6 January 2011
Terrace Hill Group PLC
("Terrace Hill" or the "Group")
FULL YEAR RESULTS SHOW CONTINUED PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS AND INCREASED FOCUS ON FOODSTORES
Terrace Hill Group plc (AIM: THG), a leading UK property investment and development group, today announces results for year to 30 September 2011.
Financial Highlights:
§ Revenue profit* of £5.6 million (30 September 2010: loss of £3.0 million)
§ Revenue of £67.8 million (30 September 2010: £30.7 million)
§ Loss before tax (IFRS) of £10.2 million (30 September 2010: profit of £17.9 million)
§ EPRA Net Asset Value per share decreased by 23.9% to 25.4p (30 September 2010: 33.4p as restated) while EPRA Triple Net Asset Value per share decreased by 23.0% to 26.6p (30 September 2010: 34.5p as restated)
§ Balance sheet gearing reduced to 95.1% (30 September 2010: 127.6%, on a restated basis)with net debt reduced by £39.3 million to £51.4 million (30 September 2010: £90.7 million)
Operational highlights:
§ Foodstore business maturing very well and growing rapidly, with the committed programme of development now standing at 652,000 sq ft, with a projected end value of £240.0 million
§ Good progress with other developments, including two central London office led mixed use schemes at Howick Place in Victoria, and Savile Row / Conduit Street, W1
§ Orderly disposal of residential portfolio underway with a 12-18 month sales process expected
Commenting, Robert Adair, Chairman of Terrace Hill, said: "In the last year there have been some very positive aspects to our business, most particularly the strong growth in our foodstore development programme and reduction in debt. We believe that the greatest potential for the business lies in focusing on our key strengths of commercial property development and trading, and as we execute this strategy I remain confident we will perform well over the medium term and add value to the business for our shareholders."
*See Chairman's Statement below for definition of revenue profit
For further information, please visit www.terracehill.co.uk, or contact:
Terrace Hill Group plc |
+44 (0)20 7631 1666 |
Robert Adair, Chairman |
|
Philip Leech, Chief Executive |
|
|
|
Oriel Securities Limited (Nominated Adviser and Broker) |
+44 (0)20 7710 7600 |
Gareth Price |
|
|
|
FTI Consulting |
+44 (0)20 7831 3113 |
Richard Sunderland |
|
Stephanie Highett |
|
Olivia Goodall |
Will Henderson
Chairman's Statement
I am pleased to report our financial results for the twelve months ended 30th September 2011 where we have witnessed good progress in our foodstore development programme. However our financial results have been affected by falling asset values and the decision to sell our residential investment assets.
It has become clear that the longer term investment horizon of holding and managing residential investment property is not well suited to a property development and trading business like ours and that our capital can generate far higher returns through deployment in carefully selected commercial developments, in particular within the foodstore sector. We have therefore decided to sell the residential investment assets owned directly by us and through our associate Terrace Hill Residential PLC, a process which we expect to complete over the next 12 - 18 months. The result of selling portfolios of let residential investments is that the prices achieved often reflect a discount to the individual vacant possession values of the properties. We have decided to reflect the discounted prices we are likely to achieve on sale by changing the basis of valuation of the properties from their individual vacant possession value to their discounted investment value which we now consider to be more appropriate. This has been reflected as a prior year adjustment so that comparisons can be readily made with earlier periods. The cumulative impact of this change in valuation basis on the Group's NAV at 30 September 2011 has been a reduction of £22.5 million. Further details of this can be found in the Finance Review below.
As a result of this change in our valuation methodology and movement in the value of our legacy development properties, our EPRA Net Asset Value has decreased by 23.9% to 25.4 pence per share (30 September 2010: 33.4 pence per share as restated) and our EPRA Triple Net Asset Value has decreased by 23.0% to 26.6 pence per share (30 September 2010: 34.5 pence per share as restated). The EPRA Triple Net Asset Value takes account of contingent tax on prospective gains and other fair value adjustments.
The Group's revenue profit (which is stated before valuation movements on investment and development properties and contributions from our joint venture and associated undertakings but after normal financing costs) improved to £5.6 million for the period, compared with a loss of £3.0 million for the restated comparative 11 month period. Our loss before tax, measured under IFRS, was £10.2 million for the period compared with a profit before tax of £17.9 million for the restated comparative 11 month period.
Our net debt has continued to reduce at a very satisfactory rate and is now £51.4 million, £39.3 million lower than at 30 September 2010, when it was £90.7 million, reflecting our success in realising developments and managing our cash flow. Despite the change in basis of valuing our residential assets as noted above, our net gearing has also reduced and was 95.1% at 30 September 2011 compared to 127.6% at 30 September 2010 (on a restated basis).
We continue to review the Group's position as regards the payment of dividends and reluctantly have concluded that we should not resume payment of dividends and should remain prudent in this respect until market conditions allow.
Our foodstore development programme is maturing and growing rapidly. We have recently gained detailed planning consents covering a total of 194,000 sq ft of new floor space at our sites in Sunderland, Whitchurch and Skelton where we also have pre-letting or freehold sale agreements in place with retailers. In addition we have recently received a resolution to grant planning consent for a foodstore of 48,786 sq ft at Sedgefield, Co Durham, and have pre-planning discussions and occupier negotiations on-going at four other sites bringing our committed programme to a total of 652,000 sq ft with a projected end value of £240.0 million. With the help of teams dedicated to this sector working in all our offices we have a lengthening pipeline of new foodstore development proposals and I see this as the main driver of sustainable growth in our business for some time to come. The impact of this programme on the Group's EPRA NAV is modest at this stage. We have included 3.3 pence per share in our EPRA NAV reflecting a conservative view of the anticipated profits from our eight current committed sites.
In central London we are managing two office led mixed use schemes at Howick Place in Victoria and Conduit Street in Mayfair. I expect these to show good returns as they reach completion over the next 12- 24 months, however the competitive nature of site acquisitions in central London makes the timing of similar further deals uncertain.
I reported in my interim report the resignation of Julie Green, our most recently appointed independent non-executive director, for reasons connected with her appointment with Ernst & Young and we are seeking to appoint her replacement as soon as possible. Also, I would like to thank everyone at Terrace Hill for their hard work and commitment during the last year.
Outlook
In the last year there have been some very positive aspects to our business most particularly the strong growth in our foodstore development programme and reduction in debt. I see these trends continuing into the current year, notwithstanding the current economic uncertainty. I remain confident we will perform well over the medium term and add value to the business for our shareholders.
Robert FM Adair
Chairman
6 January 2012
Business Review - Operations
Commercial Property
Foodstore Development
We have recently reported that the main area of our commercial property development activity is currently in the foodstore sector. This is a sector where demand from occupiers remains unabated, with all the main foodstore retailers rapidly expanding their trading footprint in the UK. This demand is fuelled not only by a desire of the retailers to grow market share, but also their expansion into new product areas, in particular comparison non-food items and household goods. In some cases up to 50% of sales space in new stores is dedicated to non-food items. There is also a strong push by certain retailers to fill geographic gaps in their portfolios with Waitrose and Sainsbury's expanding in the north and Morrisons in the south of the country.
At Terrace Hill we have a team dedicated to this sector with specialists in each of our regional offices. This gives us a unique insight into local markets which is essential in terms of site finding, planning, and fulfilling the retailer's specific requirements. Our focus is entirely on large format foodstore development, usually over 40,000 sq ft, and not in the small "convenience" shop sector where we cannot justify our time being spent on the smaller returns.
Our focus is paying off handsomely. Over the past 24 months we have completed three large foodstore schemes at Bishop Auckland, Manchester and Helston which together generated in excess of £14.0 million of profit before tax. We also have eight new committed projects with sites under contract, four of which have recently received detailed planning consent or a resolution to grant planning and all of which have commitments or discussions on-going with retail occupiers.
