Final Results

RNS Number : 5092A
Secure Trust Bank PLC
21 March 2013
 



PRESS RELEASE                                                                                                         For Immediate Release

 

  21 March 2013 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                   

SECURE TRUST BANK PLC

 

Audited Final Results for the year to 31 December 2012

 

Delivering on our commitments

 

 

In its 60th year in business Secure Trust Bank PLC ("STB" or the "Company") has increased its customer lending balances by 93%, demonstrating the value to the UK of challenger banks. Its simple straightforward banking philosophy appeals strongly to customers underserved by larger banks with customer numbers rising by 60% to 231,713 contributing to another positive set of results.

 

Financial Highlights

 

·     Operating income increased by 65% to £47.0m (2011: £28.5m)

·     Statutory profit before tax increased by 136% to £17.2m (2011: £7.3m)

·     Underlying* profit before tax increased by 110% to £16.6m (2011: £7.9m)

·     Core Tier 1 Capital ratio at year end of 23% (2011: 21%)

·     Loan to deposit ratio 75% (2011: 57%)

·     Gross leverage ratio 5.8x (2011: 6.7x)

·     Post-tax return on average equity 39% (2011: 26%)

·     Reported earnings per share 108.9p (2011: 39.6p)

·     Underlying* earnings per share 89.2p (2011: 55.6p)

·     Proposed final dividend per share of 43p

 

Operational Highlights

 

·     First bank in the UK to be granted the Customer Service Excellence Award, introduced by the Cabinet Office in 2010 to replace the Kite Mark

·     New internet banking platform launched

·     Customer numbers grew 60% to 231,713

·     Customer lending balances increased by 93% to £297.6m

·     Customer deposits increased by 47% to £398.9m

·     Impairments have continued to be lower than the level expected at origination

·     Robust contribution from Everyday Loans following the acquisition in June 2012

 

Placing to fund growth

 

·     Raised gross proceeds £20m in November to provide capital to support organic and inorganic growth opportunities and to repay the £5m subordinated loan due to Arbuthnot

·     Acquisition of V12 Retail Finance Group and Debt Managers (Services) Limited in January

 

* Before acquisition costs, excess funding costs incurred prior to completion of acquisitions, fair value adjustments, costs associated with share based payments, income from acquired portfolios, IPO costs and Arbuthnot Banking Group management charges.

 

Henry Angest, Chairman, said:

 

"The results announced today evidence that Secure Trust Bank has had another successful year. Our strong balance sheet gives us the potential to contribute even more to the UK economic recovery if decisive steps are taken to make the competitive playing field less biased towards the large banks"

 

 

Paul Lynam, Chief Executive Officer, said:

 

"2012 was an excellent year for Secure Trust Bank. We have made significant progress against our strategic plan and delivered a very strong underlying financial performance. We are open for business and doing exactly what the UK Government has been calling for banks to do. The potential for positive actions by the regulator and the combination of strong on-going organic demand, a healthy pipeline of business opportunities and the medium term prospects for the recently acquired businesses make us confident about the current year and the future of Secure Trust Bank."

 

 

-ENDS-

 

 

Enquiries:

 

Secure Trust Bank PLC

Henry Angest, Non-Executive Chairman

Andrew Salmon, Non-Executive Director

 Tel: 020 7012 2400

 

 

Paul Lynam, Chief Executive Officer

Neeraj Kapur, Chief Financial Officer

 

 Tel: 0121 693 9100

 

David Marshall, Director of Communications

 

 Tel: 020 7012 2400



Canaccord Genuity Limited
(Nominated Adviser and Broker)


Tel: 020 7523 8000 / 020 7665 4500

Roger Lambert

Paul Baines

Sunil Duggal

Lucy Tilley

 

Pelham Bell Pottinger

 

Tel: 020 7861 3232

Ben Woodford

Dan de Belder

 

The 2012 Annual Report, Notice of Meeting and accompanying letter from the Chairman will be posted and available on the Secure Trust Bank website http://www.securetrustbank.com/general/results-presentations by 5th April 2013. Copies may also be obtained from the Company Secretary, Secure Trust Bank PLC, One Arleston Way, Solihull, B90 4LH.


 

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

 




Year ended 31 December

Year ended 31 December




2012

2011


Note


£000

£000

Interest and similar income



44,893

22,836

Interest expense and similar charges



(10,467)

(5,609)

Net interest income

6


34,426

17,227

Fee and commission income



15,788

12,662

Fee and commission expense



(3,206)

(1,429)

Net fee and commission income



12,582

11,233

Operating income



47,008

28,460

Impairment losses on loans and advances

13


(8,946)

(4,601)

Gain from a bargain purchase

30


9,830

 -  

Other income



37

36

Costs arising from acquisitions



(1,397)

 -  

Share listing transaction costs

25


 -  

(536)

Operating expenses

7


(29,367)

(16,079)

Profit before income tax



17,165

7,280

Income tax expense

9


(1,628)

(2,216)

Profit for the year



15,537

5,064






Other comprehensive income, net of income tax





Hedging reserve





 - Effective portion of changes in fair value



(34)

(333)

 - Net amount transferred to profit or loss



 -  

4

Other comprehensive income for the year, net of income tax



(34)

(329)

Total comprehensive income for the year



15,503

4,735






Profit attributable to:





Equity holders of the Group



15,537

5,064






Total comprehensive income attributable to:





Equity holders of the Group



15,503

4,735




Earnings per share for profit attributable to the equity holders of the Group during the year





(expressed in pence per share)





Basic and diluted earnings per share

10


108.9

39.6


 

Consolidated statement of financial position

 




            At 31 December




2012

2011


Note


£000

£000

ASSETS





Derivative financial instruments

18


25

58

Loans and advances to banks

11


155,301

139,498

Loans and advances to customers

12


297,631

154,585

Current tax assets



351

Property, plant and equipment

17


5,414

4,926

Intangible assets

15


5,231

686

Deferred tax assets

23


5,031

212

Other assets

19


5,966

7,524

Total assets



474,599

307,840

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY





Liabilities





Deposits from customers

20


398,891

272,063

Debt securities in issue

22


3,000

Current tax liabilities



340

12

Deferred tax liabilities

23


1,145

97

Other liabilities

21


18,302

8,853

Total liabilities



418,678

284,025

Equity attributable to owners of the parent





Share capital

25


6,259

5,667

Share premium



28,206

9,547

Retained earnings



21,679

8,790

Cash flow hedging reserve



(363)

(329)

Revaluation reserve



140

140

Total equity



55,921

23,815

Total liabilities and equity



474,599

307,840


 

Chairman's statement

 

Secure Trust Bank PLC marked its 60th year in business by achieving profits before tax of £17.2m; a record for the bank, and a clear demonstration that our principles and philosophies have served us well.  The successful IPO has allowed the business to seize the opportunities that are available to a well funded and robust bank.

Significantly, we were able to complete the acquisition of Everyday Loans in the first half of the year.  This was the result of many months of hard work and we were delighted to welcome the management team and business to the Group.  Our relationship with them dates back to 2007 when we agreed to refer lending opportunities to them in order to help their business get started.  As a result, we have worked closely with them and respect their knowledge and experience of the market within which they operate.  I am confident that both, they and the business will play a significant role in the future growth of the Group.

I have been pleased with the progress made across the whole bank in serving our customers and in particular, I would draw attention to the contribution made by our lending operations.  Loan balances have increased by 93% as we have played our part in promoting growth by lending money to support the UK economy.  For example, at a time when the retail sector has been struggling, we have enabled UK businesses to sell over 100,000 of their products, with the help of our retail point of sale operations.  We believe we were the largest financiers of musical equipment and cycles during the year.  Indeed the levels of demand for new cycles reached record levels, stimulated by the success of the Olympics and Paralympics.

Many commentators have noted that the UK banking industry needs to promote more competition and allow smaller banks to challenge the dominance of the larger players.  Many factors have developed to leave the smaller banks at a competitive disadvantage, not least of which is the regulatory environment.  The advantage afforded the larger banks via their sophisticated advanced capital models should not be underestimated.  I and others have many times called for regulators to take a more judgemental approach towards all banks and reward them for their previous good performance and management.  This would go some way to creating a level playing field and promote further competition. 

Encouragingly, I have detected positive signals from the newly created Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA), which has indicated that it is in favour of judgemental regulation.  I hope this will be to the long term benefit of Secure Trust Bank PLC and the economy as a whole.

These results reflect the dedication and commitment of our employees who have done well in the current environment. On behalf of the Board, I would like to extend our thanks to all our staff for their contributions to the Group in 2012.

With the benefit of strong capital and funding, the opportunities arising for organic growth coupled with the benefits from the acquisitions completed in 2012 and early 2013, I am confident that Secure Trust Bank PLC will continue to demonstrate profitable and sustainable growth over the coming period.  A levelling of the competitive landscape, were it to happen, should allow us to achieve faster progress.  However, we are not immune to developments in the wider economy.  The Board proposes to pay a final dividend of 43p per share.  If approved the dividend will be paid on 10 May 2013 to shareholders on the register as at 12 April 2013.


 

Chief Executive's statement

 

2012 was a very important year for Secure Trust Bank (STB) marking as it did our 60th anniversary and our first full year as a public company. I am pleased with the financial performance detailed in this report and feel that we delivered on the commitments made at the time of our flotation in November 2011. The magnitude of the growth of the business over the last 12 months clearly demonstrates the scale of the opportunity that lies ahead.

Our reputation with our customers

A bank's reputation is the by-product of the behaviour of its staff, which in turn is influenced by its leadership and culture. In 2012, just as in the 59 years before, Secure Trust Bank has striven to provide customers with simple straightforward banking solutions coupled with great service delivered by friendly and professional staff. This is evident in the way we interact with our customers and the fact that every week we reward 'customer service heroes' for going the extra mile for their customers.

As a result of an 18 month long programme, in September 2012 we became the first bank in the UK to receive the Customer Service Excellence award (CSE). This award was introduced by the Cabinet Office in 2010 to replace the Kite Mark. The CSE is a strong independent endorsement of the way customer focus is embedded in the culture of the business and the improvements we are making to our products and services. The quote from the 60 page final CSE assessment below is insightful.

'There is absolutely no doubt that the culture of this organisation is to treat its customers as pivotal to their success. Without exception, the assessor was impressed with staff and their levels of knowledge, their empathic handling of customer issues and their involvement in developing policies and procedures. All customers spoken to were highly complementary about staff and one customer even named an individual for special mention. This attitude is clearly driven from the very top and the commitment to customers is the first message to appear on their website'.   

We followed up the CSE award by becoming the only UK bank to be granted a 4 star mark from the Fairbanking Foundation in respect of our current account product. This represented an upgrade from the previous 3 star mark and reflected the investment we have made in our Internet and SMS Banking platforms during 2012. These have made it much easier for customers to interact with us at times of their choosing and should enable us to achieve good growth in this product this year.

Whilst we were delighted to receive the CSE award and Fairbanking mark, we know we are not perfect and will continue to invest in people, systems and processes to improve our service and products still further. 

Ultimately all of these words and awards are meaningless unless they are reflected in the experience customers have when dealing with us. I am therefore pleased to note improving trends in our internal customer satisfaction (from a high base) and reductions in customer complaint levels (from a low base). This in turn has helped us to increase like for like customer numbers by 42% from 145,174 in 2011 to 206,273. Inclusive of Everyday Loans (EDL) customers, the overall Secure Trust Bank Group customer base at the end of 2012 was 231,713 representing an increase of 60% on the prior period.

Controlling growth

The Board's on-going top strategic priority is to protect the reputation and sustainability of the bank via prudent balance sheet management, investment for growth and robust risk and operational controls. During 2012 we have continued to invest in our risk control and governance capabilities to reflect the growth in the business. Specifically we have made new appointments in the roles of Chief Risk Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Deputy Finance Director and Group Head of Compliance to strengthen our senior team. We have also recruited additional staff with internal audit and operational risk experience gained at larger financial institutions.

Stronger Funding Profile

Throughout 2012 we have further enhanced our funding profile. As at 31 December we had no direct exposure to wholesale funding or interbank markets. All of our lending activities continued to be funded by customer deposits. To achieve a broadly matched asset: liability position we increased the average tenor of our deposits over the year. This treasury management has largely removed the bank's exposure to interest rate basis risk whilst improving our resilience in the event of unexpected major market shocks. Our year-end Loan to Deposit ratio was a modest 75%. The bank continues to enjoy strong demand for its deposit products and is in the position of having a waiting list of people looking to lodge their savings with us.

Substantial Capital surpluses

We were delighted to complete a very successful placing in December. This raised £19.2 million of core tier one capital after costs, which allowed us to repay a £5 million subordinated loan from Arbuthnot Banking Group and boost our capital reserves. The placing coupled with robust capital levels at the beginning of the year and the profits generated during 2012 results in a very strong year end Tier 1 Capital ratio of 23.3%. Comparing the relative balance sheet strength of individual banks is extremely difficult due to the differing methodologies used under Basel II which can lead to a picture of seemingly similar capital ratios despite the underlying gross leverage positions being wildly different. As at 31 December the Secure Trust Bank Gross Leverage (total customer lending divided by equity capital) was only 5.8x. The leverage ratios disclosed by the major UK banks over recent weeks are considerably higher which highlights the scope we have to increase our lending activities whilst remaining modestly leveraged on a comparable basis.

Robust profit growth

The statutory pre-tax profits for 2012 of £17.2 million are 136% higher than the £7.3 million recorded in 2011.

Costs continue to be rigorously controlled and the enlargement of the Group should increase our negotiating position with key suppliers going forward. It is imperative that we do not allow the pace of growth to exceed our ability to manage the risks associated with increased business volumes. We are investing in all areas of the business, especially in Risk and Finance, to ensure we are suitably resourced to grow in a sustainable manner. We have enhanced our Project Management capability to help us take advantage of opportunities as they arise without deflecting management focus from the core business. This investment in our organisational capabilities inevitably means the short term cost to income ratio is higher than if the business was growing more slowly.

Claims management companies are acting indiscriminately

In various briefings and media interviews during 2012 I have referred to us being inundated with high volumes of baseless claims alleging mis-selling of payment protection insurance (PPI). This issue is common to both STB and EDL as detailed in note 21. The majority of the claims we are receiving are from people who have never been sold PPI. Many are loyal longstanding customers who are being duped into authorising unscrupulous claims management companies to submit claims on their behalf. During 2012 we have had to deal with allegations that we mis-sold PPI on credit cards and mortgages despite the fact that we have never provided these products. We have had customers who have received more in successful claims than they ever paid in premiums alleging mis-selling. We have even had the quite surreal instance of the emergency telephone in our office's lift receiving a call from a claims management company advising it could reclaim £2,500 for mis-sold PPI! It is useful to note that every 6 months the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) publishes data, available to all, that shows the levels of mis-selling allegations they find in favour of complainants and the levels they find in favour of the financial institution. STB has not featured in this data. EDL has a record of approximately 92% of cases being found in its favour in the second half of 2012. Putting this in context during 2012 EDL paid less than £10,000 in compensation as a result of FOS cases going against them. The fact is that despite the FOS supporting EDL in the vast majority of cases it has still cost us well in excess of £1 million to deal with claims management companies and the baseless claims they are submitting. A simple solution to this problem is for the FOS to oblige claims management companies to pay a fee, which would be refunded if the case is won. This would immediately free us of the scourge of unwanted texts or cold calls when we are trying to eat tea at home of an evening. It would also mean that rather than wasting significant resources for no benefit we would instead be making larger profits enabling us to increase our lending further and to pay more tax.    

Lending portfolio performing as expected

We monitor all aspects of risk extremely closely with particular attention to the performance of our lending book. In absolute quantum terms our impairment levels have risen as we expected given our growing and maturing lending portfolio. These remained below the level which we had assumed within our pricing models when writing the business in both the core STB and the EDL portfolios. We continue to adopt a robust and dynamic formulaic approach to impairment provisioning.  We do not seek to manage our impairments via forbearance activities.  The Group has however looked to support customers who are in financial difficulty and we seek to engage in early communication with borrowers experiencing difficulty in meeting their repayments.  The 2012 impairment numbers are lower than expectations at origination which we believe is due to two factors: the first is that in the light of the deteriorating economic outlook in late 2011 we tightened our lending criteria, which had a modest impact on new business volumes but protected the quality of the book. Secondly we have migrated all of the STB collections activity onto a single common operating platform which has improved efficiency.  

Lending operations

2012 saw continued strong, controlled, organic growth. Overall new business lending volumes excluding Everyday Loans grew 28% to £173.6 million (2011: £135.9 million) which translated to an increase of 44% in overall balance sheet lending assets to £223.8 million (2011: £154.6 million). Including the year-end Everyday Loans portfolio of £73.8 million, the overall STB lending balances of £297.6 million increased by 93% during 2012.

Motor finance which is our most mature lending book increased lending, net of provisions, to £89.6 million at 31 December 2012 (2011: £63.4 million). This business, which focuses on the near prime market segment now services the majority of the Top 100 UK car dealer groups. We were delighted to be named 'Motor Finance Provider of the Year' by the Institute of Transport Management in 2012.

