Interim Results
Rio Tinto PLC
03 August 2005
Record earnings from strong operational performance and markets
• First half underlying earnings of $2,087 million were more than double
those of the first half of 2004 ($993 million).
• First half net earnings were $2,165 million (first half 2004 $1,611
million).
• Cashflow from operations was a record $3,421 million, 69 per cent
higher than that of the first half of 2004.
• Consistent operational performance enabled record volumes of most
products to be delivered into strong markets. Higher prices increased
underlying earnings by $1,004 million and higher volumes by
$460 million.
• Construction of the major rail and port infrastructure expansion for
the Western Australian iron ore operations remains on track.
Commissioning of the port expansion has commenced and will progress
through the second half of the year.
• An agreement to form a joint venture to develop the Hope Downs iron
ore deposits further strengthens Rio Tinto's position as the prime
supplier of iron ore from Australia.
• Approval for the construction of a new ilmenite operation in
Madagascar and the associated upgrade of existing processing
facilities in Canada is announced today.
• In addition to the increased 2004 final dividend, shareholders
benefited from the return of $774 million through the successful
completion of Rio Tinto Limited's off-market buyback. As a result,
over half of the $1.5 billion capital management programme was
completed within three months of its announcement, on favourable
terms.
Six months to 30 June (All dollars are US$ unless otherwise stated) 2005 2004 Change
Underlying earnings 2,087 993 +110%
Net earnings 2,165 1,611 +34%
Cash flow from operations (incl. associate and JV dividends) 3,421 2,020 +69%
Underlying earnings per share - US cents 152.0 72.0 +111%
Earnings per share - US cents 157.6 116.8 +35%
Chairman's comments
Rio Tinto's chairman Paul Skinner said, ' Very good operational performance
across all our businesses enabled us to capitalise on the strong markets we
experienced for our products. As a result, cash flows and earnings were at
record levels. Cash flow from operations, including dividends from associates
and joint ventures, was $3,421 million.
'Our top priority for the application of this strong cash flow remains the
investment in value creating opportunities like Hope Downs and the ilmenite
project in Madagascar. Reflecting our ability to develop investment options
from our existing portfolio, capital expenditure in the first half of the year
was over $1 billion and is likely to be higher in the second half.
'We are committed to efficient capital management in the interests of
shareholders. The strength of our cash flow enables us to continue to return
excess capital to shareholders while maintaining the flexibility to take
advantage of opportunities as they arise. In February, we announced our
intention to return $1.5 billion of capital to shareholders before the end of
2006 and, with the completion of the off-market buy back in May 2005, we have
already returned over half this amount.
'Although the rate of growth in the major economies slowed somewhat in the first
half of this year, we are still seeing strong markets for our products. In
particular, demand from China remains strong. Low inventories and the time lag
in the supply side response to increasing demand is likely to keep markets tight
in the short to medium term. In the meantime, we continue to work on driving
world class performance in all of our businesses to strengthen our long term
competitive position.'
Chief Executive's comments
Leigh Clifford, Rio Tinto's chief executive said, 'Our operations have continued
to respond well to the opportunities and challenges that strong markets bring
and maximisation of production has been the priority across most of the
business. Many of our operations produced record volumes. The ramp-up of the
new Comalco Alumina Refinery which began late last year continued through the
first half of 2005 and we completed the expansion of our upgraded slag (UGS)
plant in Quebec.
'This is a challenging time to be undertaking major construction projects as the
market for mining related materials, equipment and skills is particularly
competitive. Notwithstanding this, we will be progressively commissioning the
major expansion of our Dampier port in the Pilbara, Western Australia as
scheduled during the second half of the year and the project remains on budget.
'In the first half of this year we committed a further $290 million to the
expansion of existing Hamersley Iron mines in Western Australia. We also
revised the scope of the Hail Creek expansion to facilitate further expansions
beyond eight million tonnes in line with market demand and available
infrastructure capacity.
'As well as developing opportunities from within our existing portfolio, we also
search for opportunities to create value for our shareholders through
acquisitions and alliances. The agreement to form a joint venture to develop
the Hope Downs iron ore deposits, which we announced at the beginning of July,
brings an excellent resource to the Group. The development of the project will
strengthen Rio Tinto's position as Australia's prime supplier of iron ore.
'We have a number of projects in the advanced study phase. The development of
one such project, the QMM ilmenite project in Madagascar and Canada, is
announced today. This project, which will enhance our leadership position in
this industry, will provide the catalyst for the broader economic development of
one of the poorest regions of Madagascar. In addition to creating value for our
shareholders, it gives us the opportunity to demonstrate the contribution that
mining can make to sustainable development through the successful integration of
financial, environmental and community objectives.'
Net earnings and underlying earnings
In order to provide insight into the underlying performance of its business, Rio
Tinto presents underlying earnings. The differences between underlying earnings
and net earnings are set out in the following table.
Six months ended 30 June 2005 2004
US$m US$m
Underlying earnings 2,087 993
Items excluded from underlying earnings
Profits on disposals of interests in businesses 89 875
Impairment charge - (160)
Effect of exchange on US dollar debt and intragroup balances 9 (89)
Mark to market of derivatives not qualifying as hedges (20 ) (8)
Net earnings 2,165 1,611
Commentary on the Group financial results
Underlying earnings of $2,087 million and net earnings of $2,165 million were
$1,094 million and $554 million above the comparable measures for the first half
of 2004. The principal factors explaining the increases are set out in the
table below.
Six months ended 30 June
Underlying Net
earnings earnings
US$m US$m
First half 2004 993 1,611
Prices 1,004
Exchange rates (85)
Inflation (73)
Volumes 460
Costs (185)
Other (27)
1,094 1,094
Profits on disposals of interests in businesses (786)
Impairment charge 160
Effect of exchange on US dollar debt and intragroup balances 98
Mark to market of derivatives not qualifying as hedges (12)
First half 2005 2,087 2,165
Prices and exchange rates
Prices for the major products were significantly above those experienced in
2004. Compared with the first half of 2004 average copper prices were 21 per
cent higher and average aluminium prices 12 per cent higher. The strength of
the global iron ore market was reflected in the 71.5 per cent increase in the
benchmark price, which was mainly effective from 1 April 2005. The seaborne
thermal and coking coal markets were also strong.
Molybdenum prices, which have generally been below $5/lb over the last decade,
averaged over $30/lb in the first half of 2005.
The US dollar was generally weaker than in the first half of 2004 relative to
the currencies in which the Group incurs the majority of its costs. The
Australian dollar was five per cent stronger, the Canadian dollar was eight per
cent stronger and the South African rand seven per cent stronger. The effect of
this was to reduce underlying earnings relative to the first half of 2004 by $85
million.
Volumes
Higher sales volumes increased earnings by $460 million compared with the first
half of 2004. The ramp-up of new projects in iron ore (Eastern Range mine and
Yandicoogina expansion), coking coal (Hail Creek) and alumina (CAR) all
contributed higher volumes. To take advantage of the strong market for
molybdenum, the mine sequencing at Kennecott Utah Copper was optimised to
maximise molybdenum production. This, together with modifications to the
molybdenum circuit at the concentrator, almost tripled production volume.
Production of copper and gold from the Grasberg mine was also significantly
above that of the first half of 2004.
Costs
Excluding the effects of inflation, higher costs reduced earnings by $185
million. Of this, $60 million was due to higher energy costs. Strong markets
create cyclical cost pressures in the industry and operations continued to
experience higher prices for skilled labour, steel, rubber, explosives, freight
and other mining related supplies. Costs at Kennecott Utah Copper were also
affected by a scheduled 17 day smelter maintenance shutdown. Port congestion at
Dalrymple Bay resulted in higher demurrage charges.
Tax
The effective tax rate on underlying earnings, including associates and jointly
controlled entities, was 30.1 per cent compared to 30.5 per cent in the first
half of 2004.
Other
The net after tax interest expense was $12 million lower than in the first half
of 2004 due to lower levels of net debt. First half 2004 underlying earnings
included $52 million from businesses that have since been sold.
Items excluded from underlying earnings
In the first half of 2005 the net profit on the disposal of interests in
businesses was $89 million relating mainly to the sale of Rio Tinto's interest
in the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund. Disposals in the first half of
2004, principally the holding in Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, resulted in
gains of $875 million.
Net earnings for the first half of 2004 included an impairment of $160 million
relating to the Colowyo coal operation. There were no such items in the first
half of 2005.
Exchange gains and losses on US dollar debt that are recorded in the US dollar
income statement and gains and losses on derivative contracts that do not
qualify as hedges under IFRS are excluded from underlying earnings. Neither of
these items were significant in either the first half of 2004 or the first half
of 2005.
Cash flow
Cash flow from operations, including dividends from equity accounted joint
ventures and associated companies, was a record $3,421 million, 69 per cent
higher than the first half of 2004. Net working capital levels improved with
days inventories and receivables both continuing to fall.
The Group's investment in the business continued. Purchase of property, plant
and equipment of $1,110 million included the major port and rail infrastructure
expansion in Western Australia, initial expenditure on the construction of a new
dike at Diavik and payments in respect of North Jacobs Ranch coal reserves by
Kennecott Energy.
Dividends paid in the first half of 2005 of $622 million were $158 million
higher than dividends paid in the first half of 2004. To reflect the increased
capital base of the Group following a period of investment, dividends were
increased by 20 per cent in 2004. Shareholders also benefited from the
off-market buy back of Rio Tinto Limited shares ($774 million). This represents
over half of the $1.5 billion capital management programme announced on 3
February 2005.
Balance sheet
The balance sheet strengthened during the period. Net debt reduced by $368
million to $3,451 million. Debt to total capital fell to 21 per cent and
interest cover strengthened to 39 times.
In the first half of 2005, net assets increased by $689 million. The profit for
the period was $1,569 million greater than dividends paid. The Rio Tinto
Limited share buyback reduced shareholders' equity by $774 million.
The adoption of IAS 39 ('Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement')
resulted in an increase of $109 million in net assets, less than one per cent of
the total. This represents the net gain on marking to market of qualifying
hedges, embedded derivatives, available for sale investments and certain
derivatives that do not qualify as hedges, which were not previously recognised
under IFRS.
IFRS
These financial results have been prepared in accordance with accounting
policies which are consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS). Presentation materials explaining in detail the effects of the
transition to IFRS on the financial reporting of Rio Tinto were released on 5
May 2005 and are available on the Rio Tinto website (www.riotinto.com). IFRS is
continuing to evolve through the issue and/or endorsement of new Standards and
Interpretations and developments in the application of recently issued
standards. For that reason, the basis of preparation and the accounting
policies applied in preparing the information in this release may require
adjustment before the Group issues its first complete set of IFRS financial
statements.
IFRS defines Profit for the period reported in the income statement inclusive of
earnings attributable to outside shareholders in subsidiaries. For the first
half of 2005, the Profit for the period was $2,263 million (2004 first half
$1,623 million) of which $98 million (2004 first half $12 million) was
attributable to outside shareholders, leaving $2,165 million (2004 first half
$1,611 million) of net earnings attributable to Rio Tinto shareholders. Both
net earnings and underlying earnings, which are the focus of the commentary in
this report, deal with amounts attributable to equity shareholders of Rio Tinto.
Dividends
Dividends are determined in US dollars. The interim dividend is set at one half
of the total dividends for the previous year. Therefore, interim dividends
equivalent to 38.5 US cents per share (2004: 32.0 US cents per share) have been
declared by Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited.
Rio Tinto plc dividends are declared and paid in pounds sterling and Rio Tinto
Limited dividends are declared and paid in Australian dollars, converted at
exchange rates applicable on Monday 1 August 2005.
Rio Tinto plc shareholders will be paid an interim dividend of 21.75 pence per
ordinary share (2004: 17.54 pence per share). Rio Tinto Limited shareholders
will be paid an interim dividend of 50.56 Australian cents per ordinary share
(2004: 45.53 Australian cents per share), which will be fully franked. The
Board expects Rio Tinto Limited to be in a position to pay fully franked
dividends for the reasonably foreseeable future.
The respective dividends will be paid on Thursday 8 September 2005 to Rio Tinto
plc shareholders on the register at the close of business on Friday 12 August
2005 and to Rio Tinto Limited shareholders on the register at the close of
business on Tuesday 16 August 2005. The ex-dividend date for both Rio Tinto plc
and Rio Tinto Limited will be Wednesday 10 August 2005. Dividends will be paid
to Rio Tinto ADR holders on Friday 9 September 2005.
As usual, Rio Tinto will operate its Dividend Reinvestment Plan, details of
which can be obtained from the Company Secretaries' offices and from the Rio
Tinto website (www.riotinto.com). The last date for receipt of the election
notice for the Dividend Reinvestment Plans is Wednesday 17 August 2005.