Our foodstore development transactions are structured in a way that ensures the associated risks are relatively small. We usually hold the sites under options or conditional contracts and only commit to the acquisition once we have received detailed planning permission and commitment from an occupier, often sharing the uplift in value with the landowner. This means that our financial risk is limited to the costs and fees associated with gaining planning consents and legal agreements. Furthermore there is great demand for the subsequent property investments from a wide range of purchasers attracted by the long, usually 25 year plus, lease terms and secure income. This allows us to raise equity finance through a forward sale to an investor which reduces the need to seek bank debt or use our own equity in the development phase. The typical margin we achieve on these developments is in the region of 15-20% of gross development value.
We have a substantial pipeline of further foodstore development sites and we are confident that this is a sustainable area of business for us for the foreseeable future. The planning system in the UK remains challenging, however, so far we have achieved a 100% success rate in winning planning for our foodstore schemes and have found that, in general, the uncertainty lies around the timing of the consents.
Highlights from our foodstore development programme include:
Wessington Way, Sunderland |
Detailed planning consent was granted in November 2011 for a 98,679 sq ft Sainsbury's store and a petrol filling station. The property will be let at completion to Sainsbury's for a 25 year term from completion which we expect to take place in early 2013 following a start on site in spring 2012. |
Skelton, East Cleveland |
We received detailed planning consent on this 5.2 acre site for a 41,800 sq ft foodstore and petrol filling station in October 2011. The development has been pre-let to Asda for a 25 year term. |
London Road, Whitchurch, Shropshire |
Detailed planning consent was granted on this site in November 2011 for a 55,000 sq ft foodstore. The site will be sold to Sainsbury's at the expiry of the planning Judicial Review period, which we expect to take place in spring 2012. |
Sedgefield, Co. Durham |
We entered into a contract to acquire this 7.1 acre site in spring 2011. Completion of the acquisition is conditional upon us receiving detailed planning consent for a 48,786 sq ft foodstore. A planning application was submitted in the autumn and a resolution to grant planning consent was granted in early December 2011. There is considerable interest from number of food retailers in this development. |
Middlehaven, Teesside |
This 16 acre site is owned by the Group and has an existing consent for 128,000 sq ft of non-food retail. However, the planning authority is supportive of a change of use and we have an agreement with a retailer, conditional on the receipt of planning, to pre-let a 125,000 sq ft foodstore for a 25 year term. We expect to submit a detailed planning application in early 2012. Terms have also been agreed with a pub and two drive-through food outlet operators on the balance of the land. |
Herne Bay, Kent |
In the spring we entered into a conditional contract to acquire a 6.84 acre site on the edge of Herne Bay and, following strong competition between a number of retailers, we have agreed terms with one for a pre-let of 95,239 sq ft and a petrol filling station. We expect to submit a planning application in late 2012 and the project is likely to complete in spring 2014. |
Prestwich, Greater Manchester |
We have acquired, conditional on planning, a site in Prestwich town centre for a foodstore led development. Detailed discussions are on-going with an occupier and we expect to make a planning application towards the end of 2012. |
Hyde, Greater Manchester |
This former heavy industrial site lies adjacent to the M67 motorway to the south east of Manchester and we are in detailed negotiations with a retailer to take over 100,000 sq ft on the site. Acquisition of the site is conditional on obtaining planning and we expect to make a detailed planning application in the second half of 2012. |
London Offices
We have two central London office led mixed use development schemes in progress at the moment, both of which we expect to perform strongly as they complete over the next 12 - 24 months. New acquisitions are, however, hard to achieve with strong competition for a limited supply of sites and almost no debt available to help purchasers.
Howick Place Victoria, SW1 |
Construction of this scheme is progressing well with completion due in the third quarter of 2012. There has already been considerable occupier interest in the 135,000 sq ft office element, which reflects the oncoming scarcity of new large floor plate office accommodation in the West End markets. The residential element of 25,300 sq ft will benefit from the rapidly rising values of central London residential property. This scheme is being carried out in joint venture with Doughty Hanson and has the benefit of development finance with no recourse to the Group. |
Savile Row/Conduit Street,W1 |
We are acting as the development manager of this mixed use retail and office development on the corner of Conduit Street and Savile Row. A planning application has been submitted to almost double the developed density on the site and, with strong demand from occupiers for prime locations in the West End, we expect the development to generate good returns. |
Other Developments
We have also made considerable progress with a number of our other sites and assets. These include: the pre-sale of a substantial part of a small unit industrial development in Christchurch, the construction, funding and forward sale of the Northern Design Centre at Baltic Business Quarter in Gateshead and the sale of the Hudson Quay office development, which had been let to Middlesbrough Primary Care Trust on Teesside.
Residential Investment
We stated earlier that we have decided to exit the residential investment sector through the sale of our properties and those owned by our associate, Terrace Hill Residential PLC. The portfolios have shown good growth in rental values and occupancy rates are at record levels, however we believe that Terrace Hill is better suited to and can generate significantly better returns from its core commercial real estate development and trading activities than from the longer term management of residential investment portfolios. Since January 2011 Terrace Hill Residential PLC has sold £50.1 million of assets and we are now overseeing an orderly disposal of the balance of the Group's residential properties which we expect to take 12 -18 months to complete.
Business Review - Finance
Financial results and net asset value
The results for the year and the Group's NAV at 30 September 2011 have been impacted by the adoption of the investment value basis of valuation for the residential investment properties, in which we have interests both on our balance sheet and through our investment in Terrace Hill Residential PLC. Until this year we had valued residential investment properties at fair value, which we interpreted as the market value of the properties with the special assumption of vacant possession. As a consequence of prices achieved on sales of residential properties during the year and following the decision by Terrace Hill Residential PLC to place its portfolio on the market, we have concluded that the more appropriate valuation basis for the residential properties is market value on the basis of their current, largely let status. Accordingly, the investment value basis has been adopted for residential property held by the Group and Terrace Hill Residential PLC in the current year and has been retrospectively applied to prior years. The cumulative impact of this change in basis on the Group's NAV at 30 September 2011 has been a reduction of £22.5 million. More information is included in Note 1 to the financial statements.
The Group's NAV decreased by 16.8% in the year ended 30 September 2011 to £48.1 million (22.7 pence per share) from £58.4 million (27.5 pence per share) as restated at 30 September 2010 and our EPRA NAV decreased by 23.9% to £54.1 million (25.4 pence per share) from £71.1 million (33.4 pence per share) as restated at 30 September 2010.
The decrease in our EPRA NAV was caused principally by the following:
- 1.8 pence per share from the movement in value of our residential investment properties |
- 1.8 pence per share from our investment in joint ventures and associates |
- 0.6 pence per share from continuing operations |
- 2.9 pence per share from the movement in value of our legacy development properties. |
The Group's EPRA triple NAV, which takes into account any tax payable on profits arising if all the Group's properties were sold at the values used for EPRA NAV, the write-off of goodwill and any other fair value adjustments, decreased by 23.0% to £56.5 million (26.6 pence per share) from £73.4 million (34.5 pence per share) as restated at 30 September 2010.
Calculation of EPRA NAV and EPRA Triple NAV (unaudited)
30 September 2011 |
30 September 2010 restated |
||||||
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
||||
shares |
Pence per |
shares |
Pence per |
||||
£'000 |
000s |
share |
£'000 |
000s |
share |
||
Audited net asset value |
48,134 |
211,971 |
22.7 |
58,361 |
211,971 |
27.5 |
|
Revaluation of property held as current assets |
11,641 |
18,313 |
|||||
Fair value of financial instruments |
- |
177 |
|||||
Deferred tax |
(5,710) |
(5,789) |
|||||
Shares to be issued under the LTIP |
12 |
595 |
12 |
595 |
|||
EPRA NAV |
54,077 |
212,566 |
25.4 |
71,074 |
212,566 |
33.4 |
|
Decrease % |
|
23.9% |
- |
||||
Fair value of financial instruments |
- |
(177) |
|||||
Deferred tax |
5,710 |
5,789 |
|||||
Goodwill |
(3,336) |
(3,336) |
|||||
EPRA Triple NAV |
56,451 |
212,566 |
26.6 |
73,350 |
212,566 |
34.5 |
|
Decrease % |
23.0% |
- |
|||||
Statement of comprehensive income
Revenue for the year ended 30 September 2011 includes rental income of £3.2 million, recognition of revenue under the foodstore construction contract at Bishop Auckland of £7.4 million, revenue from site sales at Farnborough, Christchurch and Bishop Auckland of £8.4 million and revenue from the sales of completed buildings at Middlehaven and Wilton Road, Victoria amounting to £34.6 million. We also sold five residential units during the year, for a total of £0.8 million.