Personal unsecured lending also evidenced strong growth with the 31 December 2012 balance sheet increasing to £68.2 million (2011: £43.6 million). The bank has broadened its distribution capabilities in this segment and entered into a number of significant new introducer relationships during the year including Shop Direct.

Retail Point of sale business grew strongly driven by retailer demand for our in store and online services with balances at 31 December 2012 increasing to £64.2 million (2011: £42.6 million). The acquisition of V12 Finance Group on 2 January 2013 should enable us to accelerate the growth rate of this portfolio. 

The portfolios of books acquired in 2009 have now been collected as expected and the remaining balances are negligible.

Positive contribution from Everyday Loans division

We were delighted to acquire the Everyday Loans Group (EDL) on 8th June 2012 after almost 18 months working on a transaction with the management team and vendors. As part of the post-acquisition integration project either Paul Marrow (who chairs the EDL Board) or I have visited the vast majority of the 26 branches. We have been very impressed with the quality of the staff and their commitment to doing the right thing for their customers. The integration was completed rapidly and without issue and the EDL management are now contributing to the development of the wider STB Group.

As EDL only provides loans to customers after a full face to face income and expenditure review it is able to tailor loans to non-standard borrowers enabling them to borrow at affordable interest rates whilst ensuring that the loans are an acceptable risk for the bank to take. The branch staff incentive scheme is biased in favour of the safe repayment of loans which means the staff are focused on prudent rather than volume lending.

The EDL portfolio credit quality remained stable throughout 2012 despite the underlying difficulties in the economy. The portfolio derived from the branch based lending model comprises a wide spread of unsecured personal loan customers with a relatively low average balance (£2,700) geographically spread across the U.K. thereby minimising any concentration of risk.

EDL has performed robustly albeit the accounting differentials between UKGAAP and IFRS are such that it will take time for this upside to be reported in the STB accounts. The lending balances as at 31 December 2012 were 5% higher than as at 30 June 2012. The underlying profits have exceeded target despite the higher than expected costs of dealing with baseless PPI mis-selling allegations. The performance criteria for the payment of the deferred consideration of £1.5 million and the agreed management bonuses have been met and the costs of these payments have been accrued for in the 2012 accounts.

We have now begun the process of investing in the future growth of the business and opened a new office in Middlesbrough in the fourth quarter of 2012. I am pleased to report that this is already breaking even. A new office was opened in Belfast in January and a minimum of a further two offices are likely to open during 2013.

Fee based accounts

During 2012 we have made substantial improvements to our current account product. These included the launch of a new internet banking platform in the second quarter and SMS banking modules in the fourth quarter. In addition we have spent a significant amount of time working with our card processor, Fidelity Information Services, to improve the robustness and scalability of their systems and processes. Whilst this work was on-going we did not proactively sell the current account product. Nevertheless customer numbers grew by 22% with 20,962 current account holders at the end of the year (2011: 17,178). Our new iApply module is scheduled for launch in the first quarter of 2013 which will support increased promotion of this product through digital marketing channels which should lead to increased new business volumes.

As expected the OneBill customer numbers continue to decline over time. £8.9 million of income was generated in 2012 compared to £9.6 million in 2011. The reduction in income would have been somewhat lower but for the increased costs of handling large volumes of baseless PPI claims during the second half of 2012. The project to develop a next generation OneBill product was deferred whilst we completed work on the current account product and the acquisitions of V12 Finance Group and Debt Managers. This project has now resumed and we expect to launch customer trials in the coming months.

The acquisition of Debt Managers and planned growth of this business will serve to increase our revenue from commission based activities in the periods ahead which is consistent with our strategy to grow both lending and non-lending income.

Our people 

We were identified as 'one to watch' in the Sunday Times Best Companies to Work For 2012 survey. We believe this reflects positively on our expansion which is creating new jobs and our investment in overall staff proposition. Our 2012 new joiners were aged between 16 and 66 bringing with them a wide variety of skills and experience. We continue to place considerable focus on the training and development of our people and we are currently supporting over 25% of STB staff to undertake some form of academic qualification ranging from modern apprenticeships to master's degrees. I am delighted that so many staff are willing to invest in their own development which I am sure will improve their day to day performance and give them the skills needed to take on the larger roles that will inevitably arise as the business continues to expand. STB staff numbers, excluding Everyday Loans, at 31 December 2012 increased by 30 last year representing 11% growth on the prior period.

Secure Trust Bank employees have remained heavily involved in charitable activities during the year. Numerous events took place ranging from participation in the annual 'movember' campaign in aid of prostate cancer charities through to supporting Sports Relief to raise over £100,000. I am especially proud of all the work done to help those less fortunate than ourselves and I applaud my colleagues for both their charitable work and the sheer commitment to delivering great service in a very friendly manner to our customers throughout the year.

The benefits of doing the basics right

Secure Trust Bank is a UK only business. We have continued to create jobs for young and old. We have substantially increased our net lending balances thereby supporting consumers and businesses just as the Government has been calling on banks to do. We have made profits and paid our taxes thus contributing to the public purse. We have worked hard to maintain our reputation as a simple, straightforward bank to deal with. I believe that we could make an even greater contribution to the recovery of the UK economy if the Government and Regulators take steps to reduce the competitive disadvantages we continue to face relative to the larger banks especially in relation to capital requirements and funding costs.  I completely support the Chairman's comments in this regard and will continue to work with him and my peers to try to achieve progress here.

Current developments

There has been no material change to the underlying performance of the business in the early months of 2013. We continue to see strong demand for all of our core products. We have a clear growth strategy and the pipeline of new business opportunities outlined in the Chairman's letter in our circular in November 2012 is being progressed as evidenced by the acquisitions of V12 Finance Group and Debt Managers in January 2013. 

With the economic outlook remaining very difficult to predict it is appropriate for us to exercise prudence and caution. We have therefore positioned the bank to continue to grow at a good pace and in a sustainable manner whilst maintaining low balance sheet leverage and robust capital and funding positions. This will allow us to achieve strong organic new business volumes and leave scope for new product or business development opportunities should these arise, possibly as a consequence of regulatory or competitive changes. Against our expectations of a broadly flat economy, we are very confident of making further positive progress with our strategic plan during 2013. 

Personal Lending - a distinct market territory

 

The Bank's lending operations continued to grow in a controlled way, with new personal lending volumes in the year, including Everyday Loans, increasing to £77.8 million from £34.5 million in the previous year.  This generated an increase in personal lending assets during the year which at the year-end, including Everyday Loans totalled £142.0 million (December 2011: £43.6 million).  The growth in new business volumes has again not been at the expense of price or quality.

The business utilises highly automated underwriting systems which, in addition to providing significant cost advantages, ensure that very consistent credit decisions are made which improves ongoing performance monitoring and future policy decision making. Differential pricing that reflects the credit risk of the underlying customer is standard. These systems have enabled the business to control risk whilst retaining the speed of service needed to support our introducers.

The bad debt performance on all of the books has been better than the expectations set in the pricing models and this continues to be frequently scrutinised. To support this further the business has continued to invest in a new collections system that is more appropriate for the balance sheet size the business now operates.

 

Personal lending

 

Secure Trust Bank is well established in personal unsecured lending having been lending for nearly 35 years. Net outstanding loans, excluding Everyday Loans, totalled £68.2 million at 31 December 2012 (31 December 2011: £43.6 million). Following the decision in 2007 materially to reduce new lending in response to deteriorating lending conditions the portfolio reduced to less than £10 million. However new lending was strategically increased in 2009 and since then has delivered annual growth. Net new lending volumes amounted to £48.9 million in the twelve months to 31 December 2012, from £34.5 million in the previous year.

 

Personal unsecured loans are fixed rate, fixed term products with payments received monthly in arrears. Loan terms are between 12 months and 60 months with advances varying from £500 to £15,000. Loans are provided to customers for a variety of purposes which might include, for example, home improvements, personal debt consolidation and the purchase of vehicles.  Distribution of unsecured personal loans is through brokers, existing customers and Affinity Partners, and targeted to UK-resident customers who are either employed or self-employed.

 

Everyday Loans

 

During the year, the Company acquired Everyday Loans and this represents a significant strategic development for Secure Trust Bank. Everyday Loans is a provider of unsecured loans to a customer base predominantly in lower income groups and it operates through a network of offices where loans are originated, serviced and collected.  The business will continue to operate through the well known brand name of Everyday Loans and will enable it to expand whilst creating synergistic benefits for the Group.  Net new lending volumes amounted to £28.9 million in the period since acquisition, with a net lending position of £73.8 million at the end of December 2012.

 

 

Retail and Motor Lending - premium products

 

New business lending volumes for motor and retail lending increased to £124.7 million, an increase of 29% on the previous year.  This generated a significant increase in lending assets during the year, which at the year-end totalled £153.8 million (December 2011: £106.0 million).  The growth in new business volumes has not been at the expense of price or quality.

 

Motor finance

 

Secure Trust Bank's motor finance business started lending in 2009. At 31 December 2012, it represented the Company's largest lending portfolio with net outstanding motor finance loans of £89.6 million (£63.4 million as at 31 December 2011).

 

Motor finance loans are fixed rate, fixed term hire-purchase agreements and are secured against the vehicle being financed.  Only passenger vehicles with certain features including an engine size of less than three litres, an age ranging from new to a maximum of ten years old by the end of the hire-purchase agreement and with a maximum mileage of 100,000 miles are financed. The majority of vehicles are used cars. Finance term periods range from 24 months to 60 months with a maximum loan of £15,000.

 

The Company distributes its motor finance products via UK motor dealers and motor dealer brokers. New dealer relationships are established by our UK-wide motor finance sales team with all introducers subject to a strict vetting policy.

 

Retail finance

 

Secure Trust Bank's retail point of sale finance business commenced lending in 2009 and provides point of sale finance for in-store and online retailers. The portfolio at 31 December 2012 totalled £64.2 million (£42.6 million as at 31 December 2011).

 

Retail point of sale finance products are unsecured, fixed rate and fixed term loans with payments received monthly in arrears. Loans range in term from 6 months to 48 months and the size of the loans vary from £250 to £12,000 depending on the type of product being financed. The loans are either interest bearing or have promotional credit subsidised by retailers or suppliers. Secure Trust Bank does not pay retailers commissions and lending is restricted to UK-residents who are either employed or self-employed.

 

The Group focuses on ten sub-markets.  The three largest of these at 31 December 2012 are the provision of point of sale finance for the purchase of musical instruments, cycles and the leasing of computer equipment.  The latter of these is transacted through the subsidiary company STB Leasing Limited.  Cycle finance has seen positive new business levels undoubtedly as a consequence of the Olympics and Paralympics.

 

Other markets in which the Company provides finance include gym equipment, motor parts, outdoor pursuits, furniture, leisure, jewellery and funerals. Secure Trust Bank provides finance through a range of retailers including household names such as Evans Cycles, PC World and DFS. The Company has arrangements in place with a number of Affinity Partners including the Arts Council, ACTSmart and RentSmart.

 

In addition to in-store finance, Secure Trust Bank has an online e-tailer proposition which is distributed in conjunction with Pay4Later Limited ("Pay4Later"), a UK provider of web interfaces for online point of sale credit. Retailers on the Pay4Later platform include Andertons Music, bathtek.com, Power Plate, SuperFit, The Great Furniture Trading Company, Toolstop and WorldStores.

 

Current Accounts - clear and transparent

The Secure Trust Bank Current Account is a refreshingly simple and transparent bank account. 


In late 2010, Secure Trust Bank relaunched its current account product.  At 31 December 2012, the current account product had been taken up by almost 21,000 customers with the account experiencing new account openings averaging over 920 per month for the twelve months to 31 December 2012.  The Current Account generated income of over £3.9 million in the year, which represented growth of 34% over the previous year.  The growth in the current account volumes has continued to outstrip the reduction in OneBill accounts.  OneBill generated income of £8.9 million in the year, but the Company has closed this product to new customers.

 

Current accounts are distributed via the Company's website, price comparison websites, including Moneysupermarket and Compareprepaid, Debt Management Companies and through a direct outbound sales team.

 

The business has developed an on-line capability to both service and sign up accounts. It is now possible for a customer to open an account on-line, be provided with the new account details and automatically to transfer all of their direct debits and standing orders in minutes. The account charges a monthly fee of £12.50 but as part of this the customers get rewarded for using their card by selected retailers and this is between 3% and 4% of the amount spent. Any cash rebated as a consequence of customer spending at the retailers on the scheme can, in effect, help to reduce or offset the monthly account charge.

 

A real Current Account with a Prepaid Card

 

The Current Account helps the customers control their finances and manage their budget by only letting them spend the money they have available each month.  This is because the account does not have an overdraft facility so the account holder cannot spend money that isn't there. 

 

The account comes with a Prepaid Card, onto which money must be loaded before it can be used similar to a 'Pay as You Go' mobile 'phone top-up.  This way, it can help the customers manage their money more effectively because the money set aside on the Prepaid Card is separated from the money in their Current Account, so they can shop safe in the knowledge that the bills will be paid from the money kept aside in the Current Account.

 

Customers generally make sure that they have enough money in their Current Account to cover Direct Debits, Standing Orders and any other regular payments, and the remaining money can be transferred onto their Prepaid Card to spend at over 30 million outlets and for online and telephone purchases and to make cash withdrawals at ATMs showing the MasterCard® acceptance mark.

 

Rewards

 

The Current Account gives the customer the ability to earn cash rewards of up to 4% paid back into the account on purchases made with their Prepaid Card, both online and in store, at over 30 participating major high street retailers. 

The account holder can have additional Prepaid Cards linked to their account for family members at home or abroad, at no extra monthly fee, with all cards eligible to earn Rewards.  Participating retailers include well known stores such as Asda, Argos, Boots, Debenhams, B&Q and M&S.

 

Putting the account holder in control

 

Our Current Account is designed to help customers to manage their money and keep control of what they are spending, giving them the peace of mind that the money they spend is money they actually have.  Once the account is opened the account holder can register for our online and telephone banking service which gives access to their account 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and allows the movement of money to and from the Current Account and Prepaid Card free of charge. 

 

Clear and transparent charges

 

In addition, there are no charges should a Direct Debit or Standing Order payment fail - our fees are simple and transparent, there are no hidden or unexpected charges. So, unlike most high street banks, if a Direct Debit or Standing Order payment is returned unpaid, there isn't a penalty fee. 

 

Savings - attractive products

 

The Company continues to manage its liquidity on a conservative basis with none of its funding coming from the wholesale markets.  All of the lending is entirely funded by way of customer deposits.

 

Secure Trust Bank's deposit activities comprise deposit accounts and fee-based accounts, being fee-based current accounts and the OneBill accounts.  At 31 December 2012 customer deposits totalled £398.9 million. This represents an increase of £126.8 million since the last year end.

 

The Bank's deposit accounts consist of instant access accounts, notice accounts and fixed term, fixed price bonds.

 

Competitive rates

 

At Secure Trust Bank, savings accounts offer a simple way to save money.  Interest rates offered are very competitive and provide real value for money.  Methods of attracting deposits include product information on price comparison websites (such as Moneysupermarket), Best Buy tables and newspaper articles about the deposit accounts offered by the Company.

 

By virtue of a focus on higher margin lending, the absence of large fixed overheads in the form of a branch network and a policy of not cross-subsidising loss making products with profitable ones, the Bank is able to offer competitive rates and has been very successful in attracting term deposits from a wide range of personal and non-personal customers.

 

Notice deposits

 

The deposit account notice periods range from 60 days to 183 days, with the majority at the 120 day term.  This provides a secure funding profile which again gives additional financial security to the business.  The Bank's notice deposits totalled £211.5 million at the year end (December 2011: £170 million), an increase of £41.5 million or 24%.  A new 120 day notice account was introduced in June 2012 and was highly successful, raising additional new deposits of £35.8 million during the second half of the year.

 

Introduction of further deposit bonds

 

During the year, the Bank launched further fixed rate deposit bonds in two, three, four, five and six year maturities.  These again were very successful as the Company raised new deposits of £85 million achieving its desired funding maturity profile at that time.  At the year end term deposit balances totalled £155.2 million.

 

The Bank is a member of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS)

 


 

Financial review

 

Secure Trust Bank adopts a conservative approach to risk taking and seeks to maximise long term revenues and returns.

 

Summarised income statement





2012

2011

Variance


£million

£million

£million

Income by income stream:




     Personal lending

8.7

6.0

2.7

     Everyday Loans

15.5

 -  

15.5

     Motor finance

16.9

9.9

7.0

     Retail finance

5.8

3.6

2.2

     Current account

3.9

2.9

1.0

     One Bill

8.9

9.6

(0.7)

     Acquired portfolios

0.4

1.7

(1.3)

     Other

0.6

1.8

(1.2)

Interest, fee and commission expense

(13.7)

(7.0)

(6.7)

Operating income

47.0

28.5

18.5

Impairment losses

(8.9)

(4.6)

(4.3)

Net operating expenses

(29.3)

(16.1)

(13.2)

Gain from a bargain purchase

9.8

 -  

9.8

Cost arising from acquisitions

(1.4)

 -  

(1.4)

Share listing costs

 -  

(0.5)

0.5

Profit before tax

17.2

7.3

9.9

 

Operating income increased by 65% to £47.0 million.  The acquisition of Everyday Loans in June 2012 generated a fair value adjustment of £9.8 million.  The amortisation of this fair value reduced income by £1.2 million and also increased expenses by £0.7 million in the year.  £1.7 million, including employer's national insurance, has also been accrued in relation to management bonuses as agreed at acquisition.  An additional £12.5 million of operating income was generated for the Group during the period of ownership.  Organic growth was achieved through increased levels of activity in the lending business, which has three main product areas: asset finance, personal lending and acquired portfolios.  Income from motor finance increased by over 70%, whilst income from retail finance increased by 61%.  Secure Trust Bank intends to create diversified and balanced growth in our lending books which will serve the business well when the market becomes more competitive.

