investment Adviser's capital incentive fee1 |
|
(1,329) |
- |
(812) |
- |
(6,280) |
- |
(609) |
(9,030) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segmental operating profit |
|
|
|
20,020 |
4,176 |
5,000 |
4,124 |
5,159 |
(452) |
(1,423) |
36,604 |
1The capital incentive fee is allocated across segments where a realised or unrealised gain or loss has occurred. Segments with realised or unrealised losses are allocated a credit pro rata to the size of the loss and segments with realised or unrealised gains are allocated a charge pro rata to the size of the gain.
At 28 February 2014
|
|
Micro Cap |
Micro Cap |
Mezzanine |
Bank |
Listed |
Real |
Other |
Total |
|
|
US |
European |
Portfolio |
Debt |
Investments |
Estate |
Investments |
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
Investments at fair value through profit or loss |
341,560 |
186,781 |
2,706 |
11,810 |
65,423 |
112,792 |
10,587 |
731,659 |
|
Investments classified as loans and receivables |
- |
- |
1,000 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,000 |
|
Other receivables |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
486 |
- |
- |
486 |
Other payables and accrued expenses |
|
(10,771) |
(197) |
2,280 |
(12) |
(1,136) |
(119) |
(11) |
(9,966) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segmental net assets |
|
330,789 |
186,584 |
5,986 |
11,798 |
64,773 |
112,673 |
10,576 |
723,179 |
At 28 February 2013
|
|
Micro Cap |
Micro Cap |
Mezzanine |
Bank |
Listed |
Real |
Other |
Total |
|
|
US |
European |
Portfolio |
Debt |
Investments |
Estate |
Investments |
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
Investments at fair value through profit or loss |
342,566 |
107,463 |
2,530 |
11,690 |
55,069 |
30,860 |
11,080 |
561,258 |
|
Investments classified as loans and receivables |
- |
- |
8,765 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8,765 |
|
Other receivables |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
486 |
- |
- |
486 |
Other payables and accrued expenses |
|
(1,664) |
(105) |
(823) |
(11) |
(7,338) |
- |
- |
(9,941) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segmental net assets |
|
340,902 |
107,358 |
10,472 |
11,679 |
48,217 |
30,860 |
11,080 |
560,568 |
Certain income and expenditure is not considered part of the performance of an individual segment. This includes net foreign exchange gains, interest on cash, finance costs, custodian and administration fees, directors' fees and other general expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reportable segment profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,848 |
|
|
36,604 |
||
Net gains on treasury gilts and corporate bonds |
|
|
4,449 |
|
|
1,194 |
|||||||
Realised gains on investments held in escrow accounts |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
7,528 |
|||||||
Net foreign exchange gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,980) |
|
|
3,915 |
||
Interest on treasury gilts and corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
1,077 |
|||||
Interest on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
393 |
Fees payable to investment adviser based on non segmental assets |
(1,439) |
|
|
(2,358) |
|||||||||
Expenses not attributable to segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,486) |
|
|
(2,785) |
|||
Share class restructuring costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,580) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,784 |
|
|
43,988 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables and prepayments are not considered to be part of individual segment assets. Certain liabilities are not considered to be part of the net assets of an individual segment. These include custodian and administration fees payable, Directors' fees payable and Other payables and accrued expenses.
The following table provides a reconciliation between total net segment assets and total net assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net segmental assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
723,179 |
|
|
560,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non segmental assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Treasury gilts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,292 |
|
|
31,809 |
Floating rate notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,415 |
|
|
26,450 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
11,372 |
|
|
102,740 |
|||
Loans payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,839) |
|
|
- |
Other receivables and prepayments |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
66 |
||||
Zero Dividend Preference Shares |
|
|
|
|
(107,201) |
|
|
(89,839) |
|||
Other payables and accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
(2,793) |
|
|
(1,612) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non segmental net assets |
|
|
|
|
(56,723) |
|
|
69,614 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666,456 |
|
|
630,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Fair value of financial instruments
The Company classifies fair value measurements of its financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. The financial assets valued at fair value through profit or loss are analysed in a fair value hierarchy based on the following levels: |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1). |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
• Those involving inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2). |
|||||||||||||||
• Those involving inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs) (level 3). |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. For this purpose, the significance of an input is assessed against the fair value measurement in its entirety. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that measurement is a level 3 measurement. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgement, considering factors specific to the asset or liability. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The determination of what constitutes 'observable' requires significant judgement by the Company. The Company considers observable data to be that market data that is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, not proprietary, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows financial instruments recognised at fair value, analysed between those whose fair value is based on: |
Financial assets at 28 February 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss at inception: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,130 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
125,130 |
Bank debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
11,810 |
|
11,810 |
Mezzanine portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,706 |
|
2,706 |
US Micro Cap portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
341,560 |
|
341,560 |
European Micro Cap portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
186,781 |
|
186,781 |
|
Real Estate portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
112,792 |
|
112,792 |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
10,587 |
|
10,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,130 |
|
- |
|
666,236 |
|
791,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at 28 February 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss at inception: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,328 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
113,328 |
Bank debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
11,690 |
|
11,690 |
Mezzanine portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,529 |
|
2,529 |
US Micro Cap portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
342,567 |
|
342,567 |
European Micro Cap portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
107,463 |
|
107,463 |
|
Real Estate portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
30,860 |
|
30,860 |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
11,080 |
|
11,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,328 |
|
- |
|
506,189 |
|
619,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers between levels
There were no transfers between the levels of hierarchy of financial assets recognised at fair value within the year ended 28 February 2014 and 28 February 2013.
Valuation techniques
In valuing investments in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, the Directors follow a number of general principles as detailed in the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Association ("IPEVCA") guidelines.
When fair values of listed equity and debt securities at the reporting date are based on quoted market prices or binding dealer price quotations (bid prices for long positions), without any deduction for transaction costs, the instruments are included within Level 1 of the hierarchy.
The fair value of bank debt which is derived from unobservable data is classified as Level 3.
Investments for which there are no active markets are valued according to one of the following methods:
Real Estate
JZCP makes its Real Estate investments through a wholly-owned subsidiary, which in turn owns interests in various residential, commercial, and development real estate properties. The net asset value of the subsidiary is used for the measurement of fair value. The underlying fair value of JZCP's Real Estate holdings, however, is represented by the properties themselves.
The Company's Investment Adviser and Board review the fair value methods and measurement of the underlying properties on a quarterly basis. The fair value techniques used in the underlying valuations are:
- Use of comparable market values per square foot of properties in recent transactions in the vicinity in which the property is located, and in similar condition, of the relevant property, multiplied by the property's square footage.
- Discounted Cash Flow ("DCF") analysis, using the relevant rental stream, less expenses, for future periods, discounted at a Market Capitalization ("MC") rate, or interest rate.
- Relevant rental stream less expenses divided by the market capitalization rate; this method approximates the enterprise value construct used for non-real estate assets.
For each of the above techniques third party debt is deducted to arrive at fair value.
Due to the inherent uncertainties of real estate valuation, the values reflected in the financial statements may differ significantly from the values that would be determined by negotiation between parties in a sales transaction and those differences could be material.
Mezzanine loans
Investments are generally valued at amortised cost except where there is deemed to be impairment in value which indicates that a provision should be made. Mezzanine loans are classified in the Statement of Financial Position as loans and receivables and are accounted for at amortised cost using the effective interest method less accumulated impairment allowances in accordance with IFRS.
The Company assesses at each reporting date whether a financial asset or group of financial assets classified as loans and receivables is impaired. Evidence of impairment may include indications that the debtor or a group of debtors is experiencing significant financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or principal payments, the probability that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation and where observable data indicates that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows, such as changes in arrears or economic conditions that correlate with defaults. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the net present value of expected cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate.
Unquoted preferred shares, micro cap loans, unquoted equities and equity related securities
Unquoted preferred shares, micro cap loans, unquoted equities and equity related securities investments are classified in the Statement of Financial Position as Investments at fair value through profit or loss. These investments are typically valued by reference to their enterprise value, which is generally calculated by applying an appropriate multiple to the last twelve months' earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation ("EBITDA"). In determining the multiple, the Directors consider inter alia, where practical, the multiples used in recent transactions in comparable unquoted companies, previous valuation multiples used and where appropriate, multiples of comparable publicly traded companies. In accordance with IPEVCA guidelines, a marketability discount is applied which reflects the discount that in the opinion of the Directors, market participants would apply in a transaction in the investment in question.
In respect of unquoted preferred shares and micro cap loans the Company values these investments by reference to the attributable enterprise value as the exit strategy in respect to these investments would be a one tranche disposal together with the equity component. The fair value of the investment is determined by reference to the attributable enterprise value (this is calculated by a multiple of EBITDA reduced by senior debt and marketability discount) covering the aggregate of the unquoted equity, unquoted preferred shares and debt instruments invested in the underlying company. The increase of the fair value of the aggregate investment is reflected through the unquoted equity component of the investment and a decrease in the fair value is reflected across all financial instruments invested in an underlying company.