The statement of comprehensive income also includes movements in the valuation of our properties. Included in cost of sales is £6.1 million of write downs to the carrying value of our development properties (2010: write back £3.7 million). Our wholly owned residential properties fell in value by £3.6 million (2010 as restated: increase £0.9 million), and our share of the fall in value of the residential properties owned by Terrace Hill Residential PLC was £1.2 million (2010 as restated: £15.1 million increase).
Administrative expenses for the year ended 30 September 2011 amounted to £4.3 million (2010: £4.7 million), reflecting continued tight control over our overheads.
Net finance costs for the year ended 30 September 2011 were £4.6 million (2010: £1.8 million). Included in the 2011 figure is a provision for £2.0 million relating to an interest shortfall guarantee (in respect of which £1.0 million was provided in 2010), and £1.3 million relating to interest expensed on development projects where the Directors have assessed that interest should not be capitalised as work is not currently underway.
Our share of the results of our joint ventures and associated undertakings was a loss of £2.6 million in the year ended 30 September 2011 (2010 as restated: profit £16.1 million) of which as noted above £1.2 million related to movements in the value of the underlying properties (2010 as restated: £15.1 million increase).
Balance Sheet
The Group's net assets at 30 September 2011 were £48.1 million, a decrease of 17.5% on the restated amount reported at 30 September 2010 of £58.4 million. The Group's gearing has improved since 30 September 2010 and net debt as a percentage of adjusted net assets is 95.1% at 30 September 2011 compared to 127.6% as restated at 30 September 2010. The amount of net debt has also reduced to £51.4 million at 30 September 2011 from £90.7 million at 30 September 2010.
Financial resources and capital management
As mentioned above, our net debt at 30 September 2011 was £51.4 million, a reduction of £39.3 million in the year. Sale proceeds of £45.2 million were the largest contributor to this reduction, offset by expenditure on our developments and the net effect of our trading activities.
The Group funds itself and its projects with a combination of cash and bank debt. Bank debt is secured either against assets wholly and ultimately owned by Terrace Hill Group plc, or assets owned by joint ventures. Several loans falling into each of the above categories were refinanced during the year. In particular, a loan of £33.7 million that matured in September 2011 has been re-financed for a further two years on market terms. In addition to this, termsheets have been received for several loan extensions which have not been documented as at the time of writing and which we expect to finalise in the next few weeks.
The average maturity of Group debt is now 15.4 months with a weighted average margin of 2.83%, both of which measures change to 19.7 months and 3.04% if we take into account loans where terms have been commercially agreed but not yet documented. The average maturity of joint ventures and associated undertaking debt is now 15.9 months with a weighted average margin of 2.96%.
In order to benefit from the low interest rate environment, which is not forecast to change significantly for the foreseeable future, at 30 September 2011 the Group had no hedging arrangements in place. Interest rate exposure is actively monitored. 50% of joint ventures and associated undertaking debt is hedged with an average interest rate of 2.95%.
In order to determine whether the Group has adequate resources to maintain its strategy for the foreseeable future, the Group monitors its forecast cashflow movements for the next 24 months on a rolling basis and robustly and regularly updates the fundamental assumptions.
Summary of debt position
September |
||
September |
2010 |
|
2011 |
restated |
|
Net debt |
£51.4m |
£90.7m |
Net gearing |
95.1% |
127.6% |
Net debt including share of joint venture and associated undertaking debt |
£151.1m |
£226.4m |
Total net gearing |
279.5% |
318.6% |
Loan to value |
48.5% |
60.9% |
The net gearing and loan to value percentages shown above are in relation to our adjusted NAV. The majority of joint venture and associated undertaking debt is of limited recourse to the Group.
Debt expiry profile
On balance sheet |
Off balance sheet* |
|
£m |
£m |
|
Bank loans and overdraft repayable in one year |
26.8 |
40.2 |
Bank loans repayable in more than one year |
36.2 |
59.5 |
Total |
63.0 |
99.7 |
* Group share
Summary of loan to value ratios of Group property
September |
||
September |
2010 |
|
2011 |
restated |
|
Commercial property |
52.1% |
56.9% |
Residential property |
93.3% |
91.5% |
Total |
48.5% |
60.9% |
Philip Leech Jon Austen
Chief Executive Group Finance Director
6 January 2012
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
for the year ended 30 September 2011
Period ended |
|||
Year ended |
30 September |
||
30 September |
2010 |
||
2011 |
Restated* |
||
|
Notes |
£'000 |
£'000 |
Revenue |
2 |
67,766 |
30,747 |
Direct costs |
(61,333) |
(24,437) |
|
Gross profit |
6,433 |
6,310 |
|
Administrative expenses |
(4,343) |
(4,745) |
|
Profit on disposal of investment properties |
- |
47 |
|
Impairment of associated undertakings |
(1,000) |
- |
|
(Loss)/profit on revaluation of investment properties |
(4,128) |
1,956 |
|
Operating (loss)/profit |
(3,038) |
3,568 |
|
Finance income |
4 |
508 |
1,281 |
Finance costs |
4 |
(5,097) |
(3,105) |
Share of joint venture and associated undertakings post tax (loss)/profit |
(2,612) |
16,130 |
|
(Loss)/profit before tax |
(10,239) |
17,874 |
|
Tax |
6 |
(184) |
(2,818) |
(Loss)/profit from continuing operations |
(10,423) |
15,056 |
|
Total comprehensive income |
(10,423) |
15,056 |
|
(Loss)/profit attributable to: |
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent |
(10,423) |
15,060 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
- |
(4) |
|
(10,423) |
15,056 |
||
Total comprehensive income attributable to: |
|||
Equity holders of the parent |
(10,423) |
15,060 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
- |
(4) |
|
(10,423) |
15,056 |
||
Basic earnings per share |
7 |
(4.94)p |
7.14p |
Diluted earnings per share |
7 |
(4.94)p |
7.14p |
* See Note 1 Restatement of prior years
The notes below form part of these financial statements.