Income from the current account with a prepaid card increased by 34%, and this offsets the expected decline in the OneBill account following its closure to new accounts in 2009.  The current account closed this year with 20,962 open accounts (2011: 17,178), and OneBill ended the year with 26,154 open accounts (2011: 28,698).

Net operating expenses have increased, in line with expectations, as a result of the Everyday Loans acquisition as well as the organic growth of the business. 

 

Summarised balance sheet




2012

2011


£million

£million

Assets



Loans and advances to customers



     Asset finance



              Motor finance

89.6

63.4

              Retail finance

64.2

42.6

     Personal lending

68.2

43.6

     Everyday Loans

73.8

 -  

     Acquired portfolios

0.2

2.5

     Other

1.7

2.5

Loans and advances to banks

155.3

139.5

Other assets

21.6

13.7


474.6

307.8




Liabilities and equities



Deposits from customers

398.9

272.1

Other liabilities

19.8

11.9

Share capital and retained earnings

55.9

23.8


474.6

307.8

 

The total assets of the Group increased by 54% due to the continued growth in the lending business and the acquisition of Everyday Loans, total assets are now almost half a billion pounds.  Customer deposits grew by 47% to close at £398.9 million.  The Group continues with its conservative funding policy, remaining entirely funded by customer deposits and closed with a loan to deposit ratio of 75% (2011: 57%).

During the year the asset finance business increased its portfolio size by 45% to close at £153.8 million, being predominantly due to a growth in motor vehicle finance of £26.2 million.  Personal lending, excluding Everyday Loans, grew by £24.6 million as the business was able to source new business from online brokers and offer new financing to customers from the acquired portfolios.  The acquisition of Everyday Loans has increased the Group's lending by an additional £73.8 million.  The acquired portfolios reduced to £0.2 million as customers continued to repay their loans according to our expectations.

Capital

The Group's capital management policy is focused on optimising shareholder value over the long term.  There is a clear focus on delivering organic growth and ensuring capital resources are sufficient to support planned levels of growth.  The Board reviews the capital position at every Board Meeting.

In accordance with the EU's Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) and the required parameters set out in the FSA Handbook (BIPRU 2.2), the Arbuthnot Banking Group's Individual Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), of which the Group is a major component, is embedded in the risk management framework of the Group and is subject to ongoing updates and revisions where necessary, but as a minimum an annual review as part of the business planning process.  The ICAAP is a process which brings together the risk management framework and the financial disciplines of business planning and capital management.

Not all material risks can be mitigated by capital, but where capital is appropriate the Board has adopted a "Pillar I plus" approach to determine the level of capital the Group needs to hold.  This method takes the Pillar I capital formula calculations as a starting point, and then considers whether each of the calculations deliver a sufficient capital sum adequate to cover anticipated risks.  Where it is considered that the Pillar I calculations did not reflect the risk, an additional capital add-on in Pillar II is applied.

The Group's regulatory capital is divided into:

Tier 1, comprises shareholders' funds and non-controlling interest, after deducting intangible assets.

Tier 2 comprises qualifying subordinated loan capital and revaluation reserves.  This tier cannot exceed 50% of tier 1 capital.

The ICAAP includes a summary of the capital required to mitigate the identified risks in its regulated entities and the amount of capital that the group has available.  All regulated entities have complied with all of the externally imposed capital requirements to which they are subject.

Net Core Tier 1 capital

£ 51.6 million

23.3% of Basel II Risk Weighted Assets

Tier 2 capital

£   0.1 million


Total capital

£ 51.7 million

23.3% of Basel II Risk Weighted Assets

 

Risk and Uncertainties

The Group regards the monitoring and controlling of risks as a fundamental part of the management process.  Consequently, senior management are involved in the development of risk management policies and in monitoring their application. 

The principal risks inherent in the Company's business are credit, liquidity, market, operational and regulatory risks. A detailed description of the risk management policies in these areas is set out in Note 4 to the financial statements. 

Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will be unable to pay amounts in full, when due.  This risk is managed through the Company's internal controls and its credit risk policies as well as through the Credit Committee, with significant exposures also being approved by the Group's Risk Committee.

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group cannot meet its liabilities as they fall due.  The Group takes a conservative approach to managing its liquidity profile and is entirely funded by retail customer deposits, placing no reliance on the wholesale lending markets.  The loan to deposit ratios are maintained at prudent levels.  The Assets and Liabilities Committee ('ALCO'), comprising senior executives of the Company, is the formal body that has the responsibility for liquidity risk management.  The ALCO meet formally on a monthly basis to review liquidity risk against set thresholds and risk indicators including early warning indicators, liquidity risk tolerance levels and ILAA metrics.

 

Market risk arises in relation to movements in interest rates.  Arbuthnot Latham & Co., Limited's treasury function operates on behalf of the Company and it does not take significant unmatched positions in any market for its own account.  The Company also has no significant exposure to currency fluctuations.

 

Operational risk is the risk that the Group may be exposed to financial losses from failures of its systems and processes.  The Group maintains clear compliance guidelines and provides ongoing training to all staff.  The Group's overall approach to managing internal control and financial reporting is described in the Corporate Governance section of the Annual Report. 

 

Capital risk is the risk that the Group will have insufficient capital resources to support the business. The Group adopts a conservative approach to managing its capital and at least annually assesses the robustness of the capital requirements as part of ICAAP. Stringent stress tests are performed to ensure that capital resources are adequate over a future three year horizon.

 

Conduct risk is the risk that the Group does not comply with regulatory requirements including, for example, the way it conducts its business or treats its customers.  The Group reviews performance against key customer and conduct risks on a monthly basis.

 

Exceptional items

During the year there were exceptional costs of £1.4 million relating to costs arising on the acquisition of Everyday Loans and the post balance sheet acquisitions.   During the previous year, there were exceptional items totalling £0.5 million, relating to the transaction costs on the AIM market share listing in November 2011.

Taxation

The full effective tax rate on underlying profit before tax is 9% (2011: 30%) reflecting the effects of non-taxable income during the year, primarily the gain from a bargain purchase, as well as the benefit of the lowering of the UK corporation tax rate.

Distribution to shareholders

The directors recommend the payment of a final dividend of 43 pence per share which, together with the interim dividend of 14 pence per share paid on 21 September 2012, represents a total dividend for the year of 57 pence per share (2011: final dividend of 4.2 pence per share following a special interim dividend of £7 million). 

Earnings per share

Detailed disclosures of earnings per share are shown in note 10 of the financial statements.  Basic earnings per share increased by 175% to 108.9p per share (2011: 39.6p).


 

Company statement of financial position

 




            At 31 December




2012

2011


Note


£000

£000

ASSETS





Derivative financial instruments

18


25

58

Loans and advances to banks

11


153,634

139,498

Loans and advances to customers

12


197,519

137,613

Current tax assets



351

Property, plant and equipment

17


948

760

Intangible assets

15


795

686

Investments

16


101

Deferred tax assets

23


616

212

Other assets

19


98,091

23,394

Total assets



451,628

302,673

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY





Liabilities





Deposits from customers

20


398,891

272,063

Debt securities in issue

22


3,000

Current tax liabilities



334

Other liabilities

21


8,672

6,028

Total liabilities



407,897

281,091

Equity attributable to owners of the parent





Share capital

25


6,259

5,667

Share premium



28,206

9,547

Retained earnings



9,629

6,697

Cash flow hedging reserve



(363)

(329)

Total equity



43,731

21,582

Total liabilities and equity



451,628

302,673


 

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

 


Share capital

Share premium

Revaluation reserve

Cash flow hedging reserve

Retained earnings

Total


£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Balance at 1 January 2012

5,667

9,547

140

(329)

8,790

23,815








Total comprehensive income for the period







Profit for 2012

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

15,537

15,537








Other comprehensive income, net of income tax







Cash flow hedging reserve







 - Effective portion of changes in fair value

 -  

 -  

 -  

(34)

 -  

(34)

Total other comprehensive income

 -  

 -  

 -  

(34)

 -  

(34)

Total comprehensive income for the period

 -  

 -  

 -  

(34)

15,537

15,503








Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity







Contributions by and distributions to owners







Dividends

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

(2,578)

(2,578)

Credit for share based payments

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

(70)

(70)

Issue of ordinary shares

592

19,408

 -  

 -  

 -  

20,000

Transaction costs on issue of shares

 -  

(749)

 -  

 -  

 -  

(749)

Total contributions by and distributions to owners

592

18,659

 -  

 -  

(2,648)

16,603

Balance at 31 December 2012

6,259

28,206

140

(363)

21,679

55,921

 


Share capital

Share premium

Revaluation reserve

Cash flow hedging reserve

Retained earnings

Total


£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Balance at 1 January 2011

5,000

 -  

142

 -  

10,654

15,796








Total comprehensive income for the period







Profit for 2011

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

5,064

5,064








Other comprehensive income, net of income tax







Revaluation reserve







 - Amount transferred to profit and loss

 -  

 -  

(2)

 -  

2

 -  

Cash flow hedging reserve







 - Effective portion of changes in fair value

 -  

 -  

 -  

(333)

 -  

(333)

 - Net amount transferred to profit and loss

 -  


 -  

4

 -  

4

Total other comprehensive income

 -  

 -  

(2)

(329)

2

(329)

Total comprehensive income for the period

 -  

 -  

(2)

(329)

5,066

4,735








Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity







Contributions by and distributions to owners







Dividends

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

(7,000)

(7,000)

Charge for share based payments

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

70

70

Issue of ordinary shares

667

11,333




12,000

Transaction costs on issue of shares

 -  

(1,786)




(1,786)

Total contributions by and distributions to owners

667

9,547

 -  

 -  

(6,930)

3,284

Balance at 31 December 2011

5,667

9,547

140

(329)

8,790

23,815


 

Company statement of changes in equity

 


Share capital

Share premium

Cash flow hedging reserve

Retained earnings

Total


£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Balance at 1 January 2011

5,000

 -  

 -  

9,200

14,200







Total comprehensive income for the period






Profit for 2011

 -  

 -  

 -  

4,427

4,427







Other comprehensive income, net of income tax






Cash flow hedging reserve






 - Effective portion of changes in fair value

 -  

 -  

(333)

 -  

(333)

 - Net amount transferred to profit or loss

 -  

 -  

4

 -  

4

Total other comprehensive income

 -  

 -  

(329)

 -  

(329)

Total comprehensive income for the period

 -  

 -  

(329)

4,427

4,098







Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity






Contributions by and distributions to owners






Dividends

 -  

 -  

 -  

(7,000)

(7,000)

Charge for share based payments

 -  

 -  

 -  

70

70

Issue of ordinary shares

667

11,333

 -  

 -  

12,000

Transaction costs on issue of shares

 -  

(1,786)

 -  

 -  

(1,786)

Total contributions by and distributions to owners

667

9,547

 -  

(6,930)

3,284

Balance at 1 January 2012

5,667

9,547

(329)

6,697

21,582







Total comprehensive income for the period






Profit for 2012

 -  

 -  

 -  

5,580

5,580







Other comprehensive income, net of income tax






Cash flow hedging reserve






 - Effective portion of changes in fair value

 -  

 -  

(34)

 -  

(34)

Total other comprehensive income

 -  

 -  

(34)

 -  

(34)

Total comprehensive income for the period

 -  

 -  

(34)

5,580

5,546







Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity






Contributions by and distributions to owners






Dividends

 -  

 -  

 -  

(2,578)

(2,578)

Credit for share based payments

 -  

 -  

 -  

(70)

(70)

Issue of ordinary shares

592

19,408

 -  

 -  

20,000

Transaction costs on issue of shares

 -  

(749)

 -  

 -  

(749)

Total contributions by and distributions to owners

592

18,659

 -  

(2,648)

16,603

Balance at 31 December 2012

6,259

28,206

(363)

9,629

43,731


 

Consolidated statement of cash flows

 




Year ended 31 December

Year ended 31 December




2012

2011


Note


£000

£000

Cash flows from operating activities





Profit for the year



15,537

5,064






Adjustments for:





Income tax expense



1,628

2,216

Depreciation



596

467

Amortisation



876

139

Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment



 -  

(3)

Gain from a bargain purchase

30


(9,830)

 -  

Provisions against amounts due from customers



8,946

4,601

Share based compensation



(70)

70

Cash flows from operating profits before changes in operating assets and liabilities



17,683

12,554

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:





 - net increase in loans and advances to customers



(80,727)

(69,704)

 - net decrease/(increase) in derivative financial instruments



33

(58)

 - net decrease in other assets



4,521

9,328

 - net increase in loans and advances to banks



(41,333)

(19,953)

 - net increase in amounts due to customers



126,828

118,285

 - net increase/(decrease) in other liabilities



6,714

(986)

Income tax paid



(1,446)

(1,815)

Net cash inflow from operating activities



32,273

47,651

Cash flows from investing activities





Borrowings repaid on acquisition of subsidiary undertaking

30


(71,618)

 -  

Cash acquired on purchase of subsidiary undertaking



991

 -  

Purchase of computer software

15


(256)

(42)

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

17


(603)

(98)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment



10

3

Net cash from investing activities



(71,476)

(137)

Cash flows from financing activities





(Decrease)/increase in subordinated loan



(3,000)

600

Net inflow on issue of share capital



19,251

10,214

Dividends paid



(2,578)

(7,000)

Net cash used in financing activities



13,673

3,814

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents



(25,530)

51,328

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January



119,545

68,217

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

27


94,015

119,545


 

Company statement of cash flows

 




Year ended 31 December

Year ended 31 December




2012

2011


Note


£000

£000

Cash flows from operating activities





Profit for the year



5,580

4,427






Adjustments for:





Income tax expense



1,377

1,983

Depreciation



367

389

Amortisation



147

139

Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment



 -  

(3)

Release of a provision against investments



 -  

(100)

Provisions against amounts due from customers



6,225

4,616

Share based compensation



(70)

70

Cash flows from operating profits before changes in operating assets and liabilities



13,626

11,521

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:





 - net increase in loans and advances to customers



(66,131)

(57,956)

 - net decrease/(increase) in derivative financial instruments



33

(58)

 - net increase in other assets



(2,978)

(1,298)

 - net increase in loans and advances to banks



(41,333)

(19,953)

 - net increase in amounts due to customers



126,828

118,285

 - net increase/(decrease) in other liabilities



2,610

(1,075)

Income tax paid



(1,096)

(1,815)

Net cash inflow from operating activities



31,559

47,651

Cash flows from investing activities





Borrowings repaid on acquisition of subsidiary undertaking

30


(71,618)

 -  

Purchase of computer software

15


(256)

(42)

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

17


(555)

(98)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment



 -  

3

Net cash from investing activities



(72,429)

(137)

Cash flows from financing activities





(Decrease)/increase in subordinated loans



(3,000)

600

Net inflow on issue of share capital



19,251

10,214

Dividends paid



(2,578)

(7,000)

Net cash used in financing activities



13,673

3,814

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents



(27,197)

51,328

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January



119,545

68,217

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

27


92,348

119,545


 

Principal accounting policies

 

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.

 

1.1 Reporting entity

Secure Trust Bank PLC is a company domiciled in the United Kingdom (referred to as the "Company"). The registered address of Secure Trust Bank PLC is One Arleston Way, Solihull, B90 4LH. The consolidated financial statements of Secure Trust Bank PLC as at and for the year ended 31 December 2012 comprise Secure Trust Bank PLC and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the "Group" and individually as "subsidiaries"). The Group is primarily involved in banking and financial services.

 

1.2 Basis of presentation

The Group's consolidated financial statements and the Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) (as adopted and endorsed by the EU) and the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS. They have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of land and buildings, financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss and liabilities for cash settled share based payments arrangements measured at fair value.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group's accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements are disclosed in note 2.

 

The Directors have assessed, in the light of current and anticipated economic conditions, the Group's ability to continue as a going concern. The Directors confirm they are satisfied that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the 'going concern' basis for preparing accounts.

 

The consolidated financial statements were authorised for issue by the board of directors on 20 March 2013.

 

a) Standards, interpretations and amendments effective in 2012 - relevant to the Group

 

·      IFRS 7 (Revised), 'Disclosures - Transfers of Financial Assets' (endorsed for use in the EU on 22 November 2011). The revised standard requires additional disclosures for transfers of financial assets and where there are a disproportionate amount of transactions undertaken around the period end.

 

·      Improvements to IFRSs. Sets out minor amendments to IFRS standards as part of annual improvements process.

 

The above changes did not have any material impact on the financial statements.