Quantitative information of significant unobservable inputs and sensitivity analysis to significant changes in unobservable inputs within Level 3 hierarchy
The significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurement catergorised within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy together with a quantitative sensitivity as at 28 February 2014 are shown below:
|
|
Value |
Valuation |
Unobservable |
Range |
Sensitivity |
Effect on Fair Value |
||
|
|
28.2.2014 |
Technique |
input |
(weighted average) |
used* |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Micro cap investments |
|
287,792 |
EBITDA Multiple |
Average EBITDA Multiple of Peers |
5.0x - 9.0x (7.2x) |
0.5x / -0.5x |
(21,426) |
|
19,256 |
US Micro cap investments |
|
|
EBITDA Multiple |
Discount to Average Multiple |
0% - 40% (25%) |
5.0% / -5.0% |
(28,087) |
|
23,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Micro cap investments (1) |
23,563 |
Multiple of Book Value |
Multiple of Book Value |
1.5x |
0.25x / -0.25x |
(3,293) |
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Micro cap investments (2) |
30,205 |
Revenue Multiple |
Revenue Multiple |
0.4x |
0.1x / -0.1x |
(6,169) |
|
5,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Micro cap investments |
186,781 |
EBITDA Multiple |
Average EBITDA Multiple of Peers |
5.4x - 9.0x (7.3x) |
0.5x / -0.5x |
(11,010) |
|
11,010 |
|
European Micro cap investments |
|
EBITDA Multiple |
Discount to Average Multiple |
25% - 48% (33%) |
5.0% / -5.0% |
(9,730) |
|
9,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine investments |
|
2,706 |
EBITDA Multiple |
Average EBITDA Multiple of Peers |
5.0x - 8.0x (7.0x) |
0.5x / -0.5x |
(342) |
|
342 |
Mezzanine investments |
|
|
EBITDA Multiple |
Discount to Average Multiple |
10% |
5.0% / -5.0% |
(256) |
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank debt |
|
11,810 |
EBITDA Multiple |
Average EBITDA Multiple of Peers |
6.0x |
0.5x / -0.5x |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate (3) |
|
112,792 |
DCF Model / Income Approach |
Discount Rate |
10% |
+ 1% / - 1% |
(3,745) |
|
3,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
10,587 |
EBITDA Multiple |
Average EBITDA Multiple of Peers |
7.5x |
0.5x / -0.5x |
(447) |
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
Discount to Average Multiple |
25% |
5.0% / -5.0% |
(379) |
|
379 |
(1) Milestone Aviation valued using a different valuation method
(2) Dental Holdings valued using a different valuation method
(3) The Fair Value of JZCP's investment in financial interests in Real Estate, is measured as JZCP's percentage interest in the value of the underlying properties. The Directors consider the discount rate used, applied to the DCF, when valuing the properties as the most significant unobservable input affecting the measurement of fair value.
* The sensitivity analysis refers to a percentage amount added or deducted from the input and the effect this has on the fair value.
The following table shows a reconciliation of all movements in the fair value of financial instruments categorised within Level 3 between the beginning and the end of the reporting period.
At 28 February 2014
|
|
Bank |
Mezzanine |
US Micro |
Euro Micro |
Real |
|
|
|
|
Debt |
Portfolio |
Cap Portfolio |
Cap Portfolio |
Estate |
Other |
Total |
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 March 2013 |
|
11,690 |
2,529 |
342,566 |
107,463 |
30,861 |
11,080 |
506,189 |
Purchases |
|
- |
- |
63,370 |
45,172 |
76,933 |
1,750 |
187,225 |
PIK adjusted for fair value |
|
130 |
50 |
25,386 |
- |
- |
- |
25,566 |
Proceeds from investments repaid or sold |
- |
- |
(92,142) |
- |
(198) |
(1,568) |
(93,908) |
|
Net gains and losses recognised in statement of comprehensive income |
|
99 |
3,659 |
32,774 |
4,701 |
(675) |
40,558 |
|
Movement in accrued interest recognised in statement of comprehensive income |
(10) |
28 |
(1,279) |
1,372 |
495 |
- |
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 28 February 2014 |
|
11,810 |
2,706 |
341,560 |
186,781 |
112,792 |
10,587 |
666,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
Mezzanine |
US Micro |
Euro Micro |
Real |
|
|
|
|
Debt |
Portfolio |
Cap Portfolio |
Cap Portfolio |
Estate |
Other |
Total |
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 March 2012 |
|
12,971 |
5,658 |
204,583 |
85,129 |
- |
2,384 |
310,725 |
Purchases |
|
- |
- |
128,392 |
13,275 |
30,861 |
9,361 |
181,889 |
PIK adjusted for fair value |
|
535 |
- |
20,684 |
5,993 |
- |
|
27,212 |
Proceeds from investments repaid or sold |
(1,808) |
(4,309) |
(10,341) |
(2,125) |
- |
- |
(18,583) |
|
Net gains and losses recognised in statement of comprehensive income |
|
1,704 |
(2,738) |
4,142 |
- |
(665) |
2,443 |
|
Investment gains on warrants held at nil value |
- |
(518) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(518) |
|
Movement in accrued interest recognised in statement of comprehensive income |
(8) |
(6) |
1,986 |
1,049 |
- |
- |
3,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 28 February 2013 |
|
11,690 |
2,529 |
342,566 |
107,463 |
30,861 |
11,080 |
506,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table details the revenues and net gains included within the statement of comprehensive income for investments classified at Level 3 which were held during the year.
At 28 February 2014 |
|
Bank |
Mezzanine |
US Micro |
Euro Micro |
Real |
|
|
|
|
Debt |
Portfolio |
Cap Portfolio |
Cap Portfolio |
Estate |
Other |
Total |
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other revenue |
|
1,307 |
215 |
31,210 |
2,124 |
495 |
- |
35,351 |
Net gain/(loss) on investments at fair value through profit or loss |
- |
99 |
3,659 |
32,774 |
4,701 |
(675) |
40,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307 |
314 |
34,869 |
34,898 |
5,196 |
(675) |
75,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 28 February 2013 |
|
Bank |
Mezzanine |
US Micro |
Euro Micro |
Real |
|
|
|
|
Debt |
Portfolio |
Cap Portfolio |
Cap Portfolio |
Estate |
Other |
Total |
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other revenue |
|
2,479 |
3,246 |
29,134 |
1,607 |
- |
- |
36,466 |
Net gain/(loss) on investments at fair value through profit or loss |
- |
1,704 |
(2,738) |
(200) |
- |
(665) |
(1,899) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,479 |
4,950 |
26,396 |
1,407 |
- |
(665) |
34,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the investments measured at Level 3 at the reporting date, the Company adjusted the default rate, and discount rate assumptions within a range of reasonably possible alternatives. The extent of the adjustment varied according to the characteristics of each security.
The potential effect of using reasonably possible alternative assumptions for valuing financial instruments classified as Level 3 at the reporting date would reduce the fair value by up to US$84,884,000 (28 February 2013: US$9,840,000) or increase the fair value by US$77,726,000 (28 February 2013:US$10,430,000).
The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities measured at amortised cost are determined as follows:
The fair value of the Zero Dividend Preference shares is deemed to be their quoted market price. As at 28 February 2014 the ask price was £3.36 (28 February 2013: £3.24 per share) the total fair value of the ZDP shares was US$116,599,000 (28 February 2013: US$90,005,000) which is US$9,398,000 higher (28 February 2013: US$166,000 higher) than the liability recorded in the Statement of Financial Position.
The carrying amounts of loans and receivables are recorded at amortised cost using the effective interest method in the financial statements. The fair value of loans and receivables at 28 February 2014 was US$1,000,000 (28 February 2013: US$7,834,000).
The carrying amounts of trade receivables and trade payables are deemed to be their fair value due to their short term nature.
5. Critical Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty
The following are the key assumptions and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year:
Fair value of investments at fair value through profit or loss ("FVTPL")
Certain investments are classified as FVTPL, and valued accordingly, as disclosed in Note 2. The key source of estimation uncertainty is on the valuation of unquoted equities and equity-related securities.
In reaching its valuation of the unquoted equities and equity-related securities the key judgements the Board has to make relate to the selection of the multiples and the discount factors used in the valuation models.
Loans and receivables
Certain investments are classified as Loans and Receivables, and valued accordingly, as disclosed in Note 2. The key estimation is the impairment review and the key assumptions are as disclosed in Note 2.
Investment in associate
The policies applied in accounting for the Company's associate require significant judgement. Full details are disclosed in Note 2c.
Assessment as an investment entity
The Board has concluded that the Company meets the definition of an investment entity and as such, does not consolidate its subsidiary but rather values it at fair value through profit or loss as described in note 2.
6. |
Net gains on investments at fair value through profit or loss |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net movement in unrealised gains/(losses) in the year |
|
|
|
55,009 |
|
4,593 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from investments realised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,247 |
|
185,577 |
|
Cost of investments realised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,978) |
|
(158,074) |
|
Realised gains (proceeds less cost to JZCP) |
|
|
|
|
|
4,269 |
|
27,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains in prior periods now realised |
|
|
|
|
|
(3,870) |
|
(18,210) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realised gains in the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
9,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on investments in the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,408 |
|
13,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Net write back of impairments/(impairments on) loans and receivables |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (impairments on)/ write back of impairments on loans and receivables |
|
|
(77) |
|
211 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from investments previously written off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
814 |
|
|
Proceeds from investments repaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,584 |
|
15,226 |
|
Cost of investments repaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,584) |
|
(15,226) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realised gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (impairments on)/write back of impairments on loans and receivables |
|
|
(77) |
|
1,025 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from investments classified as FVTPL |
|
|
|
|
38,969 |
|
39,129 |
|
Income from investments classified as loans and receivables |
|
|
215 |
|
2,214 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,184 |
|
41,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the year ended 28 February 2014
|
|
Preferred |
Loan note |
Other |
Other |
|
||
|
Dividends |
Dividends |
PIK |
|
Cash |
Interest |
Income |
Total |
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US micro cap portfolio |
- |
15,213 |
9,272 |
|
6,725 |
- |
- |
31,210 |
European micro cap portfolio |
- |
- |
1,569 |
|
555 |
- |
- |
2,124 |
Mezzanine portfolio |
- |
- |
77 |
|
138 |
- |
- |
215 |
Bank debt |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
1,307 |
- |
1,307 |
Listed investments |
2,804 |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
2,804 |
Treasury gilts and corporate bonds |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
1,029 |
- |
1,029 |
Real estate |
- |
- |
495 |
|
- |
- |
- |
495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
2,804 |
15,213 |
11,413 |
|
7,418 |
2,336 |
- |
39,184 |
Income for the year ended 28 February 2013
|
|
Preferred |
Loan note |
Other |
Other |
|
||
|
Dividends |
Dividends |
PIK |
|
Cash |
Interest |
Income |
Total |
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US micro cap portfolio |
- |
13,353 |
8,887 |
|
6,891 |
- |
3 |
29,134 |
European micro cap portfolio |
- |
- |
1,075 |
|
532 |
- |
- |
1,607 |
Mezzanine portfolio |
1,023 |
9 |
195 |
|
2,019 |
- |
- |
3,246 |
Bank debt |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
2,290 |
189 |
2,479 |
Listed investments |
3,771 |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
3,771 |
Treasury gilts and corporate bonds |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
1,077 |
- |
1,077 |
Other |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
29 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,794 |
13,362 |
10,157 |
|
9,442 |
3,367 |
221 |
41,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on unlisted investments totalling US$12,035,000 (year ended 29 February 2013: US$9,575,000) has not been recognised in accordance with the Company's accounting and valuation policy.