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 30 September 2011
Share |
Share |
Own |
Capital |
Merger |
Unrealised |
Retained |
Total |
Non- |
Total |
|
redemption |
gains |
controlling |
||||||||
capital |
premium |
shares |
reserve |
reserve |
and losses |
earnings |
interest |
|||
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Balance at 31 October 2009 |
4,240 |
43,208 |
(609) |
849 |
7,088 |
- |
23,380 |
78,156 |
230 |
78,386 |
Prior year adjustment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(35,239) |
(35,239) |
- |
(35,239) |
Balance at 31 October 2009 restated* |
4,240 |
43,208 |
(609) |
849 |
7088 |
- |
(11,859) |
42,917 |
230 |
43,147 |
Total comprehensive income for the period restated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15,060 |
15,060 |
(4) |
15,056 |
Share-based payment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
384 |
384 |
- |
384 |
Distribution to non-controlling interest |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(226) |
(226) |
Balance at 30 September 2010 restated* |
4,240 |
43,208 |
(609) |
849 |
7,088 |
- |
3,585 |
58,361 |
- |
58,361 |
Total comprehensive expense for the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(10,423) |
(10,423) |
- |
(10,423) |
Share-based payment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
196 |
196 |
- |
196 |
Balance at 30 September 2011 |
4,240 |
43,208 |
(609) |
849 |
7,088 |
- |
(6,642) |
48,134 |
- |
48,134 |
* See Note 1 Restatement of prior years
Consolidated balance sheet
at 30 September 2011
30 September |
30 September |
31 October |
||
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
||
Restated* |
Restated* |
|||
Notes |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Non-current assets |
||||
Investment properties |
9 |
21,393 |
25,541 |
39,978 |
Property, plant and equipment |
8 |
176 |
235 |
350 |
Investments in equity accounted associates and joint ventures |
10 |
1,419 |
2,656 |
2,699 |
Other investments |
10 |
6 |
182 |
147 |
Intangible assets |
|
3,336 |
3,336 |
3,336 |
Deferred tax assets |
16 |
5,710 |
5,789 |
7,439 |
32,040 |
37,739 |
53,949 |
||
Current assets |
||||
Development properties |
11 |
72,961 |
104,902 |
101,719 |
Trade and other receivables |
12 |
14,191 |
27,036 |
22,729 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
11,630 |
1,759 |
5,290 |
98,782 |
133,697 |
129,738 |
||
Total assets |
130,822 |
171,436 |
183,687 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
||||
Bank loans |
15 |
(36,230) |
(36,286) |
(91,678) |
Other payables |
14 |
- |
(3,000) |
(3,370) |
Deferred tax liabilities |
- |
- |
(73) |
|
(36,230) |
(39,286) |
(95,121) |
||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
13 |
(16,541) |
(14,640) |
(32,572) |
Current tax liabilities |
|
(3,109) |
(3,012) |
(1,176) |
Bank overdrafts and loans |
15 |
(26,808) |
(56,137) |
(11,671) |
(46,458) |
(73,789) |
(45,419) |
||
Total liabilities |
(82,688) |
(113,075) |
(140,540) |
|
Net assets |
48,134 |
58,361 |
43,147 |
|
Equity |
||||
Called up share capital |
18 |
4,240 |
4,240 |
4,240 |
Share premium account |
19 |
43,208 |
43,208 |
43,208 |
Own shares |
19 |
(609) |
(609) |
(609) |
Capital redemption reserve |
19 |
849 |
849 |
849 |
Merger reserve |
19 |
7,088 |
7,088 |
7,088 |
Retained earnings |
19 |
(6,642) |
3,585 |
(11,859) |
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent |
48,134 |
58,361 |
42,917 |
|
Non controlling interests |
- |
- |
230 |
|
Total equity |
48,134 |
58,361 |
43,147 |
* See Note 1 Restatement of prior years
The financial information was approved and authorised for issue by the board of directors on 6 January 2012 and was signed on its behalf by:
P A J Leech J M Austen
Director Director
Consolidated cash flow statement
for the year ended 30 September 2011
Period ended |
||
Year ended |
30 September |
|
30 September |
2010 |
|
2011 |
Restated* |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
||
(Loss)/profit before taxation |
(10,239) |
17,874 |
Adjustments for: |
||
Finance income |
(508) |
(1,281) |
Finance costs |
5,097 |
3,105 |
Share of joint venture and associated undertakings post tax loss/(profit) |
2,612 |
(16,130) |
Depreciation and impairment charge |
3,832 |
3,844 |
Loss/(profit) on revaluation of investment properties |
4,128 |
(1,956) |
Loss on revaluation of investment in associated undertaking |
1,000 |
- |
Profit on disposal of investment properties |
- |
(47) |
(Profit)/loss on sale of tangible financial assets |
(64) |
12 |
Share-based payment |
196 |
384 |
Cash flows from operating activities before change in working capital |
6,054 |
5,805 |
Decrease/(increase) in property inventories |
27,630 |
(6,635) |
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables |
13,798 |
(2,330) |
Decrease in trade and other payables |
(4,375) |
(3,491) |
Cash generated from/(absorbed by) operations |
43,107 |
(6,651) |
Finance costs |
(4,425) |
(3,222) |
Finance income |
590 |
465 |
Tax (paid)/received |
(147) |
594 |
Net cash flows from operating activities |
39,125 |
(8,814) |
Investing activities |
||
Purchase of investment property |
- |
(50) |
Sale of investment property and tangible fixed assets |
100 |
16,459 |
Sale of investments |
167 |
28 |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(70) |
(35) |
Net cash flows from investing activities |
197 |
16,402 |
Financing activities |
||
Borrowings drawn down |
1,325 |
6,342 |
Borrowings repaid |
(30,743) |
(17,581) |
Net cash flows from financing activities |
(29,418) |
(11,239) |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
9,904 |
(3,651) |
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 October 2010 |
1,639 |
5,290 |
Cash and cash equivalents at 30 September 2011 |
11,543 |
1,639 |
* See Note 1 Restatement of prior years
1 Accounting policies
Basis of preparation
The financial information set out in this announcement does not constitute the Group's statutory accounts for the year ended 30 September 2011 under the meaning of s434 Companies Act 2006, but is derived from those accounts. Statutory accounts for the year ended 30 September 2011 have been reported on by the Independent Auditors. Their report was unqualified, did not draw attention to any matters by way of emphasis, and did not contain a statement under 498(2) or 498(3) of the Companies Act 2006. The statutory accounts for the year ended 30 September 2011, prepared under IFRS, will be delivered to the Registrar in due course.
The financial information set out in this announcement does not constitute the Group's statutory accounts for the period ended 30 September 2010 under the meaning of s434 Companies Act 2006, but is derived from those accounts, subject to audited restatement as disclosed in note 1. Accounts for the period ended 30 September 2010 have been reported on by the Independent Auditors. Their report was unqualified, did not draw attention to any matters by way of emphasis, and did not contain a statement under 498(2) or 498(3) of the Companies Act 2006. Statutory accounts for the period ended 30 September 2010 have been filed with the Registrar of Companies.
Changes in accounting policies
The Group has not adopted any new or amended IFRS and IFRIC interpretations in the year.
New standards and interpretations not applied
IASB and IFRIC have issued the following standards and interpretations relevant to the group. These standards and interpretations are mandatory for accounting periods beginning on or after the date of these financial statements and will become effective for future reporting periods:
IAS 12 Income Taxes
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures - revised definition of related parties
IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements
IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements
IFRS 12 Disclosure of interests in Other Entities
None of the new standards and interpretations noted above, which are effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 October 2011 and which have not been adopted early are expected to have a material effect on the group's future financial statements.
Going concern
The directors are required to make an assessment of the Group's ability to continue to trade as a going concern. The directors have given this matter due consideration and have concluded that it is appropriate to prepare the Group financial statements on a going concern basis. The two main considerations were as follows:
Cash flow - the Group maintains a rolling 24-month cash forecast that takes account of all known inflows and outflows. The cash flow is regularly stress tested to ensure that the Group can withstand reasonable changes in circumstances that could adversely affect its cash flow. The key potential changes that the Group has considered include: the timing of planned property sales and possible reductions in anticipated cash flows from re-financing properties after planning permission has been obtained.
Bank facilities - the Group maintains a regular dialogue with its lenders and keeps them informed of how the Group is trading. A consequence of the nature of the Group's business is that it has a relatively large number of discrete bank facilities, each secured on the project they finance. Consequently, the Group always has some debt to refinance and during the year refinanced £34.6 million of Group debt and £20.4 million of joint venture and associated undertaking debt. The Group has a further £26.8 million of debt facilities to be re-financed by 30 September 2012. In the normal course of business, developments will be completed and assets disposed of and so the actual requirement to renew financing is expected to be at a lower level than this. Of the £26.8 million, terms are largely agreed in respect of £19.1 million and discussions with regards the balance will be commenced closer to their maturities. The Group maintains a good dialogue with a sizeable number of banks and believes that the remaining loans that require refinancing will be refinanced on acceptable terms.
Having considered the headroom in the Group's cash forecasts and its previous success in extending finance terms when required, the Group believes that it has sufficient resources to continue trading for the foreseeable future.
Investment property and inventory
In relation to the investment and development properties, the directors have relied upon the external valuations and advice provided by professionally qualified valuers in accordance with the Appraisal and Valuation Standards of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
The Group uses the valuation performed by its independent valuers as the fair value of its investment properties and in assessing the net realisable values of its development properties. The valuation is based upon assumptions including future rental income, anticipated maintenance costs, future development costs and the appropriate discount rate. The valuers also make reference to market evidence of transaction prices for similar properties.