Rio Tinto financial information by business unit (1)
Six months ended 30 June Rio Tinto Gross turnover (a) EBITDA (b) Net earnings (c)
US $ millions interest
% 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004
Iron Ore
Hamersley (inc. HIsmelt(R)) 100.0 1,425 840 766 348 474 179
Robe River 53.0 477 270 302 146 145 59
Iron Ore Company of Canada 58.7 422 238 207 49 67 14
Rio Tinto Brasil (d) 19 53 - 20 (5) 5
2,343 1,401 1,275 563 681 257
Energy
Kennecott Energy 100.0 578 540 135 141 68 80
Rio Tinto Coal Australia 100.0 1,065 691 441 191 228 72
Rossing 68.6 60 48 11 11 1 -
Energy Resources of Australia 68.4 98 72 41 28 10 5
1,801 1,351 628 371 307 157
Industrial Minerals 1,208 943 313 251 124 88
Aluminium (e) 1,383 1,119 416 323 203 162
Copper
Kennecott Utah Copper 100.0 966 520 663 247 465 151
Escondida 30.0 538 461 378 315 219 182
Freeport (f) - 43 - 7 - (4)
Grasberg joint venture (g) 254 47 167 6 85 (8)
Palabora 49.2 168 152 28 (6) 6 (9)
Kennecott Minerals 100.0 139 130 72 68 42 43
Other copper (h) 65 124 35 63 17 39
2,130 1,477 1,343 700 834 394
Diamonds
Argyle 100.0 246 195 107 69 40 36
Diavik 60.0 186 170 136 129 50 54
Murowa 78.0 22 - 14 - 9 -
454 365 257 198 99 90
Other operations 65 94 29 38 7 11
9,384 6,750 4,261 2,444 2,255 1,159
Other items 55 55 (134) (105) (78) (74)
Exploration and evaluation (64) (55) (59) (49)
Net interest (31) (43)
Underlying earnings 4,063 2,284 2,087 993
Items excluded from underlying earnings 98 865 78 618
Total 9,439 6,805 4,161 3,149 2,165 1,611
Depreciation and amortisation in subsidiaries (660) (566)
Impairment charges - (150)
Depreciation and amortisation in jointly controlled entities and (112) (109)
associates
Taxation and finance items in jointly controlled entities and associates (168) (161)
Profit before finance costs and tax 3,221 2,163
References above are to notes on page 40
Rio Tinto financial information by business unit (2)
Six months ended 30 June Rio Tinto Capital expenditure Depreciation Operating assets
US$ millions interest (k) & (m)
amortisation
(l)
% 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004
Iron Ore
Hamersley (inc. HIsmelt(R)) 100.0 431 329 81 83 2,388 1,680
Robe River 53.0 87 37 44 41 1,601 1,448
Iron Ore Company of Canada 58.7 25 12 22 17 466 470
Rio Tinto Brasil (d) 21 6 2 3 68 86
564 384 149 144 4,523 3,684
Energy
Kennecott Energy 100.0 123 96 40 51 894 810
Rio Tinto Coal Australia 100.0 46 25 76 80 1,264 1,244
Rossing 68.6 - 1 8 8 45 52
Energy Resources of Australia 68.4 9 2 19 14 161 166
178 124 143 153 2,364 2,272
Industrial Minerals 107 73 84 85 2,212 2,051
Aluminium (e) 102 258 120 79 3,463 2,958
Copper
Kennecott Utah Copper 100.0 64 26 65 46 1,108 1,149
Escondida 30.0 118 36 32 25 661 477
Freeport (f) - - - 3 - -
Grasberg joint venture (g) 26 16 21 19 348 378
Palabora 49.2 7 19 15 22 322 472
Kennecott Minerals 100.0 19 13 19 17 132 114
Other copper (h) 9 38 15 15 182 159
243 148 167 147 2,753 2,749
Diamonds
Argyle 100.0 27 47 46 16 610 531
Diavik 60.0 53 25 39 31 575 591
Murowa 78.0 2 8 3 - 16 10
82 80 88 47 1,201 1,132
Other operations 7 7 15 14 230 211
1,283 1,074 766 669 16,746 15,057
Other items 10 4 5 155 (771) (613)
Exploration and evaluation - - 1 1 18 23
Less: jointly controlled entities
and associates
(191) (55) (112) (109)
Total 1,102 1,023 660 716 15,993 14,467
Less: net debt (3,451) (4,553)
Total shareholders' equity 12,542 9,914
References above are to notes on page 40
Review of operations
Comparison of underlying earnings
First half underlying earnings of $2,087 million were $1,094 million above the
first half underlying earnings of 2004. The table below shows the difference by
product group. All financial amounts in the tables below are US$ millions
unless indicated otherwise.
US$m
First half 2004 underlying earnings 993
Iron ore 424
Energy 150
Industrial Minerals 36
Aluminium 41
Copper 440
Diamonds 9
Other operations (4)
Exploration and evaluation (10)
Interest 12
Other (4)
First half 2005 underlying earnings 2,087
Iron Ore
First half First half Change Full year
2005 2004 2004
Production (million tonnes) 59.8 51.5 +16% 107.8
Gross turnover ($ millions) 2,343 1,401 +67% 3,009
Underlying earnings ($ millions) 681 257 +165% 565
EBITDA ($ millions) 1,275 563 +126% 1,176
Capital expenditure ($ millions) 564 384 935
The above figures include Rio Tinto Brasil which was previously reported as part
of the Copper product group. Comparative data has been adjusted accordingly.
Market conditions
Global demand for iron ore remained strong throughout the first half of 2005.
The strength of the market was reflected in the increase in the benchmark price
of 71.5 per cent for the 2005 contract year.
Brownfield mine expansions at Tom Price, Marandoo and Nammuldi were announced in
April 2005 to add to the extensive mine, rail and port expansion, construction
of which is now well advanced. In July 2005 an agreement to form a joint
venture with Hancock Prospecting for the development of the Hope Downs project
was announced. This will further strengthen Rio Tinto's position as the prime
supplier of iron ore from Australia.
Hamersley
First half 2005 underlying earnings of $474 million were $295 million above the
first half of 2004. Hamersley achieved record shipments in the first half of
2005. Commissioning of the major port expansion commenced and will continue
progressively through the second half of the year.
Hamersley's first half underlying earnings include a net loss of $4 million for
HIsmelt (R) (First half 2004 $5 million net loss) due to scheduled
pre-production and marketing costs. Construction has been completed and the
operations phase began in April 2005. First hot metal was produced in June
2005. Reflecting the innovative nature of the technology, full production is
expected to be reached over a three year ramp-up period.
Robe River
First half underlying earnings of $145 million were $86 million above the first
half of 2005. First half production was four per cent above the first half of
2004 although May shipments were affected by heavy rain at Cape Lambert, and
West Angelas production was affected by a planned two week shutdown as part of
the expansion of capacity to 25 million tonnes per annum. The rail duplication
is proceeding on schedule.
Iron Ore Company of Canada
Underlying earnings of $67 million were $53 million above the first half of
2004. Improved employee productivity under the new collective agreement and
improved plant availability resulted in record first half pellet production,
nine per cent above the first half of 2004.
Rio Tinto Brasil
Rio Tinto Brasil made an underlying loss of $5 million in the first half of 2005
compared with a net profit of $5 million in the first half of 2004, principally
due to the sale of Rio Tinto's interest in the Morro do Ouro gold mine in
December 2004 and some one-off tax provisions in the first half of 2005.
Energy
First half First half Change Full year
2005 2004 2004
Production Coal (million tonnes)
Hard coking coal 3.9 3.3 +18% 6.8
Other Australian 15.3 15.9 -4% 32.9
US 58.2 56.3 +3% 117.7
Uranium (tonnes) 2,945 2,788 +6% 5,974
Gross turnover ($ millions) 1,801 1,351 +33% 3,008
Underlying earnings ($ millions) 307 157 +96% 431
EBITDA ($ millions) 628 371 +69% 912
Capital expenditure ($ millions) 178 124 244
US Coal - Kennecott Energy
US coal production increased by approximately one per cent in the first half of
2005 in line with the increase in US power generation. However, western coal
including that from the Powder River Basin gained market share over eastern
production.
Kennecott Energy's first half 2005 underlying earnings of $68 million were $12
million below the first half of 2004. Second quarter production was marginally
below the first quarter of the year as shipments were disrupted by two train
derailments on the main line in May in addition to ongoing railroad maintenance.
Increased railroad maintenance, which is expected to continue through the
summer and possibly later into the year, will adversely affect Powder River
Basin coal shipments. Earnings were adversely affected by higher fuel costs.
Approval was given for the expansion of Antelope mine and development of the
West Antelope reserves. At a capital cost of US$87 million, this will optimise
the usage of the current facilities and enable production to increase in line
with market demand.
Asia Pacific seaborne coal markets
The global coking coal market has been strong, driven largely by increased
Chinese steel production. With export thermal coal volumes from Australia and
South Africa constrained by infrastructure, the partial withdrawal of Chinese
supply from the export thermal coal market has been balanced by increased
Indonesian and Colombian supply with the result that prices have remained
relatively stable during the half.
Rio Tinto Coal Australia
Underlying earnings of $228 million were $156 million above the first half of
2004, reflecting both higher prices and volumes.
Available port and rail capacity constrained export shipments from the
Australian coal operations. In March 2005, the ship queue at Dalrymple Bay Coal
Terminal peaked at over 54 vessels with a consequent impact on demurrage. A
queue management system was successfully implemented from late April, although
it was only in the latter part of the period that the vessel queue reduced
significantly.
At the port of Newcastle, the capacity balancing system that has been in place
for over a year remained effective at reducing demurrage charges although the
queue reached over 30 vessels in June as producers scheduled shipments to meet
quarterly allocations.
Production volumes reflected both the effects of shipping constraints and the
normal variation in line with the mining sequence.
The Rio Tinto Board approved an enhanced Hail Creek expansion project in the
first quarter. The expanded capacity of the project will remain at eight million
tonnes per annum, but the enhancement will allow further expansions in line with
market demand and port and rail capacity. The revised capital expenditure for
the increase in annual capacity from six million tonnes to eight million tonnes,
reflecting both the scope change and an increase due to cyclical material and
labour cost pressures, is $223 million.
Uranium markets
The further reduction of excess inventory has continued to push spot prices up
to the $30/lb level. The lead time for significant new capacity from mines will
be at least five years which is expected to keep prices firm in the short to
medium term. As sentiment towards nuclear generation of power begins to change
and China commits to a nuclear generation investment programme, the longer term
outlook for uranium demand looks better than it has done for several years.
Rossing
Underlying earnings of $1 million were $1 million above the first half of 2004.
Work continues on extending operations beyond the life of the existing open pit.
Energy Resources Australia
Underlying earnings of $10 million were $5 million above the first half of 2004
due to both higher volumes and prices.
Industrial Minerals
First half First half Change Full year
2005 2004 2004
Production Borates (000 tonnes) 268 275 -2% 565
Titanium dioxide (000 tonnes) 649 577 +12% 1,192
Salt (000 tonnes) 2,776 2,390 +16% 4,792
Talc (000 tonnes) 720 717 +0% 1,443
Gross turnover ($ millions) 1,208 943 +28% 2,126
Underlying earnings ($ millions)
Rio Tinto Borax 32 43 -26% 93
Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium 72 28 +157% 116
Dampier Salt 9 5 +80% 13
Luzenac 11 12 -8% 21
124 88 +41% 243
EBITDA ($ millions) 313 251 +25% 554
Capital expenditure ($ millions) 107 73 248
Rio Tinto Borax
Underlying earnings of $32 million were $11 million below the first half of
2004. First quarter borates production was affected by unusually wet weather at
the Boron mine which also adversely affected mining costs for a prolonged
period. Costs were also adversely affected by higher diesel, natural gas and
raw materials prices. Sales into Asia were particularly strong.
Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium
Underlying earnings of $72 million were $44 million above the first half of
2004. Improvement in pigment markets flowed through into strong demand for
chloride feedstocks and QIT's upgraded slag (UGS) product. The expansion of the
UGS was completed on time and is being ramped-up to full capacity. Demand was
also generally strong for Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium's co-products although the
iron and steel markets softened somewhat towards the end of the half.
The Board has recently approved the construction of a new ilmenite project in
Madagascar. The project will involve the construction of a dredging operation
and port in Madagascar at a cost of $585 million and the enhancement of existing
smelting facilities in Sorel, Canada at a cost of $190 million. First
production is expected towards the end of 2008 and the initial capacity, all of
which will be smelted in Sorel, will be 750,000 tonnes per year of ilmenite.
The final product will be a new, high quality chloride slag with 91 per cent
titanium dioxide content.
Dampier Salt
Underlying earnings of $9 million were $4 million above the first half of 2004.
The North Shore project, which will optimise production across the three sites,
was completed in the first half of the year.
Luzenac
Underlying earnings of $11 million were $1 million below the first half of 2004.
Increased sales to the polymer market were counteracted by higher freight and
energy costs and the adverse effects of exchange rate movements.
Aluminium
First half First half Change Full year
2005 2004 2004
Production Bauxite (000 tonnes) 7,117 6,339 +12% 12,828
Alumina (000 tonnes) 1,490 1,030 +45% 2,231
Aluminium (000 tonnes) 421.6 417.1 +1% 836.5
Gross turnover ($ millions) 1,383 1,119 +24% 2,356
Underlying earnings ($ millions) 203 162 +25% 331
EBITDA ($ millions) 416 323 +29% 688
Capital expenditure ($ millions) 102 258 505
Prices
The average aluminium price of 84c/lb was 12 per cent above the first half 2004
average price. The alumina market remained tight and spot prices continued to
trade at over $400 per tonne. These, together with the effects of other price
movements, increased earnings by $89 million.
Bauxite
Bauxite production was 12 per cent above the first half of 2004 in order to
supply the new Comalco Alumina Refinery (CAR). The higher production was aided
by the NeWeipa mine expansion which was completed in the second half of 2004.
Alumina
The ramp up of CAR is progressing well with 425,000 tonnes produced in the first
half of 2005. The production processes at both Eurallumina and QAL were stable.
First half production from QAL was a half year record and production from
Eurallumina was only marginally below the record level achieved in the second
half of 2004. Overall first half alumina production was up 45 per cent compared
to the first half of 2004. Production costs were adversely affected by higher
caustic soda prices, higher internal freight costs and higher fuel costs.
Aluminium
All of the aluminium smelters operated consistently at, or near, capacity.
Earnings were adversely affected by higher average power and other input costs,
partly offset by the benefits from stable operations and the Six Sigma
improvement programme.