 

b) Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards (applicable to the Group) that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted by the Group

 

The following standards and amendments to existing standards have been published and are mandatory for the Group's accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 or later periods, but the Group has not early adopted them:

 

·      IAS 1 (Revised), 'Presentation of Financial Statements - Presentation of items of other comprehensive income' (effective 1 July 2012).  The revised standard requires that an entity present separately the items of other comprehensive income that may subsequently be reclassified to profit or loss from those items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss.

 

·      IFRS 7 (Revised), 'Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities' (effective 1 January 2013). The revised standard amend the required disclosures to include information that will enable users of an entity's financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements, including rights of set-off associated with the entity's recognised financial assets and recognised financial liabilities, on the entity's financial position.

 

·      IFRS 10, 'Consolidated Financial Statements' and IAS 27 (Revised), 'Separate Financial Statements' (effective 1 January 2013). IFRS 10 supersedes IAS 27 and SIC-12, and provides a single model to be applied in the control analysis for all investees. There are some minor clarifications in IAS27, and the requirements of IAS 28 and IAS 31 have been incorporated into IAS 27.

 

·      IFRS 11, 'Joint Arrangements' (effective 1 January 2013). This standard replaces the existing accounting for subsidiaries and joint ventures (now joint arrangements) and removes the choice of equity or proportionate accounting for jointly controlled entities, as was the case under IAS 31.

 

·      IFRS 12, 'Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities' (effective 1 January 2013). This standard replaces the existing accounting for subsidiaries and joint ventures (now joint arrangements) and contains the disclosure requirements for entities that have interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and/or unconsolidated structured entities.

 

·      IFRS 13, 'Fair Value Measurement' (effective 1 January 2013). This standard replaces the existing guidance on fair value measurement in different IFRSs with a single definition of fair value, a framework for measuring fair values and disclosures about fair value measurements.

 

·      IAS 32 (Revised), 'Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities' (effective 1 January 2014). This standard was amended to clarify the offsetting criteria, specifically when an entity currently has a legal right of set off; and when gross settlement is equivalent to net settlement.

 

The above standards are unlikely to have a material impact on the Group.

 

·      IFRS 9 'Financial instruments' (effective from 1 January 2015). Phase one of this standard deals with the classification and measurement of financial assets and will replace IAS 39. The requirements of this standard represent a significant change from the existing requirements in IAS 39. The standard contains two primary measurement categories for financial assets: amortised cost and fair value. The standard eliminates the existing IAS 39 categories of 'held to maturity', 'available for sale' and 'loans and receivables'. The potential effect of phase one of this standard is currently being evaluated but it is not expected to have a pervasive impact on the Group's financial statements, due to the nature of the Group's operations.  Further development phases for IFRS 9 are scheduled to cover key areas such as impairment and hedge accounting.  The impact of these future developments is likely to be material to the Group once it becomes effective.  1

 

1 This standard has not yet been endorsed by the EU.

 

1.3 Consolidation

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases.

 

The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any non-controlling interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement.

 

Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.

 

1.4 Interest income and expense

Interest income and expense are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income for all instruments measured at amortised cost and held to maturity using the effective interest method. 

 

The effective interest method calculates the amortised cost of a financial asset or a financial liability and allocates the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability. When calculating the effective interest rate, the Group takes into account all contractual terms of the financial instrument but does not consider future credit losses. The calculation includes all fees paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums or discounts.

 

Once a financial asset or a group of similar financial assets has been written down as a result of an impairment loss, interest income is recognised using the rate of interest used to discount the future cash flows for the purpose of measuring the impairment loss.

 

1.5 Net fee and commission income

Fees and commissions which are not included in the effective interest rate are generally recognised on an accruals basis when the service has been provided.  Fees and commissions income consists principally of weekly and monthly fees from the One Bill and Current Account products, arrears fees in the Everyday Loans business along with associated insurance commissions.  Fees and commissions expense consists primarily of referral fees and broker commission.

 

1.6 Financial assets and financial liabilities

The Group classifies its financial assets in the following categories: at fair value through profit and loss, loans and receivables and held-to-maturity investments and its financial liabilities as other financial liabilities. Management determines the classification of its investments at initial recognition. A financial asset or financial liability is measured initially at fair value.  At inception transaction costs that are directly attributable to its acquisition or issue, for an item not at fair value through profit or loss, is added to the fair value of the financial asset and deducted from the fair value of the financial liability.   

 

(a) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

This category comprises interest rate caps.  All caps at 31 December 2012 are in qualifying hedge relationships.  These cash flow hedges are used to hedge against fluctuations in future cash flows from interest rate movements on variable rate customer deposits. On initial purchase the derivative is valued at fair value and then the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument is recognised in equity (cash flow hedging reserve) until the gain or loss on the hedged item is realised, when it is amortised; the ineffective portion of the hedging instrument is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income immediately.  Fair values are based on quoted market prices in active markets and where these are not available, using valuation techniques such as discounted cashflow models. (See also 1.7).

 

(b) Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise when the Group provides money, goods or services directly to a debtor with no intention of trading the receivable.  Loans are recognised on origination. Loans and receivables are carried at amortised cost (see (e) below).

 

(c) Other financial liabilities

Other financial liabilities are non-derivative financial liabilities with fixed or determinable payments. Other financial liabilities are recognised when cash is received from the depositors. Other financial liabilities are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method.  The fair value of other liabilities repayable on demand is assumed to be the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date.

 

(d) Derecognition

Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or where the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. In transactions in which the Group neither retains nor transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a financial asset and it retains control over the asset, the Group continues to recognise the asset to the extent of its continuing involvement, determined by the extent to which it is exposed to changes in the value of the transferred asset. There have not been any instances where assets have only been partially derecognised.  The Group derecognises a financial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled or expire.

 

(e) Amortised cost measurement

The amortised cost of a financial asset or financial liability is the amount at which the financial asset or financial liability is measured at initial recognition, minus principal payments, plus or minus the cumulative amortisation using the effective interest method of any difference between the initial amount recognised and the maturity amount, minus any reduction for impairment.

 

(f) Fair value measurement

Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction on the measurement date. The fair value of assets and liabilities traded in active markets are based on current bid and offer prices respectively. If the market is not active the Group establishes a fair value by using appropriate valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm's length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same for which market observable prices exist, net present value and discounted cash flow analysis.

 

1.7 Hedge accounting - cash flow hedges

On initial designation of the hedge, the Group formally documents the relationship between the hedging instruments and the hedged items, including the risk management objective and strategy in undertaking the hedge, together with the method that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the hedging relationship.  The Group makes an assessment, both at the inception of the hedge relationship as well as on an ongoing basis, as to whether the hedging instruments are expected to be highly effective in offsetting the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the respective hedged items during the period for which the hedge is designated, and whether the actual results of each hedge are within a range of 80-125%.  The Group makes an assessment for a cash flow hedge of a forecast transaction, as to whether the forecast transaction is highly probable to occur and presents an exposure to variations in cash flows that could ultimately affect profit or loss.

 

If a hedging derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exchanged, or the hedge no longer meets the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting, or the hedge designation is revoked, then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively.  In a discontinued hedge of a forecast transaction the cumulative amount recognised in other comprehensive income from the period when the hedge was effective is reclassified from equity to profit or loss as a reclassification adjustment when the forecast transaction occurs and affects profit or loss.  If the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, then the balance in other comprehensive income is reclassified immediately to profit or loss as a reclassification adjustment.

 

1.8 Offsetting financial instruments

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the statement of financial position when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

 

1.9 Impairment of financial assets

Assets carried at amortised cost

On an ongoing basis the Group assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired. Objective evidence is the occurrence of a loss event after the initial recognition of the asset that impacts on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group of financial assets, and can be reliably estimated.

 

The criteria that the Group uses to determine that there is objective evidence of an impairment loss include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Delinquency in contractual payments of principal or interest;

• Cash flow difficulties experienced by the borrower; and

• Initiation of bankruptcy proceedings.

 

If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on loans and receivables or held-to-maturity investments carried at amortised cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the financial asset's original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the amount of the loss is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income. If a loan or held-to-maturity investment has a variable interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment loss is the current effective interest rate determined under the contract.

 

The Group considers evidence of impairment for loans and advances at both a specific asset and collective level.  All individually significant loans and advances are assessed for specific impairment.  Those found not to be specifically impaired are then collectively assessed for any impairment that has been incurred but not yet identified.  In assessing collective impairment the Group uses historical trends of the probability of default, the timing of recoveries and the amount of loss incurred, adjusted for management's judgement as to whether current economic and credit conditions are such that the actual losses are likely to be significantly different to historic trends.

 

When a loan is uncollectible, it is written off against the related provision for loan impairment. Such loans are written off after all the necessary procedures have been completed and the amount of the loss has been determined. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off decrease the amount of the provision for loan impairment in the statement of comprehensive income.

 

1.10 Intangible assets

(a) Goodwill arising on business combinations

Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired at the date of acquisition.  Goodwill is held at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is deemed to have an infinite life.

 

Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment or when events or changes in economic circumstances indicate that impairment may have taken place. Impairment losses are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income if the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amounts.

 

(b) Computer software

Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the specific software. These costs are amortised on the basis of the expected useful lives (three to five years).

 

Costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software programs are recognised as an expense as incurred in line with IAS 38.

 

(c) Other intangibles

The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 3 'Business Combinations', which requires the recognition of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values.  As part of this process, it is necessary to recognise certain intangible assets which are separately identifiable and which are not included on the acquiree's balance sheet. 

 

The intangible assets recognised as part of the EDL acquisition have been recorded at fair value and are being amortised over their expected useful lives, which is four years.

 

1.11 Property, plant and equipment

Property is held at historic cost as modified by revaluation less depreciation.  The Group has elected under IAS 16.31 to measure its property at fair value.  Revaluations are kept up to date such that the carrying amount does not differ materially from its fair value as required by IAS 16.34.  Revaluation of assets and any subsequent disposal are addressed through the revaluation reserve and any changes are transferred to retained earnings.

 

Plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method to reduce their cost to their residual values over their estimated useful lives, applying the following annual rates, which are subject to regular review:

 

Land

not depreciated

Freehold buildings

2%

Leasehold improvements

shorter of life of lease or 12.5%

Other equipment 

5% to 15%

Computer equipment

20% to 33%

 

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amounts. These are included in the statement of comprehensive income.

 

1.12 Leases

(a) As a lessor

Assets leased to customers under agreements which transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, with or without ultimate legal title, are classified as finance leases. When assets are held subject to finance leases, the present value of the lease payments is recognised as a receivable. The difference between the gross receivable and the present value of the receivable is recognised as unearned finance income. Lease income is recognised over the term of the lease using the net investment method, which reflects a constant periodic rate of return.

 

Assets leased to customers under agreements which do not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. When assets are held subject to operating leases, the underlying assets are held at cost less accumulated depreciation.  The assets are depreciated down to their estimated residual values on a straight line basis over the lease term. Lease rental income is recognised on a straight line basis over the lease term.

 

(b) As a lessee

Rentals made under operating leases are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income on a straight line basis over the term of the lease.

 

1.13 Cash and cash equivalents

For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in hand and demand deposits, and cash equivalents comprise highly liquid investments that are convertible into cash with an insignificant risk of changes in value with a maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition, including certain loans and advances to banks and building societies and short-term highly liquid debt securities.

 

1.14 Employee benefits

(a) Post-retirement obligations

The Group contributes to a defined contribution scheme and to individual defined contribution schemes for the benefit of certain employees. The schemes are funded through payments to insurance companies or trustee-administered funds at the contribution rates agreed with individual employees. The Group has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid. The contributions are recognised as an employee benefit expense when they are due. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available.  There are no post-retirement benefits other than pensions.

 

(b) Share based payment transactions

During 2012 the scheme was changed to become cash-settled.  In accordance with IFRS2, the valuation technique adopted by the Company in calculating the fair value of the share options includes a number of inputs including: the exercise price of the option, the current share price, the expected life of the option, the expected volatility, the expected dividend yield, a risk-free interest rate and incorporates an assessment of the probability of pay out.

 

The fair value of the liability is remeasured at each reporting date and at each settlement date and is recognised on a straight line basis over the vesting period.

 

1.15 Share issue costs

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of an equity instrument are deducted from the initial measurement of the equity instruments.  Costs associated with the listing of shares are expensed immediately.

 

1.16 Income taxation

Current income tax which is payable on taxable profits is recognised as an expense in the period in which the profits arise.

 

Deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the statement of financial position date and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred tax liability is settled.

 

Deferred tax assets are recognised where it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.

 

1.17 Dividends

Dividends on ordinary shares are recognised in equity in the period in which they are approved.

 

1.18 Significant items

Items which are material by both size and nature (i.e. outside of the normal operating activities of the Group) are treated as significant items and disclosed separately on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.  The separate reporting of these items helps to provide an indication of the Group's underlying business performance. 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements 

2.         Critical judgements and estimates

 

The Group makes critical judgements and estimates which affect its reported assets, liabilities and profits.  Estimates are calculated using various assumptions and judgements.  Critical judgements and the assumptions used in calculating estimates are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

 

2.1           Impairment losses on loans and advances

The Group reviews its loan portfolios to assess impairment at least on a half-yearly basis.  The basis for evaluating impairment losses is described in accounting policy 1.9.  In determining whether an impairment loss should be recorded in the statement of comprehensive income, the Group makes judgements as to whether there is any observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows from a portfolio of loans before the decrease can be identified with an individual loan in that portfolio. This evidence may include observable data indicating that there has been an adverse change in the payment status of borrowers in a group, or national or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults on assets in the group.  Loans and advances are identified as impaired by taking account of the age of the debt's delinquency and the product type.  The impairment provision is calculated by applying a percentage rate to the balance of different ages and categories of impaired debt.  The methodology and assumptions used for estimating both the amount and timing of future cash flows are reviewed regularly to reduce any differences between loss estimates and actual loss experience.

 

Where financial assets are individually evaluated for impairment, management uses their best estimates in calculating the net present value of future cash flows. Management has to make judgements on the financial position of the counterparty and the net realisable value of collateral (where held), in determining the expected future cash flows. 

 

In assessing collective impairment the Group uses historical trends of the probability of default, the timing of recoveries and the amount of loss incurred, adjusted for management's judgement as to whether current economic and credit conditions are such that the actual losses are likely to be significantly different to historic trends.

 

To the extent that the default rates differ from that estimated by 10%, the allowance for impairment on loans and advances would change by an estimated £1.6 million.

 

2.2           Acquisition accounting

The Group recognises identifiable assets and liabilities at their acquisition date fair values.  The exercise of attributing a fair value to the balance sheet of the acquired entity requires the use of a number of assumptions and estimates, which are documented at the time of the acquisition.  These fair value adjustments are determined from the estimated future cash flows generated by the assets.

 

Loans and advances to customers

The methodology of attributing a fair value to the loans and advances to customers involves discounting the estimated future cashflows after impairment losses, using a risk adjusted discount factor.  A fair value adjustment is then applied to the carrying value in the acquiree's balance sheet.

 

Intangible assets

Identifying the separately identifiable intangible assets of an acquired company is subjective and based upon discussions with management and a review of relevant documentation.  During the year the acquisition of Everyday Loans indicated that there were four separately identifiable intangible assets which met the criteria for separation from goodwill, these being Trademarks, Customer Relationships, Broker Relationships and Technology.

 

Trademarks are valued by estimating the fair value of the estimated costs savings resulting from the ownership of trade names as opposed to licensing them.  Customer Relationships are valued through the application of a discounted cashflow methodology to net anticipated renewal revenues.  The valuation of Broker Relationships are derived from a costs avoided methodology, by reviewing costs incurred on non-broker platforms versus costs which are incurred in broker commission.  Technology is valued by the market derived royalty rate applied to the related cash flows to arrive at estimated savings resulting from the use of the acquired credit decisioning technology.

 

2.3           Share Option Scheme valuation

The cost of the cash settled share option scheme is determined by reference to a range of factors aimed at estimating the fair value of the liability at the balance sheet date.   In deriving that fair value, the Directors have also considered the probability of the options vesting. In the opinion of the Directors the terms of the scheme are such that there remain a number of key uncertainties to be considered when calculating the probability of pay out, which are set out below.

 

Much of the bank's lending is in the near and sub-prime categories, with performance of the book heavily influenced by employment trends. The UK economy remains fragile, with stagnant growth, high street closures and a triple dip recession a realistic possibility. The impact of a further downturn would be increasing unemployment, potentially causing impairments to rise and new business levels to fall, thereby affecting the bank's ability to sustain the levels of dividend growth required under the terms of the scheme. Depending on the product type, market and customer demographics, the bank's current product range includes expected lifetime losses of between 1% and 20%.

 

Uncertainties in the regulatory environment continue, with pressure on the government to further constrain the activities of banks following the well reported catalogue of recent issues in the industry. Further uncertainty exists with the forthcoming demise of the FSA and the likely additional scrutiny following its replacement, with effect from 1 April 2013, by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Any tightening of capital requirements will impact on the ability of the Company to exploit future market opportunities and furthermore may inhibit its ability to maintain the required growth in distributions.