Restatement of prior years
The Group's investment properties are revalued annually to fair value, with changes in fair value being recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. The same accounting policy is applied to residential investment properties held by the Group's associate, Terrace Hill Residential Plc, which is reflected in the Group's share of the associate's profits or losses recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and reflected in the Group's share of the associate's net assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In prior years the fair value of residential investment properties owned by the Group and its associate has been interpreted as the Market Value applying the special assumption of vacant possession in accordance with RICS Valuation Standards VS 3 Appendix 4.
As a consequence of prices achieved on sales of residential properties during the financial year ended 30 September 2011 and following the stated intention to place the residential portfolio owned by Terrace Hill Residential PLC on the market, the board has reviewed the valuation basis to be adopted for the purposes of fair value for residential investment property in the financial statements both in the current and prior years.
The board concluded that fair value, as required by IAS 40 "Investment Property", should be determined by adopting an investment value basis of valuation, as defined by RICS Valuation Standards VS 4, as it better reflects the price at which the residential properties could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in arm's length transactions and is more appropriate for inclusion in financial statements than the previous valuation basis. Accordingly, the investment value basis has been adopted for residential property held by the Group and the associate in the current year and has been retrospectively applied to prior years. The impact of the restatement on 30 September 2010 is to:
• increase the Group's share of the associates profit for the period by £8,549,000;
• increase the profit on revaluation of investment properties by £948,000;
• increase the profit attributable to equity holders of the parent by £9,497,000;
• decrease the fair value of the Group's investment properties by £5,832,000;
• decrease the investment in associates by £6,425,000;
• decrease the trade and other receivables by £13,485,000; and
• decrease the Group's net assets by £25,742,000.
The impact on the Group's balance sheet at 1 November 2009 is to decrease the Group's investment property by £6,780,000, decrease the Group's investment in associates by £147,000, decrease the trade and other receivables by £13,602,000, increase creditors by £14,710,000 and decrease the Group's net assets by £35,239,000.
The impact on the Group's basic earnings per share for 2010 is an increase from 2.64p to 7.14p and an increase in the diluted earnings per share from 2.64p to 7.14p.
2 Revenue
Total |
Total |
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Sales of development properties |
61,200 |
25,595 |
Rents receivable |
4,608 |
4,392 |
Project management fees and other income |
1,958 |
760 |
67,766 |
30,747 |
Sales of development properties includes £16,030,000 (2010: £17,777,000 for one investor) of revenue recognised on two construction contracts for investors. Construction contract revenue is recognised in the accounts in line with contract stage of completion determined by stage valuations. The costs incurred on these construction contracts totalled £12,878,000 (2010: £13,139,000). Revenue was generated from two sales of development properties to individual investors of £7.9 million and £26.75 million.
3 Segmental information
The operating segments are identified on the basis of internal financial reports about components of the Group that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (which in the Group's case is its executive board comprising the three executive directors) in order to allocate resources to the segments and to assess their performance. The internal financial reports received by the Group's executive board contain financial information at a Group level as a whole and there are no reconciling items between the results contained in these reports and the amounts reported in the financial statements.
The Group operates in two principal segments being commercial property development and investment and residential property investment. The Group does not operate outside the UK.
Unallocated |
Total |
|||||||
Unallocated |
Residential |
Commercial |
items |
|||||
Residential |
Commercial |
items |
Total |
2010 |
2010 |
2010 |
2010 |
|
2011 |
2011 |
2011 |
2011 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
restated |
restated |
restated |
restated |
|
Statement of comprehensive income |
1,356 |
66,410 |
- |
67,766 |
1,261 |
29,486 |
- |
30,747 |
Revenue |
||||||||
Direct costs |
(518) |
(60,815) |
- |
(61,333) |
(405) |
(24,032) |
- |
(24,437) |
Gross profit/(loss) |
838 |
5,595 |
- |
6,433 |
856 |
5,454 |
- |
6,310 |
Administrative expenses |
- |
- |
(4,343) |
(4,343) |
- |
- |
(4,745) |
(4,745) |
Profit on disposal of investment properties |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47 |
- |
47 |
Loss on revaluation of associated undertakings |
- |
(1,000) |
- |
(1,000) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(Loss)/profit on revaluation of investment properties |
(3,628) |
(500) |
- |
(4,128) |
929 |
1,027 |
- |
1,956 |
Operating profit/(loss) |
(2,790) |
4,095 |
(4,343) |
(3,038) |
1,785 |
6,528 |
(4,745) |
3,568 |
Net finance costs |
(514) |
(4,073) |
(2) |
(4,589) |
(533) |
(1,218) |
(73) |
(1,824) |
Share of results of joint venture before tax |
- |
(236) |
- |
(236) |
- |
(43) |
- |
(43) |
Share of results of associated undertakings before tax |
(2,376) |
- |
- |
(2,376) |
16,173 |
- |
- |
16,173 |
Profit/(loss) |
(5,680) |
(214) |
(4,345) |
(10,239) |
17,425 |
5,267 |
(4,818) |
17,874 |
The segmental results that are monitored by the board include all the separate lines making up the segmental IFRS operating profit. This excludes central overheads and taxation which are not allocated to operating segments.
Residential |
Commercial |
Unallocated |
Total |
Residential |
Commercial |
Unallocated |
Total |
|
items |
||||||||
items |
2010 |
2010 |
2010 |
2010 |
||||
2011 |
2011 |
2011 |
2011 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
restated |
restated |
restated |
restated |
|
Balance sheet |
||||||||
Investment properties |
18,643 |
2,750 |
- |
21,393 |
22,271 |
3,270 |
- |
25,541 |
Property, plant and equipment |
- |
15 |
161 |
176 |
- |
25 |
210 |
235 |
Investments - associates and joint ventures |
- |
1,419 |
- |
1,419 |
- |
2,656 |
- |
2,656 |
Other investments |
- |
6 |
- |
6 |
3 |
49 |
130 |
182 |
Intangible assets |
2,365 |
971 |
- |
3,336 |
2,365 |
971 |
- |
3,336 |
Deferred tax assets |
- |
- |
5,710 |
5,710 |
- |
- |
5,789 |
5,789 |
21,008 |
5,161 |
5,871 |
32,040 |
24,639 |
6,971 |
6,129 |
37,739 |
|
Development properties |
- |
72,961 |
- |
72,961 |
- |
104,902 |
- |
104,902 |
Trade and other receivables |
257 |
13,934 |
- |
14,191 |
1,871 |
25,165 |
- |
27,036 |
Cash |
93 |
11,537 |
- |
11,630 |
41 |
1,718 |
- |
1,759 |
350 |
98,432 |
- |
98,782 |
1,912 |
131,785 |
- |
133,697 |
|
Borrowings |
(17,407) |
(45,631) |
- |
(63,038) |
(20,375) |
(72,048) |
- |
(92,423) |
Trade and other payables |
(1,330) |
(15,211) |
- |
(16,541) |
(514) |
(17,126) |
- |
(17,640) |
Current tax |
- |
- |
(3,109) |
(3,109) |
- |
- |
(3,012) |
(3,012) |
(18,737) |
(60,842) |
(3,109) |
(82,688) |
(20,889) |
(89,174) |
(3,012) |
(113,075) |
|
Net assets |
2,621 |
42,751 |
2,762 |
48,134 |
5,662 |
49,582 |
3,117 |
58,361 |
4 Finance costs and finance income
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Interest payable on borrowings |
5,471 |
4,793 |
Interest capitalised |
(374) |
(1,688) |
Finance costs |
5,097 |
3,105 |
Interest receivable from cash deposits and other financial assets |
508 |
1,281 |
Finance income |
508 |
1,281 |
Interest is capitalised at the same rate as the Group is charged on the respective borrowings. Fair value adjustments to financial liabilities totalled £177,000 gains (2010: £785,000 gains) on interest rate swaps included in finance income.