Copper
First half First half Change Full year
2005 2004 2004
Production Mined copper (000 tonnes) 378.3 373.4 +1% 753.1
Refined copper (000 tonnes) 139.8 169.0 -17% 332.6
Mined molybdenum (000 tonnes) 7.1 2.5 +184% 6.8
Mined gold (000 oz) 809 570 +42% 1,164
Gross turnover ($ millions) 2,130 1,477 +44% 3,033
Underlying earnings ($ millions) 834 394 +112% 860
EBITDA ($ millions) 1,343 700 +92% 1,503
Capital expenditure ($ millions) 243 148 326
Kennecott Utah Copper
Underlying earnings of $465 million were $314 million higher than the first half
of 2004. In order to take advantage of the strong market for molybdenum, mine
sequencing was optimised to maximise molybdenum production and hence copper
concentrate production was lower than in the first half of 2004. Both gold and
molybdenum grades were significantly above the first half of 2004. An expansion
of the molybdenum plant, which is designed to increase recoveries, was completed
in June 2005.
The smelter was shut down for 17 days in the second quarter for scheduled
maintenance, which adversely affected production of both refined copper and
gold. By the end of June, the smelter had returned to full production.
Escondida
Underlying earnings of $219 million were $37 million above the first half of
2004. Mined copper production was marginally below the first half reflecting
variations in grade due to mine sequencing. Mill throughput continued to
increase, resulting in improved daily production rates.
Grasberg joint venture
Underlying earnings of $85 million were $93 million above the first half of
2004, excluding the earnings attributable to Rio Tinto's holding in
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold prior to its disposal in March 2004. Both copper
and gold production at the Grasberg mine were significantly above the first half
of 2004 when efforts were focused on the recovery from the 2003 material
slippage.
Kennecott Minerals
Underlying earnings of $42 million were $1 million below the first half of 2004.
The effects of higher gold prices were offset by higher costs and lower sales
volumes from Cortez due to lower grades.
Palabora
Underlying earnings of $6 million compare with an underlying loss of $9 million
in the first half of 2004. The underground mine production exceeded its
nameplate capacity of 30,000 tonnes per day in May and June. Earnings also
benefited from lower operating costs following the business review in the second
half of 2004.
Northparkes
Underlying earnings of $17 million were $6 million above the first half of 2004.
Copper production was 71 per cent higher as the new Lift 2 block cave
ramped-up to full capacity. Nameplate capacity was reached in June 2005.
Other
Rio Tinto's interests in Somincor, Morro do Ouro and Zinkgruvan which were
reported in the Copper product group, were sold during 2004. Rio Tinto Brasil
and Kennecott Land, which previously reported in the Copper product group now
report in the Iron Ore product group and Other Operations respectively.
Comparative data has been adjusted accordingly.
Diamonds
First half First half Change Full year
2005 2004 2004
Production Diamonds (000 carats)
Argyle 18,057 6,282 +187% 20,620
Diavik 2,558 2,286 +12% 4,545
Gross turnover ($ millions) 454 365 +24% 744
Underlying earnings ($ millions) 99 90 +10% 188
EBITDA ($ millions) 257 198 +30% 419
Capital expenditure ($ millions) 82 80 152
Diamond markets
Due to a strong US jewellery market, demand for rough diamonds, particularly
smaller and larger stones, continued to increase through the first half of 2005.
This resulted in price rises for Argyle and Diavik production. Polished
prices continued to increase at the wholesale level.
Diavik
Underlying earnings of $50 million were $4 million below the first half of 2004.
The effect of the weaker US dollar offset the benefit from higher prices.
Argyle
Underlying earnings of $40 million were $4 million above the first half of 2004.
Production at Argyle returned to more normal levels in the second half of 2004
following the tight mining conditions experienced in the first half.
The Argyle underground feasibility decision on mine closure or further mine
development is expected around the end of the year.
Murowa
Underlying earnings from Murowa, which commenced production in the second half
of 2004, were $9 million.
Other operations
First half First half Change Full year
2005 2004 2004
Underlying earnings ($ millions) 7 11 -36% 25
Kelian ceased processing ore in February 2005 and the final gold pour was in May
2005.
At Kennecott Land's Project Daybreak, land sales started in mid-2004 and will
ramp-up over a period of 5-6 years. To date builders have closed on over 400
lots.
Exploration and evaluation
First half First half Change Full year
2005 2004 2004
Post-tax charge ($ millions) 59 49 +20% 128
Exploration drilling continued on copper targets in Chile, Turkey, Mexico and in
the US. Diamond exploration continued in Canada, Botswana, Mauritania, India
and Brazil. Iron ore exploration continued in the Hamersley Basin (Western
Australia) and in west Africa. Exploration for thermal and coking coal
opportunities continued in southern Africa, Australia and Canada. At La Sampala
(nickel, Indonesia), scoping studies are underway
Brownfield exploration is under way at a number of Rio Tinto businesses, with
notable efforts to expand resources being made in the Pilbara, at KUC, on the
Freeport and Cortez joint ventures, at Greens Creek, and at Northparkes.
Evaluation work continued at Eagle (nickel/copper, US), Sari Gunay (gold, Iran),
Resolution (copper/gold, US), Potasio Rio Colorado (potash, Argentina) and
Simandou (iron ore, Guinea). Reflecting the positive progress so far in its
evaluation and pilot work at Potasio Rio Colorado, Rio Tinto exercised its
option over the Potasio Rio Colorado project in July 2005 to take full ownership
of the project.
Capital projects
Project Estimated Status/Milestones
cost
(100%)
Completed in 2005
Iron ore - HIsmelt (R) (Rio Tinto 60%) direct iron $200m Construction was completed and the
smelting technology. Construction of an 800,000 operations phase began in April 2005.
tonne capacity plant in Kwinana, Western Australia. Full commissioning will take three
years. First hot metal was produced
in June 2005.
Iron ore - Expansion of Yandicoogina mine (Rio $200m Commissioning ramp-up is progressing
Tinto 100 %) from 24 million tonnes per annum to 36 well and the plant has been operating
million tonnes per annum. at design capacity.
Titanium dioxide - Expansion of Rio Tinto Iron & $76m Commissioning started in March 2005
Titanium's (Rio Tinto 100%) upgraded slag plant and the plant is ramping up to full
(UGS) from 250,000 tonnes per annum to 325,000 capacity.
tonnes per annum.
Ongoing
Iron ore - Expansion of Hamersley's (Rio Tinto $685m The project is 76 % complete and
100%) port capacity to 116 million tonnes per remains on track for completion by
annum. the end of 2005.
Iron ore - Expansion by Robe River (Rio Tinto 53%) $200m The project is 63 % complete and
of rail capacity including completion of dual track laying is on schedule.
tracking of 100 km mainline section.
Iron ore - Expansion of West Angelas mine (Rio $105m At 30 June 2005 construction was 84 %
Tinto 53%) from 20 million tonnes per annum to 25 complete and project completion is
million tonnes per annum. expected in the third quarter of
2005.
Coking coal - Hail Creek (Rio Tinto 82%) Expansion $223m A revised project scope, which will
of annual capacity from 6 million tonnes to 8 facilitate expansions beyond 8
million tonnes per annum. million tonnes in line with market
demand and port capacity, was
approved in the first quarter of
2005.
Copper - Escondida Norte (Rio Tinto 30%). $400m First production is expected in the
Satellite deposit will provide mill feed to keep fourth quarter of 2005.
Escondida capacity above 1.2 million tonnes per
annum to the end of 2008.
Copper - Escondida sulphide leach (Rio Tinto 30%). $870m First production is expected in the
The project will produce 180,000 tonnes per annum second half of 2006.
of copper cathode for more than 25 years.
Diamonds - Construction at Diavik (Rio Tinto 60%) $265m The project was approved in December
of the A418 dike, and funding for further study of 2004. Preparatory work has commenced
the viability of underground mining, including the for the construction of the A418
construction of an exploratory decline. dike. Construction of the
exploratory decline has commenced.
First production from the A418 pit
will be in 2008.
Project Estimated Status/Milestones
cost
(100%)
Recently approved
Copper - Kennecott Utah Copper (Rio Tinto 100%) $170m The project was approved in
East 1 pushback. The project extends the life of February 2005 and work on the
the open pit to 2017 while retaining options for pushback has commenced.
further underground or open pit mining thereafter.
Titanium dioxide - Construction by QMM (Rio Tinto $775m The project was approved in August
80%) of a greenfield ilmenite operation in 2005 and first production is
Madagascar and associated upgrade of processing expected in late 2008.
facilities at QIT.
Iron ore - Expansion of Hamersley's (Rio Tinto $290m Approved in April 2005,
100%) Tom Price and Marandoo mines and construction commissioning is expected to
of new mine capacity at Nammuldi. commence from early 2006.
Divestments
The sale of Rio Tinto's holding in the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund
(LIORIF) for cash consideration of $130 million was completed in the first
quarter of 2005. LIORIF has an equity interest of 15.1 per cent in, and
receives royalties from, the Iron Ore Company of Canada (IOC). The transaction
has no effect on Rio Tinto's 59 per cent interest in IOC.
Price & exchange rate sensitivities
The following sensitivities give the estimated effect on underlying earnings
assuming that each individual price or exchange rate moved in isolation. The
relationship between currencies and commodity prices is a complex one and
movements in exchange rates can cause movements in commodity prices and vice
versa. The exchange rate sensitivities quoted below include the effect on
operating costs of movements in exchange rates but exclude the effect due to the
revaluation of foreign currency working capital. They should therefore be used
with care.
Average price/exchange rate 10 per cent change Effect on full year
for first half 2005 underlying earnings
US$m
Copper 151c/lb +/- 15.1c/lb 195
Aluminium 84c/lb +/-8.4c/lb 125
Gold $427/oz +/- $42.7/oz 55
Molybdenum $31/lb +/- $3.1/lb 40
Australian dollar 77USc +/-7.7USc 245
Canadian dollar 81USc +/-8.1 60
South African rand 16USc +/-1.6 20
For further information, please contact:
LONDON AUSTRALIA
Media Relations Media Relations
Lisa Cullimore Ian Head
Office: +44 (0) 20 7753 2305 Office: +61 (0) 3 9283 3620
Mobile: +44 (0) 7730 418 385 Mobile: +61 (0) 408 360 101
Investor Relations Investor Relations
Nigel Jones Dave Skinner
Office +44 (0) 20 7753 2401 Office: +61 (0) 3 9283 3628
Mobile +44 (0) 7917 227 365 Mobile: +61 (0) 408 335 309
Richard Brimelow Susie Creswell
Office: +44 (0) 20 7753 2326 Office: +61 (0) 3 9283 3639
Mobile: +44 (0) 7753 783 825 Mobile: +61 (0) 418 933 792
Website: www.riotinto.com
Group income statement
Six months Six months Year to 31
to 30 June to 30 June December
2005 2004 2004
US$m US$m US$m
Gross turnover (including share of jointly controlled entities and associates) 9,439 6,805 14,530
Share of jointly controlled entities' and associates' turnover (768) (787) (1,576)
Consolidated turnover 8,671 6,018 12,954
Operating costs (excluding impairment charges) (5,823) (4,846) (10,249)
Impairment charges (a) - (160) (558)
Profit on disposal of interests in businesses and investments (b) 98 875 1,180
Operating profit 2,946 1,887 3,327
Share of profit after tax of jointly controlled entities and associates 275 276 523
Profit before finance items and taxation 3,221 2,163 3,850
Finance items
Exchange (losses)/gains on external debt and intragroup balances (14) (191) 119
(Losses)/gains on currency and interest rate derivatives not qualifying
for hedge accounting (27) (9) 16
Interest receivable 23 11 28
Interest payable and similar charges (84) (82) (148)
Amortisation of discount related to provisions (55) (41) (87)
(157) (312) (72)
Profit before taxation 3,064 1,851 3,778
Taxation (a),(b) (801) (228) (613)
Profit for the period 2,263 1,623 3,165
- attributable to outside equity shareholders (a) 98 12 (53)
- attributable to equity shareholders of Rio Tinto (Net earnings) 2,165 1,611 3,218
Basic earnings per ordinary share 157.6c 116.8c 233.3c
Diluted earnings per ordinary share 157.3c 116.7c 232.9c
Dividends per share: paid during the period 45.0c 34.0c 66.0c
Dividends per share: proposed in the announcement of the results for the 38.5c 32.0c 45.0c
period
(a) The tax credit resulting from impairment charges for the year ended 31
December 2004 was US$108 million (half year 2004: nil), and the net charge
attributable to outside equity shareholders was US$129 million (half year 2004:
nil).
(b) The net tax charge resulting from profit on disposal of interests in
businesses and investments for the six months ended 30 June 2005 was US$9
million (half year 2004: nil; year ended 31 December 2004: US$9 million).