9. Finance costs
Finance costs arising are allocated to the statement of comprehensive income using the effective interest rate method. The rights and entitlements of the ZDP shares, which are accounted for at amortised cost are described in Note 17.
10. Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Adviser's base fee |
|
|
|
|
11,220 |
|
10,707 |
Investment Adviser's incentive fee |
|
|
|
|
9,408 |
|
9,030 |
Directors' remuneration |
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,976 |
|
20,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal and professional fees |
|
|
|
|
870 |
|
1,086 |
Other expenses |
|
|
|
|
557 |
|
565 |
Accounting, secretarial and administration fees |
|
324 |
|
451 |
|||
Auditors' remuneration |
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
190 |
Auditors' remuneration - non-audit fees |
|
|
108 |
|
65 |
||
Custodian fees |
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share class restructuring costs |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
|
|
23,114 |
|
24,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors fees
The Chairman is entitled to a fee of US$140,000 per annum. As from 1 January 2014, the Chairman of the Audit Committee is entitled to a fee of US$70,000 per annum, all other directors are entitled to a fee of US$60,000. For the year ended 28 February 2014 total Directors' fees included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income were US$348,000 (year ended 28 February 2013: US$380,000), of this amount US$63,000 was outstanding at the year end (28 February 2013: US$62,000).
Investment Advisory and Performance fees
The Company entered into the amended and restated investment advisory and management agreement with Jordan/Zalaznick Advisers, Inc. (the "Investment Adviser") on 23 December 2010 (the "Advisory Agreement").
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Investment Adviser is entitled to a base management fee and to an incentive fee. The base management fee is an amount equal to 1.5 per cent. per annum of the average total assets under management of the Company less those assets identified by the Company as being excluded from the base management fee, under the terms of the agreement. The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears; the agreement provides that payments in advance on account of the base management fee will be made.
For the year ended 28 February 2014, total investment advisory and management expenses, based on the average total assets of the Company, were included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income of US$11,220,000 (year ended 28 February 2013: US$10,707,000). Of this amount US$848,000 (28 February 2013: US$715,000) was outstanding at the year end.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part is calculated by reference to the net investment income of the Company ("Income Incentive fee") and is payable quarterly in arrears provided that the net investment income for the quarter exceeds 2 per cent of the average of the net asset value of the Company for that quarter (the "hurdle") (8 per cent. annualised). The fee is an amount equal to (a) 100 per cent of that proportion of the net investment income for the quarter as exceeds the hurdle, up to an amount equal to a hurdle of 2.5%, and (b) 20 per cent. of the net investment income of the Company above a hurdle of 2.5% in any quarter. Investments categorised as legacy investments and other assets identified by the Company as being excluded are excluded from the calculation of the fee. A true-up calculation is also prepared at the end of each financial year to determine if further fees are payable to the investment adviser or if any amounts are recoverable from future income incentive fees.
For the years ended 28 February 2014 and 2013 there was no income incentive fee.
The second part of the incentive fee is calculated by reference to the net realised capital gains ("Capital Gains Incentive fee") of the Company and is equal to: 20 per cent. of the realised capital gains of the Company for each financial year less all realised capital losses of the Company for the year less (b) the aggregate of all previous capital gains incentive fees paid by the Company to the Investment Adviser. The capital gains incentive is payable in arrears within 90 days of the fiscal year end. Investments categorised as legacy investments and assets of the Euro Microcap Fund 2010, LP are excluded from the calculation of the fee.
For the purpose of calculating incentive fees cumulative preferred dividends received on the disposal of an investment are treated as a capital return rather than a receipt of income.
A capital gains incentive fee based on realised gains during the year ended 28 February 2014 of US$3,115,000 is payable to the Investment Adviser. The Company also provides for a capital gains incentive fee based on unrealised gains. For the year ended 28 February 2014 a provision of US$3,503,000 (28 February 2013: nil) has been included.
In 2012, an income incentive fee of US$4,411,000 was paid to the Investment Advisor on the basis that net investment income for the quarter ended 30 November 2011 exceeded the hurdle rate of 2% (8% per annum), the income incentive fee was shown as a contingent asset in the Company's financial statements for the years ended 29 February 2012 and 28 February 2013 as the annual hurdle for the year ended 29 February 2012 had not been exceeded. A re-interpretation in the current period of the Advisory Agreement resulted in cumulative preferred dividends being treated as capital rather than income for the purpose of the incentive fee calculations. Retrospective amendment to the fees resulted in the write back this year of the US$4,411,000 and additional capital incentive fees payable to the Investment Adviser of US$7,201,000 on prior year realisations.
Total incentive fees payable to the Investment Adviser within 90 days of the year ended total US$5,907,000.
The Advisory agreement may be terminated by the Company or the Investment Advisor upon not less than two and one-half years' (i.e. 913 days') prior notice (or such lesser period as may be agreed by the Company and Investment Adviser).
Administration fees
Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Guernsey) Limited was appointed as Administrator to the Company on 1 September 2012. The Administrator is entitled to a fee payable quarterly in arrears. Fees payable to the Administrator are fixed for the three years from the date of appointment and are then subsequently subject to an annual fee review.
Custodian fees
HSBC Bank (USA) N.A, (the "Custodian") was appointed on 12 May 2008 under a custodian agreement. The Custodian is entitled to receive an annual fee of US$2,000 and a transaction fee of US$50 per transaction. For the year ended 28 February 2014 total Custodian expenses of US$63,000 (28 February 2013: US$48,000) were included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income of which US$16,000 (28 February 2013: US$7,000) was outstanding at the year end and is included within Other Payables.
Auditors remuneration
All of the auditors remuneration relates to the annual audit and half year review report. During the year ended 28 February 2014, professional fees of US$65,000 were paid to Ernst & Young for taxation services (28 February 2013: $65,000).
11. Taxation
For both 2014 and 2013 the Company applied for and was granted exempt status for Guernsey tax purposes under the terms of The Income Tax (Zero 10) (Guernsey) Law, 2007.
For the year ended 28 February 2014 the Company incurred withholding tax of US$841,000 (28 February 2013: US$1,131,000) on dividend income from listed investments.
12. Investments
Categories of financial instruments |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Listed |
|
Unlisted |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) |
|
|
|
125,130 |
|
666,236 |
|
791,366 |
|
|
Loans and receivables |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
1,000 |
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,130 |
|
667,236 |
|
792,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed |
|
Unlisted |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
Book cost at 1 March 2013 |
|
|
|
|
102,384 |
|
541,869 |
|
644,253 |
|
Purchases in year |
|
|
|
|
39,336 |
|
156,190 |
|
195,526 |
|
Capital calls during year |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
31,035 |
|
31,035 |
|
Payment in kind ("PIK") |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
25,566 |
|
25,566 |
|
Proceeds from investments disposed/realised |
|
|
(42,366) |
|
(101,464) |
|
(143,830) |
|
||
Realised gains on disposal |
|
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
3,243 |
|
4,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book cost at 28 February 2014 |
|
|
|
|
100,380 |
|
656,439 |
|
756,819 |
|
Unrealised gains at 28 February 2014 |
|
|
24,655 |
|
1,271 |
|
25,926 |
|
||
Accrued interest at 28 February 2014 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
9,526 |
|
9,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at 28 February 2014 |
|
|
|
|
125,130 |
|
667,236 |
|
792,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed |
|
Unlisted |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2013 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) |
|
|
|
113,328 |
|
506,189 |
|
619,517 |
|
|
Loans and receivables |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
8,765 |
|
8,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,328 |
|
514,954 |
|
628,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed |
|
Unlisted |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2013 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
Book cost at 1 March 2012 |
|
|
|
|
132,577 |
|
381,086 |
|
513,663 |
|
Purchases in year |
|
|
|
|
79,316 |
|
174,607 |
|
253,923 |
|
Capital calls during year |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
13,275 |
|
13,275 |
|
Payment in kind ("PIK") |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
21,466 |
|
21,466 |
|
Proceeds from investments disposed/realised |
|
|
(129,934) |
|
(56,457) |
|
(186,391) |
|
||
Realised gains on disposal |
|
|
|
|
20,425 |
|
7,892 |
|
28,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book cost at 28 February 2013 |
|
|
|
|
102,384 |
|
541,869 |
|
644,253 |
|
Unrealised gains/(losses) at 28 February 2013 |
|
|
10,877 |
|
(36,016) |
|
(25,139) |
|
||
Accrued interest at 28 February 2013 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
9,101 |
|
9,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at 28 February 2013 |
|
|
|
|
113,328 |
|
514,954 |
|
628,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above book cost is the cost to JZCP equating to the transfer value as at 1 July 2008 upon the liquidation of JZEP and adjusted for subsequent transactions.
The cost of PIK investments is deemed to be interest not received in cash but settled by the issue of further securities when that interest has been recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Investment in associate
As at 28 February 2014, the Company had a direct investment in the following associate: |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity |
Place of incorporation |
|
Principal activity |
|
% Interest |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EuroMicrocap Fund 2010, LP |
Cayman |
|
|
Acquiror of Europe-based microcap companies |
|
75% |
The Company has elected for an exemption from the IAS 28 equity method. Therefore the Company values its associate at fair value through profit or loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EuroMicrocap Fund 2010, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,115 |
|
113,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in associate at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
150,115 |
|
113,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company may have ownership that is above 20% in other investments but does not have significant influence, therefore these are not classified as associates.
Restrictions
There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the associate to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, or repayment of loans or advances. However, the company has not received any funds from the associate.
Investment in subsidiary
As at 28 February 2014, the Company had a direct investment in the following subsidiary:
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JZCP Realty Fund, Ltd |
|
|
|
|
112,792 |
|
30,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries at fair value |
|
|
|
112,792 |
|
30,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company meets the definition of an investment entity. Therefore, it does not consolidate its subsidiaries but rather recognises them as investments at fair value through profit or loss.
Unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
Place of incorporation |
|
% Interest |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JZCP Realty Fund, Ltd |
|
|
Cayman |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above subsidiary controls the following subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity |
|
|
Place of incorporation |
|
% Interest |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JZ REIT Fund Metropolitan, LLC |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
99% |
JZCP Loan Metropolitan Corp |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
100% |
JZ REIT Fund 1, LLC |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
99% |
JZCP Loan 1 Corp |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
100% |
JZ REIT Fund Flatbush Portfolio, LLC |
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
99% |
|
JZCP Loan Flatbush Portfolio Corp |
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
100% |
|
JZ REIT Fund Flatbush, LLC |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
99% |
JZCP Loan Flatbush Corp |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
100% |
JZ REIT Fund Fulton, LLC |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
99% |
JZCP Loan Fulton Corp |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
100% |
JZCP Loan Greenpoint Corp. |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
99% |
JZ REIT Fund Greenpoint, LLC |
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
100% |
Restrictions
The Company receives income in the form of interest from its investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, and there are no significant restrictions on the transfer of funds from these entities to the Company.
Support
The Company has no contractual commitments to provide any financial or other support to its unconsolidated subsidiaries.
13. Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,372 |
|
39,612 |
Money Market Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
55,497 |
Cash held on deposit with maturity of less than 3 months |
|
|
|
- |
|
7,631 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and cash held on deposits |
|
|
|
11,372 |
|
102,740 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents comprise bank balances and cash held by the Company including short-term bank deposits and investments in money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less. In the prior year cash held on deposit had a maturity date of greater than 3 months. The carrying value of these assets approximates to their fair value.
14. Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividend income on listed investments |
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
486 |
||
Other receivables and prepayments |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517 |
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Other payables
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for tax on dividends received not withheld at source |
|
1,004 |
|
1,004 |
|||
Structured forward currency contract |
|
|
|
721 |
|
- |
|
Legal fees |
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
250 |
Fees due to administrator |
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
174 |
Other expenses |
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
201 |
Auditors' remuneration |
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
110 |
Custody fees |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
1,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Loan payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
Loan payable |
|
|
|
|
|
17,839 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,839 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 28 February 2014, the Company had a loan facility with Deutsche Bank allowing the Company to draw down a total of US$52.0 million. At the year end the loan outstanding was US$17.8 million and a further US$34.2 million was available to draw down. The loan is secured by the Company's investments in corporate bonds and UK Gilts, the total value of assets held as collateral at 28 February 2014 was US$59.6 million. The interest rate for the loan is charged at 30 day Libor +75 basis points.
The carrying value of the loans approximates to fair value and would be designated as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
17. Zero Dividend Preference ("ZDP") shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZDP shares issued 22 June 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortised cost at 1 March |
89,839 |
87,281 |
|||||
Finance costs allocated to statement of comprehensive income |
7,489 |
7,007 |
|||||
Unrealised currency loss/(gain) to the Company on translation during the year |
9,873 |
(4,449) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortised cost at year end |
107,201 |
89,839 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of ZDP shares in issue |
20,707,141 |
20,707,141 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZDP shares were issued on 22 June 2009 at a price of 215.80 pence and are designed to provide a pre-determined final capital entitlement of 369.84 pence on 22 June 2016 which ranks behind the Company's creditors but in priority to the capital entitlements of the Ordinary shares. The ZDP shares carry no entitlement to income and the whole of their return will therefore take the form of capital. The capital appreciation of approximately 8% per annum is calculated monthly. In certain circumstances, ZDP shares carry the right to vote at general meetings of the Company as detailed in the Company's Memorandum of Articles and Incorporation. Issue costs are deducted from the cost of the liability and allocated to the statement of comprehensive income over the life of the ZDP shares.
18. Share Capital
Authorised Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited number of ordinary shares of no par value. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares - Issued Capital |
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares |
|
Number of shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1 March |
|
|
|
65,018,607 |
|
37,319,238 |
|
Converted from Limited Voting Ordinary shares |
|
|
- |
|
27,699,369 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ordinary shares in issue |
|
|
|
|
65,018,607 |
|
65,018,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Voting Ordinary shares - Issued Capital |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares |
|
Number of shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1 March |
|
|
|
- |
|
27,699,369 |
|
Converted to Ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
(27,699,369) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total limited voting ordinary shares in issue |
|
|
- |
|
- |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares in issue |
|
|
|
|
65,018,607 |
|
65,018,607 |
On 31 July 2012 the Company announced the cancellation of the listing of its Ordinary shares on the premium segment of the Official List and trading on the London Stock Exchange's main market for listed securities. Subsequently the Company's shares were admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange's Specialist Fund Market. The Company also announced the admission to listing on the Channel Islands Securities Exchange.
The Ordinary shares carry a right to receive the profits of the Company available for distribution by dividend and resolved to be distributed by way of dividend to be made at such time as determined by the Directors.
In addition to receiving the income distributed, the Ordinary shares are entitled to the net assets of the Company on a winding up, after all liabilities have been settled and the entitlement of the ZDP shares have been met. In addition, holders of Ordinary shares will be entitled on a winding up to receive any accumulated but unpaid revenue reserves of the Company, subject to all creditors having been paid out in full but in priority to the entitlements of the ZDP shares. Any distribution of revenue reserves on a winding up is currently expected to be made by way of a final special dividend prior to the Company's eventual liquidation.
Holders of Ordinary shares have the rights to receive notice of, to attend and to vote at all general meetings of the Company.
19. Capital management
The Company's capital is represented by the Ordinary shares and ZDP shares.
As a result of the ability to issue, repurchase and resell shares, the capital of the Company can vary. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements and has no restrictions on the issue, repurchase or resale of its shares.
The Company's objectives for managing capital are:
• To invest the capital in investments meeting the description, risk exposure and expected return indicated in its prospectus.
• To achieve consistent returns while safeguarding capital by investing in a diversified portfolio.
• To maintain sufficient liquidity to meet the expenses of the Company.
• To maintain sufficient size to make the operation of the Company cost-efficient.
The Company continues to keep under review opportunities to buy back Ordinary or ZDP shares.
The Company monitors capital by analysing the NAV per share over time and tracking the discount to the Company's share price. It also monitors the performance of the existing investments to identify opportunities for exiting at a reasonable return to the shareholders.
20. Reserves
Capital raised on formation of Company
The Royal Court of Guernsey granted that on the admission of the Company's shares to the official list and to trading on the London Stock Exchange's market, the amount credited to the share premium account of the Company immediately following the admission of such shares be cancelled and any surplus thereby created accrue to the Company's distributable reserves to be used for all purposes permitted by the Companies Law, including the purchase of shares and the payment of dividends.
Capital raised on issue of new shares
Subsequent amounts raised by the issue of new shares, net of issue costs, are credited to the share capital account.
Distributable reserves
Subject to satisfaction of the solvency test, all of the Company's capital and reserves are distributable in accordance with The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008.
Summary of reserves attributable to Ordinary shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable reserve |
|
|
353,528 |
|
353,528 |
|||||
Share capital account |
|
|
149,269 |
|
149,269 |
|||||
Capital reserve |
|
|
76,788 |
|
50,512 |
|||||
Revenue reserve |
|
|
86,871 |
|
76,873 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666,456 |
|
630,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no movement in the Company's share capital account and distributable reserve for the years ended 28 February 2014 and 2013.
Capital reserve
All surpluses arising from the realisation or revaluation of investments and all other capital profits and accretions of capital are credited to the Capital reserve. Any loss arising from the realisation or revaluation of investments or any expense, loss or liability classified as capital in nature may be debited to the Capital reserve.
|
|
|
|
|
Capital reserve |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realised |
|
Unrealised |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 March 2013 |
92,834 |
|
(42,322) |
|
50,512 |
|
|||||
Net gains on investments |
4,291 |
|
51,117 |
|
55,408 |
|
|||||
Net gains on foreign currency exchange |
|
|
371 |
|
(10,428) |
|
(10,057) |
|
|||
Realised gains on investments held in escrow accounts |
|
|
2,233 |
|
- |
|
2,233 |
|
|||
Expenses charged to capital |
|
|
(13,819) |
|
- |
|
(13,819) |
|
|||
Finance costs in respect of Zero Dividend Preference Shares |
|
|
- |
|
(7,489) |
|
(7,489) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
At 28 February 2014 |
85,910 |
|
(9,122) |
|
76,788 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital reserve |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realised |
|
Unrealised |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2013 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 March 2012 |
|
|
68,107 |
|
(26,332) |
|
41,775 |
|||||
Net gains on investments |
|
|
28,389 |
|
(13,478) |
|
14,911 |
|||||
Net gains/(losses) on foreign currency exchange |
|
|
|
|
(580) |
|
4,495 |
|
3,915 |
|||
Realised gains on investments held in escrow accounts |
|
|
|
|
7,528 |
|
- |
|
7,528 |
|||
Expenses charged to capital |
|
|
|
|
(10,610) |
|
- |
|
(10,610) |
|||
Finance costs in respect of Zero Dividend Preference shares |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
(7,007) |
|
(7,007) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
At 28 February 2013 |
|
|
92,834 |
|
(42,322) |
|
50,512 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue reserve |
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 March |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,873 |
|
70,890 |
|||
Profit for the year attributable to revenue |
|
|
|
|
29,178 |
|
27,113 |
|||||
Dividend paid |
|
|
|
|
(19,180) |
|
(21,130) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 28 February |
|
|
|
|
86,871 |
|
76,873 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21. Financial Instruments
Strategy in using financial instruments
The Company's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, fair value interest rate risk, cash flow interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company's overall risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the Company's financial performance.
Categories of financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
791,366 |
|
619,517 |
|
Loans and receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
8,765 |
Other receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517 |
|
552 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,372 |
|
102,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
804,255 |
|
731,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valued at amortised cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,839) |
|
- |
Zero Dividend Preference ("ZDP") shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,201) |
|
(89,839) |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,759) |
|
(11,553) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,799) |
|
(101,392) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and receivables presented above represent mezzanine loans.
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost presented above represent ZDP shares, loans payable and trade payables as detailed in the statement of financial position.