5 Administrative expenses
Is arrived at after charging/(crediting):
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
94 |
143 |
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
(64) |
12 |
Operating lease charges - rent of properties |
1,327 |
1,228 |
Share-based payment remuneration |
196 |
384 |
Fees paid to BDO LLP in respect of: |
|
|
- audit of the Group's annual accounts |
135 |
180 |
- audit of the Group's associates |
17 |
19 |
- other services |
30 |
30 |
6 Tax on (loss)/profit on ordinary activities
(a) Analysis of charge in the year
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Current tax |
||
UK corporation tax on (loss)/profit for the period |
59 |
63 |
Adjustment in respect of prior periods |
46 |
1,177 |
Total current tax |
105 |
1,240 |
Deferred tax |
||
Origination and reversal of temporary differences |
79 |
1,578 |
Total deferred tax charge |
79 |
1,578 |
Total tax charge |
184 |
2,818 |
(b) Factors affecting the tax charge for the year
The tax assessed for the period is higher than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 27% (2010: 28%). The differences are explained below:
2010 |
||
2011 |
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
restated |
|
(Loss)/profit before tax |
(10,239) |
17,354 |
Plus/(less) joint ventures and associates |
2,612 |
(16,130) |
(Loss)/profit attributable to the Group before tax |
(7,627) |
1,224 |
(Loss)/profit multiplied by the average rate of UK corporation tax of 27% (2010: 28%) |
(2,059) |
343 |
Disallowables |
2,118 |
1,132 |
Other temporary differences |
79 |
166 |
138 |
1,641 |
|
Adjustments in respect of prior periods |
46 |
1,177 |
Total tax charge |
184 |
2,818 |
(c) Associates and joint ventures
The Group's share of tax on the associates and joint ventures is £Nil (2010: £Nil).
7 Earnings per ordinary share
The calculation of basic earnings per ordinary share is based on a loss of £10,423,000 (2010 profit: £15,060,000) and on 210,951,299 (2010: 210,951,299) ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year.
The calculation of diluted earnings per ordinary share for 2011 is the same as that for basic earnings per share. The calculation of diluted earnings per share for 2010 is based on earnings of £15,060,000 and on 210,952,880 ordinary shares being the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year adjusted to allow for the issue of ordinary shares in connection with a share award.
8 Property, plant and equipment
|
Leasehold |
Motor |
Office |
Furniture |
|
|
improvements |
vehicles |
equipment |
and fittings |
Total |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
Cost |
|||||
At 1 November 2009 |
159 |
292 |
112 |
229 |
792 |
Additions |
- |
- |
12 |
23 |
35 |
Disposals |
- |
(19) |
(4) |
(36) |
(59) |
At 1 October 2010 |
159 |
273 |
120 |
216 |
768 |
Additions |
- |
- |
69 |
1 |
70 |
Disposals |
- |
(258) |
(3) |
(5) |
(266) |
At 30 September 2011 |
159 |
15 |
186 |
212 |
572 |
Depreciation |
|||||
At 1 November 2009 |
39 |
162 |
74 |
167 |
442 |
Charge for period |
15 |
60 |
23 |
45 |
143 |
Disposals |
- |
(12) |
(4) |
(36) |
(52) |
At 1 October 2010 |
54 |
210 |
93 |
176 |
533 |
Charge for year |
16 |
28 |
26 |
24 |
94 |
Disposals |
- |
(224) |
(2) |
(5) |
(231) |
At 30 September 2011 |
70 |
14 |
117 |
195 |
396 |
Net book value |
|||||
At 30 September 2011 |
89 |
1 |
69 |
17 |
176 |
At 30 September 2010 |
105 |
63 |
27 |
40 |
235 |
At the year end there were no assets held under finance leases.
9 Investment properties
|
£'000 |
Valuation |
|
At 1 November 2008 |
49,160 |
Additions |
4 |
Disposals |
(265) |
Loss on revaluation restated |
(8,921) |
At 1 November 2009 restated |
39,978 |
Additions |
443 |
Disposals |
(16,810) |
Gain on revaluation restated |
1,930 |
At 1 October 2010 restated |
25,541 |
Transfers |
(20) |
Loss on revaluation |
(4,128) |
At 30 September 2011 |
21,393 |
The commercial investment properties situated in England owned by the Group have been valued as at 30 September 2011 by qualified valuers from CB Richard Ellis, an independent firm of Chartered Surveyors, on the basis of open market value. The valuations were carried out in accordance with guidance issued by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
Residential investment properties owned by the Group have been valued as at 30 September 2011 by qualified valuers from Allsop LLP, an independent firm of Chartered Surveyors, on the basis of open market value. The valuations were carried out in accordance with guidance issued by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
Rental income generated from investment property in the year was £560,000 and direct operating costs on this was £240,000.
10 Investments
Associates and joint ventures
Joint |
Total |
||
Associates |
venture |
||
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Cost or valuation |
|||
At 1 November 2008 |
6,375 |
770 |
7,145 |
Disposals |
(6) |
- |
(6) |
Transfer to other investments |
(14) |
- |
(14) |
Share of results restated |
(5,700) |
(72) |
(5,772) |
Share of results for period applied against long-term receivables forming part of net investment |
1,346 |
- |
1,346 |
At 1 November 2009 restated |
2,001 |
698 |
2,699 |
Share of results restated |
16,173 |
(43) |
16,130 |
Share of results for period applied against long-term receivables forming part of net investment |
(16,173) |
- |
(16,130) |
At 1 October 2010 restated |
2,001 |
655 |
2,656 |
Share of results |
(2,376) |
(236) |
(2,612) |
Impairment |
(1,000) |
- |
(1,000) |
Share of results for period applied against long-term receivables forming part of net investment |
2,375 |
- |
2,375 |
At 30 September 2011 |
1,000 |
419 |
1,419 |
The Group's interest in its principal associates which have been equity accounted in the consolidated financial statements were as follows:
Terrace Hill Residential PLC |
49% |
Property investment |
Castlegate House Partnership |
30% |
Property development |
Devcap 2 Partnership |
26% |
Property development |
Terrace Hill Development Partnership |
20% |
Property development |
Terrace Hill Residential PLC is incorporated in Scotland.
Summarised information 2011
Terrace Hill |
Devcap 2 |
Castlegate |
Terrace Hill |
Two |
Total |
|
Development |
House |
Residential |
Orchards |
|||
Partnership |
Partnership |
Partnership |
PLC |
Limited |
||
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Revenue |
2,581 |
2,508 |
608 |
10,989 |
16,686 |
|
(Loss)/profit after taxation |
(1,313) |
(1,895) |
7 |
(4,849) |
(8,050) |
|
Total assets |
36,770 |
42,057 |
7,290 |
165,743 |
251,860 |
|
Bank debt |
(19,881) |
(40,580) |
(8,248) |
(165,103) |
(233,812) |
|
Other liabilities |
(19,761) |
(12,809) |
(2,718) |
(34,684) |
(69,972) |
|
Total liabilities |
(39,642) |
(53,389) |
(10,966) |
(199,787) |
(303,784) |
|
Net assets/(liabilities) |
(2,872) |
(11,332) |
(3,676) |
(34,044) |
(51,924) |
|
Opening carrying amount of interest under equity method |
2,000 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
2,001 |
Share of results for year |
- |
- |
- |
(2,376) |
- |
(2,376) |
Share of results for period applied against long-term receivables forming part of net investment |
- |
- |
- |
2,376 |
(1) |
2,375 |
Impairment |
(1,000) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(1,000) |
Closing carrying amount of interest under equity method |
1,000 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,000 |
Capital commitments |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Two Orchards Limited was placed into administration on 19 May 2011. The Group has fully provided for its investment in this company. Provision of £1.0 million was made against the Group's investment in Terrace Hill Development Partnership based on a valuation deficit of that entity's investment properties.