 

One participant in the share option scheme left the Company during the year and was consequently withdrawn from the scheme. The Directors consider that there is further uncertainty surrounding whether the remaining participants will all still be in situ and eligible at the vesting date.

 

Having taken all of the above risk factors into account, the Directors are of the opinion that there is currently a probability of 70% that the 2014 options will vest and a probability of 50% that the 2016 options will vest. A change in the probability percentage of 10% across the two option dates would result in a £269,000 movement in the charge for the year.

 

In establishing an estimated share price at the vesting dates, an average market consensus valuation has been taken, by reference to a number of share investment research analysts. The average valuations as at 31 December 2012 were determined as £15.61 per share and £15.56 per share for 2014 and 2016 respectively. The highest and lowest estimates were within 10% of these average prices.

 

2.4           Average life of lending

IAS 39 requires interest earned from lending to be measured under the effective interest rate method.  The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts or payments through the expected life of the financial instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period to the net carrying amount of the financial asset.

 

Management must therefore use judgement to estimate the expected life of each instrument and hence the expected cash flows relating to it.  The accuracy of the effective interest rate would therefore be affected by unexpected market movements resulting in altered customer behaviour, inaccuracies in the models used compared to actual outcomes and incorrect assumptions.

 

2.5           Valuation of financial instruments

In designating financial instruments in qualifying hedge relationships, the Group has determined that it expects the hedges to be highly effective over the period of the hedging relationship.  In accounting for derivatives as cash flow hedges, the Group has determined that the hedged cash flow exposure relates to highly probable future cash flows.

 

Fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities that are traded in active markets are based on quoted market prices. If the market is not active the Group establishes a fair value by using appropriate valuation techniques which include the use of recent arm's length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same for which market observable prices exist, net present value and discounted cash flow analysis. The objective of valuation techniques is to determine the fair value of the financial instrument at the reporting date as the price that would have been agreed between active market participants in an arm's length transaction.

 

The Group measures fair value using the following fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making measurements:

• Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e.

  as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices).

• Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that is not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

 

Fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are traded in active markets are based on quoted market prices. Observable market prices are available in the market for simple over the counter derivatives like interest rate caps and their availability reduces the need for management judgement and estimation and also reduces the uncertainty associated with the determination of fair values. 

 

The consideration of factors such as the magnitude and frequency of trading activity, the availability of prices and the size of bid/offer spreads, assist in the judgement as to whether a market is active. If in the opinion of management, a significant proportion of the instrument's carrying amount is driven by unobservable inputs, the instrument in its entirety is classified as valued using significant unobservable inputs. 'Unobservable' in this context means that there is little or no current market data available from which to determine the level at which an arm's length transaction would be likely to occur. It generally does not mean that there is no market data available at all upon which to base a determination of fair value (consensus pricing data may, for example, be used).

 


Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

At 31 December 2012

£000

£000

£000

£000

Derivative financial instruments

 -  

25

 -  

25

Total

 -  

25

 -  

25

 


Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

At 31 December 2011

£000

£000

£000

£000

Derivative financial instruments

 -  

58

 -  

58

Total

 -  

58

 -  

58


 

3.  Maturity analysis of consolidated assets and liabilities








The table below shows the contractual maturity analysis of the consolidated assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2012:


Due within one year

Due after more than one year

Total

At 31 December 2012

£000

£000

£000

ASSETS




Derivative financial instruments

25

25

Loans and advances to banks

155,301

155,301

Loans and advances to customers

105,639

191,992

297,631

Property, plant and equipment

5,414

5,414

Intangible assets

5,231

5,231

Deferred tax assets

5,031

5,031

Other assets

5,966

5,966

Total assets

266,906

207,693

474,599

LIABILITIES




Deposits from customers

268,187

130,704

398,891

Current tax liabilities

340

340

Deferred tax liabilities

1,145

1,145

Other liabilities

13,843

4,459

18,302

Total liabilities

282,370

136,308

418,678

 

The table below shows the contractual maturity analysis of the consolidated assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2011:


Due within one year

Due after more than one year

Total

At 31 December 2011

£000

£000

£000

ASSETS




Derivative financial instruments

58

58

Loans and advances to banks

139,498

139,498

Loans and advances to customers

52,316

102,269

154,585

Current tax assets

351

351

Property, plant and equipment

4,926

4,926

Intangible assets

686

686

Deferred tax assets

212

212

Other assets

7,524

7,524

Total assets

199,689

108,151

307,840

LIABILITIES




Deposits from customers

200,945

71,118

272,063

Debt securities in issue

3,000

3,000

Current tax liabilities

12

12

Deferred tax liabilities

97

97

Other liabilities

5,924

2,929

8,853

Total liabilities

206,881

77,144

284,025





The Directors do not consider that the behavioural maturity is significantly different to the contractual maturity.





 

The table below shows the contractual maturity analysis of the Company assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2012:


Due within one year

Due after more than one year

Total

At 31 December 2012

£000

£000

£000

ASSETS




Derivative financial instruments

25

25

Loans and advances to banks

153,634

153,634

Loans and advances to customers

65,158

132,361

197,519

Property, plant and equipment

948

948

Intangible assets

795

795

Deferred tax assets

616

616

Other assets

98,091

98,091

Total assets

316,883

134,745

451,628

LIABILITIES




Deposits from customers

268,187

130,704

398,891

Current tax liabilities

334

334

Other liabilities

8,672

8,672

Total liabilities

277,193

130,704

407,897

 

The table below shows the contractual maturity analysis of the Company assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2011:


Due within one year

Due after more than one year

Total

At 31 December 2011

£000

£000

£000

ASSETS




Derivative financial instruments

58

58

Loans and advances to banks

139,498

139,498

Loans and advances to customers

43,951

93,662

137,613

Current tax assets

351

351

Property, plant and equipment

760

760

Intangible assets

686

686

Investments

101

101

Deferred tax asset

212

212

Other assets

23,394

23,394

Total assets

207,194

95,479

302,673

LIABILITIES




Deposits from customers

200,945

71,118

272,063

Debt securities in issue

3,000

3,000

Other liabilities

6,028

6,028

Total liabilities

206,973

74,118

281,091





The Directors do not consider that the behavioural maturity is significantly different to the contractual maturity.


 

4.  Financial risk management

 

Strategy

The directors and senior management of the Group have formally adopted a Risk and Controls Policy which sets out the Board's attitude to risk and internal controls. Key risks identified by the Directors are formally reviewed and assessed at least once a year by the Board, in addition to which key business risks are identified, evaluated and managed by operating management on an ongoing basis by means of procedures such as physical controls, credit and other authorisation limits and segregation of duties. The Board also receives regular reports on any risk matters that need to be brought to its attention. Significant risks identified in connection with the development of new activities are subject to consideration by the Board. There are budgeting procedures in place and reports are presented regularly to the Board detailing the results of each principal business unit, variances against budget and prior year, and other performance data.  A more detailed description of the risk governance structure is contained in the Corporate Governance Statement on pages 22 to 23.

 

The principal non-operational risks inherent in the Group's business are credit, market and liquidity risk.

 

(a) Credit risk

The Group takes on exposure to credit risk, which is the risk that a counterparty will be unable to pay amounts in full when due.  A formal Credit Risk Policy has been agreed by the Board whilst credit risk is monitored on a monthly basis by the Credit Risk Committee which reviews performance of key portfolios including new business volumes, collections performance, provisioning levels and provisioning methodology. 

 

The Group structures the levels of credit risk by placing limits on the amount of risk accepted in relation to individual borrowers or groups of borrowers.  Such risks are monitored on a revolving basis and subject to an annual or more frequent review.  The limits on the level of credit risk are approved periodically by the Board of Directors and actual exposures against limits monitored daily.

 

Impairment provisions are provided for losses that have been incurred at the statement of financial position date.  Significant changes in the economy could result in losses that are different from those provided for at the statement of financial position date.  Management therefore carefully manages its exposures to credit risk as they consider this to be the most significant risk to the business. 

 

Exposure to credit risk is managed through regular analysis of the ability of borrowers and potential borrowers to meet interest and capital repayment obligations and by changing these lending limits where appropriate.  The assets undergo a scoring process to mitigate risk and are monitored by the Board.  Disclosures relating to arrears on loans and advances to customers are disclosed in note 12.

 

The Board monitors the ratings of the counterparties in relation to the Group's loans and advances to banks.  Disclosures of these at the year end are contained in note 11.  There is no direct exposure to the Eurozone and peripheral Eurozone countries.

 

Motor finance loans, the largest lending balance by value, are secured against motor vehicles.  Details of the collateral held in respect of these loans are detailed in note 12.

                                                                                                                                                                                          

The Group's maximum exposure to credit risk is as follows:

 


2012

2011


£000

£000

Credit risk exposures relating to on-balance sheet assets are as follows:



Loans and advances to banks

155,301

139,498

Loan and advances to customers

297,631

154,585

Amounts due from related companies

2,002

4,795

Derivative financial instruments

25

58




Credit risk exposures relating to off-balance sheet assets are as follows:



Loan commitments

1,218

924

At 31 December

456,177

299,860

 

The Company's maximum exposure to credit risk is as follows:




2012

2011


£000

£000

Credit risk exposures relating to on-balance sheet assets are as follows:



Loans and advances to banks

153,634

139,498

Loan and advances to customers

197,519

137,613

Amounts due from related companies

96,938

21,332

Derivative financial instruments

25

58




Credit risk exposures relating to off-balance sheet assets are as follows:



Loan commitments

943

787

At 31 December

449,059

299,288

 

The above table represents the maximum credit risk exposure (net of impairment) to the Group and Company at 31 December 2012 and 2011 without taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements attached. For on-balance-sheet assets, the exposures are based on the net carrying amounts as reported in the statement of financial position.

 

Forbearance

Secure Trust Bank does not reschedule contractual arrangements where customers default on their repayments. Under its Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) policies however, the company may offer the customer the option to reduce or defer payments for a short period. If the request is granted, the account continues to be monitored in accordance with the Group's impairment provisioning policy. Such debts retain the customer's normal contractual payment due dates and will be treated the same as any other defaulting cases for impairment purposes.  Arrears tracking will continue on the account with any impairment charge being based on the original contractual due dates for all products.

 

In June 2012, the group acquired Everyday Loans whose policy on forbearance is that a customer's account may be modified to assist customers who are in or, have recently overcome, financial difficulties and have demonstrated both the ability and willingness to meet the current or modified loan contractual payments. These may be modified by way of a reschedule or deferment of repayments. Rescheduling of debts retains the customers contractual due dates, whilst the deferment of repayments extends the payment schedule up to a maximum of four payments in a 12 month period.  As at 31 December 2012 the gross balance of rescheduled loans included in the consolidated statement of financial position was £12.3 million, with an allowance for impairment on these loans of £1.2 million. The gross balance of deferred loans was £2.9 million with an allowance for impairment on these of £0.4 million.

 

(b) Market risk

Market risks arise from open positions in interest rate and currency products, all of which are exposed to general and specific market movements.

 

Currency risk

The Group and Company have no significant exposures to foreign currencies.

 

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the potential adverse impact on the Group's future cash flows from changes in interest rates and arises from the differing interest rate risk characteristics of the Group's assets and liabilities. In particular, fixed rate products expose the Group to the risk that a change in interest rates could cause either a reduction in interest income or an increase in interest expense relative to variable rate interest flows. The Group seeks to "match" interest rate risk on either side of the statement of financial position. However, this is not a perfect match and interest rate risk is present on money market deposits of a fixed rate nature. The Group monitors the interest rate mismatch on a daily basis in conjunction with liquidity and capital.

 

The interest rate mismatch is monitored, throughout the maturity bandings of the book on a parallel scenario for 50, 100 and 200 basis points movements. The Group consider the 50 and 100 basis points movement to be appropriate for scenario testing given the current economic outlook and industry expectations. This typically results in a pre-tax mismatch of £0.1m or less (2011: £0.2m or less) for the Company and Group, with the same impact to equity pre-tax. In 2011 the Group put interest rate caps in place primarily to hedge the exposure to cash flow variability from interest rate movements on variable rate customer deposits.

 

Interest rate sensitivity gap

The following tables summarise the repricing periods for the assets and liabilities in the Group, including derivative financial instruments which are principally used to reduce exposure to interest rate risk.  Items are allocated to time bands by reference to the earlier of the next contractual interest rate and the maturity date.

 

Group

Within 3 months

More than 3 months but less than 6 months

More than 6 months but less than 1 year

More than 1 year but less than 5 years

More than 5 years

Non interest bearing

Total

As at 31 December 2012

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

ASSETS








Derivative financial instruments

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

25

25

Loans and advances to banks

126,836

28,465

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

155,301

Loans and advances to customers

65,044

29,740

60,068

153,879

122

(11,222)

297,631

Other assets

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

21,642

21,642

Total assets

191,880

58,205

60,068

153,879

122

10,445

474,599

LIABILITIES








Deposits from customers

107,402

128,628

 -  

128,866

1,838

32,157

398,891

Other liabilities

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

19,787

19,787

Equity

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

55,921

55,921

Total liabilities

107,402

128,628

 -  

128,866

1,838

107,865

474,599

Impact of derivative instruments

(20,000)

 -  


20,000




Interest rate sensitivity gap

64,478

(70,423)

60,068

45,013

(1,716)

(97,420)










Cumulative gap

64,478

(5,945)

54,123

99,136

97,420

 -  


 

Group

Within 3 months

More than 3 months but less than 6 months

More than 6 months but less than 1 year

More than 1 year but less than 5 years

More than 5 years

Non interest bearing

Total

As at 31 December 2011

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

ASSETS








Cash

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

58

58

Loans and advances to banks

124,532

14,966

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

139,498

Loans and advances to customers

16,658

14,796

23,849

103,936

 -  

(4,654)

154,585

Other assets

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

13,699

13,699

Total assets

141,190

29,762

23,849

103,936

 -  

9,103

307,840

LIABILITIES








Deposits from customers

200,945

 -  

 -  

71,118

 -  

 -  

272,063

Debt securities in issue

3,000

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

3,000

Other liabilities

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

8,962

8,962

Equity

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

23,815

23,815

Total liabilities

203,945

 -  

 -  

71,118

 -  

32,777

307,840

Impact of derivative instruments

(40,000)

20,000

 -  

20,000

 -  

 -  


Interest rate sensitivity gap

(102,755)

49,762

23,849

52,818

 -  

(23,674)










Cumulative gap

(102,755)

(52,993)

(29,144)

23,674

23,674

 -  


 

Company

Within 3 months

More than 3 months but less than 6 months

More than 6 months but less than 1 year

More than 1 year but less than 5 years

More than 5 years

Non interest bearing

Total

As at 31 December 2012

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

ASSETS








Derivative financial instruments

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

25

25

Loans and advances to banks

125,169

28,465

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

153,634

Loans and advances to customers

21,381

19,674

33,100

136,827

108

(13,571)

197,519

Other assets

72,115

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

28,335

100,450

Total assets

218,665

48,139

33,100

136,827

108

14,789

451,628

LIABILITIES








Deposits from customers

107,402

128,628

 -  

128,866

1,838

32,157

398,891

Other liabilities

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

9,006

9,006

Equity

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

43,731

43,731

Total liabilities

107,402

128,628

 -  

128,866

1,838

84,894

451,628

Impact of derivative instruments

(20,000)

 -  


20,000




Interest rate sensitivity gap

91,263

(80,489)

33,100

27,961

(1,730)

(70,105)










Cumulative gap

91,263

10,774

43,874

71,835

70,105

 -  


 

Company

Within 3 months

More than 3 months but less than 6 months

More than 6 months but less than 1 year

More than 1 year but less than 5 years

More than 5 years

Non interest bearing

Total

As at 31 December 2011

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

ASSETS








Derivative financial instruments

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

58

58

Loans and advances to banks

124,532

14,966

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

139,498

Loans and advances to customers

14,588

12,693

19,657

95,329

 -  

(4,654)

137,613

Other assets

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

25,504

25,504

Total assets

139,120

27,659

19,657

95,329

 -  

20,908

302,673

LIABILITIES








Deposits from customers

200,945

 -  

 -  

71,118

 -  

 -  

272,063

Debt securities in issue

3,000

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

3,000

Other liabilities

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

6,028

6,028

Equity

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

21,582

21,582

Total liabilities

203,945

 -  

 -  

71,118

 -  

27,610

302,673

Impact of derivative instruments

(40,000)

20,000

 -  

20,000

 -  

 -  


Interest rate sensitivity gap

(104,825)

47,659

19,657

44,211

 -  

(6,702)










Cumulative gap

(104,825)

(57,166)

(37,509)

6,702

6,702

 -  


 

(c)Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with its financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset.

 

The Group's approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group's reputation.  The liquidity requirements of the Group are met through short-term repayments of its deposits with Arbuthnot Latham & Co., Limited's treasury department to cover any short term fluctuations and longer term, funding to address any structural liquidity requirements.

 

The Company has a formal governance structure in place to manage and mitigate liquidity risk on a day to day basis.  The Board sets and approves the Company's liquidity risk management strategy.  The Asset and Liability Committee ('ALCO'), comprising senior executives of the Company, monitors liquidity risk.  Key liquidity risk management information is reported by the finance team and monitored by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer on a daily basis.  The ALCO meets monthly to review liquidity risk against set thresholds and risk indicators including early warning indicators, liquidity risk tolerance levels and ILAA metrics.