22. Financial risk and management objectives and policies
Introduction
The Company's objective in managing risk is the creation and protection of shareholder value. Risk is inherent in the Company's activities, but it is managed through a process of ongoing identification, measurement and monitoring, subject to risk limits and other controls. The process of risk management is critical to the Company's continuing profitability. The Company is exposed to market risk (which includes currency risk, interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk arising from the financial instruments it holds.
Risk management structure
The Company's Investment Adviser is responsible for identifying and controlling risks. The Directors supervise the Investment Adviser and are ultimately responsible for the overall risk management approach within the Company.
Risk mitigation
The Company's prospectus sets out its overall business strategies, its tolerance for risk and its general risk management philosophy. The Company may use derivatives and other instruments for trading purposes and in connection with its risk management activities.
Market risk
Market risk is defined as "the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in variables such as equity price, interest rate and foreign currency rate".
Market price risk
The Company's investments are subject to normal market fluctuations and there can be no assurance that no depreciation in the value of those investments will occur. There can be no guarantee that any realisation of an investment will be on a basis which necessarily reflects the Company's valuation of that investment for the purposes of calculating the Net Asset Value of the Shares.
Changes in industry conditions, competition, political and diplomatic events, tax, environmental and other laws and other factors, whether affecting the United States alone or other countries and regions more widely, can substantially and either adversely or favourably affect the value of the securities in which the Company invests and, therefore, the Company's performance and prospects.
The Company's market price risk is managed through diversification of the investment portfolio across various sectors. The Investment Adviser considers each investment purchase to ensure that an acquisition will enable the Company to continue to have an appropriate spread of market risk and that an appropriate risk/reward profile is maintained.
Equity price risk is the risk of unfavourable changes in the fair values of equity investments as a result of changes in the value of individual shares. The equity price risk exposure arises from the Company's investments in equity securities. The company has two listed equity investments valued at US$65,423,000 (28 February 2013: two investments valued at US$55,069,000) which are listed on the NASDAQ, and NYSE.
A 10% increase/decrease in the carrying value of listed investments at 28 February 2014 would increase/decrease the net assets attributable to shareholders by US$6,542,000 (28 February 2013: US$5,507,000).
The Company does not generally invest in liquid equity investments and the current portfolio of the listed equity investments result from the successful flotation of unlisted investments.
Management's best estimate of the effect on the net assets attributable to shareholders and on the profit for the year due to a reasonably possible change in equity indices, with all other variables held constant is indicated in the table below. In practice, the actual trading results may differ from the sensitivity analysis below and the difference could be material. An equivalent decrease in each of the indices shown below would have resulted in an equivalent, but opposite, impact.
Equity price risk (listed investments)
The table below analyses the Company's concentration of equity price risk by industrial distribution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Equity Securities |
|
Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2013 |
Property and Casualty Insurance |
|
|
|
98.6% |
98.6% |
||
Education and Training Services |
|
|
|
1.4% |
1.4% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0% |
100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has certain financial instruments (common stock private investments) that are recorded at fair value using valuation techniques such as earnings multiple model derived either from acquisition/purchase information or observable market data from comparable companies. In some cases an adjustment is made to the acquisition/purchase multiple to reflect the underlying growth of the investment. These are adjusted to reflect counter party credit risk and limitations in the model.
Equity price risk (unlisted investments)
For the financial instruments whose fair value is estimated using valuation techniques with no market observable inputs, the net unrealised amount recorded in the statement of comprehensive income in the year due to changes in the inputs amounts to gains of US$47,604,000 (28 February 2013: losses of US$2,558,000).
Sensitivity analysis relating to changes in unobservable inputs and the effect on the fair value of Equity and other unlisted investments is found in Note 4 of these financial statements.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in interest rates will affect future cash flows or the fair values of financial instruments. It has not been the Company's policy to use derivative instruments to mitigate interest rate risk, as the Investment Adviser believes that the effectiveness of such instruments does not justify the costs involved.
The table below summarises the Company's exposure to interest rate risks:
|
|
|
|
Non interest |
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
Floating rate |
bearing |
Total |
|
|
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2014 |
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value through profit or loss |
601,341 |
11,810 |
178,215 |
791,366 |
|
Loans and receivables |
|
1,000 |
- |
- |
1,000 |
Other receivables and prepayments |
|
- |
- |
517 |
517 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
- |
11,372 |
- |
11,372 |
Loan payable |
|
- |
(17,839) |
- |
(17,839) |
Zero Dividend Preference shares |
|
(107,201) |
- |
- |
(107,201) |
Other payables |
|
- |
- |
(12,759) |
(12,759) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets |
|
495,140 |
5,343 |
165,973 |
666,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest |
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
Floating rate |
bearing |
Total |
|
|
28/02/2013 |
28/02/2013 |
28/02/2013 |
28/02/2013 |
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value through profit or loss |
526,308 |
38,140 |
55,069 |
619,517 |
|
Loans and receivables |
|
8,765 |
- |
- |
8,765 |
Cash held on deposit (maturity date > 3 months) |
- |
- |
552 |
552 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
- |
102,740 |
- |
102,740 |
Zero Dividend Preference shares |
|
(89,839) |
- |
- |
(89,839) |
Other payables |
|
- |
- |
(11,553) |
(11,553) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets |
|
445,234 |
140,880 |
44,068 |
630,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income receivable by the Company is not subject to significant amounts of risk due to fluctuations in the prevailing levels of market interest rates. However, whilst the income received from fixed rate securities is unaffected by changes in interest rates, the investments are subject to risk in the movement of fair value. The Investment Adviser considers the risk in the movement of fair value as a result of changes in the market interest rate for fixed rate securities to be insignificant, hence no sensitivity analysis is provided.
Of the money held on deposit, US$11,372,000 (28 February 2013: US$47,243,000) earns interest at variable rates and the income may rise and fall depending on changes to interest rates.
The sensitivity of the bank debt's market value is not influenced by a change in prevailing interest rates, because they are floating rate instruments. The market value of bank debt is influenced by factors such as the performance of the issuer and bank liquidity.
The data below demonstrates the sensitivity of the Company's profit/(loss) for the year to a reasonably possible change in interest rates, with all other variables held constant.
The sensitivity of the profit on interest received on cash and cash equivalents is the effect of the assumed changes in the daily interest rates throughout the year to 28 February 2014 and year ended 28 February 2013, on accounts where cash is held:
The sensitivity of the profit for the year on investment income received on bank debt is the effect of the assumed changes in the 3 month Libor on which the interest paid was derived.
Change in basis points Increase/(decrease) |
Sensitivity of interest income Increase/(decrease) receivable on cash and cash equivalents |
Sensitivity of investment income Increase/(decrease) receivable on bank debt |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+25 / -25 |
|
|
106/(106) |
|
167/(167) |
|
|
|
30/(30) |
|
|
|
45/(45) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+100 / -100 |
|
|
424/(130) |
|
666/(200) |
|
|
|
119/(119) |
|
|
|
182/(182) |
The following table analyses the Company's interest rate exposure in terms of the assets and liabilities maturity dates.
28/02/2014 |
0-3 months |
4-12 months |
1-2 years |
2-5 years |
More than 5 years |
No maturity date |
Non- interest bearing |
Total |
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
11,372 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11,372 |
Financial asset at fair value through profit or loss |
11,810 |
38,328 |
58,560 |
108,015 |
11,855 |
179,517 |
383,281 |
791,366 |
Loans and receivables |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,000 |
- |
1,000 |
Loan payable |
- |
- |
- |
(17,839) |
- |
- |
- |
(17,839) |
Zero Dividend Preference Shares |
- |
- |
- |
(107,201) |
- |
- |
- |
(107,201) |
Other receivables / payables |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(12,242) |
(12,242) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,182 |
38,328 |
58,560 |
(17,025) |
11,855 |
180,517 |
371,039 |
666,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
102,740 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
102,740 |
Financial asset at fair value through profit or loss |
- |
16,686 |
37,581 |
131,564 |
21,886 |
11,267 |
400,533 |
619,517 |
Loans and receivables |
- |
- |
- |
8,515 |
- |
250 |
- |
8,765 |
Zero Dividend Preference Shares |
- |
- |
- |
(89,839) |
- |
- |
- |
(89,839) |
Other receivables / payables |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(11,001) |
(11,001) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,740 |
16,686 |
37,581 |
50,240 |
21,886 |
11,517 |
389,532 |
630,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Investment Adviser monitors the Company's overall interest sensitivity on a regular basis by reference to prevailing interest rates and the level of the Company's cash balances. The Company has not used derivatives to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates.
Credit risk
The Company takes on exposures to credit risk, which is the risk that a counterparty to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss to the Company by failing to discharge an obligation. These credit exposures exist within investment classified as FVTPL, debt investments, loans and receivables and cash & cash equivalents.
They may arise, for example, from a decline in the financial condition of a counterparty, from entering into derivative contracts under which counterparties have obligations to make payments to the Company. As the Company's credit exposure increases, it could have an adverse effect on the Company's business and profitability if material unexpected credit losses were to occur.
In the event of any default on the Company's loan investments by a counterparty, the Company will bear a risk of loss of principal and accrued interest of the investment, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's income and potential to pay dividends to Shareholders and to redeem the ZDP Shares.
In accordance with the Company's policy, the Investment Adviser monitors the Company's exposure to credit risk on a regular basis, by reviewing the financial statements, budgets and forecasts of underlying investee companies.
The table below analyses the Company's maximum exposure to credit risk. The maximum exposure is shown gross at the reporting date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,810 |
|
|
|
11,690 |
||
Mezzanine Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
11,294 |
||
US Micro Cap Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
341,560 |
|
|
|
342,567 |
||
European Micro Cap Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,781 |
|
|
|
107,463 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,372 |
|
|
|
102,740 |
||
Accrued dividend income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
486 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,715 |
|
|
|
576,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A proportion of Micro Cap and Mezzanine debt held does not entitle the Company to interest payment in cash. This interest is capitalised (PIK) and as a result has substantial credit risk as there is no return to the Company until the loan plus all the interest, is repaid in full. Of the US$215,000 (28 February 2013: US$2,214,000) interest that was recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income on investments classified as loans and receivables during the year US$77,000 (28 February 2013: US$195,000) was receivable in the form of PIK Investments. There is no collateral held in respect of Mezzanine debt forming the loans and receivables.
An impairment review is performed by the Investment Adviser on an investment by investment basis every quarter.