Summarised information 2010 restated
Terrace Hill |
Two |
Total |
||||
Terrace Hill |
|
Castlegate |
Residential |
|||
Development |
Devcap 2 |
House |
PLC |
Orchards |
||
Partnership |
Partnership |
Partnership |
restated |
Limited |
||
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Revenue |
3,702 |
2,101 |
557 |
11,819 |
- |
18,179 |
(Loss)/profit after taxation |
(496) |
1,114 |
(2,782) |
32,707 |
(5,089) |
25,454 |
Total assets |
38,073 |
43,713 |
6,811 |
214,544 |
60,853 |
363,994 |
Bank debt |
(21,409) |
(40,553) |
(8,302) |
(206,741) |
(78,884) |
(355,889) |
Other liabilities |
(8,222) |
(4,554) |
(2,723) |
(35,096) |
(5,888) |
(56,483) |
Total liabilities |
(29,631) |
(45,107) |
(11,025) |
(241,837) |
(84,772) |
(412,372) |
Net assets/(liabilities) |
8,442 |
(1,394) |
(4,214) |
(27,293) |
(23,919) |
(48,378) |
Opening carrying amount of interest under equity method |
2,000 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
2,001 |
Share of results for period |
- |
- |
- |
16,173 |
- |
16,173 |
Share of results for period applied against long-term receivables forming part of net investment |
- |
- |
- |
(16,173) |
- |
(16,173) |
Closing carrying amount of interest under equity method |
2,000 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
2,001 |
Capital commitments |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
The Group's interest in its joint venture which has been equity accounted in the consolidated financial statements was as follows:
Achadonn Limited |
50% |
Property development |
2011 |
2010 |
|
Achadonn |
Achadonn |
|
Limited |
Limited |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Revenue |
63 |
81 |
Loss |
(335) |
(87) |
Total assets |
15,067 |
14,591 |
Bank debt |
(8,110) |
(8,110) |
Other liabilities |
(6,000) |
(5,171) |
Total liabilities |
(14,110) |
(13,281) |
Net assets |
957 |
1,310 |
Share of results for the period |
(236) |
(43) |
Share of net assets |
419 |
655 |
11 Development properties
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
At 1 October 2010 |
104,902 |
101,719 |
Additions |
3,899 |
6,170 |
Transfers |
20 |
- |
Disposals |
(29,754) |
(6,742) |
Amounts written (off)/back on the value of development properties |
(6,106) |
3,755 |
At 30 September 2011 |
72,961 |
104,902 |
Included in these figures is capitalised interest of |
9,839 |
10,450 |
No amounts are held in development properties in respect of construction contracts and retentions on such contracts is £Nil.
12 Trade and other receivables
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
restated |
Trade receivables |
2,720 |
5,229 |
Other receivables |
6,145 |
8,984 |
Trade and other receivables |
8,865 |
14,213 |
Amounts recoverable under construction contracts |
- |
4,872 |
Prepayments and accrued income |
2,612 |
4,235 |
Amounts due from associates and joint ventures |
28,379 |
27,896 |
Provision for amounts due from associates and joint ventures |
(25,665) |
(24,180) |
|
14,191 |
27,036 |
Included in other receivables and prepayments and accrued income is a balance due from Howick Place JV S.a.r.l. totalling £4.3 million (2010: £4.5 million) that has a final maturity date of 31 December 2014.
At 31 October 2009, trade and other receivables of £22.7 million have been restated and decreased by £13.6 million being an additional provision against amounts due from associates and joint ventures.
The ageing of trade and other receivables was as follows:
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Up to 30 days |
2,973 |
4,169 |
31 to 60 days |
61 |
67 |
61 to 90 days |
7 |
4 |
Over 90 days |
169 |
155 |
Total |
3,210 |
4,395 |
Amounts not yet due |
5,655 |
9,818 |
Closing balance |
8,865 |
14,213 |
No amounts were overdue at the year end.
The movement in the allowance for impairment in respect of amounts due from associates and joint ventures during the year was as follows:
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
restated |
At 1 October 2010 restated |
24,180 |
23,836 |
Amounts written back in period |
- |
(1,346) |
Increase in allowance on amounts due from associates |
1,485 |
1,690 |
Closing balance |
25,665 |
24,180 |
The allowance is based on falling asset values in the associates.
13 Trade and other payables
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Trade payables |
2,979 |
1,189 |
Other taxation and social security costs |
2,204 |
427 |
Accruals and deferred income |
8,112 |
11,609 |
Derivative liabilities |
- |
177 |
Other payables |
3,246 |
1,238 |
|
16,541 |
14,640 |
At 31 October 2009, trade and other payables of £32.5 million
have been restated and increased by £14.9 million relating to an increase in accruals.
14 Other payables (non-current)
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Other payables |
- |
3,000 |
15 Bank overdrafts and loans
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Bank loans |
63,112 |
92,504 |
Bank overdrafts |
87 |
120 |
|
63,199 |
92,624 |
Unamortised loan issue costs |
(161) |
(201) |
|
63,038 |
92,423 |
Amounts due: |
||
Within one year |
26,808 |
56,137 |
After more than one year |
36,230 |
36,286 |
|
63,038 |
92,423 |
An analysis of interest rates and information on fair value and security is given in note 17.
16 Deferred tax
Details of the deferred tax charged/(credited) to the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income are as follows:
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Trade losses |
138 |
1,588 |
Share-based payments |
(59) |
(83) |
Short-term timing differences |
- |
73 |
|
79 |
1,578 |
The Consolidated balance sheet deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Deferred tax asset |
||
Share option scheme |
163 |
104 |
Trade losses |
5,547 |
5,685 |
|
5,710 |
5,789 |
Under IAS 12, deferred tax is recognised for tax potentially payable on the realisation of investment properties at fair values at the balance sheet date. No deferred tax asset is recognised in respect of losses if there is uncertainty over future recoverability. A deferred tax asset has not been recognised for tax losses of £9,140,000 (2010: £4,200,000).
17 Financial instruments
The Group's principal financial instruments comprise loans, overdrafts, cash and short-term deposits. The main purpose of these financial instruments is to provide finance for the Group's operations. Further information on the Group's financial resources and capital management is given in the Financial review above.
The Group has various other financial instruments such as trade receivables and trade payables that arise directly from its operations, listed and unlisted investments.
The main risks arising from the Group's financial instruments are interest rate risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks and they are summarised below. The magnitude of
the risk that has arisen over the year is detailed below.
Interest rate risk
The Group holds cash balances on short-term deposit. The Group's policy is to monitor the level of these balances to ensure that funds are available as required, recognising that interest earnings will be subject to interest rate fluctuations.
The Group borrows cash in the form of loans and overdrafts, which are subject to interest at floating rates, recognising that rates will fluctuate according to changes in LIBOR and the bank base rate. The Group is cognisant at all times of movements in interest rates and will, as appropriate, enter into interest rate swaps to maintain a balance between borrowings that are subject to floating and fixed rates.
Credit risk
The Group's principal financial assets are cash and trade receivables. Our cash deposits are placed with a range of banks to minimise the risk to the Group. The principal risk therefore arises from trade receivables. Trade receivables from the sale of properties are secured against those properties until the proceeds are received. Rental receivables are unsecured but the Group's exposure to tenant default is limited as no tenant accounts for more than 10% of total rent. Rental cash deposits and third party guarantees are obtained as a means of mitigating financial loss from defaults.
Liquidity risk
The Group's objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of bank balances and loans. Cash flow and funding needs are regularly monitored. Further information is given in note 1.
Categories of financial assets and financial liabilities
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
restated |
Current financial assets |
||
Other investments |
6 |
182 |
Trade and other receivables |
8,865 |
14,213 |
Amounts due from associates and joint ventures |
2,714 |
3,716 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
11,543 |
1,639 |
|
23,128 |
19,750 |
Financial assets measured at fair value amount to £6,000 (2010: £182,000).
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
£'000 |
|
£'000 |
restated |
Current financial liabilities |
||
Trade and other payables |
14,337 |
14,036 |
Loans and borrowings |
26,876 |
56,145 |
Total current financial liabilities |
41,213 |
70,181 |
Non-current financial liabilities |
||
Other payables |
- |
3,000 |
Loans and borrowings |
36,236 |
36,359 |
Total non-current financial liabilities |
36,236 |
39,359 |
Total financial liabilities |
77,449 |
109,540 |
The maximum exposure to credit risk in financial assets is £23,112,000 (2010: £19,568,000). The maximum amount due from any single party is £14,943,000 (2010: £14,948,000) included in amounts due from associates and joint ventures.