 

The Group relies on deposits from customers.  During the current year the Company issued over £84.8million of fixed rate deposit bonds to customers over terms ranging from 2 to 6 years.  These were issued to broadly match the term lending by the Company.

 

The new Liquidity regime came into force on the 1 October 2010. The FSA requires a firm to maintain at all times liquidity resources which are adequate, both as to amount and quality, to ensure that there is no significant risk that its liabilities cannot be met as they fall due. There is also a requirement that a firm ensures its liquidity resources contain an adequate buffer of high quality, unencumbered assets (i.e. Government Securities in the liquidity asset buffer); and it maintains a prudent funding profile. The liquid assets buffer is a pool of highly liquid assets that can be called upon to create sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities on demand, particularly in a period of liquidity stress. The liquidity resources outside the buffer must either be marketable assets with a demonstrable secondary market that the firm can access, or a credit facility that can be activated in times of stress.

 

The Group has a Board approved Individual Liquidity Adequacy Assessment (ILAA). The liquidity buffer required by the ILAA has been put in place and maintained since. Liquidity resources outside of the buffer are made up of deposits placed via Arbuthnot Latham & Co., Limited at the Bank of England.

 

The Group is exposed to daily calls on its available cash resources from current accounts, maturing deposits and loan draw-downs.  The Group maintains significant cash resources to meet all of these needs as they fall due.

 

The matching and controlled mismatching of the maturities and interest rates of assets and liabilities is fundamental to the management of the Group.  It is unusual for banks to be completely matched, as transacted business is often of uncertain term and of different types.  An unmatched position potentially enhances profitability, but also increases the risk of losses.

 

The maturities of assets and liabilities and the ability to replace, at an acceptable cost, interest-bearing liabilities as they mature are important factors in assessing the liquidity of the Group and its exposure to changes in interest rates and exchange rates.

 

The key measure used by the Group for managing liquidity risk is the ratio of net liquid assets to deposits from customers.  For this purpose net liquid assets are considered to be loans and advances to banks.  At the year end this ratio was 38.9% (2011: 51.3%).

 

The table below analyses the contractual undiscounted cash flows for the Group and Company's non-derivative financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings at 31 December 2012:









Carrying amount

Gross nominal inflow/ (outflow)

Not more than 3 months

More than 3 months but less than 1 year

More than 1 year but less than 5 years

More than 5 years

At 31 December 2012

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Non-derivative liabilities







Deposits from customers

398,891

(419,396)

(66,068)

(205,391)

(145,527)

(2,410)


398,891

(419,396)

(66,068)

(205,391)

(145,527)

(2,410)








The table below analyses the contractual undiscounted cash flows for the Group and Company's non-derivative financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings at 31 December 2011:









Carrying amount

Gross nominal inflow/ (outflow)

Not more than 3 months

More than 3 months but less than 1 year

More than 1 year but less than 5 years

More than 5 years

At 31 December 2011

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Non-derivative liabilities







Deposits from customers

272,063

(283,672)

(70,002)

(132,968)

(80,702)

 -  

Debt securities in issue

3,000

(3,825)

 -  

 -  

 -  

(3,825)


275,063

(287,497)

(70,002)

(132,968)

(80,702)

(3,825)








The maturities of assets and liabilities and the ability to replace, at an acceptable cost, interest-bearing liabilities as they mature

are important factors in assessing the liquidity of the group and its exposure to changes in interest rates and exchange rates.

 

(d) Financial assets and liabilities












The tables below sets out the Group's financial assets and financial liabilities into the respective classifications:


Fair value through other comprehensive income

Loans and receivables

Other liabilities at amortised cost

Total carrying amount

Fair value

At 31 December 2012

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Loans and advances to banks

 -  

155,301

 -  

155,301

155,301

Loans and advances to customers

 -  

297,631

 -  

297,631

297,631

Derivative financial instruments

25

 -  

 -  

25

25


25

452,932

 -  

452,957

452,957

Deposits from customers

 -  

 -  

398,891

398,891

398,891


 -  

 -  

398,891

398,891

398,891








Fair value through other comprehensive income

Loans and receivables

Other liabilities at amortised cost

Total carrying amount

Fair value

At 31 December 2011

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Loans and advances to banks

 -  

139,498

 -  

139,498

139,498

Loans and advances to customers

 -  

154,585

 -  

154,585

154,585

Derivative financial instruments

58

 -  

 -  

58

58


58

294,083

 -  

294,141

294,141

Deposits from customers

 -  

 -  

272,063

272,063

272,063

Debt securities in issue

 -  

 -  

3,000

3,000

3,000


 -  

 -  

275,063

275,063

275,063

 

The tables below sets out the Company's financial assets and financial liabilities into the respective classifications:


Fair value through other comprehensive income

Loans and receivables

Other liabilities at amortised cost

Total carrying amount

Fair value

At 31 December 2012

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Loans and advances to banks

 -  

153,634

 -  

153,634

153,634

Loans and advances to customers

 -  

197,519

 -  

197,519

197,519

Derivative financial instruments

25

 -  

 -  

25

25


25

351,153

 -  

351,178

351,178

Deposits from customers

 -  

 -  

398,891

398,891

398,891


 -  

 -  

398,891

398,891

398,891








Fair value through other comprehensive income

Loans and receivables

Other liabilities at amortised cost

Total carrying amount

Fair value

At 31 December 2011

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Loans and advances to banks

 -  

139,498

 -  

139,498

139,498

Loans and advances to customers

 -  

137,613

 -  

137,613

137,613

Derivative financial instruments

58

 -  

 -  

58

58


58

277,111

 -  

277,169

277,169

Deposits from customers

 -  

 -  

272,063

272,063

272,063

Debt securities in issue

 -  

 -  

3,000

3,000

3,000


 -  

 -  

275,063

275,063

275,063

 

(e)Operational risk

Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect loss arising from a wide variety of causes associated with the Group's processes, personnel, technology and infrastructure, and from external factors other than the risks identified above.  Operational risks arise from all of the Group's operations.

The Group's objective is to manage operational risk so as to balance the avoidance of financial losses and damage to the Group's reputation with overall cost effectiveness and innovation.  In all cases, the Group's policy requires compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements.  The Corporate Governance Statement on pages 22 and 23 describes the Group's system of internal controls which are used to mitigate against operational risk.


 

5.  Capital management

 

The Group's capital management policy is focused on optimising shareholder value, in a safe and sustainable manner. There is a clear focus on delivering organic growth and ensuring capital resources are sufficient to support planned levels of growth. The Board regularly reviews the capital position.

 

In accordance with the EU's Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) and the required parameters set out in the FSA Handbook (BIPRU 2.2), the Arbuthnot Banking Group's Individual Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), of which the Group is a major component,  is embedded in the risk management framework of the Group and is subject to ongoing updates and revisions when necessary.  However, at a minimum, the ICAAP is updated annually as part of the business planning process. The ICAAP is a process that brings together management framework (i.e. the policies, procedures, strategies, and systems that the Group has implemented to identify, manage and mitigate its risks) and the financial disciplines of business planning and capital management.

 

Not all material risks can be mitigated by capital, but where capital is appropriate the Board has adopted a "Pillar 1 plus" approach to determine the level of capital the Group needs to hold. This method takes the Pillar 1 capital formula calculations (standardised approach for credit, market and operational risk) as a starting point, and then considers whether each of the calculations delivers a sufficient capital sum adequately to cover managements' anticipated risks. Where it is considered that the Pillar 1 calculations do not reflect the risk, an additional capital add-on in Pillar 2 should be applied, as per the Individual Capital Guidance (ICG) issued by the FSA.

 

Pillar 3 complements the minimum capital requirements (Pillar 1) and the supervisory review process (Pillar 2).  Its aim is to encourage market discipline by developing a set of disclosure requirements which would allow market participants to assess key pieces of information on a firm's capital, risk exposures and risk assessment processes.  Pillar 3 disclosures for the year ended 31 December 2012 are published as a separate document on the Arbuthnot Banking Group website.

 

The Group's regulatory capital is divided into two tiers:

• Tier 1 comprises mainly shareholders' funds, non-controlling interests, after deducting goodwill and other intangible assets.

• Tier 2 comprises qualifying subordinated loan capital and revaluation reserves. Lower Tier 2 capital cannot exceed 50%

  of Tier 1 capital.

 

The following table shows the regulatory capital resources as managed by the Group:




2012

2011


£000

£000

Tier 1



Share capital

6,259

5,667

Share premium

28,206

9,547

Retained earnings

21,679

8,790

Cash flow hedging reserve

(363)

(329)

Goodwill

(309)

(309)

Other deductions

(3,905)

(377)

Total Tier 1 capital

51,567

22,989

Tier 2



Revaluation reserve

140

140

Debt securities in issue

3,000

Total Tier 2 capital

140

3,140




Total Tier 1 & Tier 2 capital

51,707

26,129




Reconciliation to total equity:



Goodwill

309

309

Other deductions

3,905

377

Debt securities in issue

(3,000)


55,921

23,815

 

The following table shows the regulatory capital resources as managed by the Company:




2012

2011


£000

£000

Tier 1



Share capital

6,259

5,667

Share premium

28,206

9,547

Retained earnings

9,629

6,697

Cash flow hedging reserve

(363)

(329)

Goodwill

(309)

(309)

Other deductions

(486)

(478)

Total Tier 1 capital

42,936

20,795

Tier 2



Debt securities in issue

3,000

Total Tier 2 capital

3,000




Total Tier 1 & Tier 2 capital

42,936

23,795




Reconciliation to total equity:



Goodwill

309

309

Other deductions

486

478

Deb securities in issue

(3,000)


43,731

21,582

 

The Group forms part of the Arbuthnot Banking Group's ICAAP which includes a summary of the capital required to mitigate the identified risks in its regulated entities and the amount of capital that the Group has available. The FSA sets ICG for each UK bank calibrated by references to its Capital Resources Requirement, broadly equivalent to 8 percent of risk weighted assets and thus representing the capital required under Pillar 1 of the Basel II framework. The ICAAP is a key input into the FSA's ICG setting process, which addresses the requirements of Pillar 2 of the Basel II framework. The FSA's approach is to monitor the available capital resources in relation to the ICG requirement. The Group maintains an extra internal buffer and capital ratios are reviewed on a monthly basis to ensure that external and internal requirements are adhered to.

6.  Net interest income

 

Total interest income and expense calculated using the effective interest method reported that relates to financial assets or liabilities not carried at fair value through profit or loss are £44,577,000 (2011: £22,454,000) and £10,467,000 (2011: £5,605,000) respectively.  Included in interest income is income on loans and advances to banks of £316,000 (2011: £382,000).

 




7.  Operating expenses




2012

2011

Operating expenses comprise:

£000

£000

Staff costs, including Directors:



  Wages and salaries

13,999

6,705

  Social security costs

1,398

669

  Pension costs

374

213

  Share based payment transactions

1,610

70

Amortisation of intangible assets  (Note 15)

876

139

Depreciation (Note 17)

596

467

Profit on disposals of property, plant and equipment

-  

(3)

Operating lease rentals

687

282

Other administrative expenses

9,827

7,537

Total operating expenses

29,367

16,079

 


2012

2011

Remuneration of the auditor and its associates, excluding VAT, was as follows:

£'000

£'000

Fees payable to the Company's auditor for the audit of the Company's annual accounts

108

75

Fees payable to the Company's auditor for other services:



The audit of the Company's subsidiaries, pursuant to legislation

82

5

Audit related assurance services

105

Tax advisory services

105

16

Corporate finance services

250

500

All other non-audit services

5

147


655

743




Remuneration for corporate finance services in 2012 comprise £250,000 in relation to the acquisition of Everyday Loans Holdings Limited (2011: £250,000 for providing services in respect of the issue of new shares and £250,000 for providing services in respect of the share listing.)

The cost of the advice on the share issue has been charged against the share premium account, all other costs have been expensed.


 

8.  Average number of employees




2012

2011

Directors

6

9

Management

33

20

Administration

360

200

Total

399

229


 

9.  Income tax expense




2012

2011

Current taxation

£000

£000

United Kingdom corporation tax at 24.5% (2011: 26.5%):



Corporation tax charge - current year

2,107

2,326

Corporation tax charge - adjustments in respect of prior years

18

(49)


2,125

2,277




Deferred taxation



Deferred tax credit - current year

(457)

(63)

Deferred tax credit - adjustments in respect of prior years

(40)

2


(497)

(61)

Income tax expense

1,628

2,216




Tax reconciliation



Profit before tax

17,165

7,280

Tax at 24.5% (2011: 26.5%)

4,205

1,929

Marginal relief

(3)

 -  

Permanent differences

(2,730)

337

Tax rate change

178

(3)

Prior period adjustments

(22)

(47)

Corporation tax charge for the year

1,628

2,216

 

Of the £2,730,000 permanent differences, £2,408,000 relates to the non-taxable gain from a bargain purchase.

 

During the year the Government substantively enacted a reduction in UK corporation tax rate to 24% with effect from 1 April 2012 and to 23% with effect from 1 April 2013.  Furthermore, on 5 December 2012 the Government announced its intention to further reduce the UK corporation tax rate to 21% by April 2014.  This will reduce the Company's future current tax charge accordingly. 


 

10.  Earnings per ordinary share

 

Basic and diluted

Earnings per ordinary share are calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity shareholders of the Group of £15,537,000 (2011: £5,064,000) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares 14,267,861 (2011: 12,773,973) in issue during the year.


 

11.  Loans and advances to banks




2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Placements with banks included in cash and cash equivalents (Note 27)

94,015

119,545

Other loans and advances to banks

61,286

19,953


155,301

139,498




Included within loans and advances to banks are amounts placed with Arbuthnot Latham & Co., Limited, a related company, of £24,859,000 (31 December 2011: £81,601,000).




Moody's long term ratings:

2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Aaa

68,783

52,936

Aa3

 -  

4,961

A2

23,076

 -  

No rating

63,442

81,601


155,301

139,498

 


2012

2011

Company

£000

£000

Placements with banks included in cash and cash equivalents (Note 27)

92,348

119,545

Other loans and advances to banks

61,286

19,953


153,634

139,498








Moody's long term ratings:

2012

2011

Company

£000

£000

Aaa

68,783

52,936

Aa3

 -  

4,961

A2

21,409

 -  

No rating

63,442

81,601


153,634

139,498




None of the loans and advances to banks is either past due or impaired.




 

12.  Loans and advances to customers




2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Gross loans and advances

313,856

163,449

Less:  allowances for impairment on loans and advances (Note 13)

(16,225)

(8,864)


297,631

154,585




The fair value of loans and advances to customers is considered to be in excess of their book value due to the interest rates being priced including credit risk.




For a maturity profile of loans and advances to customers, refer to Note 3.






Loans and advances to customers include finance lease receivables as follows:




2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Gross investment in finance lease receivables:



 - No later than 1 year

22,157

12,804

 - Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years

13,047

10,663


35,204

23,467

Unearned future finance income on finance leases

(8,897)

(6,495)

Net investment in finance leases

26,307

16,972

The net investment in finance leases may be analysed as follows:



 - No later than 1 year

10,495

8,365

 - Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years

15,812

8,607


26,307

16,972




Loans and advances to customers can be further summarised as follows:




2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Neither past due nor impaired

282,408

144,299

Past due but not impaired

608

364

Past due up to 90 days and impaired

19,866

10,989

Past due after 90 days and impaired

10,974

7,797

Gross

313,856

163,449

Less: allowance for impairment

(16,225)

(8,864)

Net

297,631

154,585




Gross amounts of loans and advances to customers that were past due up to 90 days were as follows:




2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Past due up to 30 days

11,207

8,550

Past due 30 - 60 days

7,135

1,861

Past due 60 - 90 days

2,082

942

Total

20,424

11,353




Interest income on loans classified as impaired totalled £1,534,000 (2011: £716,000).



 


2012

2011

Company

£000

£000

Gross loans and advances

211,090

146,477

Less:  allowances for impairment on loans and advances (Note 13)

(13,571)

(8,864)


197,519

137,613




For a maturity profile of loans and advances to customers, refer to Note 3.






Loans and advances to customers can be further summarised as follows:




2012

2011

Company

£000

£000

Neither past due nor impaired

186,116

127,694

Past due up to 90 days and impaired

16,008

10,989

Past due after 90 days and impaired

8,966

7,794

Gross

211,090

146,477

Less: allowance for impairment

(13,571)

(8,864)

Net

197,519

137,613




Gross amounts of loans and advances to customers that were past up to 90 days were as follows:




2012

2011

Company

£000

£000

Past due up to 30 days

9,042

8,292

Past due 30 - 60 days

5,916

1,796

Past due 60 - 90 days

1,050

901

Total

16,008

10,989

 

The majority of the loans are unsecured personal loans with an average size at inception of £5,000; therefore the portfolio does not have a significant concentration to any individuals, sectors or geographic locations.

£188,000 (2011: £204,000) of the loans are secured upon residential property and these are neither past due nor impaired. The residential property over which the mortgage is secured has a fair value of £245,000 based on other recent property sales, giving a loan to value ratio of 77% (2011:83%).