During the year ended 28 February 2014 there was an increase in the allowance for impairment in respect of loans and receivables of US$77,000 (28 February 2013: write back of impairment of US$211,000). Total impairment of loans and receivables at 28 February 2014 was US$7,176,000 (28 February 2013: US$ 7,099,000)
Mezzanine investments typically have no or a limited trading market and therefore such investments will be illiquid, and as such the Company's ability to sell them in the short term may be limited.
The Investment Adviser closely monitors the creditworthiness of mezzanine debt counterparties and other loans and receivables and upon unfavourable change, may seek to terminate the agreement or to obtain collateral. The creditworthiness is monitored by the reviewing of quarterly covenant agreements and by the Investment Adviser having board representation on a significant number of these investees.
Bank debt designated at fair value through profit or loss
As at 28 February 2014 and 28 February 2013, the Company's only investment in Bank Debt was Dekko Technologies LLC, a private company whose debt was neither listed or credit rated.
The following table analyses the concentration of credit risk in the Company's debt portfolio by industrial distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
Healthcare Services & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
31% |
|
25% |
Financial General |
|
|
|
|
14% |
|
21% |
Water Treatment / Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
11% |
|
9% |
Private Security |
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
- |
Support Services |
|
|
|
|
9% |
|
9% |
Electronic & Electrical Equipment |
|
|
|
|
6% |
|
5% |
Industrial Engineering |
|
|
|
|
5% |
|
6% |
House, Leisure & Personal Goods |
|
|
|
|
4% |
|
3% |
Logistics |
|
|
|
|
4% |
|
- |
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
2% |
|
- |
Document Processing |
|
|
|
|
2% |
|
- |
Telecom |
|
|
|
|
2% |
|
- |
Industrial Services |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
22% |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
100% |
The table below analyses the Company's cash and cash equivalents and cash deposits by rating agency category.
|
|
|
Credit ratings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard & Poor's Outlook |
Fitch LT Issuer Default Rating |
|
28/02/2014 |
|
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
Cash deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC Bank USA NA |
|
|
Negative |
AA- |
|
- |
|
7,654 |
Deutsche Bank |
|
|
Negative |
A+ |
|
- |
|
47,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
55,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC Bank USA NA |
|
|
Negative |
AA- |
|
10,832 |
|
29,661 |
Deutsche Bank |
|
|
Negative |
A+ |
|
498 |
|
17,524 |
Northern Trust (Guernsey) Limited |
|
|
Stable |
AA- |
|
42 |
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,372 |
|
47,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy or insolvency of the Banks may cause the Company's rights with respect to these assets to be delayed or limited. The Investment Adviser monitors risk by reviewing the credit rating of the Bank. If credit quality deteriorates, the Investment Adviser may move the holdings to another bank.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities. Liquidity risk arises because of the possibility that the Company could be required to pay its liabilities earlier than expected.
Many of the Company's investments are private equity, mezzanine loans and other unlisted investments. By their nature, these investments will generally be of a long term and illiquid nature and there may be no readily available market for sale of these investments.
The closed-ended nature of the Company enables the Investment Advisor to manage the risk of illiquid investments. The Directors review liquidity reports and consider how best to utilise the funds generated to maximise income.
There are no restrictions on the saleability of the listed investments.
The Company has outstanding investment commitments at the year end of US$73,995,000 (2013: US$40,032,000) see Note 26. The Company manages liquidity levels to ensure these obligations can be met.
The table below analyses the Company's financial liabilities into relevant maturity groups based on the remaining period at the reporting date to the contractual maturity date. The amounts in the table are not discounted to the net present value of the future cash outflows as it is not considered significant.
At 28 February 2014 |
Less than 1 month |
|
2-12 months |
|
1-5 years |
|
>5 years |
|
No stated maturity |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable |
- |
|
- |
|
17,839 |
|
- |
|
- |
Other payables |
12,759 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Zero Dividend Preference shares |
- |
|
- |
|
128,342 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,759 |
|
- |
|
146,181 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 28 February 2013 |
Less than 1 month |
|
2-12 months |
|
1-5 years |
|
>5 years |
|
No stated maturity |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables |
11,553 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Zero Dividend Preference shares |
- |
|
- |
|
116,252 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,553 |
|
- |
|
116,252 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a capital requirement to pay ZDP shareholders a pre determined final capital entitlement of 369.84 pence on 22 June 2016. As at 28 February 2014 the liability to the ZDP shareholders amounted to US$107,201,000 (28 February 2013: US$89,839,000).
Currency risk
Currency risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in foreign exchange rates.
Zero dividend preference shares are denominated in Sterling. The Company has an obligation to redeem the ZDP shareholders on 22 June 2016. The total liability on the redemption date, 22 June 2016, will be GBP76,583,969. The Company currently has no hedge to manage this risk to Sterling.
The following table sets out the Company's exposure by currency to foreign currency risk.
At 28 February 2014 |
|
US dollar |
Euro |
Sterling |
Total |
|
|
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2014 |
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss |
561,293 |
186,781 |
43,292 |
791,366 |
|
Loans and receivables |
|
1,000 |
- |
- |
1,000 |
Other receivables |
|
486 |
- |
31 |
517 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
9,584 |
923 |
865 |
11,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
572,363 |
187,704 |
44,188 |
804,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable |
|
17,839 |
- |
- |
17,839 |
Zero Dividend Preference shares |
|
- |
- |
107,201 |
107,201 |
Other payables |
|
12,759 |
- |
- |
12,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
30,598 |
- |
107,201 |
137,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net currency exposure |
|
541,765 |
187,704 |
(63,013) |
666,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has entered into a Structured Forward Currency Contract. If the US$/€ exchange rate reaches the trigger rate of 1.4, the Company will buy €13,000,000 at a cost of US$16,900,000.
At 28 February 2013 |
|
US dollar |
Euro |
Sterling |
Total |
|
|
28/02/2013 |
28/02/2013 |
28/02/2013 |
28/02/2013 |
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss |
482,435 |
105,273 |
31,809 |
619,517 |
|
Loans and receivables |
|
8,765 |
- |
- |
8,765 |
Other receivables |
|
486 |
- |
66 |
552 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
92,202 |
1,435 |
9,103 |
102,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583,888 |
106,708 |
40,978 |
731,574 |
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Zero Dividend Preference shares |
|
- |
- |
89,839 |
89,839 |
Other payables |
|
11,411 |
- |
142 |
11,553 |
Bank overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,411 |
- |
89,981 |
101,392 |
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net currency exposure |
|
572,477 |
106,708 |
(49,003) |
630,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23. Basic and Diluted Earnings per share
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing the earnings for the period by the weighted average number of Ordinary shares outstanding during the period.
For the years ended 28 February 2014 and 28 February 2013 the weighted average number of Ordinary shares (including Limited voting ordinary shares) outstanding during the year was 65,018,607.
24. Net Asset Value Per Share
The net asset value per Ordinary share of US$10.25 (28 February 2013: US$9.69) is based on the net assets at the year end of US$666,454,000 (28 February 2013: US$630,182,000) and on 65,018,607 (28 February 2013: 65,018,607) Ordinary shares, being the number of Ordinary shares in issue at the year end.
25. Notes to the Cash Flow Statement
Reconciliation of the profit for the year to net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
55,454 |
35,850 |
Decrease/(increase) in other receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
(94) |
Increase in other payables |
|
|
|
|
|
1,206 |
2,891 |
Net movement in unrealised gains on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
(54,935) |
(4,875) |
Net impairments on/(write back) of impairments on loans and receivables |
|
|
77 |
(211) |
|||
Adjustment for foreign currency exchange gains/(losses) on ZDP Shares |
9,873 |
(4,449) |
|||||
Realised gain on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
(476) |
(9,896) |
Increase in accrued interest on investments and adjustment for PIK interest |
|
|
(26,019) |
(24,027) |
|||
Finance costs in respect of Zero Dividend Preference shares |
7,489 |
7,007 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
(7,296) |
2,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income received during the year |
|
|
|
Year ended |
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on investments |
|
|
|
10,215 |
11,125 |
Dividends from listed investments |
|
|
|
2,804 |
3,690 |
Bank interest |
|
|
|
130 |
393 |
Other income |
|
|
|
- |
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,149 |
15,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and sales of investments are considered to be operating activities of the Company, given its purpose, rather than investing activities. The cash flows arising from these activities are shown in the Cash Flow Statement.
26. Commitments
At 28 February 2014 JZCP had the following financial commitments outstanding in relation to fund investments:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ '000 |
US$ '000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EuroMicrocap Fund 2010, LP (related party) |
|
|
|
|
45,287 |
20,072 |
Constituent Capital Management, LLC |
|
|
|
|
11,083 |
12,833 |
Toro Finance (€8,000,000) |
|
|
|
|
11,049 |
- |
Acon AEP Co-Invest (Suzo), LP |
|
|
|
|
4,491 |
5,042 |
Grua, LP |
|
|
|
|
2,085 |
2,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,995 |
40,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2013, the capital commitment of the EuroMicrocap Fund 2010, L.P was increased by US$75,000,000 to US$185,000,000. JZCP's 75% share of the total capital commitment as at 28 February 2014 was US$138,750,000 (28 February 2013: US$82,500,000) of which US$45,287,000 (28 February 2013: US$20,072,000) remained available for call at the year end.
27. Related Party Transactions
In 2007, JZEP invested US$250,000 in ETX Holdings, Inc. which was a spin off from Jordan Auto Aftermarket Holdings, Inc., a former co-investment with The Jordan Company. The investment was subsequently transferred to JZCP as part of the in specie transfer dated 1 July 2008. A further US$142,000 has subsequently been invested in ETX Holdings, Inc. The investments were sold/repaid during the year ended 28 February 2014. Aggregate proceeds of disposals totalled US$675,000, the value of these investments at 28 February 2013 were US$671,000.
At 28 February 2014, JZCP has invested US$93,463,000 (28 February 2013: US$62,248,000) in the EuroMicrocap Fund 2010 LP ("The Europe Fund"). At 28 February 2014 the investment was valued at US$148,230,000 (28 February 2013: US$87,567,000). The Europe Fund is managed by JZ International LLC ("JZI"), an affiliate of JZAI, JZCP's investment manager. JZAI and JZI were each founded by David Zalaznick and Jay Jordan.
The Company has invested with The Resolute Fund, which is managed by The Jordan Company, a company in which David Zalaznick and Jay Jordan are Managing Principals. Investments held by the Company and The Resolute Fund included: Kinetek, Inc.; TAL International Group, Inc.; TTS, LLC. The investments were sold/repaid during the year ended 28 February 2013. Aggregate proceeds of disposals totalled US$76,576,000, the value of these investments at 29 February 2012 were US$71,154,000.
The Company has invested with Fund A, a Limited Partnership in a number of US micro cap buyouts. Fund A is managed by JZAI. At 28 February 2014, the total amount of these co-investments was US$161,675,296 (28 February 2013: US$117,700,275) of the total amount of the co-investment US$132,004,623 (28 February 2013: US$96,099,904) was invested by the Company and US$29,670,673 (28 February 2013:US$21,600,371) was invested by Fund A.
Jordan/Zalaznick Advisers, Inc. ("JZAI"), a US based company, provides advisory services to the board of Directors of the Company in exchange for management fees, paid quarterly. Fees paid by the Company to the Investment Adviser are detailed in Note 10.
During the year ended 28 February 2014, the Company retained Ashurst LLP, a UK based law firm. David Macfarlane was a former Senior Corporate Partner at Ashurst until 2002.
The Directors' remuneration is disclosed in Note 10.
28. Controlling Party
The issued shares of the Company are owned by a number of parties, and therefore, in the opinion of the Directors, there is no ultimate controlling party of the Company, as defined by IAS 24 - Related Party Disclosures.
29. Contingent assets
Amounts held in escrow accounts
Investments have been disposed by the Company, of which the consideration given included contractual terms requiring that a percentage was held in an escrow account pending resolution of any indemnifiable claims that may arise. At 28 February 2014 the Company has assessed that the fair value of these escrow accounts are nil as it is not reasonably probable that they will be realised by the Company.
As at 28 February 2014, the Company had the following contingent assets held in escrow accounts which had not been recognised as assets of the Company:
Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
28/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$'000 |
US$'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Chemistry & Technology, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
1,613 |
1,613 |
Wound Care Solutions, Llc |
|
|
|
|
1,421 |
1,573 |
GHW (G&H Wire) |
|
|
|
|
883 |
2,609 |
N&B Industries, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
776 |
776 |
ETX Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
185 |
- |
Dantom Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
15 |
15 |
Recycled Holdings Corporation |
|
|
|
|
- |
1,300 |
Apparel Ventures, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
- |
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,893 |
8,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended 28 February 2014 net proceeds of US$2,233,000 (28 February 2013: US$7,528,000) were realised relating to the escrow accounts of the Company.
30. Dividends paid and proposed
In accordance with the Company's dividend policy, it is the Directors' intention for the year ending 28 February 2014 and thereafter to distribute approximately 3% of the Company's net assets in the form of dividends paid in US dollars (Shareholders can elect to receive dividends in Sterling). Prior to the new policy, the Directors have distributed substantially all of the Company's net cash income (after expenses) in the form of dividends.
A second interim dividend for the year ended 28 February 2013 of 15.0 cents per Ordinary share (total US$9,752,791) was paid on 14 June 2013.
For the year ended 28 February 2014 an interim dividend of 14.5 cents per Ordinary share (total US$9,427,698) was paid on 15 October 2013.
A second interim dividend for the year ended 28 February 2014 of 16.0 cents per Ordinary share (total US$10,402,978) will be paid on 6 June 2014.
31. Financial Highlights
The following table presents performance information derived from the financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share at the beginning of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
9.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance during the year (per share): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
0.23 |
Incentive fee |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.21) |
Net realised and unrealised gains |
|
|
|
|
|
0.90 |
Finance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.41) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total return |
|
|
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return |
|
|
|
|
|
5.26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income to average net assets excluding incentive fee |
|
|
|
|
4.57% |
|
Operating expenses to average net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
(2.27%) |
Incentive fees to average net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
(2.15%) |
Operating expenses to average net assets including incentive fee |
|
|
|
|
(4.42%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
(4.15%) |
32. US GAAP reconciliation
The Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS, which in certain respects differ from the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("US GAAP"). It is the opinion of the Directors that these differences are not material and therefore no reconciliation between IFRS and US GAAP has been presented.
33. Subsequent events
These financial statements were approved for issuance by the Board on 2 May 2014. Subsequent events have been evaluated until this date.
A second interim dividend for the year ended 28 February 2014 of 16.0 cents per Ordinary share (total US$10,402,978) will be paid on 6 June 2014.
Company Advisers
Investment Adviser US Bankers
The Investment Adviser to JZ Capital Partners Limited("JZCP") HSBC Bank USA NA
is Jordan/Zalaznick Advisers, Inc., ("JZAI") 452 Fifth Avenue
a company beneficially owned by John (Jay) W Jordan II and New York NY 10018
David W Zalaznick. The company was formed for the purpose (Also provides custodian services to
of advising the Board of JZCP on investments in leveraged JZ Capital Partners Limited under the terms of
securities, primarily related to private equity transactions. a Custody Agreement).
JZAI has offices in New York and Chicago.
Jordan/Zalaznick Advisers, Inc. PO Box 71
9 West, 57th Street Trafalgar Court
NewYork NY 10019 Les Banques
St Peter Port
Registered Office Guernsey GY1 3DA
PO Box 255
Trafalgar Court Independent Auditor
Les Banques Ernst & Young LLP
St Peter Port PO Box 9
Guernsey GY1 3QL Royal Chambers
St Julian's Avenue JZ Capital Partners Limited is registered in Guernsey St Peter Port Number 48761 Guernsey GY1 4AF
Administrator, Registrar and Secretary UK Solicitors
Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services Ashurst LLP
(Guernsey) Limited Broadwalk House
PO Box 255 5 Appold Street
Trafalgar Court London EC2A 2HA
Les Banques
St Peter Port US Lawyers
Guernsey GY1 3QL Monge Law Firm, PLLC
333 West Trade Street Charlotte, NC 28202
UK Transfer and Paying Agent
Equiniti Limited Mayer Brown LLP
Aspect House 214 North Tryon Street
Spencer Road Suite 3800
Lancing Charlotte NC 28202
West Sussex BN99 62X
Winston& Strawn LLP 35 West Wacker Drive Chicago IL 60601-9703
Guernsey Lawyers
Mourant Ozannes
P.OBox 186
1 Le Marchant Street St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 4HP
Financial Adviser and Broker JP Morgan Cazenove Limited 20 Moorgate
London EC2R 6DA
David Macfarlane (Chairman)1
Mr Macfarlane was appointed to the Board of JZCP in April 2008 as Chairman and a non-executive Director. Until 2002 he was a Senior Corporate Partner at Ashurst. He was a non-executive Director of the Platinum Investment Trust Plc from 2002 until January 2007. He has recently been appointed Chairman of Rex Bionics plc.
Patrick Firth2
Mr Firth was appointed to the Board of JZCP in April 2008. He is also a Director of a number of offshore funds and management companies, including BH Credit Catalysts Limited, ICG-Longbow Senior Secured UK Property Debt Investments Limited and Riverstone Energy Limited. He is Chairman of GLI Finance Limited. He is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and The Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment. He is a resident of Guernsey.
James Jordan
Mr. Jordan is a private investor who was appointed to the Board of JZCP in 2008. He is a director of the First Eagle family of mutual funds, and of Alpha Andromeda Investment Trust Company, S.A.. Until 30 June 2005, he was the Managing Director of Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder Advisers, LLC, a privately owned investment bank and asset management firm; and until 25 July 2013, he was a non-executive director of Leucadia National Corporation. He is a Trustee and Vice Chairman of the World Monuments Fund, and serves on the Chairman's Council of Conservation International. Mr Jordan also joined the Board of Riverstone Energy Limited during the year.
Tanja Tibaldi
Ms Tibaldi was appointed to the Board of JZCP in April 2008. She was on the board of JZ Equity Partners Plc from January 2005 until the company's liquidation on 1 July 2008. She was Managing Director at Fairway Investment Partners, a Swiss asset management company where she was responsible for the Group's marketing and co-managed two fund of funds. Previously shew as an executive at the Swiss Stock Exchange and currently serves on the board of several private companies.
Christopher Waldron
Mr Waldron was appointed to the Board of JZCP in October 2013. He is a Director of a number of Guernsey funds and investment companies including GBD Limited, Multi Manager Investment Programmes PCC Limited and BH Credit Catalysts Limited. An experienced investment manager, he was Chief Executive Officer of the Edmond de Rothschild companies in Guernsey until January 2013 and he remains a consultant to the Edmond de Rothschild Group. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment and a Guernsey resident.
1Chairman of the nominations committeeof which all Directors are members.
2Chairman of the audit committee of which all Directors are members.
Listing
JZCP Ordinary and Zero Dividend Preference shares are listed on the Official List of the Financial Services Authority of the UK, and are admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange Specialist fund market for listed securities. The ticker symbols are "JZCP" and "JZCN" respectively.
The prices of the Ordinary and Zero Dividend Preference shares are shown in the Financial Times under "Investment Companies - Ordinary Income Shares" and "Investment Companies - Zero Dividend Preference Shares" as "JZ Capital" respectively.
The Company has complied with the requirements of the SEC Custody Rules within these Financial Statements. These requirements include the Investment Portfolio falling within the remit of the annual audit, disclosure of the Company's Financial Highlights, as disclosed in Note 30, and a reconciliation of the accounts prepared under IFRS to US GAAP, as discussed in Note 31.
Financial diary
Annual General Meeting 19 June 2014
Interim report for the six months to 31 August 2014 23 October 2014
In accordance with the Transparency Directive JZCP will be issuing an Interim Management Statement for the quarters ending 31 May 2014 and 30 November 2014. These Statements will be sent to the market via RNS within six weeks from the end of the appropriate quarter, and will be posted on JZCP's website at the same time, or soon thereafter.