Group cash flow statement
Six months Six months Year to 31
to 30 June to 30 June December
2005 2004 2004
US$m US$m US$m
Cash flow from consolidated operations 3,167 1,732 3,974
Dividends from jointly controlled entities and associates 254 288 478
Cash flow from operations 3,421 2,020 4,452
Interest received 23 14 28
Interest paid (90) (100) (179)
Dividends paid to outside shareholders (73) (24) (56)
Tax paid (424) (543) (865)
Cash flow from operating activities 2,857 1,367 3,380
Cash flow from investing activities
(Acquisitions) less disposals of subsidiaries, joint ventures & associates (2) 1,137 1,507
Purchase of property, plant & equipment and intangible assets (1,110) (1,028) (2,256)
Funding of jointly controlled entities and associates 5 - 9
Exploration and evaluation expenditure (102) (73) (190)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets 8 5 41
Sales less purchases of other investments 94 124 231
Cash flows from non-hedge derivatives not related to net debt 15 78 77
Cash (used in)/from investing activities (1,092) 243 (581)
Cash flow before financing activities 1,765 1,610 2,799
Cash flow from financing activities
Equity dividends paid to Rio Tinto shareholders (622) (464) (906)
Own shares purchased from Rio Tinto shareholders (774) - -
Net proceeds from issue of ordinary shares in Rio Tinto 52 13 26
Net proceeds from issue of ordinary shares in subsidiaries to outside
shareholders
- - 7
Finance lease principal payments (73) (11) (20)
Net proceeds from issue of new borrowings 179 76 206
Repayment of borrowings (364) (1,217) (2,041)
Cash flows from non-hedge derivatives related to net debt 5 - -
Cash flows relating to liquid resources not classified as cash and cash 13 33 23
equivalents
Cash used in financing activities (1,584) (1,570) (2,705)
Effects of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents (6) (49) (9)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 175 (9) 85
Opening cash and cash equivalents 326 241 241
Closing cash and cash equivalents 501 232 326
Cash flow from consolidated operations
Profit for the period 2,263 1,623 3,165
Taxation 801 228 613
Net interest payable and amortisation of discount 116 112 207
Share of profit after tax of jointly controlled entities and associates (275) (276) (523)
Profit on disposal of interests in businesses and investments (98) (875) (1,180)
Depreciation and amortisation 660 566 1,171
Impairment charges - 160 558
Exploration and evaluation charged against profit 93 72 190
Provisions 107 67 192
Utilisation of provisions (111) (70) (220)
Change in inventories (228) (122) (217)
Change in trade and other receivables (180) (95) (97)
Change in trade and other payables (31) 103 234
(Gains)/losses on derivatives not qualifying as hedges under IFRS 27 9 (16)
Exchange (gains)/losses on external debt and intragroup balances 14 191 (119)
Other items 9 39 16
3,167 1,732 3,974
Group balance sheet
30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 31 December
2005 2004 2005 2004 2004
A$m A$m US$m US$m US$m
Non-current assets
1,397 1,428 Goodwill 1,062 985 1,075
254 241 Intangible assets 193 166 189
22,527 21,548 Property, plant and equipment 17,121 14,868 16,721
2,722 2,543 Investments in jointly controlled entities and 2,069 1,755 2,016
associates
161 188 Loans to jointly controlled entities 122 130 130
58 84 Inventories 44 58 68
933 1,122 Trade and other receivables 709 774 770
16 36 Deferred tax assets 12 25 52
178 180 Tax recoverable 135 124 125
524 487 Derivatives related to net debt 398 336 494
461 361 Other financial assets 350 249 275
29,231 28,218 22,215 19,470 21,915
Current assets
2,791 2,529 Inventories 2,121 1,745 1,952
63 62 Loans to jointly controlled entities 48 43 46
2,716 2,417 Trade and other receivables 2,064 1,668 1,832
29 35 Tax recoverable 22 24 29
4 6 Derivatives related to net debt 3 4 29
188 270 Other financial assets 143 186 99
- 3 Other liquid resources - 2 14
741 513 Cash and cash equivalents 563 354 392
6,532 5,835 4,964 4,026 4,393
Current liabilities
(82) (177) Bank overdrafts repayable on demand (62) (122) (66)
(1,084) (988) Borrowings (824) (682) (789)
(2,241) (2,119) Trade and other payables (1,703) (1,462) (1,753)
(57) - Other financial liabilities (43) - -
(516) (142) Tax payable (392) (98) (142)
(354) (335) Provisions (269) (231) (193)
(4,334) (3,761) (3,293) (2,595) (2,943)
2,198 2,074 Net current assets 1,671 1,431 1,450
Non-current liabilities
(4,613) (6,442) Borrowings (3,506) (4,445) (3,883)
(1,043) (964) Trade and other payables (793) (665) (910)
(30) - Derivatives related to net debt (23) - -
(133) (112) Tax payable (101) (77) (87)
(2,979) (2,725) Deferred tax liabilities (2,264) (1,880) (2,135)
(5,157) (4,572) Provisions (3,919) (3,155) (3,759)
(13,955) (14,815) (10,606) (10,222) (10,774)
17,474 15,477 Net assets 13,280 10,679 12,591
Capital and reserves
Share capital
226 249 - Rio Tinto plc 172 172 172
1,384 1,452 - Rio Tinto Limited (excl. Rio Tinto plc interest) 1,052 1,002 1,133
2,436 2,628 Share premium account 1,851 1,813 1,822
339 (517) Other reserves 258 (357) 432
12,118 10,556 Retained earnings 9,209 7,284 8,318
16,503 14,368 Equity attributable to Rio Tinto shareholders 12,542 9,914 11,877
971 1,109 Attributable to outside equity shareholders 738 765 714
17,474 15,477 Total equity 13,280 10,679 12,591
Group statement of recognised income and expense
Attributable Outside Six months Six months Year to 31
to interests to 30 June to 30 June December
shareholders 2005 2004 2004
of Rio Tinto Total Total Total
US$m US$m US$m US$m US$m
Profit for the period 2,165 98 2,263 1,623 3,165
Currency translation adjustment (269) (22) (291) (508) 489
Cash flow hedge fair value gains 10 2 12 - -
Gains on available for sale securities 18 1 19 - -
Cash flow hedge (gains)/losses transferred to the
income statement 4 (1) 3 - -
(Gains)/losses on available for sale securities
transferred to the income statement (76) - (76) - -
Actuarial gains/(losses) on post retirement benefit
plans 52 - 52 11 (153)
Total recognised income for the year 1,904 78 1,982 1,126 3,501
(a) The amounts above are shown net of tax.
Group statement of changes in equity
Attributable Outside Six months Six months Year to 31
to interests to 30 June to 30 June December
shareholders 2005 2004 2004
of Rio Tinto Total Total Total
US$m US$m US$m US$m US$m
Opening balance 11,877 714 12,591 10,023 10,023
Adjustment for adoption of IAS 39 90 19 109 - -
Opening balance as restated 11,967 733 12,700 10,023 10,023
Total recognised income for the year 1,904 78 1,982 1,126 3,501
Employee share options charged to income statement 14 - 14 10 27
Dividends (621) (73) (694) (493) (966)
Subsidiaries disposed of - - - - (27)
Own shares purchased from Rio Tinto shareholders (774) - (774) - -
Ordinary shares issued 52 - 52 13 33
Closing balance 12,542 738 13,280 10,679 12,591
The adoption of IAS 39 resulted in a US$90 million increase in equity
attributable to Rio Tinto shareholders at 1 January 2005. This was net of
consequential increases in deferred tax liabilities of US$24 million, and
outside equity shareholders' interests of US$19 million. This represents the
net gain on marking to market of qualifying hedges, embedded derivatives,
available for sale investments and certain derivatives that do not qualify as
hedges, which were not previously recognised under IFRS.
The major balance sheet line items affected were financial assets: increase of
US$287 million, financial liabilities: increase of US$66 million, and
borrowings: increase of US$69 million. The net impact on other balance sheet
items was a credit of US$19 million.
Reconciliation of Net earnings to Underlying earnings
Pre-tax Taxation Outside Six months Six months Year to 31
interests to 30 June to 30 June December
2005 2004 2004
Net Net Net
amount amount amount
Exclusions from Underlying earnings US$m US$m US$m
Gains relating to disposal of interests in
businesses and investments 98 (9) - 89 875 1,175
Impairment charges
- Palabora - - - - - (161)
- Colowyo - - - - (160) (160)
- - - - (160) (321)
Exchange differences and derivatives
- Exchange gains/(losses) on external
debt and intragroup balances (14) 12 15 13 (80) 80
- Gains/(losses) on derivatives, not qualifying
as hedges (27) 7 - (20) (7) 8
- Gains/(losses) on external debt and
derivatives not qualifying as hedges in jointly
controlled entities and associates (net of tax) (4) (4) (10) 4
(45) 19 15 (11) (97) 92
Total excluded from Underlying earnings 53 10 15 78 618 946
Net earnings 3,064 (801) (98) 2,165 1,611 3,218
Underlying earnings 3,011 (811) (113) 2,087 993 2,272
'Underlying earnings' is an alternative measure of earnings, which is reported
by Rio Tinto to provide greater understanding of the underlying business
performance of its operations. Underlying earnings and net earnings both
represent amounts attributable to Rio Tinto shareholders. The items excluded
from Net earnings in arriving at Underlying earnings are as follows:
- Gains and losses arising on the disposal of interests in businesses
and undeveloped properties
- Charges and credits relating to impairment of non-current assets,
excluding those related to current year exploration expenditure
- Exchange gains and losses on US dollar debt and intragroup balances
- Valuation changes on currency and interest rate derivatives which are
ineligible for hedge accounting, other than those embedded in
commercial contracts
- The currency revaluation of embedded US dollar derivatives contained
in contracts held by entities whose functional currency is not the
US dollar
- Other credits and charges that, individually, or in aggregate if of a
similar type, are of a nature and size to require exclusion in order
to provide additional insight into underlying business performance
Consolidated net debt
Cash and Other Borrowings 30 June 30 June 31 December
cash liquid 2005 2004 2004
equivalents resources Net debt Net debt Net debt
US$m US$m US$m
Analysis of changes in consolidated net debt
At 1 January 326 14 (4,149) (3,809) (5,710) (5,710)
Adjustment for adoption of IAS 39 - - (10) (10) - -
Opening balance as restated 326 14 (4,159) (3,819) (5,710) (5,710)
Adjustment on currency translation (4) (1) 61 56 237 (203)
Exchange gains/(losses) charged to the
income statement (2) - 1 (1) (207) 161
(Losses) on derivatives related to net
debt (44) (44) - -
Exchange gains/(losses) recognised in
reserves - - - - (32) 5
Subsidiaries disposed of - - - - 12
Finance leases raised less repaid - 9 9 11 20
Cash flow excluding exchange movements 181 (13) 180 348 1,148 1,906
Closing balance 501 - (3,952) (3,451) (4,553) (3,809)
Cash and Other Borrowings 30 June 30 June 31 December
cash liquid 2005 2004 2004
equivalents resources Net debt Net debt Net debt
US$m US$m US$m
Reconciliation to balance sheet
categories
Non-current - (3,506) (3,506) (4,445) (3,883)
Current 563 - (824) (261) (326) (383)
Bank overdrafts repayable on demand (62) - (62) (122) (66)
Derivatives related to net debt:
non-current 375 375 336 494
Derivatives related to net debt: current 3 3 4 29
Balances per above 501 - (3,952) (3,451) (4,553) (3,809)
Primary segmental analysis (by product group)
Six months Six months Year to 31
to 30 June to 30 June December
2005 2004 2004
US$m US$m US$m
Turnover
Iron ore 2,343 1,401 3,009
Energy 1,719 1,264 2,826
Industrial minerals 1,157 911 2,052
Aluminium 1,383 1,119 2,356
Copper 1,505 827 1,756
Diamonds 454 365 744
Other 110 131 211
Consolidated turnover 8,671 6,018 12,954
Share of jointly controlled entities and associates 768 787 1,576
Gross turnover 9,439 6,805 14,530
Consolidated profit before finance costs and taxation
Iron ore (c) 1,210 419 887
Energy (c),(d) 461 27 455
Industrial minerals 206 158 362
Aluminium (c) 295 211 520
Copper (c),(d) 791 935 1,037
Diamonds 169 151 311
Other (c) (124) 20 (131)
Exploration and evaluation (c) (62) (34) (114)
Operating profit (segment result) 2,946 1,887 3,327
Share of profit after tax of jointly controlled entities and associates
Copper 250 238 495
Other product groups 25 38 28
275 276 523
Profit before finance costs and taxation 3,221 2,163 3,850
(a) The product groups shown above reflect the Group's management structure
and are the Group's primary segments in accordance with IAS 14 'Segment
reporting'. The analysis deals with the turnover and profit before
finance costs and taxation for subsidiary companies and proportionally
consolidated joint ventures. The amounts presented for each product
group exclude equity accounted units, and include the amounts
attributable to outside equity shareholders. The classification is
consistent with the financial information by business unit data included
on pages 7 and 8 of this news release. However, that information
includes the results of equity accounted units and presents different
financial measures. Generally this product group structure has regard
to the primary product of each business unit, but there are exceptions.
For example, the Copper group includes certain gold operations. The
classification differs, therefore, from the Commodity analysis which is
included on page 26 of these financial statements, in which the
contributions of individual business units are attributed to several
products as appropriate.
(b) The analysis of profit before finance costs and taxation includes the
profit on disposal of interests in businesses and investments, and
impairment charges, which are excluded from Underlying earnings, as
detailed below.
(c) Disposals of businesses and investments: gains of US$84 million are
included within the Iron Ore product group (2004 half year: nil; 2004
full year: nil). Gains of US$11 million are included within the
Aluminium product group (2004 half year: US$6 million; 2004 full year:
US$4 million). Gains of US$3 million are included within Exploration
and evaluation (2004 half year: US$22 million; 2004 full year:
US$30 million). For the year ended 31 December 2004, gains of
US$64 million were included within the Energy product group (2004 half
year: US$3 million loss), US$976 million within the Copper product
group (2004 half year: US$744 million) and US$136 million were included
in 'other' (2004 half year: US$128 million).
(d) Impairment charges of US$160 million were reported within the Energy
product group for the six months ended 30 June 2004. For the year ended
31 December 2004, impairment charges of US$160 million were reported
within the Energy product group, and US$398 million within the Copper
product group.