£89,620,000 (2011: £63,376,000) of the loans are secured against motor vehicles where the security is discharged when the buyer exercises an option to buy the goods at a predetermined price at the end of the loan term. During June 2012 a third party provided a fair value of the motor vehicles of £54.3 million, at a time when the net motor lending balances were £78.0 million.


 

13.  Allowances for impairment of loans and advances






A reconciliation of the allowance accounts for losses on loans and advances is as follows:



Group

2012

2011

Specific allowances for impairment

£000

£000

At 1 January

8,864

7,814

Provision for impairment losses

9,210

5,280

Amounts recovered previously written off

(634)

(679)

Release of provision on debt sale

 -  

(2,439)

Loans written off during the year as uncollectible

(1,585)

(1,112)

At 31 December

15,855

8,864




Collective allowances for impairment



At 1 January

 -  

 -  

Provision for impairment losses

370

 -  

At 31 December

370

 -  




Total allowances for impairment

16,225

8,864

 

Company

2012

2011

Specific allowances for impairment

£000

£000

At 1 January

8,864

7,797

Provision for impairment losses

6,189

5,295

Amounts recovered previously written off

(334)

(679)

Release of provision on debt sale

 -  

(2,439)

Loans written off during the year as uncollectible

(1,518)

(1,110)

At 31 December

13,201

8,864




Collective allowances for impairment



At 1 January

 -  

 -  

Provision for impairment losses

370

 -  

At 31 December

370

 -  




Total allowances for impairment

13,571

8,864


 

14.  Debt securities held-to-maturity

 

Debt securities represent certificates of deposit. The Group's intention is to hold them to maturity and, therefore, they are stated in the statement of financial position at amortised cost. All of the debt securities had maturities, when placed, of 3 months or less and are therefore included in cash and cash equivalents (Note 27).

 

The movement in debt securities held to maturity may be summarised as follows:




2012

2011

Group and Company

£000

£000

At 1 January

 -  

25,627

Additions

 -  

9,507

Redemptions

 -  

(35,134)

At 31 December

 -  

 -  





 

15.  Intangible assets











Goodwill

Computer software

Other intangible assets

Total

Group

£000

£000

£000

£000

Cost or valuation





At 1 January 2011

309

1,932

 -  

2,241

Additions

 -  

42

 -  

42

At 31 December 2011

309

1,974

 -  

2,283

Additions

 -  

256

 -  

256

On acquisition of subsidiary undertaking (Note 30)

 -  

50

5,115

5,165

At 31 December 2012

309

2,280

5,115

7,704






Accumulated amortisation





At 1 January 2011

 -  

(1,458)

 -  

(1,458)

Amortisation charge

 -  

(139)

 -  

(139)

At 31 December 2011

 -  

(1,597)

 -  

(1,597)

Amortisation charge

 -  

(181)

(695)

(876)

At 31 December 2012

 -  

(1,778)

(695)

(2,473)






Net book amount





At 31 December 2011

309

377

 -  

686

At 31 December 2012

309

502

4,420

5,231

 


Goodwill

Computer software

Total

Company

£000

£000

£000

Cost or valuation




At 1 January 2011

309

1,932

2,241

Additions

42

42

At 31 December 2011

309

1,974

2,283

Additions

256

256

At 31 December 2012

309

2,230

2,539





Accumulated amortisation




At 1 January 2011

(1,458)

(1,458)

Amortisation charge

(139)

(139)

At 31 December 2011

(1,597)

(1,597)

Amortisation charge

(147)

(147)

At 31 December 2012

(1,744)

(1,744)





Net book amount




At 31 December 2011

309

377

686

At 31 December 2012

309

486

795

 

Goodwill is monitored throughout the period.  This enables management to complete goodwill impairment testing if indicators arise. 


 

16.  Shares in subsidiary undertakings







Shares at cost

Impairment provisions

Net

Company


£000

£000

£000

At 1 January 2011


1,513

(1,512)

1

Write back of impairment


100

100

At 31 December 2011


1,513

(1,412)

101

Acquisition of Everyday Loans Holdings Limited (Note 30)


On liquidation of subsidiaries


(101)

(101)

At 31 December 2012


1,412

(1,412)






 

The principal subsidiary undertakings of Secure Trust Bank PLC at 31 December 2012 were:

 


Country of incorporation

Interest %

Principal activity

Everyday Loans Holdings Limited

UK

100

Holding Company

UK

100

Sourcing and Servicing of Unsecured and Secured Loans

UK

100

Provider of Unsecured and Secured Loans

UK

100

Property Rental

STB Leasing Limited

UK

100

Leasing






Shares in subsidiary undertakings are stated at cost less any provision for impairment. All subsidiary undertakings are unlisted. None of the subsidiary undertakings are banking institutions.

All the above subsidiary undertakings are included in the consolidated financial statements and have an accounting reference date of 31 December.

All the above interests relate wholly to ordinary shares.



* These companies are owned indirectly by Secure Trust Bank PLC.  Their immediate parent is Everyday Loans Holdings Limited


 

17.  Property, plant and equipment











Freehold land and buildings

Leasehold improvements

Computer and other equipment

Total

Group

£000

£000

£000

£000

Cost or valuation





At 1 January 2011

4,400

 -  

8,138

12,538

Additions

 -  

 -  

98

98

Disposals

 -  

 -  

(12)

(12)

At 31 December 2011

4,400

 -  

8,224

12,624

Additions

 -  

5

598

603

On acquisition of subsidiary undertaking

 -  

340

151

491

Disposals

 -  

(32)

 -  

(32)

At 31 December 2012

4,400

313

8,973

13,686






Accumulated depreciation





At 1 January 2011

(156)

 -  

(7,087)

(7,243)

Depreciation charge

(78)

 -  

(389)

(467)

Disposals

 -  

 -  

12

12

At 31 December 2011

(234)

 -  

(7,464)

(7,698)

Depreciation charge

(78)

(101)

(417)

(596)

Disposals

 -  

22

 -  

22

At 31 December 2012

(312)

(79)

(7,881)

(8,272)






Net book amount





At 31 December 2011

4,166

 -  

760

4,926

At 31 December 2012

4,088

234

1,092

5,414

 




Computer and other equipment

Company



£000

Cost or valuation




At 1 January 2011



8,138

Additions



98

Disposals



(12)

At 31 December 2011



8,224

Additions



555

At 31 December 2012



8,779





Accumulated depreciation




At 1 January 2011



(7,087)

Depreciation charge



(389)

Disposals



12

At 31 December 2011



(7,464)

Depreciation charge



(367)

At 31 December 2012



(7,831)





Net book amount




At 31 December 2011



760

At 31 December 2012



948

 

The Group's freehold property was valued on 17 December 2008 by an Independent external valuer, who is a Fellow of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.  The Valuation was in accordance with the requirements of the RICS Valuation Standards 6th Edition and the International Valuation Standards.  The Valuation of the property was on the basis and assumption it is an Owner/Occupied property, valued to Market Value assuming that the property will be sold as part of the continuing business.  The Valuer's opinion of Market Value was primarily derived using comparable recent market transactions on arms-length terms.   The Directors have assessed the value at year end through comparison to current rental yields on similar properties in the year and do not believe that the fair value of freehold property is materially different from the carrying value.  The carrying value of freehold land not depreciated is £0.5 million (2011: £0.5 million).

 

The property is fully utilised for the Group's own purposes.

 

The historical cost of freehold property included at valuation is as follows:




2012

2011


£000

£000

Cost

3,778

3,778

Accumulated depreciation

(981)

(903)

Net book amount

2,797

2,875


 

18.  Derivative financial instruments

In order to protect its floating rate deposit book from increases in Bank of England base rates above 1.5%, the Group entered into an interest rate cap on 30 June 2011, with a notional amount of £20 million and a maturity date of 30 June 2015.  This hedge meets the condition for qualifying for hedge accounting during the year and also was an effective hedge and as such the loss on the hedging instrument was recognised in other comprehensive income.

 


2012


2011


Contract/ notional amount

Fair value assets

Fair value liabilities


Contract/ notional amount

Fair value assets

Fair value liabilities

Group and Company

£000

£000

£000

-

£000

£000

£000

Interest rate caps held in qualifying hedge relationships

20,000

25

 -  


40,000

58

 -  


20,000

25

 -  


40,000

58

 -  

 


Moody's long term ratings:




2012

2011

Contract amount:

£000

£000

A2

20,000

 -  

A1

 -  

40,000


20,000

40,000


 

19.  Other assets




2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Trade receivables

143

1,559

Amounts due from related companies

2,002

4,795

Prepayments and accrued income

3,821

1,170


5,966

7,524

 


2012

2011

Company

£000

£000

Trade receivables

129

1,485

Amounts due from related companies

96,938

21,332

Prepayments and accrued income

1,024

577


98,091

23,394


 

20.  Deposits from customers




2012

2011

Group and Company

£000

£000

Current/demand accounts

32,158

31,197

Term deposits

366,733

240,866


398,891

272,063

 

For a maturity profile of deposits from customers, refer to Note 3.


 

21.  Other liabilities




2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Trade payables

5,903

6,047

Amounts due to related companies

640

1,305

Accruals and deferred income

11,759

1,501


18,302

8,853

 


2012

2011

Company

£000

£000

Trade payables

998

3,117

Amounts due to related companies

640

1,410

Accruals and deferred income

7,034

1,501


8,672

6,028

 

Within Group trade payables at 31 December 2012 there is £4,459,000 (2011: £2,929,000) collateral held from RentSmart.  The Group buys assets which are then leased to customers of RentSmart and the Group pays RentSmart a commission, which is recognised within operating income.  In return RentSmart will continue to operate the agreement, retain the credit risk and provide the Group with a collateral amount that is based upon the balance of customer receivables and expected new agreements during the following month.

 

Within Group accruals and deferred income there is £1,075,000 relating to case fees payable to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and a further £667,000 relating to potential compensation if PPI mis-selling allegations are proven.

 

Within Group and Company accruals and deferred income there is £2,662,000 relating to accrued interest payable.  At the previous year-end all interest was paid.

 

FSCS Levy

In common with all regulated UK deposit takers, the Company pays levies to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme ('FSCS') to enable the FSCS to meet claims against it. The FSCS levy consists of two parts: a management expenses levy and a compensation levy. The management expenses levy covers the costs of running the scheme and the compensation levy covers the amount of compensation the scheme pays, net of any recoveries it makes using the rights that have been assigned to it. During 2008 and 2009 claims were triggered against the FSCS in relation to Bradford & Bingley plc, Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander, Heritable Bank plc, Landsbanki Islands hf, London Scottish Bank plc and Dunfermline Building Society.

 

The FSCS meets these current claims by way of loans received from HM Treasury. The terms of these loans were interest only for the first three years, and the FSCS seeks to recover the interest cost, together with ongoing management expenses, by way of annual management levies on members over this period.

 

The Company's FSCS provision reflects market participation up to the reporting date.  £189,422 of the provision relates to the estimated management expense levy for the scheme years 2012/13 and 2013/14. This amount was calculated on the basis of the Company's current share of protected deposits taking into account the FSA's estimate of total management expense levies for each scheme year.

 

The management expenses levy for scheme year 2011/12, which formed part of the provision at 31 December 2011, was calculated using the agreed funding rate of 12 month LIBOR + 30bps. Following the expiry of the initial three year fixed interest term, extensive negotiations between HMT and FSCS resulted in an agreed funding rate of 12 month LIBOR + 100bps which is the rate that will be charged for the HMT loans for the period from 1 April 2012, on which the management expenses levy for scheme year 2012/13 and 2013/14 has been based.

 

In addition to the management levies, from scheme year 2013/14, triggered by participation in the market at 31 December 2012, the FSCS is to levy over three years the current estimated shortfall on capital loans outstanding of £802m. In common with the management expenses levy, the capital loan repayment was calculated on the basis of the Company's current share of UK protected deposits. The Company has therefore recognised a provision of £65,213 related to the compensation levy.


 

22.  Debt securities in issue




2012

2011

Group and Company

£000

£000

Subordinated loan

 -  

3,000

 

As a consequence of the revised regulatory framework being introduced under Basel II, the Company raised £1 million by way of a subordinated loan from the parent Arbuthnot Banking Group PLC in December 2007. This was due to be repaid in 2016 and attracted interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 1.5%.

 

The loan was increased by £1.4 million in 2009 under the same terms as above. In June 2011 the loan was increased by a further £0.6 million and the interest rate changed to LIBOR plus 4%. The repayment date of the loan was also extended to 2017.

 

The loan was increased by a further £2.0 million in June 2012.  On the share issue in December 2012 £5.0 million was fully repaid.


 

23.  Deferred taxation







2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Deferred tax liability:



Unrealised surplus on revaluation of freehold property

(71)

(97)

Other short term timing differences

(1,074)

 -  

Deferred tax liability

(1,145)

(97)

Deferred tax asset:



Accelerated capital allowances and other short-term timing differences

 -  

102

Cash flow hedges

 -  

110

Carried forward losses

5,031

 -  

Deferred tax asset

5,031

212




Deferred tax liability:



At 1 January

(97)

(126)

Arising on acquisition of Everyday Loans Holdings Limited (Note 30)

(3,039)

 -  

Profit and loss account

1,991

29

At 31 December

(1,145)

(97)




Deferred tax asset:



At 1 January

212

70

Arising on acquisition of Everyday Loans Holdings Limited (Note 30)

6,313

 -  

Profit and loss account

(1,494)

32

Cash flow hedges

 -  

110

At 31 December

5,031

212

 





2012

2011

Company

£000

£000

Accelerated capital allowances and other short-term timing differences

506

102

Cash flow hedges

110

110

Deferred tax asset

616

212




At 1 January

212

70

Profit and loss account - accelerated capital allowances and other short-term timing differences

404

32

Cash flow hedges

 -  

110

Deferred tax asset at 31 December

616

212

 

During the year the Government substantively enacted a reduction in UK corporation tax rate to 24% with effect from 1 April 2012 and to 23% with effect from 1 April 2013.  This will reduce the Group's future current tax charge accordingly.  Deferred tax has been calculated based on a rate of 23% to the extent that the related temporary or timing differences are expected to reverse. 

 

On 5 December 2012 the Government announced its intention to further reduce the UK corporation tax rate to 21% by April 2014.  It has not yet been possible to quantify the full anticipated effect of the announced further 2% reduction, although this will further reduce the Group's future tax charge and reduce the Group's deferred tax assets and liabilities accordingly.


 

24.  Contingent liabilities and commitments

 

Capital commitments

At 31 December 2012, the Group and Company had no capital commitments (2011: £nil).

 

Credit commitments

At 31 December 2012, the Group had commitments of £1,218,000 and the Company had commitments of £943,000 (2011: £924,000 and £787,000 respectively) to extend credit to customers.

 

The future aggregate lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:


2012

2011


Land and Buildings

Other

Land and Buildings

Other

Group

£000

£000

£000

£000

Operating leases which expire:





Within 1 year

19

212

14

104

Between 1 year and 5 years

492

118

 -  

130

Over 5 years

29

 -  

 -  

 -  


540

330

14

234







2012

2011


Land and Buildings

Other

Land and Buildings

Other

Company

£000

£000

£000

£000

Operating leases which expire:





Within 1 year

 -  

212

14

104

Between 1 year and 5 years

 -  

118

 -  

130

Over 5 years

360

 -  

 -  

 -  


360

330

14

234






There are 31 leases under Land and Buildings in 2012 (2011: 1 branch).  Other leases include motor vehicles and computer hardware.

 

Other commitments

At 31 December 2012 a commitment exists to make further payments with regard to the Financial Compensation Scheme Levy for 2013 and thereafter. Due to uncertainties regarding the calculation of the levy and the Group's share thereof, the Directors consider this cost to be unquantifiable.


 

25.  Share capital




Number of shares

Ordinary    shares



£000

At 1 January 2011

5,000,000

5,000

Consolidation of ordinary shares

(2,500,000)

Sub-division of ordinary shares

10,000,000

Shares issued during year

1,666,667

667

At 31 December 2011

14,166,667

5,667

Shares issued during year

1,481,482

592

At 31 December 2012

15,648,149

6,259

 

On 27 October 2011 an ordinary resolution of the Company was passed such that each of the existing 5,000,000 ordinary shares of £1 per share be consolidated into 2,500,000 ordinary shares of £2 per share and then subsequently each of the 2,500,000 ordinary shares of £2 per share be sub-divided by 5 into 12,500,000 ordinary shares of 40 pence each.

 

On 2 November 2011, an additional 1,666,667 40 pence ordinary shares were allotted and the gross proceeds on the issue of these shares were £12,000,000.  Transaction costs of £1,786,000 were incurred as part of the share issue and have been net against the share premium account, whilst £536,000 was incurred as part of the consequent share listing and have been expensed.

 

On 20 November 2012 an ordinary resolution of the Company proposing the placing of 1,481,482 new ordinary shares at 1350 pence each was passed. 

 

On 7 December 2012, an additional 1,481,482 ordinary shares were placed and admitted to trading on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM), raising £20 million.  Following the admission of the new shares, the Company had 15,648,149 ordinary shares of 40 pence each in issue.