Payment of dividends
Cash dividends will be sent by cheque to the first-named shareholder on the register of members at their registered address, together with a tax voucher. At shareholders' request, where they have elected to receive dividend proceeds in GBP Sterling, the dividend may instead be paid direct into the shareholder's bank account through the Bankers' Automated Clearing System. Payments will be paid in US dollars unless the shareholder elects to receive the dividend in Sterling. Existing elections can be changed by contacting the Company's Transfer and Paying Agent, Equiniti Limited on +44 (0) 121 415 7047.
Share dealing
Investors wishing to buy or sell shares in the Company may do so through a stockbroker. Most banks also offer this service.
Internet address
The Company: www.jzcp.com
ISIN/SEDOL numbers
The ISIN code/SEDOL (Stock Exchange Daily Official List) numbers of the Company's Ordinary shares are BB00B403HK58/B403HK5 and the numbers of the Zero Dividend Preference shares are GG00B40B7X85/B40B7X8.
Share register enquiries
The Company's UK Transfer and Paying Agent, Equiniti Limited, maintains the share registers. In event of queries regarding your holding, please contact the Registrar on 0871 384 2265, calls to this number cost 8p per minute from a BT landline, other providers' costs may vary. Lines are open 8.30 a.m. to 5.30 p.m., Monday to Friday, If calling from overseas +44 (0) 121 415 7047 or access their website at www.equiniti.com . Changes of name or address must be notified in writing to the Transfer and Paying Agent.
Nominee share code
Where notification has been provided in advance, the Company will arrange for copies of shareholder communications to be provided to the operators of nominee accounts. Nominee investors may attend general meetings and speak at meetings when invited to do so by the Chairman.
Documents available for inspection
The following documents will be available at the registered office of the Company during usual business hours on any weekday until the date of the Annual General Meeting and at the place of the meeting for a period of fifteen minutes prior to and during the meeting:
(a) the Register of Directors' Interests in the share capital of the Company;
(b) the Articles of Incorporation of the Company; and
(c) the terms of appointment of the Directors.
Warning to shareholders - Boiler Room Scams
In recent years, many companies have become aware that their shareholders have been targeted by unauthorised overseas-based brokers selling what turn out to be non-existent or high risk shares, or expressing a wish to buy their shares. If you are offered, for example, unsolicited investment advice, discounted JZCP shares or a premium price for the JZCP shares you own, you should take these steps before handing over any money:
• Make sure you get the correct name of the person or organisation
• Check that they are properly authorised by the FCA before getting involved by visiting http://www.fca.org.uk/firms/systems-reporting/register
•Report the matter to the FCA by calling 0800 111 6768
•If the calls persist, hang up
•More detailed information on this can be found on the Money Advice Service website www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk
US Investors
General
The Company's Articles contain provisions allowing the Directors to decline to register a person as a holder of any class of ordinary shares or other securities of the Company or to require the transfer of those securities (including by way of a disposal effected by the Company itself) if they believe that the person:
(A) is a "US person" (as defined in Regulation S under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended) and not a "qualified purchaser" (as defined in the US Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended);
(B) is a "Benefit Plan Investor" (as described under "Prohibition on Benefit Plan Investors and Restrictions on Non-ERISA Plan" below); or
(C) is, or is related to, a citizen or resident of the United States, a US partnership, a US corporation or a certain type of estate or trust and that ownership of any class of ordinary shares or any other equity securities of the Company by the person would materially increase the risk that the Company could be or become a "controlled foreign corporation" (as described under "US Tax Matters" below").
In addition, the Directors may require any holder of any class of ordinary shares or other securities of the Company to show to their satisfaction whether or not the holder is a person described in paragraphs (A), (B) or (C) above.
US Securities Laws
The Company (a) is not subject to the reporting requirements of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and does not intend to become subject to such reporting requirements and (b) is not registered as an investment company under the US Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), and investors in the Company are not subject to the protections provided by the 1940 Act.
Prohibition on Benefit Plan Investors and Restrictions on Non-ERISA Plans
Investment in the Company by "Benefit Plan Investors" is prohibited so that the assets of the Company will not be deemed to constitute "plan assets" of a "Benefit Plan Investor". The term "Benefit Plan Investor" shall have the meaning contained in Section 3(42) of the US Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), and includes (a) an "employee benefit plan" as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA that is subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA;(b) a "plan" described in Section 4975(e)(1) of the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), that is subject to Section 4975 of the Code; and (c) an entity whose underlying assets include "plan assets" by reason of an employee benefit plans or a plan's investment in such entity. For purposes of the foregoing, a "Benefit Plan Investor" does not include a governmental plan (as defined in Section 3(32) of ERISA), a non-US plan (as defined in Section 4(b)(4)of ERISA) or a church plan (as defined in Section 3(33) of ERISA) that has not elected to be subject to ERISA.
Each purchaser and subsequent transferee of any class of ordinary shares (or any other class of equity interest in the Company) will be required to represent, warrant and covenant, or will be deemed to have represented, warranted and covenanted that it is not, and is not acting on behalf of or with the assets of a, Benefit Plan Investor to acquire such ordinary shares (or any other class of equity interest in the Company).
Under the Articles, the directors have the power to require the sale or transfer of the Company's securities in order to avoid the assets of the Company being treated as "plan assets" for the purposes of ERISA.
The fiduciary provisions of pension codes applicable to governmental plans, non-US plans or other employee benefit plans or retirement arrangements that are not subject to ERISA (collectively, "Non-ERISA Plans") may impose limitations on investment in the Company. Fiduciaries of Non-ERISA Plans, in consultation with their advisors, should consider, to the extent applicable, the impact of such fiduciary rules and regulations on an investment in the Company. Among other considerations, the fiduciary of a Non-ERISA Plan should take into account the composition of the Non-ERISA Plan's portfolio with respect to diversification; the cash flow needs of the Non-ERISA Plan and the effects thereon of the illiquidity of the investment; the economic terms of the Non- ERISA Plan's investment in the Company; the Non-ERISA Plan's funding objectives; the tax effects of the investment and the tax and other risks associated with the investment; the fact that the investors in the Company are expected to consist of a diverse group of investors (including taxable, tax-exempt, domestic and foreign entities) and the fact that the management of the Company will not take the particular objectives of any investors or class of investors into account.
Prohibition on Benefit Plan Investors and Restrictions on Non-ERISA Plans (continued)
Non-ERISA Plan fiduciaries should also take into account the fact that, while the Company's board of directors and its investment advisor will have certain general fiduciary duties to the Company, the board and the investment advisor will not have any direct fiduciary relationship with or duty to any investor, either with respect to its investment in Shares or with respect to the management and investment of the assets of the Company. Similarly, it is intended that the assets of the Company will not be considered plan assets of any Non-ERISA Plan or be subject to any fiduciary or investment restrictions that may exist under pension codes specifically applicable to such Non-ERISA Plans. Each Non-ERISA Plan will be required to acknowledge and agree in connection with its investment in any securities to the foregoing status of the Company, the board and the investment advisor that there is no rule, regulation or requirement applicable to such investor that is inconsistent with the foregoing description of the Company, the board and the investment advisor.
Each purchaser or transferee that is a Non-ERISA Plan will be deemed to have represented, warranted and covenanted as follows:
(a) The Non-ERISA Plan is not a Benefit Plan Investor;
(b) The decision to commit assets of the Non-ERISA Plan for investment in the Company was made by fiduciaries independent of the Company, the Board, the Investment Advisor and any of their respective agents, representatives or affiliates, which fiduciaries (i) are duly authorized to make such investment decision and have not relied on any advice or recommendations of the Company, the Board, the Investment Advisor or any of their respective agents, representatives or affiliates and (ii) in consultation with their advisers, have carefully considered the impact of any applicable federal, state or local law on an investment in the Company;
(c) None of the Company, the Board, the Investment Advisor orany of their respective agents, representatives or affiliates has exercised any discretionary authority or control with respect to the Non-ERISA Plan's investment in the Company, nor has the Company, the Board, the Investment Advisor or any of their respective agents, representatives or affiliates rendered individualized investment advice to the Non-ERISA Plan based upon the Non-ERISA Plan's investment policies or strategies, overall portfolio composition or diversification with respect to its commitment to invest in the Company and the investment program thereunder; and
(d) It acknowledges and agrees that it is intended that the Company will not hold plan assets of the Non-ERISA Plan and that none of the Company, the Board, the Investment Advisor or any of their respective agents, representatives or affiliates will be acting as a fiduciary to the Non-ERISA Plan under any applicable federal, state or local law governing the Non- ERISA Plan, with respect to either (i) the Non-ERISA Plan's purchase or retention of its investment in the Company or (ii) the management or operation of the business or assets of the Company. It also confirms that there is no rule, regulation, or requirement applicable to such purchaser or transferee that is inconsistent with the foregoing description of the Company, the Board and the Investment Advisor.
US Tax Matters
This discussion does not constitute tax advice and is not intended to be a substitute for tax advice and planning. Prospective holders of the Company's securities must consult their own tax advisers concerning the US federal, state and local income tax and estate tax consequences in their particular situations of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of any of the Company's securities, as well as any consequences under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
The Company's directors are entitled to decline to register a person as, or to require such person to cease to be, a holder of any class of ordinary shares or other equity securities of the Company if they believe that: such person is, or is related to, a citizen or resident of the United States, a US partnership, a US corporation or a certain type of estate or trust and that ownership of any class of ordinary shares or any other equity securities of the Company by such person would materially increase the risk that the Company could be or become a "controlled foreign corporation" (a "CFC").
In general, a foreign corporation is treated as a "CFC" only if its "US shareholders" collectively own more than 50% of the total combined voting power or total value of the corporation's stock. A "US shareholder" means any US person who owns, directly or indirectly through foreign entities, or is considered to own (by application of certain constructive ownership rules), 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of a foreign corporation, such as the Company.
There is a risk that the Company will decline to register a person as, or to require such person to cease to be, a holder of the Company's the Company if the Company could be or become a CFC. The Company's treatment as a CFC could have adverse tax consequences for US taxpayers.
The Company is expected to be treated as a "passive foreign investment company" ("PFIC"). The Company's treatment as a PFIC is likely to have adverse tax consequences for US taxpayers.
The taxation of a US taxpayer's investment in the Company's securities is highly complex. Prospective holders of the Company's securities must consult their own tax advisers concerning the US federal, state and local income tax and estate tax consequences in their particular situations of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of any of the Company's securities, as well as any consequences under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.