Commodity analysis
Six months Six months Year to 31
First half First half to 30 June to 30 June December
2005 2004 2005 2004 2004
% % US$m US$m US$m
Gross turnover
13.0 16.1 Copper 1,227 1,094 2,233
3.9 5.0 Gold (all sources) 370 338 634
24.8 20.0 Iron ore 2,343 1,360 2,931
17.4 18.1 Coal 1,643 1,230 2,709
14.7 16.2 Aluminium 1,383 1,103 2,320
13.1 14.2 Industrial minerals 1,233 967 2,175
4.8 5.4 Diamonds 454 366 744
8.3 5.0 Other products 786 347 784
100.0 100.0 9,439 6,805 14,530
Net earnings
36.9 35.6 Copper, gold and by-products 831 413 862
30.2 21.7 Iron ore 681 251 565
13.1 13.1 Coal 296 152 416
9.0 14.0 Aluminium 203 162 331
5.7 7.9 Industrial minerals 129 91 256
4.4 7.7 Diamonds 99 90 188
0.7 - Other products 16 - 25
100.0 100.0 2,255 1,159 2,643
Exploration and evaluation (59) (49) (128)
Net interest (31) (43) (69)
Other items (78) (74) (174)
Underlying earnings 2,087 993 2,272
Items excluded from Underlying earnings 78 618 946
Net earnings 2,165 1,611 3,218
This analysis is strictly by commodity. In this regard it differs from the
primary segmental analysis on page 25, and the financial information by Business
Unit on pages 7 and 8, both of which are based on the Group's management
structure. The notes to the primary segmental analysis by product group provide
further detailed explanation of differences in presentation between the
commodity analysis above and the primary segmental analysis.
Geographical analysis (by country of origin)
Six months Six months Year to 31
First half First half to 30 June to 30 June December
2005 2004 2005 2004 2004
% % US$m US$m US$m
Gross turnover
31.5 31.8 North America 2,969 2,161 4,571
50.9 47.1 Australia and New Zealand 4,808 3,202 7,023
6.0 7.7 South America 566 523 1,131
5.3 5.6 Africa 501 383 850
3.2 2.4 Indonesia 299 165 314
3.1 5.5 Europe and other countries 296 371 641
100.0 100.0 9,439 6,805 14,530
Net earnings
34.2 34.9 North America 724 362 829
51.9 47.5 Australia and New Zealand 1,099 492 1,130
9.2 16.3 South America 195 169 364
2.0 (0.4) Africa 42 (4) 2
4.4 1.1 Indonesia 93 11 44
(1.7) 0.6 Europe and other countries (35) 6 (28)
100.0 100.0 2,118 1,036 2,341
Net interest (31) (43) (69)
Underlying earnings 2,087 993 2,272
Items excluded from underlying earnings 78 618 946
Net earnings 2,165 1,611 3,218
The above analyses include Rio Tinto's share of the results of jointly
controlled entities and associates including interest.
The amortisation of discount is included in the applicable product category and
geographical area. All other financing costs of subsidiaries are included in
'Net interest'.
Prima facie tax reconciliation
Six months Six months Year to 31
to 30 June to 30 June December
2005 2004 2004
US$m US$m US$m
Profit before taxation 3,064 1,851 3,778
Deduct: share of net profit of jointly controlled entities and associates (275) (276) (523)
Parent companies' and subsidiaries' profit before tax 2,789 1,575 3,255
Prima facie tax payable at UK and Australian rate of 30% (a) 837 473 977
Impact of items excluded from Underlying earnings (27) (262) (290)
Permanent differences relating to:
Other tax rates applicable outside the UK and Australia (23) (20) (33)
Resource depletion and other depreciation allowances (5) (14) (25)
Research, development and other investment allowances (3) (2) (7)
Exchange differences relating to deferred tax balances - 16 (12)
Other 22 37 3
(9) 17 (74)
Total taxation charge 801 228 613
(a) The benefit of 'other tax rates applicable outside UK and Australia'
includes the effect of the US Alternative Minimum Tax rate of 20 per
cent.
(b) This tax reconciliation relates to the parent companies and
subsidiaries. The Group's share of profit of jointly controlled
entities and associates is net of tax charges of US$136 million
(2004 half year: US$114 million, 2004 full year: US$262 million).
Other disclosures
Capital commitments
Contractual commitments to acquire fixed assets were US$618 million at 30 June
2005 (at 31 December 2004:US$700 million).
Contingent liabilities
There were no material changes in contingent liabilities or contingent assets
during the period.
Share buyback
In May 2005, Rio Tinto Limited bought back 27,294,139 of its own shares from
public shareholders at a buy back price of A$36.70 per share. Under a matching
buy back agreement, Rio Tinto Limited also bought back 16,367,000 of its shares
held by a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc.
Related party matters
Transactions and balances with jointly controlled entities and associates are
included in the lines of the financial statements set out below. Purchases
relate largely to amounts charged by jointly controlled entities for toll
processing of bauxite and alumina. Sales relate largely to charges for supply of
coal to jointly controlled marketing entities for onsale to third party
customers.
Six months Six months Year to 31
to 30 June to 30 June December
2005 2004 2004
Income statement items US$m US$m US$m
Purchases from jointly controlled entities and associates (606) (539) (1,078)
Sales to jointly controlled entities and associates 477 296 692
Balance sheet items US$m US$m US$m
Investments in jointly controlled entities and associates 2,069 1,755 2,016
Loans to jointly controlled entities 170 173 176
Trade and other receivables: amounts due from jointly controlled entities
and associates 659 574 672
Trade and other payables: amounts due to jointly controlled entities and
associates (581) (511) (601)
Non-adjusting post balance sheet event
On 1 July 2005, Rio Tinto reached agreement with Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd to
purchase a 50 per cent joint venture interest in the Hope Downs iron ore
resource.
Reconciliation of 2004 UK GAAP Earnings to 2004 IFRS Earnings
Six months Year to 31
to 30 June December
2004 2004
Attributable to Rio Tinto shareholders US$m US$m
Net earnings under UK GAAP 1,439 2,813
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of :
Reversal of goodwill amortisation 37 77
Post retirement benefits 20 25
Share based payments (16) (27)
Deferred tax 4 (7)
Profit on disposal of interests in businesses and investments 269 262
Exchange gains/(losses) on US$ debt and intra-group balances (89) 80
Mark to market of derivatives (14) 12
Other (39) (17)
Net earnings under IFRS 1,611 3,218
Six months Year to 31
to 30 June December
2004 2004
Outside equity shareholders' interests US$m US$m
Profit under UK GAAP 20 (58)
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of :
Post retirement benefits 1 2
Deferred tax 1 -
Exchange gains/(losses) on US$ debt (9) 12
Other (1) (9)
Profit under IFRS 12 (53)
Six months Year to 31
to 30 June December
2004 2004
Profit for the period US$m US$m
Profit under UK GAAP 1,459 2,755
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of :
Reversal of goodwill amortisation 37 77
Post retirement benefits 21 27
Share based payments (16) (27)
Deferred tax 5 (7)
Profit on disposal of interests in businesses and investments 269 262
Exchange gains/(losses) on US$ debt (98) 92
Mark to market of derivatives (14) 12
Other (40) (26)
Profit under IFRS 1,623 3,165
Explanations of the IFRS adjustments affecting both earnings and shareholders'
equity are given on the following pages.
Reconciliation of 2004 shareholders' equity under UK GAAP to 2004
shareholders' equity under IFRS
31 December 30 June 2004 1 January
2004 2004
Attributable to Rio Tinto shareholders US$m US$m US$m
Under UK GAAP 12,584 10,685 10,037
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of :
Deferred tax (899) (806) (885)
Post retirement benefits (764) (613) (659)
Dividends 626 433 469
Exchange differences on capital expenditure hedges 162 132 93
Goodwill 74 36 -
Mark to market of derivative contracts 99 73 139
Other (5) (26) 6
Under IFRS 11,877 9,914 9,200
31 December 30 June 2004 1 January
2004 2004
Outside equity shareholders' interests US$m US$m US$m
Under UK GAAP 936 934 1,003
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of :
Deferred tax (114) (102) (108)
Post retirement benefits (91) (58) (66)
Other (17) (9) (6)
Under IFRS 714 765 823
31 December 30 June 2004 1 January
2004 2004
Total equity US$m US$m US$m
Under UK GAAP 13,520 11,619 11,040
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of :
Deferred tax (1,013) (908) (993)
Post retirement benefits (855) (671) (725)
Dividends 626 433 469
Exchange differences on capital expenditure hedges 162 132 93
Goodwill 74 36 -
Mark to market of derivative contracts 102 73 139
Other (25) (35) -
Under IFRS 12,591 10,679 10,023
Items affecting the UK GAAP to IFRS reconciliations
The Group's transition date for IFRS was 1 January 2004. The principal
differences between UK GAAP and IFRS were described in detail in the IFRS
restatement released on 5 May 2005. A summary of these differences is given
below.
Reversal of goodwill amortisation
The systematic amortisation of goodwill under UK GAAP, by an annual charge to
the profit and loss account, ceased under IFRS. The carrying value of goodwill
is subject to annual impairment reviews.
Post-retirement benefits
Under UK GAAP, the Group applied SSAP 24, Accounting for Pension Costs under
which post retirement benefit surpluses and deficits were spread over the
expected average remaining service lives of relevant current employees. Under
IAS 19 the basis of calculating the surplus or deficit differs from SSAP 24. In
addition, IAS 19 permits three alternative ways in which the surplus or deficit
can be recognised. The Group has chosen to recognise actuarial gains and losses
directly in shareholders' equity via the Statement of Recognised Income and
Expense (SORIE). The annual service cost and net financial income on the assets
and liabilities of the Group's post retirement benefit plans are recognised
through Net Earnings.
Share based payments
Under UK GAAP, no cost was recognised in respect of the Group's share option
schemes. IFRS requires the economic cost of share option plans to be recognised
by reference to fair value on the grant date, and charged to the Income
Statement over the expected vesting period.
Reconciliation of 2004 shareholders' equity under UK GAAP to 2004
shareholders' equity under IFRS (continued)
Deferred tax on fair value adjustments arising on acquisitions
IFRS requires deferred tax to be recognised on all fair value adjustments, other
than those recorded as goodwill. The profit under IFRS will benefit as the
additional deferred tax provisions on upward revaluations of non-monetary items,
on which no deferred tax was provided under UK GAAP, are released to the Income
Statement in line with the amortisation of the related fair value adjustments.
For acquisitions prior to 1 January 2004, the increase in deferred tax
provisions was reflected as a reduction in opening shareholders' equity. For
acquisitions after 1 January 2004, these additional deferred tax provisions will
be offset by increases to the value of goodwill or other acquired assets.
Deferred tax on unremitted earnings
Under UK GAAP, tax was only provided on unremitted earnings to the extent that
dividends were accrued or if there was a binding agreement for the distribution
of earnings at the reporting date. Under IFRS, full provision must be made for
tax arising on unremitted earnings from subsidiaries, joint ventures and
associated companies, except to the extent that the Group can control the timing
of remittances and remittance is not probable in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax related to closure costs
Under IFRS, deferred tax is not provided on the depreciation of capitalised
closure costs, except to the extent that the capitalised amount was first
recognised in accounting for an acquisition.
Profits on disposal of subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and undeveloped
properties
In 2004, the majority of additional profit on disposals under IFRS arose because
under UK GAAP goodwill that had been eliminated against reserves at the time of
the acquisition was reinstated and charged against earnings at the time of
disposal. Such reinstatement does not apply under IFRS.
Exchange differences on net debt
The Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars. A substantial part
of the Group's US dollar debt is located in subsidiaries having functional
currencies other than the US dollar. Under IFRS, exchange gains and losses
relating to US dollar debt and certain intragroup financing balances are
included in the Group US dollar Income Statement, whereas under UK GAAP they
were taken to reserves.
Mark to market of derivative contracts
Some derivative contracts that qualified for hedge accounting under UK GAAP do
not qualify for hedge accounting under IFRS, for example because the instrument
is not located in the operation which carries the exposure. These contracts are
marked to market under IFRS, thereby giving rise to charges or credits to the
income statement in periods before the hedged transaction is recognised.
Dividends
Under IFRS, dividends that do not represent a present obligation at the
reporting date are not included in the balance sheet. Hence, the Companies'
proposed dividends are not recognised in the Group accounts until the period in
which they are declared by the directors or approved by shareholders.
Subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates
The basis for determining the presentation of partially owned operations in the
Group's financial statements differs in certain respects between IFRS and UK
GAAP. The Group has decided to adopt equity accounting for all jointly
controlled entities.
Material adjustments to the cash flow statement
The pre-tax cash flows from operations for the six months to 30 June 2004, and
for the year ended 31 December 2004, including dividends from equity accounted
joint ventures and associates, were similar to those under UK GAAP. Some
operations equity accounted under UK GAAP are proportionately consolidated under
IFRS, and vice-versa, with the effect that the increase in cash flow from
subsidiary operations is largely offset by lower reported dividends from equity
accounted joint ventures and associates.
In accordance with IAS 7 'Cash flow statements', cash equivalents include
certain bank deposits with a maturity of greater than 24 hours. These were
previously shown as current asset investments, as they did not fall within the
definition of cash according to FRS 1 'Cash flow statements', under which only
deposits having a maturity of not more than 24 hours may be classified as cash.
Accounting principles
ACCOUNTING POLICIES ADOPTED UNDER IFRS
The basis of preparation and accounting policies used in preparing the interim
accounts for the six months ended 30 June 2005 are set out below. The basis of
preparation describes how IFRS has been applied under IFRS 1, the assumptions
made by the Group about the Standards and Interpretations expected to be
effective, and the policies expected to be adopted, when the Group issues its
first complete set of IFRS financial statements for the year ending 31 December
2005. The basis of preparation and accounting policies, including the
exemptions applied under IFRS 1 are consistent with those disclosed in the
Group's 2004 IFRS restatement published on 5 May 2005, as amended for the
adoption of IAS 32 'Financial instruments: disclosure and presentation', IAS 39
'Financial instruments: recognition and measurement' and IFRS 5 'Non-current
assets held for sale and discontinued operations' from 1 January 2005.