Financial liabilities designated at fair value amount to £Nil (2010: £177,000) in respect of financial derivatives.
All the Group's financial liabilities designated at fair value through the statement of comprehensive income are defined as level 2, in accordance with IFRS 7, as they are derived from inputs other than quoted prices.
Interest rate risk profile of financial assets and liabilities
The interest rate profile of financial assets and liabilities of the Group at 30 September 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
on which |
|
|
Floating rate |
Fixed rate |
no interest is |
|
Total |
financial assets |
financial assets |
earned |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
Sterling |
23,128 |
11,543 |
3,480 |
8,105 |
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
Floating rate |
Fixed rate |
on which |
|
Total |
financial |
financial |
no interest is |
|
|
liabilities |
liabilities |
charged |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
Sterling |
77,449 |
63,112 |
- |
14,337 |
Floating rate financial liabilities bear interest at LIBOR or base rate plus margins of between 1% and 4%.
There are no amounts included in floating rate financial liabilities that are subject to interest rate swaps (2010: £20,795,000).
The interest rate profile of financial assets and liabilities of the Group at 30 September 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
on which |
|
|
Floating rate |
Fixed rate |
no interest is |
|
Total |
financial assets |
financial assets |
earned |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
Sterling |
19,750 |
1,639 |
3,480 |
14,631 |
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
Floating rate |
Fixed rate |
on which |
|
Total |
financial |
financial |
no interest is |
|
|
liabilities |
liabilities |
charged |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
Sterling |
109,540 |
92,504 |
- |
17,036 |
The floating rate financial assets comprise:
• cash on deposit.
The floating rate financial liabilities comprise:
• Sterling denominated bank loans that bear interest based on LIBOR and bank base rates; and
• Sterling denominated bank overdrafts that bear interest based on bank base rates.
The fair value of the financial assets and liabilities is equal to the book value.
Borrowings
The Group's bank borrowings and overdrafts are repayable as follows:
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
On demand or within one year |
26,975 |
56,265 |
In more than one year but less than two |
36,224 |
26,256 |
In more than two years but less than five |
- |
10,103 |
|
63,199 |
92,624 |
The bank overdraft is secured by way of debenture and cross guarantee from certain subsidiaries and legal charges over properties.
The bank loans are secured by legal charges over the Group's investment and development properties together with guarantees from certain subsidiary undertakings with a limited guarantee from the parent company and in one case a floating charge from the parent company.
Borrowing facilities
The Group has the following undrawn committed bank borrowing facilities available to it at the year end:
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Expiring in one year or less |
3,848 |
3,176 |
Expiring in more than one year but not more than two |
4,122 |
1,102 |
Expiring in more than two years but not more than five |
- |
- |
|
7,970 |
4,278 |
Guarantees
Refer to note 20 for details.
Market rate sensitivity analysis
Financial instruments affected by market risk include borrowings, deposits and derivative financial instruments. The analysis below shows the sensitivity of the statement of comprehensive income and net assets to a 0.5% change in interest rates on the Group's financial instruments.
The sensitivity analysis is based on the sensitivity of interest to movements in interest rates and is calculated on net floating rate exposures on debt and deposits.
|
0.5% decrease |
0.5% increase |
|
in interest rates |
in interest rates |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Impact on interest payable - gain/(loss) |
1,210 |
(1,210) |
Impact on interest receivable - (loss)/gain |
(72) |
72 |
Total impact on pre-tax loss and equity |
1,138 |
(1,138) |
18 Called up share capital
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Authorised: |
||
500,000,000 (2010: 500,000,000) ordinary shares of 2 pence each |
10,000 |
10,000 |
200,000 cumulative 8% redeemable preference shares of £1 each |
200 |
200 |
44,859 convertible shares of 20 pence each |
9 |
9 |
32,551,410 deferred shares of 2 pence each |
651 |
651 |
10,860 |
10,860 |
|
Allotted, called up, and fully paid: |
||
211,971,299 (2010: 211,971,299) ordinary shares of 2 pence each |
4,240 |
4,240 |
19 Reserves
|
Capital |
Unrealised |
Retained |
|||
Share |
Own |
redemption |
Merger |
gains |
||
premium |
shares |
reserve |
reserve |
and losses |
earnings |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
At 1 November 2009 |
43,208 |
(609) |
849 |
7,088 |
- |
23,380 |
Prior year adjustment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(35,239) |
At 1 November 2009 restated |
43,208 |
(609) |
849 |
7,088 |
- |
(11,859) |
Total comprehensive income and expense for the period restated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15,060 |
Share-based payment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
384 |
At 1 October 2010 restated |
43,208 |
(609) |
849 |
7,088 |
- |
3,585 |
Total comprehensive income and expense for the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(10,423) |
Share-based payment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
196 |
Balance at 30 September 2011 |
43,208 |
(609) |
849 |
7,088 |
- |
(6,642) |
The following describes the nature and purpose of each reserve within owners' equity:
Share premium - represents the excess of value of shares issued over their nominal amount.
Own shares - represents amount paid to purchase issued shares for the employee share-based payment plan.
Capital redemption reserve - represents amount paid to purchase issued shares for cancellation at their nominal value.
Merger reserve - the Merger reserve has arisen following acquisitions where the Group's equity has formed all or part of the consideration and represents the premium on the issued shares less costs.
Unrealised gains and losses - represents unrealised loss on available-for-sale investments.
Retained earnings - represents cumulative net gains and losses recognised in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
20 Contingent liabilities and capital commitments
On the acquisition by Terrace Hill Group PLC of a subsidiary company, amounts were repayable in the event of:
(a) disposal of the property/ies prior to an agreed cut-off point; or
(b) the discontinuation of rental income from the property/ies.
The directors are of the opinion that neither of these contingencies will crystallise, since the principal activity of the subsidiary concerned is the letting of the properties for rental income and it is not anticipated that the properties will be disposed of within the timeframe of (a) above. In the event of crystallisation of (a) and/or (b), the subsidiary concerned will be obligated to pay an amount calculated with reference to the properties disposed of/not let out. The maximum sum repayable is £278,000 (2010: £301,000).
The Group has given a guarantee of £15.0 million (2010: £15.0 million) as part of the security arrangements for the bank facilities of Terrace Hill Residential PLC, one of its associated undertakings. In the 2011 financial statements the Group has included within payables an amount of £917,000 (2010: £nil) being the shortfall between property values and the bank loan in its associate. The Group has also given a guarantee of £600,000 (2010: £nil) as part of the development obligations of another of its associated undertakings.
The Group has provided for in full an interest shortfall guarantee of £3.0 million (2010: £1.0 million) to a bank as part of its investment in Two Orchards Limited, an associated company.
Capital commitments relating to development sites are as follows:
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
Contracted but not provided for |
3,171 |
2,135 |
Terrace Hill Residential PLC
As stated in note 12 the Group has accounted for its 49% share of Terrace Hill Residential PLC as an associate company. Of the other 51% shareholding in that company, 49% is held by the Skye Investments group and 2% by R F M Adair. Skye Investments Limited is a company ultimately owned by family trusts for the benefit of R F M Adair and family. As part of the security arrangements for the financing of a residential investment property portfolio by Terrace Hill Residential PLC, Skye has given a guarantee for £20.0 million. Skye and R F M Adair also advanced to Terrace Hill Residential PLC £15.8 million (2010: £15.8 million) by way of shareholder loans to assist in the funding of the acquisition and the ongoing working capital requirements of the associate. The Group has agreed to a charge of 4.41% per annum on £5.0 million (being the amount by which the Skye Investments Limited guarantee exceeds the guarantee provided by the Group), which is accrued in the Group accounts. The charge in the year was £217,000 (2010: £86,000) and the total accrued at the end of the year is £303,000 (2010: £86,000).