 

26.        Share based payments

On 17 October 2011, the Group established the Share Option Scheme entitling key management personnel and senior employees to purchase shares in the Company. 

 

The performance conditions of the Scheme are that for the duration of the vesting period, the dividends paid by the Company must have increased in percentage terms when compared to an assumed dividend of £8 million in respect of the financial year ending 31 December 2012, by a minimum of the higher of:

 

a)     the increase in the Retail Prices Index during that period; or

b)    5% per annum during that period.

 

All dividends paid by the Company each year during the vesting period must be paid from the Company's earnings referable to that year.  Also from the grant date to the date the Option is exercised, there must be no public criticism by any regulatory authority on the operation of the Company or any of its subsidiaries which has a material impact on the business of the Company.

 

Options are forfeited if they remain unexercised after a period of more than 10 years from the date of grant.  If the participant ceases to be employed by the Group by reason of injury, disability, ill-health or redundancy; or because his employing company ceases to be a shareholder of the Group; or because his employing business is being transferred out of the Group, his option may be exercised within 6 months after such cessation.  In the event of the death of a participant, the personal representatives of a participant may exercise an option, to the extent exercisable at the date of death, within 6 months after the death of the participant.

 

On cessation of employment for any other reason (or when a participant serves, or has been served with, notice of termination of such employment), the option will lapse although the Remuneration Committee has discretion to allow the exercise of the option for a period not exceeding 6 months from the date of such cessation. 

 

In such circumstances, the performance conditions may be modified or waived as the Remuneration Committee, acting fairly and reasonably and taking due consideration of the circumstances, thinks fit.  The number of Ordinary Shares which can be acquired on exercise will be pro-rated on a time elapsed basis, unless the Remuneration Committee, acting fairly and reasonably and taking due consideration of the circumstances, decides otherwise. In determining whether to exercise its discretion in these respects, the Remuneration Committee must satisfy itself that the early exercise of an option does not constitute a reward for failure.

 

On 2 November 2011 934,998 share options were granted at an exercise price of £7.20 per share.  Half of the share options are exercisable on 2 November 2014 with the remainder exercisable on 2 November 2016.

 

During 2011 the Share Option Scheme was established as a share settled scheme with an expense recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income and a corresponding movement within reserves during the year of £70,000.  In 2012 the Scheme was changed to a cash settled Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP).  An expense has been recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income of £1,610,000.  The prior year's reserves movement has been reversed.

 




2012



No.

LTIP1

LTIP2

Total

Key management personnel

3

 318,750

 318,749

637,499

Senior management

5

 141,666

 141,666

283,332

Share Options in issue

8

460,416

460,415

920,831






Exercise price (£)


 7.20

 7.20







Current share price (£)


 15.70

 15.70







Market consensus share price (£)


 15.61

 15.56







Expected volatility


10%

10%







Risk free 5 year UK gilt rate


0.86%

0.86%







Liability at 31 December  (£'000)


 1,108

 572

 1,680


 

27.  Cash and cash equivalents

 

For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents comprises of the following balances with less than three months maturity from the date of acquisition.

 


2012

2011

Group

£000

£000

Loans and advances to banks (Note 11)

94,015

119,545


94,015

119,545

 


2012

2011

Company

£000

£000

Loans and advances to banks (Note 11)

92,348

119,545


92,348

119,545


 

28.  Related-party transactions

 

Related parties of the Company and Group include subsidiaries, Key Management Personnel, close family members of Key Management Personnel and entities which are controlled, jointly controlled or significantly influenced, or for which significant voting power is held, by Key Management Personnel or their close family members.

 

A number of banking transactions are entered into with related parties in the normal course of business on normal commercial terms. These include loans and deposits. Except for the directors' disclosures, there were no other Key Management Personnel disclosures; therefore the tables below relate to directors.

 


Directors


2012

2011


£000

£000

Loans



Loans outstanding at 1 January

 -  

229

Interest capitalised

 -  

3

Loan repayments during the year

 -  

(232)

Loans outstanding at 31 December

 -  

 -  

Interest income earned

 -  

3




Deposits



Deposits outstanding at 1 January

158

312

Interest applied

6

8

Additional deposits made during the year

135

 -  

Deposit reclassification

 -  

(162)

Deposits outstanding at 31 December

299

158

Interest expense on deposits

6

8




The deposit reclassification in 2011 relates to directors who resigned during the year.




The above transactions arose during the normal course of business and are on substantially the same terms as for comparable transactions with third parties.

 


2012

2011

Deposits held with Group Companies

£000

£000

Deposits made during the year

 -  

3,000

Deposit repayments during the year

 -  

(3,000)

Balance at 31 December

 -  

 -  

Interest income earned

 -  

5

 

The Company undertook the following transactions with other companies in the Arbuthnot Banking Group:







2012

2011



£000

£000

Arbuthnot Latham & Co. Ltd - recharge income of shared services


(212)

(136)

Arbuthnot Latham & Co. Ltd - interest income on call account


(121)

(77)

Arbuthnot Banking Group PLC - group recharges


300

1,781

Everyday Lending Limited - interest income on loan receivable


(1,597)

 -  

Secure Homes Services Limited - building rental paid


360

360



(1,270)

1,928





For convenience the loans and advances with, and amounts receivable and payable to, related companies are noted below:



2012

2011

Group


£000

£000

Loans and advances to related companies


24,859

81,601

Amounts receivable from ultimate parent undertaking


1,994

4,745

Amounts receivable from related companies


8

50

Amounts payable to related companies


(640)

(1,305)

Subordinated loan from ultimate parent undertaking


 -  

(3,000)



26,221

82,091







2012

2011

Company


£000

£000

Loans and advances to related companies


24,859

81,601

Amounts receivable from ultimate parent undertaking


1,994

4,745

Amounts receivable from related companies


8

50

Amounts receivable from subsidiary undertakings


94,936

16,537

Amounts payable to subsidiary undertakings


 -  

(101)

Amounts payable to related companies


(640)

(1,309)

Subordinated loan from ultimate parent undertaking


 -  

(3,000)



121,157

98,523

 

Directors' remuneration



The directors' emoluments (including pension contributions and benefits in kind) for the year were as follows:





2012

2011


£000

£000

Other emoluments

1,252

1,079

Pension contributions

60

104


1,312

1,183

 

The emoluments of Mr Angest and Mr Salmon are paid by Arbuthnot Banking Group PLC and disclosed in the Arbuthnot Banking Group PLC consolidated financial statements.

 

The aggregate emoluments of the highest paid director were £870,000 for the period ended 31 December 2012 (2011: £685,728), including £35,000 (2011: £35,000) of contributions made to a money purchase scheme on their behalf.

 

No share options were exercised or were exercisable as at 31 December 2012 (2011: none). 

 

On 2 November 2011, Mr Lynam and Mr Salmon were both granted an option to subscribe between 2 November 2014 and 1 November 2021 for 141,666 ordinary 40p shares in the Company at 720 pence a share, as well as an option to subscribe between 2 November 2016 and 1 November 2021 for 141,667 ordinary 40p shares in the Company at 720 pence a share.

 

On 2 November 2011, Mr Kapur was granted an option to subscribe between 2 November 2014 and 1 November 2021 for 35,416 ordinary 40p shares in the Company at 720 pence a share, as well as an option to subscribe between 2 November 2016 and 1 November 2021 for 35,417 ordinary 40p shares in the Company at 720 pence a share.

 

During 2012 the Share Option Scheme was modified to become cash-settled rather than equity settled.

 

The interests of any directors whom hold shares in the ultimate parent company are shown in the Directors' Report of the ultimate parent company.

 

At the year end the ordinary shares held by the directors (including non-executive directors) were:

 

 


At 1 January 2012

Acquired during the year

At 31 December 2012




and 20 March 2013

N Kapur

-  

1,000

1,000

P A Lynam

6,600

2,200

8,800

P Marrow

-  

5,440

5,440

A A Salmon

-  

7,500

7,500

C F Sergeant

6,600

-  

6,600





 

29.  Operating segments

 

The Group is organised into five main operating segments, which consist of the different products available, disclosed below:

 

1) Personal lending - Unsecured consumer loans sold to existing customers via brokers and affinity partners.

2) Everyday Loans - An acquired entity during the period.  A provider of unsecured loans.

3) Motor finance - Hire purchase agreements secured against the vehicle being financed.

4) Retail finance - Point of sale unsecured finance for in-store and online retailers.

5) One Bill - An account designed to aid customers with their household budgeting and payments process.

 

The only transaction between the operating segments was loan interest paid by Everyday Loans to the Company.  Management review these segments by looking at the income, size and growth rate of the loan books, impairments and customer numbers. Except for these items no costs or balance sheet items are allocated to the segments.

 


Personal Lending

Everyday Loans

Motor Finance

Retail Finance

One Bill

Other

Group Total

Year ended 31 December 2012

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Interest revenue

8,683

12,751

16,889

5,790

 -  

780

44,893

Fee and commission income

 -  

2,717

 -  

 -  

8,947

4,124

15,788

Revenue from external customers

8,683

15,468

16,889

5,790

8,947

4,904

60,681









Impairment losses

2,634

2,722

2,701

721

(90)

258

8,946









Lending balances

68,175

73,806

89,620

64,189

384

1,457

297,631

 


Personal Lending

Everyday Loans

Motor Finance

Retail Finance

One Bill

Other

Group Total

Year ended 31 December 2011

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Interest revenue

5,993

 -  

9,941

3,554

 -  

3,348

22,836

Fee and commission income

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

9,644

3,018

12,662

Revenue from external customers

5,993

 -  

9,941

3,554

9,644

6,366

35,498









Impairment losses

2,089

 -  

2,253

260

(87)

86

4,601









Lending balances

43,601

 -  

63,376

42,608

2,316

2,684

154,585

 

The "Other" segment above includes segments below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure and fulfils the requirement of IFRS8.28 by reconciling operating segments to the amounts reported in the financial statements.

 

As interest and operating expenses are not aligned to operating segments for day-to-day management of the business and cannot be allocated on a reliable basis, profit by operating segment has not been disclosed.

 

All the Group's operations are conducted wholly within the United Kingdom and geographical information is therefore not presented.


 

30.  Acquisition of Everyday Loans

On 8 June 2012 Secure Trust Bank Plc (STB) acquired 100% of the shares in Everyday Loans Holdings Limited and its wholly owned subsidiaries Everyday Loans Limited and Everyday Lending Limited (together "EDL").  EDL was previously controlled by its management team and Alchemy Partners Nominees Limited.  The acquisition of Everyday Loans represents a significant strategic development for STB and will enable the Company to broaden its distribution channels to a wider market. 

 

The acquisition resulted in a gain from a bargain purchase as STB acquired EDL for consideration of £1.  This was because upon acquisition STB provided funding so that EDL could redeem the remaining £34 million of subordinated debt principally held by Alchemy and also provided a loan facility of £37 million to refinance EDL's existing bank debt and to fund future loans.  A payment of £1.5 million will be made to the management team of EDL, and has been included in accruals in 2012, if the team met certain performance targets in 2012.

 

The revenue included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income since 8 June 2012 contributed by EDL was £15.5 million and EDL also contributed profit of £1.8 million during the same period.  Had EDL been consolidated from 1 January 2012, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income would have included revenue of £28.8 million and profit of £4.3 million.

 

The costs of the acquisition, which are included in operating expenses, totalled £0.8 million.

 

 


Acquired


Recognised


assets /

Fair value

values on


liabilities

adjustments

acquisition


£'000

£'000

£'000

Intangible assets

50

5,115

5,165

Property, plant and equipment

491

491

Loans and advances to customers

63,720

7,545

71,265

Cash at bank

991

991

Other assets

24

24

Prepayments and accrued income

2,939

2,939

Deferred tax asset *

6,313

6,313

Total assets

68,215

18,973

87,188





Loans and debt securities

71,618

71,618

Other liabilities

960

960

Accruals and deferred income

1,741

1,741

Deferred tax liabilities

3,039

3,039

Total liabilities

74,319

3,039

77,358





Net identifiable (liabilities)/assets

(6,104)

15,934

9,830





Consideration £1







Gain from a bargain purchase



9,830





* The deferred tax asset has increased by £913,000 when compared to the interim accounts for the period ending 30 June 2012.  This is due to a revision to the amount of losses acquired.


 

31.  Immediate and ultimate parent company

 

The Directors regard Arbuthnot Banking Group PLC, a Company registered in England and Wales, as the immediate and ultimate parent Company. Henry Angest, the Group Chairman and Chief Executive has a beneficial interest in 53.6% of the issued share capital of Arbuthnot Banking Group PLC and is regarded by the directors as the ultimate controlling party. A copy of the consolidated financial statements of Arbuthnot Banking Group PLC may be obtained from the Secretary, Arbuthnot Banking Group PLC, One Arleston Way, Solihull, B90 4LH.


 

32.  Events after the balance sheet date

 

On 2 January 2013 the Company acquired 100% of the ordinary share capital of V12 Finance Group Limited, who along with its wholly owned subsidiaries, V12 Retail Finance Limited and V12 Personal Finance Limited provide retail point of sale loans, typically for 12 months on an unsecured basis to consumers who are predominantly classified as prime borrowers.  The acquisition is complementary to the Group's existing retail finance proposition and the V12 management team will continue in the business.

 

The cash consideration of £3.5 million was paid on completion and the Group provided funding such that the V12 Group could redeem £7 million of subordinated debt and also could repay existing bank finance amounting to £28.5 million. 

 

The acquisition of V12 Finance Group Limited is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 3 'Business Combinations', which requires the recognition of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values.  As part of this process, it is also necessary to identify and recognise certain assets and liabilities which are not included on the acquiree's balance sheet, for example intangible assets.  The exercise to fair value the balance sheet is inherently subjective and required management to make a number of assumptions and estimates. 

 

The unaudited net assets being acquired are expected to be fair valued at £3.4 million and the associated costs incurred by STB to complete the transaction are expected to be £0.7 million.

 

On 15 January 2013 the Company acquired the businesses of Debt Managers Holdings Ltd, Debt Managers (AB) Limited and Debt Managers Limited (together "Debt Managers"). Debt Managers collects delinquent debt on behalf of a range of clients including banks and utility companies. Key benefits of this acquisition to STB include:

•  Broadening the income base of STB without the requirement for large amounts of capital;

•  The acquisition of a scalable collections platform through which STB intends to channel its delinquent debt; and

•  The acquisition of the latest call centre and collections technology, including market leading dialler capability, IVR technology and payment websites.

 

STB acquired Debt Managers for an initial cash payment of £0.4 million paid on completion of the transaction which includes payment for the estimated book value of the net assets of £14,000. In addition deferred consideration of up to £0.4 million in cash is payable by STB one year after completion subject in part to the Business achieving certain income criteria. The assets acquired are expected to be fair valued at circa £0.8 million after completion.

 

Debt Managers generated an unaudited loss before tax of £0.1 million under UK GAAP for the year ended 31 August 2012. No material differences are anticipated under IFRS. The acquisition is initially expected to be earnings neutral.

 

The initial cash consideration was funded from STB's existing cash resources and the additional regulatory capital requirements arising as a result of this acquisition are expected to be minimal. No regulatory approvals were required in relation to the transaction. STB also funded the repayment of Debt Managers' outstanding overdraft of £1.7 million.


 

Five year summary


 


2012

2011

2010

2009

2008


£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Profit for the year






Interest and similar income

44,893

22,836

15,891

9,935

3,420

Interest expense and similar charges

(10,467)

(5,609)

(3,419)

(1,345)

(830)

Net interest income

34,426

17,227

12,472

8,590

2,590

Net fee and commission income

12,582

11,233

11,750

13,119

15,423

Operating income

47,008

28,460

24,222

21,709

18,013

Impairment losses on loans and advances

(8,946)

(4,601)

(2,168)

(1,173)

(533)

Gain from a bargain purchase

9,830

 -  

 -  

 -  

 -  

Other income

37

36

982

41

121

Exceptional costs

(1,397)

(536)

 -  

(693)

 -  

Arbuthnot Banking Group recharges

(91)

(1,781)

(960)

(320)

 -  

Operating expenses

(29,276)

(14,298)

(13,390)

(11,468)

(12,567)

Profit before income tax

17,165

7,280

8,686

8,096

5,034













Earnings per share for profit attributable to the equity holders of the Group during the year




(expressed in pence per share)






 - basic and diluted

108.9

39.6

50.0

46.4

28.0













Financial position






Loans and advances to banks

155,301

139,498

42,577

39,334

12,882

Loans and advances to customers

297,631

154,585

89,482

51,440

12,551

Debt securities

 -  

 -  

25,627

11,000

14,293

Other assets

21,667

13,757

23,013

14,021

13,473

Total assets

474,599

307,840

180,699

115,795

53,199







Deposits from customers

398,891

272,063

153,778

93,342

35,828

Other liabilities

19,787

11,962

11,125

10,405

8,624

Total shareholders' equity

55,921

23,815

15,796

12,048

8,747

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

474,599

307,840

180,699

115,795

53,199

 


This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
 
END
 
 
FR JMMLTMBTTBRJ
UK 100

Latest directors dealings