However, the basis of preparation and accounting policies may require adjustment
before the Group issues its first complete set of IFRS financial statements.
Standards currently in issue and endorsed by the EU are subject to
Interpretations issued from time to time by the International Financial
Reporting Interpretations Committee ('IFRIC'), and further Standards may be
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ('IASB') that will be
adopted by the Group in its first complete set of IFRS financial statements for
the year ending 31 December 2005. Also, the directors have assumed that the
Group's first complete set of IFRS financial statements will be able to reflect
certain Standards and Interpretations currently in issue which have yet to be
endorsed by the EU.
Additionally, IFRS is currently being applied in a large number of countries for
the first time. Due to a number of new and revised Standards included within
IFRS, there is not yet a significant body of established practice on which to
draw in forming opinions regarding interpretation and application. Accordingly,
practice is continuing to evolve.
At this preliminary stage, therefore, the full financial effect of reporting
under IFRS as it will be applied in the Group's first complete set of IFRS
financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2005 may be subject to
change.
Basis of preparation
Except as described below, the interim accounts for the six months ended 30 June
2005 have been prepared on the basis of all IFRS Standards and Interpretations
published by 31 December 2004, and are prepared in accordance with IAS 34,
'Interim financial reporting'. The 2004 comparative financial information has
also been prepared on this basis, with the exception of certain standards,
details of which are given below, for which comparative information has not been
restated.
A number of IFRS Standards and Interpretations are not yet mandatory but can be
adopted early under their respective transition arrangements. The Group has
early adopted IFRS 6 'Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources', the
amendment to IAS 19 'Employee Benefits: Actuarial Gains and Losses, Group Plans
and Disclosures' and IFRIC 5 'Rights to Interests arising from Decommissioning,
Restoration and Environmental Rehabilitation Funds'. These Standards and
Interpretations have not yet been endorsed by the EU.
The Group has not applied the pronouncement IFRIC 4 'Determining whether an
arrangement contains a lease' for which adoption is not mandatory until the year
ending 31 December 2006 and which has not yet been endorsed by the EU.
The Group is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement and may
decide to adopt it in the year ending 31 December 2005, assuming it is endorsed
by the EU, in which case the information included in these interim accounts will
need to be restated.
The Group's transition date to IFRS is 1 January 2004. The rules for first-time
adoption of IFRS are set out in IFRS 1 'First-time adoption of International
Financial Reporting Standards'. In preparing the IFRS financial information,
these transition rules have been applied to the amounts reported previously
under generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom ('UK
GAAP'). IFRS 1 generally requires full retrospective application of the
Standards and Interpretations in force at the first reporting date. However,
IFRS 1 allows certain exemptions in the application of particular Standards to
prior periods in order to assist companies with the transition process. Rio
Tinto has applied the following exemptions:
- The Group has elected to adopt IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 5 with effect
from 1 January 2005, with no restatement of comparative information for 2004.
Accounting policy notes b), e) and i) explain the treatment of non-current
assets held for sale prior to and after adopting IFRS 5. Accounting policy
note p) explains the basis of accounting for financial instruments pre and
post 1 January 2005.
- The Group has applied IFRS 2 'Share-based Payment' to all share-based
payments which had not vested at 1 January 2004, the date chosen by the Group
as the effective date for application of IFRS 2.
- The Group has not restated business combinations that occurred before
the date of transition to comply with IFRS 3 'Business Combinations'. This
means that:
- The 1995 merger of the economic interests of Rio Tinto plc and Rio
Tinto Limited into the dual listed companies ('DLC') structure
continues to be accounted for as a merger.
- Additional deferred tax provisions recognised in respect of upward
revaluations of non-monetary assets held by previously acquired
entities have been recognised as a reduction of shareholders' equity
on the date of transition.
- The Group has deemed cumulative translation differences for foreign
operations to be zero at the date of transition. Any gains and losses on
subsequent disposals of foreign operations will not therefore include
translation differences arising prior to the transition date.
In respect of the comparative financial information disclosed, IFRS 1 requires
that estimates made under IFRS must be consistent with estimates made for the
same date under UK GAAP except where adjustments are required to reflect any
differences in accounting policies.
Accounting principles (continued)
(a) Accounting convention
The financial information included in the interim accounts for the six months
ended 30 June 2005, and for the related comparative periods, has been prepared
under the historical cost convention as modified by the revaluation of certain
derivative contracts as set out in the notes below.
(b) Basis of consolidation
The financial statements consist of the consolidation of the accounts of Rio
Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited (together 'the Group') and their respective
subsidiaries.
Subsidiaries: Subsidiaries are entities over which the Group has the power to
govern the financial and operating policies in order to obtain benefits from
their activities. Control is presumed to exist where the Group owns more than
one half of the voting rights (which does not always equate to percentage
ownership) unless in exceptional circumstances it can be demonstrated that
ownership does not constitute control. Control does not exist where joint
venture partners hold veto rights over significant operating and financial
decisions. The consolidated financial statements include all the assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of the parent and its
subsidiaries after eliminating intercompany balances and transactions. For
partly owned subsidiaries, the net assets and net earnings attributable to
minority shareholders are presented as 'Attributable to outside equity
shareholders' interests' on the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated
income statement.
Associates: An associate is an entity, that is neither a subsidiary nor a joint
venture, over whose operating and financial policies the Group exercises
significant influence. Significant influence is presumed to exist where the
Group has between 20 per cent and 50 per cent of the voting rights, but can also
arise where the Group holds less than 20 per cent if it is actively involved and
influential in policy decisions affecting the entity. The Group's share of the
net assets, post tax results and reserves of associates are included in the
financial statements using the equity accounting method. This involves
recording the investment initially at cost to the Group and then, in subsequent
periods, adjusting the carrying amount of the investment to reflect the Group's
share of the associate's results less any impairment of goodwill and any other
changes to the associate's net assets such as dividends.
Joint ventures: A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby two or more
parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control. Joint
control is the contractually agreed sharing of control such that significant
operating and financial decisions require the consent of more than one venturer.
The Group has two types of joint ventures:
Jointly controlled entities ('JCEs'): A JCE is a joint venture that involves
the establishment of a corporation, partnership or other entity in which each
venturer has a long term interest. JCEs are accounted for using the equity
accounting method.
Jointly controlled assets ('JCAs'): A JCA is a joint venture in which the
venturers have joint control over the assets contributed to or acquired for the
purposes of the joint venture. JCAs do not involve the establishment of a
corporation, partnership or other entity. This includes situations where the
participants derive benefit from the joint activity through a share of the
production, rather than by receiving a share of the results of trading. The
Group's proportionate interest in the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses
and cash flows of JCAs are incorporated into the Group's financial statements
under the appropriate headings.
Acquisitions: The results of businesses acquired during the year are brought
into the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
Disposals: From 1 January 2005, individual non-current assets or 'disposal
groups' (i.e. groups of assets and the liabilities directly associated with the
assets to be disposed of) to be disposed of, by sale or otherwise in a single
transaction, are classified as 'held for sale' if the following criteria are
met:
- the carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale
transaction rather than through continuing use, and
- the disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present
condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for such sales,
and
- the sale is highly probable.
Disposal groups held for sale are carried at the lower of their pre- existing
carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell and are presented separately
on the face of the balance sheet with the related assets and liabilities being
presented as a single asset and a single liability respectively.
The results of disposal groups classified as held for sale are included in the
consolidated financial statements for the period up to the date of
classification as held for sale. Where a disposal group (or group of disposal
groups) classified as held for sale represents a separate major line of business
or geographical area of operations, and is part of a single co-ordinated plan of
disposal or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale, it is
classified as a discontinued operation and the net results attributable to the
disposal group (or group of disposal groups) are shown separately.
For a disposal group held for sale which continues to be carried at its
pre-existing carrying amount, the profit on disposal, calculated as net sales
proceeds less the pre-existing carrying amount, is recognised in the income
statement in the period during which completion of the sale takes place. Where
the fair value less costs to sell of a disposal group is lower than the
pre-existing carrying amount, the resulting charge is recognised in the income
statement in the period during which the disposal group is classified as held
for sale.
Prior to 1 January 2005, the results of businesses sold during the year were
included in the consolidated financial statements for the period up to the date
of disposal. Gains or losses on disposal were calculated as the difference
between the sale proceeds (net of expenses) and the net assets attributable to
the interest which had been sold.
Accounting principles (continued)
(c) Turnover
Turnover comprises sales to third parties at invoiced amounts, with most sales
being priced ex works, free on board (f.o.b.) or cost, insurance and freight
(c.i.f.). Amounts billed to customers in respect of shipping and handling are
classed as turnover where the Group is responsible for carriage, insurance and
freight. All shipping and handling costs incurred by the Group are recognised as
operating costs. If the Group is acting solely as an agent, amounts billed to
customers are offset against the relevant costs.
Turnover excludes any applicable sales taxes. Mining royalties are presented as
an operating cost. Gross turnover shown in the income statement includes the
Group's share of the turnover of equity accounted JCEs and associates.
By-product revenues are included in turnover.
A large proportion of Group production is sold under medium to long term
contracts, but turnover is only recognised on individual sales when persuasive
evidence exists indicating that all of the following criteria are met:
- the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the product have
been transferred to the buyer;
- neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually
associated with ownership nor effective control over the goods sold has been
retained;
- the amount of revenue can be measured reliably;
- it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the sale will
flow to the Group;
- the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the sale can be
measured reliably.
These conditions are generally satisfied when title passes to the customer. In
most instances turnover is recognised when the product is delivered to the
destination specified by the customer, which is typically the vessel on which it
will be shipped, the destination port or the customer's premises.
The turnover from sales of many products is subject to adjustment based on an
inspection of the product by the customer. In such cases, turnover is initially
recognised on a provisional basis using the Group's best estimate of contained
metal. Any subsequent adjustments to the initial estimate of metal content are
recorded in turnover once they have been determined.
Certain products are 'provisionally priced', i.e. the selling price is subject
to final adjustment at the end of a period normally ranging from 30 to 180 days
after delivery to the customer, based on the market price at the relevant
quotation point stipulated in the contract. Turnover is initially recognised
when the conditions set out above have been met, using market prices at that
date. At each reporting date the provisionally priced metal is marked to market
based on the forward selling price for the quotational period stipulated in the
contract until the quotational period expires. For this purpose, the selling
price can be measured reliably for those products, such as copper, for which
there exists an active and freely traded commodity market such as the London
Metals Exchange and the value of product sold by the Group is directly linked to
the form in which it is traded on that market.
From 1 January 2005, under IAS 39, the marking to market of provisionally priced
contracts is recorded as an adjustment to operating costs. Prior to 1 January
2005, the marking to market was recorded as an adjustment to turnover.
(d) Currency translation
The functional currency for each entity in the Group is determined as the
currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates. For most
entities, this is the local currency of the country in which it operates.
Transactions other than those in the functional currency of the entity are
translated at the exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at
year end exchange rates.
On consolidation, income statement items are translated into US dollars, which
is the Group's presentation currency, at average rates of exchange. Balance
sheet items are translated into US dollars at year end exchange rates. Exchange
differences on the translation of the net assets of entities with functional
currencies other than the US dollar, and any offsetting exchange differences on
net debt hedging those net assets, are dealt with through reserves.
Exchange gains and losses which arise on balances between Group entities are
taken to reserves where that balance is, in substance, part of a parent's net
investment in its subsidiary.
The Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars and a substantial part
of the Group's US dollar debt is located in subsidiaries having functional
currencies other than the US dollar. Except as noted above, exchange gains and
losses relating to such US dollar debt are charged or credited to the Group's
income statement in the year in which they arise. This means that the impact of
financing in US dollars on the Group's income statement is dependent on the
functional currency of the particular subsidiary where the debt is located.
Except as noted above, or in note (p) below relating to derivative contracts,
all exchange differences are charged or credited to the income statement in the
year in which they arise.
Accounting principles (continued)
(e) Goodwill and intangible assets
Goodwill represents the difference between the cost of acquisition and the fair
value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill on acquisition of
subsidiaries and JCAs is separately disclosed and goodwill on acquisitions of
associates and JCEs is included within investments in equity accounted entities.
In 1997 and previous years, goodwill was eliminated against reserves in the year
of acquisition as a matter of accounting policy, as was then permitted under UK
GAAP. Such goodwill was not reinstated under subsequent UK accounting standards
or on transition to IFRS. Goodwill on the Group's opening IFRS balance sheet in
respect of acquisitions prior to 1 January 2004 is therefore stated at its
carrying amount on that date under UK GAAP.
Goodwill is not amortised; rather it is tested annually for impairment and,
under IFRS 1, was reviewed for impairment at the transition date. Goodwill is
allocated to the cash generating unit or group of cash generating units expected
to benefit from the related business combination for the purposes of impairment
testing.
Finite life intangible assets are amortised over their useful economic lives on
a straight line or units of production basis as appropriate. From 1 January
2005, finite life intangible assets held for sale, or included within a disposal
group held for sale, are not amortised. In accordance with the accounting
requirements for disposal groups, intangible assets held for sale are carried at
the lower of their pre-existing carrying amount and fair value less costs to
sell, and are presented separately on the face of the balance sheet.
(f) Exploration and evaluation
The Group has continued its UK GAAP policy for the recognition and measurement
of exploration and evaluation expenditure, in accordance with IFRS 6
'Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources'.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure comprises costs which are directly
attributable to:
- researching and analysing existing exploration data;
- conducting geological studies, exploratory drilling and sampling;
- examining and testing extraction and treatment methods; and
- compiling pre-feasibility and feasibility studies.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure also includes the costs incurred in
acquiring mineral rights, the entry premiums paid to gain access to areas of
interest and amounts payable to third parties to acquire interests in existing
projects.
Capitalisation of exploration expenditure commences on acquisition of a
beneficial interest or option in mineral rights. Capitalised exploration
expenditure is reviewed for impairment at each balance sheet date. Full
provision is made for impairment unless there is a high degree of confidence in
the project's viability. If a project does not prove viable, all irrecoverable
costs associated with the project and the related impairment provisions are
written off.
When it is decided to proceed with development, any impairment provisions raised
in previous years are reversed to the extent that the relevant costs are
expected to be recovered. If the project proceeds to development, the amounts
included within intangible assets are transferred to property, plant and
equipment.
(g) Property, plant and equipment
The cost of property, plant and equipment comprises its purchase price and any
costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition
necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by
management. Once a mining project has been established as commercially viable,
expenditure other than that on land, buildings, plant and equipment is
capitalised under 'Mining properties and leases' together with any amount
transferred from 'Exploration and evaluation'. This includes costs incurred in
preparing the site for mining operations, including stripping costs (see below).
Costs associated with commissioning new assets, in the period before they are
capable of operating in the manner intended by management, are capitalised.
Development costs incurred after the commencement of production are capitalised
to the extent they give rise to a future economic benefit. Interest on
borrowings related to construction or development projects is capitalised until
the point when substantially all the activities that are necessary to make the
asset ready for its intended use are complete.
(h) Deferred stripping
As noted above, stripping (ie overburden and other waste removal) costs incurred
in the development of a mine before production commences are capitalised as part
of the cost of constructing the mine and subsequently amortised over the life of
the operation. These may relate to a discrete section of the ore body, for
example.
The Group defers stripping costs incurred subsequently, during the production
stage of its operations, for those operations where this is the most appropriate
basis for matching the costs against the related economic benefits. This is
generally the case where there are fluctuations in stripping costs over the life
of the mine, and the effect is material. Deferred stripping costs are presented
within 'Mining properties and leases'. The amount of stripping costs deferred is
based on the ratio ('Ratio') obtained by dividing the tonnage of waste mined
either by the quantity of ore mined or by the quantity of minerals contained in
the ore. Stripping costs incurred in the period are deferred to the extent that
the current period Ratio exceeds the life of mine Ratio. Such deferred costs
are then charged against reported profits to the extent that, in subsequent
periods, the Ratio falls short of the life of mine Ratio. The life of mine
Ratio is based on proven and probable reserves of the operation.
In some operations, there are distinct periods of new development during the
production stage of the mine. The new development will be characterised by a
major departure from the life of mine stripping Ratio. Excess stripping costs
during such periods are deferred and charged against reported profits in
subsequent periods on a units of production basis.
If the Group were to expense production stage stripping costs as incurred, there
would be greater volatility in the year to year results from operations and
excess stripping costs would be expensed at an earlier stage of a mine's
operation.
Deferred stripping costs form part of the total investment in the relevant cash
generating unit, which is reviewed for impairment if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
Amortisation of deferred stripping costs is included in depreciation of
'Property, plant and equipment' or in the Group's share of the results of its
equity accounted operations, as appropriate. Changes to the life of mine
stripping Ratio are accounted for prospectively.
Accounting principles (continued)
(i) Depreciation and impairment
Property, plant and equipment is depreciated over its useful life, or over the
remaining life of the mine if shorter. The major categories of property, plant
and equipment are depreciated on a units of production and/or straight-line
basis as follows:
Units of production basis
For mining properties and leases and certain mining equipment, the
economic benefits from the asset are consumed in a pattern which is
linked to the production level. Except as noted below, such assets are
depreciated on a units of production basis.
Straight line basis
Assets within operations for which production is not expected to
fluctuate significantly from one year to another or which have a physical
life shorter than the related mine are depreciated on a straight line
basis as follows:
Buildings 10 to 40 years
Plant and equipment 3 to 35 years
Land Not depreciated
Residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at
each balance sheet date. Changes to the estimated residual values or useful
lives are accounted for prospectively. In applying the units of production
method, depreciation is normally calculated using the quantity of material
extracted from the mine in the period as a percentage of the total quantity of
material to be extracted in current and future periods based on proven and
probable reserves (and, for some mines, mineral resources). Development costs
that relate to a discrete section of an ore body and which only provide benefit
over the life of those reserves, are depreciated over the estimated life of that
discrete section. Development costs incurred which benefit the entire ore body
are depreciated over the estimated life of the ore body.
From 1 January 2005, property, plant and equipment held for sale, or which is
part of a disposal group held for sale, is not depreciated. Property, plant and
equipment held for sale is carried at the lower of its pre-existing carrying
amount and fair value less costs to sell, and is presented separately on the
face of the balance sheet.
Property, plant and equipment and finite life intangible assets are reviewed for
impairment if there is any indication that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. This applies to the Group's share of the assets held by associates
and joint ventures as well as the assets held by the Group itself. In addition,
from 1 January 2005, an impairment loss is recognised for any excess of carrying
amount over the fair value less costs to sell of a non-current asset or disposal
group held for sale.
When a review for impairment is conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by
reference to the higher of 'value in use' (being the net present value of
expected future cash flows of the relevant cash generating unit) or 'fair value
less costs to sell'. Where there is no binding sale agreement or active market,
fair value less costs to sell is based on the best information available to
reflect the amount the Group could receive for the cash generating unit in an
arm's length transaction. Future cash flows are based on:
- estimates of the quantities of the reserves and mineral resources for
which there is a high degree of confidence of economic extraction;
- future production levels;
- future commodity prices (assuming the current market prices will
revert to the Group's assessment of the long term average price, generally
over a period of three to five years); and
- future cash costs of production, capital expenditure, close down,
restoration and environmental clean up.
IAS 36 'Impairment of assets' includes a number of restrictions on the future
cash flows that can be recognised in respect of future restructurings and
improvement related capital expenditure. When calculating 'value in use', it
also requires that calculations should be based on exchange rates current at the
time of the assessment.
For operations with a functional currency other than the US dollar, the
impairment review is undertaken in the relevant functional currency. These
estimates are based on detailed mine plans and operating budgets, modified as
appropriate to meet the requirements of IAS 36.
The discount rate applied is based upon the Group's weighted average cost of
capital with appropriate adjustment for the risks associated with the relevant
cash flows, to the extent that such risks are not reflected in the forecast cash
flows.
(j) Determination of ore reserves
The Group estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on information
compiled by Competent Persons as defined in accordance with the Australasian
Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves of December 2004 (the
JORC code). Reserves, and for certain mines resources, determined in this way
are used in the calculation of depreciation, amortisation and impairment
charges, the assessment of life of mine stripping ratios and for forecasting the
timing of the payment of close down and restoration costs.
In assessing the life of a mine for accounting purposes, mineral resources are
only taken into account where there is a high degree of confidence of economic
extraction.
Accounting principles (continued)
(k) Provisions for close down and restoration and for environmental clean up
costs
Close down and restoration costs include the dismantling and demolition of
infrastructure and the removal of residual materials and remediation of
disturbed areas. Close down and restoration costs are provided for in the
accounting period when the obligation arising from the related disturbance
occurs, whether this occurs during the mine development or during the production
phase, based on the net present value of estimated future costs. Provisions for
close down and restoration costs do not include any additional obligations which
are expected to arise from future disturbance. The costs are estimated on the
basis of a closure plan. The cost estimates are calculated annually during the
life of the operation to reflect known developments and are subject to formal
review at regular intervals.
The amortisation or 'unwinding' of the discount applied in establishing the net
present value of provisions is charged to the income statement in each
accounting period. The amortisation of the discount is shown as a financing
cost, rather than as an operating cost. Other movements in the provisions for
close down and restoration costs, including those resulting from new
disturbance, updated cost estimates, changes to the lives of operations and
revisions to discount rates are capitalised within property, plant and
equipment. These costs are then depreciated over the lives of the assets to
which they relate.
Where rehabilitation is conducted systematically over the life of the operation,
rather than at the time of closure, provision is made for the outstanding
continuous rehabilitation work at each balance sheet date. All other costs of
continuous rehabilitation are charged to the income statement as incurred.
Provision is made for the estimated present value of the costs of environmental
clean up obligations outstanding at the balance sheet date. These costs are
charged to the income statement. Movements in the environmental clean up
provisions are presented as an operating cost, except for the unwind of the
discount which is shown as a financing cost.
(l) Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value on a first
in, first out ('FIFO') basis. Cost for raw materials and stores is purchase
price and for partly processed and saleable products is generally the cost of
production, including the appropriate proportion of depreciation and overheads.
For this purpose the costs of production include:
- labour costs, materials and contractor expenses which are directly
attributable to the extraction and processing of ore;
- the depreciation of mining properties and leases and of property,
plant and equipment used in the extraction and processing of ore; and
- production overheads.
Stockpiles represent ore that has been extracted and is available for further
processing. If there is significant uncertainty as to when the stockpiled ore
will be processed it is expensed as incurred. Where the future processing of
this ore can be predicted with confidence because it exceeds the mine's cut off
grade, it is valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. If the ore
will not be processed within the 12 months after the balance sheet date it is
included within non-current assets. Work in progress inventory includes ore
stockpiles and other partly processed material. Quantities are assessed
primarily through surveys and assays.
(m) Deferred tax
Full provision is made for deferred taxation on all temporary differences
existing at the balance sheet date with certain limited exceptions. Temporary
differences are the difference between the carrying value of an asset or
liability and its tax base. The main exceptions to this principle are as
follows:
- tax payable on the future remittance of the past earnings of
subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures is provided for except where
Rio Tinto is able to control the remittance of profits and it is probable
that there will be no remittance in the foreseeable future;
- deferred tax is not provided on the initial recognition of an asset or
liability in a transaction that does not affect accounting profit or
taxable profit and is not a business combination. Furthermore, deferred
tax is not recognised on subsequent changes in the carrying value of such
assets and liabilities, for example where they are depreciated; and
- deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is more
likely than not that they will be recovered.
(n) Employee benefits
For defined benefit post-employment plans, the difference between the fair value
of the plan assets (if any) and the present value of the plan liabilities is
recognised as an asset or liability on the balance sheet. Actuarial gains and
losses arising in the year are taken to the Statement of Recognised Income and
Expense. For this purpose, actuarial gains and losses comprise both the effects
of changes in actuarial assumptions and experience adjustments arising because
of differences between the previous actuarial assumptions and what has actually
occurred.
Other movements in the net surplus or deficit are recognised in the income
statement, including the current service cost, any past service cost and the
effect of any curtailment or settlements. The interest cost less the expected
return on assets is also charged to the income statement. The amount charged to
the income statement in respect of these plans is included within operating
costs or in the Group's share of the results of equity accounted operations as
appropriate.
The values attributed to plan liabilities are assessed in accordance with the
advice of independent qualified actuaries.
The Group's contributions to defined contribution pension plans are charged to
the income statement in the period to which the contributions relate.
(o) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are carried in the balance sheet at cost. For the
purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on
hand, deposits held on call with banks, short-term, highly liquid investments
that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and which are subject to
insignificant risk of changes in value, and bank overdrafts which are repayable
on demand.
Accounting principles (continued)
(p) Financial instruments
The Group's policy with regard to 'Treasury management and financial
instruments' is set out in the Financial Review on page 35 of the Group's 2004
Annual Report and financial statements . When the Group enters into derivative
contracts these transactions are designed to reduce exposures related to assets
and liabilities, firm commitments or anticipated transactions.
The Group has adopted IAS 39 from 1 January 2005. A further description of the
accounting for each class of financial instrument is given below. Adjustments
have been made to the opening balance sheet at 1 January 2005 for the adoption
of IAS 39; these are shown separately in the Group statement of changes in
equity.
Fair value: This is the amount at which a financial instrument could be
exchanged in an arm's length transaction between informed and willing parties.
Where available, market values have been used to determine fair values. In other
cases, fair values have been calculated using quotations from independent
financial institutions, or by discounting expected cash flows at prevailing
market rates. The fair values of the Group's cash, short term borrowings and
loans to joint ventures and associates approximate to their carrying values, as
a result of their short maturity or because they carry floating rates of
interest.
Borrowings: From 1 January 2005, borrowings are recognised initially at fair
value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently stated at
amortised cost, or are adjusted to reflect movements in the fair value of
amounts designated as hedged items. Any difference between the proceeds (net of
transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised in the income
statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method.
Prior to 1 January 2005, borrowings were stated at amortised cost.
Borrowings backed by medium term facilities are classified as non-current
borrowings.
Investments: The Group has certain investments in companies that are not
subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures. From 1 January 2005, these
investments are classed as 'available for sale'. Such investments are held at
fair value with unrealised gains and losses recognised in equity until the
investment is disposed of. Impairment charges and exchange gains and losses on
such investments are recognised directly in the income statement. Prior to 1
January 2005, these investments were accounted for at cost less provisions for
diminution in value.
Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting
From 1 January 2005, all derivatives are initially recognised at their fair
value on the date the derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently
remeasured at their fair value. The method of recognising the resulting gain or
loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument
and, if so, the nature of the item being hedged. The Group designates certain
derivatives as either hedges of the fair value of recognised assets or
liabilities or a firm commitment (fair value hedges) or hedges of highly
probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges).
- Fair value hedges: Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are
designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income
statement, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset
or liability or firm commitment that is attributable to the hedged risk.
Where derivatives are held with different counterparties to the
underlying asset or liability or firm commitment, the fair value of the
derivative is shown separately in the balance sheet as there is no legal
right of offset.
- Cash flow hedges: The effective portions of changes in the fair value
of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are
recognised in equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion
is recognised immediately in the income statement. Amounts accumulated in
equity are recycled in the income statement in the periods when the hedged
item will affect profit or loss (for instance, when the forecast sale that
is being hedged takes place).
- Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting: Certain
derivative contracts entered into by the Group in respect of its
recognised assets or liabilities, firm commitments or anticipated
transactions, in order to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in exchange
rates against the US dollar are not located in the entity with the
exposure. Such contracts, and any other derivative contracts that do not
qualify for hedge accounting are marked to market at the balance sheet
date. In respect of currency swaps, the gain or loss on the swap and the
offsetting gain or loss on the financial asset or liability against which
the swap forms an economic hedge are shown in separate lines in the
income statement. In respect of other derivatives, the mark to market will
give rise to charges or credits to the income statement in periods before
the transaction against which the derivative is held as an economic hedge
is recognised.
- Embedded derivatives: Derivatives embedded in other financial
instruments or other host contracts are treated as separate derivatives
when their risks and characteristics are not closely related to their host
contracts.
Prior to 1 January 2005, derivative financial instruments were accounted for as
follows:
- Amounts receivable and payable in respect of interest rate swaps were
recognised as adjustments to net interest over the life of the contract.
- Derivative contracts which had been entered into by the Group in
respect of its firm commitments or anticipated transactions, in order to
hedge its exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates against the US
dollar, and which were located in the entity with the exposure, were
accounted for as hedges: gains and losses were deferred and subsequently
recognised when the hedged transaction occurred. Where such contracts
were not located in the entity with the exposure they were fair valued at
the balance sheet date. This gave rise to charges or credits to the
income statement in periods before the transaction against which the
derivative was held as an economic hedge was recognised.
- Where contracts and financial instruments contained embedded
derivatives under IAS 39, the derivative element was not treated as a
separate derivative.
- Gains or losses on foreign currency forward contracts and currency
swaps relating to financial assets and liabilities were matched against
the losses or gains on the hedged items in the income statement. Where
currency swaps were held with different counterparties to the underlying
borrowing the fair value of the swaps was shown separately in the balance
sheet as there was no legal right of offset.
Accounting principles (continued)
(q) Share based payments
Most of the Group's share based payment plans are settled by the issue of shares
by the relevant parent company. The fair value of the share plans is recognised
as an expense over the expected vesting period. The fair value of the share
plans is determined at the date of grant, taking into account any market based
vesting conditions attached to the award (e.g. Total Shareholder Return). When
market prices are not available, the Group uses fair values provided by
independent actuaries based on an actuarial binomial model.
Non-market based vesting conditions (e.g. earnings per share targets) are taken
into account in estimating the number of awards likely to vest. The estimate of
the number of awards likely to vest is reviewed at each balance sheet date up to
the vesting date, at which point the estimate is adjusted to reflect the actual
awards issued. No adjustment is made after the vesting date even if the awards
are forfeited or not exercised.
(r) Taxation for interim periods
The income tax expense for the interim period is accrued using the tax rate that
would be applicable to expected total annual profit.
Prior year financial information
Financial information for the year to 31 December 2004 and for the half year to
30 June 2004 presented as comparative figures in this report, has been restated
in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and on the basis
set out in the Accounting principles section of this report. This 'IFRS
restated' information was first published in a News release issued on 5 May
2005.
The IFRS restated information for the year to 31 December 2004 was derived by
restatement of information extracted from the full financial statements prepared
under United Kingdom generally accepted accounting principles ('UK GAAP') on the
historical cost basis. These full financial statements under UK GAAP were filed
with the Registrar of Companies and the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission.
The Auditors' report on the full financial statements under UK GAAP for the year
ended 31 December 2004 was unqualified and did not contain statements under
section 237(2) of the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985 (regarding adequacy of
accounting records and returns), or under section 237(3) (regarding provision of
necessary information and explanations).
In addition to the restatement to IFRS of UK GAAP financial information reported
in the Group's full financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2004 and
half year report for the period ended 30 June 2004, the comparatives presented
in this report have been modified as follows:
- Turnover has been restated to gross up certain amounts charged to
customers for freight and handling, which previously were deducted from
operating costs. This has no effect on shareholders' equity, profit for
the period, Net earnings or Underlying earnings.
- The presentation of performance by business unit has been amended to
reflect changes in management responsibilities. Rio Tinto Brasil is
reported as part of the Iron Ore product group and Kennecott Land is
reported in 'other operations'. Both were previously reported as part of
the Copper product group. Reflecting the new management structure
implemented in 2004, the results of Coal & Allied are combined with those
of Rio Tinto Coal Australia. In line with its obligations as a listed
company, Coal & Allied Industries Limited will continue to report its
results separately.
- Certain items previously reported as 'central items' within the
financial information by Business Units have now been allocated to the
Business Units to which they relate.
Directors' declaration
In the directors' opinion:
The financial statements and notes have been prepared in accordance with the
Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom,
applicable accounting standards and the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (as
modified by an order of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission
dated 26 July 2005) using the most appropriate accounting policies for Rio
Tinto's business and supported by reasonable and prudent judgements.
The financial statements and notes give a true and fair view of the state of
affairs of the Rio Tinto Group at 30 June 2005 and of the profit and cash flows
of the Group for the half year then ended.
There are reasonable grounds to believe that each of the Rio Tinto Group, Rio
Tinto Limited and Rio Tinto plc, has adequate financial resources to continue in
operational existence for the foreseeable future and to pay its debts as and
when they become due and payable.
By order of the board
G R Elliott
Finance Director
3 August 2005
Independent review report to Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
('the Companies')
Introduction
We have been instructed by the Companies to review the financial information of
the Rio Tinto Group (comprising the Companies and their subsidiaries) for the
six months ended 30 June 2005 which comprises the Group interim balance sheet as
at 30 June 2005, the Group interim statements of income, cash flows and changes
in shareholders' equity for the six months then ended and the related notes
(including the financial information by Business Unit). We have read the other
information contained in the interim report and considered whether it contains
any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the financial
information.
Directors' responsibilities
The interim report, including the financial information contained therein, is
the responsibility of, and has been approved by the directors of the Companies.
The directors are responsible for preparing the interim report in accordance
with the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom
and the Australian Corporations Act 2001 as amended by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission Order dated 26 July 2005.
As disclosed in notes to the financial information, the next annual financial
statements of the Rio Tinto Group will be prepared in accordance with accounting
standards adopted for use in the European Union. This interim report has been
prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, 'Interim
financial reporting'.
The accounting policies are consistent with those that the directors intend to
use in the next annual financial statements. This financial information has been
prepared in accordance with those IFRS standards and IFRIC interpretations
issued and effective or issued and early adopted as at the time of preparing
these statements (3 August 2005). The IFRS standards and IFRIC interpretations
that will be applicable and adopted for use in the European Union at 31 December
2005 are not known with certainty at the time of preparing this financial
information.
Review work performed
We conducted our review in accordance with guidance contained in Bulletin 1999/4
issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review
consists principally of making enquiries of Group management and applying
analytical procedures to the financial information and underlying financial data
and, based thereon, assessing whether the disclosed accounting policies have
been applied. A review excludes audit procedures such as tests of controls and
verification of assets, liabilities and transactions. It is substantially less
in scope than an audit and therefore provides a lower level of assurance.
Accordingly we do not express an audit opinion on the financial information.
This report, including the conclusion, has been prepared for and only for Rio
Tinto plc for the purpose of the Listing Rules of the Financial Services
Authority in the United Kingdom and for Rio Tinto Limited for the purpose of the
Australian Corporations Act 2001 as amended by the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission Order dated 26 July 2005 and for no other purpose. We do
not, in producing this report, accept or assume responsibility for any other
purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands
it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
Review conclusion
On the basis of our review we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the financial information as presented for the six months
ended 30 June 2005.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP PricewaterhouseCoopers
Chartered Accountants Chartered Accountants
London Perth
3 August 2005 3 August 2005
in respect of Rio Tinto plc in respect of Rio Tinto Limited
Notes to financial information by business unit (Pages 7 and 8)
(a) Gross turnover includes 100 per cent of subsidiaries' turnover and the
Group's share of the turnover of jointly controlled entities and
associates.
(b) EBITDA of subsidiaries and the Group's share of, jointly controlled
entities and associates represents profit before: tax, net finance
items, depreciation and amortisation.
(c) Net earnings represent profit after tax for the period attributable to
the Rio Tinto Group. Earnings of subsidiaries are stated before finance
items but after the amortisation of the discount related to provisions.
Earnings attributable to jointly controlled entities and associates
include interest charges and amortisation of discount. Earnings
attributed to business units exclude amounts that are excluded in
arriving at Underlying earnings.
(d) Rio Tinto sold its 51 per cent interest in Morro do Ouro on 31 December
2004.
(e) Includes Rio Tinto's interests in Anglesey Aluminium (51 per cent) and
Comalco (100 per cent).
(f) On 30 March 2004 Rio Tinto sold its 13.1 per cent shareholding in
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. The sale of the shares does not
affect the terms of the Grasberg joint venture referred to below.
(g) Under the terms of a joint venture agreement, Rio Tinto is entitled to
40 per cent of additional material mined as a consequence of expansions
and developments of the Grasberg facilities since 1998.
(h) During July 2004, Rio Tinto sold its interests in Somincor and
Zinkgruvan.
(i) Business units have been classified according to the Group's
management structure. Generally, this structure has regard to the
primary product of each business unit but there are exceptions. For
example, the Copper group includes certain gold operations. This
summary differs, therefore, from the Product analysis in which the
contributions of individual business units are attributed to several
products as appropriate.
(j) Certain items, which were reported in the 2004 financial statements as
central items have been allocated to the Business Units to which they
relate.
(k) Capital expenditure comprises the net cash outflow on purchases less
disposals of property, plant and equipment. The details provided
include 100 per cent of subsidiaries' capital expenditure and Rio
Tinto's share of the capital expenditure of jointly controlled entities
and associates. Amounts relating to jointly controlled entities and
associates not specifically funded by Rio Tinto are deducted before
arriving at total capital expenditure for the Group
(l) Depreciation figures include 100 per cent of subsidiaries'
depreciation and amortisation and include Rio Tinto's share of the
depreciation and amortisation of jointly controlled entities and
associates. Amounts relating to jointly controlled entities and
associates are deducted before arriving at the total depreciation and
amortisation charge.
(m) Operating assets of subsidiaries comprise net assets before deducting
net debt, less outside shareholders' interests which are calculated by
reference to the net assets of the relevant companies (i.e. net of such
companies' debt). For jointly controlled entities and associates, Rio
Tinto's net investment is shown.
Summary financial data in Australian dollars, Sterling and US dollars
Six Six Six Six Six Six Year to 31
months months months months months months December
to 30 to 30 to 30 to 30 to 30 to 30 2004
June June June June June June
2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004
A$m A$m £m £m US$m US$m US$m
12,258 9,206 5,048 3,734 Gross turnover (including share of 9,439 6,805 14,530
equity accounted units)
3,979 2,504 1,639 1,016 Profit before taxation 3,064 1,851 3,778
2,710 1,342 1,116 546 Underlying earnings * 2,087 993 2,272
2,812 2,179 1,158 884 Net earnings attributable to Rio Tinto 2,165 1,611 3,218
shareholders
204.7c 158.0c 84.3p 64.1p Earnings per ordinary share 157.6c 116.8c 233.3c
197.4c 97.4c 81.3p 39.5p Underlying earnings per ordinary share * 152.0c 72.0c 164.8c
Dividends per share to Rio Tinto
shareholders
58.29c 44.68c 23.94p 18.68p - paid 45.0c 34.0c 66.0c
50.56c 45.53c 21.75p 17.54p - proposed 38.5c 32.0c 45.0c
2,292 2,176 944 885 Cash flow before financing activities 1,765 1,610 2,799
(4,541) (6,599) (1,907) (2,522) Net debt (3,451) (4,553) (3,809)
16,503 14,368 6,929 5,490 Equity attributable to Rio Tinto 12,542 9,914 11,877
shareholders
* Underlying earnings for the six months to 30 June 2005 are stated after
excluding items totalling US$78 million (Full year 2004: US$946 million, half
year 2004: US$618 million), which are analysed on page 24.
The financial data above have been extracted from the primary financial
statements set out on pages 20 to 23. The Australian dollar and Sterling
amounts are based on the US dollar amounts, retranslated at average or closing
rates as appropriate. For further information on these exchange rates, please
see below.
Metal prices and exchange rates
Six months Six months Year to 31
to 30 June to 30 June Change December
2005 2004 1H05 v 1H04 2004
Metal prices - average for the period
Copper - US cents/lb 151c 125c 21% 130c
Aluminium - US cents/lb 84c 75c 12% 78c
Gold - US$/troy oz US$427 US$401 6% US$409
Average exchange rates in US$
Sterling 1.87 1.82 3% 1.83
Australian dollar 0.77 0.74 4% 0.73
Canadian dollar 0.81 0.75 8% 0.77
South African rand 0.160 0.150 7% 0.155
Period end exchange rates in US$
Sterling 1.81 1.81 (0%) 1.93
Australian dollar 0.76 0.69 10% 0.78
Canadian dollar 0.81 0.74 9% 0.83
South African rand 0.150 0.160 (6%) 0.177
The Australian dollar exchange rates, given above, are based on the Hedge
Settlement Rate set by the Australian Financial Markets Association.
Circulation to shareholders
This report will be circulated to shareholders and is available on the Rio Tinto
website.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange